336 LAFAYETTE STREET - ZBA (2) 336 Lafayette St. R-2
St. Joseph Credit Union
u
V I
✓) DATE OF HEARING ///��➢A.2
N
PETITIONERS xvj kC (l
LOCATION �536 /t/jp
V
i'10Ti0N: 0 GRANT SECOND
TO DENY ii SECOND
:0 RE-HEAR SECOND
LEAVE TO WITHDRAW SECOND
,O CONTINUE SECOND
ROLL CALL PRESENT GRANT
DENY WITHDRAW RE-HEAR CONTINUE
RIC;:?.RD BENGAL v
RICHARD FEBONIO
FRANCIS GREALISH i
EDWARD LUZINSKI
STEP-EN TOUCHETTE
ASSOCIATE "IEMBERS
Ri"�ITI-AABR7/QUE
CONDITIONS, A o
City ofttlem, �zssttdTusetts
7 - C• � r, z
. s garb of Av
peal N
f ca
CD
T_f. m
0.O
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF ST. JOSEPH'S CREDIT UNION n
FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 336 LAFAYETTE ST. (R-2 )
A hearing on this petition was held November 18, 1992 with the following
Board Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Richard Febonio, Francis
Grealish Jr. , Edward Luzinski and Stephen Touchette. Notice of the hearing
was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly
published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts
General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioners, owners of the property, are requesting a Special Permit to
extend nonconforming use and structure allowing for construction of two
additions. Property is located in an R-2 district.
The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this
request for a Special Permit is Section 5-3(j ) , which provides as follows:
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the
Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set
forth in Section 8-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permits for alterations and
reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement,
extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses,
provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion
shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming
use to the neighborhood.
In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit
requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted
upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will
promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's
inhabitants.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented
at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings
of fact:
1. The property has been used as a commercial building for many years.
2. There are other commercial properties in the general area.
3. The new design and reconfiguration would allow petitioner to better
serve customers and comply with the new Americans with Disabilities Act.
J
PETITION OF ST. JOSEPH'S CREDIT UNION
SPECIAL PERMIT AT 336 LAFAYETTE ST. , SALEM
page two
4 . The remodeled structure would help to beautify and upgrade the general
area.
5. The addition would not encroach on any front setbacks.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented,
the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1. The Special Permit requested can be granted without substantial
detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially
derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
2. The granting of the Special Permit requested will promote the public
health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants and may
be granted in harmony with the neighborhood.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the
Special Permit requested, subject to the following conditions:
1. Petitioner shall comply with all City and State statutes, ordinances,
codes and regulations.
2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions
submitted.
3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and
fire safety shall be strictly adhered to.
4. Petitioner shall obtain a legal building permit.
SPECIAL PERMIT GRANTED
November 18, 1992
Richard A. Bencal, Chairman
Board of Appeal
n
n ~ �A.
CQ
�0
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF ST. JOSEPH'S CREDIT UNION FOR A
SPECIAL PERMIT AT 336 LAFAYETTE ST. , SALEM
page three
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY
CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of
MGL Chapter 40A. , and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of
filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MCL
Chapter 40A. , Section 11, the Special Permit granted herein shall not take
effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City
Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if
such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is
recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of
the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of
Title.
Board of Appeal
r
co- w
T1 r O
:n Cp
Iv
ILIf , � ussttcljusetts
bourn of Au
peal
DECEMBER 10, 1992
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT AS OF NOVEMBER 25, 1992 THE DECISION OF
THE BOARD OF APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK TO
GRANT THE PETITION OF ST.JOSEPH'S CREDIT UNION FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT TO
EXTENT NONCONFORMING USE AND STRUCTURE ALLOWING FOR CONSTRUCTION OF
TWO ADDITIONS AT 336 LAFAYETTE ST.
BOARD OF APPEAL
BRENDA M. SUMRALL
CLERK OF THE BOARD
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section
17, of MGL Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the
date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk.
Pursuant to MGL Chapter 40A. , Section 11, the Variance/Special Permit
granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision
bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed
and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed,
that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded_ in the South Essex
Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or
is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of title.
r
Board of Appeal
I �
J
Ctu of -'zittlem, 4ffissachusetts
Bomb of CAu{reul
mo c.n
N
T li C3
-1 -TJ
L.0
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF ST. JOSEPH'S CREDIT UNION n
FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 336 LAFAYETTE ST. (R-2)
A hearing on this petition was held November 18, 1992 with the following
Board Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Richard Febonio, Francis
Grealish Jr. , Edward Luzinski and Stephen Touchette. Notice of the hearing
was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly
published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts
General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioners, owners of the property, are requesting a Special Permit to
extend nonconforming use and structure allowing for construction of two
additions. Property is located in an R-2 district.
The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this
request for a Special Permit is Section 5-3(j ) , which provides as follows:
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the
Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set
forth in Section 8-6 and 9-4 , grant Special Permits for alterations and
reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement,
extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses,
provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion
shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming
use to the neighborhood.
In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit
requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted
upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will
promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's
inhabitants.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented
at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings
of fact:
1 . The property has been used as a commercial building for many years.
2. There are other commercial properties in the general area.
3. The new design and reconfiguration would allow petitioner to better
serve customers and comply with the new Americans with Disabilities Act.
J
PETITION OF ST. JOSEPH'S CREDIT UNION
SPECIAL PERMIT AT 336 LAFAYETTE ST. , SALEM
page two
4. The remodeled structure would help to beautify and upgrade the general
area.
5. The addition would not encroach on any front setbacks.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented,
the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1. The Special Permit requested can be granted without substantial
detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially
derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
2. The granting of the Special Permit requested will promote the public
health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants and may
be granted in harmony with the neighborhood.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the
Special Permit requested, subject to the following conditions:
1. Petitioner shall comply with all City and State statutes, ordinances,
codes and regulations.
2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions
submitted.
3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and
fire safety shall be strictly adhered to.
4. Petitioner shall obtain a legal building permit.
SPECIAL PERMIT GRANTED
November 18, 1992
Richard A. Bencal, Chairman
Board of Appeal
o0
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF ST. JOSEPH'S CREDIT UNION FOR A
SPECIAL PERMIT AT 336 LAFAYETTE ST.., SALEM
page three
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY
CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of
MGL Chapter 40A. , and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of
filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MCL
Chapter 40A. , Section 11, the Special Permit granted herein shall not take
effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City
Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if
such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is
recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of
the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of
Title.
Board of Appeal
C]�
r<
rn � ti
C43
A cc
LQ
^I
Titu of -1�ulem, 'Ma88ucliusetts
f
'Sarzra of Aupeal
s c cn
�f W
.1 D
S (17
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF ST. JOSEPH'S CREDIT UNION
FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 336 LAFAYETTE ST. (R-2)
A hearing on this petition was held November 18, 1992 with the following
Board Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Richard Febonio, Francis
Grealish Jr. , Edward Luzinski and Stephen Touchette. Notice of the hearing
was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly
published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts
General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioners, owners of the property, are requesting a Special Permit to
extend nonconforming use and structure allowing for construction of two
additions. Property is located in an R-2 district.
The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this
request for a Special Permit is Section 5-3(j ) , which provides as follows :
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the
Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set
forth in Section 8-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permits for alterations and
reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement,
extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses,
provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion
shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming
use to the neighborhood.
In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit
requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted
upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will
promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City' s
inhabitants.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented
at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings
of fact:
1 . The property has been used as a commercial building for many years.
2. There are other commercial properties in the general area.
3. The new design and reconfiguration would allow petitioner to better
serve customers and comply with the new Americans with Disabilities Act.
f
PETITION OF ST. JOSEPH'S CREDIT UNION
SPECIAL PERMIT AT 336 LAFAYETTE ST. , SALEM
page two
4. The remodeled structure would help to beautify and upgrade the general
area.
5. The addition would not encroach on any front setbacks.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented,
the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1. The Special Permit requested can be granted without substantial
detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially
derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
2. The granting of the Special Permit requested will promote the public
health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants and may
be granted in harmony with the neighborhood.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the
Special Permit requested, subject to the following conditions:
1. Petitioner shall comply with all City and State statutes, ordinances,
codes and regulations.
2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions
submitted.
3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and
fire safety shall be strictly adhered to.
4. Petitioner shall obtain a legal building permit.
SPECIAL PERMIT GRANTED
November 18, 1992
Richard A. Bencal, Chairman
Board of Appeal
C ti �a
�o
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF ST. JOSEPH'S CREDIT UNION FOR A
SPECIAL PERMIT AT 336 LAFAYETTE ST. , SALEM
page three
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY
CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of
MGL Chapter 40A. , and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of
filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL
Chapter 40A. , Section 11, the Special Permit granted herein shall not take
effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City
Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if
such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is
recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of
the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of
Title.
Board of Appeal
A O �
C�h
r ca
V _
Iv
�e
(Citu of ttlem, ttssttclTusetts
attra of Aupeal �G r13
0
J1 LQ
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF ST. JOSEPH'S CREDIT UNION "
FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 336 LAFAYETTE ST. (R-2)
A hearing on this petition was held November 18, 1992 with the following
Board Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Richard Febonio, Francis
Grealish Jr. , Edward Luzinski and Stephen Touchette. Notice of the hearing
was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly
published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts
General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioners, owners of the property, are requesting a Special Permit to
extend nonconforming use and structure allowing for construction of two
additions. Property is located in an R-2 district.
The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this
request for a Special Permit is Section 3-3(j ) , which provides as follows:
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the
Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set
forth in Section 8-6 and 9-4 , grant Special Permits for alterations and
reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement,
extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses,
provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion
shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming
use to the neighborhood.
In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit
requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted
upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will
promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's
inhabitants.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented
at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings
of fact:
1. The property has been used as a commercial building for many years.
2. There are other commercial properties in the general area.
3. The new design and reconfiguration would allow petitioner to better
serve customers and comply with the new Americans with Disabilities Act.
PETITION OF ST. JOSEPH'S CREDIT UNION
SPECIAL PERMIT AT 336 LAFAYETTE ST. , SALEM
page two
4 . The remodeled structure would help to beautify and upgrade the general
area.
5. The addition would not encroach on any front setbacks.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented,
the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1. The Special Permit requested can be granted without substantial
detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially
derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
2. The granting of the Special Permit requested will promote the public
health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants and may
be granted in harmony with the neighborhood.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the
Special Permit requested, subject to the following conditions:
1. Petitioner shall comply with all City and State statutes, ordinances,
codes and regulations.
2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions
submitted.
3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and
fire safety shall be strictly adhered to.
4. Petitioner shall obtain a legal building permit.
SPECIAL PERMIT GRANTED
November 18, 1992
2�A' �.�riJL-GtLC_
Richard A. Bencal, Chairman
Board of Appeal
� Y
sa
n
"Y
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF ST. JOSEPH'S CREDIT UNION FOR A
SPECIAL PERMIT AT 336 LAFAYETTE ST. , SALEM
page three
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY
CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of
MGL Chapter 40A. , and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of
filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MCL
Chapter 40A. , Section 11, the Special Permit granted herein shall not take
effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City
Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if
such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is
recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of
the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of
Title.
Board of Appeal
n
r'<
mo H
ti
t ti (Cita of �ttlem, � usstzcltusetts o
-t. F -Sottra ofpeal N
T^ o
✓> Lp
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF ST. JOSEPH'S CREDIT UNION
FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 336 LAFAYETTE ST. (R-2 )
A hearing on this petition was held November 18, 1992 with the following
Board Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Richard Febonio, Francis
Grealish Jr. , Edward Luzinski and Stephen Touchette. Notice of the hearing
was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly
published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts
General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioners, owners of the property, are requesting a Special Permit to
extend nonconforming use and structure allowing for construction of two
additions. Property is located in an R-2 district.
The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this
request for a Special Permit is Section 5-3(j ) , which provides as follows:
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the
Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set
forth in Section 8-6 and 9-4 , grant Special Permits for alterations and
reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement,
extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses,
provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion
shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming
use to the neighborhood.
In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit
requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted
upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will
promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's
inhabitants.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented
at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings
of fact:
1 . The property has been used as a commercial building for many years.
2. There are other commercial properties in the general area.
3. The new design and reconfiguration would allow petitioner to better
serve customers and comply with the new Americans with Disabilities Act.
r
PETITION OF ST. JOSEPH'S CREDIT UNION
SPECIAL PERMIT AT 336 LAFAYETTE ST. , SALEM
page two
4 . The remodeled structure would help to beautify and upgrade the general
area.
5. The addition would not encroach on any front setbacks.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented,
the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1. The Special Permit requested can be granted without substantial
detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially
derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
.
2. The granting of the Special Permit requested will promote the public
health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants and may
be granted in harmony with the neighborhood.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the
Special Permit requested, subject to the following conditions:
1. Petitioner shall comply with all City and State statutes, ordinances,
codes and regulations.
2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions
submitted.
3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and
fire safety shall be strictly adhered to.
4. Petitioner shall obtain a legal building permit.
SPECIAL PERMIT GRANTED
November 18, 1992
Richard A. Bencal, Chairman
Board of Appeal
sa
n ^
n
J
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF ST. JOSEPH'S CREDIT UNION FOR A
SPECIAL PERMIT AT 336 LAFAYETTE ST. , SALEM
page three
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY
CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of
MGL Chapter 40A. , and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of
filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL
Chapter 40A. , Section 11, the Special Permit granted herein shall not take
effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City
Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if
such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is
recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of
the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of
Title.
Board of Appeal
r
mo NJJ T
m
Gi
�1
APPEAL CASE NO. .. . . . . . . . . .. .. ....... .. ' ^
�c difu of inig 1t, Alss uzeffS
euttrb of C }"zal
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS: - - -
The Undersigned represent that he is are the owners of a certain parcel of land located
at NO. . 336, Lafayette . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... Street; Zoning OistrictR2 . . .
. ; and said parcel is affected by Section(s) . . . . . . .. . .. . .
of the Massachusetts State Building Code.
Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in
accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance.
n o
m o L
�m
C' N
N 5
O m CDT
C7;
m�
n Lz
N
The Application for Permit was denied by the, Inspector of Buildings for the following
reasons:
Direct Appeal
The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem
Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to
approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said
Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary
hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero-
gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for
the following reasons:
See Attached
N G n
u n
d c'.
N Owner.st:.4aseph,G5edit LTnio^ . ..:
.......
CD
CD `" Y" Address. (508)7441153
336 Lafayette St.t ,SalemJ,MA
i1 ~
Telephone. . . . . . . . ... . . .
. . . .. . ............. ..
Petitioner.Royal(DPPigp,Ppi1derP--I r... ....
Address. llt.Winwwoet.Rd,.Nampton,.NH... ..
Date. ,September 30, 1992„ Te lep ne. 603)925-,j533.
ByAnopo.9. .ymr9p.. .. ... ................
Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of f=
Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of.... .. .... ......... . ......
four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The
Evening News.
.13
(1) Section 8-1 and 8-4 (1) of the Salem zoning ordinance subjects
petitioner to the provision that the present nonconforming structure
(The St. Joseph Credit Union) may not be enlarged or altered in a way
which increases its nonconformity. Petitioner requests permission
granted from the Board of Appeals to enlarge existing structure with
two small additions and to change the facade of the existing
structure.
(2) The present exterior and interior design of the existing structure is
dated and not as pleasing as the new proposed facade and type of
structure as envisioned by the petitioner. The new building with its
traditional McIntyre architecture would tend to beautify the area.
(3) The existing operations at the credit union are being hindered by in-
adequate and inefficient space. The new plan offers the credit union
more space and more efficiency to better serve its community members.
Operating under the present conditions is proving to be a financial
hardship to the credit union.
(4) The new design affords access and equal services to disabled members
by providing a handicapped accessible restroom, coupon booth and
teller station in conformance with the provisions of the Americans
With Disabilities Act.
(5) The location and size of the lot and its relation to nearby properties
presently zoned for business or non-residential uses such as
professional offices or apartment houses give reason to expand the
current business use.
(6) An increase in taxable value might result from an expansion of the
current use.
n �
r
T o L i
a T
N 6 n
Q _
r O
.. w :mx o S �n
CD N u cn m to
o
cn
c v �
c� o
LR:al:
TO BE
L�
C35� 1 �J, �)
ALF
N j3JT5, E �
/ O g 1�
42• .�. g i ��y I(� LEGEND
5 6g� , i Y4 :iD CATCH BASIN
0 EXIST. GRAN CURB
TO BE REMOVED I i); LIGHT POLE
k
_
! RELOCATED .a..•.: !/ i _iN .i FNATER { SIGN
............ �� I maV — ` _:.. `' STOCKADE FENCE
P PROPOSED mar w.' EXIST. BLDG. OFFSET
ADDITION � �,'o; •— 15.41r PROP. BLDG. OFFSET
i — 14.74• — 15.50• ��y
wood I
RET. SEE DETAIL I `J
[2]
2 MANE WALL � ,��,� ABOVE
r .f LOT AREA= 15:48' y
`�. 19,253 SFt
£ ,
EXISTING NOTES
ST. JOSEPH
'j / 1. THIS PLAN REFERS TO SALEM ASSESSORS MAI
CREDIT UNION 'a
. . . \ / °a• LOT 209 AND IS ZONED R2—RESIDENTIAL (REFER
8 i 1 STY BRICK / 3 .
SALEM BOARD OF APPEALS DECISION DATED 07)
•�R• �: '� ,. #336 / 2. THE EXISTING SETBACK VIOLATION AS SHOWN
O / D = 40.31'59' DETAIL ABOVE, WILL BE CORRECTED CATH THE PI
C_•:C RLL. R = 98.85'
ADDITION.
� 60• / . � �si� a T = 36.50'
/ W� ° j• / L = 89.93' 3. THIS PLAN IS BASED ON AN INSTRUMENT SUI
HASAV
PERFORMED ON 09/29/92, DEEDS, AND PLANS
4. THE BUILDING, INCLUDING THE ADDITION, REPT
\ ONLY 17% LOT COVERAGE.
F
vp
maCal
m
OF
A-
C
V �� O -
In < \ N\[l �-,\ �
J Y�
0�\S
1
0\
1\ �1 Ql N✓` lflf^•J. oO . O O O ��l'1 K+
O CCJ. Z ;n
e
m
N 7
O '•M1
1 w s Q ,•°
., f ,o < {
R m L lV G C[1
two 4 _
la
�e •x' Y £ 7 j { e J G�
-soz
so
R� nx
.38
Nc Q
Ng C4c F .
jl�l C4
1 N
N > /s
•
100-5ts
o q �sy !'•js W
5'�: s• 'o q� s. �l'p� r�F
- O1 to
ILOO O CP
mono �� r v � ! Are
{n � DQO O- Op Rj � •) � � /i,- /s / a pj, u
N Q s o I 0
n 50 °O .� �a
IX (fitt IIfLTIPYYi, �' 2TS S2XCli SPttS
a
V#ice of the (Eitg Council
ntu�lnll
COUNCILLORS-AT-LARGE DONALD T. BATES WARD COUNCILLORS
PRESIDENT 1992
1992
DONALD T.BATES JOSEPHINE R. FUSCO GEORGE A.NOWAY
NEVIN R.HARVEY
GEORGE P.McCABE
CITY CLERK VINCENT J.FURFARO
JANE STIRGWOLT
STANLEY J.USOVICZ.JR. LEONARD F.O'LEARV
DAVID B.GAUDREAULT
SARAH M.HAYES
MARK E.BLAIR
November 16, 1992
Mr. Richard Bencal, Chairman
Board of Appeal
City of Salem
Salem, MA 01970
Dear Chairman Bencal & members of the Board:
I would like to go on record supporting the applicant, St.
Joseph ' s Credit Union, appearing before the Board of Appeal on
November 18, 1992 .
The proposed changes would be a great improvement to the area.
Very truly yours
MARK E . BLAIR
COUNCILLOR WARD SEVEN
(ffYtg of �rxlem, �49Hrxssttel�ixsetts
(Office of the Ctv Tauuril
ntu W1
COUNCILLORS-AT-LARGE DONALD T. BATES WARD COUNCILLORS
1992 PRESIDENT 1992
DONALD T.BATES JOSEPHINE R. FUSCO GEORGE A.NOWAK
GEORGE P.MCCABE CITY CLERK KEVIN R.HARVEY
JANE STIRGWOLT VINCENT J.FURFARO
STANLEY J.USOVICZ,JR. LEONARD F.O'LEARY
DAVID B.GAUDREAULT
SARAH M.HAYES
MARK E.BLAIR
November 16, 1992
Mr. Richard Bencal, Chairman
Board of Appeal
City of Salem
Salem, MA 01970
Dear Chairman Bencal & members of the Board:
I would like to go on record supporting the applicant, St.
Joseph ' s Credit Union, appearing before the Board of Appeal on
November 18, 1992 .
The proposed changes would be a great improvement to the area.
�ytruly yours �.
MARK E . BLAIR //1J
COUNCILLOR WARD SEVEN
MTV OF SALERI
110:11O OF AI'1'1?:A1.
745-9595 Ext. :181
Will hold a pohlie hearing Iire all perm", i"t"-
ill the pclilion sohmillcd hN S'P. JOSEPH
CI EDIT ONION lire a Speri;d I'crmil to calcul
11AVAflollcoforming slrud nre and uac at 336
I.A O ES :11 ST. IN Said hearing to be held
11'FUNI?Slid 1', N. IN
18, 1!1!12 A'1' 7:1111
1'.111., ONE 5:11.13111 GREEN. second Iloor.
"'IIARO A. RI?NCAL, Chairman
November 4, 11, I9y) SN26214
J�
C� - �� S �Z
_ �^`^`
�'_ i '3.
_ _ __ �
—— _ —�Z_
<_� � __
��— --L =��r�
__ _ � —>a
L -_ �7 C r
Sin
—_ '_� __i Z= _
'_ � J
i � �r�T �
-� '---- z
Y Y Y Y K Y Y Y Y Y Y Y � Y'-
Y i Y Y Y i Y Y Y y { \ Y Y
A
APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . .
of '-5ttI>rm, tts�Ful�usE##s
\rs �Buttrb of '4pad
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
The Undersigned represent that he is are the owners of a certain parcel of land located
at NO. . 336 Lafayette . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . ._ . . . . . ... . . .Street; Zoning District R2 . . .
and said parcel is affected by Section(s) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
of the Massachusetts State Building Code.
Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in
accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance.:
n o
mo , z
R U, N
om LM
m. -o
c,x
m�
The Application for Permit was denied by the; Inspector of Buildings for the following
reasons:
Direct Appeal
The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem !'
Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to
approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said
Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary
hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero-
gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for
the following reasons:
See Attached
J - �
LU �T
4
N "- Owner.St: Joseph Credit Union
. .Union.. .
v:n . . . . . .. 'r.
f CrAddress. . .
0 336 Lafayette St. , .Salemj.MA . . ..
cy _ . . . . . . . . . . . .. .
508)74-1153
ro L Telephone. .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .. . ... .. . .. . ... ..
Petitioner.F9Ya1(Desigp,Bui Id 0-.IPr... .. ..
Address. 11t.WiPDaCUPper. Rd,.Hampton,. NIL .. ..
Date. ,Segtember,30,, 1M. -
ByTheodere.g:.Vrettos. . . . . . . .. ..... ....... . . . I.
Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of
Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . .. ... . .. .. .. . . ....
four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The
Evening News.
e a e
NO.......
PETITION 10 BOARD OF APPEALS
LOCATION
rr
PEI H LONER.....................................
ADDRESS...................... .....:
CONDI110NS
................... .......................................
............................................... .
,PETITION APPROVED.................... ❑
DENIED.......................:. C"F
Cil
19.........
'
jr�
(1) Section 8-1 and 8-4 (1) of the Salem zoning ordinance subjects
petitioner to the provision that the present nonconforming structure
(The St. Joseph Credit Union) may not be enlarged or altered in a way
which increases its nonconformity. Petitioner requests permission
granted from the Board of Appeals to enlarge existing structure with
two small additions and to change the facade of the existing
structure.
(2) The present exterior and interior design of the existing structure is
dated and not as pleasing as the new proposed facade and type of
structure as envisioned by the petitioner. The new building with its
traditional McIntyre architecture would tend to beautify the area.
(3) The existing operations at the credit union are being hindered by in-
adequate and inefficient space. The new plan offers the credit union
more space and more efficiency to better serve its community members.
f' Operating under the present conditions is proving to be a financial
hardship. to the credit union.
(4) The new design affords access and equal services to disabled members
by providing a handicapped accessible restroom, coupon booth and
teller station in conformance with the provisions of the Americans
With Disabilities Act.
(5) The location and size of the lot and its relation to nearby properties
presently zoned for business or non-residential uses such as
professional offices or apartment houses give reason to expand the
current business use.
(6) An increase in taxable value might result from an expansion of the
current use.
• o 0
n
r
m o
A T,
_ 7c n
J Q
L9
N c3N Cn
CD W�
C71 Cr
C3
APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. . . . . . . .
yJ1.G
of Sttlem, ��Httsstttl�tsP�ts
\�.. attr,3 of CAeul
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
The Undersigned represent that he is are the owners of 'a certain parcel of land located
at NO. , 33A Lafayette . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..Street; Zoning DistrictR2. . . .
and said parcel is affected by Section(s) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
of the Massachusetts State Building Code.
Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the inspector of Buildings in
accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance.
m �
1L
�.y
U=
The Application for Permit was denied by the; Inspector of Buildings for the following
reasons:
Direct Appeal
The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem
Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to
approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said
Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary
hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero-
gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for
the following reasons:
See Attached
cn m N
J - N
Q ,q
W
0 4
ti CV ua
CD
in 3
- r
07 O
U i
Owner.St. JoseRh Credit Union ... .
Address. . ,336 Lafayette St. = Salem) P7A,.. . ..
Tel ephone. �506)744-1153. . . . .. . ... .. .. . . . .. . .
Petitioner.Royal1Desigp,Puild9F$e-TPC... .. ..
Address. 117.�Winnacupnet.Rd,.Hampton,. NIL .. ..
Date. .Segtember,30:. 199?. .
Tel
pe. f503)9 !��3`OZF*
Byrg. :.Vretjos. . . . . . . ........ .... ... .
Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of
Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. .. . .. . . . .. ... . . .. . . . ... ..
four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The
Evening News.
NO.....................................
PETIT IONTO BOARD OF APPFALS
LOCATION
PF.T 111 ON ER.... .....
ADDRESS..... .... ... . ..................
CONDH IONS
,PETITION APPROVED.................... C rr
DENIED......................... ❑
19......... ,rjC1 C2 E r 1F
,,
:I
(1) Section 8-1 and 8-4 (1) of the Salem zoning ordinance subjects
petitioner to the provision that the present nonconforming structure
(The St. Joseph Credit Union) may not be enlarged or altered in a way
which increases its nonconformity. Petitioner requests permission
granted from the Board of Appeals to enlarge existing structure with
two small additions and to change the facade of the existing
structure.
(2) The present exterior and interior design of the existing structure is
dated and not as pleasing as the new proposed facade and type of
structure as envisioned by the petitioner. The new building with its
traditional McIntyre architecture would tend to beautify the area.
(3) The existing operations at the credit union are being hindered by in-
adequate and inefficient space. The new plan offers the credit union
more space and more efficiency to better serve its community members.
Operating under the present conditions is proving to be a financial
hardship to the credit union.
(4) The new design affords access and equal services to disabled members
by providing a handicapped accessible restroom, coupon booth and
teller station in conformance with the provisions of the Americans
With Disabilities Act.
(5) The location and size of the lot and its relation to nearby properties
presently zoned for business or non-residential uses such as
professional offices or apartment houses give reason to expand the
current business use.
(6) An increase in taxable value might result from an expansion of the
current use.
r
Mo y,
v� crr x
cn n N
Gamin o m o
to
6 CD n$
tyros - m2.
CD
C-1 F
BOARD OF ASSESSORS
C.T. I'Y HALL PAGE. ........ .
......... ..
10f—" ........ 2
3
3
4........... .......
4
5 SUBJECT PROPERTY: NAP: 32 LOT'. ()209 SOFF . 6
PROPERTY ADDRESS: 0336 LAFAYETTE 51_REc:1".T 70
a
9
10
11
12
10 r ws SUF- DDRESS— ASSESSED-0 IIIA-1-L-1-NG—ADD ESS 13
:I 1___� �4*
2 32 0209 0336 L.AF'AYETTE STREET ST J 0 SIc-.'P r I CREDIT L
UNION 336 AFAYETTE ST 5
13 16
14 32 0208 000.4. LORING AVENUE $.1-,1J STATE REALTY TRUST P 0 BOX 8586 16 S
77
:'1%.....
SHEA S11 4ANSCOM WICANDELARIA J, TRS SALEN MA 0-197-1
15 19
201
16: . - .. ,, ttAFh..-rrr. —r-,L Sf-' t :.. �-U�. -r�-LJ .W�J 21
7 SALEM NA O-IIP70 5i
220 x
:8 32 0226 0039 WISTERIA STREET GNEADE JOAN M 3 INWOOD DRIVE ✓ 23
24
15
00 ',lISfERIA STRE.ET . I Y _'RIA
T 260
..................
..........
........ spio HT"., 'F'RANK J, �4� ZALEI,fMW QJWGw '
...... 27
21
... ... 21
23 SALEM MA 0-1970 3010
24
32' 0213 0330 LAFAYETTE STREET' MATEX REALTY TROST' 857 WESTERN AVE 31
3d
-;
25
Z_Z,0231 Q ON RD 33
261,
L i
9E _ qf( SEL ' AN 35
27
0335%-LAFA VETTEF STRE 36
AG W! L-T-Y- T43k
—N4)
T8 37
29 GAGMAN GEORGE A TR SALEM MA (31970 36
10 .
30 32 0323 0339 LAFAYETTE STREET SPARTA REALTY TRUST' P 0 BOX 591 39
1,fAHKCG—C7&N-cj-`W4G1_ T R SAT,4:-P-V-MA—Q4xA7-Q 40
31 41
32 0173 3 7 RIE"E T, MASS COM11ONWEALTH OF, _'E
32 0352 'LAFAYETTE SALEM STATE COL LEG 42
33 SALEM MA 01970 43
10
44
34 45
0
35 46
0
41
36 48
37.
49
............ ...... .......%
38 500
39 —
...... ....... 22
. ..........
40 53
41 54
10
55
4256
43 57
44
58
10
591
.........
.........
46 61
47 6
63
48 64
B1060
610
5168
52
53 70
71
54 72
...................... ............................ 73
55
CAR
PETER M _74
E'
56
......... ....
CHI El-
ASSE3'S 0 R 76.
Q q
ay m O
`'K, C� � `v as �� • f') .n s` o}'
,n tfl�ts,
oe
in
ID
- to s m r> .� '� •°. ._
-
1
u a J
-
a
_t0� a NQ o
IV
N
,i �N m y r
•� A ... .[ -r ua
CQ
^q� Q CN"•'w ST 8O h o
C- �o > '.>b ;¢ • q .qE °i O •m S DS`OC s.(Fs
55 `.,• °� 0 2 % -
aft
50
TSION ON THE
A ECIA PE . l ,..T 336 a e�� C� Z)
hearing on this oEvition w .a 1 d '?Board �f��/sf,-.iijl(�l},6Sv�tdd� /r'iCLyG'4`K/ /AJO^'t
with the fcllowin - 3,rd ' trot . ^eggni: ,i �C 66JJ/�/�
Notice f the hA i n
n 6'I.' !-e ,-:yetproperly published in the Salem r.vF_r r NelN
accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chaptor 41 '] • �� /�
Permit
I'u'h i.ti. !-mets. arca requesting a Special In order t0
The orovision of the Salem inning Ordinance which 1 _
anpli.cai_,le to this request for a Speci.a:l. Permit. is Section V-3 (3
4�. iihl. cn provides as follows,
Notwithstanding an?fhing to the contrary appma.ri '-
'i.n this Ordinance, the Hoard of appeal may , in
accordance with the procedure and conditions 'set
forth in Section VIII-6 and IX 1 , grant Special.
Permits for alterati.ons, and reconstruction of
nonconforming structures, and for changes ,
enlargement , extention or expansion of
- nonconforming lots , land , structures, and uses ,
provided , however , that such change, extension ,
enlargement or expansion shall not be substantialbr
more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use
to the neighborhood .
In more .general terms, this hoard is . when reviewing
Special Permit requests, guided by the rule that. _s
Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding by the
Board that the grant of the Special Permit will promote the
public health , safety , convenience and welfare of the City's
inhabitants.
The Board of Appeal , after consideration of the evidence
presented at the public hearing , makes the following
findings of fact:
( }
i p
_
oil
r`� 4;w,��"'v�:5
on aoylzo�
6.
Ol/(
wv
1-herefore the Board or Appeal voted
Special Permit reqUeStpd SUbject to the following.
conditions'.
t.
DRILL HOLE
FOUND N
o J ! {332
WF BLDG. a � I�lEE
— —
— 14.74' .� EIOST.
3 15.50'
o aL 1
g CTION TO BE
REMOVED
� c 3 DETAIL
a �g MAFco
^ NOT TO SCALE
r No g ►�
d Ka /
• q28 / / y LEGEND
AD
\ I may
5 69� / / :.'. ` • y ) CATCH BASIN I
i
TOB REMOVEDEMST. GRAN CURB
I '" y LIGHT POLE
t RELOCATED ' Cie, %5H
':.....:.. ..:.'.•. • ?+ 4, cAN )rur�iER SIGN
66 4q I.,,. y
mar -- STOCKADE FENCE
r /hro 15.50' — taeY EXIST. BLDG. OFFSET
N �6 PROPOSED
ADDITION /� ° — 15.48' PROP. BLDG. OFFSET
f 14.74' — 15.50'
MiJu I
.� RET. pt. SEE DETAIL
2 \ 32'MAPLE WALL 0�S I ABOVE
CANOPYy
° LOT AREA= 15.48'
`°o. tr. 19,253 SFt taw
EXISTING NOTES
ST. JOSEPH I
1. THIS PLAN REFERS TO SALEM ASSESSORS MAP 32
CREDIT UNION 1408, LOT 209 AND IS ZONED R2—RESIDENTIAL (REFER TO
'> .i SALEM BOARD OF APPEALS DECISION DATED 07/06/70)
1 STY BRICK
#336 { �' 2. THE EXISTING SETBACK VIOLATION AS SHOWN IN THE
= 40'31'59' DETAIL ABOVE, WILL BE CORRECTED WITH THE PROPOSED
6 CCNL RE'.
�o {5 ,00�ry' S S. "A / 7e*T — T = 3650' ADDITION.
00. / L = 69.93'
"CATCH 3. THIS PLAN IS BASED ON AN INSTRUMENT SURVEY
a RA9y PERFORMED ON 09/29/92, DEEDS, AND PLANS OF RECORD.
1 6
4. THE BUILDING, INCLUDING THE ADDITION, REPRESENTS
JK ONLY 17% LOT COVERAGE.
BIRr
F � �
�• a
ya.
PLAN OF LAND
IN
o HALNo.i SALEM, MA
\ NC80
SHOWING PROPOSED ADDITION
(��y ��s U,+" !/ PREPARED FOR: ROYAL/DESIGN
�``'°�" BUILDERS, INC. HAMPTON, NH
SITE: ST. JOSEPH CREDIT UNION
336 LAFAYETTE ST., SALEM, MA
n DATE: OCTOBER 2, 1992
SCALE: 1"=20'
PLS DATE Cameron—Bishop Engineering Corp.
90 MONTVALE AVE., STONEHAM, MA (617) 279-0733