Loading...
175 & 183 LAFAYETTE STREET - ZBA LOL ayalE4— S� I � 3 C— ct �2 rnn CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS BOARD OF APPEAL 120 WASHINGTON STREET♦ SALE.M,MASSACHUSETTS 01970 / TELE:978-619-5685 PAX:978-740-0404 KIMBERI.GY DRISCOLL MAYOR Q iA 1V r 3' m a x April 30, 2012 b^ m 3 City of Salem Zoning Board of Appeals y a N N r Decision to Extend Petition of A.L. PRIME ENERGY CONSULTANTS for a Special Permit under Sec. 3.3.2 of the Salem Zoning Ordinance to extend a nonconforming use (gas station) and Dimensional Variances under Sec. 3.3.3 to reconstruct a nonconforming structure (constructing a convenience store); requesting relief from frontage and lot area; and requesting relief from screening requirements of Sec. 6.3.4,for the properties located at 175 LAFAYETTE ST. (B-1 and R-3) and 183 LAFAYETTE ST. (B-1). On April 20, 2011,the Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Salem voted in favor to approve the application of A.L. PRIME ENERGY CONSULTANTS for a Special Permit under Sec. 3.3.2 of the Salem Zoning Ordinance to extend a nonconforming use (gas station) and Dimensional Variances under Sec. 3.3.3 to reconstruct a nonconforming structure (constructing a convenience store); requesting relief from frontage and lot area; and requesting relief from screening requirements of Sec. 6.3.4, for the properties located at 175 LAFAYETTE ST. (B-1 and R-3) and 183 LAFAYETTE ST. (B-1). A Decision dated May 4,.2011 was filed with the City of Salem Clerk's Office on that date. An Amended Decision was subsequently filed with the City Clerk's Office on May 12, 2011. On April 18, 2012, the Salem Zoning Board of Appeals voted to extend the Variances granted on April 20, 2011 for six (6) months to November 12, 2012. The Board understands A.L. Prime Energy Consultants intends to go forward with the project, though additional time is needed to complete the necessary permitting and property transactions. A COPY OF THIS DECISION TO EXTEND HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK. Richard Salem Zoning Board of Appeals Pursuant to the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certificate of the City Clerk has been filed with the Essex South District Registry of Deeds. RONAN, SEGAL & HARRINGTON ATTORNEYS AT LAW FIFTY-NINE FEDERAL STREET JAMES T.RONAN(1922-1987) SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS 01970-3470 JACOB S.SEGAL MARY PIEMONTE HARRINGTON GEORGE W.ATKINS, III GREGORY R.RICHARD TEL(978)744-0350 FAX(978)744-7493 FILE NO.AA63 OF COUNSEL JOHN H.RONAN MICHAEL J.ESCHELBACHER April 16, 2012 ®�p Zoning Board of Appeals APR ' 2012 City of Salem Zai;OF PL 'A 120 Washington Street, 3`d Floor c ° rrrQFV �"�$ Salem, MA 01970 `�oP�ewT ATTN: Danielle McKnight RE: Variance Decision dated May 4, 2011 and Amended Decision dated May 12, 2011 A.L. Prime Energy Consultants 175-183 Lafayette Street, Salem Dear Ms. McKnight: In accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A Section 10, A.L. Prime Energy Consultants hereby requests a six month extension of its right to exercise the above referenced Variance Decisions. For your convenience, a copy of the Decisions are included herewith. Please see to assignment of this matter to the Board's agenda for the meeting of April 18, 2012. Very truly-yours, f rge W. Atkin , III'_ .. GWA/dap Enclosure �oewrq�a CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS Irk. ; BOARD OF APPEAL m m 120 WASHINGTON STREET, 3RD FLOOR e j�qQ+ SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE: 978-745-9595 FAX: 978-740-9846 KIMBERLEY DRISCOLL MAYOR May 12, 2011 Amended Decision N r» City of Salem Zoning Board of Appeals 77 r- Petition of A.L. PRIME ENERGY CONSULTANTS requesting a Special Permit under Sec. 3.3.2 of the Salem Zoning Ordinance to extend a nonconforming use (gas station), and Variances under Sec. 3.3.4, 4.0 and 6.3 to construct a convenience store and canopy over gas pumps for the properties located at 175 LAFAYETTE ST. (B-1 and R-3) and 183 LAFAYETTE ST. (B-1 Zoning District). A public hearing on the above Petition was opened on March 16, 2011, pursuant to Mass General Law Ch. 40A, § 11. The hearing was continued to April 20,2011 and closed on that date with the following Zoning Board of Appeals members present: Rebecca Curran, Elizabeth Debski,Richard Dionne,Annie Harris,Jamie Metsch,Jimmy Tsitsinos (alternate) and Bonnie Belair (alternate). Petitioner seeks a Special Permit pursuant to Section 3.3.2 and Variances under Sections 3.3.4, 4.0 and 6.3 of the City of Salem Zoning Ordinances. Statements of fact: 1. Attorney George Atkins represented the petitioner at the hearings. 2. In a petition date-stamped December 22, 2010,petitioner requested Special Permits and Variances to extend a nonconforming use (gas station), and reconstruct a nonconforming structure (constructing a convenience store), and requested relief from screening requirements for the properties located at 175 LAFAYETTE ST. and 183 LAFAYETTE ST. 3. At the meeting on March 16, 2011, one resident spoke in opposition to the proposal, citing concerns about traffic congestion and safety,snow removal problems currently on the site, and the potential for loitering late at night. 4. Also at the March 16 meeting,Ward 1 Councillor Robert McCarthy spoke in support of the petition, citing the project's potential to improve traffic congestion and queuing on Lafayette St. and noting that the petitioner's other facilities were well- maintained. 5. At the March 16 and April 20 meetings,Ward 7 Councillor Joseph O'Keefe spoke in support of the project, citing proposed fire safety improvements (larger,safer storage 2 tanks, canopy sprinkler system) and improved access and circulation due to double- sided pumps. 6. At the March 16 meeting,some Board members expressed concern about the number of pumps proposed, suggesting four new double-sided pumps might increase traffic to the site and increase the intensity of use too much, and also noted that snow removal could be a problem. 7. The hearing was continued to April 20. At this meeting, the petitioner presented revised plans showing a reduction in the number of pumps from four to three, additional landscaping, and a designated area for snow stacking. AttomeyAtkins also noted that subject to Planning Board approval,the petitioner would place "Do Not Enter" signs at the Palmer Street driveway to ensure one-way traffic flow. Board members noted that these were improvements to the plan. 8. At the April 20 hearing, some Board members expressed concern about the width of the existing 79'driveway from Lafayette Street (saying it was too wide and created an unsafe pedestrian environment),while others were satisfied with the dimensions. Board members agreed to allow this issue to be addressed by the Planning Board during their review and noted that they would send a letter to the Planning Board suggesting they examine this and the location of the crosswalk that currently exists on Lafayette Street. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the public hearing, and after thorough review of the plans and petition submitted, makes the following findings: 1. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent or purpose of the zoning ordinance, since the proposed plan is expected to reduce queuing on Lafayette Street,improve traffic congestion and circulation on the site, reduce the number of uses currently on the site, provide for a higher level of fire safety, and provide landscaping that will improve the site aesthetically. 2. In permitting such change,the Board of Appeals requires certain appropriate conditions and safeguards as noted below. On the basis of the above findings of fact and all evidence presented at the public hearing including, but not limited to, the Plans,Documents and testimony,the Zoning Board of Appeals concludes: 1. A Special Permit under Sec. 3.3.2 of the Salem Zoning Ordinance to extend a nonconforming use (gas station) is granted. 2. Variances under Sec. 3.3.4, 4.0 and 6.3 to construct a convenience store and canopy over gas pumps as shown on the approved plan are granted. 3 3. Relief from the screening requirements of Sec. 6.3 is granted (landscaping is to be done as shown on the approved plan). In consideration of the above,the Salem Board of Appeals voted, five (5) in favor(Curran, Debski, Dionne, Tsitsinos and Belair) and none (0) opposed,to grant petitioner's request for Special Permits and Variances subject to the following terms, conditions, and safeguards: 1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted to and approved bythe Building Commissioner. Approved plan is titled "Site Improvement Plan," sheet G1,prepared by Ayoub Engineering, last revised 4/14/11. 3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety shall be strictly adhered to. 4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to beginning any construction. 5. A Certificate of Occupancy is to be obtained. 6. Petitioner is to obtain approval from any City Board or Commission having jurisdiction including, but not limited to, the Planning Board. Rebecca Curran, Chair Salem Board of Appeals A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision,if any,shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A,Section 11,the Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certificate of the City Clerk has been filed with the Essex South Registry of Deeds. OONOITq,q� CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS og' fie; BOARD OF APPEAL 120 WASHINGTON STREET, 3RD FLOOR `. SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01 970 Fn TELEPHONE: 978-745-9595 MINe D0� FAX: 978-740-9846 KIMBERLEY DRISCOLL ,r., tt MAYOR 2011 1 i:Hi -LI :ry 10: 7�. May4, 2011 Cl j' Decision City of Salem Zoning Board of Appeals Petition of A.L. PRIME ENERGY CONSULTANTS requesting a Special Permit under Sec. 3.3.2 of the Salem Zoning Ordinance to extend a nonconforming use (gas station), Special Permit under Sec. 3.3.3 and Variance under Sec. 3.3.4 to reconstruct a nonconforming structure (constructing a convenience store); relief from frontage and lot area under Sec. 4.1.1; and relief from screening requirements of Sec. 6.3.4, for the properties located at 175 LAFAYETTE ST. (B-1 and R-3) and 183 LAFAYETTE ST. (B-1 Zoning District). A public hearing on the above Petition was opened on March 16, 2011,pursuant to Mass General Law Ch. 40A,$ 11. The hearing was continued to April 20,2011 and closed on that date with the following Zoning Board of Appeals members present: Rebecca Curran, Elizabeth Debski, Richard Dionne, Annie Harris,Jamie Metsch,Jimmy Tsitsinos (alternate) and Bonnie Belair(alternate). Petitioner seeks Special Permits pursuant to Sections 3.3.2 and 3.3.3, and Variances under Sections 3.4.4, 4.1.1 and 6.3.4 of the City of Salem Zoning Ordinances. Statements of fact: 1. Attorney George Atkins represented the petitioner at the hearings. 2. In a petition date-stamped December 22, 2010,petitioner requested Special Permits and Variances to extend a nonconforming use (gas ), and reconstruct a station nonconforming structure (constructing a convenience store), and requested relief from screening requirements for the properties located at 175 LAFAYETTE ST. and 183 LAFAYETTE ST. 3. At the meeting on March 16,2011, one resident spoke in opposition to the proposal, citing concerns about traffic congestion and safety,snow removal problems currently on the site, and the potential for loitering late at night. 4. Also at the March 16 meeting, Ward 1 Councillor Robert McCarthy spoke in support of the petition, citing the project's potential to improve traffic congestion and queuing on Lafayette St. and noting that the petitioner's other facilities were well- maintained. i 2 5. At the March 16 and April 20 meetings,Ward 7 Councillor Joseph O'Keefe spoke in support of the project,citing proposed fire safety improvements (larger, safer storage tanks,canopy sprinkler system) and improved access and circulation due to double- sided pumps. 6. At the March 16 meeting,some Board members expressed concern about the number of pumps proposed, suggesting four new double-sided pumps might increase traffic to the site and increase the intensity of use too much, and also noted that snow removal could be a problem 7. The hearing was continued to April 20. At this meeting, the petitioner presented revised plans showing a reduction in the number of pumps from four to three, additional landscaping, and a designated area for snow stacking. Attorney Atkins also noted that subject to Planning Board approval, the petitioner would place "Do Not Enter" signs at the Palmer Street driveway to ensure one-way traffic flow. Board members noted that these were improvements to the plan. 8. At the April 20 hearing, some Board members expressed concern about the width of the existing 79' driveway from Lafayette Street (saying it was too wide and created an unsafe pedestrian environment),while others were satisfied with the dimensions. Board members agreed to allow this issue to be addressed by the Planning Board during their review and noted that they would send a letter to the Planning Board suggesting they examine this and the location of the crosswalk that currently exists on Lafayette Street. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the public hearing, and after thorough review of the plans and petition submitted, makes the following findings: 1. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent or purpose of the zoning ordinance, since the proposed plan is expected to reduce queuing on Lafayette Street, improve traffic congestion and circulation on the site, reduce the number of uses currently on the site, provide for a higher level of fire safety, and provide landscaping that will improve the site aesthetically. 2. In permitting such change,the Board of Appeals requires certain appropriate conditions and safeguards as noted below. On the basis of the above findings of fact and all evidence presented at the public hearing including, but not limited to,the Plans,Documents and testimony, the Zoning Board of Appeals concludes: 1. A Special Permit under Sec. 3.3.2 of the Salem Zoning Ordinance to extend a nonconforming use (gas station) is granted. 2. Dimensional Variances under Sec. 3.3.3 to reconstruct a nonconforming structure (constructing a convenience store); are granted. 3 3. Relief from the screening requirements of Sec. 6.3.4 is granted (landscaping is to be done as shown on the approved plan). In consideration of the above,the Salem Board of Appeals voted, five (5) in favor (Curran, Debski,Dionne, Tsitsinos and Belair) and none (0) opposed,to grant petitioner's request for Special Permits and Variances subject to the following terms, conditions, and safeguards: 1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted to and approved bythe Building Commissioner. Approved plan is titled "Site Improvement Plan," sheet G1, prepared by Ayoub Engineering, last revised 4/14/11. 3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety shall be strictly adhered to. 4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to beginning any construction. 5. A Certificate of Occupancy is to be obtained. 6. Petitioner is to obtain approval from any City Board or Commission having jurisdiction including, but not limited to,the Planning Board. Rebecca Curran, Chair Salem Board of Appeals A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk Pursuant to the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11,the Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certificate of the City Clerk has been filed with the Essex South Registry of Deeds. pSit ox �.A AAA AAAAAAAVA AAAA > 6 k �o PALMER (PUBLIC — 40' NIDE) STREET m Y� o Exsnlvc x9'pRVEWAY ro az rxoscGm 'F NEW J0.G'0.%4FM Y Ex51ING NDRIVEWAY IS K 0.05E0 - R€ ! I rm y NEW 2°.0'CM'WY 140.00 2 N r I I I N� Bg F S @p D 11 I I I p via x � A m D o N 1 n Io I . 09 Z5 '. _ I \ 4gw,k m I.1 ��k li um 2zs's I I II O I la OI I °� 3or>Do,° ---- — �v vv vvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvv vvvv\ ���� �g £P�m q % p n : fl ar° to tnm P.' Sde°5 fjJ,P A5 �� +st �Ws £ NDA CC � `i S Z 2 kn mRm `saQ � £ `-: €g ' Ni _N � �^., p sa ^o'e A -Im P c K7 t" Margin St " z � �O O Canal Si"`^^--•-..,_,__ N 'P'b0V4seM 6' yOR TI31. TIM 1� s z F� p�£ :➢ i �is aree $ e 12 u -u u n u u o yp yyW�$ d d+ Aaauy k n NK m g m c a s PS cw9rea,x mOg ^� a m m � � a>aW` Rn9exA P R E P A R E D F O R R E V I S I O N SP � n°v RG aft SXIOI3 a A.L. PRIME ENERGY A GIG/32/1G 10ARIRDGS2E/PGA GZGNING XAR, 'co a uYO U B 2 AC 11/19/10 UPOArtO ZONING[XMi AC R4 A + a p 319B SALEM ST.WAKEFIELD,MA 01880 ` & ENGINEERINQ ° �R a I. ]a11 zaE ozol s 0 0 + p ° � m � PROJECT ADDRESS 2 SALEM MA E.m1re::re.s.wa.,. e.. / 1 CORPORATE OFFICE: ° F 175 LAFAYETTE STREET 10 RR I $p Np R 414 BENEFIT STREET VV R 3 } ^ S H E E T D E S C R I P T I O N PAWTUCKET. RHODE ISI-AND 02861 €g � 401-728-5533 14 SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN P.O. BOX 514 2 S EXETER, NEW HAMPSHIRE 03833 603-765-1001 IE � �I I C AYOUB ENGINEERING EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY RESPONSIBILITY L7� IA FOR MONITORING, INSPECTING, OBSERVING, OR SUPERVISING .:''v -1- CsS Caedre'y St ., ' . CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, OR THE MEANS, METHODS. SEQUENCES High St hadge52��� Pea4 pd AND PROGRAND AQUES OF MS FOR THE PROJECTNOR DEFINEDRJOB SITE BY THE PLANS FOR Ir MAP 34 Ct t r* 1`St WHICH THIS CERTIFICATION 6 AFFIXED. AYOUB HAS NOT BEEN LOT 125 1n Wardst RETAINED FOR NOR SHALL R HAVE ANY CONTROL OVER OR BE p + C -st IN CHARGE OF ACTS OR OMISSIONS OF ANY CONTRACTOR, SUBCONTRACTOR, OTHER AGENTS OR EMPLOYEES OR OF ANY 12 PALMER STREET REALTY TRUST / +Sr 0 ' Mivatnof+ I: h`" Har6prSf ,� OTHER PERSONS PERFORMING PORTIONS OF THE WORK. RAMSEY, DAVID T TR Lynch St RAMSEY, JEAN E TR N .Q a5S i' o ribs �s 01 Flesco t �, Do"5k n u !SITE a (WOOD FRAME OPEN DECK AND STAIRWELLI !»cks w Palmer5t NEW FOUNDA77ON L_---------- orr T " CedOSt- itt 3' PLAN77NGS ALONG { Leov5 NORTH AND EASTSl�e x dStittSt AMI OF BUILDING r _ -1 a f+ ' a'd� also tt+1 f Chase St CrvL 56.00' RETAIN EVERGREEN/ $��� C o r5[M -.... ._• .... ___.. .. ...._. _. •..._.. PLANTING AT TOP OF - >4 n � ardne 3 SOUTH PROP LINE {o © RETAINING WALL, TRIM �Oneer'Ce" BACK FROM NEW e k' BUILDING Han"Cock - . . 13etuceiQ '?+� Lafayette � i w MAP 34 pity Sc I 11`6Z11 EXISTING WALL SECTION " LOT 124 ALONG SIDEWALK TO BE ERNES, LOLA Homy 5t 3 Eden S t" REMOVED fx° , EANES, RICHARD E aye d : .� y des;est 9W� �d.�s 1 x p m , S ru SAIii ow A°v O NEW C—STORE & PIZZA LOCUS MAP MAP 34 1, 995 S.F. NOT TO SCALE o Lor 249 47. 5' x 42' 3 LOCKE, LINDA ZONING INFORMATION Z o ASSESSOR MAP 34, LOT 126, PARCEL ID 34-0126-0/LOT 127 PARCEL ID 34-0127-0 La NEW CURB ZONE: BI BUSINESS NEIGHBORHOOD I BOOK: 393 PLAN: 95 N z a o BOOK: 308 PLAN: 51 Z f v z W 5 t PLAN: 2369/454 o Ix z J m PETITIONER: A.L. PRIME ENERGY - o o w ABIITIFR 3198 SALEM ST. WAKEFIELD, MA 01880 Tn N o > o (781) 246-0201 - Wo ui w awn o REQUIRED EXISTING PROPOSED RELIEF REQ. v a MAP 34 MINIMUM SE7BACK: FRONT.• N M z O I LOT 248 PAR TNG SPACES 0 BE USED FOR SNOW PALMER STREET 40' GARAGE 26' 5' C-STORE 35' o z n } z S70 AGE DURING EAVY SNOW E NTS TO o p p} SCARES, FLORIEL BE EMOVED FROM THE SITE AN 3' CANOPY 37' m N o SOARES, ALICIA M k PROPERLY DISPOSEI WITHIN 48 PRS OF LAFAYETTE STREET 40' GARAGE 50' 94' C-STORE NONE w w o w THE ONCLUSION THE STORM, EACH NEW TRASH ENCLOSURE RETAIL 30' 22' CANOPY 18' > ¢ U SPA E PROVIDES R 1.8' OF S OWFALL SOUTH SIDE 1 _ it a o FOR EVERY:SIX FT OF STORAGE EIGHT W LOT 127 t0 RETAIL 20 35'CANOPY NONE SIGNORE, SHAWN REAR: 30' GARAGE 44' 3' C-STORE 27' o \ SIPPOLA-SIGNORE, ANNA MIN. AREA: S. 13,019 S.F. 13,019 S.F. 981 S.F. s.o' 14,000 F.-� 8.0' � s.o' TYP. L �.- __ `.. _ LOT REQUIREMENTS: , MIN. LOT WIDTH: p NEW CONC. WALL r r I OO IO O I (2) NEW 10' DIA. DOUBLEWALL FIBERGLASS > PALMER STREET 140' 140' 140' NONE UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS (1) 20K g U o U 3 EXISTING GARAGE BUILDING \ / GAL. REGULAR & LAFAYETTE STREET 140' 172' 112 28' TO BE REMOVED MAP 34 12K DIESEL 8K SUP / (1) SPLIT COMPARTMENT a Q —�———— 1 11 11111 12K GAL. DIESEL/ 8K GAL. SUPER MIN. FRONTAGE: ------ aro .rmm � a o LOT 126 PALMER STREET 60' 140' 140' NONE 7,839 S.F. Ld po EXISTING U/G STORAGE ! LAFAYETTE STREET 60' 112' 112' NONE ° TANKS TO BE REMOVED SDRIVEWAY DISTANCE TO SIDE 20' 20- j — S 3 /-q \ 0' 0' Z I n O I BUILDING LOT COVERAGE: 40� 25.9% BOTH 15.47 NONE � y N 00 0 NEW 72.0' CANOPY 20K REG O / PUMP ISLAND SETBACK: O V) PALMER STREET ----�� 15 9 15' NONE I- p O LAFAYETTE STREET 15' 14' 30' NONE W W Z W J MAX. DRIVEWAY WIDTH 24' 39'/34' 30' 6' Z F LL U7 � ID I/7 0 MAP 34 PALMER STREET m I I I LOT 127 LAFAYETTE S1REE7 24 79' 79' S5' W U7 a I 5,180 S.F. � � W ~ oma n T MAP 34 d o PARKING REQUIREMENTS: W a H W O N m D U EXCLUDING STORAGE AREA ? Q O O Ig LU W LOT 247 v ¢ RETAIL: 1 SPACE/150 S.F. GFA W C 0, Z 173 LAFAYETTE STREET o g g g 10 9 10 NONE L7 (L CO O - W O SALEM LLC 01 I ' I 1,478 S.F. GFA/150 S.F.=10 o Z O W Z a0 z I I CURRENT REQUIRED W w U Lu 69 S.F. G 50 S.F.=23 Z W Lu _ _ . __ _ o I X 3 3 FA/1 m l7 3 S 24.0' (EYP) _.., .. _ EVERGREEN SCREENING VARIANCE REQUESTED W W G j - .. ...__. ... . ._. - -._... ....._ _. _._. .._ ._ ..._..-.. - REFERENCE: u,. _ ,.. R E z - CITY OF SALEM ZONING ORDINANCE SEPTEMBER 10, 20D9 -- p 3't EXIS77NG RETAIL BUILDING TO BE REMOVED LFENCE EXISTING ISLANDS TOi BE REMOVED n n* 1 W j N _ NEW ID SIGN a`+ O O LJ. n t0 v � N Z 1 —NEW CURB Q N O 6.0 =x Ld 56.00' W I- W 40.00' N 7 W a L J p W — C o w U- o o U) w G W N Q �W U w fn W O EXISTING 79' DRIVEWAY TO REMAIN n U LL 0 w � v W Q Q W !!^^ Lo J 0.. Q O V J W 10 0 10 20 J m O W o = LAFAYETTE (PUBLIC — VARIABLE WIDTH) STREET GRAPHIC SCALE Q M N W REFERENCE: PROPERTY LINES AND OTHER TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION v, SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING WERE TAKEN FROM A PLAN ENTITLED: U) EXISTING COND17IONS PLAN IN SALEM, MA FOR A.L. PRIME ENERGY SCALE: 1'=10' DATE: JANUARY 28, 2010 PREPARED BY: LANDMARK ENGINEERING & SURVEYING, INC. 583 CHESTNUT STREET LYNN, MA ABUTTING BUILDINGS OUTLINES SHOWN ARE TAKEN FROM THE PROJECT No. 4169.109 SHEET NO. CITY OF SALEM GIS INFORMA77ON C/,O FILE No. 4169MP SCALE: 1"=10' C- 1/� �+• BY: RCD 1 DATE: 4/6/10 - a .