237 JEFFERSON AVENUE - ZBA 237 Jefferson Ave. :R-2
James &;Therese Hudson-
� r
�\e
S
s
s
Ctu of ;Szllem, ��Httssrzcllusetts
September 30, 1993
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT AS OF THIS DATE THE DECISION OF
THE BOARD OF APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY
CLERK TO GRANT THE PETITION OF JAMES & THERESE HUDSON FOR A
SPECIAL PERMIT TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A SUNROOM AND DECK AT
237 JEFFERSON AVENUE.
BOARD OF APPEAL
Brenda M. Sumrall
Clerk of the Board
Appeal from this deer gym:, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of
the Mass. Gc eial Laws, Chapter 808, and shall be filed within 20 days
attar tLe rate cf flin;� cY this decision in the office of the City Clerk.
P,.!rsuant to ?eras:. .al Chap�er 808, Section 1Z, the Variance
er f::acral Permit gr:u:e.'. herein shah not take effect until a copy of the
deeision, bearing tile certification of the City C!erk that 20 days have
elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been
filed,that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex
Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name or the owner of record or
is recorded and noted en the owner's Certificate of Title.
BOARD OF APPEAL
r y (1�it oftt1Pm, � ttsstttljusPtts
Bnttrb of �upeal OCT i G tat „i
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JAMES & THERESE HUDSON
FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 237 JEFFERSON AVENUE (R-2)
A hearing on this petition was held September 15, 1993 with the following
Board Members present: Francis X. Grealish, Chairman; George Ahmed,
Stephen O'Grady and Associate Member LaBrecque. Notice of the hearing was
sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly
published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts
General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioners, , owners of the property, are requesting a Special Permit to
allow construction of a sunroom and deck which will extend the existing
nonconforming side setback. Property is located in the R-2 district.
The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this
request for a Special Permit is Section 5-3(j ) , which provides as follows:
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the
Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set
forth in Section 8-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permits for alterations and
reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement,
extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses,
provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion
shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming
use to the neighborhood.
In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit
requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted
upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will
promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's
inhabitants.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented
at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings
of fact:
1. There was no opposition to the petitioners request.
2. The proposed construction will allow the petitioners a fuller use of
their property.
3. This is the most feasible location for the sunroom and deck.
4. All other setback requirements will be met.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JAMES & THERESE HUDSON
FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 237 JEFFERSON AVENUE, SALEM
page two
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented,
the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1. The Special Permit requested can be granted without substantial
detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially
derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
2. The granting of the Special Permit requested will promote the public
health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants and may
be granted in harmony with the neighborhood.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 4-0, to grant the
Special Permit requested, subject to the following conditions:
1. Petitioner shall comply with all City and State statutes, ordinances,
codes and regulations.
2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions
submitted.
3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and
fire safety are to be strictly adhered to.
4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to starting
construction.
5. Exterior finishes of the new construction shall be in harmony with the
existing structure.
Special Permit Granted
September 15, 1993
Stephen O'Grady, Member
Board of appeal
0
c:.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JAMES & THERESE FOR SPECIAL PERMIT AT
237 JEFFERSON AVENUE, SALEM
page three
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY
CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of
MGL Chapter 40A. , and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of
filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL
Chapter 40A. , Section 11, the Special Permit granted herein shall not take
effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City
Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if
such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is
recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of
the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of
Title.
Board of Appeal
o
- r
b (1Lit of 1�ttiem, � Httssttcljusetts
I:r S Ottrb Of peal OCT i G 4c Ui JJ
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JAMES & THERESE HUDSON
FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 237 JEFFERSON AVENUE (R-2)
A hearing on this petition was held September 15, 1993 with the following
Board Members present: Francis X. Grealish, Chairman; George Ahmed,
Stephen O'Grady and Associate Member LaBrecque. Notice of the hearing was
sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly
published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts
General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioners, , owners of the property, are requesting a Special Permit to
allow construction of a sunroom and deck which will extend the existing
nonconforming side setback. Property is located in the R-2 district.
The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this
request for a Special Permit is Section 5-3(j ) , which provides as follows:
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the
Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set
forth in Section 8-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permits for alterations and
reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement,
extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses,
provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion
shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming
use to the neighborhood.
In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit
requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted
upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will
promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's
inhabitants.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented
at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings
of fact:
1. There was no opposition to the petitioners request.
2. The proposed construction will allow the petitioners a fuller use of
their property.
3. This is the most feasible location for the sunroom and deck.
4. All other setback requirements will be met.
` DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JA14ES & THERESE HUDSON
FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 237 JEFFERSON AVENUE, SALEM
page two
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented,
the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
I. The Special Permit requested can be granted without substantial
detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially
derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
2. The granting of the Special Permit requested will promote the public
health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants and may
be granted in harmony with the neighborhood.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 4-0, to grant the
Special Permit requested, subject to the following conditions:
1. Petitioner shall comply with all City and State statutes, ordinances,
codes and regulations.
2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions
submitted.
3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and
fire safety are to be strictly adhered to.
4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to starting
construction.
5. Exterior finishes of the new construction shall be in harmony with the
existing structure.
Special Permit Granted
September 15, 1993
Stephen O'Grady, Member
Board of appeal
0
c:.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JAMES & THERESE FOR SPECIAL PERMIT AT
237 JEFFERSON AVENUE, SALEM
page three
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY
CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of
MGL Chapter 40A. , and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of
filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL
Chapter 40A. , Section 11, the Special Permit granted herein shall not take
effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City
Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if
such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is
recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of
the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of
Title.
Board of Appeal
0
.. ra
G:
_ w
a.
1` r
(9itg of --,Salem, f Hassadjusetts
Board of Au{renl OCT i 42
�i
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JAMES & THERESE HUDSON
FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 237 JEFFERSON AVENUE (R-2)
A hearing on this petition was held September 15, 1993 with the following
Board Members present: Francis X. Grealish, Chairman; George Ahmed,
Stephen O'Grady and Associate Member LaBrecque. Notice of the hearing was
sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly
published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts
General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioners, , owners of the property, are requesting a Special Permit to
allow construction of a sunroom and deck which will extend the existing
nonconforming side setback. Property is located in the R-2 district.
The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this
request for a Special Permit is Section 5-3(j ) , which provides as follows:
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the
Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set
forth in Section 8-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permits for alterations and
reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement,
extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses,
provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion
shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming
use to the neighborhood.
In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit
requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted
upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will
promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's
inhabitants.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented
at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings
of fact:
1. There was no opposition to the petitioners request.
2. The proposed construction will allow the petitioners a fuller use of
their property.
3. This is the most feasible location for the sunroom and deck.
4. All other setback requirements will be met.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JAMES & THERESE HUDSON
FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 237 JEFFERSON AVENUE, SALEM
page two
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented,
the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1. The Special Permit requested can be granted without substantial
detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially
derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
2. The granting of the Special Permit requested will promote the public
health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants and may
be granted in harmony with the neighborhood.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 4-0, to grant the
Special Permit requested, subject to the following conditions:
1. Petitioner shall comply with all City and State statutes, ordinances,
codes and regulations.
2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions
submitted.
3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and
fire safety are to be strictly adhered to.
4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to starting
construction.
5. Exterior finishes of the new construction shall be in harmony with the
existing structure.
Special Permit Granted
September 15, 1993
Stephen O'Grady, Member
Board of appeal
0
a:
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JAMES & THERESE FOR SPECIAL PERMIT AT
237 JEFFERSON AVENUE, SALEM
page three
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY
CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of
MGL Chapter 40A. , and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of
filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL
Chapter 40A. , Section 11, the Special Permit granted herein shall not take
effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City
Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if
such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is
recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of
the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owners Certificate of
Title.
Board of Appeal
O
n
_ y
CT.
L.)
ofttlem, ttssrzcl�usetts
nttrd of Atpeal
OCT 1 lag 3t 53
t T
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JAMES & THERESE HUDSON
FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 237 JEFFERSON AVENUE (R-2)
A hearing on this petition was held September 15, 1993 with the following
Board Members present: Francis X. Grealish, Chairman; George Ahmed,
Stephen O'Grady and Associate Member LaBrecque. Notice of the hearing was
sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly
published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts
General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioners, , owners of the property, are requesting a Special Permit to
allow construction of a sunroom and deck which will extend the existing
nonconforming side setback. Property is located in the R-2 district.
The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this
request for a Special Permit is Section 5-3(j ) , which provides as follows:
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the
Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set
forth in Section 8-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permits for alterations and
reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement,
extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses,
provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion
shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming
use to the neighborhood.
In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit
requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted
upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will
promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's
inhabitants.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented
at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings
of fact:
1. There was no opposition to the petitioners request.
2. The proposed construction will allow the petitioners a fuller use of
their property.
3. This is the most feasible location for the sunroom and deck.
4. All other setback requirements will be met.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JAMES & THERESE HUDSON
FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 237 JEFFERSON AVENUE, SALEM
page two
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented,
the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1. The Special Permit requested can be granted without substantial
detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially
derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
2. The granting of the Special Permit requested will promote the public
health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants and may
be granted in harmony with the neighborhood.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 4-0, to grant the
Special Permit requested, subject to the following conditions:
1. Petitioner shall comply with all City and State statutes, ordinances,
codes and regulations.
2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions
submitted.
3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and
fire safety are to be strictly adhered to.
4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to starting
construction.
5. Exterior finishes of the new construction shall be in harmony with the
existing structure.
Special Permit Granted
September 15, 1993
Stephen O'Grady, Member
Board of appeal
C
G
n�
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JAMES & THERESE FOR SPECIAL PERMIT AT
237 JEFFERSON AVENUE, SALEM
page three
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY
CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of
MGL Chapter 40A. , and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of
filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL
Chapter 40A. , Section 11, the Special Permit granted herein shall not take
effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City
Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if
such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is
recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of
the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of
Title.
Board of Appeal
o
n
w
a.
(flit ofttlPm, � ttSStztljuSPtts
'Euttra of
peal OCTi tl 42
er JJ
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JAMES & THERESE HUDSON
FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 237 JEFFERSON AVENUE (R-2)
A hearing on this petition was held September 15, 1993 with the following
Board Members present: Francis X. Grealish, Chairman; George Ahmed,
Stephen O'Grady and Associate Member LaBrecque. Notice of the hearing was
sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly
published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts
General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioners, , owners of the property, are requesting a Special Permit to
allow construction of a sunroom and deck which will extend the existing
nonconforming side setback. Property is located in the R-2 district.
The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this
request for a Special Permit is Section 5-3(j ) , which provides as follows:
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the
Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set
forth in Section 8-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permits for alterations and
reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement,
extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses,
provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion
shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming
use to the neighborhood.
In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit
requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted
upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will
promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's
inhabitants.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented
at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings
of fact:
1. There was no opposition to the petitioners request.
2. The proposed construction will allow the petitioners a fuller use of
their property.
3. This is the most feasible location for the sunroom and deck.
4. All other setback requirements will be met.
l
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JAMES & THERESE HUDSON
FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 237 JEFFERSON AVENUE, SALEM
page two
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented,
the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1. The Special Permit requested can be granted without substantial
detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially
derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
2. The granting of the Special Permit requested will promote the public
health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants and may
be granted in harmony with the neighborhood.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 4-0, to grant the
Special Permit requested, subject to the following conditions:
1. Petitioner shall comply with all City and State statutes, ordinances,
codes and regulations.
2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions
submitted.
3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and
fire safety are to be strictly adhered to.
4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to starting
construction.
5. Exterior finishes of the new construction shall be in harmony with the
existing structure.
Special Permit Granted
September 15, 1993
Stephen O'Grady, Member
Board of appeal
0
c:.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JAMES & THERESE FOR SPECIAL PERMIT AT
237 JEFFERSON AVENUE, SALEM
page three
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY
CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of
MGL Chapter 40A. , and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of
filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL
Chapter 40A. , Section 11, the Special Permit granted herein shall not take
effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City
Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if
such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is
recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of
the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of
Title.
Board of Appeal
c� O
n
r
cr
ATE OF ._cAR�i:G
PETITIOIEP, 12
.00ATIOi] a67
LOTION: TD GRANT SECOND
TO DENY SECOND !/
TO RE-HEAR SECOND
LEAVE TO WITHDRAW SECOND
.0 CONTII•]UE SECOND
POLL CALL PRESENT GRANT DENY WITHDRAW RE-HEAR CONTINUE
STEPHEN O'GRADY
GEORGE A. AHMED
FRANCIS GREALISH
E4WARB-tti�I1QSI<h
ASSOC .',TE 'MEMBERS
R OtfihtE) p mt�
ARTHUR LABRECOUE
CONDITIONS: �Qp n
APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Ctg of "tem, f ttssarlTus>etts
�,. Puarb of �Vrettl
s�
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
The Undersigned repr�s�nt that Fie is are the owners of a certain parte] of land located
at NO. . ?3�. . ��� :"e r. S.m1.f . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Street; Zoning District./ .off
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : and said parcel is affected by Section(s) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
of the Massachusetts State Building Code.
Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in
accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance.
n r Ql
r
T.ry N
r]:C
m A
Vi �J
The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following
reasons:
The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem
Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to
approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said
Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary
hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero-
gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for
the following reasons:
'44
CLLU
d
Ln
a � o
co w
W cn
Owner. . . . . . �. . . . . . . . . . . .
Ca -j U
Addre s. . ��
Telephone. Q�Q . . . . . ... . .
Petitioner. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
�y q Address. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Date. /. .' .�f' . 1. . . .
Telephone. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
By. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Three copies of the application must be filed with theSecr tary of the Board of
Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. .7. -.`,� . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The
Evening News.
NO....................................
PETITION TO BOARD OF APPEALS
LOCATION
................................................................
PETITIONER..........................................
ADDRESS...............................................
................................................
CONDITIONS
.................................................................
........................ .......................................
................................................................
.................................................................
.................................................................
.................................................................
PETITION APPROVED.................... ❑
DENIED......................... 0
.....:.............................................1 19.........
a
LOT IST
O
pOAT' E MARIE E CORrsIAJ
N LJHCATLAIJLD :57-
A 0 Tr 0 P
Y-A0T10P �>
I �
39
L_OT 161
Lor 159
RAY MOtiJt BLALHAIZD
PROPOSwD
AutTIR ciJOWLES r1�oFOsc�
�' ,nom
L JHEFTtM� 6 -T-t11noD oI LOT ! 6Z
SC 1 A' RoDERT e /2�0rlM ,q
1 ri io.4> porch ( L.4%j0'; E
N '
6..
3.5 �
e
V � T
9 7-37 a
LOT i60 jO
i
Ro�3ERT- E o y � *L39
tt SAIL JN S . a., ti
ti I
= 1
,TEFF ti ULNU E
zonll��cz D1SrR ICT - � Z
or
= SSE SJ.'t h/fjlJ Z14-
REFERENCE.-
'd.REFERENCE. - PLOT PLAN QP LAND
DEED. REC. BK. 4S I I PG. L404
PLAN.' RE(-, 6L. I001 Ellit6 LOCATED IN
I CERTIFY THAT THE BUILDING (S) S L E )
HEREON ARE LOCATED ON THE GROUND
AS SHOWN. PREPARED FOR
.TAN ES E 17HERESE IAUr)JOrJ
DA TE REG. PROFESSIONAL LAND oma 4tF s9Oti SCALE. 1 ' = GO' MAY L7 19 v
GAIL
L °N NORTH SHORE SURVEY CORP.
o .
SMITH
No 35a43 209 WASHINGTON SL- SALEM, MA. j
90, 9 E� a�
EJ, C'ISTEP J4.
9��NAC LANG SVO ',,
R PLAN
EXISTING
HOUSE
SECTION
DRAWING
SUNROOM
7=8"
10 0"
14 ,0
DECK 4, 0"
4413"
8-6'"
-DUL E
- SI --- T P - PR AND -
OVELijx ENTILATING•
SKYLITES SIz55 "
12
2-10'HLAI)Ei 5[ 2x10'LEDGER
6 "IN'DULATION R- 30
ZXIC'=11At TERS
2X4 Tr)PI'LATES BLUEBOARD
GIRD A-Sl I;111_T SHIPIGLES PLASTER
� FI�iISH
-' PLYW0(Df. -
" V'PLYWOOD
1x12'FASCIA 2
COT)-
SOFFITzVENT j 2z10'HEADEI
2x8" HEAT tR B=III"
2i[ ' HEADER
4x4" 1'.L PGST
I 1
ANDERSEN PERMA-SHIELD C-11•.
PATIO D�)i;IiS
HAf;DW ( ,D FLOOR
OAK
I I
Y,41" Pf1 !)t;_XING
2x P, FRAME
ANCHOR DOLT? EXISTING
2x10' JOIST j1
2Y6' SILL RT FOUND
SILL INSULATI )N
ANC H �f� 0,.,-GALNIZLD PGtiT _ GRADE8 BLOCK FOUNDATION
A —
to- c:f7 , TE
FOOTING--
I
3-0 i i 12
EXISTING VI NYL
SIDIh G
— - GIRB
- SOI
ANDERSE�
-- - ' PATIO
2X4',Tor RAll L
2x6 RAI L
i
i
- _--- 2x
GALVI
i I A(
i 10- Cf
I I I I i I
I I �
r EA11' E! Evn TI )N
3�8'
1 . O`
LOT 15$
DOWnT' E MARIE COR1310 O
N tW H ERTL A Qt, S Y.
/NOTTOP
� 39,± C
LOT 161
LOT 159 /AREA = 5350+ s.�
RAY Moab (BLRCHh12.D p�Ct
t rRppCS�b
A0ITq k00WLC5
# Z I.OHEATLFbAZ 6 'rO�-1 TTI / SPD n p LOT 16Z.
Sl ISAJO -7--
L191?
UJ10.9> po'ah 1 LA UDI En 6" 5 > 2Lor /GO .37E,AIL tJHEE 5't '
F I
63 .
I
_TC F- FERS Oti n UL=NU L
zunll/JU blZT}21C7- - R2.
LOT- rJUHt:�EeS REFER T-0
✓9SSESS0R 'S /-/.q/J 214.
REFERENCE— PLOT PLAN OF LAND
DEED: . REC. BK. us I I PG. y0'{
PLAN: REC, Dt. loo 1 oub LOCATED IN
I CERTIFY THAT THE BUILDING (S) S /9 L
HEREON ARE LOCATED ON THE GROUND
AS SHOWN. PREPARED FOR
-5, 279 JAMES THERE5E HUbSOQ
D TE REG. PROFESSIONAL LANDOdds9Oti SCALE. 1 "= 2-0, MA / Z7 19`Z3
oa
GAIL �N NORTH SHORE SURVEY CORP.
sMITH 209 WASHINGTON ST.- SALEM , MA.
9 No.35o43 c
All TS
LAND OQ��io
BOARD OF ASSESSORS
CITY HALL PAGE
;zp
. DATE
tj5 42 67 9?2 2
2 ...................
RT
3 CERTIFIED "ABUTTERS
IF-
............ ........ 4
4 5 SUBJECT PROPERTY: MAP: 24 LOT: 0161 SUFE:
PROPERTY ADDRESS: 0237 JEFFERSON AVENUE 7
a
9
.................
....... ......... .......... ...... 100
-JUDSOh THE RESE
.........
...........
:2
10 13
14
•
24 0161 0237 JEFFERSON AVENUE HUDSON JAMES H 237 JEFFERSON AVE 5
12 16
-TmE1m75E— M imIA10119,70......1111�111......1,1
13 .........%
.......... 17
RL74Y J
ET,.,AL
F T�
14
Pil ......
.................
......... .......... N RENEi,
............ �o
is �k
R V-4
116 21
17 BEVERLY MA 01915 220
a 24
24 0158 0004 WHEATLAND STREET CORBIN DONAT E 4 WHEATLAND STREET 231
Il
19
.................
Fq
......
6
ymom 15
"
.........../......... .
..........
A T
'o
............
7
Z PIA, 04 9�7 Q
-KNo
21 . ................It i� ........ 128
a',4 I
'441
•
"R' �4
22 29
23 WHEELER GAIL SALEM MA 01970 300
0 24 0162 0239 JEFFERSON AVENUE LAVOIE ROBERT G 245 PARADISE RD 31
24 11 32
................ ...... A I
-OT--T- PIA--Q
25 -1 1 SI I
........; 33
2, 1� 'I V 34
4�;
26 REALTY ........
................
_7
35
"fAYI ...... ......
27
A
...............
36
28 5-4 J E F F E R S 0 3• 7
29 SALEM MA 01970 380
23 0067 0250 JEFFERSON AVENUE M & L REALTY TRUST 250 JEFFERSON AVE 31
30 4
......... In"
31•
N, 41
2 .......... ..
5 ......... .............. ........ ...... 42
2
3 .............. ..............
............
,,11"1 11 1.""1...... •
43
I%
33 .....
........ ......... ........ 44
............. ..........
34 45
035 4
4670
36 48
37 ............. ......... 49
.............
�',1, -,11 1.,......... ......
................
........�, .1��;�.'�,1,'% . �,�,� 50
...................
3 1 IN I'll
..................
3: ............... .............x--,
............. . 52
...................
40 53
41 54•
55
42 56
................ ..........
43 ...... .........e, 57
........... ........ ........
44
...............
s.........
z ..........
......... 609
45 xGF
46 61
047 :20
3
48
64
41 7
11 I.
65
77777
66
............
........... . . .....
•7
....... 681
52 69
53 *71
54 72
...... 777777777777777777777�
55 73
-�PETER, M.��ZAR 74
......... ..
56
..... 75
lit
�7 11—N
..........
... ............
..........
q
0
Q/ , NUf so
_ 77
e O spp / / 7a ,WEST
� �
JL v
/7
A O \ v o
112-s ��&6` S"J 61-.p 9 /7e
9000 -700
5000IP 8,90
x9 / 4
Cl a
aa
s56 1a4�E10,200 N 'S/8pp8
n \ ra
0,200 sov
co
Nrivot : 30-S
ze ' \.°40093zes,S
a -4 C) D P /9 73�C0NrR
ENT 130.5 6 5 6 sbO ° ,a1�LLL J6�"
e 5 73 ° a 0
0 19.9 x 2C /92 so
75 ^ g� o A
M1 „ 9 6,000/4'500 2O ip &
7 /
"1000 5W ?�2k 2p /9/
I 90..
59716
9 g 6 198 es a' 4750
SpY O 9 pC
7476 H " 30 Bp ?app O
- 70 : W O
2�6
7 00 5poo -J sS,S< Hfg l s0 Aso 2G
!2VO''
67 68 71 �' IEiB oo C q N 0 so sa O c
10-
0 a0 v p3g0 262- 4
❑
40 40 161 .x /5j 50 i2 a s2
( u
STREfl �I».
.o F10fsTON goo c l 62 /gs /g / 9s �a
e Z
oB
< m ae � 212 213163 �
sirs .,
N � s
j- 64 65 06 Leg 9 ,270 9000
p0 6 / 9
50 15.386 v P z5-S "6
4589 50(10 3�3 \
as_s 440 O /
c � s u7 �
N °
-T% Q7o 9 14r� a ,5 ,o a oC 0 U T MA z0o qhs a
6 2e . N ,
?6 O N 10> I690 ee o�� /// ,e 2�
LL C ;15U00 42 g 6
g IIO 93-5. ,o a REE r
e 7 �1O .1 Z 7 O O
15-5 �e 1 111 °3p00 3557 �y C 00 0 0 �s
�� 60 �, S o
zo i b
5 � REEj1 �e 40 „\.\1 M � 652y h S /� "� bbm
,91 ,9 25 SO 63 ., a ,� ` 91 o p`" o•^ h a
�1
/0
4
43 ro 8 14 29 v •�, Q 6041 92 S a
0
o m 500
5612 'S9p� h ti Wq
? O �� o� 5 gj29 /
Q 901 0 2500 v A 6 2 w°
94 v1 sp
n J 8 0 O s0 v e
a 1"tw 4600 /0/
Ro 40
O 8s�s
o
too-
5 00 977 62s s0so
°O`S 401".y 1 100
fl 33 031 ro a q°p0 96 {yq Y� eo
80p0 5000 ; 00 50 p0 j y c 9e 7i550J1 ^° F/22
n036 n O
L FLOOR PLAN
�3�8 "� I -or'
EXISTING
HOUSE
SECTION
DRIN�,VING
O
GUNROOM
7' T
lo'o'
14 ,0
W
- I -I- i
UECK
I I I
I
I
8-6
�J
WINDOW 'S'CHEDULE
MARK aUAN '111 Y SIZE TYPE BRAND
A 2 G VxG" 0 " PSSL SLIDER ANDERSON PERMA-SHIELD
PROPOSED ADDITION FOR:
B 2 3oXsx 55 SKYLIGHT VELUX VSd-
237 JAMES HUDSON SR
JEFFERSON AVE SALEM NI A.
SCALE.a1 �- =0•" APPROVED BY. DRAWN BYJ H H J
DALE: 5- 9- REVISED
DRAWING NUMBER
S
EXISTING V I NYL
S1f)IHG
_ OBVEL'-)X "vEhTILAT�NG ,"
SKYLITES :31 z5b
12
2-"10` N[ Af% i, 5� . 2 X10'LEDGER
6 " )ULATION R - 30
- 2x1C'� IlA, T E R S
_. _ 2X4 TOPPLATES BLUEBOAR�
-- - -
_-
GIRD Asr I;AI T sNfPIGLES PLASTER
FINISH
-- �8=PLYW- iOf '/2"PLYWOOD
-` Izl2"FASCfA — 1--y 2'X8'-EXISTING I'RAMEING
--- - S0FFITxVE f4T ,,� I 2xK READER
2 ' 10" HEAf)ER
4x4"" II.T. Pu`;7
ANDERSEN PERMA-SHIELD C=I I°
+ PATIO DOvhS
2xU',TOP RAI L
I2xG ROIL HAknVv i,D FL-()()R
"OA i<
2YR FIA' AME
- ANCHOR DOLTS- -~ EXISTING FIELDS TONE
2x10, JOIST I'1 FOUNDATION
2K6 SILL P.T
- GALVINIZLD POST GRADE__ SILL INSULATIi)N
. _ -_.
1 i I _ ANC H ')(; _ I , W-- 8 BLOCK FOUNDATION
_ J i I ' I 10- CONC RE7� I I i t jO
I I i FOU ING---- -
I I
I
I I I I I I i 3 0 i ' 12= FOOTING
I I I i I I rl
kEAP ELEVATi")N
SECTION DRAWING �
/s I O"
3/6 _ I O PROPOSED ADDITION F' ri:
JAMES H HUDSON S R
237 JEFFERSON AVE SALEr' rilA.
SCALE. TJ I0•. APPROVED BY. DRAWN BYJHHJ
DATE. J - [� (J REVISED
DRAWING NUMBER
2