2 HILLSIDE AVENUE - ZBA 2 Hillside Ave. R-1
Charlotte Madson
c�
1
j
f�Ttt1 of _Iittiem, 'Massadjusetts
Pnttra of - , peal
AUGUST 4, 1994
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT AS OF AUGUST 2; 1994 THE DECISION OF
THE BOARD OF APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK TO
GRANT THE PETITION OF CHARLOTTE MADSON FOR A VARIANCE TO ALLOW
CONSTRUCTION OF A SINGLE STORY SCREEN PORCH AT 2 HILLSIDE AVENUE.
BOARD OF APPEAL
BRENDA M. SMALL
CLERK OF THE BOARD
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY
CLERK.
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17, of
MGL Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing
of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL Chapter
40A. , Section 11, the Variance/Special Permit granted herein shall not take
effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City
Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if
such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is
recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of
the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of _
title.
Board of Appeal
of .Salem, 'Massadjusetts
.,4� �nttra of �u}iettl
AUGUST 4, 1994
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT AS OF AUGUST 2, 1994 THE DECISION OF
THE BOARD OF APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK TO
GRANT THE PETITION OF CHARLOTTE MADSON FOR A VARIANCE TO ALLOW
CONSTRUCTION OF A SINGLE STORY SCREEN PORCH AT 2 HILLSIDE AVENUE.
BOARD OF APPEAL
BRENDA M. SMALL
CLERK OF THE BOARD
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY
CLERK.
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17, of
MGL Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing
of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL Chapter
40A. , Section 11, the Variance/Special Permit granted herein shall not take
effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City
Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if
such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is
recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of
the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of
title.
Board of Appeal
(Gita of ulem, Aussachu Betts
ettl
o Ills
CITY OF SACEM.
CLERK'S OF MASS
FIC
E
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF CHARLOTTE MADSON
FOR VARIANCE AT 2 HILLSIDE AVENUE (R-1)
A hearing on this petition was held Jufy 20, 1994 with the following Board
Members present: Stephen Touchette, Chairman; Gary Barrett, Nina Cohen and
Associate Member Arthur LaBrecque. Notice of the hearing was sent to
abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in
the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws
Chapter 40A.
Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting Variance from rear setback
to allow construction of a screen porch which will be one story high.
Property is located in the R-1 district, Residential Single Family.
The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding by this
Board that:
1. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the
land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting
other lands, buildings and structures involved.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner.
3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented
at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings
of fact:
1. There was no opposition to the petition.
2. Two people spoke in favor.
3. The proposed addition of a screened porch will allow the petitioner a
fuller use of the property.
4 . Due to the configuration of the lot and location of the dwelling, the
porch could not be located in any other location.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF CHARLOTTE MADSON FOR
VARIANCE AT 2 HILLSIDE AVENUE, SALEM
page two
On the basis of the above findings of fact, ando�y� evidence presented
at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as "'GCEi�"'tE . M!A$$
a 4tE�rG�F
1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property
but not the district in general.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship to the petitioner.
3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 4-0 to grant the
variances requested, subject to the following conditions:
1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances,
codes and regulations.
2. All construction shall be done in strict accordance with the plans and
dimensions submitted.
3. Petitioner shall comply with all requirements of the Salem Fire
Department relative to smoke and fire safety.
4. A Building Permit is to be obtained prior to beginning construction.
5. Exterior finishes of the new addition shall be in harmony with the
existing structure.
Variances Granted
July 20, 1994
Stephen C. Touchette, Chairman
Board of Appeal
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF CHARLOTTE MADSON FOR VARIANCE
AT 2 HILLSIDE AVENUE, SALEM
page three Z
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOAR&' D1TN Kr�TY
CLERK ERK-S 0Fi,44SS
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of
the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20
days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City
Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the
Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a
copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20
days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has
been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South
Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record
or is recorded and noted on the owners Certificate of Title.
Board of Appeal
(Gitu of 1�tzlem, � tzssttcljusetts
bnurb of A eul
hLT 1 9 2Q 4N '9V
CITY of
CLfRK'S� FFIMESS
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF CHARLOTTE MADSON
FOR VARIANCE AT 2 HILLSIDE AVENUE (R-1)
A hearing on this petition was held July 20, 1994 with the following Board
Members present: Stephen Touchette, Chairman; Gary Barrett, Nina Cohen and
Associate Member Arthur LaBrecque. Notice of the hearing was sent to
abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in
the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws
Chapter 40A.
Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting Variance from rear setback
to allow construction of a screen porch which will be one story high.
Property is located in the R-1 district, Residential Single Family.
The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding by this
Board that:
1. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the
land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting
other lands, buildings and structures involved.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner.
3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented
at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings
of fact:
1. There was no opposition to the petition.
2. Two people spoke in favor.
3. The proposed addition of a screened porch will allow the petitioner a
fuller use of the property.
4. Due to the configuration of the lot and location of the dwelling, the
porch could not be located in any other location.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF CHARLOTTE MADSON FOR
VARIANCE AT 2 HILLSIDE AVENUE, SALEM
page two
Arc 9 2? Ali %'W
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and op evidence presented
at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as f"dLiLlkP
a. QW.F1jCFFIiC�� F5S
1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property
but not the district in general.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship to the petitioner.
3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 4-0 to grant the
variances requested, subject to the following conditions:
1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances,
codes and regulations.
2. All construction shall be done in strict accordance with the plans and
dimensions submitted.
3. Petitioner shall comply with all requirements of the Salem Fire
Department relative to smoke and fire safety.
4. A Building Permit is to be obtained prior to beginning construction.
5. Exterior finishes of the new addition shall be in harmony with the
existing structure.
Variances Granted
July 20, 1994
Stephen C. Touchette, Chairman
Board of Appeal
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF CHARLOTTE MADSON FOR VARIANCE
AT 2 HILLSIDE AVENUE, SALEM
page three
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOAR&'RDD1j% CITY
CLERK ERX•S OFFICESS
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of
the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20
days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City
Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the
Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a
copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20
days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has
been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South
Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record
or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title.
Board of Appeal
(Citu of ialem, ;fttsszlChu Betts
'Enttra of A enl
44 1
9ism 194
CITY OF
OLER jAL'fIOESS
DECISION ON THE PETITION TI ION OF GHARLOTTE MADSON
FOR VARIANCE AT 2 HILLSIDE AVENUE (R-1)
A hearing on this petition was held July 20, 1994 with the following Board
Members present: Stephen Touchette, Chairman; Gary Barrett, Nina Cohen and
Associate Member Arthur LaBrecque. Notice of the hearing was sent to
abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in
the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws
Chapter 40A.
Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting Variance from rear setback
to allow construction of a screen porch which will be one story high.
Property is located in the R-1 district, Residential Single Family.
The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding by this
Board that:
1. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the
land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting
other lands, buildings and structures involved.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner.
3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented
at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings
of fact:
1. There was no opposition to the petition.
2. Two people spoke in favor.
3. The proposed addition of a screened porch will allow the petitioner a
fuller use of the property.
4. Due to the configuration of the lot and location of the dwelling, the
porch could not be located in any other location.
1
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF CHARLOTTE MADSON FOR
VARIANCE AT 2 HILLSIDE AVENUE, SALEM
page two
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and o evidence presented
at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as ALEW.#(ASS
a DFF6CE'
1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property
but not the district in general.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship to the petitioner.
3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 4-0 to grant the
variances requested, subject to the following conditions:
1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances,
codes and regulations.
2. All construction shall be done in strict accordance with the plans and
dimensions submitted.
3. Petitioner shall comply with all requirements of the Salem Fire
Department relative to smoke and fire safety.
4. A Building Permit is to be obtained prior to beginning construction.
5. Exterior finishes of the new addition shall be in harmony with the
existing structure.
Variances Granted
July 20, 1994
Stephen C. Touchette, Chairman
Board of Appeal
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF CHARLOTTE MADSON FOR VARIANCE
AT 2 HILLSIDE AVENUE, SALEM
page three
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARPR DOITMtiy!Y
CLERK ERK'S p,Ff/BASS
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of
the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20
days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City
Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the
Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a
copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20
days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has
been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South
Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record
or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title.
Board of Appeal
(Git" of ttlem, ttssttcltusetts
;a �uttrd ofpeal
CITY OF
CLERKSSLEM
FIMESS
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF CHARLOTTE MADSON
FOR VARIANCE AT 2 HILLSIDE AVENUE (R-1)
A hearing on this petition was held July 20, 1994 with the following Board
Members present: Stephen Touchette, Chairman; Gary Barrett, Nina Cohen and
Associate Member Arthur LaBrecque. Notice of the hearing was sent to
abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in
the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws
Chapter 40A.
Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting Variance from rear setback
to allow construction of a screen porch which will be one story high.
Property is located in the R-1 district, Residential Single Family.
The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding by this
Board that:
1. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the
land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting
other lands, buildings and structures involved.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner.
3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented
at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings
of fact:
1. There was no opposition to the petition.
2. Two people spoke in favor.
3. The proposed addition of a screened porch will allow the petitioner a
fuller use of the property.
4. Due to the configuration of the lot and location of the dwelling, the
porch could not be located in any other location.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF CHARLOTTE MADSON FOR
VARIANCE AT 2 HILLSIDE AVENUE, SALEM
page two
Ane 2 9 d '34
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and o evidence presented
EH-
at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as .a �ar-n qr
S dZFFGE
1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property
but not the district in general.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship to the petitioner.
3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 4-0 to grant the
variances requested, subject to the following conditions:
1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances,
codes and regulations.
2. All construction shall be done in strict accordance with the plans and
dimensions submitted.
3. Petitioner shall comply with all requirements of the Salem Fire
Department relative to smoke and fire safety.
4. A Building Permit is to be obtained prior to beginning construction.
5. Exterior finishes of the new addition shall be in harmony with the
existing structure.
Variances Granted
July 20, 1994
Stephen C. Touchette, Chairman
Board of Appeal
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF CHARLOTTE MADSON FOR VARIANCE
AT 2 HILLSIDE AVENUE, SALEM
page three � Z
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARSI mFTt� ir�vy
CLERK ERK•S OFlCpSS
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of
the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20
days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City
Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the
Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a
copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20
days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has
been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South
Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record
or is recorded and noted on the owners Certificate of Title.
Board of Appeal
Chi of -,5ttlem, nssuchusetts
30 -Boura of ,_.A enl
Z
9
z
a
CITY pF � 9�
Sq�
C E
if M.
Rt( MA
S pFFICESS
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF CHARLOTTE MADSON
FOR VARIANCE AT 2 HILLSIDE AVENUE (R-1)
A hearing on this petition was held July 20, 1994 with the following Board
Members present: Stephen Touchette, Chairman; Gary Barrett, Nina Cohen and
Associate Member Arthur LaBrecque. Notice of the hearing was sent to
abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in
the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws
Chapter 40A.
Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting Variance from rear setback
to allow construction of a screen porch which will be one story high.
Property is located in the R-1 district, Residential Single Family.
The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding by this
Board that:
1. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the
land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting
other lands, buildings and structures involved.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner.
3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented
at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings
of fact:
1. There was no opposition to the petition.
2. Two people spoke in favor.
3. The proposed addition of a screened porch will allow the petitioner a
fuller use of the property.
4. Due to the configuration of the lot and location of the dwelling, the
porch could not be located in any other location.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF CHARLOTTE MADSON FOR
VARIANCE AT 2 HILLSIDE AVENUE, SALEM
page two
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and o evidence presented
at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as KAS W �tE,
1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property
but not the district in general.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship to the petitioner.
3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 4-0 to grant the
variances requested, subject to the following conditions:
1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances,
codes and regulations.
2. All construction shall be done in strict accordance with the plans and
dimensions submitted.
3. Petitioner shall comply with all requirements of the Salem Fire
Department relative to smoke and fire safety.
4. A Building Permit is to be obtained prior to beginning construction.
5. Exterior finishes of the new addition shall be in harmony with the
existing structure.
Variances Granted
July 20, 1994
Stephen C. Touchette, Chairman
Board of Appeal
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF CHARLOTTE MADSON FOR VARIANCE
AT 2 HILLSIDE AVENUE, SALEM
page three c 2
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARPRDORJt¢ (
CLERK `ERKIS 0pfINASS
CF
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of
the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20
days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City
Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the
Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a
copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20
days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has
been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South
Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record
or is recorded and noted on the owners Certificate of Title.
Board of Appeal
i
DATE OF HEARING
700
PETITIONER (� 4 /
LOCATION
MOTION: TO GRANT SECOND AMENDMENT SECOND
TO DENY SECOND
TO RE-HEAR SECOND
WITHDRAW SECOND
CONTINUE SECOND
ROLL CALL PRESENT GRANT DENY AMEND WITHDRAW RE-HEAR CONTINUE
GARY M. BARRETT _
STEFL�ADY
STEPHEN TOUCHETTE
NINA V. COHEN
ASSOCIATE MEMBERS
ARTHUR LEBRECQUE
CONDITIONS:
I,zbaform\
t
-
AsPIfAG�Tz�(i=7 G��2l �i TCH
M�S�,C'7SS; ISI
G,4�STcZCNG Lb 5
YLF_,2DO�i O M,�Tcff �xis��i✓�
- mss �EAz Roof r�v�
-I ILI q
L
S_7 AL iRS
I
�V I.
t �1
�Z.[�11C1�-TT�jj-/_?�7-Cf�-�XTS77�✓�
CID NC,
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
dituIII �ai=. Rzlssc'ILITIIsgits
_
,. �IItIIII IIf tEu!
,
O THE EOARD OF APPEALS:
e Hoerr aneo represent that `.e = are -he owners .f a certain parcel or land local
2" T3iI. .s. ide Ave 'trees: Zoning Oistrict.Rl.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .:no o Crce ! ' " - =Tem=p oy ectionis ) . . . . . . . . . . . .
�assacnusetts _State nuildino Cede.
.ons c scribing the work proposed, cave peen suomittea to the inspector of Buildings in
;ccorcance with Section 1X A. 1 or the Zoning Ordinance.
To construct a ten by eighteen ( 1010" x 181011 )
Screen porch on the rear of the dwelling (one story high)
3
a
N
- Cf1
0
W
C9
LO
67 •_
The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following
reasons:
Thts screen porch would encroach upon rear
set backs ,of this already nonconforming lot , to a distance of
seven feet ( 710" ) the existing house sits approximately
seventeen feet ( 17 ' 0" ) away now.
The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem
Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to
approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said
Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary
hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero-
gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for
the following reasons:
This is already a nonconforming lot
Owner. . . . . c1lgt}o M. .":adson. . . .. . . . . . . .
Hillside
Address. . . . . P.. . . . .
Telephone. . . 508 ) 745.8462 . . . . . . . . . . . . .
same
°etitioner. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
'ddres<_ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
April 28 1994
-are. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
-i lepnone.. . ... . . . . ..... . . . ..:. .. .�. . . . . . . . . . . . .
Three copies of the application must to filed with the _Secretary of the Board of
4ppeais with a check. `or advertisina in the amount or. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
our :,eeKS prior to the meetino of the Boara of Appeals. --hecK payable to The
vernna .Jews.
h- IT•%i �
t �
S/.
FFM
W_W_W_ O
NNN
NOry I
H a sb11�+
I 1vt
SF
I a
s
N
I
I
I '
tL�.S�� E AVE�Jt�E
II
I
I
i
� ILLSIDC /-/kJ>=�JUE--
A,s tis sf�OWIJ
I
I ii
=-z-0 ti WAS TJbT t.hj SURV11
O. 3 8
a 6.5 QAC.
329
n 1.5 AC s 1
+ PLAYGROUND °`
= u
P4
LS
310
AN eu �1
SEL (,, t� 14450Go \
M 380 /
_a 36%
' Z u 367 tA
� • ON494� �. 50038s �
r
5500 6039 Z \
o i9 A p 433 0 383
• w \\ ��
` N 376 3 >
+ 0 4233 822069 0 .4480 5-�60
� 398 ./
n 'b 3��
1 1377 T 4450 -4-2311
� •o /x Jr7 , a /052B
O
0
O 40'0
x378 6260 d
a 6984 372� a 68 °
394 g 0(1 O
� S.S,f f. 5-foo 4 00 66/1 . /\
Is-X 37g 37q 373 a � ►�4�g8{{10- 30l0661
0�
u L L SIDE
ee TVI e9 as
e t}0-a BS • 561174
\ l
406 ree-e z r \/
3 6580 406 A v E.
407
9012 h R no
aN /0415
0 40$ 403
$ p O
408 Baa 404 55j0
/3270 /2349
4;I 45/1 OAZ A
4►
14681 R46 S
a,
ar C::�
of 69
HE R I T AG E 3a 8610 4
416 ° 39-C
rrir Iet
G
r� 9 6
3� Q
12828 00 119
415
,w Q\8 496 23088
t240 9�
414
23081
0
i
1
07-01-94.15 i29:29>S6812-L J UL
CITY OF SALEM
BOARD OF APPEAL
745-9595 Ext. 381
n Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter-
ested in the petition submitted by CHARLOTTE
MADSON for Variance from rear setback to allow
construction of a screen porch at 2 HILLSIDE
AVE.(R-1).Said hearing to be held WEDNESDAY,
JULY 20, 1994 AT 6:00 P.M., ONE SALEM
GREEN, second floor.
STEPHEN TOUCHETTE, Chairman
July 6, 13, 1994
.
07-01-94.15:29:29. 26812-LJ UL
CITY OF SALEM
BOARD OF APPEAL
745-9595 Ext. 381
Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter-
ested in the petition submitted by CHARLOTTE
MADSON for Variance from rear setback to allow
construction of a screen porch at 2 HILLSIDE
AVE.(R-p.Said hearing to be held WEDNESDAY,
JULY 20, 1994 AT 6:00 P.M., ONE SALEM
{ GREEN, second floor: 11'!!
�! STEPHEN TOUCHETTE, Chairman
July 6, 13, 1994 SN26812
07-01-04 15 29:29.26812-LJUL
I
` CITY OF SALEM
BOARD OF APPEAL
745-9595 Ext. 381
� Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter-
ested in the petition submitted by CHARLOTTE
MADSON for Variance from rear setback to allow
construction of a screen porch at 2 HILLSIDE
AVE.(R-1).Said hearing to be held WEDNESDAY,
�. JULY 20, 1994 AT 6:00 P.M., ONE SALEM
GREEN, second floor.
STEPHEN TOUCHETTE, Chairman
July 6, 13, 1994 SN26812
=PEA_ _-, [ NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
uiPm. ssarimmits
BBIIIII II{ _t:�rgYal
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
',e inners yned represent that ::^e is are t` e owners sf a certain parcel of land locate
2 i3iliside Ave . . . . . . .Street; Zoning DistrictTiRi.
. . . . . -no < t
_ id cartel is affeceni
a by ectiosl . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
c7e ?assacnusetts Etate Building Code.
:'fans aescribing the work proposed. ?,ave been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in
ccoraance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance.
To construct a:;ten by eighteen ( 10 , 0" x 18 ' 011 )
Screen porch on the rear of the dwelling (one story high)
n
.ry 0
CD
� L
The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following
reasons:
This screen porch would encroach upon rear
set backs -of this already nonconforming lot , to a distance of
seven feet ( 71011 ) the existing house sits approximately
seventeen feet ( 171011 ) away now.
The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem
Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to
approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said
Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary
hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero-
gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for
the following reasons:
This is already a nonconforming lot
co Owner. . . . . . . . .. . . . .. ..
2 Hillside Ave
Address. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . . . . . ...
c1� Telephone. . .50.8.). .74.5.-.846.2. . . . . .. . . . . . . .
Petitioner. . same
. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
April 28 1994 ddress . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
-ate. . . . . . . . . . . . .
feo n o n
Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of
appeais with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
rour weeKs prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The
Evening News.
C
j
❑ ❑
Ali
1 �
V;
1NOO
- h 1
'tea -b'11+
1
0
I 1 �
lLLS�� E A�VENt�E j
T4
pcT 2- t41LLSIDC 1`kU��JVE , Sr��-�'/'/�
,4 S S 1-E-O VJ
NO\E -
Sc ALE. "=20�T. - rtiC5 WAS NoT AQ IN5TRUolENT SuRVE
l< wh5 12l c t_dT41 -r/�t�E l=Ro�
suRVSy cap-)TRoL FL( oTtteks%
_PEAL 'r.:E ';''0. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .
Boar1T LT{ AFpr2I1
70 THE BOARD Of APPEALS:
_`Ie Unaersigned represent that : e is are the owners of a certain parcel of land locat,
;Z kiii1side Ave . .street; Zoning District. . . .
. . . . . . . . , R1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : ana said carte ! ; s of fec*_eo by Section1S1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.ne :lassacnusetts State Building Code.
-dans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in
;ccoroance ',jith Section 1X A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance.
To construct a ten by eighteen ( 10 ' 0" r. 18 ' 0" )
Screen porch one story high on the rear of the dwelling.
� p
b
c
En
79
�T
� tJ0
to L
The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following
reasons:
This screen porch would encroach upon the rear
set back of this nonconforming lot , to a distance of seven feet
( 71011 ) . the existing house sits approximately seventeen feet
( 171011 ) now.
The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem
Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to
approve the application fee permit to build as filed. as the enforcement of said
Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary
hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero-
gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for
the following reasons:
This is already a non conforming lot .
sCn
V� 1�__3
ui .
J a Owner. . Charlotte Madson .
.a r . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. .. . ..
"v2 Hills
Address. . . . . . . . . . . ide. . . .Ave. . . . .. . . . . . ...
Telephone: • , ( 508 ). .7.45-.8462
. . . . . . . . . . .
Petitioner. . . . . .Same . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
=.ddres<_. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
April 28 , 1994
ate. .
. . . . . . . . . . . . _e Anon . . . . . . . . . .
B . . . . . . .
Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the a rd of
Appeals .with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .
,-Our weeKs prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The
Svenina News.
- -
:� - - -
- -^ Z Z
Z .: n — —
_ � z z -
- - Z
z = - i
=i - - -
- r L '. _ — N
— n ' Z
C
� ' �
❑ ❑
�,_
w'C:_.
. . .. . . '•stiu•�..i c,;s..
. ..: 'C?gin#i._
r'v'r+n']':.
. _ ]SC.i;
.. ) � _ T � Y
.i]� i �T
r
r '
NNN G 6` 1
r.W W • l 1 1
s
NNN
NO_O
N I "
�l]t
rrr
NNN '
B
Z UI +
/ N
tLL.St'ME AVEt*3ue
�r s
G>=12TIF� T1+R41 �N� �TRU�-1'U2'` �
NNiil
•
'-I-tttS whs t3aT AQ iNSTRUmem-r SuRVe
l< Wks �� -rhPE RoM
.sc�RV7="� cou-�RoL C��( ottkes�',
}.
. §
� �
N
q
f
f
•
N
/ A t f: R� �N
�;y¢� :zY� •:r
� '
R r i
•
�'" T ro , w
i
L z ,
s
N N h
NOO
r H I
DCIV
117'+
AAA
N tVH 1 -
e --I Z:*
a �
®F
< Q
IA
S
2
1 ,
A%JeNuE
1 �vt0 OF
GE 12TtF� T1+�1 �CN� STRU�� UR� aa�+ GERALD
RALPH
MARSELLA a
I S S I T U til T4Pfl o PS-P- NM=
II ��
2 { iLLSIAv1�NUE S-,4, � f Giuw9
AS sIEowl
�L4L� „ � =20 �T. TtFIS WA5_.NoT p.tJ INSt }ZlfAteNT . SuRV�.
_ - . ..._ . l� wk5 41� c �oT+t TAPE (=2oFl
suRVEy couTRoL 3N oTtfelCS.
o � r
i 4 6.5 AC. /
0 c
N
329
f M
15 AC . �a
N
PLAYGROUND a'
saws R KW AY P,/�ll .l` f f-� io�9
P A a 310 /l
MANSE I-
IF
/4400
7 eo 360 \
60 M$ 1 -a W 0 \.i 3g 000 m °
367 Ip a 0 N494` \
5400 6039158
Z �
r m $ 409595
0 9 p
143j0
457 0 / \
9
N
3g9 In
s
`+ $ 423-4 8220 o A480 5760
1
377 70900 N $ q 50 364 311
•$
Qlkol1 P a 52 a /0328
P
0
V, N 4813 Ge wN 39 60 °
0„ 0 s 4045
6 6260 w
N
6.904 372
A-94 .$ U O
ea 374 373 a 8339 .391 3
151
•
is-X s0 ;� O
Oo
.95153 eo it
LLSIDE N° � Zo �}
113 4a '�•� 9
as , e 361 74
406 183-9
6580 406 — ° AVE, '
Q /9733 y O 76'S ° O
N 90/2 J O
Ito
-j
O
= a J� /047
"- C3 = 0 405 4p3 $ 1'
408 �',s 404 55j0 O
/3?70
/?34
e0 B 45/T
Is
4;1 O
i
n
410 412
� /7681 X645
s, 4
Boa a°Z 69
16,
las HER Ia AGE is BO10 °m
416 °
7717 39-C °
X01
41799
12800 415J19
23 Be
4Q
4/
sP a�a0 4\6 Og g ��'° OR/`
O8
P0 /
2308/
II
BOARD OF ASSESSORS PAGE:
CITY HALL
IT,
5
ue, .... . ..
2
CE,
RTIFIt& 3A UTTt S,
3 ............. 4
•
4 ...... ...... 5
SUBJECT PROPERTY: MAP, 15 LOT: 0390 SUFF. 6
PROPERTY ADDRESS: 0002 HILLSIDE AVENUE 1 0
X� )'r'TF a
ASSESSE)"I n1aftir-p mA n C
'-777777777777,,
7 .............
............ ........
.............
..........
..............
..........
IMAILING-ADDRE, •
-66IFF— . .... 12
0 MA42't�g 10, 1 13
:
4
:1, 15 0390 0002, HILLSIDE AVE14UE MADSEN CHARLOTTE C 2 HILLSIDE AVENUE 5
MA p.i27n
15
�%...............6 .
. 0068PROCTOR .... ...
...... ....... 17
66"'PROCTOR, STREET
3
............ .�: �.:S.T%
EE
:4 SALEM MA.,
15 67E�' PROGT loll I
9�
15
n 12RCXTC)P, 1; 21
16 21
ANNE R SALEM MA 01970 22
IS 15 0387 0072 PROCTOR STREET GILLOOLY JOHN J 72 PROCTOR ST 23
",: .......................... ...... Gil&—j- \1 r+c M e+In A U---- ......... PIA ...... 24
19 ................. .............. 25
'1S 038$ : 007 T' '14' 'STREET,'� -4�111
�60%�IMIN GSo� Jo"AN' B
..........
•
20 . t
�SXA4.
L..'R.'T.
.. .M
A
01970
1� : 26
2128
22
29
•23
JOANNE P SALEM IIA 01970
o
24 15 0391 0004 HILLSIDE AVENUE DIMARZIO SUSAN H P 0 BOX 459 '
mrm--t X 3�
25
qVIE 4:CJ-IARLE'S,, ............... o....... ........... 3• 3
lN, T.5 DE.%AVENUE,, 4 -.4
..........
26 oll.... o
34
,.,SALEht MA
"'o,.......1� 3
5
EBRA.�,A,"," ........ ..
AVE 3.
27 N AV
....... o,o o l M Al E I I 111
28 SALEM MA 01970 37
29 36
15 0394 0004 LOONEY AVENUE FOUHEY ROBERT E 4 LOONE., AVE 39
30 -- K4 RAI EM MA 0-19711
....................... I
, ,, 11 X 4
..........
31
15 777
0 FE{ 1%X S,, ........
39 ........
b 0 O'�, LOONEY N�EY
•3 - l
.................... ............ 4
................ .... .. .................. e':4
2 -- , - -,";SAI'E�,, MX U-1 97U,', ......l,..........
•
.......... ........... .... ..
33 ........... ...... .............
41
34 451
35 46i
471
36 481
37 ..... ........ ......... .......
41
50 •3
51
40 53
•41 •
:4
5
42 56
57
43
•
............
5B
59
'o
45 2l .........
..........
46 61
0 47 •
:2
3
48 64
......... ........ ........ ......... ...... 7777 ..... ......
49 ...... ......... 65
6
50
67
............l.
......................
51 ea
52 69
53 70
71
54 Pik W, 72
55 ....... ......
Mr," CA
3
56
............. ...
4
1 ......
A 5
17
71