405-427 HIGHLAND AVENUE - ZBA cIUS''i1� I-��gklo-� �e.c -
� � «��� /
oNmra� CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
BOARD OF APPEAL
.e
120 WASHINGTON STREET, 3RD FLOOR
SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970
9�re TELEPHONE: 978-745-9595 ..
W� FAX: 978-740-9846 1012 APR 25 P 3: 29
KIMBERLEY DRISCOLL
MAYOR - FILE #
CITY CLERK. SALEM.MASS,
April 25, 2012
Decision to Extend
City of Salem Zoning Board of Appeals
Petition of PAUL FERRAGAMO seeking Variances from minimum lot area,
minimum lot width/frontage, and minimum depth of front yard to allow
for a proposed subdivision for eleven (11) single-family house lots at 405-
427 Highland Avenue, Salem, MA (R-1 Zoning District).
On Wednesday, March 16, 2011, the Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Salem voted
in favor to approve the application of Paul Ferragamo for Variances to allow for a
proposed subdivision for eleven (11) single-family house lots at 405-427 Highland
Avenue, Salem, MA (R-1 Zoning District). A Decision dated March 24, 2011 was filed
with the City of Salem Clerk's Office on March 24, 2011, and such Decision is recorded
with the Essex South District Registry of Deeds in Book 30354, Page 289 (the
"Decision").
The Decision is valid for one year from the date of the Decision unless extended by the
Board.
On March 21, 2012, the Salem Zoning Board of Appeals extended the Variances granted
on March 24, 2011 for six (6) months to September 23, 2012 by a vote of 5-0 (Rebecca
Curran, Bonnie Belair, Annie Harris, Jamie Metsch and Rick Dionne in favor, none
opposed).
A COPY OF THIS DECISION TO EXTEND HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD
AND THE CITY CLERK.
Rebecca Curran, Chair
Salem Zoning Board of Appeals
.N
RONAN, SEGAL & HARRINGTON
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
FIFTY-NINE FEDERAL STREET
JAMES T.RONAN(1922-1987) SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS 01970-3470
JACOB S.SEGAL
MARY PIEMONTE HARRINGTON
GEORGE W.ATKINS, III
GREGORY R.RICHARD TEL(978)744-0350
FAX(978)744-7493 FILE NO.F-509.1
OF COUNSEL
JOHN H.RONAN
MICHAEL J.ESCHELBACHER
February 13, 2012
Zoning Board of Appeals
City of Salem
120 Washington Street, 3rd Floor
Salem, MA 01970
ATTN: Danielle McKnight
RE: Variance dated March 24, 2011
405-427 Highland Avenue, Salem
Dear Ms. McKnight:
In accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A Section 10, Paul
Ferragamo hereby requests a six month extension of his right to exercise the above
referenced Variance Decision. For your convenience, a copy of the Decision is
included herewith.
Please see to assignment of this matter to the Board's agenda for the meeting of
March 21, 2012.
Enclosed for filing with regard to the above-captioned location are ten (10) copies of a
Very�truly yours,
G e W. Atkins, III
GWA/dap
Enclosure
1
VA C7
CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
e Pq BOARD OF APPEAL
120 WASHINGTON STREET. 3RD FLOOR
.� SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970
TELEPHONE: 978.745-9595
FAX: 978-740.9846 1
KIMBERLE YOR ISCOLL 2CI1 hf,1R 2Q P 1:
Cil Y
March 24, 2011 III� IIIIIII�III�� IIIIIIIII�IIIIIIIIIII
_Decision 2011041500535 800354 Pg:289
04/15/2011 03:38 VAR P9 1/3
City of Salem Zoning Board of Appeals
Petition of PAUL FERRAGAMO seeking Variances from minimum lot area,
minimum lot width/frontage, and minimum depth of front yard to allow for a
proposed subdivision for eleven (11)single-family house lots at 405-427 Highland
Avenue, Salem, MA(R-1 Zoning District).
A public hearing on the above Petition was opened on March 16, 2011 pursuant to Mass
General Law Ch. 40A, §§ 11. The meeting was closed on March 16, 2011 with the
following Zoning Board of Appeals members present: Rebecca Curran,Elizabeth
Debski, Richard Dionne, Bonnie Belair(alternate) and James Tsitsinos (alternate).
Petitioner seeks variances pursuant to the Salem Zoning Ordinance, §4.1.1: Table of
Dimensional Requirements.
Statements of fact:
I. Attorney George Atkins presented the petition on behalf of the petitioner, who
owns the property.
2. In a petition date-stamped December 22, 2010, the applicant requested variances
from minimum lot area, minimum lot width/frontage, and minimum front yard
depth.
3. The property, the site of a single-family home, currently has the address of 419
Highland Avenue. 405-427 Highland Avenue is the applicant's proposed street
numbering after subdivision.
4. The Board of Appeals had granted relief for a similar plan on April 15, 2009.
However, the Attorney Atkins stated that the Massachusetts Department of
Transportation, which has jurisdiction over Route 107/Highland Avenue, would
not approve the site entrance as previously configured, and so they are proposing
a relocated site entrance. Attorney Atkins stated that this change caused the
reconfiguration of the house lots, with minor changes in the relief needed.
2
5. At the hearing, two residents spoke in support of the project, both stating their
preference for the reconfigured site driveway. No one spoke in opposition.
6. At its meeting on March 16,2011, the Board of Appeal voted five(5) in favor and
none(0)opposed to grant Variances from dimensional requirements to allow for
the redevelopment of the site as proposed in the plan titled "ZBA Submittal:
Subdivision Plan, Locus.Plan for 11 Residential Lots for a site at#405-427
Highland Ave., Salem, Massachusetts,".dated October 22, 2010, and prepared by
Patrowicz Land Development Engineering and North Shote Survey Corporation.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the public
hearing, and after thorough review of the.plans and petition submitted, makes the
following findings:
1. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good
and without nullifying.or substantially derogating from the.intent or purpose of
the zoning ordinance. Board members expressed that they felt this was a well
thought out project that could potentially increase property values in the area.
Additionally,they noted that changes from the previously approved plan were
better for neighbors and that the new site driveway, including the proposed traffic
light, were an improvement over the original plan.
2. The applicant may vary the terms of the Residential One-Family District to
construct the proposed development, which is consistent with the intent and
purpose of the City of Salem Zoning Ordinance.
3. in permitting such change,the Board of Appeals requires certain appropriate
conditions and safeguards as noted below.
On the basis of the above findings of fact and all evidence presented at the public hearing
including, but not limited to,the Plans,Documents and testimony, the Zoning Board of
Appeals concludes:
1. To allow for the redevelopment of the site as proposed, the requested Variances
from dimensional requirements are granted.
in consideration of the above, the Salem Board of Appeals voted, five (5) in favor
(Curran,Debski,Belair,Tsitsmos and Dionne) and none(0)opposed, to grant petitioner's
requests for Variances subject to the following terms,conditions,and safeguards:
1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes,ordinances, codes and
regulations.
2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted to and
approved by the Building Commissioner.
3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety
shall be strictly adhered to.
a
3
4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to beginning any construction.
5. A Certificate of Occupancy is to be obtained.
6. Petitioner shall obtain street numbering from the City of Salem Assessor's Office
and shall display said numbers so as to be visible from the street.
7. Petitioner is to obtain approval from any City Board or Commission having
jurisdiction including, but not limited to the Planning Board.
mptJc
Elizabeth Debskt,
Salem Zoning Board of Appeals
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
Appeal from this decision,if any,shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts General Laws
Chapter 40A,and shall be filed within 20 days of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk.
Pursuant to the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A,Section 11, the Variance or Special Pemnt
granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certificate of the City Clerk has
been filed with the Essex South Registry of Deeds.
Date APR 1 4 2014
� 1 heroby c Jiv 7.0 days have expired
„p frcr� ' c '`r i1trument was received,
.G `49 1" aru that has been filed in this
/o,'" / r office.
A True COPY
t r ATTEST:_CiYY C12ERK, Salem, Mass.
•. 1
COND17A.gd CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
BOARD OF APPEAL
120 WASHINGTON STREET, 3RD FLOOR
SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970
TELEPHONE: 978-745-9595
DOS FAX: 978-740-9846
KIMBERLEY DRISCOLL q ^
MAYOR 200 `il,00 24 E^'-' l: ' ! '
�.L t
C',P, i` t
March 24, 2011
Decision
City of Salem Zoning Board of Appeals
Petition of PAUL FERRAGAMO seeking Variances from minimum lot area,
minimum lot width/frontage, and minimum depth of front yard to allow for a
proposed subdivision for eleven (11) single-family house lots at 405-427 Highland
Avenue, Salem, MA (R-1 Zoning District).
A public hearing on the above Petition was opened on March 16, 2011 pursuant to Mass
General Law Ch. 40A, §§ 11. The meeting was closed on March 16, 2011 with the
following Zoning Board of Appeals members present: Rebecca Curran, Elizabeth
Debski, Richard Dionne, Bonnie Belair (alternate) and James Tsitsinos (alternate).
Petitioner seeks variances pursuant to the Salem Zoning Ordinance, §4.1.1: Table of
Dimensional Requirements.
Statements of fact:
1. Attorney George Atkins presented the petition on behalf of the petitioner, who
owns the property.
2. In a petition date-stamped December 22, 2010, the applicant requested variances
from minimum lot area, minimum lot width/frontage, and minimum front yard
depth.
3. The property, the site of a single-family home, currently has the address of 419
Highland Avenue. 405-427 Highland Avenue is the applicant's proposed street
numbering after subdivision.
4. The Board of Appeals had granted relief for a similar plan on April 15, 2009.
However, the Attorney Atkins stated that the Massachusetts Department of
Transportation, which has jurisdiction over Route 107/Highland Avenue, would
not approve the site entrance as previously configured, and so they are proposing
a relocated site entrance. Attorney Atkins stated that this change caused the
reconfiguration of the house lots, with minor changes in the relief needed.
2
5. At the hearing, two residents spoke in support of the project, both stating their
preference for the reconfigured site driveway. No one spoke in opposition.
6. At its meeting on March 16, 2011, the Board of Appeal voted five (5) in favor and
none (0) opposed to grant Variances from dimensional requirements to allow for
the redevelopment of the site as proposed in the plan titled "ZBA Submittal:
Subdivision Plan, Locus Plan for 11 Residential Lots for a site at#405-427
Highland Ave., Salem, Massachusetts," dated October 22, 2010, and prepared by
Patrowicz Land Development Engineering and North Shore Survey Corporation.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the public
hearing, and after thorough review of the plans and petition submitted, makes the
following findings:
1. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good
and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent or purpose of
the zoning ordinance. Board members expressed that they felt this was a well
thought out project that could potentially increase property values in the area.
Additionally, they noted that changes from the previously approved plan were
better for neighbors and that the new site driveway, including the proposed traffic
light, were an improvement over the original plan.
2. The applicant may vary the terms of the Residential One-Family District to
construct the proposed development, which is consistent with the intent and
purpose of the City of Salem Zoning Ordinance.
3. In permitting such change, the Board of Appeals requires certain appropriate
conditions and safeguards as noted below.
On the basis of the above findings of fact and all evidence presented at the public hearing
including, but not limited to, the Plans, Documents and testimony, the Zoning Board of
Appeals concludes:
1. To allow for the redevelopment of the site as proposed, the requested Variances
from dimensional requirements are granted.
In consideration of the above, the Salem Board of Appeals voted, five (5) in favor
(Curran, Debski, Belair, Tsitsinos and Dionne) and none (0) opposed, to grant petitioner's
requests for Variances subject to the following terms, conditions, and safeguards:
1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances, codes and
regulations.
2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted to and
approved by the Building Commissioner.
3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety
shall be strictly adhered to.
3
4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to beginning any construction.
5. A Certificate of Occupancy is to be obtained.
6. Petitioner shall obtain street numbering from the City of Salem Assessor's Office
and shall display said numbers so as to be visible from the street.
7. Petitioner is to obtain approval from any City Board or Commission having
jurisdiction including, but not limited to the Planning Board.
Elizabeth Debski,
Salem Zoning Board of Appeals
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts General Laws
Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk.
Pursuant to the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the Variance or Special Permit
granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certificate of the City Clerk has
been filed with the Essex South Registry of Deeds.
A
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
PETITION FORM
�pot�orrj� CITY OF SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS 2010 KC 22 ?: E13
sµ3 t' 120 WASHINGTON STREET,Sao FLOOR
zk ' SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS 01970 t I
Danielle McKnight,Staff Planner Thomas St.Pierre,Building Inspector
� Ifylry�_♦ `�: t.978-619-5685/f.978-740-0404 t.978-619-5641/f.978-740-9846
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
The Undersigned represent that he/she is/are the owners of a certain parcel of land located at:
U-P
Address: 405—AO Highland Avenue Zoning District: R-1
An application is being submitted to the Board of Appeal for the following reason(s): This statement must
describe what you propose to build, the dimensions, the zone property is in, and the zoning requirements. Example.
lam proposing to construct a 10'x 10'one story addition to my home located at 3 Salem Lane, in the R-2 Zoning
District. The Zoning Ordinance requires the minimum depth of the rear yard to be 30 feet. The current depth of my
rear yard is 32 feet; the proposed addition would reduce the depth of the rear yard to 22 feet.
Massachusetts Highway requires the relocation of the Highland Avenue
entrance to this previously approved eleven (11) lot single family home
subdivision. The relocated entrance results in revised lot area and lot
width/frontage dimensions as shown on the statement attached hereto
The previous decision of the Board is attached hereto.
For this reason I am requesting:
O Variance(s)from provisions of Section 4.0 of the Zoning Ordinance,specifically from minimum lot
Area; minimum Lot Width/Frontage; and
Minimum Depth Front Yard (i.e. minimum depth ofrearyard).
What is allowed is 15,000 SF/100' /15' (ft?sq ft?stories? %?), and what I
amproposingis variablecarea and width and (ft?sgft?stories? W).
7.5 foot front yard depth
O A Special Permit under Section of the Zoning Ordinance in order to
O Appeal of the Decision of the Building Inspector(described below):
The Current Use of the Property Is; Are the lot dimensions included on the plan? .
(example: Two Family Home) Single Family Home (x)Yes O No n/a because
and vacant land
The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the teens of the Salem Zoning Ordinance and allow
the project to be constructed as per the plans submitted,as the enforcement of said Zoning By-Laws would involve
practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially
derogating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance.
, 1
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
PETITION FORM
The following written statement has been submitted with this application:
(g)For all Variance requests a written Statement of Hardship demonstrating the following must be attached:
a) Special conditions and circumstances that especially affect the land,building,or stricture involved,
generally not affecting other lands,buildings,and structures in the same district;
b) Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance would involved substantial hardship to the
applicant;and -
c) Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good,and without nullifying or
substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the ordinance.
( )For all Special Permit requests a Statement of Grounds must be attached. An application for a special permit for
a nonconforming use or structure shall include a statement demonstrating how the proposed change shall not be
substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood in accordance with Art.V,
§ 5-3. Such a statement should include reference to the following criteria:
a) Social,economic,or community needs served by the proposal;
b) Traffic flow and safety,including parlang and loading;
c) Adequacy of utilities and other public services;
d) Impacts on the natural environment,including drainage;
e) Neighborhood character; and
I) Potential fiscal impact,including impact on City tax base and employment.
Previous applications to the Board of Appeals involving this property have been submitted with this petition
form. The Building Commissioner can provide documentation ofprevious applications to the petitioner or his
representative.
If different from petitioner:
Petitioner: Paul Ferragamo Property Owner:
419 Highland Avenue
Address:Sal am MA 01 q70 Address:
Telephone: Telephone:
Signator - Signature(Attached consent letter is also acceptable)
a2
-[a
Date Date
If different from petitioner:
ATRUE Representative: Attorney George W. Atkins, III
ATTEST 59 Federal Street
Address:Salem MA 01 q7n
Tele8-744 350
Si e
Date
DATE SUBMITTED TO
BOARD OF APPEALS:
CITY CLERK
This original application must be filed with the City Clerle
STATEMENT
I. Dimensional Variances Requested:
Lot Area SF Width FT Frontage (FT) Front Yard (FT)
1 9,393 7.5
2 8,195 38.92 35.13 7.5
3 6,216 78.62 74.91 7.5
4 6,736 90.16 90.04 7.5
5 7,043 -- 7.5
6 6,910 67.43 66.87 7.5
7 6,914 92.08 7.5
8 6,523 83.55 81.93 7.5
9 6,143 87.27 86.79 7.5
10 6,406 87.17 87.05 7.5
11 9,312 -- 7.5
II. The land is located on Highland Avenue on a steep slope consisting of large
quantities of ledge, which constitute special conditions not generally affecting the
zoning district. A traditional subdivision would result in a maximum of six (6) lots,
all fronting directly on Highland Avenue with substantial ledge removal required,
such that site development costs would exceed marketable prices for the lots.
Thus, literal enforcement of the ordinance would result in substantial hardship to
the petitioner in that it is not economically feasible or likely that the land can be
used for single-family homes as intended by the zoning district. The proposed
use as a twelve-lot single-family neighborhood can be accomplished with smaller
lot sizes and lot widths, and front yard setbacks, and the dimensional relief can
be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and will not only not
nullify the intent of the zoning district, but enable use of the land in accordance
with that intent.
N� V\Cl
.y ; 817 CITY OF SALEM MASSACHUSETTS
/ Y' BOARD OF APPEAL
120 WASHINGTON STREET, 3RD FLOOR
l ' SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970
�' ♦ TELEPHONE: 978.745.9595
>� FAX: 978-740-9846
KIMBERLEY DRISCOLL 1009
MAY -b A 10' 3q
MAYOR
FILE tt
CITY CLERK, SALEM. MASS
May 4, 2009 1111111111 Ill 1111111111111111111111111111111 Ill
Decision 2009061800356 Bk:28702 Pg:107
06/1812009 11:40 VAR P9 113
City of Salem Zoning Board of Appeals
Petition of PAUL FERRAGAMO,seeking variances from minimum lot area,
minimum lot width, and minimum depth of front yard to allow for a proposed
subdivision for twelve (12) single-family homes at 405-427 HIGHLAND AVENUE,
Salem, MA (111 zoning district).
A public hearing on the above Petition was opened on February 18,2009 pursuant to
Mass General Law Ch. 40A, §§ 11. The meeting was closed on April 15, 2009 with the
following Zoning Board of Appeals members present: Rebecca Curran, Annie Harris,
Richard Dionne, and Jimmy Tsitsinos (alternate).
Petitioner seeks variances pursuant to the Salem Zoning Ordinance, §64, Table 1:
Residential Density Regulations.
Statements of fact:
1. Attorney George Atkins presented the petition on behalf of the petitioner, who
owns the property.
2. In a petition dated January 26, 2009, the applicant requested variances from
minimum area and minimum front yard depth required by the zoning ordinance;
seven of the lots had less than the minimum lot width required. Relief is
requested as a prerequisite to a petition to the Planning Board to subdivide the
property into twelve single-family house lots.
3. The property, the site of a single-family home, currently has the address of 419
Highland Avenue. 405-427 Highland Avenue is the applicant's proposed street
numbering after subdivision.
4. A public hearing on the above mentioned Petition was opened on February 18,
2009 pursuant to Mass General Law Ch. 40A, §§ 11. Following the hearing on
February 18, 2009, an amended petition was submitted. The public hearing was
continued to March 18, 2009 and April 15, 2009. The public hearing was closed
on April 15, 2009 with the following Zoning Board of Appeals members present:
Rebecca Curran, Annie Harris, Jimmy Tsitsinos(alternate) and Richard Dionne.
2
5. Opposition to the project and the relief sought was voiced by several members of
the public; concerns included density,traffic congestion, property values and
drainage. Members of the Board also expressed concern about density and about
the proximity of one of the proposed houses to the abutter's property at 403
Highland Ave.
6. Following comment from the public hearing on February 18, 2009, the applicant
submitted a revised plan on March 10, 2009 showing eleven(11)houses instead
of the originally proposed twelve(12), and with a landscaped buffer area between
403 Highland Avenue and the proposed house closest to that property. The
applicant appeared before the Board again on April 15, 2009 and presented the
revised application.
7. At its meeting on April 15, 2009, the Board of Appeal voted four(4) in favor and
none (0) opposed to grant Variances to allow from dimensional requirements to
allow for the redevelopment of the site as proposed in the revised plan titled"Site
Plan Layout Geometry at 0405-427 Highland Ave., Salem,Massachusetts," dated
January 14, 2009 and revised March 2, 2009, by Patrowicz Land Development
Engineering.
8. At the hearing, Board members noted that the applicant had made the changes the
Board requested. Board members also commented that the design,which allowed
the new driveways to front onto a new street rather than onto Highland Avenue,
was better solution for the City in terms of safety and traffic management, and
also noted that such a design would be more costly than building a smaller
number of homes on lots that did not require dimensional relief because of the
expense of building a street. Difficulties in the developing the property given the
amount of ledge present were also noted.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the public
hearing, and after thorough review of the plans and petition submitted, makes the
following findings:
1. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good
and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent or purpose of
the zoning ordinance.
2. The applicant may vary the terms of the Residential One-Family District to
construct the proposed development,which is consistent with the intent and
purpose of the City of Salem Zoning Ordinance.
3. In permitting such change,the Board of Appeals requires certain appropriate
conditions and safeguards as noted below.
On the basis of the above findings of fact and all evidence presented at the public hearing
including,but not limited to, the Plans, Documents and testimony, the Zoning Board of
Appeals concludes:
3
1. To allow for the redevelopment of the site as proposed, the requested Variances
from dimensional requirements are granted.
In consideration of the above,the Salem Board of Appeals voted, four(4) in favor
(Curran,Harris, Tsitsinos and Dionne) and none(0) opposed, to grant petitioner's
requests for a variance and special permit subject to the following terms, conditions,
and safeguards:
1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances, codes and
regulations.
2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted to and
approved by the Building Commissioner,subject to any minor changes required
by the Salem Historical Commission.
3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety
shall be strictly adhered to.
4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to beginning any construction.
5. A Certificate of Occupancy is to be obtained.
6. A Certificate of Inspection is to be obtained.
7. Petitioner shall obtain street numbering from the City of Salem Assessor's Office
and shall display said numbers so as to be visible from the street.
8. Petitioner is to obtain approval from any City Board or Commission having
jurisdiction including,but not limited to the Planning Board.
chard Dionne
Salem Zoning Board of Appeals
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
Appeal from this decision,if any,shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts General Laws
Chapter 40A,and shall be filed within 20 days of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk.
Pursuant to the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A,Section 11,the Variance or Special Pemtit
granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certificate of the City Clerk has
been filed with the Essex South Re isiry of Deeds.
Date u_ l„r;��n011
I hereby certify that 20 days have aq*od
from the date this instrument was reeghled,
and that NO APPEAL has been Bled In this
office.
A True Copy 1, �`
ZBA S SUBDIVISION PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 . LOCUS PLAN
FOR A SITE AT
2. LAYOUT GEOMETRY
#40 .5=427 Highland Avenue 3. EARTHWORK/GRADING
SALEM , MASS .
OCTOBER 22, 2010
Y
9L 3 +
f MP9EtlUE ` ❑ + x
O
r � � m r ❑ o! W fdgR
O In ¢ Ro
a M A § +
m m o 9
i p
3 .
t- o +�,�� NOTES
N qCf'
1.DaHs Is s<M A55®OY
He SNFL S YM NS 1 IO14. n NO M ILILS fA515 wTfLN
Ll 11E R-1 ZONING IMTHWT NI
NO p1xNtlZ COCaDUI
42/ UVdA0 Is.12 IO£S
Uf O O O= ¢ ¢ z ooslYlc Ololy¢rRwivNx wo.1 uc rm,.c1uwL mn s.Mcv 19saa[n xx NwM sIQE smcv ms..aotwn n.Sen
m ..P`' ♦ O ! i rrmFan uc xuTTm1�
N
a tvR COURT RAM nsxn.UAZ 1z/sD/.s,n ..oxmu "M
c lM0 O]RT ftNl nW.DAZ]/to/.r.rlID wrN OFri1 w blit
(V 2"O saw / 94A, • O ulo mRr wn nsw.wTm 0CLIOENT run wTx m(mua essm.
p 1P s,P` /-/J fs i E wo mRr rmlFure esea oaaaenr nr.n.
- c v.R cartr axmure R.Daa Don11RNr ay..ee.
O ?ati /� O ,p n uro mRr ww nsm.wnn s/u/x.nm rm mnfrwrt lllev.
lip f d N � w ns ww oa5 Ile r mnwl¢wlx att°r swm zn.c Dvtinc(miswK vwawus ws R[amnl
V E
M +
o !
01 ♦ O
U-1 ! /�
o _
o I
< N
r ¢ ! NOTE: THIS LOCUS PIAN WAS SCANNED FROM THE
0 SITE O C/�5�\ CITY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT'S GIS DATA BASE.
Q ❑ O O (/ THIS LACUS PLAN IS NOT TO SCALE AND SHALL NOT
BE USED TO DETERMINE ACTUAL PROPERTY LINES,
STREET LAYOUT AND/OR ACTUAL BUILDING LOCATIONS.
�O /� THIS LOCUS PIAN IS INTENDED FOR GRAPHIC
_ \(�!/-� !" J �\ PURPOSESS ONLY TO SHOW THE PROJECT SITE IN
z��� JI o
RELATIONSHIP M AT[ONSHie8 GENERAL NEIGHBORHOOD.
�`§J+ p, O 9 APPROXIMATE GRAPHIC SCALE
Q a
^ o- m
LL Aeeoo Q 'rs 1 RICH- T Rp rm
aE Qp eO O ! T i-iiS PLAN HAS BEEN
! O o ¢ REDUCED FROM THE OPaRCI !AL
THE SCALE OF THIS PLAN IS:
art ?ADOr� ! .
J E ` ¢
\ ,
O CN 4 �! ! ! ¢ • ✓ �8Pµt45 OIINHt/D6Y®DP612: 02SCOT s9 R CONSTRUCTION. PLANS FOR PERMITTING PIIRPO1t.' ONLY
ea- sT ! ruu rem PATI WICZ m
O ¢ O! Ol�n.' II�.n.°"A—UE.sueA.
!L I»n1 1 1 0
Z \ 1 S _ ¢ I Me
AT'ICIRNEYS xANwxsron -
Q 1 a e T,pff s0 reozz s�Reer. sura. "0
n
nal H.. Oxa
W I O ARCHITECT: NO. DATE DESC]>P11p1
NANxr
Oaf [9 oo49P P != o s o ! oo
OI ! P o# 0 - �0,HNI xrrMNu t emg°«eF,nE°Tu
B,ri te.ese
1ASR
u°
°eCRN` ZBA SUBMIT
TAL.
ENGINEER:
sDn rarxOna.r.e
r;.rxY"�
a
FIELD SURVEYOR:
SUBDIVISION PLAN
(AIIT . RRLLOCUS PLAN
Her.
S...SUxvev'...ren
n.... S.eel.Suez. ..I.1. for
TRAFFLC ENGINEER: 11 RESIDENTIAL LOTS
9 V A 3 1. .tHu me for a site at
IU X Y U tlU]INti11 CelrtFll tlK
>w�`x:q1"-1°tltl #405-427 Highland Ave.
! __ _ r.
Salem, Massachusetts
U) = O - APPROVAL UNDER SUBDMSION
a : P roe o=t
CONTROL LAN REQUIRED:
SALEM PLANNING BOARD 1'i or Ye9-sa s�m0: I mea
zz. zolo
" iao' 1 „ v
♦e of "Z/
Land Owner. Paul Ferragamo
N I 9L 419 W6GMud Awnub 8 m YA DIM
¢ ! PATROWICZ
N LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING
3 } 14 f3raxnStreet. Salem. MA 01910
(978) BM 6400
C
U
No
E I g
3 € 9^ Ia e1n.n street, soicn, ua 01910MTE (97e) 744-4806
O
7
U
BARNES CIRCLE #22 �-
iBARNES CIRCLE
MAP 3
I
HAY. !R I ��I � � YAP 9. LOT 6F v CLARK JIa{00/
1\
#�� I , LC 6915I/JIB
MAP
°6LYALLH
I YIP y /O1 Te
I \ I6.WI0l�
BARNES CIRCLE /• 11!!WR>t ;
Fq/lLrr N°Ylxss ./
i aeALrr rw/sr I #14 I BL��✓lJP
YAP 9, LflT 99 \
I 662/I/S/g pA#1 MNS CI d•LE
1VR/A °F/1lLI., I #I V I H V I20
Y, (aT 82 1#
Lr „p2n11 BARNas CIRCUS i BARNES CIRCLE j BARNESBArC,RCLS #5
04 YAT°REALTY TRII.ST
I PYAP LOT%° I':1, lUf 4p y'EA6�ta
II a,R6Rk® j 4C T2TII/929 I l.! fiOfin SIlli I \ �\ Ce ApV MrpOyH• \ ^ 1\ ���(�]f
6,8603ia j i •\ ,\ 4NOA'NFMY NI?uA°,IY3KOIYa / " ,,py// � \
YAY A. 11/>fl CLARK STREET
I LC AT6/I/266 /- /gHLNT l/T
r� �o—y� 1a010e9r `\ / 0.waw+a / L. o Lm
114
I
/i K
- CLARE STREET -
\ AsrrREr nA6HYANx
340' �.lt"M ` MA 1. n
0 1" LOT #2 ez�►��z9sa �sTO 009 �� 96A/9fl -�
Lar AREA-alga:o _ \ is LOT #6 Ea 6oaWks m i
a1 .RE.�,a103v 1#435
C3 I rmxr�ics=ss is 1 LOT #3 1u.9�__ '^� +• sa" �I lm ruvre .4s' _ a•a$ \, IUAND AVENUE
------ y _ _ �q�.'
_ # reoxrsss=ae er
1 ` I loY wfD1H a?&eR' E LOT 4 IP.TA• �� a„ �\ 6 YAP"A. rmTsrnNx LP
I \ \ lam PR9NTIrd=4LR1 ar Aeu a,vse:sr \ wn �� PARCEL I LK 6d98A Affi
� far Wf1MH=ao.le' LOT 5 t SNOW SroOlaes% neemeD ca&ss�mrr
I^ :3 fmOrrrecE=ao.w' ml # , '3 \
I I I e R far efOAl,0483bT
AREA = 6,06Ti:� \
D — W nR YAK➢ "',A 'pi.
I m LO'r Wmre=l00.0a' NOTE: ALJ.aaUNAGft STRIIL GHS O O
b I PRONiAGH=l09.M' _ M$ l `n l
I II' \iJ 2 n \J 1` SYS'RC MS.ICATGG NAME., m-}O
.O
o ° �Im ` ` m \ ; \
y,0 ^ \ P6RCR I \ /� \ SNAIL. PR{rPP.NA E.GTAINHD
N #401 I tbH \6ya \ ,A ' ' p o f �` I `S O \ BY NUYRollst R'S ASSgC1ATION.
C) I ROGLAND AVENUE - PO a ��1� vt L=Tawas• �I
SAWEL CAVE I 403 ,P• L '�- 1 Al
ED I YAP s. /M TA # 1
OO __J!�� I 10.R$1aR+s Ie•.ajP si I•0 HIGL . -:'LOT #1 x-ss4so' LL_ NPoa
-r'I PoRCa \I ��_ •� , I. \ ! i s M1sTo - s.as"
.�
ss4•ss•o•WN " KUIfar R =9,993±f
IM Wmra=l4G.11l % 1, 47
PRUNAGE=lz9.4eC 1U66a \
r
v 'ROAD
10
1
a) j2111111lift itaftIGHT OF A — !
N "oY69 i
co
NI I ' I / !• a ASK` _ t�Y _
d _ i POWsI o � ° .yer/ it .9.i iso• a=
II 1 I Y'�/•' � �y I—_- =aT.oa• t �a �zw� Ty,.t=a" la' �—Id �•
I
n - _ -RONT YARD SE iBPCK-]5 � —�-� � ay�0_♦ 29
LOT #11 1\g N ITaa• P9RCR x -- - I
1 T IE!-
T. 4 / I far AaEA=a,slztsE f m !AQ ,V, JWJU.AND AVENUE
Q �" /bA•$ ¢I IaI Wmra=l6B.aD' I a $s 10.0' H ��
N --- I __ / l / (meweral Art front eeM.ak 11Y0) i>I� P nl.^ `� S I I B0.4T°NSTFSAT FEALTY.
J L '+r/ �I PRONrece=lea.ae• w gl^ t t \ l ' Psno J YAP.f. roTrr, ISA
1E W /' ma..a as .L Ta.a R.ow.. Yat mw. Parvo 9 : a z LOT 7 xr.AR rano
3 11M,_•� m N Yf.na ci
e.Y. Ro.w. — - ro A PmO J # sa'
v �'• o afa ) --�.. L___ _- PNNf1 _J �p�. --�'�'�� /'// lot AREA=e,au:� �1 rBAEK= « I I te,erstsP
2 % �Y SNOW STORAGR, \ REAR YARD _ 3 = REAR YIP11 P1�R) q o 0 REAR YARD fa'r' WIVra=a2.0e' 1
M YAO s I SETBACK=30'
3 _ .Y_< sETBncR m- z LOT #8 ]FRONT(naeannonalGE 10 t...t aa.ek ate)
_�k`.!e oRAfrecR aks�7P SErenl:• '
71.1Y• ARRA=a.lao�v EAesraLl LOT #10 I 1m AREe=e.6zs:� \ ]FRONTAGE=-106.1117'
SIPl/_!�w► I.aa1'wWn �._._. e9.Rr-- 1 loT ARRA=6,aa6�o LOT #9 LOT Wm1R�m• (ma t Anvo .L Il 0.o.W., Yat md.
L`�. - N:I W far wmrR=ar.1Y R 1 rm eRu=a,l4ss� 1 rRONrACR=eI.m'—_ �- xa.W.l
_IIJ Far � _ _ i¢oraecc=azo6' far ►mis=ex.zx' — 1
_ / I FYON'rAGR=66.'N• 1� 9t Is _
❑ -- P I. =].BI' All
1 1 Aw All.
Z 11-1dL = GCUI' R = 1958.00'
Q
lop
ce srauL-ruNes. CULTHCaABINS. 6rCIRLY YNN'TNNHaS ASSOCIATION.
= HIGHLAND AVENUE (ROUTE 107) NORTHBOUND
- --
Q
I _
W — — THIS PLAN HAS BEEN
UI #392 REDUCED FROM THE ORIGINAL
E HIGHLAND AVENUE j HIGHLAND AVENUE SOUTHBOUND THE SCALE OF THIS PLAN IS:
{9 Jv[ AIs.LANO A1.1 IRIAeLlc
ir.
(n YAP], /OT
L) I #886 — — — P`s" of Mgrs
O I / I HIGHLAND AVENUE OWNER/DEVEIAPER: �3\� $CO P 'Qe R CONSTRUCTION, PIANS FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY
OL➢E v/LACE YALE ItKALrr r96r PAOL i¢RIG4Wo G
YAP A. L°I'/.T9 #400 uv mcxuno Avenue. sA�sY. dy PATR WIC <r'
x 1�'I IP,61 Yrr v6v a
Q r O/� HICELAHD AVENUE IL
\ /
ENTRANCE 1 °/LF Yolaaar Al UrY TLal51 ATCORNBY: �S 5
z (Y I AND EGRESS FROM
an AS •:= nsae`S= �P
HIGHLAND PLAZA ¢HER a r. Y.°
YAP.v. LOT 6 % \ I ARCHITECT:
NO. DATE DESCRIPTION,
r \ EROE1'L1N°u
FW¢NIn
m
2CL '
al Z BA S U B M I TTA L:ENG E e� �. AA,Y. YA N19Niel - SUBDIVISION PLAN
LAYOUT GEOMETRY
Fll SURVEYOR:
GAIL tiYIr N.L].
i it ARORF. aer.ifirsY COFPO¢Alan
N 14 exxEn sa¢n.sA1EY. MA Nlna for
(9
Y) RESIDENTIAL LOTS
3 nt&MC ENGINEER:
O 1..Lsle.Asw:ura.INc, for a site at
a n¢E sncunx EOsTA.66NmH aB
y*o° W r:'(9>BI 4>4-YA°161°-la 6 #405-427 Highland Ave.
oI NOTES PEW
(� / I T LOLLS 6 SNOYI LN SNFY ASAE4A's YM;L°3 fl T5 AIU f8. LDUIS d6R WTYI T1E R-1 IPMr Salem, Massachusetts
En OLsfwL1 AND AN ENTRMIS memNR of 1 all L.s 2311 AGES APPROVAL UNDER SUBDIVISION Oates alreer 22. 2010
. P -34 Scale: I = 90 Short 2 nl 3
CONTROL LA
LOEi99
C z t�nlc--1— 1 ARID mtPLRTr Lw,PER ACNAL Elf saMwE,PfmiAam Fv xmm slvE SALEM PLANNING BOARD
suxT Www.n1wrowtr,tom.
Land Owner. Paul Ferragamo
1 Mp
w ROta alHkfaYa saY . SafCmR0110
NMD CalA .Esx
WB➢a/S/4T.RLE WT1 CERn�E 'E
C H.LNAD WORT PLAY 11510. A.I"'l OE,BLED.,N(WffIGIE(TTA PATROIIICZ
c lno caar PLAR nsvr. Am 2/ta/a.•Asn Wtx aRTETCArt fTiu
to GRAPIIIC SCALE I B.wu COAT PLAN EW OATm 10P8,AB,¢Asn rTN CptIfYATr aaN1. LAND DEVBI.OPl�T771' BNGMBBItING
C E LNOCOJRT maflUlf MSDJ,OCKoMENT]11421. 14 Brawn Seel, Salem, MA 01970
(978) BM-64M
N
F.All OAWT maYYAE 64Yve.OCU.AWNT 2v44ee, NORTH SHORE SURVEY CORPORATION
°wo LrAAi °A
PIAx n5vaDATED s/az/x.¢Asn YITN sell.ares.
3 ( a rYr 1 4, Ill RMI°RS NOT REPRESENT WYRWICE Ill Cm OF sIIFAI's IOMT EYE MS(Leaf .'AhAl MR 14 Brown(978)Stree1144�4a00 A Bt910
V 1 mak- EO H. ARE RERAME ,
O
U
#12 I I ` #22 ; �• \
I
I i #14
j L#
I #18 I
' I I
r.a,
rm e
�4
s
a ;
0
a �w
3
—/
-
a
-
I
42
ov I I �'w.a p Lr.. M . lI 1 -\- ♦.�ia� _„,'t,«.ii,P}PB,RPes]-=,mo,.�xlW.sac—BEeAA .mJ., �,.a iF`1\_c`a_1"\\,.1 o_-__/__r1rrPP�eE===1IlEaaLaE..PAgOlSl GB ..� ,
LL
\\
,
14i1-
1s. \1
�
47.6
435
#3 .o #B
Oo #4 .
nuni PS1NPl- 16
"ANi r „e ♦ 1111) , i PPE=lacy 1Jd"r
\ \_.-/ '\ . sR �RTg i PBE=1056 9 \ rae ,Tae- --� •'iK l 1 _
i
r
°
_t��
J(I
IffT
PPE=IaLE _
N h PP nt. /lx� _-;.T I\ _^',I' L lY ,. -_-I- _/ �_-._-
I )'�, Pes=191.1 \\ \ . s i Y a,rlEe aiA6
I #401 .y ',�, a ` u]A 1 "' \/ � „�, _i-' )
y T
� I I r.x -_ � /// a 4'b \� 1> .- 7" -f < `Y � - �_ _ 1 1 1 1 1 1_ 1 p.. A T ( ,❑ I i
/ A//,/ ime.\ Y � I ; I f« : _.� xrzn �'`^ _-- • ^ S- ,{ 1 J,
,
Ml
I I C.\\1 \ I «a rv. ,�w - -VY-_ \ \ 1 I >..m..a.r. #
4 u �/ u , . b. ,\� 7 429
«, xx
t] u° JI\1\\�\ �r s /// \\ d * ,y «.)` \ / 1 \ \ \1�,�1 $ PR[m177A ' _
Q I I ia.., .m `�\:'t` .y / ' %; \�\ r«° 0 P s= 4 s POE® y10 �I _ ni/ 8 11 11 n. EPCWZE
m ! - •) \\\\ / '��\\\\ w a1b'A' 7I_ 1 I �•°' �� POBCO 4 PPE-101.6
IV I rv.. i - is / IIS „\ I./..a,r %�/�?j'�/.r, \\\. _a' -��\ PPE=1aEb b '9 PPE=101.1 (M VIIVia) s,x ,sso
L i/ uT- 1 9TH \\, \ _ ru PRE=1a41 n REm1aEA 4 p`f P�l!'l.E 1.2
wn- ,
,
//I� *\I1 ' / �`A
O ��� ,n �, ,r/ �\ n,°� �' 11.; '� \\ PIfIp 1 ') � \ .n i !f P�+11EA _yxi _ ♦M) ,.,a 1 r., / { }►�
PATIO /- "l�'1-.o. « «° I ma. 1 \I PATEN 1 •.0 1\ _
P1191 \r1
°
3 I q mv,M„ ,•a¢ry. _ 1]1`� ur.Sl -- _ P]BIwE Y A"AND FffiElo 1ma r/Il'PJw I4101Ax AS s ,y. tw.a,
Ixi a.
Cllr YArzN[nsnN -.])] .. —
i 'jL z(ae
.wwrm wri Q111ER a ��.
r�
- - -- - - �� m
- -
--
� -•.MO n...r ssee NOTY.. All. OMIN C8:il'BUCTUR85
,r
.Y.
i •�4AY)_ — (LBAI.RING BAST CULTBC '”
w Sr47EYS, CAM IIASINS, ETC) ' FFA la rq.0
> y - SH11.B8 PROVENLY YAINTAIN80 L„ A
QY
a°YE01N S ABEBCUTON.
_ _. MRrK aT'MV
HIGHLAND AVENUE (ROUTE
z A _
HIGHL VEN107) NORTHBOUND
4d
FH,4 Ir4/o• , __ _
Tr
�1 �naarL
AA
-- #392 � n Y A HIGHLAND AVENUE SOUTHBOUND ------
#440-450
— - - #402 I
I #399 — — THIS/PLAN HAS BEEN
U) j I —A— — — — — — REDUCED FROM TFIE
A THE SCALE OF THIS PL `111 d3:
U) ENTRANCE TO 1EE
w !� I AND EGRESS FROM TEAM: OF ry) - —
0 q HIGHLAND PLAZA OWNER/DEVELOPER:1 .1 � @ FOR CONSTRUCTION. PLANS FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY
O' ' - -.. -_ I 4,u wcx.0 .venue.sA1xN. YA SCO T IAN 5G
dPAIR WICZ
/ ^Y
z s7•[oE NE N0. 56
Q !Pa ;o„AN. UGAI. HAERLYcron 9
PeoeIML sTxeer.&a'a" ALA o1 F
l./e1 E.1 S nm G T
03 ARCHITECT: ,y NX DAIS OESOiWnav
� laxer cunoExen
:uxooLSRry AswcuTEs
SITE
TEM NGU M. ZBA SUBMITTAL:
E — �I 1 .
E e SUBDIVISION PLAN
rArlmnc<.a ocv®uPYexr Elwaveanc
p tne) eae-eauu ,nx
. 91N.N TNAYt. fAIEY. YA°
0 NOTES MUD SURVEYOR:
EARTH WO R
K/G RAD I N G
nMY. 1 „°. °.Rr C°xY°uTioA
N ...lM 1N 'A.. A1. (al,
3 e))« .ex
= na�E °;e�N L" TRAMC ENGINEER: 11 RESIDENTIAL LOTS
O ,al R PIaIAR w sAxwix.atvAlla-1xieP ra..YA�A'swxrures, wL. tar a site at
Bel A RO,K tl BUXAN snR.F ARON-124,w ,° E.Enc.° NVSLYES9 G2m2
a f. 1B'/A Vpl/ll N®AP slwEr FAM]F)I.DINAIION-ll=W 111 1114 YA ° ae4 „aE #405—427 Highland Ave.
./ %QUn M®AR$IIIFk'I.fl AMOK-,1..0° 011
O19Y 0: M.w°PoAE Y PAM T.aEYABaB-,her late).r.-nxm
181#7 aw,.Nal St7.I1DIF.L.L raw- 61.w Salem, Massachusetts
(j Bala TACKY s AlU4 aLVA11W- 1,1w APPROVAL UNDER SUBDIVISION
1a1 R aYL 1Y.L gr x IIDrZ.a A11CM-,ena' Oale'. atm- 22. 2010
Bal Pa Y BxEr,aLYAnor-1SA41CONTROL LAW REQUIRED: PLOE/99-34 Stas: t' = 20' sheet 3 Tr 3
c SALEM PLANNING BOARD
.v las Ptv,Is xB°un wLr ro aeJAw vIr4YEaxa aFPARIYaIT uBUBr APRIaVAIs rae 1K caNsalrcllax
a nc�aNSro.I4SIOwaNrs y,oxY oI las ww B1c ACBUAI mis1w 1 unuBcs LflIId OwnerPaul Fea
anao
U) a (BUBarLtIMrOTsAs alv egm Aenm. em r11M
9 a. aN A Ea E EF o w SP M E AAYA PATROAICZ
(a 4 AS vMr a CMS(AND/al.BIE SBE Ca11MC1aR YAr YMIT ro YNQ RDER NAe15BY y.BA4D al w1UK
to GRAPHIC SCALE nae aRa.STAN45(Aro/Ox ro xrcB.r Anr 6.aar as°EVAxrfs N oPOm ro talar wTx ,v'•,�1A1E
eIYLYIIc IMIa$ala sPETGBgXS MO AaaAE Ya111C1A➢IEg4YlYl11s jai Ca1s1I111CBO1). ANY a1N m LAND DEPEIDP
r. — 1H5 RAN MS B1E )lY(MO�I111 611E CMIRACRR. RY]D A0.USeYlIrz YA°E WTNUT RLE la Branrr street. Salem. Yn 01910
(9/6) 836-6400
E —Al-SLN<wmuBrxLr au AND lm Au 0lTA1IaL5 nI..ABB Amwmlrxa oaculKmm NORTH SHORE SURVEY CORPORATION
D ( N l,=) P -NOT a (BE tU8£)ROf RE1➢OIMIaS yUE..T%GE IpPR°VAL 14 Brown Street. 5AA n. MA 019/0
U 11ue4 2a w1C B-
O W9 744-4800
G
U