Loading...
333 HIGHLAND AVENUE - ZBA (2) S33 HIGHLAND AVE. BPD Thos. , Philip & Mary McAuliffe a nw 71141 g 1 r-r- �% ti ti f it of �alem, c assac4 let FP 7 i^( DECISION ON THE PETITION OF THON,AS, PHILIP .AND f•;ARY MCAULIFFE FOR VARIANCES AT 333 HIGHLAND AVENUE (BPD) A hearing on this petition was held January 14 , 1987 with the following Board Members present: James Hacker, Chairman; Messrs. , Bencal, Fleming, Luzinski and Strout. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. The petitioners, represented by Attorney Quinn, are requesting Variances to allow two (2) principal buildings on one ( 1 ) lot and a further Variance from side yard setbacks to allow the construction of building at 333 Highland Avenue, said property being located in the Business Park Development District (BPD) . The in- tended use of the new building is to house medical offices. The Variances which have been requested may be granted upon a finding of the Board that: a. special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and structures in the same district; b. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner; and c. desirable relief may be granted without substantial. detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fa.-t: 1 . There was no opposition, to the petition presented at the hearing; 2. The petitioners have secure- approval from the Salen-s Conservation Co=ission, which has places an Order of Conditions on the proposed development. On the basis of the above findings of' fact, and on the evidence presented, the Board of Appeal concludes as. follows: 1 . Special conditions exist .which especially affect the subject property but not the district generally; 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance would involve substantial hardship to the petitioner; 3. The relief requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. DECISION Ota THE PETITION OF THO'-,AS, PHILIP AND MARY MCAULIFFE FOR VARIANCES AT 333 HIGHLAND AVE. , SALEM, page two Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the requested Variances, subject to the following terms and conditions: 1 . That all the reouirements of the Conservation Commission' s Order of Conditions be complied with by the petitioners; 2. That the building be constructed as per the plans submitted to the Zoning Board of Appeal; 3. That a Certificate of Occupancy be obtained; 4. That all applicable provisions of the State Building Code, Fire Prevention Code, City Ordinances, and Massachusetts General Laws relative to fire safety be complied with; 5• That all the requirements of the Salem Planning Board be adhered to; 6. That the new building not be occupied by more than sixteen ( 16) physicians; 7 . That the petitioners maintain not less than eighty nine (89) parking spaces on the site of the new building, said parking spaces to comply with all the requirements of the Salem Zoning Ordinance. VARIANCES GRANTED dames M. Fleming, Esq. Member, Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK .__u�::; :i P, iJ n'L;: LDGu A6 •..J C:. iF.0 UC. �C Y,S lJ.. _.TE C, LE. BOARD OF APPEAL i TINTI, QUINN & SAVOY 222 ESSEX STREET SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01070 WILLIAM J. TINTI DANVERS OFFICE WILLIAM F. QUINN RICHARD E. SAVOY (817)743-8065 - WILLIAM H.ARDIFF PETER R. MERRY (817)744-2048 CHARLENE FOY GIBNEY RICHARD W. STAFFORD (817)741-4241 CAMERON MCL. WICKER FAX(617)745-3380 SCOTT M. GROVER MARK W. HARRETT FRANCINE M. FERRIS B CHERRY STREET JAMES M. MORRIS DANVER S.MASS. 01923 THOMAS M. GL AVIN (017)774-3810 January 29, 1987 James B . Hacker, Chairman Salem Board of Appeals 7 Ugo Road Saleff, Massachusetts 01970 Re : Zoning Variances - 333 Highland Avenue Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Petition of Thomas McAuliffe, Philip J. McAuliffe, and Mary L. McAuliffe Dear Mr. Hacker: Upon reflection, I would like to suggest a substitute to the language proposed in my January 22 , 1987 letter to the Board for the parking space condition in the variances grant to the McAuliffes . The substitute would be as follows : "There shall at all times be at least 89 legally conforming parking spaces provided on the lot, as shown on the site plan drawn by Lindentree Corporation, dated 12/26/86 and submitted to the Board. " One reason for this alternative suggestion is that this site plan was the one used at the hearing as the genesis for the 89 space limitation. Further, Section VII C-4 of the Zoning Ordinance only requires angle parking stalls such as these to have dimensions of 9 feet wide and 19 feet long (rather than the 9 ' X 20 ' mentioned in my previous letter) , and upon a second look at the plan it is possible that some of the stalls may have been designed at larger dimensions while others were designed at slightly smaller, but still conforming, dimensions . January 29 , 1987 Page 2 I apologize for any inconvenience the consideration of this substitute may cause the Board. Very truly yours , James M. Norris JMN./mh cc:V Brenda Sumrall Thomas McAuliffe s TINTI, QUINN & SAVOY 222 ESSEX STREET SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01870 WILLIAM J. TINTI DANVERS OFFICE WILLIAM F. QUINN (617)746-6066 RICHARD E. SAVOY WILLIAM B.ARDIFF PETER R. MERRY (61'»744-e043 CHARLENE FOY GIBNEY RIC$ARD W. STAFFORD (617)741-4241 CAMERON M.L.WICKER FAX(617)745-3069 SCOTT M. GROVER MARK W.BARRETT FRANCINE M.FERRIS 6 CHERRY STREET JAMES M. NORI27S DANVERS,MASS.01023 THOMAS M. GLAVIN (617)774-3610 January 22, 1987 James B. Hacker, Chairman Salem Board of Appeals 7 Ugo Road Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Re : Zoning Variances - 333 Highland Avenue Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Petition of Thomas McAuliffe, Philip J. McAuliffe, ` and Mary L. . McAuliffe Dear Mr. Hacker: In the draft of the written decision in the above referenced matter, the petitioner respectfully requests that the following language be incorporated to cover the conditions on parking spaces and on the number of physicians operating at the site, which were imposed 'by the n " Board of Appeals as part of its grant of these variaces tor"? the McAuliffes. -.a For the parking space condition, the language requested is: "There shall at all times be at least 89 parking spaces provided •;; ; on the lot, each of dimensions gl 9 feet wide and 20 feet long.,", ., a For the condition pertaining to the number of docto=s that may operate in the new building, the language , requested is: ..:A L +_ January 22 , 1987 Page 2- "The new, approximately 15,000 square foot building to be constructed on the lot shall not be used by more than the reasonable number of equipment, patients, employees , etc. associated with the operation of sixteen (16) practicing physicians ' offices, if the new building is used for professional medical offices" ., Very truly yours; f .. James M. Norris JMN/mh cc: V Brenda Sumrall Thomas McAuliffe HACKER/MCAULIP1 a i� 4 PETITION FOR VARIANCE AT 333 HIGHLAND AVENUE SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 I , the undersigned, have reviewed: 1 . the Application of Thomas McAuliffe , Philip J. McAuliffe and Mary L. McAuliffe , owners of property located at 333 Highland Avenue, Salem, Massachusetts, for a proposed variance from Sections II (B) (26) and III (C) (9) of the Salem Zoning Ordinance, so as to allow the existence of two principal buildings on the same lot, and also for a proposed variance from the side yard requirement of Section VI (D) , Table IV of the Salem Zoning Ordinance, so as to allow the construction of a new building with only a ten (10 ' ) foot side yard setback; and 2 . the plans to be submitted at the scheduled hearing by the Salem Board of Appeals on the Application; and I support the grant of the variance by the City of Salem Board of Appeals. CRETE REALTY TRUST 11 Bridge Street Salem, Massachuset 1970 By: Nondas Lagonakis rustee VARIANCE/MCAULIFI C. 1°B. sv/f. (FO.) (FD.) / cER71f ;rIlWT ////S ,9C7UAG SURVEY WfS r/ADE O.a 711E G•eovWD /AI 4CCORDA.UCF (,ulrfl 7NE Z"D COU2 r /,U5TR0C7'/0A/S OF /9171 86r4)66-A/ 0Cr /, /970 AA/D JULY 22, Lki /986 . A J .e�`Fi OF 6ftff SUNS S 1 a �1 ko 0 h Ci/y of So/Pm c e' Qo C.e.(F°.] y ..5 35°OQ'/O ..E y OPS/ .99Doq PrN rN � FA ■ l� c0.M..) 300. Z9 C.S. CFO LOT 6 7'7 H= 99,93G�* S.F. R 3 0 �, wog, • ��FL G Q8 T•� ,g ti � .s, 94/. i M � . .9� 1/.89. ../G o 99 `.. S ' N35128*Sd'ij :� 35°Zg'SO"F+ o h a!P G 8 �y C0. LOr 6 72 -� Nis°?.B 50"w G o r \ ffal 2/ h el ,f. 3878? P•n in CB.(FO) �.co. /FD.) /VO rE.'PH/t C6L H f LO rG 78 rd -666 SOC D 7"O OUTA16k OF GOr 6 72 70 FORff OA/E COAIrIGUOUS LOr PARCEL G E Lor 6 77 r0 BE COHBIWO 7'0 ForeH oA/E cov risaoos t or. 6E/A1G R 5060/VISION 0r� PLAN OF LXi✓O in ,110NOV& UA/OER rNE L o rS 673 f 674 SNOG/A/ O V ��JJ SU80/V/5/0NCO4/r/N Z.C. PLfLU S/7L E�VI LAf„ AIor REoU12AD SAC EN 1CA�vAI/A/G 60AR0 Scq/e: /'=/Oo JUG Y 2 2,1986 o so roo tae zou lssEx SaRVey scevirE,/VC . /8/ E551V SrREE'r S19LE/1, 9W /O971 S}J V 7 m n N N ' 1 Z `O r 132 Q OL O W SALEM HONi� LP�XNNOT) c ,� L Z W It'T F�wr \ \ \ \ \ \ 6bE S°N _ R= 13112lp ' \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ N \\ \\ T N F-Y\15 IJGI 6UILPINa i Nt O : \ \\ \ \ t \ \ \ \ \ \ t4 \ \ \ \\ \\ \ � H.P C� IIS \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ Q \ d) \ \ 130 W bo,/ HIP. - _ W \ \N \ \ \ \ \ \ FIRST FLX F ELF-\A 2' Cyt \\ \\ \\ \ \ \\ 17 ► \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \\ \\ d\ T- 5550 o 555° 2B'g0"E 478.94'- x.T M-H• R= 124.89' q !) kx!STiNf� LUNPITIONS INDIC/,TED DN i THIS M4 ARB coMPILED FROM 70H O APH ILAL MAN OP LAN 7 Ff PkTF-P 27 XT R 1156P.I , ING• 1 2� FARKIN� Rr%CWIREMENTS '- A, A• W;NIL "INE% 7500 6.R - 5eW 6•F. eqRAfaE -?_SW'5 F 2500 ; 150 = 17 RW,5! CPNGG5 8 PKOF IDNAL OpF1g6 15 PROF W IPNAL6 1< 15 t 30 . 45 00"1 NA 5 called North 45 EMPIOM%& 28 PWK WA Wrid, L16 TOTAL I a A5PKtJ� G. VA. FIF4'D• FAKKINIEI SNNGFab- 17+(08 c 86 s NA�kN 5 R TOTAL p1mJIDEpWASJ OUT Lftt 5S. X.O r7// Rpr(�t7 H•P F 11ZKIN� h�FACTH OF d'ASSQ 1v 1C1Flf� bF�G6 PImVIDEb 8-I) ABY DEVELOPMENT Mb LaATF.V O 383 HJAHLAND AM• eAusM, MA � 15THc FVSKrf M Mg.-T 1 r1Ab NkAu 1FFI5 1 f� NUT. FOR CU%STRUCT1011 J9AN6 busmrmD FK V� OW1 - NOT rocWNSFOOTIU011t 9930L OOOSOV 9NI�ne; F Z' • Q� x 1 2 3 45 1 2 3 4 5 1 ifmAL I 1 1 t 1 � ' Z _0 F- Ar n 13A OPFIGf, ar-FIGm aFFIt.E HU95E STATION H•F To1LET H•FTOIW�T ewINA OL61NE,% 0 aFF16E (, ❑ W Ii W TO LLT ' I 14PRRIWK , -t�HIM E1J51NE'� uui I a ❑ o - Z U=� v�1Atrj* L EXAM FxAM >< IzA( RUM FILES FI - - - --- -- ------- -- - -I - 1 � �newirYa. � � - RFLEPf IoN I' II I N �NFER:NGE ; KAI7A.7A`( f MNEP MT10 LA6 WAITINF I' ---- --- ---- K6r VEbTIEl91E FU FE 1,013BY WTUIc GOIZRIR�R 1 L01ZlZIGt�R -- YWITIt �t ( MMeU jR Fu1uRE I vBB( rAu(rmeE I IVc• ExAM 1ffia4TMEN1 KKR W5 Ta i 1 I � Q , 50 -- --- -- - -- -- - - - - _ -- - ------- -- - _ --- - - �/ Q — _ _ - __- - N OC 5rAIR Z SIR I E AM OIIIKZ WAITINEI OATH VAM _EXAM STAIK I- Q U uP ❑ -d TT t I � � I t SRW RSR t LWI OFFICE' OFFICE OFFICE NUiS155- 6y4TION WAM EXAM FAM orfiGp- OFFIG� 1 FIRST FLOOR PLAN SECOND FLOOR PLAN — 1 I � I 1 I. 1 i J i 1 cU Fl"'r t m `A J MASS, L' i �FAC7H OF�acC 0. \ - --_'f-+frT✓ 1W'+.lirl/ �A��K. '� �-�ItIVMry-�s}}`...�._ 99ZOL000904`JNIN HE I iJ, �f J n g Y m N N 5 4 3 2 1 A B D z o ► o o u W W Nf " I Z I -- -t--- -- --- ------ --- --- -- - TSP OF Ram - — --- - --- - - - -- -- ---- - W EE _ 14 -- -SONG F1DOfZ _ - - -- I LEY• 125'-O" - _- I , I I I I I � �LLN•stlOi_D,i - _ I I z 4 WEST ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION � �b i Z 1 2 3 4 5 D C B A I , 1 - -- - ---- i- - ------ - 1-- ---- —t-` WOF 1mop i -------- ---- - - — -- — — --- - - -gLV4 123 o- — — - — it JLJ I II II I I 1 I . - - - _ I I I I --- -- _ - - - - I FIt85T Fi.00K I j ' ----Jt -------YI--------- -- -------- --- -----___________ _______ __________ _IT 1 EAST ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION iJ-`� EaCiH D�_ I -tF" it f 4�_ 1�•.r� ' {I',�Y� I/�� `��,f t1 vl��.,+•. ,I i1, 1 1dpiL �1DT� PANS 'StlbMltTr-0 I�oR yp��al.ICE vx�Y-t�of ��loN• - S8Z0L00080v9N1 HE IIS Q f - z t1< IYLt7 Il� YSo O CL \ usT4 tttt-pub v \ l m \ \ W LW LLJ to KaoD F'r 'LS1. 4 ISO ` \ . ell S �. U L_ z I ` 1 00 ��IC Ilio IIoC 1110 `ItC ,ho f7� Agp A.,L bticitJOAA - 72 xav sF - � 'SS'co : Itt7 - 17 sP�fh r=GSSicrk*L opfILEo, ILS -- lS f Prv"l o44lh . K + 3o 4 POLVI' -h = 23 IIa - Tv(i�L: G6 spAalcs _-�v('aL �1[tR1,t�P-IGD -Sra s�aWc7 Iv1�D - f37 ,(%e,Ciro 64JAVwT . nuc• wo• 'TncD "Paw vpt"P 111 '�til�►' Fas1b d c.1111?( 2L I aiL. N ARk`V FSCl ! f J O I n a w p :CH. y A59- Lob if'CF VY �� z z m