Loading...
313 HIGHLAND AVENUE - ZBA ■ � � P-l. L�• 313 Highland Ave. BPD Tony Lena (Petitioner) Moose Lodge (Owner) -- - cal- s �V V J M. (Citt1 of �ttlrm, ,fttsencilusetts OF C.FT,,,.-... Board of rAtypral \\ '91 APR -3 P 3 :0 7 DECISION ON THE PETITION OF TONY LENA ( PETITIONER) LOYAL ORDER OF MOOSE (OWNERS) FOR VARIANCE FROM SIGN ORDINANCE FOR 313 OtILCAIL�D�)OE2FFACE) A hearing on this petition was held March 20, 1991 with the following Board Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Joseph Correnti, Richard Febonio and Mary Jane Stirgwolt. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. The Petitioner is requesting a Variance from the City of Salem Sign Ordinance to allow a roof top sign at 313 Highland Avenue, property is located in the Business Park Development District (BPD) The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of the Board that: a. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building, or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and structures in the same district. b. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. c. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to .the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1 . There is an existing roof sign which has been at this location for many years. 2. The existing sign was erected by the former owners without benefit of a building permit. 3. There will be no structural change in the sign, the only change will be in the lettering. 4. The property is located in the Entrance Corridor Overlay District. 5. There was no opposition presented. DECISION ON THE PETITION OF TONY LENA (PETITIONER) , LOYAL ORDER OF MOOSE (OWNERS) FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE SIGN ORDINANCE FOR 313 HIGHLAND AVE. , SALEM page two On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1 . Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the Ordinance would work a substantial hardship on the petitioner. 3. The relief requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 4-0, to grant the Variance requested, subject to the following conditions: 1 . All construction be done in-.accordance with all local and state building codes. 2. All construction be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted. 3. All requirement of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety are to be strictly adhered to. 4. A Sign Permit be obtained. 5. The proposed sign have no flashing lights. 6. Petitioner must obtain the approval of any other department, board or commission that has jurisdiction, including but not limited to the Design Review Board. 7.r`Pet"ioner get approval of the Sign Review Committee which has the 'Presggnsibility of reviewing all signage for the Entrance Corridor Overlay QD isttt`Gt (ECOD) Vat +anc anted Cr` Mar�t1 2t;S991 }N S C Richard Febonlo, Member, Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision,if any,shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of t!:e floss.General Laws, Chapter 808, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the city Clerk. ' Laws. Chapter 808, Section 11, the Variance r:a=uant to Mass.General o^�ml Parmit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the un, bearingthe certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have ps been filed, or that, if such appeal has been an' no appeal has c% that it has been dismisse0 or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name or the owner of record 9r is recorded and noted an the owner's Certificate of Title. BOARD OF APPEAL 1 � V DATE OF HEARINGa d 9 PETITIONER— LOCATION ETITIONERLOCATION MOTION: TO GRANT L SECOND �f C/ tt TO DENY SECOND TO RE-HEAR SECOND LEAVE TO WITHDRAW SECOND TO CONTINUE SECOND ROLL CALL PRESENT GRANT DENY WITHDRAW RE-HEAR CONTINUE RICHARD BENCAL JOSEPH CORRENTI_ / I RICHAR&'FEB9N10 MARY JANE STIRGWOLT ASSOCIATE MEMBERS CONDITIONS: 7 /ey (Citi of -,'�tzlem, 44R. ttssttcjjusetts 'BQMTa of ':Av peal \,' > AGENDA March 20, 1991 - 7:00 p.m. 2nd Floor - One Salem Green 1 . Continued - Petition of John Perroni, Tr. for a Special Permit o allow the construction of an addition at 86 Summer St. (R-2) 2. Petition of the City of Salem for a Special Permit to allow overnight parking of not more that sixty (60) recreational vehicles at 50 Winter Island Rd. (RC) 3. Petition of Laurier Bouchard for a Special Permit to change the height of the garage roof at 8-10 Chase St. (R-3) 4. Petition of Virginia & Fernando Gomes for Variances to convert a two family dwelling into a three family dwelling at 5 Balcomb St. (R-2) 5. Petition of Mark Petit for Variances to allow construction of a single family dwelling at Skerry Street Court (R-2) 6. Petition of Carroll & A'r•Pane Dickinson for a Special Permit and Variance to allow the second floor to be expanded and to convert to a two family at 3 Conners Rd. (R-1 ) 7. Continued - Petition of Brian Call for Variances to divide lot and to construct a single family dwelling at 15 Cherry Hill Ave. (R-1 ) 8. Petition of Tony Lena for.a Variance from the City of Salem Sign Ordinance to allow a roof top sign at 313 Highland Ave. (BPD) 9. Approval of minutes as taped - February 27, 1991 . 10. Old/New Business For the, BOARD OF APPEAL e Brenda M. Sumrall Clerk of the. Board (Ilitti of �ttlrm, ��u55ttcltusett5 ���� �ottra of .Appeal RF '-�"� '91 RPR —3 P3 :07 DECISION ON THE PETITION OF TONY LENA (PETITIONER) LOYAL ORDER OF MOOSE (OWNERS) FOR VARIANCE FROM SIGN ORDINANCE FOR 313 Uh1�LGY1`fD'mtcFwff) AL'c •1 ' 11;S A hearing on this petition was held March 20, 1991 with the following Board Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Joseph Correnti, Richard Febonio and Mary Jane Stirgwolt. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. The Petitioner is requesting a Variance from the City of Salem Sign Ordinance to allow a roof top sign at 313 Highland Avenue, property is located in the Business Park Development District (BPD) The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of the Board that: a. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building, or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and structures in the same district. b. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. c. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1 . There is an existing roof sign which has been at this location for many years. 2. The existing sign was erected by the former owners without benefit of a building permit. 3. There will be no structural change in the sign, the only change will be in the lettering. 4. The property is located in the Entrance Corridor Overlay District. 5. There was no opposition presented. i DECISION ON THE PETITION OF TONY LENA (PETITIONER) , LOYAL ORDER OF MOOSE (OWNERS) FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE SIGN ORDINANCE FOR 313 HIGHLAND AVE. , SALEM page two On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1 . Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the Ordinance would work a substantial hardship on the petitioner. 3. The relief requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 4-0, to grant the Variance requested, subject to the following conditions: 1 . All construction be done in-accordance with all local and state building codes. 2. All construction be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted. 3. All requirement of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety are to be strictly adhered to. 4. A Sign Permit be obtained. 5. The proposed sign have no flashing lights. 6. Petitioner must obtain the approval of any other department, board or commission that has jurisdiction, including but not limited to the Design Review Board. 7.M1Pet"loner get approval of the Sign Review Committee which has the 'PresZnsibility of reviewing all signage for the Entrance Corridor Overlay d istt,��t (ECOD) »} VaMnceid?anted Com` Marsh 2Cf;;S991 1S+ 6 U Q UN Richard Febonio, Member, Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision,If any,shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Mass.General Laws,Chapter 808,and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. 'r::r=uant to Mass.GeneraP Caws, Chapter 808, Section 11, the Variance ial F.^rmit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the ,cion. ',airing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 da Ys have an... no appeal has been filed,or that,if such appeal has been e, that H has been dismissetl or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name or the owner of record or is recorded and noted an the owner's Certificate of Title. BOARD OF APPEAL aChi of �ttlrm, ���s5tztltusrtts '91 APR -3 P 3 :07 DECISION ON THE PETITION OF TONY LENA (PETITIONER) LOYAL ORDER OF MOOSE (OWNERS) FOR VARIANCE FROM SIGN ORDINANCE FOR 313 QtDjLDdD'1AaC;FFJBff) 5AL'c:•i . :d°O' A hearing on this petition was held March 20, 1991 with the following Board Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Joseph Correnti, Richard Febonio and Mary Jane Stirgwolt. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. The Petitioner is requesting a Variance from the City of Salem Sign Ordinance to allow a roof top sign at 313 Highland Avenue, property is located in the Business Park Development District (BPD) The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of the Board that: a. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building, or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and structures in the same district. b. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. c. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to .the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1 . There is an existing roof sign which has been at this location for many years. 2. The existing sign was erected by the former owners without benefit of a building permit. 3. There will be no structural change in the sign, the only change will be in the lettering. 4. The property is located in the Entrance Corridor Overlay District. 5. There was no opposition presented. II DECISION ON THE PETITION OF TONY LENA (PETITIONER) , LOYAL ORDER OF MOOSE (OWNERS) FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE SIGN ORDINANCE FOR 313 HIGHLAND AVE. , SALEM page two On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1 . Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the Ordinance would work a substantial hardship on the petitioner. 3. The relief requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 4-0, to grant the Variance requested, subject to the following conditions: 1 . All construction be done in-accordance with all local and state building codes. 2. All construction be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted. 3. All requirement of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety are to be strictly adhered to. 4. A Sign Permit be obtained. 5. The proposed sign have no flashing lights. 6. Petitioner must obtain the approval of any other department, board or commission that has jurisdiction, including but not limited to the Design Review Board. 7.r`Pet"ioner get approval of the Sign Review Committee which has the 'Presggnsibility of reviewing all signage for the Entrance Corridor Overlay C. o�istttt�t (ECOD) nI =• Vat�ance�anted C7 Marsh 20_V1991 i '.:i 91 Richard Febonio, Member, Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision. If arty,shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of E:e Mass.General Laws• pnIn tos,and he be oiled l the city Clerk. 0dys after the date of filing of this decision --::rsuant to Mass.GeneraPLaws, Chapter 808, Section 11, the Variance +--_•ial Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the - i=iun. ,c.)ring the certification of the City Clerk that 20 drys have p—, an' no appeal has been filed,or that,if such appeal has been ,l, that i, has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex tiegistry of Deeds and indexed under the name or the owner of record 9• is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. BOARD OF APPEAL � _ Tr�M "" Tity of �ttlrm jEttssachusetts y � , Board of .Aupeal '91 APR —3 P 3 :0 7 DECISION ON THE PETITION OF TONY LENA (PETITIONER) LOYAL ORDER OF MOOSE (OWNERS) FOR VARIANCE FROM SIGN ORDINANCE FOR 313 QYEXLDcU'`--iAa EFFACE) AL�I•i , i1P A hearing on this petition was held March 20, 1991 with the following Board Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Joseph Correnti, Richard Febonio and Mary Jane Stirgwolt. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. The Petitioner is requesting a Variance from the City of Salem Sign Ordinance to allow a roof top sign at 313 Highland Avenue, property is located in the Business Park Development District (BPD) The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of the Board that: a. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building, or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and structures in the same district. b. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. c. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1 . There is an existing roof sign which has been at this location for many years. 2. The existing sign was erected by the former owners without benefit of a building permit. 3. There will be no structural change in the sign, the only change will be in the lettering. 4. The property is located in the Entrance Corridor Overlay District. 5. There was no opposition presented. DECISION ON THE PETITION OF TONY LENA (PETITIONER) , LOYAL ORDER OF MOOSE (OWNERS) FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE SIGN ORDINANCE FOR 313 HIGHLAND AVE. , SALEM page two On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1 . Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the Ordinance would work a substantial hardship on the petitioner. 3. The relief requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the Intent of the district or the pappose of the Ordinance. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 4-0, to grant the Variance requested, subject to the following conditions: 1 . All construction be done in-accordance with all local and state building codes. 2. All construction be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted. 3. All requirement of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety are to be strictly adhered to. 4. A Sign Permit be obtained. 5. The proposed sign have no flashing lights. 6. Petitioner must obtain the approval of any other department, board or commission that has jurisdiction, including but not limited to the Design Review Board. 7.r—Pet"ioner get approval of the Sign Review Committee which has the 5�resVnsibility of reviewing all signage for the Entrance Corridor Overlay Gist #; t (ECOD) U n =- Vat +ancezVanted Mar�tt 2C14;S991 GC yN C Richard Febonio, Member, Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision,If any,shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of ;e Mass.General Laws, Chapter 808,and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. 'ror=ucnt to Mass. General Laws,Chapter 808, Section 11,the Variance Parmit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the •icion, Le.irinq the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have p,e an' no appeal has been filed,or that,if such appeal has been ; '-c, that it has be^n dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name or the owner of record or ;s recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Titis. BOARD OF APPEAL APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . ti (Ilt#v ofttlPm, tt�stuF�usPits J� J GD,p1E TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS: le Undersigned repres t th t he is are the owners of a certain parcel of land locaJ�r�j _ . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Street; Zoning District. . .4� C� NO. . . . 3.\.3 . . . . .g. . and said parcel is affected by Section(s) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r the Massachusetts State Building Code. lans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in =cordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance. y� 3 In O'1 N rrnrq = W LL- Q }.. It M EJ Vl. f7 O CD W m vi o , �o c >_ CD `.' -he Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following •easons: Q e. ova \3UA V" The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem ?oning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary nardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero- gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for the following reasons: e-ems e o`er �w c� JA cs v^ S'\S V\ T `�c9 s� AA-_'2— rw n.A_ (0� Q'( b s_.�_6 nrr�— esv� "--e- si SV\_ C-r vwu V0 fig - wovke/uJ 1 c�_ \�_av\dSG,� �. . .1 : Address. . . .F. . 57 ."OC14`R . `2�.::. . . . . Telephone.SW. 1(S faTi WA. . • • �A-WV) Address. . . . .:Q. . � Date. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Telephone. . . z ` `�. �G.�.�. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .... . four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The Evening News. t ,� `'A � I 4f•� r Y„, NO.................................... [ -42 M3 PETITION 10 BOARD OF APPEALS LOCATION .(.3....... �II. ((nn .''...''. ADDRESS-.......... S-o V.��............ ................................................ CONDITIONS _.. ....................................... ............................................................... ................................................................. ................................................................. ........................................................ PETITION APPROVED.................... ❑ DENIED......................... 19......... G..::......................................... �- LI) -� i Y � � Z ' N� .P mm , m m n rT1 r- n a k � � d r a 1 509 7 oIIAP , I rL�a6 0 24 x26 I12459 m 12995 y CRFF /oc N� s 79D . r 35-5 .� \ 2 ri � � 6 ;ITY OF SALEM\ ob 102 c".EO AC bt l\a5 \ r 1e � 2 96 e `e0 \ah PG n �? oA D'o -A 37 A � 66\ 1 :" ee ry0a 0 9Q 6 68 7 \ \ 91 Ac V i / I APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . oftti�rn, ��9E{tts$ttrftusPffs �Roarb of "cal TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS: ,e Undersigned repres t th t he is are the owners or a certain parcel or land locayo N0. . . . { Q•_. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Street; _onina District. . ./� and said parcel is affected by Section(s ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . the Massachusetts State Building Code. fans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the inspector of Buildings in _cordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance. n � H � m LJ _ 0- N of•'- �� U; q LL. M rn c= r a r_• CD U CO �— he Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following 'easons: �;5v� I\ S CHpen, ov` 13UA�%� "he Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem :oning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to ipprove the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said 'oning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary iardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero- lating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for the following reasons: �_ePs use �w ctJA 0 2 0 L�eax 0\c\ S�Sh. Y c0.rM.Q--- esv. �_� ` o-� y\0� �_U wo-vk 1 to e` V.o V"d s ( p Address. . .� . . Sl .� !4�1 . . . . .. �. . . . . . . . Telephone.S '. S Lz1S .4 . . . . . .$I Address. . . . .`:d. �J� . Z.G�f. . Sr�1�-�-�• Date. . . . . . . . . . . . Telephone. . . 7o .V. - . . . . . . . . . . . . . B . . . . . Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The. . . Evening News. a ti IZL i- a Z v Q a- W G U V _ WW z uN 3 � U Q O .L J z CD t \ \\ 6 89 \ Ii i -- r- - C41 0 r c3a ro i \ JiP o 9d V296 6nV\ c 1� y` t � k1� `� or 09'Z \. 44 Zol 9 0 _ �' ,.. �V43-IVS J0 All^ 04 O a 3. C� $_GE & \ �\ fps O• � I Py \ 1� 631 9.3x CDC A "" eoy 6-6 Cb 6c r \� % °/ 2662 {7Z 90 OZ I C" / I�� i b j CITY OF SALEM BOARD OF APPEAL 745-9595 Ext. 381 Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter- ested in the petition submitted by Tony Lena for a Variance from the City of Salem Sign Ordinance r to allow a roof top sign at 313 Highland Ave.(BPD). Said hearing to be held Wednesday,March 20,1991 11. at 7:00 P.M., One Salem een, 2nd floor, RICHARD Ar BENCAL, Chairman F March 6, 13, 1991 1 CITY OF SALEM BO4RD OF APPEAL 795-9595 Ext. 381 Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter- ested in the petition submitted by Tony Lena for a Variance from the City of Salem Sign Ordinance - to allow a roof top sign at 313 Highland Ave.(BPD). Said hearing to be held Wednesday,March 20,1991 at 7:00 P.M., One Salem Green, 2nd floor. RICHARD A. BENCAL, Chairman { March 6, 13, 1991 I 1 CITY OF SALEM ` BOARD OF APPEAL 745-9595 Ext. 381 Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter- i esled in the petition submitted by Tony Lena for a V ariance from the City of Salem Sign Ordinance to allow a roof top sign at 313 Highlan v 201991 Said hearing ft be held Wednesday, at 7:00 P.M., One Salem Green, 2nd ❑C . RICHARD A. BENCAL, Chairman March 6, 13, 1991 APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C �a gft of 2llPrii� Mfi'3fIL�t1IfiP fi 'lnar3 of T'7 TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS: :e Undersigned re pre nt *ha he is are the owners of a certain parcel of land Ioc tS� No. . . . . . .3J . . �4 land-. V.�-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Street; Toning Distri ct. .�f. and said parte] is affected by Section(s ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . the Massachusetts State Building Code. fans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the inspector of Buildings in _cordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance. LU -71 he Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the fo l owiEd easons: The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem _oning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to ipprove the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said Toning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary ,ardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero- 3ating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for the following reasons: ba 6L(ASL U� C e d k-L4&I1.LC4 t�LZ lLu u� Q, wc�l e Iia n� 0L"L ,t— �n LK�� rKe A G I Plu/r - Owner. J. • • • ' ' Address. • • • • •• ' "' Telephone. . .? —�� W. Petitioner. . �-(tV�l.� c. Address. . . .`.S, ,�J•1\S?? . . .V: . . . .,?W1� C Q. . Date. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Telephoner—�-� 9. By. . . . ,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . ... . . . . . .. . . . . . . . ... . . \ four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The Evening News. m O i _ O Z C � � C h, NOj al .. �': 3r• ' 11 J Y i7 t i b . r a V Q U-j Lr) u, C U MU-L? � C:) ;. U, c L Q Nf U c LLJ -A� `Z 91 ~ v co Q � . Vi � Z J = • �c b r Q � a 11 U Q U-j . � W UJI G V - W WW � L t o\ � kill& - C t � A � 206 Wo 24 2 ` x \ � \ �12459 3m !2995 C �� 79 t, Y \ \ O i o-s \ \ CITY OF SALEM\ pC \06 \ \ x \6 \ 102 \\ \ \ 2.60 AcpQ9 61 D110 \? OA 37 A \ 6\ w �9 t ry D � 9Q 68 6 1 - I \ SII •••�._� \\' 9.2c \ \ • BOARD OF ASSESSORS CI'T'Y HALL PAGE., .. ........ DAf E 6 uto- ABU I Ut.�,t� �lpj 4 4 5 05 SUBJECT PROPERTY: MAP: 08 L0 T'. 01 6 45 SUFFg 201 0 6 PROPERTY ADDRESSg 0313 HIC"il-4LAND AVENUE 8 F- P' ..... . .. .. 7 ....... ,) TJPI'Jt�K VlyVZL. LVYP.L Uj'�L)LK, Oh' " ,ALEt ... . .. . -, I ' I , .. .. ... .. 10 • T, 12 9 . ... ... . . . . F" cwrmn� rl�47` ADDRESS 10 14 911 ✓ — 07 0042 0329 HIGHLAND AVENUE CRETE REALTY TRUST 9 BRIDGE STREET is 12 16 6AG 'I.l . . .. ....GAL 13 . .. ..... ...... 17 — S i�l CNVY b4[]'.Ell`CI,7 Yl 107- ' - 0012, U, 'OF-, 9 T RANSEEW STAT TO y, '4 . ..... 201 Rl G4 '3qP HIGH6,419 AV —EF"IL' — SOLIMENO CHRISTINA 7R SALEM MA 0,19*70 22 17 — 08 0018 0318 HIGHLAND AVENUE ADAMO JOHN 318 HIGHLANC) AVENUE 23 18 24 .. . . .. . MARY K _F_w MA Qli?7n kk� 'sSAL.VANR 19 '63', 4;1,, 2• 6 'o c ....... .....�, 27 *F' ....... ..........",I I I �� 21 • OR 9 -F-2 8 'T 2GEORGETOWN PIA 0,1833 5 23 L,1Z — 08 0146 0323 HIGHLAND AVENUE MOOSE LOYAL ORDER OF INC 319 HIGHLAND A 310 243 25 3 0 26 5:R .......... 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 ,x 'Oy8 27 s I I S I I K .......... 28 • 29 3 0 3C 4 ............. 31 ..... . ...... • 32 .. ... • % ... ..... 4q 4 34 5 0 35 0 36 9 7 ................... ... . .... 3 ......... ............... s r, so ............ ............ 9 .............K 40 41 L4 Ls 42 56 43 0 .. ... . . 5 7 .......... ... .... 44 v . .... .. 58 59 60 45 46 61 • 47 662 48 4 49 sQ 6 52 053 7 54 4 ice 55 taR 75 0 .. .... ... ..