296 HIGHLAND AVENUE - ZBA (2) 1
296 Highland Ave. B-2 h
_. . _
— \
Gary A. Nadeau
- A-1 Auto Brokers
4
A t
Titu of , 551VM, 4RUSSadjusett8
M
Pnttrd Of (Appezd
4MM(
AUGUST 4, 1994
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT AS OF AUGUST 2, 1994 THE DECISION OF
THE BOARD OF APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK TO
DENY THE PETITION OF GARY A. NADEAU FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT TO ALLOW A
USED CAR LOT AT 296 HIGHLAND AVENUE
BOARD OF APPEAL
BRENDA M. SUMRALL
CLERK OF THE BOARD
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY
CLERK.
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17, of
MGL Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing
of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL Chapter
40A. , Section 11, the Variance/Special Permit granted herein shall not take
effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City
Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if
such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is
recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of
the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of
title.
Board of Appeal
,yyn Ctv of ttlem, IEassarllusrtts
f13a4"°" Evara of Av}ienl
AUC
CITY OF SALEM
CLERKS OFFICESS
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF GARY A. NADEAU D/B/A A-1 AUTO ANNEX FOR A
SPECIAL PERMIT AT 296 HIGHLAND AVENUE (B-2)
A hearing on this petition was held February 16, 1994 with the
following Board Members present: Stephen Touchette, Chairman; Gary
Barrett, Nina Cohen and Associate Member Arthur LaBrecque. Notice of
the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the
hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in
accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioner is requesting a Special Permit to allow the use of the
property as a used car lot. Property is located in the B-2 district.
The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to
this request for a Special Permit is Section 5-3(j ) , which provides
as follows:
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance,
the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and
conditions set forth in Sections 8-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permits
for alterations and reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and
for changes, enlargement, extension or expansion of nonconforming
lots, land, structures, and uses, provided, however, that such
change, extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be
substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to
the neighborhood.
In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit
requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be
granted upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special
Permit will promote the public health; safety, convenience and
welfare of the City's inhabitants.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence
presented at the hearing and after viewing the plans. makes the
following findings of fact:
1. The petitioner failed to file a set of accurate, scaled drawings
showing the proposed use of the site.
2. The petitioner failed to provide evidence that the request could
be granted without substantial detriment to the public good or
without nullifying and substantially derogating from the intent of
the district or the purpose of the ordinance.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF GARY NADEAU D/B/A A-1 AUTO ANNEX FOR A
SPECIAL PERMIT AT 296 HIGHLAND AVENUE, SALEM
page two
AUG Z 9 24 AN '94
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the a39#4eW%ADEM.
presented, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: CLERK'S OFMASS
CE
1. The relief requested cannot be granted without substantial
detriment to the public good or without nullifying and substantially
derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the
ordinance.
2. The granting of the Special Permit requested will not be in
harmony with the neighborhood and will not promote the public health,
safety, convenience or welfare of the City's inhabitants.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, three (3) in
favor, one (1), Mr. Barrett in opposition to the motion to grant the
relief requested. Having failed to garner the four affirmative votes
required to pass, the motion to grant fails and the petition for a
Special Permit is denied.
Special Permit Denied
July 20, 1994
Stephen C. Touchette, Chairman
Board of Appeal
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND
. THE CITY CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section
17 of MGL Chapter 40A and shall be filed within 20 days after the
date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk.
Pursuant to MGL Chapter 40A, Section 11, the Variance or Special
Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the
decision, bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days
have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal
has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in
the South Essex Registry or Deeds and indexed under the name of the
owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate
of Title.
Board of Appeal
Titu of tzlem, � ttssttclrusetts
Evarb of A eul
Q kX 1 9 A AH '9�1
CITY OF
CLERKSSLOFFI�ESS
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF GARY A. NADEAU D/B/A A-1 AUTO ANNEX FOR A
SPECIAL PERMIT AT 296 HIGHLAND AVENUE (B-2)
A hearing on this petition was held February 16, 1994 with the
following Board Members present: Stephen Touchette, Chairman; Gary
Barrett, Nina Cohen and Associate Member Arthur LaBrecque. Notice of
the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the
hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in
accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioner is requesting a Special Permit to allow the use of the
property as a used car lot. Property is located in the B-2 district.
The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to
this request for a Special Permit is Section 5-3(j ) , which provides
as follows:
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance,
the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and
conditions set forth in Sections 8-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permits
for alterations and reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and
for changes, enlargement, extension or expansion of nonconforming
lots, land, structures, and uses, provided, however, that such
change, extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be
substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to
the neighborhood.
In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit
requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be
granted upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special
Permit will promote the public health-, safety, convenience and
welfare of the City's inhabitants.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence
presented at the hearing and after viewing the plans. makes the
following findings of fact:
1. The petitioner failed to file a set of accurate, scaled drawings
showing the proposed use of the site.
2. The petitioner failed to provide evidence that the request could
be granted without substantial detriment to the public good or
without nullifying and substantially derogating from the intent of
the district or the purpose of the ordinance.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF GARY NADEAU D/B/A A-1 AUTO ANNEX FOR A
SPECIAL PERMIT AT 296 HIGHLAND AVENUE, SALEM
page two
AUG Z 9 ia AH '94
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the eWtiel �ALEM. MASS
presented, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: CLERK'S OFFICE
1. The relief requested cannot be granted without substantial
detriment to the public good or without nullifying and substantially
derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the
ordinance.
2. The granting of the Special Permit requested will not be in
harmony with the neighborhood and will not promote the public health,
safety, convenience or welfare of the City's inhabitants.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, three (3) in
favor, one (1), Mr. Barrett in opposition to the motion to grant the
relief requested. Having failed to garner the four affirmative votes
required to pass, the motion to grant fails and the petition for a
Special Permit is denied.
Special Permit Denied
July 20, 1994
Stephen C. Touchette, Chairman
Board of Appeal
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND
THE CITY CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section
17 of MGL Chapter 40A and shall be filed within 20 days after the
date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk.
Pursuant to MGL Chapter 40A, Section 11, the Variance or Special
Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the
decision, bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days
have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal
has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in
the South Essex Registry or Deeds and indexed under the name of the
owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate
of Title.
Board of Appeal
(Gitu of �;ttfem, � . assrurflusetts
`ae Botts of Aupeul
AUG 1 9 Z4 AN 19q
CITY OF
CLERKSS p fICESS
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF GARY A. NADEAU D/B/A A-1 AUTO ANNEX FOR A
SPECIAL PERMIT AT 296 HIGHLAND AVENUE (B-2)
A hearing on this petition was held February 16, 1994 with the
following Board Members present: Stephen Touchette, Chairman; Gary
Barrett, Nina Cohen and Associate Member Arthur LaBrecque. Notice of
the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the
hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in
accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioner is requesting a Special Permit to allow the use of the
property as a used car lot. Property is located in the B-2 district.
The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to
this request for a Special Permit is Section 5-3(j ) , which provides
as follows:
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance,
the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and
conditions set forth in Sections 8-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permits
for alterations and reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and
for changes, enlargement, extension or expansion of nonconforming
lots, land, structures, and uses, provided, however, that such
change, extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be
substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to
the neighborhood.
In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit
requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be
granted upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special
Permit will promote the public health; safety, convenience and
welfare of the City's inhabitants.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence
presented at the hearing and after viewing the plans. makes the
following findings of fact:
1. The petitioner failed to file a set of accurate, scaled drawings
showing the proposed use of the site.
2. The petitioner failed to provide evidence that the request could
be granted without substantial detriment to the public good or
without nullifying and substantially derogating from the intent of
the district or the purpose of the ordinance.
'A
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF GARY NADEAU D/B/A A-1 AUTO ANNEX FOR A
SPECIAL PERMIT AT 296 HIGHLAND AVENUE, SALEM
page two
AUG Z 9 24 AH '9�1
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the E04" %4LEM,
presented, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: CLERK'S OFFICESS
1. The relief requested cannot be granted without substantial
detriment to the public good or without nullifying and substantially
derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the
ordinance.
2. The granting of the Special Permit requested will not be in
harmony with the neighborhood and will not promote the public health,
safety, convenience or welfare of the City's inhabitants.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, three (3) in
favor, one (1), Mr. Barrett in opposition to the motion to grant the
relief requested. Having failed to garner the four affirmative votes
required to pass, the motion to grant fails and the petition for a
Special Permit is denied.
Special Permit Denied
July 20, 1994
Stephen C. Touchette, Chairman
Board of Appeal
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND
THE CITY CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section
17 of MGL Chapter 40A and shall be filed within 20 days after the
date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk.
Pursuant to MGL Chapter 40A, Section 11, the Variance or Special
Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the
decision, bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days
have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal
has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in
the South Essex Registry or Deeds and indexed under the name of the
owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate _
of Title.
Board of Appeal
k
itv of �ttlPm, �. assurltusetfs
-6oara of Au}teal
AUG 1 9 z4 AN 'Sq
CITY OF
CLERKSSLEM, MASS
CF
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF GARY A. NADEAU D/B/A A-1 AUTO ANNEX FOR A
SPECIAL PERMIT AT 296 HIGHLAND AVENUE (B-2)
A hearing on this petition was held February 16, 1994 with the
following Board Members present: Stephen Touchette, Chairman; Gary
Barrett, Nina Cohen and Associate Member Arthur LaBrecque. Notice of
the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the
hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in
accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioner is requesting a Special Permit to allow the use of the
property as a used car lot. Property is located in the B-2 district.
The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to
this request for a Special Permit is Section 5-3(j ) , which provides
as follows:
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance,
the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and
conditions set forth in Sections 8-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permits
for alterations and reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and
for changes, enlargement, extension or expansion of nonconforming
lots, land, structures, and uses, provided, however, that such
change, extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be
substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to
the neighborhood.
In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit
requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be
granted upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special
Permit will promote the public health; safety, convenience and
welfare of the City's inhabitants.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence
presented at the hearing and after viewing the plans. makes the
following findings of fact:
1. The petitioner failed to file a set of accurate, scaled drawings
showing the proposed use of the site.
2. The petitioner failed to provide evidence that the request could
be granted without substantial detriment to the public good or
without nullifying and substantially derogating from the intent of
the district or the purpose of the ordinance.
V�.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF GARY NADEAU D/B/A A-1 AUTO ANNEX FOR A
SPECIAL PERMIT AT 296 HIGHLAND AVENUE, SALEM
page two
A#& Z s 24 AM #9q
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the eMt4e eSAIEM. MASS
presented, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: CLERK'S OFFICE
1. The relief requested cannot be granted without substantial
detriment to the public good or without nullifying and substantially
derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the
ordinance.
2. The granting of the Special Permit requested will not be in
harmony with the neighborhood and will not promote the public health,
safety, convenience or welfare of the City's inhabitants.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, three (3) in
favor, one (1) , Mr. Barrett in opposition to the motion to grant the
relief requested. Having failed to garner the four affirmative votes
required to pass, the motion to grant fails and the petition for a
Special Permit is denied.
Special Permit Denied
July 20, 1994
Stephen C. Touchette, Chairman
Board of Appeal
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND
THE CITY CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section
17 of MGL Chapter 40A and shall be filed within 20 days after the
date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk.
Pursuant to MGL Chapter 40A, Section 11, the Variance or Special
Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the
decision, bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days
have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal
has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in
the South Essex Registry or Deeds and indexed under the name of the
owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate
of Title.
Board of Appeal
fit" of `ttlem, �fttssuchusetts
'Enara of '-�u}1en1
�..` AVG 1 9 za QN '9�1
OITY OF
OLERK,SLOFFICpSS
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF GARY A. NADEAU D/B/A A-1 AUTO ANNEX FOR A
SPECIAL PERMIT AT 296 HIGHLAND AVENUE (B-2)
A hearing on this petition was held February 16, 1994 with the
following Board Members present: Stephen Touchette, Chairman; Gary
Barrett, Nina Cohen and Associate Member Arthur LaBrecque. Notice of
the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the
hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in
accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioner is requesting a Special Permit to allow the use of the
property as a used car lot. Property is located in the B-2 district.
The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to
this request for a Special Permit is Section 5-3(j ) , which provides
as follows:
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance,
the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and
conditions set forth in Sections 8-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permits
for alterations and reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and
for changes, enlargement, extension or expansion of nonconforming
lots, land, structures, and uses, provided, however, that such
change, extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be
substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to
the neighborhood.
In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit
requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be
granted upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special
Permit will promote the public health; safety, convenience and
welfare of the City's inhabitants.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence
presented at the hearing and after viewing the plans. makes the ---
following findings of fact:
1. The petitioner failed to file a set of accurate, scaled drawings
showing the proposed use of the site.
2. The petitioner failed to provide evidence that the request could
be granted without substantial detriment to the public good or
without nullifying and substantially derogating from the intent of
the district or the purpose of the ordinance.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF GARY NADEAU D/B/A A-1 AUTO ANNEX FOR A
SPECIAL PERMIT AT 296 HIGHLAND AVENUE, SALEM
page two
AUG Z 9 24 AN '9�1
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the EW dee%QCEM.
presented, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: CLERK'S OM MASS
1. The relief requested cannot be granted without substantial
detriment to the public good or without nullifying and substantially
derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the
ordinance.
2. The granting of the Special Permit requested will not be in
harmony with the neighborhood and will not promote the public health,
safety, convenience or welfare of the City's inhabitants.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, three (3) in
favor, one (1), Mr. Barrett in opposition to the motion to grant the
relief requested. Having failed to garner the four affirmative votes
required to pass, the motion to grant fails and the petition for a
Special Permit is denied.
Special Permit Denied
July 20, 1994
eeel
Stephen C. Touchette, Chairman
Board of Appeal
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND
THE CITY CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section
17 of MGL Chapter 40A and shall be filed within 20 days after the
date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk.
Pursuant to MGL Chapter 40A, Section 11, the Variance or Special
Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the
decision, bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days
have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal
has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in
the South Essex Registry or Deeds and indexed under the name of the
owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate
of Title.
Board of Appeal
DATE OF HEARING /7Zc�,oZq Z
PETITIONER
LOCATION
CM (6-a kC
MOTION: TO GRANT SECOND AMENDMENT SECOND
TO DENY ° SECOND
TO RE-HEAR SECOND
WITHDRAW SECOND
CONTINUE SECOND
ROLL CALL PRESENT GRANT DENY AMEND WITHDRAW RE-HEAR CONTINUE-
GARY M. BARRETT
APBFRT-C-fiTGC
!l/)STEPHEN T!)UCHETTE
NINA V. COHEN
ASSOCIATE MEMBERS
ARTHUR LEBRECQUE ��
CONDITIONS:
i
7�
J
� r✓Com
\zbaform\
APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
di#V oftzlem, ttssttcl�us>e#ts J 9 I
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
The Undersigned repre,�ent that he is are the owners of a certain parcel of land located
at NO.•?%9.4-. . �/4y�4R•! !;✓e. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Street; Zoning District 6?. . .
. ; and said parcel is affected by Section(s). . . . . . . . . . . . . .
of the Massachusetts State Building Code.
Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in
accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance.
Ne m R �Qcia C �Ex�:r Tp ^n e T �i1
h 4 Y
mi
m
rnu
The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following
reasons: - -
The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem =-
Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to
approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said
Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary
hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero-
gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for
the following reasons:
ta.a o -
LD ,f, w w n
v
L ..Owner. . .. . .y . . /7, d(IiJ. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
LU-c*
E=' � Address?27 /!t!C . . .. .. ... . . .xi�i✓•/+i+. /11?
.J
Tel enhono . 'Z'7. . . 7f 7/� . . . . . . . . . . .
Petitioner ':�`/ . !?'#72. . . . . f??2'�e!' . . . . . . .
Address'2:4. .
Date.�?.r�`� !y. . . . . . . . . . ,509 7�S,2J21
Telephone . . . . . �/ 1 . . . . . . . . . . .
By. . . . . >. . : ti W./. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of
Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .
four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The
Evening News.
f--H t ex ✓t 'G rw
cam.", 4 � C1
v
NO.................................... r. n
p r
PETITION TO BOARD OF APPEALS
LOCATION
................................................................
PETIT'IONER..........................................
ADDRESS...............................................
c f
................................................
CONDITIONS
................................................._..............
........................ .......................................
................................................................
i
.................................................................
.................................................................
PETITION APPROVED.................... ❑
DENIED......................... 0
.............................................. 19.........
t� Pit1`
07-01-94.15.30:07.26817-LJUL
CITY OF SALEM
1 07-01-94.15:30:07.&6817 LJUL
I
BOARD OF APPEAL -
j 745-9595 Ext. 381 CITY OF SALEM
j Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter- BOARD OF APPEAL
� ested in the petition submitted by A-I AUTO 745-9595 Ext. 381 ,
. ANNEX for a Special Permit for a used car lot Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter-
)Said-hearing_to----- ,. _ ested in the petition submitted by A-1 AUTO
be held WEDNESDAY, JULY 20, 1994 AT 6:00 ANNEX for a Special Permit for a used car lot
6 P.M., ONE SALEM GREEN, second floor. at-�LAXD-AVE—(113.2)x-5aid-hearing.to—---
'.�Julv,6,_13, 1994PHEN TOUCHETTE, Chairman be held WEDNESDAY, JULY 20, 1994 AT 6:00
SN26817 P.M., ONE SALEM GREEN, second floor.
t --'-T -- - STEPHEN TOUCHETTE, Chairman
_Rilv r, 13.. 1994 SN26817
07-01-94.15:30707 2 817-LJUL
07-01-94.15,30-07 2617-LjUl,
i
CITY OF SALEM
BOARD OF APPEAL CITY OF SALEM
745-9595 Ext. 381- BOARD OF APPEAL
Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter- 745-9595 Ext. 381
ested in the petition submitted by A-1 AUTOi Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter-
ANNEX for a Special Permit for a used car lot ested in the petition submitted by A-1 AUTO i
aid-hearingato<--- _ ; ANNEX for a Special Permit for a used car lot
be held WEDNESDAY, JULY 20, 1994 AT 6:00 moi*:::^,�•,,;
P.M., ONE SALEM GREEN, second floor. be held WEDNESDAY /B l sed-heaving-to-�..__,
, JULY 1994 6:00
- - STEPHEN TOUCHETTE, Chairman I � P.M., ONE SALEM GREEN, second floor.
SN26817 t }. STEPHEN TOUCHETTE, Chairman
i_July-_6, 13, 1994
-- _ SN26817 '`
APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
,,. pawb of � ettl
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
The Undersigned 7present that he is are the owners of a certain parcel of land located
at NO. J, . . . . t`/!y�!"i 91. . . /! . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Street; Zoning District.4-?Z .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : and said parcel is affected by Section(s) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
of the Massachusetts State Building Code.
Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in
accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance.
Alegi it SSPe ;+e To Oo°e�l 6! �r or'
.a Z
rno L
A�
O� W
n
N �
The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following
reasons:
The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem
Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to -
approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said
Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary
hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero-
gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for
the following reasons:
� µ'C
N is w
Owner. . ��,y. .�: . Gf/i�3UP�.�1. . . . .. . . . . . . . . .
LJ
=r �� Address�7. ./ e^!%4v0. t7. . t�1.
Telephone. l/>. . .. "9.7/9. . . . . . . . . . . . .
Pet ti one r :�. . f/��. .!`t!v��f�. . . . . . . . .
/ !1 Addressa9G. . /(�����. . f)✓C . . .s�!���`Y. . .
Date. . lo.��7. � . . . . . . . Telephone. . 7TS�2 )-2- .
i
By. . . .5. . . . . . . . . . . . .
Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of
Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The
Evening News.
IP
NO.................................... W rlx�
PETITION TO BOARD OF APPEALS
LOCATION
296 Highland Ave.
.........................................................I......
PETITIONER.....Gary...Nadeau...........
ADDRESS..........296
Salem, MA
................................................
1.
HEARING:
CONDITIONS
................... ............ .......................
................... .... .......................................
................................................................
.................................. .............................
.................................................................
.................................................................
PETITION APPROVED.................... ❑
DENIED.........................
.............................................119.........
/
J
� i
? > J
e �
V
9G r
� pl bin OLPc °
M CO
V tda R
v _
l°iEs
v
�to
I E
v
pJ
r, I p �..
F (•O%
U.P
a 11 M2SS 11J9 =19� wro.
I Y,
rgo.00' °I
PLOT PGAN
y /GHL.S'NO q✓ENUE
3gLff", Mi9S5.
OfTE (' OWYE.P, /NC. 'Su2 VEY025 MgSS.
,9G GENT.2/aG °�ST2EBT SF+u��/6,
ZO' M,92GH �3, 9 90
wu, O 20 FO GO
1��Y4 StlPvt t`�'
••��nnv
/
/ -\
/
� EP iti I n
a
i > V
e
i
0 01 E 14
ego
All) °
e
L�
f GOt U.P.
d I �Y/¢SSi✓Jq goE� pine�v7'h Nro. _._
150.00' °I
,vEIE
N/GNGA `E�
KTE. i07) q✓E
PLOT PGF7.�
N /G q I-RA/0 gVeAV4/E
s.94GEM, MaSS.
U2 VEY025
OTTf f OH/Yf2, -s MgSS.
' ,9G GENTQ/aG SreT2EET Sf+UG US.
.S�n;arw �.. 3GFCE
"gecH 13, 1990
20 40 40
4 °�sunvlq..
'wenn
i
i
a
i a �
V
QG' �
4' 'L Iola
L°f
ld
o02 v
i I /h¢SSl�R ��enrTh
NYo.
1
I 2,
LSo.00' °I
�//GNLF7M0 C
KTE• /07� q✓En/clE
PL pT PLgv
` yyGHLANO y✓ENUE
' OwyEe, /nY c. sue VEYoeS
- � ofTE f n.YgSS.
L9G CENTQAG 3T2EET SAUGt/3, ,
;!— ;JC9LE ✓"� 2p M'9@GN 13, Y990
01
e- I
UIt,
,1 f'mlo �` ♦O GO
O YO
••1.•L tVP�\
•�YV—v
eP
/ ev
/ p F90 1
a
� e J
V
y4. �
(1� OL 1114
ea
d dL / V
pa'`' o
� v
r Lo.
� u.v
g0,.r glc
� 1
/Sa.O o' cl
N/ GHLA'�O �
are. /07) q✓�cvUE
- PLOT PLFa'�/
y /GH L.S'NO .9 VENUE
6F) LEM. MASS.
SU.E Vf YO25
oTTE f' n,rg55.
i9G GENT2HL ST2EET SFr UG US,
in ura... JGFGE
j40
/
/ OA
/ ' V
14
i ` V
o a e
r
n
Q, ..Mrr inerr7h
LSA+ p
I /+leSS1�R pE
/50.00' ul
io7� aVEAlaE
H,, J4 ¢TE.4 ,gAJ0 C I
PLOT PG qAd
N /GsNGF1N0 yVENUE
S,gLEJu, M.9S6.
' OfTE S` Ow YE4, /Nf. Su.2 VEY0¢5
' ,9G CEN T2HL ST2EET Sv+uG US, Mg3S.
✓.-_�� dGFLE + �•'� 20' MH2CH /3, /990
I p
GO
20 �p
wu 1'
psi
q"r��suavi`ot;
to
J _. .`� � _------ :;: . . .Vii- - �-� •,\ o- - _1^1 R:
�� '/�/ c101c I/ '/� pt\pN 1PG ''' `'• `� 1p
-71 ice' a`'`'. .�� ° \', i 1�• `Rpq��`ea
�J�W_ �'fpSGME 52
y11u� .to p0 6195
'1L. — 931 r
T— AS
T 9.3 s M s
All I
' o
e°5 v
v
30A
q O y5
0j29 663 5
66 5
16396
�66'k6NT 160 57
IWI 6068 12024
1 + x 111 44 \/ � `�< h,i 80617 yp 1601 `9 y
/ 1 11111` 29297 V �e \ �; 0626 O 1
0s
i i 1111 43 V 'a\``` O5e i2 0%
M9-L/ x 11`1 /0968 /'(/\\ `. 121
15P?'a yj21 O(
6 ,,F
/11850
42
410 / 3022
JJ/0590 /0,638 V �B
v04 ac \\� An0
` Wlla I 11 9
li 11 4201 k °ow
1
pFPip,
G\SP\'EMage--124 Z92
8 ,t`Vr' X000
11,2469 a .IY90 a
_ .•.I I... 1\si \902 4� . uxa +� �<
1601 \ 11 _
O
O ..11.x. CITY OF SpLEty` \ 6
�j / 03 ac
C \ \ O O 011
y \A90 \ 002 ,°
51 .\B°0 oB IG 1.60 ac ��sin3\\ \g91 q '4• a q \ A
59
.11 k \ .. V
.516 16
P 1.46 AC
V 9u �OO yti \ / N
\b\5 V 4 \At p /
1
BOARD OF ASSESSORS /
CITY HALL PAGE.
-----
241 cm, WA
�, DATE c 06/20/94
i2 _ Ill
CERTIFIED ABUTTERS LIST 3
41
SUBJECT PROPERTY: MAP., i13 LOTg 0029 SU=Fr ::01
s
� s
s PROPERTY ADDRESSx 0296 HIGHLAND AVENUE. 7
9
"And
10
I9 _r PROPERTY AD :t:12
J 13
111 /
14
08 0029 201 0296 HIGHL.AIND AVENUE AME:NTA ME:SSINA DE:SCHAMPS 305 N POMPANO BEACH BLVD #'5.40 l/ 1s
112 POMEANO BEACH L 3Z062-5137 16
11a1 0'S UL107 0050 RAVENNA AVENUE : G ',B ALEXIS TRUST- 50-. RAVE:NlNA AVE.. . f :'7
18
BAt_IO1IS GEORGE TR SALEM MA 01970 9
I15! F12
ODDS anon pAurWWA aurNur
prar
SAI P I TY :.1 is:20
j l6i - 21
1 22
71 0t, 00'1'? 0000 THOMAS CIRCLE ADAMO 'VITO W 186 HENRY AVE � 23
lel 104111-_A LYNN ''iA
Ii9i - ! 24
25
08 00: 0 0000 THOMAS CIRCL_ LAG-rIS ALAMANTIA 30 FAIRVIED
26
Izo{ SALEM MA: 01970 ,:..::;27
d` l, T•" .,+,,:11'441477:-, iil r1\i R"TFIi E�1 2e
Tlt rrn� 6 I RE6 f` L �c Nh�l< -
x,221 - S„v_>vrt MA 01970 ' ;o
j23 08 00:.2 0007 THOMAS CIRCLE LAGONAKIS, ADAMANTIA 30 FAIRVIEW RD
44 SALEM MA (3-1970
31
zsi ? 0005 THOMAS CIRCLE WILLIAMS RICHARD. A 3-T1b::MAS CIRCLE 3
08 LQ':a J, ! 3
26 RC7BERTA J SALEM MA Q:t97G 3s
2B
Ri)E•F_I '1'4 A SAL.E:)''Y r'tA 01970f 3
-' HIGHLANDdJ3:
0028 0300 HIGHLAND AVENUE BRODEINE FRANCIS - )R300 " E 3
301 BRODBINE JEAN S3,ALE.Itf NfA 01970 4
311 08 0030 0288 HIGHLAND- AVENUE GAL.LO L.EONORA :'8$ HI.CiHL?,NTl. AVE:INUE' 71
32 _ _ - - SALEM Mn.. 0.1970 43
331 4
7-)A (l 7i ' AVENUE. . A 'T `O ANDREW 6 HIGHLAND AVENUE{ . � 44
A�EP,I.E
34!
SALEM MA 01970 45
46
_51
08 0038 0015 ORLEANS AVENUE GAL..LO ORLANDO ..1 15 ORLEANS AVENUE 47
'361 GA _O _IOSEPH.INE T SALEM MA 01970 46
3' 0&'. 0039 0017 ORLEANS A!dE;lN1)E GAL:Lc.+ JOSEPH J 18 PURITAN ROAD {49
so
1381 SALEM MA 01970 st
j391' na -,RI FA NR A:VENLIF DID
.. _ ER
T 19. ORLEANS AVENUE
4; 53 RE_ SALEM MA 01970 s3
sa
4' 08 0041 0001 CROSBY STREET DIONNE ERNEST 19 ORLEANS AVENUE ss
D.IONNE CLAIRE 1; SALEM MA OI970 s6
!'i3, 08 0042 0003 CROSBY STREET ROONEY ..1171-IN F 3 CROSBY STREET 57
sa
i44 - . ,. KATHLEEN HLE_EN E SALEM MA 01970 Q l� ''''59
'45i nA tin L..i nQ11 CROSBY S'T'REET BARRY KEVIN R 11 CROSBY ST •`'60
61 - PAULA A SALEM MA 0:1970 61
62
"T Cir; 0044 00'15 CROSBY STREET DE>SCHAMPS FAMIL..Y TRUS, f 45, CROSBY 'ST � 63
DE CHr"MPS RICHARD S ET AL. TRS SALEM MA 01970 64
08 0045 00::2 VEP,DI:;N STREET RHODES ROBERT E: 22 VERDON STREET 6s
. 66.
CYNTHIA W SALEM MA 01970 67
of 69
531 70
711
11164 V �.. 772
73
I551 740156CHIEFASSESSOR
1�,, 7
4k
BOARD OF ASSESSORS
CITY HALLMA
z I DA rE 3 06/20/94 z
3 , CERTIFIED ABUTTERS LIST '
5
5 SUBJECT PROPERTYa "'rAP; t_18 LOT: 0029 SUFE: 201 6
I6
PROPERTY ADDRESS„ 1296 HIGHLAND AVENUE 7
3ti='Su'czi OWNER—.--AftF_9 ' _.�.� S ... 9
;Ito
e l
30 MAP to? Supp PRePERTY A00RESS ASSESS60 OWNER MAILING ADDRESS 13
14
08 0046 0020 VE.:RcDON STREET GEORGENE?= PETER 20 VE:R,DON STREET ✓ s
112; PANAfy SAI F-n MA Q 7 t6
08 0047 0018 'JE:RDr?N STREET ELCiH'fEE:IV lE'htDr?!U ST SALEM Rl_Y TRUST 1:3 VERC?+ tV ryTC2E:ET17
to
HEW.IT'r HARRY A SALEMMA 01970 19
QQ
6j -- - - -- - C'ORINE: SALEM MA 01970 21
22
e1 08 0069 000.3 MICHAEL. ROAD NEW ENGLAND POWER CO 25 RESEARCH AVE: 23
:1 T'1' Q02F'P7Y TA..X DF"Pi_. WES BO .r i1 G nj5 24
:91.. 08 +_1070 0009 MICHAEL ROAD NE:W. ENGLAND POWER CO 25 RESEARCH A'VE'NUE 25
TAX L)-
r-
_ 26
ATT PROPERTY rPT 4JLST r;,:,R+_N 1GH TCi
L1 158 27
G8 0974 9014,44A RI-20 ROUGH ROAD s� wr-w �"iv-'i Alvin Pol _ R .S ,,:. U. 2.1
ATT PROPERTY TAX DEPT WESTBORV{lGH MA 01581 29
L3' 03 0102 0320 .HIGHL.AND AVENUE SALEM CONSERVATION COMM 3031
24 3
125U8 '.01.3'1 0301 HICiHL.r^,Qb AVENUE, WESCOTT REALTY 'TRUST � �03..HIGHLANIY AVE:: -; ?. 3
3
Izfit _. .. ' :WESCOTT MARJOR..I.E. C TR - .::.SALEM MA
0197 0 : ' 3
5
11 +k7ICgroTcA .V +- W : i. AVENUE • j , ;3na naZ, nT WIGWI6AAI at €
X281 -- - WESC OT-T MARJOR.I` V TR SALEM MA 01970 3
z313
08 0138 0307 HIC:iHL.AND AVENUE PL.AIST'ED STUTZ 3 PARI'=H RD 3
301 11-1971'l a
1300 _ OSHE.A THOMAS H JR 9 CROSBY. `STREET a'
U8 0158 0009ROSP.Y ST'RE.ET
3z _ JAYNE A SALEM MA 01970 �-' "'.a
1W 611331I 714 PF"Al TY 7RUqT 10 LOOKQUT TORR ++�� 44
34j - - D.IBIASE E1. 0057 MARI POR01 low PDA[) IATRTATF L.IO ET AL. TRS L.YNNFIELD MA 01940 as
s1
a
47
36! 4a
.1.49
50
51
i
52
1401 53
54
4 55
321 56
1431 - I: 57
_ _ 58
1441: .. ` SB
451 60
461 61
=7i 62
I
1 63
i4al 84
j491 65
66
X601 67
52: 69
70
'3 71
54 'L 72
55I PETLR tr. tiARONJ75
l G74
56, CHIEFASSE.,. SOR 1571 - - _.
BOARD OF ASSESSORS
CI rY HAL.L.
CIA 14A 411 7Q
6.11-11
.... ....... ..
................... .. ..
.... ...................
p, T E �j ............I........I,,"�,,'.","�",'.1, %. , , 2
2 .....
El TTE'R-S'... ...... ...... .........
n CE R T 1:F� A L s T,
3
......... ................ .
........... 4
........... ......
4 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 06 L.Or. 00`9 SUI F _.0405 PROPERTY ADDRESS., 0296 HIGHL.AND AVENUE
6 ASSF!,'2FI) QW14FR t1fF"RqT1hfA Q17SCHAMPS
I i1
............
.........
........ ... .... .....
............
9
MA ILI ISIG 12
12ROM1214�AL)CIRES43- ......... "ASSESSED DIMFA
10 13
.11 / 4 0
C38 C1029 0206 HIGHL.Alff) AVE114UE AlIEN 7 A I N A DESCHAPIPSS 305 N POMPANO BEACH BLVD #510 5
12 POMPANO BEACH FL 33062-5137 16
17
YOOST 18
... ... E, 50� RAVE)M�k
3 ALEX,1.5
0 :
005 PA4 AI�Et�QE
4 .....
.........:.. %,�,,, % ,, 0
PAL -E GE .'i r)
...... ....... I C)I I f-j OR R,
. ....... 19
....°. .....201
16 21
22
017 06 00'1' 0000 THOMAS CI RCL.E ADAMO VITO 14 186 HENRY AVE 23 0
Lylq1%] M16 01902 24
. .. ...........
bb F I E'.w"RD,
0 20 00,7HOM'S �C I Rt L.E
26 0
L)
27
.............. ....... .
........... AL-EN MA,%"OTO.7
21 .. %"
'''"'':...... 28
.. .......
-A 'AP_4 i4_ jGi tkil,��!'j S it
�4 t T PAJ PVTFjJ,R�f� ........
22 SAL.EPI NA 0-19170 Tg
23 300
0 08 0022 0007 71-IOIIAS CI RCLE L.AGONAKIS ADAIIANTIA -70 FAIRVIEW RD 31
24 SALEM MA 0-1970 32
21
04 % S L
;...M..A.I.S . RCARD' A
3 T 0,I A
'S" p- R C
L
. 33
2 ROBERT ..J "WA ^O19'o, 35
27 4i" 3
23 46
ROBERrA A 0 SALEM NA 0-.11?-0 37 29 38
08 00*�Is 0300 1-11(51-IL.AND AVENUE BRODBINE FRANCIS H J R 1-f00 'H I GiHL.Alq 3910
30 �,;U .tF-` 1 431 0
C�CIL 9: A N 7
Li,,I I�I � �%-,,, , 4
iAL%L�OL,.EQAOR 1
2 "lq CIE
6� '6 �6 6,, kjj6'C'j'f6' A14 D� AVE L
0
........ .......
42
....................
SM.EW A ,LT1XT7'LT,'-',,% 43
'IW,,i i.''AE A 1�'D� A VEWLIE 44
��4 'H T GLAIi tq,(JE A ZCA
33
34 S m A LEM M 7
A 0190 45
4
035 f 1 10; 00-78 0015 ORL.EAMS A VEN UE 6AL.L.0 ORL.AlqDO J 15 ORLEANS AVENUE 47
36 rjAj._L.O JOSEPHINE T SALEM NA 0.1970 48
-
-A 49
p
-,AL AN
370 0039, 00,176 ORL.,EANS A U F,
•38 .......
..........................6
50 0
51
........... ..... ............
39
Nc
6"�j t"j'%'1�
0 f b 9 6%6RG� AVEN 4?1.,_%
........6 ..........% `52
40 CLAI RE SAAL.EPI MA 0-1970 53
41 54
0 06 0041 0001 CROSBY STREET DIONNE E Rill E'S 7 19 ORL.EANS AVENUE 55 0
42 DIONNE CL.A.1 RE R SAL.EM MA 01970 56
43 ............. .. i7
sa 0
p6b. R Q ON EN"%'JOHIV�_;P,
0 % Lltii 0046_ 3 C1,0 ......:.Se
...........Z I
44 .... ...... .......... E' ..... .
F EM 6, '%.....%'
.............. ...I..
C R C"_�'S'y" S T 6 %........... .
6""i(E"!) j4' R' so
45 .... .. ......
:, ,. ""4 6............
f1A no Y f
46 PAULA A, SALEM MA 0.1970 61
47 :2 0
08 0044 0015 CROSBY STREET DESCHAMPS I-AMI[..Y TRUST 15 CROSBY ST 3
48 DESCHAMPS RICHARD S. El- AL. TRS SAL-01 MA 0.1970 64
49 E 65
�z'0022:'VEPDON �STREET�'
0 0 A- 00�-5 ...... 4
.............
50
..............
Q ....... 67
-*)Ii' KA 0
t'� "A
"c iY6 N T
... .........
51 ......
...........
.......... ....... 6
52 a
0 53 700
71
54 VT. 72
55 - R C A'NON ... .... 73
%...........
.......... ....... ... ......
...... ....... 74 •
0 56 ...... I— S
......... ......
1751
,A
CH I E
7
............... .........
L o•f
11
BOARD OF ASSESSORS 2-
C.1 TY HALL. PAG- -----
7�, .........
1 !A--5 t970....... . .......... 777777�77 .7
.........-1........ I I
2
2 .......
41, ................... I
3
3 ...... 4
4
5 SUBJECT PROPERTY2 MAP." 08 L.0 r.-, 00*2'9 SOFF. 201
6 PROPERTY ADDRESS. 0,296 H 1(.51-11 ANI) AVENUE 7
PMN�it.-T., , ,, -, -- , I,p.1-- , —1111— .11, a
7
.........
0. .....I...I..
10 MAP tvT%'4-Rt)ffr- I...
13
1 4
10 :, CIS 0046 0020 VERDON STREET GEOR.GiENES P[,'.*T ER 20 VE RDON STREET
1
n is
3 ........
4
CIA' :Pq-Rt'-Y"�: T.R ST.- "I
T
I. .... -HARRIt.
A
.0
P
16 S A L EP I MA 0.1970• 21
1722
03 006? 0003 MICHAEL. ROAD NEW E.NGL.AN() POWER CO 25 RESE'ARCH AVE: 23
is Ajr MA 24
1925
RPH
. ... ... .
26
27
WEST OUG
'00-F v A
•20 1...I.11 1 1 1 1 1 w,
E"
,:
174P74
fr
21 r IPIN
22 ATr PROPERTY TAX DEDEPTWESTBOROUGH PIA 0-158-1 2930
23 08 0 110�21 03:20 H I GHL.AINI D AVENUE* SAL.Ell CONSERVATION COMPI 31
24 Oj=- C,Aj F'rIj 32
25
33
t."A'o 0.1 �H 3
...... 4
CIS 013i' 0301,j
21% ...................I
I N
aL � ...... 35 •
% ...... IiA,
Inj_ T - 3G
27 ,4
D I I',IE (Xv 0 IREALTV 'H� GELA14'[)%,A'�IFNt"Jb",",'.1I 'j-
28 WE-13COTT NARJOR.11E (-,7 TR SALEM MA 019*70 37
29 -18 0307 H1(-iHL.AND AVENUE PLAISM) S7UTZ 3 PARISH RD 3
08 01-1 3
30 &64- FTi WA 01970 40
31 41
G J R 14?9 19 c Lzky,9 )E. j.
F EA
T -,T,! '�%�%,%I�,%�� I',(
)- �I H [ASI H -q7 E
0 0156 1; :000!9• ......%% I ,I
32 ......
........... ....... ........
43
42
33
on� 005 P Iry b7% ,_�;T���, rif ze )44ri -rtr,)j I CIA r Im'I
34 DIBIASE EL.10 ET AL. rW3 L.YNNFIELD MA 019'to 45 1
0 35 46 •
47
36
48
37 ...... ... ..... 49
38
..........
39 52' I'
40 53
41 54
55
42 56
43
IS
57
45 .I......
60
46 61
0 47 :2
3
48 64
41
•
...... ....... ...... 65
66
50
67
41
52 69
.53 70
710
54 72
55
73
�j Fj M UA
74 0
5 CHIEF ........
975
�7 7