Loading...
95 LAWRENCE STREET - BUILDING INSPECTION yik`.��! a� ':.4Y "ro<y`iy.•.W �,',,�.iji.#x�F,'v f�.�.q��:'. l ,y it 95 LAWRENCE STREET b No. ly City of Salem Ward 3— A cH.uoRwr�� �� 6 0 7 APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO BUILD ADDITION, MAKE ALTERATIONS OR NEW CONSTRUCTION IMPORTANT-Applicant to complete all items in sections:1, ll, /it, IV, and IX. I. AT(LOCATION) �y/ /7��7�NeC �T ZONING DISTRICT LOCATION C (NO.) (STREET) � OF BETWEEN /-rI=yQ..3'0�1,/ 19/ . AND C/c�+-tl" /4 ✓i (CROSS STREET) (CROSS STREET) BUILDING //�� LOT l3 t r SUBDIVISION LOT ' BLOCK SIZE 11. TYPE AND COST OF BUILDING -All applicants complete Parts A-D A. TYPE OF IMPROVEMENT D. PROPOSED USE-FOR"DEMOLITION"USE MOST RECENT USE 1 ❑ New building Residential Nonresidential 2 ❑ Addition(it residential,enter number of new 12 One family 18 ❑ Amusement,recreational !rousing units added,if any,in part D,13) 19 ❑ Chwch,other religious 13 ❑ Two or more family-Enter number 3 Alteration(See 2 above) of units ....................................................... 20 ❑ Industrial 21 ❑ Parking garage 4 Repair replacement 14 ❑ Transient hotel,motel,or dormitory- 22 ❑ Service station,repair garage Enter number of units ... 5 ❑ Wrecking(1i multifamily residential,enter number 23 ❑ Hospital,institutional of units in building in Part D, 13) 15 ❑ Garage 24 ❑ Office,bank,professional 6 ❑ Moving(relocation) 16 ❑ Carport 25 ❑ Public utility 26 ❑ School,library,other educational 7 E] Foundation only 17 ❑ Other-Specify 27 E] Stores,mercantile B.OWNERSHIP 28 ❑ Tanks,towers 8 Private(individual,corporation,nonprofit institution,etc.) 29 ❑ Other-Specify 9 ❑ Public(Federal,State,or local.government C.COST (Omit cents) - Nonresidential-Describe in detail proposed use of buildings,e.g.,food processing plant, machine shop,laundry building at hospital,elementary school,Secondary school,college, parochial school,parking garage for department store,rental office building,office building 10. Cost of improvement ......................................................... $ ,OIj at industrial plant.It use of existing building is being changed,enter proposed use. - To be installed but not included in the above cost a. Electrical........................................................................... O C b. Plumbing............................:............................................. O c. Heating,air conditioning............................................. O d. Other(elevator.etc.)..................................................... dA/ 11. TOTAL COST OF IMPROVEMENT s, DG�J/O� III. SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS OF BUILDING -For new buildings and additions, complete Parts E-L;demolition, complete only Parts J&M,all others skip to IV E. PRINCIPAL TYPE OF FRAME F. PRINCIPAL TYPE OF HEATING FUEL G. TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL I. TYPE OF MECHANICAL 30 ❑ Masonry(wall bearing) 35 ❑ Gas 40 Public or private company Will there be central air II� conditioning? LS 31 Wood frame 36 &'Oil 41 ❑ Private(septic tank etc.) 32 ❑ Structural steel 37 ❑ Electricity 44 WYes 45 -] No 33 ❑ Reinforced concrete 38 ❑ Coal H. TYPE OF WATER SUPPLY Will there by an elevator! 34 ❑ Other-Specify 39 ❑ Other-Specify 42 ®Public or private company 4rey- 47 43 E] Private(well,cistern) ZZZ"""""" J.DIMENSIONS M. DEMOLITION OF STRUCTURES: 48. Number of stones ............................................................ as. Total square feet of area all floors,based on exterior - Has Approval from Historical Commission been received exterior dimensions ......................................................................... for any structure over fifty(50)years? Yes_ No_ 50. Total land area,sq.ft....................................................... Dig Safe Number K.NUMBER OF OFF-STREET PARKING SPACES Pest Control: 51. Enclosed ................................. 52. Outdoors HAVE THE FOLLOWING UTILITIES BEEN DISCONNECTED? Yes No L RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS ONLY Water: 53. Enclosed ............................................................................. Electric: Gas: 54. Number of full........................................... Sewer: � bathrooms DOCUMENTATION FOR THE ABOVE MUST BE ATTACHED Partial...................................... BEFORE A PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED. IV. COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING: Historic District? Yes_ NoX (If yes, please enclose documentation from Hist. Com.) Conservation Area? Yes_ No-X (If yes, please enclose Order of Conditions) Has Fire Prevention approved and stamped plans or applications? Yes_ NOA Is property located'in the S.R.A. district? Yes_ No- Comply with Zoning? YesA— No (If no,enclose Board of Appeal decision) Is lot grandfathered? Yes_ No (If yes,submit documentation/if no,submit Board of Appeal decision) If new construction,has the proper Routing Slip been enclosed? Yes_ No Is Architectural Access Board approval required? Yes_ No_ (If yes,submit documentation) Massachusetts State Contractor License # Oa"�3�/� Salem License# (0'01 dill d Home Improvement Contractor # ��5' Homeowners Exempt form (if applicable) Yes_ No_ CONSTRUCTION TO BE COMMENCED WITHIN SIX (6) MONTHS OF ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT If an extension is necessary, please submit CONSTRUCTION IS TO BE COMPLETED BY: in writing to the Inspector of Buildings. V. IDENTIFICATION • To be completed by all applicants Name Mailing address-Number,street,city,and state ZIP Code Tel.No. 1. dtOtra�,140 Owner or Lessee 2. Hi c'Hr� l S, J Ti�Ti o�v �Qo��/ o/goo tiGr��F Contractor , r IA -116VC� ��r •5��� Builder's !,(/ YG Ucense No. 3. Architect or Engineer I hereby certify that the proposed work is authorized by the owner of record and that I have been authorized by the owner to make this application as his authorized agent and we agree to conform to all applicable laws of this jurisdiction. Signature,of applica 2&f!�:4Add&SI /���� _ Application date DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE VI. VALIDATION Building I �] _ FOR DEPARTMENT USE ONLY Permit number L/ J Building Use Group Permit issued / ' 1 19 Fire Grading Building 99'� Permit Fee $ 5 • V l Live Loading Certificate of Occupancy $ Approved by: occupancy Load � Drain Tile $ Plan Review Fee $ TITLE NOTES AND Data - (For department use) w S at,C Q 'P 2. f PERMIT TO BE MAILED TO: DATE MAILED: Construction to be started by: Completed by: r Y VI ZONING PLAN EXAMINERS NOTES DISTRICT USE FRONT YARD SIDE YARD SIDE YARD REAR YARD NOTES SITE OR PLOT PLAN -For Applicant Use O N VA - t95 1 2 m, � I 8 <` / -. A• $64.6 o•F•t � .N ss.s3' J m J at. A• 371 G..S.f.1_, tJ � I I I 11., - 5e. ee' • __6LE VA1 IANeEB,6 �1- .101dT ¢A6E. .485. NOTES: (1) Verifications of property line dimensions,building offsets,fences,or lot configuration may only be accomplished by an accurate Instrument survey. (2) This plan was not made for recording purposes,for use in preparing deed descriptions or for construction purposes. -- -- ---- (3)rThls plan is for mortgage purposas only - (4) Flood Hazard Zone has been determiriedby sdalaand is notneoessarily exurate. Until definitive plans ere Issued by H.U.D.andlor a vertical conal survey Is pedomled,an=wrote determination cannot be made. s .. MORTGAGE INSPECTION PLOT PLAN ORIGINAL SCALE: 1 inch.10 feet DECELLE ENGINEERING AND SURVEY,INC. DATE oEa. 11b, IgQ3 30 CHESTNUT ST.,CUINCY LOCATION 'SALEM', t.qq. certify to the 0ny.T. Sul. V r"i pd Fide.-L>,-/ ChECIr'I' Us7Kv7� DEED AND PLAN REFERENCE: that the existing dwelling shown on this plan Is located on the lot as 'li 1au4r4 Registry of Deeds designated. It is my professional opinion that the dwelling was either .Deed Book ' T'L'ic Page 406 In compliance with the applicable horizontal dimensional require- plan Book 29B plan Z f ments of the municipality when constructed, or is exempt from enforcement action under GLTitIeVII,Chapter40A,Section7,unless IN Title Er.lva6I. N..,msec.cr IN.r wb,awlbs ••t a ft as.• otherwise noted. �^••^« Te IM1.b.idrte N.wbdg•W6.6. RN•dEA.Iodd. on�M1i.PN^YNOT ' butW HNna9PELWL FL000 WVABDABFA u.E.6nu1W•n Jx mPPN it o+�t�Etx B•p,Us+cs 250 102 -- , Cammmiry No. }y G LAWRENCE ¢ Au6 5, IQ82 777 EMMM WN: DeCEU.E,JR By ft U.9.Dp.mm.MMHou.i,plUA.n DrvNapm.M1 ' $� '9E'OIart0 � FW"Yw,u,w AdmwueWm. �dxaL axon I; l§olessbnel LaM Surveyoi JOB NUMBER I I CITY OF :SALEM BUILDING DEPARTMENT HOMEOWNER LICENSE EXEMPTION Please Print DATE JOB LOCATION Number Street address Section of Town "HOMEOWNER&._9�-PS &zznl nc Zy ✓'!/�So�✓ iJh/�_ y'��� Name Home phone Workphone PRESENT MAILING ADDRESS �if 474 _77— City/Town State Zip Code The current exemption of "homeowners" was extended to include owner-occupied dwellings of six units or less and to allow such homeowners to engage an in- dividual for hire who does not possess a license, rovide acts as supervisor. (State Building Code Section 109.1 .11 that the owner DEFINITION OF HOMEOWNER: Person(s) who owns a parcel of land on which he/she resides or intends to re- side, on which there is, or is intended to be, a one to six family dwelling, attached or detached structures accessory to'such use and/or farm structures. A person who constructs more than one home in a two-year period shall not be considered a homeowner. Such "homeowner" shall submit to the Building Official , on a form acceptable to the Building Official , that he/she shall be res onsible for all such work performed under the buildingpermit. Section 109.1 .1 The undersigned "homeowner" assumes responsibility for compliance with the State Building code and other applicable codes, by-laws, rules and regulations. The undersigned "homeowner" certifies that he/she understands the City of Salem Building Department minimum inspection procedures and requirements and that he/she will comply with said procedures and re uu-irreemeents. HOMEOWNER'S SIGNATURE— APPROVAL OF BUILDING OFFICIAL NOTE: Three family dwellings 35,000 cubic feet, or larger, will be required to comply with State Building Code Section 127.0, Construction Control . HOME OWNER'S EXEMPTION The Code states that: "Any Home Owner performing work for which a building permit is required shall be exempt from the provisions of this section (Section 109.1 .1 - Licensing of Construction Supervisors) ; provided that is a Home Owner engages a person(s) for hire to do such work, that such Home Owner shall act as supervisor. " Many Home Owners who use this exemption are unaware that they are assuming the responsibilities of a supervisor (see Appendix Q, Rules and Regulations for Licensing Construction Supervisors, Section 2.15) . This lack of aware- ness often results in serious problems, particularly when the Home Owner hires unlicensed persons. In this case your Board cannot proceed against the unlicensed person as it would with licensed Supervisor. The Home Owner acting as supervisor is ultimately responsible. To ensure that the Home Owner is fully aware of his/her responsibilities, many communities require, as part of the permit application, that the Home Owner certify that he/she understands the responsibilities of a supervisor. On the last page of this issue is a form currently used by several towns. You may care to amend and adopt such a form/certification for use in your community. ofIem, Ctt �ttc #use##sem, DECISION ON THE PETITION OF NAPOLEON LEBLANC FOR VARIANCES FOR of LAWRENCE`ST� A hearing on this petition was held September 29, 1987 with the following Board Members present: James Hacker, Chairman; Messrs. , Bencal, Fleming, Strout and Associate Member LaBrecoue. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published. in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting variances from lot size, density, setbacks, lot width and area per dwelling unit to allow parcel to be divided into two lots, A & B,, and to construct a single family on lot B. Property is located in a B-1/R-2 district. The Variances which have been requested may be granted upon a finding of the Board that: C= a. special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and structures in the same district; p _J - - Cn b. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would in- volve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to petitioner; C= �. c. desirable relief may be granted without- substantial detriment to the C= m public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1 . There was no opposition to the plan; 2. The proposed division would create two lots that would conform with other lots in the area; 3. The configuration of the lot makes it difficult to maintain. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1 . Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district in general; 2. Literal enforcement of the Ordinance would work a substantial hardship on the petitioner; 3. The relief requested can be granted without detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. DECISION ON THE PETITION OF NAPOLEON LEBLANCE FOR VARIANCES FOR 95 LAWRENCE ST. , SALEM page two Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the variances requested, subject to the following conditions: 1 . All work be done in strict accordance with plans, as amended September 29, 1987 and submitted to the Board; 2. Plans for construction be presented to the Fire Prevention Bureau prior to issuance of a Building Permit; 3. Proposed construct conform to Massachusetts State Building Code; 4. Property street numbering be obtained from the City Assessor; 5. Building Permit be obtained prior to construction; 6. A driveway large enough for two (2) cars be provided; 7. A Certificate of Occupancy be obtained. GRANTED p \ Peter Strout, Member, Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK APPEAL FROV THIS O:CISIO N. I: ANY. SHALL BE L=E PUP•SU•';NT TO SECTION 17 OF THE MASS GENERAL LA dS. CHAPTER 855, AND SHALL BE FILED WITHIN 20 DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF FILING OF THIS DECIS!2N IN THE OFFICE OF THE.CITICLERK. PUFSANT TO L(:.SS. CEI;-RAA LAWS, CHAPTER VS. SECTION 11. THE VARIANCE OR SPECIAL PER':SIT GRAFTED HERD:,. SHA!' NCT TARE EFFECT UNTIL A COPY OF THEDECISICN. BE:.R:^; THE CERT HCATil,i OF THE CITY CLERK THAT 20-DAYS HAVE ELAPSED WiD NO APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED, OR THAT, IF SUCH AFN APFEAL HAS BEEN FILE. THAT IT HAS EEEI: OISN:ISSED OR DE;('ED IS i"PLED I; THE SOUTH ESSEX REGISTRY OF DEEDS AND INDEXED UNDER THE NA',:[ OF THE MNER IF RECORD OR IS RECORDED AND NOTED ON THE OWNER'S CERTIFICATE OF TITLE. - BOARD OF APPEAL .eco• 4b, JUL 11 3 2e of Salem, ttssttcljuset# �.� DECISION ONTHE PETITION OF NAPOLEON LEBLANC FOR VARIANCES AT- 95 LAWRENCE STREET,-(R-2/B-1 ) 1 A hearing on this petition was held June 6, 1989 with the following Board Members present: James Fleming, Chairman; Messrs. , Febonio, Dore and Labrecque. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws chapter 40A. Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting variances from lot size, density, setbacks, lot width and area per dwelling unit to allow parcel to be divided and to construct a single family dwelling on the new created lot. Property is located in a B-1/R-2 district. The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of the Board that: a. special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and structures in the same district; b. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner; c. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1 .. There was no opposition to the plan. 2. The Variances were allowed at a hearing on September 29, 1987 but construction did not begin. 3. The proposed division would create two lots that would conform with others in the area. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1 . Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district generally; 2. Literal enforcement of the Ordinance would work a substantial hardship on the petitioner; 3. The relief requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. DECISION ON THE PETITION OF NAPOLEON LEBLANCE FOR VARIANCES AT 95 LAWRENCE STREET, SALEM page two Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 4-0, to grant the Variances requested, subject to the following conditions: 1 . All work be done in accordance with plans submitted and dated July 29, 1987 with revisions dated April 7, 1988. 2. Plans for construction be presented to the Fire Prevension Bureau prior to issuance of a Building Permit. 3. Proposed construction conform to the Massachusetts State Building Code. 4. Proper street numbering be obtained from the City Assessor. 5. A Building Permit be obtained prior to construction. 6. A driveway large enough for two (2) cars be provided. 7. A Certificate of Occupancy be obtained. VARIANCE GRANTED Peter Dore, Member Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision. if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Mass. General Laws, Chapter 808, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to glass. General Laws, ChL,pter 808, Section 11, the Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision, bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name or the owner of record or LS Gecorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. BOARD OF APPEAL - ?fes cowirlb BOARDOFASSESSORS 508 93 WASHINGTON STREET, CITY HALL, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 MM 745-9595 Ext.261 March 8, 1989 m -a c -k en ra Mrs. Josephine R. Fusco City Clerk City of Salem Salem, MA 01970 Dear Mrs. Fusco: Please be advised that the proposed single-family home to be built on the subdivided rear portion of the parcel located at 95 Lawrence Street (Assessors' Parcel 1123-0127) has been assigned the street address of 0 Parallel Street. -Very) ly ours, Peter M. Caron Chief Assessor PMC:mjg cc: Joseph J. Leccese, Postmaster Chief Joseph F. Sullivan, Fire Department Margaret R. Hagerty, Principal Clerk, Water Dept. k illiam H. Munroe, Inspector of Buildings Engineering Dept. , City of Salem Mr. Napoleon R. LeBlanc, 206 Loring Ave. , Salem �L�' � (due =�aleut (�reett FORM A - DECISION Ms. Josephine Fusco City Clerk City Hall Salem, MA 01970 Dear Ms. Fusco: At a fg�lajV8gscheduled meetin of the Salem. Planning Board held on Ap11 it was voted to endorse "Approval Under Sub- division Control Law Not Required" on the following described plan: 1. Applicant: Napoleon LeBlanc 206 Loring Avenue Salem, MA 01970 2. Location and Description - 95 Lawrence and Parallel Street, Salem, MA Deed of property records in Essex South District Registry. Sincerely, Walter Power III fj,© Chairman WP/sm .'o,��.�� Tits of 5nlem, fflassac4uuetts p pr r Paurb of A"Ml gUrtF• '81 JUN 17 A10 :07 CITY CLERK'S OFFICEjUNE 10, 1981 SAL_m 0A.SS DECISION ON THE PETIT30NS OF NAPOLEON R. LeBLANC and RAYMOND 0. PINAULT and NANCY L. PINAULT REQUESTING VARIANCES FOR 95 and 99 LAWRENCE STREET A hearing on this Petition was held on June 10, 1981 with the following Board Members present: Douglas Hopper, Chairman, Messrs. Feeherry and Hacker and Associate Member Lusinski. Notices of the hearing were sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. The Petitioners have requested variances to divide the property into two distinct lots. Variances are required because this property is presently in both a R-1 and R-2 district where the proposed division of the property would be prohibited without the grant of variances from side yard restrictions as well as lot area require- ments. The Board of Appeals, after consideration of the evidence presented at the public hearing and after viewing the property makes the following findings of fact: 1. The property has since 1922 had the presently existing buildings on this property. 2. The proposed division of this property into two lots will place a lot line across the property which will cause the two lots to be in violation of the Zoning. Ordinance because of the absence of sufficient sideyards and lot area. 3. The proposed division of the property will.not in any way involve an alteration of the existing structures on this property. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Board of Appeals concludes as follows: 1. The property in question is unique because of the existing structure on the property which structures make it impossible to divide this property into two lots without in some way violating the provisions of the City's Zoning Ordinance. 2. The conditions described above especially affect the land in question but do not generally affect the zoning district in which the land.is located. DECISION - JUNE 10, 1981 - LeBLANC & PINAULT - PAGE TWO '81 JUN 17 A10 :07 CITY CLERK'S OFFICE SALE;', ?4r SS 3. The conditions described above which affect the land in question, but not the zoning district generally cause a special hardship to the Petitioners by complicating separate ownership of the two residences on the property. k. The desired variance may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good. Therefore, the Board of Zoning Appeals unanimously voted in favor of granting the requested relief. The Board grants a .variance to the Petitioners on the following terms and conditions: The Petitioners are granted a variance from sideyard requirements and lot area requirements to allow the division of this property into two lots as described on the plans submitted to this Board. Anthony M. Feelhe rY P.P?EAL F -, UIS B,'.......,, I:FF. " ,,.J.`,L F= ••G.7: Pu%". ?"i TO SECii^.N 17 OF-ME MASS, U'-; f,;i,;= . ...,,. ,1:.:) ... . .._ . .. d...:.n 2J DAIS Ail_:. 1-,v CAM OF NUN.' C. 7r'I`a L'-C'.":2 ' It'. Pu: li .. i �.-.ii` i 3. J : ....1 11. Ur CR 1!1.13, �; .,. .. F.,' 7, .... f. F' L .. v...... .J ^. „. J iS . I:.-- ,"CL... !..x .,ia .i t.: C-2-D'S k.{D t ,°-:.v C :.:t a THE OSit.ER OF R&Cil179 OR IS REGu CF,D A'X imED. C;{ i::E G'2"S"4R'S 4"E.iTl:-'iCATc CE iliLE. BOARD OF APPF,AC . A COPY OF THIS DECISION AND PLANS HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLEI LAWRENCE STREET S 240 - 19'- 28" W P,K. P.K. \ 15.27 6.0.00' ; W I+, c*l Z R x 4' N u1 °', NO. 95 `^ W DWELLING N a U3 FOR REGISTRY OF DEEDS USE ONLY W >_ I CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN HAS BEEN PREPARED IN CONFORMITY WITH THE Ri1LES AND REGULATIONS OF THE REG- --1 I IST7RS OF DEEDS OF THE COMMON- WEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS. Lo LOT A C) YN 8 r ui 3l646 S.F. f' LQ DAZ REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR � y �N :r ~ k NOTE: SEE BOARD OF APPEALS .DECISION DATED / • 4 , OCT. 20, 1987 AND ACCOMPANYING PLAN. 15.00 p� GA R . N 230- 43'-15"E o 58.53' N (TO BE REMOV D ) !4 o _ It 0 2 w i to LOT B PROPOSED � 3 716 S.F24' x O' :N DWELLING to (D o , m w co LM { �9 OF LP51PI ® 1 Y Z SALEM , MASSACHUSETTS t � f OWNER : NAPOLEON R. LEBLANC 206 LORING AVE . APPROVAL, UNDER SUBDIVISIQN SALEM , MASS. CONTROL LAW NOT REQUIRED ; SALEM PLANNING BOARD �. ,. ,.:.- .� ,... .. . . sC(F_/_ SCALE 1 " 10' ASEJUL7981987N 250- 04'_00° E RAPRIL , 8 CARTER a TOWERS ENGINEERING CORP. BOSTON 8 MAINE CORP. ( BOSTON DIVISION ? �p�f AEc�stFg �ss� s=:. :' 6 FAIRVIEW AVENUE ��g4Al.lNk�-�' SWAMPSCOTT, MASS. 01907 DALE GRAPHIC SCALE O 5 IO 15 20 30 40 ZONING : R- 2 & B- 1 15350 ( 13871)