3 HENRY STREET - ZBA - `
�1���
,�
,� � � \
��� `,,
�. � �,
�� �
l
..
Legal Notice
CITY OF SALEM
BOARD OF APPEALS
Will hold a public hearing for all per-
sons interested in the petition submit-
ted by JAY SALEM seeking a Variance j
from rear yard setback to construct a
new sunroom, rear setback will be 23
instead of the required 3a for the prop-
, I arty located at 3 HENRY STREET R-
1... Said hearing will be held on i
WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 21, 2007 1
I 6"30p.m., 3rd floor, 120 Washington
r Street,Room.313
R FEB 7&14,2007
`t Nina Cohen,Chairman
S` SN=2/7,2/14/07 d
onurr CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
BOARD OF APPEAL
120 WASHINGTON STREET, 3Ro FLOOR
f SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970
TELEPHONE: 978-745-9595
FAX. 978-740-9846
KIMBERLEY DRISCOLL
MAYOR
March 2, 2007
Decision
Petition of Jay Salem requesting a Variance C-)
for the property at 3 Henry Street
City of Salem Zoning Board of Appeals
A public hearing on the above petition was opened on February 21, 2007 pursuant to rt3
Massachusetts General Law Ch. 40A, Sec. 11. The following Zoning Board members -0 r,_
were present: Nina Cohen,Richard Dionne, Steven Pinto,Elizabeth Debski, Bonnie w r^
v
Belair and Annie Harris. cn
The petitioner, Jay Salem, sought a Variance from rear yard setback to construct a sunroom for
the property located at 3 Henry Street, Salem, in the Single-Family Residential (R-1)
zoning district.
The Board of Appeals, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the public
hearing, and after thorough review of the Petition submitted, makes the following
findings of fact:
1. Petitioner's property is in the Single-Family Residential (R-1) district.
2. A preexisting deck is located in the proposed area for the new construction
and will be removed for the addition.
3. The petitioner was requesting a variance to allow for construction of a one-
story sunroom addition to be located in place of an existing non-conforming
deck.
4. The depth of the rear yard setback would be twenty-three (23) feet instead of
the required thirty (30) feet.
5. One (1) resident spoke in favor of the petition.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, including all evidence presented at the public
hearing, including, but not limited to, the Petition the Zoning Board of Appeals concludes
as follows:
l
1. The petitioner's request to for a Variance does not constitute substantial
detriment to the public good as residential additions are common in the R-1
district and the proposed addition will not substantially impact the abutters.
2. The requested relief does not nullify or substantially derogate from the intent
or purpose of the zoning ordinance as residential dwellings are a permitted use
in the R-1 district.
3. In permitting such change, the Board of Appeals requires certain appropriate
conditions and safeguards as noted below.
In consideration of the above, the Salem Board of Appeals voted, five (5) in favor
(Cohen, Belair, Debski, Dionne, Harris) and none (0) opposed, to grant the request for a
Variance, subject to the following terms, conditions, and safeguards:
1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances, codes and
regulations.
2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted to and
approved by the Building Commissioner.
3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety
shall be strictly adhered to.
4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to beginning any construction.
5. Exterior finishes of the new construction shall be in harmony with the existing
structure.
6. A Certificate of Occupancy is to be obtained.
7. Unless this Decision expressly provides otherwise, any zoning relief granted doe
not empower or authorize the Petitioner to demolish or reconstruct the
structure(s) located on the subject property to an extent of more than fifty percent
(50%) of its floor area of more than fifty percent (50%) of its replacement cost at
the time of destruction. If the structure is demolished by any means to an extent
of more than fifty percent (50%) of its replacement cost or more than fifty percent
(50%) of its floor area at the time of destruction, it shall not be reconstructed
except in conformity with the provisions of the Ordinance.
� iaC�,,
Nina Cohen
Salem Zoning Board of Appeals
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any,shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts General Laws
Chapter 40A,and shall be filed within 20 days of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk.
Pursuant to the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A,Section 11, the Variance or Special Permit
granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certificate of the City clerk that
20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed,or that,if such appeal has been filed,that it has been
dismissed or denied and is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of
the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title.