35 HANSON STREET - ZBA F� 35 Hanson St. R=1
-� George & Priscilla O' Donnell
Com,
DATE OF HEARING
PETITIOidER C�7 Lo
LOCATION
MOTION: 70 GRANT SECOND
TO DENY SECOND
TO RE-HEAR SECOND
LEAVE TO WITHDRAW SECOND
CONTINUE SECOND
ROLL CALL PRESENT GRANT/DENY WITHDRAW RE-HEAR CONTINUE
RICHARD BENCAL v
RICHARD FEBONIO
FRANCIS GREALISH /
EDWARD LUZINSKI
STEPHEN TOUCHETTE
ASSOCIATE AEMBERS
RONALP..AK
ARTk UR L. BR COUE
CONDITIONS:
a_
;4 (CCU of �ttlem, �fflttssucilusetts
-Sous of Aupeal
DECEMBER 10, 1992
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT AS OF DECEMBER 3, 1992 THE DECISION OF
THE BOARD OF APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK TO
GRANT THE PETITION OF GEORGE AND PRISCILLA O'DONNELL FOR A VARIANCE TO
ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A SINGLE STORY ADDITION AT 35 HANSON STREET.
BOARD OF APPEAL
BRENDA M. SUMRALL
CLERK OF THE BOARD
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section
17, of MGL Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the
date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk.
Pursuant to MGL Chapter 40A. , Section 11, the Variance/Special Permit
granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision
bearing the certification of the City Clerk that $0 days have elapsed
and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed,
that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex
Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name ofltle owner of record or
is recorded and noted on the"owner's Certificate 'of title.
Board of Appeal
3Fc 3
Cts of -'&ttlem, 'Iffissuchusetiory of 9 �s �,' '9
i t
$1 �nttra of .�v}tenl C f�KSS�o, ` 'ss
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF GEORGE AND PRISCILLA O'DONNELL FOR A VARIANCE
AT 35 HANSON STREET (R-1)
A hearing on this petition was held November 18, 1992 with the following
Board Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Richard Febonio, Francis
Grealish Jr. , Edward Luzinski and Stephen Touchette. Notice of the hearing
was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly
published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts
General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting a variance from side
setback requirement to allow construction of a single story addition in
this R-1 district.
The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding by this
Board that:
1 . Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the
land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting
other lands, buildings and structures involved.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner.
3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented
at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings
of fact:
1. There was no opposition to the petition.
2. One abutter spoke in favor.
3. There are existing stairs there that lead directly to the outside.
These stairs will be removed and an enclosed entry way will be
constructed.
4 . The egress is already existing and it would not be feasible to relocate
it.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF GEORGE AND PRISCILLA O'DONNELL FOR
VARIANCE AT 35 HANSON STREET, SALEM
page two
CITY
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidW�ft esente
at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1 . Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property
but not the district in general .
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship to the petitioner.
3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the
variance requested, subject to the following conditions:
1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances,
codes and regulations.
2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions
submitted.
3. Petitioner shall comply with all requirements of the Salem Fire
Department relative to smoke and fire safety.
4. Petitioner shall obtain a legal building permit from the City of Salem
Inspector of Buildings.
5. Exterior finishes of the proposed addition will be in harmony with the
existing structure.
VARIANCE GRANTED
November 18, 1992
Francis X. Grealish, Jr. , Secretary
Board of Appeal
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF GEORGE AND PRISCILLA O'D0NNELL
FOR VARIANCE AT 35 HANSON STREET, SALEM vfC
page three
46
CITY OF,
CC FS,,ti
P'
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD Aft ai' E-CITY
CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of
the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20
days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City
Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the
Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a
copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20
days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has
been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South
Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record
or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title.
Board of Appeal
�y DEc 3
<� (Citjg ofttlem, � ttssuclTuset��r of
CCfRKS�
�3unrD of �trpezd s OFA ss
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF GEORGE AND PRISCILLA O'DONNELL FOR A VARIANCE
AT 35 HANSON STREET (R-1)
A hearing on this petition was held November 18, 1992 with the following
Board Membersresent: Richard Bencal Chairman; Richard F
p ebonio Francis
Grealish Jr. , Edward Luzinski and Stephen Touchette. Notice of the hearing
was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly
published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts
General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting a variance from side
setback requirement to allow construction of a single story addition in
this R-1 district.
The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding by this
Board that:
1 . Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the
land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting
other lands, buildings and structures involved.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner.
3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of thedistrict d st ict or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented
at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings
of fact:
1. There was no opposition to the petition.
2. One abutter spoke in favor.
3. There are existing stairs there that lead directly to the outside.
These stairs will be removed and an enclosed entry way will be
constructed.
4. The egress is already existing and it would not be feasible to relocate
it.
.;�>
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF GEORGE AND PRISCILLA O'DONNELL FOR
VARIANCE AT 35 HANSON STREET, SALEM
page two
CITY OF S4
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidW7' ' yit,6, 2'nted�'�
at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
I. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property
but not the district in general.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship to the petitioner.
3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the
variance requested, subject to the following conditions:
1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances,
codes and regulations.
2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions
submitted.
3. Petitioner shall comply with all requirements of the Salem Fire
Department relative to smoke and fire safety.
4 . Petitioner shall obtain a legal building permit from the City of Salem
Inspector of Buildings.
5. Exterior finishes of the proposed addition will be in harmony with the
existing structure.
VARIANCE GRANTED
November 18, 1992
Francis X. Grealish, Jr. , Secretary
Board of Appeal
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF GEORGE AND PRISCILLA O'DONNELL
FOR VARIANCE AT 35 HANSON STREET, SALEM vfC 3
page three 9 46 if
CITY OF S
C1 FRa�Itf,
J.
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD � 0rHE0" rTY
CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of
the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20
days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City
Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the
Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a
copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20
days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has
been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South
Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record
or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title.
Board of Appeal
tGit9 46
OF
u ofulem, � uSstztliuSPt�e�v f g;
l/ 'Bourb of Au- CLERKS6 OFA r;A,CS
em
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF GEORGE AND PRISCILLA O'DONNELL FOR A VARIANCE
AT 35 HANSON STREET (R-1 )
A hearing on this petition was held November 18, 1992 with the following
Board Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Richard Febonio, Francis
Grealish Jr. , Edward Luzinski and Stephen Touchette. Notice of the hearing
was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly
published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts
General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting a variance from side
setback requirement to allow construction of a single story addition in
this R-1 district.
The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding by this
Board that:
1. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the
land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting
other lands, buildings and structures involved.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner.
3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented
at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings
of fact:
1 . There was no opposition to the petition.
2. One abutter spoke in favor.
3. There are existing stairs there that lead directly to the outside.
These stairs will be removed and an enclosed entry way will be
constructed.
4 . The egress is already existing and it would not be feasible to relocate
it.
n>
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF GEORGE AND PRISCILLA O'DONNELL FOR
VARIANCE AT 35 HANSON STREET, SALEM
page two
Ile 3
CITY OF
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidS4 yr.e�entew"�
at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows :
1 . Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property
but not the district in general.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship to the petitioner.
3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the
variance requested, subject to the following conditions:
1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances,
codes and regulations.
2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions
submitted.
3. Petitioner shall comply with all requirements of the Salem Fire
Department relative to smoke and fire safety.
4. Petitioner shall obtain a legal building permit from the City of Salem
Inspector of Buildings.
5. Exterior finishes of the proposed addition will be in harmony with the
existing structure.
VARIANCE GRANTED
November 18, 1992
1
/y
Francis X. Grealish, Jr. , Secretary
Board of Appeal
0
J
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF GEORGE AND PRISCILLA O'DONNELL
FOR VARIANCE AT 35 HANSON STREET, SALEM vfC
page three 9 46
Cl�hOF S'LFL.
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD ADS THR'PTY
CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of
the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20
days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City
Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the
Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a
copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20
days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has
been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South
Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record
or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title.
Board of Appeal
APPEAL CASE NO. .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .
`��� �i#g of �ttlenm, f ttssadjusetts
4e e
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
The Undersigned represent that e is are the owners of a certain parcel of land locgt�
at NO. . .�r. . 1 �tL
A.K..ro , , , ,�f , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,Street; Zoning District./> . �
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : and said parcel is affected by Section(s) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
of the Massachusetts State Building Code.
Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in
accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance.
� � �.� �n'z-LiL7_ bh��!��1'r�/ � �C�L�t��'Cr/JP_[�_o� �i '�'��•LG�rt 'L_
N nl -----
Vi
ti o
TF Appli(Mtiort:for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following
reasons: (::'
The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem
Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to
approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said
Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary
hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero-
gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for
the following reasons:
cc
LJ
j,�., %.� it i- - �=i°/��-L •.�,., _ ,
i
G Vi
- J)
•� 1
Q-
P,e1sclLLn L_ C TO.vNeLL
Owner. G pO
m o w . .... ... ..e . . . . . . . �R/J/�.�L4. T1?
N J
Address. . . 3S�?.PJO!�. . � . . : 5/,L�i�<
O U
Telephone. . . . .? S ". . Z -�� . . . . . . . . .
Petitioner. Gea/; F// . „ 7?fJIV.e4A . TF
Address. . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
Date. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
-.. . - - — -- y / `.2G1C. -...�`iCJ 6 rrwwLl civ
Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of
Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . .
four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The
Evening News.
r
jr-
/ c�r/;; � O/JS t �thJc O�
m q
loa74,/i)j_g 1r1 • l� iF F • c/t' t� f0 i'2 rr r ' e /G /�j
cyC/u/7 nSc r SL/�o�f ` c r' yr �y / `�• ����`i�,
to /yrs', ��� � ���• �y - ��, � ;����« .y �Pn �-y
C / i"/V
/ •nrS' ie � `� r//�rcr �s' �/i4
C-' k
�-rf /C' LLfi<�:
;t
LriS�a/� Uig S4n7c /v/4 ��cr.,� /r/• �� l ><- I.JG�/S /G
l •�, X� �,f' /n � /1�.�1� CC_`�/ Lt/:r r �tr° (, L 7L[cJ0
GCJ/ /� C�UW .S• f /Cr �'t/� �/ fl; �C �//Ui'f!1 .�'iiC�� C�/1/G '
(-G o J /) 1 ClJ <
AGj
� "I/,/' lyL. S7L
o 6: AI
C'x
-(-/c, S/I r71c,/ ve
s cz .140
&
0 1114/Us 6 0
/-,tc/
-,Aq,
L
ci
del TL P
clt!zt-ls 7LO Z't lecl e G
7L
14A
6lu
i .
— ZOT-
TO H N T E M't�
&I�lVN i Aj 6G RAr�N r
SHED
LOT �6y'
LOT LOT 6(,
CITI OF SpLZ7q
37 Ht9kkSOA) ST"
/ ADoI77001
N
# 35
I
#33
H ti15U �/ S7-R EE T
REFERENCE - PLOT PLAN OF LAW
�EF>•/,�/:P?t- 7F -TITLE 3-IL5 -
PLAN: 856-0 LOCATED /IN
HEREONIFY ARETHAT THE LOCATED ONITHE DIGROUND 5 J9 L L. � " I S
AS SHOWN. PREPARED FOR
(n /� GEORGE P. O' 30NNELL .T,E.E
ZB L PRISC/LLA L. O'�00NN ALL_
DA TE REG. PWESSIO AL LAND SCALE. 1 2c ' ocr. 2 E
cS�S r 199
'4gSSl
`�✓ GAtL °H NORTH SHORE SURVEY CORP.
L' 209 WASHINGTON ST.- SALEM, MA.
s i2�.8,Od9 o-
twmv:
# X68
I !
1 I
i
i
i
i
CotV
a
O
V 4 /
/ m� /•y/ ?O O ° S ey ��� J/o /
�e Sw ,/'•,/9 6.J89 /86 S T 29 0 A. /
4i
19
Q ee
D _ V Lj
�• Jea 3 ??4C2v� • iy b ! /��p
+C2
ti o
s� l•P\ 0 2 2` �r O ,qf
b
i' 1 $0 43
•• o
lip
4► ,�a.s �o .°/ d ^ \\Sc 0
-.0y9 so,p9 G,Q rs Js
0Ob
3 /
t�w01
\ o 9
o
_ e
R� " I
APPEAL --
745 fmi) Est. 381 CITY OF SALIi IYt'
Will hold a public bearing Im all persons inter- R1L'a�.F:D OF APPEAL
cslud in the peliliun suhmitted by GEORGE,AND 745-9595"Ezt. 381
1'1[ISCILLA U'UIINN L:1.1.At. fill-ViPruni Will holt) a public hearing I'or all persons inter-
sidesefbackloalloweunsl ruction of a single story eMed in the petition submitted by CE11KCE:IND
addition ill :15 HANSON S'1'. (N-2) Said hal-ing PRISCILLA O'DONNELL jit. fill,Variance from
to he hold WEDNESDAY, NII11IT1REIt 18, 1!1!12 side setback to elloweonstruction ofa single story
A'1'7:00P.M.,ONE SALEM GREEN,sorond floor. addition at 3.5 IIANSON S'1'. (12-2) Said hearing
RICHARD A. 1;1?NCAI„ Chairman to bu held WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 1992
November 4, 1 I, 1!)!12 SN26213 A'1'7:00 P.M.,ONE SALEM GREEN,saamd floor.
RICI1ARf) A. DENCAL, Chairman
November 4, 11, 1992 SN26213
APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(1Li#g of "ittltnt, 'Mttssadjusefts
goarb of �ypral
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
The Undersigned represent that he is are the owners of a certain parcel of land located
at NO. . . Y. - A/9—N.-!�o !� . , , -'i'f-, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Street; Zoning District. :iK
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : and said parcel is affected by Section(s) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
of the Massachusetts State Building Code.
Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in
accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance.
a
Lei LO-�
n 'ai
Ttg Applic:AtiorLfor Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following
reasons: �
The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem
Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to
approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said
Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary
hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero-
gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for
the following reasons:
�C`4
a Z L
® 4
P. I& -L,3
`AY �eo�2Ge
a Owner. . . . . . . . •
N J
" Address. . . f7� ALEJn
O U
Telephone. . . . . )/ . . . . . . . . .
��ei.r ciLLlaL. C�7.�o.2Ae/l-
Peti ti oner. .GGeOl? / • .�n�Jl�l•�! Tf—
Address. . . . . :.5�r.`?�1s��(Z h1�� . . . . . . . . .
Date. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Telephon . . .. . . . .. . :�j�7�� / . . . . . . . .
By. . . . e. .Y.°"Gyr k. .
Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of
Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . .
four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The
Evening News.
fl
1
•� T
fNO....................................
6 PETITION TO BOARD OF APPEALS
LOCATION
................................................................
PETITIONER..........................................
ADDRESS...............................................
CONDITIONS
............................ ....................................
s
........................ .......................................
................................................................
.................................................................
.................................................................
.................................................................
,PETITION APPROVED.................... ❑
DENIED.........................
..... .............................................. 19.........
LOr 3�3
.JOHN T E CYNTHIA A, O
/"IANN IN U
a 8 G RAr- rDN sr
SHED
LOT 36H
LOT 3C�5 LOT 66
[LINOR L FOUfIEY l�Rpq = s500ts*l CITY OF ZAL&q
3'7 Hry/�kSON ST:
8 PRO/kLSt�
ADDS n0n1
0
.• 34: 0
6•, ry,
-L N
# 35
#33 Io'rYr
7.3
55 '
H /"SOJV STREET
REFERENCE.- PLOT PLAN OF LAND
CERTIFICATE of TITLE 32-ILS
PLAN: E-56-C- LOCATED IN
IFY TTHE ITNHEREONARE LOCATED ON THE s )9 L E / t
AS SHOWN. PREPARED FOR
GEORGE P. o' Z�oNNELL,JE4'
PRISULLA L. O'OONN ELC.
'DATE REG. PROFESSIONAL LAND SCALE: 1 20 ' ocr. 28, 1992
-Al NORTH SHORE SURVEY CORP.
s L209 WASHINGTON ST.- SALEM , MA.
Y " Si.11H v'
Na 3:049 r
I. ., poF`
�L Lf�ID,.
# -768
r.
v
.5
/ ,
ro� OSec� Aldl
i
q�olro /'In q 7% �- 74,
i
i3/S Woof .nys a F ,2P-t,Zy ,2P-t, de o fv
o reel/'e -C /0 /// 93
�O/uh,nS -Co 1/ SUpa,-f -r'o r �/iCf, 6y lc ��• /2 oris,
j � o 'eC-Swq)l -e17
F/aor j a /'sz -/o r,6, v
--5 8 in • c�'ub T '/oo ✓
rre, �-- v-e- cc,n e(:! Oromr"cQ
r gaitler,C,
co suuhc/. .
4/urr/iI hum/ L '2/d1.17Y ol? �/rr/en- zoJ'eei'ev-e-
�r0 /�US''C'cl y7`7 ' ✓�/ G- �//f' C(��//T/�JYL
r/ 40 �e0-�/7 ev reS/ r 'e/�L' e
In In �y � �,�, ls�q//f /G
rye, e�� _ a �� //`a//s �v, / r� gin • //looc/
I
q, C,/ C1rV�
III e
I Aaje a .
I
6,'s7 e6n.S' /sz/.�y
r'ec'e/ve- _ q Z/dy ra of / 4YecL i'n kvl�,`e/
4
/
-exi evi0r �D//Wood i'h 1,0J 166/
4' 6,'ro/ se/-'Sea/ rad -r' s�:,�y�� .'n
eorwplt---�/1 -rlcsl eco Y'o ",Preveh-�
4h� r� e4 -Z-� -e - c/'m aye .
74 7 ns�a// S.'cl,hy 46, me�� t�� eXes �,'n5
L -e_ rn -e o 3S lVhlVg / Sof, i'n Iul ,,el %S
C/l��tm/ 'num So rrof 7'0
r • rJ -7r- - 7o r-ee.' evt mac - /
%n S''-a,'r ;/-/-ed Q*pc1 �i'n i s A 0 4-r fkle
6o Me n, oI- 2gm -e— gcldl�,'on 6rces400l &,
W/ `
A� /�'e w , X/
don --c- by oo-)n ev- ,
�")e M o i/'ed 6l G w/� e V 7L0 (flc- r '!ry
T J
no"
❑
APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
h 3 (1li#g of '�$ttlem, 'Massar4usetts
�Rottrb of '�Yyettl
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
The Undersigned represent that he is are the owners of a certain parcel of land to ted
at NO. ., S-. ! fr�P!fM! ft . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Street; Zoning District./�-�•
. . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : and said parcel is affected by Section(s) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
of the Massachusetts State Building Code.
Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in
accordance with Section IX A. 1 off the Zoning Ordinance.
N J �e tee_
J
Cr') N / ✓
Q �dJ
['G N O
< y
C n ti
m
CD
V
The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following
reasons:
The Undersigned herebypetitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem
Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to
approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said
Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary
hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero-
gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for
the following reasons:
I— T
O�
R�
P,�lSL'lGGA L, gr7el-
Own er. . � . .� . . . . .hn CLC
Address. . . . 5. A s . . . . . . . . . . . .
Telephone. . . .IP . . . . . . . . .
Peti ti oner. .G.�f?� . . G . .(*—Na
Address. . . . . /?�l�,�a// 6,�T . . . . . . . . . . . .
Date. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Telephone..... . . ':� 7��. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of
Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . .
four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The
Evening News.
NO....................................
PETITION TO BOARD OF APPEALS
LOCATION
................................................................
PETITIONER..........................................
ADDRESS...............................................
................................................
CONDII IONS
............................ ....................................
........................ .......................................
................................................................
.................................................................
.................................................................
.................................................................
PETITION APPROVED.................... ❑
DENIED......................... 0
.............................................. I9.........
co
X 4�
ro� a � e� Alwif�'on
� y � f'/���'urryr Cr Un s ;�7L•hy-. ��'
C'GrlL�re�� rrlQ�er��/ roI'M of,elj yFt, 6y_ s��•
a, F -F GOT ,hyS' c9 �/. by a�f. GPGO fo rccrl-tv'�
C'o/unVns Eo v syporf fo/,� y,�t. 6y fit• �ls� or�r,
�� to y� e�'•ev-e � .���. 6y � ��, ,�r��scu�y -en�ry
-P�ov ✓ �v -e � ev
58 in , c�u6 �/aos' ! h ��hr'E/i wr•�� .�i ,c !GS'e�
j� onF' s/frue� ur� zZv r-re, �ve (:<-/tc
e0rvmr"ems//�
7 J:Sr7 e C/ -Ir/a u l-- if S 111/ e -1Z72 9))Q // Ze- O�
ar 'sZ� 1*1) a17ye/rs ,/i�O- /wh, e7/,
t h7ad4/ e/7. U �riJ/�/,/ n7 �er,4 ( /o LcJ/iiN/i 71-
/
r .. . ... rorm (�tJr // e sUGG`Jc/� -.
ouf aI hum 6n C7i-e� -/v Yee�'ev-C-
gcic/i/ian OYeesw4/
1
/�/s�'
/Q T"t o r,,n Alt'-74, iy IV,?IIS
I
_ .. C'•.j�, jl, _%_,•h . rv/, :�/7 G[Jr // Y'eC' : C L'2. fw o
i
fl-eO v Iii 9, aI�e Dn/e.
E /�S c/Oar e/7 evo,
k
I /2Gj e
e �ns .s�,:9y
/'tee-e/ve
exi e r/ o v i0//
l
Sea radf
/W p E'/c,s/i ec/ /-o U eH z<
-ev. c/4m aye .
3S /�ANsli/ S'f, �'n �u1� , e/ /'S
e` ewm ,'num So /7G7-0 C /c� n5 -e
6oJ''7`Grn Uc�' �Gln � 4ctic/iLion 6reeScc/C�� c.ui �/i
I 4i ) e )'n/5 7 4-0 h _e elon -L/ by oW,3 ev
GTremov'ed Oy ocuhv 7/-0 ht`'iYm
vr�rn rt r'ea ear,
i
� r
4
#/ y 7einove_. ekes by 24, rs y �c>`�ar.N C� ans ;�tnS. .oE
ro ,'M g71e% y4F74,
�oo7 4,11nyS' a ��. 6� aF4, c/e o -lo rtcr,'-eve /rr //yS
,�, � o yeer'-ev-e cc 5/F'�. .�y � -F-/, „�reesw4� •en�ry
ih�o /•�,'t o/ div
�y ��.�ns� a./� q � >'h �y lD ,i, ��ao✓ J o , 'sf �o r� � e, v-�
7/0 /A 4&�7r"E
1
'n,s`i •e o/. �/a u if' ` loo orzL�
ar �j ia ' j ois gi9SIfrS' ail wh,_ell r.r-r—
_
//e .-_ O- Sri)///, in 4 t �r,41 7Zv tcJlJ,ed, flz � .
s
fIg7 t/ ortn &U /� �e so Un c/.
y �af auf 4. /Urr7,•hum s/.'�l/.i,y aia area
PYO"oe)sdr/ crc/UiTiOn 6re'�sWIV
f� ILO _cvkea -+A )e,' rleS17/- enee
�r ii fir, Sa/� do m e /47-116'0rm r/ �,�/ Z t/,
/40 0vc/
't
i C! in - ui/ ,�� Gvr �/ /��C , CL'L 7LW0
�,'nclows req C/11y _74-1-e. eorll sale. Urve
W "fleja6v "fU r/Ovr ej/�e/ia
rye e<ve __moi yY/ C rG o//F
C & Vtfvtfc,/ Ci
-exi a V io//Gd v o eV i n Gu k6h
4
AI)rne 1�fNS'A/ iS
C/c�urn/ 'num So hof fo � �4n5 � �Lie //le//—
-70�
//
Sy 9-4ri"r / revs 4J7c/ t .,,,? i s h 0 �- ff'�
Oa /f6rn Otd ir- eeSluCeyyltui'�/i
/ /�`
_e clon
- .r0 r -e /no ✓-ec//1 6y 0cul) r-V �o C°Oh 'iYm
_ M
LOT 3G3
.JOH" T £ CYNTNrN
/"l A NN I N U
`� 6RAi=TON ,ST:
FSHED
DoT 36y
LOT 3C�5 LOT 66
[LINOR L . FOUFIfY AREA = 55cots'�' CITY OF ZALEN
3'7 HRAISOA) ST.-
&D
T.ED
A001 7700
a \
.
o
N # 35
Ol'33
I
73 t
Z5'
H /9 M SO /V S-FR EE T
REFERENCE: - PLOT PLAN OF LAND
CERT/FICA',r� OF TITLE 32./2.5
PLAN' 956-c LOCATED IN
I CERTIFY THAT THE BUILDINGS) _S /9 L M
HEREON ARE LOCATED ON THE GROUND
AS SHOWN. PREPARED FOR
�J ' GEORGE P. a'DCNAE`LL,.T',_,E
/DSZ / Cr,c� Cx r� PRISCILLA L. O'AO/4N [-'—
/DATE ✓REG. PROFESSIONAL LAND SURV Y R SCALE. 1 '1= 20 ' OCT: 28, 199E
o��F.P�jN�FMASSgcyG NORTH SHORE SURVEY CORP.
GAIL N� 209 WASHINGTON ST.- SALEM MA.
VAIITH
b t' '043 c
90 G/STEP�O ,`„4z
^'S `
s�QtAl
LAPID SJ
=-�-4 Lor 3C O
JOHN T £ CYNTH/A q,
I`I ANN I N 6
$ 6 RAJ- 7-oN ST:
55'
SHED _ I
LOT 36q
LOT 3Ca LOT 66
ELINOR L . FOUFIfY ARFA = 55cots,�, CITY OF SAL&H
TED3.7 /-IHLuSDN ST-
ED
AODL 7?a.1
m
3-4
y•: ry,
~L 0
# 35
#33
fi
55 '
HPM SO N STREET
REFERENCE: - PLOT PLAN OF LAND
C-EI�7/F/GP,TF OF -TITLE 32.12-5
PLAN: ?66-c LOCATED IN
I CERTIFY THAT THE BUILDING (S) -S /91- EM
HEREON ARE LOCATED ON THE GROUND
AS SHOWN. PREPARED FOR
Z GPRISCIEL.LA LL.Do oNLN f--L4-
/062 E
TE REG. PR FESSIONAL LAND SUP V SCALE. 1 20 ' OCT. 28, 199b
o���pyZNOFMgssgcb NORTH SHORE SURVEY CORP.
ti
GAIL m 209 WASHINGTON ST.- SALEM , MA.
SIVITH
s N0.35043
o��Ss90 ALL LAND
4 -7469
�I DD?C�55 : 35 NH N5 0Y St
41D�"P, c-SS : 35 NAID'SOY .St&
BOARD OF ASSESSORS
CI 7 HALL. PAGE
. .............
10
2 riATE S-_1144/5 '
... I ........ ... 2
3
411�1,
.. .. .........
"CER37,1F E R3 ......... ............... .................. 1 1-4.......... 6 ry—E Ils, LIST.1 ....... ..
4
4 5
10 5 SUBJECT PROPERTY: MAP: 15 L 0 T.,., 0365 SOFF.
6 PROPERTY ADDRESS: 0035 HANSON 97 Rat"l".-F
7 PM SESSr 0 OWNER ULICIP111ILL-L. 5
•
LVKQ—Z� JK 9
8 01)(AMNELL. PR1GCILL.A L :0
109
10 tlAP--L-C4-7---SUF4- PROPERTY AL49RESS12
MAI-L-MG-ADDRIES-S
13
11
140
0 -15 0365 00:.35 HANSON EST REE I- ODONNELL GEORGE- P JR 35 V[A N SO N STREET ✓ 5
12 R44!�Gilf I..L.A- p 16
&E.444A-g
13 17
14 15 0066 0037 HANSON STREET SALEM CITY OF 180
15 Q31,4 R& "0
WANSON' 01
Lo
16 21
SALEM MA 01970 2
15 0086 0001 BEMIS STREET SULLIVAN JOSEPH F JR 4 BORDI-,'R S frf E&LI 2
.......... ...... LOW S 24
.. ............. 25
MANNING, J014N J
20 "pR (tAN' .........
260
C
it YN CIA'
',SA
A 27
21 ...... . . .. 1 11''1
p I-TVAN 10 6 E.R4 4, r' ...... 1 28.
22 LOUISL S SALEM MA 0197029
23 15 0361 0010 GRAFTON STREET SLAVEN LAWRENCE C 10 GRAFTON STREET--,�"/ 3
1 310
24 00NOTWVWA (44i-,
!,49 32
25 .......... pi T3
15 14CMAHON 'JUDITMC, .4.0 I-IA14SO14 ST
3
10 ' 4
26 C/O MUSE R W11110SE ,C E '
27SALEPI PIA 01976 35
10
gggg, JAA111��cjw f4-PRE- Wk4A=:&--AN-r1RE-.W L.'.. —38-4-
28 -1ANSON-S-T— 36
—77
29 JAMIE S SALEPT MA 10:11'10'70.
3-1970 2 380
15 060 0036 HANSON STREET CON DON RUTH A 4.0 RAVENNA AVE 39
30 Ci-IN-DA:Jta—JOH-N—A 40
31 41
10 32 4
40
33 44
34 45
0 35 460
47
36 48
37
49
..........
0 ..........
38 ,,
e.�,,,,����,',.,,,�.�,.,,,,e.............. ....... .
5 c
51
10
39
I .... .... ...
....... 52
40 53
.41 540
55 z
42
56
43 T7
•
44
.......... ....... ...... ... I.
...........e.......... ........
S9
45
Sol
46 61
0 47 :210
3
48 84
49 . 15
...........
0 50 ........— ....... 66
67
51
68
52 69
7
0 53 0
1541 77;
:5 ...... 73
PETER M. CARON
516 749
CHIEF' ASSESSOR 75
7
..........
V '
Co
/ Q114"
Of, /
<u
d �
ti bh
4v741
�0
-
C
r '
Gil „ `356. / ''•sJ
06,
v _
'cR� oa9C 3 0
�
VO
J '�04 _ 4 �'Sg •° SFS/ J, / 3. + e`36b B
e � Y
?Q3 `'zoo 9/ 4p,
n