15 HANCOCK STREET - ZBA 15 Hancock St. (R-2)
Mary Lou Sorgini t
� 9
h9
r
i
.rcnw I
�� fllit of "Sttlrm, ttssttthusetts
? em s P aura of cal
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF MARY LOU SORGINI FOR A
SPECIAL PERMIT FOR 15 HANCOCK ST. , SALEM
A hearing on this petition was held February 26, 1986lttwith the following Board
Members present: James Hacker, Chairman; Messrs. , BAMQ Ca AN tggout and
Associate Member Dore. Notice of- the hearing was sent to abutters and others end
notices of the hearing were properly published in th9lMem Evening News in
accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
CITYCLCQF 5+1EM.MASS
Petitioner, owner of the premises, requests a Special Permit to allow her to
convert an existing two family dwelling into a three family dwelling in this
R-2 district.
The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this request
for a Special Permit is Section V B 10, which provides as follows:
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in
this Ordinance, the Board of Appeal may, in accordance
with the procedure and conditions set forth in Section
VIII F and IX D, grant Special Permits for alterations
and reconsstruction of nonconforming structures, and for
changes, enlargement extension or expansion of nonconforming
lots, land, structures, and uses, provided however, that
such change, extension, enlargement or expansion shall
not be substantially more detrimental than the existing
nonconforming use to the neighborhood.
In more general terms, this Board is; when reviewing Special Permit requests,
guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding
by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will promote the public health,
safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants.
The Board of Appeal, after considering the evidence presented at the hearing,
makes the following findings of fact:
1 . No opposition to the plan was raised` at the hearing;
2. The premises contains adequate room for parking;
3. Granting the relief requested will not appreciably impact of
the neighborhood.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the
hearing the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1 . The proposed use of the property will not be substantially more
detrimental to the neighborhood than the existing use;
2. The proposed use of the property will promote the health, safety,
convenience and welfare of the -City's inhabitants.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF MARY LOU SORGINI FOR A
SPECIAL PERMIT FOR 15 HANCOCK ST. , SALEM
page two
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted four to one, 4-1 lMr. Bencal voted
in opposition) , to grant the relief requested, provided that:
1 . A minimum of five (5) parking spaces are to be maintained on
on the premises, and a plan delineating such spaces is submitted
to the Board;
2. A Certificate of Compliance is obtained;
3. A Certificate of Occupancy for each apartment or unit is obtained;
4. The premises is owner occupied.
SPECIAL PERMIT GRANTED
rn f\
Scott E. Charnas, Secretary
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
APPEAL FROM THIS DECISIDN, IF ANY, SHALL BE MADE PURSUANT TO SECTION 17 CF THE 6:ASS.
GENERAL LA.-IS, C::A?TER COS, AND SHALL BE FILED Y:ITHIN 20 DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF FILING
OF TH:E DE::'S iC" IN THE OFFICE CF THE CITY CLERK.
PU.",S'..,T 7j ;;:F`.S CEWR.A' LATS. CHAPTER 808, SECTION 11, THE VARIANCE OR SPE"IAL PER.':IT
G6=.::1 H-RH::. SPQL NOF T,.i;E EFFECT UNTIL A COPY OF THEDECISIDN. 9EAn3C T4E CERT.
FIL..TI.N. C: THE CI 1 CLEKK THAT 20 DA':S HAVE ELAPSED AND NO APPEAL HAS BFa: FI_D,
lR Ili=S. IF S,;CH /d: APPEAL HAS BEEP! FILE, THAT IT HAS BEEP, DISMISSED OR CE. IEO IS
RECORDED IN THE SGUTH ESSEX REGISTRY OF DEEDS AND INDEXED UNDER THE N41 OF THE O2'.NER
OF RECORD OR IS RECORDED AND NOTED ON THE OWNER'S CERTIFICATE OF TITLE.
BOARD OF APPEAL
CUEL L ET TL
F
46.
x
•q<r Ilk
♦ + - S'°'- }. "ab �.S' `s '� ,y„ A«l _ i 'etc - ��.
Ct'^sNY+'^j _3
~4 Y rr I "K lea .,•a'« ti4 F Sri' J>73sx'r` y t s _ r
ti
,
`_._':�`Y'"�':' v.._' ' (/q-QEQ_=4,517_S_F�i:_� r �•.-rwc%4.x"!#:.,:�;r '.„*c�,y�•-.�.<t✓f��'.x,,•'.r-:�,x �kw
.= Ai
•-!1-a E s
r
KC
w �
MORM" .LIMEY PLIQIV'
-
-
=------____
! I Sca/e :/in. O f1. Dole
I' Reference = -� = - ✓ -'�— --
i T I DQ n ^
— - I Able-,7Ais is a bpe survey and it of an w0rument
- I survey, Mere fore -this plot Alan is fr mortpvpe
purposes only.
--BAY ' STAY£ -VPVEY/YG SERY/C£.
222 -0qbpt St, Bevrr/y,Aloss.
f-1AAICOC k S T.
To the Salem Sav/ngs Bank , I
hereby certify that /have examined the Premlsesi
and a// -easements, encroachments and
Du/ldings ore bcated on the ground as
ko.:Eli =' >' sAovn." l further- aerlily, that Me Dui/dings
r=�
Sa It�og 1:.
sAaw� Conlbrmed to
the zoning brrs of the
{ ,
No_xosa Moss. ,/ further
Iv
S,v F'y�� ;��:,.;� - - - certify,that this prge;ty is not tamed m an. ..
estobli~ flood hazard arm as defined by Me
Dept. of Housing and Urban Development
.Y;^r"w .. •.J.. _ _,.t",r-i .>�. - -i J r.Y F=r.:'q , -. - ,�A
' r