Loading...
57 GROVE STREET - ZBA 57 Grove St. BPD Spiros Fiomp L c� Acb P (�itn of -'E�ajvm, flttssurijusetts4p v. $ bonra of Avpenl DECISION ON THE PETITION OF SPIROS P. FLOMP FOR VARIANCE AT 57 GROVE STREET (BPD) A hearing on this petition was held October 20, 1993 with the following Board Members present: Francis X. Grealish, Chairman; George Ahmed, Stephen Touchette and Associate Member Arthur Labrecque. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting a Variance to allow portion of the building to used for auto sales, repair, and body work. Property is located in the Business Park Development District. The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding by this Board that: 1. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and structures involved. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1. There was no opposition to the proposed request. 2. The petitioner purchased the property in January of 1988 when the area was zoned Industrial (I) . 3. There are several businesses on the premises, including a towing company. 4. There are similar businesses in the area. r DECISION ON THE PETITION OF SPIROS FLOMP FOR A VARIANCE AT 57 GROVE STREET, SALEM page two � -1 /C�oS On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 4-0, to grant the variance requested, subject to the following conditions: 1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. Petitioner shall comply with all requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety. 3. Petitioner/Lessee/Tenant shall be required to obtain all proper licenses/permits from all city departments, including, but not limited the Licensing Board. Variance Granted October 20, 1993 rL Stephen C. Touchette, Vice Chairman Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. 5 Ctu of --�3ulem, 'fU95UC1ju5ett94/.;' i 'N � s uttra of .�trpeal ✓f DECISION ON THE PETITION OF SPIROS P. FLOMP FOR VARIANCE AT 57 GROVE STREET (BPD) A hearing on this petition was held October 20, 1993 with the following Board Members present: Francis X. Grealish, Chairman; George Ahmed, Stephen Touchette and Associate Member Arthur Labrecque. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting a Variance to allow portion of the building to used for auto sales, repair, and body work. Property is located in the Business Park Development District. The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding by this Board that: 1. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and structures involved. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1. There was no opposition to the proposed request. 2. The petitioner purchased the property in January of 1988 when the area was zoned Industrial (I) . 3. There are several businesses on the premises, including a towing company. 4. There are similar businesses in the area. 4y DECISION ON THE PETITION OF SPIROS FLOMP FOR A VARIANCE AT r T a 33 57 GROVE STREET SALEM page twoCp =<, •! On the basis of the above findings of fact and on the evidence resented g � P at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 4-0, to grant the variance requested, subject to the following conditions: 1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. Petitioner shall comply with all requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety. 3. Petitioner/Lessee/Tenant shall be required to obtain all proper licenses/permits from all city departments, including, but not limited the Licensing Board. Variance Granted October 20, 1993 Stephen C. Touchette, Vice Chairman Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. n t y City of 'E�ttlem, �4RttsstttljusettS//ov 33ottrd of 'A, peal � J✓ DECISION ON THE PETITION OF SPIROS P. FLOMP FOR VARIANCE AT 57 GROVE STREET (BPD) A hearing on this petition was held October 20, 1993 with the following Board Members present: Francis X. Grealish, Chairman; George Ahmed, Stephen Touchette and Associate Member Arthur Labrecque. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting a Variance to allow portion of the building to used for auto sales, repair, and body work. Property is located in the Business Park Development District. The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding by this Board that: 1. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and structures involved. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1. There was no opposition to the proposed request. 2. The petitioner purchased the property in January of 1988 when the area was zoned Industrial (I) . 3. There are several businesses on the premises, including a towing company. 4. There are similar businesses in the area. DECISION ON THE PETITION OF SPIROS FLOMP FOR A VARIANCE AT ^;- 33 y 57 GROVE STREET, SALEM F page two " %,< ,4;:� SS On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 4-0, to grant the variance requested, subject to the following conditions: 1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. Petitioner shall comply with all requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety. 3. Petitioner/Lessee/Tenant shall be required to obtain all proper licenses/permits from all city departments, including, but not limited the Licensing Board. Variance Granted October 20, 1993 . L Stephen C. Touchette, Vice Chairman Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. O J (1�itn of -�ttlem, ^4Ra95Urj1U6ettS4', -Board of Am {tettl DECISION ON THE PETITION OF SPIROS P. FLOMP FOR VARIANCE AT 57 GROVE STREET (BPD) A hearing on this petition was held October 20, 1993 with the following Board Members present: Francis X. Grealish, Chairman; George Ahmed, Stephen Touchette and Associate Member Arthur Labrecque. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting a Variance to allow portion of the building to used for auto sales, repair, and body work. Property is located in the Business Park Development District. The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding by this Board that: 1. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and structures involved. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1. There was no opposition to the proposed request. 2. The petitioner purchased the property in January of 1988 when the area was zoned Industrial (I) . 3. There are several businesses on the premises, including a towing company. 4. There are similar businesses in the area. f J DECISION ON THE PETITION OF SPIROS FLOMP FOR A VARIANCE AT 57 GROVE STREET, SALEM page two if On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 4-0, to grant the variance requested, subject to the following conditions: 1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. Petitioner shall comply with all requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety. 3. Petitioner/Lessee/Tenant shall be required to obtain all proper licenses/permits from all city departments, including, but not limited the Licensing Board. Variance Granted October 20, 1993 i Stephen C. Touchette, Vice Chairman Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. Titu of Salem, 'Massadjusetts 4 Poara of "Cal November 9, 1993 YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT AS OF NOVEMBER 3, 1993 THE DECISION OF THE BOARD OF APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK TO GRANT THE PETITION OF SPIROS P. FLOMP FOR A VARIANCE TO ALLOW A PORTION OF THE BUILDING TO BE USED FOR AUTO SALES, REPAIR AND BODY WORK AT 57 GROVE STREET. BOARD OF APPEAL BRENDA M. SUMRALL CLERK OF THE BOARD A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK. Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17, of MGL Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL Chapter 40A. , Section 11, the Variance/Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owners Certificate of title. Board of Appeal DATE OF HEAR7NG Q �d PETITIONER LOCATION ;10TION: TO GRANT SECOND TO DENY SECOND l( O RE-HEAR SECOND LEAVE TO WITHDRAW SECOND -0 CONTINUE SECOND POLL CALL PRESENT GRANT DENY WITHDRAW -az NZAa CONTINUE GEORGE A. AHMED FRANCIS GREALISH EDWARD=WlZiteH STEPHEN TOUCHETTE ASSOCIATE 'IEMBERS R ARTHUR LABRECOUE t� CONDITIONS: r , BOARD OF ASSESSORS crrY HALL PAGE., RM FM.. MA njq7n ......... AI...I I..... "b 'T, CERTIFIED ABUTTERS LIS1 2 3 E, 2 3 4 ......... 4 SUBJECT PROPERTY: MAP. 16 LOT: 0368 SUFF 5 5 PROPERTY ADDRESS.: 0057 GROVE STREET 61 6 ASSESSED OWNER FLOMP .9PTROS ..................... 7 ..............1-1 0 .m I.I I..I.I I . . 'PRt!PERTY.,AD0RESS.... Al" MAP LOTI'SLIF 10 13 Oil 16 0366 0057 GROVE STREET FLONP SPIROS P 50 BROAD ST 4 5 12 SALE �M MA 01970 16 i TR .......... �I .64 WE I NBSTE-IN •'B`AAE'tl 4 ... ...I..... TI I, -H 19 . .......... ... ..... 3 • 15 0,.5 r 20 16 WEN U Y �ALLM PIAL;b U T9 i U 21 17 16 0360 0105 MASON STREET REAR BRENNAN JOHN WALSH 419 LAFAYETTE ST 22 • x 23 18 SALEM MA 01970 24 79 "01 Q 7 1, ....... jCiNtHEAT ............. ...... I MASON'I HEAL T'y� I ts'L164, I I I. I...1 25 .......... ......... R .......I-- .............. 20 T MIA 6• I..I.....I. . 21 7 ....................... ...... 28 22 MOSCA I Q CA HQL YN A14 N 29 •23 16 0363 0111 MASON STREET OCONNOR ROSE MARY E Ill MASON Sr30• 1 OCONNOR CARRIE SALEM M E ALEA 01 3 970 3; 24 4� CAHH(.,C .......I ,- I.I I.I...... 33 3 26 ANNA JEi 1970 27 bi L?1,17-# em-ST, REET' - , 4fi S, JEFFRE .. . 7, 'A 6 T > . 35 28 VLPUK'� PIAI-Ut- A MA—TJT97ET- 3 1 29 16 0366 0119 MASON STREET JANK(N-JSK 7 YG1e1UN T 119 MASON STREET 3 30 EMI L I A SALEM MA 01970 4] 31 41 LJT -�5 ..... .. .. L-1 TPIAN'A PNILI'P:EXECUT(ik,�, 42 32 0 ......... .............. ........... 'r MA I MON I DES 'SfH()OL 43 33 44 lZRIDC 'ST—EE- 34 45 35 16 0370 0057 GROVE STREET RR LABRIE ARTHUR F 61 BOWDITCH S7 4 36 PEABODY MA 01960 448 49 37 U ........... ............................ ........... I....I.A 1 50 .................... ....... ......... ............ . ......I 51... .. ..... .........%".", ........ ......... ......I I.....I..I..I.I. .. 521 .. . ............... 40 53 54 41 5 5 • 42 56 ........... z 43 ........... . ........l', ...... ............. % 58 ... 51 ........... IAI 45 1 1 . ....... ....... 60 46 61 47 62 63 48 64 49 50 671 51 ..I I.. ...... .....I...... 52 n 69 70 53 71 54 72 55 l.....I...... ....... S 74 OR, ............. ........ 75 7 go .......... 178 AC. \I 039E R \ \ jp 95.39 MASON , ST RI RI 00 / a RI 1 6 °•a • RE Fsoo 3 3sg Pp RE \\63s) 0 379 3�\ roy- 03sB op RE .� ' ss ` 3� o � a3 5�. R[ 90 3 !y sco s, M°pLS N 0 RE 103 e 23 \ W� 3 6 e� _ a ,y ry�h .246 \ 34 AE ov- / }. O 4 \ /�i ►P \ y 5. 3a 2sg FNp ✓ eT + O ° °° 2 1 / icHp Ol .3 z r ;.)q 0 5QO s6 yo ASEMENT — —— 4y s4jg a 01' e4eo �. 3 - -- --- RE` i o / tr tAp 3958 ' / e REN is i0f y JO Sj /Qb fid o' ,6�g W i / f 2 F 0 G //�J°6� /g o s/gO •+ 0 1.60 p REI APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . A� Qlitg of '�$ttl>em, Anssar4usEtts Poarb of �Appral AW Z9 10 AM '33 CITYOFTO THE BOARD OF APPEALS: C SA�F?i, F � lEftK S 'S ©tfIC The Undersigned represent that he is are the owners of a certainP arcel of land located at NO. . . . . . . C; - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Street; Zoning District C?/ e. . . . . . . • • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : and said parcel is affected by Section(s) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . of the Massachusetts State Building Code. Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance. hV i O O rn rn c� N C3 The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for t'e fqbl owing reasons: " w "� The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero- gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for the following reasons: Ve4b C7 1-z 7v vS� QU77Uv o f �vi�r>>,�� �.� OLos B�2 Address. .S4 . !3� ST S�4[ ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . so 4� Telephone. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 -) 1Z— . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Petitioner. . S��°L5. . .� . 7C�'-- �q,� Address. So Date. . . . ��. .�1. .�. .� . Telephone. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . By. . . . . . . . . . . Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The Evening News. NO.................................... PETITION TO BOARD OF APPEALS LOCATION ........................................ PETITIONER....... ............... .......... ....... ADDRESS............................................... ..............................I................. CONDII IONS .......................... .................................... ........................ ....................................... ................................................................ ..................!.............................................. PETITION APPROVED.................... ❑ DENIED......................... 19......... CITY OF SALEM CITY OF SALEM BOARD OF APPEAL BOARD OF APPEAL Will hold 745-9595 Egt. 381 F�74RD O Ext. E ested Will in the Public hearing for all Persons inter- Will hold a Public hearing for all persons inter- F Petition submitted by SPIR.OS P, LOMP for Variance to a ested in the petition submitted by SPIROS P. at57 GROVE STREET(BPPortion for auto the sales,repair FLOMP for Variance to a portion of the building and body work.Said hearing to be held WEDNES- at 57 GROVE STREET(BPD)for auto sales,repair DAY, g and body work.Said hearing to be held WEDNES- SALEM GREEN 20' 1dfl AT 6:00 P.M., ONE DAY, OCTOBER 20, 1993 AT 6:00 P.M., ONE FRANCIS X. floor. SALEM GREEN, second f1 or. 1993 GREALISH, Jr., Chairman FRANCIS X. GREALISH, Jr., Chairman t October 6, 13 October 6, 13, 1993 SN22492 SN22492 ' .. CITY OF SALEM BOARD OF APPEAL `1 CITY OF SALEM W 745-9595 Ext. 381 BOARD OF APPEAL ill hold a public hearing for all persons inter- 745.9595 Ext. 381 ested in the petition submitted by SPIROS P. Will hold a public hearing for all Persons inter- , FLOMP for Variance to a Portion of the building ested in the at57 GROVE STREET(BPD)for auto sales,repair FLOMP for Variance submitted by SPIROS P. and body work.Said hearing to be held WEDNES- at 57 GROVE STREET(BPD) a Portion of the building DAY, OCTOBER 20, 1993 AT 6:00 P.M., ONE and body work.Said heaBinD toobe heldalesI repair SALEM GREEN, second floor. DAY, OCTOBER 20, 19938 WEDNES- FRANCIS X. GREALISH, Jr., Chairman SALEM GREEN, AT 6:00 P.M„ ONE October 6, 13, 1993 FRANCIS Xcond floor. SN22492 October 6, NIS GREALISH, Jr., Chairman SN22492 • APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . of 'SaI rm, 'Massadjus etts 406 20 10 29 411 093 CITY OF SA!LEPf TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS: C!.C[?K,S CF,,MASS The Undersigned represent that he is are the owners of a certain parcel of land located at NO. . . . . . . . 57 . . .��PT.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Street; Zoning District.e5 ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : and said parcel is affected by Section(s) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . of the Massachusetts State Building Code. Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance. to rn 6"y The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for 'the fs` owing reasons: The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero- gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for the following reasons: S IS = (/ X3C6 Tv v5j_ /2o77aA-- vt q,�rV d- E p p y L✓o2C sal p �L oryi Owner. . . . . . . /GDS . . . . . . . . . . . . . Address. . r?. .�IZP!9V 57. . . . .S�G� ! Telephone. . . S g. . .?. 'i.DL 7 1 L . . . . . . . . Petitioner. . S�/!�S . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Address. . . . r . Telephone. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . By. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The Evening News. NO.................................... PETITION TO BOARD OF APPEALS LOCATION ................................................................ PETITIONER.......................................... ADDRESS............................................... ................................................ CONDII IONS .......................... . .................................... ........................ ....................................... ................................................................ ............................................................ ................................................................. ................................................................. PETITION APPROVED.................... ❑ DENIED......................... ..................................... 19......... CILAN BOOK kiSPLAN &t T !►v w s paa,sw er�+t s■Aua Mw. O BARRY KOPLEMAN + 6*a;ry Or. 71 � •1 �J w REGISTRY OF DEEDS USE _C J W a Z r {4� NO. ST o C�caw G I� 80`7 (3 AREA:259S.F1 s 5 � I CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN CONFMVS TO THE RULES S REGULATIONS OF THE REGISTRY z aC� OF "EDS. L t1• i s7 G-�pvE 5'7' sly PLAN OF LAND SALEM , MASS . PROPERTY OF MICHAELS TRIM CO.,INC. I CERTIFY rMT THE PROPERTY LINE$ snow" ARE SCALE : I"- 20' MARCH 7,1979 THE LINT! MING EXISTING OWNERlnIP, AND THE LMS Of STREETS AND WAYS SHOWN ARE THOM NORTHEAST ENGINEERING s SURVEY , INC. OF PUBLIC AND PRIVATE STREETS AND WAYS 13 E A STREET PEAPODY .kIAIS. ALREADY ESTABLISHED i AND 1 FURTHER CERTIFY r;«. THAT NO NEW LINES FOR DIVISION Of EXISTING \: OWNERSHIP OR FOR NEW WAYS ARE SHOWN , ! _� 3 tu.+e 0 10 20 40 -Go w b0 J 4 w.. 91T1Q GRAPHIC SCALE . CIAN BOOK AISPLAN (Q/ r+�A�f>M s altea.9A or�sft awt+a� �U Q BARRY KOIILFWA14 r h t ^s� REGISTRY OF DEEDS USE Otif � 3C a a W 2 NG. e.T o it o C�caw G I�-e n , 80'7 03 AREA: 25, S.Fx cA Do � •� r!s i_cc,U� � Jc r ti I CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN CONFOR"S TO THE RULES D REGULATIONS OF THE REGISTRY OF CRE[?9. UWNBn ti .5-7 6-y(�O v� 57— PLAN OF LAND SALEM , MASS , PROPERTY OF MICHAELS TRIM CO.,INC. I CERTIFY THAT TM PRDlERTY LINES SIIOrN ARE SCALE : I"= 20' MARCH 7,t979 TW LINES DWI" EXISTING OWNERSNfP, AND THE LINES OF STREETS AND WAYS SHOWN ARf: TIICRE NORTHEAST ENGINEERING a SURVEY , INC. 13 WALLIS STREET OF PUBLIC AND .PRIVATE STREETS AND WAYS PEARODY , MAIS. ALREADY ESTABLISHED i AND l FURTHER CERTIFY THAT NO NEW LINES FOR DIVISION OF EXISTING o 1KII.J1 e` OMNERS!IIP OR FOR NEW WAYS ARE SHOWN ELAM 0 10 210 40 so t0 100 W / ��"'' �'n� GRAPHIC SCALE