24 GROVE STREET - ZBA (2) 24 Grove Street R-1
Raymond & Barbara Haight
J
1
V �
I J
11
(Ilif ofttlPm, ttssttr�ju�effs
^� �Roarb of �u}tenl PITY
a
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF RAYMOND AND BARBARA HAIGHT FOR A SPECIAL
PERMIT AT 24 GROVE STREET (R-1)
A hearing on this petition was held August 9, 1989 with the following
Board Members present: Richard Bencal, Vice Chairman, John Nutting,
Secretary, Messrs. Richard Febonio, Edward Luzinski and Peter Dore.
Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of
the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in
accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting a Special Permit to
allow construction of an addition and deck located in an R-1 district.
The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this
request for a Special Permit is Section V B, 10, which provides as
follows:
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance,
the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions
set forth in Section VIII F and IX D, grant Special Permits for alterations
and reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement,
extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses,
provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion
shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming
use to the neighborhood.
In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests,
guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding
by the Board that the special permit will promote the public health, safety,
convenience and welfare of the City's habitants.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented,
and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact:
1. There was no opposition.
2. Neighbors and abutters spoke in favor.
3. The proposed changes would allow the petitioner a fuller use of their
property.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented,
the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1. The granting of the requested Special Permit will promote the public
health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants and
will be in harmony with the neighborhood.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF RAYMOND AND BARBARA HAIGHT FOR A SPECIAL
PERMIT AT 24 GROVE STREET (R-1)
page two
2. The relief requested can be granted without substantial detriment to
the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating
from the intent of the district or the purpose of the ordinance.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0 to grant
the request for a Special Permit to allow construction of an addition and
deck, subject to the following conditions:
1. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke
and fire safety be adhered to.
2. All construction be done with a legal building permit and as per
all City and State Building codes.
3. All construction be as per plans and dimensions submitted.
4.. Exterior finishes of the proposed addition be in harmony with
the existing building.
GRANTED
Richard T. Febonio, Board Member
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of
the Mass. General Laws, Chapter 808,and shall be filed within 20 days
after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk.
Pursuant to Mass. General Laws, Chapter 808, Section 11, the Variance
or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the
dacision. bearing, the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have
elapsed and no appeal has been filed, cr that, if such appeal has been
filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex
Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name or the owner of record or
is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title.
BOARD OF APPEAL
r •
•—
_
C ,�,,tr:.-•�E- a -•rA i � Cn'•:�`"� .i
Cl r,! f}SI'! _ 1 Pool - pwic.�r3.;G�oria
a� I �
Los 2SD
� 3 3r.✓%n' St'
II Imo_;,.. '3,2i •
t•rs
. Arer�= S.r�y3SF _
ZZ
c=/d;roe d
Zu9 J� Levesgvg
I2 'i Greva 74
✓w� iGn�
I (�
1
cL _ cj y?
C/Z0 ✓� ST.
PLOT PL/,N o< L,�'/j/f7ti• ,.
ba-
� :. :t :.:PSS ort /"7np •C�,�... � � ,y~ p �
9 y
NMA
/e 4 �fi /o n/ I� fi�AXa y7'
788
-zp' /Olay
TEIR
MLUAND �S'S•`-'r S.J2VE Y S��C-V�G �11AC.
i `'., -sh
�9,L64 -
p 9 Po •-#rte— 2Ns
/asn voce wicrr?.;6%oris
�s
9
y
Got LSO
1 3 3r✓i r)� Ste.
I r I Z2.
.,g
4/ F
, �- : .v9 Lcves$vC
I L 2 Cuero vt $1
i
r �
i
Z/Cj
G20VE:- ST.
or fE
AIMA
iahs
uwo
I
�twa� GIApLoa P, - _
# I/a x I % G e oR R q`ate 00 --- -- -- - --
I
v II ill � ,i I j T Y — {
I..
I _
W EST EI_EVA7- or`( NoRTH I= IEVRTr0rY
TROPOsED Pl,(-)xROOm aF- DEek
ti ( 1R. a M2s. I Ap�IOIYD HAiGkT
by . Exscu—r VE 84 � `f G ;;vv E St- SALErS , MA.
!2 Wx 25� SflF?L BERrns --- --
VELUx g yk,ft
- � !6' To.SiudS 5 - 161 %
Ezr
i
�i - - -
`
.2.X.1.0��I DbEfj__ - • =L_ � -3 EEL �EAm
FLooR FfR gmirYG
tpR.o_03_E_D__ 't _69 Y.Roov) � tI<
RIEM ,_._.N1R,.
EXEourr VE--3a+r_k 6189 - EAST--- ELEVgT!_O-rc - --
617 -,387-,T/17