11,13, 15 GREENLAWN AVENUE - ZBA i 11 ,13, & 15 Greenlawn Ave. R'j
Charles Brett
s
J
DATE OF HEARING
PETITIONER eZ,A
LOCATION
MOTION: TO GRANT 5f rU SECOND �em
r'o
TO DENY SECOND
TO RE-HEAR SECOND
LEAVE TO WITHDRAW SECOND
TO CONTINUE SECOND
ROLL CALL PRESENT GRANT DENY WITHDRAW RE-HEAR CONTINUE
Di
RICHARD BENCAL
RICHARD' FEBONIO
EDWARD LUZINSKI
MARY JANE STIRGWOLT
f ASSOCJIATE MEMBERS
JOkk9 Y
ARTHUR LABREC�Q-UE
CONDITIONS: / I� 7 (�� I c nv !; l d r ✓ n f o�
�✓�{�' {1" nIrn.brr5 m `f2c G; o P✓ ]CsSar ] C9 c�
� 11 Leo r�
-o=a
c
(�Itu of lrm, �ssttthiisetf�
BLIZlyd ui _CNV .. 7
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF CHARLES BRETT FOR VARIANCES FOR
11 , 13, 15, GREETNLA'WN AVENUE a/k/a LOTS 46-52 GREENLAWN AVE. ( R-1 )
A hearing on this petition was held June 19, 1991 with the following Board Members
present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Richard Febonio, Edward Luzinski, Mary Jane
Stirgwolt and Associate Member Ronald Plante. Notice of the hearing was sent to
abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the
Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting Variances to divide existing
three lots into four lots. Property is located in an R-1 district.
The 'Variances which have been requested may be granted upon a finding of the
Board that:
a. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land,
building and structure involved and which are not generally affecting other
lands, buildings or structures in the same district.
b. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve
substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner.
c. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public
good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the
district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the
hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact:
1 . Councillor Leonard O'Leary spoke in favor of this petition.
2. Mrs. Walsh, and abutter who had concerns about Nater run--Ci'.' on her
property, was informed by the Chairman that the petitioner was at this
time only asking to divide his lots and not to build ant at a future
time if the petition is granted and at the start of any construction,
she would be notified by the proper City Dept. and she could voice her
concerns at that time.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the
hearing, the Board of Appeal, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1 . Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but
not the district in general.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance would involve
substantial hardship to the petitioner.
3. The relief requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent
of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF CHARLES ERETT FOR VARIANCES
AT 11 , 1 3, 15 GREENLAWN AVE. , .A/K/A LOTS 66-52 GREENLA`r1N AVE. , "ALEM
page two
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the
Variances requested, subject to the following conditions
1 . That the petitioner shall have a ore-blast survey in accordance with
City Ordinance.
2. Property street numbering be obtained from the City of Salem Assessor.
Variances Granted
June 19, 1991
r-1chard Febonio, Hember, Board of Appeal
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of
the Mass. General Laws, Chapter 808, and shall be filed within 20 days
After the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk.
Pursuant to Mass. Genera! Laws, Ch:p':_^r 808, Section 11, the Variance
or P^rnrt genre:: he!ein shall not take effect anti; a copy of the
decision, herring the certJ;catlon of the City Clerk that 20 days have
Oansed and no appeal has been wcd, or that, if such appeal has been
filed, that it hes been dismisse4i or denied is recorded in the South Essex
Raglslry of Deeds and indexed under the name or the owner of record or
is recorded and no'.ed on the owuei s Certificate of Title.
BOARD OF AP-PFAL
;o
cr v,
.a
.i7
_J
J_ -
r�1
" Itt1 of 65jem, c_Ja9Sar4USPJfB
'Buttrb of Apeal
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF CHARLES BRETT TR. =0R VARIANCES
AT LOTS 46-52 GREENLAWN AVENUE (R-1 )
A hearing on this petition was held August 16, 1989 with the following Board
Members present: James Fleming, Chairman; Messr. , Febonio, Luzinski, Nutting
and Associate Member LaBrecque. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and
others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening
'Mews in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioner, owner of the property, represented by Attorney John Vallis, s
requesting variances from lot size and frontage to allow parcel to be divided
into three lots in this R-1 district.
petition to divide this property into four (4) lots was denied by the
Board of Appeal on May i;, 1989. The Board of Appeal, after hearing evidence
regarding substantial change, said change being, three (3) lots rather than
the four (4) lots originally, and after receiving Consent from the Salem Planning
Board, voted unanimously, 5-0, that there was a substantial change and they
would hear the petition.
The Variances which have been requested may be granted upon a finding of the
Board that:
a. special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the
land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting
other lands, buildings and structures in the same district;
b. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve
substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner;
c. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public
good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent
of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented, and
after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact:
1 . The abutter who had been opposed to the previous petition requesting
four lots sent a letter to the Board of Appeal stating he would have
no objection to the request for three (3) lots.
2. Councillor Leonard O'Leary, Ward IV, spoke in favor.
3. The property in question is unique in the manner in which the
property slopes up and the amount of ledge, making this the most
feasible wav to develop this site.
4. The proposed lots would be in harmony with the existing neighborhood.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF CHARLES BRETT, TR. FOR VARIANCES
AT LOTS 46-52 GREE.NLAWN AVENUE, SALEM
page -wo
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented, the
the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
Soecial conditions exist which especially affect the subject aroperty and
and not the district generally.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance would .fork a
substantial hardship on the petitioner.
3. The relief recuested can be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the ordinance.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the
Variances requested, subject to the following conditions:
1 . The lots be established as per the plans submitted and as per the
dimensions shown on those plans dated 6/12/89•
2. Subdivision approval, including the extension of Greenlawn Avenue, 'ce
obtained from the City of Salem Planning Board.
3. Drainage plan be offered and approved by the City of Salem Director of
Public Services.
4. Proper numbering of lots be obtained from the City of Salem Assessor.
VARIANCES GRANTED
*ohn'e=R. Nut ing, Se tary
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
I
?.npeal from this decision, if nnv, s!ioll bn mrde our-.•,:cnt !o S^cr-n 17 of
_ ... .ss. G_ncr... Laws. CF...,;;r nOG. ,,:':d
•!ie cite or f::;nq or :r.is : :union ; o!`._e c: the ......
rr�n:-... ....cin
c •i., r, 're .. .
th:: it 1:7s ooan cJ mi53C ci or r.cr,: . s r=C.. . .i ;n t . . _LdX
. Fiumsrry c! Gaetl and tndese,i ❑c:cr t-, roma or r" n•.nr.- c: record of
is recorded and noted on the o.r:er's Cert:tica:a o: Ts;:a.
GOARO OF APPEAL
. ..,:. UJ
�tLTfU IIfIIIPTIi, c'285dtI11Iff$28
�nttr>3 of �u�resi
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF CHARLES BRETT. „USTEE FCR VARIANCES
AT LOTS 46-52 GREET LAIN AVENUE (R-1)
A hearing on this petition was held May 17. 1989 with the rollowino Sparc `lember,
present: James Fleming, Chairman: Richard Bencal , ';ice Chairman: John Plutting,
Secretary, and Associate Member LaBrecque. Notice of the hearing was sent to
abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Sal
Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioner. Trustee of the Brett Family Realty Trust, owners of the property, is
requesting variances to combine seven ( 7) lots into four (4) lots in this t-1 zon
The Variances which have been requested may be granted upon a finding_ of -he
Board that:
a. special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land.
building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other
lands, buildings or structures in the same district:
b. literal enforcement of the provisions of the zoning ordinance would involve
substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner:
c. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public
good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of thf
district or the purpose of the ordinance.
The Board of Appeal , after careful consideration of the evidence presented and
after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact:
1 . The lots in question have always been vacant.
2. The lots in the immediate area of the proposed plan all contain
more square footage than the proposed lots.
3. The proposed lots would not be in harmony with the surrounding area.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented.
the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1 . Special conditions do not exist which especially affect the subject
property and not the district generally.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance would not involve
substantial hardship to the petitioner:
Desirable relief can not be granted without substantial detriment to
the public good or without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
in 1of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
4.I
. ti �� ole
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF CHARLES BRETT. TR. FOR VARIANCES
AT LOTS V6-52 GREENLAWN AVENUE. SALEM
Page two
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted three (3) in favor, one ( 1 ) opposed
(Mr. Nutting) to the granting of the variances requested. The request is denied
due to the failure of the petitioner to obtain the required four (4) affirmative
votes.
DENIED
71chard A. Bencal , Vice Chairman
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Mass.
General Laws, Chapter 808, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing
of this decision in the office of the k:ity Clerk.
Pursuant to Mass. General Laws, Chapter 808, Section 11, the Variance or Special Permit
granted herein, shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the Certi-
fication of the City Cleric that 20 days have elapsed and not appeal has been filed,
or that. if such an appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is
recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner
of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title.
BOARD OF APPEAL
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
(Dig of ,§nIgnt, AussuripsEttsREr.EM:r)
Pntttb. of ,�ypettl '81 OCT 19 P4 :21
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF EDWARD MORGANI CITY CLFP►1'S OFFICE
REQUESTING A VARIANCE FOR LOTS 46-52 GREENLAWN AVENUE SALEM MASS
A hearing on this Petition was held on October 14, 1981 with the
following Board Members present: Douglas Hopper, Chairman; Messrs. Hacker,
Piemonte, Feeherry and Associate Member Lusinski. Notices of the hearing
were sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly
published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General
Laws Chapter 40A.
The Petitioner has requested a variance for Lots 46-52 Greenlawn Avenue
to combine the existing seven lots and then divide them into four new lots.
A variance is required because the lots to be created as shown on the plans
submitted to the Board will all be non-conforming.
The Board of Appeals, after consideration of the evidence presented
at the public hearing and after viewing the property makes the following
findings of fact:
1. The lots in the surrounding area are similar in size to
those which petitioner wishes to create.
2. No substantive opposition was raised to petitioner's plan by
neighbors.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and the evidence presented
at the public hearing, the Board of Appeals concludes as follows:
f
1. The property in question is unique because of its peculiar configur-
ation and because of the ledge at the site and the manner in which the
property slopes up from Greenlawn Avenue. In addition, the
present configuration of the lots imposes a hardship on the
petitioner by restricting his development of these lots in a manner
which is consistent with the surrounding area.
2. The conditions described above especially affect the land in question
but do not generally affect the zoning district in which the land
is located.
3. The conditions described above which affect the land in question,
but not the zoning district generally cause special financial hardship
to the Petitioner.
4. The desired variance may be granted without substantial detriment
to the public good.
DECISION - OCTOBER 14, 1981 - EDWARD MORGANI - PAGE TWO
'81 OCT 19 P4 :21
Therefore, the Board of Zoning Appeals unanimously voted it� favor ,; _
of approving the grant of the requested relief. The Boar sttr: •. UFFICE
a variance to the Petitioner on the following terms and cond fi S.
MPSS
1. Petitioner may combine Lots 46-52 Greenlawn Avenue into four single
family house lots as shown on the plan submitted to the Board.
2. This variance is conditioned upon the approval of the petitioner's
plan by the Planning Board and any conditions imposed upon petitioner
by the Planning Board Shall-be incorporated into this decision.
3. Petitioner shall submit all plans to the City Engineer who may then
review these plans to determine whether they adequately deal with
drainage at the site. The City Engineer shall, in his sole discretion,
modify such plans as they relate to drainage if he deems that to be
necessary.
Anthony M. eeherry
APP&1:
CERERAI. Lt.:.S, Cil; , • : I•':aS':F.'i7 TOry_ ' A,S.
OF THIS GCC1C::::I IL TIIL;._..- :[:i''L: -C ::: SU L... :..... : - .
3F T'r:"e U:Y ..• -..TE C7 Fi U::S
CRAY.TEJ ! t1:J.VSi ALL �" lI 1'.: r .CT 2i .I r 'I T !.0 E P ',:IT
FlcOR NA.1 C i :E UiY CLEF D.,yS HATE
7•
CR THAT. IF SJCd Aii 0PCiL :i:.; FE=i: - ,<_ . r0 H"' •..
RECORDED Ci I . _0 _ .:1.E. VAI I h'S _ . 7.. .•-"
:.E S TH ESSE:� R <"r.•
OF TflARD GC I_I • OF DEE S l,3C C; Ei.-D 'FRE GL::IER
4 R"O"ED AND UDTCJ ON THE 0-dNiR'S CER7IFICF.iE OF TITLE.
000 Of APKAL
A COPY OF THIS DECISION AND PLANS HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLE!
4 Ctu of 5aIEm, assns seih F
'Pnar3 of app al 82 MAR 17 A10 :49
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF EDWARD MORGANI CITY CLERKS OFFICE
REQUESTING A VARIANCE FOR LOTS 46-52 GREENLAWN AVENUE S A L E I i`A?
A hearing on this Petition was held on March 10, 1982 with the following
Board Members present: Douglas Hopper, Chairman; Messrs. Hacker, LaBrecque,
Piemonte and Feeherry. Notices of the hearing were sent to abutters and
others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening
News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
1981This property is currently the subject of a prior variance dated October 14,
. However, the Petitioner has requested a new variance for Lots 46-52 Creenlawn
Avenue to divide the property into four lots as shown on the plan dated December 31,
1981, bubmitted to the Board. A variance is requird because the lots !to
be created as shown on the plan submitted to the Board will all be non-conforming.
The Board of Appeal, after consideration of the evidence presented at the
public hearing and after viewing the property makes the following findings
of fact:
1. The lots in the surrounding area are similar in size to those
which Petitioner wishes to create.
2. No substantive opposition was raised to petitioner's plan by
neighbors.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and the evidence presented
at the public hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1. The property in question is unique because of its peculiar
configuration and because of the ledge at the site and the
manner in which the property slopes up from Greenlawn Avenue.
In addition, the present configuration of the lots imposes a
hardship on the petitioner by restricting his development
of these lots in a manner which is consistent with the sur-
rounding area.
2. The conditions described above especially affect the land in
question but do not generally affect the zoning district in
which the land is located.
3. The conditions described above which affect the land in question,
but not the zoning district generally cause special financial
hardship to the Petitioner.
DECISION - March 10, 1982 - EDWARD MORGANI
Page 2 '82 MAR 17 A10 :49
4. The desired variance may be grantedwithout s p tantial
g ^
detriment to the public good. �p1C_ Pi: _ r, rICE
SALE i
Therefore, the Board of Zoning Appeal voted 4-1 in favor of
approving the grant of the requested relief (Mr. Piemonte voted
"present") . The Board grants a variance to the Petitioner on
the following terms and conditions. .
1. Petitioner may combine Lots 46-52 Greenlawn Avenue into
four single family lots as shown on the plan submitted to
the Board.
2. This variance is conditioned upon the approval of the
Petitioner's plan by the Planning Board and any conditions
imposed upon Petitioner by the Planning Board shall
be incorporated into this decision.
3. Petitioner shall submit all plans to the City Engineer
who may then review these plans to determine whether they
adequately deal with drainage at the site. The City Engineer
shall, in his sole discretion, modify such plans as they
relate to drainage if he deems that to be necessary.
i
nthony M. Feek r
APPEAL FS^" TFL. C£. :i:... .. •..... S-ALL '.::?.',_ PL"J_..,.: T^ ...:is"..''. 17 CF T:iE LASS.
GEES!^.AL !'....., C::-' ... .... ....i Sw '!. ...7.i'.'1 2u 3"S .'TE;^. ':ii"t D.QE CF FILING
CF TH:3 Gc!"".,. 1:: i'LE
P✓"f.'i:T i0 ....... .. .... ... ... :' .F? ?i' S'. TLE ....::i.:':i' .. . ":. .. . Pi.
?:'IT
S':": N." L..._ ..._:i ..... 1. ..?i .. .... .. :.,.... . :i!? vni, '
FICATiM U
OR ICAT. IF Ss... .... ..F 7.i... fii:S L.... .'�L . . ii ., 'i'7 CR SCi:._. 13
REC',,M0 I': THE ._.iil n.:E U "Az C:".NEM
OF RECORD 03 IS B:C.I;uFO ANL; N 110 04 T:.: C:.;!M'S CEitG7lL?dE GF TITLE.
BOARD OF APPEAL
A COPY OF THIS DECISION AND PLANS HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLER1
BOARD OF' ASSESSORS
• CITY HALL- PAGE.
M4 1-11�71-1
.............
.......... C I S,
E VTT 'R ,IST,�
T Fl
...........
3 ......
.. . .. . . .. . ...........
. .......... . ..... .
4 SUBJECT PROPERTY: MAP. 08 LOT-,., 0154 BUFF - MAP: 08 LOT: 0113 MAP
• -5 PROPERTY ADDRESS: 0011 GREENLAWN AVENUE 0013 GREENLAWN AVENUE 0015 GREENLAWN AVENUE 6
6 ASSESSED OWNER BRETF FAMILY REALTY TRUSF SAME OWNER SAME OWNER
..... .. ....
7F8 1
1... ...
0
y .... . ..
)ORE
m A I NGADj2RESS,"'---- . 2
A C'O 'SVEE PE
10
4
• 11 08 (3101 0014 GLENN AVENUE PHEASANT HILL REALTY TRUST 14 GLENN AVE 5 •
12 Sl I INI I LICH RIQHARQ V I R RAI EM MA Q197n 16
— ,11 ,, �. , .,, .-, � - I , , � , , -,i �,a,,,�",;,�7, 17
IEI P IE TE� 9� ",IN ,A0N-,,,AWb
7,7
•
013 Z�REX-N L�'A WN!'A
GREE -IL
ME'ii'lET!6& t.-ti-IRGE, �C A!:d i Vh) ... . ....
'0A 'ill-1-14', 7, 0
fl
-iVEIRDA) FLAUE,
I�njn.1 cli cl,�,,,,Jl,FL I . . . . . . . LdAl ��0-4 GPORGTA 1- 210
t4l'F" -AVFNe*
016 SALEM MA 01970 1 21
— L2
17 08 0115 0012 CLOVERDALE AVENUE ROMANO ANNE '12 CLOVERDALE AVENUE L, 0
18 SAI FlIf MA Q197n 24
L
01a1$ 0008 I z
10 4ARL
'KIPI(f L o
21
20
L L -I'EltlkiLS, ROW
•
21 ."Lt PfI`GlqL`AN'f. *AVENLIE"" El N'(-) t-0 v,16SE' PH"A'
2.1
022 TOPSFIELI) MA 01963 0
23 08 0152 0020 CLOVERDALE AVENUE ROMANO JOSEPH J 20 CLOVERDALE AVENUE
24 ROMANO DARLENE SALEM MA 01970 3
25 ...... 57, g dzy,eS
7 33
SW�NIUCK;LUGILUE,A
Nm
3
025 e En �19 50
j� :,(j 70,
3 1
08 0165— �;WIN UCH LAU ANN T4 GLENN"AVE ' ."
V 0012 �GLENN, AVENUE, I., I I .I I I %1��t*,I s" I,--��`i� 'q 36
28 SALEM MA 01970 �-j 3 z
29
3
30 4
3
5
36
3
3
41
"I 'z I I I 1 1: 1,-�I I I I I�l I I I '1 41
4
32
z 4
33
,4
34 5
035 L6 0
E
3 48
317 4
38
5
3
3 •9
40 5
• 41
42 5
43 SF . .....
F
44 . ... .. S 5
9
45
46 61
• T7 6320
4
j!-
49
. ..... .
50 . .
N
52
0 53
54
...........
s5 ..
p _
1-0
J � J N � Af ✓ � .I� '
105-5 IIO Rol-5 IL'0-5 \ k�
o Y yV a`
zz
109 I10-5 O O I10- a
i
7E)
lb6
OOl�
G
O om cl
v� t� o OO
y/ in
O 'a n0
'CP
y i
_ W I
r O
ZP O I
o V'
� 04
O � q
L j
� I
W
p _ W N ioy
4 (J1 m
to
d ` N
2G o 4
9 y
SERAFINI, SERAFINI AND DARLING
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
63 FEDERAL STREET
SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970
JOHN R. SERAFINI. SR. TELEPHONE
JOHN R. SERAFINI,JR. 508-744-0212
JOHN E. DARLING 617-581-2743
ELLEN M, WINKLER
T PIER
/
JOSEPH C. CORRENTI May 20 1992 508-74-741 46B3
Board of Appeals
City of Salem
One Salem Green
Salem, MA 01970
RE: Variances Granted to Property at
11, 13 , 15 Greenlawn Avenue
a/k/a Lots 46-52 Greenlawn Avenue
Charles Brett
Gentlemen:
Please consider the enclosed application for extension of the
above referenced Variances granted by your Board for a period of
six (6) months from the effective date of that grant.
While Petitioner has been adversely effected by the past and
current economic situation, but, hopeful of an economic turnaround,
wishes to keep the Variances from lapsing, so as to be able to
commence construction when the climate for development improves.
We would, therefore, respectfully request that this Board
grant an extension as provided in General Laws Ch. 40A, Section 10,
for an additional six (6) month period from the effective date of
the Variances granted for the property at 11, 13 , 15 Greenlawn
Avenue, a/k/a Lots 46-52 Greenlawn Avenue.
Respectfully submitted,
JOHN R. SERAFINI, s64
Attorney for
Charles Brett
JRS,SR. /ln
j��� ��
Heritage Co-operative Banti
e,t. 1888 71 WASHINGTON STREET•SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS 01970•TEL.508-744-5450
January 11, 1991
Mr. Charles Brett
139 Holten St.
Danvers, Ma 01923
RE: Greenlawn and Glenn Avenues, Salem
Dear Mr. Brett:
The Bank has reviewed your request for financing regarding the land
you own on Greenlawn and Glenn Avenues in Salem.
In analyzing the proposed costs for construction of roadways, ledge
removal, etc. , it is apparent to us that three lots do not make a
viable development. We feel that the addition of a fourth lot
would spread the costs of construction so that the project would
then make more financial sense.
Under the circumstances, we cannot agree to go forward on the basis
of three lots.
Sincerely /yours,
Peter W. Copelas
President
PWC/wld
BRANCH OFFICE: 123 PLEASANT STREET•MARBLEHEAD,MASS.01945•TEL.617-639-2300
4 COLON STREET• BEVERLY, MASS. 01915 •TEL. 508-921-0723
DATE OF PERMIT I PERMIT No. OWNER LOCATION
EDWARD MORGANI ( LOTS 46-52 GREENLAWN AVE.
STRUCTURE MATERIAL I DIMENSIONS No. OF STORIES No.OF FAMILIES I WARD COST
BUILDER
j BOARD OF APPEAL - OCT. 14, 1981 - GRANTED VARIANCE TO COMBINE THE EXISTING SEVEN LOTS AND
THEN DIVIDE THEM INTO FOUR NEW LOTS.
BOARD OF APPEAL: 3/17/82 - GRANTED - Variance to divide into four lots
j BOARD OF APPEAL: 5/17/89 - DENIED - Variance to divide into four lots, Charles Brett
Owner
BOARD OF APPEAL: 8/16/89 - GRANTED : Variances to divide into three (3) lots
06-03-91.10:56:20.59916-LEGF V I 06-03-91.10:56:20.59916-LEGF
I
CITY OF SALEM CITY OF SALEM
BOARD OF APPEAL BOARD OF APPEAL
95
745-9595 Ext. 381 Will hold a Public hear ngtfo3r all persons inter-
ested
Will
in theap public
hsubmg ted by for all Cha les Brett ersons inter- ested in the petition submitted by Charles Brett
for Variances to divide 11, 13, 15 Greenlawn Ave. for Variances to divide 11, 13, a Greenlawn Ave.
into four lots.Said hearing to be held Wednesday, into four lots.Said hearing to be held Wednesday,
June 19, 1991 at 7.00 P.M.,One Salem Green,2nd June 19, 1991 at 7.00 P.M.,One Salem Green,2nd
floor. Floor.
RICHARD A. BENGAL, Chairman RICHARD A. BENCAL, Chairman
{i June 5, 12, 1991 June 5, 12, 1991
l
� --uo-08=91.10:56:20.59916-LEGF
j I 06-03-91.10:56:20.59916-LEGF
I I
CITY OF SALEM `
BOARD OF APPEAL CITY OF
745-9595 Ext. 381 BOARD SALEM
Will hold a public hearing For all persons inter- OF APPEAL
ested in the petition submitted by Charles Brett Will hold a 745-9595 Ext. 361
for Variances to divide 11, 13, IS Greenlawn Ave. esled in the public hearing for all
into four lots.Said hearing to be held Wednesday, petition submitted b persons inter-
flettfor Variances to divide 11, 13, 15 Greenhill arles Ave
June 19, 1991 at 7.00 P.M.,One Salem Green,2nd into four lots.Said hearing to be held Wednesday,
oor. June 19, 1991 at 7.00 P.M.,One Salem Green,2nd
June 5, 12, 1991CHARD A. BENGAL, Chairman floor.
J Tune 5, 12 RICHARD A. BENCAL, Chairman
1991
APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . .
aitu1 of 'Sttlem, ttBstTtl�Lt E#�s
A
PDara Df Appeal
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
The Undersigned represent that he is are the owners of a certain parcel of land located
at NO. .Greeala v.aud 41erlrl venues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Sct►�t; Zoning District.$.I . .
/./�./. . . A?. and{ v�k}pavkXi�xafCf�edx��xSgtran�as. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
o��keXR9a�s3a�h�n�Ut���Pgt�Qvd�.
Plans deo•ibi" the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in
ac4ordance. with the
IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance.
_ W
f'a
x<r
cry
m n
(n
The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following
reasons:
Direct Appeal
The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem
Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to
approve the application fee permit to build as filed; as the enforcement of said
Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary
hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero-
gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for
the following reasons:
See Schedule A
Owner. .. Charles Brett. . , , , , , , •• , , ,, , . . ,
Address. . .19 Holten Street.,, Danvers
c/o John R. Serafini, Sr.
Telephone. . 744-0212. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
Petitioner. . rj-ax" Brait. .-.. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.
c/o John R. Serafini, Sr.
/ ff Address. . . . . La Faexal. Street. . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
Date. .ems( 1� . . . . . . . . . . . Salem, MA 01970
Tele one.. . 7.44.-.0212. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
By �.: � � :^ i• . . . . . . .
/ •-r
Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of
,,rAppeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
+four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The
Evening News.
SCHEDULE A
The Petitioner was previously before the Board regarding his
desire to subdivide the land on Greenlawn and Glenn Avenues into
four (4) house lots, as shown on the enclosed plan. That petition
was denied on May 17, 1989.
Subsequently, the Board did grant the Petitioner permission
to divide the property into three (3) lots rather than four lots.
Since that time, because of the topography of the property as it
exists, consisting of a considerable amount of ledge and change and
fluctuation in elevations, the Petitioner has determined that it
is not economically feasible to divide the property into three
lots, because the costs attendant to putting in the required road
improvements and utilities create a financial hardship for the
Petitioner.
It is submitted that the present request for four lots creates
lots which are basically in keeping with the surrounding lots that,
of course, do not conform to present zoning. The lots,
nevertheless, will have adequate frontage and area to accommodate
a single family home in keeping with the homes in the general
vicinity. Given the need for single family housing in the City,
it is submitted that the requested variance is in accordance with
a public need and that a variance can be granted without
substantial impact on the surrounding area.
The Petitioner respectfully requests, based on the hardship
created by the conditions of the land itself and the financial
hardship resulting therefrom, that he be given permission to divide
the land into four lots as shown on the enclosed plans.
Please have in mind that the Board previously granted
permission to divide the land into four lots, but the Petitioner
did not act timely on the granted variance. When he applied again
to the Board for a regranting of the four lots originally approved,
one of the abutters expressed concern and the Petitioner was
subsequently denied the petition. Since that time, the abutter has
reviewed the plans and is now in favor of the petition.
RlO {(yJ
n r�
O f N
ms
APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . .
a (11Ttu of 'Salem' 'Massy r4usetts
a
'PBttrh of '�Fpeal
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
The Undersigned represent that he is are the owners of a certain parcel of land located
at NO. .Greeolaay.aud.G7enn .Avenuea . . . . . . . .8trmt; Zoning District.&.1 . .
. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : a�►dt�sak�pauxavk �t�dgc �tisrslt� zs. . . . .. . . . . . . . . .
o��k�XHas 5a�k�n�t � ddxi�
Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in
accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance.
uCSx .
C-1
u.
o rn
r, . cn
n �-
The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following
reasons:
Direct Appeal
The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem
Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to
approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said
Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary
hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero-
gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for
the following reasons:
See Schedule A
Owner. .. Charles Brett, , , , , , ,
Address. . ,19, Holten Street,,, Danvers
c/o John R. Serafini, Sr.
Telephone. , 7.4.4.-.0.2.1.2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
Petitioner. . rhaslas. 8rezi. . ... ... . . . . . . . . . . . .
c/o John R. Serafini, Sr.
Address. . . . . .6 .Faeral. street. . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
Date. 1 �. . . . . . . . . . . Salem, MA 01970
Tele one.. . ).4,4,-.0212. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of
,;,Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .
+four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The
Evening News.
SCHEDULE A
The Petitioner was previously before the Board regarding his
desire to subdivide the land on Greenlawn and Glenn Avenues into
four (4) house lots, as shown on the enclosed plan. That petition
was denied on May 17, 1989.
Subsequently, the Board did grant the Petitioner permission
to divide the property into three (3) lots rather than four lots.
Since that time, because of the topography of the property as it
exists, consisting of a considerable amount of ledge and change and
fluctuation in elevations, the Petitioner has determined that it
is not economically feasible to divide the property into three
lots, because the costs attendant to putting in the required road
improvements and utilities create a financial hardship for the
Petitioner.
It is submitted that the present request for four lots creates
lots which are basically in keeping with the surrounding lots that,
of course, do not conform to present zoning. The lots,
nevertheless, will have adequate frontage and area to accommodate
a single family home in keeping with the homes in the general
vicinity. Given the need for single family housing in the City,
it is submitted that the requested variance is in accordance with
a public need and that a variance can be granted without
substantial impact on the surrounding area.
The Petitioner respectfully requests, based on the hardship
created by the conditions of the land itself and the financial
hardship resulting therefrom, that he be given permission to divide
the land into four lots as shown on the enclosed plans.
Please have in mind that the Board previously granted
permission to divide the land into four lots, but the Petitioner
did not act timely on the granted variance. when he applied again
to the Board for a regranting of the four lots originally approved,
one of the abutters expressed concern and the Petitioner was
subsequently denied the petition. Since that time, the abutter has
reviewed the plans and is now in favor of the petition.
m:n Gi
c,
CD
� rtrb11.
SCHEDULE A
The Petitioner was previously before the Board regarding his
desire to subdivide the land on Greenlawn and Glenn Avenues into
four (4) house lots, as shown on the enclosed plan. That petition
was denied on May 17, 1989.
Subsequently, the Board did grant the Petitioner permission
to divide the property into three (3) lots rather than four lots.
Since that time, because of the topography of the property as it
exists, consisting of a considerable amount of ledge and change and
fluctuation in elevations, the Petitioner has determined that it
is not economically feasible to divide the property into three ,
lots, because the costs attendant to putting in the required road
improvements and utilities create a financial hardship for the
Petitioner.
It is submitted that the present request for four lots creates
lots which are basically in keeping with the surrounding lots that,
of course, do not conform to present zoning. The lots,
nevertheless, will have adequate frontage and area to accommodate
a single family home in keeping with the homes in the general
vicinity. Given the need for single family housing in the City,
it is submitted that the requested variance is in accordance with
a public need and ,that a variance can be granted without
substantial impact on the surrounding area.
The Petitioner respectfully requests, based on the hardship
created by the conditions of the land itself and the financial
hardship resulting therefrom, that he be given permission to divide
the land into four lots as shown on the enclosed plans.
Please have in mind that the Board previously granted
permission to divide the land into four lots, but the Petitioner
did not act timely on the granted variance. When he applied again
to the Board for a regranting of the four lots originally approved,
one of the abutters expressed concern and the Petitioner was
subsequently denied the petition. Since that time, the abutter has
reviewed the plans and is now in favor of the petition.
ra �;
a
rra c ¢sn
rnni :....
�
r»
cia
= - B- Q rron Pipe
EX/JT.
�GlUGrNf _
.-ION
r �a,
�— N/ F ROMANO
N/ F WAISH _--
N/F ROMANO ( 010f al
,� (fnd� 244. 61
8 N 57°-48-23 E 90. 00 r
5 N6CP-00 -00 E
75. 98 74.61' . i . . . . , .. . SD.O LOT 1 U► __
1 LOT 3 Z 11
LOT 2\ 0 1.
8,11
7 S.F
LOT 4z
/ REA=
-�
AREA 9,049S.E 3 o =8,155 S.F �, 0
N/F ROMANO /0 AREA =B, 8 ro v �' =\ PROP HYD. m n
1°N ih o S F 4 a° W \w� a GATE /38
�N o PROP. BND I /O PR
85.0 /34
Z :21.85 . 90. 00 ° 42-2 W
8
105. 0PROP. 17520 _.— S55 - * 5
250.20 5 0 _ {
0
PROP 12" 1
- = 560°00-00 W 126.85 - 4 +0
PROPSMH 1
340 '
AVE _�WAT sEOP 8 PROP % � a M PROP CON (GREENLAWN
9� M AND SHALI
Nr \gyp fn
NSF FINOCCHIO \V PROP. CATCH BASINS
N/ F MENEADES 0 20' 40' 80' LEGEND
Contour Lines Existing /44
SCALE-- 1 = 40 Proposed
CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
PUNNING DEPARTMENT
WILLIAM E. LUSTER � ONE SALEM GREEN
City Planner - -"
01970
(508)745-9595, EXT.31 1
FAX(508)744-5918
nuc
September 25, 1991
Leonard F. Femino
Assistant City Solicitor
93 Washington Street
Salem, MA 01970
RE: GREENLAWN AVENUE SUBDIVISION
Dear Mr . Femino:
This letter is in response to the Planning Board ' s meeting on
September 19, 1991, regarding the subdivision of Greenlawn Avenue.
To briefly summarize the subdivision to date; On February 15 ,
1991 , the Planning Board approved a three ( 3 ) lot subdivision on
Greenlawn Avenue. Following the Board ' s approval , the developer ,
Charles Brett, was unable to obtain financing for the three ( 3 )
lots so he approached the Board of Appeals for a Variance to divide
the property into four ( 4) lots. On June 19, 1991, the Board of
Appeal granted the requested Variance .
One of the questions that was raised at the last Planning
Board' s meeting was whether the developer could go before the Board
of Appeal and ask for a Variance on this subdivision if one of the
conditions of the Decision states that "Work shall conform to plan
entitled ' Definitive Subdivision Plan, ' - Greenlawn and Glen
Avenue, dated February 14 , 1989 , revised December 26, 1989 . " This
plan shows only three lots not four .
That conditions implies that if there is any deviation to the
plan that the applicant must appear before the Planning Board for
approval of the new plan. The Board is questioning if this
condition provides them with an opportunity to force Charles Brett
to resubmit the plan for their review.
Leonard F. Femino
September 25 , 1991
Page 2
If you need further information regaring this issue, please do
not hesitate to contact me. Thank you for your assistance in this
matter .
Sincerely,
William E. Luster
City Planner
cc: Kevin Daly
Walter Power
Richard Bencal
EX\DH\FEMGREEN
cp
JEARING
PETITIONS
LOCATION_ �� (�fie rn`Qllw
MOTION: TO GRANT Ste✓ `/Z SECOND
r
TO DENY SECOND
TO RE-HEAR SECOND
LEAVE TO WITHDRAW SECOND
TO CONTINUE SECOND
ROLL CALL PRESENT GRANT DENY WITHDRAW RE-HEAR CONTINUE
G) RICHARD BENCAL y
JOSEPH CORRENTI
RICHARD' FEBONIO /
EDWARD LUZINSKI
MARY JANE STIRGWOLT Y
ASSOCIATE MEMBERS y
ARTHUR LABRECOUE
CONDITIONS: ( p
95JJ$r5s i-'or
of-4 Ue �o
v
APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
a �Ttv of tTlP1tT� tI88FIt LISP tS
Poarb Df Appeal
��nnr
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
The Undersigned represent that he is are the owners of a certain parcel of land located
at NO. .9reeolaay.aud .Qlgnn .Auenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Styt t; Zoning District.a:1 . .
. . . . ; axrd{ v¢k�pamkf��tra� gisxatskss. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
oftkeXR9aaxa�iamn� �6uhdd teg{}Qod .
Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in
accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance.
Cl COP
CS `�
The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following
reasons:
Direct Appeal
The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem
Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to
approve the application fee permit to build as filed; as the enforcement of said
Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary
hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero-
gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for
the following reasons:
See Schedule A
Owner. .. Charles B.ett„ , ,, , , ,,
Address. . .1 Holten Street,,_ Danyers . . . . . , , , ,
c/o John R. Serafini,' Sr.
Telephone. . 744,-0212 , , . . , ,,, , ,
Petitioner. . rharJes. B.rert...-.. : . . . . . . . . . . . .
c/o John R. Serafini, Sr.
Address. . . . . .&IYgderal. street:. . . . .. . . . . . . . .
Date. . . . . . . . . . . . Salem, MA 01970
Tele one. . . J,4,,4.-A212. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of
,;,Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ifour weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The
Evening News.
SCHEDULE A
The Petitioner was previously before the Board regarding his
desire to subdivide the land on Greenlawn and Glenn Avenues into
four (4) house lots, as shown on the enclosed plan. That petition
was denied on May 17, 1989.
Subsequently, the Board did grant the Petitioner permission
to divide the property into three (3) lots rather than four lots.
Since that time, because of the topography of the property as it
exists, consisting of a considerable amount of ledge and change and
fluctuation in elevations, the Petitioner has determined that it
is not economically feasible to divide the property into three
lots, because the costs attendant to putting in the required road
improvements and utilities create a financial hardship for the
Petitioner.
It is submitted that the present request for four lots creates
lots which are basically in keeping with the surrounding lots that,
of course, do not conform to present zoning. The lots,
nevertheless, will have adequate frontage and area to accommodate
a single family home in keeping with the homes in the general
vicinity. Given the need for single family housing in the City,
it is submitted that the requested variance is in accordance with
a public need and that a variance can be granted without
substantial impact on the surrounding area.
The Petitioner respectfully requests, based on the hardship
created by the conditions of the land itself and the financial
hardship resulting therefrom, that he be given permission to divide
the land into four lots as shown on the enclosed plans.
Please have in mind that the Board previously granted
permission to divide the land into four lots, but the Petitioner
did not act timely on the granted variance. When he applied again
to the Board for a regranting of the four lots originally approved,
one of the abutters expressed concern and the Petitioner was
subsequently denied the petition. Since that time, the abutter has
reviewed the plans and is now in favor of the petition.
� s
a
r�K TL
t^A
y
of 06ttlem' � Cssttchu�e##
Aire Pepartmeut �Heabquarters
conc
48 PfaUcite ,�itrcd
Joseph F. Sullivan o$a[rxn, 4M. 01970
Chief
City of Salem Date: June 19, 1991
Board of Appeal
One Salem Green RE: 11,13,15 Greenlawn Avenue
Charles Brett
Salem, MA 01970
The Salem Fire Departnent has no objection to the granting of a Special Permit and/or
Variance to allow: dividing of lots #11 13 15 Greenlawn Ave into four(4) lots
subject to the following conditions:
1- This property (has no) (is in) compliance with the provisions of the Massachusetts
General Laws, Chapter 148, Section 26E, relative to the installation of automatic
smoke detectors.
2- Plans for the proposed construction are to be presented to the Salem Fire Prevention
Bureau for approval prior to the issuance of a building permit.
3- The proposed construction shall conform to all applicable provisions of the Massa-
chusetts State Building Code, the Salem Fire Prevention Code, 527CMR(Code of Massa-
chuestts Regulations) , the Salem City Ordinances, and Massachusetts General Laws
relative to fire and public safety.
4- The applicant and/or contractor shall arrange for an inspection by the Salem Fire
Prevention Bureau upon rorrpletion of the work.
(7/d
rm3n P. LaPointe
Fire Inspector
cc:
file
applicant
b Ctv of ";ttlem, 'fflttssadjusetts
Poara of Appeal
July 3, 1991
Notice is hereby given that as of July 2, 1991 the decision
of the Board of Appeal has been filed in the office of the
City Clerk to grant the petition of Charles Brett for
variances to divide existing three lots into four lots
at 11 , 13, 15, Greenlawn Avenue a/k/a Lots 46-52 Green-
lawn Avenue.
BOARD OF APPEAL
Brenda M. Sumrall
Clerk of the Board
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to section 17 of
the Mass. General Laws, Chapter 808, and shall be filed within 20 days
after the date�of firing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk.
Pursuant to Mass. Genera! La.vs !'Lh::r_
- Fakv eff"t n 71, the �lariance
or ."+ecirl Permit,game-! h2 ei. sh '- „ai f�kc eff:ia ti .
de;.ision, hearing the c.artifbztiui One riiy Ce'k that 20 days pha`,ethe
rfapsed and no ap;.eal has been ;lir:i, ur Ira-, if such appeal has been
filed, that it has been disniisseJ or- emed is recorded in the South Essex
Registry of Deeds and indexed umier the name or the owner of record or
is recorded and noted #n the owner's Certificate of Title,
BOARD OF APPEAL
_ CITY OF SALEM E0� 0
�
BOARD OF APPEAL �-`- ,'.,` PLf P _ `.z--'�=�"'"�`
One Salem Green UG tj T Ea � '� i�SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 SEND ERJu9 Mp 51971
UntlaimsdREASON CHECKED
AtlemBMNot—IupMaN
Insutho" +Md
No such
st
�
No such office m�
\" ygh
`- 0o not remail in this enrellpe /
Charles B t, Tr.
19 Holten St.
?P2nw.@rs, MA 019155 ,' /
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxzxxx
x xxNxxxxxxxzxxxxxxxxxzxzxxxxxxxxx
Chi of .��lcm, ���ssttc�lusetts
t
Boura of Au}r
r
car s
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF CHARLES BRETT FOR VARIANCES FOR
11 , 13, 15, GREENLAWN AVENUE a/k/a LOTS 46-52 GREENLAWN AVE. (R-1 )
A hearing on this petition was held June 19, 1991 with the following Board Members
present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Richard Febonio, Edward Luzinski, Mary Jane
Stirgwolt and Associate Member Ronald Plante. Notice of the hearing was sent to
abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the
Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting Variances to divide existing
three lots into four lots. Property is located in an R-1 district.
The Variances which have been requested may be granted upon a finding of the
Board that:
a. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land,
building and structure involved and which are not generally affecting other
lands, buildings or structures in the same district.
b. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve
substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner.
c. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public
good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the
district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the
hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact:
1 . Councillor Leonard O'Leary spoke in favor of this petition.
2. Mrs. Walsh, and abutter who had concerns about water run--cf.` on her
property, was informed by the Chairman that the petitioner was at this
time only asking to divide his lots and not to build ant at a future
time if the petition is granted and at the start of any construction,
she would be notified by the proper City Dept. and she could voice her
concerns at that time.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the
hearing, the Board of Appeal, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1 . Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but
not the district in general.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance would involve
substantial hardship to the petitioner.
3. The relief requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent
of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
i
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF CHARLES BRETT FOR VARIANCES
AT 11 , 13, 15 GREENLAWN AVE. , A/K/A LOTS 46-52 GREENLAWN AVE. , SALEM
page two
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the
Variances requested, subject to the following conditions:
1 . That the petitioner shall have a pre-blast survey in accordance with
City Ordinance.
2. Property street numbering be obtained from the City of Salem Assessor.
Variances Granted
June 19, 1991 )
»/ �P*/
r�ichard Febonio, Member, Board of Appeal
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of
the Mass. General Laws, Chapter 808, and shall be filed within 20 days
after the dateof filing of thts decision in the office of the City Clerk.
Pursuant to Mass. Ge iero! Laws, Chrmtar 808, Section 11, the Variance
or Npeciai Permit .erante.! herein shall nat take effect anti! a copy of the
decision, bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have
e!ansnd and no appeal has been bled, or that, if such appeal has been
filed, that it lits been dismisse4l or denied is recorded in the South Essex
Rzglslry of Deeds and indexed under the name or the owner of record or
is recorded and noted en the owner's Certificate of Title.
BOARD OF APPEAL
c>7
:n
I }t
;7
_J -
i
z 3'Biluminous ConerrfP Gra""c- Curbi�9, (verf o� s/oped� D/Q�f%�9 sf'�P
�' Z"Binder CaurSe Bituminous Sideu/a/k
N /„ ToP Course 4",B'II urinous CaricrC/`0 3, S"
m Pq6. I' SALEM PLANNING BOARD
� uS
cto✓ E 0c 8"Gio%/ ✓'e
z
'.REENAve N � 9 hlbfe �
o ASE ,-o'�r CLOVERDALE AVE. \�
Iron Pipe � ,
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION �a <
40 FOOT STREET
�1 5r Scale 1 = 8 40
� N/F ROMANO
Note : All construction work shall conform to the N/ F WAL.SH ;
F1R51 to the City of Salem, Subdivision Regulations. N/F ROMANO / ----- peal
t-23
I 1 E h�1 \f 244. 61' CHAIRMAN DATE:
N6C`-OO'-OO"E N 57°-48
/�• . . 90. 00' - r
Cij 75.98' 74.61 80.0 LOT I� u' m
$ LOT 2\ Z � Z
LOCUS MAP SCALE: 1 =800 Q 1� LOT 4 LOT 3 w o z
° REA= 8,117 S.F.
AREA = 9,049S.F 3 �° 8,155 S.F. i
N/F ROMANO rb AREA =8,4 Sa C01- _\ PROP HYD.
GO
�� ,°N /t oi"_o N "'- \w °'- & GATE
OP. BND /��
Qo cv 'On
I i PROP. DMH
rxirf. / Z :•21.85': 90. 00' -85.00
PROP. THRUST BLOCK yyd �8. 105. 00' PROP. 7 ••250.20 x-555°42-2 W /34
S 60°00'-00 W 126.85•- - + 5 0 _ +
- - - - Gare 4 0 5 PROP. 12 R.C.P
LA
rxist. G" a e� 0+ 0 PROP. CONN. h POP. 8 WAT — 2 w 3+0 _� PROP. SMH
_g 8' SEWER
s I - S-
Ito GREENLAWN AVE. 'R6a
1775 isf
9� PROP CONCRETE HEAD WALL & RIP RAP
9 � a
\�D1i 8' \�� \gyp D AND SHALL MEET EXISTING SWALE.
40' i 1�D '1� 10 fn
-I Tj �Q \pA N/F FINOCCH ��
PROP. CATCH BASINS
N/ F MENEADES 0 20' 40' 8'
_ LEGEND
~ 11 Contour Lines Existing I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN CONFORMS WITH
cn SCALE= I = 40 Proposed /q ¢ THE RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE REGISTERTSOF
Q
z DEEDS OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS.
0
I •��.5 A�,r(c�
_ *p• ��� t
_ 0.
�o GERALD
V N•.
GUERRINI
14034 0 _
• ^v
Standard C011- /cTe,4 Bas//I
15 0 150 �ND sua�E�OQ
Frame Cover
. :�•;-• ;'• (oiYlin.l7ep .• • '• ' Exi.sf .0 e •Z- -- -
i/fer --- - - -
•� � 0. GERALD GUERRINI PE. 13938 a N.L.S. 14034
/cbriC w�e✓ery14 5 — �=_ �h f J! 145
/ to //z ;coda ihirdj0inf op ods° r ex >
1✓ashed ° Q°a D 0 daOQ /, PROP. 3.T� G a `
open- o 0a 40 ° I I
C/-ushed 'b'd 0 °e °o cd — R �F \ z I o
SfonW e �A eoo — , =
dGd�4 9 4° A. ARA44v 20% GRADE I �� I I
adedSand 140 `• � I I n�
.¢'PreCpsfBaSEw%lh � I 140
6r � "
f
PROP. LEACHING CATCH BASIN - N T S
S=. OOp
VrI
�OCatio/7 o.7r/.C.3. to he deferrrmiaediri fie/d, 13 5 PROP. 8 SAN. SEWER N
hasc'dupor7 50/1 C0r/odifi0ns, be&ueer7 Station x Q� 135
_ o \
O/O 0 /7,0. Int!
130 _ o � Axl 130 SUBDIVISION PLAN OF LAND
o h SALEV , MASS .
GREENLAWN & GLENN AVE.
o h h h
h
M ti I�
FOR REGISTRY USE ONLY 125 �; �I a a 125 OWNER: SURVEYOR / ENGINEER
+50 +50 +50 +80 + 30 +50 +80 +50 -t-20 +55 CHARLES BRETT 0. GERALD GUERRINI
0 +00 I t-00 2t00 3t00 4x00 . +45 5+00 +50 6+00 139 HOLTEN ST.
DATUM DANVERS, MASS.SALEM CITY BASE � '
BENCHMARK:
INVERT OF SEWER MANHOLE AT THE INTERSECTION OF VERONA
SCALE HOR. 1 = 40 VERT. I - 4 ST. & GREENLAWN AVE. ELEV. = 131. 30
DATE : MAY 18, 1990 SALEM PLANNING BOARD APP FILED
PLAN PREPARED BY: FINAL PLAN
PJ.F & ASSOCIATES HEARING DATE
I I GLEASON ST
MEDFORD, MASS. 02155 PLAN APPROVED
• i
i
z
3'9iJuminous Concre/`
PSE•
B�h
d
er Ca
u
rse G41aBn/�ffe
Curbirs79C,onvcrofe
s/oped�
ToPCourse urinou
So/
Q�Bf�infgumSinf�oipus
Sib'eala/k
SALEM PLANNING BOARD
4oeu5 ZcLo / "
Gro✓e/
z
h�fer LO
I
A vE 3
a �=oCLOVERDALE AVE.
o a
6 Sealer /
8' o" /,Z-0 " /Z0 8=0"
Iron Pipe
vQ EX/J7
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION
40 FOOT STREET
e Scale 1°= 8' 401
Note = All construction work shall conform to the N/ F WAL-SH N/F ROMANO
4 FIRST to the City of Salem, Subdivision Regulations. N/F ROMANO (fin —� 561p•f�a1
� R -
CHAIRMAN
�� 570-48-23° E 244. 61 � RM N DATE
- N
N6CP 00 00 E
�, �• 90. 00 r
C� 75.98' 74.61 80.0 LOT I cn fn
$ LOT 2\ UI
LOCUS MAP SCALE: 111=8001 Q 13 / LOT 4 LOT w o = 8 117 S. z
AREA 9,049S.F 3 t° LD =8,155 S.F. 00 REA N
N/F ROMANO A AREA =8,498 ro N P
1n� n� io S.F. 0° in �,\ PROP HYD. -11
�� 0 o >3� GATE
_ N �
tea, PROP. 'IN I � /3� PROP. DMH
ExiJf / Z :•21.85': 90. 00 :.•85.00
PROP THRUST BLOCK #5o1 Ni,
105. 00' PROP. �0 . S55°42-2 W /34
- - - - - S 60°00-00 W 126.85 • . . .• `• . . . . 250.20 + 5+0 _
Gafewz� 4 0 I 54
PROP. 12 R.C.P.
rX/Sf e p "5 0+0 PROP. CONN. _a POP. 8 WAT — : � S + S 3�0 PROP. SMH
S
- ER
E s . it0 �ROP 8 SEWER
W
Exisf oovtinxnf x/ f , G RE ENL AWN AVE.
PROP CONCRETE HEADWALL 81 RIP RAP
AND SHALL MEET
EXISTING SWALE.
140' 1 �Q� 1%� N/FFINOCCHIO
PROP. CATCH BASINS
N/ F MENEADES 0 20' 40' 80
LEGEND
Contour Lines Existing I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN CONFORMS WITH
SCALE= 111= 401 Proposed /q¢ THE RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE REGISTERTS OF
Q DEEDS OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS.
NNO
Itk OF P40
\
'F O• 0.GERALD
o GERALD i
G
� GUERRINI
ca 1$ 1403410 H No.13938 y t
Sfaridard Ca/ch Basin F%S-r '��9�c/STr,91
Frame CA CO✓e%, 150 150 SND SU R 'Js SOMAL ENG
- ADO"V o. C '
6iYfinpe
0
P.Y.T=/46./ i9 - 90
F//fer �pprre/Bl . °�r zxisf /ef/ Z_ -- 0. GERALD GUERRINI PE. 13938 81 RL.S. 14034
Fabric w/every ,:;t;:'• 145 EXi s 1� 145
/"fa /%z anQe fhirdjainf oa°Q°a j Ex- R/qh I - _ Lj
Mashed o e-d o operl. o°oa°ba PROP � 3.7, GR
(Crushed e ao ° ° a p z.I I
0
$fone� eeaoa 4o e. 6049 4,°°o°4` pE F
Graded Sand ZO/� GRA •� � -' \\� � J I I
4'PreCasfBaseWilh 140 ,-
Z"d/a. creep ho/es. _ 140
I E// of P4dl/77C/1
PROP. LEACHING CATCH BASIN - N T S
�oeofiaaof/.C.g lo be deferMlnedil7 fe/d 135 PROP. 8 SAN. SEWER S 008/1
bas[�duvoq sol/ conditions, be/ureen Sfafiorl 135
_ o
O/O 0 /t0. Ini /39.5
130 - o � SUBDIVISION PLAN OF LAND
�I 130
o h SALEM , MASS .
h
h h h h
GREENLAWN & GLENN AVE:
a
12 5 a ~ 1� M 125
FOR REGISTRY USE ONLY I a OWNER SURVEYOR / ENGINEER
+50 +50 +50 +80 + 30 +50 +80 +50 4-20 +55 CHARLES BRETT 0. GERALD GUERRINI
0+00 I -r00 2tOO 3tOO 4 +00 . +45 5+00 +50 6+00 139 HOLTEN ST.
DATUM: SALEM CITY BASE DANVERS, MASS. l
BENCHMARK:
INVERT OF SEWER MANHOLE• AT THE INTERSECTION OF VERONA
SCALE HOR. 111- 401 VERT. 111 - 41 ST. 8. GREENLAWN' AVE. ELEV. = 131. 30
I -
DATE MAY I8, 1990 SALEM PLANNING BOARD APP. FILED
PLAN PREPARED BY: FINAL PLAN
PJ.F & ASSOCIATES HEARING DATE
I I GLEASON ST 1
MEDFORD, MASS. 02155 PLAN APPROVED
1
,_ _.
__ .
i `� - �'-
I
!l
i
j
J
� � ..