24 GRANT ROAD - ZBA 24 Grant Road R-1
lhomas & El-izabeth Burke
' J
I
t
V'
�.cenm rq�
Ij
Ti#g of Salem, Httssttcljusetfs
Pourb of (Appeal
'tcume.r.'`
December 28, 1992
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT AS OF DECEMBER 22, 1992 THE DECISION OF THE
BOARD OF APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK TO GRANT THE
PETITION OF THOMAS AND ELIZABETH BURKE FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT TO ALLOW
CONSTRUCTION OF A DECK AT 24 GRANT ROAD.
BOARD OF APPEAL
Brenda M. Sumrall
Clerk of the Board
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17, of
MGL Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing
of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL Chapter
40A. , Section 11, the Variance/Special Permit granted herein shall not take
effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City
Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if
such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is
recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of
the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owners Certificate of
title.
Board of Appeal
� o
(Cit ofttlem, HttssttclTusetts N
peal C=o
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF THOMAS AND ELIZABETH BURKE
FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 24 GRANT ROAD (R-1 )
A hearing on this petition was held December 9, 1992 with the following
Board Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Francis Grealish Jr. ,
Edward Luzinski , Stephen Touchette and Associate Member Arthur Labrecque.
Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the
hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance
with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioners, owners of the property, are requesting a Special Permit from
rear setback requirements to allow construction of a deck in this single
family district.
The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this
request for a Special Permit is Section 5-3(j ) , which provides as follows:
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the
Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set
forth in Section 8-6 and 9-4 , grant Special Permits for alterations and
reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement,
extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses,
provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion
shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming
use to the neighborhood.
In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit
requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted
upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will
promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City' s
inhabitants .
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented
at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings
of fact:
1 . There was not opposition to the proposed deck.
2. The granting of this petition will enhance the quality of life for the
petitioners.
PETITION OF THOMAS AND ELIZABETH BURKE FOR A
SPECIAL PERMIT AT 24 GRANT ROAD, SALEM
page two
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented,
the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1 . The Special Permit requested can be granted without substantial
detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially
derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
2. The granting of the Special Permit requested will promote the public
health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants and may
be granted in harmony with the neighborhood.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the
Special Permit requested, subject to the following conditions:
1. Petitioner shall comply with all City and State statutes, ordinances,
codes and regulations.
2 . All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions
submitted.
3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and
fire safety shall be strictly adhered to.
4. Petitioner shall obtain a legal building permit.
SPECIAL PERMIT GRANTED
December 9, 1992
Stephen C. Touchette, Member
Board of Appeal o
n
r }V
T O n)
SJ"i
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF THOMAS AND ELIZABETH BURKE FOR A
SPECIAL PERMIT AT 24 GRANT ROAD, SALEM
page three
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY
CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of
MGL Chapter 40A. , and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of
filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL
Chapter 40A. , Section 11, the Special Permit granted herein shall not take
effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City
Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if
such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is
recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of
the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of
Title.
Board of Appeal
C-> o
m
r� N
fn O N
r. O
C, o
m
\, (IitV Lif ttlem, 4'RuSSttChU!5dt9 N
f �uttra of
CD
e+
peal
N
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF THOMAS AND ELIZABETH BURKE
FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 24 GRANT ROAD (R-1 )
A hearing on this petition was held December 9, 1992 with the following
Board Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Francis Grealish Jr. ,
Edward Luzinski, Stephen Touchette and Associate Member Arthur Labrecque.
Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the
hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance
with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioners, owners of the property, are requesting a Special Permit from
rear setback requirements to allow construction of a deck in this single
family district.
The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this
request for a Special Permit is Section 5-3(j ) , which provides as follows:
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the
Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set
forth in Section 8-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permits for alterations and
reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement,
extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses,
provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion
shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming
use to the neighborhood.
In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit
requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted
upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will
promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's
inhabitants.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented
at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings
of fact:
1. There was not opposition to the proposed deck.
2. The granting of this petition will enhance the quality of life for the
petitioners.
f ..
PETITION OF THOMAS AND ELIZABETH BURKE FOR A
SPECIAL PERMIT AT 24 GRANT ROAD, SALEM
page two
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented,
the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1. The Special Permit requested can be granted without substantial
detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially
derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
2. The granting of the Special Permit requested will promote the public
health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants and may
be granted in harmony with the neighborhood.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the
Special Permit requested, subject to the following conditions:
1 . Petitioner shall comply with all City and State statutes, ordinances,
codes and regulations .
2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions
submitted.
3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and
fire safety shall be strictly adhered to.
4 . Petitioner shall obtain a legal building permit.
SPECIAL PERMIT GRANTED
December 9, 1992
Stephen C. Touchette, Member
Board of Appeal y o
0 N
T 0 T7
+d
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF THOMAS AND ELIZABETH BURKE FOR A
SPECIAL PERMIT AT 24 GRANT ROAD, SALEM
page three
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY
CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of
MGL Chapter 40A. , and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of
filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL
Chapter 40A. , Section 11, the Special Permit granted herein shall not take
effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City
Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if
such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is
recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of
the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of
Title.
Board of Appeal
n o
r K N
m O N
� T
O
— G
n LD
S
(Cit of �ttlem, �fttssurflusetts N
.4 e �-
;;, ;= -Buura of rAtrpeal o
cL�
N
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF THOMAS AND ELIZABETH BURKE
FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 24 GRANT ROAD (R-1 )
A hearing on this petition was held December 9, 1992 with the following
Board Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Francis Grealish Jr. ,
Edward Luzinski , Stephen Touchette and Associate Member Arthur Labrecque.
Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the
hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance
with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioners, owners of the property, are requesting a Special Permit from
rear setback requirements to allow construction of a deck in this single
family district.
The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this
request for a Special Permit is Section 5-3(j ) , which provides as follows:
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the
Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set
forth in Section 8-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permits for alterations and
reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement,
extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses,
provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion
shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming
use to the neighborhood.
In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit
requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted
upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will
promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's
inhabitants.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented
at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings
of fact:
1 . There was not opposition to the proposed deck.
2. The granting of this petition will enhance the quality of life for the
petitioners.
�r
PETITION OF THOMAS AND ELIZABETH BURKE FOR A
SPECIAL PERMIT AT 24 GRANT ROAD, SALEM
page two
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented,
the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1. The Special Permit requested can be granted without substantial
detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially
derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
2. The granting of the Special Permit requested will promote the public
health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants and may
be granted in harmony with the neighborhood.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the
Special Permit requested, subject to the following conditions:
1 . Petitioner shall comply with all City and State statutes, ordinances,
codes and regulations..
2 . All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions
submitted.
3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and
fire safety shall be strictly adhered to.
4. Petitioner shall obtain a legal building permit.
SPECIAL PERMIT GRANTED
December 9, 1992
C
Stephen C. Touchette, Member
Board of Appeal y m
�� N
n
a
N
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF THOMAS AND ELIZABETH BURKE FOR A
SPECIAL PERMIT AT 24 GRANT ROAD, SALEM
page three
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY
CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of
MGL Chapter 40A. , and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of
filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL
Chapter 40A. , Section 11, the Special Permit granted herein shall not take
effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City
Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if
such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is
recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of
the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of
Title.
Board of Appeal
n o
m
r N
m O N
0o t- O
cn �
r
(Citu of ttlrm ttssttclTusetts N
�u}1en1 0
N
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF THOMAS AND ELIZABETH BURKE
FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 24 GRANT ROAD (R-1)
A hearing on this petition was held December 9, 1992 with the following
Board Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Francis Grealish Jr. ,
Edward Luzinski, Stephen Touchette and Associate Member Arthur Labrecque.
Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the
hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance
with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioners, owners of the property, are requesting a Special Permit from
rear setback requirements to allow construction of a deck in this single
family district.
The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this
request for a Special Permit is Section 5-3(j ) , which provides as follows:
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the
Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set
forth in Section 8-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permits for alterations and
reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement,
extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses,
provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion
shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming
use to the neighborhood.
In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit
requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted
upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will
promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's
inhabitants .
The Board of Appeal , after careful consideration of the evidence presented
at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings
of fact:
1 . There was not opposition to the proposed deck.
2. The granting of this petition will enhance the quality of life for the
petitioners.
PETITION OF THOMAS AND ELIZABETH BURKE FOR A
SPECIAL PERMIT AT 24 GRANT ROAD, SALEM
page two
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented,
the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1. The Special Permit requested can be granted without substantial
detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially
derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
2. The granting of the Special Permit requested will promote the public
health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants and may
be granted in harmony with the neighborhood.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the
Special Permit requested, subject to the following conditions:
1 . Petitioner shall comply with all City and State statutes, ordinances,
codes and regulations.
2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions
submitted.
3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and
fire safety shall be strictly adhered to.
4. Petitioner shall obtain a legal building permit.
SPECIAL PERMIT GRANTED
December 9, 1992
Stephen C. Touchette, Member
Board of Appeal y m
�� N
m o N
z
'°rn
o
m
T (Ei#u ofttlem, � ttssttcltuse##s `^ N
7
Vuttra ofupeal o
N
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF THOMAS AND ELIZABETH BURKE
FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 24 GRANT ROAD (R-1)
A hearing on this petition was held December 9, 1992 with the following
Board Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Francis Grealish Jr. ,
Edward Luzinski, Stephen Touchette and Associate Member Arthur Labrecque.
Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the
hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance
with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioners, owners of the property, are requesting a Special Permit from
rear setback requirements to allow construction of a deck in this single
family district.
The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this
request for a Special Permit is Section 5-3(j ) , which provides as follows:
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the
Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set
forth in Section 8-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permits for alterations and
reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement,
extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses,
provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion
shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming
use to the neighborhood.
In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit
requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted
upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will
promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's
inhabitants.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented
at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings
of fact:
1 . There was not opposition to the proposed deck.
2 . The granting of this petition will enhance the quality of life for the
petitioners.
PETITION OF THOMAS AND ELIZABETH BURKE FOR A
SPECIAL PERMIT AT 24 GRANT ROAD, SALEM
page two
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented,
the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1. The Special Permit requested can be granted without substantial
detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially
derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
2. The granting of the Special Permit requested will promote the public
health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants and may
be granted in harmony with the neighborhood.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the
Special Permit requested, subject to the following conditions:
1 . Petitioner shall comply with all City and State statutes, ordinances,
codes and regulations .
2 . All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions
submitted.
3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and
fire safety shall be strictly adhered to.
4 . Petitioner shall obtain a legal building permit.
SPECIAL PERMIT GRANTED
December 9, 1992
Stephen C. Touchette, Member
Board of Appeal C' o
� N
rn O N
o - o
a.
'' N
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF THOMAS AND ELIZABETH BURKE FOR A
SPECIAL PERMIT AT 24 GRANT ROAD, SALEM
page three
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY
CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of
MGL Chapter 40A. , and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of
filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL
Chapter 40A. , Section 11, the Special Permit granted herein shall not take
effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City
Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if
such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is
recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of
the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of
Title.
Board of Appeal
n o
r N
m C N
7 r. O
LZ
:� fel
DATE OF HEARING a
PETITIONER
LOCATION 'gly
NOTION: 70 GRANT SECOND
70 DENY !% SECOND 'Z
TO RE-HEAR SECOND
WEAVE TO WITHDRAW SECOND
70 CONTINUE SECOND
POLL CALL PRESENT GRANT DENY WITHDRAW RE-HEAR CONTINUE
RICHARD DENCAL
FRANCIS GREALISH v
AMD LUZINSKI
STEPHEN TOUCHETTE
ASSOCIATE MEMBERS
RONH-�`NTS
ARTHUR LABRECOUE
CONDITIONS:
APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . .'. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
a�
(1Si#v oftti�m, ,� [�za��chusPtfs
s�
'Baarb of Apprzd
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
-he Undersignea reoresent hat h is are 'he owners or a certain Parcel or land loc„pt a
at P10. . . . . . .et.4. . . . . .— . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :street; Zonina District.K_./ .
ana said Parcel is affectea by Sectionisj . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
of the Massacnusetts State Building Code.
Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in
accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance.
m o O
A-it
N> Co
om =
T�J
4a
� nJ
The A.001ication tor Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the rolIowing
reasons :
The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem
Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to
approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said
Zonina BY-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary
hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero-
�jating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Cade for
the following reasons:
� r y
N �2
N C7'J to
-- ;._
U_ m v Owner. . hovus. . 9r1S `�. (t�tP ,/J.Wi�eQ
CD
M
r Address. . a4 Cs ranT. . U.�. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Telephone. . 741 O wA . . . . ./. . . . . . . . . . . . .• . .
Petitioner. . .I. )lamp s. !�.u.r�(c
Address Goo . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Ja te. . Q c z��e.(. .5, !`.1q.� `1 41 O& 6�.
Telephone. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
By. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Three copies of the application must be filed with the S�gcretary of the Board of
Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. .R�&V. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .
four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The
Evening News.
- U
'_ _
�, _ -
o
z � � z z
� z - -
z � _ � ? ?
n _ >
� z c
�_
❑ ❑
n
7
��
CITY OF SALEM i CITY OF SALEM
'BOARD OF APPEAL 'BOARD OF APPEAL I'
745-9595 Ext. 381 745-9595 Ext, 381
Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter- Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter-
ested in the petition submitted by THOS. AND ested in the petition submitted by THOS. AND
" ELIZABETH BURKE fora Special Permit to allow i ELIZABETH BURKE fora Special Permit to allow
a deck in the rear of 24 GRANT RD. (R-1). Said a deck in the rear of 24 GRANT RD. (R-1). Said
hearing to be held WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER hearing to be held WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER
9,1992 AT 7:00 P.M.,ONE SALEM GREEN,second 99 1992 AT 7:00 P.M.,ONE SALEM GREEN,second
- floor. I floor.
RICHARD A. BENGAL, Chairman 1 RICHARD A. BENCAL, Chairman
November 25; December 2, 1992 SN14378 November 25; December 2, 1992 SN14378
1 "
CITY OF SALEM "
`BOARD OF APPEAL -
745-9595 Ext.
Will hold a Public hearing for all persons inter-
ested in the petition submitted by THOS. AND I�p
1 a deck
ELIZABETH
theBURKE ream of 24rGRANT Special
(Rt l). Said
( hearing to be held WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER
9,1992 AT 7:00 P.M.,ONE SALEM GREEN,second
t Floor.
November 25;RICHARD A. BENCAL, Chairman N
December 2, 1992 SN14378
APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
A•�
of '�;njgM C41MUSSarhuseffs
�Rvarb rrf AFpeni
J�
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
-he UndersianQg represent that he is are he owners or a certain oarcei or land loc��A3te
°RMt! . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . street; __onino Jistrict.& .-
7. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : and said carcei is arrected by Sectionis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
of the Massachusetts State Building Code.
Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in
accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance.
rno
�J T
P Sm 0
r
a m rc�ta
c';2
m>
cn na
T'he P.00iication for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following
reasons : LIj
The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem
Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to
approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said
Zoning 4-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary
hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero-
gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for
the following reasons :
ta-- o Owner. . ?.�o ,
� � . . . . .
a '_5
ryD �v4 Address. . '. . . .'.en?. R00' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Telephone. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Peti ti oner. .' hom,1 .3�rkc/L � . . . .
Address.a.y .Gr9^T. . ° ?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Jate. . . S cuter. 5.,.�`���.`�
Telephone. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
-\By. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of
Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . 'f.7?4P. . .. . . . . . . . .. . . .
four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The
Evening News.
m �
o = o
v c L N
>
'o
� in
APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Qf `{211Prit, c ZI55c'tLfT12SP fi
33carb of rnl
sG
TO THE EOARD OF rPPEALS:
he ungersioneg represent 'hatJ _h :re -h'e owners cf certain oarcei of land lordtgo
t '10. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
/! . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -treet; _.;tuna Jistrict.K-4 .
and said oarcei is affecteo by Section( s ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
of the Flassacnusetts State Building Code.
Plans describing_ the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in
accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance.
C) s
mo 0
;0
�c�
N> Co
om F
� S
n S
T 7
N Ga
y IV
'he doolicancn for Permit was denied by the inspector of Buildings for the following
reasons :
The Undersiqned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem
Zoninq Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to
approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said
Zoninn Ov-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary
haraship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero-
,latinq from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for
the rollowing reasons:
//t�� /9 S�`�^'!J7 / /r-'-ILI••r`7 ' �i,cou.. /+tN K�
,� e� hpw 7t:172 p 04Lek l� /a "k /,y
7
N Li
J �t
W C
C
CL
lL OrD
o wy Owner. x10w14
. . . . . . . .S .
� Zk tP 6.LL:
Cn o o
r Address . . a;4 CTry nT. .�`{xn.�. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Telephone. . 4l O .U. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .
Petitioner. . ). is
Address. Aoe ei . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Jate. . . Telephone. .71 OBO�. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
By. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Three copies of the application must be filed with theS cr tary of the Board of
Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. 7Tg0. . . .. . . . . . .... .
four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The
Evening News.
i
91
5vior Aoix2
May► /� + oo ��g _37-
.Ply
+u3
i'
u ao a�av�uoJ 9
„ SI
xPa,Yll
_2 y '
j
,,,�P Hl pis Us x�
NCTE: This plan was drawn for mortgage purposes only and Is not to be recorded, or construed as an Instrument
survey, It should be further understood that If an Instrument survey Is accomplished at a later date we will not
be responsible for any changes that occur.
N�F S.y.P/BMAN
G0.64
\ Q
633/ SF
\ 0
o �
o
"IF COX z
Q
ENC[. '^
PA's/0
/;[a STII,Py
.oLUM/NUM
zr24 '•
s 3
� ,40RE
LINCOLN ROAD
MORTGAGE PLOT PLAN OF PROPERTY
in Sates Fh4PX County,Mass.
M1 '
Owned by -Thomnn F £ Ffizaboth Rrrnbe
-" Scale: 1"=20Date: 12/21 /82
r Book No. 6023 Page No. 9
L.C.Cert.No. 111A W M,P,Zo
_ I hereby certify that the building and lot Ilnes oc y�
shown on this plan are approximately located on = JOHN mJ
the ground as shown hereon and that they have $ THOMAS in
conformed to the Zoning Laws of the City ,� YUNITS p
of
pr
t P
-` `: t
r tha obeat of my knowledge and belief the a GhD Ss
parcel as shown does not fall within the Flood
Plain as shown on the FEMAIFIA National Flood
- Insurance Program Maps dated 3-IS-7z,
By:
.•..
YUNITS eN
—�- NwERING CO.INC.
Holb .Mhu"maZ143
G
t O • \Q +
.IS
i • p �L q, `+ 6` u Q1CJ
T`
O O
m
Otto
If. N
oQ(i 'Tla/O o • .�y. 4,4\ ` � /� / �"� `f'� oy14
o
r�
• ,, � i � / r �, .gyp U �
t•, �• Io /F�jjj 1 p4/ o• wA@
�/p
+ /A\
o Ta. P d► � m b' s 1 o 'd3' , ',
{�
14 cl,
O J \ s•vi
,,,ids
A w O ti k 0 f la\
• ZIII •'�
r t
:GW Oo� C�" D J '
�--� ((�►�,
NOTE: This plan was drawn for mortgage purposes only and Is not to be recorded, or construed as an Instrument
survey, It should be further understood that If an Instrument survey Is accomplished at a later date we will not
be responsible for any changes that occur.
N// SH.P/BMA/✓
co.G6
G33] SF
Q
lye .
o
o ! �
�i f
"IF COX Z
1
ENOL
Cel
V.f7/0
lye STORY
- .aLUM/NUM
*,?q l
es t3 ,
n
—
3 .34
L I NC.OLN _ ..:- ROAD
MORTGAGE PLOT PLAN OF PROPERTY
in SG-Qem e County,Mass.
Owned by ThnmaA F. F FGi7ahoth Rtihbo
Scale: 1"=20' Date: 12/21/82
F'�Pl Book No. 6023 - Page No. 9
/ L.C.Cert.No. tH OF
I hereby certify that the building and lot lines oto c'fcv,
shown on this plan are approximately located on JOHN
the ground as shown hereon and that they have 3 'A THOMAS y
conformed to the Zoning Laws of the CityYDNITS p
of Satem Fi
Onthisdete iZ-2G-8z Icertify • �pr�-rEPp�
that to the best of my knowledge and belief the Ghe SUav�
k
parcel as shown does not fall within the Flood
Plain as shown on the FEMA/FIA National Flood
Insurance Program Maps dated 3–/S-77.
By:
_ _.. YUNITS N NEERING CO. INC.
— - -'- Holbro ,MasmchumeMO2343
N �
07 �
<W
1 W O
J
i N�
W K
O O W
r J
O ~U +
2 U
�` _
OF
I
i
I
if)vr I x'
E ✓ CL �X/U 1 .11 A, r �au
L�JLrl4tGl�"�+ Nt t�
'^��A � ✓ • ..r ✓' ts ✓.. fit���1AGSa � tt
fo�y y' hWaw 6:m4,
�o
i \r
6x �s �1�'
to
rLrurblr 22 AQq
eO
For,•! D 7 / �flL'aG (9ee
ZxtotS. i I r
16 O.C.
ge--
--
r: IN .;:E t t t 1 r r ) " to t ! ht3
° D H 5 hj f tP' fr,>;"� Yte V . h ,fi ,+ r'6%' Yt`�r {S 2 ( F } !t
y,- t .: l`wF r r ! 16 a:• '
S , t r s1;1 ;' �: � ) �,:r , ' if1'?�f t,r :.•.fir, �., i:..rr {I�1C1p • , ..t r "l4�yf�°t 11 i•ry {. •rr stlr}") IY
-
i d k..
Ji„
t
a. r .>1' t
n.•K .� ,':',:
fl �e, ':!17,tr
,.. I- } pr k1 er' r i! 5. tk,i� t,.•
.,;:kx- CY„! ../.,• .;.G:: '.:..,.x�k e�. ('.�,. 7 �%...r. .r.. . ,., ., . . , ' lrrt�} 1 . :.v .1 i t{r t;'ix 1 ,
tr , r -4.
,y3"$ r eiSY i11..,, : .f... +'tlr, vx 'r au'_yf taCi(:.'u v.:Ir f?e .1�1a.y`°F t ° afYr tt'r,".:!: fl
,t r. ,rr r l� ';p.; 8( t iv t r r.,.. ��1p ,�f j1,.r;C( of kC Pt.'C' � > mug 5 t,a:r r;r�
r.
1 r f .. r r 1, ,e.: ;"I� f 'ei .l.taa r ',9u.: t.;p.,at {` m2•,:, �7"r.'.�1.,.
s ,y" ", r`
And } 1 , ¢ r . i., Ste , td iYt ��it t tk. dftn
"'' r k� cx�r+t,•' .' v ., ; ',w,... { ft P . 'n �{ ,). .�'. t ;.i e % } i'=:r •,;+�•A r`r 7+�t VF . t(}r ( '."i.: is p.�..r.0'q': m �•f �
} li,r t ri a, ¢??,, // I r LF td1f (,/.q d'R;.t� r I }y�`f 'v,yy}� yrk.r 4 ai a r`e'st
r,. 1 ,�... ' Y ,.., .,J (^/it, '. .r, hp>y �
vfit $ s� 2y r S 4*Il',h it (,
, f i t n._' St lrtl. 'rlll ;:d f '' y r � ( ! t r r � h'• 1i F(�.. 1" (
r r„a(fY" u r ,r:i r t -' , ,:;:: itFi i7;.'.'' w r !„� r -�:�t i, '$-,� •Ra„r. rpt,: r.,]ti rA
r I . l r i'7}i. {f t t4Ft r+,.y., r4. , , ry” t ,.n s.;t' /E�tfSh'iN''♦.,rfJ(..�,kt.,; ,. r}�
r
,t 1l t
I;,.
+tjf r y trt:rr V r . , at iia t4 'C
f,f r J '>r A P Il ,:, ,, a yy. i ,4lftus��
r{
�x �s ih;� Sidlti� ;o'ce
Ova
r.
r
36 Z L/ 2,epdx--------------
,�
flop n f dex-K T G d�
f I ,
Get n ale. .�
coo GR2�C oe r
� �
�'. r � . ,p�; i �� �� �;� , � � � v a �n\V` `.�.� ',jy � °� � � ,•�, r
(Ni.}r !.fy . . t,� Y� -�-•-`--mss^^— _`—T'�^""'��.a"_'�__
1
fAaCfA l�'Si1 JIrrJy k ' tld lhtJ` ?i.'to A :t .dtrYl{
tk` v t,".Y MAN
'.!!1�gy�lfffff1+*}, # it yrt -
3% S
' . n.... .- - x -_- / 1.:�;5.xa _t.. .' t i:v. W Ymr .r.:w • ,'�.� _ __- _ +'. _� �('k Mf -
�I � m
r�tau�Ali
� ff
e 'fr r1
§y ,/ f,✓',f�/��,rr � � (�C�-e�1i`Q x 1i\�� � FOGC/Hp 7 /.JG'!t`.W VI, �WCs
' r
Zx10° �u�sts SeGsTs ,buff /� ,�'jer�oMs
16 / p.c• ��
1111 � r
ilyq
3
l
P
.t
Ear .
i
, I
nc
Isis
\ O
c � f O 0 . • ♦ .\ a J. � • I 6 J 6
It
BOARD OF ASSESSORS
CITY HALL PAGE
01970 77777�
...... ...........
cR7,
3
..I. ......I
0 2
Z'.
. •
.........
.............
EST........ ..I I
...................14
4 5
0 5 SUBJECT PROPERTY# NAP: 31 LOT: 0172 SUFE:
0
6 PROPERTY ADDRESS: 0024 GRANT 130AD
7 QWNLH SURF�. Q �0 -
0 a ELIZABETH A 0
9 10
10 MAP LVI bUPP PROPLRIY ADD 5SESSE-D--W4NER MAILING-ADDRESS 13
4
�
• 1z 3.1 0.172 0024 GRANT' ROAD BURKE THOMAS F 24 GRANT ROAD ✓
5016
13 ELI 17
0-171 , '� 00,1 LINCOLN ROAD 1
4 3 , ROWE WILLIAM G 13 LINCOLN ROAD a
0 : ...........
5
NANCY J SALEM MA 01970
2
ir 31 0.170 0011ALINCOLN ROAD WALKER FRA j I I A L I III(,(.)LR NU 21
0 :7 WALKER MARGUERITE T SALEM MA 01970 22
0
8 31 0166 0020 CLEVELAND ROAD —CONWAY THOMAS P 20 CLEVELAND ROAD ✓
2324,
19 ............. G SAL
25
............
•
2 31 PEZE'NNY-STEPHEN i ....... 18 26
0
P"LE, ELANUl..ROAD,
SALEIT:MA�%019710
21 270
28
31 0173 UUZZ bNANI NVAL) Pit NO
22 191`01111.1 �,Tyt=?T F 22 `G`R 29
0 23 FRAKF."R MURIEL E SALEM 11A 01970 30
24 3.1 0.174 0020 GRANT ROAD DARISSE MARC Pf 20 GRANT RD 310
32
25 GAHMEN, 11A U'I'/1 33
u
2 31 0291 CALLAHAN KATHLEEN T 29 BUCHANAN RE,
0 6 NROAD 34
27 SALEM MA 0.1970 3510
Z 36
28 31 0188 0017 LINCOLIT ROAD P0q*ff1'N-GT0N-T-rA7 I I E. u co 2 7-Cc--T1Nr-0 1 %-,� 37
29 SALEM MA 01970 3
0 30
30 40
31 41
0 32 42
430
33
44
34 45
35 46
0 1710
36 48
37 49
............... > 4
> 50
38
............
39
52
40 53
41 54
0 550
42
!6
43 57C.
z
58
...............
4
0 591
45 ........
............. 60
46 61
47 2
0 :30
48 64
49 %
65
50 66
67
51
68
52 69
53 70
0 710
54 72
55 73
•56 74
PETER,11- CARON
75
CHIEF. ASSESSOR� •
7,
791
F a 3t•4 a i,. -� OQ VIM
',I 4
N :•
0
Da O =1 LJ O J�
UO
ce ✓
! ? �.. O °fir'.d`fi Tit .n � r' o'l/' Q .yl•' .G . (l+ 4 •:
F 4 r
Ol
-
�`\ m
/ s
ZX
�� � \\\\ � s9 1 rt � t,.•W yy _ o r _
` •4 6 v art riY � lj"! � ' 04 � �� `ti+/ i 9y Or
DO
e°
-"i �n�� 2 ss,s SNC .r/'Q� ;. d8 '� � '•.a .r; (j° J y
o40
•Sb1 J� pe
,.- .
or
jp
O -OJ `V 1 �O 'Q: YX.�R l s ♦ F // ra
S ((\\ ^
w 7+
a
1 r s!.l
� N0`