7 GRANITE STREET - ZBA r
1 15 o°
P
6v up to$100 a bare
^I rel...and it wW
`1121 Legal Notice
CITY OF SALEM
BOARD OF APPEAL
ce 745-9595 Ext 361
i9 Will hold a public hearing for
ia, all persons interested in the petition
ig.' submitted by PETER RENAULT
requesting a Variance from side
na setbacks to construct a 29x24 single
Itcstory addition for the property located
at 7 Granite Street R-2. Said hearing I
'm will be held on WEDNESDAY,
February 8, 2006 AT 6:30 P.M.,
120 WASHINGTON STREET, 3RD 1
I FLOOR,ROOM 313.
Nina Cohen
Chairman
SN—1/27,21V06
CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
BOARD OF APPEAL ,-EM. MA
120 WASHINGTON STREET, 3RD FLOOR CLERKS OFFICE
SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970
TELEPHONE: 978-743-9595
FAX: 978-740-9846 .2006 FEB 22 A 10: 2U
DECISION ON I HE PE 14TION OF G PETER RENAULT REQUESTING A
VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7 GRANITE STREET R-2
A hearing on this petition was held on February 8, 2006 with the following Board
Members present;Nina Cohen,Richard Dionne,Nicholas Helides, Bonnie Belair and
Edward Moriarty. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and other;and notices of the
hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with
Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
The petitioner is requesting a Variance from side yard setback to construct a 22 x 24
single story addition for the property located at 7 Granite Street located in an R-2 zone.
The Variances,which have been requested,may be granted upon a finding by this Board
that:
a. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land,
building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands,
buildings and structures involve.
b. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve
substantial hardship, financial or otherwise,to the petitioner;.
c. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good
and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district of
the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal,after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing,
and after viewing the plane, makes the following findings of fact:
1. The petitioner Peter Renault appeared and represented himself at the hearing.
2. Petitioner requests a variance from a side yard setback to construct a single story
addition for his family who needs the additional room.
3. Plans were submitted to the Board showing the proposed addition
4. The addition will be a single story 24 x 22.
5. There was no opposition to this petition.
UZL,1611JN Ur THE PETITiUN OF G. PETER RENAULT REQUESTING A
VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7 GRANITE STREET R-2
page two
On the basis of the above findings of fact,and on, the evidence presented the Board
of Appeals finds as follows;
1. Special conditions exist when especially affect the subject property but not he
District.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve
substantial hardship to the petitioner.
3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good
and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or
the purpose of the Ordinance.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted 5 in favor and 0 in opposition to grant the
Variances requested, subject to the following conditions:
1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state stature, ordinance, codes and
regulations.
2. Petitioner shall obtain approval from any City Board or Commission having
jurisdiction, including but not limited to the Planning Board.
3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety
shall be strictly adhered to.
4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to beginning any construction.
5. A Certificate of Occupancy shall be obtained.
6. All construction shall be done according to plans submitted to and approved by
the Building Commissioner,with plans to be amended to reduce the size of the
second floor by eliminating the outside deck adjacent to the parking area and
setting the second floor back an additional four(4)feet from the property
Hoe shared with the McGrath family.The amended plans and new
construction cannot exceed the footprint or height of the demolished
structure
7. Exterior finishes of the new construction shall be in harmony with the existing
structure.
8. The residence shall remain a single family dwelling.
9. Petitioner shall obtain approval from any City Board or Commission having
jurisdiction, but not limited to the Planning Board.
DECISION OF THE PETITION OF G. PETER RENAULT REQUESTING A
VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7 GRANITE STREET R-2
page three
VARIANCE GRANTED
February 8, 2006 r
'chard Dionne �C�--�
Board of Appeal
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD
AND THE CITY CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the
Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days date of filing
of this decision in the office of the City Clerk Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws
Chapter 40A, Section 11,the Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take
effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certificate of the City Clerk that 20 days
have elapsed and no appeal has been filed,or that,if such appeal has been filed,that is
has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and
indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's
Certificate of Title.
Board of Appeal
0
fY U �o
Q :3
z �;w
REMOVE "DOGHOUSE" O sm
COMPLETE
---- REMOVE PORCH, STAIRS, t
PORCH ROOF COMPLETE
DOOR AND WINDOW TO REMAIN 214 REMOVE SIDING FROM TH15 SIDE U
SAVE FOR PATCH-IN ONLY
DECK
� I
REMOVE [DOOR yy
COMPLETE
FIN 5H FOR OPENING Q L
Pi REMOVE WINDOW COMPLETE
FRAME FOR OPENING U n
ll-
UJ
II I J Q
li l7LL
I I m
X LL
I I I I
LU m
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I
II I I I
I II z
II I I I
II I ,
I I I I
L— ^------------- z o
-- to Q mg
V4 DECK z
U
z °
�w
1.0
W1 3 F
!-I��l
1 EXIST,/DEMO FND, PLAN EXIST,/DEMO IST FLR PLAN A-
1 SCALE: 1/8" - 1'-0" 1 SCALE: V8" - 1'-0"
1/31/2006
Al
A
3
O
pm
00
3=
m�
�m
m ,
— II
m
J II
11--- �; II
D X n m l
m N _ X IJ----
� I I !^ N I I
p Q I I S I I
3 m
I I 3 I I ❑
O II II
r I I ❑ O I I
m II
� I I ail I I
m 11 011
mI
mll
e - m
D
Z II II
Oil
z l ❑
II71:71II
II II
II - II
II II
II II
I__-- -
II II
II II
II II
AA
77
om
mmm
m
DA
mA
_ 00
OX
U
rx
m=
I
I
M
11 X
m N II I
II ❑
O
II I
m IJ---
3 11 –
O
Ir .
M II ❑
m
m
II
�J 47pp
3 All 03 3 3 �Om
O r0�
A
m ym m m �00im
O DT E N ZEE
D
m mo r c Nzp
0 px m . =E
0 mOnti TD
O m AO
3 mA m
0 A y
m i
m
CLIENT TITLE CONTRACTOR
W PETER 4 D1ANEEXISTING/DEMO J.L. WARD
o RENAULTELEVATIONS CONSTRUCTION
NO T GRANITE ST SO GLIDDEN STREET
SALEM, MA OISIO BEVERLY, MA 01915
TEL: STS-911-1153
N
r ------------ -
-_____________ ___----____
______________
„91 ® 81610r Irl „B/L It
z v
I I I I I
I I I I I I
D I I I I I I
z I I I I I I
I I I I I I
I I I I I I
I I I I I I
I I I I I I
I I I I I I
F
1a'-o"
p m z z m
In m m E E m X y
30 A x X 30 z m
i c m n D L, m
E E E
O D r m
D F r r r z
O
r
r
O
N
n ^" —`---Lr—---------�- obe
G I
m —1 1 II n
71 � li �-T III bN
b r `(li a 3 III
pto
O i °
� \
It T 3
E —
A O 9 60 A
m N
I my ±m
li .= m I Dm m *mU
Az I my Wb
CLIENT TITLE CONTRACTOR
FETER 4 DIANE FND. PLAND a FIRST J-L, WARD
o RENAULT FLOOR PLAN CONSTRUCTION
O l GRANITE ST 50 GLIDDEN STREET
SALEM, MA 01910 BEVERLY, MA 01915
TEL: 910-911-3153
A
O
yA �TI
V
z N z
N_
O
z
N
N X1
O
A
m
N
•d,�l •o•o „�z � s�ssn�l -�
3
A
z
G�
N
25 _111
CLIENT TITLE CONTRACTOR
W PETER DIANE ROOF PLAN J.L. WARD
°oN
CONSTRUCTION
RENAULT
T GRANITE.ST SO GLIDDEN STREET
SALEM, MA OISIO BEVERLY, MA 0I9I5
TEL: 918-921-2152
rl EXISTING RI E
EL ./-2d O"
LLO
T
I wr�,�, ffl
win
MATCH SIDING WITH EX15TING IU O n
AS CLOSELY AS POSSIELE
ZEW
MATCH ROOFING WITH EXISTING 0>:0
LLOSELLASROSSIELE..
NEW IDGE
sm
FI sr F o0
EL.O'-O'
GRADE LINE
II I z
NEW FO4 FOOTER 12' O.G. VERT. TYP.
I`----`I--- -_ .._. .. .. .. _.. .—.._.._ O
I
—__ __I;I ______--__
WORK LIMIT LINE
LEFT ELEVATION L
MATCH TRIM DETAIL AS
SCALE: 1/8" - I'-D" CLOSELY AS P05515LF ❑
GRADE LINE
W
MATCH SIDING WITH EXISTING Z
AS CLOSELY AS POSSIBLE WORK LIMIT LINE
NEW FO`FOOTER I ~ �
rt z p � �m
I I
--------------------------------- w � �o
if
❑ i 3 REAR ELEVATION lu
SCALE: 1/8" - I'-0" Lu
W
0 + GRADE LINE
TIE-IN FOUNDATION ® I
IT O.C. VERT. TYP. NEW FOUNDATION - 1/31/2006
_- ------ 1 FOOTER
-----------
Li) RIGHT ELEVATION A E
SCALE: 1/8" - II - ✓
5+ .. r ffi al,rg■�x b �x a�_ �e. x"� m a w���x
Its
- e`
i&
z.r.
ma
r
1
w
i �F
IIS x r,e -
r�