1 GEDNEY COURT - ZBA 1 Gedney Court a/k/a 21 Gedney Ct.
Andrew Brauer R`2
CY ��
GL
;TE OF HEARING
PETITIONER
LOCAT12N
sl K9 /
MOTION: V GRANT �_ SECOND
TO DENY SECOND
TO RE-HEAR SECOND
.SAVE TO WITHDRAW SECOND
70 CONTINUE SECOND
ROLL CALL PRESENT GRANT DENY WITHDRAW RE-HEAR CONTINUE
RICHARD EENCAL
RICHARD FEBONIOy
FRANCIS GREALISH
v EDWARD LUZINSKI
ASSOCIATE MEMBERS /
RONALD P4NTF t/
ARTHUR
CONDITIONS: f--2
` .; flZitg of '$Arm, �Rttssarljusetts
� Pattra of Appeal
September 14, 1992
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT AS OF SEPTEMBER 8, 1992 THE DECISION
OF THE BOARD OF APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE
CITY CLERK TO GRANT THE PETITION OF ANDREW BRAUER FOR A SPECIAL
PERMIT TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A DECK AT 1 GEDNEY COURT A/K/A
21 GEDNEY COURT.
BOARD OF APPEAL
Brenda M. Sumrall
Clerk of the Board
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section
17, of MGL Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the
date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk.
Pursuant to MGL Chapter 40A. , Section 11, the Variance/Special Permit
granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision
bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed
and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed,
that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex
Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or
is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of title.
Board of Appeal
of "'t'ttlrm, 4Raz5adlusetts
VOtIrb 0f �Upeal n
�n r
o m �
S
Jn ry
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF ANDREW BRAUER FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 1 GEDNEY
COURT a/k/a 21 GEDNEY COURT (R-2)
A hearing on this petition was held August 26, 1992 with the following
Board Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Richard Febonio, Francis
Grealish Jr. , Edward Luzinski and Associate Member Ronald Plante. Notice
of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing
were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with
Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting a Special Permit to extend
nonconforming side and front setbacks to allow the construction of a deck
and stairs. The property is located in an R-2 district.
The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this
request for a Special Permit is Section 5-3(j ) , which provides as follows:
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the
Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set
forth in Section B-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permits for alterations and
reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement,
extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses,
provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion
shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming
use to the neighborhood.
In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit
requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted
upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will
promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's
inhabitants.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented
at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings
of fact;
1. There was no opposition to this petition by neighbors or abutters.
2. There were two letters submitted by the petitioner from abutters in
favor of the plan.
3. Granting this petition will enhance the quality of life for the
petitioner and would provide safe and easy access to the second floor.
PETITION OF ANDREW BRAUER FOR A SPECIAL
PERMIT AT 1 GEDNEY CT. a/k/a 21 GEDNEY CT. , SALEM
page two
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented,
the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1. The Special Permit requested can be granted without substantial
detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially
derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
2. The granting of the Special Permit requested will promote the public
health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants and may
be granted in harmony with the neighborhood.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the
Special Permit requested, subject to the following conditions:
1 . Petitioner shall comply with all City and State statutes, ordinances,
codes and regulations.
2 . All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions
submitted.
3 . All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and
fire safety shall be strictly adhered to.
4 . Petitioner shall obtain a legal building permit.
5. Exterior finishes of the proposed deck shall be in harmony with
existing structure.
SPECIAL PERMIT GRANTED
August 26, 1992
i j i 7
Ronald G. Plante, Member
Board of Appeal
n N
co
rn
CO
N
cn
cti
ti
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF ANDREW BRAUER FOR A
SPECIAL PERMIT AT 1 GEDNEY CT. a/k/a 21 GEDNEY CT. , SALEM
page three
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY
CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of
MGL Chapter 40A. , and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of
filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL
Chapter 40A. , Section 11, the Special Permit granted herein shall not take
effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City
Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if
such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is
recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of
the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of
Title.
Board of Appeal
m
r
r
`m LA
_ z
,f
of "Salem, 4Eassadlusetts
s. Buttra of �trpeal mo "
CM
,s
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF ANDREW BRAUER FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 1 GEDNEY
COURT a/k/a 21 GEDNEY COURT (R-2)
A hearing on this petition was held August 26, 1992 with the following
Board Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Richard Febonio, Francis
Grealish Jr. , Edward Luzinski and Associate Member Ronald Plante. Notice
of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing
were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with
Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting a Special Permit to extend
P
nonconforming side and front setbacks to allow the construction of a deck
and stairs. The property is located in an R-2 district.
The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this
request for a Special Permit is Section 5-3(j ) , which provides as follows:
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the
Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set
forth in Section 8-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permits for alterations and
reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement,
extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses,
provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion
shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming
use to the neighborhood.
In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit
requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted
upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will
promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's
inhabitants.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented
at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings
of fact;
1. There was no opposition to this petition by neighbors or abutters.
2. There were two letters submitted by the petitioner from abutters in
favor of the plan.
3. Granting this petition will enhance the quality of life for the
petitioner and would provide safe and easy access to the second floor.
PETITION OF ANDREW BRAUER FOR A SPECIAL
PERMIT AT 1 GEDNEY CT. a/k/a 21 GEDNEY CT. , SALEM
page two
On the basis f the above findings s s o e a of fact, and on the evidence presented,
the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: !
1. The Special Permit requested can be granted without substantial
detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially
derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
2. The granting of the Special Permit requested will promote the public
health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants and may
be granted in harmony with the neighborhood.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the
Special Permit requested, subject to the following conditions:
1 . Petitioner shall comply with all City and State statutes, ordinances,
codes and regulations.
2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions
submitted.
3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and
fire safety shall be strictly adhered to.
4 . Petitioner shall obtain a legal building permit.
5. Exterior finishes of the proposed deck shall be in harmony with
existing structure.
SPECIAL PERMIT GRANTED
August 26, 1992
Ronald G. Plante, Member
Board of Appeal
m
r�
O LM
N
Ln
M
Lzti
t
Y
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF ANDREW BRAUER FOR A
SPECIAL PERMIT AT 1 GEDNEY CT. a/k/a 21 GEDNEY CT. , SALEM
page three
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY
CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of
MGL Chapter 40A. , and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of
filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL
Chapter 40A. , Section 11, the Special Permit granted herein shall not take
effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City
Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if
such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is
recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of
the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of
Title.
Board of Appeal
n H
T
rno �p
"•n
r
0 N
m
LS
x
r
N
b Chi of _,$ttlem, C-ttssadlusefts
Boarb of Apral
_- On
_. m
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF ANDREW BRAUER FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 1 GEDNEY
COURT a/k/a 21 GEDNEY COURT (R-2)
A hearing on this petition was held August 26, 1992 with the following
Board Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Richard Febonio, Francis
Grealish Jr. , Edward Luzinski and Associate Member Ronald Plante. Notice
of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing
were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with
Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting a Special Permit to extend
nonconforming side and front setbacks to allow the construction of a deck
and stairs. The property is located in an R-2 district.
The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this
request for a Special Permit is Section 5-3(j ) , which provides as follows:
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the
Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set
forth in Section 8-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permits for alterations and
reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement,
extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses,
provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion
shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming
use to the neighborhood.
In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit
requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted
upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will
promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's
inhabitants.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented
at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings
of fact;
1 . There was no opposition to this petition by neighbors or abutters.
2. There were two letters submitted by the petitioner from abutters in
favor of the plan.
3 . Granting this petition will enhance the quality of life for the
petitioner and would provide safe and easy access to the second floor.
PETITION OF ANDREW BRAUER FOR A SPECIAL
PERMIT AT 1 GEDNEY CT. a/k/a 21 GEDNEY CT. , SALEM
page two
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented,
the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1. The Special Permit requested can be granted without substantial
detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially
derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
2. The granting of the Special Permit requested will promote the public
health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants and may
be granted in harmony with the neighborhood.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the
Special Permit requested, subject to the following conditions:
1. Petitioner shall comply with all City and State statutes, ordinances,
codes and regulations.
2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions
submitted.
3 . All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and
fire safety shall be strictly adhered to.
4 . Petitioner shall obtain a legal building permit.
5. Exterior finishes of the proposed deck shall be in harmony with
existing structure.
SPECIAL PERMIT GRANTED
August 26, 1992
Ronald G. Plante, Member
Board of Appeal
c7 C/9
r �
^i GO
N
- co
,v
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF ANDREW BRAUER FOR A
SPECIAL PERMIT AT 1 GEDNEY CT. a/k/a 21 GEDNEY CT. , SALEM
page three
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY
CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of
MGL Chapter 40A. , and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of
filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL
Chapter 40A. , Section 11, the Special Permit granted herein shall not take
effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City
Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if
such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is
recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of
the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of
Title.
Board of Appeal
n cn
m
r
r ri
-n
v:rLA
N
^J
r�
_ Gita of -,� ttlem, rTf ussadlusetts ^
Bourn of CAv{ieul m "
L.
p
, r
1
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF ANDREW BRAUER FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 1 GEDNEY
COURT a/k/a 21 GEDNEY COURT (R-2)
A hearingthis i
on s pet tion was held August 26 1992 with the following
g , owing
Board Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Richard Febonio, Francis
Grealish Jr. , Edward Luzinski and Associate Member Ronald Plante. Notice
of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing
were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with
Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting a Special Permit to extend
nonconforming side and front setbacks to allow the construction of a deck
and stairs. The property is located in an R-2 district.
The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this
request for a Special Permit is Section 5-3(j ) , which provides as follows:
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the
Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set
forth in Section 8-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permits for alterations and
reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement,
extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses,
provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion
shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming
use to the neighborhood.
In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit
requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted
upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will
promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's
inhabitants.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented
at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings
of fact;
1 . There was no opposition to this petition by neighbors or abutters.
2. There were two letters submitted by the petitioner from abutters in
favor of the plan.
3. Granting this petition will enhance the quality of life for the
petitioner and would provide safe and easy access to the second floor.
y
PETITION OF ANDREW BRAUER FOR A SPECIAL
PERMIT AT 1 GEDNEY CT. a/k/a 21 GEDNEY CT. , SALEM
page two
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented,
the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1. The Special Permit requested can be granted without substantial
detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially
derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
2. The granting of the Special Permit requested will promote the public
health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants and may
be granted in harmony with the neighborhood.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the
Special Permit requested, subject to the following conditions:
1. Petitioner shall comply with all City and State statutes, ordinances,
codes and regulations.
2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions
submitted.
3 . All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and
fire safety shall be strictly adhered to.
4 . Petitioner shall obtain a legal building permit.
5. Exterior finishes of the proposed deck shall be in harmony with
existing structure.
SPECIAL PERMIT GRANTED
August 26, 1992
i ) r7
Ronald G. Plante, Member
Board of Appeal
n cn
rn
J Lo
N
Ln
m
ti
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF ANDREW BRAUER FOR A
SPECIAL PERMIT AT 1 GEDNEY CT. a/k/a 21 GEDNEY CT. , SALEM
page three
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY
CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of
MGL Chapter 40A. , and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of
filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL
Chapter 40A. , Section 11, the Special Permit granted herein shall not take
effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City
Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if
such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is
recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of
the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of
Title.
Board of Appeal
rn
r N
co
.m co
�J
il
- 4C1 Cn
b Ctn of -'Ettlem, 4Rttssttcllusetts
CD
�aara of .�vpeul 70
- -v
s
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF ANDREW BRAUER FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 1 GEDNEY
COURT a/k/a 21 GEDNEY COURT (R-2)
A hearing on this petition was held August 26, 1992 with the following
Board Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Richard Febonio, Francis
Grealish Jr. , Edward Luzinski and Associate Member Ronald Plante. Notice
of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing
were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with
Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting a Special Permit to extend
nonconforming side and front setbacks to allow the construction of a deck
and stairs. The property is located in an R-2 district.
The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this
request for a Special Permit is Section 5-3(j ) , which provides as follows:
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the
Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set
forth in Section 8-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permits for alterations and
reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement,
extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses,
provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion
shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming
use to the neighborhood.
In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit
requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted
upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will
promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's
inhabitants.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented
at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings
of fact;
1 . There was no opposition to this petition by neighbors or abutters.
2. There were two letters submitted by the petitioner from abutters in
favor of the plan.
3. Granting this petition will enhance the quality of life for the
petitioner and would provide safe and easy access to the second floor.
PETITION OF ANDREW BRAUER FOR A SPECIAL
PERMIT AT 1 GEDNEY CT. a/k/a 21 GEDNEY CT. , SALEM
page two
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented,
the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1 . The Special Permit requested can be granted without substantial
detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially
derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
2. The granting of the Special Permit requested will promote the public
health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City' s inhabitants and may
be granted in harmony with the neighborhood.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the
Special Permit requested, subject to the following conditions:
1 . Petitioner shall comply with all City and State statutes, ordinances,
codes and regulations.
_'. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions
submitted.
3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and
fire safety shall be strictly adhered to.
4 . Petitioner shall obtain a legal building permit.
5 . Exterior finishes of the proposed deck shall be in harmony with
existing structure.
SPECIAL PERMIT GRANTED
August 26, 1992
Ronald G. Plante, Member
Board of Appeal
c'f N
rn
r
N
Ln
m
ti
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF ANDREW BRAUER FOR A
SPECIAL PERMIT AT 1 GEDNEY CT. a/k/a 21 GEDNEY CT. , SALEM
page three
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY
CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of
MGL Chapter 40A. , and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of
filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL
Chapter 40A. , Section 11, the Special Permit granted herein shall not take
effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City
Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if
such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is
recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of
the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of
Title .
Board of Appeal
m
c.o
N
m
rr d
}^O/1 yti,�ro� oi� J/ c7/� a�iS
n
N
t
I
MORTGAGE INSPECTION
BAY STATE SURVEYING SERVICE INC.
234 CABOT ST., BEVERLY, MA.
i
LOCATION i SALEM. MASS. NOTESt
SCALE - 1" = 18 FT DATE , AUG. 22 . 1988 0 This is a Mortgage inspection survey and not
REFERENCE DEED BK. _• 7662 - •. PG . '#-5_
5. 7 an instrument survey,therefore this plot pian is for
RECORDED IN THE ESSEX SOUTH mortgage inspection purposes only.
DI�i,.8E6igT87.4F.PEgDs•_:--_ Y This survey is based on survey marks of
others.
To -. _S:.PPM?tWK}4TH•t%Ftj'GA6E_ CO_ INC_........... 0 Bushes,shrubs, fences and tree lines do
I hereby certify that I how wmmirKd the premises and that the not necessarilyindicate
building(s) shown on this property lines.
ALE - plan an located on the ground as
CITY_QE_t_..Jto formed to the zoning setbacks of the • The building(s) are not located 'm the special
shown a� that Macy 111% MASS.......... when constructed• flood hazard zone,as def Ind by H.U.D.
I
z
I - �
Lvr 3
,.771
jl l
i
$$$
5Tf N
NIFLLFZ621NCyT # 21 U at l
j .
1,0
I
i
� f
71 E ,N OF
IIAKEMACE
APPEAL CASE NO. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Ctv of �Afnt' Ansondluseffs
SUN=
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
The Undersigned represent that he is are the owners of a certain parcel of land located
at NO. . . . . .*/. .66dnl! . .Ct. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Street; Zoning District. � .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : and said parcel is affected by Section(s) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
of the Massachusetts State Building Code.
Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in
accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance.
I11 i-e c L,LCf a"
mo C
�1 Np
O LA)
rr�a
4.0
r. '
The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following
reasons:
L) �Pc
The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem
Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to
approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said
Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary
hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero-
gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for
the following reasons: /
per�, ; t Fw,
l V
Cans?k..rL ti c(ecl� G�c( S-t�ios C�Z.�rl � /J
�Owner. . . r. . Vic.``. . ...1 � rAue
J: . . . . . .k. . . . . . . . . . . .
Address. . . . A/. . . CeClnn
J
Telephone. . . . . . . .?�?y.: .�b y . . . . . . . . . . . .
Petitioner. . . . . . :lrauer
Address. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Date. . . . . /��92 . . . . . . . . . Telephone.. . ��/.�Jp. . i .`�� . . . . . . . . . . . . .
By. . . . . . . �uw. . Q�!: . . . . . . . . . . .
Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of
Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . ... . .
four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The
Evening News.
4-j S a�7Js
rr d
Ili Acre
I
i
i
I
MORTGAGE INSPECTION
it BAY STATE SURVEYING SERVICE INC.
234 CABOT ST., BEVERLY, MA.
LOCATION = SALEM. MASS. NOTES :
SCALE - I° = 1 s FT DATE , Aus: 22 . 1988 • This is a Mortgage inspection survey and not
"'______•••-"'
REFERENCE i DEED BK . + 7662 PG . +527 an instrument survey,therefore this plot plan is for
... . . ......... .......................... mortgage inspection purposes only.
.R CORDED.SN THE ESSEX SOUTH
OI�t.,8E6iS]87.4F_AEgDs..• _ • This survey is based on survey marks of
others.
To _ --PNMl1W, 4TN_ VF Tg6GE_ CA.. INC: - - _ • Bushes,shrubs, fences and tree lines do
hereby certify that I have examined the premises and that the not necessarily indicate property lines.
building(s) shown on this plae are located on the ground as
,j shorn and that they con to v to the zoning setbacks of the • The buildings) ars not located! in the spec=
91 TIX AL ALE 9. when constructed. flood hazard zone,as dot4od by H.U.D.
Z
LaT 3
I
X4.4/
Rrh 1660 SP
i
'STY N
� cn
NIF QINdx 21 Lo-r 1
�N or
39.co'* — sa
Cj E I7 tJ E.Y (f'O U RT
u.FEMACa
Q2,500 E
1 .
-554,'40 N
1�
NOR 'MA' N STREET
za-v
1b-
y
�o g60 Q
>�
j o2 =O
:48
�p
574 576
\ 5591 3336V - 5 38096 w
4y4y 'S 20,92/ I
w U.S. POST OFFICE n "'
S30" 558 p -
4Cll 0 - -
5576400 0
o
�� _, n Asa-• ,
a
sc �
STI STREET
yto0 In,EQNEx
"ss i :ue Xo a 3 )3 ;3i1/J M9 .11 59�
e LAag s 1 , 5 . 6132 c
66 ! d w
480 r 3 @. it ! F_•::
`' C X 5366 9 4 197 sT two s
5 , 663 ; sa
•s /6689 ,a-eo 1s '• '`. EE a a
tot�'�
A 604 to 1 s-a� .e 5 c —598. .
4
34 40 T _ 1
7� C 3677
16C0 _ 6
. 1
V- au a 597
6 '. 4 + '° N 19341 a
000 606 evL ST. N R 'S
/ 34000 PLAYGROUND
N CMUA; i
%
0 1
o
• � 7400
46 rQ _ 1 0
u �J
2.69 pL � 9 62�
a 2?, 0
6j36
Fa _
�A = 0. '-� IJV n`.�o• .,1 1 ,1 m "��10
63
SO
CITY OF SALEM CITY OF SALEM
p BOARD OF APPEAL BOARD OF APPEAL _
745-9595 Ext. 381 745-9595 Ext. 381
Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter �, Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter-
ested in the petition submitted by ANDRE%,, ested in the petition submitted by ANDREW
BRAUER for a Special Permit to allow construe BRAUER for a Special Permit to allow construe-,
tion of a second floor deck at 1 GEDNEY CI'.A/ tion of a second floor deck at 1 GEDNEY CT. A/
K/A 21 GEDNET CT.(R-2)Said hearing to be held K/A 21 GEDNET CT.(R-2)Said hearing to be held.
WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 26, 1992 AT 7:00 P.M., WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 26, 1992 AT 7:00 P.M.,
ONE SALEM GREEN, 2nd floor. ONE SALEM GREEN, 2nd floor. — —
.— - a t RICHARD A. BENCAL, Chairman ' RICHARD A. BENGAL, Chairman
August 12, 19, 1992 SN72845 August 12, 19, 1992 SN72845-
CITY OF SALEM
BOARD OF APPEAL
745-9595 Ext. 381
Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter-
ested in the petition submitted by ANDREW
BRAUER for a Special Permit to allow construe-
tion of a second floor deck at 1 GEDNEY Cf. A/
K/A 21 GEDNET CT.(R-2)Said hearing to be held
WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 26, 1992 AT 7:00 P.M.,
ONE SALEM GREEN, 2nd floor.
RICHARD A. BENCAL, Chairman
August 12, 19, 1992 SN72845
_ e e�
CITY OP' SALEM
BOARD OF APPEAL CITY OF SALEM
745-9595 Ext. 381 BOARD OF APPEAL.
Will hold a public hearing for alt persons inter- 745-9595 Ext. 381
ested in the petition submitted b Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter-
BRAUF,R for a Special Permit to allow consti uc� Will
in the
tion of a second floor deck at 1 GEDNEY CT A/ petition submitted by ANDREW
R/A 21 a recon P BRAUER 1'co a Special Permit to allow construe-
/A 21 G
WEDNESDAY, CC.(R-2)Said hearing Lion of a second Floor deck at i 1 GEDNEY eT held
AUGUST 26, 1992 AT 7:00 Y Id R/A 27 GEDNEY CC(R-2)Said hearing to beheld
ONE SALEM GREEN, 2nd Moor. WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 26, 1992 AT 7:00 P.M.,
RICHARD A. BENCAL, Chairman ONE SALE31 GREEN, 2nd floor.
August 12, 19, 1992 RICHARD A. BENCAL, Chairman
--T SN72845 August 12, 19, 1992 SN72845
a
APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Qi#g of "Sttlem, 'Mussad usetts
. �RaarD of �Vpeal
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
The Undersigned represent that he is are the owners of a certain parcel of land loc3&,ted
at NO. . . . . .0t . .6 Pdei Js . .Gz`_ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Street; Zoning District. AY . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : and said parcel is affected by Section(s) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
of the Massachusetts State Building Code.
Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in
accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance.
�i�-ecZL c,
o...r
rno m
�rn
r
_e m>
i,: � v> cn
Cl 1,
G� O
F-
co
The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following
reasons:
The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem
Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to
approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said
Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary
hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero-
gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for
the following reasons:
/. ' `:cz,-8.j zit), gru u e k
Owner. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Address. . . . �. . . ec�nP C(t. . S-aAo " . .
Telephone. . . . . . . , y.y.: .��y2. . . . . . . . . . . . .
Petitioner. . . . . . / t!? . . . rauer
Address. . . . . . . . . .SP ne . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Date. . . . . /��q2 . . . . . . . . . Telephone. . . 7���IQ:. Z. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
By. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Three copies of the application must be filed with the SSecretary of the Board of
Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .
four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The
Evening News.
}
NO....................................
PETITION TO BOARD OF APPEALS
LOCATION
................................................................
PETITIONER..........................................
ADDRESS...............................................
CONDITIONS
.................................................................
........................ .......................................
................................................................
.................................................................
.................................................................
.................................................................
,PETITION APPROVED.................... ❑
DENIED.........................
...................................................1 19.........
V
Richard and Patricia Pierga
14R High Street
Salem, Massachusetts, 01970
8/13/92
Dear Sir:
We wish to make it public knowledge that we, as owners
of the property located at 14 High Street and identified as lot #3
referenced in Deed book #7662, Pg. 527 and sharing a common
property line at the rear ( Easterly ) side of property owned by Mr.
Andrew Brauer at 1 Gedney Ct., have reviewed the plans ( plot and
side elevation ) of Mr. Brauer to alter the footprint of his property
facing Northerly with a wooden pressure treated 5' x 12.5' deck and
double railing 36" wide staircase to permit safe and easy access to
their 2nd floor apartment. We have no untoward objection to this
plan and construction as presented to us.
Thank you,
ti
August 19, 1992
To Whom it May Concern,
I have reviewed the plans for Gedney Court and I have no
objections.
Sincerely,
I Via F . McGi'Szn—"
DFM/bgf
APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gi#g of gttlem, Ansear4usetts
�Rvar t of '4veal
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
The Undersigned. re resent that he is are the owners of a certain parcel of land located
at NO. : : s�/. : �.? kiej. . �� . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Street; Zoning District. t?A.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : and said parcel is affected by Section(s) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
of the Massachusetts State Building Code.
Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in
accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance.
� m
c
LU
r
<= m o m
O_ o
1t LaJ n� C31
u_ j
o nm
ci �� .IX
C C N
The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following
reasons:
L)irecLl-
The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem
Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to
approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said
Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary
hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero-
gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for
the following reasons:
S�BCiG.� �gimi//�
Owner. . . .hcl�e . . �:. , jr4u. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Address. . At. . 6eJoe Cts sa/Pm. . . . . . . . .
J. . . .
Telephone. . . . . .? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Petitioner. . . . . , . . . . .
Address. . . . . . . . . . Sq'� e. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Ah . . . . . . . . �y�l-. ���
Date. . Telephone. . . . z. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
By. . . . . . . . .i ... . . . . . . . . .
Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of
Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .
four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The
Evening News.
1
NO....................................
PETITION TO BOARD OF APPEALS
LOCATION
................................................................
PETITIONER..........................................
ADDRESS...............................................
................................................
CONDITIONS
.................................................................
........................ .......................................
................................................................
.................................................................
.................................................................
.................................................................
X.ETITION APPROVED.................... ❑
DENIED.........................
.............................................1 19.........
r
r
I i
MORTGAGE INSPECTION
BAY STATE SURVEYING SERVICE INC.
234 CABOT ST., BEVERLY, MA.
LOCATIONS SALEM. MASS . NOTES =
.................................................
SCALE - 1 10 FT DATE , AUG. 22 . 1988 • This is a Mortgage inspection survey and not
REFERENCE + DEED BK . • 7662 Pc . +527 an instrument survey,therefore this plot plan is for
.. . .. .... ............................... ur
mortgage inspection
RECORDED IN 171E ESSEX SOUTH p purposes only.
' gI .E..6EG1gTBY_4E_PE;ps_._ • This survey is based on survey marks of
....... others.
To .. .FOppj I'MAt,TH.'M.F T6A9E_ Co: ANC. .......
_ • Bushes,shrubs, fences and free lines do
I hereby certify that 1 have examined the premises and that the not necessarily indicate property lines.
building(s) shown on this plan are located on the ground as
shown and that they conformed to the zoning setbacks of the • The building(a) are not located lo the special
GITY_ . ALP__. Pt..
M
.. o E. rss----------- when constructed, flood hazard zone,as defined by H.U.D.
i Lar 3
IA ?
mr�
1660 SF
st
isi + ` ' f1 I � 7E
t
011
ip
ill
Nit A�Z2lwcr' # 2 i Lot I
1
1 v I 38.00't
x I.
C,.E17rJEY COt IiZT
tltl -.
JAKEVEAG! -
rr fj S it� a�7jS
ao/y hH,�ro� ono f�/ a�a a�tS
e
it
I
I
i
f i ,
MORTGAGE INSPECTION
BAY STATE SURVEYING SERVICE INC.
234 CABOT ST., BEVERLY, MA.
L ;CATION : SALEM. MASS. NOTES =
SCALE : I° = 10 FT DATE ,•AU6: 22 . 1988 a This is a Mortgage inspection survey and not
..••-•--•--•--. ......
REFERENCE DEED 8K. • 7662 PG . +527 an instrument survey,therefore this plot plan is for
RECORDED IN THE.ESSEX SOUTH
mortgage inspection purposes only,
EEDS • This survey is based on surveymarks of
OI�i..6E6i3T6Y_4E_P.... ..............
others.
To _- _FOMPLWK41�]'H_tWI T6A§E_!CCL.. _I NC: e Bushes,shrubs, fences and tree linea do
1 hereby certify that I have examined the premises and that the not necessarily indicate property linea.
building(s) shown on this plae are located on the ground as
shown and that they conformed to the zoning setbacks of the to The building(,) are not located in the special
GITY_QE_ A)-EI?a.!I! 9,_ flood hazard zone,as defined by H.U.D.
when constructed.
i
Lvr 3
4
171
T:r
I .. g
j . h 1660 SF �� ..
X15 IIx
i
i I —_•
i.t
P lt?RIN61T # 21
NIa f
S ' 7K
I
t
I Ir
YAKEVEACE 1
MORTGAGE INSPECTION
BAY STATE SURVEYING SERVICE INC.
234 CABOT ST., BEVERLY, MA.
LOCATION + SALEM. MASS . NOTES ,
......... . ...... .....
SCALE : I° _ t 0 FT DATE , .nus: 22 . 1988 • This is a Mortgage inspection survey and not
. .. .... .... . ...... ......
REFERENCE DEED BK . • 7662 PG . +527 an instrument survey,therefore this plot pion is for
T H . •S•. - "
� '
RECORDED ITHE ESSEX SOTmortgage inspection purposes only.
.. ..... .. ................ . .. . .. ... .......
_U__H _ _
DISt,.8E6i3TBY_4F_DEEpsY This survey is based on survey marks of
... .. .... .... others.
TO •. _�Op(h10Ni H0I T6A6E. C0 : INC . Bushes,shrubs, fences and tree lines do
hereby certify that I have examined the premises and that the
not necessarily indicate property lines.
building(a) shown on this plan an located on the ground as
shown and that they conformed to the zoning setbacksof the ® The building(s) are not located in the special
Mss__.. • when constructed. flood hazard zone,as defined by H.U.D.
r
z
l.vr 3
4 R4 � 1660 SF 1-1
l MI5 I
I
.0001
i
Z
fY N
NIF A7,;ZIN61T` 2 i C aT
7
i
v�
x ,N Of
s It I yr
i
n
A< ,y• r _
Side- vo,. {k
Stele 1 = 5 F#
4-1
r d
Aar' �'H��ro"4
i
I
N /
i
i
554,500 N
N-0R MAN STREET
25-31
lal_ 111 175-S JO:
ea 560 ¢
X448 .
` r� 574 "' 576
5�,'n 3336II _ - • . : 5� 36096 a. 1
5 O ,
55SI!, 4 , £ . 'm. W. U.S. POST. OFFICE .ei �'
m YO !
. . 407i
5576400 U: -
0' • o ,,` I `{D - 7Y 418 5-3 1 li
a ..
s
)0
�T{ S:TRcET'
g�100 t g3� G:ERH E, a k s rrrr s s. 1u t ;.
�a t' 480 qcv
EE +
• ..�Qt. .�� - _- " G X � ��. � 4 2T97 sT z a� • �,o-
663 3d o sT tB 3 9
EE
s
604 ze 1 ,FF ;z-zr n _le
a 4 4
54 4 40 TY v Y7' 3617 .
1600 _
I4P i5Ar 6 60-11no 597 e
w
S X000 4 .. /'' L, _ w N f454
ST/ M 3 'S
3400 X PLAYGROUND c N CHlin.hk
s
60 �
� 7400
6
54 AC M1jo ? a � 4
69 ` lls�-+ e .
2 < 621 C-00
�, 22,
3�3 9
� 68 60 Y`
�
P -10
� L n
3 ' 5 ~
5
Say ' •\'> ;�t?
45,
i
Et2ME<48 >'�, ti' 634
t
1
;y a
19 ti
BOARD OF ASSESSORS
CITY HALL PAGE:
......... . . .... ...... .. ...
A flEf 10f9<°
2
2
.........
3
...........
'dtRTlFiE6-ABUTTERS PT,e,
4
...... .... ..............
4 5
5 SUBJECT PROPERTY: MAP. 25 LOT: 0593 SUFE: 6
• PROPERTY ADDRESS: 0001 GEDNEY COURT I *
6 B
7 ASSESSEB , OWNER BRAUEll 9
PAMELA P 10
11 *
�A 12
10 LOT SUFF PROPERTY-ADDRESS ASS WIER —MA-1-L-ING-ADDRESS 13
140
01z 25 05513 0001 GEDNEY COURT BRAUER ANDREW W I GEDNEY CT ✓ 151
6
13 PAMEL-.A-PSALEM-MA-&I-9 17
• 14 25 0584 GGG2 GEDNEY COURT VETRO GIACOMO 2 GEDNEY COURT
15 ANTEMA SALEM MA 01970 z
5 0585 661' 1" 1 1±614 STREET Ul Si EE-I+-4+.I-GH-S:FRLE-E--I--RL-T-Y--:FRbtS-T—P-0-Elc)-X--78FJ 20
Is 2 21
7 THROUGH 805 THROUGH U5 CLARKE DAVID G T9 MARBLEHEAD MA 0 10:)A, 220
:8 25 0586 OCJ14 HIGH STREET QUARTARONE IDA 14 HIGH Si- _>� 23
_SA6F.M MST-1 -711 24
19 ..............I........... 25
0 21" 5 0587 _0010 ROSE_
REE.T,.'%%' ARELL
HIGH ST, U , . ,O,' PATSY ,C& l0j,4IGH �ST26
............
............ 'LYTLE% C e J. & KEMNEY .E .0 SALEM. MA 019!0 27
21
28
9 29
23 NANCY VE FRANCESCO SALEM MA 015170 30
0 24 25 0592 E
0013 GEDNEY STREET 17 MCGINN DAVID F & THEL A 15 GEDNE.Y 13; EFT ✓
310
444 r'� j 32
25 C,1/0, QUALl 1 4614G G.1=I CAP I!IN, P SlAl FA �933
1.111�_
0 ..........
26 .. ..... ....... 340
35
27
3
28 37
0 29 380
39
30 41
31 41
0 32 420
43
33 44
34 45
35 4
0 40
36 48
37 49
50
38
........ ....... .... 510
39 ... ......
5 2
40 si
54
41
550 z
42 56
41 57
............ ......
05
44
..........
.............. ,%,'_.......
45 .......
......... 60
46 6_1
0 47 620
63
48 641
49 65
66
50
670
51 68
52 69
0 53 700
71
54 72
55 73
PETER M. 740
56
0CHIEF ASSESSOR 75
7
7