9 GALLOWS HILL ROAD - ZBA � \
� � �.
��
� �
� ��9�
h
(1
F r�
of 'inlem, ��ttssttcljusett$
\ ,y=' oxra of �}r�reul DEc 3 3 �. P�1 'P5
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF EPAMINONDAS & CECILE PYLIOTIS FPR
VARIANCES FOR 9 GALLOWS HILL ROAD Fil
A hearing on this petition was held November 19, 1986 withKe following Board
Members present: James Hacker, Chairman; Messrs. , Bencal, Fleming, Strout and
Associate Member Dore. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others
and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in
accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioners, owners of the property, are requesting a Variance from side yard
setbacks to allow an existing shed and deck. Also requesting Variances from
density and front yard setback to allow existing single family dwelling in this
R-1 district.
The Variances which have been requested may be granted upon a finding of the
Board that:
a. special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect
the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally
affecting other lands, buildings and structures in the same district;
b. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance would involve
substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner; and
c. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the
hearing, and after viewing plans of the property, makes the following findings
of fact:
1 . There was no opposition;
2. Structure was built as is in 1970;
3. Existing shed and deck were constructed and in place when the
applicant purchased the building in 1973.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at
the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1 . Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property
but do not generally affect the district;
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance would involve
substantial hardship to the petitioner;
3. The relief requested can be granted without substantial detriment to
the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating
from the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF EPA! IhIOi DAS CECILE PYLIOTIS
FOR VNRIANCES FOR 9 GALLOWS HILL ROAD, SALEM
page two
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant Variance
from side yard setback to allow deck to encroach to within six (6) feet of
easterly property line; Variance from side yard setback to allow existing shed
which encroaches to within two (2) feet on the easterly side of the property
line; and Variance from front setback to allow existing single family dwelling
to within eighteen (18) feet of the front property line; as per plans presented.
GRANTED
/James B. Hacker, Chairman
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING UARD AND THE CITY CLERK
Ti; S-, 17 OF THE
!HE DATE Or :1'
O: TH'S 17; THS OF':'-- .F T5E _:Ti
OF—'NT_.. Yr:._�'i Sr. L '9. u._,:1 L':. ._ n c. - -n__ .. . _ --R,T-
FISAT:� .._: OF THE C!il EFs .. _,'.$ -. .. E .^7,
OF THAT. IF S'd,H F.n AFrEAL HSS E,E6 QE. - zi .' -i
- P.°C^RBS", IN THE
. 0➢ RECORD OR IS RECORDED AND I,-,TED ON ThE Ohl'ERS �ERTIflOATE OF TITLE.
BOARD OF APPEAL
r ;
_Vt. and d44z,. cRo9z,tpp1. �E10E
7 �aocvs c�{i�o�oad
cSa�Em, 4als c4uletti 01970
D 6�1� m/*7 1444
vP,--qo✓a� o 'F I- � l of /1/0v D,4 s ✓9-11a
PYL/oi IS of= 9 (� �ueucus lfrGL /2o4,- q ,
� �c6 o A e
Fox, A t1�1�2 "
,4.s 5'r7�-� Int -TW,=
7704 r-
p� LLD�s «rLL Z eb /F NO
F�7ff—r7-.
i II
7 ��owi AL ;Road
cSa�nz, --Maaaacful_tta 01970
(30<r Zl7
rnl .CvP�o✓ OF �= pf1�� //l/0vD14S .9 )ca GF�lGF
,�ucr vac Alov F��3�•z c�� <<lG�� I,
�U!�LrS�fr�a 3Y 7-7y( SiJC �rJ �� �/sYG /l/�,IIJS,
Alo
q6
UrJ c1(JH'SJ
I
I
I
II
I
MORTGAGE ` INSPECTION
BAY STATE SURVEYING SERVICE INC. "
234 CABOT ST., BEVERLY, MA,
LOCATION NOTES +
SCALE ; i° = 4'0 FT. DATE + 9/y/P6- • This is a Mortgage Inspection Survey and not.
REFERENCE + JyS;.6l Pb..�G-._7�3..._......:.
• an instrument survey,therefore this plot plan IS for
mortgage inspection purposes only:
�JS.�:......... .......
.• .• • This survey is based on survey marks of.
To ,G others.
Y_�1!n1..S -••S'4 V�nl6s �9n�i�_•__... • Bushes,shrubs, fences and tree lines do
I hereby certify that I have examined the premises and that the
building(s) shown on this plan are located on the ground as not necessarily indicate property lines.
shown and that they conformed to the zoning setbacks of the • The building(,) are not located in the special
- /L _P.F. ( (�!1 _,..,_.... when constructed, flood hazard zone,as defined by H.U.D.
gr pori , ec!� Z)cx�s Mol' 04)U p�� (4,771•k,
WHENEVER AN OFFSET IS /O '.7ipE g7•
1'±OR LESS AN INSTR. SURVEY IS
RECOMMENDED TO DETER E
PROP. LINES.
Gu�71L j-5 TREtr
7,�T��cl� � �� ,Zx e� ti•�r
0V A�104y t t l h�- .7v '-.1/`7_4ACk
I ,
` ? Loi
ti '1
1 yr 1
L0 y va
I �0T
�tTf�N Of
4X •- , O 14
r ?B
i q
24094 om DP��ylo . kaNe:
�l lANO GALLOWS H I L L
F:.
i