5 FRIEND STREET - ZBA 1 5 FRIEND STREET
WW\ U V \
l_J
CGS
;`
�i
t
,�
��
- 1
.�.
� .
i�
Aau,....auo ava a' -
Legal Notice
CITY OF SALEM
BOARD OF APPEAL
j 978-745.9595,Ext,381
r will hold a public hearing for all
persons interested in the petition sub-
mitted by PAUL CAISSE requesting
Variances from side setback,rear set-
backs and lot coverage to construct a
24'x 24' addition for the property
located at 5 FRIEND STREET,R-2.
Said hearing to be on WEDNESDAY,
DECEMBER 18, 2002,at 6:30 P.M.,
120 WASHINGTON STREET,3rd
FLOOR,ROOM 313.
Nitta Cohen,Chairman
(12/4,11), _
I
�;cot+wm CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
}� BOARD OF APPEAL CITY Of .SALOKiMA
120 WASHINGTON STREET, 3RD FLOOR CLERK'S:OHME
SALEM, MA 01970
TEL. (978) 745.9595
FAX (978) 740-9846 ( '
STANLEY J. USOVICZ, JR. '�. 4fC?31 "A b
, A^;91a46
MAYOR
DECISION OF THE PETITION OF PAUL CAISSE REQUESTING A VARIANCE
FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 5 FRIEND STREET R-2
A hearing on this petition was held December 18, 2002 with the following Board
Members present: Nina Cohen, Chairman, Richard Dionne, Stephen Harris,Nicholas
Helides and Bonnie Belair. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and
notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening New in accordance
with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
The petitioner is requesting a Variance from side setback, rear setback, and lot coverage
to construct a 24' x 24' addition for the property located at 5 Friend Street located in an
R-2 zone.
The Variances, which have been requested, upon a finding Board that:
a. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building
Or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands,buildings,
and structure involve.
b. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve
substantial hardship,financial or otherwise, to the petitioners..
c. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and
Without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of this district of the
purpose of the Ordinance
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing,
and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact:
1. Petitioner and his architect David Jaquith of Beverly appeared and presented his
petition.
2. Plans were shown showing the proposed 24 x 24 addition to his property.
The addition will require a variance from the side setback,rear setback and lot
coverage.
3. Councillor Michael Bencal spoke in favor of the addition.
4. There was no opposition.
i CITY 6F SALE. ►
CLERK'S OF OE'
DECISION OF THE PETITION OF PAUL CAISSE REQUESTING A VARIANCE
FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 5 FRIEND STREET R-2 DEC 31 A 9: 11b
page two
On the basis of the above finding of fact, the evidence presented at the hearing, the
Zoning Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the
district in general.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve
substantial hardship to the petition.
3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and
Without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the
purpose of the Ordinance.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted 5-0, to grant the Variances requested,
subject to the following conditions;
1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statures, ordinances, codes and
regulations.
2. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety
shall be strictly adhered to.
3. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to beginning any construction
4. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimension submitted and approved
approved by the Building Commissioner.
on with the existing
5. Exterior finishes of the new construction shall be m harmony g
structure.
Variance Granted
December 18, 2002 � f�
Nina Cohen SC Yk�
Board of Appeal