Loading...
27 FAIRMOUNT STREET - ZBA 27 PAIRMODNT STREET JOSEPH CONTRACDA { _ - �J C� v � 1 auueu aclWy. r .. 1 '. CITY OR SALEM BOARD OF APPEAL . 'c frt%• °" •.745-9595 Ext.381. public hearing for all pelsogs�I teresled.in the-petition sub-.i,' t, 11ttedab' I.. OSEPB CONTRADA',, ; rfipquesting a,SPecial;Pcrmlt,to;allow ',,' `Nu re fopaii�ir the p opert nlo"ated:t 27 f:AIRMONT STREET '(R-2). 'Said ;, . harin- to be licld WEDNESDAY, ; JUNE 17,4998'AT 6:30 P.M.; ONE SALEM GREEN 2nd floor: , Nina Cohen,rChainnan r';r(6/3,6/10/98) i ofttlpm, ttssttt4luspff� �RD2trh of gpeal JA30 301 , ellDECISION ON THE PETITION OF JOSEPH CONTRADA REQUESTING A SPECIAL ClD$n 5 04- PERMIT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 27 FAIRMONT STREET R-2 orh A hearing on this petition was held June 17, 1998 with the following Board Members present: Nina Cohen, Chairman, Richard Dionne, Paul Valaskagis, Ronald Harrison and Michael Ward. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioner is requesting a Special Permit to allow expansion of a non conforming structure for the property located at 27 Fairmont Street. The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this request for a Special Permit is Section 5-3(j ) , which provides as follows: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set forth in Sections 8-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permits for alterations and reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement, extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses, provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood. In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1. The petitioner Joseph Contrada, represented himself. 2. Mr . Contrada showed plans of the proposed expansion and explained how he would like to be able to enlarge the rooms . 3. Councillor Sarah Hayes wrote a letter stating opposition from the neighbors . 4 . A number of neighbors and abutters spoke in opposition to the request, stating objections to density, restricted parking, and esthetic design. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: DECISION OF THE PETITION OF JOSEPH CONTRADA REQUESTING A SPECIAL PERMIT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 27 FAIRMONT STREET R2 page two 1. The Special Permit requested cannot be granted without substantial detriment to the public good or without nullifying and substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the ordinance. 2. The granting of the Special Permit requested will not be in harmony with the neighborhood and will not promote the public health, safety,convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted 1 in favor, and 4 in opposition to the motion to grant the relief requested. Having failed to garner the four affirmative votes required to pass, the motion to grant fails and the petition for a Special Permit is denied. SPECIAL PERMIT DENIED /� ✓\� June 17, 1998 �j/�GGCI ����a�t G• C`` J Richard Dionne Member, Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of MGL Chapter 40A and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL Chapter 40A, Section 11 , the Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision, bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded Lrj. the South Essex Registry or Deeds and indexed under the name OF- tt* owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certili-Ea o of Title. Board of Appeal o; ) --o N � Citp of *alem, A&5.5arbuatt.5 Office of the Citp Council Citp gaff COUNCILLORS-AT-LARGE LEONARD F.O'LEARY WARD COUNCILLORS PRESIDENT JOHN J.DONAHUE DEBORAH E. BURKINSHAW PETER L.PASKOWSKI THOMAS H.FUREY CITY CLERK REGINA R.FLYNN KEVIN R.HARVEY JOAN B.LOVELY SCOTT J.MCLAUGHLIN LEONARD F.O'LEARY WILLIAM A.KELLEY June 17 , 1998 SARAH M.HAYES MARK E.BLAIR Board of Appeal City of Salem One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 Dear Members of the Board: I am writing to express my opposition to the petition of Joseph Contrada, requesting a special permit to allow expansion of a non-conforming structure. The property is located at 27 Fairmount Street. I have inspected the locus and have spoken with most of the abutters of the property, and they have expressed their opposition to the project. I therefore request .that the board deny the requested relief. Very truly yours, 4SH M. HAYES COUNCILLOR WARD SIX