8 LAWRENCE STREET - BUILDING INSPECTION ...
�a �,. ren ec S%���7'
-. . .•'�1
J
I
of �$ttlem, f ttssac4usetts
Paxra of A}r}tenl
�s
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF ELEANOR SCIALDONE FOR
A VARIANCE AT(B-LAWRENCE'ST 6t�YCLFnA. FfCEM.N►aE.
A hearing on this petition was held September 24, 1986 with the following Board
Members present: James Hacker, Chairman; Messrs. , Bencal, Fleming, Luzinski and
Strout. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the
hearing were properly. published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with
Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting a Variance from density
requirements to allow a second dwelling to be constructed above the first
floor in this R-2 district.
The Variance whish has been requested may be granted upon a finding of the
Board that:
a. special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the
land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting
other lands, buildings and structures in the same district;
b. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve
substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner; and
c. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the
hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact:
1 . There was neighborhood support;
2. This is a two family zone;
3. The size of the lot. is its own hardship;
4. Petition was submitted in support of this project.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the
hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1 . Special conditions exist which especially affect the land in question but
do not generally affect other lands in the same district;
2. Literal enforcement of the Ordinance would involve substantial
hardship to the petitioner; and
3. The relief requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF ELEANOR SCIALDONE FOR
A VARIANCE FOR 8 LAWRENCE ST. , SAS
Page two
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5_p� to grant the
requested, subject to the following conditions:
Variance
1 . Construction be done in accordance with plans submitted;
P. Plans be submitted to the Salem Fire Prevention Bureau for their
approval prior to the issuance of a Building Permit;
3. A Certificate of Occupancy be obtained.
VARIANCE GRANTED
dames B. Hacker, Chairman
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
APPEAL FP,GI; THIS DECISION. It ARY. SHALL BE MADE PURSUANT TO SECTION 17 OF THE
GENERA. L WS, CHAPTER-. 50E. AND SHA:L BE FILED tt"THiN 20 DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF F:-V,-2
- OF THIS OECIS,0q; I77 THE OFFi;E OF THE CITY CLERK.
PGRS;,':i Tv F:FSS. :EN?EEE.L 1-4'.L9. CP%FTER 305. SE-Tl':; 11, THE Yi.^.Ifi';CE OR SPP 11,1 F,'.'"7
CRi,t..:_ HEi:E:f:. S'r.4LL Ni " T.—KE EFFECT UNTIL A C;-PY Of THE 'fCiS'Jfi. EE.'.°.. . THn
�.,..I C c . E.;' M1-" EAY VE °1r"^ED i N9 P.PP:AL HAS Z PE F1Lcr
FICAT, _F 7H_ �-QTY t"L... -. i'r.,.; 6 EAYS HA _.
OR THAT. IF S3CF: Ai APF-EV- : %S K-N FILE, TnfiT IT F:AS :__: U,S'/'Ci;=O CR DE !EG 1S
RECu°DED IN THE SOUTH ESS{%: REGISTRY OF DEUS AND INDEXED .....Er'; THE iiA.:SE OF i:1E C'i:.a^
OF RECORD OR IS RECORDED AND NOTED ON THE OWNER'S CERTIFICATE OF TITLE.
BOARD OF APPE•iL