Loading...
76-78 ENDICOTT STREET - ZBA 7(o-fig Er�d ico t-t S��e� (CUC`acut �ec�,veS�' __-�— _ __--- -f Zonine Board Proiect Status Sheet Address & Applicant: :1 — Ey-�& C C) e �� Date Submitted to BOA: ER,' Clerk Stamp: Variances Only - Constructive Approval Date: (100 days from riling) Abutters List Requested: 5 /Z,A I i G d Abutters Notice Sent: (o 6 Notice to Abutting Cities & Towns, Councillors: Legal Notice posted at City Hall: (la days before meeting) B/ Legal Notice Emailed & Confirmed: d/ Legal Notice Posted on Web: d Agenda to Applicant: Applicant's email address or fax number to send agenda: Opened at Meeting: 64 & Continued Meetings: Extension Form(s) Signed & Clerk Stamped? . Closed at Meeting: 6 Decision: C� cc�v�te Decision Filed: 6 Appeal Period Over: (21° day% after decision filed) M1 Decision Sent to Applicant: 16 Notice of Decision Sent to abutters, cities and towns, councillors: ZBA ACTION FORM Date: Rebecca Curran Chair) Mike Du Petitioner: Tom Watkins Peter Co elas Address: Jimm Tsitsinos ieeiea-(AI . Conditions: Total:� 2S Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes,ordinances, codes and regulations. ❑All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted to and approved by the Building Commissioner. E l All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety shall be strictly adhered to. El Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to beginning any construction. Exterior finishes of the new construction shall be in harmony with the existing structure. ❑ Certificate of Occupancy is to be obtained. LJ A Certificate of Inspection is to be obtained. ❑Petitioner shall obtain street numbering from the City of Salem Assessor's Office and shall display said number so as to be visible from the street. 13 Petitioner is to obtain approval from any City Board or Commission having jurisdiction including,but not limited to,the Planning Board. ❑Unless this Decision expressly provides otherwise, any zoning relief granted does not empower or authorize the Petitioner to demolish or reconstruct the structure(s)located on the subject property to an extent of more than fifty percent (501/o)of its floor area or more than fifty percent(50"/o)of its replacement cost at the time of destruction.If the structure is demolished by any means to an extent of more than fifty percent(50%)of its replacement cost or more than fifty percent(50%)of its floor area at the time of destruction, it shall not be reconstructed except in conformity with the provisions of the Ordinance. 07'W? 9 T� P s ZJ � r � a �irS CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS BOARD OF APPEALS „omulr PETITION FORM QTY OF SALEM MASSACHUSETTS BOARD OF APPEALS 120 WASHINGTON STREET,3RD FLQgJ4 MAY i b P 3, 36 SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS 01970 Thomas St.Pierre,Director of Inspectional Services Phone:978-619-5641 /Fax:978-740r=9894t Cl t �hl"I, it u.. KI.MBLRLLY DRISCOLL Erin Schaeffer,Staff Planner �^'� e MAYOR Phone:978-619-5685/Fax:978-740-0404 ,' REG C 9�M`� TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS: MAY 16 2016 The Undersigned represent that he/she is/are the owners of a certain parcel of land located at: t'` DEPT. C1F PLAN NI Nr;. Address: 76-78 Endicott Street, Unit#2 Zoning District: Residentia�Tw,o,Familys-(R2);-Lp p;�iaNT 5�P, An application is being submitted to the Board of Appeal for the following reason(s): This statement must describe what you propose to build,the dimensions,the zone property is in,and the zoning requirements.(Example: I am proposing to construct a 10'x 10'one story addition to my home located at 3 Salem Lane, in the R-1 Zoning District. The Zoning Ordinance requires the minimum depth of the rear yard to be 30 feet. The current depth ofmy rearyard is 32 feet, the proposed addition would reduce the depth of the rear yard to 22 feet.) Seeking a variance to Section 5.1.5.6 c,which states: The design of all off-street parking facilities shall conform to the following:of twenty(20) feet at the street lot line in residence districts. 76-78 Endicott Street is a two family structure in a townhouse configuration,with a condominium deed, therefore is a single property lot line. The 76-78 Endicott Street Unit#1 has an existing dedicated 14-0" -curb cut.This variance would provide an additional 12'-0"wide curb cut,for a total of 26-0".This .variance would provide the 76-78 Endicott Street property an additional 6-0"of curb curb, beyond the current maximum allowable, as interpretation allowed by the Zoning Ordinance Enforcement Officer. For this reason I am requesting: avariance(s)from provisions of Section 5.1.5.6c of the Zoning Ordinance,specifically from maximum curb cut width - (i.e.minimum depth ofrear yard). What is allowed is 20' (/1?sq ft?stories? %?), and what I am proposing is 26' (ft?sq ft?stories?%?). ( )A Special Permit under Section of the Zoning Ordinance in order to O Appeal of the Decision of the Building Inspector(described below): ( )Comprehensive Permit for construction of low or moderate income housing(describe below): Current Property Use: Town House Are Lot Dimensions Included?VYes O No Why? (Example.'Two Family Home) The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem Zoning Ordinance and allow the project to be constructed as per the plans submitted,as the enforcement of said Zoning By-Laws would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially derogating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance. CrrY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS BOARD OF APPEALS PETITION FORM The following written statement has been submitted with this application: (V{ For all Variance requests a written Statement of Hardship demonstrating the following must be attached: a) Special conditions and circumstances that especially affect the land,building,or structure involved, generally not affecting other lands,buildings,and structures in the same district; b) Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance would involved substantial hardship to the applicant;and c) Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good,and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the ordinance. O For all Special Permit requests a Statement of Grounds must be attached.An application for a special permit for a nonconforming use or structure shall include a statement demonstrating how the proposed change shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood in accordance with Section 9.4 Special Permits.Such a statement should include reference to the following criteria: a) Social,economic,or community needs served by the proposal; b) Traffic flow and safety,including parking and loading; c) Adequacy of utilities and other public services; d) impacts on the natural environment,including drainage; e) Neighborhood character;and f) Potential fiscal impact,including impact on City tax base and employment. O For all Comprehensive Permits for construction of low or moderate income applicants should refer to M.G.L. Ch.40B §20-23. Previous applications to the Board of Appeals involving this property have been submitted with this petition form. The Building Commissioner can provide documentation ofprevious applications to the petitioner or his representative. If different from petitioner: Petitioner: Christopher B. Ingersoll Property Owner: Address: 78 Endicott Street Address: Telephone: 617-460-5442 Telephone: Email: ingersoll.chris@comcast.net Email: Signature: Signature: (Attached cowent letter b,also acceptable) Date: April 28, 2016 Date: If different from petitioner: Representative: A TRUE Address: ATTEST Telephone: Signature: Date: CITY CLERK DATE DPCD DATE This original application must be filed with the City Clerk. City of Salem Zoning Variance Statement of Hardship Seeking a variance to Section 5.1.5.6 c,which states:The design of all off-street parking facilities shall conform to the following: of twenty(20)feet at the street lot line in residence districts. 76-78 Endicott Street is a two family structure in a townhouse configuration,with a condominium deed, therefore is a single property lot line.The 76-78 Endicott Street Unit#1 has an existing dedicated 14-0" curb cut.This variance would provide an additional 12'-0"wide curb cut,for a total of 26'-0".This variance would provide the 76-78 Endicott Street property an additional 6'-0"of curb cut, beyond the current maximum allowable by the current Zoning Ordinance Enforcement Officer. �ONUIT CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS BOARD OF APPEAL � iMm>sua?� 'I 120 WASHINGTON STREET* SALEM,MASCAJ40160 8 KIMBHRLEY DRiscoLL TELE:978-745-9595 ♦ FAX:978-740-984P E _r MAYOR CITY CL'. ,if b.•.L� June 29, 2016 Decision City of Salem Board of Appeals Petition of CHRISTOPHER INGERSOLL, seeking a Variance per Sec. 5.L5 Off-Street Parking Design of the Salem Zoning Ordinance to allow a 10' wide curb cut at the property located at 76 ENDICOTT STREET (Map 25 Lot 453)(112 Zoning District). A public hearing on the above Petition was opened on June 15, 2016 pursuant to M.G.L Ch. 40A, � 11 and closed on that date with the following Salem Board of Appeals members present: Ms. Curran (Chair), Mr. Duffy,Mr. Copelas,Mr. Tsitsinos, Mr. Watkins. The Petitioner seeks a Variance requesting relief from Sec. 5.1.5 Off-Street Parking Design of the Salem Zoning Ordinance to allow a 10' wide curb cut that would exceed the total maximum allowable curb cut at the property. Statements of fact: 1. Mr. Ingersoll,petitioner,presents the petition. 2. In the petition date-stamped May 16, 2016 the Petitioner requested a Variance requesting relief from Sec. 5.1.5 Off-Street Parking Design for maximum curb cut width that would allow the petitioner to construct a second driveway at the property. 3. The property is located on a comer between Endicott Street and Hathome Street. The Department of Planning and Community Development reached out to the Salem Traffic Division to review the safety of the proposed curbcut. 4. Lt. Preczewski sent a letter to the Board stating that there is no problem with a vehicle passing over the sidewalk and into the street as long as nobody parks on the public sidewalk or within 20' feet of the corner of the public street. 5. There is an existing fourteen foot (14') wide curb cut at the property that serves Unit #1 of two. The petitioner is proposing a second driveway, which would exceed the maximum allowable curb cut width of twenty feet (20'). 6. The petitioner requested a twelve (12') wide driveway to serve Unit #2. With either proposed curbcut width, the curbcut of the existing and proposed driveways exceed the maximum allowable curb cut width of twenty feet (20'). 7. Since an Appeal of the Building Inspector was upheld in September of 2015, Mr. Ingersoll has constructed and used a hardscaped space for parking without a curbcut. 8. As a result of the construction of the hardscape, the City Tree Warden has notified the Zoning Board of Appeals that the existing public shade tree has been compromised and would most likely not survive. City of Salem Board of Appeals June 29, 2016 Project:76-78 Endicott Street Page 2 of 3 9. The petitioner was notified by the tree warden and Board of Appeals that the petitioner will need to be heard at a public hearing for the removal of the shade tree and will likely be required to pay for the removal and replacement as can be enforced under M.G.L. Chapter 87 Public Shade Tree Law. 10. Mr. Ingersoll, stated that he has spoken to the tree warden and will pay to remove the existing shade tree and purchase four (4) replacement trees to be planted adjacent to 76-78 Endicott Street along Endicott Street and Hathome Street depending on the approval and request of the tree warden. 11. The Board requested that Mr. Ingersoll reduce the curbcut to 10' feet rather than the 12' feet requested and as advertised. 12. The Board expressed discontent with the petitioner's process to request a Variance. The applicant was notified that a request for a Variance could be sought from the Board, but chose to Appeal the Decision of the Building Commissioner instead and further constructed a parking area without a curbcut before requesting a Variance from the Board. 13. The requested rehef, if granted, would allow the Petitioner to construct a ten foot (10') wide curb cut as proposed and exceed the maximum allowable curb cut width at the property. 14. At the public hearing two (2) members of the public spoke in favor of, and none in opposition to, the petition. The Salem Board of Appeals, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the public hearing, and after thorough review of the petition, including the application narrative and plans, and the Petitioner's presentation and public testimony, makes the following findings that the proposed project meets the provisions of the City of Salem Zoning Ordinance: Findings for Variances: 1. Special conditions and circumstances that especially affect the land, building, or structure involved generally not affecting other lands,buildings and structures in the same district because the property is a two (2) unit structure, the existing driveway is narrow and there is no place for shared resident parking. No public parking spaces will be removed as a result of this proposal. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance would create a substantial and unique hardship. 3. The desired relief may be granted without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or purpose of the City of Salem Zoning Ordinance. On the basis of the above statements of facts and findings, the Salem Board of Appeals voted five (5) in favor (Ms. Curran (Chair), Mr. Duffy, Mr. Copelas, Mr. Tsitsinos, Mr. Watkins) and none (0) opposed, to grant a Variance requesting relief from Sec. 5.1.5 Off-Street Parking Design of the Salem Zoning Ordinance to allow the petitioner to exceed the maximum allowable curb cut at the property, subject to the following terms, conditions and safeguards: Standard Conditions: 1. The Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted to and approved by the Building Commissioner. 3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety shall be strictly adhered. 4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to beginning any construction. City of Salem Board of Appeals June 29,2016 Project: 76-78 Endicott Street Page 3 of 3 5. A Certificate of Inspection shall be obtained. 6. Petitioner is to obtain approval from any City Board or Commission having jurisdiction including, but not limited to, the Planning Board. Special Conditions: 1. The width of the curbcut shall be ten (10') feet wide. 2. The petitioner shall comply with the decision of the Public Shade Tree Commission. Re.Yt-e—r e A Rebecca Curran, Chair Board of Appeals A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts General Lawn Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days of fihng of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the Vanance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certificate of the City Clerk has been filed uath the Essex South Registry of Deeds. �ONUIT do y l9 y""v CITY OF SALEM MASSACHUSETTS BOARD OF APPEAL -- 120 WASHINGTON STREET* SAi.EMMMA4 C , 01 0 KIMBERLEY DRIscoLL TELE:F:978-745-9595 ♦ FAX:978-740-9846 L c rt MAYOR l, CITY 1_Lt\!`.. JrtLJ., '"L.`,S June 29, 2016 Decision City of Salem Board of Appeals r Petition of CHRISTOPHER INGERSOLL, seeking a Variance per Sec. 5.1.5 Off-Street Parking Design of the Salem Zoning Ordinance to allow a 10' wide curb cut at the property located at 76 ENDICOTT STREET (Map 25 Lot 453)(112 Zoning District). A public hearing on the above Petition was opened on June 15, 2016 pursuant to M.G.L Ch. 40A, g 11 and closed on that date with the following Salem Board of Appeals members present: Ms. Curran (Chair), Mr in . Duffy,Mr. Copelas, Mr. Tsitsos, Mr. Watkins. The Petitioner seeks a Variance requesting relief from Sec. 5.1.5 Off-Street Parking Design of the Salem Zoning Ordinance to allow a 10'. wide curb cut that would exceed the total maximum allowable curb cut at the property. Statements of fact: 1. Mr. Ingersoll,petitioner,presents the petition. 2. In the petition date-stamped May 16, 2016 the Petitioner requested a Variance requesting relief from Sec. 5.1.5 Off-Street Parking Design for maximum curb cut width that would allow the petitioner to construct a second driveway at the property. 3. The property is located on a corner between Endicott Street and Hathome Street. The Department of Planning and Community Development reached out to the Salem Traffic Division to review the safety of the proposed curbcut. 4. Lt. Preczewski sent a letter to the Board stating that there is no problem with a vehicle passing over the sidewalk and into the street as long as nobody parks on the public sidewalk or within 20' feet of the comer of the public street. 5. There is an existing fourteen foot (14') wide curb cut at the property that serves Unit #1 of two. The petitioner is proposing a second driveway, which would exceed the maximum allowable curb cut width of twenty feet (20'). 6. The petitioner requested a twelve (12') wide driveway to serve Unit#2. With either proposed curbcut width, the curbcut of the existing and proposed driveways exceed the maximum allowable curb cut width of twenty feet (20'). 7. Since an Appeal of the Building Inspector was upheld in September of 2015, Mr. Ingersoll has constructed and used a hardscaped space for parking without a curbcut. 8. As a result of the construction of the hardscape, the City Tree Warden has notified the Zoning Board of Appeals that the existing public shade tree has been compromised and would most likely not survive. City of Salem Board of Appeals June 29, 2016 Project:76-78 Endicott Street Page 2 of 3 9. The petitioner was notified by the tree warden and Board of Appeals that the petitioner will need to be heard at a public heating for the removal of the shade tree and will likely be required to pay for the removal and replacement as can be enforced under M.G.L. Chapter 87 Public Shade Tree Law. 10. Mr. Ingersoll, stated that he has spoken to the tree warden and will pay to remove the existing shade tree and purchase four (4) replacement trees to be planted adjacent to 76-78 Endicott Street along Endicott Street and Hathorne Street depending on the approval and request of the tree warden. 11. The Board requested that Mr. Ingersoll reduce the curbcut to 10' feet rather than the 12' feet requested and as advertised. 12. The Board expressed discontent with the petitioner's process to request a Variance. The applicant was notified that a request for a Variance could be sought from the Board, but chose to Appeal the Decision of the Building Commissioner instead and further constructed a parking area without a curbcut before requesting a Variance from the Board. 13. The requested relief, if granted, would allow the Petitioner to construct a ten foot (10') wide curb cut as proposed and exceed the maximum allowable curb cut width at the property. 14. At the public hearing two (2) members of the public spoke in favor of, and none in opposition to, the petition. The Salem Board of Appeals, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the public hearing, and after thorough review of the petition, including the application narrative and plans, and the Petitioner's presentation and public testimony, makes the following findings that the proposed project meets the provisions of the City of Salem Zoning Ordinance: Findings for Variances: 1. Special conditions and circumstances that especially affect the land, building, or structure involved ,generally not affecting other lands, buildings and structures in the same district because the property is a two (2) unit structure, the existing driveway is narrow and there is no place for shared resident parking. No public parking spaces will be removed as a result of this proposal. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance would create a substantial and unique hardship. 3. The desired relief may be granted without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or purpose of the City of Salem Zoning Ordinance. On the basis of the above statements of facts and findings, the Salem Board of Appeals voted five (5)in favor (Ms. Curran (Chair), Mr. Duffy, Mr. Copelas, Mr. Tsitsinos, Mr. Watkins) and none (0) opposed, to grant a Variance requesting relief from Sec. 5.1.5 Off-Street Parking Design of the Salem Zoning Ordinance to allow the petitioner to exceed the maximum allowable curb-cut at the property, subject to the following terms, conditions and safeguards: _ Standard Conditions: 1. The Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted to and approved by the Building Commissioner. 3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety shall be strictly adhered. 4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to beginning any construction. City of Salem Board of Appeals June 29,2016 Project: 76-78 Endicott Street Page 3 of 3 5. A Certificate of Inspection shall be obtained. 6. Petitioner is to obtain approval from any City Board,or Commission having jurisdiction including, but not limited to, the Planning Board. Special Conditions: 1. The width of the curbcut shall be ten (10') feet wide. 2. The petitioner shall comply with the decision of the Public Shade Tree Commission. _�PiftiPivit C;� nA/fs� ��J� Rebecca Curran, Chair—� Board of Appeals A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any,shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Masrachusettr Genera!Lover Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days of filing of this deaston in the office of the City Clerk Pursuant to the Massachusetts General Znws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the Vanance or Special Pemit granted herein shall not take effect until a ropy of the decinon beanng the certjcate of the City Clerk has been filed with the Essex South Registry of Deeds. ' II Erin Schaeffer From: Robert Preczewski <rpreczewski@salempd.net> Sent: Tuesday,June 07, 2016 2:19 PM To: Erin Schaeffer Subject: RE: 76-78 Endicott Street- Curb Cut Request Review I do not have a problem with the vehicle passing over the sidewalk and into the street as long as nobody parks on the public sidewalk or within 20 feet of the corner on the public street. It would be okay to pass over the sidewalk from the street to the driveway. RJP From: Erin Schaeffer [eschaeffer@Salem.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2016 12:49 PM To: Robert Preczewski Cc: Thomas St. Pierre; Michael Lutrzykowski; David Knowlton Subject: 76-78 Endicott Street- Curb Cut Request Review Dear Lt. Preczewski, I have an applicant who will be before the Zoning Board of Appeals to request a Variance for a curb cut at 76-78 Endicott Street. He is currently out of compliance regarding the Zoning Ordinance,which only allows a 20 curb cut at a property. In this case, there is an existing curb cut that is 14 feet on the right side of duplex. Mr. Ingersoll, is proposing a 12 ft curbcut where his car is parked illegally below. Looking at this situation, he is proposing a curb cut to pass over the existing sidewalk to the right of the shade tree and stop sign. The proposed plans show a 12' concrete apron to be located from the base of the shade tree (see attached). Given that this proposed curb cut is located within a few feet from the stop sign at the intersection of Endicott and Hawthorne do you have any traffic/public safety concerns? Thank you for your time. 1 G K 3 us r 1 . y. d U� Best, Erin Schaeffer Staff Planner(ZBA) From: Erin Schaeffer Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2016 11:20 AM To: David Knowlton Cc: Giovanna Zabaleta; Thomas St. Pierre Subject: 76-78 Endicott Street Hi Dave, I have an applicant who will be before the Zoning Board of Appeals to request a Variance for a curb cut at 76-78 Endicott Street. He is currently out of compliance regarding the Zoning Ordinance, which only allows a 20 curb cut at a property. In this case, there is an existing curb cut that is 14 feet on the right side of duplex. Mr. Ingersoll, is proposing a 12 ft curbcut where his car is parked illegally below. Looking at this situation, he is proposing a curb cut to pass over the existing sidewalk to the right of the shade tree and stop sign. The proposed plans show a concrete apron to be located from the base of the shade tree (see attached). Are there additional steps that Mr. Ingersoll needs what are steps that Mr. Ingersoll needs to take in addition to his application with the ZBA? 2 CITY OF SALEMMASSACHUSETTS BOARD OF APPEAL E ;a s: ll 1(_r Tj 120 WASHINGTON STREET♦SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELE:978-619-5685 ♦FAX:978-740-0404 ICIMBERLEY DRI$coLL MAYOR City of Salem Zoning Board of Appeals Will hold a public hearing for all persons interested in the petition of CHRISTOPHER INGERSOLL, seeking a Variance per Sec. 5.1.5 Off-Street Parking Derign of the Salem Zoning Ordinance to allow a 10' wide curb cut at the property located at 76 ENDICOTT STREET (Map 25 Lot 453)(R2 Zoning District). The public hearing will be held on WED. June 15, 2016 at 6:30 PM, 3d Floor, 120 WASHINGTON STREET,Rm 313. Rebecca Curran, Chair Board of Appeals Salem News: 6/1/2016 and 6/8/2016 This notice posted on "Official Bulletin Board" City kiali, Salern, Mass. on 7 1 �' ll• at F 1-1; Nr in accordance with MGIL Chap. 30AI Sections U-25. ' P CURB CUT, APRON & COURT - 7.6- 78 UNIT #2 ENDICOTT STREET, SALEM, MA 01970 y11 f SHIED .,1 I I REGISTRY USE ONLY 1 EXCLustVE USE UNIT 1 l UNIT 2 w 4 I IJ z II EXCLUSIVE USE 1 IUUNIT I I' I yyy �. ENTRY ENTRY UNIT 2 UNIT 1BULKHEAD t UNIT 'T: UNIT I t EXCLUSIVE Lryui_ ,OT ' STREET - =.lG ENDICOTT I ; BULKHEAD f y XCL'USIVE . 'u3 USE UNIT I .t'� OK EXCLUSIVE USE ; tn�IT r7L j +dt t } DI}11NC ROOM T O i 13'6'4 1Y-tY' I 1 SS tfE.tJ 1 1... 13"-Cx 1T-0' 19 50-FT. yLU ! EXCLUSIVE:US. I I t [23 SOFT. UNIT 2 - .kN L. PAN uiCl.. W1C l EOGE OF GRAVEL ��'fi -.JI � �.t I I _- -. - ER ( I " t - .-:..��.rC I I •1� I ` TT STREET 'FOYER �.1� VING y, 1pp� Ips-.•x 13 3 .. . } .• Sa 13''3 , i _. wI ��� t I F glYING Rt30n I 50-4T I _tt SO.FT,.fy rk - .�F' O`c Y-9` a a . �4 199 SC].FT. t I I .TY M9 SOFT. i7; CERTIFY THAT THIS PLA'•' ACCURATELY DEPICTS HEt o �s s, RATION. THE IITL'( L I 4 } UNITS. THE LAYOUT OF "'HE O ENTRY tNT 4 o OCATEAtTRY will 1 ` ION. , I I ' " r�r � DIMENSIONSI ' ,� tOt7nON FRONT PORCdi { 1 1'. ,p I t GRAVES PARKING TE AREA, MAIN ENTRAN. E. 5l'-t©• r 1 1 W EXCLUSIVE USE ♦ I TATE COMMON AREAS T Granite Cobblestone Courto UNIT 1 IT HAS ACCESS. AS BUIL i 'A y COMMON AREA (SEE SURVEY PLANT } 10, 7003_ ENDICOTT STREET _ Concrete Apron. 'r ., �.,,A c,,•l „ ,„o, Y ,w.,�>i1 ll �I s 1 CERTIFY THAT THt SPLs, HAS BEEN II g��SCs' 'F RLILI S AN€3 REGULAii'ION CUf`�F Ut�E �y s Hrt �.....:�,. to [ _E s TRY 4F 13EEL ' OF I hEC --- .T 4 Rr FEET 5 1` _ . - • �' Nn.YVSV max, ` '7 \/1 _• ... :. Il"iJJP\\..ilU^!- 1 1 J. .F f 1'41 r.l f.,MR 1 F.iN !�. '�r .11 Yi G M SS x0 SQUARE X00 'w 01112'-0",. Q SEriENT 1 i22 $F 0 2 16 SQ ' �1RS:f PLOORTA 649. 5E 3I - GE . .y,a . DATE 04/21/20y6, �jss K4 _.y. )Nn F1 QOR b A I I, 2004E E.F;Ep ARCHITECT, JANUARY 2I, 2004ATTIC FL OR lc�q SP, A NFEET + VERBRIDGE, INC. SIEl1fASK0 + VERBRIDGE, INC., 124 DODGE ST . ., BEVERLY, MA. T.QTAL 2.814 SF , NORTH .t STREET, BEVERLY" A. I I