EMERTON STREET - ZBA I Emerton St: } }
R-2• + r'
{ ' Claire Castonguay (Blanchiette' w.
�J
1 �t�
N I
9
L
f
I
s-
0
DATE OF HEARING
PETITIONER
LOCATION
MOTION: TO GRANT / SECOND
TO DENY VI SECOND
TO RE—HEAR SECOND
LEAVE TO WITHDRAW SECOND
TO CONTINUE SECOND
ROLL CALL PRESENT GRANT DENY WITHDRAW RE—HEAR CONTINUE
RICHARD BENCAL r
JOSEPH CORRENTI
RICHARD' FEBONIO
MARY JANE STIRGWOLT
ASSOCIATE MEMBERS /
RONALD PLANTS c/
CONDITIONS:
r-
�t# ofttlertt, CHttssttch �e#f
Aire pepartmeut �teabquarterz
auaia
48 Pfgctte ,*treet
Joseph F. Sullivan *a&m, Ufa. 01970
Chief
City of Salem Date October 16, 1991
Board of Appeal
One Salem Green RE: 1 Emerton Street
Claire Castonguay (Blanchette)
The Salem Fire Department has no objection to the granting of a Special Permit and/or
Variance to allow: the construction of an enclosed deck.
subject to the following conditions:
1- This property (has no) (+Tii *iA) compliance with the provisions of the Massachusetts
General Laws, Chapter 148, Section 26E, relative to the installation of automatic
snake detectors.
2- Plans for the proposed construction are to be presented to the Salem Fire Prevention
Bureau for approval prior to the issuance of a building permit.
3- The proposed construction shall conform to all applicable provisions of the Massa-
chusetts State Building Code, the Salem Fire Prevention Code, 527CMR(Code of Massa-
chuestts Regulations) , the Salem City Ordinances, and Massachusetts General Laws
relative to fire and public safety.
4- The applicant and/or contractor shall arrange for an inspection by the Salem Fire
Prevention Bureau upon completion of the work.
ed,
Norman P.. LaPointe
Fire Inspector
CC:
file
applicant
ATin
%Eity of "Stttem, �Xtasgarhugdt5
''s,� �irr �i epartmr:tt �rnDyuartrra
48 'xfgcttr *trrrt
Sairm, Ott. 01970
Joseph F. Sullivan
Chief
City of Salem Date: October 16, 1991
Board of Appeal
One Salem Green RE: 1 Emerton Street
Claire Castonauav (Blanchette)
The Salem Fire Department has no objection to the granting of a Special Permit and/or
Variance to allow: the construction of an enclosed deck
subject to the following conditions:
1- This property (has no) (itt*iA) compliance with the provisions of the Massachusetts
General Laws, Chapter 148, Section 26E, relative to the installation of automatic
smoke detectors.
2- Plans for the proposed construction are to be presented to the Salem Fire Prevention
Bureau for approval prior to the issuance of a building permit.
3- The proposed ecnstruetion shall conform to all applicable provisions of the Massa-
chusetts State Building Code, the Salem Fire Prevention Code, 527CMR(Code of Massa-
chuestts Regulations) , the Salem City Ordinances, and Massachusetts General Laws
relative to fire and public safety.
4- The applicant and/or contractor shall arrange for an inspection by the Salem Fire
Prevention Bureau upon completion of the work.
Norman P., LaPointe
Fire Inspector
oc:
file
applicant
(fity of ttlem, tzsstttllusetts
Paurb of �Fveal
' ki'd�mT.W4
November 4, 1991
Notice is hereby given that as of October 30, 1991 the
decision of the Board of Appeal has been filed in the
office of the City Clerk to grant the petition of Claire
Castonguay Blanchette for a Special Permit to allow con-
struction of an enclosed deck at 1 Emerton St.
Board of Appeal
Brenda M. Sumrall
Clerk of the Board
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made purst ant to Section I7 dB
the Mass. General Laws,Chapter 808, and shall be filed within 20 days
after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk.
Pursue,,r, to Mass. General Laws, Chapter 808, Section 11, the variance
er Permit granted herein shalt not take effect until a copy of the
decision, hearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have
elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been
filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Esse,
Registry,of Deeds and indexed under the name or the owner of record or
is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title.
BOARD OF APPEAL!
- r
F
x
Chi of 'ttlrm, 49assadjusetts
H �:s -Snttra of _�u{rettl GET 3 u4 Pia �J
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF CLAIRE CASTONGUAY BLANCHETTE
FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 1 EMERTON ST. (R-21
A hearing on this petition was held October 16, 1991 with the following Board
Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Joseph Correnti, Richard Febonio, Mary
Jane Stirgwolt and Associate Member Ronald Plante. Notice of the hearing was sent
to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the
Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting a Special Permit to allow con-
struction of an enclosed deck in this Residential Two Family District.
The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this request
for a Special Permit is Section 5-3(j ) , which provides as follows:
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the Board
of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set forth in
Sections 8-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permits for alterations and reconstruction
of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement, extension or expansion
of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses, provided, however, that such
change, extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more
detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighbohrood.
In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests,
guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding
by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will promote the public health,
safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the
hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact:
1 . The new structure would replace a dilapidated structure.
2. The new structure would allow petitioner a better and fuller use of
the property.
3. No opposition was voiced to the plan.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the
hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1 . The expansion shall not be substantially more detrimental than the
existing nonconforming structure.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the
Special Permit requested, subject to the following conditions:
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF CLAIRE CASTONGUAY BLANCHETTE FOR
A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 1 EMERTON STREET, SALEM
page two
1 . Petitioner shall comply with all City and State statutes, ordinances,
codes and regulations.
2. All construction shall be done as per plans and dimensions submitted.
3. Petitioner shall obtain a legal building permit.
4. Petitioner shall comply with all requirements of the Salem Fire Department
relative to smoke and fire safety.
5. All exterior finishes shall be in harmony with existing exterior finishes.
Special Permit Granted
October 16, 1991
i�chard A. Bencal, Chairman
Board of Appeal
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
Appeal
e Nass. Generali Laws. chapter 803, and shall bedded within 20 days d}
t
after the date of filing of this decision m the office of the City Clerk.
Pursu::n' to :d�s. Grrnrvl L:. C't.C'"-'P .08, Section 11, the Variance
or ' ^rm'rl h^_.ui; s:r;.I r;t t:d<n ctfact until a COPY of the
F.:�rr',i
decision. brainy, th' cerGhcntion ''r ;he C'•ty Cinik that '_0 days have
t
elapsed Inc no aPPecl has bort t:i..1, or htif such appeal
has been
filed, that ri hes been dismissed or denroi is recorded inn the
he South Essex
_ Regi>try of Deeds and indexed under the name er the owner of record or
ficate of Title.
is recr. Jed and noted 2, the owner's Corti
BOARD OF APPEAL
c'> O
� c'a
r K C.LJ
r r•. O
w
0
Tr
cn CD
N
�Y
of -'�ulrm, 44'Russad1u6etts
-SOMLa of JA v
peal IW.1 JJ X14 JJa �r7�
:SS
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF CLAIRE CASTONGUAY BLANCHETTE
FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 1 EMERTON ST. (R-2)
A hearing on this petition was held October 16, 1991 with the following Board
Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Joseph Correnti, Richard Febonio, Mary
Jane Stirgwolt and Associate Member Ronald Plante. Notice of the hearing was sent
to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the
Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting a Special Permit to allow con-
struction of an enclosed deck in this Residential Two Family District.
The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this request
for a Special Permit is Section 5-3(j ) , which provides as follows:
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the Board
of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set forth in
Sections 8-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permits for alterations and reconstruction
of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement, extension or expansion
of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses, provided, however, that such
change, extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more
detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighbohrood.
In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests,
guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding
by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will promote the public health,
safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the
hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact:
1 . The new structure would replace a dilapidated structure.
2. The new structure would allow petitioner a better and fuller use of
the property.
3. No opposition was voiced to the plan.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the
hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1 . The expansion shall not be substantially more detrimental than the
existing nonconforming structure.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the
Special Permit requested, subject to the following conditions:
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF CLAIRE CASTONGUAY BLANCHETTE FOR
A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 1 EMERTON STREET, SALEM
page two
1 . Petitioner shall comply with all City and State statutes, ordinances,
codes and regulations.
2. All construction shall be done as per plans and dimensions submitted.
3. Petitioner shall obtain a legal building permit.
4. Petitioner shall comply with all requirements of the Salem Fire Department
relative to smoke and fire safety.
5. All exterior finishes shall be in harmony with existing exterior finishes.
Special Permit Granted
October 16, 1991 /
i�chard A. Bencal, Chairman
Board of Appeal
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any,shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of
the Nass. General Laws. Chapter Bos, and shall be filed within 20 days
after the da:- of tiling of this decision in t P088 s ctionoffice of h11. the Citye variance
Pursu;_n' tc :yrs. Go'I Cy'• e` of the
or ' _.a: F:;m.i ^.rm'c•1 ho.ai; s: .1 ::ct I.:+l,^. effect until a COPY
decision. nC;rin fi ave
th^ cerl,ficntion ^i ;110 City Gif seal,nPP al'ha5ys hbeen
elapse' and no oPPeu has b=un r.i�i, or that,
filed, that ii hes heen dismissed or rtenie i is recorded in the South Essex
Registry of Deeds and indexed umler '.he name er the owner of record or
is recc-jed and note' ort the owner's Certificate of Titla.
BOARD OF APPEAL -
n O
w
O
— Zr
(n e n
!n ^
i �'` a ser I �, __..-rJyz t r__..-L.� rte-,-r. ';_""_ � �'-.✓ '�^s.r r ° ate.�iY i �,'( 1—.y. �+` n x
M /
' 4
r
: a
Y
r+
A »
t ,
� � 1 w•b
_
h
T �^
{ y
.,., y ._ _. _,.;_ u .i r::,,.. -.....rs _.�:.:_ •...,. .f:a ._Y,, P vim'.»i- v a..5..�. _ - .
� d
»
m
1
H _
' a.
. 1
x -
..:... . ... ..... .. — ._ _. _ _,. _ ._,-- _.. r. -. _.:_r._._,.... _:_. .... .:... .:._. r sem.-.� _ _ •. "_ .. .» a .._` ... - _ Sr y�
I'
f
w. . - j4`.SsNi'
.. ......—.x.+.;_. irm..r+v+_w+w+ .w--- �cw=^rvv.'• .. .' ..sL[<v�+rw m s w.«a �v •...._.. -.v:-.... ..r_....<u ..�,,:«.uv.v.-« w.a..mu..+i.. -,+Lw Ra Y • a ., r{ y<
•
s �v
_ 1
• a
ry ^^ � ^� � .�' * k ,�i } a �r t �Y y ~ �a t mss'•.." 1:.,
1_
ha t . _ i i t
-...: �. � tr V
k �r 'a^ k, f •.t ae� -, 4 , f` - A ::y { 54 f �f.. E•S r {
_ mar. r 4,.}:,. .:1.,: �.a-...._ r ,r•-'-1' d�%� �..�.-_ 4.c.. - :t`,: - k� r
IT
t
PAT t�it!171iyi
NO
74
:4
X b C2:G t Tdo c �lo OG_
Wy;'
h .
0
^a.
Olin
i & �::..r " N t b' k C M "9 i ;•,". �S'- S X` yr \DR —.'.i s # � !>;
7.
_ Y}
1
sAw
.
j Ta
Otoi�h, r ,L '� x k a { 3 t AW ' r{
lot
n'T { —F ' } vlWl["y'_� "! '��]"'' y D µ { __ ` ,_ _P��+�1►17'tUM1f� iU� - .
a
xrP k --I `�' t y P }
4Kr s y,Y 1 " • ya 7 +��•1'G�� t
t IIJ
TiN of ttlem, 4555ndlusetts
t $ -Sourb of �Av al
_- IDLY �U � 'G4 oda
CA T'i
IF
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF CLAIRE CASTONGUAY BLANCHETTE
FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 1 EMERTON ST. (R-2)
A hearing on this petition was held October 16, 1991 with the following Board
Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Joseph Correnti, Richard Febonio, Mary
Jane Stirgwolt and Associate Member Ronald Plante. Notice of the hearing was sent
to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the
Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting a Special Permit to allow con-
struction of an enclosed deck in this Residential Two Family District.
The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this request
for a Special Permit is Section 5-3(j ) , which provides as follows:
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the Board
of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set forth in
Sections 8-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permits for alterations and reconstruction
of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement, extension or expansion
of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses, provided, however, that such
change, extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more
detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighbohrood.
In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests,
guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding
by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will promote the public health,
safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the
hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact:
1 . The new structure would replace a dilapidated structure.
2. The new structure would allow petitioner a better and fuller use of
the property.
3. No opposition was voiced to the plan.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the
hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1 . The expansion shall not be substantially more detrimental than the
existing nonconforming structure.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the
Special Permit requested, subject to the following conditions:
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF CLAIRE CASTONGUAY BLANCHETTE FOR
A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 1 EMERTON STREET, SALEM
page two
1 . Petitioner shall comply with all City and State statutes, ordinances,
codes and regulations.
2. All construction shall be done as per plans and dimensions submitted.
3. Petitioner shall obtain a legal building permit.
4. Petitioner shall comply with all requirements of the Salem Fire Department
relative to smoke and fire safety.
5. All exterior finishes shall be in harmony with existing exterior finishes.
Special Permit Granted
October 16, 1991
i�chard A. Bencal, Chairman
Board of Appeal
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any,shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of
the Mass. General Law% ctiapter
dec8os. and sh,alfiall ce filed
ilof d within
CIOs 3YS
after the date of filing g08, Section I1, the variance
Pursu;:n, ;c M s. Gc-ieral L:: ,�,. C'+�•'."
or ` . F.:'+rr.,i ^ran%s;l h^_.ei; siit.l :t t:d<e effect until a COPY of the
decision, Oe;ring th^ ccrofiCave
ation ..,i ;ne CitY Cif ruah,+PP ahhasys nbeen
clapseu and no aPPevl hus baen i'�i..1, or that.
filed, dwt it hes hcen dismisseli or denici is recorded in the South Essex
Registry of Deeds and indexed uw;er the name or the owner of record or
is rete. Jed and noteu 1.1 the owner's Certificate of Titla.
130ARD OF APPEAL
n O
� n
CKD
O
ti
V, co
N
C ty IIf " Ule ' Cfca$suchii5Ptf5
�r4'?c �irt �tparimettt �iea�quarfers
uma
48 Pfgctte *trert
�nlrm, �{n. 01970
Joseph F. Sullivan
Chief
City of Salem Date: October 16, 1991
Board of Appeal
One Salem Green RE: 1 Emerton Street
Claire Cstonauav (Blanchette)
The Salem Fire Department has no objection to the granting of a Special Permit and/or
Variance to allow: the construction of an enclosed deck.
subject to the following conditions:
1- This property (has no) ( *sties) compliance with the provisions of the Massachusetts
General Laws, Chapter 148, Section 26E, relative to the installation of automatic
smoke detectors.
2- Plans for the proposed construction are to be presented to the Salem Fire Prevention
Bureau for approval prior to the issuance of a building permit.
3- The proposed construction shall conform to all applicable provisions of the Massa-
chusetts State Building Code, the Salem Fire Prevention Code, 5270 R(Code of Massa-
chuestts Regulations) , the Salem City Ordinances, and Massachusetts General Laws
relative to fire and public safety.
4- The applicant and/or contractor shall arrange for an inspection by the Salem Fire
Prevention Bureau upon completion of the work.
1�'�`�v '
Norman P.. LaPointe
Fire Inspector
co:
file
applicant
1\
I
:
:
4
� H-�-.--f--r -�--�-•--{ -_.i �--� i. -�-._-A.-.--+-- -1--_�-_^_ _:-- I i �,/1=11/�NAT�/-l:I/Y'f"GIIC/�r-� � � _
- .'--�_ I--i---F--^ F 1-T-�--1--^�- ( �--�-"-y.�.�--1-SAF_4�/Yy�'�2�/�_-7V/AjTy�S'��-�-� •
1
1
I
,
+ 11
j 1
I I �
} f 1 } > } } r T - 7
- ! t. i-- ` _ _ y i t L i 1 Y } ♦ r .+ .{. j. � 1. y L � -t r i
• f 1 i 7 r j + + 1 i I tr t + t i I f i � l
II i
I 1
4
I -r-
1 i e j l I � I I I � � I
.{y- a - 1 . .t <- i 1 I �, . }. - {. i• - }. '! } t -r 1 } . r t �
' � � i � �
` } k
� �, � s ( * � t i I t
i
I
I
{ s i ( f F r 4 } jl .I + t tl , i i- - ! , 3-
� I II � � I r I I � I i i
� 1 � � +
l i
t � + + � } 1r i � } f j f r fi I [ rl � �
r t r � � I r ' ! {' i ( } � � i � � I
I ,. { �
� f � t � � � � � 1.
r � r } ; r t r ; + E ) f � t + � f
I
1 � C I
1 F ; i � ; 1 4 I + } 1 i � j � i t � 4 � � t l I
I � I I i � I
I i
� � I i
j � } i t '. i � I � l f i 1 ! � 1 � i
- i I '.
r � + f + I � t .} i 1 # � � � r J f i t � f � r 1 i � r � ...t..
+ t � +, � � � � t I I � - f i t � r t - } � f � r
� ' I
� � i
I I • I 1 � I � �� ' I
1 _ . . �. L .} � r r - � 1.. ..t � - i- ' 1.
i � ��
� i ' � � C I
L �' + '. . } .'r - t �II I} r i 1 r i ( t � r r
. � , ftr � ;
� i
' � , i
' i
' �
, jj I ,
' # t F i �' i t ! i i i + t t -F } } y i � : i r i.
1 I � , � � � + i !..
f 'r' i' { � . f I � 1 i -{- t ! 1 � �r- � ! i � � } 4 t • f � t t
� I + 3r I1
.. _ f r 't } r t r r -.i i .i i- - 1 � 7 I � -Y �� r t i r Y .. } , t
+ 1 I I I I ,
't t t { + 1. 1 I � � � } _ } - �- It 1 { - ; �. � 1
- I . I I { 1 I
�__.�-
. 2 ,
kcLt4- 4p
a-x(,. C2i liteTd 41- Ao oG-
�z ur�llg�eA-g'
r
—t-- -—,- -�- --- -- a --- ----�---�--- ------- -+— — - --�-—�--•—;—_;—:--• - —•-- +
—_ �-- .�_.i --•�`— --" c — �P�I�C CO NG1t?iTe _ yf .�0� ' � ----ti— �—..—_ + —: �r --�--
.1�G�I•'.u� J�
I � { rte-.� r ti � � � _-� � --1_ _-.:-_ �. .._ _-•-_J_--_.r._ � � }.
1 r ,
41-
41
1-+ � -
r
I
T
1
APPEAL CASE NO. .. . . . . .. .. .. . . . . . . . . . . .
fQi1t> al tz�unz,
�aar3 of �uIItui
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
'rp onaersi neo represent that e re _!:e owners of certain carcei or lana ioc�tea
f��r.y�.�'JQ.fx /(. . .�.� . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _. . . _. . . . . __root: _ mna : i sir:
_-Aid cart_
or the Massacnusetts State Building Code.
Plans describing the work proposed, nave been submitted to the inspector of Buildings in
accoraance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zonina Ordinance.
CV)
rn
The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following:- '
reasons:
The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem
Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to
approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said
Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary
hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero-
gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for
the fallowing reasons:
Owned.:/?l Pae
Address.
All.
. /f. . . . . . . . . . .
Telephone. .7 .41 .'191 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Petitioner. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Address. . . . .. olv-G . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Date. . ./.� . . ./.,1. . . . . . . . Teleo one. . . .�/ ! t-)e. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
By./ �C"/t: ,` /��;
Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of
Appeals with a check. for advertising in the amount of. . . . .. . . . . .... . . . . . . . .. . . .
four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The
Evening News.
CARTER & TOWERS ENGINEERING CORP.
JunH�e, (.,oun9�( and KtPor�e
JOSEPH D. CARTER, P E. 8 R.L.S.
6 FAIRVIEW AVENUE
SWAMPSCOTT, MASS. 01907
Tel. 592.8396
7 i..
8' 00
LoT z v
0 9
i
„w EL.-t_t N G
i
POF�L T
To the
a and ! wr -„s n-mss Ns C-
M RTo N S T R + 1 hereby certify that I have examined
the premises and all easements,
encroachments and buildings are
S A L c 1`4 Nl A SS located on the ground as shown. I
further certify that the huildings she,,
S C- L c I = conformed to the zoning lags of
9 7 6 SA when constructer_
I further certify that this property
7�
”. IS 0—k locate he
�`
JOSEPH
"" e tab fished floc h r ra ;
CARTER f
No. 9387 ~ D. Car er
ty��
�Va
CIVIL ENGINEERING PERCOLATION TESTS SEWAGE DISPOSAL DESIGNS SURVEYING
i
.. ._ .._ :. 1.
ESL � ��� •CtOf11AP
0
EJ�1e P-4m; $f.
SF17fN7 A .. .. . .
j
1
j
r
4Y1
Z
rz
.. . •'S FL[,'J� its hQA`T�FM1�
-.- ol-iL�• (�vS�-RLL't�2+c- l 1, QC .
Asai 16*
s
�wir� snj. s ' . RrnwJ� YSK�nC .
�►��e�-ir..nr sf- -
,\ Sd
oSlA
'b
CPP
J' � .. ♦�. •, It
v Fj _, 10
r y
13
ItSve `fa S � 6• 1 O
a9C AN 0
q .r
? p S
s b V ' � 00 � �''1 j� JJ / �t F •� `
vrn
Oa,Q ( ► ,r,� sr� JA • F� s, VVV a
li o 10
19
O bO \,0, o F
�, "rc `rr"FO r.. •O 9 AS I '{�� ",rr/
N\ P,
�" o yS • \
ire%%%✓//� (•, N \ � CC //vv \ '\ .. i���. ^_ � ,14c�,
' CITY OF SALEM
CITY OF SALEM - 90ARD OF APPEAL
q BOARD OF APPEAL 745-9595 Ext. 381
745-9595 Ext. 381 Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter-
I,. Wt11 hold a public hearing for ally rsons
Claire Cas-
. toted in the petition submitted by toted y the petition submitted by Claire CasCas-
tonguay(Blanchette)for a Special Permit to con-
tonguay(Blanchette) for a Special Permit to con- struct an enclosed deck at the rear of 1 Emerton
struct an enclosed deck at the rear n 1 Emerton St.(R-2).Said bearing to be held Wednesday,Octo-
St.(R-2).Said hearing to be held Wednesday,Octo-
+ ,,one Salem Green, 2nd I her 16, 1991 at 7:00 P.M.
her 16, 1991 at 7:00 , One Salem Green, 2nd
P.M.
. w -1 • Boor.
RICHARD A. BENGAL, Chairman
Boor.
� RICHARD A. BENGAL, Chairman � October 2, 9, 1991
October 2, 9, 1991
a
e CITY OF SALEM
BOARD OF APPEAL
745-9595 Ext. 381 1
Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter-
ested in the petition submitted by Claire Cas-
tonguay(Blanchette) for a Special Permit to con-
struct an enclosed deck at the rear of 1 Emerton
St.(R-2).Said hearing to be held Wednesday,Octo-
ber 16, 1991 at 7:00 P.M., One Salem Green, 2nd
floor.
RICHARD A. BENCAL, Chairman
October 2, 9, 1991
APPEAL CASE NO. .. . . .. .. .. .. . . .. . . . . . . .
ditu of Riem, c4NttsIzzjr.jmzrtts
�. � �aar3 IIf ��russsl
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
'ne Undersi ned represent that he is are the owners or a certain oarcei or land located
,0.� . j.i°�Q.7�c.'y. . .S.� . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .St _ _; cnino i ri c
rear st
and said oarcei' is arfec=ea ov _ectionis : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
of the Massachusetts State Building Code.
Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the inspector of Buildings in
accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance.
NO"
rrtm
rr— .�.-
'r� T
cn
The Application for Permit was denied
, nby, the Inspector of Buildings for the roll.ow;ing%'
reasons:
r_
The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem
Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to
approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as_ the enforcement of said
Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary
hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero-
gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for
the following reasons:
Owner s%s11
fe, �
Address l . .4i. f??.ex A��2. .✓ .7L. . . . . . . . . ..
- yy.�-.,8 ?9/ . ~
Telephone. . ������"" DD • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Petitioner. .�"1111ee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • •
Address. . . . .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Date. . . / .�,` . . . . . . . . Tel one. . . . !'!� e . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of
Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . . . . . . . ...... .. . . . ... . .
four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The
Evening News.
> -
,� _ 3 i
n
Z Z
Z Z
� v
Z < L � � j Z
_ .n � Z
� � �
rV^ �VS'
r C
���n
�_.
CARTER & TOWERS ENGINEERING CORP.
" ✓Y,9A.��, C����and�.po�re
JOSEPH D. CARTER, P E. & R.L.S.
6 FAIRVIEW AVENUE
SWAMPSCOTT, MASS. 01907
T*I. 392•6066
LO T .VI.-.__ .
34.4 0
o e
Q
6± LoT �v
i
J /
^wF_L l t N G
i
i
i
i
/
/
Pops ;
I i To the ALcPA j 4 SAV i vS5
E.M F RTo N S TR E E.-7 1 hereby certify that I have examined
the premises and all easements,
encroachments and buildings are
S 4 L E M M A SS located on the ground as shown. I
further certify that the buildings shov,;
SCA L a I = y0 Conformed to the zoning lzws of
JAN 22_ 19 7 6 Sia when constructed.
I further certify that this property
ti
hYH or f';'n ye. locate e
JOSEPH re$tah fished f oc h
CARTERS
No. 93870 /,�• `t13�,h D. Car er LS. #9337
CIVIL ENGINEERING PERCOLATION TESTS SEWAGE DISPOSAL DESIGNS SURVEYING
F e _
.r
40
IL
"70
r . . Y
r
"
� 4
v�
di !1117!17
.
3
- ne
i'
-
. .
-1 717-144
ai
v
V'. a e � .k
<:� ' •�- _�.., x 4 } � � tee.
5
v 3 { ?
t
q
as-s + _
w _. _ _ .._....
.�:w�.r :x- .-.. i is y' i c r„L 3«.r { 4 y y,,.i.. t Cx`�,;ga � e�y`- $ xk -i ti4 n} a dt }' �'� '^-s•� ''
i
1 * l4
�'•-_- a ..:c _ � r ,$' lat- t ba t a'.r .y- a
r " e 1• � � yx9 r ;:P
s
-fi r
s r r m } }`.t+. y- ...r $ .1.- '' y,,.. t '-ft5''r"--r• � r.F �- � P- n
a r a
£ }
s
�r
Y
4
•,,,fi,..,',m a-«...m i r � ,y,, ,tee. _ F.. _ ��a
„
w-
f
IF
IT
41
7 v"13
0
r
: �'C't-f.�;5• r ': , , . � F � k 'ap.-� �t'�. '� R ; '� 5 y'"n��;, t 3 a1 �°' d
1 r
s Y z r -µr- ,_v'n R k' ,.� t -s•-y( —a,-- F —Y-'
t �S' � .�-q,''2���� I � I.. t -'''� f I ._..� #' I,- -_I I a � t{♦��' _ � )�{�p ' }a:%Itt� ; ti-< "r 'n s."„'` #•----�,.�,.
r
44 2
rof
a
n k
r
L
-
ir}#
f
n
e
�O a� X
s �L
j1• ^AYES ioxn
,1 111 V.1
}
APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
�ao
CtV of ,Salera, Anssar4usetts
,JS 'Puttrb of �k}pettl
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
The Undersi ned represent th t he is are the owners of a certain parcel of land locAted
at . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Street; Zoning District. �-
and said parcel is affected by Section(s� . . .rte
of the Massachusetts State Building Code.
Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector 01P-$uildings int
accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance. Lt',
C7 6/D
mm
r �
s� G7D
C Ln
,l b
LSD
to _
The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following
reasons:
The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem
Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to
approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said
Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary
hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero-
gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for
the following reasons: �/� /2`�� � 40" 'eo�ql
_7It-4a
l9 X io �/ O
Own era�./.�/.,�1q!L✓ f%1���%.�r�1/�(/ae�J
Address.44� elf O.y. .57 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tel ephone. I?!r /. _.!? ?9/. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Petitioner. . . .S.aw. re. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
q q
Address. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
Date. . . . . . . . . . . .
Telep ne. . .� .a/??2:�. . . . . . . . . . .
By. Gz /G1!/ . . . . . . . .
Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of
Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The
Evening News.
NO....................................
PETITION TO BOARD OF APPEALS
LOCATION
........................................ _............ ........ -
PETITIONER..........................................
ADDRESS...............................................
................................................
CONDII IONS
............................ ....................................
I
................. .......................................
................................................................
II, .................................................................
.................................................................
PETITION APPROVED.................... ❑
DENIED.........................
.............................................1 19.........
r
CARTER & TOWERS ENGINEERING CORP.
JK�veys, C..ounsr[ an�Kipor�s
JOSEPH D. CARTER, P E. & R.L.S.
6 FAIRVIEW AVENUE
SWAMPSCOTT, MASS. 01907
T•1. 592.43/6
1
R
8` Xio
>
�= LoT �v
I-
J
/ ;mow F_I„Lt N G
No I i
i
i
/
i
'i is is
PoP,c
I *
Tothe ;,ALEM3.t E;AV;nss
-
c yt E F.TC 1 hereby certify that I have examined
the premises and all easements,
encroachments and buildings are
S L E rn Nl SS located on the ground as shown. I
further certify that the buildings shov..
S LA L. c conformed to the zoning la:vs of
J A 22 19 7 6 SA t_I-;•,A, when constructed.
I further certify that this property
�tzj"A
locate e
JOSEPH ��: ;
Yab
shed floc h rra.
DAVICARTER-A No. 9387 1 �; h, D. Car er .L.S. #9337
e9 C'ISTE
N� sU[L����tiP
CIVIL ENGINEERING PERCOLATION TESTS SEWAGE DISPOSAL DESIGNS SURVEYING
CARTER & TOWERS ENGINEERING CORP.
�u�wya, C..ounet[ anc��ePorle
JOSEPH D. CARTER, PE. & R.L.S. - 6 FAIRVIEW AVENUE
SWAMPSCOTT, MASS. 01907
T*I. 592.9396
LOT
�2
n4. 4' \J�
`T
8` xyo 'y
yX 7`
> i
I-
0
i
J /
No /
I
/
i
i
To the _,ALZMa 4 SAV;NSS
al and wr ;,Ns C_
c I�E RTC N STREET 1 hereby certify that I have examined
the premises and all easements,
encroachments and buildings are
S A L E M MASS located on the ground as shown. I
further certify that the buildings shov—
S CA L t I = yo conformed to the zoning laws of
J A 2Z 19 7 6 SA i—>-''n when constructed.
A�I, I further certify that this property
d Oi if^�i�;f�,
e� ,,.,.•,\, I,, No; locate / e
Jowo 114' e tab fished floc ha r r a.
CARTERS —�
,A No. 93870 ~� Y�; .•y D. Car er .L.S. #9537
N0 SURvb`iF;f'
CIVIL ENGINEERING PERCOLATION TESTS SEWAGE DISPOSAL DESIGNS SURVEYING
CARTER & TOWERS ENGINEERING CORP. y�
Sunieye, C..//��ouneeland kapoeb
JOSEPH D. CARTER, P E. 8 R.L.S.
6 FAIRVIEW AVENUE
SWAMPSCOTT, MASS. 01907
T*I. 392.066
n4.4 �o
o C- n
�y R
8' oo
I-
o i
J / i
N G-
PO C-
r
I t , To the -ALcM5 h SAV;Ns c
si andL�wr!=s�� : !NsC_
E rZ i o N S T R EEC 1 hereby certify that I have examined
the premises and all easements,
encroachments and buildings are
S i_ E M MASS located on the ground as shown. I
further certify that the buildings shox.
S CA L t = y0 conformed to the zoning lzws of
J A ti 2 Z 19 7 6 5A when constructea.
I further certify that this property
nl trl^�'(' yy C
locatediMe
JOSEPHetab fished floc h rr .
DAVID `"'•f _�
CARTER �
SA No. 9387 `r'os�r .,h D. Car er L.S. #9337
No sun���i�;N
CIVIL ENGINEERING PERCOLATION TESTS SEWAGE DISPOSAL DESIGNS SURVEYING
•
ZVI -
a a S oa
OA
h
.lam" r� 6d �s/`.` F �� r• S c� � '(, \p,, �, �r�y ` i
°r` T°• S� p� d \c d• I`.i h'� (� h Na �6 .� �
en \ ..
10
a S/^`j a o t` //may •. a y ��, .a \
dCm S� i \errs �( / O ♦ c�0 j `t t• �� p� d \
` / IIIJJJ SSS �� o S a/ • ',o
���:J ./�v o� / /sr f' r.(`S / 3 �09> �O s� o • °a rl ��Fs, a m, O `+:.'
Ie,
�'a
Ap
/ r➢�' °r � . . A'3. JJ % "a .off f\ 4 . � _
N
5
rs O
00
)' o
�: 9` y 9 • �' F
p C O V V19
`
Ip_ CSJ
"
.ems
• p
IS
• i
BOARD OF ASSESSORS t"r1{E:e
CITY HALL_ �.
11A el,
2 DATE : 1010.1f91
3 CERTIFIER' ABUTTERS" 'LIST 3
05 SUBJECT PROPERTY: MAP. 35 LOT. 0484 SUFE
6 PROPERTY ADDRESS. 000, 1 EhEaTC4 5-fREET 76
0
J , -- - J -- - .. : ' 8
9
•
eCIO BLANC",HE.TTE' CLAIRE M o •
'
MAP Lei" SIW( PRO PERTY 'ADDRESS wcD cr-SEOWNERz
10 13
1114
3`: 0484 0001 E""MERTON S1RE_LT GASTONGUAY CLAIRE M 1 EMERTON STREE1" 150
12
--f-v—k:L.ANCHE-T...fE 61 AIRL. M SAI
EN MA
_ 16
13 _ ;35 0449 000.2'. EMERTON Si-REST L+IEUREUX ROGER N 3.1 f. ESSEX Sl"" , ,6
14
• 15 SALEM MA 01970` 19 0
5 )47^ 1:104— 6't_?+ PPMAN ST'RE:E=T x:1,1 1 MAW - - z°
,s GRAC.ZYK EDMUND S DANVERS MA 0193 2,
2
� 'J 2 35 047.:1 0010 BOARDMAN STREET KAL.GREN THERESA 10 BOARDMA14 ST 23 � '
,8
SAI—"- 11—MA-0 19 '-G 24
19
�
35 0473 0008 BOAF2L�t•1AN S1'RE:ET' BA'1"E:S' ARTHUR ti TII 8 E?t?ARC?hfAN S'T'RE:E:T 25
26 20 MARY P MCCUKER -ALEN MA u1570 270
21 _ 0474 Q-)n; ROAR NAW P.1:
22 CAROL A SALEM MA G11?70... 29
2330
35 0481 0011 FORREST'ER STREET" BURNHAM BARBARA T 11 FORRE:'S"iER ST 310
24 S 970 3
2535 U4£s 0015 FORRE:3T'ER SITREE
COSTA LEONARD 15 FORRE:STER STREET � 33
34
.2s SAI--F"I'1 rtr1. G-197G. . - - 35
27
28 CIO KEENAN [)ORO`THY E SALEM NA 0-19;C) 3
.
29 3
3 .9
30 40
31 41
•32.: _ 4 •
43
33' .. .. - 44
34 45
•35 46 .
4]
36 48
3> .... 49
3851 •
39
40 53
.4I 54 •
55
42 56
43 97
58
!:, 59
451
46 .....61
•
47 82 .
83
48 64
49 65
50 66
51 6768
•
52'. .'69
•53 ]0
]1
54 72
s6
PETER. M CATc5 J3
CHIEF AS SEE SOd3 ]4 .
+]s
]
• i
�r�.
\ ~ `
C1SInN 'I-NI THE PE''ITIO! 1
` \\ C
� 0 v FDR A �PECIAL PERMIT AT /
� /4fy
A
hear in� on this iti �n vias held '--n
foilowinc Memoers present;
Cf 7he nearinCl was sent �2 abUit- 71". ap.:3
notices were prc/perly _sDlisMec in t*e Sam EveMiIn
� accordance with enera� j4
Petitioners, are reouestino a Special Permit n order tci
The orovision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is , �
�
aoplicaole to this reouest for a Special Permit is Section �"~�x�
orovides as f.nllows:
Notwithstanding anvthina to �he contrary appear1no
� in this Ordinance, the Board of Appeal nay , in
� accordance with the procedure awl conditions set
forth in Section VIII4 and IX JF" grant Special
Permits for alter=tions sno reconstruction nf
nonconforming structures, and for changes "
enlargement , extention or expansion of
nonconforming lots , land , structures, and uses^
provided , however , that such change , extension ,
enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially
more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use
to the neighborhood "
^
�
In more general terms. this Board is. when reviewing
Soecial Permit r�equests. guided by the rule that a
Gpecial Permit request may be granted upon a finding by the
Board that the grant of the Special Permit will promote the
public health , safety, convenience and welfare of the City's
inhabitants.
The Board of Appeal . after consideration of the evidence
presented at the public hearing , makes the following
findings of fact:
� ~f� �
^
|
3.
On tine basis of the above -Fincina cf fact „ and an the
,gvioerce presented at the hparini7 . the Hoard of Appeal
-::OnCludes as -follows.
There-Fore the Board of Appeal voted to /q the
Special Permit requested subject to the following
conditions:
I.ItA oA�