The URL can be used to link to this page

21 EAST COLLINS STREET - ZBA 21` East. Collins" St. R-1. Philip 'Bedard Q , iTE OF ::7-ARI:10 PETITIC:IER LOCATI0`1 10TION: -0 GRANT p SECOND TO DENY SECOND TO RE-HEAR SECOND HEAVE TO 'WITHDRAW SECOND 70 CONTINUE SECOND ROLL CALL PRESENT GRANT DENY WITHDRAW RE-HEAR CONTINUE 1 �vJ j � ' RICHARD EENCAL RICHARD FEBONIO FRANCIS GREALISH EWAR0ZLU-Z I NSK"I STEPHEN TOUCHETTE ASSOCIATE '-1EMBERS R@PFAI:D�P'_-AN�'r ARTHUR LAB RECCUE CONDITIONS: ' ;n) Cga_c__, b Q I 15j � v � of ulrm, 4jja55aCliu5eft5 Ac "° N�N a �j W 7G'7Qttrb of ,AUpeal om O fJ S ma N l5 N ^) DECISION ON THE PETITION OF PHILIP BEDARD FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 21 EAST COLLINS STREET (R-1) A hearing on this petition was held July 22, 1992 with the following Board Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Richard Febonio, Francis Grealish Jr. , Stephen Touchette, and Associate Member Labrecque. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting a Special Permit to extend a nonconforming structure to allow construction of a second floor this R-1 district. The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this request for a Special Permit is Section 5-3(j ) , which provides as follows: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set forth in Section 8-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permits for alterations and reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement, extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses, provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood. In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact; 1 . There was no opposition to this petition by neighbors or abutters. 2. The granting of the Special Permit would enhance the quality of life for the petitioner and family 3. The impact of this addition is extremely minimal. mo w .Z7 T PETITION OF PHILIP BEDARD FOR A SPECIAL ice' PERMIT AT 21 EAST COLLINS ST. , SALEM page two T,n � N 4 . The addition of a second floor is in harmony with the abutting homes and the neighborhood. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1. The Special Permit requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. 2. The granting of the Special Permit requested will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants and may be granted in harmony with the neighborhood. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the Special Permit requested, subject to the following conditions: 1. Petitioner shall comply with all City and State statutes, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted and by legal building permit. 3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety shall be strictly adhered to. 4. Petitioner shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy for the addition. 5. Exterior finishes shall be in harmony with existing structure. 6. The dwelling is to remain a single family dwelling. SPECIAL PERMIT GRANTED July 22, 1992 Richard Febonio, Vice Chairman Board of Appeal DECISION ON THE PETITION OF PHILIP BEDARD FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 21 EAST COLLINS ST. , SALEM page three A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of MGL Chapter 40A. , and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL Chapter 40A. , Section 11, the Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner' s Certificate of Title. Board of Appeal n Ir m o 4f :0� C,a W om o n= 3 ma N L � H Qlitu of tt1em, lassadjusetts Pottra of 'A"eal August 6, 1992 Notice is hereby given that as of August 6, 1992 the deU.sion of the Board of Appeal has been filed in the office of the City Clerk to grant the petition of Philip Bedard for a Special Permit to allow construction of a second floor at 21 East Collins St. BOARD OF APPEAL Brenda M. Sumrall Clerk of the Board Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of, the Mass.General Laws, Chapter 808, and shall be filed within 20 Slays after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to Mass. General Laws, Ch:!-,+a�808, Section 11,the Variance or 9pecial Permit granted herein 5 ;,,I :r.::. take effect until a copy of the decision, bearing the certifcaticn of the City Clerk that 20 days have - _ elapsed and no appeal has been fled, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name or the owner of reonrdpp is recorded and noted r:n the owner's Certificate of Title. BOARD OF APPEAL of �ulrm, �asearijusrtta M0 CAJ a W Board of _Aupeul 4M o T= r T �O n 3 s ma N N DECISION ON THE PETITION OF PHILIP BEDARD FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 21 EAST COLLINS STREET (R-1) A hearing on this petition was held July 22, 1992 with the following Board Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Richard Febonio, Francis Grealish Jr. , Stephen Touchette, and Associate Member Labrecque. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting a Special Permit to extend a nonconforming structure to allow construction of a second floor this R-1 district. The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this request for a Special Permit is Section 5-3(j ) , which provides as follows: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set forth in Section 8-6 and 9-4 , grant Special Permits for alterations and reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement, extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses, provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood. In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact; 1. There was no opposition to this petition by neighbors or abutters. 2. The granting of the Special Permit would enhance the quality of life for the petitioner and family 3. The impact of this addition is extremely minimal. r mo w ;1K r � PETITION OF PHILIP BEDARD FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 21 EAST COLLINS ST. , SALEM :2, � n x page two T n � c.n n iv 4. The addition of a second floor is in harmony with the abutting homes and the neighborhood. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1 . The Special Permit requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. 2. The granting of the Special Permit requested will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants and may be granted in harmony with the neighborhood. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the Special Permit requested, subject to the following conditions: 1. Petitioner shall comply with all City and State statutes, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted and by legal building permit. 3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety shall be strictly adhered to. 4 . Petitioner shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy for the addition. 5. Exterior finishes shall be in harmony with existing structure. 6. The dwelling is to remain a single family dwelling. SPECIAL PERMIT GRANTED July 22, 1992 Richard Febonio, Vice Chairman Board of Appeal i DECISION ON THE PETITION OF PHILIP BEDARD FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 21 EAST COLLINS ST. , SALEM page three A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of MGL Chapter 40A. , and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL Chapter 40A. , Section 11, the Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. Board of Appeal n Ir MCD tai 'A T X om ca n= S ma N C.O N fV H `\ til ppm r `" It" of �ttlem, A2Issachilsetts ; `" ` � om o A= S mn (n LZ N N DECISION ON THE PETITION OF PHILIP BEDARD FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 21 EAST COLLINS STREET (R-1) A hearing on this petition was held July 22, 1992 with the following Board Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Richard Febonio, Francis Grealish Jr. , Stephen Touchette, and Associate Member Labrecque. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting a Special Permit to extend a nonconforming structure to allow construction of a second floor this R-1 district. The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this request for a Special Permit is Section 5-3(j ) , which provides as follows: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set forth in Section 8-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permits for alterations and reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement, extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses, provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood. In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact; 1. There was no opposition to this petition by neighbors or abutters. 2. The granting of the Special Permit would enhance the quality of life for the petitioner and family 3. The impact of this addition is extremely minimal. mo ty om PETITION OF PHILIP BEDARD FOR A SPECIAL -n= PERMIT AT 21 EAST COLLINS ST. , SALEM page two m. LZ n N 4. The addition of a second floor is in harmony with the abutting homes and the neighborhood. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1. The Special Permit requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. 2. The granting of the Special Permit requested will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants and may be granted in harmony with the neighborhood. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-O, to grant the Special Permit requested, subject to the following conditions: 1. Petitioner shall comply with all City and State statutes, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted and by legal building permit. 3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety shall be strictly adhered to. 4 . Petitioner shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy for the addition. 5. Exterior finishes shall be in harmony with existing structure. 6. The dwelling is to remain a single family dwelling. SPECIAL PERMIT GRANTED July 22, 1992 Richard Febonio, Vice Chairman Board of Appeal A DECISION ON THE PETITION OF PHILIP BEDARD FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 21 EAST COLLINS ST. , SALEM page three A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of MGL Chapter 40A. , and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL Chapter 40A. , Section 11, the Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. Board of Appeal jr r� mo W �m om o �= r �x s mn u to � N i +situ oftticm, assaclTusetts �N cBonrb of _Au}ienl 4m o rnrn> = n � c.o � N DECISION ON THE PETITION OF PHILIP BEDARD FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 21 EAST COLLINS STREET (R-1) A hearing on this petition was held July 22, 1992 with the following Board Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Richard Febonio, Francis Grealish Jr. , Stephen Touchette, and Associate Member Labrecque. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting a Special Permit to extend a nonconforming structure to allow construction of a second floor this R-1 district. The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this request for a Special Permit is Section 5-3(j ) , which provides as follows: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set forth in Section 8-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permits for alterations and reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement, extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses, provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood. In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact; 1. There was no opposition to this petition by neighbors or abutters. 2. The granting of the Special Permit would enhance the quality of life for the petitioner and family 3. The impact of this addition is extremely minimal. rn o u. .Z7 T to n w r PETITION OF PHILIP BEDARD FOR A SPECIALo i W PERMIT AT 21 EAST COLLINS ST. , SALEM 2- =y° page two T n � c.o n ,v 4. The addition of a second floor is in harmony with the abutting homes and the neighborhood. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1 . The Special Permit requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. 2. The granting of the Special Permit requested will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants and may be granted in harmony with the neighborhood. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the Special Permit requested, subject to the following conditions: 1. Petitioner shall comply with all City and State statutes, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted and by legal building permit. 3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety shall be strictly adhered to. 4 . Petitioner shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy for the addition. 5. Exterior finishes shall be in harmony with existing structure. 6. The dwelling is to remain a single family dwelling. SPECIAL PERMIT GRANTED July 22, 1992 Richard Febonio, Vice Chairman Board of Appeal DECISION ON THE PETITION OF PHILIP BEDARD FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 21 EAST COLLINS ST. , SALEM page three A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of MGL Chapter 40A. , and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL Chapter 40A. , Section 11, the Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner' s Certificate of Title. Board of Appeal rr- K m o ... ;a� �n W om o -2 r ox s ma (n , � tv APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S (1li#u of *11cm, (7 tt gti f�iisPfts TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS: The Undersigned represent that he is are the owners of a terrain parcel of land located at ^l0. .- ,./. . zc�'r . . t� Al.,: . .� . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Zoning District.11l . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : and said parcel is affected by Sectiones ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . of the Massachusetts State Building Code. Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance. The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following reasons: The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary relief may be hardship to the Undersigned and rel y granted without substantially dero- gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for the following reasons: C' /� 1 1 4 Ci :: �CC�7 GL i-Pil 71 Owner.,. .� L y. . :. . o .��. . .. . . . . . . . . . Address. � . .�c � .�c?//;it �cf: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Telephone. . . Petitioner-2. �x�r� .�!. . . . . / Address.,,�A.� . 5.f.�cll<t�Cs . .� . . . . . Date. . 4/ v2. . . . . . . . . Telh e. . �Jz Sof . . By,ep ,01. �� . . . . . . . Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The Evening News. MORTGAGE INSPECTION BAY STATE SURVEYING ASSOCIATES 234 CABOT ST., BEVERLY MA LOCATION : SALEM. MASS . NOTES: ..... .. .......--...-.... .. .. . ................ SCALE : 1' = 30 FT. DATE : JUNE 22 . 1992 •This is a Mortgage Inspection survey and not an ... ..... .. . ... . . ..... ... ... instrument survey, therefore this plot plan is for REFERENCE DEED . . . + e9a7 .. . + 21 a mortgage inspection purposes only. RECORDED IN THE ESSEX SOUTH •This survey is based on survey marks of others. D IST.__REGISTRY_OF DEEDS. . _ - _ • Bushes, shrubs,fences and tree lines do not To ✓E2i Gez� necessarily indicate property lines. . � -. - . - \Zl. .._ . p.. _ -_F3r4lJ - -_.._. -_... In my professional opinion the building(s) are not located I hereby certify that I have examined the premises and that the in the special flood hazard zone, as defined by H.U.D. building(s) shown on this plan are located on the ground as •Whenever an offset is 1'= or less, an instrument survey shown and that they conformed to the zoning setbacks of the is recommended to determine prop. lines. CITY OF SALEM. MASS . when constructed. Offs is shown are approximate b tapes rvey. - ---- - --- ---- -- - • n1FfPr� c6/oZ o { SlS" I J3LOCa. ( S �A�i rA LL-Y t r.-) Z i Lir l I La-r l0 ' I G-o SF o g LST Z ?yvE C. =Loop Z0NF_ 13 61` I Srt Wo -21 N N t LMI�J�W `\ roeear `y �PAST Cot_L I N S ST1ZEcT a 3 lJ4dhncy T,1Z , Of i El- - - . _. - - -T. . �y � � � � .��d��d l t� � r _.. _� F r Gr �ti� Nsr ::I . ' :.. .. .. � � � ;. �z y i -- — __ � ..� . .. �— � i � � is -� � � Y3 � r �� nii'-� � p '� � e � ___ I IIIlllli ♦� � K;_ � -� I K'fl �6 �r � � .� � ., � ,.� � . x �, ��: � . r � S' �� r fw+� � `� I � - i I! �� L 1'— �� s ,T. i � j I " - I�� i - �, --- I�� 1 t j----�`-!--- l i I L i 1 � I I ,� . ( I I I L I I - '� ;' I , ;_ l o — - -- 1 _ , �_. � ,;� � � / ;, � _ � � _ j _ l4 i .' I I �. - I I � .►, � .. �� ; � ,. a.. j a C T/ y a T ( r_ I \ 1 I u - •r- � � F r. I� • to �� x I b it I f gyro- i iN i - I u. v I f� L�t2L' r!-lNv 00 ' ST1 U � it _ � mal a ' s I 0 i -___. 4xz=lo N IG Wolk 13 e p" A I I 9 • I M I I � _ . _ � t� � � � s kl I } a r' p ►! r i ip sow T r — �. R,:7 - • �_. >� -�:< 4, 5, z �v� I 1� L11 �cr /' Se J cg9, -3 1712r Ir � `mac 0 46. a „ CO I9 288 `•_ Ji ? i 8O 3 F 35.4C > q° 86�.•^B:o C JQ /9+. . 2T� 6,888 95 D 9 S r 62� N fa 19 2gg �J. IsO - Q ,4C JV 's� � � 30g 4z / �/ s .>, 3�8 o wX `Q3/ 3j2 150 m?3 2 �✓,! 80' I 3j3 3' ,4 Og �• �. sa 0N o 0 4 0 460 3�3 70 ' ` 4638 3j sJ R o AC \ e,00 r 9 3 c /g a "o ' �so Q2� MRSA 6j-� Cl �Q32� y10 032 /v a a &o 325 If C� T •F .r `��i I 3,6 V It all ��• rt � �,�� / it ,25637 ST30 253 72 250 A, C9 3> ' GJ u•7 '� n 2 S 3490 47 ror s_I ry Is 31p� SFT 4a o �2 298 3090 so s4 s�s4De 4 315 3 3 3 r s�8 s3 PD /E 0< .14 Y a S 'SCO Q. Oatg a 3 � . 4\ Mry? M_, ,90 - N 60 3B 0326 y rio �� `O �•-' ;� �q �� °X22 3 � C, 0 2`rjV > 5 O rR 4 ' •0 316 F- I 0 BOARD 'OF ASSESSORS CITY HALL 2 2 3 4 ERII,�j IS I�cEq,:FxFztb��ABVTTE S ' A T�11 4 5 SUBJECT PROPERTY: PIAP. 36 LOT: 0320 SUFF. 61 III, PROPERTY ADDRESS. 0021 EAST COLLINS STREET a 7 ASSESSED OWNER e. -7 A SUSAN S 10 11 9 12 10 P7Afj LQ1 SUI-1- PROPER I V ADDRESS --ASSESSED-OWNER —MA-i-L-ING—ADD E 13 • 1 1 14* 12 36 0320 0021 EAST COLLINS STREET BEDARD PHILIP 1`1 2-1 EAST COLLINS STREET 5 .0 16 SU - 1---MA-&1-9-7 - 13 S JS-AN IA&H 17 • 14 36 0303 00-11 LATHROP STREET DESANTIS FABIO JOHN 63R BRIDGE STREET 7 180 a 15 SALEM MA 01970 0 16 -76 e9i7 eee6 e0NMERS ROM) e 0 F?0BF-.'R'F A 6-C-tW4F-RS RE.) 2 21 •17 SAL-Ell MA 01970 220 36 0318 0017 EAST COLLINS STREET NICHOLSON PETER R 17 EAST COLLINS ST✓ 23 18 SALEPI hYA 1.111�1 24 Yb (1314 F'.IT,'I KON 0 PKA 20 JY,%, 19JEAST, COLLINS ST • 26 25 'L -1970 ................ 27 21 ...............4........ ��FEMq- IFIA, 0 ....... I I % , "I.,� ell —," - % ' - - -/ I 22 G( .641119 -T4 2; 23 SALEM MA 0-1970 3010 36 0322 0025 EAST COLLINS STREET KOEN DAVID 25 EAST COLLINS ST 3j 24 3 25 A Mc-6 % SALSM MA 949'� 33 � PERKI - RD QQ T,4 QQ 36 2 NNE 9 �RQAD? N S 'A L.B E.R T R. 14 'CO�NERS 21 3 ............. 27 SA LEM MA 01970 ✓ 350 Te 6' ('26 '' 0012 G0NNF'RS"R(:.hiVF.) Hf.--VF-R--R(-:.)G AL.F-44j A 6-01-p-+-.N I I L-41-S 36 37 0 29 HARNOIS JOSEPH L DOVER NH 03820 J380 30 36 0327 0010 CONNERS ROAD LOWE JOHN R 10 CONNERS RD 39 31 LOWE EL-11-ABE-Tl I d Spj_-Epl 16 n-19-pi 40 32 36 0328 0008 CONNERS ROAD CANTY JOHN J JR 8 CON14ERS RD 429 33 CANTY HELEN M SALEM MA 01970 435 34 451 •35 460 47 36 48 37 49 38 . . ....... ..... .......... 05C 39 7.. 51 0 52 40 53 •41 54 E 55 z 42 56 43 ...... 57 58 44 ?1 590............. 45 .......... .. . .. ....... ... .. ... .. ........ 60 46 61 0 47 62o .3 48 64 49 • 65 50 66 671 51 '8 52 69 53 0 70 71 54 72 55 73 56 PF 74 71 'HIEF ASSESSOR 75 Z .... .. 79 APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . �T Cc BOA R Gr APPEaLS $ Ctv [if 'it11Em' AnsonLu8Pfts �VVPA 2J 12 12 , , `92 S� TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS: REG E I`L D CITY OF SALEVi'MASS. The Undersigned r prgse that fie, is are the owners of a certain parcel of land lox ted at NO.A.I. I , a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Street; Zoning District. . L . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : and said parcel is affected by Section(s) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . of the Massachusetts State Building Code. Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance. The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following reasons: / The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero- gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for the following reasons: a'e'u a Owner.& X v. Jnq ' l )dliaRc . . . . . . . . . . . . Telephone. . .7y�.: 1`�✓9 3r?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Petitioner.0./.�.�.�. .6F . . • e le / Address.�.� . ��S, . .�d/l:nrS . .S7`;. . . . . Date. . LP/� .1oZ. . . . . . . . . Tel e. . Zle'J5� a . . . . . . CIl! By. '�R:t Cd �c •� Three copies of the application must be -filed with the Secretary of the Board of Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The Evening News. NO.................................... PETITION TO BOARD OF APPEALS LOCATION ................................................................ PETITIONER.......................................... ADDRESS............................................... ................................................ c_ s ryp L 37T ' CON DI T IONS c' N om Tg -n- -o ................................................................. .. mA (n Co n N ................................................................ ................................................................. ................................................................. ................................................................. ,PETITION APPROVED.................... ❑ DENIED......................... .............................................. 19......... I MORTGAGE INSPECTION BAY STATE SURVEYING ASSOCIATES 234 CABOT ST., BEVERLY MA LOCATION .................. ....... . . ................ -- SCALE : I = 30 FT. DATE : JUNE 22 . 1992 •This is a Mortgage Inspection survey and not an j instrument survey,therefore this lot plan is for REFERENCE PEED BK . + 8947 PG . + 214 mortgage inspecion purposes only. • -- - ---- • ------ -•--- RECORDED -IN THE ESSEX SOUTH •This survey is based on survey marks of others. D IST,- REG ISTRY-OF_ DEEDS• - .:. •_ - . • Bushes, shrubs, fences and tree lines do not - necessarily indicate property lines. To E✓E2— Germs In my professional opinion the building(s)are not located I hereby certify that I have examined the premises and that the in the special flood hazard zone, as defined by H.U.D. building(s) shown on this plan are located on the ground as •Whenever an offset is 1'± or less, an instrument survey shown and that they conformed to the zoning setbacks of the is recommended to determine prop. lines. -- CITY OF SALEM. MASS. --- ----- when constructed. •Offs is shown are appproximate b tapes ry 8(-064, LL-Y ( n, �=L=�az 'E B Z LoT ! I Lo-t- t O Lm `t re.Yz�a'.= 4-360 SF o r Int- 2 ?sive- CEDAP?FzGK_ �L�oQ L/n e i Zov: /3 61' QYSc4LE tit �r- �zl In �, Ld11y- `y,A�tiK 3� RCTER l_L. INS ST2EcT S 1 IL` YL LIA r: S y,1 M It P T I ell 'Iyt RO F 9f j Z}J '< / 3 P�! .�f i ALL 1\ Yom'. l - F 1 i v i + i \. i I .e� .� r kL S$ ary If rroSN � irk t' L / I _ q•I I ,. '��, rT�ia T-! 4 V ggol �,n r r 17, x.... %}// g r '35t t�k!,Vi5.n ' at '.a�I " * � i`ry' *4x '` y d'�✓fu .rE�a � Pr �•�� 1 � ��t`�� ,F '�i + `•�++�� _._.w�•..`. /� �i � T�..' e++'_"�31cTk'x.7&''d ��{'�' til a4,�� q+ I 1 a + t , 'b1 fir• 'C.Z au ^ h o f r � .L� I vd CW J d v �. Y�>• 4� � � -p � I -. p(I � a dam.i' ! 1 � •.1 �i s S 1� b xi �s� V 4 r a• Y ;s t.1, � i t Y S * y I K a 1 IS is I Flo Aft P, .1 OWN 0 A4 ON ! if A Onto h 1p $ i s Of fry �N ih Oyu 2 Ile tb ti" rt, ''k• c {ti' r t I sr :r#1 a ]sir .1»A, t y1 ax 1'i3 AT- . 1 n i � p t AK wina - _ . r E v v �Y .. J ' j k 1z (1 YM't too, 121 A�l ai _ ;� Wt at ON PS` n r2q,1v top t f a ` F' z L e � .. v i�IVI. Y'. .�� '% i v k Yxa f �� A's �,�" }a � •p%i, T- qu., r k }�, . .. jy AMS,pmum s t Md �, I I I I � { ;. i I Ile i QUI, -------------- Jill vw -777 - f _ i I � � q ,.gyp Or _�12 r � r {' t If ! 1 n � l rhe � 1 w _ ata t2 •N`y%, Y i r - .. '�. Mi �" t -It°t r: rrv,wf�ky`3 j al eg ji NN k � s t 1 r� � _ —'t_ �--� i;i•�'t�^dM'�.#�i�¢,+��6.:�;,,�.� 'rd`a,, 1 ,v�,'�,s �,.'. • , � Li S $ i rN�il n rsi., �:. _ »._...._�_.__.__.._ _ _____......� I s� r,rL9` ��3`kv.t"i '�117t� �'#^r ''�'"' � r. - ' t�r�e�y1'' f.r i CITY OF SALEM ` BOARD OF APPEAL CITY OF SALEM l.. 745-9595 Ext. 381 �, BOARD OF APPEAL Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter- I 745-9595 Ext. 381 ested in the petition submitteby PHILIP ns inter- d BEDARD for a Special Permit to add a second Will hold a public hearing for all perso floor at21EASTCOLLINSST.(R-q Said hearing ested in the petition submitted by PHILIP to be held WEDNESDAY,JULY 22, 1992 A'I.7:00 + BEDARD for a Special Permit to add a second P.M., ONE SALEM GREEN, second floor. floor at 21 EAST COLLINS ST.(R-1)Said hearing RICHARD A. BENCAL, Chairman to be held WEDNESDAY,JUDY 22,1992 AT 7:00 July 8, 15, 1992 P.M., ONE SALEM GREEN, second Boor. SN82814 RICHARD A. BENCAL, Chairman ' -• — - _ _ _ _ _ July 8, 15, 1992 SN82814 — CITY OF SALEM BOARD OF APPEAL 745-9595 Ext. 381 Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter- ested in the petition submitted by PHILIP BEDARD for a Special Permit to add a second floor at 21 EAST COLLINS ST.(R-I)Said hearing to be held WEDNESDAY, L JUY 22, 1992 AT 7:00 P.M., ONE SALEM GREEN, second floor. July 8, 15, 19�R2ICHARD A. BENCAL, Chairman � SN82814 APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a� BOARD OF APPEALS Ctv rif "'ittfem, 'fflttssadjuse tts 12 TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS: CITY OF Sid'Pi.HASS. The Un rsi g,ned epres��jJn,t tha he 's are the owners of a certain parcel of land located at NO. �• . � •xis '4• . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Street; Zoning District. .'./. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . and said parcel is affected by Section(s) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . of the Massachusetts State Building Code. Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in accordance with ,�ection IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance. The Application f r Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following reasons: � The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero- gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for the following reasons: y� Q 'ate O Owner. � ! �. t�? . .'. .N c 019 °�. . . . . . . . . . Address.� � . : �GfiSf. . . �41�.7s. s . . . . . . . Telephone. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Petitioner., 116.�4P.<�?: �r3eo%oP.n�• • • • • / AddressalliYs . �T . . . . . . . . Date. . Y,r�y'1` . . . . . . . . . . . Te lep �ysyy � 1.�7. . . . . . . . . CI.L.1 T By dl.�.I.: • • . . . . . . . . . Three copies ofsfhe app"lication must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The Evening News. � � ^ ' N0—`..`.`---... � �=~ � PETITION T0BOARD 0FAPPEALS LOCATION �n ` `------`-------------- °«�c PET/7|0NKR------------.,. Ln ,. r—~ &DDRES8-------. ------.. ---------~^^~---' � � C0ND11\0NS � ! � � -----~^'—' ----------^^' � / -----^-- -----------^^' � ~~^`------'—~—`-------^ ` ......,^,..................^^...',..................~. ......................................,................. ^`'--`^`---^`'—'-----~~^. r� ,PETITION APPROVED.................... DDN[ED--...,---' [_l \� ~^,--^'--~---~..---. ......... \ � � � ... ..IL __►_—C--�--(—t i i roo 1/ / .r . t2 .g6 w s le Jf a" N � z 44 F c S -- Y I _ w� Rf Av iT ITS '124rd 101 v Po ��vt i' t lf hF yy w �"- "S I � ' r: c x � z v y Lf x C.� CA a :rs s ? ' •. c d� tp� '.� } 91 � #� �t i p i�J''a i,�,t:. s # A is� � E _ y � \�� r •; { �. R 1 It F } .. r R .� • � .. 2 '� C � :, _ a � � F �� K h j .. L � y -' _ � 1.,..a '.i, A ♦T`FSL �Y� IY & t s >�E � aw �pp ! s F.rt I r,. — _,.______ `•' -___--- — � --_ Y A.'' �y�1� �'p4$ '$ y {� i 3,g #fid F L I e' t -� r• i, s I sy..ti '< i� L-/ln r+( �• ,,e s �,ti 13Gol�G�U yx{yrr A� cy xv + A •' F r s C . - x t° �Pd Rm • 1 I hX / A � 17 1 ti ov x . 13t ,��idrR'.,-ti it ui {+m � M��Y ata f�-0 Ir \"I \ i f'a ! 4415 a • `f '. , ��io'G'W+ i4*� " 'Sy'..C'i 11�fi N "�2�' R: r�',ka x a .,r` o � VVV\.t`l(J Y.'.-�,-_--• \ � I,! _. .___ k1. � l � zA 5�` '{,. _'+`�':�'�"^''P�i��^� Tr"�S',• P k�' ry x si.�r Ar lS �' o- � { ?x f Rk�I t n : i � �..- F �+' � .t3�� p1A'•,�_ {ry' � ¢ �V'vk; � �� jri g a ; � - � L"• `�h'T'� 4 e '�€l�,c�r«. `� ,a, �atl{F'.: r r I15}. s4 t � s i I ti,k � �� "� .: ytC i #t° +1s Sj•A+�' > 4 M � A f a „ � khl �, C> �. � i fs .. `^ ir^ P t �.. .�'✓ Fk #i♦ab\ r °# YE '�: a St ,kmt oi• s„ 2a re S ' 9 rt xwa x A 0 1 &Cc Ak,g n, t if �^'S�A`tM!L 'LS4"" S�'�ti�f'J' S�,✓�. . j. d c 0 I + 77777 Dt e rg4�. 4 M n 7a.ry ins F» >PXh. x ...flii�y - i-. w(m F ' iF l 41 �'• �1' '� 4�e�$ Ap Y d YN Y^ Y Y '^ 2 - LA ;! "yt r' t o er�t Y{g i r a t o 1 1 I, ;G 6�'L- GP�•w t 's M 1 { lDry �t- }Y. Y • _ WY �(i .:. �. ' 1 %D i3 f ; �6�f i.T 'A ryi �y� Y Y q .: '+•Cn M _ L •ia` - — ��: F '. .a d,t �ev�. .�2'3 � tY''�� O� cc*`-' I ZRIK, Y '.t r• h I': /� � �1 ,,r ./ f ^1 A� Tj. j £q55 1 y'��i 9. 't t � � f Y yL I F ��L s/�.. S• JP ._�..._ .!�/ / �� tr rT ��Ph".y L^yr iii SY� I'�W 'y�'.F'. � e ¢a 2j,7 rY t �D ,,t Q'C. � .. '_-� f a+ r� s' 4M1• I� A, A s i +Z . F I • _ y ✓ f �i Y YT 4 y.t orf t f 1 1 dx aA" Ail I 4 . •am �� E i. �. r�z mac, zi MORTGAGE INSPECTION BAY.STATE SURVEYING ASSOCIATES 234 CABOT ST., BEVERLY MA LOCATION _ SALEM. MASS . NOTES: -.................• ... .................. ........ ......... ........ SCALE : I' = 30 FT. DATE : JUNE 22 , 1992 •This is a Mortgage Inspection survey and not an REFERENCE PEED - 8947 instrument survey, therefore this lot plan is for - - + --- + 214 .._..._._._ mortgage inspectitiplot purposes only. RECORDED IN THE ESSEX SOUTH •This survey is based on survey marks of others. -- ----- -- - --------------- - - D IST.-REG ISTRY_OF. DEEDS. ..._ • Bushes, shrubs,fences and tree lines do not _ To ✓E2�— Geri necessarily indicate property lines. "' - -' _Y-_•_" "P.. - '•�'4N . ...... ..... In my professional opinion the building(s)are not located I hereby certify that I have examined the premises and that the in the special flood hazard zone, as defined by H.U.D. building(s) shown on this plan are located on the ground as •Whenever an offset is 1'± or less, an instrument survey shown and that they conformed to the zoning setbacks of the is recommended to determine prop. lines. CITY _OF SALEM. MASS_ when constructed. •Offs is shown are appproximate b tape s ry.YY MAO Dcx71 S ?l S r3C OCa, ( S eoi9p—(rA t-Ly ( N ti Lo-r l l LP'r l o rVCla�=4-350 SF b 8 0 r 1 ST-.t Wo lr roeer �y� �ASST' �L L l N S STF�EcT �U c7J` � la 1 y 'pr:9'•n i L /��'C� d ._._ . I r . � I Ell 11 n _ .. ; . - : I z 171 I - �` -'`/ rr 1 y _ OIL ._ lar to ``aS' Y sbaf I l ( \ � 3 v n X I S � ' 5 1 n r r { r i r 1( Lit "v 23,E°Tg'iI x a 1 t f �i• ,+ t a�J`p7,�`'ny a ":� � {��';� (1 �'Ip• -{/. z � CA jam` r V 4.4 7 �nb. MM �j \ r.-3 ✓ rr >;� it ,j, ,. f i _ \ _ ✓ � s t! s s"< i�'vor 47z'^m428A�'?j��" It to I s +.� � •t.at it�r.� X11 � g :_�+ n . r 'rL^§."... f; i r ' - x,tx �. nt e #• fj� JFi� " r " ♦ F i Y t " Ltin i'� IN Jli 45 Pi /3' a PI`/�L� P ! 't^'S, u{ yr3 f a • -. " � �� i qr3( t "�'�� k l,e�x� I. �• �t � � � I ,� •� F � � � � C"era �c � x �,I r n { { `4 �*� w i`� 7 t e s tl � � � [✓� a CY I '•i`, P9 � � �u i ;i.+��k�aw-tr �S_; r. ttrYww�Wl� v vi,r RU / f �f(._ t r S }a� xs t,, a s6,�e �'T • h ff 4{f h A�� t I.. a �C �, -� s _ 1 ,F -4• °i FKk Jb� i� ' �x� 3' c: . ! r';t 7 �•,F 1 1'. E � a `/ t x ;10 1 a ae spF 'Y{ s {3� k 15 � r v sv- � iL t .: : It 11 All 'k3y ) vL P _ Fr t'W ,i �t4 11 � P r � t 5tq S 'FY 'e Q � t.e �ywSX• K s� � � �: .� _�_.___._—____—� �_ .OFL._ __•.__-_._... _ —__ . II_�� r� a� 'tt �� at,�$L� �� t a'r#. 777 T fin -f' y.. F Yr t 4. , / s..y 3 5`�S a •, 'rS a•. � ty �'a61.Y� v ,,F .__._ �� — / S � 1 �( f:Py dt eY 15ed FULL 1 d �� j way, Viol! d r 3' 1 'J till W. `�•, i #ijaksT{-iti� ` ' ii x �'£A ?�' �5�]' c I�jrr 1 ai. }211++, fi''f 31e'w�-,- 64 log4 .F x N. •'�� + S hr a �0 Ross 3 Fv.• I J(�.�^S� v'y pax l�1 � ,�.�S'.�� .a�`5,� _: PontAW M f J ! rti , 613I, is ro Yf�Y 1M 5,. f IT �1 S1ST. ✓ Y� 1-0� 4 MORTGAGE INSPECTION BAY STATE SURVEYING ASSOCIATES 234 CABOT ST., BEVERLY MA LOCATION : _ SALEM. MASS . NOTES: ......... .............. ....... . ................. SCALE : 1 = 30 FT. DATE : JUNE 22 . 1992 •This is a Mortgage Inspection survey and not an REFERENCE PEED instrument survey,therefore this lot plan is for . . + 8947 . + 214. . . . .... . ................... ...... mortgage inspection on purposes only. RECORDED IN THE ESSEX SOUTH •This survey is based on survey marks of others. DIST..--REGISTRY.OF_ DEEDS• _ . • Bushes, shrubs,fences and tree lines do not To ✓E2� Gem necessarily indicate property lines. & " y' P �"4NI- • ---•----••- In my professional opinion the building(s) are not located I hereby certify that I have examined the premises and that the in the special flood hazard zone, as defined by H.U.D. building(s) shown on this plan are located on the ground as •Whenever an offset is 1'± or less, an instrument survey shown and that they conformed to the zoning setbacks of the is recommended to determine prop. lines. CITY OF SALEM._ MASS. when constructed. •Offs is shown area proximate b tapes ry m P # 6/0� ocb� s L 2 Lor l I La-s- lO l�{Z1�+1= 43s0 SF o r LoT Z 21ivEC -�_ r VIP Loop Lr I srY We -#2 1 j _M r3o ,L' L_LIN STCZEET bUl k J k. L a I z U — � ��__ nn^^ / -cja�C2%