The URL can be used to link to this page

10 DEARBORN STREET - ZBA (2) 10 Dearborn St. R=2 Gail' & James'Sa'gri's ' �� ~ _�co>mkM (t�itg of "Salem, -�Httssadjusefts Pourb of Apvf l August 3, 1992 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT AS OF THIS DATE THE DECISION OF THE BOARD OF APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK TO DENY THE PETITION OF JAMES & GAIL SAGRIS FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A DECK AT 10 DEARBORN ST. BOARD OF APPEAL Brenda M. Sumrall Clerk of the Board Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to section 17 of the Mass. General Laws, Chapter 808, and shall be flied within 20 days aftc;the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Purge-=.nt to Mass. General Laws, Ch. s08,Section 11, the variance ial Permit granted herein snail ,�.c+ take effect until a eery of the hearing the certification r_f ,`jc City Clcrl<that 20 drys have elapsed and no appeal has been ff;c.d, or that, if such appeal has been - __ filed, that it has been dismissed or de^ied is recorded in the South Essex, l — Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name or the owner of record of is recorded and noted ori the owner's Certificate of Title. BOARD OF APPEAL DATE OF HEARING �� 9� PETITIONER .f LOCATION MOTION: TO GRANT SECOND N TO DENY SECOND TO RE—HEAR SECOND LEAVE TO WITHDRAW SECOND TO CONTINUE SECOND ROLL CALL PRESENT GRANTI DENY WITHDRAW RE—HEAR CONTINUE RICHARD BENCAL I \ I RICHARD FEBONIO ' f/ FRANCIS GREALISH �TEPHEN TOUCHETTE I �I ASSOCIATE MEMBERS RS�11 .AIdTE I G JI ARTHUR LABRECOUE \ �j CONDITIONS: U Mr. & Mrs. James Sagris 10 Dearborn Street Salem, MA 01970 October 6, 1992 Ms. Sarah Hayes 21 Fairmont Street Salem, MA 01970 Dear Ms. Hayes, We are writing to express our dismay for the manner in which you have conducted yourself in regard to our deck. Copies of this letter are being sent to the Mayor's office, City Solicitor, Planning Board, a Councillor-at-large, and the Board of Appeals. We spoke with you at length some time age concerning our deck and the problems we were having getting it approved. At that time you ex- pressed ignorance about the appeal process and said we would just have to go through the system. It was quite a shock to us to discover that you wrote a lengthy letter in opposition to the deck that was publicly read by the Chair- man of the Board of Appeals at a meeting on September 30, 1992. Your alleged innocence of the system was grossly misleading at best. You didn' t even have the courtesy to inform us of your opposition, never- the-less write such a damaging letter. We have since come to discover that you spoke with one person in the entire ward - the one neighbor who is in opposition to the deck. This hardly constitutes advocating for the people in the ward. Ever single neighbor and abuttor has signed our petition approving our plans. Enclosed please find a copy. Please note over fifty (50) signatures. You are also aware that the Planning Board is unanimously in favor of our deck. The job of a ward councillor is to represent the interests of the entire ward. Your actions clearly favor the interest of a single in- dividual. This is most disconcerning behavior from an elected official. You are more than welcome to come to our home and listen nttelephone side of the story. We both work full time so if you wish, j Phone us or drop by during the evening or weekend. Sincerely, Gail & James Sagris (H) 745-1651 (W) 741-0200 ext. 276 - Gail CC: City Solicitor Mayor's office Councillor-at-large Planning Board Board of Appeals =x3' .. September 2 , 1992 We , the undersigned, as neighbors and abu=cs are in favor of the deck the Sagr'_s ' wish to build on their property at 10 Dearborn St. / F r1:JtlC Tl'' .r• .� 4-( tiZ 4yC% / C./ C�%vG",ty/"� �Y•isr �if!.C1y7�- _ ` 1 ULF IL 1. / !J _\ � _. / -.. • _ F ./'�. _L�:... __t'.__.. :::_�..y✓�}. l.1 i.":C 12• _. _ J-..i L{..�✓�1!'i19'\. ,Y.t _ i'C�C:')'� /� "% 1. ,,�tl.as>� �:fj�^„c.k�� 1�� PC%�rJC^✓lt �• /l/77 -7 J_t z_ IL- _ V 2(/2 Li/A cl/y '70 --7 -3 yf t,4Z,,j.4't4 6/"1 ;4_2 z ztt eti 170 P4 , oX -1-\L -77, '' 1 / y l, � �,.� , .,� . ;�'I ccs.`�..�. �.��{M.c -J� Mr. & Mrs. James Sagris 10 Dearborn Street Salem, MA 01970 October 6, 1992 Ms. Sarah Hayes 21 Fairmont Street Salem, MA 01970 Dear Ms. Hayes, We are writing to express our dismay for the manner in which you have conducted yourself in regard to our deck. Copies of this letter are being sent to the Mayor's office, City Solicitor, Planning Board, a Councillor-at-large, and the Board of Appeals. We spoke with you at length some time age concerning our deck and the problems we were having getting it approved. At that time you ex- pressed ignorance about the appeal process and said we would just have to go through the system. It was quite a shock to us to discover that you wrote a lengthy letter in opposition to the deck that was publicly read by the Chair- man of the Board of Appeals at a meeting on September 30, 1992. Your alleged innocence of the system was grossly misleading at best. You didn't even have the courtesy to inform us of your opposition, never- the-less write such a damaging letter. We have since come to discover that you spoke with one person in the entire ward - the one neighbor who is in opposition to the deck. This hardly constitutes advocating for the people in the ward. Ever single neighbor and abuttor has signed our petition approving our plans. Enclosed please find a copy. Please note over fifty (50) signatures. You are also aware that the Planning Board is unanimously in favor of our deck. The job of a ward councillor is to represent the interests of the entire ward. Your actions clearly favor the interest of a single in- dividual. This is most disconcerning behavior from an elected official. You are more than welcome to come to our home and listen to our side of the story. We both work full time so if you wish, just telephone us or drop by during the evening or weekend. Sincerely, Gail & James Sagris (H) 745-1651 (W) 741-0200 ext. 276 - Gail CC: City Solicitor Mayor's Office Councillor-at-large Planning Board Board of Appeals September 2 , 1992 We , the undersigned, as neighbors and abu=rs are in favor of the deck the Sagris ' wish to build on their property at 10 Dearborn St. - �a ,�y,-1 7 /) L/.) .. rr:L7:/ —L.:: i• l / 1. A',..-C}4• _ _ 1..1 1.�..�.: [.(•/19'x. ..,:�. ._.<i Com.:�.v Q — own�t IJ `� ,/GG LG� r.µ,�.GJ-r '2�'L :JC)�C�GL T�L-L�'(i✓ti /J-/ /117.ray �J 1 ,� ` d✓-�l��.�i`ry''" e AN L2c2_ ��: �✓\�1{ .. �• %:�%`� !C /LLQ 2.CG�;Zc, _ ,:,;/�-� � �'-�c � c � "fir ,'�� / (cic;•=-�= /' � (� , �' � �.Ia � ,�EIJ,I-r� �1�� '/ �/� II r T IV ^� 1 f I/vJ• ,.: ,T L cLLC iLl:r �,;Z G -3 117 li (� L, 41A CITY OF SALEM CITY OF SALEM BOARD OF APPEAL BOARD OF APPEAL 745-9595 Ext. 381 745-9595 Ext. 381 Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter- Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter- ested in the petition submitted by GAIL&JAMES ested in the petition submitted by GAIL&JAMES SAGRIS for a Special Perm, of from side and rear SAGRIS for a Special Permit from side and rear setbacks to allow construction of a deck at 30setbacks to of a t 10 DEARBORN ST. (R-2) Said hearing to be held DEARBORNallow (R 2)ton Said�hearing tocbeaheld WEDNESDAY,JULY 22,1992 AT 7:00 P.M.,ONE Y WEDNESDAY,JULY 22,1992 AT 7:00 P.M.,ONE ` SALEM GREEN, second floor. SALEM GREEN, second floor. RICHARD A. BENGAL, ChairmanSALEM RICHARD A. BENCAL, Chairman July 8, 15, 1992 July 8, 15, 1992 SN82812 CITY OF SALEM BOARD OF APPEAL 745-9595 Ext. 381 Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter- ested in the petition submitted by GAIL&JAMES SAGRIS for a Special Permit from side and rear setbacks to allow construction of a deck at 10 DEARBORN ST. (R-2) Said hearing to be held WEDNESDAY,JULY 22,1992 AT 7:00 P.M.,ONE SALEM GREEN, second Floor. RICHARD A. BENCAL, Chairman July 8, 15, 1992 SN82812 APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . flLitu of �$ttlent, ��ttssarhusetts TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS: The Undersigned represent that he is are the owners of a certain parcel of land located at P10. . . 1.? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Street; Zoning District. el'� . and said parcel is affected by section(s ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . of the Massachusetts State Building Code. Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in accordance withtion X A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance. N vi n m C7-) mo m "cn 00 a r w cn T' n cv % r C)T {D CO CDCD c 2 O Lx:) T m cG G V m The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following reasons: k . The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero- gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for the following reasow � jdae� Owner.', i7. �. /fj�¢. . . . . . . . . Address/17. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . Telephone. . . 7y. /(<dl. . . . . . . . �. . . . Petitioner. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Address. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Date�lll i./�!�./.�9c1�. . . . Telephontee.. . . . . .,.J. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . By. . 1E1. �C/ j r�J` . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The Evening News. 9 _ - -, s Z z z z = — — o > z _ _ > o z _ �_ � > � n Z C v ,a n s'. _� Y �y� �"1 1 �/ `-i Rt .n _ 1 APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . oftz�m, ''gtt��husPtf� TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS: The Undersi nea reoresent that he s are 'he owners of a certain parcei of land located ;t NO. /d. .��ftl��`Y1/LI�. ST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Street; =ina Jistrict.loi. ana said parcel affected cy �ectionis : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ;f the Massacnusetts State Building Code. Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the inspector of Buildings in accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance. c r� n o m �c CD The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following reasons: The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero- gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and. Building Code for the following reasons: S/olGi�9L �inr0 Fr-am si��' G1�iD ,¢E.9,e .�,TB�e'C`S Owner.,hfv. � /!'eJ` . . �P�l� . . . . . . . Address/Q. .. . . . . . . . ... . . Telephone. .G�i�: . . . . . . . . . . Petitioner. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Address. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Date. . �1/��i. .��!� . �99P� Telephone,J . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . By. . .��15 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . ... . . four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The Evening News. TARTER & TOWERS ENGINEERING CORP. .�cu�upe�a-, �oc�.zaeLaizd��efw�e� Joseph 0.Carter 6 FAIRVIEW AVENUE Professional Engineer SWAMPSCOTT, MASS. 01907 .Registered Land Surveyor Tel. 592-8386 AS–BUILT PLOT PLAN Salem, MA Owners : James H. & Gail �= i E. Sagris — Date : June 15 , 1992 G' Scale : 1 "=20 ' "v N� 0:) r 01N n co r�i LST 2 ECK �JNC F� C'•�NJ?- I0 2599 G.F. +; P N� S z Z P �( .1`J EI—V ti1G is #/a I hereby certify that the 3 i :;�a ., ss' ,..,�:•t•. > structures depicted are located on the as CD EAR36R�1 shown r rof ssional Land Surveyor OFitq\ JOSEPH o D' � CARTER No.8387 / ACCISTEaEe ��unL uaa� CIVIL ENGINEERING PERCOLATION TESTS SEWAGE DISPOSAL DESIGNS SURVEYING LK /8d85 MAKEPEACE 135989 25 t VO I ? ot v1 fit r - .. _. Ij - - _- , r i i FCL co,JS712UCc�oN I �!A Y �s card t4- V. h'T � ])4- 10 ,, , o 3 5 � I i 1)E4r- i sa°n (o_�I2 To7o}S�5 i W tod � i , , v O5 s 1i11 - ii;! }' ' UA mo 0 3 �,, f o -- �r ✓ LN / a� U � 1 . J I N2 a I \ O r G Z _ ap i I tf itu of �&ttlrm, assttthusettEi Bourd of Atrpeul nXM CAS r mo -n N� W om o DECISION ON THE PETITION OF GAIL AND JAMES SAGRIS s FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 10 DEARBORN ST. (R-2) m n Cn cn n N A hearing on this petition was held July 22, 1992 with the following Board Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Richard Febonio, Francis Grealish, Jr. , Stephen Touchette and Associate Member Arthur Labrecque. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioners, owners of the property, are requesting a Special Permit to extend nonconforming rear and side setback to allow construction of a deck. The property is located in an R-2 district. The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this request for a Special Permit is Section 5-3(j ) , which provides as follows: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set forth in Sections 8-6 and 9-4 , grant Special Permits for alterations and reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement, extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses, provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood. In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing ind after viewing the plans. makes the following findings of fact: 1. The immediate rbutter was in opposition. 2. The Special Permit requested cannot be granted without substantial detriment to the public good or without nullifying and substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. DECISION ON THE PETITION OF GAIL AND JAMES SAGRIS FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 10 DEARBORN ST. , SALEM page two On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1 . The Special Permit requested cannot be granted without substantial detriment to the public good or without nullifying and substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the ordinance. 2. The granting of the Special Permit requested will not be in harmony with the neighborhood and will not promote the public health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City's inhabitants. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted two (2) in favor (Touchette and Labrecque) three (3 ) against (Bencal, Febonio and Grealish) the granting of the Special Permit requested. Having failed to garner the four affirmative votes required to pass, the motion to grant fails and the petition for a Special Permit is denied. Special Permit Denied July 22, 1992 Stephen Touchette, Member Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of MGL Chapter 40A and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL Chapter 40A, Section 11, the Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision, bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry or Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate or Title. Board of Appeal n Ir mo Cj �N Wn w r �M O Ti O Cn N f� •!V (fit" of �ittivm, fflassMd111sett5� Board of Auprttl r 2 i - < M o Cy iJ T cn> W r om O T; O DECISION ON THE PETITION OF GAIL AND JAMES SAGRIS = s FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 10 DEARBORN ST. (R-2 ) ma- N A hearing on this petition was held July 22, 1992 with the following Board Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Richard Febonio, Francis Grealish, Jr. , Stephen Touchette and Associate Member Arthur Labrecque. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioners, owners of the property, are requesting a Special Permit to extend nonconforming rear and side setback to allow construction of a deck. The property is located in an R-2 district. The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this request for a Special Permit is Section 5-3(j ) , which provides as follows: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set forth in Sections 8-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permits for alterations and reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement, extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses, provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood. In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing and after viewing the plans. makes the following findings of fact: 1. The immediate rbutter was in opposition. 2. The Special Permit requested cannot be granted without substantial detriment to the public good or without nullifying and substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. DECISION ON THE PETITION OF GAIL AND JAMES SAGRIS FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 10 DEARBORN ST. , SALEM page two On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1 . The Special Permit requested cannot be granted without substantial detriment to the public good or without nullifying and substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the ordinance. 2. The granting of the Special Permit requested will not be in harmony with the neighborhood and will not promote the public health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City' s inhabitants. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted two (2) in favor (Touchette and Labrecque) three (3 ) against (Bencal, Febonio and Grealish) the granting of the Special Permit requested. Having failed to garner the four affirmative votes required to pass, the motion to grant fails and the petition for a Special Permit is denied. Special Permit Denied July 22, 1992 Stephen Touchette, Member Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of MGL Chapter 40A and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL Chapter 40A, Section 11, the Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision, bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry or Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. Board of Appeal n s C�,� r� m o c+a z-M �:Cn r om c $ O �I ti y GG I Salem Historical Commission ONE SALEM GREEN.SALEM. MASSACHUSETTS 01970 (508)745-9595 EXT.311 July 22 , 1992 Richard Bencal, Chairman Board of Appeal One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 Dear Chairman Bencal : The Salem Historical Commission is in receipt of your agenda for July 22 , 1992 of which petitions for 460MONIMPpmolX10 Dearborn will be heard. While the Commission taIce s- o position on these petitions, we are hopeful that any alterations or new construction will be sympathetic to the historic architecture of these buildings . In this regard, the Commission has enclosed building survey forms for each of these and would be pleased to offer design review, should the Board of Appeal request such services . Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, THE SALEM HISTORICAL COMMISSION Annie C. Harris Chairman JG\JANE\HOAPPEAL 1,-PEA F6Fdh N0. FORM B - BUILDING 3 -7 y MASSACEUSETTS HISTORICAL COMMISSION 80 BOYLSTON STREET; BOSTON, MA 02116 Salem s 10 Dearborn. Street W7. c Name Present Residential iginal RPG+ +enrj ,3l RI:TI0d: c. 1810 c_ iJJe nb.-,.r. r ion S=-TCH MAP Show property'.$ location in relation Style Federal to nearest cross streets and/or geographical features. Indicate Architect all buildings between inventoried property and nearest intersection. K Exterior wall fabric wood shingles Indicate north. outbuildings D Ef100 N ST Major alterations (with dates) Victorian bracketed doorhro aral__ second story bay Moved Date VPNAM Sl Approx. acreage less than one acre Recorded by Debra Hilbert Setting Residential Grganization Salem Planning Devartment Date April 1986 (Staple additional sheets here) AF2L3I� JR>L S:G4'IFICkNC:E (Desc:ibe important architectural features and evaluate in terms of other buildings within the cors-..siity.) This house is one of Dearborn StIeet' s earliest dwellings . In its vernacular character, the dwelling is similar to many in Salem. It has a gambrel roof and a 3—bay symmetrically arranged facade with a center entry. Decorating this entry is the Victorian feature of a. bracketed doorhood supportii,g a second story bay. other features are the pedimented dormers, rear leanto, west end wing, and placement of the second story windows close to the roof eaves. HISTORICAL SIG�IFIC4NG (blain the role owners played in local or state history and how the building relates to the development of the c.,^�uaality.) Deed researc:' would be needed to identify the early owner(s) of '_his property but by 1851 it was the home of shoea�akEr Joseph Smith. The house remained in the Smith family as late as _897. Later it was purchased by Frank E. Locke (see J1 Dearborn Street ) who rented the house to teamster Howard A. Sylvester and Julia E. Smith, occupation unknown. Because of the large number of tanner;cs located along the batiks of tae North River, many shoemakers and leather workers lived in North Salem during the 19th century. The area also developed as a suburban neighborhood for professional and clerical people who worked in downtown Sale-. Before such residential subdivision began, ownership of land in the Morthfields, as this part of Salem was called, was based on a system of communal proprietorship for argricu'_tural our roses. By the mid-18th century individual ownership vegan to replace the notion. of land held in common by. a group of proprietors and during the 19th century houses were b:;ilt in large numbers . Judging by its appearance, this house was built Q shortly after Dearborn Street was openej in 1810. B1BLI06,!_P1Y and/or PM;ZRE`7frS (name of publicatica, author, date and publisher) 1851, 1874, 1897, 1911 Salem -Map & Atlases 18"3, - 1911 Salem Directories 3; 4' 1CM - 7/82 address: / A ,� � �,REA Fors xo. FORM B — BUILDING . 3 -7 MASSACHUSETTS HISTORICAL COMMISSION 80 BOYLSTON STR.E T-, BOSTON, MA 02116 Salem s 10 Dearborn Street a Name Present Residential iginal R G+�ria1 RIPTIOd: c. 1810 -- _ WCe nhcoryption SMCH i4P Show property'.s location in relation Style Federal to nearest cross streets and/or geographical features. Indicate Architect ell buildings between inventoried p-:operty and nearest intersection. K Exterior wall fabric wood Shingles Indicate north. outbuildings D F�1'RBoAJ� ST Major alterations (with dates) -- Victorian bracleeted doorhood anti second story. bay Moved Date �PNaM Sl. Approx. acreage less than one acre Recorded by Debra Hilbert Setting Residential Organization Salem Plannine Deyartment Date April 1986 (Staple additional sheets here) ARLvj-1_=CPLRtaL, S:Gs'IFICkNCE (Describe impertant architectural features and evaluate in terms of other buildings within the co=mity-) This house is one of Dearborn Street' s earliest dwellings. In its vernacular character, the dwelling is similar to many in Salem. It hes a eambrel roof and a 3—bay symmetrically arranged facade with a center entry. Decorating this entry is the Virtorian feature of a bracketed doorhood supportii,g a second story bay. Other features are the pedimented dormers, rear leanto, west end wing, and placement of the second story windows close to the roof eaves. HISTORICAL SIGNIFIG4NC (Main the role owners played in local or state history and how the building relates to the development of the commtmity.) Deed researcS would be needed to identify the early owner(s) of th$c property but by 1851 it was the home of shoemaker Joseph Smith. The house remained in the Smith family as late as 1897. Later it was purchased by Frank E. Locke (see 31 Dearborn Street) who rented the house to teamster Howard A. Sylvester and Julia E. Smith, occupation unknown. F' Because of the large number of tanneries located along the banks of the North River, many shoemakers and leather workers lived in North Salem during the 19th century. The area also developed as a suburban neighborhood for professional ar,d clerical people who worked in downtown Sales. Before such residential subdivision began, ownership of land in . the Northf.ields, as this part of Salem was called, was based on a system -f communal proprietorship for argricu'_tural purposes. By the mid-18th -- ' century individual ownership began to replace the notion of land held in common by, a group of proprietors and during the 19th century houses were built in large n,.,mbers . Judging by its appearance, this house was built shortly after Dearborn Street was opened in 1810. - C xBiBLIOG pHY and/or REFc72E`IS (rare of publication, author, date and publisher) 1851, 1874, 1897, 1911 Salem-Map & Atlases 1853, ' 191J. Salem Directories Y .ya st. - loM - 7/82 " m , :"'dress - --- APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . .. . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . of '�$ttlrm, ��rzssarhusetts �iv=b of Fsrai TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS: The Undersigned represent that he is are the owners of a certain parcel of land located at ri0. /.O• . .eAeW1W. vnr . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Street; Zonino District.A R. and said parcel is affected by Section(s ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ;f the Massachusetts State Building Code. Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance. r mo m I 477 � (n D CL _ y i 3u- CJ C",Cz 5..)t•) m Cl) ' 4t1 � LO 4 �— 3- O a 1-- m 7 U The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following reasons: The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero- gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for the following reasons: S�lGi�9L i 0 rtOM sig' a,00 x4.9,e S6;� Owner.,. � /17�5 . ��1`-� . . . . . . . Address X0. . �fi' 1SO�C1. . S7 _ . Telephone. . . . . . . . . . �. . . . Petitioner. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Address. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Date. . 1.9e. ./o/ . �ffp? Telephone. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . /� By. . �16 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . .. . . . . . ... . . . . . . . ... . . four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The Evening News. f Z Z e Z Z — v C t l L v _ f I r ( I 00, If/✓�/ 9C-i ASIX j �. f � i t I I r E ` f i ME ✓ _ I t �i i Ft�t: .�e,Js7nu�rro� �• H ,Z y � �res3✓ic -f-�'��f�' ;AA �E� r Y� �-- — - ---- _ - — __ -------_ 1 n _. ------------ -- - - ----- �s!a,�cd u�l+fyd 3jg`�e�A�s ; - a-It � 17 E'T"i ►L 1 i I' z,t aRG«�EP uPP£k— f 0 i � i ani I � Y 1 Y � r t 10: I + n ' �o ,35 .; DECKING - � Tb S01$1S # � � GRLt N9165 I w i I i t 45 $F (1 I�t�� r t. � i ss '� YL .1 �� °y Gf Ne : ,4 r .�'.� S e +r 1 i •€' flt.... ,,., .. `a 1 I .. 9 Y k ,3 C - x �. . . 1 i ra :r .:tea' -^%✓= l`^, - R1 7-1 ' O ZR� CI `ate � �'1.a. 1J�� i IN. b ARTER s TOWERS ENGINEERING CORP. Joseph D.Carter Professional Engineer 6 FAIRVIEW AVENUE Registered Land Surveyor SWAMPSCOTT, MASS. 01 907 Tel. 592-8386 AS—BUILT PLOT PLAN Salem, MA Owners : James H. & Gail / E. Sagris _ Date : June 15 , 1992 MC Cn T, Scale: 1 "=20 ' N CO r ti+ o? � T 3� rnA N c.n N N 1_e�T 2 / Car/ST7.0 G t�(JIC. (�, TO EC K. (_/NOES' Cb DIST, 55 i oti! 2 0 >=Z ? Lo-r- 3 q*_ IIII�«<ffff N 2599 � t 1i k y r- ELL/�1G L p �I 1 #fid ' .til I hereby certify that the 3 3 structures depicted are located on the as C)EA?.-F:3-6F;7�_J v'T, shown r i rof ssional Land Surveyor $��\N OF e� JOSEPHo CARTER H q No. 9M7 � QSTER L18JjC L&� CIVIL ENGINEERING PERCOLATION TESTS SEWAGE DISPOSAL DESIGNS SURVEYING 3K MAKEPEACE 135989 CARTER & TOWERS ENGINEERING CORP. .�u�tae�e-, �atuzep,Lared��e�eaute' Joseph D.Carter 6 FAIRVIEW AVENUE Professional Engineer Registered land Surveyor SWAMPSCOTT. MASS. 01907 Tel. 592-8386 AS-BUILT PLOT PLAN Salem, MA Owners : James H. & Gail C" c E. Sagris Date: June 15 , 1992 0 �, Scale: 1 "=20 ' " n n CO o rry r Rt T N tV ECi< Utio GbNJ'T, N 2.5 s.r. +a P N�� F Zyz Srr_ i Y d r �E�Li lG ' a # I hereby certify that the structures depicted are c located on the as 3EAZ861��I ��7 . s}lOWn i J rof ssional Land Surveyor JOSEPH y� a D. T CARTER H No.9387 . ��ne Lam CIVIL ENGINEERING PERCOLATION TESTS SEWAGE DISPOSAL DESIGNS SURVEYING 3K /3C)85 MAKEPEACE 135989 ARTER s TOWERS ENGINEERING CORP. �7iu�e�e., �iacuzaeLand�� Joseph 0.Carter 6 FAIRVIEW AVENUE Professional Engineer Registered Land Surveyor SWAMPSCOTT. MASS. 01907 Tel. 592.8386 AS-BUILT PLOT PLAN Salem, MA Owners : James H. & Gail E. Sagris Date: June 15 , 1992 n c. c — Scale: 1 "=20 ' r ' ma Cn �rn "u1 om r 3s M rna (n ca (n ry ECK lJ r.1o� C2��J'r LoT 3 9'± 1G I hereby certify that the 3 3 ti,1 ;=4 rr <,. 55.�k aftikl:k'4 - structures depicted are C - located on the as TJ EAZ30F=ti1 �J ! , ShOWI] - ofgs5�',o L Su veyor 06 + JOSEPH o D. CARTER No. M7 ISTER``�� CIVIL ENGINEERING PERCOLATION TESTS SEWAGE DISPOSAL DESIGNS SURVEYING 7��f=_: 3K MASEPEACE 135089 f { o j. p/ CijX � K� J � r '.. ed Y II � i•: r bYh I r I ( I tin, j n i I I I i 1.Ilk SvbN �lbtJ � � i _. .. pot 0M . I Ilk eV, t 0 I � r ' — FYI A 1 /1 d�� ,�S H rvol.-on2ttrro� '�?� r C1NC)0?1 �J 4g ` 46 % }; I a a 40r: Iff°iii j Tl I 'a i / 4)id `p IYYA4 a, 1 r' hX-z h-'(c - �� .Ss �7Qpzovof ! 2 Ls r __ 1 r 1 - 4-4 a /t Y !— A � I I. 77, NZ t v _ I � � r 1 i i e f i S gyp'( .y ft I .:Y } � 3 'i'<S`��iu 1. SvyN ''Ib�J - j SLS1aZ Q.l ,71x„Vr I 01 i ��ddGl. rs;n�yuo Z rit 1{ulaq- }I+h fly -t� o� k��R tib -flo4 S-71F77- HCV Sl d�dd�BtC n T°.tJ 17 0 1 ! def{ a?0` ��.1f�irss»� A Hr c<t; X i IK U L. ' -nw •tat- x -. i.:; '-,�:r.a_. - - � V .!.LL a. _.xw a �_^�.__ 'l..-R... \ t i y ' xe�c„ 2 *ra`��r"0 ani �"c" '2..n"p�..�•'��' � ,; ""�- Z I A ti F ^ & I� / lS of �� \�Q °� vy� � 4`�'4� gti' x� , �S •�,'� G •sem r'p t'UA c`rt.� q pa � . �._ 9 nN St \ c J m o G u' r Sb``Tro D �'iu�WST 'py Ca ' NO i a O sr Q > Q L �Nu� �2�i9' x`90 '" 4` d �? vs1" p',p •,,�.. / .�;�3d'S . n° . oQ ��'° ��nem ¢' a• o°,. � w YvaU� 1p'L rip • 8p N°� O , u o a ru' �e9 `,cava �-'� •y ,�� O , �� • �4 y ;: �s29 CP lk v, q4 V _ O Sar Bs. _yO r7`C� � \\4' v "re„ . ,'.�' /�a�, , 5 .b o "1�;. . .. , ,�. ,o . . , w.•�u '�. �, � �'�V 99 <,:. / BOARD OF ASSESSORS ciTY HALL PAGE. III �IA NA 19 4 97 r) 77 2 PATo o �6 7l9" 2 , o o y 3 ERTIFABUTTERSL ET 4 ..........., 4 sSUBJECT PROPERTY: NAP. 27 LOT. 0294 SUFE. 5 5 6 PROPERTY ADDRESS: 0010 DEARBORN STREET 70 6 A9&'E;Sr'f'P OWNER SAGAUS jA1!XZ' W a 7 GAIL E 9 10* 9 MAP LOT %UFF EROPERTY ADDRESS ASSESSED OWNER MAILING ADDRESS 1. 10 13 1 1 :4 0 27 0294 0010 DEARBORN STREET SAGRXS JAPIES F1 10 DEARBORN ST 5 12 GAIL E SALEM MA 01970 16 13 27 0257 0001P DEARElOR14 STREET BERNIER RICHARD J 9 DEARBORN ST 17 14 'ARET E too a BERNIER MARG SALEM MA 01970 -ER 191 15 27 0291 rjQ-15' LOUF PEI 15 UPHAM ST 20 16 CHRISTINE SALEM MA 01970 21 17 27 0292 0017 UPHAM STREET LITWIN EDWARD U22 17 UPHAM STREET 23 is Io LITWIN DOROTHY R SALEM MA 01970 24 to 'p o 25 GROLCKX TIAUREEN 19 UPHAM ST 20 ......L l l l o SALEM MA 019-70 26 21 o 27 6- DEARBORN, ST ' 28 22 SALEM MA 01970 29 23 '27 0296 0006 DEARBORN STREET' CANN CORA B 6 DEARBORN ST 300 311 24 SALEM PIA 0197CJ 32 25 I= , 27, 032&- 001 Z,DEARBORN,o.STREET 12-�12 1/2 � DEAIRL�ORN�'ST..,REAL.T'Y�:T'FZUS-f� .4.6 SMITH sT 33 o TRALCY WILLIAPI' A 340 0 26 TR- MARBLEHEAD HA 01945 35 27 ........ 36 28 37 0 29 38 39 30 40 31 41 32 42 43 33 441 34 45 •35 46. 47 36 48 37 o 49 38 50 ........... ........ 51 52 40 53 •41 54 55 z 42 56 2 43 o o o o l 44 o l ............ ................. 5945 60 46 61 47 :2 3 48 64. 49 o l<> 65 •50 66 67 52 69 53 70 9 71 '�—— 72 55 PETE P1. CARON ——--- 73 56 .. ....... CHIEF ASSESSOR 740 �7 o J75 11 .rs or; \ / S"/ L9 vr o ��f��C�, j\ +V`ti a u,�' co rz- cp 0u1 —00 Ip LE 14 on OIV Vol • 057 L, CV -"o BOARD OF ASSESSORS CITY HALL PAGE: ................. ... ..... ...... • 2 2 AT, '�6 '01XW, 3 ........... ........... ........... ....... • CERTlFlEQ, ABUTT'kS,-LIST' 3 ......... ........... 4 4 0 5 SUBJECT PROPERTY: MAP. 27 LOT: 0294 SUFF. 6 •7 6 PROPERTY ADDRESS: 0010 DEARBORN STREE7 8 7 ASSESSED OWNER SAGRIS 9 GAIL E • 0 a �01 a 12 10 MAP—LOT—SOF PTRYPERTY–WUME55 A ESSED—OWNER MAIL–ING—ADDRESS 13 • 11 :4• 7 0294 0010 DEARBORN STREET S A GRI G JAMES H 10 DEARBORN ST 5 12 2 16 13 SA-LE-E RAf..E"4A--e+9:7-0 - �ERNIER RICHARD J 9 DEARBORN ST7 17 • 14 27 0257 0009 DEARBORN. STREET — SALEM MA 01970 �980 15 BERNIER MARGARET E.:, z 20 — 2F e2l?f A5 UPHPitl STRE LOUF PETER .15 16 211 0 7 CHRISTINE SALEM MA 01970 22 1 ,a 27 0292 G0-17 UPHAM STREET LITWIN EDWARD U 17 UPHAM ST 130241 N M MA 01970 25 19-1— .... .... V--�7—l" 1, : 1. SALE ........... �90 rj 019- U.r�.,HA M, STREET REET ....... 27, 02 ...... GROCki–�,MAUR'EEN,," 26 2 '%�-� PHAM.�ST;l ''. ........ 0 .................... 21 ........................... ............... ......... SALEM'MA 270 ........ 28 22 29 23 SALEM MA 01970 30• 10 24 .27 0296 0006 DEARBORN STREET CANN CORA 6 6 DEARBORN ST 31 32 'SM 25 33 E E BAY ROAD 34 7' 0326 MARBORN.�STREET' MADE • •26 ........ 35 AtllLTON M4 0-1936 27 3,1 28 37 •29 3: 3 • 30 40 31 41 0 32 420 43 33 44 34 45 35 4 0 470 36 4,1 .... . . .... 37 49 38 t 50• • 39 ......... ..... .. . 52 40 53 • 5 41 4 55 42 56 43 .............. .. 57 Z, 44 51 45 ...... 60 46 61 •47 • :2 3 48 64 49 65 50 66 67 51 68 52 69 53 709 0 71 54 72 55 73 PETER M. CARON 74 •55 ......- CHIEF ASSESSOR 750 �� o —� o��{�.��-� — ��- • - - �° �. --�� - -