92 COLUMBUS AVENUE - ZBA (3) 92 Columbus Ave. R-1
Wm. & Sallie Cass
� 1
DATE OF HEARING
PETITIONER e5�
LOCATION 9ct /C4 � -
MOTION: TO GRANT_ SECOND
TO DENY SECOND
TO RE-HEAR SECOND
LEAVE TO WITHDRAW SECOND
TO CONTINUE SECOND
ROLL CALL PRESENT GRANT
DENY WITHDRAW RE-HEAR CONTINUE
RICHARD BENGAL
V JOSEPH CORRENTI_
RICHARD''FEBONIO
EDWARD LUZINSKI
MARY JANE STIRGWOLT /
ASSOCIATE MEMBERS
7q A.) G�,�°/
ARTHUR LABRECQUE
CONDITIONS:�n� � n�
OCT Z6 3 08 FM '87
b_ ,�y� N '
of �Iem, e4'f a5sac4uzvtJs"n
4 � 7
CITY CLEf0 , c !.I.FP.. Mr.s°..
23OMTa of ( FFpe l
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF WILLIAM & SALLIE CASS FOR A VARIANCE'
AT 92 COLUMBUS AVENUE (R-1 )
A hearing on this petition was held October 7, 1987 with the following Board Members
present: James Fleming, Vice Chairman; Messrs. , Bencal, Luzinski and Strout.
Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing
were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts
General Laws Chapter 40A.
The petitioners, representing themselves, are requesting a Variance from setback
requirements to allow for the construction of a te-:porary boat shelter at 92
Columbus Avenue, which is in an R-1 district.
The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of the
Board that:
a. special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the
land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting
other lands, buildings and structures in the same district:
b. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve
substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner;
c. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose-of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal,- after careful consideration of the evidence presented, and
after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact:
1 . There was strong neighborhood support for the petition expressed
at the hearing, including the approval of all the abutters;
2. The plans proposed are in harmony with the neighborhood are relate
to the ship building history of the area.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the
hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1 . Special conditions exist which affect the subject property but which
do not affect the district generally;
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
work a substantial hardship to the petitioner;
3. The relief requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF WILLIAM & SALLIE CRSS FOR,
VARIANCE AT 92 COLUMBUS AVENUE, SALEM
page two
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 4-0, to grant the
requested Variance, subject to the following conditions:
1 . The temporary boat shelter is to be built as per the plans submitted;
2. A building permit must be obtained from the Building Inspector;
3. This Variance is to expire on December 31 , 1990.
VARIANCE GRANTED
yax:es I;. Fleming, Esq. , Vice airman
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
: t. . TP. . Sr 1L L FE ?'P'E PURSUANT TO SECTION 17 OF The
CA`.'S P.FTiER THE Dr.'.El; i:
_;CO
- C -c C G T C17i CLERK.
C . F-[L Sc : 11 THE iF. :C° 0, c:��..
( - - ,. T
._ S APPEAL P"7
JH" ESSEX E;ulR, C: CE 'S ID I':Sc'rD .Ir c. L -
- OF R.C'3RD OR IS ti_,.6ROED A.J NO-cO 0. TEE 0..NER'S CERTIFICATE OF TITLE.THE +. '.E CF THE
-- - BOARD. OF APPEAL
15 /9%d
1
U r ` �
LtiC�J c ��L�-r2
l)
Y
rt-
ZQ
all-
�� d'�.-e�..�iz��-`'� ��� Y%%�'• tic
_Zr
y t
-
/
7X�IL- � �
APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .
CHH of tt1em, tx�sttt u' e##s
�CUR�IE
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
The Undersign�1 rr�eepresent tha he is are the owners of a certain parcel of land located
at NO. . .�a1. 1G410436l�. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Street; Zoning District. . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : and said parcel is affected by Section(s). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
of the Massachusetts State Building Code.
Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in
accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance.
_� C/3 m
-i -v O
�� Rl
� � r
The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following
reasons:
The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem
Zoning Ordinance and/or the .Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to
approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said
Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary
hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero-
gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for
the following reasons:
�C— /z�
eP
O
Own er. �1I. . ., ��.j ���r. . . . . . . . .
Address
Telephone
Peti ti oner4�l�L��glI1. v�S. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
/ Address. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Date . . ��.�� � . . . . . . . . . . .
Telep .. . . ?�. .
By. . . . . . . . .
Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of
Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The
Evening News.
�
^ �
� r
�
`
�
N0~.-........-~
`
PETITION T0BOARD OFAPPEALS
L0C&Tl00 �
^'~~^`^-^~~--`--~~~''~~^.
PEIl7l0NEO..-......-.....-.
ADD8SS3....---~...~-.~.~
�
^-~^`'--'~~^--''-~^
`
CONDITIONS
�
..-~..--._-~'~~-~-~.-^^~' �
'
� `
' ...'.~^^.~'-.~.~~---...-~~^.
`
.^~~~_~~~~~~~--.~.,--~..
�
� ~-~~-^~~,-^~~'---.~`-^.`.
'
�
~~^~~~^~-^~--~^~~^--~~^-^
�
. .
� -' .~~..~~~^-.~,_-.~~'^.~~
PETITION APPROVED....................
��
DENIED......................... �
�
�
19~~^, .^.^
'-~~~^^~'^~-~^~'-
�
�
�
� ' U
� � �
i
ur
II ]
5 . t Yi r'S 5Fpp'�
11 1, F1'lY
IVa, )' re 7 Y.la f t
,
r
�y, 4
q 1z
'V
1
y5
tt Y r
.�w���I.rii
<3 6 , t �4
,t
, t
>r I
� MlICL
�` S
t.�"COMpy.(,
s° Ctg of tt1Pm, ttSsttCl#uSP##S
s
3� r# Poxra of Nett!
' Aep�uiue
October 28, 1987
Notice is hereby given that as of October 26, 1987
the decision of the Board of Appeal has been filed
with the City Clerk to grant the petiton of William
and Sallie Cass for Variance to allow temporary boat
shelter at 92 Columbus Ave.
BOARD OF APPEAL
Brenda M. Sumrall Clerk
APPEAL FROM THIS DECISION, IF ANY, SHALL BE MADE PURSUANT TO SECTION 17 OF THE MASS.
GENERAL LAWS, CHAPTER 808, AND SHALL BE FILED WITHIN 20 DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF FILING
OF THIS DECISION IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK.
PURSANT TO MASS. GENERAL LAWS, CHAPTER 808, SECTION 11, THE VARIANCE OR SPECIAL PERMIT
GRANTED HEREIN, SHALL NOT TAKE EFFECT UNTIL A COPY OF THEDECISION, BEARING THE CERTe
FICATION OF THE CITY CLERK THAT 20 DAYS HAVE ELAPSED AND NO APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED
OR THAT, IF SUCH AN APPEAL HAS BEEN FILE, THAT IT HAS BEEN DISMISSED OR DENIED IS
RECORDED IN THE SOUTH ESSEX REGISTRY OF DEEDS AND INDEXED UNDER THE NAME OF THE OWNER
OF REGQRQ OR 1S RECORDED ANQ NOTED. ON THE OWNER'S CERTIFICATE OF TITLE.
VWQ OF APPEAE
OCT 26 3 os
,CON
ofttlem, � ttss�zclluse##SFILEn
g "CITY CLEkK. P.I.E!�
larb of
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF WILLIAM & SALLIE CASS FOR A VARIANCE
AT 92 COLUMBUS AVENUE (R-1 )
_ A hearing on this petition was held October 7., 1987 with the following Board Members
present: James Fleming, Vice Chairman; Messrs. , Bencal, Luzinski and Strout.
Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing
were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts
General Laws Chapter 40A.
The petitioners, representing themselves, are requesting a Variance from setback .
requirements to allow for the construction of a temporary boat shelter at 92
Columbus Avenue, which is in an R-1 district.
The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of the
Board that:
a. special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the
land, building or structure involved and which are not, generally affecting
other lands, buildings and structures in the same district:
b. literal enforcement of the provisionsofthe Zoning Ordinance would involve
substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner;
c. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the,
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal,. after careful consideration of the evidence presented, and
after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact:
1 . There was strong neighborhood support for the petition expressed
at the hearing, including the approval of all the abutters;
2. The plans proposed are in harmony with the neighborhood are relate
to the ship building history of the area.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the
hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1 . Special conditions exist which affect the subject property but which
do not affect the district generally;
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
work a substantial hardship to the petitioner;
3. The relief requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF WILLIA'•; & SALLIE CESS FOR
VARIANCE AT 42 COLUMBUS AVENUE, SALEM
page two
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal Voted unanimously, 4-0, to grant the
requested Variance, subject to the following conditions:
1 . The temporary boat shelter is to be built as per the plans submitted;
2. A building permit must be obtained from the Building Inspector;
3. This Variance is to expire on December 31 , 1900.
VARIANCE GRANTED
games [•i. Fleming, Esq. , Vice airman
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FIL✓ED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
c ,rLE FE E PURSUANT TO SCCTiOY 17 OF TEE
DA"S AT ER THE Dr..E C- F'_'4D
11 Th° V SCE 0-
7: c --....i
c S cF Fl4� I
F
ESSEX _-,is! r rr CE )S ! I: 6e ED . . �' The E Oi THE
OF P70ORD OP IS F-E-RDD A,' NJI_D C.. ,:.E C,.,..R S CERTIFICATE OF TITLE.
BOARD OF APPEAL
OCT U 3 Da PM '81
TLitU of ,�3alvm, � tts5tttijusPttsF'L`n
3 CITY CLEF F:. c MJ Ff4, Rtst_
Y
curb of �Pvpzl
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF WILLIAM & SALLIE CASS FOR A VARIANCE
AT 92 COLUMBUS AVENUE (R-1 )
A hearing on this petition was held October 7, 1987 with the following Board Members
present: James Fleming, Vice Chairman; Messrs. , Bencal, Luzinski and Strout.
Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing
were properly published in the Saler Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts
General Laws Chapter 40A.
The petitioners, representing themselves, are requesting a Variance from setback
requirements to allow for the construction of a temporary boat shelter at 92
Columbus Avenue, which is in an R-1 district.
The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of the
Board that:
a. special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the
land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting
other lands, buildings and structures in the same district:
b. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve
substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner;
c. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal,. after careful consideration of the evidence presented, and
after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact:
1 . There was strong neighborhood support for the petition expressed
at the hearing, including the approval of all the abutters;
2. The plans proposed are in harmony with the neighborhood are relate
to the ship building history of the area.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the
hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1 . Special conditions exist which affect the subject property but which
do not affect the district generally;
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
work a substantial hardship to the petitioner;
3. The relief requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF WILLIAM & SALLIE CESS FOR
VARIANCE AT 92 COLUMBUS AVENUE, SALEM,
page two
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 4-0, to grant the
requested Variance, subject to the following conditions:
1 . The temporary boat shelter is to be built as per the plans submitted;
2. A building permit must be obtained from the Building Inspector;
3. This Variance is to expire on December 31 , 1990.
VARIANCE GRANTED J
t /
ya-Res M.. Fleming, Esq. , Vice airman
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
SHALL Fr. F PURSUANT S �
C LP .. L 7 TO LCTIO4 11 OF irr
L D;'IS AFTER IPE DAT E ri IIt3
P 27 - - :. c i^ r
EE �i AUt OE it n
. F S I THE ` u P ESSEX �1 fii 1 C; ^S �^ L.!'LkrO :,.w.2 TF i t Cf THE
OF RECORD GR IS n ,ARDED AND �SOIED 0.. THE w,.;ER S CERTIFICATE OF TITLE.
BOARD. OF APPEAL
OCT 26 3 06
� u
f t Cita of tt(em, 'f2I5B2Ic4uBetts"LEn
CITY CLEi'K' 'a_Gk !iAS£_
ourb of ' }AFPE rl
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF WILLIAM & SALLIE CASS FOR A VARIANCE
AT 92 COLUMBUS AVENUE (R-1 )
A hearing on this petition was held October 7, 1987 with the following Board Members
present: James Fleming, Vice Chairman; Messrs. , Bencal, Lu--inski and Strout.
Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing
were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts
General Laws Chapter 40A.
The petitioners, representing themselves, are requesting a Variance from setback
requirements to allow for the construction of a temporary boat shelter at 92
Columbus Avenue, which is in an R-1 district.
The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of the
Board that:
a. special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the
land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting
other lands, buildings and structures in the same district:
b. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve
substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner;
c. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal,. after careful consideration of the evidence presented, and
after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact:
1 . There was strong neighborhood support for the petition expressed
at the hearing, including the approval of all the abutters;
2. The plans proposed are in harmony with the neighborhood are relate
to the ship building history of the area.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the
hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1 . Special conditions exist which affect the subject property but which
do not affect the district generally;
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
work a substantial hardship to the petitioner;
3. The relief requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF WILLIAM & SA.LLIE CASS FOR
VARIANCE AT 92 COLUMBUS AVENUE, SALEM
page two
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 4-0, to grant the
requested Variance, subject to the following conditions:
1 . The temporary boat shelter is to be built as per the plans submitted;
2. A building permit must be obtained from the Building Inspector;
3. This Variance is to expire on December 31 , 1990.
VARIANCE GRANTED
Lanes M. Fleming, Esq. , Vice airman
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLER3
f TP: . rz= c'.F tLL Pc r PUPSUA T TO S_C^O`, 17 OF THE _
Cr P:_ A;TER iPE D,-E OF r I!:L
,:.,. .,,..._._., 1:: THE O:r':= GF T:1= CM CLE::, .
Trc k. .':_Cr
F - I T ° ,d F ESSEX T E S1 r C. Dr DS TO I r::C k 'v U Th �..'E O THE
OF RECORD OR IS n ,cRDCD AN' :UTED D- T�:E u BR'S CERTIFICATE OF TITLE.
-- BOARD. OF APPEAL
DATE OF HEARING_
PETITIONER�//�j�
LOCATION ?,2
MOTION: TO GRANT SECOND
i
TO DENY SECOND
TO RE-HEAR SECOND
LEAVE TO WITHDRAW SECOND
TO CONTINUE SECOND
ROLL CALL PRESENT GRANT DENY WITHDRAW RE-HEAR CONTINUE
RICHARD BENCAL
i
JAMES FLEMING /
JAMES HACKER
EDWARD LUZINSKI
PETER STROUT
ASSOCIATE MEMBERS
PETER DORE
ARTHUR LABRECQUE
CONDITIONS:
Salem Fire Department
Fire Prevention Bureau
48 Lafayette Street
Salem, Ma 01970
( 617 ) 745-7777
TO: Board of Appeal
FROM Capt. Turner, Fire Prevention Bureau
RE: Comments relative to October 7 , 1987 meeting
92 Columbus Avenue
William & Sally Cass
Hearing date : October 7 , 1987
The property located at #92 Columbus Avenue has current compliance with
the provisions of Chapter 148, Section 26E, Massachusetts General Laws
relative to the installation of automatic smoke detectors .
The Salem Fire Department has no objection to the granting of a Special
Permit to allow a temporary boat shelter at this location.
TO: THE CITY OF SALEM BOARD OF APPEALS
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, ARE ABUTTERS, NEIGHBORS OR FRIENDS OF MR. AND MRS.
WILLIAM CASS, 90 COLUMBUS AVENUE, SALEM, MA
WE ARE IN NO WAY OPPOSED TO THEIR BUILDING A TEMPORARY SHELTER FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF A BOAT.
THE CASS FAMILY IS A CREDIT TO OUR COMMUNITY IN EVERY WAY AND WE WILL SHARE
THEIR HAPPINESS IN THIS ENDEAVOR.
NAME ADDRESS
1. iaiiQza. ✓� 95GoAvMF✓ 5 AVL ,
3. IN &f6AAdJftr%
4.
5.
6.
7 _ D
8. 6
9.
10. ,
��. auv-
12. 2 v i'ew 4V (F .
13. tl'kv4ke
v�
14.
5 _ V
1 . )
1 r
1 z. '75'
18.
19. 79
20.�/
21
�-
22 3
23.
24.
25.
Salem Fire Department
Fire Prevention Bureau
48 Lafayette Street
Salem, Ma 01970
( 617 ) 745-7777
TO: Board of Appeal
FROM: Capt. Turner, Fire Prevention Bureau
RE: Comments relative to October 7 , 1987 meeting
92 Columbus Avenue
William & Sally Cass
Hearing date: October 7 , 1987
The property located at #92 Columbus Avenue has current compliance with
the provisions of Chapter 148, Section 26E, Massachusetts General Laws
relative to the installation of automatic smoke detectors .
The Salem Fire Department has no objection to the granting of a Special
Permit to allow a temporary boat shelter at this location.
C118-LEGT ,llg_LEGI
C
CITY OF SALEM CITY OF SALEM
BOARD OF APPEAL L BOA
APPEAL
745-9595F% for all persons 745-9595Ext.381for all persons
Will hold a public hearing William ublic hearing . William
etition submitted by Will hold a P pet" submitted by rom setback
interested in the p interested in the P Variance oat
and Sallie Cass for a temporary boatlshel shelter at and Sallie Cass for a temporary boat shelter held
requirements to allow a temp Said hearing to be One
1987 at 7:00 P.M., One 92Columbus
requirements to allow a t 1 87 at 7:00 P•
92 Columbus Ave. (R-1). Said hearing to be held 92 Columbus Ave. (R-1). M.'
' Wednesday, October 7, October 7,
Salem Green,2nd floor. Wednesday, 2nd floor. Chairman
JAMESB.HACKER,Chairman Salem Green, JAMESB.HACKER+
September 23,30,1987 1981
- September 23,30,
C118-LEGI C118 LEGI —
CITY OF SALEM 'y'' CITY OF SALEM •M;•
BOARD OF APPEAL BOARD OF APPEAL
745-9595Ext.381for all persons 745-9595 Ext.381
Will hold a public hearing William
interested in the petition submitted by Will hold a public hearing for all persons
and Sallie Cass for a Variance b&oomsnelter t interested in the petition submitted m William
requirements to allow a temporary , is el held and Sallie Cass for a Variance from setback
re Columbus Ave. ow a Said hearing requirements to allow a temporary boat shelter at
October 7, 1987 at 7:00 P.M., One 92 Columbus Ave. (R-1). Said hearing to be held
Wednesday, Z to er Wednesday, October 7, 1987 at 7:00 P.M., One
Salem Green, JAMES B.HACKER,Chairman Salem Green,2nd floor.
JAMES B.HACKER,Chairman
September 23,30,1987 September 23,30,1987
� 0118-LEGI
C118-LEGI
CITY O
ALEM
CITY OF SALEM RDF APPEAL
BOA
BOARD OFAPPEAL 745.9595 Ext:381 for all Persons
745-9595 Ext.381for all persons hearing tarso
ring ram a public muted by g
hes Will old sub tbac
ll
Will hold a public fitted by Will h petition from se
in the Petitron subm setback in the I a Variance
interested for a Variance Crom intereSs 1. Cass for atemporaTy boat shelter at
and Saline Cass orary boat shelt held and _ hearing be to be held i
Said hearing to M One requirements to allow 1 Said One
requirements to allow stem? 92uireol Columbus ober 7� 1987 at IM
92 Columbus OA e.( 7) 1987 at 7:00 P. Wednesday, Chairman
Wednesday, 2nd door. Chairman 2nd 0°or. HACKER,
Salem Green, JAMES B.HACKER, Salem Green, JAMESB
September 23,30,
1987 September 23,30,1987
G118-LEGT
CITY OF SALEM
arr
BOARD OF APPEAL
745-9595 Ext.381 for all persons
Will hold a public hearing µilliam
interested in the petition s antubmie efrom setback
and Sallie Cass for a temporary boat shelter at
requirements to allow a temp to be held
92 ColumbasOA a(R I)' 1987 atSaid 7:00 P.M., One
Wednesday, 2nd floor. Chairman
Salem Green, JAMES B.HACKER
September 23,30,1987
APPEAL CASE NO. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
T. Ctu of �r1Em,
ttssttc usP##s
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
The Undersigned represent thathe is are the owners of a certain parcel of land loc, ted
at NO. . . % E. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Street; Zoning District. . .. .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : and said parcel is affected by Section(s) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
of the Massachusetts State Building Code.
Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in
accordance with Section IX A. l of the Zoning Ordinance.
.n
cn C O
_ y
r � N
�n C�
U� J
The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following
reasons :
6L-
The
The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem
Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to
approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said
Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary
hardship to the Undersigned and relief -may be granted without substantially dero-
gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for
the following reasons:
Address. �a .�Nl�1/?�m3f' ./? . . �?�"! m
Telephone. 7.Yf-76 � .
Petitionerl/// iW. l-ll3.S. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Address. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Date.{�1' " " .� Ivy Telephone. . . .
� . . . . . . . . . .
Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of
Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The
Evening News.
NO....................................
PETITION TO BOARD OF APPEALS
LOCATION
................................................................
PETITIONER..........................................
ADDRESS...............................................
............................................
CONDITIONS
................ ....................................
..............................I.................................
................................................................
. ........................................ ........................
.................................................................
............................................................
PETITION APPROVED....................
DENIED.........................
.................................................... 19.........
- pv
�i��� n�nr��iVLz-'7 �y�N,d� _ — X7)S \ _/�• � f:1` e_ \ �� I�
t
-
jI
o- 6 8s os QD 62
e e 5 �e e P BI
e O 19 0.9 ZA 268 e5 a ; po 10, g5 y 98 6'b I
R 9 4
161 ' P 3 r �� pm 90
l0 346 a '$ 3Q 1
m` p5 ao� 23 °° t °° SAO 216 6 \ 4500 $ so
\J 22 15 °° .y�$ 5500 5500
5A
5 50 6p36 6555
32
/ 9440 3 255
. \0° .t 15 0 1
20
e W JJ
c,�150 O e1 ,ts
13 n25 O 2 ^Cp0 o I 5\ y6� 55 xSPJ�. °o s
t fit` ti� v p
96 15o Ag 900 5 e° ,t, ,t6 66
4380 \ 6 4O 3? b\
4j3k
A 10 5� A A80 5000 5 ,•s° 6� O'(1b00�tP
A 58
o A 0 A6 . e° oy.o' e9 �0 988pB PJB. 6
J 945 6883 5.s o,.o' t o 69 415 �\
6775 2122 5° R o 2010
00
GLV 1p 0 m �a 38 kOyC e
415 ty 4'
3? -I2 2�y0 4150 6\ 2x65
421y fb 23 0
a ° e° o eq 6180 �Og� NJ� t >s C4 2405E 0E
\ 00 Ja 9J 111 ° s po tiN
6j2y C(� S 2 E� ( \
.� \A1�s, \C 16 2 fJ \ 9G \a,' O Wo O9
�� 5850 \AZ •8j21 'J J 2119 9481 26 9� �° s
0. PO5. 9 Jrola
2 0
\. 00.5 /2ss IL s 15�-5 EJP 1' 0
51 F G� w
w w
ice/ \p 11 990 N 003°
00 29/ ep' ze 20 ,
146 30-s>9 >> ei ea e'r
e e
8,7AC-FLATS �� . / / 33-s0 e2 Be Be
i / ^ 40 25 24 25
In N
ENS��� 5225
m
• BOARD OF ASSESSORS r •
CITY HALL PAVE.
SALEM, MA 01970
6 DATE . 09/17/87 e
ERTrFrEr�evTTE�s—L�
• ) SUBJECT PROPERTY: EMAP. 44 LOT. 0058 SUFE. •
U -. Y � ? a .SS UOz Z i(_III' : E+ r �✓E7411_.
{ • ASSESSED OWNER CASS S'ALLIE W
°
J • MAP LOT SUFF PROPERTY ADDRESS ASSESSE OWNER MAILING ADDRESS .
° r 5�-0043-E:AY-VIED!�t%fIVl7) C'N-TF'F-J'0t=1N-i4
• MAUREEN E SALEM MA 01970 •
44 0060 0014 JUNIPER AVENUE CARRO FRANK A 14 JUNIPER AVENUE
(-St_PFi T.WE-1 Tom- saCEti-MA 0.297
. ,. 44 0144 0038 E?AY VIEW AVENUE DAVIS RICHAR P 38 SAY VIEW AVE .
MARY I SALEM MA 01970
-+
ni4.3 0030-6A-Y-VTEt-J-4VEKtrF DUDErtOENE` D-Ei Y-VIFrtJ-AV
• „ MARY" 6' SALEM PTA 01970 n
45 0045 0017 PAY VIEW AVENUE OHARA JANE B � 17 BAY VIEW AVE:
5A7_t=M-M ,A-t?T 0n
• ,° 45 0046 0095 COLUMBUS AVENUE PHIPPS C'HARL.F_ H 95 COLUMBUS AVE
PHYI.J.-IS R / SALEh'! P'IA 01470
45-00-71— —A'HMEC-�-CiE�t:rRCF_-A-"
✓/ , i?-HEial-fAtiF t'c?c-rP-[•-AIV1C
• FI...ORENCE L SALEM MA 01970 � •
45 007.:' 0096 COLUMBUS AVENUE MCGARRY WIL.L.IAM 96 COI...UMBUS AVE
24
). AR4�A'RFT-tv. SAi=1.=tH-A'1A-Ert-`Y�
57
W .
w
y • •
B)
Q
------
PETER II''l. CAROM q��/f(� -
;t s
}
r
T
F
r
rd
s.
rr
:x
y , w
�Yd
iY
9
lA � K,
`� f.,` i '��� �� ria � •
�y
�\owl
y f \
N; { rl
/ f
GI1�
i
Q � i
f
t
5 6
t
3 a
t
x $iR
r
)F
1
4
N
7
1 �r
:�1
The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of the
Board that:
a. special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the
land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting
other lands, buildings and structures in the same district;
i
b. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would in-
volve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to petitioner; .
c. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented, and
after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact:
r
iD 0F PFL-LS
Orl TRE 'PE-TITu,J dF W\ W / tvj
RE;:r_!'!t.,4.. SAILI C C/kSS Fak A VPr(z, i ArJ CC AT
CITr'OF ;1-i-D%E60S.
(I Cwy tsvns AVC`J�AE erz- 1 )
-7 � a r2 L
'1 l� g'{ �,.�.�•- '� -FU��a� ,...o� �aa-rr�.; I�L¢.r,l,R.rs �arcSe,�T
Uig,, - V��o"r Ae c-� i 2,rS,]rs. /�JE-wC.e.I
LLvT - PiA 1I Q� 11� l �-° r/t/ rf1h1 1A/lJ
J e--+ o�J iw rTY,rJ o..�-d� 0 'lAr'J j C- W4 h\- I) c2.-s 0'I_ / ,
-P-^^r� ,-°� �,..ie,r-c. p�Pv-1 y �w� ��.cL.a..� l� �-z. .�c..,�•r,�-,.
.. ✓'Q.w� ,. s..,J ///// /nn�. e�rdl c/..,QA, L-) �"LL /u- p ry V i s I Q n P
dr r ss c ei�v r�7T� lam'¢ ` e v C��/s� C� r 4-ld A
_. � t--e- LL '?a.. IL-C i d r.Jl.rS , ("C-io r2.-s�..,��.�..r� '1�LLr,•�/SQ.�/��P ,l J
... G.r`e. 1 wl_sT� /r.. V o..r'lcr�.✓�-c�Z �e,�,`, S-��7{/.-S o.c.lL� /�
»; c` 7'c-.,..�0 0✓��.n//� ,`J� d cl. 1 51.x.l Tom/ onn.,'f" �ppZ l.�d/l.v-..� b gin,S
�T
VP✓l-V'Le t LCS L
r
v
i
" v
i rc wi> c �g L r�.ppaa
s . l" �a rf ✓ /aZ4� J, - 24[� ssev� G f
t "9 / n.c 0�0 7 ca p ✓a/ a�
4.0 fits. 0-- 1, U-e,rs,
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the
hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1 . Special condiitons exist which affect the subject property but which
do not affect the district generally;
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship to the petitioner;
3. The relief requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from,the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
..
y
tr}
a. iL1m - pl��s p�aF a s e a u`-t I -rr m b
t„� 1�Y.. Y`-Y.IC LJJ•J"�Q O G,_,�-dam V�C.�Lp�R% 4D
i*i +1
-it., s� :� , Sv ; lcl. .q �,S �ry of �'tR �r-e-�
Y;}
t.,
, ,
k+f
i
it-
—r44-Ju
p.0,477ame-r -j .
�47 Y (al Y
11Are rdcFs Go-/L' qr ✓Tr,o
ETO
i
I r'
r
r
r
p^.^,• N
N Y7 N
J �
4 �
LO X.
ji;r
41
co
Cy �
O U