Loading...
15 CLIFF STREET - ZBA 15 Cliff St. R-1 Lawrence & Elizabeth Ash c� i �w°�. fllit of �$ttlem, 'Mttsondjusetts �nttrD of �p}iettl January 7, 1994 YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT AS OF DECEMBER 27, 1993 THE DECISION OF THE BOARD OF APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK TO GRANT THE PETITION OF LAWRENCE & ELIZABETH ASH FOR A VARIANCE TO ALLOW AN EXISTING DECK TO REMAIN AS IT CURRENTLY EXISTS AT 15 CLIFF ST. BOARD OF APPEAL BRENDA M. SUMRALL CLERK OF THE BOARD A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK.y Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17, of MGL Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL Chapter 40A. , Section 11, the Variance/Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of title. Board of Appeal f ; . Ctv of Salem, � Hazsacljusetts - M O �Raara of � pezd DECISION ON THE PETITION OF LAWRENCE & ELISABETH ASH FOR VARIANCE AT 15 CLIFF STREET (R-1) A hearing on this petition was held December 1, 1993 with the following Board Members present: Francis X. Grealish, Chairman; George Ahmed, Stephen Touchette and Stephen O'Grady. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioners,owners of the property, are requesting a Variance to allow an existing deck that encroaches on the rear yard setback requirement. The property is located in a Residential Single Family District. The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding by this Board that: 1. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and structures involved. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1. There was no opposition to the petitioners request. 2. The granting of this variance will allow the petitioners a fuller use of their property. 3. This is the only feasible location for the placement of the deck. DECISION ON THE PETITION OF LAWRENCE & ELIZABETH ASH FOR A VARIANCE AT 15 CLIFF STREET, SALEM page two On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 4-0, tog rant the variance requested, subject to the following conditions: 1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted. 3. Petitioner shall comply with all requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety. 4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit from the City of Salem Building Inspector prior to beginning any construction . 5. The deck is to be in harmony with the existing structure. Variance Granted December 1, 1993 �t DSL (� Ste en O'Grady, Membe Board of Appeal 0 _ W 0 G: 4> r DECISION ON THE PETITION OF LAWRENCE & ELIZABETH ASH FOR VARIANCE AT 15 CLIFF STREET, SALEM page three A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. Board of Appeal c� m N W r 0 �. w of �ttlem, '-ttssadjusetts 3 o ° Q �Rottrh of �vveal cr DECISION ON THE PETITION OF LAWRENCE & ELISABETH ASH FOR VARIANCE AT 15 CLIFF STREET (R-1) A hearing on this petition was held December 1, 1993 with the following Board Members present: Francis X. Grealish, Chairman; George Ahmed, Stephen Touchette and Stephen O'Grady. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioners,owners of the property, are requesting a Variance to allow an existing deck that encroaches on the rear yard setback requirement. The property is located in a Residential Single Family District. The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding by this Board that: 1. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and structures involved. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1 . There was no opposition to the petitioners request. 2. The granting of this variance will allow the petitioners a fuller use of their property. 3. This is the only feasible location for the placement of the deck. DECISION ON THE PETITION OF LAWRENCE & ELIZABETH ASH FOR A VARIANCE AT 15 CLIFF STREET, SALEM page two On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 4-0, to grant the variance requested, subject to the following conditions: 1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted. 3. Petitioner shall comply with all requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety. 4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit from the City of Salem Building Inspector prior to beginning any construction . 5. The deck is to be in harmony with the existing structure. Variance Granted December 1, 1993 4he4nO'LGr �ady, Membe Board of Appeal _ a NO w - o c� �o w DECISION ON THE PETITION OF LAWRENCE & ELIZABETH ASH FOR VARIANCE AT 15 CLIFF STREET, SALEM page three A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. Board of Appeal 0 N . W Y 0 _ � v of ,�Wvm, 4Hassadjusetts o -oe vara of �upeal �r DECISION ON THE PETITION OF LAWRENCE & ELISABETH ASH FOR VARIANCE AT 15 CLIFF STREET (R-1) A hearing on this petition was held December 1, 1993 with the following Board Members present: Francis X. Grealish, Chairman; George Ahmed, Stephen Touchette and Stephen O'Grady. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioners,owners of the property, are requesting a Variance to allow an existing deck that encroaches on the rear yard setback requirement. The property is located in a Residential Single Family District. The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding by this Board that: 1. Special conditions and circumstances exist. which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and structures involved. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1 . There was no opposition to the petitioners request. 2. The granting of this variance will allow the petitioners a fuller use of their property. 3. This is the only feasible location for the placement of the deck. DECISION ON THE PETITION OF LAWRENCE & ELIZABETH ASH FOR A VARIANCE AT 15 CLIFF STREET, SALEM page two On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 4-0, to grant the variance requested, subject to the following conditions: I. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted. 3. Petitioner shall comply with all requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety. Y 4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit from the City of Salem Building Inspector prior to beginning any construction . 5. The deck is to be in harmony with the existing structure. Variance Granted December 1, 1993 Step e�a(ddy,°M�embeid Board of Appeal _ W 0 c, � DECISION ON THE PETITION OF LAWRENCE & ELIZABETH ASH FOR VARIANCE AT 15 CLIFF STREET, SALEM page three A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. Board of Appeal c� m cro N W _ r o �, cL` (I�it of .Salem, 4HUssadjusetts o 4 ' �uttra of �upeal 4.� L� DECISION ON THE PETITION OF LAWRENCE Sr ELISABETH ASH FOR VARIANCE AT 15 CLIFF STREET (R-1) A hearing on this petition was held December 1, 1993 with the following Board Members present: Francis X. Grealish, Chairman; George Ahmed, Stephen Touchette and Stephen O'Grady. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioners,owners of the property, are requesting a Variance to allow an existing deck that encroaches on the rear yard setback requirement. The property is located in a Residential Single Family District. The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding by this Board that: 1. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and structures involved. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1. There was no opposition to the petitioners request. 2. The granting of this variance will allow the petitioners a fuller use of their property. 3. This is the only feasible location for the placement of the deck. DECISION ON THE PETITION OF LAWRENCE & ELIZABETH ASH FOR A VARIANCE AT 15 CLIFF STREET, SALEM page two On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 4-0, to grant the variance requested, subject to the following conditions : 1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted. 3. Petitioner shall comply with all requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety. 4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit from the City of Salem Building Inspector prior to beginning any construction . 5. The deck is to be in harmony with the existing structure. Variance Granted December 1, 1993 i Ste en O'Grady, MembeV Board of Appeal 6 ti W 0 c� c.o DECISION ON THE PETITION OF LAWRENCE & ELIZABETH ASH FOR VARIANCE AT 15 CLIFF STREET, SALEM page three A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. Board of Appeal 0 m n N W 0 n w -,ATE OF HEARING PETITIONER �� ( ��� Com✓ O LOCATION ACTION: TO GRANT SECOND TO DENY SECOND O RE-HEAR SECOND LEAVE TO WITHDRAW SECOND 70 CONTINUE SECOND POLL CALL PRESENT GRANTDENYWITHDRAW RE-HEAR CONTINUE STEPHEN O'GRADY f/ GEORGE A. AHMED FRANCIS GREALISH STEPHEN TQCHETTE ASSOCIATE :iEMBERS CONDITIONS: G APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . of tt1Pm, �fflassarhuagits J� TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS: the Undersigg,d represe..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . t that he is are the owners of a certain parcel of land located ;t NO. . I�. . . .r. ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Street; Zoning District. R.-J. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ; and said parcel is affected by Section(s ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . of the Massachusetts State Building Code. Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance. 2 If W The App@icatipn far Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following reasonf:! The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero- gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for the following reasons: ✓— �� 3 0 Z _ i Owne,) Address. �9 . . . .. . . . . .... . . . . . . . . . .. Telephone: . .0 FJ %�,5 ?y. . . . . . . . . . Petitioner. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Address. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Date. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . telephone. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . By. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The Evening News. MORTGAGE INSPECTION BAY STATE SURVEYING ASSOCIATES 234 CABOT ST., BEVERLY MA LOCATION : SRLE✓v� fY�{ . NOTES: - .... SCALE : I = 3Q FT. DAIS : - OC,T (593 •This is a Mortgage Inspection survey and not an c REFERENCE r 17F � `J AG 7S� instrument survey, therefore this plot plan is for rs- __ . _ .__. _ _._�. . . .............. mortgage inspection purposes only. E�?�X .. 7 L�y •This survey is based on survey marks of others. REG OF �� •Bushes, shrubs,fences and tree lines do not ... .... .... . .. .. ...... ..5.... _..•-- ---• ---- necessarily indicate property lines. To _ .TY1a i G �_C. +NA�1�c I L S E RY 10ES •In my professional opinion the building(s)are not loca The location of the building(s) as shown, either complied with the in the special flood hazard zone, as defined by H.U.D. local zoning set backs at the time of construction or is exempt •Whenever an offset is 1'± or less,an instrument survi from violation enforcement action under Mass. G.L.Title VII is recommended to determine prop. lines. Chapter 40A Section 7. 5zc6al •Offsets shown are approximate by tape survey. DrC:K ooh DoT Cc�Ml'r-Y WITH 3D�I2E4� 5c7.�4CiG -� `� Lo-r- 4- L/L W Q IY2 $TY wo i5 co Q Ott r � ROBE T z AM O a tt�- � z ��'41 LAND 5U 1334 005 OOb 002 007 d Y ar cr �Y \ � m a . b� v� "tcL�L � v I Ib E9Ej 6 v r ! 0 6 of �4L CV YZS9 a /0 n - --X i i \ a , 9y °�✓ L sass bI b S N q� Z£ „ o I I \\ �I \J\//\r S+� r. �_ iL£ •Y m OOS009p, 606 i x 26v p ❑ 6ZSZl r e 1� o 02c" 6�L l� o:= ` 9 jig O 8'L S m r D d H a V d � vL pbt'£ a 3 £ b1 I y gZ.L LZ I £L a ea 0t at N 00 rn d3A 1 !! ez�a °o a; er � xSa 1 I V. 0j b °r =-09 rc ur a f ost 051 m 1S380d.. as m X 11 ' ✓ q-09t O` y: 6 \k\ ',f- Qr . r 0 Z� c In I mCO-9 aI h8£ %A N ~ I 1b 7tiZ 6 � � Z 69 rr 9�t Dot' o M 6 �oy`/L. m 119 G .gos's tot 00L - 006'z 600E IZL a a 6tb o ZOL �t s m r Q 9 £ I U`c r a. 52 OC9� 9 N : Q11 OOSL ❑ $Zb In rO gd Szs'e o ' < I 7O 0 s boL n b'5 Oa6L / I O9L+£1 m l W l 6 69 OZb ^ Z� 9 L69 - 1c 0 L z I nosy " 4 o - t2 CJ I /II 9185 06Z S69 261 oo£s V 7 0 V. :rOZ b n I II pOSY �i.'it7 C.:B•SZ b + pB cl 3 0C)p be �� F X89 ? aT t4b C O S♦ m J08 . ❑ rJs < ,I V n_ n 171 L t O.\ 0 +° G �F�,• 0 �� £69 � ' d1 a OSrL£ s F 01 6 � •d.,. � �9 r s, _ Doe g �• IE „y o � ' ro sas£ 0 .,a�� a oo tp s2 . . o` ❑ tJ6 ` 0005 U. 9Ba> gIL a r I1. ' F vst•t Z GZb ri no0.t 689 t- �-, �OJt �'a bu ° APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ctv of 3ttlrm, 'fflttssar4usl'##s Paurb of '4yral TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS: The Undersignep,d r res nt that he is are the owners of a certain parcel of land located at NO. . ./.S. . C: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Street; Zoning District.9.-/. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : and said parcel is affected by Section(s) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . of the Massachusetts State Building Code. Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance. r a a Cn Cr, fr® crs� � u3^'- Ll. Ln �r ,S C9 Uj m m d: cdn cn c.' LU W rt The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following reasons: The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero- gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for the following reasons: G G�� Address Z� . Vi c. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Tel ephone.49' .© l5.: ��.��3. . . . . . . . Petitioner. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Address. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Date. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Telephone. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . By. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The Evening News. NO.................................... PETITION TO BOARD OF APPEALS LOCATION ................................................................ PETITIONER.......................................... ADDRESS............................................... ................................. CONDITIONS ............................ .................................... ........................ ....................................... ................................................................ ................................................................. ................................................................. ................................................................. PETITION APPROVED.................... ❑ DENIED......................... .............................................. 19......... MORTGAGE INSPECTION BAY STATE SURVEYING ASSOCIATES 234 CABOT ST., BEVERLY MA LOCATION SALEfM ✓�1 il NOTES: --- SCALE I° = 30 FT. ' DATE : _ OGT / 3 •This is a Mortgage Inspection survey and not an REFERENCE � �F� 1�k � instrument survey, therefore this plot plan is for - -a c PG 7S� mortgage inspection purposes only. L)l '�i _ •This survey is based on survey marks of others. t� G -�F - ��.... . . .. .. . . .. . ... • Bushes, shrubs, fences and tree lines do not To I A PVC r, _ necessarily indicate property lines. 1C1�1_Cr._r - N_ _-• --- - _, L RYICEs The location of the buildings) as shown, either com lied with the ' In my professional opinion the building(s) are not located P in the special flood hazard zone, as defined by H.U.D. local zoning set backs at the time of construction or is exempt ,Whenever an offset is t'± or less, an instrument survey from violation enforcement action under Mass. G.L. Title VII is recommended to determine prop. lines. Chapter 40A Section 7. 5AFC5517- � � • Offsets shown are approximate by tape survey. '� ACCK OoES n.�d i C��l�Y �lJ/rr/ n o m' Lo-r 4 m,x co Edo co c:.r v i V I(d O /— O 6 0 �{ Lb I��z STY Wb U 1 O CLI�� STREtT tx or aigss9 ROSE T cyo. Z AM ti o ' 2 STIR" APPEAL CASE NO_ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . f�i#g u# �ttl�m, �Httsstttl#us>e#fs Poarb of �kppral TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS: The Undersig e pr sent that he is are the owners of a certain parcel of land located at NO. . /�. � . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Street; Zoning District. f�.—� . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : and said parcel is affected by Section(s) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . of the Massachusetts State Building Code. Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance. m vy o E-- m � c LU co a f n The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following reasons: The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero- gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for the following reasons: vim/ �p C�P�Ls.uJ�atr� L�iiC_ C�� z" Owne . . . . EI . / Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Telephone. a �. . . .� �.: ��� �. . . . . . . . . Petitioner. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Address. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Date. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Telephone. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . By. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The Evening News. NO.................................... PETITION TO BOARD OF APPEALS LOCATION ................................................................ PETIT'IONER.......................................... ADDRESS............................................... ................................................ COND11 IONS ................................................................. ........................ ....................................... ................................................................ ................................................................. ................................................................. ................................................................. PETITION APPROVED.................... ❑ DENIED......................... .................................................... 19......... MORTGAGE INSPECTION F[: BAY STATE SURVEYING ASSOCIATES 234 CABOT ST., BEVERLY MA LOCATION : sf}�E }� 1 �}� � NOTES: SCALE : I" = 3 FT. DATE : OGr--- - ------- - - 3 •This is a Mortgage Inspection survey and not an r" y' REFERENCE L7FFDsurvey, this Plot P instrument surve therefore Ian is for _ j? �a A-- 7�� •-rr-� - - -,^,•--�--- --•-------- -_-__ mortgage inspection purposes only. •This survey is based on survey marks of others. - - - -- -- - - -- - --- • Bushes, shrubs, fences and tree lines do not To rnA 4 — NA i1/C Iri L [ RY ICES „1c��� � �� � _ s necessarily indicate property lines. The location of the building(s) as shown, either complied with the • In my professional opinion the building(s) are not located P in the special flood hazard zone, as defined by H.U.D. local zoning set backs at the time of construction or is exempt •Whenever an offset is 1'± or less, an instrument survey from violation enforcement action under Mass. G.L. Title VII is recommended to determine prop. lines. Chapter 40A Section 7. CXC6�T PG I •Offsets shown are approximate by tape survey. DrCK booms �o c�m�Y wiry a r- • rn o c.n 4 II ^ r w t-.O-f' - o m T T� y m J 9ss6 ' L C/ ' t $NE r X11 O 4 Lb 1V2 5T V/b M� al+, - lo3' i I CSTREtT i lN OF A v ROBE T rya. Z g AM �^ ti o . 2 tp�,aN MORTGAGE INSPECTION BAY STATE SURVEYING ASSOCIATES 234 CABOT ST., BEVERLY MA [LOCATION SALE✓�1 M� NOTES: SCALE I° = 30 FT. DATE _��r__-�_ 1593 •This is a Mortgage Inspection survey and not an REFERENCE instrument survey, therefore this plot plan is for r mortgage inspection purposes only. FX. C"Ob r r, L�S .. . .. ... ....... •This survey is based on survey marks of others. .. . .... .. .. . .. .. .... __ .._ _ _ ___ -•_ • Bushes,shrubs,fences and tree lines do not r— necessarily indicate property lines. To . .J1'jG'2�IG!��rC_�jNAI�iCIr;L_ SERVICES •In,my professional opinion the building(s)are not located The location of the building(s) as shown, either complied with the in the special flood hazard zone, as defined by H.U.D. local zoning set backs at the time of construction or is exempt •Whenever an offset is 1'± or less, an instrument survey from violation enforcement action under Mass. G.L.Title VII is recommended to determine prop. lines. Chapter 40A Section 7. CXCE,al Q�CK •Offsets shown are approximate by tape survey. '-�o'lZF�4,:2 �c7�iGtc Mp � o n t Lo-7 Q-- 2/ v :n Lp ' , t 5� � 1 r--- 0 � p � I%z 57v Wn # Is at� CL-I�� STRE�"f' ,0" OF Mqs n `9 Z ROSE AM 7 yN. Ta W K� XTCREaJJ X I tANZ 5 P o m � s9 9a o _ 9 -- -- 1 3 a 99a o<_ osl t4• S1 w SL O pl£ 9L p 19 119 b9 C N os LS41 Nt- m i�•Q N w� v F 1 `11 n r V O c n to m ro- n l0 N 4LkD 14 ,.7.b m m cn W m N + O t1'J� G p -i ❑� ro O L � 41 SL °Q Ob — E eb- 3nN3AV --' -- ❑ Lv S L ol o GG —_-19 xm — — 09 Aa❑ _I OS OL w _ DO O 91 + °w--f —1 " � � = o ❑ o N Cl l.J awl W IIIZ Q H a-4 a cO w 0en I w b N 1FL, FyF p Ch O'C9 91 -1 Ui g 9b l a x b v ba q W N y 1 of l e v A c., o N � 09 Qt a Z v ❑ a o m IS o wN 30 a O - s 61� S " rmn `" o -+ a t0 . y } °� ° r J m W "1 C " ob oy ° m » u N` w(�j N� ° q ' ❑ Nco tf` NIli 1 06 C 12 IV 4 �/. 5 p�sl / U J� rc ❑ .a m� Q 9 V h q' ep 91 b o 09000 \ f 6 y V / ,T s F'• •4 +1 —X BLEAcHERS, m� 11-15-93.15:45:00.363400-LNO V CITY OF SALEMI BOARD OF APPEAL 45-9595 It. Will hold a publ c hearingfo3 all persons inter- ested in the petition submitted by LAWRENCE s ELIZABETH ASH for a Variance from rear setback requirement to allow an existing deck at IS CLIFF STREET tR-1).Said heexin WEDNESDAY,DECEMBER 1,1993 AT 6:0P.Ma ONE SALEM GREEN, second floor. FRANCIS X.' 93 LISH, JR., Chairman - - November 17, 24, 1993 SN36340 ;' ;•ii ;' Ul y * L 9 - 7 r S ► s s y ; a ►: s ; y ' ; 3 • r y ; ; • y ;. y s 2 s s s y s ;' ; © i s s ; ■ COLUMN +I,- �� r.r '_ �COLUMNS ��%S COli1MNs ��;'( `;-6'COIUMN 11-15-93.15:45:00.363400-LNO V CITY OF SALEM BOARD OF APPEAL Will hold a 745-9595 Ext. 3S1 inter- ested in the petiition submitted by LAWRENCE & ELIZABETH ASH for a Variance from rear setback requirement to allow an existing deck at 15 CLIFF STREET(R-1).Said hearing to be held �. WEDNESDAY DECEDIBER 1,1993 AT 6:00 P.M ONE SALEM GREEN second floor. ., FRANCIS X. GREALISH, JR. , Chairman November 17, 24, 1998 ! SN36340 Ir• m a a .� m m 1 y�c4T 3A... s9 4cT cy�s F e cF ! Rr Frr Iti •o 6'4b 1 zFscy� s ' CpClil 'r*` s AFC Y-r,r Y Y r M 11 Y i Y r 2/q3 yt •.r..r �! r r'r Y Y Y p°O g 3 H VI = D N 2 10 .ro G1 mw mw V. zx �+ v) m it T < < co < m E ., o a _;; N O Y Y r' r Y Y r r Y +lYY YY Y..Y._Y.Y..#'Y'r r i YY• O b N Z Or ;. G1 ziC- zi -1: �s 1w' 2 n c: P4 2 AI tly •S s. eel F C N KEFCy <FS•O ji Yis „ yURp jNAR�VtNC ��,IrrYYYr +� Y"ryrYYrYYY .p� Ny 1'1093 ClR C 'CO ?O cla z ' 11-15-93.15:45:00.363400-LNO V i CITY OF SALEM BOARD OF APPEAL 745-9595 Ext. 381 Will hold a Public hearing for all persons inter- ested in the petition submitted by LAWRENCE & ELIZABETH ASH for a Variance from rear setback requirement to allow an existing deck at r 15 CLIFF STREET(R-1) Said hearing to be held WEDNESDAY,DECEMBER 1,1993 AT 6:00 P.M., ONE SALEM GREEN, second floor. FRANCIS X. GREALISH, JR., Chairman November 17, 24, 1993 i SN36340 * s r 8 s �► E ■ a r r r 8 • r fir, r' : s r 6 7 r r it r r ® s * k r • • s s� r r 6 * s * s r 6 m a- r • _r r 5 a 3 s i r r r 2 s a r r s ' • s r. � • s. rr. r: y'„gT,COLUMNin,;;7+., .:�4 COLUMN��. ;1�,.:i3COLUMN .i ;!M,� �"4COLUMN jY`,: y3COLUMN Ja+� •:,`8`COLUMN .F--- 11-15-93.15:45:00.363400-L NO V CITY OF SALEM BOARD OF APPEAL 745-9595 Ext. Will hold a Public hearing for all persons inter- ested in the petition submitted by LAWRENCE & ELIZABETH ASH for a Variance from rear setback requirement to allow an existing deck _ 15 CLIFF STREET(R-1) at .Said hearing to be held WEDNESDAY DECEMBER 1,1993 AT 6:00 P.M., i ONE SALEM GREEN second floor. �- November 17,FRANCIS X993REALISH, JR., Chairman SN36340 i ; r � s r ; • �f' ; ® s' ■ x r ; as r s • r- s ; i • r i ; ; • m ► s ;. ; a a . • a r� s 2 s s s • ; ® s s •.. i ; s' •. � • s. ■ r. r: ® • a s ; i. 11-15-93.15:45:00.363400-LNO V CITY OF SALEM BOARD OF APPEAL Will holda 745-9595 Ext. 381 ested in the public hearing for all persons inter- petition submitted by LAWRENCE & ELIZABETH ASH for a Variance from rear setback requirement to allow an existing deck at 15 CLIFF STREET(R-1).Said hearing to be held WEDNESDAY,DECEMBER 1,1993 AT 6:00p M ONE SALEM GREEN, second floor. FRANCIS X. GREALISH, JrR. November 17, 24, 1993 Chairman SN36340 s t s t t s s' • t _ 9 s s •. s t t s t t t e • a �►. y. : s t m s- s t -qja �► t } it' "Is. i 7 8 s' s n t- t 6 i m s s t- t • t t 1�� - t' •t 4 � i►� s t s +'t i . s• t s t 9 t r t t 2 s s • s ® • t s, W t t s t. • t- © s a s s t i ►. t s s• • s s t' s' .. - r.� . Bv-s _.. ... _. y.tei LVMN .. a�..' 2COLUMNX " ,S'r'.=3 COLUMN iC"I,. r'$w,'4 COLUMN r;; . :r'?S OOLUMN'F'� IBQOLUMN BOARD OF ASSESSORS CITY HALL PAGE. A-04-970 (OTE3IN 7 "j- 2. R; T, 3 4 4 0 — SUBJECT PROPERTY: MAP: 33 LOT: 0697 SUFE:5 PROPERTY ADDRESS: 0015 CLIFF STREET z A9l-3E-SSF-J.j�-jWME-R-- ASH-L-AWRF--M,C 8 7 7-7 f as Z, 9 ;a'aR6 .. ........ ax x.Paaa as -ADDc Pa 112 iLADD I IAP • RES&L2 SE -MAILING- 10 3 14 1-53 0697 00.15 CLIFF STREET ASH LAWRENCE D 15 CLIFF ST ✓ 12 ASH-Q-1-Z-ASEZ S-LEM-MA-W-9-7 16 13a. ,-,, 1 1, 1 � �*,, & 7 6 mu"m- .,: , ,� I i C E A �tt R R A C E 3, 0 C Ts R CE W3 6 14�*"',�,�,,,".*;,,w,7,'e.�,N,1,.,�s 0 14 1p WH I a. Aa N AN'C. 9,70� ,5• ,,,X : aaa as@aa9 MA 4A,--ROP L,14 0 16 PHI A 0 - L YN DA SALEM MA 01970 �2 o 17 3-5 0692 0009 OCEAN TERRACE LIPTAK MARK 11 OCEAN TERR 18 & -5 9 r7Q47?7?-' W aaa«bdaaa jx• P. I C- -Ajq.L�aQLQ.A.Mp- SEQ 0, E LIPTAK MARK SALEM PIA 0,1910 - 33 0696 0017 CLIFF STREET SOUSA ROBERT A 17 CL I FF ST 4 A A74A7707-S.7 - --- - SUZ-ANNE-L 5 LE� 1! 4 ,,0013,;CL-1,FTON,AVENL NE A JF Y i A I E-S J A as ---f-M 'TE, ST�, '- 7,7 LA ........... =VF 7; �4 s, 'a T A ---- - -- -0 w904-7--i� 7 9 8 SALEM PIA 04970 0 33 0701 0019 CLIFTON AVENUE WALKER PETER 31 BATES STREET 0 C1-O-WALf,\ERPElERR DAN 0-1 5, Ja.Sa - -- - - --- --1 -7777777777 4aEa -AVENUE "" F.,T ,,AVE,,*'�a r00. 1._-CLIFTON 6L4"� bN 2- .... .. 70, ,,SAL, 3 ...... ... . .. PP. ........ 4 THERESA F SALEM PIA 01970 5 33 0705 0012 SHORE AVENUE COLLINS RUTH Ml 12 SHORE AVE 6 .... fiR 7 13x;0710.' 0016 CLIFFISTREET , SPIERS, MAR' SALEM-PIA-W- 0 38 SAUEM`MA" X 7 39 i )-IAELENE 'T"T T-,Pl)qT, --4,�,q 00-4-7-SU-ITIMI-T-AME."M -11-C LLT, ....... 40 HURLEY PATRICK & NICHOLS P1 TRS SALEM MA 01970 5 40 41 33 0711 0012 CL I FF STREET SOUSA IIANUEL J 12 CLIFF ST 42 SCIUS.A-Lf).RRAIVE- 13."0745 0010 CLIFF STREET SEIBER7 'DAVID T 0 44 45� Pas,SAL EP*1,�- 1�1 41"I'll "1`$",11 I'll 46 �7 4678 9 XI I,,, 2 -3 -f,ER M -,','C A RON A- SS 6 �,A