7 CLARK STREET - ZBA (2) 7 Clark St. R-1
Paul Ferragamo, Tr.
1\\
V
DATE OF HEARING S
PETITIONER
LOCATION-2
MOTION: TO GRANT SECOND
TO DENY SECOND
TO RE-HEAR SECOND
LEAVE TO WITHDRAW SECOND
TO CONTINUE SECOND
ROLL CALL PRESENT GRANT DENY WITHDRAW RE-HEAR CONTINUE
RICHARD BENCALy
RICHARD FEBONIO
JAMES FLEMING
EDWARD LUZINSKI
JOHN NUTTING
ASSOCIATE MEMBERS
PETER DORE
ARTHUR LABRECQUE
CONDITIONS:
V '
`i..Mp......
(fifv of , tt[em ttssttc usPffs AUG a J 2,
h eaf
�EC7-10N ON THIE ?ETITI6N OF ?AUL FERRAGAMO F R 'iARIANCES
T 7 CLARK STREET ;R-1 )
cearing on this Petition was r.eld July c89 with the ollowinE Boara ;!emoers
.cresent; James Fleming, Chairman: P!essrs. , Hencal, Febonio, Luzinski and Nutting.
'iotiz= of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the nearing
were croperiv published in the Salem Evening views in accordance with Massachusetts
lenerai Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioner is requesting Variances from frontage and lot size to allow construction
01 a single family dwelling in this R-i district.
The Variances which have been requested may be granted upon a finding of the
Hoard that:
a. special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect
the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally
affecting other lands, buildings or structures in the same district;
b. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would in-
volve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner;
c. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the
hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact:
1 . Opposition was voiced by the abutters;
2. A concern regarding blasting on the site was noted;
3. The traffic problems would be increased by the building;
4. Further development of the neighborhood would be detrimental.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the
hearing the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1 . Special conditions and circumstances do not exist which especially
affect the subject property and not the district generally;
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance would not involve
substantial hardship to the petitioner;
3. The relief requested cannot be granted without substantial detriment to
the public good or without nullifying or substantially derogating from
the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
L
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF PAUL FERRAGAMO FOR A VARIANCE
AT 7 CLARK ST. , SALEM
Therefore, the Zoning Board of .Appeal voted unanimously, 0-5, against granting
the Variances requested. The Variances are, therefore, denied, due to the failur
of the petitioner to obtain the required four (4) affirmative votes.
!iARIANCES DENIED /
CCC
( aures M. Fleming, Esq. , Cha man
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
ays
nnneal from this decis'�on, if any, shall he made D
ursuantto Section 17 of
nd shall he file h`4�C t'y ciO rk.
i-n^. cl Ills decs.en in int ofiics of
the Pdsss. Genes al Laws. ChaPtef SOB• :.. ,o .,.^n 7.1. tho Variance
aaei die daU of ; , .,,. .'�._. of the
-.it- 'nt to Nass. 6oncra: ,., r''•
cpgpal Pe Rrar.'a;l h'r q;n ;i�.•i -•• t",P.c alfcrt chili a con%
lne ,;;�rtif•.eat,e;r of the Cdy CIar1< that ZO d.ys have
r;r _ of has peen
;!2GISIO.I. d2arin✓, n in=_d, or ilia L it sudr aPP'-
a!apsed and no opPeiI has sseMed Is ec r
filed. that it has been dismissed rider
er the name ordthel o:9nerie Sof record or
Regstry of D^=d5 and indexed under
is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title.
BOARD OF APPEAL
Fh�
d.(OU vt\Mw
try Civ Of §aIrm, flttssar4norifs fuc
utsrD of cAvettl ..
:�ECICiON ON T.^:E PETIT=ON GF ?AUL FERRAGAN0 F-R ':ARIANCES
.. 7 CLARK STREET (R-1 )
hearing on this petition was 'r.eld July � , ' 939 with the followina Board 'tempers
_resent; James Fleming, Chairman: idessrs. , 3encal, Febonio, Luzinski anc :Iuttina.
']otize of the :nearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the nearing
were crooeriy 'published in the Salem Evening dews in accordance with Massachusetts
Generai Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioner is requesting Variances from frontage and lot size to allow construction
of a single family dwelling in this n-1district.
The Variances which have been requested may be granted upon a finding of the
hoard that: "
a. special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect
the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally
affecting other lands, buildings or structures in the same district;
b. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would in-
volve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner;
c. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the
hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact:
1 . Opposition was voiced by the abutters;
2. A concern regarding blasting on the site was noted;
3. The traffic problems would be increased by the building;
4. Further development of the neighborhood would be detrimental.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the
hearing the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1 . Special conditions and circumstances do not exist which especially
affect the subject property and not the district generally;
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance would not involve
substantial hardship to the petitioner;
3. The relief requested cannot be granted without substantial detriment to
the public good or without nullifying or substantially derogating from
the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF PAUL FERRAGAMO FOR A VARIANCE
AT ? CLARK ST. , SALEM
':herefore, the Zoning Board of Appeai voted unanimously, 0-5, against Granting
the Variances reouested. The Variances are, therefore, denied, due to the failur
of the petitioner to obtain the required four (4) affirmative votes.
'iARIANCES DENIED )
Games M. Fleming, -Esq. , Chaipman
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
hall be made pursuant to Section 17 of
nd mall be filed vnOthi fUrk Ys
,Anneal from this deci4
it any.
s .jCe o, the
the Pd;-s. Ceneru Lav;s, Chapter SO n m tnc of', ..r t 1, the Variance
alvei U.e ddta of fi.�n�, of tins dec,� ,.�,q, £...
�Jr_U1 rt to Mass. (v R.rd Lu`'r;
_r cnUi a co^y or the
^::e9an
per quart I 1\.f9in �� l 1;
Ule � < t .at 2U da.s have
t; l
if sudt aPPeai has 'Nein
racisioabzgrin✓, ee.l has teen ined, or that. n the South Essex
elapsed and no :PP
need �s recorded
filed. that it has oeen dismissed or er
Registry of De- ds and 'o"exed under cite name or the o-.vner of recor or
Is recorded and noted on the owner's cartif icate of Title.
BOARD OF APPEAL'
,vcom r�Mw
(fit" of Salem, �ttssttchusetts
C:
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF PAUL FERRAGAMO POR VARIANCES
,T 7 CLARK STREET (R-1 )
A hearing on this petition was held July 1939 with the following Board Members
present; names Fleming, Chairman; Messrs. , Bencal, Febonio, Luzinski and Nutting.
Not-.ce of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing
Were properiv published in the Salem Evening hews in accordance .with Massachusetts
General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioner is requesting Variances from frontage and lot size to allow construction
of a single family dwelling in this R-1 district.
The Variances which have been requested may be granted upon a finding of the
Board that:
a. special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect
the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally
affecting other lands, buildings or structures in the same district;
b. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would in-
volve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner;
c. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the
hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact:
1 . Opposition was voiced by the abutters;
2. A concern regarding blasting on the site was noted;
3. The traffic problems would be increased by the building;
4. Further development of the neighborhood would be detrimental.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the
hearing the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1 . Special conditions and circumstances do not exist which especially
affect the subject property and not the district generally;
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance would not involve
substantial hardship to the petitioner;
3. The relief requested cannot be granted without substantial detriment to
the public good or without nullifying or substantially derogating from
the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF PAUL FERRAGAMO FOR A VARIANCE
AT 7 CLARK ST. , SALEM
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 0-5, against granting
the Variances requested. The Variances are, therefore, denied, due to the failur
of the petitioner to obtain the required four (4) affirmative votes.
VARIANCES DENIED
r
ames M. Fleming, Esq. , Cha man
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
;f anY. `--hall be made Pursuant to ce°tion 17 oi.
r 305, and mall be file
within �0 daYs
Anpeal from this decision, ;ice o; the City hark.
the Mass:General Lnws, Chapte
n ct lh;s decsicn in r"z °'• �• rl, the Variance
fl'.mR ,.,,. ;,Og ,. _ of the
after the date of ra: Lea - '_.rt i�ntu a copy
'n sir.�'.i itc It,yCier;< that 20 days have
P❑rsue.nt to Arias. Gi❑za h'-re's
r,r �oeaial Perm t R ` if such aPPaal has been
wing'.ne cerrif.eat,�' °id or tont•
dsc'slon, be; peal has bee
eiapsed and no ap. or denied is recorded in the Soulh sse
filed, the, ii has bee nd'in"eXed under the name or the o.vner of record or
Reg
stry of Deas ; the owner's Certificate of Title.
is recorded and noted on BOARD OF APPEAL'
vzlity D �I�Eili, C c�SS?iC�iLi5P f5
.r� 'Fire Pepartmeut �ieabyuartrrs
4n,![
48 Pfgctte ,litred
Joseph F. Sullivan4ttlem, tt. 01970
Chief
City of Salem Re: 7 Clark Street
Board of Appeal Paul Ferragamo
One Salem Green Hearing date: July 5, 1989
The Salem Fire Department has no objection to the granting of Variances to
allow the construction of a single family dwelling at #7 Clark Street
subject to the following conditions:
1. Plans for the proposed construction are presented to the Fire
Prevention Bureau for approval prior to the issuance of a
building permit.
2. The proposed construction shall conform to all applicable
provisions of the Massachusetts State Building Code, 527 Code of
Massachusetts Regulations, the Salem Fire Prevention Code, the
Salem City Ordinances, and Massachusetts General Laws, relative
to fire safety.
3. The applicant shall arrange for an inspection by the Fire
Prevention Bureau upon completion of the work.
4. The applicant shall obtain and post proper street numbering from
the City Assessor in accordance with the city ordinance relative
to the numbering of buildings.
Signed,
Robert W. Turner,
Fire Marshal
L
t - CITY OF SALEM-
. CITY OF SALEM t BOARD OF APPEAL
BOARD OF APPEAL 4. 74RD O Ext. 381
74ic hearing
Ext. 381 Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter-
Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter- ested in the petition submitted by Paul Ferragamo
for Vin the petition submitted frontage
Ferragamo for Variances from lot size and frontage to allow
for Variances from lot size and frontage to allow construction of a single family dwelling at 7 Clark
construction of a single family dwelling sd 7 Clark St.(R-1).Said hearing to be held Wednesday,July
5, 989 a Said hearing to be held Wednesday,July 5, 1989 at 7:00 P.M.,One Salem Green,2nd floor.
5, 1989 at 7:00 J My One Salem Green, 2nd floor. JAMES M. FLEMING, Chairman
JAMES M. FLEMING, Chairman -..June 21, 28, 1989
June 21, 28, 1989
CITY OF SALEM
BOARD OF APPEAL'
745-9595 Ext. 381
Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter-
ested in the petition submitted by Paul Ferragamo
for Variances from lot size and frontage to allow
construction of a single family dwelling at 7 Clark
St.(11-1).Said hearing to be held Wednesday,July
5, 1989 at 7:00 P.M.,One Salem Green,2nd floor.
JAMES M. FLEMING, Chairman
June 21, 28, 1989
APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .�. . . . .
(Ili#g
of '�$ttlPm, Anssatllusetts
•r. _ Pourb of � ettl
TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS:
The Undersign epr sent that he is are the owners of a certain parcel of land loc ed
at NO. . . .�j. . _. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Street; Zoning District. .�
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : and said parcel is affected by Section(s) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
of the Massachusetts State Building Code.
Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in
accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance.
V C1 r T
nn; y
v 'r
to C N
N GO
The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following
reasons: n
/,.e_�
The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem
Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to
approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said
Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary
hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero-
gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for
the following reasons:
m
LnOwner. lvL /C 64M✓10
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Address.
H
`"w * � �( ,�-DSG �j
r. Telephone. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Petitioner. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
/ Address. .
Telephone. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
By. . . .y`.`::: . ��. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of
Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The
Evening News.
i
i 4
NO......1........,...................
PETITION TO BOARD OF APPEALS
A
LOCATION
................................................................
PETITIONER..........................................
ADDRESS...............................................
...............................I................
CONDITIONS
.......................... .......................................
................................................................
.................................................................
.................................................................
.................................................................
PETITION APPROVED.................... ❑
DENIED.........................
.................................................... 19.........
r
Petitioner is requesting variances from frontage;lot size ng .
test to allow construction of a single family dwelling in this R-1 district. ff�
The Variances which have been requested may be granted upon a finding of the
Board that:
a. special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect
the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally
affecting other lands, buildings or structures in the same district;
b. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would in-
volve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner;
c. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
x intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
i ` . The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the
hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact:
1 . Opposition was voiced by the abutters;
2. A concern regarding blasting on the site was noted;
` 3. .The traffic problems would beiincreased by the building;
4. Further development of the neighborhood would be detrimental.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the
hearing the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1 . Special conditions and circumstances do not exist which especially
affect the subject property and not the district generally;
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance would not involve
substantial hardship to the petitioner;
3. The relief requested cannot be granted without substantial detriment to
the public good or without nullifying or substantially derogating from
the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
Qw 17 QCT 77ji,/ o r
Fort V KiPOCCS PrT COW( �I-Ce-CT (K-I)
c,l.e.�,� CN �' /�/ ✓�.r (jvy�eA/ F-�.SOI�,D r Lkz.r•�wK; c-�-� �"--"'-� J
. `,.0�1 cep o� %i-e, �,r .,.y �,✓�.-e., fo�rd�er-� /a�..�li«rle.� i,t � J�-ems..
E�¢ � ///J)e ,)1js I c r re u L �vdLL fte�/ df
t=
1
c
f
f
�—� � �t..c'°"'� ��a,^�.y � "`' V!^r'1 n."c.Q�° Y'`c�19.4' `–+�- 1 �-2 `�oJ'(c„�,c•pp
' i'�? m ��a•" '1 �L f�w.�-{ �'Uv.r ��) rJTI ✓v.•.....�V2 VJ?C.s-
l >
CPtL
b
< 0 0
Z
_ i O
0
h
e
4- >E
C
/ 2
� T 6• � 0
1 lb /N,,
ZF¢ h OF
6 e
02
89
14,669
✓��o 6• o' I _. /�_._..
ir
88ti
i sqc 2C, 925 R E ti #,
REV, ,;'
cryj�is's� 8 _
REN'_ If
AI
�� .` `
CLARK a' so. s 8O {/ ip85
=E
.'�Qft
d{ Jf A aQ � • ' 83 n r :'
x aQ STp aQ �••
LLJJ o`
Aft
131
-. /122 a `O % O Au
0 0� _
^ \1s3 10;p
�6132
200 13op} �� \;0 2'' .u, = io5 a 1,
° 1L
f �rLQ pG
i s s �J
btq2 i R EV s
C
R EV. t
0
BOARD OF ASSESSORS
CITY HALL PAGE
31
.............o'
I'
-9 _,1.....I
7
...............
2
Z Z,,, l.........
3
CE�tT CID, ITT
4
4 5
05 SUBJECT PROPERTY. MAF'. 03 LOT. 0079 SUFE.
PROPER7Y ADCRESS. 0007 CLARK STREEJ 7 •
,77777� 7 1 7l— 'Ile 0 11 H,11
9
�A 10
7
s
I I.I I 1 012
9 ..........
............ .I I...I I I I
10 13
�: 0
12 Jzo 16
1 1 0 3 0079 0007 CLARK STREET HAMMOND FAMILY T RUST 419 HIGHLAND AVENUE
F_ 'RAGAk"Qe
t,7 p
:3 17
-pip,
);•00'i� I-IVIA is
IF At IM Y ......
4 I.I.I..I
SAL120
ZIT 7
MA ZIA!.R
15
p
SALEM MA 01970 2
17
03 0078 0005 CLARK STREET RUTKOWSK*I H!r'_'N,9Y W 2 EISSEX ST 23 i
18 24
19
... .....
25
.......I .......... I. I...I. 1 2
�l 1009..��CUARK..'STREET`, �,'�M M C 1,TY%I 0,Fe`,e
20 .I I I I..oe,�I I I I I I I e.I I I I I I. I 1 11 1 1 1 1 e e I 1 6
.%.......I I I e I
I I...I. 27
P
C a T Orr'f 'qv t
21
P Tr I
22 29
MASELLA PEGGY E MASELLA DONALD R SALEM MA 01970 3
23 fOMAS C
03 0081 00.1.5 CLARK S T REET ANDREWS TV 47 NORTH FEDERAL ST 31 0
24 3
25M
ba 01 .3 C)
26
3
........... 3
27
IE'Rx t;� 4:41,4ii` I I I 1 3
28 37
29 SrILIAN ROUENT11STILIAN Ji V 114 TRS LYNN MA 0.1905 3e
03 0087 0024 BARNES CIRCLC'�_.' MASELLA STEPHEN J 24 BARNES Cf HCLE. 39
30
It
41
31 QPVA r,n I-,I-1,
& NA�;9LLA _14 40
RLf-,T"
K" ...........I ....... 42 AM
0— LP R,_777—st 1, -, 7_!
32 ....... F"I NV IN
S A C 1Z., 43
33
.. ..... ...............44 9-4 14!
I, I I I PE R RA GAMO,I F�A t1L I"
34
45
FEVZRAGANO PAUL TR SIALLM MA I 0.1 -7 o 4
35 610
47
36 1 481
37 ......I, 49
• 5
38 C
51
52
40 53
4154
55
42 56
43 .I I°.•:: 557
44
I III I ..II.II II II I.I.
I,1
69
45 . 0
46 JJ st
471 620
:
3
48 41
49 1, 1 1 1 ..........I .......... I.I I.I.I..I I.
65
68
•
50 •
67
Ill 1 1 1,1 68
51
52 69
53 701
0 7
54 72
M_
. ... .... 3
"ER, M,;:�CAR7
ON�j
.......... .I...I.I.I I,, .... 74
�5611 .I I I I I
11
G, UE, 7 5
7