Loading...
5 CHEVAL AVENUE - ZBA 5 Cheval Ave.' R-1 James Picone a cb c a Ti#g of S' ttlem, fflttssar4usetta A . PDura of �ppeu1 August 6, 1992 Notice is hereby given that as of Aug., 3, 1992 the decision of r the Board of Appeal has been filed in the office of the City Clerk to grant the petition of James Picone for Variances to allow con- struction of new garages at 5 Cheval Ave. BOARD OF APPEAL Brenda M. Sumrall Clerk of the Board Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Mass. General Laws, Chapter 808, and shall be filed within 20 days af¢or the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to Mass. Genera: Lavas: Ch pter 808, Section 11, the Variance or Permit granted herein slral! not take effect until a copy of the der_;;;ion, bearpg the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal-has been filed,that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name or the owner of record or 1% recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. BOARD OF APPEAL 0 3 of �ttlrm, �ttsstttltusetta �N "' J n W BOura of -ALt}lelll omw T �a a ma N (.O N n) DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JAMES PICONE FOR VARIANCE AT 5 CHEVAL AVE. (R-I) A hearing on this petition was held July 22, 1992 with the following Board Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Richard Febonio, Francis Grealish, Stephen Touchette and Associate Arthur Labreque. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting variances from lot coverage and all setbacks to allow existing garage to be demolished and to construct a new structure. Property is located in a Residential Single Family district. The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding by this Board that: 1. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and structures involved. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1. There was no opposition. 2. The existing garage was built during the 1930's and cannot accommodate modern motor vehicles. 3. The new structure would be more in harmony with the adjoining structures. 4. If not granted the structure could only be used for dead storage which was not the intended nor desired use. C � r m o tat A T en U,n W CDM o T y N DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JAMES PICONE FOR " —a A VARIANCE AT 5 CHEVAL AVENUE, SALEM m page two On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the variance requested, subject to the following conditions: 1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances, codes and regulations . 2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted. 3. Petitioner shall comply with all requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety. 4. Petitioner shall obtain a legal building permit from the City of Salem Building Inspector. 5. Petitioner shall obtain a demolition permit before removal of the existing structure. VARIANCE GRANTED July 22, 1992 J / Richard A. Benca1, Chairman Board of Appeal DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JAMES PICONE FOR VARIANCES AT 5 CHEVAL AVENUE, SALEM page three A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner' s Certificate of Title. Board of Appeal _o Ir � < r'� M0 c+l 7c!n CDM O rn S r ma (n cn N IV i 4S fliitu ofttlrm, ttssttrlTusettaN uaourd of ACI}1F2d om N T- n� S mn N LO N N DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JAMES PICONE FOR VARIANCE AT 5 CHEVAL AVE. (R-I) A hearing on this petition was held July 22, 1992 with the following Board Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Richard Febonio, Francis Grealish, Stephen Touchette and Associate Arthur Labreque. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting variances from lot coverage and all setbacks to allow existing garage to be demolished and to construct a new structure. Property is located in a Residential Single Family district. The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding by this Board that: 1. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and structures involved. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence . presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1. There was no opposition. 2. The existing garage was built during the 1930's and cannot accommodate modern motor vehicles. 3. The new structure would be more in harmony with the adjoining structures. 4. If not granted the structure could only be used for dead storage which was not the intended nor desired use. r-< mo W a�+ • x N> W o m ca n= N DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JAMES PICONE FOR —v n= s A VARIANCE AT 5 CHEVAL AVENUE, SALEM n page two On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the variance requested, subject to the following conditions: 1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted. 3. Petitioner shall comply with all requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety. 4 . Petitioner shall obtain a legal building permit from the City of Salem Building S g Inspector. 5. Petitioner shall obtain a demolition permit before removal of the existing structure. VARIANCE GRANTED July 22, 1992 / X16 Richard A. Bencal, Chairman Board of Appeal DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JAMES PICONE FOR VARIANCES AT S CHEVAL AVENUE, SALEM page three A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner' s Certificate of Title. Board of Appeal S!_ Ir � < r"� MCD aaa s r om o -n- �2 S ma rs N N Titoof ulrm, fttsmttrhllsrtta "Cn N> w ._ Bnttra of -Aupud om N mn N (.O N N DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JAMES PICONE FOR VARIANCE AT 5 CHEVAL AVE. (R-I) A hearing on this petition was held July 22, 1992 with the following Board Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Richard Febonio, Francis Grealish, Stephen Touchette and Associate Arthur Labre ue. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting variances from lot coverage and all setbacks to allow existing garage to be demolished and to construct a new structure. Property is located in a Residential Single Family district. The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding by this Board that: 1. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and structures involved. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1. There was no opposition. 2. The existing garage was built during the 1930's and cannot accommodate modern motor vehicles. 3. The new structure would be more in harmony with the adjoining structures. 4. If not granted the structure could only be used for dead storage which was not the intended nor desired use. l r mo c.a ;0T xCn om o T= N DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JAMES PICONE FOR —" A VARIANCE AT 5 CHEVAL AVENUE, SALEM m N S page two n `� On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship to the petitioner. 3 . Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the variance requested, subject to the following conditions: 1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances, codes and regulations . 2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted. 3 . Petitioner shall comply with all requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety. 4 . Petitioner shall obtain a legal building permit from the City of Salem Building Inspector. 5. Petitioner shall obtain a demolition permit before removal of the existing structure. VARIANCE GRANTED July 22, 1992 /amu' J /6 J Richard A. Bencal, Chairman Board of Appeal DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JAMES PICONE FOR VARIANCES AT 5 CHEVAL AVENUE, SALEM page three A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. Board of Appeal r < m o ty �T �f �a W CDM o mrn S a N tV ISI nATE OF ::ERRING a o PETITIONER s2B11/ LOCATION �—� p/ MOTION: 70 GRANT SECOND TO DENY SECOND 70 RE-HEAR SECOND LEAVE TO WITHDRAW SECOND 70 CONTINUE SECOND ROLL CALL PRESENT GRANT DENY WITHDRAW RE-HEAR CONTINUE ORICHARD %ENCAL RICHARD FEBONIO FRANCIS GREALISH €DrfihR��Z-I-N�K-h STEPHEN T'QUCHETTE ASSOCIATE MEMBERS R04ALD_P-LANIZ / ARTHUR LABRECOUE !/ CONDITIONS: 3 APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 (gut,_ of �ttlrm, Cfflussarhmuffs �Kiarb of "ral TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS : -he Undersignea represent that he Is are `he owners of a certain parcel of land lo, t .id : ,t ri0. .5.Gheva) . Pven . . . . . . . . . . ue. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ! }AXRg; ; Zoning District ana said parcel is affected by Section(s ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . of the Massachusetts State Building Code. Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance. cam, m o cr+ 0 � N The Application for Permit was denied by the� Inspector of Buildings for the following . reasons : The existing garage (circa 1930) needs to be extelded 18 inches to accommodate modern motor vehicles. The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero- gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for the following reasons: The structure in question, located at 5 Cheval Avenue, Salem, is a metal 4-door garage contiguous with 18 other garages on that street. The building is prefabricated and was erected to shelter cars built during the 1930' s. Present day cars do not fit in the garage. The overhead doors strike the trunk lids of full -size cars preventing the doors from meeting their intended purpose. The building needs to be expanded by 18 inches which will equal the depth of all other garages in that row. The neighbors who abut the property are supportive of this request since the improvements made to the garage will benefit their property. II Owner. Jame$, L athlggn, Fig ppp. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . Address. 25. Beach. Avenue,. Salem,.MA. . . . . . . . . . Telephone. . 744.3857, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , amePetitioner.. . . . Picone . . . . . . . . . . . . Address?5. Beach, Ayenue,, Wpm,, MA, , , , , , , , , , , Date. g4gq .1.9, .1 M. . . . . . . Telephone. ./744,-3857. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . By. . . . .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The Evening News. COM,yH o s M E R a�S,i�pN i rnV r r � u � y y rfilbU o NA cZ 32 � o kx N �� > f ' i Ih r -P Q d vv(D Jul f i f � , y j � I II' I 171177-171 I a I`I—T III ��I I li I I 1 I I I1 \\\� /� I .. � I I ' , 1 i I { I I } ( f j it I � ` Il � j � l I � lii � llfl � II ( � � I � { iilil ; i � ! - I I � j I � I � I � � I � I ` � � I � � � ( Ijl I + 1 ` � III � � IIII I � i { �. II j � it ! � I I i i J ( j l l j � i � { i l ` s l ! I I i 1 1 1 � � I i I 1 i t i � ' ' � l i i 1 , ; 1 I { I i � � { I ; I � ! � 1 55 J � - I ji � ill1 ! II jlil � � � ' Ij � ljt { i - ( i i I � Il � lj � I � II I I i I jj' � I I � I1 � � , I , Ilial lilt ! � i i � � l � I i I ill Il , j ' fll ! j � I i l � � I � � I ' 1 I ������� W CsT � t-��' � s e°O E m . 1 I C- 9 0550n p '� � � �50 bo 6 O • ,a 45 068 5 pL 1 0 775 zl2 Ft ' 010 g31 \ JUNIPER / \ BEACH 70 �/�! : �� zk3e 0 \a65�r "^:1, \ �s,l5 a 't,\P y � :V r. l4 W All A 7- � isa °s �4209 i * �•? 0' �rL .lY4 �'� 22.`L � ,C a/� 5y5 9' `.� bFi F TV L �'?9 9 8ep IL 1 264 ` q ®3 •°9 ��` X50 sd �� 1 � �o Frye //� / 3 �� ._^J oOAU TOs �2 'i 4 X97 4i W Joy >y ! ei ea •� ? � C J/ 400 BL 96 !! 90 9 q S Z ZAn w ; 5225 - N � ry^y a o N w 31 N Sp O� C / CITY Or SALEM f c1TY or snI,EM Bonn or nrrEnL , , BOARD or nrrrnL ' -745-9595 Ext. 381 ." 745-9595 Ext. 381 Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter- Will hold a public hearing for all persons inter- ested ill tire petition submitted byJAMESPICONE ested in the petition submitted by JAMESPICONE for Variances to allow existing garage to be for Variances to allow existing garage to be demolished and to construct a new garage at demolished and to construct a new garage at �- 5 CREVAL AVE. (R-1) Said hearing to be held 5 COEVAL AVE. (R-1) Said hearing to be held WEDNESDAY,JULY 22,1992 AT 7:00 P.M.,ONE WEDNESDAY,JULY 22,1992 AT 7:00 P.M.,ONE -SALEM GREEN, second floor. SALEM GREEN, second floor. RICHARD A. BENCAL, Chairman RICHARD A. BENGAL, Chairman July 8, 15, 1992 SN82815 July 8, 15, 1992 SN82815 APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . affil of 'Mm C!, assar4usetts paurb »f �a PAI TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS : The Undersigned represent that he s are .he owners of a certain parcel of land Iota e7 at f10. .5.Gheval . Avenue. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . qRR Zom ng District. . . 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : and said parcel is affected by Section(s ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . of the Massachusetts State Building Code. Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance. n � cn ��--a N < x J ^- -t Uc rn o vN j i T C4. LS� 1> LD O '-' T 49 q= v >_ m N t- G'1. "3 The Application for Permit was denied by the; Inspector of Buildings for the following . reasons: The existing garage (circa 1930) needs to be exte4ded 18 inches to accommodate modern motor vehicles. The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero- gating from the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for the following reasons: The structure in question, located at 5 Cheval Avenue, Salem, is a metal 4-door garage contiguous -with 18 other garages on that street. The building is prefabricated and was erected to shelter cars built during the 1930' s. Present day cars do not fit in the garage. The overhead doors strike the trunk lids of full-size cars preventing the doors from meeting their intended purpose. The building needs to be expanded by 18 inches which will equal the depth of all other garages_ in that row. The neighbors who abut the property are supportive of this request since the improvements made to the garage will benefit their property. Owner. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . Address. 25. Beach. Avenue,. Salem,. MA. . . . . . . . .. Telephone. . 744,3857, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Petitioner. James Picone Address?5. Beach, Avenue,, Salem,, MA, , , , , „ , , , , Date. June ,l.9, .?992. . . . . . . Telephone. 744,-3857. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . By. 1-7 62o-.0. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Three copies of the application must be filed wit the Secretary of the Board of Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The Evening News. m a - 0 m O < L o z m � Z G m 'o m � y t APPEAL CASE NO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . c STT ' (1LTtr1 IIf2IlEIIt' C2TS5tIL�l28ES Psarb of ��psezdl cam. TO THE BOARD OF APPEALS : The Undersigned represent that he is are the owners of a certain parcel of land to t�d at f10. .5.Gheva) . 9venu€. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .JAgRRg; Zoning District— . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : and said parcel is affected by Section(s ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . of the Massachusetts State Building Code. Plans describing the work proposed, have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in accordance with Section IX A. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance. N iri < _ n i✓ 4. C) tii;:. r- -� N et F� m o cin ;m c.C) <1 sn N Cr r- CD Ca Lr" p O rn r CD v n 3 mCn N N The Application for Permit was denied by the, Inspector of Buildings for the following . reasons : The existing garage (circa 1930) needs to be exte6ded 18 inches to accommodate modern motor vehicles. 4 The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeals to vary the terms of the Salem Zoning Ordinance and/or the Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the enforcement of said Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship to the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially dero- gating from the intent. and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for the following reasons: The structure in question, located at 5 Cheval Avenue, Salem, is a metal 4-door garage contiguous with 18 other garages on that street. The building is prefabricated and was erected to shelter cars built during the 1930' s. Present day cars do not fit in the garage. The overhead doors strike the trunk lids of full-size cars preventing the doors from meeting their intended purpose. The building needs to be expanded by 18 inches which will equal the depth of all other garages in that row. The neighbors who abut the property are supportive of this request since the improvements made to the garage will benefit their property. Owner. James. �. Kath3ggn. N9909.. . . .. . . . . . . . . . Address. 25. Beach. Avenue,. Salem,.MA. . .. . . . . . . Telephone. , 744,3857, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Petitioner. �ames Picone Address?5. Beach, Avenue,, Salem,, MA, , , , , , , , , „ Date. Aqq .1.9, .1992. . . . . . . Telephone. . . /7�44,-3857. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . By. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Three copies of the application must be filed with the Secretary of the Board of Appeals with a check, for advertising in the amount of. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . four weeks prior to the meeting of the Board of Appeals. Check payable to The Evening News. NO.................................... PETITION 10 BOARD OF APPEALS LOCATION ............ ..... ...... ....... .................. PF]I I IONFII.......................................... ADDRESS............. ............................... . ................................................ CONVII IONS ................... I ................................. ........................ ........................ .............. ......................... ........--......................... ............-.............. . ................................. ........... ........ .................. .................... ................................................................. PETITION APPROVED.................... ❑ DENIED......................... E] ........... 19......... H o s M E R A-vENuE Septi coke cT' �fv � tVD 0 20.0 j= m o m kksNc 1 p 03 c it o o Uy WA m � � b � Ill NS2U Nei 71 H o s M E R vENUE aSs,�,oti coMMoy�� > 210.0 / 1 _ 1 U c r o rh - Y Zi � U � 2 � • N • rad i Z N�f + fUNlPE�2. PLfFYC7,20UNG p.5 j EX/STirl.6 p. 6tiz- I p � 2� G V E VA L k' VE�'.0 0- 1=)"67 _- va 1--A PztlPC'yz--y t_IAr C /}rv)o �A-fZ A G 1-TS i y iJ N�/G lr 13o�21j✓6 642d 66 PLAN of L!+lvD iN Of „ JA L E /Y7 o� y P45FAR�=D ,-og E SAMES ICATNLcE/�f /GONE o. 26M MAY 20992 SAF AFCISTfRE� Q+�' S MI( too eaY srA j�jRvEY/N6 �SSac. ! Z.�4- GABaT ST. , BEVERLY, ML} . AvENUE O Z r r2i 20.0 -}} 1 lT m m fil y m � bU b � , v 1p t- r `L! 1 46 n i m� � b � n � �,o coM,yoy a z �. S � � 24.0 _�� _- i5•+ G - ;,;.• •hSpP� � 18.3 1 1 O 1 O - I �sCZ1 < Ho s m e 2 ,4v�Nue 31 1 1 1 0 � i p 1 U_ e (A ym \ br \ Q Qm 20.0 � m u�h, �x � - liR Nm ' \\ _\ S O "o- a.y ����G. N m O is Dr u• V �'� IG 11 t37 d a a �m. lY �'•a c0� �i"±\���� �i � :,\ �� \`n �,r .�•, ON �\ 1 t',\�,�/ o I:�llo- � tV •,� � � iP� m� m � `'° `9� l' � I / oZ9' 4 ati- ,F/� 0 0 .. . \ L t)p �� TA p 1` ` .i 32 e Q�2 _ (p}� 6' ��' .'.� 5 °,P �0 �ci •Loi.. _. � � q \ °''�j r w � v' �o: . g24oj \ P 9t 4\\\ ^, 1 s c► of 5 %- �'a`�' to n n kcv o \ 00°4 1 Z0� pa Og L F_.1 BOARD OF ASSESSORS CITY HALL PAGE. 2 ..... . ........ . CERTIFIED.: TE _VrzED�ABUT RS' LIST 3] 7-' SUBJECT PROPERTY: MAP. 44 LOT: 0075 SUFF. 710 PROPERTY ADDRESS: 0005 CHEVAL AVENUE 8 7 ASSESSED OWNER PI C_(JNF_,J_4MES L 9 :01 12 10 MP­_L_07 S ESS ASSESSED-OWWR KXIL-ING-ADDRESS 13 : E L I �4* 2 44 0075 0005 CHEVAL AVENUE PICONJAMES 25 BEACH AVE 5 16 13 77 14 4.4 0062 0031 JUNIPER AVENUE FLEMING JOSEPH V 31 JUNIPER AVENUE I SALEM MA 01970 19 15 44 006 (30�23 J'L4NjPER% A'v1&.' 0 76 —3 AHBREPE PAL16 A 29-4UN442ER­-AVF- 21 ELIZABETH G SALEM te(A 01970 22 7 44 0071 0031 JUNIPER AVENUE REAR SALEM CITY OF 230 a 24 .........I'll .......... 25 142 SAY -VIEW A 2 1670 20 ....... ...... SALEM MA '01970'- 21 22 — 28 29 23 JUNIPER PLAYGROUND 300 24 44 0074 0003 HOSMER AVENUE FOX WILL1AJ1 PAUL 82 PAY VIEW AVE 31 25 6AL9A NA 94f)'779 26 33 4.4' 0076 : .......1)007,%,,.frt-,4EVAL.,.;,,6.Yl,�.7�.Nc)t�',: WALLIS GLORI,A' A , 92 BAY VIEW AVE 34 ....... . SALEM MA 0-1970 350 27 ...... 36 AR49 PHPIA.b; : 4­p�w� c� 4. &4-0Av­V-1-f-WA-V. 9977 - v 37 29 P*ICARTHUR VIRGINIA M TR SALEM MA 0197030 38 Zo 4 0078 0011 CHEVAL AVENUE FELLOWS JOSEPH E JR 72 BAY VIEW AVE V1 39• 31 AL-I-SGN G 40 0497G- ✓ 41 4.4 0079 0013 CHEVAL AVENUE GRAY JOHN M 6 RIDGEVIEW RD 42 32 ROSEMARY A TQPSFIELD MA 0198-c 430 33 �' 'A�V_l . 7 441 34 44 eL98B Oe!5 ef fEVAF. AVENUE EH410S 4.4Sf.4-H F R I .�. 45 35 ALISON C SALEM MA 01970 46� 36 4-4 0081 0017 CHEVAL AVENUE KENT CAR(_"LYN J 116 SAY VIEW AVE 47 0 48 37 49 44 0082�' 0019 HALL. FLETCHIER- G. 16 BEACH -AVE 38 50 ......... SALEM MA 0,15170 ✓ . 51 39 '1."...... Ibb-694 RA-Y­V-14z:'4 -AV9 ..... 01 5n : KATHLEEN G MARTIN SALEM MA 01970 0 4.4 0084 0023 CHEVAL AVENUE KLINE JOHN J 130 BAY VIEW VE 42 Z 54 .................. K6 101 R.A.1 N NA I ( - z 3 7, 5]11 OHN E 9 .MINUTEMAN 'ROAD 58 "ec KLINE, „44 0085, oa ,:"' HEVAL,,AVF_,N. 44 .. HAM, MA :0204 ..........-. ....:11" NE P c� , , , 01 45 ...... .................. . 46 61 47 GREEN LAURIE A SALEM MA 01970 :2 4.4 0088 0006 CHEVAL AVENUE STf VENS THIOMAS P 6 C11-11E.VAL AVE 3 •48 S 61 64 49 6i; 50 44 0069,', WHITE RICHARD ,,P 3 C,--,EVAL 'AVE :6 0 JUDITH A 7 'SALEM MA 01970 51 68 52 69 53 70 71 54 ]2 55 '3 PETER M. CAR 1�,?IA!?," 14 5 CHIEF ASSESSOR 750 7 BOARD OF ASSESSORS CITY HALL PAGE. ......... I DAIt 2 492............"Illo........ 11...I I I I........ . ............: , ..... 3 3 IICEWTIFZEP :A UTTERS11S 2 4 • 4 5 5 SUBJECT PROPERTY. MAP. 44 LOT: 0075 SUFE: 6 PROPERTY ADDRESS: 0005 CHEVAL AVENUE ASSESSEE) CIN14ER PfeeHE jAME-S. 17 7 9 8109 11 9 12 10 MA-P-L-OT--StF-F— PROPERfY ADDRESS AS ESSEI�-OW PER --MAIL-1-MG-ADD 13 * :1 :4 45 0066 0037 JUNIPER AVENUE DAWKINS EVEREL '122 TT JR PAY VIEW AVENUE 5 2 —1 16 T3 �, L-.F)-f--HA-E)-1-9-7 17 014 45 0067 0035 JUNIPER AVENUE CLOUTIER CATHERINE-: 35 JUNIPER AVE 1 SALEM MA 0.1970 15 21 -AeH02 16 t-Ewf N19(i zi OHN D- --Bf. AVE.-AV . 17 DALE 11 SALEM MA 01970 22* 23 24 79 ...... 25 26 ................... 20 21 270 ............ ... ...... 28 22 29 23 3010 3 24 J ...I .. 33 25 34 26 35 0 27 36 28 37 •29 380 39 30 41 3141 32 . ...420 43 33 44 34 45 35 460 47 36 48 37 ... .II 49 38 of 39 52 40 53 0540 41 z 55 42 56 ..... 1 4 z 43 I 1...I...1 4 57 fn 5: 44 5 45 2 1 1 60 46 61 47 6210 63 48 64 49 65 ..I.I..I.I 66 50 ...... I 1 67 51 ,I I., ,,I I I... . .1 68 52 69 0 71 53 70 0 54 Z�� 7 55 P 73 ETER M. CARON 1 74 i56 CHIEF ASSESSOR 75 �717 Q DECISION ON THE PET IT�ION OF , FOR �C VARIANCES'AT 4011 � clQ l) .i A HEARING ON THIS PETITION WAS HELD ON WITH THE FOLLOWING BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: RICHARD A. BENCAL. CHAIRMAN ; FRANCIS X. GREALISH, SECRETARY : RICHARD FEBONIO : STEPHEN TOUCHETTE AND ASSOCIATE MEMBER ARTHUR LA BRECQUE AND RONALD PLANTE. NOTICE OF THE HEARING WAS SENT TO ABUTTERS AND OTHERS . AND NOTICES WERE PROPERLY PUBLISHED IN THE SALEM EVENING NEWS IN ACCORDANCE WITH MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL LAWS CHAPTER 40A. PETITIONER IS REQUESTING 6?� VARIANCESLL�n C®7/e1� I N ORDER T , pe w YO le- �2� 7/0� 6�� IN THIS le'/ ZONE. THE VARIANCE WHICH HAS BEEN REQUESTED MAY BE GRANTED UPON A FINDING BY THIS BOARD THAT: 1 . SPECIAL CONDITIONS AND CIRCUMSTANCES EXIST WHICH ESPECIALLY AFFECT THE LAND, BUILDING OR STRUCTURE INVOLVED AND WHICH ARE NOT GENERALLY AFFECTING OTHER LAND, BUILDINGS OR STRUCTURES IN THE DISTRICT: 2 . LITERAL ENFORCEMENT OF THE PROVISIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE WOULD INVOLVE SUBSTANTIAL HARDSHIP, FINANCIAL OR OTHERWISE TO THE PETITIONER; 3 . DESIRABLE RELIEF MAY BE GRANTED WITHOUT SUBSTANTIAL DETRIMENT TO THE PUBLIC GOOD AND WITHOUT NULLIFYING OR SUBSTANTIALLY DEROGATING FROM THE INTENT OF THE DISTRICT OR THE PURPOSE OF THE ORDINANCE. THE BOARD OF APPEAL, AFTER CAREFUL CONSIDERATION OF THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED AT THE HEARING MAKES THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS OF FACT: G(1Q4� w,/93a ,s ao' � eww ON THE BASIS OF THE ABOVE FINDINGS OF FACT AND ON THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED AT THE HEARING . THE BOARD OF APPEAL CONCLUDES AS FOLLOWS : 1 . SPECIAL CONDITIONS EXIST WHICH ESPECIALLY AFFECT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY BUT NOT THE DISTRICT IN GENERAL ; 2 . LITERAL ENFORCEMENT OF THE PROVISIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE WOULD INVOLVE SUBSTANTIAL HARDSHIP TO THE PETITIONER; 3 . DESIRABLE RELIEF MAY BE GRANTED WITHOUT SUBSTANTIAL DETRIMENT TO THE PUBLIC GOOD AND WITHOUT NULLIFYING OR SUBSTANTIALLY DEROGATING FROM THE INTENT OF THE DISTRICT OR THE PURPOSE OF THE ORDINANCE. THEREFORE, THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS VOTED TO THE VARIANCE REQUESTED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITI S: t. P � � � t. I i/ _ 38q' O - i -- i i 1 � � • — C�irZ-R�JG� �1tr� �OVNK�A�e"{C?�) �_ _. I C�fe`C`F�t t.,.. !'.S 5 H Cy.,J w O+�} R..tG t3T, it j,, -:.'' ,••��., 1 � ;- q N ` f ill + 1 i �— R;= �L1`�C'.G CND W tat_.}_. �,S tT t-t i �•- - ' !f} +n3ooC) r Fork +- T- { ►1 /�" ; 1 2 K-1 1r. QC—. �OV NOATl01.•1 ��CY- �` i ` ' f a r � I S ' Sc ALE = ' r—O i 1 9 1=" L©t' ) R i i i ; F • F : • , � 1 C Fi F-= V-sN- , e HOS`� fu1E R _Avis. ---------- FOR - SAME s F't�4 4`•1 E M A 2c 17 2 S B'EA\C H NJ F. f -COnra1-RtJC'['.. ►Vl�.vl _.. FO•JNCSA'�"►O+.J � ....rtT�,{ l� i'E '�a t��"%;r` , c ti-- _/ UNDER Cri1ST_ tAaT-kL GNP-NC.0 - Fam /,S Plr�wr-" { 1 i lli N e7 %- in3O4C2tFtf if t r SCAL-6 Y2 7 -O f •� ! i I E i ? I } 1S i ` 1 1 f _ i 1 7 F-O MNGLCH 17 ) _IJJ2 2,5' BEaCME A�� t I 1 UNDeR Ex�ST- MEZ�L GAQAGC tliIL 1t`` �o`TtitL /a5 SHcx,JN O+a R 1tk1T, 10 r ! - r 1 1 F N f a Pt-rNci EH V} Wood F��► � +- T- 1 �ti -� _/6"- 1 ! ' I i ' I � ) � i j 1 i F�'LOb 1_o.t�l W Cs`T- L� I r i ji F'OR, - SAMES PtCaNE I T l9 9 2 e.ae•¢ewR:,wurnen.v..�......�....m.r my.. CO/�>STRI,CX _ tVC?W �I �a u �1T � mitt I•/ (, : i- G Tt�k tr Ns S IN CW" G1 P.f P114 Wr E " .,_ - �� � �. .,¢. '.moi .l i 4 � ♦ 1 � i ! 1 1 //++ �- /6"_ I '✓% 11 i � I I I ( t � 1 C I � i it ! 1i X111 � I ` ` ) ' t I � i , 1 • I � � i ! � ! � f1 � if iot It s ' Lnail W MS7i 12 Llama ( _ _..� J .\.�-,�[ .��-._..,��'�•--mow.._ r _ . CONSTRVGTiO�J L t tom" OC » 10 -T-R U sem. s 3 ! ii 1, "oR SAt\�tES F'I�a � M P\rZc ki 1 T ) 19 9 2 i i _ Q TRvcT F'G0N'>A-r-10ti1 ali d f N f _ I } y 4' ;r' .'FOVNCATI.QN -. wEGt ,, ! W C�"i"" T=— LES! _CONSTRVCTEON �ooa a'�rat 2X1} t6" OC ___ _ - I 1n1C� - - - I p , F-OR — _. :T MMES 1P1CO NF ►''1 Ac�.c tt 17 19 2 _ a T Beit\c H Nj }FJ i _............ + i CC�TRu tZ• 1�1�W_ ..Fp v rtt.7 hr!O� .---^--T----� i, jilt Fr I Ll y � 1 � li�l ti .• g� 1�� r� III i I { I ( i ( I kill 10 I f ` 1.� %2" _ � '-o i t F=7CO ' 1-0.1 1 W CST L�>I CONSTRVC�TtO►J OC "j"' - Ii1 ) 0 'fes � I i ; iii III ! ; HI1 ! i ! 11 411 ' � � � I � � i a k , a + L--- --'---- --_ ---------------- Vis, FOR _ . 2T BeP�CH NJ S-.