Loading...
37 CHESTNUT STREET - ZBA 37 CHESTNUT STREET (R-2) GARY PALARDY , (fitn ofu1Pm, rttssttrlrusPtts j,Q 9 Poura of rAppeal J JU DECISION ON THE PETITION OF GARY PALARDY FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 37 CHESTNUT STREET (R-2) A hearing on this petition was held December 11, 1996 with the following Board Members present: Gary Barrett, Chairman, Paul , Valaska is Richard g Dionne, Nina Cohen and Albert Hill. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioner is requesting a Special Permit to convert an existing historic carriage house for the use as a single family dwelling. this carriage house is an accessory to the existing principal dwelling for the property located at 37 Chestnut Street. The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this request for a Special Permit is section 5-3(j ) , which provides as follows: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set forth in Section 8-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permits for alterations and reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement, extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses, provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood. In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants . The Special Permit which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of the Board that: A. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings or structures in the same district. B. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. DECISION ON THE PETITION OF GARY PALARDY FOR A SPECIAL PERK?IT AT 37 CHESTNUT STREET, SALE:: page two C. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1. There was no opposition to the petition. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1 . Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance would involve substantial hardship on the petitioner. 3. The relief requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the ordinance. 4. The Special Permit granted can be granted in harmony with the neighborhood and will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the city's inhabitants. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the relief requested, subject to the following conditions: 1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, codes ordinances and regulations. 2. All construction shall be done per the plans and dimensions submitted and approved by the Zoning Enforcement Officer. 3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Dept. relative to smoke and fire safety shall be strictly adhered to. 4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to beginning any construction. 5. Exterior finishes of the new construction shall be in harmony with the existing structure. DECISION ON THE PETITION OF GARY PALARDY FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 37 CHESTNUT STREET, SALEM page three 6. A Certificate of Occupancy is to be obtained. 7. A Certificate of Inspection is to be obtained. 8 . Petitioner shall obtain proper street numbering from the City of Salem Assessors office and shall display the street number so that it is visible from the street. 9 . Petitioner is to obtain approval from any Citv Board or Commission having jurisdiction including, but not limited to, the Planning Board and the Historic Commission. Special Permit Granted December 11, 1996 (,C Albert C. Hill , Jr. Member, Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of MGL Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL Chapter 40A, Section 11, the Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision, bearing the certification of the Citv Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. Board of Appeal ��r�,comlra'`4 yr e9" RfGUIIVF. Salem Historical Commission ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 (508) 745-9595 EXT. 311 FAX (508) 740-0404 November 26, 1996 Gary Barrett, Chairman Board of Appeal One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 Dear Chairman Barrette: The Salem Historical Commission is in receipt of your agenda for December 11, 1996 and offers the following comments: 1. 8-10 Winter Street- Enclosed please find a Building Survey form for this property indicating that it was constructed in 1830. Although it is not located in a local historic district (the district ends at 24 Winter Street), and therefore not under our jurisdiction, it is a contributing structure to the Salem Common National Register District. While the Commission takes no position on the proposal,we hope that any exterior alteration would be sympathetic in design. If requested by the Board of Appeal as a condition of approval, we would be pleased to provide design review. 2. 126 Bay View Ave. -Enclosed please find a Building Survey form for this property indicating that it was constructed between 1871 and 1897. While the Commission takes no position on the proposal, we hope that the proposed garage will be sympathetic in design. If requested by the Board of Appeal as a condition of approval, we would be pleased to provide design review. 3. 37 Chestnut Street - This property is located within the McIntire Historic District. Please be advised that any proposed alterations to the exterior of the property will first require review and approval by the Salem Historical Commission. This includes the installation or alteration of vents, electric and gas meters and their conduit, secondary egress or other alterations to accommodate an additional unit. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, THE SALEM HISTORICAL COMMISSION Helen Sides Chairperson '`�;