Loading...
142-144 CANAL STREET - ZBA - TM,. . tt I -C.o Lf117q CITY OF SALEM MASSACHUSETTS BOARD OF APPEAL ?ravrla� 200 NOV -8 120 WASHINGTON S7REETSALEM,MASSACHusEm 01970 P 2. 2b KiUBERLEYDRISCOLL TELE:978-745-9595 FAX:978-740-9846 MAYOR C tali t.Ltfl ; :� iL_I-1.1'jh Citi November 3, 2010 Dan DiLullo DiLullo Associates, trio_ 16 Crystal Street Melrose, MA 02176-2706 Re: Variance to reduce the number of required parking spaces on the property located at 142-144 CANAL ST. (industrial Zoning District). Dear Mr. DiLullo: On October 20, 2010, the Board of Appeals voted five (5) in favor(Beth Debski, Becky Curran, Bonnie Belair, Rick Dionne, and Annie Harris), and none opposed, to allow withdrawal without prejudice of the above petition. Robin Stein Chair CC: Cheryl LaPointe, City Clerk 10/20/10 14:11 FAI 978 745 3369 TINTI QUINN DROVER FREY. 1@003 T'IN)'I, QUINN, GROVER &. FREY, P.C. 27 CONGRESS STREET,SUITE 414 SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS 01970 VnLLIAM 1.TINTI WILLIAM B.ARDIFF(1965.1995) cinci@tindlaw.com ITELURONE WILLIAM F.QUINN (976)7458065 •(978)744-2948 MARCIMULFORD CIlQI OF L WilliamFQuion@aol.com ODK SCOTT M.GROVER TELECOP13JOHN D..KEENAN EE s n4R overx'dodlaw.cam (976)745336699 OF COUNSEL www.dmilaw.com MARC P.PREY mphevotimilaw.com JONATHAN M.OFILOS joHlosWdndlaw.eom - October 20,2010 BY HAND Robin Stein,Chairman Salem Zoning Board of AXpeals 120 Washington Street,3 floor Salem,Massachusetts 01970 Re: 142 Canal Street, Salem,MA Dear Board Members: Please accept this request to withdraw the petition of DiLullo Associates,Inc.regarding the above referenced mater. Very truly yours, M. over SMG/dlg f 10/20/10 14:11 FAX 078 745 3389 TINTI QUINN GROVER FREY. R002 TINTI, QUINN, GROVER &. FREY, P.C. 27 CONGRESS STREET,SUITE 414 SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS 01970 WILLIAM J.TINTI WILLIAM E.ARDIFF(1965•1995) dnti@toldlaw.com TELEPHONE WILLIAM F.QUINN (978)7458065 • (978)7442948 MARCIA MULFORD CINI On COUNeft WNiamFQuian®aol.com TELECOFDJR JOHN O.KEENAN SCOTT M.GROVER UNSEL g smovcr@dndluw_eam (9753369 oe COUNSEL A74 www.dndlaw.com MARC Y,FREY mP(ftY0dnd1sw,com JONATHAN M.OFILOS iaFlloel�dtsdlew,wm October 20, 2010 BY HAND Robin Stein, Chairman Salem Zoning Board of Appeals 120 Washington Street,3 floor Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Re: 24 Saunders Street Dear Ms. Stein: Pursuant to M.G.L. Ch_40, See. 10, I am writing to request that the Variances granted by the Board of Appeals with respect to the above referenced property be extended for a period of six ' months. The applicant has been delayed in exercising the rights granted by the Board due to processing paperwork relating to the now completed environmental cleanup at the property. 1 would appreciate it if my application could be considered by the Board at its meeting on October 20,2010. Thank you for your consideration of this request. Very truly yours, Scott ov SMG/dlg I 8 V90o nM3A�Al 3 � 6 � 0 —4 / F5 FP �8D ---I— v8 —4c- �n f�-- MMP"LME J N - u _ I e _—.0 _T N, (rj . iris P" i e � o iig.pp8 g5g�z gg�Q gS g-° irg a., a f'X ntl� 89a5 BAa8 Q ;8 4:j e� ppp � S S'�4 ae x ��n 27 F "' pn 9 a _ F r �l �`�.\ ✓ or, ln„ 'R 3 � n ° m,,�"� 11 RI F'1 MI g M s s 3 c � aias'3 � Q g�v Vie- ie� eQ A pp p � s mP a F P A=P M �SggP kP a K e P P 27 2! �E 21 ! N ouL a 2 W 4 & I 1 I o'O ! S@�@p� P " R 9 8 O a 20 £ '� i�`�I >Ss =aa �S# sSg "s# s� q e v 1 �$ $ i 5x m 1 n'$ a �"/ 0 o No g4 p4 1� k�RoQ -r Sa ..m,a� w m m z x s mEH' 1.MAX a I P F rp . gDD9l, g �g gm ^W.�, �.I'pU. !� lA LY g8 .. oir9 / r39 A. r. (R my Flo a. ^ate Q R P a jn Q> A f E� 1 F /i9 mmgi __ 2X MAX Fm }}VLiS{!fZ Cm I 40 �, o`k m i a DIY �a.�O N22 R. Im � 4r N€ II c �g a un dg I=gz a _ mM SgL m 0 n 'D $ w m 0u.y o�z�m 29Nou.oF 2� P oA >eM o z og m m �i �� a�A - F �o� Da IioNor�9z��N.�9oNmcD 28 v N$ g N m mD O as 9AOm g ymF7 .p � �0. om o mFo s a y n no ' c a 3 m o g Ii w E n o FFmFis�z.,pzp9N o"^n7$p> p m omr �mm� Bmo is ax �' - oN. mKmm'm"o $mo�b"i Ngm ` : 11 �� a F48 g A. o u, ^Noma m > o �a °F e a m _ A. m 0 ORW: DSC: CHK: CINL d m REGISTRY USE ONLY -_ SITE LAYOUT PLAN APPROVED LEM F 3 Eic L ADDED BIOREIEN¶ON AREA, 0p(AE QITY QF SALEM a m w, ADDED BOUARDS, MODIFIED s O. PLANNING BOARD N n_ a PROPOSED RETAIL STORAGE AREAS, ADDED STOP qq 5 oT e' . > 5GN N0 Irr AND STOP LINE R p 2 ADDED STOP SIGNS/LINES AT 1 DATE P u 'S m 0 142 CANAL STREET BOTH EXITS; REMOVED STOP SIGN 01-11-1�s S _ 0-- f)�S SALEM,MA N PARKING AREA SE OF PR. BLD SURVEYOR! T RSKa'c m m a O MADE DRIVE TO S OF PR. BLDG h 9 8 0 Appft<a t: ONE-WAY OUT V a 8 7 F 142 CANAL STREET NOMINEE TRUST Tl� 5 CRANBERRY LANE LYNNFIELD, MA 01940 SI DESCRIPTOR ME Page 1 of 1 Danielle McKnight From: Polly Wilbert [pwilbert2@gmail.comj Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 10:45 AM To: Danielle McKnight Subject: 142 Canal St. Issue before Tonight's ZBA Meeting Danielle, I cannot attend tonight's ZBA meeting. I am concerned, however, about the issue before the Board to issue a variance to the owner of 142 Canal St. to not have to meet the specific parking requirements that currently apply to the site. Additionally, I am concerned about the number of times that the owners have sought continuance on this issue. I ask that the Board not grant the applicant a variance. Further, if the owners seek a continuance on this issue, I recommend that they be asked to withdraw the variance application until they have a reason to seek a variance, which I do not believe exists at this time. Mary Wilbert 7 Cedar St. Salem, MA 01970 9/15/2010 Page 1 of 1 Danielle McKnight From: Thomas Stpierre Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 12:19 PM To: Danielle McKnight Subject: RE: 142 Canal Tom, I do not get to involved with the Planning Board,s decisions or site plans. The issue last night was that the uses currently on the site meet the zoning requirements for the square footages of each space. Enterprise came in with a proposed use that would need 15 or so spaces. This could not be accommodated with the current number of spaces existing in the redeveloped area of the site. The developer needed a variance from the number of spaces required for the Dollar store building to accommodate the spaces Enterprise was requesting. Yes Enterprise could park in the rear yard ,but that was not what they were requesting.Seemed pretty straight forward but it sure got convoluted by the Board and the Councilor. Tom From: Danielle McKnight Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 11:19 AM To: Thomas Stpierre Subject: 142 Canal Tom, Can you help me understand how the planning board's decision and approved plan limit Family Dollar's parking to the area near it and impede Enterprise's fulfillment of its required spaces? I only see parking mentioned in sections 11 b and 18b of the decision, and it isn't clear to me how either section allocates the spaces in front of Family Dollar to only Family Dollar or prevents the spaces in the rear lot from counting toward any business's parking requirement. Tom Thomas H. Devine Interim Staff Planner (for Danielle McKnight) Department of Planning and Community Development City Hall Annex 120 Washington Street Salem, MA 01970 (978) 619-5685 dmcknight(a)salem.com 7/22/2010