62 BUTLER STREET - ZBA 62 Butler St. R-2
Jose Pereira
s
T
O�
�1
V
r
j�nvny�
f" TitV of �ttlem, &fttssachusetts
Pourb of Appral
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JOSE PEREIRA FOR A
SPECIAL PERMIT FOR 62 BUTLER ST. , SALEM ,,
A Public Hearing on this petition was held August 14 , P%�L tl2tt wing
Board Members present: James Hacker, Chairman; MessrEht, arnas, Gauthitr,
r Luzinski and Strout. Notice of the hearing was sent to a utters and others and
= notices of the hearing were properly published in the C$*ei8,.EyePjn News in
z accordance with Massachusetts General Law Chapter 40A. 'L MASS.
getitioner, owner of the property, requests a Special Permit to extend non-
W _ conforming front setback in order to construct a second means of egress in this
" L ' - 11-2 district.
C to C ui O
w �
- LL the provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this request
_
" Tor a Special Permit is Section V B 10, which provides as follows:
w x - Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the Board
r w of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set forth in
S = c Section VIII F nad IX D, grant Special Permits for alterations and reconstruction
tz * z of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement, extension or expansion
5 = o of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses, provided, however, that such
change, extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more
w w = = z detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood.
y c o
c = o In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests,
guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding
- - - v by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will promote the public health,
y �
Q rt p. LL o safety, convenience and welfare of the City' s inhabitants.
`' v The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented and
j w N
after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact:
— z o
1 . This is the only logical location for a second means of egress;
r = 2. Planning Board is in favor;
3. There was no opposition.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented,
the Board of Appeal concudes as follows:
1 . The proposed plan will promote the health, safety, convenience
and welfare of the City's inhabitants;
2. The relief requested may be granted without substantial detriment
to the public good and without derogating substantially from the
intent or purpose of the Ordinance.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously 5-0 to grant the
petitioner the relief requested.
amen B. Hacker, Chairman
.r'
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND CITY CLERK
We the neighbors of Jose Pereira give our concent on the second
entrance to 62 Butler St.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
NAME ADDRESS
r
r,n Loll
� (9
1
MORTGAGE INSPECTION
BAY STATE SURVEYING SERVICE INC.
234 CABOT ST., BEVERLY, MA.
LOCATION ........CY..?�.5..�r............ To ...G.�E��E:...� RLScL��k:..�:�.-.�::r ... ......... —,
SCALE I =gip FT DATE .d?teJ YE.e:-. I hereby certify that I have examined the premises and that the
REFERENCE
building is plan are located on the ground as
shown and they conformed to the .zoning setbacks of the
........ ._ P-/- ---------- when constructed.
"ITE - Th4n is a Mortgage Inspection survey and not The building(s) are not located in the special flood hazard
an instrument survey, therefore this plot plan Is for zone, as defined by H.U.D. `��,
mortgage inspection purposes only. 4,W _':-_
-------- -------
•_-- l7� 5 �o� iROBERT
/ r SOTIROS y
No.26094 0
�HU Suitt"
THIS SURVEY IS BASED ON
SURVEY MARKERS OF OTHERS.
BV TL E� 6 • E'S, SHRUBS, FENCES & TREE
LINES SH NOT NECESSARILY INDICATE
PROPERTY LINES.