Loading...
116 BRIDGE STREET - ZBA Bridge St. R-2 Helen O'Connor FEB 20 2 `9 r r t1lit of "Salem, Aagsacllusgfts bourb of rAv}tezil m, DECISION ON THE PETITION OF HELEN O'CONNOR FOR VARIANCE AT 116 BRIDGE STREET (R-2) A hearing on this petition was held February 21 , 1990 with the following Board Members present: James Fleming, Chairman; Richard Bencal , Vice Chairman; Edward Luzinski , Associate Members Peter Dore and Arthur Labrecque. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting a Variance from side setback requirements to allow construction of a double deck in this R-2 district. The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of the Board that: a. special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and structures in the same district; b. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner; c. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal , after careful consideration of the evidence presented, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1 . No opposition was presented to the plan. 2. The proposed decks would add a second means of egress and would thus be a safety addition as well . On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented. the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1 . Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district in general . 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance would involve substantial hardship to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. DECISION ON THE PETITION OF HELEN O'CONNOR FOR A VARIANCE AT 116 BRIDGE STREET, SALEM page two Therefore, the Zoning Board of Apeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the variance requested, subject to the following conditions: 1 . Petitioner comply with all requirements of the Salem Fire Department. 2. All construction be done as per existing City and State Building Code. 3. All construction be done as per plans and dimensions submitted. VARIANCE GRANTED Richard A. Bencal , Vice Chairman A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of E+.e Mass. General Laws. Chapter ECS, and shall to filed rnthm 20 �!_is alter th^_ cate c° nim; of tNS ecu:cn in the othce of the City Clerk. __ p L , S_ctlon. t' the V,:nancc Pursu,nt to '. _ .. _ ,;Hct ::nul a copy :ror L � dec•von. ta�:'•n- 1. e rcr : . .• ' -. -' C';; Cork that 20 d.'.Vs nave - . or teat, i; such elope-[ lus heel ela fled :."; r-' ccm•s. or ^n:_d is r�corr,.,d m.the South Csax f:,ec, tn._t it r.E o"n Registry of D^__^n_S -ntl 1❑de Y.ed ❑n'ler Ule n]me or the owner of record or is recorded ano noted on the owner's ccr:incate of T,tla. BOARD OF APPEAL f f— N�CAc�►.s� 6'0 -0- N/F,pob@r/[. Frosf�r i I , i AS Or 69 it I� I it n N/F i �crr�esr DASHED L/NE INDICATES 4' OEEP ROOFED PORCH REMOVED r 2 I/2 5 TOR Y ZONING - R-2 ---- WOOD 'I NO 116 , 4y 540, BRIDGE STREET RL O T PLAN /N p`tN OF 41A SAL EM, MASS. H\� a P N�\,�P FOR dANUS o. 9239 G.o HELEN O'CONNOR ,P fV e SCALE /'=W' DEC./9, /989 L ANDAWK ENGINEERING B SURVEYING, INC. L YNM MA5i 1 i I' I