25 BRIDGE STREET - ZBA Iw
- 25 Bridge St. B-2
Jean & Evelyn Palardy
�1�
C 0v4R1. .�!l
n{ cllFm, � ttSSttrlju�P##s�cT 2i 3 O1 P �8�
s Potts of �PPVA
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JEAN & EVELYN PALARDY FOR A
SPECIAL PERMIT FOR 25 BRIDGE STREET (B-2)
w A'hearing on this petition was held October 7, 1987 with the following Board
o F o Members present: James Hacker, Chairman; Messrs. , Bencal, Fleming, Luzinski and
w " W Strout. Notice of the hearing was sent to.abutters and others and notices of the
cz
L W L
heiaring were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with
w = = w Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
? w Petitioners, owners of the property, are requesting a Special Permit to extend
- 5 nonconforming side setback to allow cosntruction of a deck in this R-2 district.
tz G C_
t c �_ ' V; -: w
The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this request
LL for a Special Permit is Section V B 10, which provides as follows:
a � w -
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance
- E c __ w the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions
LL F o set forth in Section VIII F and IX D, grant Special Permits for
._ � � _ _ w
-- � - - - alterations and reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for
V u -
w changes, enlargement, extension or expansion of nonconforming lots,
land structures and uses provided however, that such changes,
extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more
w w detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood.
z - in more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests,
guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding
the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will promote the public health,
safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants.
-. -. -'fie Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence and after
_\?ewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact:
1 . There was no opposition;
2. Would be in keeping with the surrounding neighborhood.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented, the
Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1 . The granting of the Special Permit request will not be detrimental
to the public good and will not nullify or derogate from the district
or the purpose of the Ordinance.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the Special
Permit, subject to the following conditions:
1 . All requirements of the Salem Fire Prevention Bureau be adhered to;
2. Construction and placement of deck be in accordance with plans submitted;
3. Construction conform with city andstate building codes.
Peter Stout, Member,Board of Appeal
A COPY OF THIS DECISION; HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PIA!dNTNG BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
lily
4 4
r�
19
I r♦
Lr
• / �Eo k
rC_CK VAW#Ul 5
ET
i� Fix 6
1•U ' ' � c• ill'
I �
PLOT RZ 4-41 aOr1Al/O
loroqrCD Al
AreParea' far
of-ED : REc. 8fr. N7$E l� 0 w �
PCaN: it. &y u�p"gg� y
jpfrff6Y [ee7rY F�/�O/ fRfuv �voR1N SHORE suRvtyCog?
A,eE y��6fJ at/fA !Bi ass cx street, SalP/n,fed.
0 4 r.- IS1E ZOOJ�
� �i�t � .✓a s�trc roc