19 BRADFORD STREET - ZBA IL
19 BRADFORD STREET
- - -- - GARY W. MARQUES
L
Cftp of *arem, Alamwbugettg
Jgoarb of fppeal
OCTOBER 24, 2000
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT AS OF OCTOBER 24, 2000 THE DECISION
OF THE BOARD OF APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY
CLERK TO GRANT THE VARIANCE REQUESTED OF GARY MARQUES
FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 19 BRADFORD STREET LOCATED IN A
R-2 ZONE.
PETITION GRANTED
OCTOBER 18, 2000
BOARD OF APPEAL
SALLY/4MTAGH
CLERK OF THE BOARD
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND
THE CITY CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17, of MGL Chapter
40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office
of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL Chapter 40A., Section 11, the Variance/Special
Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the
certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or
that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in
the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of the
record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of title.
ta�gac�ju�ettg
� eitp of 6aiettt, f
. ,�
39oarD of Zippeal r coo
o �s
o�a
LP y�oil
DECISION OF THE PETITION OF GARY MARQUES REQUESTING A VARIANCE
0
FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 19 BRADFORD STREET R2
A hearing on this petition was held October 18, 2000 with the following Board Members
present: Nina Cohen, Chairman, Richard Dionne, Stephen Buczko, Stephen Harris and
James Hacker. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the
hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with
Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
The petitioner is requesting a Variance for side setback relief to construct an addition for
the property located at 19 Bradford Street located in an R-2 zone.
The Variances, which have been requested, may be granted upon a finding by this
Board that:
a. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building
or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and
structure involve.
b. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve
substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioners.
c. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and
without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district of the
purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the
hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact:
1. The petitioner, Gary Marques, submitted drawings and plot plans showing the
proposed addition to his property.
2. The petitioner sought a variance to the left side setback, asking the setback be
seven (7) feet instead of the required ten (10) feet.
3. There was no opposition from anyone in the neighborhood.
f
DECISION OF THE PETITION OF GARY MARQUES REQUESTING A VARIANCE n
FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 19 BRADFORD STREET R-2 n
pagetwo o <-o
O cn
v
a oto
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on, the evidence presented at the ,3
hearing, the Zoning Board of Appeal concludes as follows
1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the O
district in general.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve
substantial hardship to the petitioner.
3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and
Without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the
purpose of the Ordinance.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted 5-0,to grant the Variances requested,
subject to the following conditions;
1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statures, ordinances, codes and
regulations.
2. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety shall
be strictly adhered to.
3. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted.
4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to beginning any construction.
5. Exterior finishes of the new construction shall be in harmony with the existing
structure.
6. A Certificate of Occupancy shall be obtained.
Variance Granted `
October 18, 2000 csck J
Stephen Harris, Member
Board of Appeals
f
i
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND
THE CITY CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the
Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the
office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to
decision
in the o
date a filing tt this er Variance or Special
Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11. P
Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the
certificate of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed,
or that, if such appeal has been filed, that is has been dismissed or denied is
recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the
owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title.
o r-c
C rn
�C:)
N ND
� ar
T3
n.
m3
N D
Regyst
O
f
a, Fed al Deeds
tem, xa• 01St
0 t
Sane ale dly, Depart,
Salem, Ma reel,
g 0 rtment
0197a,
citp of �baiem, fan5arbugettz
33oarb of Zipped
�s
l
DECISION OF THE PETITION OF GARY MARQUES REQUESTING A VARIANCE
O
FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 19 BRADFORD STREET R2
A hearing on this petition was held October 18, 2000 with the following Board Members
present: Nina Cohen, Chairman, Richard Dionne, Stephen Buczko, Stephen Harris and
James Hacker. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the
hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with
Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
The petitioner is requesting a Variance for side setback relief to construct an addition for
the property located at 19 Bradford Street located in an R-2 zone.
The Variances, which have been requested, may be granted upon a finding by this
Board that:
a. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building
or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings and
structure involve.
b. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve
substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioners.
c. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and
without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district of the
purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the
hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact:
1. The petitioner, Gary Marques, submitted drawings and plot plans showing the
proposed addition to his property.
2. The petitioner sought a variance to the left side setback, asking the setback be
seven (7) feet instead of the required ten (10)feet.
3. There was no opposition from anyone in the neighborhood.
DECISION OF THE PETITION OF GARY MARQUES REQUESTING A VARIANCE n
FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 19 BRADFORD STREET R-2 �i p
page two o �T
0
s
a ori
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on, the evidence presented at the S ,3
hearing, the Zoning Board of Appeal concludes as follows
�t?
1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the O
district in general.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve
substantial hardship to the petitioner.
3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and
Without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the
purpose of the Ordinance.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted 5-0, to grant the Variances requested,
subject to the following conditions;
1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statures, ordinances, codes and
regulations.
2. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety shall
be strictly adhered to.
3. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted.
4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to beginning any construction.
5. Exterior finishes of the new construction shall be in harmony with the existing
structure.
6. A Certificate of Occupancy shall be obtained.
Variance Granted
October 18, 2000 Csc
Stephen Harris, Member
Board of Appeals
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND
THE CITY CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the
Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the
date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to
Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11. The Variance or Special
Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the
certificate of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed,
or that, if such appeal has been filed, that is has been dismissed or denied is
recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the
owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title.
o r-<
�
=o
N N D
t cr-
-n
-n-X
k� m3
N D
O
�glst
36 f
lgjta1m, it,
01 �
SaleObe Sal 1ding DePar
Sale$, el 019), tment
PETITIONER DATE OF HEARING .�
LOCATION
MOTION: TO GRANT SECOND AMENDMENT SECOND
-TO DENY SECOND
TO RE-HEAR SECOND
WITHDRAW SECOND
CONTINUE SECOND
ROLL CALL PRESENT GRANT DENY AMEND WITHDRAW RE-HEAR CONTINU
NINA V. COHEN
Stephen Harr'
;Jim Hacker
STEPHEN BUCZKO
RICHARD DIONNE
d�
ASSOCIATE MEMBERS
PAUL VALASKATGIS
CONDITIONS:
t
y � KE-
c ` 1P
i
DATE OF HEARING
PETITIONER
LOCATION
MOTION: TO GRANT SECOND AMENDMENT SECOND
•TO DENY SECOND
TO RE-HEAR SECOND 1
WITHDRAW SECOND 1
CONTINUE SECOND
1
ROLL CALL PRESENT GRANT DENY AMEND WITHDRAW RE-HEAR CONTINU
NINA V. COHEN F�
Stephen Har;ia
;Jim Hacker
STEPHEN BUCZKO -
RICHARD DIONNE
ASSOCIATE MEMBERS
PAUL VALASKATGIS
CONDITIONS:
j (CTIU Llf �11C1.55c�L�t1I5E1f5
� -��y Uozira of
We the undersigned do hereby waive all right= ::ith regard to time
requirements for the Toning Board of Appeal -elative to hearing
the following g application:
Property Location
Original Meeting date �,—a \ V C
New Meeting date I �Uy
Signature of, Petitioner and/or his/her Representative :
September 20,2000
To whom it concerns,
I wish to postpone until the October meeting the hearing for a set back
variance due to the fact that I was unable to procure a certified plot plan from
my mortgage company.
Please accept my apology for any inconvenience which I caul-A
i
Respectfully,
Gary W. Mar s
19 Bradford Street
CERTIFIED PLOT PLAN
(AS-BUILT)
TREMONT STREET
45.00'
Y"777� �
o garage p
io
LOT 6 LOT 8
LOT 7
1
_ 45.00' _ I
l �- 50.00'-- \
o LOT 17
0
orch
03 Do
enclosed M p
roam, p
1 2 story o
�I wood' o
LOT 18 1 #19� LOT 16
8' 12'
1 ^Ipor
f w/ -- /
50.00'
BRADFORD STREET
PREPARED FOR.-GARY W.& KATHLEEN T.MARQUES
19 BRADFORD STREET
SALEM MA "°F"'"
PREPARED BY-NORTHERN ASSOCIATES INC. �aT cARA.
mEra�
401 SOUTH BROADWAY TESTA
LAWRENCE MA 01843 S No. 18467
DATE:OCT.16,2000 SCALE: 1"=30' °bynA1 TS
10/17/60
CARMEN A:TESTA DATE
Flood hazard zone has been determined by scale
and is not necessarily accurate.Until definitive plans
are issued by HUD and/or a vertical control survey
is performed,precise elevations cannot be determined.
M f. Property/Hoare U not in Flood Hazard
O P. Pro rty Hoose is in a flood Hazard Ana
O3. In tan U inst4ficent to determine Flood Hazard
Flood Hazard dsto rntned Jfnm Latest Fedora! Flood
I... Rat. Yap fhrul 250102—OOOIB
Data- 8-5-85 Pone C
A't
i-7
---------
�0000�
-Tl�q Lill 1. in -
. 1171. TZ
7 171- POW
------------
- r F µi-� _} i ' _
7
T
All
ote 021 1 i_1 -- ---- --
t,t
—------ _,Z __7 _7Zt--
AWN
Iv
Zvi I
17 1
711
t �
- - - -
I
77 _
r `+
-
//1t
t - -
{
1
_ 1
- - / -- -
Q CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS
CIFFiCE
BOARD OF APPEAL
0 i,!!G 22 A 8: 32_
To THE BOARD OF APPEAL:
The Un=signj e t that they e the owner(s) of a certain parcel of land located at:
d d r prese are
re p Street; Zoning District
and said parcel is affected by Section(s) of the Massachusetts State Building Code.
Plans describing the work proposed have been submitted to the Inspector of Buildings in accordance with Section IX
A.1 of the Zoning Ordinance.
Ap�
The Application for Permit was denied by the Inspector of Buildings for the following reason(s):
-t"r, rt-p--+ App
The Undersigned hereby petitions the Board of Appeal to vary the terms of the Salem Zoning Ordinance and/or the
Building Code and order the Inspector of Buildings to approve the application fee permit to build as filed, as the
enforcement of said Zoning By-Laws and Building Code would involve practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship to
the Undersigned and relief may be granted without substantially derogating from the intent and purpose of the
Zoning Ordinance and Building Code for the following reasons:
OJL 'I
(PLEASE PRINT)
Owner: Petitioner:
Address:—) cl -g"aj,-A � Address: S�
Tel. No. 9IF- 5n - 151 !j Tel. No. 7 34—3 _/YV 5-1 q
By:
,(Si afore)
Date: c- 2,2-- �D
This original application must be filed with the City Clerk. A certified copy of this petition will be returned to
petitioner at the time of filing with the City Clerk, to then be filed with the Secretary of the Board of Appeal , four
weeks prior to the meeting, of the Board of Appeal, along with a check for advertising in the ?--noLnt of
$ Mply4:11a to .tw"Sa�em evening Ne
Ws".
V k-4 1-4-1 1 V,� J U1 As.i
A A 12 3 Vz
A�TRUE C.2OPY :8 V ZZ Vin,: opf,7
ATTEST:
1d30 SNIO
CITY
ITY CLERK
3� 5440 I T.L 5449 90 ��. r o °, g�
T3 E�oc I 8T 432c 89 8439 00 �o° 91,L•x t'a
xTl 5075
t
bZ v�d�
110 CCU, J
6e VL� .
'd
° .o �8 •
86
.x °F0 STE R n y °
22000 'V 00
85 `� iS00Z X209 a� .
5�0
10 800 to 0 E d '� "° 0
00 3g ss
a ��
—„ O1
rs� o a 01,
ti s T -a l - q3 .. a
8o O � � O s +
O 46 >a wc�O
/99/5 O g2 e ° -wo c
sro 1 x- ;23 68 p w
y as n 91 33 9 J yOEb 4NOO J .
84_ ss?e STRF 6
583e ° �. Q - P �
0 jr
x b 320 O�
s o 3F a° ss 48 c =
83 Q o O s*�o 3 ORS '1 asp !,40 io C1J�:"�`AJ
Q // / *tea /• o q9 32
^.
00 � uoo 32 iuo v •
° Qoor 32 e+ + °3 1 3
o ,.�3 3 O 5 4 314
7
6s
°j +s + ✓ p�Jj
+ ° 130C3 ?133
O /d / /O 7
0 151
+a, 3,� d ..� / m 30 o° ° ° S T R
TT e o epOG
a Q
Sq r° ay o sso
F r7 ". • 3z/o
2Ace
9
O 3E* x ss 6033 3640 26 a\
e v soo ,..: '• ++ a �o ?/
�g �s�� Vs� � r 33 Z _�,. •�
as OV Eby �Sj'1h0
i 3s 6 02 p N F g b
?93 0 930/ oi� •o Uq R E - a L .b\ 0
,p� 'b
as meso o00 F9�0 '
2 I %° 110
• +e ams 9� X040. a ''
�o� ) /S $��S' 9
�+ oy s�9 �i0 ° *! / N,A FyG�
s
�o � O •i a+.` +0.a �b X09 sJol
ky, ?' 'Os•ej a° _ Js ob' 2eSOo 3ry�'m °f �t�
? ++ a dj
i i.o as / u
9 dig ° ,e•o
'° ?•b8 *�j '4s?s O , TRF '�2 °s �'
e c� O a • s e s O .
co ^•
s oo 4b I
49,
i
i PX:q.-7 of Nouscr Lois
1
6c on�in� o
— LOVETT $ CQLE
..Sa/gym Miss
Jce% ..rt t. " inch.
s2 si so r9 �crisco/ Oct /909. Me--k w$ Asha—,, Civ,,l
53
•� -• - S4 s°.o s°o *o.o - �e �cr/fE ��Cm,/Yass Oct 25 98
d {e S6 5'S SO0 S00 �o U3 .0 Cfipr./CMe n�i
4°D /O/.o 800 60.0 .�
so.o Soo 00 109
« is 58 57
o so. sop soo 43 44
so.o 4f'
a 60 59 sao U-3
40 'N a o
38
376
70.0 .90Q.
0O SO.O SO.O SO.O SD.O S0,0 J0.0 SOA0
70.0 1. b °33 ,32 3/ 30 29 28 27 Z6 � ,r� bD 50.0 SO.O ,fee Soo AQo0.0 50.0 SOD Saa 1 V .
t �D
B �df o/
e� . � Z•TS .r1, ,
- 64D 58.0 SB.O .Fze SO.o SO.O SO.O SO.O SOD
A? /3 /4 /S /6 /7 /8 /9 20
+ 1 o pW,
SOO 3,00 Soo SO.O so.0 s0.0
I' h • '; 45.0 Oso Oso 45.0 Oso Oso 7?J q qQ�,,,� �,�,r.�. 3 . ' 9O 1 . �aJe.•'� `04. .�.,•� AN+•yL
CV
^ ^ ^ e ^ trQ., cs.v�l-az,�,s: afi 10J-
'3
0J- 990 .
/O 9 8 7 6 S - O` ft ( i
�'I' 4S.o 45.0 4S0 .fs..O 45.0 fSO 4.i..f - a • r' + i
Ternonf
{ Y {C e
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS i
ESSEX REOISTRYOFDEEDS,S(O}.�DIST„SALEM,MASS
' ESSAEXXa& '```,,�a p' r? 2000
t-t PUltl LEO IN THIS OFFICE
^ ! ATTCST: 1
&&& : 4 n-
15
u .
`y gISTEA
rrlw�a • � s
r