Loading...
110 BAY VIEW AVENUE - ZBA (4) 110 BAY VIEW AVENUE I v 'V Legal Not6 CTTY OF SALEM BOARD OF APPEAL , 745-9595 Ext.381 Will hold a public hearing for all persons interested in the petition sub- mitted by SUSAN MACFARLANE requesting a Special Permit to run a home business for property located at 110 BAY VIEW AVENUE'R-2.Said hearing to be held WEDNESDAY, JULY 17, 2002 AT 6:30 P.M., 120 WASHINGTON STREET, 3RD FLOOR,ROOM 313. Nina Cohen Chairman (7/3,10) I g ND CITY OF SALEM9 MASSACHUSETTS BOARD OF APPEAL n 120 WASHINGTON STREET, 3RD FLOOR SALEM, MA O 1970 TEL. (978) 745-9595 FAX (978) 740-9846 STANLEY J. USOVICZ, JR. MAYOR M 0 N (J9 cr> Ln 1. Cir- . DECISION ON THE PETITION OF SUSAN MACFARLANE REQUESTING A SPECI T Ma PERMIT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 110 BAY VIEW AVENUE R-2 A hearing on this petition was held on July 17, 2002 with the following Board Members present: Nina Cohen, Richard Dionne, Nicholas Helides, Bonnie Belair and Joan Boudreau. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioner is requesting a Special Permit to conduct a business from the residence for the property located at 110 Bay View Avenue located in an R-2 Zone. The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this request for a Special Permit is Section 5-3 0), which provides as follows: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the Board of Appeal may, in accordancewith the procedure and conditions set forth in Sections 8-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permits for alterations and reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement, extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses, provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood. In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing and after reviewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1. The petitioner Susan MacFarlane appeared and represented herself at the hearing. 2. Petitioner explained how she would like to run a Holistic Massage & Polarity Therapy practice out of her home. 3. The petitioner's property is a two family residence. 4. Ms. MacFarlane has 3 parking spaces at her residence. Her tenant hasl space and herself and her husband have 2 spaces. 5. There were two letters submitted in opposition to the petition. One from Elizabeth Wolfe of 95 Bay View Ave. and another from Cynthia O'Connor of 100 Bay View Ave. DECSION OF THE PETITION OF SUSAN MACFARLANE REQUESTING A SPECIAL PERMIT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 110 BAY VIEW AVENUE R-2 pagetwo 6. A petition with 11 names in support of the petition was submitted. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1. The Special Permit requested cannot be granted without substantial detriment to the public good or without nullifying and substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the ordinance. 2. The granting of the Special Permit requested will not be in harmony with the Neighborhood and will not promote the public health, safety, convenience and Welfare of the City's inhabitants. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted 2 in favor and 3 in opposition to the motion to grant the relief requested. Having failed to garner the four affirmative votes required to pass, the motion to grant fails and the petition for a Special Permit is denied. Special Permit Denied r�k c J n July 17, 2002 C oseph Barbeau, Member Board of Appeal N 2> 1l 1^ r A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of MGL Chapter 40A and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL Chapter 40A, Section 11, the variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision, bearing the certification of the the City Clerk that 20 days have elapses and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that is has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. Board of Appeal I'C June 15, 2002 City of Salem Zoning Board of Appeals Salem, MA 01970 Re: Susan M. MacFarlane, Certified Holistic Massage&Polarity Therapist 110 Bay View Avenue Salem,MA 01970 Dear Chairperson; As neighbors of Susan M. MacFarlane, we the undersigned have no objection to her running her Holistic Massage&Polarity Therapy practice from her home located at 110 Bay View Avenue. Mary C. ilson 111 Ba View Avenue Iq6AQ Gifford&Ann Scott 106 Bay View Avenue Marion Manning 107;Bay View Avenue stir-=-Wd- •��Y I�—�-a_ D(bris Nolan 104 Bay View Avenue n Naoma Haseltine 112 Bay View Avenue Page 1 of 2 =z Page 2 of 2 Re: Susan M. MacFarlane 2�Q.rrl�?R &,,/,/, Naoma Boylston 112 Bay View Avenue Carolyn Kelly 116 Bay View Avenue N. Malia Griffin 120 Bay ie venue t in Griffin 1 0 ay View Avenue Eric Olson 1 High Avenue 32 Beach Avenue Leo Notice I - CITY OF SALEM a BOARD OF APPEAL '` 795.9505 Eat 381 `I Will hold a public hearing1br-0 persons interested in the peOtion subs` mittedby SUSAN MACF NE requesting a Spedel'Yermi LANE a home business for pt+operTyllocated 8t 110 BAY VIEW AVENUE,R•2.Said hearing to be held WEDNESDAY,. JULY 17,2002.AT 8;30 P.M., 120 WASHINGTON STREET, 3RD FLOOR ROOM 313. . . Nina Cohen (7/3,10) .. ', Chairman !• Elizabeth Wolfe 95 Bayview Av Salem, Ma 01970 July 7, 2002 City of Salem Board of Appeal Nina Cohen, Chairperson 97 Washington St Salem, Ma 01970 r- Regarding Application for Special Permit to run a home business by Susan MacFarlane, 110 Bayview Av, Salem Ma. 0.970. Public Hearing scheduled for Wednesday, July 16, 2002. I object to such permit if the use involves vehicular traffic, deliveries, parking. My objection is based on the fact that the street is approximately 20 feet wide at said property, that there are no legal on-street parking spaces in front of the said property, and There are approximately only four legal on-street parking spaces the length of Bayview Av. on approach to said property. There is also a blind bend on Bayview Av on approach to said property. I object to such permit if the use involves overnight guest accommodations. My objection is based on the area zoning of Residential 1. 1 object also on the basis of very limited parking, as stated in above paragraph. Sincerely: Elizabeth Wolfe 'i � '�✓ July 17, 2002 Ms.Nina Cohen City of Salem Planning Board Salem, MA 01970 Dear Ms. Cohen: Since I am unable to attend the Board meeting tonight I am writing this letter to express my opposition to the proposal by Mrs. McFarland at 110 Bay View Ave.,to open a massage business in her home When I first spoke with Mrs. McFarland I did not oppose the idea,but after polling my tenants(my house being a four family)they expressed opposition mainly due to the fact that it would present more of a parking problem then that which already exists, and that the street being so narrow and congested a potential dangerous condition would also exist, especially in an emergency situation. The street being so narrow if a car were to park along side of her home another could not pass through, heaven forbid for a fire truck or ambulance, if one was needed. I do apologize to Mrs. McFarland for my opposition,nor do I wish to cause any ill feelings,but as expressed by other persons, "the street should remain a residential area and not become another commercial street in Salem". If granted this would only open the door to others who have also express interest in opening businesses within their homes, where clients would be coming and going. Bay View Avenue really is too narrow to support any extra traffic than we already incur, and as everyone knows who lives here the parking is a problem. Sincerely, i C thia O'Connor goo RAI/ v,PU.) ,qv-c soh-M, M4