Loading...
332 LAFAYETTE STREET - BUILDING INSPECTION 33� k���-sem '�, 1 332 LAFAYETTE STREET 213-09 'GIs# — 111068 ._ COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS Map__ i32 Block: CITY OF SALEM Lot -- --,0212 Category: REPAIR/REPLACE Permit# 1213-09 - - ! BUILDING PERMIT Project# JS-2009-000298 j Est. Cost: $18,500.00 "Fee Charged: 1$214.00 Balance Due: $.00 PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO: Const. Class: Contractor: License: Expires Use Group: _ James D'Amico/Mystic River Realty Lot S_iz_e(sq. ft.):17200.0324__ � Owner: DAMICC LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Zoning: R2 Units Gained: !Applicant: James D'Amico/Mystic River Realty ti Units Lost: AT: 332 LAFAYETTE STREET q' Dig Safe#`. ii ISSUED ON: 08-Sep-2008 AMENDED ON: EXPIRES ON: 08-Feb-2008 ad„ TO PERFORM THE FOLLOWING WORK: INSTALL KITCHEN&BATHROOM AS PER PLANS ATTACHED INSTALL REAR SLIDING DOOR& BUILD OUT #` PARTITION FOR BEDROOM 60 X 6'X 8 FIRE CODE WALLS AS PER PLANS FOR A ONE BEDROOM APARTMENT jhb l T POST THIS CARD SO IT IS VISIBLE FROM THE STREET icy lty Electric Gas Plumbing Building e 1k7,t Underground: ' Underground: Underground: Excavation: q6 I ,ill Service: >ftter: / (' Footings: �6f Rough C79-7 Rough: . Rough:o// I —GJ' Foundation: rl 1�'7i�• 'YY' Final' ilial: � Finaft�l ;] —/y/Gly Rough Framc:XvNt& /Jf Fireplace/Chimney: D.P.W. Fire Health Insulation: Miter: Oil: House# Smoke: Ct// Treasury: Water: Alarm: Assessor Sewer: Sprinklers: Final: THIS PERMIT MAY BE REVOKED BY THE CITY OF SALEM UPON VIO O OF ANY OF ITS RULES AND REGULATIONS. Signature: Receipt No: Date Paid: Check No: Amount: B RE--C3, -1 3 4 08-Sep-08 2325 S21401) UPM COIllpletioi 1 , •:, ;k, please rxj 745-9595 Ext aW (7coT\IS©2008 Des Lauriers Municipal Solutions.Inc. M M"a Certificate No: 213-09 Building Permit No.: 213-09 Commonwealth of Massachusetts City of Salem Building Electrical Mechanical Permits This is to Certify that the RESIDENCE located at Dwelling Type 332 LAFAYETTE STREET in the CITY OF SALEM -------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Address Town/City Name IS HEREBY GRANTED A PERMANENT CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY OCCUPANCY PERMIT FOR 332 LAFAYETTE STREET This permit is granted in conformity with the Statutes and ordinances relating thereto,and expires -_ ........... unless sooner suspended or revoked. Expiration Date Issued On:Toe Feb 24,2009 ........ -- — — GeoTMS02009 Des Launers Municipal Solutions,Inc. --------------------------------- 7. illi LoT zs SIC) i < 20 > LOT .32 I FiJeE.4c '� �o s.F i 1 n 1 I L nJ 1 I i I V2 .S L,9FHYET7-E S-rR+£F-T DONALD S. FOX. REGISTERED LHND 5UF2VF-Y0,9 SVNsET RoAo - CRRLISLE, Mg55. Lo CHrIOM — S sEr�` /'JNSS•- -- -__ ihe.-eby cert) y r orrh¢bO H& SCALE : 1" = 20' QgTE : on {his � un i5 locatac) on th,a c • Sho��n qnd ihut R conFormS h� LAN REFERENCE: lows of fhe City /Tt"&r) of: 6Q.inq Lot--3L- -- on a plan by l) --"- - w)Qn con ,tr-vct¢d. —n- --- and r¢eord¢d in S16NED:�CCJ �;. 4�nt — Count ° �� - - R¢cgistry of__D_Q be ok No._yv :____ Pcac30- No. IThis plA plwn b.,s nut road, WCoNiff, o CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS ��, BOARD OF APPEAL 120 WASHINGTON STREET, 3RD FLOOR A�'� l�Q SALEM.MASSACHUSETTS 01970 �6 �.-•'�ceY TELEPHONE 978745-9595 asFAX 978-740-9846 7008 JUL 24 P 3: 55 KIMBERLEY DRIRISCOLL MAYOR FILE 'f CITY July 24, 2008 Decision City of Salem Zoning Board of Appeals Petition of JAMES D'AMICO requesting a variance from parking requirements and a special permit to allow for a dwelling unit within the existing nonconforming structure at 332 LAFAYETTE STREET (R-2). A public hearing on the above Petition was opened on July 16, 2008 pursuant to Mass General Law Ch. 40A, §§ 11. The public hearing was closed on July 16, 2008 with the following Zoning Board members present: Bonnie Belair, Annie Harris, Rebecca Curran, and Richard Dionne. Petitioner seeks variances pursuant to the following sections of the Salem Zoning Ordinance: § 5-30) Extension of Nonconformity, and § 7-3 Off-street parking, uncovered, not included in structure. Statements of fact: 1. James D'Amico presented the petition for the property he owns at 332 Lafayette Street (R-2). 2. The petition was accompanied by a plot plan, as well as plans entitled "Rear Apartment Unit, 332 Lafayette Street", dated November 9, 2007, prepared by D.F. Valente Architect & Planner. 3. The petitioner is proposing to add one (1) dwelling unit within the structure at 332 Lafayette Street, which is currently used as the Century 21 North Shore Real Estate office. The dwelling unit would be contained within the existing structure, there would be no changes to the footprint. 4. A letter from Tom St. Pierre dated April 8, 2008 denies a building permit application to add a dwelling unit, noting that a special permit would be required from the Board of Appeals. 5. Prior to being an office, the structure had housed a photography studio. In a decision dated June 16, 2004, the Board of Appeals granted a special permit for a change in non-conforming use, as well as a variance from off street parking . .• 2 regulations, to allow for an office with six (6) parking spaces. The petitioner is again requesting a variance from parking regulations. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the public hearing, and after thorough review of the plans and petition submitted, makes the following findings: 1. The residential use proposed is not outside of the uses previously existing at the property, and is an allowed use in the zoning district. The existing use of the property as a real estate office is a nonconforming use. These are circumstances especially affecting this property which do not generally affect other properties in the zoning district in which the property is located. 2. A literal enforcement of the provisions of the City of Salem Zoning Ordinance would result in substantial hardship financial or otherwise to the petitioner whose business is not fully occupying the existing structure or parking area. 3. For these reasons, desirable relief maybe granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent or purpose of the ordinance. On the basis of the above findings of fact and all evidence presented at the public hearing including, but not limited to, the Plans, Documents and testimony, the Zoning Board of Appeals concludes: 1. To allow for the addition of a dwelling unit within the structure, the petitioner may vary the terms of the Salem Zoning Ordinance, specifically lot the number of parking spaces required (§ 7-3). 2. To allow for the change to the nonconforming structure, a special permit may be granted under § 5-3 0)Extension of nonconformity in accordance with the procedures and conditions set forth in sections § 8-6 and 9-4. 3. In permitting such change, the Board of Appeals requires certain appropriate conditions and safeguards as noted below. In consideration of the above, the Salem Board of Appeals voted, four(4) in favor (Belair, Harris, Dionne, and Curran) and none opposed, to grant petitioner's request subject to the following terms, conditions, and safeguards: 1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted to and approved by the Building Commissioner. 3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety shall be strictly adhered to. 1 3 4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to beginning any construction. 5. Exterior finishes of the new construction shall be in harmony with the existing structure. 6. A certificate of Occupancy is to be obtained. 7. A certificate of Inspection is to be obtained. 8. Petitioner shall obtain street numbering from the City of Salem Assessor's Office and shall display said number so as to be visible from the street. 9. Petitioner is to obtain approval from any City Board or Commission having jurisdiction including, but not limited to, the Planning Board. 10. Unless the Decision expressly provides otherwise, any zoning relief granted does not empower or authorize the Petitioner to demolish or reconstruct the structure(s) located on the subject property to an extent of more than fifty percent (50%) of its floor area or more than fifty percent (50%) of its replacement cost at the time of destruction. If the structure is demolished by any means to an extent of more than fifty percent (50%) of its replacement cost or more than fifty percent (50%) of its floor area at the time of destruction, it shall not be reconstructed except for in conformity with the provisions of the Ordinance. 11. One of the existing parking spaces shall be designated for use by the tenant of the new unit. 12. Petitioner shall remove the tree stump and replace or repair the existing 6' high stockade fence along the property line. Bonnie Belair Salem Zoning Board of Appeals A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A,Section 11, the Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certificate of the City Clerk has been filed with the Essex South Registry of Deeds. UVDIT�,AO CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS PUBLIC PROPERTY DEPARTMENT 1 20 WASHINGTON STREET, 3RD FLOOR SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS O1 970 TELEPHONE: 978-745-9595 EXT. 380 <' =} P�zerucW��r FAX 978-740-9846 KIMBERLEY DRISCOLL MAYOR April 8, 2008 James D'Amico D'Amico Limited Partnership 473 Broadway Chelsea, Ma. 02150 Dear Mr. D'Amico: I have reviewed your building permit application and the 2004 Zoning Board of Appeal petition. At this time I must reject your building permit application. The 2004 Special Permit application asked for the entire building to be converted to a Real Estate Office. Additionally, a Variance was granted to allow six spaces for the building. It is my decision that another Special Permit will be required to create a separate residential unit and that parking may also have to be considered. If you wish to appeal my interpretation denying your permit, your appeal is to the Salem Zoning Board of Appeals. If you would like to file for a Special Permit it is also filed with the Zoning Board of Appeal. S1 ely, Thomas St. Pierre Building Commissioner Zoning Enforcement Officer J' The Commonwealth of Massachusetts FOR Board of Building Regulations and Standards MUNICIPALITY Massachusetts State Building Code. 780 CMR. 7'edition USE Building Permit Application To Construct, Repair, Renovate Or Demolish a Revived J""""'' 1. 21K)3 One.or Tu•u-Frtmily Dwelling This Section For Official Use Only Date Applied: Building Permit Number: Signature: Date BuilJing Commissioner/Inspector of BuilJings SECTION 1:SITE INFORMATION 1.1 Property AddSesa: Sa 1.2 Assessors Map& Parcel Numbers t A,.,'r - 0;L I ?- -A p e 1T e Map Number Parcel Numtnr t L 1a Is this an accepted street'?yeses no— Dinsenslons: 1.4 Property 1.3 Zoning information: 7 o_ Frontage(Il) Zoning District Proposed Use Lot Area lsq R) ! 1.3 Building Setbacks(h) Rear Yard Side Yards Front Yard - Provided Required Provided ! Provided Required Required °2- ( 1.8 sewage D sal System: 1.6 Water Supply:(M.G.I.c.40,y 54) 1.7 Food zone t de Flood Zone! g 1 Municipal eon site disposal system ❑ Public Er Private❑ Check if s@� SECTION 2: PROPERTY OWNERSHIPS 2.1 Owners of Recoorr'd: �. . Address for Service: ' Name(Print) Iyq .. 611-�J-� -�v20 'f' Telephone Si nat 1 SECTION 3: DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED WORKr(eheck all that apply) Owner-Occu ied I°f Repairs(s) ❑ Alteration(s) ❑ Addition ❑ New Construction❑ Existing Building P I Demolition ❑ Accessory Bldg. ❑ Number of Units! Other ❑ Specify: lwk A Brief Description of Proposed Work : /a s &S c l (to tot Ok) SECTION 4: ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COSTS r Estimated Costs: Official Use Only Item (Labor and Materials) 1. Building Permit Fee:$ Indicate how fee is determined: 1. Building $ e/ �� ❑Standard City/Town Application Fee 2. Electrical $ � Sd n / ❑Total Project Costs(Item 6)x multiplier x 3. Plumbing $ q0 2. Other Fees: $ List: 4. Mechanical (HVAC) $ - B� 5. Mechanical (Fire $ Total All Fees: S suppression) Check No. Check Amount: Cash Amount: i 6. Total Project Cost: $ Jej .f(O [3 Paid in Full E3 outstanding Balance Due: o CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS BOARD OF APPEAL CITY OF $ALH. MA 120 WASHINGTON STREET, 3RD FLOOR ro SALEM, MA 01970 CLERKS b ' BICE TEL. (978) 745-9595 FAX (978) 740-9846 STANLEY J. VICZ, JR. 2004 JUN 21 A ID 58 DECISION OF THE PETITION OF JAMES D'AMICO REQUESTING A SPECIAL PERMIT AND A VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 332 LAFAYETTE STREET R-2 A hearing on this petition was held on June 16, 2004 with the following Board Members present: Nina Cohen, Chairman, Stephen Harris, Richard Dionne,Nicholas Helides and Bonnie Belair. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening New in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioner is requesting a Special Permit for a change of use from a photographer's studio to a Real Estate Office and a Variance from off street parking regulations to allow six parking spaces for the property located at 332 Lafayette Street R-2. The provisions of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to the request for a Special Permit is Section 5-3 0),which provides as follows: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance,the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set forth in Sections 8-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permit for alterations and reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement, extent expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses, provided, however,that such change extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood. In more general terms,this Board is,when reviewing Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants. The Variances which have been requested may be granted upon a finding of the Board that: A. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings or structures in the same district. B. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise,to the petitioner. DECISION OF THE PETITION OF JAMES D'AMICO REQUESTING A SPECIAL PERMIT AND A VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 332 LAFAYETTE STREET R-2 page two C. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented, and after reviewing the plans makes the following findings of fact: 1. Petitioner is the prospective purchaser of a Victorian era home at 332 Lafayette St. The site owner,Louis Goutzos,has operated a photography studio on the first floor since being granted a Special Permit some years ago by the Zoning Board of Appeal. The second floor houses a residential apartment, and there is off-street parking for six cars on site. 2. Petitioner seeks a Special Permit for a change in use to convert the entire building to a residential real estate brokerage office for the company he owns, Century 21 Realty. He proposes to install offices for 10 independent brokers;who will do much of their business off-site,either at home or viewing listings. Onsite there will be 1 fulltime and I part-time employee. Office hours will be 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Monday—Friday, and 10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. on Saturdays and Sundays. 3. Very little activity will take place at the Century 21 offices. Clients typically use the office to drop off papers or meet briefly with their broker, and training sessions that involve the entire staff take place at the company's Lynnfield or Peabody offices. 4. Petitioner's request was supported by Matthew Veno, Ward 5 City Councillor, who stated that the proposed use was very low impact and would benefit the City. Petitioner's proposal was not opposed by a neighbor in attendance, Georgann Hallett of 326 Lafayette Street. Signage for the new business would be approved by the Signage Committee of the Salem Planning Department. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearing the Zoning Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance would involve substantial substantial hardship on the petitioner. DECISION OF THE PETITION OF JAMES D'AMICO REQUESTING A SPECIAL PERMIT AND VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 332 LAFAYETTE STREET R-2 page three 3. The relief requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the ordinance. 4. The Special Permit granted can be granted in harmony with the neighborhood and will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants. Therefore,the Zoning Board of Appeal voted, 5 in favor and 0 in opposition to grant the relief requested, subject to the following conditions: 1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statues, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted and approved by the Building Commissioner. 3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety shall be strictly adhered to. 4. Petitioner is to obtain approval from any City Board or Commission having jurisdiction including,but not limited to the Salem Sign Committee. 5. Exterior finishes of the new construction shall be in harmony with the existing structure. SPECIAL PERMIT&VARIANCE GRANTED JUNE 16, 2004 NiinaaaCCo� Chairman Board of Appeal Lj FEB 7 16, 45 N '80 (fit# of 5ateray fflasBarljusettawyr_ . '.'3 rFICE of ¢Iil SALEM. MASS. II T A JANUARY 16, 1980 DECISION ON THE PETITION OF LOUIS GOUTZOS REQUESTING A SPECIAL PERMIT FOR 332 LAFAYETTE STREET. A hearing on this Petition was held on January 16, 1980, with.the following Board Members present. Douglas Hopper, Acting Chairman, Arthur LaBrecque, Edward Luzinski and Joseph Piemonte. Notices of the hearing were sent to abutters and others and a notice-of the hearing was published in the Salem Evening News on January 2, 1980 and January 10, 1980 in accordance with Mass General Laws, Chapter 40A. The petitioner requested a Special Permit which will allow him to utilize certain rooms within the dwelling house situated on the premises to carry on his profession as a photographer while also using the premises as his residence. The premises are situated within a two-family residential- district and a Special Permit may be granted for home occupations as an accessory use, provided the Special Permit use is in harmony with the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance. Mr. Roger Estella, an abutter, appeared to express his concern over the proposed parking which would abut his yard where his children play. The Board of Appeals, after consideration of the evidence presented at the public hearing and after viewing the property makes the following findings of fact. 1. The Petitioner is a professional photographer with over 20 years of experience. 2. The property in question is located in an area where many property owners carry on their'professional offices within their properties. 3. The occupation will be operated entirely within the dwelling house with no display visible from the street. - 4. The occupation will be operated only by the resident of the dwelling house'. 5. The occupation will not occupy more than 25% of the gross floor area of the dwelling unit.. 6. The proposed use of the property will not result in any diminution in the value of surrounding properties. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and the evidence presented Lit the public hearing, the Board of Appeals concludes as follows: With proper conditions and safeguards a Special Permit may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent or purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and the proposed occupational use is in harmony with the ordinance. 1, fit u# ntem, sttcl�u +l �I '�1 '8U oc' G� T1 I; F: -o rtCE P=b d C ""Vd CIT' ` j: ICE SALEM.kASS. SALEm, HASS. DECISION - PAGE TWO LOUIS GOUTZOS - 332`LAFAYETTE STREET Therefore, The Board of Appeals votes unanimously in favor of granting the requested relief on the following conditions: 1. That a six (6) foot high stockade fence or equivalent be erected on the Westerly property line between the locus property and the abutting property at 29 Wisteria Street. 2. That the trees located in the 7 foot buffer zone at the rear of the dwelling house not be destroyed. 3. That the parking area at the rear of the dwelling house provide for not more than four vehicles and that it be set back a distance of at least seven feet from the Westerly boundary line. SPECIAL PERMIT GRANTED WITH CONDITIONS. c. Dougla opper, Ac i g Chairman APPEAL FROM THIS DECISION, IF ANY, SHALL BE RFADE PURSUANT TO SECTION 17 OF THE MASS. GENERAL LAWS. CHAPTER 808, AND SHALL BE FILED WITFIN 20 DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF FILING OF THIS DECIS:O. I:: TIH—E OFFICE ^" TF.E rM CLERK. PURMNT TO ,.;ASS i ^ - r o r^ . .,,.'i !:! .A _. _ ._. ..,. a... I�: �,. Ti.� 5-. .�,.,_ C.. GRA, .ED h REi:.. S, :.0 T:_. -! =Y TSI; ._„ ,! .'! -'�::_ THE .,ERT- . . FICAi13P: OF 7HE CITY C�_R:\ rr+.,i __ . ..s - .:� ..D AN- � P?EAL HAS BEEN FILEO, OR THAT. IF SUCH AN APPEA:. HAS Br—;l .,EO OR ,:'a°0 IS - - RECORDED IN THE SOUTH ESSEX REGiBTRt -: S AND IN, °� "-0C•Ed THE NA?::E OF THE OWNER - OF RECORD OR IS RECORDED AND NOTED ON THE OWNER'S CERTIFICATE OF TITLE. . BOARD OF APPEAL A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK � fOTltl� . of �&IPm, � 2255�ItI�uSPt�S ='J DECISION ON THE PETITION OF LOUIS GOUTZOS FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT FOR 332 LAFAYETTE ST. , SALEM A hearing on this petition was held June 26, 1985 with the following Board Members present: Edward Luzinski, Acting Chairman; Messrs. , Charnas, Gauthier, Strout and Associate Member Bencal. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Law Chapter 40A. Petitioner, owner of the premises requests a Special Permit. to construct an addition in the rear of the premises in order to expand his photography business in this R-2 district. The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this request for a Special Permit is Section V B 11 , which provides as follows: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing, — in this Ordinance, the Board of Appeal may, ie — accordance with the procedure and conditions sit forth in Section VIII F and IX D, grant Special Permft4 for alterations and reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement, ext`' Sion ory expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structiees, 3 and uses, provided, however, that such changer exten�n, enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood. In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding by the Board that the grant Of the Special Permit will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City' s inhabitants. The Board of Appeal, after hearing the evidence and viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1 . No opposition was presented to the plan; 2. The proposal will have no significant affect of the neighborhood or on the abutters. On the basis of the evidence presented at the hearing, and on the above findings of fact, the Board concludes as follows: 1 . The proposed addition will not be substantially more detrimental to the public good than the existing premises; 2. The proposed addition is in harmony with the Salem Zoning Ordinance. ,.` DECISION ON THE PETITION OF LOUIS GOUTZOS FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT FOR 332 LAFAYETTE ST. , SALEM page two Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously 5-0 to grant the requested Special Permit, provided that: 1 . The addition be designed to blend architecturally with surrounding buildings; 2. The ridge line at the top. of the addition be no more than one (1 ) foot higher than the existing dwellings ridge line; 3. A Certificate of Occupancy be obtained. SPECIAL PERMIT GRANTED Scott E. Charnas, Secretary A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK APPEAL FROS'. THIS DECBOBISION, IF ANY. SHALL BE MADE PURSUAM TD SECTION 17 OF THE MASS. GENERAL LAWS, CHAPTER , AND SHALL BE FILED WITHIN 20 DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF FILING OF THIS DECISION IN THE OFFICE OF THE LIT'! CLERK. 11. THE SEcVARIANCE OR SPECIAL PEWIT PURSANT TO 1::.SS SPALL LTAkE CHAEFrPTEU TIR S'P'�i A COPYTIDi,OF THS DCCISIO:. 6EA`1\, THE CERT- GRANTED HERE"t. r c cE AND NO AFr:A- Hii B.H: fY_ED. RI:AThIt OF THE C!,'i CLER,i TRA'i 20 DAYS HA'+. LRP HHS 5"[Eii D'S�.415SED OR CEFII:D IS c c AND INDEXED IS UNDER THE NAiCE OF THE OVR:TR DR THS, IF STFE AN APPEAL HA.S BEEN FILE, 7HAi I RE:,':RDED li: THE SOUTH ESSEX REGISTRY OF DEEDS OF RECORD OR IS RECORDED AND NOTED ON THE OWNER'S CERTIFICATE OF TITLE. tr BOARD OF APPEAL C= C _ Ln CL- Ln (V y J � u rah+rexxnw�ax as�a;a iwwrn®r rnnwra��ao�o�wwassr�