Loading...
330 LAFAYETTE STREET - BUILDING INSPECTION -------------- 330 TAFAYETTE STREET' - J. , i F' f Oxford� 0 ESSELTE MADE IN U.S.A. N0. 752 215 RC • s o ^ � ' Ll-� ��������� �������� ��1� � � � '�r �^r ��p���� °J �l��J°"i �~ ~ «^ �^^/ peal DECISION ON THE PETITION OF JEFFREY BARROWS REQUESTING 6 SPECIAL PERMIT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 320 L&F89ETTD STREET (B'2 ) 6 hearing on this petition was held September ll , 1096 with the following Board Members present: Gary Barrett Cbuiczun, Nina Cohen, Joseph Ywuc, Richard Dionne and Paul Vulusbatgis . �otice of the hearing was oeu� to abutters and others and notices 'of the hearing were properlv published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40&. Petitioner is requesting u Special Permit for u Change of Use from u 14 room rooming house to 8 multi dwelling units for the property located at 330 Lafayette Street (D-2) . The provision of the Salem %uoiog Ordinance which is applicable to this request for u Special Permit is Section 5-2(j ) . -which provides as follows: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set forth in Sections 8-6 and 9-4, grant Special Permits for alterations and reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement, extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, laud, struc1ores, and uses, pcovided, bowever, that such change. euteouiou, enlargement or expansion shall nor he substuotiull7 more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the oeigbhorbood. in more general terms. this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests, guided bv the rule that u Special Permit request mav be granted upon u finding h? the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will Dromnte the public health, oafet?, coovenleoce and welfare of the City's inhabitants. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing and after viewing the plans . makes the following findings of fact: l. Petitioner. through his legal representative, George Atkins, requested to withdraw his petition without prejudice. , 2. Two Ward Councillors and three abutters objected to the request for withdrawal on the grounds that the petitioner ' s pruvoeul could then be reshaped and resubmitted for approval at unvtime. It was their position that any petition for mult4 -family use of the structure at 330 Lafayette Street would impose a hardship ' DECISION OF THE JEFFREY BARROWS REQUESTING A SPECIAL PERMIT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 330 LAFAYETTE STREET (R-2 ) r page two SEP I0 I Ltd iii °90 neighborhood by increasing density, parking problems Fand nuisangecl issues arising from the cohabitation of unrelated addPtis arfdCIiICF students. 3. Petitioner's request was denied by the Board. No further discussion took place regarding the petition's proposal. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1 . The Special Permit requested cannot be granted without substantial detriment to the public good or without nullifying and substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the ordinance. 2. The granting of the Special Permit requested will not be in harmony with the neighborhood and will not promote the public health, safety,convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 0-5 in opposition to the motion to grant the relief requested. Having . failed to garner the four affirmative votes required to pass, the motion to grant fails and the petition for a Special Permit is denied. SPECIAL PERMIT DENIED 1996 - \ September 11, /J / _� t Nina Cohen Member, Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of MGL Chapter 40A and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to MGL Chapter 40A, Section 11, the Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision, bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed. that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry or Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner' s Certificate of Title. Board of Appeal Business Certificate Up of *alem, fflasgubugetts P. DATE FILED '✓)/�I��YD�99y Type: New Expiration Date��' 4-T0, ❑ Renewal. no change Number 94-79 ❑ Renewal with chance In conformity with the provisions of Chapter one hundred and ten, Section five of the Massachusetts General Laws, as amended, the undersigned hereby declares) that a business is conducted under the title of: W zC,h CSV Ope-r +q Secures at _ 3 ')O Lo, ave. type of business e r 6`vvk-tn1 eti Q p C e, by the following named personts): (Include corporate name and title if corporate officer) Full Name Residence �oNa (0 SUr0..�eW lC z. 41 , 33o L&-Caye.4e bt. <3cdtv,�, Sin es � t�-- - ------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------- ------ - - -- - - - --o � - - --------- ------ - ----------- --- -------- ------ ---- -- -- --- - on 3 3n 19J -the above named penon(s) personally-appeared befnre-me :tnd made ;m- - oath that the foregoing statement is true. -- - --, ---------- ----------------------------------------------------- CITY CLERK Notary Public seal) Date Commission Expires Identification Prugnted State Tax I.D. # S.S. # 03 f — S0 0 a (if available) In accordance with the provision of Chapter 337 of the Acts of 1985 and Chapter 110, Section 5. of;lass. General Laws, business certificates shall be in effect for four(4) years from the date of issue and shail be renewed each four years thereafter. A statement under oath must be filed with the town clerk upon discontinuing, retiring, or withdrawing from such business or partnership. Copies of such certificates shall be available at the address at which such business is conducted and shall be furnished on request during regular business hours to any person who has purchased goods or services from such business. Violations are subject to a fine of not more than three hundred dollars ($300.00) for each month during which such violation contimies. P0111i:i THE INN-ftr* m 25 HOLTE➢M STREET PEABODY, MA 01 960 (50$) 532-2372 November 22, 1988 n i C � Honorable Anthonv Salvo, Mayor n= City Hall Incl,., ill Washington Street m< c ` Sale_, MA 01970 3D v 2 g li a � o0 N ap Dear Mayor Salvo* As a follow—up to our conversation at the Homelessness Task Force meeting on Tuesday, November 15, 1988, I wanted to further communicate with you regarding 330 Lafayette Street, Salem. As I mentioned, we will not be involved with providing a shelter for homeless families at that site. Yet, independent of Citizens for Adequate Housing Inc., that site will continue to house homeless families. The owner— manager, Frank Cardile, will remain totally responsible for those families and whatever services are provided. The Shelter Resource Unit of the Department of Public Welfare is still interested in having Citizens for Adequate Housing Inc. open a second shelter. Therefore it is still possible that we will be looking for a site in Salem. The board of directors will be discussing these possibilities over the next two—three months. I will continue to be in contact with you as necessary. Thank you for your continued support of our efforts. Sincerely, Nancy Crowder, Executive Director Sponsored by CITIZENS FOR ADEQUATE HOUSING, INC. �)! iii, i'� l G] ::�i Q�i"13'i3!{ V ot, CHU of 5nlem, 'T' assadjusetts Puura of '�u}ieal fia ZS S4 el , DECISION OF THE PETITION OF_,JAMES-NICHOLSON-REQUESTING A (VNP4 ''M, MAS 97 FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED A 330 LAFAYETTE__5TREET—(R-2) °ffycF S A hearing on this petition was held March 19, 1997 with the following Board members present: Gary Barrett; Chairman, Nina Cohen, Albert Hill, Arthur LeBrecque and Paul Valaskagis . Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioner, requests a Variance to allow a second building to be build with two dwelling units for the property located at 330 Lafayette Street (R-2) . This property is located in a residential two family district. The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of this Board that: 1. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other land, buildings, or structures in the same district. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogation from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful considerations the evidence presented at the hearing, makes the following findings of fact: 1. The subject property is located in a neighborhood of predominantly two family structures. 2. The subject property is unique in that it is a through lot from Lafayette Street to Wisteria which is uncharacteristic of the neighborhood creating hardship to the petitioner. 3. The Historic Commission estimates that the existing structure was built around 1902. 4. The petitioner is willing to consult the Historic Commission for design review of any exterior alterations to the existing structure. 5. With respect to the existing structure, petitioner plans to make one unit on the first floor, and a second unit containing the second and third floors. Petitioner intends to remove the exterior stairs on the upper floors of the existing house as well as the enclosure of the second floor on the front of the house. 6. Petitioner also plans to construct a two-story, duplex structure on the Wisteria Street side of the lot. The new construction will be two units. 7. There will be 8 off-street parking spaces between the two structures which is in compliance with the zoning ordinance. 8. Petitioner plans to take the necessary steps in order to make the four units that will be created into a condominium under state law. 9. Petitioner met with neighbors in the area to discuss his plans, and there were changes to his original plans as a result of such meetings. 10. Petitioner is willing to erect a fence on the southerly side of the DECISION OF THE PETITION OF JAMES NICHOLSON FOR A VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 330 LAFAYETTE STREET page two property, and indicated that he will landscape the property. 11. Louis Goutzos and Edwina Labreque, 332 Lafayette St. , spoke in favor of the petition. 12. Richard L'Heureux, 26 Wisteria Street, spoke in favor of this petition, but expressed concerns about water run-off and drainage. 13. David Goggin, 9 Wisteria Street, and owner of 300 Lafayette Street, spoke in favor of the petition. 14 . Georgeann Kalat, 326 Lafayette Street, spoke in favor of the petition. 15. Petitioner requires a variance from lot size, lot frontage; side yard setbacks;rear yard setback (Wisteria St) ;lot size; and minimum lot area per dwelling unit. Petitioner also requires a variance in order to put 2 detached two-family dwellings on one lot; to allow more than one dwelling on a lot; to permit four families to reside on the lot. 16. The proposed construction will improve the property and the neighborhood. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearings, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1 . Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property and not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substation hardship to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to public good and without nullifying and substantially derogating from the intent of the district or purpose of the Ordinance. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0 to grant the variance requested, subject to the following conditions: 1 . Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statures, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to beginning any construction. 3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and safety shall be strictly adhered to. 4 . Exterior finishes of the new construction shall be in harmony with the existing structure. n 5. Petitioner is to obtain a building permit prior to beginningc4t x construction. ^o a- 6. A Certificate of Occupancy is to be obtained. x N 7. Petitioner shall obtain proper street numbering from the CitIO2 S)Rem Assessor's office and shall display said number so as to be vI blm from the street. m b N � N �i DECISION OF THE PETITION OF JAMES NICHOLSON REQUESTING A VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 330 LAFAYETTE STREET page three 8. Petitioner is to obtain approval from any City Board or Commission having jurisdiction including, but not limited to, the Planning Board. 9. Petitioner shall consult with the City Engineer to design and assure proper drainage of surface water from the property. 10. Petitioner shall install a fence along the southerly side of the property. Variance Granted March 19, 1997 Gary Barrett, Chairman Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. Board of Appeal C a o n K nS Z m D V1 t0 N � -330 LAFAYETTE STREET 878-12 GIs# COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS ap 3 a c s" rte' CITY OF SALEM 02131 '; Category r•'C'+n �NewRoof. „„ ' x Pecm[t# 878.12 . . ; , BUILDING PERMIT Pr oleo#s JS 2012-002439.-:;, Est Cosh; $13,125.00 7, Eee Charged:'- $148'00' '• 113alance Due:a $.00 PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO: Const Class _ Contractor: License: Expires': Use Group: !pro-Formance Construction_.. CONSTRUCTIO SUPERVISOR-.99871 Lot Slze(sq ft.). + =*t a>u OwnCr: Josc Bisbe - - Units Gained: '. 1s _ " "'" 'Applicant: Pro-Formance Cons action•. - Units lost 4y": (,',1 AT: 330 LAFAYETTE STREET Dig Safe#: r '11—,. r ISSUED ON: 30-Apr-2012 AMENDED ON: EXPIRES ON: 30-Sep-2012 TO,-PERFORM:THE FOLLOWING WORK: NEW ROOF ON PORCH AND DECK REPAIRS jbh POST THIS CARD SO IT IS�VTSTBLEFROM-THE"STREET Electric Gas Plumbing Building Underground: Underground: Underground: Excavation: Service: Meter: Footings: Rough: . .. .Rough: - Raoul]: Foundation: LL Final: - Final:. " -. , - -,.,....Final: s -- . ...... Rough Frame:.. Fireplace/Chinmey: D.P.W. Fire.' Health I Od '-"..:: ; i r j:,: :. n' a r'.:: Final: House# Smoke:— Treasury: - \Vater: Alarm: Assessor Sewer:- Sprinklers: Final: ._ THIS-PERMIT MAY BE REVOKED BY THE CITY OF SALEM UP 0 T A OF ITS RULES AND,REGULATIONS. Signature: Fee Type: Receipt No: Date Paid: Cheek No: Amount: BUILDING REC-2012-002671 " '30-Apr-12 0071, - - $148.00 .IMPORTANT pypNFR OR CONTRACTOR MUST , A"RANG'i- t - Pen^^IODIC INSPECTIONS DURING I ` 'C iNSTRUCTIOft SEE CUgF ENT'5TLDiNG CODE Ci iAR7cR + Fr,4- >T C PF,OUIRED INSPECTIONS C CL 978.615.5641 TO SCHcDULE AN lNSPECiION t t _ t S 31?°7s6 r `".Iv.Ra-4 C y B1 f{01]1 f, T.} .9(Y4i T, 2"lf94:4r 11it.1.,k },mT.h.` --v...� -..�.._...._._.,«.,-..._._..I ir GeuTMS©2012Des-L'auricrs:Municipal+Solutions Itis i t., C•t.. :a ��,CONDITq�'� 4 VSOVE AD CITY OF SALEM BUILDING PERMIT i g'. X L� r'L4.�• qjy CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS ��'� 9�P SFO BUILDING INSPECTOR 120 WASHINGTON STREET, 3RD FLOOR niREv eow[5 �i SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 02 1R $ 00.450 0006557030 APR30 2012 MAILED FROM ZIPCODE 0 19 70 U NT xT�: n R 5� 7 n.? 091104 /i" " I-ilpw TV, fv'v JIi Lti iv iJ wi6 eR 11NIABLl- IU !-JJRWANO 8C: 01970354599 '°2621- 09498-30-39 01976@3545 1111111e 1111{,1,.1.1, i.,i..d. :11v-_+i_•tet1 . :„ f