The URL can be used to link to this page

51-71 LAFAYETTE STREET - BUILDING INSPECTION �.�'] ��I ��5 �� . ;. L ___ � _ � _ - -� - __ - _� L Certificate Number: B-15-211 Permit Number: B-15-211 Commonwealth of Massachusetts City of Salem This is to Certify that the Building located at ............... Building Type 71-C-4A LAFAYETTE STREET in the City of Salem Address Town/City Name IS HEREBY GRANTED A PERMANENT CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY THE CHEESE SHOP OF SALEM 71-C-=4A LAFAYETTE STREET THE CHEESE SHOP This Permit is granted in conformity with the Statutes and Ordinances relating thereto, and expires Not Applicable unless sooner suspended or revoked. Expiration Date Issued On: Tuesday, August 25, 2015 /// Commonwealth of Massachusetts '- ON & Salem r 120 Washington St,3rd Floor Salem,MA 01970(978)745-9595,6641 'Return raid to Building Divisionfor Certificate of Occupancy Permit No. a-15-211 PERMIT TO BUILD. FEE PAID: $1,650.00 - , DATE ISSUED: 4/1/2015 This certifies that DERBY LOFT LLC C/O RCG LLC'" has permission to erect, alter, or demolish a bulldirg71_Ca{A LAFAYET,TE STREET Map/Lot: 340485-855 as follows: Renovation.a BUILD OUTfOF„THE CHEESE SHOP @ 45LAF ETTE ST. NO STRUCTURAL r CHANGES Contractor Name: TIMOTHY LAFERRIE RE DBA.` LAFERRIERE CONSTRUCTI MN SERVICE _ A Contractor License No: CS-051426 jr-114 '` -/j 4/1/2015 ` Building Official / Date This permit shall be deemed abandoned and invalid unless the work authorized by this:permit is commenced within six°months after issuance.The Building Official may grant one or more extensions not to exceed sixmp`ntths each upon written request. ,y _ a All work authorized.by this permit shall conform to theaproved aplicati Ion and thea construction-documentsdor which this permit has been granted. All construction,afterations and changes of use of any�burlding and structures shall be in compliance with the local zoning by-laws and codes. This permit shall be displayed in a location clearly visit a from access street or road and shall be maintained ope for public inspection for the entire duration of the work until the completion of the same. The Certificate.of Occupancy will not be issued until al Y applicable signatures by the Building and Fre Of u:ials�are provided on this permit. HIC#: - 'Persons contracting with unregistered contractors tlo not have access to the guaranty fund”(asset forth in-MGL C.142A). s .. - w Building plans are to be available on site. All Permit Cards are the property of the PROPERTY OWNER. April 18, 2007 NOMA Mr. Thomas St. Pierre Derby Lofts LLC Building Commissioner c/o RCG LLC 17 Ivaloo Street Public Properties Department and Building Office Suite 100 City of Salem Somerville, MA 02143 120 Washington Street T 617 625 8315 Salem, MA 01970 F 617 625 8345 MPicarsic@RCG-LLC.com www.RCG-LLC.com B Fir ass Mail 51 Lafayette Street, Unit 507 Supplemental Documents Dear To We have received the final report from Cavanaugh Tocci Associates, Inc. relative to the sound transmission concerns raised by Ms. Shirley Walker, the owner of Unit 507 at the Derby Lofts Condominium. This report is attached hereto for your records. As you will see, the testing indicates that the existing assemblies exceed the minimum code requirements rather significantly at all areas tested. Given these results, we do not believe any additional testing, investigation or remedial work is required on this item. I will be meeting with Ms. Walker in the near future again to discuss the remaining items. Should you have any additional questions, please feel free to contact me directly at(617)625-7817. Sincerely, �,�,7 Matthew Picarsic On behalf of Derby Lofts LLC cc: Mr. Paul Wakem Department of Public Safety Tewksbury Hospital Dietary Building, East Street Tewksbury, MA 01876 1 CAVANAUGH TOCCI ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED 327 F BOSTON POST ROAD,SUDBURY,MA 01776-3027 0 TEL: (978)443-7871 0 FAX: (978)443-7873 0 E-MAIL:cta@cavtocci.com SENIAM J.CNOPALS UG SENIOR AND STAFF CONSUL TANTS WILLIAM J.CAVANAUGH,FASAEIDEw ANDREW C.CARBALLEIRA GREGORY C TOCCI,PAFASA PRESIaENT EMILY L.CROSS,P.ENG. PRINCIPALS JOHN T.FOULKES DOUGLAS H.BELL BRION G.KONING LINCOLN B.BERRY MICHAEL D.MAYNARD,CTS TIMOTHY J.FOULKES,FASA INCE Rd.cerc CHRISTOPHER A.STORCH K.ANTHONY HOOVER,FASA INCE,Rd Cert. MATTHEW J.MOORE,CTS ADMINISTRATOR DONNA L.RAFUS MARKETINGMANAGER PATRICIA A.CASASANTO April 12, 2007 ASSOCIA TED CONSUL TANTS NICHOLAS BROWSE,SMP7 STEWART RANDALL,CTS Mr. Alex Schnip, Project Manager RCG LLC 17 Ivaloo Street Somerville, MA 02143 PROJECT: Derby Lofts, 51-71 Lafayette Street, Salem, MA SUBJECT: Sound Isolation Evaluation of Floor/Ceiling Partition Demising Condominiums 407 and 507 Alex, This letter and attachments summarize condominium-to-condominium sound isolation measurements conducted at Derby Lofts on March 27, 2007. Scope The scope of this report is limited to the evaluation of airborne sound transmission from Condominium 407 to 507, with respect to the sound isolation requirements of the Massachusetts Building Code. Portions of the Condominium 407 ceiling are exposed underside surface of the concrete structural deck, and other portions have been augmented with a suspended drywall ceiling. We have evaluated both ceiling types. Condominium 507 is located directly above Condominium 407. The owners of Condominium 507 have complained regarding sound produced within Condominium 407 and transmitted upwards through the floor/ceiling deck into Condominium 507. We understand that the complaints principally focus on sound produced by the television and music sound system within Condominium 407, particularly during occasions when the Condominium 407 owner is entertaining guests during televised football games, etc. RCG LLC has retained Cavanaugh Tocci Associates, Inc. to investigate and evaluate the noise complaint. It is important to note that our evaluation is principally focused on the acoustical characteristics of the building(with particular respect to airborne sound transmission from 407 to 507), rather than the activities of people within the building. MEMBER FIRM,NATIONAL COUNCIL OF ACOUSTICAL CONSULTANTS Mr:Alex Schnip, Project Manager, RCG LLC Page 2 Re: Derby Lofts Sound Isolation April 12, 2007 Attachments • Table 1 summarizes the Noise Isolation Class(NIC) sound isolation ratings for the Derby Lofts condominium-to-condominium sound transmission measurements, as discussed below. • Appendix A contains the measured data from which the Table 1 summary was derived. • Appendix B provides a detailed explanation of pertinent sound isolation terminology and measurement/evaluation procedures. Pertinent Acoustical Terminology and Criteria As further explained in Appendix B,the NIC rating is the"field-equivalent"of the sound transmission class (STC)rating, which is derived in a certified acoustical laboratory, under very carefully controlled test conditions, and with a very carefully constructed and inspected test partition. The Massachusetts Building Code requires STC 45 sound isolation performance. Cavanaugh Tocci Associates, Inc. typically recommends STC 50+performance for"market rate" or"upscale" multi-family housing, and STC 60+for"luxury" multi-family housing. Floor/Ceiling Test Results As shown on Table I and Figures 1 through 3: • Sound transmission measured through exposed concrete deck portions of the 407 ceiling (Living/Dining room, and Study) resulted in sound isolation ratings of NIC 50 and NIC 52, respectively. • Sound transmission measured through the 407 Master Bedroom gypsum ceiling and concrete deck assembly resulted in a sound isolation rating of NIC 67. Conclusion and Recommendation All of the sound transmission measurements and resultant sound isolation ratings clearly meet/exceed the Massachusetts Building Code requirements. Even the lowest-measured sound isolation rating(NIC 50, for the living/dining exposed concrete deck) meets our more conservative recommended performance level for"market rate"or "upscale" multi-family housing. Mr.'Alex Schnip, Project Manager, RCG LLC Page 3 Re: Derby Lofts Sound Isolation April 12, 2007 Most notably, the highest-measured sound isolation rating (NIC 67 for the 407 Master Bedroom with gypsum ceiling suspended below concrete deck) is well into the "luxury" sound isolation performance range. With respect to the noise complaint evaluation, we note that the lowest-measured rating(NIC 50) is for the exposed concrete deck above the 407 Living/Dining room; and this room is where the television and music sound system are located. Developing recommendations to improve sound isolation is beyond the scope of services requested. We shall be pleased to develop recommendations to mitigate the noise complaint condition. Our services could be provided to one or both condominium owners, assuming a cooperative agreement between the two condominium owners can be achieved. We trust this submittal fulfills your request. Please call if Cavanaugh Tocci Associates, Inc may be of further assistance in this matter. Sincerely, CAVANAUGggH TOC�rC,I✓�ASSOCIATES, INC. Brion G. Koning, Senior Consultant 0515 5-RCG-DerbyLofts-4-12-07-D.doc Mr.'Alex Schnip, Project Manager, RCG LLC Page 4 Re: Derby Lofts Sound Isolation April 12, 2007 Table 1. Summary of Sound Isolation Ratings Derby Lofts, 51-71 Lafayette Street, Salem, MA— 3/27/07 Source Room Receiver Room NIC Rating Unit 407 Unit 507 Living/Dining Room Living/Dining Room 50 (exposed concrete deck) Unit 407 Unit 507 Master Bedroom Master Bedroom 67 (gypsum ceiling) Unit 407 Unit 507 Study Master Bedroom 52 (exposed concrete deck) APPENDIX A Noise Isolation Class Graphs DerbyLoftsNICData-1.xls Cavanaugh Tocci Associates, Inc. Printed A1.Graph 2007.03.29 Derby Lofts: Noise Isolation Class (NIC) evaluation 407 Living Room to 507 Living Room 80 - --- ! i I i I I I I 70 . - 60 0 60000 -- -- ---- - - - -- - --- - '.._ a c 0 000 50 0-00 d 0 c 40 -- --- - - — --- --- .-.-- — —, -- -- -- — -... 30 I , i I I I I I 20 31.5 63.0 125 250 500 1k 2k 4k 8k 16k 113 octave band center frequency (Hz) --o—Measured Noise Reduction (NR) —Noise Isolation Class (NIC) 50 contour -- - Figure 1_ DerbyLoftsNI CData-1.As Cavanaugh Tocci Associates, Inc. Printed A2.Graph 2007.0129 Derby Lofts: Noise Isolation Class (NIC) evaluation 407 Master Bedroom to 507 Master Bedroom 80 - 70 . 60 ----- - 0 50 29 0 40 -------- 30 ------ - ------- 20 31.5 610 125 250 500 1k2k 4k8.k 16k 113 octave band center frequency (Hz) -0-Measured Noise Reduction (NR) —Noise Isolation Class(NIC) 67 contour Figure 2 DerbyLnftoN|CData'1xb Cavanaugh ToncAssociates, Inc. Printed 83.Snmph 2007V320 Derby Lofts: Noise Isolation Class (NIC) evaluation 407Study to507Study 00 70 RV 0100 0000� 0000 � 50 40 30 - 20 31.5 800 125 250 500 1k 2k 4k 8k 18k l/3octave band center frequency (Hz) –0�-Measured Noise Reduction (NR) —Noise Isolation Class (m|C) 52contour APPENDIX B Glossary of Pertinent Architectural Sound Isolation Terminology Sound Isolation Terminology Sound isolation between living units(and between living units and other spaces, such as corridors, mechanical rooms, etc.) typically falls into two main categories: 1. Airborne sound (principally speech, television, etc.) 2. Struchureborne sound (sub-categories of structureborne sound include impact sound generated by footsteps on floors and stairs, kitchen and bathroom cabinets doors and drawers closing, stereo system loudspeakers resting on or attached to the structure, and various plumbing noises). Airborne sound transmission (speech, etc.)and impact sound transmission(footsteps, etc.) measured in the field(i.e. in buildings) are often evaluated and compared with building code and mortgage agency requirements, and with general acoustical design criteria. Airborne Sound The airborne sound isolation performance of building partitions and partition elements (walls, doors, windows, and floor/ceiling assemblies, etc.) is determined in certified acoustical laboratories. The sound isolation rating obtained in the laboratory environment is termed the sound transmission class (STC) rating in accordance with test procedures and reporting requirements of the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). In the simplest explanation of the STC rating procedure, the measured sound transmission loss data are plotted on a graph together with an STC rating"contour" and the contour is"fitted" to the data in accordance with specific criteria. Airborne sound isolation between rooms in buildings(non-laboratory conditions) is quantified using various test methods, calculations and resultant ratings, which are all essentially "field-versions" of or"field-equivalents"to the STC laboratory test procedures and calculations. The simplest and most-often used of the field test ratings is the noise isolation class(NIC) rating, which is simply the STC rating "contour" applied to the measured noise reduction. A slightly more rigorous/accurate method is the normalized noise isolation class(NNIC)rating, which includes an adjustment for receiving room absorption, based on measured reverberation time (RT(,p). The most rigorous of the field tests is the_Jield sound transmission class (FSTC)rating, which is extremely complex and (expensive)and is vary rarely performed in strict accordance with ASTM Standards. In general, the NIC and NNIC ratings are most often considered the most practical field-measurement equivalents to the laboratory STC rating. All of these airborne sound isolation ratings are determined by placing a very loud signal generator, amplifier, and loudspeaker system in one room (called the source room). Sound levels are measured in the source room, and are also measured in one or more adjacent rooms (called receiver rooms). Each pair of source and receiver room(s) is separated by a specific partition being tested. In multi-story, multi-unit buildings, airborne sound isolation can be measured both horizontally (through walls) and vertically (through floor/ceiling constructions). In the acoustical laboratory, the only significant sound transmission path between source and receiver rooms is via the partition being tested. However, in typical buildings, sound can also be transmitted around or through portions of the partition, via various sound "flanking" and "leakage"paths. Generically, these additional sound transmission paths can include back-to- back bathroom medicine cabinets, plumbing fixtures or electrical boxes, recessed ceiling lights, air-conditioning ductwork, poorly fitted drywall junctions hidden behind baseboards or ceiling molding, etc. Essentially, the laboratory STC and the field NIC,NNIC and FSTC ratings represent the difference between the sound level incident upon a partition and the resultant sound level transmitted through it. The difference in sound levels (called noise reduction) is then evaluated with a standardized rating contour. The higher the STC or NIC,NNIC FSTC numerical rating, the better the sound isolation performance. It is important to note that, typically,the actual as-built NIC rating of a partition in a building will vary by approximately 3 rating points (decibels) from the laboratory ratings for that same partition design. This is generally due to variations in individual room acoustics such as room size, room finish, and furnishings (carpeting, drapes, etc.). For very absorptive or large receiving rooms, the building NIC ratings can actually be higher than the laboratory STC rating. In general, a NIC rating that is 3-decibels lower than the design STC rating for that partition does not necessarily indicate problems with the actual partition construction. However,NIC ratings that are approximately 5 decibels (or more) lower than the corresponding design STC ratings almost always indicate one or more problems in the actual building construction (compared with the partition design). Impact Sound The impact sound isolation of floor/ceiling partitions is also determined in certified acoustical laboratories. The impact sound isolation rating obtained in a laboratory environment is termed the impact insulation class(ITC) rating. The impact sound isolation between rooms in typical buildings (non-laboratory conditions) is typically quantified using the field impact insulation class (FIIC). This is the field-measurement equivalent of the laboratory I1C rating. Both of these impact insulation ratings are determined by placing a standardized"tapping machine"on a floor in the source room, and then measuring sound levels transmitted through the floor/ceiling into the receiver room, located directly below the source room. The receiver room sound levels are then evaluated with a standardized rating contour. The higher the IIC or FIIC numerical rating the better the impact sound insulation performance. It is important to note that, typically, the actual as-built FIIC ratings for floor/ceiling impact insulation in buildings will be somewhat lower(i.e. higher sound levels transmitted to the receiver room) than the laboratory ratings for that same partition design. This is generally due to impact sound energy(actually vibration) transmitted along the floor joists to supporting stud walls, which results in sound radiated into the receiving room from the walls, in addition to the sound radiated from the ceiling. (The wall radiation characteristic is minimized in the acoustical test laboratory.) The American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) and the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) are the two principal agencies promulgating acoustical terminology, testing procedures and standards used as the acoustical test and reporting basis for this report. The specific test and reporting requirements of these agencies are extremely rigorous, precise, and extensive. Our test procedures used for most of our building sound isolation evaluations are in general conformance with the ASTM and ANSI requirements. However, it is important to note that there are certain technical aspects of our test procedures that deviate slightly from the standards agency requirements. For instance, we typically report FIIC values (impact noise ratings) based on receiver room sound levels, which have not been adjusted for receiving room sound absorption characteristics. Technically this does not meet the ASTM reporting requirement. Also, some of the rooms tested for our clients do not meet the minimum room size and/or shape requirements of ASTM. However,these are just slight deviations from the rigorous ASTM testing and reporting requirements, and are not a significant concern for our evaluations. One of the dilemmas of evaluating sound isolation in buildings in comparison with building code requirements is that the code requirements are published in terms of the STC and IIC, which technically can only be determined in an acoustical laboratory. To absolutely ascertain compliance with the building code requirements (and/or FNMA requirements),the project developer/owner/contractor would have to construct one or more representative partitions (floor/ceiling partition, party wall or corridor wall, etc.) of exactly the same elements and assembly as installed in the project building and submit the partition samples to a certified acoustical laboratory for testing. Architectural Interior Sound Isolation Design Criteria Most local and state building codes in the northeastern United States are based on the Building Officials Council of America(BOCA)National Building Code. BOCA requires a minimum STC rating of 45 for airborne sound isolation for walls and floor/ceiling constructions between dwelling units, and also between dwelling units and "public or service areas". In addition, BOCA requires a minimum IIC rating of 45 for floor/ceiling impact sound insulation between dwelling units, and also between dwelling units and public or service areas. The Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA) also requires minimum STC/IIC ratings of 45 for airborne sound isolation for walls and floor/ceiling constructions between dwelling units. However, FNMA requires higher-performance STC/IIC ratings of 50 between dwelling units and public or service areas. It is important to note that these are absolute minimum sound isolation performance requirements for any housing that must comply with the BOCA Building Code (and for financed housing that must also comply with FNMA requirements). For the purposes of most project evaluations, we infer that at the very least, the mortgage agencies would require STC ratings of 50 for residential condominium walls demising to common corridors, stairways, elevators, etc. However, in our experience, acoustical consulting firms and architectural design firms with architectural sound isolation experience recommend STC/IIC ratings in the range of 50 to 55 for "market rate" housing, and STC/IIC ratings of 60 and higher for"luxury" housing. It is important to note that, without special acoustical underlayment or other specialized treatment of the floor/ceiling construction, the IIC/FIIC impact sound insulation ratings for hard- surfaced floor/ceiling constructions (hardwood, ceramic and marble tile, etc.) are typically below 45. The llC/FIIC ratings improve dramatically (to ratings of 60 and higher)with heavy carpeting or rugs on thick resilient padding. However, simply carpeting floors or installing area rugs typically has not fully resolved owner/occupant noise complaints about footstep sound transmitted from unit to unit. Although carpeting or rugs dramatically increases the IIC/FIIC ratings and effectively attenuates the"clicking" sound of hard-soled shoes, it does not eliminate the"thudding" sound of footsteps transmitted through the floor/ceiling construction. ;4 $ I I I\. s{Y` u i) Elk Z s f �I � �, ! i n o * k Will j Lrcy- ,g. �g 4 { k kt � N R � z D `"'" mP1 Owby Loge OOndominWmc rers srrsF'r aeumtus Inc. � eo-n wwmq sem w.m.u�rn�em ••• -_,. I /'s NOBLIN & ASSOCIATES L. L. C. CONSULTING ENGINEERS ONE WASHINGTON STREET SUITE 3050 DOVER, NEW HAMPSHIRE, 03820 PHONE (603) 740-9400 FAX (603) 740-9339 December 20,2012 Project#11198NH Mr.Tom Daniel Economic Development Manager City of Salem Planning Dept. 120 Washington St,3rd Floor Salem,MA 01970 RE: Derby Lofts Condominium Salem,Massachusetts Dear Mr. Daniel: The Derby Lofts Condominium is presently preparing to begin an exterior fapade repair project. Noblin & Associates has prepared the plans and specifications for this project,and is currently overseeing the work as the Association's technical representative. The scope of work for this project can be summarized as follows: 1. Removal,flashing and reinstallation(or replacement if necessary) of the existing windows and doors above the first floor level of the building. Replacement windows will be aluminum framed units to aesthetically match the existing aluminum clad windows as closely as possible. This work is necessary to address improper flashing of the window and door openings which have contributed to water infiltration issues in the building. 2. Removal and replacement of the existing synthetic stucco system on the building with a new exterior stucco system with complete waterproofing underlayment and flashings. The replacement stucco system will aesthetically match the existing system as closely as possible. This work is necessary to address improper flashings in the existing synthetic stucco system which have contributed to water infiltration issues in the building. As noted above,the new materials incorporated into this project will be "in kind",to match the original materials as closely as possible,while upgrading the building systems to address previous installation deficiencies and meet the current building code requirements. tv4 Mr.Tom Daniel December 20,2012 City of Salem Planning Dept. Project#11198NH Page#2 If you are in need of additional information,please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, Timothy D. Little, P.E. Senior Project Manager Cc: Michael Lutrzyowski,City of Salem Inspectional Services Rachel Campbell,Harvest Properties Paul McGovern,Bay Contracting Ralph Noblin,Noblin&Associates November 9, 2007 Mr. Thomas St. Pierre, Building Commissioner Public Property Department, City of Salem 120 Washington Street, 3`d Floor Salem, MA 01970 RE: Derby Lofts Condominium Dear Mr. St. Pierre: It has just been brought to my attention that two months ago, Janine M. Racanovic, Property Manager, Derby Lofts Condominium, Great North Property Management, sent you the attached September 12, 2007 letter. She copied The Honorable Kimberley Driscoll and the Derby Lofts Board of Trustees. I was the subject of her letter but she did not inform me. We purchased Derby Lofts December 29, 2005. Over the past two years, you and the state building inspector addressed building code violations in my unit and the related common areas at Derby Lofts. One example is the Derby Lofts As-Built Drawings were not filed at your office November 2005 when the Derby Lofts certificate of occupancy was issued. February 2007, the Derby Lofts As-Built Drawings were essential to address code violations in my unit and the common area chase attached to my unit. The state building inspector ordered RCG to produce the As-Built Drawings on disc: RCG did so May 2007. The code violation in my unit was resolved. This is public record on file in your office (see Assistant Building Inspector February 8, 2006 letter "Unit 507...you open the wall at the living room side of the utility room. for our inspection'. "Due to the lack of As Built Drawings from this project..."). As a Derby Lofts owner, I continue to have concerns regarding our building. This includes, but is not limited to, National Grid transformers/water in the basement. Derby Lofts Trustees have not informed owners of building insurance and liability in the event of an explosion. I request you to enter into the public record my August 28, 2007 letter to commercial and residential owners of Derby Lofts (attached). It is a public matter when this "private" building has many potential unresolved health and safety issues. Open participation and communication among all parties is essential. The public record will ensure all Derby Lofts owners are informed of issues that can impact the safety of their person and their property. S' erely, Shirley Walker Derby Lofts Owner, Unit 507 Cc: The Honorable Kimberley Driscoll Derby Lofts Board of Trustees: Owners: James Regis/Chairman, Clifford Abelson, Marlene Faust and Developer/Owner/Landlord: Matthew Picarsic/RCG CEO Attachments: February 8, 2006 letter: Joseph Barbeau, Asst. Bldg. Inspector, Public Property Dept., Salem August 28, 2007 letter: Shirley Walker to Derby Lofts Residential and Commercial Owners September 12, 2007 letter: Janine Racanovic, Property Manager, Derby Lofts Condominium Shirley Walker, Derby Lofts, Unit 507, 51 Lafayette Street, Salem, MA 01970 CITY OF SALEM PUBLIC PROPERTY DEPARTMENT K]"Ili,:ai.r, Iris'."',. n 1z 120%V\an%emv SilU.1 I 11-.1.9-8-:45-9595 F.\s,9-8--40 9846 February 8, 2006 Shirley Walker Unit 507 Derby Lofts 51 Lafayette Street Salem, MA 01970 Dear Ms. Walker; As a result of our meeting with you today, and due to the on-going nature of this issue, this office is requiring that you open the wall at the Living Room side of the Utility Room so that a thorough inspection of this area may be conducted. Due to the lack of As Built Drawings from this project there is no way to ascertain the nature of the heat signature that has been detected at this location. Once this wall has been opened for our inspection, we may hopefully find the source of this on-going problem, and work towards a solution. We remain very concerned as to the source of the heat in this area, and feel that this work should be done within the next 14 days. If you have any further questions or concerns please feet free to call this office at (978) 745 —9595 ext. 5640. S cerely, � �Iy ��Jos ph E. Barbeau, Jr. '14 / A istant Building Inspector CC: file GREAT NORTH PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 182 NEWBURY STREET PEABODY, MA 01960 TEL: 978-278-4000 978-278-4008 September 12, 2007 Mr. Thomas St. Pierre Building Inspector City of Salem One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 RE: Derby Lofts Condominium Dear Mr. St.Pierre: It has been brought to my attention that a unit owner of Derby Lofts Condominium, Ms. Shirley Walker,has been in contact with your department on numerous occasions relative to common area concerns at Derby Lofts. Although we completely understand your obligation to investigate any matters brought to your attention, we respectfully request that you contact us,as the managing agent of the condominium and the authorized agent for the Board of Trustees, if you schedule a site visit so that I may be in attendance to answer any of your questions or concerns. I may be reached at the above telephone number or via email at lanine@%treatnorth.net and am happy to speak with you regarding any concerns or issues that may arise. Thank you for your attention and I appreciate your consideration. Sincerely, JanZe M. Racanovic "-f�operty Manager Cc: The Honorable Kimberly Driscoll Derby Lofts Board of Trustees JGCA, INC. DERBY COFTS August 28,2007 Dear fellow residential and commercial owners: This letter and attached documents are intended to highlight "the state of our building". Each year it is wise to review how our community is faring. Thus far, we have been hit with an unexpected assessment; unaddressed health and safety issues and an unresponsive duly elected Board of Trustees. We are a new community and have not yet found our voice. It is important to take an active interest in the affairs of Derby Lofts because of the financial and personal investments we have made to make this our home. Many of us have not lived in a condominium before and we are all learning how to adjust to our new community and its functions. The relationship between all of us 'depends upon open communication and a free flow of information:top down and bottom up. In the attached document,you will find what a number of owners have uncovered. This chronology is intended to make us a more informed community and establish the ground Hiles for a Board that is more responsive to owners. Here are some of the many questions that come to mind when reviewing this year so far. Some of us spent weeks and months trying to get some sense of how decisions were made that have affected us all.Through public records, meetings, discussions and inspections with city and state officials, a search for answers began with a list of questions. Some answers were obtained but many still remain unanswered. • How was the transition from a developer run Derby Lofts LLC to a condominium association run . community handled? Was an independent audit of the books conducted prior to the transition? • How were the negotiations handled concerning the condominium trust and National Grid conducted prior to the assessment?Why did the Board not investigate and dispute the$32,914.83.00 electric bill? • Why and under what authority did the condo association pay for parking passes held by individual owners? How do we get the money back from those owners who did not pay? Are all owners paying for the special assessment? • Who pays the legal fees for legal collection and attorneys as issues arise? • Who pays for the MOLD clean up in certain unit(s) and the rest of Derby Lofts? Who ensures that our health and safety is protected? Why has the Board never sent written notice to owners regarding this ongoing health hazard?Is it necessary to notify public health officials? • Did you know we'have three large transformers in our basement? Did you know water pours into the basement from a Derby Street sidewalk catch basin every time it rains? Did you know the basement floods?Do we have insurance in the event of a malfunction or explosion caused by the transformers? Have you questioned any of the above?Have you been made part of the decision making process, informed after the fact,or not informed at all? Do you care? Please make your voice heard at the Board meetings. Attend the next meeting and see for yourself how the Board functions and respond as you see St. This is our home, our community, and for many of us, our largest investment. Please become involved and voice your opinions freely and openly. It will be to all of our benefit. Sincerely, Shirley Walker, Unit 507 owner(December 29, 2005) DERBY LOFTS 2007 OWNER QUESTIONS August 28, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS LETTER TO RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL OWNERS 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 BUILDING MANAGEMENT 3 2007 BUDGET 3 CAPITAL NEEDS STUDY 3 COLLECTION AND LEGAL FEES 3 CONDITION SURVEY REPORT 3 $57,000.00 ELECTICAL SPECIAL ASSESSMENT 4 ELECTRIC TRANSFORMERS IN DERBY LOFTS BASEMENT I SALEM FIRE CHIEF&CITY ELECTRICIAN INSPECTION FINDINGS 4 II TRANSFORMERS 5 III NATIONAL GRID 5 MOLD 6 SECURITY AND SAFETY 6 DERBY LOFTS: CONDOMINIUM OR CONDOMINIUM—APARTMENT 6 WHAT YOU CAN DO 7 LETTER TO DERBY LOFTS BOARD OF TRUSTEES 8 ATTACHMENTS: A. 08/07/2007 SAFETY&SECURITY LETTER TO BOARD B. 08/26/2007 POLICE BURGLARY REPORT: VANDALISM TO FRONT DOOR Note:Many thanks to Derby Lofts owners who assisted in the research and preparation of this document. A community service announcement from your Derby Lofts neighbor 2 DERBY LOFTS 2007 OWNER QUESTIONS August 28, 2007 BUILDING MANAGEMENT Why has the Board not provided timely responses to the following concerns? • Building repairs; • Outside door broken,not fixed for months; • Paint peeling and unsightly,not painted for months; • Trash room fan noise,not fixed for months; • $32,914.83.00 electric bill not negotiated for six months. 2007 BUDGET • Where is the current 2007 Budget updated by line item,including 2007 electric special assessment,parking passes,condominium fees,collection and legal fees and 2007 projected deficits by line item with supporting documentation? • Why has the Board not distributed the revised budget to all owners? • Why has the Board not notified us of owners(by name and Unit#)who have not paid 2007 parking passes, electric special assessment and condominium fees? CAPITAL NEEDS STUDY The Capital Needs Study will determine the Derby Lofts capital repairs that will be included and funded in specific years in the Capital Budget From this study, the Board will establish a capital reserve account that owners are obligated to pay for a period of fifteen to twenty years. • When will the Board notify owners to participate in a public meeting with the Board and the selected company concerning the Capital Needs Study? COLLECTION AND LEGAL FEES • What are the legal fees paid to date by the Board to Derby Lofts condominium attorneys Marcus,Errico, Emmer and Brooks?This includes,but is not limited to:court filings and appearance regarding eviction, unit inspection,Hens,multiple incident reports and outstanding warrants with Salem Police. • Why has the Board not notified owners of actions and results taken against owners and others in the above matters? CONDITION SURVEY REPORT • What is the current status of the Board of Trustees Derby Lofts Condition Survey that owners completed in March 2007?What problems has the Board fixed,are currently under repair,or outstanding? • What steps has Board taken to fix water damage in the building? • Why has the Board not billed our insurance company for the wind damage to the Central Street door? Why has the door remained broken for five months and not been repaired? A community service announcement from your Derby Lofts neighbor 3 DERBY LOFTS 2007 OWNER QUESTIONS August 28, 2007 $57,000.00 ELECTRIC SPECIAL ASSESSMENT • December 13,2006 Derby Lofts owners election of Board of Trustees • January 1,2007 Derby Lofts Condominium Trust Certification of Resignation and of Trustees. Five Trustees of Derby Lofts Condominium elected for term January 1, 2007—December 31,2007. • January 18,2007: National Grid$32,914.83.00 electric bill for November 15, 2005-September 7,2006 for Derby Lofts common meter.Trustee Joey Killar stated RCG-LLC received the bill. • March 14,2007, Great North Property Manager requested National Grid for"missing"January,February and March 2007 electric bills. • June 12,2007 National Grid notice to Board of termination of electricity for the Derby Lofts common Meter. • June 13,2007 Board notice to owners of$57.000.00 electric costs/Special Assessment effective July 15, 2007 because"the amount of electricity we consume exceeds the measurement capacity of the meter." • June 19,2007 Board request to National Grid for a"payment plan"for a$32,914.83.00 electric bill. What was the"payment plan"proposed by the Board? • June 19,2007 Board request for a"hearing"to the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Public Utilities Consumer Division Department of Telecommunications and Energy (DTE)regarding"the termination of electricity notice received from National Grid on June 12,2007. • Why did six months elapse from January 2007 through June 2007 before the Board notified owners of a $57,000 electric special assessment? • What was National Grid response to the Board June 19,2007 request for a"payment plan"? • What was the Commonwealth of Massachusetts DTE response to Board for a"hearing"regarding "The termination of electricity notice received from National Grid on June 12,2007? ELECTRIC TRANSFORMERS IN DERBY LOFTS BASEMENT I AUGUST 16,2007 SALEM FRE CHIEF AND CITY ELECTRICIAN INSPECTION FINDINGS • Water pours into the Transformer Room under the open catch basin on the Derby Street sidewalk 365/days per year and builds up quickly around the transformers during floods. • Lock the Basement Transformer Room Door. • Put sign on Transformer Room door: DANGER:ONLY AUTHORIZED PERSONS ALLOWED. • Notify maintenance personnel when people are in the water around the transformers,people"serve as a conduit"for electricity. This is DANGEROUS. • The Transformer Room sump pump must only be used to remove water in the Transformer Room. • The Transformer Room must have two industrial size sump pumps:one operational and one back up. • The Basement Storage Space(BSS)is shared by two commercial units: owner Rouge Properties LLC and owner/RCG-LLC(Derby Lofts LLC)/renter Radiance Aveda • Sump pumps that are currently in the BSS must NOT connect to the sump pump in the Transformer Room Construct a separate sump pump hook-ups for two sump pumps in the BSS • BSS,including the bottom row of gas meters,was flooded during the 2006 Mothers Day flood. • Why does water pour into the transformer mom through the Derby Street catch basin/sidewalk grate? Salem officials state"make up"air is essential for transformers. However,WATER IS A HAZARD AROUND TRANSFORMERS. • Who owns the three transformers and basement room where transformers are located? • What are the Board actions taken to implement these findings? • When will the Salem Building Inspector inspect these commercial spaces currently operating under building permits? (owner Rouge Properties LLC and owner/RCG-LLC(Derby Lofts LLC)/renter Radiance Aveda). A community service announcement from your Derby Lofts neighbor 4 DERBY LOFTS 2007 OWNER QUESTIONS August 28, 2007 II TRANSFORMERS • Does Derby Lofts have insurance coverage in the event of an electrical malfunction or explosion caused by the Transformers? • Who pays for the Derby Lofts building insurance(insurance carrier,policy owner,coverage amount deductible and cost)? • Where is the legal documentation and notice to Derby Lofts owners that these transformers are in the basement? • Why do the following documents on file at the Essex County Registry of Deeds and with the city of Salem NOT refer to the transformers in the basement? Derby Lofts construction and as-built plans. Owner Unit Deeds Derby Lofts Condominium Trust-Declaration of Trust Derby Lofts Condominium Master Deed Exhibit A to Master Deed,Description of building Exhibit B to Master Deed,Rules and Regulations Exhibit C to Master Deed,Description of Units Second Amendment to the Master Deed 4/15/06 Derby Lofts LLC,RCG Salem,LLC,by Alex Steinbergh, Its Manager Third Amendment to the Master Deed 6/15/07 Derby Lofts LLC,RCG Salem,LLC,by Alex Stembergh, Its Manager • How,and by what authority,is RCG amending our Master Deed without the signatures of the Derby Lofts Board of Trustees? III NATIONAL GRID • Who is the National Grid"customer"that permitted National Grid to set up three transformers in the Derby Lofts basement? • Why has National Grid not scheduled the meeting the Salem City Electrician requested in July 2007 to inspect Derby Lofts common meter re:the$32,914.83 electric bill for November 15,2005— September 7,2006 and the three transformers in the basement? • Why does National Grid state to an owner that the matters regarding the Derby Lofts electric bill $32,914.83 for the common meter and three transformers in the Derby Lofts storage space(BSS)have been sent to National Grid legal department? • Why are three transformers,in addition to the 64 individual meters in the first floor electric room, necessary for 62 units at Derby Lofts? • Why does National Grid state that they did not tell RCG in 2005 that RCG must hook up the new streetlights to the Derby Lofts common meter or National Grid would not provide power to the pole; and municipal streetlights are not hooked to the Derby Lofts common meter? • Why has the Board refused multiple requests to throw the common meter breaker switch at night to determine if streetlights go out? This test will verify if Derby Lofts owners have paid the electric bins for city streetlights since November 2005. A community service announcement from your Derby Lofts neighbor 5 DERBY LOFTS 2007 OWNER QUESTIONS August 28, 2007 MOLD • 2006 MOLD and severe recurring water leaks reported by owners of one Unit. • July 2007 MOLD remediation started in the affected Unit.Owners were forced out of their unit because the work was so extensive and MOLD is hazardous to their health. • Why are owners still out of their unit? • What is the status of MOLD remediation in this Unit? What are the reports findings and conclusions by in mance companies,certified industrial hygienists,laboratories,and the Salem Board of Health, claimstsettlement and MOLD remediation vendor(s)? • Where is MOLD located at Derby Lofts? • What is the total cost of MOLD REMEDIATION at Derby Lofts? • Who will pay for MOLD REMEDIATION in the damaged Unit? • Who will pay for MOLD REMEDIATION in the rest of Derby Lofts? • Why did the Board not send written notification to owners that MOLD,a public health hazard and potential financial cost to owners is present in our building? • What are Board actions to date to eradicate MOLD at Derby Lofts? • Does the Derby Lofts insurance policy and the Board of Trustees Directors and Officers(D&O)insurance policy provide MOLD coverage? What are the coverages/amounts/deductibles,carriers and liability insurance coverage? • Where is the documentation of Board discussions re: MOLD at Derby Lofts? • Why has the Board not disclosed to owners that there is MOLD present in Derby Lofts? SECURITY AND SAFETY • What is the Board response to owner request at August 7,2007 Board meeting: (see Attachment A)? Surveillance cameras Police/security personnel shifts Owner notification of all safety problems when they occur Documentation of owner safety complaints Owner notification of Board complaint resolution process and conclusion Establish visitor log,note visitor name and unit#/owner/renter visited Call Salem Police at 978-744-1212 and file incident reports. • Why has the Board not notified owners that there are 26 incident reports that include burglary and breaking and entering on file with the Salem Police Department from May 22,2006 through August 26,2007? • What action has the Board taken to address the Sunday August 26, 2007 police burglary incident report by an owner of vandalism of the Lafayette Street inner front door?(Attachment B) DERBY LOFTS: CONDOMINIUM OR CONDOMINIUM-APARTMENT? • Derby Lofts has 62 units: 54 Residential and 8 Commercial:40/64%owned and 29/461/o rented. • 25/46%of 54 Residential rented. 18/33%owned/rented by RCG-LLC and 7/12%rented by owners other than RCG(Units#204,307,407,502,504,508 and 510) • 4/50%of 8 Commercial rented by RCG to: A&J King Bakers,Radiance Aveda, Cornerstone Books, and Chulamama. 4/501/o owned by New Civilitea Holdings LLC,71 Lafayette Street Realty Trust(renter Engine House Pizza),Rouge Properties LLC and Richard A.DiFillipo • 36/53%owners of 54 Residential and 4/50%owners of 8 Commercial Units 22/35%owned by RCG: 18/33% of 54 Residential and 4/50%of 8 Commercial • RCG owns 22 units or 35%of Derby Lofts. • Other owners own 40 units or 64%of Derby Lofts • Derby Lofts Board of Trustees has five seats:Owners hold three 64%and RCG holds two 35% With 46% units rented_ is Derby Lofts a condominium or *condominium-apartment? *The Warren Group: Public Tax and Assessment records A community service announcement from your Derby Lofts neighbor 6 DERBY LOFTS 2007 OWNER QUESTIONS August 28, 2007 WHAT YOU CAN DO WRITE TO: James Regis, Chairman Derby Lofts Board of Trustees 51 Lafayette Street, Unit #501 Salem MA 01970 Email:jregis@s-cmanagement.com Tell Jim what you think. Ask questions and get answers. A community service announcement from your Derby Inks neighbor 7 DERBY LOFTS 2007 OWNER QUESTIONS August 28,2007 August 28, 2007 Derby Lofts Condominium Unit 507 51 Lafayette Street Salem, MA 01970 Derby Lofts Board of Trustees Condominium Owner/Resident • Clifford Abelson • Marlene Faust James Regis Condominium Owner/Landlord RCG-LLC • Matthew Picarsic • Joseph Killar Dear Board of Trustees: I request the Board to provide all owners with the following: • A written response to the questions posed in the attached document entitled Derby Lofts 2007 Owner Questions dated August 28, 2007. • A Board meeting at Derby Lofts with all owners to discuss the above. • A Board meeting at Derby Lofts with all owners and the company conducting the Derby Lofts Capital Needs Study to identify building problems. Your timely response to this request is greatly appreciated. Yours truly, Shirley Walker Unit#507 owner(December 29,2005) CC: Derby Lofts Owners A community service announcement from your Derby Lofts neighbor 8 t4 7TA6u 14 �lv August 7, 2007 Derby Lofts Condominium Unit#507 51 Lafayette Street Salem, MA 01970 Derby Lofts Board of Trustees Derby Lofts Property Maraaer Great North Condominium Owner/Resident: Janine Raconovic • Kip Abelson • Marlene Faust • James Regis Condominium Owner/Landlord:RCG-LLC • Matthew Picarsic • Joey KiIlar Dear Board and Property Manager: Derby Lofts is not safe.The Board of Trustees is responsible to ensure building security and resident safety. I request the Board to take essential steps to secure our building and protect us from documented intruders and residents. Salem police recommend basic security measures employed by management companies of other downtown buildings to protect residents and secure our building. This includes surveillance cameras in the lobby 24/7 and shifts of police/security personnel. In conjunction with these steps,I request the Board to notify owners of all safety problems when they occur. Tell owners and employees to call the police to file public safety incident reports. Document owner safety complaints and inform owners of the complaint process and Board complaint resolution. Create a visitor log of individuals who enter/leave the building and the unit they visit,to identify people who are not residents. Warn owners of all observed incidents such as 'dumpster diving' in our trash room. Protect . owners and recommend they notify the Credit Bureaus to put a fraud alert or security freeze on their credit file, to protect their credit record from predators. This is our home.I request the Board to consider and immediately establish basic security measures to resolve the serious safety situation that now exists at Derby Lofts. Please enter this letter into the Board meeting minutes to put my concerns on the record. Yours truly, Shirley Walker, Unit#507 Owner(December 29, 2005) CC: Salem Police Chief Robert St.Pierre, Captain Brian Gilligan 1 DERBY LOFTS OWNERS CALL POLICE 978-744-1212. REPORT ALL INCIDEAITSI A rr661 l A4 Ek P 08/27/07 09 : 38 SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT PAGE: .1 v5 . 5n INCIDENT REPORT TTYR034 -742 shift: A date: 08/26/07 SUNDAY org/1st -------------------'------------------------------------------------------------- ********** CI 22E BURGLARY-ATT F.E. RESIDENCE * **rcv*clr* 07 : 29 * 51 LAFAYETTE ST SAL 290 22E 486618 * VANDALISM TO DOOR 12 * ID # : 21789 74 -742 : DERBY LOFTS Rept : SHERRY, ROBERT 06/24/42 51 LAFAYETTE ST SALEM,MA 01970 call-back# (508) 958-3893 *** UNITS) *** 22 * SAL P PTL M DUNN PTL GAUDET 74 -74 r> 07 : 29 d> 07 : 29 a> 07 : 29 c> 07 : 37 k> h> *** COMMENTS *** 22 SAL 07 : 29 :29 CD-290-VANDALISM TO DOOR 74 - 22 SAL 07 : 37 : 37 CLEAR 74 - 22 SAL 107- 22 SAL ON 08-26-2007 , AT 0729 HOURS, OFFICERS DUNN AND 107- 22 SAL GAUDET, RESPONDED TO 51 LAFAYETTE ST. , ON A REPORT OF 107- 22 SAL MISSING HINGES . UPON ARRIVAL CONTACT WAS MADE WITH SHERRY. 107- 22 SAL SHERRY REPORTS THAT WHEN HE WENT DOWN STAIRS TO WALK HIS 107- 22 SAL DOG HE REALIZED THAT SOMEONE REMOVED THE PINS FROM INSIDE 107- 22 SAL THE HINGES. TWO OF THE FOUR PINS WERE STILL IN THE HINGES, 107- 22 SAL HOWEVER THE OTHER TWO WERE ON THE FLOOR. IT IS UNKNOWN 107- 22 SAL WHY THE HINGES WERE TAMPERED WITH. 107- Salem Police Department Ro=ds Division 95 MarWn Street Salem,MA 01970 ----- -- --------------- -- ---- officer ' s signature date MINUTES OF THE BOARD MEETING OF THE SALEM REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY HELD ON JULY 9, 2003 A regular meeting of the Salem Redevelopment Authority (SRA) Board was held in the third floor conference room at the City Hall Annex, 120 Washington Street, on Wednesday,July 9, 2003 at 6:OOpm. Chairman Robert Curran called the meeting to order and on roll call, the following members were present: Conrad Baldini, Michael Brennan, Michael Connelly, Robert Curran, and Russell Vickers. Joseph Walsh, Executive Director of the SRA, Tania Hartford, Economic Development Planner,and Valerie Gingrich,Clerk were also present. Minutes Mr. Baldini made a motion to approve the minutes from the May 7, 2003 and June 11, 2003 meetings, and Mr. Vickers seconded the motion. Motion passed (5-0). Discussion/New Business 1. Executive Director's Report Mr.Walsh, Executive Director,provided the Board with his report. • A letter was sent to the Peabody Essex Museum (PEM) asking them to return to the Board to address the outstanding issue of the Marine Arts Gallery wall. A response from the PEM asked for a request incorporating the issues. A lengthier letter was sent to the PEM on June 23, 2003 and there has not been a reply. • Mr. Walsh stated that in a recent newspaper article, the PEM commented that there will not be pedestrian access through the Museum from Essex Street to Charter Street. The next round of correspondence will address the fact that such a decision by the PEM is a violation of both the SRA's decision and the Planning Board's decision. Free pedestrian access through the Museum Atrium is a condition included in both decisions. The PEM will have to come back to the Board to request an amendment. At this point, -Mr. Curran recognized Councilor O'Leary. Councilor OT.eary commented that the City gave up two pieces of property and a street. He commented that the Board needs to take a stand on this issue in a straightforward manner. In regards to the wall, the Board decided that they will wait for a response from the PEM before any action is taken. Mr.Walsh stated that he will inform the PEM that their decision to not allow access through the building is a violation of the SRA decision, Planning Board decision, and City Council. • Mr. Walsh gave an update on the contamination found at the Old Police Station site. A report on remediation, source and costs is expected in the next 30 days. Mr. Walsh informed the Board that there is a chance that Beverly Cooperative Bank will not finance the cleanup. He explained that it will be hard for the developer to get conventional financing for the cleanup, and the Board could use the revenue from selling the Old Police Station to finance the cleanup. • Mr. Walsh stated that the Licensing Board has requested copies of the current cafe permits, and the list will be provided. • Mr.Walsh asked the Board to vote on two issues: o It has been requested by the Mayor that the two benches at the fountain on Washington and Essex Streets be removed because the benches are in bad shape and because of loitering. Mr. Baldini made a motion to have the benches repaired, but never permanently removed. Mr. Brennan seconded the motion. Motion passed (5-0). o It is requested that the Board vote to approve a contract for services with Wmter Street Architects for conceptual ideas for the Marketplace and Salem Evening News Building. Winter Street would present these ideas next month. Funding would be supplied through the Community Development Block Grant. Mr. Vickers made a motion to establish a contract for services with Winter Street Architects for the Marketplace project. Mr. Connelly seconded the motion. .Motion passed (5-0). DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS 2. DerLy Lofts (51-71 Lafayette Street)—Review of the final submission for the development of a mixed-use development on the comer of Lafayette and Derby Streets in the former Laundry Building. Attorney Scott Grover thanked the Board for the previous schematic approval of the project and stated that the project is being warmly received in the neighborhood. Mr. Grover informed the Board of the goal of starting construction in the fall. Mr.Walsh stated that the Planning Board has approved the project, and it is appropriate for the Board to give a final approval of the project tonight or send it back to the Design Review Board for additional review. Mark Meche presented the project to the Board. He stated that they are starting the construction process and would like to pull a building permit in September. Mr. Meche explained that the Planning Board had asked them to make some changes, which include a wrought iron entrance to the Carriage Way, an audible alarm when exciting onto Central Street, and period lighting around the building and across the street. In addition, the clock on the corner facade will remain. Mr. Meche stated that because signage will depend on the tenants, they will come back to the Board with proposals for signage when plans are more concrete. Mr. Baldini inquired as to the projected completion date. Mr.Meche replied that the project will be completed 14 months from the start date. Mr. Brennan asked whether there will be a deck on the roof. Mr. Meche showed the Board the proposed decks and stated that there will be a small area on the roof near the elevator,which will be considered a deck. Mr. Brennan inquired as to the total number of units. Mr.Meche replied that there will be 54 units. Mr. Vickers asked about the parking in the South Harbor Garage. Mr. Grover replied that leasing parking in the garage is not really practical and that they need to have parking closer to the site. Mr.Meche stated that the developer is currently in negotiations with 4 separate possible sites, and that 2 of the deals are ready to be finalized. They would like to do a mixed-use project that includes parking. Mr. Walsh stated that the Building Inspector cannot issue a Certificate of Occupancy until the parking has been leased. Mr. Brennan asked whether the developer would go through with the construction in September if the parking aspect was not yet finalized. Mr. Meche stated that they would. Mr. Vickers inquired as to who gets the parking spaces if there are several projects that want to lease spaces. Mr. Grover stressed that leasing spaces in the South Harbor Garage is not the way that they want to solve the parking situation and that it is simply the way to fulfill the legal requirement while they finalize an alternative. Mr. Vickers asked whether Central Street will remain one-way,Mr. Meche replied that they are not changing any traffic patterns, and that they have a proposal for a traffic/parking study in the works. Mr.Walsh informed the Board that the Planning Board approved the project with the condition that the applicant would return to the Planning Director for the final approval of lighting,utility materials, and roof materials. The applicant would need to return to the Board if any of the materials changed. Mr. Baldini motioned to approve the project with the condition that the applicant return to the Executive Director of the SRA to receive final approval of the materials and lighting. Mr. Vickers seconded the motion, and the motion passed (4-0). Mr. Brennan abstained. Mr. Walsh stated that he would inquire at the City Solicitor's office regarding the process for leasing spaces in the South Harbor Garage. 3. Lawrence Place (143 Washington/32 Front Street)—Review of final submission for the development of a mixed-use development on the corner of Washington and Front Streets in the former Bleachers Building. Mr.Walsh introduced the project and informed the Board that the DRB would like another look at it since it has been revised. The number of residential condominium units increased from 8 to 10. David Pabich explained that the Planning Board had asked for some modifications to the project because of resistance to the idea of residential units on the first floor of Derby Square. The new proposal changes the residential to professional home office space on the first floor. The first floor contains office and kitchen space. Mr. Pabich explained that this change might decrease the value of the units because living space decreases; therefore they have increased the total number of units from 8 to 10. The number of bedrooms decreased from 20 to 17. Mr. Baldini commented that home office space is a good idea and it makes sense. Mr. Pabich replied that home office space might have tax benefits. Mr. Pabich addressed the roof material issue, stating that the roof is a 200 year slate roof that is about 200 years old, and it is in great disrepair. Mr.Pabich explained that the slate will be replaced with an asphalt replica with copper detailing at the request of the DRB. The windows will be aluminum clad with narrower muttons, from 7/8" to 5/8". The lighting will not be changed and the signage will depend on who leases the retail units. They will return to the Board in respect to signage. Mr. Pabich stated that, again at the request of the DRB, he would like to add about 6 skylights to the Front Street side of the building. Mr. Vickers asked if there will be an elevator. Mr. Pabich replied that there will not. Mr.Pabich stated that he would like to show the DRB a revised plan with more skylights at their next meeting. Mr. Curran commented that the proposal looks good and that they will wait to vote on it until the DRB gets another look at it. DEIGN REVIEW BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS 4. Nostalgia (103 Washington Street)—Consideration of DRB recommendation for proposed sign. On June 25, 2003, the Design Review Board (DRB) gave a positive recommendation for a sign application for the building located at 103 Essex Street. The proposal consists of a 23" x 32" wood sign attached to a black decorative metal bracket. The sign includes a Lavender background with black and white graphics and text. At the request of the DRB, the applicant agreed to change the text to Palatino and remove the white text outline for the business name. Mr. Brennan made a motion to accept the recommendation of the DRB, Mr. Connelly seconded. Motion passed (5-0). 5. Salem's Color Corner (60 Washington Street)—Consideration of DRB recommendation for proposed sign. On June 25, 2003, the DRB gave a positive recommendation for the proposed signage for the building located at 60 Washington Street. The proposal consists of two 14" x 120" wood wall signs to be installed along the Washington Street and Lynde Street facades. At the request of the DRB, the applicant changed the text to a serif style font, increased the letter spacing, added a chamfered edge, and reduced the height of the sign by 6 inches. Mr. Brennan made a motion to accept the recommendation of the DRB, Mr. Vickers seconded. Motion passed (5-0). 6. Aroma Sanctum (5 Central Street)—Consideration of DRB recommendation for proposed sign. On June 25, 2003, the DRB recommended approval of the proposed sign for the building located at 5 Central Street. The proposal consists of a Ih" thick PVC hanging sign with a decorative metal bracket. The proposed sign is 17" x 30" and includes a green background with gold lettering. At the request of the DRB,the applicant agreed to change the shape and location of the metal bracket to match the historic metal brackets on the building. In addition, the applicant agreed to change the typography to improve the legibility of the sign. Mr. Vickers motioned to accept the DRB recommendation, Mr. Brennan seconded. Motion passed (5-0). 7. Liberty Tax (155 Washington Street)—Consideration of DRB recommendation for proposed sign. On May 28, 2003, the DRB gave a positive recommendation for a proposed wall sign for the building located at 155 Washington Street. The proposal consists of an 11" x 120" sign attached to an existing sign band. At the request of the DRB, the height of the sign was reduced by 2", the background color was changed from white to off-white, the text color was changed to maroon and the graphic logo was changed to a dark blue. In addition, the DRB requested that the applicant change the text style to Palatino. Mr. Connelly motioned to accept the DRB recommendation, Mr. Baldini seconded. Motion passed (5-0). 8. Rockafellas (231 Essex Street)—Consideration of DRB recommendation for proposed outdoor cafe. On June 25, 2003, the DRB gave a positive recommendation for the proposed outdoor cafe located at 227-231 Essex Street. The proposed cafe is located along the Washington Street side of the building and includes twelve (12) 30" round tables and 36 chairs. A black metal chain and black metal freestanding bollards will define the seating area. Mr. Baldini motioned to accept the DRB recommendation, Mr. Connelly seconded. Motion passed (5-0). OTHER BUSINESS 9. Salem YMCA (120 Washington Street)—Consideration of revised sign proposal. The revised sign has the same color scheme with an encircled "120" in the middle, and "Second Floor" at the bottom. The sign will be placed at the comer of the door at 120 Washington Street. Mr. Baldini informed the Board of his research, stating that there are not any signs in the downtown with addresses on them. Mr. Brennan motioned to approve the sign,Mr.Connelly seconded.Motion passed (5-0). 10. Der Deli (245 Derby Street)—Consideration of revised sign proposal. The revised sign is the same style as the one that previously existed at Brothers Deli, However, Mr. Walsh informed the Board that they may change their name. Mr. Brennan motioned to approve the revised sign,Mr.Connelly seconded. Motion passed (5-0). There being no further business, Mr. Baldini motioned to adjourn the meeting, Mr. Brennan seconded the motion. Motion passed (5-0). Meeting stands adjourned. RespectfuUy submitted, Valerie Gingrich,Clerk Department of Planning&Community Development CITY (;F SALLM. MA CLERK'S OFFICE City of Salem, 111aaaebuottz V k, 3 s Manning Aoarb (One :talent Oreen 1003 JUL Site Plan Review Decision July 1, 2003 Derby Lofts LLC. C/o Tinti, Quirt, Grover& Frey, P.C. Attomeys at Law 222 Essex Street Salem, MA 01970 RE: Derby Lofts LLC. 51-71 Lafayette Street Site Plan Review Decision On Thursday, May 1, 2003, the Planning Board of the City of Salem opened a Public Hearing regarding the application of the Derby Lofts LLC under Site Plan Review for the renovation of an existing four story structure, and the additiuit of two stories, resulting in a total building square footage of 115,356 sq. ft. The structure will consist of retail uses on the first floor (approximately 15,000 sq. ft.) and 54 residential units on the second through sixth floor. An additional 6,000 square feet will be devoted to the entryway for the residential floors and a drive through vehicle drop off area. The public hearing was continued to May 15, 2003 and June 5, 2003. The Public Hearing was closed on June 5, 2003. At a regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning Board held on June 5, 2003, the Board voted by a vote of nine in favor, hone opposed,to approve the application as complying with the requirements of Site Pian Review subject to the following conditions: 1. Conformance with the Plan Work shall uunfurmi with the plans entitled, "Derby Lofts Condominiums, Derby Lofts, LLC." Including sheets AO.0, CO.0, CO.1, C0.2, C0.3,ALL, A1.2, A2.0,A2.1, A2.2, and A2.3,prepared by Winter Street Architects, Inc. 209 Essex, Suite 300, Salem,MA 01970 and dated April 3, 2003. One Salem Green, Salem, Massachusetts 01970 (978) 745-9595 ext. 311 Fax (978) 740.0404 ' CJI L= Amendments Any amendments to the site plan shall be reviewed by the City Planner and if deem� essary by the City Planner, shall be brought to the Planning Board. Any waiver of conditioas-fca ained within shall require the approval of the Planning Board. q � 3. Landscaping pS a. All landscaping shall be done in accordance with the approved set of plans. b. Trees shall be a minimum of 3 %_"caliper. C. Maintenance of landscape vegetation shall be the responsibility of the developer, his succcmom or assigns. d. Any street trees removed as a result of construction shall be replanted. The location of the trees shall be approved by the City Planner prior to replanting. e. After such landscaping is completed, the developer will add further landscaping if such is requested by the Planning Board or the City Planner. 4. Signage Proposed signage shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and the Sign Review Committee. 5. Air Conditioning Units If any air conditioning units are constructed on the roof that can be seen above the ioofline they shall be properly screened with lattice. The proposed screening shall be approved by the City Planner prior to installation. 6. Lighting a. A final lighting plan (showing street lighting and building lighting) shall be submitted to the City Planner for review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. b. No light shall cast a glare onto adjacent parcels or adjacent rights of way. c. The applicant,his successors, or assigns shall install four Standard Salem Period Lights to replace the four existing cobra lights, along those portions of Lafayette and Central Streets that are adjacent to the site. Two Double rixture Salem Standard Period Lights shall be installed to replace the two existing cobra lights located along the west side of Lafayette Street, and two Single Fixture Salem Standard Period Lights shall be installed to replace the remaining two cobra lights adjacent to the site, one on the east side of Lafayette and one on Central Street. The locations and specifications of the lighting shall be reflected on a revised lighting plan submitted and approved by the Department of Planning and Community Development and the City Electrician prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 2 d. Building lighting will be located along the perimeter of the building at approximate locations shown on the elevations dated June 10, 2003, and entitled, "Derby Lofts Condominiums"and prepared by Winter Street Architects Inc. There shall be at least fourteen lights installed along the perimeter: four along the east elevation, four along the south elevation, four along the west elevation and two along the southwest elevation. Any changes in the location or number of lights must be submitted and approved by the City Planner prior to installation of the building lighting. The exact specification for the lighting fixtures shall approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. _ M- 7. Conservation Commission X` . All work shall comply with the Order of Conditions issued by the Salem Conservation vi Corn111rs5ion, if applicable. o,=' D c 8. Garage/Drive Through Area a. The final design for the garage door located at the drive through entryway:ghall be y submitted and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of a building pfflnit. b. As a safety precaution, a visual warning device shall be placed at the exit of the drive through area to warn pedestrians of possible exiting vehicles. A minor and a warning sign shall also be placed in this area so as to warn vehicles of pedestrians crossing the drive through. Plans showing an elevation and the location of the devices shall be submitted and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of a building permit. 9. Parking a. If the applicant completes a parking study of the area surrounding the site it shall be submitted to the Department of Planning and Comrauruty Development for their files. b. The applicant shall lease 81 parking spares, equivalent to one and a half parking spaces per residential unit, at the South Harbor Garage until such time as other accommodations may be made. Documentation of the leasing of these spaces shall be provided to the Department of Planning and Community Development prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 10. Construction Practices All construction shall be carried out in accordance with the following conditions: a. Work shall not be conducted between the hours of 5:00 PM and 8:00 AM the following day on weekdays or at any time on Sundays or Holidays. The Planning Board will agree to any proposed changes in the starting time, if approved by a formal vote of the City Council. b. All reasonable action shall be taken to minimize the negative effects of construction on abutters. Advance notice shall be provided to all abutters in writing at 3 't least 72 hours prior to commencement of construction of the project. C. Any drilling and blasting shall be limited to Monday-Friday between 8:00 AM until 5:00 PM. There shall be no drilling or blasting on Saturdays, Sundays, or holidays. Blasting shall be undertaken in accordance with all local and state regulations. d. All construction vehicles shall be cleaned prior to leaving the site so that they do not leave dirt and/or debris on surrounding roadways as they exit the site. e. All construction shall be performed in accordance with the Rules and Regulations of the Planning Board, and in accordance with any and all rules, regulations and ordinances of the City of Salem. f. All constructiuu vehicles left overnight at the site, must be heated completely on the site. g. A Construction Management Plan and Construction Schedule shall be submitted by the applicant prior to the issuance of a building permit.Included in this plan, but not limited to, shall be a demolition plan, inforruation regarding how the construction equipment will be stored, a description of the construction staging area and its location in relation to the site, and where the construction employees will park their vehicles. The plan and schedule shall be submitted and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. 11. Clerk of the Works A Clerk of the Works shall be provided by the City, at the applicant,his successors or assigns' expense, as is deemed necessary by the City Planner, 12. Board of Health All work shall comply with the requirements of the Salem Board of Health, if applicable. ti 13. Fire Department All work shall comply with the requirements of the Salem Fire Department. r ::0 � mac•. 14. Building inspectorD T' All work shall comply with the requirmacnts of the Salem Building Inspector. In.. no m.. : O D 15. Utilities a. An existing Utilities Plan and Utility Installation Plan shall be reviewed ani' approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. b. . Drainage calculations relating to the roof ram-off and drive through area shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. 16. Exterior Elevations a. Final elevations shall be reviewed and approved in writing by the City 4 Planner prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. 17. Maintenance a. RefuRe.. removal, ground maintenance and snow removal shall be the responsibility of the developer,his successors or assigns. b. Winter snow in excess of snow storage areas on the site shall be removed off site. U. Maintenance of all landscaping shall be the respongihility of the applicant, his successors or assigns. The applicant,his successors or assigns, shall guarantee all trees and shrubs installed at the site for a two-(2)year period. d. . A refuse dumpster shall be located in the interior of the building as indicated on the plan. 18. As-built-Plans As-built plans, stamped by a Registered Professional Engineer, shall be submitted to the Department of Planning and Community Development and Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of the final Certificate of Occupancy. 19. Violations Violations of any condition shall result in revocation of this permit by the Planning Board, unless the violation of such condition is waived by a majority vote of the Planning Board. I hereby certify that a copy of this decision and plans has been filed with the City Clerk and copies arc on file with the Planning Board. The Special Permit shall not take effect until a copy of this decision beating the certification of the City Clerk that twenty(20) days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed or that if such appeal has been filed, and it has been dismissed or denied, is recorded in the Essex South Registry of Deeds and is indexed under the came of the owner of record is recorded on the owner's Certificate of Title. The owner or applicant,his successors or assigns, sllall pay the fee for recording or registering. • Walter B Power,III Chairman n_ ..arn r 1 � O T j D m3 .p v O 5 cJ� oNDir CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS PUBLIC PROPERTY DEPARTMENT 120 WASHINGTON STREET, 3RD FLOOR SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01 970 TELEPHONE: 978-745-9595 EXT. 380 FAX: 978-740-9846 KIMBERLEY DRISCOLL MAYOR August 16, 2007 71 Lafayette Street Realty Trust David Walsh Trustee c/o Engine House Pizza 71 Lafayette Street Salem, Ma. 01970 RE: 51-71 Lafayette Street Dear Mr. Walsh: I sent a complaint letter on June 7, 2007 to Derby Lofts Condominium stating that the Engine House exhaust hood needed to be tied with the vertical duct that was installed during renovations of the upper floors. I have now received a letter from Great North Property Management stating that the unit owner—71 Lafayette Street Realty Trust and not Great North or Derby Lofts Condominium, is responsible for the connection to the duct work. I have enclosed a complaint letter. If you have any questions, please contact me directly. Sr .ely, Thomas St. Pierre Building Commissioner Cc: Lt. Erin Griffin Great North Property Management Derby Lofts Condominium Association GREAT NORTH PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 182 NEWBURY STREET TEL: 978-278-4000 PEABODY, MA 01960 FAX: 978-278-4008 August 13, 2007 Mr. Thomas St. Pierre Building Commissioner City of Salem 120 Washington Street Salem, MA 01970 RE: 51-71 Lafayette Street, Engine House Restaurant Dear Mr. St. Pierre: On June 20, 2007, we wrote to you regarding your letter of June 7, 2007 relative to the alleged code violation at Engine House Restaurant. In our response, we explained that neither Great North Property Management (the managing agent for the condominium association) nor Derby Lofts Condominium were responsible for the failure to connect the exhaust fan to the vertical duct that was installed by the developer of Derby Lofts Condominium. As a commercial condominium,the unit owner is responsible for all compliance issues relative to the business that is allowed to operate within that space. As we have not had any further communication, we respectfully request that you clarify whether or not the responsible party, in this case the unit owner, has been notified of the violation and that the City is seeking confirmation of completion of the required work within the time frame specified. We share your concerns and fully support enforcement action to bring this business into compliance. Thank you for your attention to this matter. We look forward to your response. Sincerely, / _. i �iZ�LGGC, anise M. Racanovic Property Manager Ce:Board of Trustees RCG-LLC 71 Lafayette Street Realty Trust commuml JGCA, INC. �OND1 CITY OF SALEM9 MASSACHUSETTS PUBLIC PROPERTY DEPARTMENT n 120 WASHINGTON STREET, 3RD FLOOR 7 , SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE: 978-745-9595 EXT. 380 FAX: 978-740-9846 KIMBERLEY DRISCOLL MAYOR June 7, 2007 Great North Property Management James Regis-Chari- Matt Picarsie- Trustee 51 Lafayette Street Salem, Ma. 01970 RE: 51-71 Lafayette Street Gentlemen This letter is to formalize discussions that we have had regarding a building code violation at the Derby Lofts Building. The specific violation is the hood fan, located in the Engine House Restaurant not being tied into the welded steel duct that has been installed in the building. The original permit submitted and approved, by this office required the hood fan to connect to a vertical duct that terminates above the roof. State Building Codes 780 CMR, Section 110.8 "Engineering Details, reports, calculations, plans and specifications": requires the submittal of stamped plans as a requirement prior to issuance of building permit. Failure to construct the project per the drawings is a violation of the building code. Therefore, you are directed to secure a building permit and to begin the work within 30 days of receipt of this letter. Failure to comply will result in a complaint being filed in Salem District Court. If you feel you are aggrieved by this order, your appeal is to the Board of Buildings Regulations and Standards in Boston. If you need further information, please contact me directly. Si ely, 7cerA� ,.D Thomas St. Pierre Building Commissioner cc: Paul Wakem, State Bld. Inspector Lt. Erin Griffin, Fire Marshall �oNmr�, CITY OF SALEM MASSACHUSETTS PUBLIC PROPERTY DEPARTMENT �u 120 WASHINGTON STREET, 3RD FLOOR 9 SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01 970 vgn°' .. ^'� TELEPHONE: 978-745-9595 EXT. 380 EOo� FAX: 978-740-9846 KIMBERLEY DRISCOLL MAYOR February 4, 2008 51-71 Lafayette Street Realty Trust David Walsh Trustee 71 Washington Street Salem, MA. 01970 RE: Violation Notice Dear Mr. Walsh: This Department cited a building code violation on August 16, 2007. Our records indicate that no permits have been pulled to correct the violation. You are directed to contact this office with the plans and installation date. Failure to correct this code violation will result in further enforcement actions. If you have any questions, please contact me directly. Sin rely, , /* i Thomas St. Pierre Building Commissioner cc: Lt. Erin Griffin, Fire Prevention Great North Property Management CITY OF SALEM /+ R PUBLIC PROPERTY DEPARTMENT KI\IIi9AIA W 1)111 SCVI.I. . MANOR 130\t':\tiliNGfON$'I'RIIGf 0 $:\L1:AI,,"(ntiSn(:I.11!Si"I"f5 01970 ll:1.:978-745-9595 ♦ Fns:978-740-9846 May 7, 2008 Kathy Strout Century 21 Real Estate 332 Lafayette Street Salem, MA 01970 Dear Kathy; This letter is in response to your inquiry regarding the Unit at 51 Lafayette Street (Derby Lofts), and the Building Code requirements as to flooring materials. The State Building Code (780 CMR) speaks to floor construction at the structural and load requirements, but does not govern the type of finishes installed within a private residential use. There are some types of construction such as places of Assembly or Institutional Uses where due to reasons of Fire Safety and/or Egress a more stringent requirement would be required to be met; but, these do not apply to a single residential use. Essentially, within this unit any flooring material that the owner would like to use would be acceptable by Code. If you have any further questions on this or any other issue, please feel free to contact this office at (978) 745—9595, ext. 5643. Sincerely, Joseph E. Barbeau, Jr. Assistant Building Inspector/Local Inspector CC: file r FROM RK-STRUCT FAX N0. 19785315927 Mar. 18 2004 09:32AM P1 : I AK STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING 8 Coleman Street Peabody, MA 01960-4104 (978) 531-5927 February 2, 2004 Mark Pimentel James J. Welch & Co. 27 Congress Street Salem, MA 01970 REF: Derby Lofts Exterior Demolition Dear Mr. Pimental; The Engineer has made a site visit to the above mentioned project on the afternoon of February 2, 2004. He found the existing brick masonry walls between the third floor and the roof to be in questionable stability, at this stage of demolition. At the North Building, by the east elevation a reinforced cement concrete wall (See Photo 1) has lost lateral stability, with the removal of adjacent roof beams. The engineer noticed the corrosion of reinforcing in the wall and the lack of proper rrebar development throughout the demolition areas. Excessive vibration by a skid wheel mounted hydraulic rock puncher (See Photo 2) probably aggravated the lateral movement of the above wall. Use of this tool should be discontinued. At the South and North Buildings, reinforced Portland cement concrete posts and beams, with continuous poured slab floors were introduced at a later time, compared to the earlier construction of the brick masonry exterior walls. The engineer believes that the walls and floor system lack a proper mechanical connection making a cement concrete bond only. The brick walls in question seem to be inferior quality compared to the walls of the first two floors. The engineer believes that lateral design criteria was neglected at the stages of construction. To prevent a reoccurrence of wall instability, the engineer suggests a temporary steel angle bracing (See Plan) be installed from the exterior walls' pilasters to the adjacent columns. The wall and beam demolition �� should be carried out with powered saw cutting and hoisting by crane. .3 1 FROM RK-STRUCT FAX NO. : 19785315927 Mar. 18 2004 09:33RM P2 The use of small power hammers, manually held, should be used to �. remove masonry slowly between the pilasters, to supplement the above saw cutting. The bracing can be added in both horizontal directions to stabilize demolition at spot problems. Sincerely, i� i} Andrew Kuchinsky, PE 'r ii Y y !. 1 t ' It Cf :f 3 i .i C 6 it I� iE II , t� I� i f i E.Toff James J.Welch&Co.Incorporated Derby Lofts Jan. 31, 2004 Exterior Demolition Plan South Building: During all work on the south building exterior elevations, the sidewalk below the area in question will be closed off to the public with a covered walkway provided for public safety. The windows will be removed using a bobcat to pull them into the building. The steel frames will then be brought to the first floor to prepare for removal from the jobsite. The concrete windowsills shall be taken off by hand and transported to the first floor using the interior trash chute. The interior weith of brick under the window shall be removed using 15 #hammers and the brick will be disposed of using the interior trash chute. The exterior weith of brick shall be removed from the outside using lifts and 15#hammers. The brick shall be deposited inside the building for disposal. The piers and spandrels shall be removed only after the building is shored. Their removal will be done from the exterior utilizing lifts as work platforms and 15# hammers. The rubble from this operation shall be brought into the building and deposited in the building trash chute. Steel angles that have been installed on the exterior of the building as reinforcing shall be removed only as the area directly adjacent to the reinforcing piece is being demolished. The bolts, which attach the angles to the building, shall be unscrewed or burned off. North Building: The remaining spandrel beams that make up the existing perimeter roof structure shall be removed using a crane. After the beam is attached to the crane, the columns shall be cut either by a hydraulic scythe or by workmen using 15#hammers to chip away the column directly below the beam and cut the reinforcing. This will allow the beam to be picked up by the crane and lowered to the ground. During this operation, a police detail will be employed to assist in assuring the public's safety. Other precautions will be the closing off of the sidewalk on Lafayette Street and the closing of Central Street as work is performed in each respective area. During the work, covered scaffolding shall be installed to allow the public safe access along the street. The concrete block piers shall be removed by hand using lifts and 15#hammers. The exterior walls of the lower floors shall be removed using similar techniques to those described above for the removal of the exterior of the south building. } Engine House Access: Construction Managers • Builders 27 Congress Street Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Telephone (978) 744-9300 Fax (978) 744-8320 Estimating Fax (978) 744-6463 James J.Welch&Co.Incorporated The entry to Engine House shall be protected with a covered walkway leading from the street to the entry doors. Demolition work directly above the entry way shall be scheduled for times that the restaurant is not open to any minimize potential danger to patrons. Windows to the store shall be covered with plywood during the demolition in order to make sure that if there is a stray piece of debris that falls to the ground no damage will result. Salem Laundry Roof: The roof of the existing one story building on the north side of the project has been covered with five quarter inch plywood and then with two by tens for a distance of eight feet from the building. For the next eight feet the roof has been covered with plywood. Demolition work over this area will be scheduled for off hours when people are not occupying the space. Demolition work shall be done similar to the manner described for the sides of the north building. Construction Managers • Builders 27 Congress Street Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Telephone (978) 744-9300 Fax (978) 744-8320 Estimating Fax(978) 744-6463 CITY OF SALEM PUBLIC PROPERTY DEPARTMENT huuirau.ionri�rou. \1woa 130 AA'.psi f INC JON Srararr+ tiM_i.-:ni.M,\.c:\a iui-:ri:v 019-0 117.:9-8-74i 9595 ♦ I y\.978-740-9846 February 8, 2006 Shirley Walker Unit 507 Derby Lofts 51 Lafayette Street Salem, MA 01970 Dear Ms. Walker; As a result of our meeting with you today, and due to the on-going nature of this issue, this office is requiring that you open the wall at the Living Room side of the Utility Room so that a thorough inspection of this area may be conducted. Due to the lack of As Built Drawings from this project there is no way to ascertain the nature of the heat signature that has been detected at this location. Once this wall has been opened for our inspection, we may hopefully find the source of this on-going problem, and work towards U solution. We remain very concerned as to the source of the heat in this area, and feel that this work should be done within the next 14 days. If you have any further questions or concerns please feel free to call this office at (978) 745 — 9595 ext. 5640. S cerely, �Jo, ph E. Ba can, Jr. I A istant Building Inspector CC: file ■ March 2, 2007 Derby Lofts LLC c/o RCG LLC 17 Ivaloo Street Mr. Thomas St. Pierre Suite 100 Building Commissioner Somerville, MA 02143 Public Properties Department and Building Office T 617 625 8315 F 617 625 8345 City of Salem 120 Washington Street MPicarsic@RCG-LLC.com www.RCG-LLC.com Salem, MA 01970 By Certified Mail and First Class Mail RE: 51 Lafayette Street, Unit 507 Follow-up to Inspection on February 27, 2007 Dear Tom: Following our meeting with you, Mr. Paul Wakem, the State Building Inspector from the Commonwealth's Department of Public Safety, Mr. Rich Grant of the Cranney Companies, Mr. Bob Leach of Nauset Construction, and Ms. Shirley Walker, the Owner of Unit 507, 1 am hereby providing you with a formal response as to the actions we are taking, on behalf of the previous owner of this unit, Derby Lofts LLC, to address the concerns raised by you and Mr. Wakem. 1) By March 30, 2007, we will have the original trade contractor complete and/or repair the firecaulking in the chase location opened in Unit 507 where the firecaulking was missing. If the original trade contractor is not responsive, Derby Lofts LLC will hire someone else to complete this work in that timeframe. 2) By March 30, 2007, we will compile for your office evidence that the required firecaulking work was completed during the original construction project. As your office is aware, Derby Lofts LLC and its original general contractor, subsequent construction manager, and various trade contractors performed extensive work in these chases and on the pipes and vents running through them, and we are confident this work was completed and inspected during the construction project. We believe the issue noted in Unit 507 was atypical of the condition of the other chases in the building but will spot-check some other chases to confirm this belief. 1 3) By March 30, 2007, we will provide your office with a disc containing the as-built drawings the trade contractors have produced for the original construction project. 4) We will formally request that the mechanical trade contractor, Commercial Air Control, provide your office with the air-flow calculations for the duct distribution inside Unit 507 by March 30, 2007. As you know, Commercial Air Control performed this work on a design-build basis. We will also have Commercial Air Control verify whether the ducts installed throughout the building were sealed properly. 5) Per your request, given the complaints by the Owner of Unit 507, we will notify the owner of Unit 1 of Derby Lofts Condominium, the space in which Engine House Pizza operates, that your office, in consultation with Mr. Wakem, is requiring that the operating restaurant connect its oven to the welded exhaust duct installed through the building by no later than March 30, 2007. 6) Regarding the two Unit 507-specific concerns, we intend to do the following: a. We will investigate the temperature of the unit and suggest a solution to the Unit Owner. We will first monitor the temperature in multiple places in the Unit and have a code consultant review the results. We have requested a proposal from Cranney Companies, and another qualified engineering firm, to place the temperature-reading devices and report the results.We expect to have this completed in the next week. b. Given the concerns of sound transmission in one particular area of the unit from Unit 407 below, we will first investigate an alleged crack in Unit 407 ceiling and hire an acoustical engineer to conduct a test for sound transmission. We will report the results of these investigations to your office and our intended plan of action within the next 30 days. Should you require any updates in the interim, please feel free to contact me directly at(617)625-7817. Sincerely, Matthew Picarsic On behalf of Derby Lofts LLC cc: Mr. Paul Wakem Department of Public Safety Tewksbury Hospital Dietary Building, East Street Tewksbury, MA 01876 2 ■ March 30, 2007 Derby Lofts LLC c/o RCG LLC 17 Ivaloo Street Mr. Thomas St. Pierre Suite 100 Building Commissioner Somerville, MA 02143 Public Properties Department and Building Office T 617 625 8315 F 617 625 8345 City of Salem 120 Washington Street MPicarsic@RCG-LLC.com www.RCG-LLC.com Salem, MA 01970 By Certified Mail and First Class Mail RE: 51 Lafayette Street, Unit 507 Update on Follow-up to Inspection on February 27, 2007 Dear Tom: We would like formally to update you with the progress made on investigating concerns raised during our site meeting on February 27, 2007 and the steps we outlined we would take in the letter to you on March 2, 2007. 1 think you will find that we did make significant progress towards addressing many of the concerns. Some additional investigation and actions do remain necessary and we have outlined our intended action plan below for your records. I must note that we act only on behalf of Derby Lofts LLC, who was the original owner of the construction project there, and not on behalf of the condominium association or any one particular unit owner in the condominium. Additionally, as you know, Derby Lofts LLC retained a series of licensed professionals for the design and construction, and we must honor those contractual relationships in investigating any concerns. We believe it is important to separate those issues that relate to Unit 507 specifically and the concerns you raised about other items in the building. As such, we have organized the items here accordingly. It has been our priority to first address the concerns of the Unit Owner, and unfortunately, arranging for consultants, executing contracts, scheduling the work and then receiving the reports has taken longer than we had hoped. Nevertheless, we believe we will have completely resolved the three items of concern in Unit 507 by the end of April. 1 All other remaining items identified as a concern during the last meeting relate to building elements. As the agent for the previous owner of the building, we have been in contact with the licensed construction supervisor, the architect and engineers, the various design-build engineers, and trade contractors who worked on the construction of the project. We have made progress on all of the items and have provided an update below. Based on conversations you and Mr. Wakem had with RCG personnel on March 29. 2007, we understand you would like additional work completed that was not previously contemplated during our February site visit. 1) Relative to your request that we provide evidence that the chases in the building were constructed properly, as we indicated we would do in our March 2, 2007 letter, we have assembled documentation, including a few pictures taken after the completion of the construction of the chases, indicating that the chases and any pipes running through were properly installed. The photographs are attached as Exhibit 3. I now understand that from your conversations with RCG personnel on March 29, 2007 that you request additional investigation, including photographs of more chases at this time, or alternatively, the issuance of a report from an engineer indicating the chases were properly constructed. While we received a certificate of substantial completion from the architect of record prior to obtaining any building occupancy permits, copies of which are attached hereto as Exhibit 4, given the fact that the one chase opened was not completely compliant, we do intend to investigate a few chases first by opening them in small sections and allowing you to inspect them again in units that are still owned by Derby Lofts LLC. We will also discuss your suggestion of utilizing a camera for investigation with an engineer if that still seems appropriate following the spot-check of a series of additional chases. 2) Relative to your request for copies of as-built drawings, we have assembled a package of the as- built drawings Derby Lofts LLC received as well as copies of the SKA and SKS drawings and building department correspondence. We have burned them onto three discs, as you requested. These discs are enclosed herewith for your records. 3) Relative to your request for confirmation that air-flow calculations and duct sealant, Commercial Air Control, the design-build mechanical contractor has provided two written letters, both of which are attached hereto as Exhibits 5 and 6, indicating that the duct sealant was installed properly and that the air-flow distribution is code compliant. I understand that following your March 29, 2007 conversation that you are requesting additional information, including drawings of the approved system design. We anticipate receiving these documents from Commercial Air Control and submitting them to your office by no later than the end of April. 3 4) Per your request, we sent a certified letter to the owner of Unit C-1 of the Derby Lofts Condominium, Mr. David Walsh, indicating that your office in consultation with Mr. Wakem had ordered that the operating restaurant connect its oven to the welded exhaust duct installed through the building by no later than March 30, 2007. A copy of the returned receipt of the letter is attached as Exhibit 7. Since all work in the common area of the building required for the chase was completed previously, the remaining work relates specifically to work in Unit C-1. Mr. Walsh has indicated that his intention was to connect to this duct at the time of renovation to Unit C-1 or at the time of relocation of the restaurant equipment and that this timeline had been previously approved. I have suggested to Mr. Walsh that he visit your office early next week to finalize next steps. It is important to note that any non-compliance here relates specifically to Unit C-1, a unit that Derby Lofts LLC has never owned. Should you require any updates in the interim, please feel free to contact me directly at(617)625-7817. We will provide you with another formal update at the end of April. Sincerely, Y l Matthew Picarsic On behalf of Derby Lofts LLC cc: Mr. Paul Wakem Department of Public Safety Tewksbury Hospital Dietary Building, East Street Tewksbury, MA 01876 4 1) Relative to the concerns identified in the chase in Unit 507, specifically the incompletely installed firecaulking, it was requested by your office in conversations subsequent to our March 2, 2007 letter that an independent engineer review the condition prior to any work being completed. We then hired engineering consultant LVR Corporation at our own expense to review the chase independently, and LVR Corporation conducted its site visit March 23, 2007. We expect LVR Corporation to issue its report within the week, at which time we will submit the report for your review. We then intend to proceed with the work required, as per LVR Corporation's recommendations shortly after receiving your permission to do so. As we have indicated to the Unit 507 owner, we believe we know what work needs to be completed and that this work will take very little time in the unit, but we are not able to proceed until you have reviewed this engineering report. 2) Relative to the concerns raised over the temperature of the interior of the unit, shortly after our meeting, we contracted with the Cranney Companies at our own expense to install temperature reading devices throughout the unit. The time series data produced from these tests are attached hereto as Exhibit 1. This investigation revealed that the unit temperature meets all applicable codes and, according to the Cranney Companies, that the temperature of the unit relates to the ambient temperature outside and not any heat source from inside the unit. As we believed before, the fact that this unit receives significant sunlight, has large windows, is well insulated and has thick concrete floors enables the unit to retain heat quite well. While installing thicker shades or curtains or occasionally opening the operable windows would likely help reduce the heat in the unit, we have also asked Cranney Companies for a suggestion on what modifications can be completed to the HVAC system to allow it to operate fully during all seasons of the year. A copy of this proposal is attached as Exhibit 2. We intend to discuss this option with the unit owner in the next week. 3) Relative to alleged concerns of sound transmission in the unit, we have investigated the so- called crack in Unit 407 and have determined that this believed-to-be crack is simply an area where a new section of slab was doweled into and poured next to the existing concrete slab during construction and does not represent a structural concern or a potential source of sound or heat transmission. We also hired Cavanaugh Tocci Associates at our own expense to conduct a full acoustical sound test in Unit 507, which was completed on March 27, 2007. While we await the final report, a copy of which will be forwarded to you and the Unit 507 owner upon its completion, the consultant who conducted the test indicated to RCG representatives that the STC ratings observed exceed the Massachusetts State Building Code requirements. Pending final review of the published report, no additional action may be necessary on this item. 2 �oNulr� CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS BOARD OF APPEAL CITY OF'SALEM. MA gT 120 WASHINGTON STREET.3RD FLOOR CLERK'S OFFICE SALEM, MA 01970 '✓ e� TEL (978) 745-9595 9g�mreW� FAX (978) 740-9846 STANLEY J. USOVICZ, JR. 1003 JAN -2 P 3: 5b MAYOR DECISION OF THE PETITION OF ENGINE HOUSE PLAZA REALTY TRUST REQUESTING A VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 51-71 LAFAYETTE STREET B-5 A hearing on this petition was held December 18, 2002 with the following Board Members present: Nina Cohen, Chairman, Richard Dionne, Stephen Hams, and Bonnie Belair Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening New in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. The petitioner is requesting a Variance from Table 3 of B-5 density regulation uses from the following; maximum lot are per dwelling unit, maximum height of buildings and floor area ratio to add 2 additional stories and residential uses for the property located at 51-71 Lafayette Street located in an B-5 zone. The Variances, which have been requested, upon a finding Board that: a. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land,building Or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands,buildings, and structure involve. b. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioners.. c. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and Without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of this district of the purpose of the Ordinance The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1. Petitioner is a Real Estate Trust, One Engine House Plaza Realty Trust, whose trustees are Michael J. O;Brian,David Walsh and Philip Hansbury. Petitioner's plans to redevelop for mixed retail and residential use for the property at 51-71 Lafayette St. known as the Salem Laundry Building. Attorney Scott Grover of 222 Essex represented the petitioners. 2. A recent analysis by Structures North Engineering uncovered an array or structural problems with the tum of the century property, including inadequacies of the roof, supporting members and the Lafayette St. fagade. The cost of reconstructing the building will be considerable, potentially exceeding one million dollars. ' DECISION OF THE PETITION OF ENGINE HOUSE PLAZA REALTY TRUST REQUESTING A VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 51-71 LAFAYETTE STREET B-5 page two To recover reconstruction costs, the owners plan to convert the building to residential use and create 55 condominium units. 3. Petitioners plan to add two stories, to a total building height of 78 feet. Retail use on The first floor will be retained. Parking for the owners of the condo units will be at the City of Salem's South Harbor Garage because there is no on-site parking. The project will retain the existing footprint and will preserve elements of the original design in a reconstructed core. 4. Since the Salem Laundry building does not meet density regulations for new construction,the petitioners are seeking variances from minimum lot area per dwelling unit to allow 379 square foot per unit, floor area ratio for a ratio of 5.54.1 and building height for a total height of 78 feet. As support for their request, petitioners argue that a literal enforcement of the provisions of the ordinance would be detrimental not just to the owners but to the City of Salem,because it would preclude the restoration and reuse of the historic property. 5. Petitioners will seek approval of the redevelopment plan from the Salem Redevelopment Authority and the Design Review Board,from the Planning Board and from the Conservation Commissioner. They have support for their plan from Claudia Chuber, Ward 1 Councillor, Joan Lovely,Ward 3 Councillor, Joan Kantor and Nick Helides, condomimin owners at 20 Central Street and from Salem Main Street executive director Deborah Griel. Conditional support for the project was voiced by Staley McDermet architect and former member of the Salem Redevelopment Authority,who suggested that approval of the variances should be contingent upon the preservation of the existing massing, masonry and concrete exterior wall surfaces, and detailing on the brick portion of the building. On the basis of the above finding of fact, the evidence presented at the hearing,the Zoning Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship to the petition. 3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and Without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. DECISION OF THE PETITION OF ENGINE HOUSE PLAZA REALTY TRUST REQUESTING A VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 51-71 LAFAYETTE STREET B-5 page three Therefore,the Zoning Board of Appeal voted 5-0, to grant the Variances requested, subject to the following conditions; 1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statures, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted and approved by the Building Commissioner. 3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety shall be strictly adhered to. 4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to beginning any construction 5. A Certificate of Occupancy shall be obtained. 6. Petitioner shall obtain approval from all City Boards or Commission having jurisdictions including,but not limited to, the Planning Board. 7. Petitioner shall obtain a yearly parking permit within 1,000 feet and renew them on a yearly basis for the condo owners. Variance Granted December 18, 2002 N?i/ 06C Board of Appeal .1 A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CIITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 day date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11. The Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certificate of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that is has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. Board of Appeal c STREET PERMIT Citp of *oiem mrw� Office of ingpcctor of 3guilbing.1 iii y.7falf, 20 G 'jJermi'ssion is Srere6y9iuen to r In-e 1/ n G A f //\�./ d a to occupy`or 4)i. P r!'�_ purposes (' y in�ronl oFeslale S) ( A 'rA,"i P.14 o`srdea ✓ f ]Errs permil is lmr'ledlo _ n u A217 �f 20 0 , sub ecl to l ie prour'srons o,flzre ordnances andslalules�!o cSlreels andllae gnspeclion andCO3F2Slruclion of3urldnys in(Fre Ciy olccSalem. ��^ 'TJirec/wof J�'u6/b c$erur'cer (//y//�///�fj ///�1�j� .�/napec/ate ol.`�vi/✓inyv fYY'''—1 �i na/vre o .A ('cool�/ .A r f//y AI fln ACORD CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE CSR MM I DATE(MWDDM) 1ENG01 12/03/01 PRODUCER .T ' THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE John J Walsh Ina Agency, Inc HOLDER.THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND,EXTEND OR P O Box 4407 ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. Salem NA 01970-6407 Phone: 978-745-3300 Fax:978-745-9557 INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE INSURED INSURERA: Lloyds INSURER B: One Engine House Plaza INSURER C: 71 Lafayette Street INsuRER D: Salem MA INSURER E: COVERAGES THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED.NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT,TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN,THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS,EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES.AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSRrypE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATIOLIMITS LTR DATE MWODNY ' DATE QVIXE T GENERAL LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1000000 A X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY ML0105026 11/19/01 11/19/02 FIRE DAMAGE(Anyone fire) $ 50000 CLAIMS MADE 1-1 OCCUR MED EXP(Any one person) $ 5000 PERSONAL B ADV INJURY $ 1000000 GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 200000 GENT AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: PRODUCTS-COMP/OP AGS $ included POLICY P"_ LOC JECT AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT $ ANY AUTO (Ea accident) ALL OWNED AUTOS BODILY INJURY SCHEDULED AUTOS (Per person) $ HIREDAUTOS BODILY INJURY $ NON-OWNED AUTOS (Per accident) PROPERTY DAMAGE $ (Per accident) GARAGE LIABILITY AUTO ONLY-EA ACCIDENT $ ANY AUTO OTHER THAN EA ACC $ AUTO ONLY: AGO $ EXCESS LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE $ OCCUR F-1 CLAIMS MADE AGGREGATE $ DEDUCTIBLE $ RETENTION $ 0TATU M_ $ WORKERS COMPENSATION AND TORY LIMITS ER EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY E.L.EACH ACCIDENT $ E.L.DISEASE-EA EMPLOYEE $ E.L.DISEASE-POLICY LIMIT $ OTHER A Commercial Applica ML0105026 11/19/01 11/19/02 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONSILOCATIONSNEHICLES/EXCLUSIONS ADDED BY ENDORSEMENT/SPECIAL PROVISIONS CERTIFICATE HOLDER N I ADDITIONAL INSURED;INSURER LETTER: CANCELLATION 0001003 SHOULDANY OFTHEABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORETHE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF,THE ISSUING INSURER WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL DAYS WRITTEN City of Salem NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT,BUT FAILURE TO DO SO SHALL Building Dept Peter Strout IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY OF ANYKIrID HE INSURER,ITS AGENTS OR Washington St //�� Salem MA 01970 REPRESENTATIVEI . �'1'inWHli��f(al�l,t A(ltN AUTHORIZED REPRESE A V ACORD 25S(7197) ©ACORD CORPORATION 1988 r H IMPORTANT If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED,the policy(ies)must be endorsed.A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED,subject to the terms and conditions of the policy,certain policies may require an endorsement.A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). DISCLAIMER The Certificate of Insurance on the reverse side of this form does not constitute a contract between the issuing insurer(s),authorized representative or producer,and the certificate holder,nor does it affirmatively or negatively amend,extend or alter the coverage afforded by the policies listed thereon. ACORD 25S(7197) _i C0:^!ONS7EALTH OF "_'15SACF1IISL11J ' CITY OF SALEM APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE OF INSPECTION Date, �j 'X, 1 `117 (jU Fee_Required S ( ) No Fee Required In accordance with the provisions of the Massachusetts State Building Code. Sect 108, 15, 1 hereny apply for a Cerrificate of Inspection for the below-owed premises located ac the following address: Street 6 Number '7 t - Name of Premises Purpose for which Promises is used License(s) or Permits) requirsd_,for the premises by ocher Governmental Agencies: License or Permit Acencv �rrifA care to be issued to: CL Address: a o X: —�� /naa�f Record of Building: CD tD ?J C= L Address: JName Present Holder of Certificate: mdame o gent. :f anv. . . Av 1,el F2 Signature or Person CD wDom Lert:ficare TIRE is issued or hisiher auracrized agent Date INa'SRuCiiOHS• Day time phone 1. Hake checic payable cc: The City of Salem 2. Return chis application with your check to: Insnecror of Buildings. City of Salem Building Department. One Salem Green. Salem. MA. 01970. PLEASE NOSE: 1. Application form with required fee must be submitted for each building or structure of part thereof to be certified. 2. Application 6 fee must be received before the certificate will be issued. 3. The building official shall be notified within ten (10) days of anv change in the above informacion. CEB.IZFICATE 1 3 9 ESPIEATION DATE: (Ulz _ CP dad ti' PERIODIC INSPECTION REPORT w This form is to be completed each time a Periodic Inspection is made. At the time a new Certificate of Inspection is issued, a notation indicating that the fee has been paid will be made to Application Form prior to the new Certificate of Inspection being issued. Any changes since the last inspection are to be added to the file card of the premises. / Street 5 Number l6�[ Tw�f�[ Name of Premises Certificate to be issued to: �� Ci X17 P L) Address Owner of Record of Building Address Purpose for which premises are used Changes since last Inspection (required on file card also) i. /M cool 2. 3. 4. 5. Date Order Issued: Order Issued To: Address Date Violations Corrected: REMARKS: I have this day inspected the above premises, and the same conforms to the pertinent requirements of the Massachusetts State Building Code and the rules and regulations pursuant thereto. � - a C) - Date Building Offic• 1 Certificate f / 3 - Date Issued: q Date Expires: �r / Recommended Next Inspection• � c��.� (�nmmnn�u.ett1#!� of �tt��ttrl�ix,ttpi�,tt x CITY/TOWN OF 0 In accordance with the Massachusetts State Building Code, Section 108. 15, this CERTIFICATE OF INSPECTION is issued to . . . . . .'C ni. ; 0 C. . . . . . . .A� U.V. 9. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ]I ( e rtlf, that I have inspected the.. .. . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . known as. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ✓ located at. . . . . . . . ./. . . ."/. . .X-ro'le— 1 �. `'T�. in the. . . . . . . . . . . . .of . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . County of. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Commonwealth of Massachusetts. The means of egress are sufficient for the following number of persons: BY STORY Story Capacity Story Capacity Story Capacity Story Capacity BY PLACE OF ASSEMBLY OR STRUCTURE Place of Assembly Place of Assembly or Structure Capacity Location . , or Structure Capacity Location y q 15T" X3 - 98 Certificate Number Date Certificate Issued Date Certificate Expires Building Offictl9t The building official shall be notified within (10) days of any changes in the above information. . t s 944 Tnuimnnmpttl#1� i C I T Y OF S A L E 1VI xr �j2€, fit �^.yY^1 In accordance. with the Massachusetts State Building CodelSectionY�108. th[si�`, Iq + ,, - +f 11 s . CERTIFICATE OF INSPECTI7. ONS r t4 IF ,1•. Ei'aGlr4l:= !"IOUf.E FII S -AURANT is issued to ss 7 KYPYY�i E�IGI'NE ' HOUSE that 1 have inspected the premises known as V0-1 LAI=AYI TTE STREET located at in the city of Salem . § , t 'wi i"! ti �iygk i"r i',"�J sr pppr ;, r „ yis + �9 • E - .. T Ir Jit ` q!� '.$6 I k - ( County of Essex Commonwealth of Massachusetts The means of , egress are{{?? sufftetent7{ f}y�sorTthe followings i 4+r. number of persons: Y �i r� r ttA BY STORY A+� X,F'F S�...Ti Story Cap,$s,i,�y$%%% b 4 fb Capacity Story•,. ChP�� bb!b161671i' k� '.��g rCapac[tY t. .. _ � t'k•. x k is S 1 S .. S .1 �_: t _ -�. .. - •- �p�jv�1;�, 4t6r ql J*. i 't to �,� d + s , BY PLACE OF ASSEMBLY OR STRUCTURE ss I ,r y r5 « r a i `Place of Assembly Place of Assembly r or .Structure Capacity Location or Structure F Capacity Location e' 1 r / k Tib i; � iG '' y .-. RESTAURAN"F' A. 1 T. FLOOR, Y 5,+'!sr t :j +�, s, ty y,y ks 5F ` +f} r. v; ' t' lAo R: Y 1 y t !'1 • J�� !'i.., 00"13 1996 Os/1 IID1./16.'tl ZB/idl /1359 . r,t 'Ce4tificate .Number Date Certificate Issued Date Certificate Expires "' ,�� Build[rig. Offi al -:-1 + t The building official shall be notified within (•j0) days of;uny changes in the above informations + -:,y + w. '„•' Jr 4 LxSt At F• 1 - t q' fi� k i 3M i 11 ,di'Ai1.,,. v.,tY xe,t?k`.1<.'.4cssx•3:v:,ar,rt� +Y-;<w,*. .)I'�a.:n,�,: A....,. ..�. GREAT NORTH PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 182 NEWBURY STREET TEL: 978-278-4000 PEABODY, MA 01960 FAX: 978-278-4008 September 12, 2007 Mr. Thomas St. Pierre Building Inspector City of Salem One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 RE: Derby Lofts Condominium Dear Mr. St. Pierre: It has been brought to my attention that a unit owner of Derby Lofts Condominium, Ms. Shirley Walker, has been in contact with your department on numerous occasions relative to common area concerns at Derby Lofts. Although we completely understand your obligation to investigate any matters brought to your attention, we respectfully request that you contact us, as the managing agent of the condominium and the authorized agent for the Board of Trustees, if you schedule a site visit so that I may be in attendance to answer any of your questions or concerns. I may be reached at the above telephone number or via email at Janinen,Qreatnorth.net and am happy to speak with you regarding any concerns or issues that may arise. Thank you for your attention and I appreciate your consideration. Sincerely, a' J ' e M. Racanovic roperty Manager Cc: The Honorable Kimberly Driscoll Derby Lofts Board of Trustees -coIDmllrllty JGCA, INC. b. James J.Welch&Co. Incorporated November 7, 2003 City of Salem Public Property Dept. 120 Washington St., 3"1 Floor Salem, MA 01970 Attn: Thomas St. Pierre Acting Building Commissioner Re: 270-2004 (Demolition Permit) 51-71 Lafayette Street Dear Mr. St. Pierre, I received a copy of your letter dated 11/5/03, to Derby Lofts LLC. We understand that the demo permit only allows for the removal of non-structural work, and as we discussed, that is at l we are planning to remove. We are using the Bobcats to remove only concrete floor toppings that were placed at various locations on top of the structural slabs. We have been in touch with both Winter Street Architects (the building's Architect), and Structures North (the building's Structural Engineer). We have submitted to them a plan to monitor the condition of the building during the interior demolition work per your instructions. Included in that plan is the provision that we will block the sidewalks immediately below the area that the work is being done. We will also man that area with a Flagman who will monitor the condition of the exterior of the building, as well as watch for the safety of any pedestrian traffic. Thank you for your advice and assistance in this matter. Sincerely5::� Michae .FWe4c M.T W/cj m cc: RCG`LLC Winter Street Architects Structures Noi-tli Construction Managers • Builders 27 Congress Street Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Telephone (978) 744-9300 Fax (978) 744-8320 Estimating Fax(978) 744-6463 3M FIRE STOP SUBMITTAL �. �- Project: Derby Lofts —�� c jef jQ �� Salem, Mass. Contractor:D & K Insulation Manufacturer: 3M Corporation St. Paul, Minnesota Contact: Sean Portley Phone: (401) 619-1122 Distributor: General Insulation Company I RSTAEETT,a[TECTS.INC. ESSEX 9TAEESALEM,MA 01970 Contact: Gerry Towle NO Phone: (617) 799-8345 C MAKE EXCEPTIONS N [� HAKE CORRECTIONS NOTED p CONFIRM REVISE AND RESUBMIT ❑ REJECTED Cheng is Only for tienarat co n"anos Submittal Contains: general compliance with the irdorme5on given in the cmbact decumwli. Any action shchm is subject to the require- rnents at the plaits and specifications. 1) Certificate of Conformance Contractor is respori ;ble for datensions 2) UL Details gab Ieet e�donya and �ewase c 3) Product Data ofhisorh kw�wmc 'offdotheerr` n trades;and the sedakt Wfy performance of his or her twit. By: , Date: The following manual contains through penetration fire stop systems and construction joint systems tested and listed as per ASTM E814/UL1479 and ASTM E1399/UL2079. These systems are specific to the job and comply with both BOCA and project spec requirements. I i i 3M Fire Protection Products GENERAL CERTIFICATE OF CONFORMANCE DESCRIPTION: 3M"FIRE BARRIER PRODUCTS Fir eDam'"Sproy 100 Fire Barrier CS-195+Composite Sheet FireDam'"150 Caulk Fire Barrier Sealant CP-25WB+ Fire Barrier FS-195+Wrap Strip Fire Barrier 2000 Silicone Sealant Fire Barrier Moldable Putty+(MP+) Fire Barrier 2000+Silicone Sealant Fire Barrier Ultra Plastic Pipe Device(PPD) Fire Barrier 2001 Silicone RTVFoam - Interam'"Ultra GS Wrap Fire Barrier Sealant FD 150+ - Fire Barrier Watertight Sealant1000NS Expantrol'"FlexiblelnhrmescentSeal(E-FIS) Fire Barrier Watertight Sealant 1003 SL Fire Block Sealant FB 136 Fire Barrier Watertight Sealant 3000 WT Fire Barrier Marine Wrap Fire Barrier Mortar Fire Barrier Ultra RC Pack Fire Barrier Pillow-FB249,FB269,FB369 Fire Barrier Sealant IC 15WB Fire Barrier Cast-In Devices E-5A-3 and E-5A-4 Mats THESE PRODUCTS ARE TESTED TO ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS: • ASTM E-119(ANSUUL 263)Fire Tests of Building Construction and Materials Time-Temperature Curve • ASTM E-814(ANSI/UL 1479)Fire Tests of Through-Penetration Fire Stops(under positive fumace pressure of minimum.01 inches of water column) • ASTM E-84(ANSFUL 723)Surface Burning Characteristics of Building Materials • ASTM E-1966(ANSUUL 2079)Test for Fire Resistance of Building Joint Systems • NFPA 252 Standard Methods of Fire Test and DoorAssemblies • UBC Standard 7-2(97) • IMO Res.A.754(18) Y No asbestos,PCB's,or lead are used or contained in these products. Quality Manager or Designee Fire Protection Laboratory Manager or Designee ao Date Date 8-31-04 1 ofl 3M Fire Protection Products APPROVALS h��rium:t-800-328-1681 www.3m.com/frestop (6me ap%x 4(m W 0H DEMMD i System No.C-AJ-1044 Fair AuguA23,2004 (Formerly System No.319) FRatings—2,3,and 4Fir(See Items 2A and 4) TRating—Olin L Rating At Ambient-2 CFM/sq ft 'j LRating At400F—loss than lCFM/sgft WRating—ClassI(Seeltem,l 2 , t o r--A 4 O 7 N 2 3 3 < �A SECTION A-A Q L Floor or Wall Assembly—Lightweigbt ornormal weight(100.150pcf)concrete.Except wanted intableunder ltem4,min � thickwasofsolidconerete flamer wall assemblyis4-1/2in.Floormay alsobeconstructedofanymin 6m.thick UL Classified iA hollow core Precast Concrete Units'.When floor is constructed ofhollow core precast concrete units,packing material(item 3) and caulk fill material(Item 4)to be installed symmetrically on both sides of floor,flush with floor surface.Wall assembly may also be constructed of any UL Classified Concrete Blacks-.Max dim ofopening is in solid lightweight or normal weight concrete. Floor is 32 in.Max dim of opening in floor constructed ofholtow-cote precast concrete units is 7 in. See Concrete Blacks(CAZT)and Precast Concrete Units(CFTV)categories in the Fire Resistance Directory for names of .t(A manufacturers. IA, Steel Sleeve(Optional,not shown)—Max 15 in.11)(or smaller)Schedule 10(or heavier)steel sleeve cast or grouted into floor or - wall assembly.Sleeve may extend a max oft in.above top of floor or beyond either surface of wall.Max 16 in.ID(or smaller)min _ 0.028 wall thickness(or heavier)galvanized steel sleeve cast or grouted into floor or wall assembly.Sleeve may extend amax of 12 in,beyond either surface officer or wall. 2. Through Penetrants—One metallic pipe,conduit or tubing to be installed either concentrically oreaentricallywithin the fuestop system.Max annular space between pipe,conduit or tubing and edge ofthrough opening or sleeve is dependent on the parameters shown in Item 4.Min amularspace between pipe or conduit and edge ofthmugh opening is zero in.(point contact).Pipe conduit or tubing to be rigidly supported on both sides offloor orwall assembly.The following types and sizes ofinetallic pipes,conduits or tubing maybewed: .� A. Steel Pipe—Nom 30 in.dim(or smaller)Schedule 10(or heavier)steel pipe. N B. Iron ripe—Nom 30 im dim(or smaller)cast or ductile iron pipe. N C. Conduit—Nam 6in.dim(or snudler)rigid steel conduit. D. Conduit—Nam 4 in.diam(or smaller)steel electrical metallic tubing. W E. Copper—lbbingNam 6 in.dim(or smaller)Type L(or heavier)copper tube. E Capper Pipe—Nam 6in.dim(or smaller)Regular(or heavier)copper pipe- 3. Packing Material—Polyethylene backer and or nom l in.thickness oftightly-packed mineral wool bah or glass fiber insulation firmly packed into opening as a permanent from.Packing material to be recessed from top surface of floor or from both surfaces of wall as required to accommodate the requiredthickmess of caulk fill material(Item 4). 4. Ffll,Yoid or Cavity Material"—Caulk or Sealant—Applied to fid the amularspace flush with top surface rffloor.in wall assemblies, required caulk thickness to be installed symmetrically on both sides ofwall,flush with wall surface.At point contact location between peaetu nt and sleeve or between penetrant and concrete,a min 1/4 in.diam bead of caulk shall he applied at top surface of floor and at both surfaces ofwall.The hourly F Ratings and the min required caulk thicknesses are dependent upon number of parameters,as shown in the following table: n Mla Floor or VW Nom Pip eMile e or MaxAmnular Min Caulk F O Thkmsln. Condult Diamin. Space In. Thlmsfin. Radng Ar n 2-12 1/2-12 1-3/8 12 2 2-12 12-12 3-1/4 1 2 (gym 4-12 12-6 1-3/8 1/4(a) 2 i 4.12 12.12 1-1/4 12 3 4-12 12-20 2 1 3 4-12 12-20 2 1 3 4-12 12-12 3-1/4 1 3 4-12 22.30 2 2 3 5-12 1/2-6 1-3/8 1 I(b) 4 (a)Min 2 in thidamess ofmineml wool batt insulation required in amtular space. (b)Min 1 in.thickness ofmineml wool halt insulation required in annular space on both sides of floor or wall assembly.Min I in.thickness ofcaulk to be installed flush with each surface offlooror wall assembly, i 3M COMPANY—CP 25W]3+caulk or FB-3000 WT sealant.(The W Rating applies only when FB-3000 WT sealant is used.) *Beating the UL Classification Marking This material was extruded and draws by 3M Poe hatertion Produds from the 2004 edition of the UI Fre Wlame Diredsry. 3M Fire Protection Products 1 o{1 www.3ncom/firestop m.com/8restop C-AJ-1044 0wmeopnm4forfAROBDBOD j I System No.C-AJ-2001 July09,2003 c (Formerly System No.64-A) O F Rating-2 Hr - TRahW-0,1-12 and2Hr(Seeltcm3) L Rating atAmbient—7 CFM/sq ft(See Item 3B) N L Rating at400 F-1 CFWsq ft(See Item 3B) y rl. 1 z 1 0 �A s .•a a < r a A - 0,i: L o ; 21?. SECTION A-A 1. Flooror Wall Assembly—Lightweight ormurnalweight(100-150pcfor 1600.2400kghn')concrete.Exceptas footnoted forfloor assembly in table under Item 3,min thickness ofsolid concrete floor orwali assembly is 4.12 in.(114 mm).Floorassemblymayalso be constructed of any min 6in.(152mm)thickUL Classified hollowcom Precast Concrete Units*.Wall mayalsobeconstructedof N any UL Classified Concrete Blocks*.Diam of opening through flomorwall lobe 0in.to1/4 in.(0 mm to 6 mm)largerthan the 0 outside diem ofnom 2 in.(51 mm)diem andsmallerpipes or conduits.Dim of openingto be 0 in.to 12 in.(0 mm to 13 nun)larger y than the outside diem of nom2-12 is(64 mm)diem and largerpipes m conduits.Max diem of opening is?in.(178 mm). to See Concrete Blocks(CAZT)and Precast Concrete Units(CFTV)categories in Fire Resistance Directory formursm of manufacturers. 0 2. Through Penetrants—One nonmetallic pipe or conduit to be centered in the through opening.Pipe or conduit to be rigidly CN supported on both sides ofthe floor or wall assembly The following types and sizes ofnonmetallic pipes or conduits may be used: A. Polvvluy'1 Chloride(PVC)Pipe—Nom6im(152 mm)them(or smaller)Schedule 40 solid-core PVC pipe for use in closed (process or supply)or vented(drain,waste or vent)piping system. B. Cellular—Com Polyvinyl Chloride(ecPVC)Pipe—Nom 4in.(102 mm)dim(or smaller)Schedule 40 cellular core PVC pipe for use in closed(process or supply)or vented(drain,waste or vent)piping system. C. Chlorinated Polyvinyl Chloride(CPVC)Pipe—Nom 6 in.(152 mm)diem(or smaller)SDR13.5 CPVC pipe forme in closed(process or supply)piping systems. D. Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene(ABS)Pipe—Nom 4in.(102 nun)dim(or matter)Schedule 40 solid-core ABS pipe for use in closed(process or supply)or vented(drain,waste or vent)piping systems. E. Cellular CoreAcrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene(ceABS)Pipe—Nom4in,(102 mm)dim(or mailer)Schedule 40 cellular core ABS pipe for use in closed(process or supply)or vented(drain,waste or veno piping systems. E Polybutylene(PB)Pipe—Nom 3 in.(76 mm)diem(or mailer)SDRI I(or heavier)PB pipe for use in closed(process or C t supply)or vented(drain,waste or vent)piping systems. O G. Rigid Nonmetallic Conduit++—Nom 4 in.(102 mm)diam(or smaller)(Schedule 40 or 80)PVC conduit installed in U accordance with Article 347 of the National Electric Code(NFPANo.70). H. Flame Retardant Polypropylene(FRPP)Pipe—Nom4 in.(102 mm)dim(or mallet)Schedule 40(or heavier)FRPP pipe for me in closed(process or supply)or vented(drain,waste or vent)piping systems. See Rigid Nonmetallic Conduit(DZKT)category in UL Electrical Construction Materials Directory for names of manufacturers. 3. Firestop System—The details of the fuestop system shall be as follows: A. F11I,1701d or Cavity Materials*—Wrap Strip—Nom l/4in.(6mm)trick intumescent elastomeric material faced on one side with aluminum foil,supplied in 1 in.and 2 in.(25 mm and 51 tom)wide strips.Strips lightly wrapped around nonmetallic pipe (foil side exposed)with the edges butted against the underside of die concrete floor or both sides of wall surface.Sufficient layers of wrap strip shall be installed to lap a min of 3/16 in.(5 mm)on the concrete around the entire perimeter of the through opening.The min wrap strip width and the min number of layers of imrequired is dependent unthe pipe type,the nom 1 � pipe diem,the wall of floor thickness and the hourly Rating required,as shown in the following table. i This material was extruded and drawn by 3M Fire Proledion Products from the 2003 edition of the BL Ore Res'slome Oiredory. WA Fire Protection Products AOTOFAX:uscrcanak.1-600.498.9563 WWW.3m.Wm/{fteslOp 177 Customer Service:OsarCurado1-800.328-1687 System No.C-AJ-2001 continued Folc� plpeType Nam Plpe AIInWallarFloor Wrap Ship MinWrap TRating Dim In.(min) Thlms In.(min) Width ln.(mm) Strip Layers Hr r PVC,ccPVC or CPVC 12 to 1-12(13 to 38) 2-12(64) 1(25) 1 0 b ABS,ccABS or FRPP(s) l2 to 1-112(13 to 38) 2-M(64) 1(25) 1 1 -� PVC,ccPVC or CPVC 12to2(13to51) 2-12(64) 2(51) 1 0 to Q PVC,ccPVC or CPVC 2(51) 2-12(64) 1(25) 2 0 -*, ABS,ccABS or FRPP(a) 2(51) 2-12(64) 1(25) 2 1 j PVC,ccPVC or CPVC 2-12 to 3(64 to 76) 2-12(64) 2(51) 2 0 PVC,ccPVC or CPVC 3-12 to 4(89 to 102) 2.12(64) 2(51) 3 0 PVC,ccPVC or CPVC, Wto 1-1/2(13 to 38) 4-1/2(114) 1(25) 1 2 ABS,ccPVC or FRPP(a) PVC,ccPVC,CPVC,ADS, 2(51) 4-12(114) 1(25) 2 2 ;.Z:' ABS,ccABSor FRPP(a) -�' PVC,ccPVC,CPVC, 2.1/2 to 3(64 to 76) 4-12(114) 1(25) 3 2 ABS,ccABSorFRPP(a) PVC,ccPVC,CPVC,ABS, 2-I/2 to3(64 to 76) 4-12(114) 2(51) 2 2 ccABS,PB or FRPP(a) rt PVC,ccPVCor CPVC 3-1/2 to 4(89 to 102) 4-12(114) 2(51) 2 1-12 PVC,ccPVC,CPVC, 3-12 to 4(89 to 102) 4-1/2(114) 2(51) 3 2 . A• ':_ ABS,ccABSorFRPP(b) PVC 6(c)(152) 4-1/2(114) 3(76) 3 0 � J• (a)-Requires use ofaluminust tape detailed in Item 3E. (b)-Requires use of pipe covering detailed in Item 3D- (c)-For D.(c)-For nom 6in,(152 men)diam pipe,I and 2 in.(25 and 51 mm),wide wrap strips are'Stacked"to attain nom 3 in.(76 mm)wap strip width. Each layer of wrap ship to be installed with butted seam with butted seams in successive layers staggered.Wap strip layers temporarily held in position using aluminum foil tape,steel wire tic,or equivalent.In wall assemblies,the wrap ship is to be installed us the some manner used for floor assemblies,but it shall be installed symmetrically on both sides ofthe J wall assembly 3M COTAPANY-FS-195+ B. Fm,Void or Cavity Materials*-Caulk or Putty(Not Shown)-Generous head ofcaulk or putty to be applied to outer rn perimeter of wap strip at its inecrfacewithflour orwall surface(s). N 3M COMPANY-CP 25WB+,IC I5WB caulk or MP+Stix putty N' (Note:L Ratings apply only when CP 25WB+caulk is used.) C. Steel Collar-Nom 1 in.,2 in.or 3 in.(25 tmm,51 mon or 76 mm)deep collar,dependent upon wap strip width,with 1-114 in. (32 mm)wide by 2 in.(51 mm)long anchor tabs and min 112 in.(13 mm)long tabs to retain wap strip layers.Coils ofprecut 0.016 in.(0.41 mnt)thick(28 gauge)galv sheet steel available from wrap strip manufacturer.As an alternate,collar may be field-fabricated from min 0.016 in.(0.41 mm)thick(28 gauge)gals sheet steel in accordance with instruction sheet supplied by wap strip manufacturer.Steel collar,with anchor tabs bent outward 90 deg,wrapped tightly around wrap strip layers with min I in.(25 mm)overlap at seam.Anchor tabs to be pressed tightly against Boor or wall surface(a),and collar to be compressed around wrap strip layers using a min 12 in.(13 nun)wide by 0.028 in.(0.71 mm)thick stainless steel band clamp at the collar midheight.Two band clamps are required frr 3 in(76 mm)high collar on nom 6 in.(152 mm)diam pipe.As an alternate to the band clamps,l in.and 2 in.(25 mm and 51 men)deep collars maybe secured by a means No.10 by 1/2 in. (13 mm)long sheet metal screws installed in the vertical axis at the center of the 1 in.(25 mm)overlap along the perimeter joint of the collar.A min of two and three straws are required for 1 in.and 2 in.(25 min and 51 men)deep collars,respectively. p Collar to be secured to Boor or wall surface(s)with 1/4 in.(6 ruts)diam by min 1-1/2 in.(38 mm)long steel expansion bolls,or 4 :3 equivalent,in conjunction with steel nuts and min i-1/4in.(32 mm)diam steel fender washers,Anchor bolts to be used with every other anchor tab or as described in the following which ever is greater.Tivo anchor bolts,synunetrically located,required for nom 12 in.(13 mm)to nom 2 in.(51 men)diam pipes.Three anchor bolts,symmetrically located,required for nom 2-1/2 in.to 3 is(64 mm to 76 mm)diam pipes.Foto anchor bolts,symmetrically located,required for nom 3-I/2 in.and 4 in (89 mm to 102 into)diam pipes.For 6 in.(152 mm)diam pipes,anchor bolts to beused with each anchor tab.Retainer tabs to be bent 90 deg toward pipe to lock wrap strip layers in position. D. Pipe Covering*(Not Shown)-Noml in.(25 mm)thick hollow cylindrical heavy density glass fiber units jacketed on the outside with an all service jacket.When required(seeable),min 6 in.(152 mm)length ofpipe covering installed around pipe at its egress from the steel collar(Item C)on the underside of floor or on both sides of wall.Pipe covering secured to pipe with steel wim ties spaced max 4 in.(102 rnm)OC.Edge ofpipe covering abutting steel collar to be seated with a min 114 in. (6 mm)diam bead ofcaulk or putty(Item B). See Pipe and Equipment Covering-Materials(13RGU)category in Building Materials Directory for names of manufacturers.Any pipe covering material meeting the above specifications mid bearing the UL Classification Marking with a Flame Spread Index of 25 or less and a Smoke Developed Index of 50 or less may be used. j i This material was extended and drown by X fire Protection Products from the 2003 edition of the OL Bre Resistance Directory. 3M Fire Protection Products AUTOFAX:USmConado:1.800-498-9563 www.3m.com/firestop 178 Customer Service:tiSuCmai 1400-328-1607 1 System No.C-AJ-2001 emytinued E. Foil'Cape(Not Shown)-When required(see tables),nom4 in.(102 mm)wide,3mil thick aluminum tape installed around C pipe prior to installation of wrap strip(Item 3A)or Firestop Device(Item 3F).Min one layer wrapped around pipe with edge of 0 tape flush with bottom of surface of floor mrd extending downward.In walls,min one layer wrapped around pipe flush with O both sides ofwall and extending outward. F. Firestop Device'(Not Shown)-As an altemate to Items A and C when nom 1.1/2,2,3,4 or 6 in.(38,51,76,102 or 152 mm) C diem nonmetallic pipes amused.a Firestop device consisting of a sheet-steel split collar lined with intumescent material and d provided with steel clips for attachment may be used.Firestop device to be installed on underside of floor or on both sides of S wall in accordance with the accompanying installation instructions.The Firestop device type to be used is dependent upon the 0) wall of floor thickness,the pipe type and nam pipe diem,as tabulated below: O L �C Nam Pipe Min Mall or Firestop h PdpeType Dlamin.(mm) FloorThknsln.(mm) Device PVC,ccPVC or CPVC, 1-1/2(38 mm) 2-1/2(64) PPD 1.5 or PPD 150 ABS;ccABS or FRPP(a) PVC,ccPVCor CPVC, 2(51 mm) 2.12(64) PPD 2 or PPD 200 114 ABS,ccABS m FRPP(a) .4) PVC,COW or CPVC 3(76 mm) 2-1/2(64) PPD 300 a PVC,ccPVC or CPVC 4(102 mm) 2-12(64) PPD 400 d PB 1-1/2(38 mm) 4-1/2(114 mm) PPD 150 PB 2(51 mm) 4-1/2(114 mm) PPD 200 PVC,ccPVCor CPVC, 3(76 mm) 4-12(114 men) PPD3 or PPD 300 ABS,ccABS or FRPP(a) !d PB 3(76 mm) 4-12(114 mm) PPD 300 !. PVC,cePVCorCPVC, 4(102 mm) 4-12(114 mm) PPD4 or PPD 400 ABS,ccABSor FRPP(a) 4(102 m 41/2(114 PPD401 4-12(114PVC 6(152 -Q PPD6 .Z (a)-Requiresuse of aluminum tape detailed inlmm 3E. (b)-Requires use of pipe covering detailed in Item 3D. 3M COMPANY ++Bearing the UL Listing Mark y "Bearing the UL Classification Mark N a) CD CD O N N N U U C V I I This material was extruded and drawn by 3M Fire Protection hoduds tram the 4003 edition of the Ut Fire Resistance Directory. i . Fire Protection Products AUTOFAX:USaCanoda1-800.498-9563 � www.3m.tom/fifesfop 179 Customer Service:USarC000do:l-800.328-1687 System No.C-AJ-1429 August23,2004 F.ce� FRating-2Hr TRating-0Hr W Rating—Class I(Sec Item 3) 2 2 ° 100 A; B 00000 ®® V L A 2 Section A-A .A�.. 1. Floor or WaltAsaembty—Min 4-1/2in.(114 mm)thick reinforced lightweight ornomsal weight(100-150pcfor 1600-2400kg/m') "!0 concrete.Floorassemblymayalso be constructed of my min 6 in.(152 mm)thickULClassifiedhollow-tore Precut Concrete .� UnIW.Wall may also he constructed of any UL Classified Concrete Blocks-.Maxareaofopening240sq in.(1548 sgcm)witha ID max dimension of30 in.(762 num).Max area of opening in floors constructed ofhollowcore concrete is 49 sq in.(316 sq cm) -:N with amax dimension of in.(178mm). See Concrete Blocks(CAZT)and Precast Concrete Untfs(CFTV)categories in Fire Resistance Directoryformarn es ofmanufacturers. 2. Through Penetrant—One"more metalliepipes,conduits,tubesorfleaible metalpipes installed concerntricallyoreccentrically within opening.Annular space between penetrants and periphery of opening shall be min ofo in.(point contact)to max 2 in. (0 min to max 51 mm)Space between penetrants shall be min of 114 in.to max 2 in.(6 mm to max 51 mm).Penetrants to be rigidly supported on both sides offloor or wall assembly The following types and sins of penetrants may be used: A. Steel Pipe—Nom 6 in.(152 man)dim(or mailer)Schedule 10(or heavier)steel pipe. B. iron Pipe 152mm diam or smaller cast or ductile irons e � P ( ) ( ) P�P C. Conduit—Nom6in.(152 man)diam(or smaller)steel conduit or nom 4 in.(102 mm)diam(or smaller)steel electrical fD metallictubing. D. Copper Tubing—Nom3 in.(76man)dim(or smaller)Type L(or heavier)capper tubing. m E. Copper Pipe—Nom3in.(76 min)diam(or smaller)Regular(or heavier)copper pipe. F. Through Penetrating Product--Flexible Metal Piping—The following types of steel flexible metal gas piping may be used: I. Nom 2 in.(51 num)dim(or smaller)steel flexible metal gas piping.Plutic covering on piping may or may not be mimed on both sides of floor or wall assembly. OMEGA FLEX INC. 2. Nom 1 in.(25 mm)diam(or smaller)steel flexible metal gas piping.Plastic covering on piping may or may not be removed on both sides of floor or wall assembly. TITEFLEX CORP,A BUNDY CO. n 3. Nom I in.(25 mm)dim(or smaller)steel flexible metal gas piping.Plastic covering on piping may or may not be p removed on both sides of floor or wall assembly. n n WARD MFG INC. ry 3. Firestop System—The details of the firestop system shag be as follows: lD A. Packing Material—Min 3 in.(76 nun)thickness ofmin 4 pef(64 kg/m')mineral wool batt insulation firmly packed into opening as a permanent form.Packing material to be recessed From top surface of floor or fmm both surfaces of wall as required to accommodate the required thickness of fill material.In floors constructed of hollow-core concrete,packing material to be recessed from top and bottom surfaces of floor as required to accommodate the required thickness of fill material. B. Fill Vold or Cavity Materials—Caulk or Sealant—Min 1/2in.(25 mm)thickness of caulk applied within the anulus, flush with top surface of floor or with both surfaces of wall.In floors constructed ofhollow-core concrete,min 1/2 in.(13 mm) thickness of caulk applied within the anulus,Flush with top and bottom surfaces of floor.Min 1/4 in.(6 num)dim bead of caulk applied to thepenetmnt/concrete interface at the point contact location on the top surface of floor m both surfaces of wall or hollow-coreconcrete. 3M COMPANY—iC 15WB,CP 25WB+caulk or FB-3000 WT sealant.(The W Rating applies only when FB-3000 WT is used.) j •Bearing the UL ClassificationMarking This material was extracted and drown by 3M fee Protection Products horn the 2004 edition of the OL Fre Resistance Directory. 1 oft 3M Fire Protection Products C-AJ-1429 Product Support Unxl-800-328.1687 www.3m.tom/iirestop moose cow 4for fax OR OUMD System No.C-AJ-3071 January09,1996 O FRating-2 W TRatings-0,3/4 and 2 Fir(See item 2) c _ m a FA o s 2 e, ! L�pS}' .lrnt�rc 40 � JJ rs i34 .1. �• : a 4 a A 3 SECTION A-A 1. FlourorWallAssembly—Min 4-R2 in.thick lightweight ornormal weigbt(100.150pef)concrete.Wall mayalso be constructed of any ULClassified Concrete Blocks'.Diem of circular through opening in floor or wait assembly to be3/4 in.to 1-112imlarger than diem ofthrough penetratingproduct Otero 2)iusta0ed in through opening.Max diem of opening is 3 in. d See Concrete Blocks(CAZT)category in the FireResistarrce Directory fornames of manufacturers. `y 2. Through Penetrating Product—Mar.fourcopperconductorNo.8AWG(or smaller)aluminum or steel Armored Cablet+or to Metal-Clad Cable++.Max one armored cable ormetal clad cable installed near center of circular through opening in floor orwall O assembly Through PenetratingProduct to be rigidly supported on both sides offloororwall assmbty.Whenmax No.8AWG O O armoredcableormetal clad cable is used in floorassemblyT Rating is 01cr WhenmaxNo.8AWGarmoredcable or metal clad (7") cable is used in wall assembly less than 6 in.thick,T Rating is 0 hr.When max No.SAWG mmored cable ormetal clad cable is used in minii in.duck waR assemblyT Rating is 3/4 hr.WheamaxNo.12AWG armorecicable ormetal clad cable is used in min 6 in. thick wall assembly,T Rating is 2 hr. KAF-TECH INC 3. Packing Material—Nom l is thickness ofcenunic(alumina silica)fiber blanket or mineral wool batt insulation firmly packed into opening as a permanent form.Packing material to be recessed min I in.from rap surface officer or from both surfaces of wall. 4. Ft11,Vold or Cavity Material'—Caulk—Applied to fill the annular space around the through penetrating product.In floors,a min I in.depth offill material to be installed flush with top surface of floor.In walls,a min I in.depth of fill material to be installed flush with wag surface on both sides ofwall assembly. MINNESOTA MINING&MFG CO—CP 25WB+, d 'Bearing the UL Classification Marking ++Bearing the UL Listing Mark u C O U This materia)was extracted by 31A fire Protection Products from the 2002 edition of the Ul Fre Resistance Directory. 3M Fire Protection Products RUTOFAI(:us fora -80"3.9563 WWW.3mcom/firestop 319 Customer 6ervice:USaCounts:1-800-328-1687 System No.C-AJ-2510 October07,2004 C F Rating-2 Hr O T Ratings—0 and 2 Hr(See item 2) p LRating at Ambient—Less Than I CFWsq ft L Rating at 400 F—5 CFM/sq ft a1 W Rating—Class I gCj tl —C 2 � A L H a ° 3B 2 0 d d to w, A d b I V. a SECTION A-A `d 1. Floor or WallAssembly—Min 4-1/2 in.(95 mm)or4-1/2 in.(1 l4 mm)thick reinforced lightweight ornonnal weight(100-150 pef or 1600.2400 kg/m')concrete.Wall may also be constructed of any UL Classified Concrete Blocks*.The opening shall be l in -s (25 mm)larger than the nom diem ofpenetrant See Concrete Block(CAZT)category in Fire Resistance Directory for names of manufacturers. C IA. Steel Sleeve—(optional,not shown)-Schedule 40(a heavier)steel sleeve cast or grouted into floor or wall assembly,flush with both surfaces of Bear or wall assembly.The nom size of sleeve shall be l in.(25 mm)larger than the nom size of through-penetrant . 2. Through Penetrants—One nonmetallic pipe,conduit or tubing to be installed concentrically or eccentrically within the firestop system.The annular space between the penetrant and the periphery ofche opening shall be a min 0 in.(0 mm)(point contact)to a max 518 in.(16 mm).When steel sleeve is used the annular space between the penetrant and the sleeve shall be a min 1/4 in.(6 mm) to a max 3/8 in.(10 mm).Pipe,conduit or tubing to be rigidly supported on both sides of floor or wall assembly.The following types to and sizes of nonmetallic pipes,conduits or tubing may he used: .C A. Polyvinyl Chloride(PVC)Pipe—Nom 2 in.(51 mm)diam(or smaller)Schedule 40 solid core PVC pipe ficruse in closed N (process or supply)orvented(dmin,wane or vent)piping systems. to B. Chlorinated Polyvinyl Chloride(CPVC)Pipe—Nom2 in.(51 Dan)diam(or smaller)SDR 13.5 CPUC pipe for mein closed ms0O (process or supply)Piping system. O C. Rigid Nonmetallic Conduit+—Nom2 in.(51man)diam(or smaller)Schedule 40 PVC conduit installed in accordance with N Article 347 of the National Electrical Code(NEPA No.70). D. Crosslinked Polyethylene(PEX)Tubing—Nom 2in.(51Dun)diam(or smaller)SDR 7.3 or SDR 9 PEX tubing for me in closed(process or supply)piping systems. E. Electrical Nonmetallic lubing(ENT+)—Nom 2in.(51 mm)dim(or smaller)corrugated-wall electrical nonmetallic tubing (ENT)constructed of polyvinyl chloride(PVC)and installed in accordance with Article 331 of the National Electrical Code (NFPA No.70). See Electrical Nonmetallic Tubing(FKHU)category inthe Electrical Construction Materials Directory fornames of manufacturers. E Flexible Nonmetallic Conduit,Liquid-Tight(FNMC)+—Nom 2 in.(51 mm)dim(or smaller)corrugated-wall flexible nonmetallic conduit,liquid-tight(FWC)constructed of polyvinyl chloride(PVC and installed in accordance with Article 351 of the National Electrical Code(NFPA No.70). See Flexible Nonmetallic Conduit,Liquid-Tight(DXOQ)—category in the Electrical Construction Materials Directory for names of manufacturers. G. Polyvinyl Chloride(PVQ Pipe—Nam 2in.(51mm)diann(orsmaller)Schedule 40 cellular core PVC pipe for use in closed O (Proms orsvPPIY)or vented drain,waste or vent)piping systems. e O H. Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene(ABS)Pipe—Nom2in.(51 mm)dim(or smaller)Schedule 40 solid core or cellular core U ABS pipe foruse in closed(process or supply)orvented(drain,waste orvent)piping systems. T Rating is 0 Hr when steel sleeve is used.When sleeve is not used,T Rating is 2 Hr far penetrants A,B,C,D,E and F. T Rating is 0 Hr for penetrants G and H. 3. Firestop System—The details of the firestop system shall be as follows: A. Packing Material—(Optional)Nom 318in.(10Dun)dim polyethylene backer rod or min 3/8 in.thickness of mineral wool batt insulation firmly packed into opening as a permanent form and recessed from both surfaces of floor or wall as required to accommodate the required thickness of fill material. B. FDI,Void or Cavity Material*—Sealant—Min 2in.(51 mm)thickness of fill material applied within the annulus,flush with top surface of floor orwith both surfaces of wall.An additional 1/4 in.(6 min)bead of sealant applied at the penetrant/concrete interface at point contact location. 3M COMPANY—FB-3000R'T *Bearing the UL Classification Mark +Bearing the UL Listing Mark TMs material was extracted and drawn by 3M Fire Protection Products From the 2004 edition of the UL Fire Resistance Directory. 3M Fire Protection Products ProdadSupWUms 1-800-328-1667 www.3m.com/firestop C-AJ-2510 0nsoseapfroa4furFA208DEMO 1 of 1 �pSS/FjF Fire Barrier Water Tight Sealant U` os 3000 WT Product Data 1. Product Description 3M Fire Barrier Water Tight Pneumatic Pumping the applicable listed Sealant 3000 WT is a Equipment system. premium, ready-to-use, • Gray Color with Black single component, neutral Flecks 4• Specifications cure, non-slumping, • Meets ASTM G21 for Product intumescent silicone Fungi Resistance The firestopping sealant is sealant. The sealant cures a premium, ready-to-use, upon exposure to 3. Applications single component, neutral atmospheric humidity to cure, non-slumping, form a flexible seal. Use 3M Fire Barrier Water intumescent silicone Tight Sealant 3000 WT to sealant. The sealant shall 3M Fire Barrier Water Tight firestop the following ent be listed by independent Sealant 3000 WT is used to interior construction voids: test agencies such nt firestop openings and • Blank openings OPL or FM and be tested to penetrations through fire P • Metallic pipes 9 • Non-metallic t and pass the criteria of 9 rated floor slabs,walls, pipes ASTM E 814(UL 1479) other building partitions and • Cables Standard Test Method for assemblies. 3M Fire • Cable trays Fire Tests of Through- Barrier Water Tight Sealant • Insulated pipes Penetration Fire Stops and 3000 WT,when property • Busways ASTM E 1966(UL 2079) installed,will help control • HVAC vents and ducts Standard Test Method for the spread of fire,smoke • Combos Fire-Resistive Joint and noxious gases. 3M • Bottom of wall Systems. They shall Fire Barrier Water Tight construction joints comply with the Sealant 3000 WT also requirements contained meets the new UL Water The product will restore the within the NEC(NFPA 70), Leakage Test,W Rating— integrity of the fire rated BOCAI, ICBO, SBCCI, IBC, Class 1 requirements for floor or wall assembly when IFC, IRC, NFPA 101 and systems tested and listed in installed in accordance with NFPA 5000. accordance with ANSI/UL 1479. Refer to www.3M.com/firestoo for 5. Performance listed and tested watertight A. Typical Physical Properties systems. EFull Su lied $000 WT -8902 Flow,Sa or Slum N0 2. Product Features in Time,Minutes 20-40 The 3M Fire Barrier Water Color Light ora with Black Flecks ure and Adhesion at 77°F 25°C)Days 1421 Tight Sealant 3000 WT is lec Grevi t.2s flexible, weather resistant andbonds to escent. Itmost cos also As Cured—After 2l Days at TPF(25°C and 5o%R.H. soon wr bonds to most construction materials and has the Service Temperolumeature >6 times at set°F(350°C) Service Temperature Range ASTM C 1299 -14°F Co 230°F following features; {-to°c m 1 lo°c) i • Excellent Adhesion • Re-enterable/Repairable B. Firestopping Properties • Excellent Weatherability Meats the criteria of ASTM E 814(UL 1479)Standard Test Method for E • Cures Upon Exposure to Fire Tests of Through-Penetration Fire Stops and ASTM E 1966(UL Atmospheric Humidity 2079)Standard Test Method for Fire-Resistive Joint Systems. Consult • Applied with Standard or current independent test laboratories directories for listings. Bulk Caulking Guns or I i I I 6. Installation 7. Limitations Techniques 3M Fire Barrier Water Tight conditions there may be Consult your Authorized 3M Sealant 3000 WT should discoloration of brass, Fire Protection Products not be applied to: copper or other sensitive Distributor for current metals drawings and system • Polycarbonates details. Listed and tested • Building materials that g, Maintenance Systems are also available bleed oils or solvents on the 3M Fire Protection (e.g.,impregnated wood, 3M Fire Barrier Water Tight Products website— oil based caulks,green or Sealant 3000 WT is stable www.3m.com/firestop partially vulcanized under normal storage rubber) conditions. Shelf life is 12 Installation Notes: • Unvented spaces where months from the date of sealant is not exposed to packaging when stored in a • Do not use alcohol to atmospheric moisture clean,dry area with clean surfaces in the • Wet or frost coated temperatures between 400 F penetration or joint surfaces and 900 F (40C and 320 C). opening. Alcohol can • In confined cure Stock rotation is keep the sealant from recommended. curing properly. Recommended cleaning solvents are mineral 9. Availability spirits,xylene,toluene or 3M Fire Barrier Water Tight Sealant 3000 WT is available from Authorized 3M methyl ethyl ketone Fire Protection Products Distributors. (MEK). Clean surface of the Packaging Information opening and all Product unit volume(In.J Unitsletn. wt./cIn. les. penetrating items to allow Fire Barrier Water Tight 10.1 11.oz.(298 ml) 18.2(296 cm6 12 12(5.44 kg) proper adhesion of sealant 3000 WT firestop materials. 4.5 gallons(17.0 L) 1040(17042 cm') 1 49(22.2 kg) Remove all grease, dirt, oil, wax, loose debris, dust,etc. • The 10.1 oz.tube must 10. Safe Handling Information have the inner foil seal punctured after cutting Consult the Material Safety Data Sheet prior to handling and disposing of the tip of the nozzle on the 3M Fire Barrier Water Tight Sealant 3000 WT. the tube prior to use. ! • Install the damming materials,as necessary, Warranty and Limited Remedy. This product will be free from defects in to meet the requirements material and manufacture for a period of ninety(90)days from date of purchase. of the appropriate 3M MAKES NO OTHER WARRANTIES INCLUDING,BUT NOT system. LIMITED TO,ANY V"LIED WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY OR • Install the required depth FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. User is responsible for of the 3M Fire Barrier determining whether the 3M product is fit for a particular purpose and suitable for Water Tight Sealant 3000 user's method of application. If this 3M product is proved to be defective within WT for the appropriate the warranty period stated above,your exclusive remedy and 3M's sole obligation system and rating shall be,at 3M's option,to replace or repair the 3M product or refund the purchase specified. price of the 3M product. • Clean all tools after use with a commercial solvent Limitation of Liability. Except where prohibited by law,3M will not be liable such as, mineral spirits, for any loss or damages arising from the use of this 3M product,whether xylene,toluene or methyl direct,indirect,special,incidental or consequential,regardless of the legal ethyl ketone(MEK). theory asserted,including warranty,contract,negligence or strict liability. Con umer Safety and Lght M•aegemeol Depulment 3M Center,Building 223-28-24 Reovkdp•per Uft M UsA BOLGER 4090239 4 St Paul,MN 55144-1000 40%pntonr•mer 03M 20114 98-0213-4329-2 8003281687 fOYe pon<ntuemer w Wm&cmo/0rcamp 3M Fire Barrier CP 25WB+Caulk Product Data @UL �,SSIF�F US FILL VOID OR CAVITY MATERIALS CLASSIFIED BY UNDERWRITERS LABORATORIES,INC.®FOR USE IN THROUGH-PENETRATION FIRESTOP SYSTEMS(XHEZ). SEE CURRENT UL FIRE RESISTANCE DIRECTORY 501.6,90G9 1. Product Description • Brown color. 2.Applications M • Water seal:Seals against 3M Fire Barrier CP 25WB+ Use to seal construction openings, Caulk is aremium elastomeric latex inadvertent water spills in the blank openings and P unexpanded state. penetrating items caulk designed for use as one-part High caulk rate;1000 g/min.with against the passage flame,noxious fire,smoke,noxious gas and water in.nozzle. gas,smoke and water.r.Restores fire sealant.In addition,the unique point contact rated construction to original integrity. mact allowed.intumescent property of this material Also for use with 3M Brand Fire Barrier (expands when heated)means that as Continuous Operating Temperature FS195+Wrap/Strip and CS-195+ cable or pipe insulation is consumed by not to exceed 120°F(480C). Composite Sheet. fire,CP.25WB+Caulk expands to maintain the penetration seal. CP 25WB+Caulk features superior 3- Specifications adhesion strength,Caulk rate and no- product sag application with expanded UL Classified fire protection systems plus a The firestopping caulk shall be a one-part,intumescent,latex elastomer.The caulk shall halogen-free formula. be capable of expanding a minimum of 3 times at 1000°F.The material shall be thixotropic 3M Fire Bartter CP 25WB+Caulk can and be applicable to overhead,vertical and horizontal firestops.The caulk shall be listed by independent test agencies such as LIL or FM and be tested to,and pass the criteria of, be installed with a standard caulking ASTM E 814 Fire Test,tested under positive pressure.It shall comply with the gun,pneumatic pumping equipment or requirements of the NEC(NFPA-70),BOCA,ICSO,SBCCI and NFPA Code#101. It can be easily applied with a putty knife or trowel.CP 25WB+Caulk will Typically Specified Divisions bond to concrete,metals,wood,plastic Division 7 Thermal and Moisture Protection Firestopping and cable jacketing.No mixing is 07270 required. Division 13 Special Construction Fire Suppression and Supervisory Systems . 13900 CP 25WB+Caulk Features Division 15 Mechanical 15250 Mechanical Insulation Fire Protection • Water Base:Easy Clean up,no 15300 special handling, routine disposal. Division 16 Electrical • Intumescent:Expands when heated 16050 Basic Electrical Materials and Methods to seal around items consumed by fire. • Endothermic:Absorbs heat energy, I releases chemically bound water. j • Thixotropic:Will not sag or run in overhead or vertical applications. • Halogen-free. • Fast dry:Tack-free in j approximately 10-15 minutes. • Paintable.(Best results obtained after 72 hour cure.) • Minimal shrinkage. I i I I 4. Performance A.Typicai Physical Properties B.F{restopp{ng Properties Unit Value Meets the criteria of ASTM E 814 Fire Tack Free Time Minutes at 72°F(22°C) 10-15 Test,tested under positive pressure.Consult current UL Fire Resistance (ASTM 7) Directory for systems listed under 3M Expansionion at at 6 862°F(350°C) X 2.0-3.0 Product CP 25WB+ Caulk. Color - Reddish Brown Density Lb./gal.(KgA) 11.2(1,35) Adhesion All construction substrates Very Good Application Method Caulk guns,trowel,spatula - pressurized pumps . Durometer(hardness) Shore A 70 ASTM E 84 Flame Spread - 5 Smoke Development - 0 Solids Percent(%)by weight 79 VOC Percent(°h)by weight 0 Odor - Pleasant,non-irritating Flow Rate Grams/min. 1000 1/4 in.(6,35 mm) nozzle at 50 psi Boeing Flow Inches 0 (Sag Characteristics) C.Firestopping Code Requirements ICBG Uniform SBCCI Standard BOCA Basic/National Building Code NFPA Life Safety Building Code Building Code (1996 Edition) Code 101 1997 Edition 1997 Edition 1997 Edition 702 104.2.4 702.0 709.6 6-2.3.2.4 DEFINITIONS PLANS MUST SHOW HOW REVISED AND PENETRATIONS-REFER PENETRATIONS AND INTEGRITY IS EXPANDED DEFINITIONS TO 714 MISC.OPENINGS 706 MAINTAINED FOR FOR PENETRATIONS &FIRE BARRIERS CONSTRUCTION JOINTS ASSEMBLIES AND JOINTS 709.7 PENETRATED JOINTS 6.2.4.2,EXCEPTION 708 703.1 5 OPENINGS(EXPANSION WOOD FRAME 202 CONSTRUCTION 711.0 OR SEISMIC JOINTS)IN CONSTRUCTION DEFINITIONS DOCUMENTS SHALL FIRE PARTITIONS FLOORS FIREBLOCKING INDICATE DETAILS AND 705.3 MATERIALS FOR 711.6 APPENDIX 709 WOOD FRAME PROVIDING RATINGS AT PENETRATIONS-REFERS A-6-2.4.2 WALL&PARTITION CONSTRUCTION JOINTS AND TO 714 PENETRATION FIREBLOCKING PENETRATIONS 6-3.6.1 PROTECTION 711.7 PENETRATIONS AND 705.3.1.5 703.1.1 JOINTS-REFER TO 709.7 MISC.OPENINGS 709.3.2.2 CURTAIN WALL GAP PENETRATIONS AND IN FLOORS AND SMOKE CURTAIN WALL GAP JOINTS SHALL NOT BE 713.0 BARRIERS 705.4(GENERAL) CONCEALED FROM FLOOR/CEILING AND 710 PENETRATIONS OF FIRE VIEW BEFORE ROOF/CEILING NFPA#221 FLOOR/CEILING OR RATED ASSEMBLIES INSPECTION ASSEMBLIES ROOF/CEILING FIRE WALLS AND PENETRATION 705.5(WALLS) 703.2 713.2 BARRIERS PROTECTION BUILDINGS FOR MORE CURTAIN WALL GAP 705.6(FLOORS) THAN TWO STORIES 711.3 SHALL INDICATE 713.4 NFPA SHAFT ALTERNATIVE 705.7 ALL PENETRATIONS PENETRATIONS-REFERS Code 7D NEC FIRE RESISTANT JOINT TO 714 National 714 SYSTEMS 704.1.1 THROUGH-PENETRATION SUFFICIENT DATA 713.5 Electric Code FIRESTOPS F&T SHALL BE AVAILABLE JOINTS-REFERS TO REQUIREMENTS TO JUSTIFY UNTESTED 709.7 300-21 FIRESTOPPING MATERIALS USED FOR UBC STANDARD 7-1 RESTORATION OF FIRE 714.0 EQUIVALENTTO RATINGS PENETRATIONS-ALL ASTM E 119 REQUIREMENTS CABO UBC STANDARD 7-5 707.0 (GENERAL) One and Two EQUIVALENT TO FIRE WALLS AND ASTM E 814 PARTY WALLS 7141 THROUGH 714.1.6.2 Family Dwelling WALL ASSEMBLIES Code 707.10 PENETRATIONS 714.2 THROUGH 714.2.6.5 (1995 Edition PENETRATIONS- FLOOR/CEILING AND ) REFERS TO 714 RSSEMBLIES 602,7 707.8 ASSEMBLIES FIRESTOPPING j JOINTS-REFERS TO (FIREBLOCKING IN OTHER 709.7 714.3 THROUGH 714.3.2 MODEL CODES) NONRATED ASSEMBLIES 709.0 FIRE SEPARATION 721.0 ASSEMBLIES FIREBLOCKING AND DRAFTSTOPPING 5, Installation Techniques Typical Penetration Firestpps For Metal Pipe/ConduR and Shown are examples of approved Insulated Cable Through Fire Rated Construction applications of CP 25WB+Caulk. Additional drawings and details are _ available through your Authorized 3M SMA BUyiw ,R.DePth3MRM Fire Protection Products Distributor. ep"wa•a•Nr I onawCPBM+e+va Installation Notes: 1. Metal Pipe/Conduit applications through nominal 12 va-' in.(304,8 mm)outside diameter. • Installed depth of CP 25WB+ Caulk depends on annular space. • When the annular space is less than 1-1/4 in.(31,8 mm), a 1/2 in.(12,7 mm)minimum depth of CP 25WB+Caulk is required. aovmcc•obann • When the annular space is greater than 1-1/4 in.(31,8 mm), a 1 in.(25,4 mm) minimum depth of CP 25WB+ Caulk is required. �w I-Dep1h • Common building materials, �2M6 �c such as backer rod may be rau.n m wan - used for metal pipe �� . .. applications. Soso Cd W w lA 2. Metal Pipe applications larger cha Pad gf� ; than nominal 12 in.(304,8 mm) ' wmn ax nre Awu epn outside diameter. UWftrCP r. v�•,ew.ka • All cases require a 1 in. (25,4mm)minimum depth of CP 25WB+Caulk. 3. Insulated Cable Applications. • All cases require a 1 in. (25,4mm)minimum depth of CP 25WB+Caulk. swrWr • All cases require mineral wool ca We-Cw k—1. (safing)for packing. s�ay—� 1'B•PN au FlR 4. Fiberglass Insulated Pipe a.,w""SNB'owdk ,-��ciaea_ rDeom a~d•wod f Applications. • 1 in.(25,4 mm)of fiberglass _ insulation on up to a nominal 12 in.(304,8 mm)of metal pipe may be firestopped with a ++a•saw1 1 in.(25,4 mm)depth of 0ra,-vr o *Fbm J CP 25WB+Caulk. ....... • 1 in.(25,4 mm)depth of -- mineral wool packing required. I i 1 i i I 6. Maintenance 7. Availability The CP 25WB+Caulk is stable 3M Brand Fire Barrier CP 25WB+ under normal storage conditions Caulk is available from Authorized and has a one year shelf life. 3M Fire Protection Products Normal stock and stock rotation Distributors. It is available in are recommended. Standard 10.1 fl.oz.cartridge, 20 oz. Recommended sausage,27.0 oz.cartridge, 2 gallon Store between 40°F(40C)-900F pail and 5 gallon pail. (32°C)for maximum shelf life. Keep from freezing. I Warranty and Limited Remedy. 'Phis product will be free from defects in material and manufacture for a period of ninety(90)days from date of purchase. 3M MAKES NO OTHER WARRANTIES INCLUDING,BUT NOT LIMITED TO,ANY IMPLIED WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. User is responsible for determining whether the 3M product is fit for a particular purpose and suitable for user's method of application. if this 3M product is proved to be defective within the warranty period stated above,your exclusive remedy and 3M's sole obligation shall be, at 3M's option,to replace or repair the 3M product or refund the purchase price of the 3M product. Limitation of Liability. Except where prohibited by law,3M will not be liable for any loss or damages arising from the use of this 3M product,whether direct, indirect,special,incidental or consequential,regardless of the legal theory asserted, including warranty,contract, negligence or strict liability. I Consumer Safety and Light Management j 3M Center 223-25-24 St.Paul,MN 55144-1000 Phone 800-328-1687 Fax 888-362-2737 R q.1alpVer j iw ..3mxomlfvestop 4VI.pnw.umer Litho In USA MCS 0351945 i po conmmer O 3M 2001 98-040-5012-6 3 _eS1Pa FirB 7b us Fire arrler 7b us Fircuop Device Patti) Classified by Ultra PPD Plastic Pipe Device Underwriters nc.see UL Fire Resistance 19 2 and 3 Hour Directory R926990Gs Product Data 1.Product Description It may be applied to drain,waste and S.Performance vent or closed pipe systems, See The 3M Plastic Pipe Device is a one manufacturer's instruction sheet • UL tests per ASTM E 814 piece metal collar assembly encasing supplied with each device for exaut (UL 1479) 3Ms heat expanding 3MT"t IntetamTer types of plastic pipe covered and • UL classified 1,2 and 3 hour fire Ultra GS(intumescent)material. hourly ratings. (F)and temperature(T)rating. Manufactured with 3Ms firestop See UL Fire Resistance Directory technology,it has been contractor 3.Physical Properties under Through-Penetration Firestop designed and UL Classified. Device(XHCR)R9269(f)90G8. The 3M Plastic Pipe Device is used See Table I below. . ULC for new and retrofit installations and will accommodate I"inch(38 mm) 4-Specifications 6.Installation Techniques 2 inch(5 cm),3 inch(7 cm)and 4 inch(10 em)schedule 40 drain, Installations shall be in strict The back page shows an example waste and vent pipe systems, accordance with manufacturers of a UL classified system using the The 3M Plastic Pipe Device written instructions,as shown on 3M Ultra PPD with Ultra Fast Anchor achieved up to 3 hour fire ratings when approved shop drawings. Straps in a 3 hour concrete floor tested by Underwriters Laboratories, The device shall also be classified application. See PPD installation Inc.in accordance with ASTM E 814 by Underwriter's Laboratory Inc.as instruction sheet for additional details. (UL1479) a through-penetration firestop device Product Features when tested in accordance with ASTM • Ultra fast anchoring system E 814(UL 1479)for up to 3 hour • One piece—makes installation rating' - easier and quicker All penetrations must be f unstopped • Factory made—assures consistent with a UL Classified system or device quality as listed in current UL Fire Resistance f • Proven technology—Intumescent Directory or have approved shop + action quickly seals off plastic pipe drawing prior to installation. in a fire Suitability for the intended service • UL Classified--mcets code application should be determined prior requirements—universally toinstallation. recognized • Red color--easily identified as a fire rated device during inspections Table 1-Physical Pro ernes • Embossed 3M and UL logos Color Red Red Red Red 2.Applications Nominal Pipe Size I L2" 38 mm 2" 5 coal3--(7 cm 4" 10 cm Units per carton 10 10 10 10 i The 3M Ultra PPD is used to seal j ccPVC,PVC,CPVC,FRP$PVDF, ccABS and ABS pipes penetrating 1 Table 2-Sizes and 2 hour floor/ceiling assemblies Size Part No. I Fire Ratin i and 1,2 and 3 hour fire rated gypsum 102"(38 mm) PPD-1.5 3 hour wallboard assemblies and up to 3 hour 2" 5 craPPD-2.0 3 hour fire rated concrete wall,floor or 3" 7 cm PPD-3.0 3 hour hollow core assemblies: 4"(10 cm) PPD-4.0 3 hour 1 7.Maintenance 3M Fire Barrier Plastic Pipe c. Devices are stable under norma] 0 storage conditions. Normal stock and stock rotation practices are recommended. S.Availability ❑ 3M Fire Barrier Plastic Pipe Devices are available from Authorized 3M Fire Protection Products Distributors. Figure 2:PPD positioned and anchor straps inserted Figure 1:PPO&Ultra Fast Anchor II O 2" Figure 3:Ultra Fast Anchor Strap and Figure 4:Top view of Ultra Fast Anchor PPD secured and locked Into position. Strap In place after installation complete. Warranty and Limited Remedy.This product will be free from defects in material and manufacture for a period of ninety(90)days from date of purchase.3M MAKES NO OTHER WARRANTIES INCLUDING,BUT NOT LIMITED TO,ANY IMPLIED WARRANTY OF NFERCHANTABELITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.User is responsible for determining whether the 3M product is fit for a particular purpose and suitable for user's method of application.If this 3M product is proved to be defective within the warranty period stated above,your exclusive remedy and 3M's sole obligation shall be,at 3MIS option,to replace or repair the 3M product or refund the purchase price of the 3M product. Limitation of Lfiffift Except where prohibited by law,3M will not be liable for any less or damages arising from the use of this 3M product,whether direct,indirect,special,incidental or consequential,regardless of the legal theory asserted,Including warrant);contract,negligence or strict liability. am Specified Construction Products Department 3M Center 225-45-08 MCS 163702 St.Paul,MN 551441000 Printed In U.SA (800)328-1687 03M1999 98-0400492" Feb.1999 MAY-31-2005 10.57 AN GENERAL INSULATION 6177765820 P. 02 System No.W 1.1146 June09,2000 a C F Ratings-I m12 f1r(bee Item 1) F TRating-OHr O • CL F 3 � ( I i 2 A 1B 3 SECTION A-A . I. WalAsaaubly-no Ior2NfitereWdyypwmwallboartVsmdwall aeaent6lyahnllhecomtrugodofdiemeterialamdinilu marnnerdmn(hadinthe indlvidustU100orU400WesWdlorParlidonDesigns indlaULPircResistance Directory mAshall -m utdudc Onc followingim n imon faturrs: qy A sands-Wallfrarningmay consistofeitherwoodsedaortlairJunnelstu&.Woo m&IooW"W9fnon2by4in.lumber O wwW 16 in.OC.sloclstudatohom0-12 in.widcandapamilnuz244M When a eelaudsareumilaiddiediamof g opeaftexceeds the widd,of mtdcavfyc the opening AM be timed an all sidoswln01atgborelcel atud nWplkdbaween rbc vativA snrda and caew.enealmd mdeaml aWMat each erd.•ILe Banned opening In the will shell be 41a6 in.Wide and 4 toliin,higherthanthediamofthe penewtmg iten suc htheL when thoparotr ibnx Akin isoentered in the open" a 2 to 3 in.elraanoe is prexnt haFinan the panmating item oxithefmning inall four aides B. WaIbaard Gypaume 7tmgypnmt wallbmnitype,tiddwewnumberareyes,fatl typowAOmdark"unohall haat slaoifiod iullxinaivitbml U300w U400Saiax 0.wigt is da:UL 2 Arc RsmiaWaropipeoWry.Mezdiauotopadng ia25•I/4 in. for aeol as walla.Max dim afoponing is 14-12 forwood sWwdle. The hourly P Rating of thefirsaop g0tuabequa to the hoarlyfhe rating ortbe Wal*WNW in wfikb b blmta0o0, 2. Through Petaranb -One meWfic rpe,emduitortuhi%insialied ei0ror omKennieally aracmoicelawilbin the firestop system-Tho annular apoonhowcatpipe,ronduh a tubing and periphery ofopaningahal be min of 0 is(poimomw)to max 1-U4in Pipe emdrdt svnidnOtoberigidly vvpurtal on both videsefwal)twaepnbly.11w follavhngtypesand siacoofmm0ic pipes,00ndui>sortubitmmaybeused: E A. S4a Pipe Nom 24 in.diem(urerallar)SchWule I0(ahmyiur)sloel pips R. Iron Pipe-Num 24 in,dim(ormaler)service walgla(orbMier)"a iron sellpWe.mm 12 in.diam(amoler)aClees SO(or1mvier)duetle irmpmsumpipe. C. Cepdnlf-Nom6in.diam(aamaller)tacelemdnth atam4in.tlam(a mwlia)aeil eixWpl mdalilctuhhlg I O. Copp"Talaing Nom6in.diem(oma)la)TAxL(aheaviar)mppatubing. G Copt>et'Pipe-Nmn6in.dim(amniler)Regular(ahmvierloapapipe. 3. P114VaW orCavlry Masertaea-Cask-Min 5/gin,thickness offill material applied wWm die ammha,flush with both aurraoes of the wall.Min 12 in,diem brad of caulk applied no the peneumhvalOward interfeaat pant meted location on bah aidsaof will. 3MC0MPANY-(7r25WB4 • •Bearing the ULClawifinatim Marking I- I i , . _ l6aderidwas aaheoedaddrwraby3YFlat haahiah dt fion*a20 Afisaof16itfirm ReddmxaOYadny MAY-31-2005 10:57 AM GENERAL INSULATION 6177765820 P103 system Ivo.W L-1088 rkcenber27,1999 w, F Ratings- I end 2 Hr(Sw Item 1) _c O . T kadnp4-0,1 and 2 Hr(Scc Iknr 2) � � W SECTION A•A I- WOW Aaembly-'The tor2 hr I'm rated IrAwum vmllhnmd&out wall asmrrblys(adl be Lwwu=d afnu:materialsond in 0, mannerlf(cd in Inc individual 113lDm IRWSaim Wall and Partition D*ns in the IR,Fire Rmimaw-Dirodwy and shall I... erbeq�ecfilloahlgchnswcaonfeahm. A. 1,- 11framing mqy mntlm efaidrer wnpd Nudeormeet channel etude.Wcadmudeacenaetafnnm l.IyairL itunbcr ldin.O('.Steslsludsiobondn3l/2h widoandel>ACWmax24in.ll( B. mBoerde-Thidmase,glee,numbaoflayasand faatemaos required in the individual Well end Panitioa Design. ofopenirtg shell be 7/M m hugw0un dlaoutsidadiamof nMrnctalliapipo mrmandr(lrrm 2), The hoWyF Rating otfLn IlrrWep '0 6 equM ro Wa iwriy Merntlrlg of tbo,wW eaaa.arym wNtM BYimtadicd 2- T1rou�Ifepelraoa-Oro mnmeallioPpemcmlduitkbeiacul6edelNermmm�oiranyarecemnindlywiWmtlhetiacaop oyatdn.'llu omdare)race fornom 1- 14 ur.diem evl anetlertaswett/thap�c mmodWtmtd paetPheryofgrmirrgelwll Mmlo 0 m.(paNtfAndel)tamax TAliaT Onnnlvppacafmpipa mcatdoItgmaty dwn nnm)-iN In.dfambetwcrn the piperneonduii +n P?WYaf apating ehaU be m1n ih to mvx 1 in.Pipe atcoodud w be rtgidtysupponed en hMh sidanfwall aesemby.'Dro follow)ng types and eines of nonmetal Uo Ilipea m mndrhe meq be wed A. FbbA01CIdOride(PVC)Plpe-Nom2In.dlam(ormallot)Scraluk40eolidc=arcd1ularcmePVCplpa forusein ,� dosedlptoeereamyply)mvaned(dmio,wamrrven)P�{ngsyAtm. B. C'llminiredPolyvlg4Chbrlde(CPV4�pgin-Nam2in.dune(amnalla)SDRI7CPVCpipetorweincbeed{pocesa m supply)u vended(drain,wave.n vent)Pip ung ayatertle. C. hibN 1CAkride(PVC)Pipe-Nan3isdiem(mmudler)Sdiodulc40sWidcae PVCplpeforuseindowd(maemm sugllyl vioa+asyatan. 17 D. Qgorkmted tilyviatCldorlde(CPVC)Pipe-Nam3in.diem(orsmWkr)SDRI7CPVCpipelbrwcumclosed(process p arolpplAmingaystems. cV AWd NeawAtWgc Coodu0++-Nom 3 in.dism(or=Wkr)Shcabik 40 PVC oan&il h=lled in eecordanrewithNlicle 387 oftheNationd kkeMoW Cade(NAPA No 70). R MecWWNonmouMc7Lbleg(ENT)44-Nomiin.diem(ormnaUer)BNffmme4ofpVC,inelalledinacrordauea%int Aedde 331 ofthe Nakond Blectied Code(NFPA No.70), - Sv Rlgld Neametallic Coodoll M2XT)and 6lrewkd NnomNagle7W ft(FKHU)in UL Comaruction Materials Directory fix Dames of manufaatloen. G. Aerylon111%Butadiene Styreae(ARg)Pepe-NOM 2In.diw(mmnd(er)Sdtedute40solidemcorcellulvooreABS pipe Ibrweinclosed(Pma mmoly)orvarted(dain,waee(rrvom)pipingsyslam. ThehoudyT RAdAg k tkPcu&"Qa thelrooiy Fwft of We waRm mObp lk plpeorcoodaitste and ut tber ireMPx k tatendat uaoundoaedorvmtMayekm.aMMownintbetdb.isgmate_ NtlmPipe WAUA mmbly CbW(e)ar TRad0g E Dlemlil. Pnftg Hr Vepnd(v) Hr 112to3 1 c I 10tol4l4 1 v I 1/2m1-174 2 c 2 1!200}.1!4 2 v I 2 1 v 0 2 2 v b 3. FKVIlid Or Ca*MAIVIOle'-Caulker Patty-Min thid0am 01`5111 Ift,WW I-IA In.ofetulk orpittry fiv I and 2 hr rated wall asembtlee,rsgroedvely;rypliodwltNn wwluaUmown PWeartxnuhdand paiphay efthe opening bwh with both surpass nY �.. wall asamrblY,Atl pniMauntad ltxatbn 6Gw¢anpipeor0wtddtmdgypman walihnerd.emin)Rin diem bexdofr:aulkar puny alwlit, pplicd et thepipc mcaduiVwalllxwdimaraeeantfodr mn'facbe ofwallvcanbly. 3M COMPANY CP 2$W8+,MPS-2 +r-rBcarimg the UL Luling Mark, i rBaving rho ULCtMifrcelion Marking lhhmslwiMlNasaxttaMwlddraMn6y281kahaMdimfrodatkhlp�s2002atkliseefthtUlPoa11et61mxelWrsdo . 1 MAY-31-2005 10:58 AM GENERAL INSULATION 6177765820 P. 04 syace�l xa��a��z 0Domh mer I5,I99s P Rabnga-UAW 3 Nr(Sw Item 1) c?' T Ratings-1.2And 3 Hr(Scoltem 1) j m 1 � F-y-A o � o L-•-A 2 SECTION A A L WAR Aaronbb-Thal,2or3hrruenhdQYF�mwaaur,Aemm„dmR y nuucegMfkdinthoindniijualU300orUtrim VAIIeMMttieosn�6dt OULFkc�Reaiosbfncenir falsyaMedbathaboeludthe ibl(uwiwLbnavum Rpues e OMISIstaf O A. Ittp�ace�d 6iFL 012,91001 arobamnr3d tin.wide spgteei x24 OL tds.SWadaodtodson,� 2by4in.lumber G07 bin wide apgpedmter 24 io.OG Wh�mwoodlWdaam and2 fa:Wringer. assembb is r„ U. Gypime hard•-7bxknm4w,numberoflapis aw faunno,as m*dfw in the individual wAll am"do" dJPL • Max dim ofopeningis s im h The hourly F ltodog of din 0re"OP EYE( tle oqud Lathe"fire ratlagafrhe Wall mm which ltNloAtAOEd, 2. Throngb PoneRwits-One n®metn1110 pipe oreond"to be owitm l wUbm opeNngwith A nom 114 in-own"spst:e between Pipe OFcOn at And Vwiphaynfopeniog Pipe nraadudt to beFill*EupPnEFW on bodrAWN OrWe wall sasmnh The bl rypwEndeimaofommadlicapcaarrmdtanm�rymd; iS lowing A. PobvW Cbbddv(PVC)PIPE-NOM 4in,dim(ornmel{err)8oladuk40aWidcmaorcellulwom PVCpipefirueojn cbsed(puuam m fwpb)or Vetoed{draiq waelo er vast)pipitg ayurony D. RIgWNmm ft'kC=" +t--Nom4m.dlam(M$MWIor)$dwdub40PVCeondukiror 347 ofrheNeliaml Ubcb)eal Cotb(NFPA No.70). 1lkd 1° O withAttiok C. ChlorinatedibbvttyiChWrW6ICPVC)PIPe-Nom4ln.tRem(oramller)SDR17CPVCpipoformeineloewl aWIY)or vatted(dWr4 waste wvcm)pipkgayaonm. (P � 0. AeeybtdhRe RandkPaB�reae(AR�p�p-Nom4ku dilall(txagalla)ecltrAttk40adbd sora Mce11tr1areoreAUS for Leta In aloecd fpmceaeoraupply)or vented(dnin,wmaoarVrnt)pipirtg ayamta PtPa C H NPPY)orvemed N ItetanimatAa(FWP)PIPE-Nwn4iadbm(wwWhw)&Ae ule40FRPPpipeformIndosad(proege or 1 (dnm,waMeorveot)pipbrg ayatgn. 3 TWAT laafiniparel,2md3HrfurplpasA,DAMCiol,2and 3HrmodwARtw mbR piprDand6are1HrbiMA12HrratedWagaaegohUftAad2HrIn3HrmWwdunmhll TherliatlogeWi 3. Firm"Devka-Whir-Colla lobcInstalled inwoordmmewith theatxompmp4nginpdkdpt Wkrtobe � 1-112 al And letehodarowd pipe aWee orWbll with 3M WhIs PawAndwIl"Or with lAio.diarnbymin I-112 i"-long Rae'uWlsbolb in 1141%dinm*4fa&rwuhera Min oftwo,rhme Er fliormtdmrataps orawhorbDlk&aymmeotnllY1—fe(for=in 2in,dim(AM aradlarin m3het8amOilHEM4in.diempira,rapecd"L, 3M COMPANY -Unca PPD).5,2.0,3_QwW 4A i 4. �VaWorC"hyhfm-fahe-CauyrorNtty(OPpony,ryry�,n)-Gmw mbeadofcaalkwPuttYmayb.,Wiedto porimauorcollaratill inrmkoewith"H amfacer. 3M COMPANY-CPa$WR+Calk,MP8.2+pary •Balringthe UL Gasification Making {'+Ele4dagthe UL LiaWg Mark Ikhmderirlaasuaad�aMdraanhYBURrafroledtanPrsdadr(raa1M Y j ..sy�y �.aax»a- •a �-..,,. _ �__ . � 200 adhian s(dm U(Rre Redaeen 0hniwy, MAY-31-2005 10:59 AM GENERAL INSULATION 6177765820 P105 System NO-W-1,501 Ap6109,1995 c (formerly System No.147) p F Ratings- i and 2 Hr(See Item 1) TRatings• 3/4,land l-112Hr(geehem 3) L RatingAtAmbieni-2CPM/rq 0 L RalingA1400 F-Iewtlun lOB IA al aW I_ A CD 4B AA •� 4A 3 2 L—r-A 2 3 n SECTION A-A I. a2hrfao-wealppsrnwallboanUshdwallawemblyahellbevambuokdofthemftw6h,aatin11v martnerdeuxihed a 0r nagvAml U100 aU400 Series Waliaparlimn Detlpp in the llL V rc Resirtrrr.DW"end Wan inehdedw fblhwmgm stolon fealurea, A. OAhda-Wall framing nmymnsiel ofeincm wood ri dsorated aMnnd MU&p6od Sm&rooamixvfrom 2 by4 in,iwnbcr e dl6 ia.t)C wits nnm2try 4m 1": heratdplaleigdcrwatracas.Steeiatudapobamin33$imvideby 1-3/8mdeap c$arraelagracedmaa 24 k.00. . R fypmmRoard•-NvmS/gindtidy4Rwidawithwprereampxed8(W47110aYpwmwdlbawdtypc.drkknca'6manbcr oflaytya.fastener type and dra aienbtion dwli ba as speeif ted'm the individuai U300 aU400 Saks Design in the ltLFhu Raisduaee Diaetmys Mat agrn nfnpaning is 14 1R in for woodand walls and l$in.Por rixl suw wash. Ther hourty FRallagof thenr ce"syatem b 1 brwben hwWW In a 1 trriha rated waR and 2hrwbm intmwih u 2 brtllerwpat will, 2. TroupPPftvtSaab-One metallic pipoandringrbbeoentaedwithin the fieearopgvelem.Pipeormurgmhetilpoly-mored - aaaemMy,The fbllowingtype�and of as of mdAia pipes or tubing may he used: • A. Slid Pip-Note l2in,diem(ornmelles)Sandulel0(ahwwkr)ereeiplpe. B. CoppaTWft-Nom6inabmh(ormWkr)7ypvL(abwW)wppert4k4, C. (kpWlVe-Nom6in.dim(wsmalier)Rcgular(abeavia)mpperpipe. 3. PIMCwA*pa-Nomior2in.ddahhogowoylindricalhe g4ffAky(trun3.spuf)omfRw dtsjwkdedonftouleidawiih mail savim*kst.LtmgitudinaUo ma m"with mmal4nenaea fsAmyappliadsal6maliug lop tslw.Tnrrvema jvfmasenled Mthmelal I'adawtsor withbut'"tape wiled with theproduta.Whanwin lin.thick pipe oweringuwied,dwwomiar a pace bNween thepipeerwaing and thevinwhecue tin the g)paum mMbmd heyveaon molt dtbofthe well ehnii be min IA4 kh.Nmea 31I in.When nom 2 in thick pipevovabgg is used,the mulerapm bawaen dwpfpeoaadrugmudthvdrnukranaa in lin gypsum wdllxwd hyersoo 40¢11146 ofthe fl Mail herein 12 in.tomox 3/4 in. 3a Hpeand Bquiprneol Cmariog-Mstaaiah(BRGUIa�gory in Buildk)g Malaials Wrxtory fonumeanfmmmtodruara covaiurgmataidumaingtheabmCtpCClfleetloneamdbdualgihcULCleasificatiarMatkirhgvMh.Flamegpradlnd0e of alAaan4aSmol�ttevdaprdlndprot'30alesamayberued, TpT.w..h.�hwryTRatfrtgedtheRrnaopayrbm43/ghrwbew.om 14r.tbkkplpeartgingkae0.Thehaar�TRetlagMrSe .�.wy4lyltlal6l hrnad 1-10 4wbm sem Shh,(1144 pfpealYainR M ItAtd lrhh i brand2 br Rraraled Ira01.1eaptegYegt d. 111rrwep8ytban-trwWledaynunckiaollyanbolhaidrsofwaUaaanN.Thedelei4ofthef Y ueslapayaem rdrllhe as Polkwc A. PH,Wldorfbv4ryMateMNN-Wnp6tr(p Nom 1/gin.thick inmmearml daaruncdrmataWfacedaa one eido whh dhpnimmfoii,suppileo in 2 in,wink apipy,Nang in.wWaeniptghtty waplyd amurd pipamvaing(gril aids aui)with emmlarnnd Wrap xgry Speraeahrey MamdwhSeud.rircmdwinan fo-ii upcarddid inmmmJerapeae apptvnl ith in. sudrthmapprox314in.afthe wrapasipwidthprmnuid"m mrOrowdlsufas Onekhauaofwrepmtpisrequvdwigwrom 1 in. Birk pipeoovamg Isusea4 Iwolayaas ofump strip ommquircd whm nom 2 in.thick pipe mvxring k uewl. 3M COMPANY-FS-1954 B. FRLYdd or Cavity Materiakr_ C40114-Mini/4in.diem owaimtmsbmdappnd tv rite wrapwrilYwwll inlafaxardto the expraad edge of the wrap Strip leyerappmx 3/4 in.from the will awfam AM COMPANY-CP 25WO t &arkg tae UL Claasifiaxtion Marking l�arai r— Tlds anlaialins agradad and&m by 3M Fire frmwgoa With from dw 02 adlUm if IM UL In Relld as Oirsrlw f. i I MAY-31-2005 11 ;00 AM GENERAL INSULATION 6177765620 P. 06 System Nq.W-)..-3848 Member 26,2001 �^ FRalhtgs- I mid 2 Hr(8ea hcm 1) p TRainp U4.1/2and3141k(Sucltem2) 0 • 1A m O. IB o, A 4 4 3 2 L-A 2 3 4 SECTION A-A L WhIlTheIM2Wiretracdgypsumwatm,,,djAWuntRpeepnWaltallbomr �edoflhamnitrialsand ingw mentorilodin the individual U300 or WOO BtxieaWall wFAW a Designs in ft UL Fire,Reeletanoo Directory and shell krhndafia fotlowtrrg comicuctlon feawres; y�y A. Bwde-Wall firming may consist afehherwoo4 studsm 10001 channel 01414k Wood"$to consist of nom 2 by 4 in. yj Iumba*imd 14 in.00.S"Wxft to be min 3-SM in-wt&mrdapncod max 24 is OC. & Gypsnm Bond*-Nom 518 in,thick,4 R wide with squaw of tapered edaea.Tbcgvpsum wallboard type-number of p layers,fa>denr type and shed orientation shall be a a spedfleq in the individual Wall end Partition Delign.Max diem of srE opening inwallboartl leywa ie T ia. Theharo�FRatiageftlw @adop quote @ I br coons tnnaBedina 1 hr tha>Itded trW and 2 brwheh htelaBeO io a 2hrMeratedwaB, . 2. Thrmglh Pohenaob-orcmdallic pipeuwbi�wba itrraiied tddtmoowetrtrtcellymexaririraily within dm fimaop ryaleay Pipe ortubing toberizidb summoned on hmh aides of wag assambly.The Wimving"wand siassofinetalltCpipesartubing may he usa- A. BEM Pipe-Nom4 in.dim(msmaliet)Sehedule l0(or heavia0MCI Pipe.When Simi pipe is used.T Rating is 1/4 hr. B. Copper TWft-Now 4 in.dhon(or gmaller)Typs L(or heffviwr)copper Wh1w T Rating is 3/4 hr for copper tgWag of now 2 hLdkes rod Ma w.Air copper tahlaRgreaterdwh No 2 In.tltam,TRaft h 114 and tis hr when insranedV I sad 2 hr rated walls,reepewvab. C. Copper Pipe-Nom 4in,dim(or smaller)Rogular(or heavier)copper p*.T Rating Is 3/4 hr for copper pipearnow Its,4taw and ama9er.VWCopper pipe mealerthan mar 2 In.Moan,T Rsdog Is 114 and W hr when Installed in lsad 'n 2 hunted wati respectively, Q. 3. PIPS hmladu-Ply-Nom 314in.thick acryhmibi[elanqdi$"lyvioylchloride(AB1W(•)Ruihinfmmfumiehedlnpw form oftubing.The Mat"alw"betwee(r ft insulated 11100&A tireWiloohhe Ihmugh opening shall be min mm in.(point tmuect)to max 1.114 in. Seo Phsllr>dk(fjMF7.2)oafagary to the Reowdzed Domponan Dkwmy for rtenoaof memfedurem Arty Rocognired Con h6ainetridionmawialmecftftAhn-maybetated. 9-411rr4livmiawlhavingaUL%plammahility(dalel{OMWof945YA 4- F'KVaid mC"*Matodge-Caagk-MinSB in.dd*A=Ofcudk applied within drmonlarstwe,(lush with each=fW, ofwallhadl11.A 112l.in,diem bwdofmulkshelf be Applied to thepipa hw1 tkarlwalibeprtlinlafawdthcpoimcaann luva!loran 3M COMPANY-CP 25WBt "Bearing the ULQaaeificafian Mocking Rrnmtelelwas ealraied taidtksm by 9Mfits flola®alft"bsre the 2084 ad8tan of 16 Ul Rte Rnhlreaa DkWwy. I +- t r Derby Lofts LLC April 30, 2007 c/o RCG LLC 17 Ivaloo Street Suite 100 Mr. Thomas St. Pierre Somerville, MA 02143 Building Commissioner T 617 625 8315 F 617 625 8345 Public Properties Department and Building Office City of Salem MPicarsic@RCG-LLC.com www.RCG-LLC.com 120 Washington Street Salem, MA 01970 Hand-Delivered to 120 Washington Street RE: 51 Lafayette Street, Unit 507 Supplemental Documents Relative to Questions about Chase Dear Tom: We have received the supplemental engineer's report from LVR Corporation, Inc. pertaining to the chases recently opened for examination. LVR Corporation examined the as-built condition in Unit 507, 204 and 601 and reviewed the pertinent submittals and architectural and engineering details. We also retained Al Marzullo of TKG East Ltd. Engineers to confirm the design intent and pertinent construction details for pipe chase construction at the project. Both stamped letters are attached for your records. Both reports indicate that no additional work is needed at the building relative to the pipe chases. For record purposes,we previously distributed to you copies of the temperature tests and sound tests conducted in Unit 507.And we have also reached a verbal agreement with Ms. Shirley Walker relative to any other open items. We hope to formalize and execute that agreement on May 1, 2007. Consequently, at this point in time, we hereby believe we have complied with the request of your office and the request of Mr. Paul Wakem relative to all items. 1 Should you have any additional questions, please feel free to contact me directly at(617)625-7817. Sincerely, A Matthew Picarsic On behalf of Derby Lofts LLC Encl: (1) LVR Corporation Letter (2)TKG East Ltd. Letter (3)3M Fire Stop Submittal for Derby Lofts Project (4)At 0.0 Wall Types/ Floor Types Details for Derby Lofts Project cc: Mr. Paul Wakem Department of Public Safety Tewksbury Hospital Dietary Building, East Street Tewksbury, MA 01876 2 U4/JU/ZUU7 HUA 14:bll PAA 761 246 U33U LO UK/UU1 LVR Corporation Consutdng Engineem 88 Foundry Sorer Wakefield, Mn 01UUO Tel:(781)24.5-9888 Fax:(781)246.0330 w Jvrcorp.com April 29, 2007 Mr.Alex Schnip RCG LLC Via Fax 978-740-0021 &US Mail 120 Washington Street 1-page Salem, MA 01970 Re: Vertical Mechanical Chases Units 507, 601, 205 51 Lafayette Street, Salem, MA Dear Mr. Schnip: LVR Corporation Engineering Group has re-reviewed the existing mechanical Chase in unit 507, and chases in units 601 and 205. Vertical piping and duct penetrations have been sealed in unit 507, and were sealed when observed in 601 and 205. The penetrations appear to conform with requirements of UL System No. C-AJ-1044 with mineral wool batt and fire sealant similar to Metscaulk 1000 fire sealant. We believe the horizontal fire rating between floors should be 2-hour and due to the penetrations being sealed at the floors, the mechanical chase is not required to be rated vertically as a 2-hour rated chase. Fire sprinklers are not required in the mechanical chase area since there are no combustibles in the chase. The remainder of the building appears to be fully protected with fire sprinklers. No additional firesealing or remedial work appears to be required for the chases observed by LVR Corporation. Please feel free to contact me if you need any additional information, Since M Lawren y, RE ��civ. Princi Flaerwp>N R Fire P n Engineer No. 38913-FP qy 9N°•988190 o,4, Qig�F. EVO 11e1GDeO SySaLmveftrfx9rdBOg22.doe SALENe w r TKG EAST LTD ENGINEERS & ARCHITECTS 17 IVALOO STREET SOMERVILLE,MASS 02143 Voice (617)591-8682 Fax (617)591-2086 April 27, 2007 Mr.Matthew Picarsic On behalf of Derby Lofts LLC %RCG LLC 17 Ivaloo Street, Suite 100 Somerville,MA 02143 RE: Derby Lofts Dear Mr.Picarsic: I understand that Mr.Thomas St.Pierre of the Salem Building Department has asked for some additional information regarding the construction of the pipe chases and the fire stopping of through penetrants at the Derby Lofts project. The building was designed to require a two-hour rated floor assembly for through penetrants(as shown in the 3M Fire Stop Submittal)and only a wall partition at the pipe chase locations.This is the case in the pipe chase locations opened for review in Unit 507,Unit 205 and Unit 601.The design incorporated the use of only small openings at the floors for through penetrants so that they could be fire stopped in accordance with the details submitted by 3M for DK Insulation. Through penetrants that required larger openings in the floor,such as ducts,were wrapped in fire-rated duct wrap to also meet the two-hour rating at the floor assembly.The wall partitions at pipe chaselocations, as shown on detail A10.0-3,are constructed with 5/8" GWB. If a portion of a pipe chase wall falls at a demising partition location,the design typically calls for a one-hour rated demising partition,as shown on detail A10.0-2.This one-hour rated detail is needed only at demising partition locations. To the best of my knowledge,all fire stopping work in the pipe chases at the Derby Lofts project has been completed in accordance with this design. Very Truly Yoursy� � /7�lG�d o Alfred M. Marzu' ,�? ' ry d� SITE•MECHANICAL•ELECTRICAL l..e..........<v. •. ,1.,..Pv.m..� u �,d,.. v'M..,.e. � —1 xx\) �w .��Y 1 F'.- / yt flw .un am.um / W VERTICAL SECTION Typical Wo ll PartitionTypical Demising Partition Wall Por66on of Pipe Chase �2 Hour Shoff Wall 2 Hour Rated Po'N"on Brick Veneer Wall m ce.�g,use I/ I%ui ozs uasz u.w co�.�r�.�ro„ STe a.1, STI Rating 52 .. irz Em � v�v�`immv`� up/�e[o aw�.nnai cn Vr ai5u nrimx anrs m. .i � li mvv urttu � �us�wa,en'ermmaw a ;: = H VERTICAL SECTION I JL� E (PfAN) SECTION VERTICL SECTION a �> swecoV WoI� t e Not �,ed�� esMu veneer wen Existing ar�ok well �z Hour snort well NOT TO SCALE -- ST oes w52 r�J 4C Roling 52 am.Irwvl / ] annmais/x—mm1"xe. R n''� K n /.' •+.�noo.w uo vw`�ry=0rcw ,�j J § a 9 ,xooIFIV— a ` F ivrnor � `�Muus.4u uuo u .T,.,1,11 1 CLI 6 xei k New Rool Construction New Floor Construction Existing Floor Cons'vuction New Roo�Deck/Floor Cons lruction �1 Well Types / Floor Types io.o sro... 1 la' -o A10.0 05-20-'08 11:20 FROM-Structures North 978-745-6067 T-852 P001/001 F-523 60 Structures North oo MIU Salem, lamasngton uva=91, w979 Salam,Maaaachuenttx 07970.357Y CONSULTING EN4:INFLRS, INC.. P.O.8"01971-8560 T 978.745.6817 1 F978.745,6061 www,structures-nnrch.com 20 May 2008 Derby Lofts Condominium 51 Lafayette Street Salem, MA 01970 Fax 978-740-0021 Attention: Jason Downing Reference: Lower Facade Evaluation Dear Jason: On Monday, 19 May 2008 1 visited the Derby Lofts Condominium to perform an emergency inspection of the original (early 20th C.) cast stone building facade elements following the loss of the bullnose portion of one of the stones on the Derby Street facade. This inspection covered the lower 2-1/2 floors of the Central, Lafayette and Derby Street elevations and included a full visual evaluation and impact testing (sounding) with a hammer. During this inspection we found one loose fist-sized fragment of cast stone, which we removed, and several small pieces of loose repair mortar which flaked off. Nowhere did we find any other lose elements that in our opinion threatened public safety, although there were several elements that in our opinion should be stabilized in the short-term as a preventative measure. Given these findings, we notified the Salem Building Department on the afternoon of the 20th that is was again safe to open the building and surrounding sidewalks, and that we would recommend preventative repairs that should be completed within 30-days and would consist of pinning and grouting of selected cast stone elements and re-setting of selected bricks. Fallowing a meeting in our Salem office this morning, I understand that the repairs are currently underway. Respectfully yours, r,t4�Knn:*u c!er J athne, PE, President Structures North Consulting Engineers, Inc. o� CITY OF SALEM PUBLIC PROPERTY r DEPARTMENT KINIMARIE% oeisn ik VInvon, 120 WAS1 nNG PUN Ssi=.rr Sni.r.M,,ALss,u IL S1 01970 1'IJ":978-745-9595 ♦ FAN:978-740-9846 UNSAFE STRUCTURE PROPERTY LOCATION 51 LAFAYETTE STREET May 19, 2008 Derby Lofts LLC/ co RCG Inc. 51 Lafayette Street Salem , MA 01970 Dear Sirs; At approximately 8:00 pm last evening this office received a call from Salem Fire Department for a masonry failure at the above property. Upon arrival I witnessed a portion of the decorative cornice at the Derby Street side of this property had fallen to the sidewalk below. This concrete detail forms a band around this structure from the Cornerstone Bookstore, along Lafayette Street to Derby Street and thence along the Central Street side to the automobile exit, at a height of about 20 feet above grade. As this masonry system is part of the original structure, and as a result of this failure,the integrity of the remaining parts of this decorative system is now in question. For this reason this department has closed the sidewalk below any portion of this assembly (under the authority of 780 CMR, the State Building Code, Section 121, Unsafe Structures), and this closure will remain in affect until such time as these areas have been inspected, tested, and repaired as needed. You are ordered to protect this sidewalk per Chapter 3304 of the State Building Code (780 CMR). Once this protection is in place, we will allow these businesses to reopen, and cars to then enter the off-load area again. Thank you in advance for your cooperation in this matter. If you have further questi ns please feel free to contact this office at (978) 745 —9595, ext 5643. Sinc ely,HBarbeau o ph E.Assistant or/ Local Inspector CC: file, Mayor's Office, Fire Dept., Police Dept., Health Dept., Councilor McCarthy r _ _ _ �� ,L. ,C •P.t / • C ' - y4 CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETM OF SALEM. MA BOARD OF APPEAL CLERK'S OFFICE J 120 WASHINGTON STREET. 3RD FLOOR SALEM. MA 01970 TEL. (978) 745-9595 STANLEY J. USOVICZ, JR. FAX (978) 740.9846 1001 JAN -2 P 3: 5b MAYOR DECISION OF THE PETITION OF ENGINE HOUSE PLAZA REALTY TRUST REQUESTING A VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 51-71 LAFAYETTE STREET B-5 A heating on this petition was held December 18, 2002 with the following Board Members present: Nina Cohen, Chairman, Richard Dionne, Stephen Hams, and Bonnie Belair Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening New in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. The petitioner is requesting a Variance from Table 3 of B-5 density regulation uses from the following; maximum lot are per dwelling unit, maximum height of buildings and floor area ratio to add 2 additional stories and residential uses for the property located at 51-71 Lafayette Street located in an B-5 zone. The Variances, which have been requested, upon a finding Board that: a. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building Or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings, and structure involve. b. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioners.. c. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and Without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of this district of the purpose of the Ordinance The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration Of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1. Petitioner is a Real Estate Trust, One Engine House Plaza Realty Trust, whose trustees are Michael J. O;Brian, David Walsh and Philip Hansbury. Petitioner's plans to redevelop for mixed retail and residential use for the property at 51-71 Lafayette St. known as the Salem Laundry Building. Attorney Scott Grover of 222 Essex represented the petitioners. 2. A recent analysis by Structures North Engineering uncovered an array or structural problems with the turn of the century property, including inadequacies of the roof, supporting members and the Lafayette St. fargade. The cost of reconstructing the building will be considerable, potentially exceeding one million dollars. N IIq�I�II�IIIIUIIIIII� �llll �f�r��oSt.39 P J� . . 2803032608683 Bk;20439 Pg;16 03/28/2003 08;06:00 OTHER Pe 2/4 DECISION OF THE PETITION OF ENGINE HOUSE PLAZA REALTY TRUST REQUESTING A VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 51-71 LAFAYETTE STREET B-5 page two To recover reconstruction costs, the owners plan to convert the building to residential use and create 55 condominium units. 3. Petitioners plan to add two stories, to a total building height of 78 feet. Retail use on The first floor will be retained. Parking for the owners of the condo units will be at the City of Salem's South Harbor Garage because there is no on-site parking. The project will retain the existing footprint and will preserve elements of the original design in a reconstructed core. 4. Since the Salem Laundry building does not meet density regulations for new construction, the petitioners are seeking variances from minimum lot area per dwelling unit to allow 379 square foot per unit, floor area ratio for a ratio of 5.54.1 and building height for a total height of 78 feet. As support for their request, petitioners argue that a literal enforcement of the provisions of the ordinance would be detrimental not just to the owners but to the City of Salem, because it would preclude the restoration and reuse of the historic property. 5. Petitioners will seek approval of the redevelopment plan from the Salem Redevelopment Authority and the Design Review Board, from the Planning Board and from the Conservation Commissioner. They have support for their plan from Claudia Chuber, Ward 1 Councillor, Joan Lovely, Ward 3 Councillor, Joan Kantor and Nick Helides, condomimin owners at 20 Central Street and from Salem Main Street executive director Deborah Griel. Conditional support for the project was voiced by Staley McDermet architect and former member of the Salem Redevelopment Authority, who suggested that approval of the variances should be contingent upon the preservation of the existing massing, masonry and concrete exterior wall surfaces, and detailing on the brick portion of the building. On the basis of the above finding of fact, the evidence presented at the hearing, the Zoning Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship to the petition. 3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and Without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. DECISION OF THE PETITION OF ENGINE HOUSE PLAZA REALTY TRUST REQUESTING A VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 51-71 LAFAYETTE STREET B-5 page three Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted 5-0, to grant the Variances requested, subject to the following conditions; 1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statures, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted and approved by the Building Commissioner. 3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety shall be strictly adhered to. 4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to beginning any construction 5. A Certificate of Occupancy shall be obtained. 6. Petitioner shall obtain approval from all City Boards or Commission having jurisdictions including, but not limited to, the Planning Board. 7. Petitioner shall obtain a yearly parking permit within 1,000 feet and renew them on a yearly basis for the condo owners. Variance Granted December 18, 2002 �,UyLti+J � Nina Cohen (J�"-\ Board of Appeal 2003032600683 Bk;20439 Pg;17 03/28/2003 08:08:00 OTHER Vp 314 2003032600683 Bk:20439 Pg:I& 03/2612003 06:06:00 OTHER Pp 614 A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CIITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 day date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11. The Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certificate of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that is has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. Board of Appeal Date MAR i r 2001 I hereby certify thaf 20 days have expked from the date this instrument was received, and 'th.,: 1 10 APPEAL has:beeafiled in fhis offirp. ATrue Copy • ' `- J` ATTEST: CITY CL•'ERK,Se-tem-MA-S. SERAFINI, SERAFINI, DARLING & CORRENTI, LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 63 FEDERAL STREET SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 JOHN R. SERAFINI. SR, TELEPHONE JOHN R. SERAFINI. JR. 978-744-0212 JOHN E. DARLING 781-581-2743 JOSEPH C. CORRENTI _ TELECOPIER 978-741-4683 February 28, 2008 VIA HAND DELIVERY Joanne Scott, Health Agent City of Salem Board of Health 120 Washington Street, 4th Floor Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Re: Engine House Pizza 71 Lafayette Street Dear Ms. Scott: Please be advised that this office represents the owner and operator of Engine House Pizza concerning the Board of Health Order dated February 21, 2008. Engine House Pizza is aggrieved by the Order and requests a hearing before the Board of Health. Please let me know once a nearing has been scheduled. Sincerely, Joseph C. Correnti cc: Mr. Peter Dragon Robert K. McCarthy, Ward Councillor Lt, Erin Griffin, Salem Fire Prevention Thomas St. Pierre, Building Commissioner Mayor Kimberley A. Driscoll Feb 27 08 12: 14p Salem Police Department 978-744-9952 p. l CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS Is BOARD OF HEALTH120 WASHINGTON STREET, 4TH FLOOR SALEM, MA 01970 TEL. 978-74 1-1800 FAX 978-745-0343 KIMBERLEY DRISCOLL JSCOTT@SALEM,COM MAYOR JOANNE SCOTT HEALTH AGENT February 21,2008 THIS IS AN ORDER Peter Dragon Engine House 71 Lafayette Street Salem,MA 01970 RE: Engine House Pizza 71 Lafayette Street Salem, MA 01970 Dear Mr.Dragon: This office has determined that there exists a Public Health nuisance relative to Chapter 111,Section 123 of the Massachusetts General Laws,and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Regulation 310 CMR 7.00: Offensive odor being emitted to the atmosphere Nuisance conditions from the ventilation system at your business were observed upon an inspection conducted on February 20,2008. In accordance with 105 CMR 590.000 Section 6-501.14(B): If vented to the outside,ventilation system many not create a public health hazard or nuisance or unlawful discharge. Therefore,you are hereby ordered to abate this nuisance within 30 days of receipt of this Order. You must take appropriate measures to ensure that this nuisance does not continue to occur in the future. Failure on your part to comply with this order may cause suspension or revocation of your food permit. Should you be aggrieved by this order,you have the right to request a hearing before the Board of Health. A request for a hearing must be received in writing in the office of the Board of Health within 7 days of receipt of this order. At said hearing,you will be given an opportunity to be heard and to present witness and documentary evidence as to why this order should be modified or withdrawn. You may be represented by an attorney. Please also be informed that you have the right to inspect and obtain copies of all relevant inspection or investigation reports,Orders,and other documentary information in the possession of this Board,and that any adverse parry has the right to be present during the hearing. If you have any questions,kindly contact this office at(978)741-1800. For the Board of Health: Reply to: anne ScottJanet Dionne Health Agent Senior Sanitarian Ce: ward councilor, building department, fire prevention Certified Mail: 7005 3110 0000 7160 3859 gONDI ,gOJ CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS PUBLIC PROPERTY DEPARTMENT 1 20 WASHINGTON STREET, 3RD FLOOR SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE: 978-745-9595 EXT. 380 FAX 978-740-9846 KIMBERLEY DRISCOLL MAYOR February 4, 2008 51-71 Lafayette Street Realty Trust David Walsh Trustee 71 Washington Street Salem, MA. 01970 RE: Violation Notice Dear Mr. Walsh: This Department cited a building code violation on August 16, 2007. Our records indicate that no permits have been pulled to correct the violation. You are directed to contact this office with the plans and installation date. Failure to correct this code violation will result in further enforcement actions. If you have any questions, please contact me directly. Sin rely, — Thomas St. Pierre Building Commissioner cc: Lt. Erin Griffin, Fire Prevention Great North Property Management ONDIT CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS PUBLIC PROPERTY DEPARTMENT n A' 120 WASHINGTON STREET, 3RD FLOOR M+ . SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01 970 TELEPHONE: 978-745-9595 EXT. 380 Doi FAX: 978-740-9846 KIMBERLEY DRISCOLL MAYOR August 16, 2007 71 Lafayette Street Realty Trust David Walsh Trustee c/o Engine House Pizza 71 Lafayette Street Salem Ma 01970 RE: 51-71 Lafayette Street This letter is to formalize discussions that we have had regarding a building code violation at the Derby Lofts Building. The specific violation is the hood fan, located in the Engine House Restaurant not being tied into the welded steel duct that has been installed in the building. The original permit submitted and approved, by this office required the hood fan to connect to a vertical duct that terminates above the roof. State Building Codes 780 CMR, Section 110.8 "Engineering Details, reports, calculations,plans and specifications": requires the submittal of stamped plans as a requirement prior to issuance of building permit. Failure to construct the project per the drawings is a violation of the building code. Therefore, you are directed to secure a building permit and to begin the work within 15 days of receipt of this letter. Failure to comply will result in a complaint being filed in Salem District Court. If you feel you are aggrieved by this order, your appeal is to the Board of Buildings Regulations and Standards in Boston. If you need further information, please contact me directly. i" S cerely, Thomas St. Pierre Building Commissioner cc: Lt. Erin Griffin, Fire Marshall Derby Lofts Condominium Great North Properties 6 I, V CITY OF SALEM9 MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SERVICES z a 120 WASHINGTON STREET, 4TH FLOOR O' SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 A��MIN61�Nt BRUCE D. THIBODEAU, P.E. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SERVICES/CITY ENGINEER STANLEY J. LISOVICZ„ JR. TEL: 978-745-9595 EXT. 321 MAYOR FAX: 978-745-0349 Memorandum To: Thomas St. Pierre }^ / From: Bruce D. Thibodeau, P.E.�6 CC: Joe Nerden Date: 9/19/03 Re: Conditions for Routing Slip—51-71 Lafayette St.—Derby Lofts On September 18, 2003 Joe Nerden and I met with the design team—lead by Scott Patrowicz. The following conditions were discussed: Utilities The intent is to have one wastewater collection system connection. Currently there are two connections both on Lafayette St. The connection to the south, closest to Derby St. intersection, is to be abandoned by cutting and capping at the main. The connection to the north, intended to be the sewer connection for the project,will be internally inspected by closed circuit TV camera to determine the actual location and condition of the connection into the 42" main. There will also be one drainage system connection for the project to the drain line on Central St. All other connections, including a boiler blow off connection on Derby Street,will be abandoned by cutting and capping at the main. The proponent will inspect the Central St. drain line and determine pipe size, condition, and capacity. The results of the inspection will be reported to the City's Engineering Department prior to a Street Opening Permit being issued. Existing water connections will remain. It was suggested that the proponent's representatives contact the City's Water Registrar concerning a new water meter for the project. Sidewalks Existing sidewalks are to remain as is, except the concrete sidewalk section on Central Street,which will be replaced. It was suggested that the proponent take appropriate precautions not to impact the existing sidewalks adjacent to the building during construction. If the sidewalks are damaged during construction than the proponent will repair these at their expense. 1 No. �J ity of Sa em 1s ward ;s X b I — esu Ccn APR�FOAT10N 1 5 coo s P ,a s i N v2w R PERMIT TO BUILD'ADDITION, MAK€AITERATIONS OR NEW.CONSTRUCTION IMPORTANT-A00cant taN-items=in seeNuns.4 14 14 N,and IX. L ATP";ATIM4 51-71 Lafayette Street ZONING LOCA'110N, nw st�Tl OF BETWEEN . Derby Street AND Front Street BUILDING rcsa�sr�n3MUSTOwn LUT_ SueoNISON IAT_eipcK sem' N. TYPE AND COST OF BUILDING-AN opiimf&Orn01ete PaHs,A=- A. TYPE OF IMPROVEMENT O. PROPOS®USE•FOR"OEMOUTIOW USE MOST RECENT USE 1 ❑ ""am . . .. .. Neamm�epY 2 Ad*IIwf9 .1u mAwbe ct/ 12 ❑Orr9wwv, . nou'rq unrbgutle40anY.nPR0.f71 T'1 ..ma. /�yn0sr 19 a!]nM atlfertdigiors- 3 ❑ AII9rao Mw 2 aboral 13u uf«b 74 . .esi Cl en ial � 20QN -00 __ -_ 21 ❑-Pet1�r09a9p9 - 4 ❑R9P9a fepreoanal 11 ❑.TwaiewfJrlegenrberctafYs W"lnilorY. 22 Q swomobma9epm"op9 s wEer�r.gLrfareP,.>r.lssdefrtle4anrrnnrbar- ._ .. 2sz+199pa.I.ara919f.1 of alts a bu4dog 0 vat a 131 1S Gasps - 241--I Q:4311I0etlY§I�pml®Ild s ❑ ermdep vd=amm ,9 p coom 25 ❑ PdA umv T ❑ FoaW0m pray 29 Q.soml.i wv+ oea[.ea cuaw 17 [3ocs-sp9cyr _ Sk R. &OWNERSlRP 2a Q,TWq.wr 9 ®PrigbEndiriCial,aotpofafratl,tifanP�osl - 2913 Oew-Ancif, 1] s RAee lreesaL Safe er Ioai B? + 5St P>`6V z l Ac L 50 C.COST I0R*4Demal ....,, Nor9aatleeer De9raOs n aelalRiopppeu m of .ay..Iooa .. A!? Y.A" nutaRw 91m.Iandevb rJa1fosp4a1.eWMMV9MWLae0mforY wa.0af.olapa. 10. 0a1a:rworema9 s7 869 000 . a"Bw°dOaL°of�9a�e.apam`ad°afi.raer"rsm`or a°raanpar°a°ulerg ... ..... . , � a1ntlWimr6�f�t.p.n.o4e9a�aggulriff9-.m+9�99a aritr.wavo9.sa ro b9aaa9ie bunat.rrpau Retail space . nei'iaw6Rxdst _ 812, 000 . . a Ebcw=W . n.Phu pmpp 740 000 . GCI�� L r:!5ui -L e-,r.r,pQpapww,;g 610 ENV ALO�� CR e 1fill .5 aGpsaernarer.Fire P _ 469 , 000 . _ PkfZm, las n A> D i1.TewwsroF9�PRovEmeNr ion .$ _,0-, 500 000, I RNT Ski � S O�rl2p3g Al SELECTED CHARACTER ISTIC$Q17.BUILD1W-For new t�ibd w and adddkvm con?Om Parts E-L;dwmbnn, ' to on 1 J 8 M aN ottlEYs skip io N E. PRINCIPM TYP>E�PF FRAME 'F.PMCM TYPE OF HE/1T9lG M G. TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL ...L TYPE OF MECKUWAL 30.Q:1Nrobiii6wFbeetlnpl 350 On - 40_W-HYfeaearr9oaf9errY - Vpi,lrwebeerrrstb 31�❑ S6Woad ftwo 38001 41 i7 PMVft4eepa %Iw*.6W t woftr w 32 0 umud steel 3T © memicty - . . ._:.. . . Mea IS'❑ No w 0 Reoft aed mlrtate 3B:Q.Log - - Ii TYPE OF WATM SUPPLY 34-Q:opra-so«yr 3@.p..�l9fer•SPaa/Y. 4e[f Ya ,..1.❑ No 43 QP4ft% 9a74fa91wnj ..:.. DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE VI. VALIDATION Bui d)ng FOR-DEPARTMENT USE ONLY Permit number Building use Grow Permit issued 19_ Pm Grading Buklin Pernift Fee $ 1�j o o O I �e luadig Certificate of Occupancy $ 0=PV�Y LoadApproved.by. Drain Tile $ Plan Review Fee $ 9' UILE NOTES-AND"Data•(For department use) 414 ' Ln� � C' � C s•`c� i PERMIT TO BE MAILED TO: DATE MAILED: Construction to be started by. Completed by. J.DIMENSIONS 6 �.M DEMOLITION OF STRUCTURES: .. 49 m e.�eror'°t M °'a efd a::Omrs Has Approval from Historical Commission been received Aasea forarry stnuiure over fifty(so)rears? Yes_ No_ s0. Tmm a mx m.a— 20,415 S k gSafe Number K NUMBER OF OFFSTREET PARgNG SPACES Pest : sr. Edd N/A N/A ITAVE THE FOLLOWING UTILITIES BEEN DISCONNECTED?es % -sz Oiafoas RESB /TIAL euitiritGs oras ss Entkeef 0 _.. FW 104 Sewer: sb:,NinEer a .ion» 4 OMMENTATION FOR THE ABOVE MUST BE ATTACHED. Pill BEFORE A PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED. IN. COMPLETETHEFOLLOWING: Historic DWrirr Yes_ No% (If Yes,Pleaw eraiose4oamwdaboar tmm-Hist.Cemj ; Conservation Area? Yes_ No—A (If yes Please endo to order of CoedrGonsl Has Flre4ireVentiorrappromed and stamped Plans or applications?. Yes—X No_ Is property IooaUert m the S:RJI district? Yes-L- No_ Comply war 2anhg? Yes Nom (N no,enclose-8oard- Appeal decision) Is lot grandlateed' Yes..:,- Nom (H yes,suhmft documerrial hf no,sub nit Board of Appeal declaim) ff inm sortshxftt,has#*,,proper Roofing SIiP been erciosed? Yg .. No_ N/A Is Architecluraf Access'Board approval-required? Yes_ Nom (If yes,submit documentation) Massachusetts State Contractor License# 0 012 4 7 Salem License# 487 Home NmpnovementContracBor# '114450 Homeowners Exempt form fit aWcable)'Yes_ No X CONSiRUCTION•TO BE%.CAMMENJCEO WITHNSIX(S)MONTHS OF ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT CONSTRUCTION IS 70 BE COMPLETED BY. 1$ months after tf extension pi___ subrrat in writing to the fR90kbebl'BFi>5 gs issuance ot permit . V. IDENTIFICATION• To be completed by all applloanfs Nmr Meiling a&wm-NA'bw..meet apt&w mb ZIP Cafe Tel Nn t. Derby Lofts LLC 843 Mass Ave Cambrid e A 02139 617-491 Or « i James J. Welch & 27 Congress St . Salem MA 01970 978-744 CC . , Inc . eorerrA 300 a Winter Street ', 209 Essex. St . , Salem, MA 01970 978-744 .ArdWea« FJy,;,r Architects l hereby ow*# d the proeosed•wedNsar*eraed fay ire Owner 01160011. and 918111haire basil audWriZed by tie oarreer tomake Oft -appicaton- as fab aWroraed'werit aria we - at.apabo ole laws of this iurisdicton. APP4caaondaze._ ! JJaames aJ.WWtelch & Co . Inc, 2277�Congress St . , Salem, MA 01970 9/8/03 VI ZONING PLAN EXAMINERS NOTES DISTRICT USE FRONT YARD SIDE YARD - SIDE YARD . REAR YARD NOTES WE OR PLOT PLAN•For Applicant Use See plan . O N CITY'OF SALEM k' ROUTING SLIP t li.e Iltti. - J CHECKED DEPARTMENTS REQUIRE SIGNATURES BEFORE BUILDING PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED, Ic LOCATION: 51-71 Lafayette St . DATE: 9/8/03 APPLICANT: James J. Welch & Co . , Inc . jI j ASSESSORS OFFICE @ 93 WASHINGTON ST. FRANK KULIK DATE: -IU'O') CITY CLERK(if involving a e eet) Q93 WASHINGTON ST. K DEBBIE BURKINSHAR( �/N 1 DATE: i PUBLIC SERVICES(Engineering Dept.) 1@120 WASHINGTON ST,4TM FL. - BRUCE THIBODEAU DATE: �l —�9 D �J [t] WATER DEPT. �J S Cl AT E: @120 WASHINGTON ST,4TM FL. [ �HELEN-JbkDOSZ- f—r,Tt Hi FSUii<�.= SS CON P'R BOBI ESCHENE yrN @120 WASHINGTON S1 DATE: ✓ PLANNING V. "311 �. t Q120 WASHINGTON ST..3P°FL.. HE1QI5 Scc .e— DATE:_4e�d`t J v CONSERVATION CO ON(Planning eptJ @120 WASHINGTON ST.,30.D DON CEFALO DATE:*'� ELECTRICAL @ 48 LAFAYETTE STREET N0 .REAR JOHN GIARDI DATE:_�K3 FIRE PRE VE N @29 FORT AVE(WILLOWS AREA) CAPT.HU L40 ATE: HEALTH @120 WASHINGTON ST.,4T"FL. JOANNE SCOTT X Pza!�,4,— DATE: /-d 5 -U y ❑$ BUILDING DEPT ! Q 120 WASHINGTON ST..?4°FL. 1 TOM ST. PIERRE 3g 5 eE�C I/✓ DATE:/ 301 ***SUBMIT R'ITH PERMIT APPLICATION WHEN COMPLETED*** I,J J � 1 Sent By: DESANCTIS INS; 7819335645; 8-Sep-03 10:30AM; Page 1/1 "COR _ CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE. OP� ` DA0 (MWDD/YY) LCH 1 09/09/03 PRODUCER THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE DeSaincti4 Insurance Agcy, Inc. HOLDER.THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND,EXTEND OR 36 Cummir gs Park ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. Woburn bu 01801 INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE Phone: 78 -935-8480 Fax:761-933-5645 INSURED _ INSURER A: First Pj2ecialty Insurance Cc _ INSURERS: The Commerce Insurance Company ®e J. Welch & Co. , Inc. INSURER C: Crum 6 rorster Insurance Co. _ Congas S reet INSURER O: American IRterndtlOnal Group S 3. 19A 0197 _.-__ INSDRER E: COVERAGES THE POLICIES t INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED.NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REOUINT.TERM OR CONOI nON OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, E INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS,EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES.AGO EGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE SEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. LTR TY EOF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER TATEYMMIDDIM LIMITS GENERAL IL1TY EACH OCCURRENCE S 1 000 000 A X COMMRCDILGENERAL LIABILm IRG79369 01/01/03 01/01/04 FIRE DAMAGE(Any anefire) $ 100,000 C IMAGE AGE �OCCUR' MED EXP(My me pwepn) $----------- IX Contractual LlabH . l I PERSONAL BADVINJURY s-1,000,000 '. X XCU aaard9 iNCLHOLDNAIw.aaeDDY GENERAL AGGREGATE $2,000,000 � GENIAGG GATELIMITAPPLIES PER: PRODUCTS-COMP/OP AGG $ 1,0001000 POUC X JECT LOC _ AUTOMOBIL 9 LIABILITY 8 X.ANYA 03MMXZ9712 01/01/03 01/01/04 IEa accident) INED COMBtlanp ILEUMR $ 1 000 r000 ALL HIED AUTOS BODILY INJURY E Ix SCHEO lEO AUTOS (Per Dersan) HIRED UTOS BODILY INJURY S NON-01NEO AUTOS IPBl accidan0 PROPERTY DAMAGE S (Per aciden0 GARAGE LU SHUTY AUTOONLY-EAACCIDENT S ANYAUrO OTHERTHAN H,ACC S AUTO ONLY: AGO $ EXCESS LIA HILITY _ EACH OCCURRENCE $5,000,000 C X OCCURuCLAIMSMADE 5530841568 (OMB) 01/01/03 01/O1/041AGGREGATE $10,000,000 E DEDU IBL! RETEN ION $None i $ WORKERS C DMPENSAnON AND X I TORYLIMITS JUTW ER D ;EMPLOY LIABILITY WC7253132 01/01/03 01/01/04 E.L.EACH ACCIDENT � $1,000,000 MA,CT,ME,NH,RI E.L.DISEASE-EA EMPLOYEE $ 1 000 000 E.L.DISEASE-POLICY LIMB $ 1 OOO 000 OT1ER DESCRIPTION OF I PERATIONBILOCATIONSNEHCLESIEXCLUSIONS ADDED By ENDORI EMENOSPECIAL PROVISIONS PROJECT: erby Lofts, Salem, MA. CERTIFICATE IOLDER N 1 ADDRIoNAL INSURED;INSURER LETTER:_ CANCELLATION CITYS-1 SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DBSCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF,THE ISSUING INSURER WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL 'AD_DAYS WRITTEN C ty of Shcem NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT,BUT FAILURE TO DO SO SMALL H ilding Permit Division IMPOSE NO OBUGATION OR LIABILITY OF ANY KIND UPON THE INSURER,ITS AGENTS OR S lam MA 01970 REPRESENTATIVES. AUTHORQED RESENTATIVS ' J1 ?? , ACORD 2"( 97) �? - ACORD CORPORATION 1988 RCG LLC FLEET 5-131110 006273 CLIENTS'TRUST FUNDS L-D�r5 www.fleet.com 17 IVALOO STREET,SUITE 100 Central Square Office - SOMERVILLE,MA 02143 Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139 CHECK NO. - 6273 PAY ------------------- one Hundred Five Thousand, Five ----DATE------------ 00/10OAMOUNT TO THE ORDER Jan 22, 04 105, 005.00 OF .City of Salem AU HORI2ED SIGNATURE 11'00627311' i:0 10001<*." 94210 206090 i ROOF NOTCH FLANGE- TYR 1/411 X 8" X 8" STL. BEAR, PLT.; 9/16" HOLE; FIELD WELD-TYR lei A BRACES @ SAME SIDE OF COL:TYR x O 1/411 X 811 X 8' SE ON AN.S. STL. BEAR. PLT.; 9/16" HOLE; -FIELD WELD- TYR *4TH. FLR. HILTI KB 11 1/2-2 3/4 ( OR EQUIV.)- TYR 5/8" A325 BOLTNUT, F.W.STYR PROPOSED BRACING FOR WALL DEMOLITION BRACING ELEVATIONS— AT TYR DERBY LOFTS PROJECT, HILTI KWIK—BOLT 3/811=11 SALEM,MA. B. 11 1/2-2 3/ SCALE: AS NOTED 2/2/04 OR EQUIV.)TYR AK STRUCE ENG. L'i *3 RD. FLR. 6.9 PEABODYMA. i t � NDIT CITY OF SALEM DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STANLEY J.USOVICZ,JR. MAYOR 120 WASHINGTON STREET•SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS 01970 JOSEPH P.WALSH,JR. TEL:978-745-9595•FAX:978-740-0404 DIRECTOR MEMORANDUM TO: Thomas St. Pierre, Acting Building Commissioner Department of Public Properties FROM: Denise S. McClure, Deputy Director Department of Planning and Community Development CC: Mark Meche, Winter Street Architects DATE: October 20, 2003 RE: Building Permit for the Parcel Located at 51-71 Lafayette Street (Derby Lofts) The attached routing slip has been approved by the Department of Planning and Community Development (DPCD) with the following condition: "Any work associated with the fagade and/or the exterior materials of the structure cannot commence prior to review and approval by the Salem Redevelopment Authority and the Planning Board of the change in material as shown on the plans dated August 15, 2003. If the change in material is not approved by either or both boards, then the applicant must submit plans showing the material as initially approved by the SRA and the Planning Board(plans dated April 3,2003 and on file in the DPCD office)." Following the Board's decision concerning the change in material,I will provide written notification to the Building Inspector. In addition,the Planning Board required that the following items be approved by the Department of Planning and Community Development prior to the issuance of a Building Permit: 1. Building lighting placement 2. Required period lights 3. Final lighting plan (types of light fixtures) 4. Final design of gate on the drive - thru 5. Drive - thru visual warning devices including a mirror, warning sign, and alarm J .r These items will be submitted to the Department within thirty(30)days for review and approval. I will notify the Building Inspector in writing following the Department's approval. Please contact me at DPCD if you have any questions or need further information. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. FROM AK-STRUCT FAX NO. : 19785315927 Feb. 05 2994 11:38AM P1 AK STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING 8 Coleman Street INK Peabody, MA 01960-4104 (978) 531-5927 February 5, 2004 Michael Welch James J. Welch & Co. 27 Congress Street Salem, MA 01970 REF: Derby Lofts Exterior Demolition Dear Mr. Welch; Related to my report of Feb.2,2004 and telephone conversation with you, the use of small powered hammers and the use of hydraulic scythe are recommended for removal of portland cement concrete and brick masonry structures within the Derby Lofts project. The engineer's concern is the avoidance of excessive vibration and shock within the project The existing walls to floors connection is problematic;, at best. The connection is based on cement concrete bonding, combined with a lack of lateral reinforcement throughout the two buildings. Sincer�I �' ASN Os '' ,y,_ 7.a( RUrnus�crY �� Andrew Kuchinsky,P.E. a v STRUCTURAL a \ No.38788 .o ,i��'r7e�.R� R• �� h Sent By: DESANCTIS INS; 7819335645; 5-Feb-04 11 :01AM; 'Page 1 Ommxinp Park DeSanctis Insur nce �.Agency,Inc. w . ' Fax Date: _ 3 PVA($)imdmlwg this mm shat TO: i�tzkK 4� me,�-t "G��"'- From: BERYL FINN Fam Cl 12 5 7 /Y - 8 Phona: 781-935-8480 (E9-77 Phone Fax: 781-933-5645 cc: c REMARU: ❑ UIVIld ❑ As l oa RNuc" ❑ ritac RqAy ASAP ❑ Please ommene C , c,; I r7ez,1 Sent By: DESANCTIS INS; 7a19335645; 5-Feb-04 11 :01AM; Page 2/3 UCENSE OR PERMIT BOND Street Permit Bond #0373107 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, THAT WE ,iampg .T- Wel h & .0 2n ')„7 Congraaa St- - Salem, MA_ 01970 a.s Principal, and Internagq#4,al Fidelity Insu'xance CO as Surety, and having its principal office in the Town of Franklin. MA as Surety, are held firmly bound unto city o” Salem, MA hereinafter called the Obligee in the penal .um of One Thousand Dollars (,1,000 �. Lawful money of the United Statas of America to be paid to the said Obligee,for which paymWt well and truly to be made we bind ourselves, our heirs,executors, administrators and assigns,joiWy and severally,firmly by these presents. SIGNED WITH OUR HANDS At�!D SEALED WITH OUR SEALS this 5th day Of February. 2004 WHEREAS a license or permit has been granted by the Obligee's to the above bounden Principal authorizing hien to Street Permit NOW,THEREFORE,THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that If the Principal shall faithfully oboerve the provisions of the laws, ordinances, and resolutions, governing the issuance of this license or permit , then this obligation shall be null and void, otherwise to remain in full force and effect. This bond shall become effective the 5th day of February, 2004 The Surety may cancel this bong at any time by filing with the Obligee 30 days notice of its desire to be relieved of liability. The Surety shall not be discharged Vom any liability already accrued under this bond, or which shall accrue hereunder before the expiratiorlof the 3o days _ period. James J. Welch & co. ,Ine. Principal BY: International Fidelity Insurance Co. ; Surety ,, ) BY: / L. Robert DeSanctis, Attorney-in4a3ccl Sent By: OESANCTIS INS; 7819335645; 5-Feb-04 11 :01AM; Page 3/3 Tel(973)624-7200 POWE,,t OF ATTORNEY 11,4MRNATIONAL 11DELITY INSURANCE COMPANY ROME OFFICE:ONE NEWARK CENTER,20TH FLOOR NEWAY,2K,NEW JERSEY 071025207 FOR BID BONDiRIDEWCONSENTS/AMDAVITS KNOW ALL I/1FN BY THESEPRESENTS- nu IIPf W,4ATIONAL FQ/EUTY INSURANCE l DNTANY, a corporation organized and ending bws of the State of New Jersey,ad baying its principal office b'S she Q9•of Newark,New Jersey,does hereby consaade and appoint _ CHRISTINE B. DRAM, ADAM W. DESANCTIS,! BRYAN.F. JOWA, L. ROBERT DESANCTIS, GREGORY D. JUSIA, JAMES J. AXON, HICEJ4XL F. CARNEY, WILDER PARKS, JR„ HICHMM T. GILBERT Woburn, JCA. its tints and bwfvl atmroey(s}m-hct to execute,ml and deliver fYx and on its behalf as wetly, and all bonds and imdatabop,monaets of Ww,*and enter wdaoga obligatory m tlw mire AKmf.which are or may iw albw�p�ap required or perms law,atanue �y� B coonxet or otl uwise and O�DMPANY ifLdty and amply,m Ali inn and olxupoues.a irthe same bad been doV exi��s mINTi�b'11Jo� y6 tltY�aTry�s at� principal of6. .Y� y 6e meted, eery of y olid Dbecmr�s oINl lIONA r, H&rcvob&CO�'.F�Am atiyne�g called and be on me 1m day o PeormtY�J971 by ft Board of The Resident or any Pace President,Bseevave Vitt President,Sfcmtary or Assistant Sxtuary.shall have power and aadwriry OJ Tonodaizjl g;oo�-is iaa off indemelty and other r wafdogs othem to ob34gamry�onamm t of pd,f*A Company.and amch the Sal Of she(?omAW teecm,bonds and (2)To remove.at any time.any aueh amoroey-in-bet Rod revoke,die authority given. . Further this Power of Atm ise-,ma and sealed�hyy 4�naaim;le pu mant m rosolutiou of the Board of Dimetors of said Company adopted at a meeting duly sued and bell on the 29m�y Zf d,1992 of=the allowing is a ave excerpt: .Now therefore the dgmanea of wch of5cca and the aal of do Compmy may be affixed a any wrJ.power of aaolney or any attifrate relating macro by facsimile,and soy etch of amoroey or certifiate barbg,a::A faraimrle aWtamtrs or faesimik,seal shag be valid and tint- dle Company and any bond we� ceralledby which it is�faa�le dgmpaa axi facsemile sal shall be valid and binding upon me Company ftin [vane with respect m arty ITT/,-tG d WIUWJRDPam wrpoala adored to lee a by�wAodzcd*Mm,FIDELITY a day of ACE ugugu t,AANY SD.IM.caused dSs fnraumwt Abe . vo�E Je r EMRM71ONAL HELM RJSURANCE r 1804ra- NEW JERSEY STATE Essex 1Nl tf A� vitz- On this 31st da of August 1998,before me lime the'm6reyevrlu"tW whin exemhtd tlm m d' instrumen to sue telly knewo.and.bring b me duly said mf is b Corporate Salo of W Company.that the�Xd Corporate Sul wdd°his sigoahm were��Coordda of die BBootardd othefirectors oaffixed f said Company. p�D IN TESTIMONY WHERWF,i have baeonto ret my hind affixed my Official Seal. �Q-• at the City of Newark,New Jauoy me day and year fust above written. , NO O _ puA NOTARY PUBLIC OF NEW JERSEY C FATIRCATION My Commission Expires Nov.21,2005 I,the undetAgnd offtar of WrEIMTIONAL FIDELITY INSURANCE COMPANY do hereby certify dun f have compared die foregoing copy of the Power of Avomey NO atRdavir,and the copy of the SCCdoa of ties".By-Ltws of aid Company as set forth in said Power of Attorney,with me ORIGINALS ON IN THE NOME OFFICE OF SAID COMPANY,and that the sat6o aro oorreel transcripts mcloot,and of rhe whole of Jae said originals,and that the said Power of Attorney has not been revoked and is now in full forte and cMf t IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF,I have heceuete ser my hand edits 5th day of February, 2004 Assistant Secretary CfFY OF SALEM DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STANLEY J.USOVICZ,JR. MAYOR 120 WASHINGTON STREET•SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS 01970 JOSEPH P.WALSH,JR. TEL 978-745-9595•FAX 978-740-0404 1��,�fL+1�DMECTOOR�,��r�T 7'7�,� lY1J.:.11101�L' NDlJM TO: Thomas St.Pierre,Acting Building Commissioner Department of Public Properties FROM: Denise S. McClure,Deputy Directo Department of Planning and Community Development CC: Mark Meche,Winter Street Architects DATE: October 20,2003 RE: Building Permit for the Parcel Located at 51-71 Lafayette Street (Derby Lofts) The attached routing slip has been approved by the Department of Planning and Community Development (DPCD) with the following condition: "Any work associated with the facade and/or the exterior materials of the structure cannot commence prior to review and approval by the Salem Redevelopment Authority and the Planning Board of the change in material as shown on the plans dated August 15,2003. If the change in material is not approved by either or both boards, then the applicant must submit plans showing the material as initially approved by the SRA and the Planning Board(plans dated April 3,2003 and on file in the DPCD office)." Following the Board's decision concerning the change in material,I will provide written notification to the Building Inspector. In addition,the Planning Board required that the following items be approved by the Department of Planning and Community Development prior to the issuance of a Building Permit: 1. Building lighting placement 2. Required period lights 3. Final lighting plan (types of light fixtures) 4. Final design of gate on the drive - thru 5. Drive -thru visual warning devices including a mirror, warning sign, and alarm c� These items will be submitted to the Department within thirty(30)days for review and approval. I will notify the Building Inspector in writing following the Department's approval. Please contact me at DPCD if you have any questions or need further information. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. . M 'Q d ' �' . Syw oJ. $ `� � � �@. sl a tr •ti - - 11 ' 9 � f "A.S. . 1 � e per:: t.. YF � _ b o & J ':i� m a "" r' J, G r D ❑ , s: ti CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD January 29,2004 Mr. Matt Picarsic RCG LLC 17 Ivaloo Street Suite 100 Somerville,MA 02143 RE: Building Permit for the Parcel Located at 51-71 Lafayette Street (Derby Lofts) Dear Mr. Picarsic: The Department of Planning&Community Development sent a letter dated October 30, 2003,which approved the Building Department routing slip allowing the owners of 51-71 Lafayette Street to obtain a building permit, but required the applicant to submit certain plans and details within 30 days. The applicant did not receive a building.permit and therefore did not submit the required information within 30 days. As I understand, the applicant has provided the Building Department with the necessary information to move forward with the building permit. The Department of Planning& Community Development (DPCD) has not yet been provided with the information requested in its letter of October 30, 2003. Thus, DPCD approves the issuance of a building permit for Derby Lofts,with the following condition: "Any work associated with the £made and/or the exterior materials of the structure cannot commence prior to review and approval by the Salem Redevelopment Authority and the Planning Board of the change in material as shown on the plans dated August 15, 2003. If the change in material is not approved by either or both boards, then the applicant must submit plans showing the material as initially approved by the SRA and the Planning Board (plans dated April 3, 2003 and on file in the DPCD office)." Following the Board's decision concerning the change in material, I will provide written notification to the Building Inspector. In addition, as required by the previous letter, the following items must be submitted to the Department within thirty (30) days for review and approval following the issuance of the building permit: 1. Building lighting placement 2. Required period lights 3. Final lighting plan (types of light fixtures) 4. Final design of gate on the drive—thru 5. Drive—thru visual warning devices including mirror, warning sign, and alarm 120 WASHINGTON STREET, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TEL: 978.745.9595 FAx: 978.740.0404 ♦WWW.SALEM.COM ' I will notify the Building Inspector in writing following the Department's approval. Please contact me at DPCD if you have any questions or need further information. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Sincerely, , Denise S. McClure,AICP Assistant City.Planner CC: Thomas St. Pierre,Acting Building Commissioner Mark Meche,Winter Street Architects Mark Pimentel,J.J. Welch&Co. City of SalemMassachusetts Fire Department �Qrnrso 48 Lafayette Street 29 Fort Ave: Robert Turner Salem, Massachusetts 01970-3695 TtT enon chief Tel 978-744-1235 Bureau 978-744-6990 FaX 978-745-4646 978-745-7777 FIRE DEPARTMENT CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL FOR A BUILDING PERMIT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS. OF THE MASSACHUSETTS STATE BUILDING CODE . AND THE SALEM FIRE CODE, APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE FOR THE APPROVAL OF PLANS AND THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL FOR A BUILDING PERMIT BY_THE SALEM.FIRE DEPARTMENT, ( Ref. Section 113.3 of the.Mass. •Bldg.- Code);.' ' JOB LOCATION: OWNER/OCCUPANT: ` ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR:. FIRE SUPPRESSION. CONTRACTOR SIGNATURE OF • .� '" .+ !': PHONE U• ' APPLICANT• - �—} ADDRESS OF CITY OT --. -APPLICANT: 'Z.-(. ;Lp,,;Cyv ,` , t 5.. -• t' .'" �',4' • a TOc:2 � APPROVAL DATE A . Certificate of approval-is,hereby granted, on approved plans or submittal.of .r „ "proj'ect"details,=by the SALEM FIRE DEPARTMENT. AL1`plans aie approved• solely, ' for identificatiofi of 'type+ and -location of fiie piotection'devices and equipment All'planI.s ar"e ,subject to, approval' of any other"authority having jurisdiction Upon completion,, ,the applicant. or=installer(s) shal_1 request an nspection; and/or test of-the fire-protection devices and^equipment. (ADDITTIONAL REQUIREMENTS,` SEE REVERSE- SIDE. *ar} n �• ;..` ,.t - - - t. NEW CONSTRUCTION PROPERTY LOCATION HAS, NO COMPLIANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 148; SECTION 26-,C/E, M.G.L:, RRLATIVE"TO THE.3NSTALA , TION OF APPROVED FIRE ALARMDEVICES.` THE OWNER OF THIS PRO'- PERTY. .IS REQUIRED. TO OBTAIN COMPLIANCE AS A CONDITION OF- - . OBTAINING A-BUILDING PERMIT. ' PROPERTY LOCATION IS IN COMPLIACNE WITH THE PROVISION OF CHAPTER 148; SECTION 26 C/E, M.G.L. EXPIRATION DATE: SIGNATURE OF FIRE OFFICIAL S3 au FEE DUE: UNDER 7,500 SQ. FT. - $30.00 FORMA 81 3/98 7,500. SQ. FT. OR LARGER- 50.00 4•: ' In compliance with the provision .of Section 113, 5 of the Massachusetts State Building Code, and under guidelines agreed upon by the Salem Bldg. Inspector and the Salem Fire Chief, the applicant for a building permit shall obtain the Certificate of Approval (see reverse side) and stamped plan .approval from the Salem Fire .Prevention Bureau. Said application and approval is required before a building permit may be issued. The Massachusetts State Building Code requires compliance, approval of the Salem Fire Department, with reference -to provisions of Articles 4 and 12 of the Building Code, the Salem Fire Code, Massachusetts General Laws, and 527 Code of Massachusetts Regulations. ' The applicant shall submit this appiication.with three (3) sets of plans, drawn in sufficient clarity, to obtain. stamped approval of the Salem Fire Department, This applies for all new construction, substantial. ealterations, change of use and/or occupancy, . and an other approvals required by the Massachusetts General Laws, 3nd' the Salem Fire Code. K Exception: Plans will not be required for structuralwork when' the proposed work to be performed under the building,permit.will not, in .the opinion of the Building Inspector; require a plan to show the nature and'character of, the work to' be performed. 4n.Fs `4V Notice: , . 1 Plans are normally required for, fire suppression systems, ., d fire-alarm systems, tank; installations, and Fire Code; requirements. Under. the provisions of`Article 22 of the Massachusetts State,Build ng? -., Code, certain proposed projects may not- require submission of plans or il complete compliance-with new,.construction -requirements.- intthese cases, provisions of Article 22, Appendix T, and+ Tables applicable ' shall; apply:_. This section shall not; -however, s provisions outlined in the,Salem'`tire Prevention, Regulations, Chapter : 148, .MGL, or-527 Code of Massachusetts Regulations. All permits for fire cod'e' use and/or occupancy shall apply for; the entire structure; fire alarm: and/or smoke detector installation shall apply to"the; » y= entire structure based. upon' ,current `requirements'as per Lass .and/or. E'Y'.re�, Codes, but the existing structure may comply with regulations applicable for existing structures. Notice: Sub-contractors may also` be. required to Mile individual applications fora Fire Department Certificate of Approval for the area of their work. ' Such sub-contractors shall file an Applicatiori to Install with the Fire prevention Bureau prior to commencing any work for those areas applicable: FORIt fi31 RLV. 10197 r " ;:ITY OF SALEM [/ ROUTING SLIP J C;IECKED DEPARTMENTS REQUIRE SIGNATURES BEFORE BUILDING PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED. LOCATION: 51-71 Lafayette St . DATE: 9/8/03 APPLICANT: James J. Welch & Co . , Inc . ASSESSORS OFFICE @ 93 WASHINGTON ST. FRANK KULIK DATE: CITY CLERK(if involving apse eet) @93 WASHINGTON ST. II DEBBIEBURKINSHAV( DATE: �CJ PUBLIC SERVICES(Engineering Dept.) '@120 WASHINGTON ST,4T"FL. BRUCE THIBODEAU �i1il DATE: WATER DEPT. �J S GtA tL� -@120',,VASH11NGT6N ST,4T"FL. ❑ L4FOSS CON�PLC9�513P'R 86b-H'ESCxCf,NE @120 WASHINGTON ST,3RD FL. DATE: PLANNING @120 WASHINGTON ST.,3RD FL.. DENISE MCLURE /wwDATE: IO 017' v CONSERVATION CO ON( tanning ept.) @120 WASHINGTON ST.,3RD DON CEFALO DATE:N I 2 ELECTRICAL --� @ 48 LAFAYETTE STREET ND .REAR JOHN GIARDI DATE:'��CC3 FIRE PREVE N @29 FORT AVE(WILLOWS AREA CAPT.HUDSON ATE: d ❑ HEALTH @120 WASHINGTON ST.,4T"�. / ./� JOANNE SCOTT 1- e'/r / DATE: ❑ BUILDING DEPT @ 120 WASHINGTON ST.,3'FL. �J TOM ST. PIERRE J-� A�L teL DATE: ? ji�/J3 ***SU13MTT'X1TH PERMIT APPLICATION WHEN COMPLETED*** t ��V V James J.Welch&Co.Incorporated February 23, 2004 Project: Derby Lofts Re: Town and Neighbor Relations Update On the morning of February 10, 2004 I was requested, by the Salem building dept., to attend a meeting @ Roosevelt's Restaurant which is located on Central Street. The attendees included a representative from that Mayor's office as well as the Building Inspector and the Assistant Building Inspector, JJW project superintendent and myself. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss complaints from the adjacent business. The business owner of Roosevelt's, Hugh McGowan requested that the building dept. address the ongoing construction @ Derby Lofts and the affects it was having on his ability to access his parking lot. I was previously informed of the fact that the restaurant was and would be closed for a period of time (6-8 weeks), due to water damage caused by a burst sprinkler pipe. Due to this information and after obtaining the proper permitting as well as Police details, we planned to adjust our schedule in an effort to take advantage of the closing and concentrate on the Central Street side of the project to avoid any possible impact to Roosevelt's while they would be open. At this meeting I informed the building inspector that although, we had previously discussed the majority of the staging to take place on Lafayette Street, we would be staging this portion of the project on Central Street due to the ability to provide safer environment as a result of the reduced business activity and foot traffic on the street. Mr. McGowan had stated that he had given permission to the crane operator to park his crane in his parking lot overnight in addition to allowing workers from the project to eat their lunches in the restaurant and use his facilities. Mr. McGowan then stated that due to the impact of the construction on his business, i.e. the workers using his facilities, the crane parked in his lot overnight and our closing of the street while his business was closed, that he would request that we, pay for his rent. I declined. I thanked him for his generosity to the workers but, I could not understand the request for compensation as we did not anticipate nor ask for his generosity and due to the fact that the restaurant was currently closed thru no fault of ours. Understanding the importance of maintaining a civil relationship with Mr. McGowan I provided him with my number as well as my site superintendents number so that in the event that he needed a vehicle or piece of equipment moved he would be able to communicate with us. We assured him that we would take every step possible to accommodate his needs in the event that our operation would hinder his ability to proceed with repairs to his business. Also, upon the request of the building inspector t agreed to provide a schedule of the potential activity that we expect to have on Central Street during the project. We all agreed to meet again the following week to review the schedule. Construction Managers • Builders 27 Congress Street Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Telephone (978) 744-9300 Fax (978) 744-8320 Estimating Fax (978) 744-6463 E� w �V V James J.Welch B Co.IncoFporated Re: Town and Neighbor Relations Update (Cont.) On Friday February 13, 2004 we again met at the restaurant with the same attendees. Upon the opening of discussion, Mr. McGowan insisted that his Cook's car was towed @ a cost of$95.00 for parking in a tow zone and that he did so due to the fact that he was unable to enter the restaurant parking lot because of the location of our crane. Mr. McGowan then proceeded to inform me that I would not be leaving the meeting without paying for the tow. I declined. After some further discussion the Building Inspector recommended that Mr. McGowan have his attorney contact the City's attorney who would in turn contact our attorney to discuss a possible agreement to the situation. I again stressed our desire to work with Mr. McGowan as neighbors. I proceeded to hand out the schedule to everyone in attendance, as agreed at the previous meeting, as well as additional contacts for the project and agreed to follow up after our attorney's converse. It should be noted that Mr. McGowan informed our superintendent that he had an agreement with me that the contractors who were working to repair the water damage in his building could park in front of his building. This was false. However rather than confront him with this matter I directed our superintendent to keep the parking spots open for his subcontractor's and not request that he share in the costs of the police details as a neighborly offering to him. We have, in fact done this. As of today we have not, nor has our attorney, been contacted by any one with regard to this situation. We have continued to be conscious of Mr. McGowan's needs and have seen to it that our site superintendent meet with him briefly each morning to discuss any possible deliveries that he may have scheduled and review activity planned for Central Street that day. This has seemed to work for Mr. McGowan, as I have not received any further complaints from him or the Building Dept. with regard to this matter. Sincerely, Mark imentel Project Manager CC: Salem Building Dept. RCG LLC Winter Street Architects Construction Managers • Builders 27 Congress Street Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Telephone (978) 744-9300 Fax (978) 744-8320 Estimating Fax (978) 744-6463 .toxo r gee CITY OF SALEM9 MASSACHUSETTS PUBLIC PROPERTY DEPARTMENT 9 Q 120 WASHINGTON STREET, 3RD FLOOR 9��MMEr SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 STANLEY J. USOVICZ, JR. TELEPHONE: 978-745-9595 EXT. 380 MAYOR FAX: 978-740-9846 March 19, 2004 Mark Pimentel James J. Welch & Co. 27 Congress Street Salem, Ma. 01970 RE: Derby Lofts exterior Demo Dear Mr. Pimental: I was at the jobsite Derby Lofts Project, the morning of March 18, 2004. I met with your supervisor today and Engineer Andrew Ruchinky P.E. I have a drawing of his proposed bracing for this project. But you have not implemented his plan as per drawing. I also noticed the staging in front of the Engine House Pizza has been removed Protective covering on all pedestrian right of way must be in place per 780 CMR, Section 3312.3 Thank you for your immediate attention to these matters. Sincerely, Frank DiPaolo Local Building Inspector 0 CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 4 PUBLIC PROPERTY DEPARTMENT o 120 WASHINGTON STREET, 3RD FLOOR �P��mgD SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 STANLEY J. USOVICZ, JR. TELEPHONE: 978-745-9595 EXT. 380 MAYOR FAX: 978-740-9846 October 27, 2005 To Whom it May Concern: RE: 51-71 Lafayette Street Salem, Ma. The property located at 51-71 Lafayette Street is a legal conforming structure and can be rebuilt if destroyed by any means. Sincerely, Thomas St. Pierre Zoning Enforcement Officer r _ CITY OF SALEM ROUTING SLIP CHECKED DEPARTMENTS REQUIRE SIGNATURES BEFORE BUILDING PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED. LOCATION: 51-71 Lafayette St . DATE: 9/8/03 APPLICANT: James J. Welch & Co . , Inc , It ASSESSORS OFFICE **- @ 93 WASHINGTON ST. FRANK KULIK �T �.�— DATE: CITY CLERK(if involving alpe eet) @93 WASHINGTON ST. 'I DEBBIE BURKINSHAV( y� DATE: PUBLIC SERVICES(Engineering Dept.) iii 120 WASHINGTON ST,4T"FL. BRUCE THIBODEAU DATE: �/ —�/ V 3 ❑ WATER DEPT. @120 WASHINGTON ST,4T"FL. HE-L£N R*DOSZ- L t-r'Tt IH�F�Giv�; } CI CROSS CONNECT SUP'R BOB DESCHENE @120 WASHINGTON ST,30.D FL. - DATE: �] PLANNING @120 WASHINGTON ST.,30.°FL.. DENISE McLURE DATE: CONSERVATION COMMISSION (Planning Dept.) @120 WASHINGTON ST.,3RD FL. DON CEFALO DATE: ELECTRICAL @ 48 LAFAYETTE STREET,2"D FL.REAR JOHN GIARDI DATE: ❑ FIRE PREVENTION @29 FORT AVE(WILLOWS AREA) CAPT. HUDSON DATE: ❑ HEALTH @120 WASHINGTON ST.,4T"FL. JOANNE SCOTT DATE: BUILDING DEPT `a;. 120 WASHINGTON ST.,3RD FL. TOM ST. PIERRE DATE: ***SUBD,IT V,7 T14 PERMIT APPLICATION WHEN COMPLETED*** TY OF ZAL-MVi! {0 Y � PUBLIC PROPERTY DEPARTMENT 120 WASHINGTON STREET, 3RD FLOOR '. SALEM,MA 01970 TEL. (978)745-9595 EXT.380 FAX (978) 740.9846 TANLEY J. USOVICZ, JR. MAYOR DISPOSAL OF DEBRIS AFFIDAVIT In accordance with;the provisions of MGL c 40,S34,I acknowledge that as a condition of Building Permit# all debris resulting from the construction activity governed by this Building Permit shall be disposed of in a properly licensed solid-waste disposal facility,as aefined by MGL c III,S150A. The debris will be disposed of at: Charles George Trucking Location of Facility Signature ate FULLY onowing information: (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY) c— Name of Permit Applicant James J. Welch & Co. , Inc. Firm Name,if any 27 Congress Street, Salem, YA 01970 Address, City &State The above statute requires that debris from the demolition,renovation,rehab or other alteration of building or structure be disposed in a properly-licensed solid-waste disposal facility as defined by MGL cIII, S 150A, and the building permits or licenses are to indicate the location of the facility. ee.. II CommonwiAk 01 Mi asaacLeffi a�,1,9� t 6 a �.Jeparlmaatl o to �eeiaanld 600 eWasL1lon-SW,1 James J.Camtoes Uoslen, .//Iassae�uwfG 011 1/ Ca-mrssaoraa Workers' Compensation Insurance Affidavit James J. Welch & Co. , Inc. (ae+�awrpee�:eee) with-a principal place of business at: 27 Congress Street; Salem, MA 01970 do hereby certify under the pains and penalties of perjury, that: ( 1 am an employer providing workers' compensation coverage for my employees working on this job. American Home Assurance Co. 007253132 Insurance Company Policy Plumber I am a sole proprietor and have no one working for me in any opacity. () 1 am a sole proprietor, general contractor or homeowner (circle one) and have hired the contractors listed below who have the following workers' compensation policies: Contractor Insurance Company/Policy.Plumber Contractor Insurance Company/Policy Plumber Contractor Insurance Company/Policy Plumber () I am a homeowner performing all the work myself. I unoen;ane that a codr of thif wtement�be iorwaroed to the O(rce e)in dtawn+ of the D'A' lo' corerate V fine soon aha UM(mare to secure toverate ved rared unser Section 2SA of MGL 15 2 on lean to the inoonNon of urninm oenarties corsatint of a hue of w to41.500.00 and/or one yeah'imxuonmmt a•,,d v chi ""Iciu in the loan of a STOP WORK ORDER and a fine of S 100.00 a day ata+at me. Signed this day of f s {,rl Z-' ccnsec/Fc building Department licensing board �P Seiectmens Office Health Department - - -_eo00 XSC= 40<, �0�, :Oo X75 C V-_;J � CCVERAGE 114F C- --,A.71 01 1: CALL: _, Dnt By: DESANCTIS INS; 7818335645; 8-Sep-03 10:30AM; Page 1/1 ACOA _ CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCI�LCH ip� GA09/09 03 'RODUCER THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE )eSanctis insurance Agcy, Inc. HOLDER.THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND,EXTEND OR 16 Clumir gs Hark ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. Noburn bU 01801 Phone: 78 -935-8480 Fax:781-933-5645 INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE ._ _.._ _._AAAA .-- _ ' UNED INSURER A: First Specialty Insurance Co _ INSURERS: The Commerce Insurance Company es J. Welch 6 Co. , Inc. INSURERC: Crum S Forster Insurance Co. Con Gas Street S lem MA INsuRER D: American International Group 01970 ---- .SO RER E: :OVERAGES THE POLICIES INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE SEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED.NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREM NT.TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN,I IE INSURANCE APFORDEO By THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS,EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES.AGG 'GATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. ISR TR TY ERATI NJ OF INSURANCE I POLICY NUMBER PAW(IMWE DATE N! 0 LIMITS GENERAL L WLTTY i EACH OCCURRENCE S1 OOO 000 A X COMMI RCML GENERAL LIABILITY IRG79369 01/01/03 01/01/04 FIRE DAMAGE(AAy Dneare) 3100,000 C IMS MAGE [_xj OCCUR� � MED EXP(Any one Pe,aon) f----------- iX (Ian ractual Liab. I PERSONAL b AW INJURY $1,000,000 ; X XCU Hazards THCL Nolo Unaeazas COY GENERAL AGGREGATE s2,000,000 �GEN'L AGG GATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: PRODUCTS-COMPIOP AGG 31,000,000 ILI POLIC ]( PRO- i LOC _ JECT AUTONOBI LWBILm _ EO SINGLE LIMIT 21,000,000 B X ANYp 032MXZ9712 01/01/03 01/01/04 (EeamiOenU ALL CIA 4EO AUTOS BODILY INJURY i 1x_ SCHEO IED AUTOS (PBTPeT$M) HIRED UTOSBOOIIY INJURVNON-01EO AUTOS (PerauidenO _ -- PROPERTY DAMAOE .S (Per wddmU GARAGE LU BILJTY AUTO ONLY-EA ACCIDENT ,S ANVA 0 OTHERTHAN EA ACC $ -. AUTO ONLY: AGG S EXCESS LIA HLITY EACH OCCURRENCE $5,000,000 X OCCUR CLAIMS MADE 5530841568 (ul-M) 01/01/03 01/01/04 AGGREGATE S10,000,000 DEDUCIBLE f RETEN ON $None I $ WORHER9 MPENSATION AND X TORY LIMITS EMPLov uaBILITY WC7253132 01/01/03 01/01/04 E.L.EACH ACCIDENT _ $1,000,000 _ MA,CT,ME,NH,RI E.L.DISEASE-EA EMPLOYEE f 1,ODO 000 EL DISEASE-POLICY LIMO 31 000 000 OTHER ESCRIPTION OF I PERATIONSILOCATIONSNEWCLEVEXCLUSIONS ADDED BY ENDORSEMENTISPECIAL PROVISIONS ?ROJECT: erby Lofts, Salem, MA. CERTIFICATE IN 1 ADDITIONAL INSURED;INSURER LETTER:_ CANCELLATION CITYS-1 SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF.THE ISSUING INSURERMRLL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL '40 _DAYSWRITTEN C ty of Salem NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NASIED TO THE LEFT,BUT FAILURE TO DO SO SWILL Building Permit Division IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY OF ANY KING UPON THE INSURER,ITS AGENTS OR $ lem MA 01970 REPRESENTATIVES. AUTHORIZED RFSENTATIVE 1 /.?Ary ./ .CORD 2"( 9T) ®ACORD CORPORATION 1986 Y1 6.00 0l CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS PUBLIC PROPERTY DEPARTMENT o �A t 120 WASHINGTON STREET; 3RD FLOOR SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 - STANLEY J. USOVICZ, JR. TELEPHONE: 978-745-9595 EXT. 380 MAYOR FAX: 978-740-9846 November 5, 2003 Derby Lofts LLC 51-71 Lafayette Street Salem, Ma. 01970 RE: 270-2004 (Demo Permit) 51-71 Lafayette Street Dear Owners: This Department has issued Demolition Permit#270-2004. The intent of this permit was to remove non-load bearing partitions and miscellaneous interior build outs. It was not issued to begin structural alterations. The City of Salem had installed temporary shoring of the exterior brick facade and parapet to protect the general public from injury. This system was installed in 1999 and was intended for no more than one year. We are now on year five. The concern is the current condition of both the restraint system and additional deterioration of exterior masonry.. I was even more concerned when I discovered bobcats being hoisted to the second floor with hammer attachments. Therefore, you are directed to retain the services of a Structural Engineer to determine the condition of the exterior and to advise the demolition contractor on how to proceed safely. Please forward the Structural Engineer's reportto this office. Thank you for your anticipated cooperation in this matter. Sinc�ely, J �l T nomas St. Pierre Acting Building Commissioner NO. City of Salem Ward x Own APR-UC-AT10N FOR PERMIT TO BUILD ADDITION, MAKEALTERATIONS OR NEW trONSTRUCTION IMPORTANT- aoPlicane:r8a-neras in seerrons:4 Iti ny%and a. L ATILOCATIOm 51-71. Lafayette Street ZONM LOCATION «m rsla�n OF BErwEEN ._Derby Street AN Front Street BUILDING r smffn caoss Srat£n siraolvOON LOTBLOCKsrS[& g IL TYPE AND COST OF BUILEM-All oppAmifs CornPlete PansA D A. TYPE OF IMPROVEMENT D. PROPOSED USE.FOR`DOMIOLITION-USE MOST RECENT USE 1 I/nv MaW4g RnlalanlYl ., NaamWaaYY 2 AAddananaidaieo.amermmloaorn 12 [3 4Cko*w*. /S A--oft, hcuaag aaued./&W.a.P/10.T.T �-7 T�w�..a.q...t��1y.. /��ntls 19.Q.�dl NS jnie 3 ® Afte ISM 2 abowl /3 u �M�. 74 R'1Clent ial 20a N?9u11rui 21 a:.PwM gnaw Q Reaar relMaCwaem 14(3-Tramira ncbi.aeflet wdomiib'y. ,.�&darnalOsalma 22 a_Ser.ro..f+jaR raaa9/a9a . 5 ❑ ^CP ggW4npYm>!dr�LararnmQar ._.. . 23�.=llwVii.HMmwiY M wra n Madig in Part 0.171 13 Gaw 240s011im b Q.MOM9 wbolonl. 19 a.Cam" 29 1a- ,AAWtlWft 7 ❑ F wsw wtly - ❑.. SOer1Y �,0,SrLLdaL mom 00w sammord' 1r da-- _ _.. ®.SbrM.aaeawie 13.OWNETi9RP 28 ,Q_Tiraa,brs 813P baa w&Ad A mowador4 i"Im29 ©.100w_ y .iioH4idaaI 9 0 Putfc WedsaL Siaft w loco 9oywranenl C.DOST (clalamal .DeaaOa in deli/ cymed uss d Ouranm a9..6au w=a= prL ... rwe* sr q sundry Maury a MapYaL elmmar•v s hoaL wcwaayacnoal eoM9a. to Coo at inwoYmwa - s7 869, 000 . adrd°i'°als�gganq°l'rd imw"'bs'wimL`16p°w".q`'° '°Wda9 .. .... , am.wiabm.rule a.amlegb0dM0bsgfLrged,a awampeswd Td Oa_Y+bdMwnelncWO'C .. nrae'o`ama = - 812, 000 . Retail space . i EWcwcw - tL PkNi ig 740. 0001. .c-NSYq,aimnaYwig 610 . CLL ire ire Pr. - 469 , 000 . _ ttion 11.TGTAI.COSTOFPA-ROVEMEW .$10, 500, 000. _ UL SELECTED CHARACTEFLIS[I QF BUILDWG -Fornew buddu*s and adddxm compleft Parts E-L:demolition. cam—PWft J 8 U.aft others skip to N E PRRrI-f�1 'A,_L_�T_Y� PEO.F FRAME F.PRIICPAL TYPE OF WATM FUEL- G. TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL L TYPE OF MECHAWAL 30Q.JAra f(iisAssg1 35.Q.Gn 40.Q.P+ofearpeaamawaa► - wwva becwaaai 31 32 [3Saucala ass v.O 0 w41 ❑ Prs.r a+avaeanc ael _ ya 4s'Q � IC 13 No 33 n Rei lwetl aaaaar 38,13 cam H TYPE of WATER st1PPLY wiNwpwMw re? 34.Q.:Osw-,%*W* 39.Q<911rr-Spcav -42.IM P,&Arw_ani/:.mnrwW 46 Ya ':,,.p No • "' M. DEMOLITION OF STRUCTURES: as.Ta�Knasreelaronarta - Has•Approval from Historical Commission been received for arty structure over fifty(50)years? Yes_ . No- 20,415 o_ - - a - � J 2 0,415 S Frig Safe Number y-c smTaoawoKYlAmrt s ai K NUMBER OF OFF-STREET PARKING SPACES # N/A RestCorarPl: N/A NAVE THE FOLLOWING UTILITIES BEEN DISCONNECTED? owws Yes No .X a>terdsrrur.'euaceresoar '= ,-, .A ss ra m..a 0 Be-cb G Ful 104 � � . . . sr. rme�a Saner: uau.uon. PaKma 4 DOMMENTATION FOR THE ABOVE MUST BE ATTACHED BEFORE A PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED. IV. COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING: Ffistiricbtsirict? Yes_ No-L (If yes.Please HisL.CaM Conservation Area? Yes_ No_X (ti yes please er>cft Order o(CondiSars) Has F�relGiieventio i approi ed and stamped Plans or applications? Yes_X No_ Is property bcate9m Ire&RA district? YBs_j_ No Coniphy with rg? Yes,_ NoX_ (If n0.enclose.Board4Appeal decision) Is iot `Yes No-j- (I yes.Submit documemalionffi no submit Board of Appeal decision) Iftifew 6nstrucdm itis Iteproper flouting Slip been endosed? Yrs , .. No_ N/A Is Arehbcduat Aocess'Board approval.rew ed? Yes_ Nom (I yes,submit documentation) Massachusetts State Contractor License# 001247 Salem License# G R 7 +kime'hnprOverrient Contrac6or# 11 G 4 5 0 Homeowners ExentpCform`(fi applicable)"Yes_ Pb X 3 GONSTRUCIM TO BEGOhM ENIND Wt"N-W(6)MONTHS OF ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT #an extension is CONSTRUCTION IS TO BE COMPLETED BY: 18 months after in writing to pese subm rt the Brutldngs. issuance 31 perms . V. IDENTIFICATION• To be cornpieted by aff aADUCe is Nom^^ MOB IO.d*ms-A6nm.sbee6 Mr.aaw swe LP Code Ta Na r. Derby .Lofts LLC 1843 Mass Ave . Cambrid e A 617-491 0 213 9 u;Ks 2 games J. Welch 8 27 Congress St . Salem MA 01970 978-744 culsoor-" Ca. , Inc . '., ,, >. ,.. euTerre 3'00 _ - terelun , - a Winter Street.. : . 2:09 Essex. St . , Salem, MA 01970 97$-744 a slow Architects Inc 9,379 I hereby cerWy(rat the Proposedweritsaii1limized by the Owner d recard.and fhatlbavebeen aunnxaed by the oeaKer ro-.Rake Y+is,uppicafion K as his auaroraeii'aaern ora we&7BBjOpqnbriGV aa.aooticabie taws orlris prrisdcion. Sonewre otaopicauc ( James J . Welch &' Co , Inc . 2277 Congress St . , Salem, MA 01970 918101— `A, �itJuSalem, Massachusetts r(a , Fire Department 48Lafayette Street 29 Fort Ave Robert'W.Turner Salem, Massachusetts 01970-3695 �T etion Clue 7eL 978-744-1235 Bureau 978-744-69-90 Fax 978-745-4646 978-745-7777 FIRE DEPARTMENT CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL FOR A BUILDING PERMIT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS. OF THE MASSACHUSETTS RATE BUILDING CODE AND THE SALEM FIRE CODE, APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE FOR THE APPROVAL OF PLANS AND THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL FOR A BUILDING PERMIT BY THE SALEM FIRE DEPARTMENT.- ( Ref. Section 113.3 of the Mass. Bldg. Code) TOB LOCATION: (Je-rbu W�'1S OWNER/OCCUPANT: ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR: FIRE -SUPPRESSION CONTRACTOR:.'. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT: �... . . - C} PHONE #t pn:cz r.� �\ ADDRESS OF - . .. CITY OT C APPLICANT: &-se-5s S"r' TOWN: - APPROVAL DATE: Certificate. of approval is hereby granted, on approved plans' or submittal of project details by. the. SALEM FIRE DEPARTMENT. All plans are approved solely. . for identificationoftype and aocationof fire protection devices and equipment All plans are subject to approval of any other authority having jurisdiction. Upon completion;�the applicantor installer(s) shall request an inspection and/or test of .the fire protection devices and equipment. (ADDITTIONAL REQUIREMENTS, _ SEE REVERSE SIDE.***) � - NEW CONSTRUCTION. _ h/1 PROPERTY LOCATION HAS NO COMPLIANCE WITH THE. PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 148, SECTION 26 C/E, M.G.L.., RELATIVE TO THE INSTALA- TION""OF APPROVED FIRE ALARM DEVICES. THE OWNER OF THIS PRO- . PEATY IS REQUIRED TO OBTAIN COMPLIANCE AS A CONDITION OF - - OBTAINING A BUILDING PERMIT. O PROPERTY LOCATION IS IN COMPLIACNE WITH THE PROVISION OF CHAPTER 148, SECTION 26 C/E, M.G.L. EXPIRATION DATE: SIG ATURE OF FIRE OFFICIAL 5-3 0;: FEE DUE: UNDER 7,500 SQ. FT. - $30.00 FORMAI 81 3/98 7,500. SQ. FT. OR LARGER- 50.00 In compliance with the provision -of Section 113.5 of the Massachusetts State Building Code, and under guidelines agreed upon by the Salem Bldg. Inspector and the Salem Fire Chief, the applicant for a building permit shall obtain the Certificate of approval (see reverse side) and stamped plan approval from the Salem Fire Prevention Bureau. Said application and approval is required before a building permit. may be issued. The Massachusetts State Buildine Code requires compliance approval of the Salem Fire Department, with reference •to provisions of Articles 4 and 12 of the Building Code, the Salem Fire 'Code, Massachusetts General Laws, and 527 Code of Massachusetts Regulations. The applicant shall submit this application with three (3) sets of plans, drawn in sufficient blarity, to obtain. stamped approval of the Salem Fire Department. This applies for all new construction, substantial alterations, change of use and/or occupancy, and any other approvals required by the Massachusetts General Laws, and the Salem Fire Code. Exception: Plans will not be required for structural work when the proposed work to be performed under the building permit will not, in the opinion of the Building Inspector, require' a plan to show the nature and character of the work to be performed. Notice: Plans are normally required for fire suppression systems, fire alarm systems, tank installations, and Fire Code requirements. Under the provisions of Article 22 of the Massachusetts StateBuilding Code, certain proposed projects may not require submission of plans or complete compliance with new construction.requirements. In these cases, provisions. of Article 22, Appendix T, and Tables applicable shall apply. This section shall not, however, supersede the provisions outlined in the SalemFire Prevention Regulations, Chapter 148, MGL,' or 521 Code of Massachusetts Regulations. All permits for fire code use and/or occupancy shall apply for. the entire structure; . fire alarm and/or smoke detector installation shall apply to, the entire structure based upon current requirements as per Laws and/or Codes, but the existing structure may comply with regulations applicable for existing structures. Notice: Sub-contractors may also be required to file individual . applications for a Fire Department Certificate of Approval for the area of their work. Such sub-contractors shall file an Application to Install with the Fire prevention Bureau prior to commencing any work for those areas applicable. FOR11 #81 REV. t0/97 CONSTRUCTION CONTROL AFFIDAVIT Project Number: 0135.001 Date: August 21, 2003 Project Title: Derby Lofts Condominiums Project Location: 51-71 Lafayette Street, Salem Massachusetts 01970 Name of Building: Derby Lofts Scope of Project: Additions and Alterations IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 116.0 OF THE MASSACHUSETTS STATE BUIDING CODE, I JOHN WATHNE, MASS. REGISTRATION NO. 34420 BEING A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE PREPARED OR DIRECTLY SUPERVISED THE PREPARATION OF ALL DESIGN PLANS, COMPUTATIONS, AND SPECIFICATIONS CONCERNING: Entire Project Architectural Structural X Mechanical Electrical Fire Protection Other(specify) FOR THE ABOVE NAMED PROJECT AND THAT, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, SUCH PLANS, COMPUTATIONS, AND SPECIFICATIONS MEET THE APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE MASSACHUSETTS STATE BUILDING CODE, ALL ACCEPTABLE ENGINEERING PRACTICES AND ALL APPLICABLE LAWS FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT. I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT I SHALL PERFORM THE NECESSARY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AND BE PRESENT ON THE CONSTRUCTION SITE ON A REGULAR AND PERIODIC BASIS TO DETERMINE THAT THE WORK IS PROCEEDING IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DOCUMENTS APPROVED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FOLLOWING AS SPECIFIED IN SECTION 116.2.2. 1. Review of shop drawings, samples and other submittals of the contractor as required by the construction contract documents as submitted for building permit, and approval for conformance to the design concept. 2. Review and approval of the quality control procedures for all code required control materials. 3. Special architectural or engineering professional inspection of critical construction components requiring controlled materials or construction specified in the accepted engineering practice standards listed in Appendix I. PURSUANT TO SECTION 116.4, 1 SHALL SUBMIT PERIODICALLY, A PROGRESS REPORT TOGETHER WITH PERTINENT COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING INSPECTOR. UPON COMPLETION OF THE WORK, I SHALL SUBMIT A FINAL REPORT AS TO THE Ri`f9A42LETION AND READINESS OF THE PROJECT FOR OCCUPANCY. Signature 9PuED AND SWO N TO BEFORE ME THIS 21 DAY OF August 2003 ��1X� Mycommission Expires: STACIA M.COOPER Notary Public My Commission Expires Sept.10,2004 CONSTRUCTION CONTROL AFFIDAVIT Project Number: 0135.001 Date: August 21, 2003 Project Title: Derby Lofts Condominiums Project Location: 51-71 Lafayette Street, Salem Massachusetts 01970 Name of Building: Derby Lofts Scope of Project: Additions and Alterations IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 116.0 OF THE MASSACHUSETTS STATE BUIDING CODE, I MARK MECHE, MASS. REGISTRATION NO. 7083 BEING A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECT HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE PREPARED OR DIRECTLY SUPERVISED THE PREPARATION OF ALL DESIGN PLANS, COMPUTATIONS, AND SPECIFICATIONS CONCERNING: Entire Project Architectural X Structural Mechanical Electrical Fire Protection Other(specify) FOR THE ABOVE NAMED PROJECT AND THAT, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, SUCH PLANS, COMPUTATIONS, AND SPECIFICATIONS MEET THE APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE MASSACHUSETTS STATE BUILDING CODE, ALL ACCEPTABLE ENGINEERING PRACTICES AND ALL APPLICABLE LAWS FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT. I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT I SHALL PERFORM THE NECESSARY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AND BE PRESENT ON THE CONSTRUCTION SITE ON A REGULAR AND PERIODIC BASIS TO DETERMINE THAT THE WORK IS PROCEEDING IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DOCUMENTS APPROVED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FOLLOWING AS SPECIFIED IN SECTION 116.2.2. 1. Review of shop drawings, samples and other submittals of the contractor as required by the construction contract documents as submitted for building permit, and approval for conformance to the design concept. 2. Review and approval of the quality control procedures for all code required control materials. 3. Special architectural or engineering professional inspection of critical construction components requiring controlled materials or construction specified in the accepted engineering practice standards listed in Appendix 1. PURSUANT TO SECTION 116.4, 1 SHALL SUBMIT PERIODICALLY, A PROGRESS REPORT TOGETHER WITH PERTINENT COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING INSPECTOR. UPON COMPLETION OF THE WORK, I SHALL SUBMIT A FINAL REPORT AS TP THE SATISFACTORY COMPLETION AND READINESS OF THE PROJECT FOR OCCUPANCY. jSignature B IB DAN OR TO BEFORE ME THIS 21 DAY OF Aunust 2003 \- My commission Expires: Public STACIAM.COOPER Notary Public My Commission Expires Sept.10,2004 of cow �� CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSE ZTI$' OF SALEM. MA BOARD OF APPEAL CLERK'S OFFICE y�. $ 120WASHINGTON STREET. 3RD FLOOR SALEM. MA 01970 ffC�hINBCPN TEL. (978) 745-9595 STANLEY J. USOVICZ, JR. FAX (978) 740.9846 1001 JAN -2 P � 56 MAYOR DECISION OF THE PETITION OF ENGINE HOUSE PLAZA REALTY TRUST REQUESTING A VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 51-71 LAFAYETTE STREET B-5 A hearing on this petition was held December 18, 2002 with the following Board Members present: Nina Cohen, Chairman, Richard Dionne, Stephen Harris, and Bonnie Belair Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening New in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. The petitioner is requesting a Variance from Table 3 of B-5 density regulation uses from the following; maximum lot are per dwelling unit, maximum height of buildings and floor area ratio to add 2 additional stories and residential uses for the property located at 51-71 Lafayette Street located in an B-5 zone. The Variances, which have been requested, upon a finding Board that: a. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building Or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings, and structure involve. b. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioners.. c. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and Without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of this district of the purpose of the Ordinance The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1. Petitioner is a Real Estate Trust, One Engine House Plaza Realty Trust, whose trustees are Michael J. O;Brian,David Walsh and Philip Hansbury. Petitioner's plans to redevelop for mixed retgil and residential use for the property at 51-71 Lafayette St. known as the Salem Laundry Building. Attorney Scott Grover of 222 Essex represented the petitioners. 2. A recent analysis by Structures North Engineering uncovered an array or structural problems with the turn of the century property, including inadequacies of the roof, supporting members and the Lafayette St. farrade. The cost of reconstructing the building will be considerable, potentially exceeding one million dollars. __ aIIIgNI�ll�lll�lll illq_fI J1111�111�_ 2003032600683 800439 F9:16 03/28/2003 08:06:00 OTHER Pp 2/6 DECISION OF THE PETITION OF ENGINE HOUSE PLAZA REALTY TRUST REQUESTING A VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 51-71 LAFAYETTE STREET B-5 page two To recover reconstruction costs, the owners plan to convert the building to residential use and create 55 condominium units. 3. Petitioners plan to add two stories, to a total building height of 78 feet. Retail use on The first floor will be retained. Parking for the owners of the condo units will be at the City of Salem's South Harbor Garage because there is no on-site parking. The project will retain the existing footprint and will preserve elements of the original design in a reconstructed core. 4. Since the Salem Laundry building does not meet density regulations for new construction, the petitioners are seeking variances from minimum lot area per dwelling unit to allow 379 square foot per unit, floor area ratio for a ratio of 5.54.1 and building height for a total height of 78 feet. As support for their request, petitioners argue that a literal enforcement of the provisions of the ordinance would be detrimental not just to the owners but to the City of Salem, because it would preclude the restoration and reuse of the historic property. 5. Petitioners will seek approval of the redevelopment plan from the Salem Redevelopment Authority and the Design Review Board, from the Planning Board and from the Conservation Commissioner. They have support for their plan from Claudia Chuber, Ward 1 Councillor,Joan Lovely, Ward 3 Councillor, Joan Kantor and Nick Helides, condomimin owners at 20 Central Street and from Salem Main Street executive director Deborah Griel. Conditional support for the project was voiced by Staley McDetmet architect and former member of the Salem Redevelopment Authority, who suggested that approval of the variances should be contingent upon the preservation of the existing massing, masonry and concrete exterior wall surfaces, and detailing on the brick portion of the building. On the basis of the above finding of fact, the evidence presented at the hearing, the Zoning Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship to the petition. 3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and Without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. DECISION OF THE PETITION OF ENGINE HOUSE PLAZA REALTY TRUST REQUESTING A VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 51-71 LAFAYETTE STREET B-5 page three Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted 5-0, to grant the Variances requested, subject to the following conditions; 1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statures, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted and approved by the Building Commissioner. . 3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety shall be strictly adhered to. 4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to beginning any construction 5. A Certificate of Occupancy shall be obtained. 6. Petitioner shall obtain approval from all City Boards or Commission having jurisdictions including, but not limited to, the Planning Board. 7. Petitioner shall obtain a yearly parking permit within 1,000 feet and renew them on a yearly basis for the condo owners. Variance Granted December 18, 2002 Q Nina Cohen Board of Appeal 4 2003032600683 Bk:20439 Pg:11 03/28/2003 08:08:00 OTHER Pp 3/4 1003031600683 Bk:10439 Pg:18 03/2612003 08:06:00 OTHER Py 6/4 A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CIITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 day date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11. The Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certificate of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that is has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. Board of Appeal Date i f 101 I hereby certify that 20 days have exp6d from the date this instrument was received, and ih•-: 110 APPEAL has:beer fled in ffiis off rp. 44 A"i rue Copy ATTEST: CITY CLERK; tefn;SaMass. T -r a CCitp of lbale 1, AA$$aCbUgPttq COPY l i Vublic Propertp Mepartment �hilbing Department One ibatem Oreen (978)745-9595 text. 380 Leo E. Tremblay Director of Public Property Inspector of Building Zoning Enforcement Officer January 16 , 1998 Spectrum Realty Trust C . E . Scrymgeour 69 Lafayette Street Salem, Mass . 01970 RE: 69 Lafayette Street Dear Mr . Scrymgeour : This office is once again concerned about the above mentioned property. Except for the installation of wood scaffolding to protect the public utilizing the side walks , nothing else has transpired concerning repairs . This inspector is now concerned with south, south west wall which is over the current first floor of the laundromat . The decay of the concrete and exposed re-bar concern me . I am ordering you to seek an inspection by a structural engineer and to report to me on his findings of the wall over the laundromat on the south, south west wall of the structure. Also in Mr . Rumph ' s report of January 6 , 1998 the last paragraph of his report indicates that , "after these temporary protections measures have been completed, we recommend regular periodic inspections of the building i�terior until such time permanent repairs can be made . " To this date I have not received any periodic reports . Please contact this office upon receipt of this letter to inform me of what course of action you will take in this matter . Sincerely, L � /LZ Leo E. Trembla Inspector of Bdings LET: scm cc : John Keenan Rumph Associates Carl Goodman Councillor Paskowski , Ward 1 LAW OFFICE OF CARL D. GOODMAN 17 FRONT STREET SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970-3707 CARL D. GooDMAN (978) 745-6006 JACQUELINE Voss LEES' -Al.Ad.,hW in Conncaiout January 27, 1998 Mr. Leo E. Tremblay Inspector of Buildings City of Salem, Public Property Department Building Department One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 Re: 69 Lafayette Street, Salem Dear Mr. Tremblay: Thank you for forwarding a copy of your January 16, 1998 letter addressed to Spectrum Realty Trust. In accordance with your instructions, my client informs me that he will seek an inspection by a structural engineer on the south-southwest wall of the structure. Additionally, my client has contacted Mr. Rumph to inquire as to the reason for the failure to forward the periodic inspection reports to you and has requested that the same be sent without delay. Thank you for keeping us informed. incerely, JAC QUELINE VOSS LEES JVL/msg w2spmttlt - - dm: cc: John Keenan, Esq. Spectrum Realty Trust, C.E. Scrymgeour (via facsimile) James J.Welch 6 Co.Incorporated Derby Lofts Jan. 31, 2004 Exterior Demolition Plan South Building: During all work on the south building exterior elevations, the sidewalk below the area in question will be closed off to the public with a covered walkway provided for public safety. The windows will be removed using a bobcat to pull them into the building. The steel frames will then be brought to the fust floor to prepare for removal from the jobsite. The concrete windowsills shall be taken off by hand and transported to the first floor using the interior trash chute. The interior weith of brick under the window shall be removed using 15 #hammers and the brick will be disposed of using the interior trash chute. The exterior weith of brick shall be removed from the outside using lifts and 15#hammers. The brick shall be deposited inside the building for disposal. The piers and spandrels shall be removed only after the building is shored. Their removal will be done from the exterior utilizing lifts as work platforms and 15# hammers. The rubble from this operation shall be brought into the building and deposited in the building trash chute. Steel angles that have been installed on the exterior of the building as reinforcing shall be removed only as the area directly adjacent to the reinforcing piece is being demolished. The bolts, which attach the angles to the building, shall be unscrewed or burned off. North Building: The remaining spandrel beams that make up the existing perimeter roof structure shall be removed using a crane. After the beam is attached to the crane, the columns shall be cut either by a hydraulic scythe or by workmen using 15#hammers to chip away the column directly below the beam and cut the reinforcing. This will allow the beam to be picked up by the crane and lowered to the ground. During this operation, a police detail will be employed to assist in assuring the public's safety. Other precautions will be the closing off of the sidewalk on Lafayette Street and the closing of Central Street as work is performed in each respective area. During the work, covered scaffolding shall be installed to allow the public safe access along the street. The concrete block piers shall be removed by hand using lifts and 15#hammers. The exterior walls of the lower floors shall be removed using similar techniques to those described above for the removal of the exterior of the south building. Engine House Access: Construction Managers • Builders 27 Congress Street Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Telephone(978) 744-9300 Fax(978) 744-8320 Estimating Fax (978) 744-6463 James J.Welch&Co.Incorporated The entry to Engine House shall be protected with a covered walkway leading from the street to the entry doors. Demolition work directly above the entry way shall be scheduled for times that the restaurant is not open to any minimize potential danger to patrons. Windows to the store shall be covered with plywood during the demolition in order to make sure that if there is a stray piece of debris. that falls to the ground no damage will result. Salem Laundry Roof: The roof of the existing one story building on the north side of the project has been covered with five quarter inch plywood and then with two by tens for a distance of eight feet from the building. For the next eight feet the roof has been covered with plywood. Demolition work over this area will be scheduled for off hours when people are not occupying the space. Demolition work shall be done similar to the manner described for the sides of the north building. Construction Managers • Builders 27 Congress Street Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Telephone(978)744-9300 Fax(978)744-8320 Estimating Fax (978) 744-6463 ROM RK—STRUCT FAX N0. : 19785315927 Feb. 05 2004 11:38RM P1 AK STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING 8 Coleman Street UK Peabody, MA 01960-4104 (978) 631-5927 February S. 2004 Michael Welch James J. Welch &Co. 27 Congress Street Salem, MA 01970 REF: Derby Lofts Exterior Demolition Dear Mr.Welch; Related to my report of Feb.2,2004 and telephone conversation with you, the use of small powered hammers and the use of hydraulic scythe are recommended for removal of portland cement concrete and brick maeonry structures within the Derby Lofts project. The engineer's concern is the avoidance of excessive vibration and shock within the project The existing walls to floors connection is problematic., at best.The connection is based on cement concrete bonding, combined with a lack of lateral reinforcement throughout the two buildings. Sincerl 1 �tN ov oaEw � Andrew KuchinsKy,P.E. KVCtMW = v MUCTURi1L a \, NO.387S9 . s L�s14 nt By: DESANCTIS INS; 7819335645; 5-Feb-04 11 :01AM; -Page 1 DeSanctis Insurance 'Agenc ,Inc. w Daze: �� , 5, 3C0 { Fax �_. PaBe(S)iadading this cover slext. To: (naRx From: BERYL FINN T Co: J 2p� E _ Rr q 7 — 7 y - 8 3 a ' Phone: 781-935-8480(Ext.77 Phone: _ Fax: 781-933-5645 cc: REMAM: ❑ UM=l ❑ As 7`oa xet4a ❑ Pie=ReplyASAP ❑ PICM orae nt By: DESANCTIS INS; 7619335645; 5-Feb-04 11 :01AM; Page 213 . f LICENSE OR PERMIT BOND Street Permit Bond #0373107 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, THAT WE ,.._,, r c1 1 gt Salem MA 01970 as Principal,_and International Fidelity Insurance CO as Surety, and having its principal office in the Town of Franklin MA as Surety, am held firmly bound unto City of Salem, MA __hereinafter called the Obligee in the penal sum of One Thousand Dollars $1,000 �. Lawful money of the United States of America to be paid to the said Obligee,for which paymont well and truly to be made we bind ourselves, our heirs,exeeutors, administrators and assigns,join0y and severally,firmly by these presents. SIGNED WITH OUR HANDS AND SEALED WITH OUR SEALS this 5th day of^ February. : 004 WHEREAS a license or permit has been granted by the Obligee's to the above bounden Principal authorizing him to Street Permit NOW,THEREFORE,THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that If the Principal shall faithfully observe the provisions of the laws, ordinances. and resolutions, governing the issuarice of this license or permit , then this obligation shall be null and void, otherwise to remain in full force and effect This bond shall become effective,thesth day of February, 2004 The Surety may cancel this bond at any time by filing with the Obligge 30 days notice of its desire to be relieved of liability. The , Surety shall not be discharged from any liability already accrued under this bond, or which shall accrue hereunder before the expiration of the 3o days _ -period. James J. Welch & Co. ,Inc. Principal BY: International Flddlelit Insurance Co. Surety , !. oil BY: K L. R6bert DeSanctis. Atlorney4rifact ant By: DESANCTIS INS; 7819335645; 5-Feb-04 11 :01AM; Page 3/3 Tel(473)624-1200 POWER OF ATTORNEY MI'ERNATIONAL )ADELITY INSURANCE COMPANY HOME OFFICE:ONE NEWARK CENTER,20TH FIAOR NEWARY,NEW JERSEY 07102-5207 FORBID BONDiRMERJCONSENIS/AMDAMS HNOW AIL MPN BY THESE PRESENTS: That DPTERWATIONAL FIDELITY INSURANCE COMPANY, a atpot+fion otgamud tud a daUoB laws of de Slaw of New Jerrey,and having its principal office W be Ciy ofNewalt.New Jersey,does Manby cons imir iced appoint CHRISTINE B. DEAR, ADAM W. DESANCTZ9,' BRYAN.P. JOWA, L. ROBERT DEBANCTIS, GREGORY D. JDWA, JAMB J. AXON, HIORAVL P. CUUMi WILDER PAM# JR.s HICBAEL T. GILBERT Woburn, HA. its true and lawful umro s)-m-fic[to exeww,anal and deliver fx and on its behalf as Kitty,any and a8 bonds and undertalioga.00enanm Of iodemp8y and otlur writings ebtigawry in the nun"docaf.whidt are or may be albp�rtgWad or tIW Dv hw wode.rv(e �eaolad� txmoact err otlWawtx ud the exernp�n o.meh fo ptuswae of Wax pmlats, A be as npam dw eatl >I�IFRNAiTONAL 77DRITTY IIi.SUEA1tCE W rugy and amply,10 au lmemsyand r�p uppnosdet,as t tDs same Dad beeagy o�f exeaued and aelaowkd'ed by ire reBnhdY skated o(fiara u m principal D Pawfer oTI Aftem is A1.FID) TY IIiSVEANR (�ODY A uiytmrsi eaacd and DeW on the the�m or -Laws aero�'Dy an Bond or The PraMeot or any Vice President.Baeeutive vice President,S"Mary or AssisMnt Seaeary,dhaN bare power and solhodty (1)Toemit Atw®ey&im-f wk and to authodu then n MWAft on behalf of mo OMPWy.and amrh the Sal of the Compaq dwvm,bonds and UNWraungs.cwaaar of mdemnly and other writings otawa y to de tuane dweof god. (t)To remove,at any time.any such atmrrny-m-faa and mvake the sudtorky given. Bother this Power of Atte is w�eedd and vied by raotim ie pueoaatb aesomdoo of the Bond ofl ireco s of said Company adapted at a meeft duly ailed and keld on die 29®�ay al!5 ,1982 of whirl tDe ,13Z g h a the excerpt: .Now titerefow tbe sigoastres of rich officers and the sal of the Company Way be affuod m any arh power of at oroey or aye ardfeae reLtioE 7Daeto by . 6caimae,and any neh of atlptoey,a artifiaw bemioga :h fiaimr7o attyaWrca or fusimOa seat man)K valid and D"m, »e Cep W sorb power m axbded fry faesimr'k rigmoma sokiac�ik sal slia8 be valid and binding upon die Company a de faon'e witli iapret m a°p' bond err underhKvg m which it u ittarhed. DiTBSTMONYWHMlOP.WMtNAn0NAiFIDEUTYIIih'U MCECOMPANYbasauaoddbinsOmmztsobe* . on 'hIG signed and ire corporate seal m he affmed by is audmr"vod office[,mis 3La day of August.A.D.1998. Vo 1� md1EBNATIONAL Fmr3[1ry DomANCZ . CD SEAL 1904 SrATEOFNEWJERSEY fMl It Via° (/(� On Ods 319 day M August 1998.before me sine dw viknol wM Tpled dte��>n�sbvmeot,ro ma pe�woapv ya m,sed.brag Dy me duly iwoq, raid du he B the doreia desaiko aced aukorisrd officer 6>f me INIY1WA110NALFIDRIIIY INSIAtS[iCE CODrPANYt dot Poe aeYxg.d m said irimt®e8 is do Corporate Seal of std Company.dot die said Corporate Sal and his signature viae duly affixed by order of die Board of Ditutdera of asid Compaq. � fjgG IN T)iSTIMONY WHMBOF.I bave bercmk set my band affixed my oi5eid Seal. ' at the City of Newark.Now Jerey the day and year first above written. y NOTARY 2 PUBLIC >V JERK A NOTARY PUBLIC OP NEW JlWJWY G`EItT1FiCATION My Commision Bxpba Nov.21,2003 I,de undersigned offices of INTERNATIONAL FWELXI!y UJRMMCE COMPANY tb bereby ocr*that 1 bave compared the foregoing copy of de Power of Avomey and atridaviy and the copy of the Section of So By-laws of said Compaq as ret fordb in said Power of Anomey,wilt the ORI084AIS ON IN Tim HOME OPFlCB OF SAID COMPANY,&inti that the sain am correct bemcripts dwoct mod of tiro whole of de so odgm ls,and dot dw said Ibwe of Attorney has not been revolmd and is now in toll force and effeer - INTFMA40NYWMEMP.ihave hereainset myhand dsis 5th dayef February, 2004 Assistant Secretary - CONSTRUCTION CONTROL AFFIDAVIT Project Number: 0135.001 Date: August 21, 2003 Project Title: Derby Lofts Condominiums Project Location: 51-71 Lafayette Street, Salem Massachusetts 01970 Name of Building: Derby Lofts Scope of Project: Additions and Alterations IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 116.0 OF THE MASSACHUSETTS STATE BUIDING CODE, I MARK MECHE, MASS. REGISTRATION NO. 7083 BEING A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECT HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE PREPARED OR DIRECTLY SUPERVISED THE PREPARATION OF ALL DESIGN PLANS, COMPUTATIONS, AND SPECIFICATIONS CONCERNING: Entire Project Architectural X Structural Mechanical Electrical Fire Protection Other(specify) FOR THE ABOVE NAMED PROJECT AND THAT, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, SUCH PLANS, COMPUTATIONS, AND SPECIFICATIONS MEET THE APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE MASSACHUSETTS STATE BUILDING CODE, ALL ACCEPTABLE ENGINEERING PRACTICES AND ALL APPLICABLE LAWS FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT. I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT I SHALL PERFORM THE NECESSARY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AND BE PRESENT ON THE CONSTRUCTION SITE ON A REGULAR AND PERIODIC BASIS TO DETERMINE THAT THE WORK IS PROCEEDING IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DOCUMENTS APPROVED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FOLLOWING AS SPECIFIED IN SECTION 116.2.2. 1. Review of shop drawings, samples and other submittals of the contractor as required by the construction contract documents as submitted for building permit, and approval for conformance to the design concept. 2. Review and approval of the quality control procedures for all code required control materials. 3. Special architectural or engineering professional inspection of critical construction components requiring controlled materials or construction specified in the accepted engineering practice standards listed in Appendix I. PURSUANT TO SECTION 116.4, 1 SHALL SUBMIT PERIODICALLY, A PROGRESS REPORT TOGETHER WITH PERTINENT COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING INSPECTOR. UPON COMPLETION OF THE WORK, I SHALL SUBMIT A FINAL REPORT AS TP THE SATISFACTORY COMPLETION AND READINESS OF THE PROJECT FOR OCCUPANCY. Signature BIB D AN OR TO BEFORE ME THIS 21 DAY OF August 2003 My commission Expires: i ry Pu lic STACIA M.COOPER NotaryPublic -_ My Commission Expires Sept.0 2004 OF SALEM. lrlA»a+.a,.nv PUBLIC PROPERTY DEPARTMENT ° 120 WASHINGTON STREET, 3RD FLOOR ' SALEM,MAO 1970 A A01970 ATEL. (976)745-9595 EXT-380 FAX (978) 740-9B46 STANLEY J. USOVICZ, JR. - MAYOR DISPOSAL OF DEBRIS AFFIDAVIT In accordance with the provisions of MGL c 40,534,I aclmowledge that as a condition of Building Permit# all debris resulting from the construction activity governed by this Building Permit shall be disposed of in a properly licensed solid-waste disposal facility,as defined by MGL c III,S150A. The debris will be disposed of at: Charles ceorQe Trnekinn Location of Facility. Signature ate FULLY co owing information: (PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY) 7a�n s W wq Name of Permit Applicant James J. Welch & Co. , Inc. Firm Name,if any 27 Congress Street, Salem, N.A 01970 Address, City & State The above statute requires that debris from the demolition,renovation,rehab or other alteration of building or structure be disposed in a properly-licensed solid-waste disposal facility as defined by MGL cM, S 150A, and the building permits Or licenses are to indicate the location of the facility. CONSTRUCTION CONTROL AFFIDAVIT Project Number: 0135.001 Date: August 21, 2003 Project Title: Derby Lofts Condominiums Project Location: 51-71 Lafayette Street, Salem Massachusetts 01970 Name of Building: Derby Lofts Scope of Project: Additions and Alterations IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 116.0 OF THE MASSACHUSETTS STATE BUIDING CODE, I JOHN WATHNE, MASS. REGISTRATION NO. 34420 BEING A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE PREPARED OR DIRECTLY SUPERVISED THE PREPARATION OF ALL DESIGN PLANS, COMPUTATIONS, AND SPECIFICATIONS CONCERNING: Entire Project Architectural Structural X Mechanical Electrical Fire Protection Other(specify) FOR THE ABOVE NAMED PROJECT AND THAT, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, SUCH PLANS, COMPUTATIONS, AND SPECIFICATIONS MEET THE APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE MASSACHUSETTS STATE BUILDING CODE, ALL ACCEPTABLE ENGINEERING PRACTICES AND ALL APPLICABLE LAWS FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT. I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT I SHALL PERFORM THE NECESSARY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AND BE PRESENT ON THE CONSTRUCTION SITE ON A REGULAR AND PERIODIC BASIS TO DETERMINE THAT THE WORK IS PROCEEDING IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DOCUMENTS APPROVED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FOLLOWING AS SPECIFIED IN SECTION 116.2.2. 1. Review of shop drawings, samples and other submittals of the contractor as required by the construction contract documents as submitted for building permit, and approval for conformance to the design concept. 2. Review and approval of the quality control procedures for all code required control materials. 3. Special architectural or engineering professional inspection of critical construction components requiring controlled materials or construction specified in the accepted engineering practice standards listed in Appendix I. PURSUANT TO SECTION 116.4, 1 SHALL SUBMIT PERIODICALLY, A PROGRESS REPORT TOGETHER WITH PERTINENT COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING INSPECTOR. UPON COMPLETION OF THE WORK, I SHALL SUBMIT A FINAL REPORT AS TO THE �.(vE�N AND READINESS OF THE PROJECT FOR OCCUPANCY. Signature B BED AND SWO N TO EFORE ME THIS 21 DAY OF Au- ust 2003 My commission Expires: ry Public STACIA M.COOPER. Notary Public MyCommisslon Expires Sept.10,2004 Hobbs Endeavour Corp 979-744-4646 11/0S/06 09:62A P.001 z HOBBS ENDEAVOUR CORPORATION consulcmte Ia the EnginwHou Sciences 14 RauklanA Sema SwamRaearr,MA 01907 781.4li LA454 20 December 2001 li 'r City of Salem p. Public Property Department Building Department Re: Existing 'temporary Repairs to Laundry Building 45-69 Lafayette St., Salem, MA !4i Attention: Peter Strout, Building Commissioner I• Gentlemen: 'i As you know, we installed an emergency and temporary restraint system to the walls of the 1; building to protect the public from falling masonry. The system has been in place almost two years while the forces which originally dislodged the parapet and brick-wall areas have continued to act. The system was intended to service for one year but has now serviced through Y two winters without inspection. We are concerned that the system may no longer be adequate, or that further deterioration has occurred. Either of these conditions create an immediate hazard which could cause injury or death. If these conditions exist, large sections of parapet or area,%of brick could fall. This could he triggered by vehicular traffic, heavy rain, ice or other. We observe that there is some demolition activity at the building and have heard offhand that the demolition of the chimney may occur soon. This type of activity could initiate some masonry to fall. We have discussed this with you and this letter records and confirms the existing conditions and our discussion. If you have any questions or require clarification, please contact us. Very truly, HOBBS ENDEAVOUR CORPORATION William Loring Hobbs President -t'o r S not,- ¢ 3