293 JEFFERSON AVENUE - BUILDING INSPECTION 293 JEFFERSON AVENUE
i
NO. 752 1/3
ESSELTE iso
O O
0
ALEXANDER & FEMINO
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
ONE SCHOOL STREET
BEVERLY,MASSACHUSETTS 01915
LEONARD F.FEMINO TELEPHONE(978)921-1990
THOMAS J.ALEXANDER FAX(975)921-4553
LFF@ALEXANDERFEMINO.NET
September 17, 2014
Thomas St. Pierre
Building Commissioner
City of Salem
120 Washington Street, Floor 3
Salem, MA 01970
RE: Petition of George Papagiannes for Special Permit
293 Jefferson Avenue, Salem, MA 01970
Dear Mr. St. Pierre:
This office has been asked to render an opinion on the issue of whether a finding
in a zoning decision that is not later adopted as one of the conditions in that zoning
decision binds the Petitioners and their Property, as to that finding.
We are of the opinion that if the finding is not set forth as a condition that finding
does not bind the Petitioner and the Property.
In this case the Petitioners sought to obtain a Special Permit to change a use from
a consignment shop to a coffee shop. During the hearing the Petitioners represented
among other things, that no frying or fryolators would be on the premises and that all
equipment for the preparation of food would be electric, such as ovens and grills. The .
Board in granting the special permit set forth eight specific conditions,none of which
limited the coffee shop to only electrical appliances.
If the Board intended to limit the Petitioner's operation to only electrical
appliance and exclude frying or fryolators then it must have conditioned its permit
accordingly. One may infer that the Board intended to not limit cooking to electrical
appliances but not making that issue a condition.
The Board's decision requires the Petitioner to comply with all city and state
statutes, code ordinance and regulations. If the owners so comply, the Special Permit
does not restrict them as to their type of ovens.
Please contact me should you have any questions.
7onard
y u s. Femino
LFF/gsw
Enc
i
_ -.� -------- --- - -=- - ----- --- - -------- --
293 JEFFERSON AV UE 407-14
GIB—#7 - 1aa COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
:Map - 23--- -----
'13lock: - - CITY OF SALEM
i.oi: -- ---10129 -.— --
—i
Category: ]]RmINOVATIONS
. .....# --r07_I4— BUILDING PERMIT
Project# iJS-2014-000910
Est. Cost: $59,576.00 -
,Fee Charged: 54.00
Balance Due oo_ - —_ PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO:
Const Class _ Contractor: License: Expires:
,Use Group: !GALAXY CONTRACTING INC CONSTRUCTIO SUPERVISOR-CS-08645 06/02/2015
Lot Size(sq_ ft.)_16456:0276 —
Zoning 'Bl Omner: DUANES.ANDLER
-- -� F '-------- : 4.Pn iic:uat: G.AT,A�YCORA
', IR ^^.'TNG INC
Gt Its u� uc:..
aJnits Lost: iAT: 293 JEFFERSON AVENUE
l itu Safe#- -- ---- -- -_I
ISSUED ON: 19-Nov-2013 AMENDED ON: EXPIRES ON: 19-May-2014
fO PERFORM THE FOLLOWING WORK.
RENOVATION OF EXISTING RESTAURANT/KITCHEN,WITH INSTALLATION OF NEW EQUIPMENT
POST THIS CARD SO IT IS VISIBLE FROM THE STREET
Electric - Gas Plumbing Building
Underground: Underground: Underground: Excavation:
Service: Meter: Footings:
i
Rougnr/'y 71n Rough: Rough: OOO Foundation:
Final:���rf `r�j,! Final:dA 1fimG+ f�'(],y�`�, Final: QKj,,e�Q(p /w/y Rough Frame:
ffflll %%%"'���'�" Fireplace/Chimney:
D.P.W. ! Fire H Ith
Insulation:
I Meter: Oil: y�y /
I' (n v ,rj^�� Final:
kiu �
use M Smoke: t�IIJ �/ 6
!+ Treasury: fit�e�x-.
pcrs.VIlet: Alarm: . I j LA Assessor
�De.vn: Spiioid
THIS PERMIT MAY BE REVOKED BY THE CITY OF SALEM UPON VIOLA OF ANY OF TS
RULES AND REGULATIONS. -
Signature:
Fee Type: Receipt No: Date Paid: Check No: Amount:
BUILDING REC-2014-000920 19-Nov-13 1758 $654.00
IMPORTANT:OWNER OR CONTRACTOR MUST
:GeoTMS@ 2013 Des Luuriers Municipal Solutions,Inc. ARRANGE FOR PERIODIC INSPECTIONS DURING
CONSTRUCTION.SEE CURRENT BUILDING CODE
CHAPTER 1 FOR LIST OF REQUIRED INSPECTIONS.
CALL 978-619-5641 TO SCHEDULE AN INSPECTION
ALEXANDER &FEMINO
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
ONE SCFIOOL STREET
BEVERLY,MASSACHUSETTS 01915
LEONARD F.FEMINO TELEPHONE(978)921-1990
THOMAS ALEXANDER FAX(978)921-4553
LFF®ALEXANDERFEMINO.NET
September 10, 2014
Thomas St. Pierre
Building Commissioner
City of Salem
120 Washington Street, Floor 3
Salem, MA 01970
RE: Petition of George Papagiannes for Special Permit
293 Jefferson Avenue, Salem, MA 01970
Dear Mr. St. Pierre:
This office has been asked to render an opinion on the issue of whether a finding
in a zoning decision that is not later adopted as one of the conditions to the granting of a
Special Permit binds the Petitioners and their Property, as to that finding.
We are of the opinion that if the finding is not set forth as a condition that finding
does not bind the Petitioner and the Property.
In this case the Petitioners sought to obtain a Special Permit to change a use from
a consignment shop to a coffee shop. During the hearing the Petitioners represented
among other things, that no frying or fryolators would be on the premises and that all
equipment would be electric, such as ovens and grills for the preparation of food. The
Board in granting the special permit set forth eight specific conditions, none of which
limited its operation to only electrical appliances.
If the Board intended to limit the Petitioner's operation to only electrical
appliance and exclude frying or fryolators then it must have conditioned its permit
accordingly. One may infer that the Board intended to not limit cooking to electrical
appliances but not making that issue a condition.
The Board's decision requires the Petitioner to comply with all city and state
statutes, code ordinance and regulations. If the owners so comply, this Special Permit
does not restrict them as to their type of ovens.
EXIST. DJMPSTER
r
Q
EXIST, EXTERIOR STAIR
DN EXISTING PARKING o 4
� 11
8
m
REPLAGE WINDOW
" EXIST. UNI-SEX H.P. FRID
5/5 TABLE —T-5/5 TABLE
$
GHE fridge below freezer below
TOILET ROOM TO 48x32 48x32 n ,.
REMAIN �-
11 4'-O" % Q
�1 F
Ex. Grease Relocate hand sink and
HAND trap-Below Bay Sink INFILL WINDOW-MATCH EXIST. Z N
SINK t. K ��
exis
MIX FINISHES f0
�a� oO H.S. p
Q
u
n b" Bvilt m Shelves Built-i Shelves
�� L WALL BELO I . rap oor o n z TAS�i : 5/5 WALL FINISH �' c
SUSHI BAR m ' I. H.S. 12
I.. refer to dwg. A-4 r ,ZLu
Frld e below
1
iTL 1 1 'ytI-i i.. Q
�7 PROVIDE OPENING FOR EXHAUST N
1 SUSHIDISPLAY L�yJ ; �REOUIREMENT5-INFILL WINDOW
r
PREP�
\-12' HOOD ABOVE
u
GASEI,ENT WINDOW INFILL DOOR-MATCH EXIST. U
`" FINISHES EXISTING WALL-TYP.
XIST,VE5TIBULE v
We to remain 4; u u
cn
/ 'P• yam. Z °o
Floor-Equipment Plan
r5
D+u�p a.�
3\ / - liC, �f � 4
EXISTING PARKING - ENTRY � " = 1i
Copyright Seger Architects,Inc.2011
fr `m CITY OF SALEM MASSACHUSETTS
�(j BUILDING DEPARTMENT
' -- 120 WASHINGTON STREET,3" FLOOR
TEL. (978) 745-9595
FAX(978) 740-9846
KIMBERLEY DRISCOLL
MAYOR THomAS STYIERRE
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROPERTY/BUILDING COMMISSIONER
May 2, 2013
Eastern Bank
Duane Sardle
re: 293 Jefferson Ave
Dear Sir,
The property at 293 Jefferson Ave is located in the B-I (neighborhood business) zone. The building has had a
number of small shops and in December of 2004 received a Special Permit to allow a coffee shop/food service
Use from the Salem Zoning Board of Appeals. This use is allowed to continue with the new owner. If any
additional information is required,please let me know.
Sincerely,
Thomas St.Pierre
Building Commissioner/Director of Inspectional Services
' CITY OF SALEM9 MASSACHUSETTS
+ BOARD OF APPEAL CifY (� s`.L ; MA
CLERI( S'@P' 1GE
120 WASHINGTON STREET, 3RD FLOOR
SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970
STANLEY J. USOVICZ, JR. TELEPHONE: 978-745-9595
MAYOR FAX: 978-740-9846 104 DEC 28 P I: 22'
DECISION OF THE PETITION OF GEORGE PAPAGIANNES REQUESTING A
SPECIAL PERMIT FOR THE PROERTY LOCATED AT 293 JEFFERSON AVENUE
B-1
A hearing on this petition was held on December 15,2004 with the following Board
Members present:Nina Cohen, Chairman, Richard Dionne,Nicholas Helides, Bonnie
Belair and Edward Moriarty. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and
notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance
with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioner request a Special Permit for a Change of Use to go from a Consignment Shop
to a Coffee Shop for the property located at 293 Jefferson Avenue located in a B-1 zone.
The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this request for a
Special Permit is Section 5-3 (2) (8)which provide as follows:
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance,the Board of
Appeal may,in accordance with the procedure and conditions set forth in Section 8-6 and
9-4,grant Special Permits for alterations and reconstruction of nonconforming strictures,
and for changes,enlargement, extension or expansion, of nonconforming lots, land,
strictures,and uses,provided however, that such change, extension, enlargement or
expansion shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming
use to the neighborhood.
In more general terms, this Board is,when reviewing Special Permit requests, guided by
the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding by the Board that the
grant of the Special Permit will promote the public health, safety, convenience and
welfare for the City's inhabitants.
A. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land,
building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands,
buildings or structures in the same district.
B. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve
substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner.
C. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good
and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or
the purpose of the ordinance.
v
DECISION OF THE PETITION OF GEORGE PAPAGIANNE REQUESTING A
SPECIAL PERMIT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 293 JEFFERSON AVENUE
B-1
page two
The Board of Appeal, after careful cppsideration,aLdw.evidencs pre and after
viewing the plans,makes the following findings of fact.
1. Petitioners' George Papagiannes&Michael Papagiannes,occupants of the
premises and property located at 293 Jefferson Ave in a B-1, said property and
premises owned by Steven Aggannis, seeks a Special Permit from the Board of
Appeals for a change in use of said property and premises to go from a
Consignment to a Coffee Shop,pursuant to Section 9-4 of the Salem Zoning
Ordinance.
2. The existing premises contain a consignment shop with off-street parking spaces.
3. Petitioner's purpose to convert the existing structure designed for said
consignment shop into an upscale coffee shop,providing flavored coffees,juices,
cappuccino and sandwich wraps on a sit-down, as well as a take-out basis.
4. The Petitioners represented that they have a business background running similar
upscale or specialty-type coffee shops in the Boston area, and would bring this
experience and expertise to bear on the proposed change in use.
5. The building would have off-street parking for sit-down and take-out business.
6. Testimony was provided by Ward Councillor, John Pelletier,indicating that the
building was constructed in the early to mid-60's by his father, and had been used
in the past as an insurance agency, barber shop and a sub shop.
7. Petitioners presented a plan indicating seating for up to approximately 16 patrons,
together with equipment and facilities to provide the type of food and beverage
referenced in the testimony.
8. The Petitioners represented that no flying or fryolators would be on the premises,
and that all equipment would be electric, including electric ovens, electric grills
and an electric convection oven, for preparation of food on premises,including
muffins.
9. The coffee shop would not provide a broad menu of food fare,would not be a
restaurant, and would likely have hours of operation limited to 6 or perhaps 7
days a week, between the hours of 6:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.
10. The Petitioners represented that the operation would be done in a good and clean
manner,ant that all trash would be appropriately stored on premises in a dumpster
at the rear of the premises.
11. The current owner of the premises, Mr. Steven Aggannis,represented that he
would be actively involved in the development of the proposed coffee shop, and
would assist the Petitioners in clearly marking parking spaces, clearly making
and/or creating appropriate berms between the off-street parking and Jefferson
Ave., and otherwise attempt to make entry into and exist from the premises as
safe and sound as possible,given the proximity of the premises to a busy
Jefferson Ave „+
-1�<t
L
DECISION OF THE PETITION OF GEORGE PAPAGIANNES REQUESTING A
SPECIAL PERMIT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 293 JEFFERSON
AVENUE B-1
page three
12. Councillor Pelletier was not opposed to the change in use from a consignment
shop to a coffee shop,but did express concerns,which Petitioners promised to
take into consideration and address and resolve, about the need for care in terms
of entry to and exit from the premises abutting a very busy portion of Jefferson
Avenue.
13. Councillor O'Keefe,an abutting Ward Councillor,did express concerns about
additional traffic from the premises onto a busy Jefferson Ave.,which concern
again was acknowledged by the property owner,Mr.Aggannis,and the
Petitioners,who acknowledged that the location was a good one for a coffee shop
as planned,but that care would be taken in the design of the entrance/exit way to
minimize adverse traffic associated with the use of the premises,and entry to and
egress from the premises onto Jefferson Avenue.
14. Under the circumstances,the Board determined that the change in use from a
consignment shop to a coffee shop was permissible under the Salem Zoning
Ordinance in general, and in particular,was in harmony with the purpose and
intent of the Zoning Ordinance,as required under Section 94, Subsection A.
15. Under the circumstances,the Board firrther found that the use of the property and
premises as changed,namely from a consignment shop to a coffee shop as
described in testimony and in plans submitted with said Petition,will not depart
from the intent of the Zoning Ordinance, and the property and premises prior use
or degree of use, and that such building or use is neither increased in volume nor
area unreasonably within the purpose and intent of the Ordinance.
On the basis of the above findings of fact,and on the evidence presented at the hearing,
the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the ordinance would involve substantial
hardship on the petitioner.
2. The relief requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the public
good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the
district or the purpose of the ordinance.
3. The Special Permit granted can be granted in harmony with the neighborhood and
will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's
inhabitants.
4. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property, but not the
district in general.
a
DECISION OF THE PETITION OF GEORGE PAPAGINNES REQUESTING A
SPECIAL PERMIT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 293 JEFFERSON AVENUE
B-1
page four
On the basis of the above findings of fact, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted 5 in favor
and 0 in opposition to grant the Special Permit requested, subject to the following
conditions.
1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statues, code ordinances and
regulations.
2. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety
shall be strictly adhered to.
3. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to beginning any construction.
4. All construction shall be done as per the plans submitted and approved by the
Building Commissioner.
5. Petitioner shall secure a dumpster on the premises.
6. Petitioner shall meet with City Councillors and Salem Police Traffic with regards
in the care of entry and exit from the premises.
7. Petitioner shall obtain approval from any City Board or Commission having
jurisdiction, including but not limited to the Health Department.
8. A Certificate of Inspection is to be obtained.
Special Permit Granted
December 15, 2004
Edward Moriarty �SC
Board of Appeal
t
i
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING
BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
Appeal from this decision,if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17, of MGL
Chapter 40 A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision
iatLe.office Clerk. Pursuant to MUL.Chapter 40A,SectiowU,the
Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the
decision, bearing the certification of the City Clerk that the 20 days have elapsed and
no appeal has been filed, or that,if such appeal has been filed,that is has been
dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed
under the name of the owner or record or is recorded and noted on the owner's
Certificate of Title.