18 INTERVALE ROAD - BUILDING INSPECTION it
�'. 18 INTERVALE ROAD
Cgity of 'ittlem, Anssar4use##s
,. .9 Pourb of �ppvd 1
�IN11.1 P" In V 1136 JR X87
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF GEORGE & MICHELLE GIRIIRD FOR A FILE#
VARIANCE AT 18 INTERVALE ROAD
CITY CLERK.SKLEM,MASS.
A hearing on this petition was held May 13, 1987 with the following Board
Members present: James Hacker, Chairman; Messrs., Fleming, Luzinski and Dore.
Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and others and notices of
the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with
Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioner is requesting a Variance to divide parcel into two undersized lots to
allow, construction of a single family dwelling in this R-1 zone.
The Variance which have been requested may be granted upon a finding of the
Hoard that:
a. special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the
land, building or structure involved and which are not generally
affecting other lands, buildings and structures in the same district;
b. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would in-
volve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to petitioner;
c. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the
hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact:
1. There was no opposition to the subdivision plan.
2. There are smaller sized lots in the area.
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the
hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject but do
not affect the district generally;
2. Literal enforcement of the Ordinance would involve substantial hardship
to the petitioner;
3. The relief requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 4-0, to grant the
Variance requested, subject to the following conditions:
Y
i!
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF GEORGE & MICH> LE GIRARD FOR A
VARIANCE AT 18 INPERVALE ROAD (R-1)
PAGE 2
1. That the subdivision and construction be carried out in accordance
with the plans submitted.
2. That a building permit be obtained.
3. That a certificate of occupancy be obtained.
4. That proper numbering be obtained.
5. That the dwelling be in compliance with all the requirements of the
Salm Fire Department.
6. That the provisions of the Massachusetts Building Code be followed.
UNANIMOUSLY GRANTED
Peter A. Dore, Associate Member
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK.
APPEAL FRO:', IRIS DELISICI;, IF ANY. Si1ALE EE MADE PURSUANT TO SECTL",'J 17 OF THL
GENERAL LAV:S. C.44 iL" ':F Ati SN=.'i_ 5- FILED MTHIN ZO DAYS AFTER THE DATE 0..' S_....,
OF TRIS DEC;S'S': I:i .RE ZI JITY CLERK.
C ' 7i5. S .i`!1 11, E
_ ._7iL A .SFT CF TP
r F d:j i i i t F. _ EL-V= ;NI) N, A-P;.',I h"
IF.0 IT
RK'_.LEC 9,o i TSKI PE'.5 ., u' DEEDS AND INCEXED UNC :' THE LF ..
OF RECORD OR IS R CORDED AND NOTED ON THE OVINER'S CERTIFICATE OF TITLE.
BOARD OF APPEAL
Ctg of. 'Sttlrm, 'fflttssadjusPt#s
�Roarb of Appml
•ZY Yl
NAT zi ll s6 IM '87
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF GEORGE & MICHELLE GIRARD FOR A FILE#
VARIANCE AT 18 INTERVALE ROAD
CITY CLERK.SALEM,MASS.
A hearing on this petition was held May 13, 1987 with the following Board
Members present: James Hacker, Chairman; Messrs. , Fleming, Luzinski and Dore.
Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and others and notices of
the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with
Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioner is requesting a Variance to divide parcel into two undersized lots to
allow construction of a single family dwelling in this R-1 zone.
The Variance which have been requested may be granted upon a finding of the
Board that:
a. special conditions and circumstances exist which etpecially affect the
land, building or structure involved and which are not generally
affecting other lands, buildings and structures in the same district;
b. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would in-
volve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to petitioner;
- c. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment.to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the
hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact:
1. There was no opposition to the subdivision plan.
2. There are smaller sized lots in the area. Y
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the
hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject but do
not affect the district generally;
2. Literal enforcement of the Ordinance would involve substantial hardship
to the petitioner;
3. The relief requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 4-0, to grant the
Variance requested, subject to the following conditions:
DECISION ON THE PEPITION OF GDORGE & MICHELLE GIRARD FM A
VARIANCE AT 18 INTERVALE ROAD (R-1)
PAGE 2
1. That the subdivision and construction be carried out in accordance
with the plans submitted.
2. That a building permit be obtained.
3. That a certificate of occupancy be obtained.
4. That proper numbering be obtained.
5. That the dwelling be in compliance with all the requirements of the
Salm Fire Department.
6. That the provisions of the Massachusetts Building Code be followed.
UNANIMOUSLY GRANTED
e Dore, Associate Member
.A ODPY OF THIS .DECISION.HAS,.BEEN-FILED -WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK
AFFEAL FRO?.: THIS DECISION, IF AN1'. SHkLL EE hV.DE PURSUANT TO SECTION 17 OF THE
GENERAL LAV/S. GH .'T6-^, SC£, Ai:D SH__ b- FILED W!THIN ZO DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF F;;Il;s
OF 14IS DEC!S'DI: G: THE CFFICE C; ,..E CITY CLr_P.R.
:r„S. �c l S. r -?T°= i:3. SLi :'..1; 11 THE lAc rc i _.,... .
4k EDF r_H c''tiL 2'i �'` `r E: L'TU. A COPY OF TRE: u ' E .-.
it 1HE u,t C,lin 2� CP.Y S H-vE ELAFCEp AND NC A7KAL HAS < < D,
. IF S'i 'i:E. TFRT IT H',S EEE7 DIC'1.SSEC CP 'E:;!E
:S
RE.. .- D IN TH,7 5--..i.H ESSE, P•c_iSTRi OF REELS AND INDEXED UU':ER THE 6A c LF T!; . ..._.
OF RECORD OR IS RECORDED AND NOTED ON THE OWNER'S CERTIFICATE OF TITLE.
BOARD OF APPEAL
O
A
1A�E� 7BoE3C4 Sr
Ntl/LBGE'/EAO �Jj
5?Y4 y SCOTT /
LOCUS A,-I`AO
C4,7 17y //v/fhis o/oma
/77 06VO/t.;61co
,a Ivy fh 7' a 21/e5 5
C'7 1170 eeqi.5>�r5 of Goo's.
� III
00 v, 11:501711111
3G 00
�o po 4998 0 3 C
499a.� O goo.
/00'00 (97/77,
o k3\
q Z °p1 p8 s 500 jO. 3
JAI/ ' X5.00,
QV v, N B
� h n.s � 0 33�°�/� � � � •N 3�� • O i
71.04 p5 g2
2M
_ B-x
C' N3¢y�
O
cr
.O1-4N 01G LA No
/. D
ZorVAw� - 157 2/C7 N11PProva�ux/er SuhDi✓i�ior� -�. %5w/. /t/o f✓r �a�,
,I7&D ARO Vio16=O Co�fro/ Lory roof re uiieo' �POP�2TY O�
AoV DO 720w7'AC72f- /05.00 /-
15, OOO 56/ a. a77TG ' OSE Pf// Er t�E4NNETT� ref. D.d /S.S�
/5,00 ' � ONTSETBACK 9.38 Q
2
14200 , 7/,Oe- Y.420 15.0 1Q ^_ "A2C,e1/6 /J87
3000 ' RjI YAR12 4-5' X! �JIwA OF&A� sG2 ?/ -
,55,6)0 ' X,14K. A11C7117- -30'- lJ
a� EluU
2 BLOOD �/L1Z�120 ZO.c/� .C''�Cnc/.y r 14� C/°25d/02 4 rcr: E a�. H io 50 i
Ho?� $ Tf1/1' EJVC7/NtG�2/N� .4S.90G'/.4'T�.�� IiC/C. II
r //.
83 vim �r
3. See dcliiorfee - dSo% Jnr c/' 4 /s -,filo 27/�7. �"
act,
ffi ,
10 0177 Al�01-717/i7,,:7 rc7/
Aovl,erod 5C�I3, /.�7 085/
9.