The URL can be used to link to this page

0114 REAR HIGHLAND AVENUE - BUILDING JACKET A SMEAD Y 1a "163 W UPC lasso -'Sm®ad.00m • Nada In USA t r h ` ti �� :. � ' 1 , . ., t� r '.F'•2004" + I op 1 98�- 11 1 i i OL4N AGCOMPAN/N� SET l 770N OF .. � �ti/ ��° hb � ; � . � NAUMft�AUl��'./PE.AG TY CO;�R• . . x ! : .LST fr EX?`ei` D ,DSA/M ti 1 ' / r i 1 I 47 F¢c!¢rcT�sf- .5cr/erri /vlos� /inch Y ZDddJ� t t, ' 1 �� \\ ► I NOTES: ,' Y . � . ; � � 1 �` • ./. --- 58--- /I7d/COzL¢6;` ¢X/�TiricJ' COr'ITOUr"'.5 .' � � , " , ,� � 3 �lwof�br�s, .r��er��`a. Ci�c�o�S�lcrm� G��um •�, �, .13r�kcI7 Le e \� \NI1 -y f \ t � - ` \ \�\ \ � ` . r ( ' 1 I ... .. . Pray./.v✓. 50.0 t • \ 1Ii1 , r 1 / jilt VP \ / 4� A,eE� S6, 000- - TOTAL q,E'E-n of Fico/hrc, SSD � x.��a•��=/5��.SvFr. � j 1 1 � � \ ! It 5 � D , P .D ti \ VA ' 1 it coS D• �3 � � � I � Z • 2 a D r ' N • wi��c�= 29 October• X97 f ctCttp of *atem, �fflaggacbugettg e J-3ublieroperty Department (Department One *alem Green 743-9595 ext. 380 William H. Munroe Director of Public Property Inspector of Buildings Zoning Enforcement Officer August 25, 1988 Dr. Hannaway 114 R. Highland Ave. Salem, MA. 01970 RE: �` 114 R. HilandghTA —P. Dear Dr. Hannaway, Please be advised that permission has been given to occupy the first floor of 114 R. Highland Avenue, contingent upon completion of the second floor and requirements of the City of Salem Planning Board and the Board of Appeals has been met . Sincerety, David J. Harris Assistant Building Inspector DJH/e.af C .C . Bob Parley George P. Williams Ward Councillor Beth Debski CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETU'D OF APP.;_ni S PLANNING DEPARTMENT 0N0q EF +' � ,.IJi_ GERARD KAVANAUGHy ONE SALEM GREEN S CITY PLANNER � � %=�� 01970 CITY OF S�LIE S' 617 745-9595,EXT.311 � _ti, �iC.Sy.( ) r d' peElMM6 August 1, 1988 Mr. David Harris Asst. Building Inspector One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 Re: 114R Highland Avenue Dear Dave: The Salem Planning Board is in receipt of a letter from Daniel Lynch, engineer for the 114R Highland Avenue Medical Building. Mr. Lynch will submit engineering plans to the Board for the entrance/exit to the project within two weeks. This submittal will satisfy the Planning Board Conditions of Approval, dated March 5, 1987. The Planning Board would like to recommend that a Certificate of Occupancy be issued for this project. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Beth Debski Asst. Planner cc: Paul Hannaway, M.D. 116 Highland Ave. Salem, MA 01970 M40 WP A Citp of 6alem, :ffiaggacbu.5ett5 P" �; 1 , • j Public Propertp Department 9fC/y�NE�N� �3ui(bing Department One 6alem Oreen 745-9595 tCxt. 380 William H. Munroe Director of Public Property Inspector of Buildings Zoning Enforcement Officer July 5, 1988 Dr. Hannaway 116 Highland Avenue Salem, MA. 01970 RE: as1-14 g land`Avenue Dear Sir: On July 5, 1988 1 made an inspection of the above referenced property. Accordingly there is a list of items that must be addressed prior to occupying this building. 1 . Parking spaces finished (22) 2. Signs on the bathroom doors 3. Cover walls of inside storage areas 4. Fire extinguishers installed 5• Door closers on entrances 6. Exterior guard rail completed 7. Building card to be signed off by Board of Health, City Engineer, and planning Department 8. Elevator inspected 9. Protection from soil erosion caused by unstable ledge wall. Be advised it shall be unlawful to occupy this building until a Certified of Occupancy has been issued. Sincerely, r David J . Harris Assistant Building Inspector C.C. George P. Williams Robert Farley City Solicitor Ward Councillor COxtlf,� (9lty Df '*ttlem, Aass2Xr4usP##s Public Property Pepartutent fA � _ ��qp JACO/MML�+'4V [[II11t11Lj R+PptIrtnTent ( (Out Salem (6rern 743-0213 William H. Munroe Director of Public Property Maurice M. Martineau, Ass't Inspector Inspector of Buildings Edgar J. Paquin, Ass't Inspector Zoning Enforcement Officer John L. LeClerc, Plumbing/Gas Insp. December 15, 1987 George P. Williams 194 Main Street Wenham,MA 01984 RE: 1=14=Rear Highland Ave-�--,—Sa-lem MA--w--w- Dear Sir, There are some concerns with the stability of the ledge wall abutting the property at 114 R Highland Avenue. After noticing soil erosion from above and your planned parking spaces below, it would be advisable at this time to recieve a letter from a Structural Engineer on the overall condition of the .wall. Sincerely, David H. Harris Assistant Building Inspector DH/eaf �.Cox nr4b CtV of �$alvni, 4flaSsar4usrfts Public Vropertg Pepttrttueut A f J^�a1MML�X'tiY �l ui(linq �epttrtntent (Our �itt(rm 05rern 713-0213 William H. Munroe Director of Public Property Maurice M. Martineau, Ass't Inspector Inspector of Buildings Edgar J. Paquin, Ass't Inspector Zoning Enforcement Officer John L. LeClerc, Plumbing/Gas Insp. March I , 1988 Robert D. Farley 16 Park Street RE: Danvers, M.A 01923 R$:-, 114 R. High_la_nd Ave. ,,Salem; MAs Dear Mr. Farley, Due to the lack of information on your field report , an on site inspection was done at 114 R. Highland Avenue. Upon inspection of the property a deviation from the proposed plans were noticed. The shaft for the elevator has been deleted, this is in direct Violation of the Mass State Building Code 113.8. In order to delete this elevator you must. 1 . Apply for a Variance from the Architectural Access Board. (None have yet been applied for) . 2. File an amendment to the original plan to the Building Department . Field reports from 114 R. Highland Avenue are inadequate and unacceptable. If you need help with these reports please contact me. Please contact this office within fourteen ( 14) days of receipt of this letter of your intentions . Failure to do so will result in further Legal Action. Sincerely, i David J. Harris Assistant Building Inspector DJH/eaf C.C. Cherry Hill Realty Trust George P. Williams BOARD of ASSESSORS '`'- �` �� .X 93 WASHINGTON STREET. CITY HALL. SALEM. MASSACHUSETTS 01970 (6171 744-0660 x .s : .��7 Il 7 4t; F°I 987 c�tr n SWLF_ °.inSS. May 7, 1987 Mrs. Josephine R. Fusco City Clerk City of Salem Salem, MA 01970 Dear Mrs. Fusco: Please be advised that the new medical office building to be built behind the existing office buildings at 116 and 116R Highland Avenue has been assigned the street address of 114R Highland Avenue. The building is being built on Parcel 1114-0098, formerly known as 14 Rear Cherry Hill Avenue. trul r Peter M. Caron Chief Assessor PMC:mjg cc: Kenneth B. Cahill, Postmaster Chief Joseph F. Sullivan, Fire Department Margaret R. Hagerty, Principal Clerk, Water Dept. /William H. Munroe, Inspector of Buildings Engineering Dept. , City of Salem Dr. Paul Hannaway, 116 Highland Ave. , Salem, MA 01970 , _ 80 Form 2. . . ... - _ .. DEt7E Re No. Commonwealth Gb )== of Massachusetts �oh�. �tlQ LE Y Determination'of Applicability Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act, G.L. c. 131, §40 Frorr I L Salem Conservation Commission Issuing Authority � :... . Mr. Robert Farley' -:' ==- Mr T . Paul Hanoway (Name of person making request) •` _. (Name of property owner)• , ss 16 Park. `St. Danvers,:MA Address 116 Hiohland Ave. . Sat pm- MA T7tis Bete,mination is issued and delivered as follows: E3by hand delivery to person making request on Nate) ® by certified mall,return receipt requested on (date) pursuant to the authority of u.L c.131, §40,the Salem Conse^y2*inn rn,,,,,,+ sJnn tas considered your request for a Determination of Applicability and its supporting documentation,and has made the following determination(check whichever is applicable): This Determination is positive: 1, ❑ The area described below,which includes all/part of the area described in your request, is an Area Subject to Prota,;don Under the Act.Therefore, any removing,filling, dredging or altering of that area requires the Ming of a Notice of Intent- 2. ntent2. ❑ The work desc^bed below, which includes aiVpart of the work described in your request,is within an Area Subject to Protection Under the Act and will remove,fill, dredge or alter that area.There- fore, said work,requires the filing of a Notice of Intent. 2-1 Si 3. ❑ The work described below,which includes all/part of the work described in your request, is within the Buffer Zone as defined in the regulations, and will alter an Area Subject to Protection Under the Act.Therefore, said work requires the firing of a Notice of Intent. This Determination is negative: 1. The area described in your request is not an Area Subject to Protection Under the Act No materials shall be stored on the land to the North of the Dr000sed retainir� 2. G The work described in your request is within an Area Subject to Protection Under the Act, but will wall. not remove,fill, dredge,or alter that area.Therefore, said work does not require the firing of a i Notice of Intent AN* 3. G The work described in your request is within the Buffer Zone, as defined in the regulations, but will not alter an Area Subject to Protection Under the Act Therefore, said work does not require the fining of a Notice of Intent 4. ❑ The area described in your request is Subject to Protection Under the Act,but since the work described therein meets the requirements for the following exemption,as specified in the Act and the regulations,no Notice of Intent is required: Issued by \ Salm Conservation Commission Signature(s) 2. This Determination must be signed by a majonty of the Conservation Commission. On ;him =g day of January 19 87 before me p erso n al I appear * v l , to me known to be the Person desc^bed in,and who executed, the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he/she executed the same as his/her free act and deed. Notary Public My commission expires This.Determinahon Coes not relieve the aPPlicant trom complying with all other applicable federal.state or local statutes.ordinances. oy-lays or regulations.This Delemlination Shall be valid for three years form the date of issuance. - The applicant, the owner,any Person aggrieved by this Determination.any ownw of land abutting the land upon which the proposed wont is to be done,of any ten residents of the city or:own in which such land is located.are hereby notified of their right to reauesl the Department of Enwronmental duality Engineering to issue a Superseding Determination of Applicability,providing the reauest is made by certified mail or nand delivery to the Deoartment wahm ten Pays from the date of issuance of this Determination.A copy of the request snai at the same time be sent by cert lied mail or hand celivery to the conservation Commission and the applicant. 2.2A Legal Notices Legal Notices CITY OF SALEM PLANNING BOARD Will give a public hearing under Section P, Wetlands and Flood Hazard Districts, of the Salem Zoning Ordinance at the request of Cherry Hill Realty Trust,c/o 116 Highland Avenue.The purpose of the hearing is to explore the effects of the.construction of a medical office building on Highland Avenue, within a wetland area. The hearing will be held on Thursday. February 19, 1987,at 7:30 p.m.,One Salem Green,second floor conference room. WALTER B.POWER, III, Chairman January 29; February 5, 1987 4, �1 _ o P,Y C'; J ep ca F U CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS PLANNING DEPARTMENT �COSOI{L W.GREGORY SENKO �n.'.. ONE SALEM GREEN CITY PLANNER 3 . . �3 01970 (617)744-45aO r _ mecum-eo°'� October 24, 1978 Mr. James Boulger, Chairman Board of Appeals City of Salem One Salem Green Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Dear Mr. Boulger: I am responding to an inquiry from the Board concerning correspondence of Richard McKeage, MD regarding an entry way off. Highland Avenue. Dr. McKeage has stated his view that narrowing the width of the curbcut is not feasible given the opinion of the Massachusetts Department of Public Works. Dr. McKeage encloses docu- mentation of a site inspection. by a state engineer which was the basis of the state's position. I have visited the site with Tony Fletcher, the City Engineer. . Both of us concur with the opinion of the state engineer. While we both endorse efforts at minimizing curbcuts and establishing a clear definition between street and sidewalk, in this particular case, we find the current width of the curbcut is warranted given the level of traffic on Highland Avenue as well as the volume of entrances and exists from the property in question. I should point out that the first .responsibility for streets and sidewalks in the City falls to the City Engineer. In future cases, the Board may wish to contact Mr. Fletcher directly. Very truly yours, David Lash Assistant City Planner DL/pw COPY: A. V. Fletcher R. E. McKeage, MD lLtT2t5CTfTatia T Commission December 27, 1974 Mr. Ronald. W. Keefe Crane, Inker & Oteri 20 Ashburton Place Boston, Mass. 02108 Rei Naumkeag Fealty Management Corporation DNA 64-4 Dear Mr. Keefe : We are pleased to enclose our order of the conditions to be followed by your above client at 114-116 Highland Avenue, Salem, ,"•:ass , so that increased parking facilities may be con- structed. Conditions 1 through 11 are standard. and are imposed by statute : G. L. c. 131, section 40. The Salem Conservation Commission has listed additional conditions (a, through h. ). We believe you will find these conditions to be reasonable safeguards, for the mutual benefit of Naumkeag Realty and the City Of Salem. The reason we require copies of statements dealing with permits in condition h, is that no documentation of permits was presented at the hearing on 12/10/74. If no permit is necessary simple statements to this effect should be mailed to me by the responsible authorities . Perhaps this can be accom- plished in the 10 day appeal period during which no work can commence, said appeal period to begin on 12/31/74. Thank you very much for your cooperation in this matter. Orders of conditions have been mailed to the below parties. Sine ely, on d F. ?unt / Chairman 138 Federal Street Salem, Mass. 01970 DFH:esh : enc �OOFD(�J e c (fIIttSeI 5aIIIA Tom M155IIItt ;,,s��a ��Icm, ��"rlassttcf�use#ts Oct Department Of Natural Resources Mr. Leo, J. Thornton, Division Of Waterways, Department Of Public Works Mr. John B. Powers, Zoning Officer 5 Broad Street, Salem, Mass. 01970 Mr. Ralph W. Tedford, City Engineer Dr, John J. Toomey, Health Agent 5 Broad St, , Salem, Mass. 01970 Essex Survey Service , Inc. , Salem, Mass. Herbert C. Hegele , Jr. , M. D. Gerald T. McCarthy, Chairman, Planning Board John M. Gray, Sr. , Chairman, Appeal Board ' THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS ORDER WETLAND PROTECTION ACT G.L.c. 131 s.40 FILE NUMBER: 64-4 PROJECT LOCATION: 114-116 Highland Naumkeag Realty Management Corp, Avenue , Salem, Mass, TO: Mail to: Crane Inker & Oteri (S4r, CERT. MAIL NO: Ronald W. Keefe ) , Boston, Mass, Tel: 227-4882 RE: NOTICE OF INTENT AND PLANS DATED: 11/19/74DATE '0F RECEIPT BY 11/20/74 DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: Tuesday, CONSERVATION COMMISSION: December 10, 1974 Pursuant to the authority of G.L. c. 131 s. 40, the Salem Conservation Commission has considered your notice of intent and plans submitted therewith, and has determined that the area on which the proposed work is to be done is significant to one or more of the interests described in the said act. The Salem Conservation Commission hereby orders that the following conditions are necessary and all work must be performed in strict conformance therewith: CONDITIONS 1. Failure to comply with all conditions stated herein, and with all related statutes and other regulatory measures, shall be deemed cause to revoke or modify this order. 2. This order does not grant any property rights or any exclusive privileges; it does not authorize any injury to private property or invasion of private rights. 3. This order does not relieve the permittee or any other person of the necessity of complying with all other applicable federal, state, or local statutes, ordinances, by-laws and/or regulations. 4. The work authorized hereunder shall be completed within one (1) year from the date of this order. The order may be extended by the issuing authority for one or more additional one-year periods upon application to the said. issuing authority at least thirty days prior to the expiration date of the order or its extension. 5. Any fill used in connection with this project shall be clean fill, containing no trash, refuse, rubbish or debris, including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, lumber, bricks, plaster, wire, lath, paper, cardboard, pipe, .tires, ashes, refrigerators, motor vehicles or parts of any of the foregoing. 6. No work may be commenced until all appeal periods have elapsed from the order of the Conservation Commission or from a final order by the Department of Natural Resources has elapsed. _ „D„ 30 - 64-4 CONDITIONS CONTINUED PAGE 2 FILE NO. t 7. No work shall be undertaken until the final Order, with respect to the proposed project, has been recorded in the Registry of Deeds for the district in which the land is located. Copy to be furnished to issuer of this Order showing book and page. S. Upon completion of the work described herein, the applicant shall forthwith request, in writing, that a Certificate of Compliance be issued stating that the work has been satisfactorily completed. 9. A sign shall be displayed at the site not less than two square feet or more than three square feet bearing the words, "Massachus iss Department of Natural Resources, File Number � -4 � . 10. Where the Department of Natural Resources is requested to make a determination and to issue a superseding order, the Conservation Commission shall be a party to all agency proceedings and hearings before the Department of Natural Resources. 11 . The work shall conform to the following described plans and additional. conditions : a. The proposed grading and culvert construction shall be done in accordance with the drawing prepared by Essex Survey Service, Inc. , dated Sept. 13, 1974 and titled "Plan Accompanying Petition of Naumkeag Realty Corporation To Regrade Lot and Extend Drain, Salem, Mass. " b. Ir�rder to maintain the ca , Ity of the culvert the following precautions shall be mets the soil and organic material beneath the proposed culvert shall be removed and a suitable foundation shall be prepared in order to prevent the culvert from settling unevenly due to the rock overburden ; furthermore, the culvert shall be sufficiently protected from being crushed or misaligned by the rockfilling operation. c. The slope of the rockfill bank shall be covered only with rock fragments or soil. d. The flow of water shall not be stopped during the construction of the proposed culvert. e. A rack (or screen ) shall not be placed at the entrance to the proposed culvert. f. No material shall be dumped onto adjacent wetlands not involved in the activity nor on any adjacent property. g. The installation of the proposed culvert shall be supervised by a registered professional engineer in order to insure that the culvert Is constructed in accordance with these conditions 31 - h. No work shall start until the applicant provides the Salem Con- servation Commission with a copy of letters from the Salem Health officer & the Salem Zoning officer stating that permits are not required to undertake the planned activity. 31 - CONDITIONS CONTINUED PAGE 3 FILE NO. 64-4 The applicant, any person aggrieved by this order, any owner of land abutting the land upon which the proposed work is to be done, or any ten residents of the city or town in which such land is located, are hereby notified of their right to appeal this order to the Department of Natural Resources, provided the request is made in writing and by certified mail to the Department of Natural Resources within ten (10) days from the issuance of this order. ISSUED BY r, hairman r" On this 261th. day of December 1974, before me personally appeared to me known to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he executed the same as his free act and deed. Uy COMII5SION E PIRES Jw�^W� My commission expires : 32 a f Ctv of �$ttlem, fflttssar4uuffs y� 's��? �lli.�iY[$ �PjJtIX�mPIT� �ultn �C3. �'3u&aers 5 Vrvaab Street 745-0213 January 13, 1975 Donald F. Hunt, Chairman Salem Conservation Commission 138 Federal Street Ref Naumkeag Realty Management Salem, MA 01970 Corporation DNR 64-4 Dear Mr. Hunt= Please be advised that no permit is required for the planned 'expansion of the parking fawc°'it— ies at the doctors offices located at 114-116 Highland Avenue. Very truly yours, Salem Zoning Officer JBPftc Ila February 2, 1978 -John L. O'Brien, Registrar Registry of Deeds Federal Street Salem, Massachusetts 01970 ATTEN71ON: Pauline McCarthy Dear Mc. O'Brien: This letter will serve as authorization for Pauline McCarthy to add the ieorR "Coq)." after the words Naumlceag Realty Management in the Decision W the Board of Appeal submitted May 17,1977 for property located at 116 Highland Avenue, Salem, Mass. Sincerely yours, Ethel C. Crowell Clerk cc i RECEIVED Cr 09 Ju,h tiCIv t �y 17, 1977 SACLUEM MAE,hiC` DECISION ON THE PETITION OF NAUI-0'NEAG REALTY idli97iGi'PdE3t`1`a„FOR A SPECIAL PF:i:_`-TT TO ..,_,:,,.,_,.-.a-...-LDI' A BRICK MEDICAL OFFICP BUILUS..G Al THE PyIA?Z OP 7.15 EIC•. hP.Cill AVE-`!U2- CONSTRUCT A hearing on this Petition was }field Tu4sdayj May 17, 1977 with members Jan. L,andregan, Arthur Labr2cque, William Abbott and Associ.ate Members Jemes: Boulg .r. and Douglas Hopper as voting members present. Notices were sent to abutters and others in accordance with Mass. General Laws, Chapter 808. Richard E. McKeage represented the Pet:i.-tione:rs before the Board. The Petitioners ' wish to construct a two stocy medical office building 75 x 28. feet. Said building would contain two medical office suites on each floor. The building falls within 1500 deet. of Salem Hospital. The Petitioner stated that he has been att his present location for nine years and has developed the land in back of the existing building at coasiderabbe expense and has complied with all the requirements of the Conservation Commission. The _ tit .oner stated that 'c'ne land Boas riot suitable for single family dwellings and that: if they are unable to build on it they would suffer financial hardship as the land would be useless for any other purpose. ( The plan presented for the building showed that there :;ill be 30 parking spaces to service the building. Several abutters appeared in opposition to the granting of the Petition. The abutters objected to further commercial activity in an R-1 Zone and felt that the permit, if granted, would adversely affect their property values. The Board voted to grant the Special Permit requested with conditions, to wit, the Board will allow the construction of a two story brick medical office building, . 76 ft 1 28 : with parking for 30 cars. The entrance way to the property will be 24 feet wide with gr.anit curb cuts and the sidewalk must be level right to the drive way entrance. The Board found that the property could riot be suitable for a single family duelling and that the construc- tion of the medical office building would be the best use for the property. The Board fours( that .it could grant the Special Permit requested without substantial detriment to the surrounding neighborhood and without derogating from the intent of the Salem Zoning by-la-.i. GRANTED �F ixki k::.F r=kic Vic is is!:z Appeal from this Decision, if any, stall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Mass-Gen. Lads, Chapter 802, and shall be -Filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this Decision in the office of the City Clerk. - Pursuant to Mass. General Taws, Chapter 803, Section 11, the Variance or Special Permit granted herein, shall. not take effect until a copy of the Decision, bearing the certif:ica- _-t:ion of the City Clerk that 20 clays have elapsed and no appeal has been filed or that, if such an appeal has been .filed, that it has been dismissed or denied, is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the nam.>_ of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. Copies of. this Decision have been filed; with the Planning Board and the City Clerk. BOARD Or' APPEAL of OCTF ��Iem, ��tt�sttcllu�e##s �c3 os s � L��oarb of ral �'`'�, �^ CITY QfERR, S�LrM r'a4b.S DECISION ON THE PETITION OF ROBERT D. FARLEY (PETITIONER) , CHERRY HILL REALTY rTRUST� D AV(OWNERS),FOR APPROVAL OF A REVISION OF SITE PLAN AT, 7R HIGHLANE. _(R-1 ) A hearing on this petition was held Tuesday, September 29, 1987 with the following . Board Members present: James Fleming, Vice Chairman; Richard Bencal, Secretary; Peter Strout and Associate Member Arthur LaBrecque. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly advertised in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petition, Architect for Cherry Hill Realty Trust, is requesting approval of revision of the site plan, originally approved by the Board of Appeal on January 21 , 1987 for this property which is located in an R-1 zone. The Board of Appeal, after hearing all of the evidence presented, makes the following findings of fact: 1 . The change in the position of the building on site was requested by and done to meet the concerns of the City's Public Works Department; 2. No opposition or support was voiced to the proposed change. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal concludes that the proposed change will not adversely affect the original plan submitted and -will better serve the needs of the area with the building moved to the new location. The Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 4-0, to grant the requested revision on the following conditions: 1 . The location of the building be moved to the new site as per the new plans submitted at this hearing; 2. Twenty two (22) legal spaces be maintained on site. GRANTED \ I Richard A. Bencal, S€cretary A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD PSD 4E CITY CLERK + — w � rrn O � m L �I APPEAL FP,01.; THIS DEt11SIDN, IF Ai;'f. SHALL 6E !'.LDE PURSUANT TO SECTION V OF THE MASS. CENCRAL LAIYS. CNRPTER DOE, AND SHALL BE FILEL 19;-Fli4 26 DAYS AFTER THE DA'E OF FILING ^ G� OF TFJS `vECIS;GN IA THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK. 'Y Tr, r r,^S r [ ER RO 5 Tn�'; L Ty° ]t.TIjL c OR SPErI^L f ER`:'JT s S P� ;I i -.a.S.cC i I, L L F'-.!". Crl f L!IT ! ^'r'! P' The l rev r ( 'L > F r' r. H-tL 1 NJ AIT-AL H S OD w � Fi T '.•\ Cr 'i it l�F Tc1 1 C :. ^ j P't$ C i ° C i'4 Li• ri IS 'R `,JET I� SJ..I N; PIPE!," r S i cc IF iF :A,1E G THE KNER RFC i:DC' 1'J 1HC S.-nliH LS'SD• Fr ! ^" C' OF RECORD OR IS RECORDED AND N0,1D OR TH: 01CNER'S CER1IFICF.'.E OF TITLE. BOARD OF APPEAL Iii i; 1 e9 i�rtc, SSttt ?7iS RE.0 ( r p PLAY -17, '1977 SaLE'd,a, �rrihc. P AS$ 17 DECISION ON THE PETITION OF NAUM.KM- G REALTY -r'IANAGEMENT FOR A SPECIAL,,PZ-T,IIT TO -- CONSTRUCT A BRICK MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING AT THE REAR OP 116 -HIC.--?AtiD AVE 7UE__ A hearing on this Petition was held Tuesday, may 17, 197.7 with members Jane Lundregan, Artnur Labrecque, William Abbott and Associate Members James Boulger and Douglas Hopper as voting membe-s present. Notices were senttoahu, `ers and otners i., accoidar,c:: with aPad::.. Ge..era 1'"Las;s, Chapter EOo:` Richard E. McKeage represented the Petitioners before the Board. The Petitioners wish to construct a two story medical office building_ 76 x 28 feet. Said building. - _. would contain two medical office suites on each floor. The building falls within 1500 -feet of Salem Hosp:ital. . The Petitioner stated that he_has.'been 1t' his. prCse�nt location ;:or nine years and has developed the land in back of the existing building at considerable expense and has. complied with all the requirements of the Conservation Commission. : The Petitioner stated that the land was not suitable for single family dwellings and that if they are unable to build on it they would suffer financial hardship as the land would. be useless for any other purpose. The plan presented for the building showed that there, will be 30 parking spaces to service the building. Several abutters appeared in opposition to the granting of the Petition. The \ abutters .objected to further commercial activity in an R-1 Zone and felt that the permit., . if granted, would adversely affect their property values. The Board voted to grant the, Special Permit requested with conditions, to wit, the Board will allow .the construction of a two story brick medical office ,building, 76 -ft x 2-0 :f with parking for 30 cars. ^khe entrance way to the property willhe24 feet. w.ida with granit curb cuts and thesidewalkmust,be level right. drive way entrance.. The Board-Found that the property could-not be .suitable. for a single family dwelling and that the construe tion of the medical office building would be the best use for the property. . .The_'Board found " that it could grant the Special. Permit requasted without substantial d t imam to the surrounding neighborhood- and without derogating from the intern of the Salem Zoning-by l.aw... GRANTED Appeal from this U cision," if any, shall be m-_de pursuant tO SOCtiOn 17 of is e ?Jas Laws, Chapter 808, and shall be fi�Led witi::in 20 days after the date of -filing of this Decision in the office of the City Clerk. - - Pursuant to Plass. General Laws, Chapter 805, Section 11, the Variance- or Slec..;al Permit granted herein, shall riot take effect until a copy of tine J..clsr.on, bearing the certiEica- t:ion of the. City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no iopeaL h_ls U::-en Hlerl or that, if sur;h an appeal has been filed, that :it has been dismissed or denied, is recordeu. in- t`Zn So,ith EF�sex Registry of C_eds and indexed under the. nam.e Of the oWner of r^'cord or i , recorded and noted on the o%iner'. s Certificate of Title. Copies of this Decision have b a en , filed with the P:I-anning Board`-and the City Clerk. It P ' Y JOHN M. DALY a ARCHITECT R F 2 BOX 507 a PLAISTOW, NEW HAMPSHIRE 03865 a TELEPHONE 603/382.6331 _ M August 18, 1978 C I'i'i Mr. John Powers Building Inspector City of Salem, Massachusetts Re: New Doctor's Office Building 116 R Highland Avenue Salem, Mass. Dear Mr, Powers: Enclosed please find a copy of revised drawing L-1 for subject project. This is to show proposed auto exhaust deflector at parking areas. The location and extent of barriers are shown in plan. Would you kindly look over this plan for comment and if there ate other interested city departments would you kindly discuss this proposal with them as the Owner is anxious to occupy and operate the building. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Very truly yours, e o n M. aly, Archi I ect JMD/bd cc: Connoly Brothers, Colby Burbank E. Hartley Smith, M.D. file Q ARCHITECTURAL BARRIERS BOARD ONE ASHBURTON PLACE ROOM 1319 BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02108 TEL: 727-6257 November 29, 1977 Mr. John Powers Building Inspector 1 Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 Dear Mr . Powers: RE: New Doctor 's Office Building, 116 Highland Avenue, Salem In reference to the above premises, the Board has determined that this building is a commercial building which isnot under the jurisdiction of this Board. Sincere lyj yours, �T�✓/ /dam- . /Robert J. Harris Chairman RJH/dar a ARCHITECTURAL BARRIERS BOARD ONE ASHBURTON PLACE ROOM 1319 BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02108 TEL: 727-6257 November 29, 1977 Mr. John Powers Building Inspector 1 Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 Dear Mr. Powers: RE: New Doctor 's Office Building, 116 Highland Avenue, Salem In reference to the above premises, the Board has determined that this building is a commercial building which is not under the jurisdiction of this Board. Sinc�er ly yours, 'Robert J. Harris Chairman RJH/dar Ulu C,� Cqn f3U1LDIP , Behri (� � SOV 11 AV7] ARCHITECTURAL BARRIERS BOARD RECEI 0 ONE ASH$URTON PLACE ITY OF SALE , -SASS, ROOM 1319 BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02108 TEL: 727-6257 November 29, 1977 Mr. John Powers Building Inspector 1 Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 Dear Mr. Powers : RE: New Doctor ' s Office Building, 116 Highland Avenue, Salem In reference to the above premises, the Board has determined that this building is a commercial building which is not under the jurisdication of the Board. Sincerely yours , Robert J. Harris Chairman dar BUILDING DEPT j DEC 1 16 17 RECEIVED CITY Or SALEM,MASS. ` -4e @IaLmnoniaesit4 of 4Kassa*setts DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY ELEVATOR DIVISION ONE ASHBURTON PLACE, BOSTON 02108 /��/�// ,Q ,[�/�� /Elevator No A&64% -/��/��j/y4 Located at/,y '` C.�L OAIQ ��r•F CERTIFICATE FOR USE OF ELEVATOR Chapter 143, General laws, as amended.' Capacity ysQ Pounds �.. G� Speed�Feet Per Min. JAJEA Date issued l0 YJv Inspector Expires 1 year from above date In Case of Accident Notify the Chief of Inspections at Once rvm EL.�Rm 1/88) CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTSuf,:t�lr �1 -E � PLANNING DEPARTMENT xovH p An, p{ TO wr4'b,� An, I P 2,2. I GERARD KAVANAUGH , ONE SALEM GREEN CITY PLANNER R E C E IVdf970� Cil'Y �Sis>> s J'P601MR16��< August 1, 1988 Mr. David Harris Asst. Building Inspector One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 Re: 114R Highland Avenue Dear Dave: The Salem Planning Board is in receipt of a letter from Daniel Lynch, engineer for the 114R Highland Avenue Medical Building. Mr. Lynch will submit engineering plans to the Board for the entrance/exit to the project within two weeks. This submittal will satisfy the Planning Board Conditions of Approval, dated March 5, 1987. The Planning Board would like to recommend that a Certificate of Occupancy be issued for this project. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, 1 Beth Debski Asst. Planner cc: Paul Hannaway, M.D. 116 Highland Ave. Salem, MA 01970 M40 W P GM.Jzi/.f/'L�u ifdi a9 - 116 �iyfifand�„[nu< I�1,I �� Fi� .'�T t �afe m,'A.a Ancfiusatta 01970 ar'#4an� 745-3711 ALLERGY AFFILIATES, INOU 26 9 29 jDnuf'q. '4nn..y,'A1.rb. RECEIVED 0. 2)n1,id�( d{oppEa, �41.2N. CITY OF SALEH, MASS. l�aafinaa l eonnea,�.1�. July 22, 1988 Mr. David J. Harris Assistant Building Inspector Public Property Department One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 Dear Mr. Harris: This is an update to our letter of July 20th. 1) The jersey barriers have been installed on July 22nd. 2) The berns for the parking lot will be delivered on July 27th. 3) The guard rail is due to be installed on July 28th. 4) The Massachusetts Electric Company has removed the trees and shrubs on the north side of 116 Highland Avenue that were blocking the visability of patrons exiting and entering into Naumkeag Medical and Dental Park. 5) Your office is also in receipt of a letter from Mr. Daniel J. Lynch regarding the entrance/exit to 114R, 116, 116R Highland Avenue. We will notify you of any, farthdr developments. . . Sincerely, Paul J. Hannaway, M.D. PJH:cs CC: Beth Debski Robert Farley George Vallis , Esquire George P. Williams GlHedlcaC/3ui�dia9 116 oli9 hCnnd cSaCe m, Anna aA.idL oig7o �eCe/a�zo ne 745-3711 ' 1 -' ' ALLERGY AFFILIATE9LI N . 2 52 P,11 nnu��. c}{annnwny, �St �. �ba,id X dfnppE2. V.�bf . July 20, 1988 Mr. David J. Harris Assistant Building Inspector Public Property Deopartment One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 Dear Mr. Harris: Listed below are a list of items submitted by you on July 5 that have been completed: 1. Parking spaces have been completed and we now have 25 spaces. Two spaces nearest our front door will be marked for handicapped. 2. Signs have been installed on bathroom doors. 3. Walls of inside storage areas have been covered. 4. Fire extinguishers have been installed. 5. There are door closers on entrances. 6. We had signed a contract for the guard rail with Expert Fence. This work is scheduled for completion within seven days (copy of contract will be forwarded to your office) . 7. All parties, with the exception of the Planning Department has signed off the building card. I have discussed this problem with Miss Beth Debski of the Planning Department and she informed me that the Planning Board now requires an engineering design on the curb cut at 116 Highland Avenue. She told me by phone on July 14 that the Planning Board will be willing to sign off if they receive a letter from a Certified Civil Engineer stating that a engineering plan will be submitted to the Board within 30 to 60 days. I have contacted Daniel Lynch from Marblehead and a letter to the Planning Department should be mailed to them on July 20, 1988. 8. The elevator-wheel chairlift was inspected by the State Inspector in order to insure patient safety. He requested that we rotate the elevator 90 degrees and install an additional wall and door. This project is being addressed and parts for the elevator and the elevator door have been ordered from Mississippi and as soon as these items are received, work will commence on this project. In the meantime as I previously stated, they will be no patient care on our second floor. Mr. David J. Harris - 2 - 9. Jersey barriers which will run the entire left side of our site have been ordered and are scheduled to be installed on July 22. 10. A contract has been reached with the landscapper and as soon as the weather conditions permit, planting will commence. 11 . We have also attempted to contact the Massachusetts Electric Company and have asked them to remove the trees and shrubs on the north side of our sign at 116 Highland Avenue in order to improve the visability entering and exiting Naumkeag Medical and Dental Park. In closing, if all goes as planned, we should be ready for a final inspection in the week of July 25th. If you have any questions or comments regarding the above correspondence, please call me at my office (745-3711) . Sincere] , Paul away, M.D. PJH:cs CC: Beth Debski Robert Farley George Vallis, Esquire George P. Williams Citp of 6alem, .41a55a cbugettg Public Property department �guilbing 7Department One *alem Orern 745-9595 (Ext. 380 William H. Munroe Director of Public Property Inspector of Buildings Zoning Enforcement Officer July 5, 1988 Dr. Hannaway 116 Highland Avenue Salem, MA. 01970 RE: 114R Highland Avenue Dear Sir: On July 5, 1988 I made an inspection of the above referenced property. Accordingly there is a list of items that must be addressed prior to occupying this building. 1 . Parking spaces finished (22) 2. Signs on the bathroom doors 3. Cover walls of inside storage areas 4. Fire extinguishers installed 5. Door closers on entrances 6. Exterior quard rail completed 7. Building card to be signed off by Board of Health, City Engineer, and planning Department 8. Elevator inspected 9. Protection from soil erosion caused by unstable ledge wall. Be advised it shall be unlawful to occupy this building until a Certified of Occupancy has been issued. Sincerely, r %. David J. Harris Assistant Building Inspector C.C. George P. Williams Robert Farley City Solicitor Ward Councillor GV.d(c.f Baifdla9 116 dYzygCnnd oqn,v .ut i cSaCera,G/�nsfachu xtta 01970 �eCepfioae 745-3711E c ALLERGY AFFIL`I�'kT6, &C% AN' poo LE 11,kit?53, Ba26aza L Coaaec,_f. b. July 8, 1988 Mr. David J. Harris Assistant Building Inspector Public Property Department Building Department One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 Dear Mr. Harris: Thank you for your correspondence of July 5, 1988. I will list the items which you addressed and make appropriate comments: 1. We will have the parking lot paved on Saturday, July 9. Parking spaces should be finished and available for parking on July 11 . 2. Signs on the bathroom doors has been addressed. 3. Walls of inside storage areas will be covered. 4. Fire extinguishers have been installed. 5. Door closers will be installed on entrances. 6. Exterior guard rail will be completed. 7. Building card to be signed off once the above issues are addressed. 8. Elevator inspection: We have had daily contacts with the engineers as well as the state inspectors. Mr. Williams has made numerous phone calls and we have been unable to obtain a site visit from the engineer and/or state inspectors. We will not allow the general public on the second floor of the dwelling until this elevator is operational . 9. I am fully aware that there is a total erosion problem by the unstable ledge. We have plans to install a retaining wall and/or concrete and decorate it accordingly with appropriate vines and planting. This obviously is a long range project which may take several days and/or weeks and I do not think it should hold up our Certificate of Occupancy. _ r�, 2 The wall was not an issue prior to our, being issued a building permit nor was it a concern of the various j5Tatnni'ingidepqrtments which approved our overall building plans in 14 I Giill be willing to sign a letter of intent that we will install a barrier wall and will prohibit parking in this area until such wall is installed. Sin rely, Paul �?Hannaway, M.D. a PJH:cas CC: Robert Farley George Vallis, Esquire ;George P,• Williams DECISION SPECIAL PERMIT WETLANDS AND FLOOD HAZARD DISTRICT .87 Ap•r; —� Al •�� 14R CHERRY HILL AVENUE Cherry Hill Realty Trust r1CF c/o 116 Highland Avenue CITY Salem, MA 01970 On Thursday, February 19, 1987 , the Planning Board of the City of Salem held a public hearing regarding the application of Cherry Hill Realty Trust, 116 Highland Avenue, for a Special Permit under Section P, Wetlands and Flood Hazard Districts, of the Salem Zoning Ordinance, with respect to the proposed construction of a two—story medical office building at 14R Cherry Hill Avenue. At a regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning Board on March 5, 1987, the Board voted, by a vote of four in favor, one opposed, to approve the application as complying with the requirements for the issuance of the permit with the following conditions: 1. Work shall conform to plan entitled "Site Plan, 14R Cherry Hill Avenue." 2. Refuse, road and ground maintenance and snow removal shall be the responsibility of the devloper, his successors or assigns. 3. Landscaping of the site shall conform to plan entitled "Site Plan, 14R Cherry Hill Avenue." a. Trees shall be a minimum of 32" caliper. b. Maintenance of the landscape vegetation in a healthy and thriving condition shall be the responsibility of the developer, his successors or assigns. C. Location of granite curbing shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner. 4. Board of Appeal requirements as set forth in decision granted on December 17 , 1986, shall be adhered to. 5. All utility installation shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Public Services prior to the issuance of building permits. 6. Board of Health conditions as set forth in a letter dated February 12, 1987, shall be adhered to. 7 . All construction shall be in accordance with the following conditions: a. No work shall commence before 7:00 a.m. on weekdays and 8:00 a.m. on Saturdays. No work shall continue beyond 5:00 p.m. There shall be no work completed on Sundays or holidays. Inside work of a quiet nature may be permitted at other times . b. All reasonable action shall be taken to minimize the negative effects of construction on abutters. Advance notice shall be provided to all abutters in writing at least 72 hours prior to commencement of construction. 8. The developer shall propose a new design of the entranceway to eliminate the now necessary 90 degree turning movement in the driveway and attempt to decrease the degree of such movements to minimize safety hazards of turning from Highland Avenue when such traffic is moving in a westerly direction. Such design shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department prior to the issuance of a building permit. 9. Any violation of these conditions shall result in revocation of this permit by the Planning Board. I hereby certify that a copy of this decision and plans have been filed with the City Clerk and copies are on file with the Planning Board. This Special Permit shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that twenty days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed or that if such appeal has been filed, and it has been dismissed or denied, is recorded in the Essex County Registry of Deeds and is indexed in the grantor index under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner' s certificate of title. The fee for recording or registering shall be paid by the owner or applicant. Walter B. Power, III Chariman E642 tisµcc�v-. OCr '� IIf �Iem, � tt�aSMtIj115eft� 3 ps P Ot"X. DECISION ON THE PETITION OF ROBERT D. FARLEY (PETITIONER) , CHERRY HILL REALTY TRUST (OWNERS) FOR APPROVAL OF A REVISION OF SITE PLAN AT 114R HIGHLAND AVE. (R-1 ) A hearing on this petition was held Tuesday, September 29, 1987 with the following . Board Members present: James Fleming, Vice Chairman; Richard Bencal, Secretary; Peter Strout and Associate Member Arthur LaBrecque. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly advertised in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petition, Architect for Cherry Hill Realty Trust, is requesting approval of revision of the site plan, originally approved by the Board of Appeal on January 21 , 1987 for this property which is located in an R-1 zone. The Board of Appeal, after hearing all of the evidence presented, makes the following findings of fact: 1 . The change in the position of the building on site was requested by and done to meet the concerns of the City's Public Works Department; 2. No opposition or support was voiced to the proposed change. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal concludes that the proposed change will not adversely affect the original plan submitted and _will better serve the needs of the area with the building moved to the new location. The Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 4-0, to grant the requested revision on the following conditions: 1 . The location of the building be moved to the new site as per the new plans submitted at this hearing; 2. Twenty two (22) legal spaces be maintained on site. GRANTED \ Richard A. Bencal, Secretary A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD Aj3D VE CITY CLERK + C., r L m a S c er.�„[ pURSOANT TO SECTION 17 OF THE MASS. (•,V A.F r"E0.L fR0'.: THIS DECISION, IF A'I'f. HALL B. G CUILRAL LAPIS. CH'.PTER CC°. A`:D Sl.,!LL EE FILEC 'CA-FIN =D DHl'S AFTER THE DATE OF FILING ^ � OF TFIS CEC,S:;.N I\ THE_ OFFICE OF THE WTY CLE"n{. E q--_^I".L PER':11T ro T¢ VASItI OR „r _ 3 S F T ..r Cr .I F ' lc•. p is Or REC6RD OR IS RECORDED At:D Ia DEED Ota T< uM4ER'S CERTIFICATE Oi IITLE, BOARD OF APPEAL 13- 14. 57: aha sleston o monnim)kn mills compmny April 27, 1988 Robert Magarian Carpet Company Attention Kevin 335 Bridge Street Salem, MA 01970 Dear Kevin: RE: OPTICS This letter will act as certification that Charleston Carpets has submitted for flammability test our carpet style OPTICS . This test was conducted in accordance with requirements set forth in ASTM-E-648 testing specifications , and this style has successfully passed the test. The results are as follows : CRITICAL RADIANT FLUX: 1 .08 This style was also tested in accordance with ASTM-E-662 testing procedure for the N.B.S. Smoke Chamber. The results are as follows : N.B.S . SMOKE CHAMBER # : 181 Should you require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, CHARLESTON CARPETS Xoj� <—,ocCk- Lori Ehrhardt Administrator of Contract Services jp/ch3 CC : Jack McConnell P.O. BOX 364 • CALHOUN, GEORGIA 30701-0364 •TEL. 404-629-7351 SALES OFFICE: SPACE 1868-C THE MERCHANDISE MART CHICAGO, IL 60654 SPECIFIC OPTICAL DENSITY OF SMOKE GENERATED BY SOLID MATERIALS ASTM Standard Method of Test E 662-79 GSA Flaming Requirement Material Identified as 'Optics" Report Number 54062 October 22, 1986 Prepared for: Charleston Carpets Calhoun, Georgia This report is provided for the exclusive use of the client to whom it is addressed. It may be used in its entirety to gain product acceptance from duly constituted authorities. This report applies only to those samples tested and is not necessarily indicative of apparently identical or similar products. This report, or the name of Commercial Testing Company, Inc., :.hall not be used under any circumstance in advertising to the general public. rb < COt1 MERCLALI TESTino C0111PAnY DALTON, GEORGIA r ; ° Oti COMMERCIA16 TESTinG COMPRnY SPECIFIC OPTICAL DENSITY OF SMOKE GENERATED BY SOLID MATERIALS ASTM Standard Method of Test E 662-79 GSA Flaming Requirement Material Identified as "Optics" Report Number 54062 Test Number 1760-5020 October 22, 1986 Prepared for: Charleston Carpets Calhoun, Georgia COMMERCIAL TESTING COMPANY Jonathan Jackson Executive Vice President TESTING e RESEARCH s ENGINEERING P.O. BOX 985 - 1215 S. HAMILTON ST. - DALTON, GA 30722-0985 - 404/278-3935 i l Report Number 54062 Test Number 1760-5020 Page 2 of 5 I. INTRODUCTION This report represents results of the smoke chamber test on a material submitted for testing by Charleston Carpets. The test was conducted in accordance with the American Society for Testing and Materials Standard Method of Test E 662-79, "Specific Optical Density of Smoke Generated by Solid Materials." This method, also known as the NBS Smoke Chamber, is identical to the method described in the National Fire Protection Association Number 258-1976. It is used solely to measure the smoke density characteristics of a material under controlled laboratory conditions. It should not be used for the description, appraisal, or regulation of, the hazard of a material under actual fire conditions. No consideration is made for results that may be obtained if the material being evaluated were tested in combination with other materials. The test results apply only to the specimens tested and are not necessarily indicative of apparent identical or similar materials. All test data are on file and are available for review by authorized persons. II. SCOPE The smoke density chamber test is used to determine the specific optical density of smoke generated within a closed chamber due to non- flaming pyrolitic decomposition and flaming combustion. The non-flaming mode employs an electrically-heated radiant energy heat source with an irradiance level of 2.5 watts per square centimeter. For the flaming mode, a six-tube burner, fueled with a propane/air mixture, is used in combination with the radiant heat to apply a row of equidistant flamelets across the lower edge of the specimen and into the specimen trough. A photometric system with a vertical light path is used to measure the varying light transmittance as smoke accumulates. The light trans- mission measurements are used to calculate the Specific Optical Density, which is derived from a geometrical factor associated with the dimensions of the test chamber and specimen, and the measured optical density, a measurement characteristic of the concentration of smoke. The photometric scale used to measure the smoke generated in this test is similar to the optical density scale for human vision. III. TEST PROCEDURE Specimens measuring three (3) inches square are taken from the specimen to be evaluated. Specimens are enclosed with heavy-duty alum- inum foil and mounted in troughed specimen holders backed with a } inch r � Report Number 54062 Test Number 1760-5020 Page 3 of 5 inorganic millboard block. The samples are pre-conditioned for twenty- four (24) hours at 140°F, and then conditioned to equilibrium at 70°F and 50 percent relative humidity. The test method consists of three (3) exposures in the flaming mode and three (3) exposures in the non-flaming mode. However, in many instances, the code requirement will be the same as for the General Services Administration where the flaming mode only is required. For those tests, only the flaming mode is done and reported. The test chamber is pre-conditioned to a ready state and the irrad- iance level of the radiant heat energy source is verified. The 100% and 07 transmittance of the photometric system is calibrated. The specimens mounted in the troughed specimen holders are tested in the appropriate mode for the evaluation being done, whether flaming only or both flaming and non-flaming. The test period is for twenty (20) minutes or until minimum light transmittance is obtained, whichever occurs first. The test chamber is then evacuated of the accumulated smoke. Another light transmittance reading is taken and recorded as the clear beam reading. This is the accumulation of soot and other effluent on the optical system and is converted to specific optical density and used as a correction factor in calculating final test results. The recorded data for light transmittance is used to calculate the specific optical density of the smoke generated during the test for each of the specimens tested. The results are then averaged and reported as Average Specific Optical Density. IV. DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL TESTED The material being evaluated, identified as Optics, is described in the Table below. CTC Test Number - 1760-5020 Date Tested - October 22, 1986 Identification. - Optics Construction - Cut/Uncut Carpet Yarn Type - N/A Secondary Backing - Woven Synthetic Weight - 70.6 ounces per square yard Z Report Number 54062 Test Number 1760-5020 Page 4 of 5 V. TEST RESULTS The test results are presented as an average of the specimens test- ed in each exposure mode required for the specific evaluation. The test results are shown in the following table: Flaming Optics 181 The Tektronix 4051 computer print-out for data obtained during the test is shown on the final page of the report. The following list of abbreviations and their meanings are used in the print-out and may be useful in interpretation of test data. 7T is the percent light transmission ranging from 1007 to 07 transmittance. Ds is the specific optical density. Dm is the maximum specific optical density. Dc is the specific optical density value of the clear beam reading (correction factor) . Dm (corrected) represents Dm - Dc and is the corrected maximum specific optical density, the number which, when averaged, is the final test result. Time to Ds=16 is the time at which 757 light transmittance is obtained, which yields a specific optical density of 16. Dm @ 1.5 and 4.0 minutes are shown because some aerospace and aviation agencies require these time criteria in judging the smoke development characteristics of a material. NOTE: Dm @ 4.0 minutes may be higher than Dm (corrected) because no allowance is made for the accumulation of soot on the photometer system. i ` NBS SMOKE DENSITY CHAMBER NFPA 258/ASTM E 662 CLIENT : CHARLESTON CARPET CTC TEST #: 1760-5020 MATERIAL IDENTIFICATION: OPTICS DATE: 10-22-86 CHAMBER OPERATING CONDITIONS: RADIOMETER READING = 8. 03 mV RADIOMETER IRRADIANCE = 2. 50 WATTS/SQ CM FURNACE VOLTAGE = 95. 0 VOLTS PROPANE 8 50 CC/MIN (FLAMING) = 88 AIR. @ 500 CC/MIN (FLAMING) = 104 CHAMBER TEMPERATURE = 95 + DEG F CHAMBER PRESSURE _ 0. 0 INCHES WATER TEST RESULTS: FLAMING SPECIMEN # 1 2 3 %T(raax) 2. 40008 3. 00000 5. 60000 Dm 214 201 165 TIME TO Dm 3. 8 2. 8 3. 1 Dc 14 12 10 Dm (CORRECTED) 208 189 155 TIME TO Ds=16 1 . 4 1 . 4 1 . 2 SMOKE COLOR GREY GREY GREY Dm AT 1 . 5 MIN 39 32 59 DM AT 4. 0 MIN 214 201 165 AVERAGE CORRECTED Dm 181 R TEST FOR CRITICAL RADIANT FLUX OF FLOOR COVERING SYSTEMS ASTM Standard Method of Test E 648 Floor Covering Identified as "Optics" Report Number 54128 October 26, 1986 Prepared for: Charleston Carpets Calhoun, Georgia This report is provided for the exclusive use of the client to whom it is addressed. It may be used in its entirety to gain product acceptance from duly constituted authorities. This report applies only to those samples tested and is not necessarily indicative of apparently identical or similar_ products. This report, or the name of Commercial Testing Company, Inc., shall not be used under any circumstance in advertising to the general public. C011 MERCIM TESTIIIG COMPRnY DALTON, GEORGIA r � C011 MERCIA16 TE$'Tinu C0111PA11Y CRITICAL RADIANT FLUX OF FLOOR COVERING SYSTEMS USING A RADIANT HEAT ENERGY SOURCE ASTM Standard Method of Test E 648-84 Floor Covering Identified as 'Optics" Report Number 54128 Test Number 1759-4969 October 26, 1986 Prepared for: Charleston Carpets Calhoun, Georgia COMMERCIAL TESTING COMPANY Jonathan Jackson Executive Vice President TESTING • RESEARCH a ENGINEERING P.O. BOX 985 - 1215S. HAMILTON ST. - DALTON, GA 30722-0985 - 404/278-3935 lh` � Report Number 54128 Test Number 1759-4969 Page 2 of 5 I. INTRODUCTION This report represents results of a test for critical radiant flux of a floor covering system submitted by Charleston Carpets. This test, also known as the Flooring Radiant Panel, is identical to the Federal Test Method Standard Number 372 and the National Fire Protection Association Test Method Number 253. It measures the critical radiant flux at flame-out of horizontally mounted complete flooring systems exposed to a flaming ignition source in a graded radiant heat energy environment. It is intended to simulate actual conditions that have been observed and defined in full-scale experiments. The test is applicable only to floor covering systems which duplicate or simulate accepted installation practices. Tests on individual components of a system are of limited value and are not valid for evaluation of the entire flooring system. The test results apply only to the specimens tested and are not necessarily indicative of apparent identical or similar materials. All test data are on file and available for review by authorized persons. II. PURPOSE The Flooring Radiant Panel test measures the level of incident radiant heat energy on the floor covering system at the most distant flame-out point, and is expressed as Critical Radiant Flux in watts per square centimeter. It provides a basis for estimating one aspect of flamespread behavior for floor covering systems installed in corridors or exitways of buildings. The imposed radiant flux simulates thermal radiation leoels likely to impinge on the floor of an exitway or a corridor whose upper surfaces are heated by flame and/or hot gases from a fully developed fire in an adjacent room or compartment. III. TEST PROCEDURE A minimum of three (3) sets of the floor covering system must be tested. A specimen measuring 20 centimeters by 100 centimeters is mounted in a horizontal specimen holder in the test chamber. A gas/air fueled radiant heat energy panel is mounted in the chamber at a 30° angle to the horizontal specimen plane. The radiant panel generates an energy flux distribution ranging along the 100 centimeter length of the test specimen of approximately 1.0 watts per square centimeter to a minimum of 0.1 watts per square centimeter. The test is initiated by an open flame from a pilot burner that is brought into contact with the specimen for 10 minutes. For specimens that continue to burn after the 5 Y . u Report Number 54128 Test Number 1759-4969 Page 3 of 5 pilot burner is removed, the test is continued until all flame is out. The specimen is then removed from the test chamber and the point of farthest flame front advance measured. The critical radiant' flux is then computed from the Flux Profile Curve determined during calibration of the test apparatus. IV. FLOORING SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION The material being evaluated, identified as Optics, is described in the Table below: Floor Covering: Test Number - 1759-4969 Identification - Optics Construction - Cut & Loop Secondary Backing - Woven Synthetic Color - N/A Total Weight - 69.6 ounces per square yard Flooring System• Structural Floor - mineral-fiber/cement board Underlayment - N/A Adhesive - Taylor 295 Conditioning: Duration - 48 hours Temperature - 70 = 5°F Relative Humidity - 50 t 5 percent V. TESTING The critical radiant flux of an inorganic millboard dummy specimen was checked at the 40 cm mark on the day of the test. Critical radiant flux of 0.5 t 0.02 watts per square centimeter as measured at a distance of 40 centimeters from the 0 end of the specimen, indicated proper operation of the test apparatus. The flooring system was then tested within parameters outlined in the standard on October 26, 1986. .y 1 Report Number 54128 Test Number 1759-4969 Page 4 of 5 VI. TEST RESULTS The test data for the three specimens tested are shown in the chart below and in the Tektronix 4051 computer print-out on Page 5. Material Identification - Optics Test Number 1759-4969 Date Tested - October 26, 1986 Specimen Number 1 2 3 Distance Maximum Burn (cm) 7.5 7.0 7.4 Time to Flame-out (minutes) 10.0 10.0 10.0 Critical Radiant Flux (W/cm2) 1.08+ 1.08+ 1.08+ AVERAGE CRITICAL RADIANT FLUX 1.08+ W/cm2 The Standard Deviation (S ) of the three values of the measured critical radiant flux is 0 wat& per square centimeter when calculated in accordance with the American Society for Testing and Materials Manual on Quality Control, STP 15c. �a "Ak .... � • a� Int !L :.I' d .. � � f . Y v. .. s ASTM E 648 FLOORING RADIANT PANEL CLIENT : CHARLESTON CARPETS TEST NUMBER : 1759-4969 MATERIAL IDENTIFICATION : OPTICS FLOORING SYSTEM : DIRECT GLUE-DOWN DATE : 27 OCT 86 TEST RESULTS: #1 #2 #3 MAXIMUM BURN DISTANCE (CM) : 7. 5 7. 0 7. 4 FLAME OUT (.MINUTES) : 10. 0 10. 0 10. 0 CRITICAL RADIANT FLUX: >1 . 08 ) 1 . 08 :>1 . 08 AVERAGE CRITICAL RADIANT FLUX = >1 . 08 1 . 2 R 1 . 1 PANEL TEMPERATURE 500 C A 1 . 0 GAS FLOW 0. 180 NCMH D 8. 9 AIR FLOW 690 SCFH IPRESSURE 0. 25 in. W. C. A 0. 8 TRANSDUCER: N 0. 7 MFG. BY MEDTHERM T 0. 6 MODEL NUMBER 64-2-20 0. 5 SERIAL NUMBER 92055 F CAL. (MEDTHERM) 08%86 L 0' 4 CONU. FACTOR 0. 2299 U 0. 3 X 8. 2 8. 1 0 10 20 30 48 58 60 70 80 90 100 DISTANCE (CM) vI 'ROBERT D. FARLEYU.'' " IN ARCHITECT ALI. 5 / 52 AH, pU July 1 , 1988 RECE!YE ? CITY OF S1LEH. MASS, City of Salem Office of the Building Inspector One Salem Green Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Att: David Harris Dear Mr. Harris This is to certify that the new building located at 114 Rear Highland avenue, Salem, MA. is now complete and ready for occupancy. The following items are the changes -made to the permit documents: 1 . Installation of handicap lift. 2. New handicap toilet on first floor. 3. Relocation of second floor toilet room #216. 4. Two skylights added in workroom #200. 5. New copy room added in storage area #215. 6. New sinks added in consultation rooms #113 and #111 . Very truly yours, Obert D. Far ey Architect 16 PARK STREET, DANVERS, MA 01923, TELEPHONE: 774-4039 WILLIAMS BUILDING CO. INC. 194 MAIN STREET 10 1.,D I WENHAM, MASSACHUSETTS 01984 JUL 5 7 _52 July 1 , 1988 LEPrr'I1SS. City of Salem CITY or Office of the Building Inspector One Salem Green Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Att: David Harris Dear Mr. Harris Please be advised that the new building located at 114 Rear Highland avenue, Salem, MA. is complete and the work has been performed in accordance with the approved construction documents and in a safe and satisfactory manner in accordance with all applicable local , state and federal statutes and regulations to the best of my knowledge. Very ruly yours, / l George . Williams, Pres. ROBERT D. FARLEY °ATE0a NO. Architect Zv 8�'i 16 Park St. _ PROJECT - - DANVERS, MA01923 L -RU ILDIlJ t'!j LlN k�r`T-��. LOCATION Phone 774.4039 111/ /-//G/dLaK)Is CONTRACTOR OWNER G046p-z/. LI IL/ TO T l� /7� p� SAL-6m ^^^ 4 Iv�LL�OMS 6LDG, Ca. �r�dLTY Taus WEATHER - TEMP. 0a AM 0L'G-A P, °at PM �� _ �'L11�C° PRESENT AT SITE SdL�r� , T. Ail AA1l1 A774' T�uILDI�7G DL�PT, WILL IANf MUIU20E THE FOLLOWING WAS NOTED: ' /. CTE /I>(L T21 M S IN/1U Ju-7,u-.z l �. ZJIJ—/ K7�.IP_G�- 1�,cS.jyL� q d o �l 1✓l f��. 0 �COPIES TO � D � SIGNED _ r Ag7ft, ROBERT D. FARLEY15,11 t/L ARCHITECT Pipe 3? 8 3L{ tii '88 CITY OF S4LEM, MKSS. l� l G� ILI TIF U S 16 PARK STREET, DANVERS, MA 01923, TELEPHONE: 774-4039 ' The Baker Company �I nu +n HEPA Filter 341, RECEIVED 22" C B - D — — 10 +i --r 304- i i t I Prefilter Motor/Blower C f EdgeGARD Hood Console Model V�. Console Models Model No. FiltlerPSize No loweHP Total Dimensions -; k EC 3252 36"lt 30"x 6" Amps A B C rA E 4252 48"x 30"x 6" 1 'h 13.2 34 D 38 ,h,r , EG 0 48"x 36"x 6" 1 'h 15.5 50" 461/2" 28, " 1 1h 28 6411 EG 5252 60"x 30"x 6" I6.0 50" 46'h„ 341 11 EG 6252 l h 16.4 " 70 72"x 30"x 6" 2 lh 20.0 62 581/x" EG 6320 72"x 36"x 6" 2 74" 70�h11 28 6411 EG 8252 48"x 30"x 6"(2) 220.3 74" / 701 " 341 " 7011 - -1 24.6 I 981h11 1 95" 28, J Specifications 6411. Electrical—Console Models 115V- 1 Phase - 60 Hz-Standard Units are provided Electrical—Space-Saver with one duplex receptacle (fused 61/4 amps). All units (exceptStandard UUnit nit is furnished with pl ' EG 8252) are furnished with 7-foot power cord and 20 amp 7-fone dupex receptacle(fused 12 amps)oot power cord and plug(15 amp rating). Unit is listed by ug. EG 8252 will be wired to a junction box (inside right. the Canadian Standards Association (CS hand rear). All units are listed by the Canadian Standards A) as Certified. Association (CSA) as Certified. Construction Electrical—Bench Models Cabinet exterior- 18 gauge, reinforced cold-roiled steel, 115 V- 1 Phase - 60 Hz-Standard Unitsare provided baked enamel finish. Standard color: white. with one duplex receptacle (fused 61/4 amps). All units are fur- nishedwith 7-(oot power cord and plug. All units are listed by front edge ofwork air return.kasurface and lside walls slotted for high type 304 stainless steel with" the Canadian Standards Association (CSA) as Certified. i 14 ROBERT D. FARLEY ARCHITECT r�, C V °33 CITY OF 'h f:! :w's5, April 26, 1988 City of Salem One Salem Green Salem, MA. 01970 Att: William Monroe Building inspector Gentlemen: Please be advised that the wood and steel frame structure for the new building located at 114 R Highland Avenue, Salem, MA. is complete and installed in accordance with plans and complies in full with the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Building Code. Very truly yours, bert D. Farle Architect 16 PARK STREET DANVERS. MA 0/923, TELEPHONE: 774-4039 �.cow�t111 to VL '*aIrm, 'fflassac4uset#D �A Public Propertg Peparttneut s �'Iuillinq )9epartntent (Otte ,*nlent (9ireen 7.13-11213 William H. Munroe Director of Public Property Maurice M. Martineau, Asst Inspector Inspector of Buildings Edgar J. Paquin, Ass't Inspector Zoning Enforcement Officer John L. LeClerc, Plumbing/Gas Insp. March 1 , 1988 Robert D. Farley 16 Park Street Danvers, M.A 01923 RE: 114 R. Highland Ave. , Salem, MA. Dear Mr. Farley, Due to the lack of information on your field report , an on site inspection was done at 114 R. Highland Avenue. Upon inspection of the property a deviation from the proposed plans were noticed. The shaft for the elevator has been deleted, this is in direct Violation of the Mass State Building Code 113.8. In order to delete this elevator you must . 1 . Apply for a Variance from the Architectural Access Board. (None have yet been applied for) . 2. File an amendment to the original plan to the Building Department . Field reports from 114 R. Highland Avenue are inadequate and unacceptable. If you need help with these reports please contact me. Please contact this office within fourteen ( 14) days of receipt of this letterofyour intentions. Failure to do so will result in further Legal Action. Sincerely, /cl ,Z.cti David J. Harris Assistant Building Inspector DJH/eaf C.C. Cherry Hill Realty Trust George P. Williams Michael S. Dukakis ,,�/ Governor One ._4Q44'a n otce - Room 13)'o Charles V. Barry �� . ./v/aaQacL�idel/a 02/08 Secretary (6-17> 727-0660 VOICE & TDD March 3, 1988 Robert D. Farley . 16 Park Street Danvers, MA 01923 Re: Cherry Hill Realty Trust 114R Highland Avenue Salem Dear Mr. Farley: The Architectural Access Board has reviewed your letter of January 25, 1988 relative to the above project. Please be advised- that the use of a wheelchair lift to gain access to the second floor is acceptable as long as it meets the Massachusetts Elevator Regulations. However, be advised at all exam rooms, 18" of clear space must be provided on the latch pull side of the doors. Further, if the bathroom on the second floor is available for patient use, it must be fully accessible. If you have any questions, please contact the office. Sigce�relyQ, � Gerald LeBlanc Chairman GLB/nh o.... nh U) M QT5 CYJ 1�7 `r- �t�S V"w5c�hoo� Yoo � � /5.Ze I �� !° 1Ltvins� v�^ a�hel\ I �l G s / e14 I . f\j 44,71 u o 61001d \. V,§�v i oAcc, C14c, ..'Oe;1N ig07 MOOT6,46E IMPSMON PUN -/ C6eT/FY TO / OF LAND / TNAr rA,4F'Xawd.YW/on 5.11mmawFaN 45 Ge>7 ym�S E70 NE D/MENS/ON4C RE0411RE T MENTS OF TJIE ZON/NO ZY-C.W 9f c M,-4 OF PREPARED FOR e,14 .4 � w/Tr7 ?EG4R070FeO T4GE, 4RE4 4NO S TB4CN5 4T T�(E 71 7'101V OFCONSTieUC- T/ON .4p T!/4T Mf�oundd 60" S/IOWN W.Cer0N l5 hO .LOC4TE0 W/T1//N 4,r4000 1/474Ro ZONE SCALE: ��_.�o ! l l/ /90,e A5 4?E4/NE47ED ON rWE AmP OF COMMON?Y NO: Z J OJOoPi 1q S 'I H ,FS.4CrrUSET U.4 5 2EV/SEO 70 3//5�7� BY IJGENC/ES OF T/1E FEDER�4 /N.50 :dNC 4DM/N15r2A7-AON. . of M� HAACOCK .51XYrY 4SSOC1ATES,/NC• a� ss ti Z35 NEWBUR/Y STREET DWNIIE25 FREDFR;C,M. Gs dt-I Ilf/8 '� so No 27078 r�F I DATE M1rs �� rSTFq s - ¢• NOTE. /. s,.o e/ TN/S PC,4N NOT TO BE USED FOR TME /NSURaNCE P41ZP05E5 NOR FOR ?EG/ E? PROfE35/ONgL Nom, 3U.Q4EY0,- RECONSTRUCr/ON OF 60UNO4RYUA16E5. 3�v /"ar' �"c� � '� Z�4-crc ©� � �e,�� '�®�� ROBERT D. FARLEY °ATE °E "°; Architect . Z 16 Park St. PROJECT DANVERS, MA 01923 1"'T 0 1 c LOCATION Phone 774-4039 (l `f CONTRACTOR OWN )ERG /� ?j/ L//` TO 6- -7-- O fi Sly L. C= M WILLiAt44.5 X31 b 1 ( RL�� _Jl Cy 7—IW p r WEATHER TEMP. 0a AM / pl/ CL�5/a/P S 3 n °at/2.;sv PM PRESENT AT SITE AIT .' THE FOLLOWING WAS JNOTED: J �. ise Z—A L f"7/a /11+ /x/_ S�wlQ A1 Uvr � 7L- S LL// � i1 i �/- c /� y r . 1,12 r t) Gy Mp;�? 11l /1( /'> fy lr>'bz' Y'4 L v� c 4A � % sr� /_T G/ 7: 7cz /=X ISL c: 7--Zi 4� o Al /,-Li (2 ry/),a I,�Q- 12 .r Cz - n P� ' ins J i, 19 %'/PI/ivii_29�lr ' � '. VI rA S' r&//L7 /zy✓ 1/U' c —4I_! i%I /!I> L, -L — Z. /-1 L. L-. s T /= /s L D Q n/c, L'V/ COPIES TO _ 2-9 ZSll�A�D WEIoO/2P /�/DJM SIGNED //—/;-/-t 'r/ "" ROBERT D. FARLEY DATE. '1itg� JOB NO. Architect 16 Park St. PROJECT DANVERS, MA 01923 WE D! C A L- ISO I L 6/A/ e—j LOCATION Phone 774-4039 U & /�1 Ez/f L A CONTRACTOR OWNER MILL MILL TO � O/. �l1,j MALL/f4Ivl S ZLA)Cn.L C ` r L ! S ! � It'C L`Z' T/PUZ WEATHER TEMP. O at AM C. L0U6 �'"2. °at /? PM PRESENT AT SITE 41401 w!.,n fF127- ISO I �-L) 1 4.,7 (,r -ISOI �- U / 4> Gr � � T 019' zp THE FOLLOWING WAS NOTED: r�'7-/P ub L r 2E c.0 'vLl /0 z. 4,r4 , r , y rM [i L ✓�[J L r Lf0 D L/ �� C_n ✓I A /-/ti l= n A 6,!� E9AJle_S LA7 I? 2 on And 1^ X /4Jil�`/1 C 14�1J—S_T_€zz�/l l�r L lc Cz t 2—/,57 ,4 5_/QV Pc coa r �J GJ e,W v""I CJ az Tb L7 � U1 " COPIES TO ZS LS�� LSIJ��Oo LSIJ� SIGNED ROBERT D. FARLEY DATE 2 Architect 16 Park.St. PROJECT DANVERS, MA 01923 LOCATION Phone 774.4039 /l f/� ¢� CONTRACTOR TO r // h �ry/ y� ��y. y� WEATHER TEMP. Oat AM V l"/1�—�.L(,P�Y .61—/`'• /" GG C t/,6 S—O oat /1./ 'PM PRESENT AT SITE f THE FOLLOWING WAS NOTED: 1. >/ l=ovrvQ >-td111 wM L-f IAj S 7AZ-/-a C O L U /M!'61 f.2:0 Wil;G P w 1 G at/� /d+1 C MrC/p le/F wA L L s C/� 4rvt/__1�OL- Z q /,�LOrod LOI4 ".g If �� I/W /11, A ?-A— COPIES TO SIGNED A-0 �' a 1145- h$9-f 7v . d � �� -- -Zol .� C S .-i C 0 13��i� ,vs,�C7 a,r%� isn�Co � itaLSSC ROBERT D. FARLEY DATE /�� °a " Architect 6 AF- 16 Park St. PROJECT DANVERS, MA 01923 k" C b l G 1q L C U / L. /J LOCATION Phone 774-4039 [ / �r/{L,d4 y/'vL CONTRACTOR OWNER TO 41 G 7 (� y/� WALL/ 4 tM S 13c/JC4 CO, ✓/i ,IF -Z ( lT 1 WEATHER TEMP. Dat AM PRESENT AT SITE THE FOLLOWING WAS NOTED: J I 1 Cn COPIES TO MEN 11 DD O D SIGN JG'' CONSTRUCTION CONTROL PROJECT NUMBER: PROJECT TITLE: New Medical Ruilding for cht- ry Hill Realty Trust PROJECT LOCATION: 114 R Highland Avenue, Salem, MA NAME OF BUILDING: Allergy Affilliates, Inc . NATURE OF PROJECT: New medical building containing two doctors offices, examination rooms waiting areas and business office. IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 127.0 OF THE MASSACHUSETTS STATE BUILDING CODE, I, Rnbprt D Farley Registration No. 2025 BEING A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL E1 ffff2E1OARCHITECT HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE PREPARED OR DIRECTLY SUPERVISED THE PREPARATION OF ALL DESIGN PLANS, COMPUTATIONS AND SPECIFICA- TIONS CONCERNING: ENTIRE PROJECT x ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURAL FIRE PROTECTION ELECTRICAL MECHANICAL OTHER (specify) FOR THE ABOVE NAMED PROJECT AND THAT, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, SUCH PLANS, COMPUTATIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS MEET THE APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE MASSACHUSETTS STATE BUILDING CODE, ALL ACCEPTABLE ENGINEERING PRACTICES AND APPLICABLE LAWS AND ORDINANCES FOR THE PROPOSED USE AND OCCUPANCY. I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT I SHALL PERFORM THE NECESSARY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AND BE PRESENT ON THE CONSTRUCTION SITE ON A REGULAR AND PERIODIC BASIS TO DETERMINE THAT THE WORK IS PROCEDING IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DOCUMENTS APPROVED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FOLLOWING AS SPECIFIED IN SECTION 127.2.2: 1 . Review of shop drawings, samples and other submittals of the contractor as required by the calstruction contract documents as submitted for building permit, and approval for conformance to the design concept. 2. Review and approval of the quality control procedures for all code-required controlled materials. 3. Special architectural or engineering professional inspection of critical construction components requiring controlled materials or construction specified in the accepted engineering practice standards listed in Appendix B. PURSUANT TO SECTION 127.2.3, I SHALL SUBMIT PERIODICALLY, A PROGRESS REPORT TOGETHER WITH PERTINENT COMMENTS TO THE STATE BUILDING INSPECTOR. UPON COMPLETION OF THE WORK, I SHALL SUBMIT A FINAL REPORT AS TO THE SATISFACTORY COMPLETION AND READINESS OF THE PROJECT FOR OCCUPANCY. � l NA ORc^, SUBSCRIB AND SWORN TO 0 ME THIS DAY OF _19 ARY UBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES A Michael S. Dukakis. ,,�/ � Governor J4�X4i x" ✓lace - PW oo7rc 9390 Charles V. Barry Ao tom, ✓ Wadw JeCCa 02908 Secretary (699') 727-0660 VOICE & TDD March 3, 1988 Robert D. Farley 16 Park Street Danvers, MA 01923 it Re: Cherry Hill Realty Trust 114R Highland Avenue Salem Dear Mr. Falrley: The Architectural Access Board has reviewed your letter of January 25, 1988 relative tol the above project. Please be advised that the use of a wheelchair lift to gain access to the second floor is acceptable as long as it meets the Massachusetts Elevator Regulations. However, be advised at all exam rooms, 18" of clear space must be provided on the latch pull side of the doors. Further, if the bathroom on the second floor is available for patient use, it must be fully accessible. If you have any questions, please contact the office. Siyerely, Gerald LeBlanc Chairman GLB/nh ROBERT D. FARLEY DATE /�� °R No–� Architect l 16 Park St. PROJECT DANVERS, MA 01923 k" E G/{ L 'J'01 6-7 LOCATION Phone 774.4039 // del G7 L,g A)V ,Q Uig CONTRACTOR OWNER To C17 OF 5 '4LLL/nf? W1&'L//4Yr-5 &-1) 6z v. if/ ` J 7e 4! �7 > _ WEATHER TEMP. Dat AM —/1�-lam/�/ du <I [� P lb T L L. d5,4/E °at 2:vv PM PRESENT AT SITE L92 A-2 OZe THE FOLLOWING WAS NOTED: - /2 jQ: M i A�/(� / S fi 7 f / �F GD r/Zl-/a iX/ G, Z ai--% iv f n 12 W L�t1� flW S l9 �e G0w'. 944 7` L? /,,lam/ I.,r r� 2 Z!n COPIES TO 1 vI�D BUR D OO R&lr SIGNED FOR_R WT nor�F45E >+soss� 1 4 `•- a ' i C w.r Q T d t� •�b i a r- 3 _� � _ - r / ��.:�� - -tea �_ «�� . _ �Vy� ��.max.-. '.l"�ue �•�mss..-� r ,I E `---' \\ / u i b�L-E`• 2 z � 7 � 4 Z z y2 t5 LE ( I '�-T � - ` I F',�s��>v To �EL�Y• M' �i1M1t I.L ; SINGLI< PEAS L¢.P�IhI ! ta O i : I GI G�� f�A��T�tz � ( � - j • � I 12 ; -� I ; I I W Mleep� ' T. 1 � ' it { �� r uP :r --- --- GON Li I-Z. 1I I OFF 1EE t t s'G C� C�-��-- IOC — I > I I 1 1 " r r• �' �1 n - r 1 n _ n I I A• 17 E{laWr> ( Q� 8- � I I �j {`. . _-_ �J �� . -.. . . �� ----- ` -M� .m'I � � �; ��j� � - �c%y" .' ' -.'�s8� L 1 F"( .�s/3„ 3s/�, � � 3s� --- ------- -S-r�-p- I ' _ L �N ' 41 EEIX 4 YItiYt_ f-,46- l Tamps! t t i� _ i Imo, Up T QAll, - 13 I \= lLarzi 174-:') Q (7'-4i'J - I (T , , . , � I T Id,� 8 �1 ' I � 1 ti _ __ - -� � ---i --- C I I l •I I r *41M I i /!o I I I � - I TF-Z it �N . i � �8�i i i �•; at;p_ - sv - - - _ t , I I I : .QHS- SI•Ic : _I ®'I ( 1 1 1�a 1 I I 1 M , J u=_, II d� I ! , i 1 u , .71 / I Flo i -7`l•. �,:�,��>j 5 ti--'/ ?.. 1 2 Vii' (Z/-1-�••� I I� J�✓�� 1 III A. , i I : , „ : C r A , I , V� __ _.- = - i ? I I2.0 !J-l3• 1 I _- 't._._--- `_ - ': I1 -� i��- �I- 21 (8 ( � -+-- _ _ �- -- A� .+._ - � - - { i 7--- -i II • 6 � ��rs � I I M ---_-_;- I M —=, �• _ ' 7 14" I i i X11 i I 01 -- �� I SHE YE I : V 1 1 _ i ,. I l 4 ITL -- 1 S-1 rl- T SGALE'• 3/£j" 3 ('-Q+ I'I : 4y j''2I�2r• i.f /j rI_2 1/ 1' y I: 31' .�w ,L.1'r�f�7,,l,I ,��: , ,: y t- ,: . P -1 _ I1-d3/µ I# 4.D z?, „ f - - - ; L J l <LYE a Q A, ' f s I ' I — — I j rl /'j'-- ----` —�' S �" YW�. l> q IJ.IG) L• 4" u t3tt SPLASH -7- -- . - - - ij _._ • SEE DEQ. g�l.oW - yyc Llat "FLS+`->1C� I s t �- l•- 1\ - ----- '��Ra<-!G� •tj \ N=w T�IL+TT M! ------ I fi J - -- - --- --- -- _._ ! - W)-' K M' 10, j SI-jE MAT=iCt •`�'�.•� , !- `'-- t, /I-.7 iLAo ;OOtZ. ' 100; Lat.)h1N<. p i I Y6 saL 12 LA pIMI I 71 : I Lal- II xI I� : I f I t I ' I, j ' �,_ I /- Y,,: hK1M �.i•T L'Lt-�'(�;z-� I G ��rr�-,. -�-� ' I I � I IT I -14MA- /4k t _ e I '9, DENa j !S EILt IJ t� 1 ' T; Sox, ifi t Par '_ S?ZaG I I N C LL DLscj S c PIPE '; cE LoW I � �FIrzECa� CT (pSu '7 So.�2D G!F -- Frx! EL_E-=�� C' io FEL � V T ; c "Q1 �-Ge.L 3/c+ {•�Cr --- �e.aL�. 3/�a ` I'-O �//.`vLL y '�J .SE 6-1'- k L/�7 -1'—lL/r7 T 1 { �- aA1G Gvvc-� PINI„mak- . r 1zt�tc tc> �j.L Icy I�jLbG rU lS 4 �o V�.� �� (,LNC_� �`� � .i '/Z USIC7. M,oT>cL No. 44:; A5 f Ga11�1 j CK - To Y QUI PL1Eb £ INS j F L�Ev SLlppLlr Wt'Lt 7'`( L.H i r �� I;-� GOIV��c:F+G�'b',� Df..1SV62S � MA, N�� \E:PiL.�� l_.1l'.-_�t�l�• �. '', otiK Ti(:JI HILLr-r,- ��( T�v�•'1 AVE t LI t-: Tu 1=ofz `a!� LL 7Yn'✓ a 5 EE I>IzAW I NG A-8- ' 04 Pao. 2325. �, h ,�L.l=M frt�•=.1�:A.c.F.t t� '��-r'"!"S QLL w�>n \ c -r f,17cq wl-f-H us. D. PARLEY .5 , �-,r, r:-. � ,t i "CV✓d �.b1.�S 0�= �p�Y U� �H/1TSc; 11.11�1-�. � '?lyf � �`-1 RBE ARCHITECT TY� lG,z.L. G�� I � _�L _ : . � j • T T -- - -=---- `/f A(r M' 16 Park St. Danvers:MA 01923 , cn 'r Phone 774.4039 1 - • , i ; t a I 4 I Y, fIA>I L� �/8 >< meq-" boL2 � �/3�•�7 ��Lf7G-L--';�" c v \ - %r, `;, -M 60h7 W,t-LL -- --- ---j /i x i /z ozLlC Gst?,itJ 12" X'W 1puc. r I , Ix4 F1R -- . t I , Zoe /, Pty StovL t SKte -7 f c _ =Y`�� I 1 L OAK- 4A.N P^c Al L -- I I 3 rte_--- - - - --; —t — 1 I W� ME fAL �i'lsGk I l e i , �I - - 1tIGPD �oC -� LT� I I gEG S o CSE 2S _ i rill i 31 3 4 _ _ (- • 1 ---- ! j All { / _D_A c.-T lob - , M N 1 N is -- I ; Ifo ` I 32 Si=GiZc L 0!, Lb i 1 y�l�, aii,9 ._ 7�.. -�I14 _ l Ghl I' O i ! 21'✓ �h+�LVE� 2t0 207 ;37 �- H ~v A -z(,, �x, 29 27' 0 4� Z 2DS ; 14—t — t' I I �1 �- y ---- - -I� l o�r< F,dSG l fa sea; titr Y��. q ; � _t ' � ;! .. � j , 4 -_ Y Y16: - SASGK-� I I -r• n(1 guy x , 7-_� . _ _ ._.. 8 --- - -- r i _.___:_ . r-, • , _ � ,-- -� - - - I� - �_ = t-{oLi=LG.a5 o1L t••1/Dfc./-Li...ILiG I-t-t-�- SI PgobEL Zopo I I � 3cfi zv /6. I ( i � �.\ \ � .:I ! :� _ _ _ 4� �/ '4 !l, _��--_�/� \- I o1 ', Pia �t'M ��' MO+�tTCi t�.M�rGy . >~L7=VA`t'O�. ZOO• .. ... I - _ .__--- - -__. � - ':III N i i i I i -, ' ' I � _—I=---��_ %•- ' � '_�? O I 1-IbeT.> ! l 7- 18" PA'S , ��:.WEKS KNEE S?AC.'E� Hk.TacG� FILIEs � ' OQ 51 OAK FASGI6 SC$ I>GTAIL ( IP -- --- 2 (,G SS N�GNI II', I�II ,, 1._._------ - - --__._._ ...------- ' 4" u SAr_Y_SPLA►SN J -- _ - � 1iL I , Ny7c: L ALL �LPDI'� C0 Y�4 PL`fµ CNo'Z SU P5F'Loo�L PLU< T ti- w M L vvooD LtNDc_2L�.` h 1' AILEil to - �� © ; p Y - t Nom' I -- - -- — - - �i11 M 2. fiLL S1-4ELVIl.:G ' c> B� y�" SoLrD pl • _ �'P.ltl I ';� ortE 7WO FItJIS!- u TcILE7 FzooM �GGESSoRI >~��, �SUflP'Y = iNSTI» _ti� tiRAWG1zS I 3 C7 3-c7 - _ - - Y - . . ------� o b� Df- S — P�o�SZtGL ?�-lv�o(o CON£ PLL W47zj Z LLOS�T) ` SNE". Gir`. TF+�.Et? '•( ILE-'� , f PS12 Noy. F4, _ w0 friz�'-�' BA2S FA.P- TowEL �Is{>�ts�CZ� — �0f tP `/i�.`I ftil F - G.1 CY �j�� L oma rt>_T Mci o �0� 2tcK -293 = ( iii TWo MIW-F-0it I�OF�KI -IJ S-I�ie - 1330 G\S�EMOO aR�„�rF �C. I Lam$ L7Y1r��U<T 44. QONAf.O �l A- r o. 2025 BOSTON h 5. ROBERT D. FARLEY : ARCHITECT" 16 Park St. Danvers; 23 MA 019 Phone 774.4039 - - - - I -- -_-- - I I L II _ I 1 - �(3/b7 4-2�z 2-0 a- -r- (el> Y M` �itMILKE_' , Stl1GL� R SA Gt 81t 1& O Fr�S,TG �J To �(w(20 e 1 I6 I ' L IT 77- _— - -- -- Up I I - -- P+ /: i 1 "� - LON o U t- LoN��tl' T I o F t=1 r-r=: I� --- ,,' M �. : ♦ C�!/p� ,1 ,t ; � I -`; I O 7 \, H1�t ID I 1� LIST tf•i - - 4 /&7 1 >_ I � I b i 1-7 °f saLoar��c �.. ccu L I I Ill �1'-IrJ '} ns . . Lei -t--(o• G��•-ti= rf ----r-_—_ __.__ _ I - - i t yl:•is�� L ccs ca ; r Icy) e I`' m__-. _ �; ( /n- �sl s l�j' r I i -� i '¢ _ t JCLMA A N I 4'- G>'/,; i I y/ � t j ;, �/� , it '� •. �I .-r�+'.. ,, +. '-�'I .,, � _., 'T�._.. I , . +'t�?, I ✓�i" , i L. 5/L '%.... •I _ _..__ • I ?E`N + r ' �Xk,M f - (� ' 1 � ,1 1 r ..�. , ! / • ,. I i . _. , IIC! (1 �4 I - -L IQ � C�I r - CCCIII iii' I . a3 _ I I puLMoKI4- Vri l �� I -_ `--'I; . > '- ---- _: - ----- -- - a !I ' L - _ --=1 I S i�eLV r✓5 V� ... I i ` l , i � " a 0 ' 1 I ,.__ I ,_...• :' ' _ .1a'�.f S t11 i I FA-7-'TI t 'TO llND� >IT5 I d LL a G �9 , ` I;I �'�4 '.J"�1.• i /.�. .Z. L I 3 2�L I -Z,y •, 5+— ¢�� n E .� -r_ VF_C: II ':� `! \�'`. /a �. I :::1 y / _ l - k ♦ _ u l �6 hKIM 60A-7Vr, + „ n f k i I , i � i � I, � •�I �' , .S�. r-�1, �_ I I I Il of � ".1 p OA�t c i SEE tic �- - - j• ELoW I _.- �k 1-3D J " q�ETAII a i �1.11,GS J _. r � `,, — ,__-- y - { ♦ .(,C/7 �•i.F<Sr,C(C , x �' , - F;W-6 I�-�T I 17 rQov`I�� t \ tDE � 1- v ( \ — • - ------ — 1: Y T 2�' I T� FL 1t1 I - -- --i- >--�! -", L , ;'c ES • Kots M 1 SI i= Mme. � ct��,.• LIaTJL�iNCc. � SG,+,L�: 3/g` s t'-C 5�t.� ?✓� I'-C` i �+" I�a � 1 C Iv ' t� , , j I , , IN SAiJ -' III I i l 1 I f --•kTw A I j` G" s��Lv s CI y I , r I' vrl DENS �S GEI IKi tJIel� *TS . $oK IQ -i --- I l Ij 7 Y1 S?tic SPS I CCJJ-�' J t l 1, DULLS i FtF c��Lov✓ 1tv�IC/TG HIEC,41 (, l t�_ 3t-C� _ �}'-Z'� I : _ - -, rIXEb rDTTn _ "u - 1 C :...,t''•� ,-'O.Z r .0 tri...( 2 - o - - -- Wra.-LL_ u � ��E cA-F-1 X111 ILP= � , l' ---- --=T= -- i MEf�f✓Il =� - f7 A.1 -ED � �taZ.L 11G� T oto TtzASI� GoM "f-C.To FIN I bdK LoV r'ULLS 'To `'; S (,L"s�;� � �T�} '`/c 11SIC7. V It S CoR} . I+.17ERf�1� l0?JA-L D N L GOutJ "' - M �* MoDSL No. 4-Sov AS _ < T �i1P� LIED £ Its r '_�E., sLID 'LiE� p l�ls L 4 h1,>1JtJ Vit:. 1' T• Nt k _ j �( j;-� Gb>\t'T's�:l.G rG L DA�-NVETrS / *SIA. N�.Y.I M,ED1L1s.L �UI�DrN� � f r O6� TC; ?✓ Q�\S "1A�hlFP> t <.- I _ �j TYf� c -} * , 1, �+ Fc� Gi-!'��^C Nrk_� ��'-L`C`C A-6 I •-- •� / . " Fd I` WQ L-L- 1 1 1 �~A 5 L� •N l�'�.�"� I 'V�r /-i-C� �. m m ✓+ s. G,. '7¢ C7t;�- _ a . v K W S LIM 1 ijMla dGN Li ��- 7- o P#1. 2C2? ' I `�!�� 'z"• ____-- G 1--s ,._� l, :.,._.�..,. �iti,._-. tI:J-1-- , a.� w ) v ;i n. MASS.Wo�D LV�< I-r= )z 4,14 4 � A:Ic�t MhY Z� ' �g� ROBERT R LEY ARCHITECTI07 biyccrH 16 Park St. ,'Danvers.MA 01923 . r - _ Phone 774.4039 _ _ r � I - GCIL1I,46- K4 11.1Lr=� t Y' It` SKIM Goh'T -- - W1-LL r I � Ix¢ FIR t Ile t-(lal.!161,1_ 1 I � . : _ - -I I --� th _ i ____ ----- � I � 1 w� , � : : i I , t. ` I iL - y l- z1 /� I .I _. i L7 r �L.LZY SUStN I ,, I 1 i p F I i L hflS r ' o I I I uT uSI N1=r r _ { ' k-_ --_—'f- j _' L_H L1 _._..��.�s•E C.A�vu �'Oa;L '.r,'. i�� ___ Y_ _ —.__ __ _ ___— __ _ :i %� � t i'- 7i`� f / — ! I — • + (� - ✓ Q1 �� I I 32 5 G1_c--E dI CLO - LT-- -- �- 1�` aAT. 2tv �' _ 37 f_� 207 0� . �_ t . 4 l� cK �pLt�S1 +_ ; 21 7 _1 I_yj C r---- D -�-- -_--- - --s--- - � .fid• �; r --- ,- —_- --- + N Ac - t �IF . I �_-. �I '� I � I ; ',,„ I ' (•LIZ Ftb,-)•LH/ �/Z M.D U. Pl `--� Yr ~/� a-4r W K 4-v. _ - 1 + - Ir I li —i. r , I _.___..__..-..-___-_._-_ I ��-L.G✓J �'L ( �.L. -. _____ _ _ _. __ __ - 4. I ___- -- __ __ __- __ - i \ I } ` 2 ' 1 1LezY 5u`x a- - - - - - - - - _ - c2_ i(�r" t . L p - ---- - i I Lot. Z.&F�- ' 51-f .EVES �. � l✓ GVA'T l d �' l-� II ,. _ � I '.�� N•ALI._. 1 1 sr,:�L� = ice" _ r-� • A ,-� � --- —1 ! -�- j��J - ,. ' I i t , [A1 I .SII , i 2 I a -.� « Z 03 y l M1 44 — — - 2 2. -- - - - .. �. - ot�LEaS o1L N D� fLLdLI _ 1� y � F+H- II t�Y�otJti~L Zoon I , w Mvtil'r ci<a l'•I�= ELE v,z.. off. GO.. I __-__. ._.____-___ .Ij ; - rpt >', - r - P" vs. I / P 0 7 Vr-Amvr"2S KNE. SHAG Hl�jG� �iL - s � • - t _ l s I ' Woi✓K =�o f OAK -- - _ , I i t -- ---- 11 "W x i — I , I '' I A.C> PL Wt�l ' I i r ;. ILII + i SE Lo i✓-1'tc, t r I - 44 u-g�cY-SPLdsK C-. - _ � ! - 'c� {a l- Lpok=S _ = '�¢" PL`f�100� 2, /-LL S N-f E L\/)t.S!r To 8�- meq-" 5 o L i D �'1 i�`:~_ �'A.11..1 WO F i pu I G!D h' 7- . f r T�1 L>=� Roots �GG� S�>O -' tL'. (s Lin e-Y vQawESz4 � 2,-n y �� p -�- ' -%F.._i.>r `T T P�i� t'•toLDr-_�5 - 1S=�gKIG.1_ 2 - loGr,(<. �O'Nc YE='z.. Wt."� iZ LI.OS�T� 5,a tiS — �o z>vz- .k. t3- 5 5c> I'/4' � x - L f • -TI-FKCc Pf�P�! TOWEL Dtspct �S>r<S - �oc>i�.1L'L C3-^�.fo2 Ie7t\J oHv T1> -T .ci ,moo — �o� ziLK -Z93 New MED1c�L F,Li LZ_ its% ` f / _ ( v' - Tv/0 MistRoRS - go, �� GF- ;EiF-Zf H'tL!_ �C �aL `�'. -rZUS 5CAL : 3 a. l L S-IrnG - I�i3 E o tF� T� 1'ES SE 1= D;ZA �V1lN�, -8 c , „ / \ 11 k44� �� 't L!'�+V t� 1f+�.�'-�TLSF' 119 O � LQ2J ROBERT D PARLEY , ARCHITECT, 16 P / ark 5t• Danvers, 01923 4D�.:rJ-.F.': Y4 •` �- Phone 774-40399 'S ' JUN ZZ 8 iN '90 71U ofttlem, ttssttrliz$etts Y y ✓Pottra of 'Appeal DECISION ON THE PETITION-OF,STUART-AND_IMY GOULD FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT,,116 HIGHLAND AVENUE (R_1), A hearing on this petition was held June 6, 1990 with the following Board Members present: Richard A. Bencal , Chairman; Edward Luzinski , Vice Chairman; Joseph Correnti , Secretary, Richard Febonio and Mary Jane Stirgwolt. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioners, owners of the property, are requesting a Special Permit to allow existing building to be expanded by five feet to the east. Property is located in an R-1 zone. The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordiance with is applicable to this request for a Special Permit is Section V B 10, which provides as follows: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the Board- of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set forth in Section VIII F and IX D, grant Special Permits for alterations and reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement, extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses, provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood. In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants. The Board of Appeal , after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1 . No parking spaces would be deleted by the plan. 2. Support and opposition was in both voice and letter form. 3. The Salem Zoning Ordinance allows private clinics within 1 ,500 feet of Salem Hospital and the locus is within this distance. 4. The addition would be for expanded space in existing offices and would not add any more offices. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1 . The expansion and enlargement of this structure is not more detrimental to the public good than the present structure. l DECISION ON THE PETITION OF STUART AND IMY GOULD FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 116 HIGHLAND AVENUE, SALEM page two Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted 4-1 (Mr. Febonio in opposition) to grant the Special Permit requested, subject to the following conditions: 1 . All construction be done as per existing city and state building codes. 2. All construction be done as per the plans and dimension submitted. 3. All exterior finishes are to be in harmony with the existing exterior finishes. 4. A legal building permit be obtained. 5. A Certificate of Occupancy for the new addition be obtained. 6. Petitioner comply with all requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety. 7. No change in the number of parking spaces on the site shall be made. 8. No additional rooms are to be added by this construction. SPECIAL PERMIT GRANTED (102) %n0 Richard A. Bencal , Chairman A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK 0 Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 dt En " the Mass. General Laws, Chapter 808, and shall be filed within 20 days _ after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. \ Pursuant to Mass. General Laws, Chcpter 808, Section 11, the Variance un or >+ecial Permit Granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the m CO decision, tearinG the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been tiled, or that, if such appeal has been rded ithe South Essex filed,that it has been dismissed or denied is recoowner of record W tV Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name er the o N v Is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. o — BOARD OF APPEAU