The URL can be used to link to this page

100 HIGHLAND AVENUE U1 - BUILDING INSPECTION ^100 Highland Ave. ( 1) m MEDICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES , INC . 13384 POINT RIDER LANE • HERNDON, VIRGINIA 22071 PHONE 703.471 -7204 FAX 703.481 .0768 MEMBER.: NFPA ASPE ASHE Testing and Certification of Alterations and Additions to the Medical Gas Pipeline Macomber 4 Renovation Salem Hospital Salem, Massachusetts • Test performed for: Metropolitan Plumbers and Mechanical Contractors, Inc. Testing performed: December 12, 1989 MEDICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES , INC . 13384 POINT RIDER LANE • HERNDON, VIRGINIA 22071 PHONE 703.471 .7204 FAX 703.481 .0768 MEMBER: NFPA CERTIFICATE ASPS ASHE This certificate is issued December 12 , 1989 , by Medical Engineering Services, Inc. This certificate relates to work performed pursuant to a request for testing services by Metropolitan Plumbing. In accordance witn the terms of that agreement , Medical Engineering Services has tested the alterations and additions to the medical gas piping systems known as Salem Hospital , Macomber 4 Project, located in Salem, . Massachusetts, and hereby certifies that as of the time said inspection was performed , and except as noted on the data sheets : 1 . There are no cross connections within the rr.edical oras piping systems as required by Para . 4-5 . 1 .1 . 2 , NFPA 99 . 2 . The medical gas alarm systems are functioning within the established limits as required by Para . 4- 5 . 1 . 4 , NFPA 99 . 3 . All zone valves have been tested for operation and internal leakage as required by Para . 4-5 . 1 . 3 .2 , NFPA 99 . 4 . All zone valves, gas outlets and alarms installed with • this project were properly labeled in accordance with Para. 4-5. 1 . 1 .2 ( b) , NFPe? 99. 5 . Each positive pressure piping system has been purged and analyzed and the gas dispensed is of the proper concentration as defined by applicable standards and as required by Para. 4-5 . 1 . 2 . 3, NFPA 99 . 6 . All positive pressure gas systems used for patient application have been tested for particulate contaminants , 7 . All positive pressure gas systems used for patient. application have been tested for moisture . 8 . All positive pressure gas systems used for pationt application have been tested for T3tal Volatile Hydrocarbons , Halogenated Hydrocarbons , and Carbon Monoxide contaminants . The data sheets accompanying this certificate in fi.rlal. report form substantiate the certifications and provide additional information ; they should therefore be read carefully by all parties . Only those outlets and that portion of, the systems reflected on the attached data sheets are included within this certificate. This certificate shall be rendered void at any t;.rae ad;listments , modifications, or maintenance is performed on any of the systems . By: David hire • Date: December 12, 1989 Page 1 of 16 The following report covers the testing and certification of the medical gas systems serving the Macomber 4 renovation of the Salem Hospital complex, located in Salem, Massachusetts . The installed systems consist of oxygen, air and vacuum. Gas Outlet Configuration All outlets were Chemetron Quick Connect series 500 except one separate ceiling outlet in the C-Section room and the Delivery Room which were D. I .S.S. Labeling During the conduction of the test program, all gas outlets, zone valves and alarms were checked for proper labeling with respect to both gas service and function. A recommendation is made that all zone valves be labeled to define the specific rooms or areas that they control . (See discussion section) . PROCEDURES • Zone Valve Leakage All zone valves for the areas listed or. the data sheets were tested for internal seal leakage and operation. This test was conducted by pressurizing the inlet side of each valve with the system pressure. With the zone valve closed and L-he downstream side of the valve at D psig , the zone was monitored with a pressure gauge for an increase in pressure. The data sheets present the final results of this test. Area Leakage Each positive pressure zone was tested for leakage within the zone . After the zone was pressurized, the zone valve was shut off and the zone was monitored for any drop in pressure. This would indicate a leak within the zone . . Minor drops in pressure can be attributed to new 0-rings in outlets; which usually seat properly after several cycles of usage. Any significant leakage would be reported under the Discussion heading .. Alarm Systems Test All alarms serving the specific zones of each, installed system were tested for operation at the low pressure actuation points . The data sheets present the final results of this test. • Date: December 12 , 1989 Page 2 of 16 Cross Connection Test All gas outlets defined on the data sheets were tested for cross connections . This test was accomplished by pressurizing each system to a different pressure level as indicated by the data sheets . Each outlet was then accessed with a calibrated pressure gauge and proper adapter. Verification of the proper applied pressure was made and recorded. The data sheets present the final results of this test. Supply Systems The supply systems for the installed gas services were checked for delivery pressure . The following pressures are those measured at the time of the test. Oxygen 48 - 53 . 5 psig* Air 46 - 48 psig* Vacuum 20 - 24 inches Hg • *See discussion section Moisture Test The terminal outlets `or each positive pressure system intended for patient use were tested for moisture by utilizing an automatic dewpoint analyzer . The acceptable limits are as follows : All Gases Except Air -45 degrees C. Medical Air -18 degrees C. The data sheets present the final results of this test . Purging and Analysis All outlets for rooms and areas listed on the data sheets were purged to remove both foreign test gas and solid particulate contaminants . During this purging, an evaluation of the ability for each outlet to flow was made , including vacuum. The ability of the gas outlet to accept the proper adapter was also verified. Upon completion of the purging , the dispersed gas from the outlet was analyzed for proper concentration as defined by the U.S.P. and C.G.A. Commodity Specifications . All equipment used in the gas analysis was periodically calibrated ;;,itch test gases having known concentration levels . The data sheets present the final results of this test. Date: December 12 , 1989 Page 3 of 16 Main Tie Ins For this project main tie ins for the oxygen and medical air system were performed downstream of existing valves . A vacuum tie in was performed during our visit. Purity Testing A MIRAN 1-A portable infrared analyzer was used to test the oxygen and medical air pipelines to determine if the contractor had added any contaminants to the. lines. The results were as follows for both the air and oxygen. Trichloroethylene <.i ppm Carbon monoxide <l ppm Methane equivalents <1 ppm Purity Conclusions The work done to install the new oxygen and air pi.pclines in Macomber 4 added nothing to the pipelin^s in the way of contaminants . DISCUSSION If minor problems were discovered during the conduction of the test program an attempt to resolve t•he problem„ was made. The following information relates to items that were not resolved. The. medical air pressure fluctuated between 46 and 48 psi . The oxygen system pressure fluctuated between 48 and 53 . 5 psi . The NFPA recommendation is a constant pressure selected by the hospital from a range between 50 and 55 psi . Those hospital that have high risers such as Salem might select a pressure of 54 psi at the source which will yield a pressure of 50 psi on the upper floors . Consideration should be given to determining what is causing these fluctuations . It is interesting to note that while we had noted the air fluctuation previously when we tested Davenport 9 , this is the first time we have noted the oxygen system fluctuating . Some of the causes of the fluctuating oxygen pressure might be too great a demand on the existing system or too small a main line from the bulk tank . The medical air system appears to contain a high level of moisture . Consideration should be given to determining the • cause of this moisture production and the extent of the moisture contamination in the facility . We would be interested in working with the facility to this end . Date: December 12 , 1989 'rage 4 of. 16 The hose tract: assembly in the C-Section room will need to be checked for cross connection after the installation work is completed. There was a problem in attarhing one of the feed lines and the work on this unit could not be compicted. There is only one ZVBA present for both the C-Section room and the future delivery room. This is an apparent violation of NFPA 99C. The ZVBA in the Normal Nursery ( 197 ) is in the same room as the outlets, which is a violation of the code. This ZVBA should be on the outside wall of the room. 1:` the hospital wishes to have this moved, the lines will have to rccertifi.ed. The alarm panel in the Normal Nursery ( 197 ) has non_ been checked out.. and calibrated since components ware missing. There are no zone valve box assemblies other than for the Normal. Nursery, the C-Sect/Delivery Rooms , and tiie reit of the wing. This could cause so:ce problems down the line . For • instance, if .it became necessary to repair any of the primary . . check valves in the back of the oxygen or medical air outlets anywhere in the wing other than the. Normal Nur=ery 197 or the C-Sect/Delivery Rooms , it :could mean shutting down 11.1 the LDRP 's and all the other nurseries in order to perform this work. Consideration should be given to 4 nstaliing several service valves in the ceiling area to allow service to be done on certain portions of the .wing without shutting down everything. • • DATA HEETSS MEDICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES DATE: 12/12/89 PAGE 5 OF 16 CROSS-CONNECTION DATA SHEET FACILITY: Salem Hospital TESTED BY: D. Mobile AREA: Macomber 4 WITNESS: GAS SERVICE ROOM NO. OXYGEN N20 AIR NZ VACUUM REMARKS 50 psi 40 psi 60 psi 160 psi 12" Hg 1 C-Sect. 50/50 0/60/60 12/12 ' Wall 2 i ose Track & 50/50 -- 12/12/12 Ceiling vac 3 Future 50/50 0/60/60 12/12 Wall Dplivprr 4 It Hose Track & 50/50 60/60 12/12/12 Ceiling vac 6 Normal l 7 50 60 12 6 50 12 . 7 50 60 12 8 " 50 12 9 " 50 60 12 10 50 12 t1 50 60 12 12 50 12 13 " 50 60 12 14 50/50 60 12 15 Specia} 4 50 12 16 50 12 17 50 12 18 " 50 12 19 " 50 12 20 50 12 • NOTES: MEDICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES DATE: 12/12/84 PAGE 6 OF 16 CROSS-CONNECTION DATA SHEET FACILITY: Salem Hospital TESTED BY: D. Mohile AREA: Macomber 4 WITNESS: GAS SERVICE ROOM OXYGEN N20 AIR Nz VACUUM REMARKS NO. 50 psi 40 psi 60 psi 160 psi 12" Hg DRP 1 L121 50' 12/12 2 " 50 12 3 LD19 50 12/12 4 " 50 12 5 LDRP 17 50 12/12 6 50 12 7 LDRP 50 12/12 114 • 8 50 12 9 LDS 50 12/12 10 50 12 11 LDRP 50 12/12 12 It 50 12 13 LDRP 50 12/12 164 14 of 50 12/12 15 LDRP 50 12/12 166 16 of 50 12/12 17 LDRP 50 12/12 168 18 " 50 12/12 19 LDRP 50 12/12 1 To 20 50 12/12 • NOTES: MEDICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES DATE: 12/12/89 PAGE 7 OF 16 • CROSS-CONNECTION DATA SHEET FACILITY: Salem Hospital TESTED BY: D. Mohile AREA: Macomber 4 WITNESS: GAS SERVICE ROOM OXYGEN N20 AIR Na VACUUM REMARKS NO. 50 psi 40 psi 60 psi 160 psi 12" Hg 1 LDRP 50 12/12 174 2 11 50 12 3 LDRP D76 50 12/12 4 11 50 12 ' 6 LDRP 78 50 12/12 6 11 50 12 L180 50 12/12 • 8 11 50 12 9 LDRP 50 12/12 10 50 12 11 LD$ 50 12/12 12 1" 50 12 13 LDRP 188 50 12/12 14 50 12/12 15 LDRP 50 12/12 191 16 n 50 12 17 LDRP 194 50 12/12 18 50 12 19 20 • NOTES: MEDICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES DATE: 12/12/89 PAGE S OF 16 • CROSS-CONNECTION DATA SHEET FACILITY: Salem Hospital TESTED BY: D. Mobile AREA: Macomber 4 WITNESS: GAS SERVICE ROOM OXYGEN N20 AIR N2 VACUUM REMARKS NO. 50 psi 40 psi 60 psi 160 psi 12" Hg 1 Isol 50 60 12 Nurser 2 3 Work 50 12 Room 4 ° 5 Nursery 50 60 12 6 50 60 12 7 50 60 12 • 8 50 12 9 50 60 12 10 50 12 11 " 50 60 12 12 50 60 12 13 " 50 60 12 14 " 50 60 12 15 16 17 18 19 20 • NOTES: MEDICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES DATE: 12/12/89 PAGE-2— OF 16 • GAS CONCENTRATION & PURGING DATA SHEET FACILITY: Salem Hospital TESTED BY: D. Mohile AREA: Macomber 4 WITNESS: GAS SERVICE CONCENTRATION ROOM OXYGEN wo AIR Na REMARKS NO. %02 %02 1 C-Sect 99.5/ 21/21/ wall 99.5 21 2 99.5/ -- hose track 3 Future 99.5/ 21/21/ wall Deliver-, 99.5 21 4 99.5/ 21/21 hose track 6 °tel 99.5 21 6 " 99.5 7 99.5 21 • 8 99.5 9 99.5 21 10 " 99.5 11 " 99.5 21 12 99.5 13 " 99.5 21 14 99.5/ 21 99.5 15 3pecial 99.5 gungery 16 n '.:.. 99.5 17 to 99.5 18 to 99.5 19 It 99.5 20 to 99.5 • NOTES: MEDICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES DATE: 12/12/89 PAGE10OF 16 • GAS CONCENTRATION & PURGING DATA SHEET FACILITY: Salem Hospital TESTED BY: D. Mohile AREA: Macomber 4 WITNESS: GAS SERVICE CONCENTRATION ROOM O%YGEN Nx0 AIR N2 REMARKS NO. %02 %02 LDRP 1 121 99.5 2 99.5 3 LDRP 99.5 4 99.5 5 LDRP 99.5 117 6 " 99.5 LD147 99.5 • 8 99.5 9 LDRP 99.5 112 10 99.5 11 LDRP 99.5 12 It 99.5 13 LDRP 164 99.5 14 " 99.5 15 LDRP 166 94.5 16 1, 99.5 17 LDRP 168 99.5 18 " 99.5 19 LDRP 170 99.5 20 94.5 • NOTES: MEDICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES DATE: 12/12/89 PAGE 11 OF 16 • GAS CONCENTRATION & PURGING DATA SHEET FACILITY: Salem Hospital TESTED BY: D. Mohile AREA: Macomber 4 WITNESS: GAS SERVICE CONCENTRATION ROOM OXYGEN N20 AIR N2 REMARKS NO. %02 %02 1 LDRP 74 99.5 2 it 99.5 3 LDRP 99.5 4 It 99.5 5 LDRP 99.5 178 6 " 99.5 7 LDRRP0 99.5 18 B1. 1 99.5 9 LDRP 99.5 183 10 " 94.5 11 LDRP 85 12 " 99.5 13 LDRP188 94.5 14 99.5 15 LDRP 99.5 191 16 94.5 17 LDRP 99..5 194 18 94.5 19 20 • NOTES: MEDICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES DATE: 12/12/89 PAGE 12 OF 16 • GAS CONCENTRATION & PURGING DATA SHEET FACILITY: Salem Hospital TESTED BY: D. Mohile AREA: Macomber 4 WITNESS: GAS SERVICE CONCENTRATION ROOM OXYGEN Ito AIR Nx REMARKS NO. %02 %02 1 Isol 99.5 21 Ursery 2 3 Work 99.5 Room4 6 qursery 99.5 21 6 1. 99.5 21 7 99.5 21 • 8 99.5 9 " 99.5 21 10 99.5 11 99.5 21 12 99.5 21 13 99.5 21 14 99.5 21 15 16 17 18 19 20 • NOTES: MEDICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES DATE: 12/12/89 PAGE 11 OF 16 • ZONE VALVE DATA SHEET FACILITY: Salem Hospital TESTED BY: D. Mohtte WITNESS: INTERNAL LEAKAGE ZONE OR OXYGEN N°O AIR NITROGEN VACUUM AREA IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT C-Sect. & Fut. De 49 0 47 0 23 0 Normal Nursery 19 49 0 47 0 23 0 everything else 49 0 47 1 0 1 231 0 • NOTES: • MEDICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES DATE: 12/19/RQ PAGE _-.40F _L6. LEAK TEST DATA SHEET • FACILITY: Salem Hospital TESTED BY: D. Mohile WITNESS: ZONE OR AREA OXYGEN WO AIR NITROGEN C-Sect. & Fut. Del 0.0 0.0 Normal Nursery 197 0.0 0.0 everything else 0.0 0.0 NOTES: • MEDICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES DATE 12/12/89 PAGE 15 OFA • MOISTURE ANALYSIS DATA SHEET FACILITY: Salem Hospital TESTED BY: D. Mohile AREA: Macomber 4 WITNESS: DEWPOINT ROOM OXYGEN N20 AIR N0. REMARKS -45°C -45°C -18°C 1 -49 -11 2 3 4 5 6 7 • 8 ` 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 • NOTES: MEDICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES DATE: 12/12/89 PAGE 160F 16 AREA ALARM TEST DATA SHEET • FACILITY: Salem Hospital TESTED BY: D. Mohile WITNESS: PRESSURE SET POINTS ZONE OXYGEN N20 AIR NITROGEN VACUUM OR PSI PSI PSI PSI "Hg AREA HI LO HI LO HI LO HI LO LO HI LO HI LO C-Sect & Fut. Del 60 40 60 40 12 Normal Nursery 197 -- -- -- -- -- Main nurses Station 60 40 60 40 12 • NOTES: • D E S I G N G R O U P INCORPORATED November 16, 1990 ARCHITECTS PLANNERS CONSULTANTS MEMBER AMERICAN City of Salem INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS Public Property Department 96 RICHARDSON ROAD One Salem Green MELROSE, MA 02176 Salem, MA 01970 617 -665- 7223 o Attention: Mr. William H. Munroe < r Building Inspector �� o Regarding: Relocation of Nursing Administration Main Building "1 rQ J Salem Hospital x Salem, MA 3Cn - Cn `m o Gentlemen: Pursuant to Article 1 , Section 127 . 0 of the State of Massachusetts Building Code, I hereby submit this letter as final review and approval, to the best of my knowledge, of all quality control procedures for all code required materials and installations performed at the above mentioned location. If you have ,any questions, please do not hesitate to call . Vereass. Reg. trulours, rco AIA 852 cc: Kevin G. Goggin Manager Facilities Design BRANCH OFFICE. P. O. BOX 1492 ROGERSROAD YORK BEACH, ME 03910 1 207 - 363 - 7381 CNSTP'JCT TRCL PROJECT ;!UMBER; 9008-162 PROJECT TITLE: RELOCATION OF NURSING ADMINISTRATION PROJECT LOCATION: SALEM HOSPITAL/SALEM, MA NAME OF BUILDING: MAIN BUILDING/LEVEL 6 EAST NATURE OF PROJECT: OFFICE RENOVATIONS FOR NURSING ADMINISTRATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 127.0 OF THE MASSACHUSETTS STATE BUILDING CODE, DEsr&N I. JOSEPH G. DEMARCO, IN/EX GROUP, INC. MELROSE P.egistraticn No-3852 n BEING A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, ARCHITECT HEREBY CERTIFY THAT HAVE PREPARED OR DIRECTLY SUPERVISED THE PREPARATION OF ALL DDESIGN PLANS, COMPUTATIONS AND SFECIFICA TIONS CONCERNING: ENTIRE PROJECT _ X ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURAL FIRE PROTECTION ELECTRICAL MECHANICAL OTHER (specify) FOR THE ABOVE NAMED PROJECT AND THAT, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, SUCH PLANS, COMPUTATIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS MEET THE APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE mASSACHUSETTS STATE BUILDING CODE, ALL ACCEPTABLE ENGINEERING PRACTICES AND APPLICABLE LAWS AND )RDINANCEZ FOR THE r"ROPOSED USE AND OCCUPANCY. FURTHER CERTIFY THAT : --HALL PERFORM TiiE "ECESSARY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AND [E PRESENT CN THE C3NSTRUCTICN SITE ON A REGULAR AND PERIODIC EASI: TO DETERMINE THAT THE 'WORK iS PROCEDING IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DOCUMENTS APPROVED FOR THE DUILDING PERMIT. AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FOLLOWING AS SPECIFIED IN SECTION 127.2.2: 1 . Revier of stop draaings, zamies and other cutmittals of the contractor as requires by the construction contract docunalts as submitted for building permit;-and-approval-for conformance to the design concept. 2. Revied and approval of the quality control procedures for all code-required controlled materials. 3. Special architectural or engineering professional inspection of critical construction comments requiring controlled materials or construction specified in the accepted erV;ineering practice standards listed in Appendix B. PURSUANT TO SECTION 127.2.3, I SHALL SUBMIT PERIODICALLY, A PROGRESS REPORT TOGETHER WITH PERTINENT COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING INSPECTOR. UPON COMPLETION OF THE WORK, I .SHALL SUBMIT A FINAL REPORT .AS TO THE SATISFACTORY COMPLETION AND READINESS OF THE PROJECT FOR OCCUPANCY. SIZATURIS SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS _DAY OF (, u,$— 19 70 innlnO ^,O in ee n r:: '.48 state o:lee: SostOn. "A 02109 917.7-25, . 25 April 1991 Mr.Jeff Ellowitz Edand Construction Co. 149 Middlesex Turnpike Burlington, MA 01803 Re: Salem Hospital CT Area CBI Project No. 764.00 Dear Jeff: Please find enclosed a copy of the Final Walkthrough Review of the 28 March 1991 Final Punchlist. These comments were compiled during my last site visit on Tuesday 23 April 1991. In addition to the review of the punchlist Items previously distributed some additional comments have been added. Since ly, Dennis Laidlaw, AI Project Manager Cannon DL/dbg cc: William-Monroe Kevin Goggin Mike Vaccaro sasron `IewYork Ht.Louis :':asninaion RADIATION PHYSICS INC. P. O. BOX 173 • BROOKLINE. MASS. 02146 • TELEPHONE O'S(617)321.4607 j (6 17)471-8560 April 9 , 1991 Mr . John Brennan - Radiology Manager Salem Hospital Highland Ave . Salem, Ms . Dear John , I have performed radiation safety and compliance measurements on your new CT scanner installed in the Radiology Dept . The unit is in compliance with current radiation safety rules and regulations of the Eommonwealth of Mass . We will be performing Q .A . and dosimetry measurements durint the next few weeks , along with your other ct scanner . If you have any questions , please contact me at ( 617 ) 638 7192 . S 1Qe 1 : 1 David Cail , M . S . Consultant Physicist r GREEN MOUNTAIN MED - GAS SERVICES DIVISION OF GREEN MOUNTAIN GASES, INC, 4050 WILLISTON ROAD SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 DOUG OSTRAAT 802-864-0321 PRESIDENT 11,, Page:Sry -�' Date: 3 2Z-moi To: will; am 2 CALIA14AAI k/03u� r1 IV) A5S' Attn: 0,t1AR1_TZ 1"ILA%/9 S Attached are the results of test perfromed on the -0)<3 L X./a eTir— ct'ld 5-YS4e/-n5 ;k\ 7&j nzryw� C l• SCQh 4reci 0. 1- Sa�em Nos p i 'Ta 1 t E /er'l ///0. - ,on arc- A ZZ , 1 99/. After completing all the required test, the details of which are noted on the attached reports , it is my pleasure to certify the 0X aer` 7 0. it a,AGI VaCuu ^^ _T)) ,rfeemx detailed on the attached report, as properly installed, and operating in accordance with NFPA-99 , manufacturer ' s design specifications ,- and safe medical practice. I qualify this statement only as noted /in the SPECIAL NOTES FOR TEST 4 SN 'J listed on page(s ) of this report. For purposes of record keeping, I have designated this test as number .5/1/- / The pages of this report are numbered _-�- through 5 '�-�- 7 B t egard , Douglas _raat r Q A S-E S, I N C. SUCTION T EMNT MOUNTAIN MEDICAL SYSTEMS PEDIATRIC ar R ANESTHESIA EQUIPMENT MUDDY BROOK INDUSTRIAL PARK E BULK &CYLINDER GASES MONITORING EQUIPMENT 4050 WILLISTON ROAD ECERTIFIED GAS MIXTURES SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT PULMONARY FUNCTION EQUIPMENT N RESPIRATORY THERAPY EQUIPMENT 05401 802-864-0321 M O ' I U HOSPITAL NAME: Sg1-01I fLl�1T/)L PAGE : SN - I ' N T Location:�fJ(/E/3�a121 _ Z/71 FLao fL Date of Test: ZZ- A i Tested By ��,J.-�m�, �� N Witness: TEST N1 ZONE VALVE OPERATION TEST In Accordance With NFPA-99 . Zone Valves Tested As Follows: Test 1A: Zone valve accessible. Test 1B: Zone valve box and clear window properly installed. Test 1C: Labeled Properly . Test 11): Operates manually with ease. Test 1E: Tested for leakage by turning off valve and draining pipe line to outlets. Pressure gauge left in outlets for one hour. Pressure reading zero (0) after one hour. Therefore, no leakage through zone valve. Test IF; Zone valve performs tq design specifications. Test 1G: Zone .valve to proper gas source cross connection test. ZONE VALVE ZONE VALVE COMMENTS I TESTS SERVICE LOCATION IA I 1B I 1C 1D lE I 1F 11G Oxy erl west Wa11 �,,.a, co��ei J,�ply /b y-s y� ye5 y- ✓dtc ya ✓CX . . *� '�Zo 13 ye, 16 yes IC ycs ✓I- VacuuM .. Q .T. S'C l -A- I ye-2, ye5 yg y� ✓GIC yc$ %loK c.?• Sc.A / �K. >1 >e >k -v oyi-JeA fall, W,I1 07Ca,, C-1w/5-5o l -A 4'-Zs(o// ye y6 yC5 yes 16K yd 1/01C air ljtf&,2 -j ..f CWo.;Ii�j 9,�)� 9.�M'Ivoo 8 — yq3 y6 rc5 yCS ✓[< yhs ✓oK d.., � �od� �ao8A% cT� , VA 4: Sc.AdS,2 �° ''2� 5�� Co✓k� e cYC.S Yi Yes yz5 Arc Ye5 ✓or X x x x x x y X f y SALES * SERVICE * RENTALS * LEASING COPYRIGHT 1981 r GASESI N C. SUCTION EQUIPMENT MOUNTAIN MEDICAL SYSTEMS f PEDIATRIC EQUIPMENT R' ANESTHESIA EQUIPMENT MUDDY BROOK INDUSTRIAL PARK BULK &CYLINDER GASES E MONITORING EQUIPMENT 4050 WILLISTON ROAD E CERTIFIED GAS MIXTURES SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT PULMONARY FUNCTION EQUIPMENT N RESPIRATORY THERAPY EQUIPMENT 05401 802.864-0321 M �J L O HOSPITAL NAME: 541'- '7 //QSIxTAL PAGE : U N Loc ation of System: //fll/CiA1 ao(_/j �'7-9 f--&4nate of Test: ZZ-cJ/ T A AIr`�^-r C 7 -ScAti AR I Tested By: ��yQS}�'�� —T I Witness: TEST N2 SYSTEMS LEAKAGE VERIFICATION AND CERTIFICATION: In accordance with NFPA-99 : Pressure Testing, Paragraphs 4-5 . 1 . 3 .4 . These tests completed during construction phase and previously documented. LEAKAGE VERIFICATION AND CERTIFICATION OF OPERATIONAL SYSTEM WITH PROPER SERVICE GASES PERFORMED AS FOLLOWS: OXy�e� Systems checked for leaks, by pressurizing with ox79ch to3�si then closing previously certified zone valve, and monitoring pressure in the system for one hour. After one hour line pressure still at SD psi . Therefore, no leakage. BIZ 2 System checked for Iedcs by pressurizing with oij r to _psi , closing previously certified zone valve, and monitoring pressure in the system for one hour. After one hour line pressure still at So psi . Therefore, no leakage Vacuum system checked for leakage by pulling Z3 inches Hg vacuum on system, then closing previously certified zone valve, and monitoring the vacuum for one hour. After one hour the vacuum was still 23 inches Hg. Therefore, no .leakage. Please Note: Test N2 Column of Data Sheets for Verification of this Test on each service outlet. TEST #3 CROSS CONNECTION TESTING AND CERTIFICATION In Accordance with NFPA-99. Please Note: Test R3 Column of Data Sheets for Verification of this Test . on each service outlet. TEST N4 PRESSURE CERTIFICATION AT OUTLET CONNECTION In Accordance with NFPA-99 : Paragraph4-5.1. :Medical gas Outlets delivered 50 to 55 psi at maximum flow .3.6 rate. Nitrogen outl ets del iver atl east 160 psi at mac . fl ow. Please Note: Test H4 Column of Data Sheet for Verification of this test on each service outlet. SALES * SERVICE * RENTALS * LEASING COPYRIGHT 1.981 GASES, INC. SUCTION EQUIPMENT PEDIATRIC EUIPMEN T MOUNTAIN MEDICAL SYSTEMS R ANESTHESIA EQUIPMENT MUDDY BROOK.INDUSTRIAL PARK E BULK &CYLINDER GASES c MONITORING EQUIPMENT 4050 WILLISTON ROAD E CERTIFIED GAS MIXTURES SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT PULMONARY FUNCTION EQUIPMENT RESPIRATORY THERAPY EQUIPMENT 05401 802-864.0321 M O // U HOSPITAL NAME: 3-4c �/k 'r A- PAGE :_St/ N Location of Sys't/em:2?4✓&-AJ d(Zl_-_' Date of Test:--3-2Z-91, A /(�E2J C-j ScAn1 AIZEp Tested By: D ro-J- I Witness: TEST #5 CERTIFICATION OF FLOW AVAILABLE AT OUTLET CONNECTION All Gas Outlets check for flow capable at 45 psi . Please Note: Test #5 Column of Data Sheets for Verification of this Test on each service outlet. TEST #6 PURGING AND ANALYSIS OF GAS PURITY AND CONCENTRATION TESTING AND CERTIFICATIC In accordance with NFPA-99 : Final Testing - Purging and Analyzing All outlets purged in accordance with NFPA-99. The gas supply from each outlet then tested and analyzed in accordance with NFPA-99. Please Note: Test #6 Column of Data Sheet for verification of this test on each individual outlet. TEST #7 ALL SYSTEMS COMPONENTS PERFORM TO MANUFACTURER'S DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS . Please Note:. Test #7 Column of Data Sheets for verification of this test on all outlets. TEST #8 SYSTEMS HARDWARE LABELING VERIFICATION AND CERTIFICATION: In accordance with NFPA -99 : Labeling of piping done in accordance with NFPA-99 and inspected by axil-wa P"Q4 All service station outlets are properly labeled, in accordapce with NFPA-99 . Please Note: Test #8 Column of Data Sheets for verification of labeling test on each individual outlet. GASESINC. SUCTION EQUIPMENT MOUNTAIN MEDICAL SYSTEMS f PEDIATRIC EQUIPMENT R• ANESTHESIA EQUIPMENT MUDDY BROOK INDUSTRIAL PARK E BULK &CYLINDER GASES MONITORING EQUIPMENT 4050 WILLISTON ROAD E CERTIFIED GAS MIXTURES SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT N PULMONARY FUNCTION EQUIPMENT RESPIRATORY THERAPY EQUIPMENT 05401 802-864.0321 M DATA SHEET O L PAGE NUMBER: N HOSPITAL NAME: ��IGG-tel ! �Pr7-A4, Z N DATE OF TEST: 3 ' Z-�l T J/ A LOCATION OF OUTLETS: >1 'y /JhO� --TT/� TESTED BY�c�OC� O$IYLAA 1 I N AJ -•l c, . 5r-ACJ ZtFI WITNESS: ROOM LOCATION GAS TEST#2 TEST#3 TEST#4 TEST#5 TEST # 6 TESTY TEST#8 NUMBER OF OUTLET SERVICE LEAK CROSS PRESS. FLOW PURGE GAS PERF. LABEL TEST CONN. AT AT SERV. TO TO OUTLET OUTLET C9N�� SPEC. CODE. j�C�/3 �i;h Wtll oX,15,, ✓o lc IC J6f�S, 135L#DA �e✓U Sperm y� � . j o�/borN mai / ✓��c ✓oi< 5-6 � aOLPm dorsi .X Sl1o{e+ tra 5C.g1,01 C-ISC4 .�+1 I �yacoo,,.. ✓U�< ✓elm -.Z,S.'u5 tP117l'i X 7Z x -t- f X 17o, �y 4�I eo /,N kc kc ✓�c 17c� 0L-PA dotty ! 7-- yes yeS Aa 5 w«11 �/ac�✓� ✓o,c ✓o.c 5 lfV% X x ye ycS 71Z 71- 1/0o8 Soo--Il ()xYgcvN ✓o,c ✓oIc Sl las; yea a� � ✓a< ✓o Ic y 2 Ps i ,2 m+�Pr1 I/vn-LJ .� I y�S ycs ✓aLuUM ✓o%< L'/-I-, 7v/ff A� X yet Yes r no��h oxyy�� ✓oI< ✓bF 5/ s� /So�PM (4�tiv Y1 t yes Yes a r ✓�,� �o,L 5o P' /6,6I-pm IJ ,ILu �1 es y�r a Loi 1) VecuuW1 ✓bI< ✓d IC I45 8A�/as' yCS yeS x x x le �dLf6o(o eG5 o�vqc ) ✓�I< ✓ou Sips; /<poLlM dam, 'n+ YC3 yet o,j r ✓OIc ✓QK 5-2 ?s; o?mjl?/M 2 l yea yet o✓e waI� ✓ACuuro ✓o lc ✓dic ✓"NS �61�6-3 x yu ycJ r r y y COPYRIGHT 1981 GASES, INC. SUCTION EQUIPMENT MOUNTAIN MEDICAL SYSTEMS PEDIATRIC EQUIPMENT R' ANESTHESIA EQUIPMENT MUDDY BROOK INDUSTRIAL PARK BULK CYLINDER GASES E MONITORING EQUIPMENT 4050-WILLISTON.ROAD E CERTIFIED GAS MIXTURES SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT N PULMONARY FUNCTION EQUIPMENT RESPIRATORY THERAPY EQUIPMENT 05401 802.864-0321 M '' // / O NAME OF HOSPITAL: S41— "I /`/31}iTAC PAGE : 5V - � — U N Lo T cation o f Al arms: ,/D4✓r�ti 1/�b(L% ,�/Tr1 Date of Test: 3'22- / A /VL-�w C.% .ScA0 AYZIA Tested By:,Jw etc N Witness: TEST N9 ALARM SYSTEMS OPERATIONAL TEST AND CERTIFICATION In accordance with NFPA -99 , Area Alarm Systems Alarms Tested As Follows: Test 9A: Alarms installed properly . Test 9B: Actuating switches on alarm panel checked for cross connection by turning off one service at a time, and checking for proper alarm. Test 9C: Alarm panel accessible to staffed area. Test 91): Alarm panel labeled properly. Test 9E: All alarm components found to perform to design specifications. ALARM ALARM HIGH LOW PER- TESTS SERVICE LOCATION ALARM ALARM ATING PERFORMED COMMENTS SETTING SETTING PRESS 9A 9B 9C 9D 9E 0Xy9eA so,/hviAl4OfsSop„ >0 voxy�s /c5 1Yd %/—Ai51 5-01s; yea 4K /`5IYf TCS Q,��Dv /l�g -�7N 2g " yes eyes yes yc3 /1lArH �c�j Vacl l� V;ewi- �.� ' - 3" 9 )c X Y y f �i Al es/ gw-o- y ✓ x y y +' X v V Y X s 5-o SALES * SERVICE * RENTALS * LEASING COPYRIGHT 1981 G A.S E S INC. SUCTION EQUIPMENT MOUNTAIN MEDICAL SYSTEMS 1 PEDIATRIC EQUIPMENT R- ANESTHESIA EQUIPMENT MUDDY BROOK INDUSTRIAL PARK BULK &CYLINDER GASES E MONITORING EQUIPMENT 4050 WILLISTON ROAD ECERTIFIED GAS MIXTURES SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT N PULMONARY FUNCTION EQUIPMENT RESPIRATORY THERAPY EQUIPMENT 0540.1 802-864.0321 M PAGE NUMBER:S//-� U ' SPECIAL NOTES FOR TESTS/�I' l N T DATE OF TEST: 3 22-9/ A I TESTED BY : 3" OS IrQ-t N WITNESS: SPECIAL NOTE # COMMENTS c 2yiS r o I e^ - i - ym c "u rh c-,-4 G� Sca oo.n ! re9�/re.r-,s /71 je*1 it eAJ AGI G- / .f (O O.GQJ 0.11 c a -1d Ghea)c5 ctre. S is SALES * SERVICE * RENTALS * LEASING COPYRIGHT 1981 RADIATION PHYSICS INC. P. O. BOX 173 • BROOKLINE, MASS. 02146 • TELEPHONEVS (617)638-7192 [ - (617)471.8560 i t November 1, 1990 Mr. John Brennan Radiology Manager i Salem Hospital Salem, Ma Dear John: After reviewing the plans for the new CT room, which will replace the existing tech. lounge area; I have the following recommendations: E 1. The four walls of the CT machine room shall be covered with j 1/16" lead to a height of 7 feet. li 2. The patient viewing window shall be 1/16" lead equivalent. 3. The doors shall be fully covered with 1/16" lead. j ` 4. The door to the control room should be interlocked to the rotor. 5. The corridor door should be either interlocked to the rotor or have a red warning light mounted outside the entrance. -_ 6. The viewing window should be 18" from the edge of the door casing. 7. The concrete in the floor and ceiling will be sufficient in its present state. If you have any questions, please call me at (617) 638-7192, f Sincerely, fI - David Cail, M.S. Consultant Physicist DC/jh F CANNON TRANSMITTAL 148 State Street Boston,Massachusetts 02109 (617)742-5440 To City Building Inspector Date 3/25/91 Salem Building Department Job No. 764.00 One Salem Green Attn. Mr. William Monroe Salem, MA 01970 Re: Salem Hospital CT Scanner Renovation We are sending you the following items: Q under separate cover via Attached Q Shop drawing Q Change order Prints Q Samples Copy of letter Q Plans Q Specifications 0 Copies Date No, Description 1 Architectural Certification Letter for Salem Hospital CT Scanner Area 1 Physicist's Study & Recommendations for Radiation Shielding of Walls of CT Area. These are being transmitted per action code noted: For your use Q No exceptions taken Q Prints returned after loan to us O As requested Make corrections noted Resubmit—copies for approval O For review and comment Q Revise and resubmit Submit copies fordistribution Q Forbids due Q Rejected Return corrected copies Comments Radiation shielding testing will be. done at the end of the installation of the CT Machine This work is being done undfar a separate contract between the Hospital and the cunnliar Copy to Signed r s Dennis laidlaw It enclosures are not as noted.kindly notify us at once. Planning Architecture CANNON Engineering Project Delivery 148 State Street Boston,MA 02109 617-742-5440 25 March 1991 Mr.William Monroe City Building Inspector Salem Building Department One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 Re: ARCHITECTURAL CERTIFICATION LETTER Salem Hospital CT Scanner Renovation Salem, MA CBI Project No. 764.00 Dear Sir: I certify that I, or my authorized representative, have observed the work associated with Permit No. 34-91, dated 30 January 1991, and to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief, and as stated in the Contractor's Certificate of Compliance, dated 20 March 1991,the work has been done in conformance with the permit and plans approved by the Salem Building Department and with the provisions of the Massachusetts State Building Code and all other pertinent laws and ordinances. �$Qy? QV WGNVk t /Architect: Mass. Reg. No.: No.3093 Chung N. Lee #3093 q Cannon Boston Ic.. ea0oWw�na 148 State Street ►H of to Boston, MA 02109 (617)742-5440 Inspection Dates: Weekly During Construction Na"1 dng6 19 91 Then personally appeared the above named Chung N. Lee and made oath that the above statement by him is true. Before me, •r _ Edward E. C ainey I My commission expires 19 9S CNL/dbg Boston Buffalo Grand Island New York St.Louis Washington toy W. 149 MIDDLESEX TURNPIKE BURLINGTON, MA 01803.4405 TEL 617.272.9440 FAX 617.272.8370 March 20, 1991 Mr. David J. Harris Assistant Building Inspector City of Salem One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 Re: Salem Hospital Davenport 4 Second C.T. Scan Salem, MA Job No. 09112 Dear Sir: Commensurate with the requirements of the Massachusetts State Building Code Article 127.3 this letter will serve to certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, all fit-up construction at the Davenport 4 second C.T. Scan project has been performed in accordance with the approved design documents and all pertinent provisions of state and local codes. Very truly yours, ERLAND CONSTRUCTION, INC. Jeffrey H. Ellowitz Project Manager JHE/maq 149 MIDDLESEX TURNPIKE BURLINGTON, MA 01803.4405 TEL 617272.9440 FAX 617.272.8370 February 28, 1991 -, rn �n ca CO Z Mr. David Harris rr = s Assistant Building Inspector City of Salem N 1 Salem Green Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Re: Salem Hospital - Davenport 4 Second C.T. Scan Salem, Massachusetts Job No. 09112 Dear Mr. Harris: Per your request, this letter is to serve as the Contractor's notification that to the best of my knowledge and belief, the partition walls at the above referenced project are correctly built and roughed-in and ready to be enclosed with wallboard. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me. Very truly yours, ERLAND CO//N,,STRUCTION, INC. Jeffrey H. Ellowitz Project Manager JHE/rtd 1 D E S I G N September 18 , 1991 11 NN C0R 0R AJT ED ARCHITECTS PLANNERS Cit of Salem CONSULTANTS Y MEMBER AMERICAN Public Property Department INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS One Salem Green 96 RICHARDSON ROAD Salem, MA 01970 MELROSE, MA 02176 617 - 665- 7223 Attention: William H. Munroe Building Inspector Regarding: Davenport Building Level 3 Loading Dock Ramp Salem, MA Gentlemen: rn -ro Pursuant to Article 1 , Section 127 .0 of the State of Masgichusetts Buiding Code, I hereby submit this letter as final revie�l"nd� _ approval, to the best of my knowledge, of all quality coB� row _ procedures for all code required materials and installat,`:,c sl. 3 h N performed at the above mentioned location. o 0 .st m If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to ca t1. Fz Very truly yours, 1 - J ephtDeMarco, AIAp P sident apo. ss . Reg. #3852 ' 0`0 I , �� ;0 WASL gFg6�of'A cc: Donald DiPan£ilo Asst. Director General Services Richard Kanter Facilities Design Dept. BRANCH OFFICE: P. O. BOX 1492 ROGERSROAD `TURK BEACH, ME 03910 207 -363 - 7381 F I E L D R E P O R T ABERJONA ENGINEERING INC. September 9 , 1991 #91069 ONE MT. VERNON STREET RE: Salem Hospital Morgue Ramp P.O. BOX 215 Salem, MA WINCHESTER, MA 01890 Cont: Jackson 617-729-6188 Owner: Salem Hospital Weather: Sunny/70/ 8 a.m. , 3 p.m. Present: Sean Foss/Neil Jackson In-Ex Design Richard Coleman/AEI 96 Richardson Road Melrose, MA 02176 ATTN: Joseph DeMarco (THE FOLLOWING WAS NOTED: ) * Steel ramp is in place, all connections are complete and correct. * W8 beam and shim plates spanning tunnel roof are coated. (Backfilling at time of a.m, inspection. ) * A TS 4x4 post is used in place of the 4" diameter pipe column (2 locations) . * Metal deck is in place and is properly welded to steel and screwed at deck laps. * An angle was added at the top of ramp between beam supports for additional deck support. * Pour stops along inside face of ramp are in place correctly as well as joint filler. * Angle 4x6 structural stop is in place correctly along outside face of ramp. * Pipe rail sleeves to receive pipe rail posts are in place. * Slab rebar and accessories (slab bolsters) are in place, along with slab mesh. The reinforcing is properly spaced and tied. * A reinforced concrete pad at bottom of ramp to fill gap between pavement and ramp will be placed monolithic with ramp slab. (THE COMMENTS IN THIS FIELD REPORT ARE A RECORD OF TRANSACTIONS THAT OCCURRED AT THE SITE BETWEEN THOSE PRESENT. IF THERE ARE ANY ERRORS OR OMISSIONS PLEASE NOTIFY ABERJONA ENGINEERING IN WRITING OR ALL COMMENTS AND DIRECTIVES SHALL BE CONSIDERED FACTUAL AND ACCEPTABLE BY ALL PARTIES. )) SUBMITTED GI'l1='��v Richard A/1 oleman REVIEWED L2&u Alan A. Vitukevlch, P.E. " Vice President F I E L D R E P O R T ABERJONA ENGINEERING INC. September 6, 1991 #91069 ONE MT. VERNON STREET RE: Salem Hospital Morgue Ramp P.O. BOX 215 Salem, MA WINCHESTER, MA 01890 Cont: Jackson 617-729-6188 Owner: Salem Hospital Weather: Cloudy/70 @ 10: 00 a.m. Present: Ken Thompson/Salem Hosp. In-Ex Design Joseph DeMarco/In-Ex 96 Richardson Road Neil Jackson/Jackson Melrose, MA 02176 Alan Vitukevich/AEI ATTN: Joseph DeMarco (THE FOLLOWING WAS NOTED: ) Visited the site to review progress of steel erection. Steel erectors, First Fabricators placing ramp edge beams. Steel beams and seat angles of proper size. W8 beams spanning tunnel roof are in place but not fastened or coated with mastic. Seat angles are only temporarily fastened. Backfill schedule for placement today. Galvanized sleeves for pipe rail not in conformance with drawing prepared by Aberjona. Ken Thompson commented that Contractor intended to "core" slab for rail installation. This item to be clarified. Aberjona Engineering will return Monday a.m. to complete review of installation prior to slab placement. (THE COMMENTS IN THIS FIELD REPORT ARE A RECORD OF TRANSACTIONS THAT OCCURRED AT THE SITE BETWEEN THOSE PRESENT. IF THERE ARE ANY ERRORS OR OMISSIONS PLEASE NOTIFY ABERJONA ENGINEERING IN WRITING OR ALL COMMENTS AND DIRECTIVES SHALL BE CONSIDERED FACTUAL AND ACCEPTABLE BY ALL PARTIES. ) SUBMITTED 4�& Alan A. Vitukevi , P.E. Vice President OCT. 24 191 11:09 SALEM HOSP FACILITIESi P.2 _.� PROJECi :a)tea: 7164 PROJECT '':TLE, vtrk 3 PROJECT LOCATION- Sa fe Felt �osaital , mghkand AvenueL Salem NAME OF SUILDINCf NATURE OF PROJt CTa Renovations o exiati Centre! Sterile Supply Su to IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 127.0 OF THE MASSACHUSETTS STATE BUILDING CODE, I, William C. Winds r Registration No. _4538 BEING A RECISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENWEER/ARCHITECT HEREBY CERTIFY THAT : HAVE PREPARED OR DIRECTLY SUPERVISED THE PREPARATION OF ALL DESIGN PLANS, CCMPUTATIONS AND wP£CIfTCA- TIONS CONCERNING: ENTIRE PROJECT ARCHITECTURAL STRUC RAL FIRE PROTECTION Z:LECTRICAL MECHA ICAL � OTHER (specify) FOR THE ABOVE NAMED PROJECT AND THAT, TO THE BEST Of MY KNOWLE CE, 2011 PLANS* COMPUTATIONS AND SPECICICATIONS MEET THE APPL,',CABLG PNOVISIDNS OF THE MASSACHUSET'?.", :TATE nUILDING CODE, ALL ACCCPTABLE ZSCINEERINC ?RACTIA=S AND 0PLICASLC LAWS AND 4RDI;)ANC= FOR THE PROPOSED USE AND OCCUPANCY. FURTHER CLRT!FY T!!AT �AAALL +VZPFORM THE ::BCCZZARY PROFEaZZO JAL :;ERVICC: AND 01 i RESEII: ON THE CONSTPUC"ON SITE CN A REGULAR AND PERIODIC CA$ "d ,TO DCT»AMINE T; ?AT THE WORK I:. PROCED1hr, Ail ACCORDANCE WITH TRC DOCUMENT;, APPROVE FOR THE DUILDINO PERMIT AND 5HA4L BE RbSPONSIDLL roR THE FQLLGWINf� A;i ;iFEGitli:L7 IN 5fCT10N 127.2.2: 1 . Review of step dr'a:+mgt mum end otter vumitt4.Ls of tt* =tn ctar w required by tts cctS=ticn cmuct CQctWtn Gs "tnittod for bUildinr•pefidt, hmid tppmai for cWd0P1wKo to the des* w aept. 2. Review and AppMval of tna gualiGV ccntml orcc =res far oil oWa.reDuirrd controlled m9teriols, 9, Spociat srcrdta,=wmi or mmirteerU4 Pv?awi&ial lnspeetim of entical eamcruction =pMomt r®quirinS amittzited materials or c=!:rLcr,f,en sWified in we a=opted enaxwering pract a stfs Ards Wtdd bi Appr4tx 9. PURSUANT TO �9EC%ON 127,2.30 I $HALL °UBMIT PERTOAICAL4Y, A PR GRES3 REPORT TOCETHlR WXTH PERTINENT COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING INSPECTOR, �—' UPOl1 'COMPLETION OF THE WORK, .7 $HALL SUBMXT A FINAL REPORT AS 0 THE SATISFACTORY COMPLETION AND REAM= OF THE PROJECT FOR OCCUPANCY Llktm� MUM «. U •SUb5CRI$ED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS_29 DAY OF S9, ember Building Dept 0 ARCHITECT'S' ARCHITECT--❑ IN/EX DESIGN GROUP, INC. FIELD REPORT96 Richardson Road CONSULTANT ❑ Melrose, MA. 0,2-176 AIA DOCUMENT 6717 FIELD ❑ (617) 665-7223 Renovations to Central Transport PROJECT: Davenport Building/Level 3 RELD SPORT NO:i —___._---._ _y CONTRACT:Salem Hospital Salem, MA ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO:9107-103 DATE 12/29/92, TIME 12 . 30 WEATHER na TEMP RANGE na EST. % OF COMPLETION 50% CONFORMANCE WITH SCHEDULE (+, —) WORK IN PROGRESS PRESENT AT SITE 2 carpenters OBSERVATIONS I • Metals studs installed 2 . Gypsum wallboard installed and taped. 3 . Metal door frames installation started. 4 . Wood doors on site ready for installation. 5 . Electrical rough work completed. 6 . HVAC work started 7 . Sprinkler work -started. ITEMS TO VERIFY INFORMATION OR ACHON REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS - REPORT BY: Joseph G. DeMarco,AIA Project Archit AIA DOCUMENT G711 • ARCHITECT'S FIELD REPORT • OCTOBER 1972 EDITION AIAOO • © 9 THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVE., NW, WASHINGTON, D . 006 page / o( / pages ;Building Dept 000 " " T —_ ARCHITECTS ARCOWNER CT EI `d A; IN/EX DESIGN GROUP, INC. FIELD REPORT CONSULTANT ❑ 96 Richardson Road FIELD ❑ Melrose, MA 021;76 AIA DOCUMENT G711 (617) 665-7223 Renovations to Central Transport PROJECT: Davenport Building/Level 3 FIELD REPORT NO: 2 CONTRACT:Salem Hospital ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO:9107-103 Salem, MA DATE 1/18/93 TIME 1 :30 WEAFI-TER na TEMP. RANGE na EST, % OF COMPLETION 95% CONFORMANCE WITH SCHEDULE (+, —) WORK IN PROGRESS I'RF:SLNT AT SPIE -- OBSERVATIONS 1 . All partitions completed and painted 2 . Wood doors and metal frames installed and painted. 3 . Electrical finish work completed. q •HVAC work 95% completed. 5. Sprinkler work 95% completed. 6 . Carpeting and vinyl flooring completed. 7 . Wall base completed. 8. Oak handrail completed at corridor. 9 • Oak trim at low partition installed waiting for . finished coating. 10 . Ceiling grid and ceiling panels completed. Note: Work completion is anticipated in two weeks ITEMS TO VERIFY INFORMATION OR ACTION REQUIRED - ATTACHMENTS. - REPORT BY: Joseph G. DeMarco,AlA Project Arc i AIA DOCUMENT 6711 • ARCHITECT'S FIELD REPORT • OCTOBER 1972 EDITION • AIA THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVE., NW, WASHINGTO 1972 C.20006 Page / of / pages D E S I G N October 12 , 1990 G R O U P INCORPORATED ARCHITECTS PLANNERS City of Salem CONSULTANTS Public Property Department MEMBER AMERICAN One Salem Green INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS Salem, MA 01970 96 RICHARDSON ROAD MELROSE, MA 02176 617 -665 - 7223 Attention: Mr. William H. Munroe n Building Inspector Regarding: Davenport 4 (Interior) Stress Test Renovation m CID z Salem Hospital m o Salem, MAp Gentlemen: Pursuant to Article 1 , Section 127 .0 of the State of Massachusetts Building Code, I hereby submit this letter as final review and approval, to the best of my knowledge, of all quality control procedures for all code required materials and installations performed at the above mentioned location. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Very truly ours, • ?ass. h G. DeMarco AIA dent Regis. #3852 cc: Kevin G. Goggin Manager Facilities Design BRANCH OFFICE: P. O. BOX 1492 ROGERS ROAD YORK BEACH, ME 03910 207 - 363- 7381 Salem Hospital 81 Highland Avenue Salem,Massachusetts 01970 Telephone (508) 741-1200 January 23 , 1991 zk David Harris -3 Assistant Building Inspector CD;n C City of Salem c: One Salem Green ? C� z Salem, MA 01970 ns a n � � m Re: Davenport 4 Stress Test Lab Highland Hall Suite 204 N ' Dear Mr. Harris: Davenport 4: Please be advised that the door closer on the door entering the rated area has been installed, effectively completing the project. The next time you are in the area I would be glad to walk through the site with you. Highland Hall #204: Please find enclosed a copy of the #127 Form for your records . If you have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact me at ( 508 ) 741-1200 extension 2593 . Sincerely, Ken Thompson Construction Manager Facilities Department i KT: lc cc: Donald DiPanfilo Cathie Maguire D E S I G N March 31 , 1992 G R O U P IN C0 RP0RAIED ARCHITECTS CP) 5 LA N N E R S -CONSUUANTS City of Salem w Public Property Department n dVPMBER AMERICAN One Salem Green INSTITUTE Of A$CBIiEt15 r c ,. Salem, MA 01970 fn 96 RICHARDSOW ROAD r' *7 Attention: MA�2176 C" 66 6 6 5-�7"2 2 3 Attention: William H. Munroe v Regarding: Renovations to Phippen 4 N N On-site Radiation Therapy Phases 1 , 2 & 3 Salem Hospital 81 Highland Avenue Salem, MA Gentlemen: Pursuant to Article 1 , Section 127. 0 Construction Control of the State of Massachusetts Building Code, I hereby submit this letter as final review and approval, to the best of my knowledge, of all quality control procedures for all code required materials and installlations performed at the above location. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Very truly ours , o ph G. DeMarco, AIA r sident ss. Re. #3852 cc: Frank Neville Facilities Design Dept. BRANCH OFFICE. P. O. BOX 1492 ROGERS ROAD `TURK BEACH. ME 03910 207 - 363- 7381 D E S I G N $ 59 ,' 9 G R O U P INCORPORATED February 27 , 1991 +` v '' : 9 ARCHITECTS P;I�;(Af 5-HL-'Y,MAS1 P L A N N E R S CONSULTANTS MEMBER AMERICAN City of Salem INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS Public Property Department 96 RICHARDSON ROAD One Salem Green MELROSE, MA 02176 Salem, MA 01970 617 -665- 7223 Attention: Mr. William H. Munroe Building Inspector Regarding: 'Relocation of Di g. Radio logy Film Files Adm in:/`MacomberLevel"4' 'Salem—Hospital Salem, MA Gentlemen: Pursuant to Article 1 . Section 127 .0 of the State of Massachusetts Building Code, I hereby submit this letter as final review and approval, to the best of my knowledge, of all quality control procedures for all code required materials and installations performed at the above mentioned location. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Very truly yours , • ds eMarco, AIA idePnts. Reg. #3852 cc: Kevin G. Goggin Manager Facilities Design BRANCH OFFICE'. P. O. BOX 1492 ROGERSROAD YORK BEACH, ME 03910 207 - 363 - 7381 Building Dept. ❑ owa ARCHITECTS OWNER 1:1 , IN/EX DESIGN GROUP, Inc . FIELD REPORT ARCHITECT ❑ 96 Richardson Road CONSULTANT Melrose,Ma 02176 AIA DOCUMENT 6711 FIELD ❑ (617) 665-7223 PROJECT: RENOVATIONS to SUITE X02 FIELD REPORT NO: 3 / Highland Hall Medical Center CONTRACT: . 55 Highland Ave/Salem, MA ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 9045 DATE 9/27/91 TIME 2 ; 15 WEATHER NA TEMP. RANGE NA EST. % OF COMPLETION 99% CONFORMANCE WITH SCHEDULE (+, -) WORK IN PROGRESS PRESENT AT SITE 1 case work installer OBSERVATIONS 1 . Finish plumbing completed. 2. Carpeting 100% completed. 3 . Painting 95% completed. 4 . Oak wainscott installed 80% completed. 5 . Built-in casework and furniture 95% completed. ITEMS TO VERIFY INFORMATION OR ACTION REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS REPORT BY: Joseph G. DeMarco,AIA Architect AIA DOCUMENT G711 • ARCHITECT'S FIELD REPORT • OCTOBER 1972 EDITION • a • © 19 / THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVE., NW, WASHING N, D.C.20006 page , of pages BOARD OF APPF OCTD E S I G N � 1 �+ `O� G R O U P October 2, 1991 CITY OF S4�'E-% N CORPORATE D ARCHITECTS S S- P LA N N E R S CONSULTANTS MEMBER AMERICAN City of Salem INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS Public Property Department 96 RICHARDSON ROAD One Salem Green 617 -66E, MA 0217617 - 665- 7223 33 Salem, MA 01970 Attention: William H. Munroe Building Inspector Regarding: Renovations to Suite 202 Dr. Frederick Buckley Jr. MD Highland Hall 55 Highland Avenue Salem, MA Gentlemen: Pursuant to Article 1 , Section 127 . 0 of the State of Massachusetts Building Code, I hereby submit this letter as final review and approval, to the best of my knowledge, of all quality control procedures for all code required materials and installations performed at the above mentioned location. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Very truA*44%1� • J?eident G. DeMarco, AIA PMg. #3852 cc: Donald DiPanfilo Asst. Director General Services Ken Thompson Construction Mgr. BRANCH OFFICE. P. O . BOX 1492 ROGERS ROAD YORK BEACH, ME 03910 207 - 363 - 7381 Building Dept . Q, e + `'-' '` ARCHITECT'S OWNER El _i a IN/EX DESIGN GROUP, Inc . FIELD REPORT ARCHITECT E3 .I , 96 Richardson Road CONSULTANT ❑ F Melrose,Ma 02176 AIA DOCUMENT 0711 FIELD El �' � ' (617) 665-7223 PROJECT: RENOVATIONS to SUITE 204 FIELD REPORT NO: 2. Highland Hall Medical Center CONTRACT:..55 Highland Ave/Salem, MA ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 9045 DATE 9/17/91 TIME I : 30 WEATHER NA TEMP. RANGE NA EST. % OF COMPLETION 95% CONFORMANCE WITH SCHEDULE (+, -) WORK IN PROGRESS PRESENT AT SITE 2 carpet installers 1 painter 1 carpenter cn e� OBSERVATIONS 1 . Ceiling grid and panels completed l' r= r 2 . Rough plumbing completed waiting for plumbing f��-ages 3 . Electrical work completed. ulc� 00 g{5R C'J 4 . HVAC work completed. m�1 N 5 . Sprinkler work completed. y. 6 . Vinyl floor covering completed. `n 7 . Carpet being instaleed 95% completed. 8 . Wood doors and metal frames completed. 9 . Painting started 80% completed NOTE: Waiting for built-in casework and furniture. ITEMS TO VERIFY INFORMATION OR ACTION REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS REPORT BY: Joseph G. DeMarco,AIA Architect MIA DOCUMENT 0711 • ARCHITECT'S ROD REPORT • OCTOME 1972 W1110H I 1NE AMIE RICAN INSTITUTE OF- ARCHITECTS, '1775 NEW YORK AVL, NW, WASI IING , U.C.20006 PpIfC of BUILDING DEPT �DO CV March 28, 1991 — — APR 3 85oAM `91 D E S I G N G R O U P IN CORPORA T EO City of Salem [IFOEIV-0 ARCHITECTS Public Property DepartmentC1TY OF S,4LEK,MASS. P L A N N E R S One Salem Green - CONSULTANTS Salem, MA 01970 MEMBER AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS Attention: Mr. William H. Munroe 96 RICHARDSON ROAD Building Inspector MELROSE, MA 02176 617 -665- 7223 Regarding: Renovations to SuitN4 L,Highland Hall. Medical Center- ' '. 55 'Highland Avenue Salem Hospital Salem, MA Gentlemen: Pursuant to Article 1 . Section 127 . 0 Construction Control of the State of Massachusetts Building Code, I hereby submit this letter as final review and approval, to the best of my knowledge, of all quality control procedures for all code required materials and installations performed at the above mentioned location. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Very ruly rs, • J se h G. DeMarco, AIA e ident a Reg. #3852 cc: Kevin G. Goggin, Manager Facilities Design 5je BRANCH OFFICE. P. O . BOX 1492 ROGERSROAD YORK BEACH, ME 03910 207 - 363 - 7381 preferred LEMCO To1�-��r . �� , peed Memor From Subject—" t -�Vozo -No.Y•IOiIXD MESSAG jl1J`� p 04 c-otz � c:,n - � 4� r 2c Date Signed 1 REPLY /,z -No.a FOLD -No 10FOLD Date Signed LE.Munn Co.,a5 OUMm RDW,&71er ,MA 01621 Tdom(SD6)66149DO-(617)272-2206 SENDER—DETACH AND RETAIN YELLOW COPY. SEND WHITE AND PINK COPIES. _ xef erred LEMCO ��(�..�p( �f � speed Memo�t/�. �7 0 Frorri°- 'lam . U/c}�V EiGV C3—1 .S To 7 e Subject S� t s.,eFo�o MESSAGE- c/) ESSAG/ Po zoo" - CCD s /tet s�C-x) �( � c�lcpt_� c_ ter �� c� <r (')10— �51z -7 Date Signed J REPLY / -Ho ccom -MOJOFOLe Date Signed L.E.lhuran Co.,450urham Road,Billerica,MA 01821 RECIPIENT—RETAIN WHITE COPY, RETURN PINK COPY. Telephmre(508)667-4900•(6171272-2208 p J speed Memo To S!`�Cl . l}/cl�L9 �% % Cr C S From Subject �J C �� T CC�� IZ-�J -No.8610 FOLD �=Co e c c Date Signed REPLY 3 oZ - -No.9 FOLD N ,orom Date Signed LE.Mu,m Co.,a5 Our2Mam Rud,Bilari a,MA 01821 Te Owe(5M 667-4900•(61 7)272-22M RECIPIENT—RETAIN WHITE COPY, RETURN PINK COPY CCNSTPUCT t1-,RCL PROJECT :!UMBER: 9045 PROJECT '::TLE: Development of Suite 204 PROJECT LCCATIGN: 55 Highland Ave. , Salem, MAss. 01970 NAME OF BUILDING: Highland Hall :4--- NATURE OF PROJECT: Development of Suite 204 0 w n 00 rn c„ n w6 t7l IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 127.0 OF THE-MASSACHUSETTS STATE BUIF$ING-2bDE, r'� u Nco' I, Joseph G. DeMarco, AIA Registration No. 3852 BEING A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER/ARCHITECT HEREBY CERTIFY THAT HAVE PREPARED OR DIRECTLY SUPERVISEED THE PREPARATION OF ALL DDESIGN PLANS. COMPUTATIONS AND SPECI.. ICA- TIONS CONCE-RNING: EENTIRE PROJECT XXXX ARCHITECTURAL. STRUCTURAL FIRE PROTECTION ELECTRICAL. MECHANICAL OTHER (specify) FOR THE ABOVE NAMED PROJECT .AND THAT, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, _-UCH PLANS, COMPUTATIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS MEET THE APPLICABLE P90VISIONS OF THE MASSACHUSETT_- _-TATE BUILDING CODE, ALL ACCEPTABLE ENGINEE°ING PRACTICES AND APPLICABLE LAWS AND •)RDINANCE_- FOR THE PROPOSED USE AND OCCUPANCY. FURTHER C'ERTIF'i 7AT : 'NALL PERFORM THE ::ECE_-_-ARY PROFES_-TONAL "TR. VICES AND BE -RESE^:T CPI THE CCNSTRUCT:ON SITE ON A REGULAR *AND PERIODIC C;ASI.". TO DETERMINE THAT THE 'WORK I_- PROCEDING 1N ACCORDANCE WITH THE DOCUMENT:, APPROVED FOR THE BUILDING ,. PERMIT. AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FOLLOWING AS SPECIFIED IN SECTION 127.2.1• 1 . Review of stop drwirgs, zamples and other -submittals of the contractor as regmmud by the construction contract docurents as subnittcd for buildirg,permit, and approval for conformnce to the design concept. 2. Review and approval of the quality control procedures for all code-required controlled materials. 3. Special architectural or engineering professional inspection of critical construction carmments requiring controlled materials or cccnstruction specified in the accepted engineering practice __.standards lusted in Appendix B. PURSUANT TO SECTION 127.2.3, I SHALL SUBMIT PERIODICALLY, A PROGRESS REPORT TOGETHER WITH PERTINENT COMMENTS TO THE BUICD'ING INSPECTOR." ' UPON COMPLETION OF THE WORK, .SHALL SUBMIT A FINAL REPORT AS TO THE SATISFACTORY COMPLETION AND READINESS OF THE PROJECT FOR OCCUPANCY. GNAT RE SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS 18 DAY OF OCL- ober 1990 _ • 44* Salem -- Hospital 81 Highland Avenue Salem,Massachusetts 01970 Telephone(508)741-1200 October 18, 1990 Mr. William Monroe Inspector of Buildings City of Salem One Salem Green . Salem, MA 01970 Re: 55 Highland Avenue, Suite 204 Dear Mr. Monroe: I wish to inform you that we have employed the services of the IN/EX Design Group, Mr. Joseph G. DeMarco,AIA to . supervise the construction of Suite 204 located at 55 Highland Avenue. As prepared by the Ritchie Organization, Mr. DeMarco will be responsible for reviewing all phases of the construction and will file the required reports to your department. If you have any questions concerning this project please , c.ontact me at 741-1200, extension 835-599 . Very truu'ely yours, 7K /�t.%�'.i Kevin G. Goggin Manager, Facilities Design' Joseph G. DeMarco,AIA IN/EX Design Group a � Salem Hospital 81 Highland Avenue Salem,Massachusetts 01970 Telephone(508) 741-1200 October 21, 1992 Mr. Dave Harris Assistant Building Inspector City of Salem One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 Re: Macomber Building Level 6 Dear Dave; Please find attached the signed off Building Permit Card and Medical Gas Certificate for the new system installed on the floor and a letter from the Architect of record for your files. Please forward the occupancy permit for the above mentioned space at your earliest convenience. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me at (508) 741-1215 extension 1-599. Sincerely, Ken Thompson Construction Manager Facilities cc: Norman LaPointe Jon Keys Project File B D E S I G N October 1 , 1992 G R O U P I N C 0 R P 0 R A i E 0 ARCHITECTS City of Salem CONSULTANTS Public Property Department OMEMBER AMERICAN One Salem Green INS111UiE Of ARCHITECTS Salem, MA 01970 96 RICHARDSON ROAD MELROSE. MA 02176 Regarding: Renovations to Special Care Nursery 617 -665 - 7223 Macomber/Level 6 Salem Hospital 81 Highland Avenue Salem, MA Gentlemen: Pursuant to Article 1 , Section 127 .0 Construction Control of the State of Massachusetts Building Code, I hereby submit this letter as final review and approval, to the best of my knowledge, of all quality control procedures for all code required materials and installations performed at the above location. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Very truly you , • Jo p G. eMarco, AIA Pr s ' ent Ma s Reg. #3852 cc: Frank Neville Facilities Design Dept. BRANCH OFFICE, P. O. BOX 1492 ROGERS ROAD YORK BEACH, ME 03910 207 - 363- 7381 Fomded 1887 - INDUSTRIAL TESTING LABORATORIES Analytical and Consulting Chemists �.teo[n[gofA 50 MADISON AVENUE, NEW YORK, N.Y. 10010 MEMBERSHIPS ey (212)685-8788 CORPORATE/INDIVIDUAL. OAmerican Association of Candy Technologists i American Amociatlon of Ctrnl Chemise e American Association of Clinical Chemises is American Chemical Socia, di `' American Council of Independem Laboratories,b American Institute of Chemists An erinn Oil Chemists Society American Petroleum Institute American Pharmaceutical Association American Public fieahh Assnciminn American Society for Testing&Materials American Society of Microbiology Association of Consulting Chemists &Chemical Foginkeee International Food Technologists Society for Applied SfKctrossoPY Society of Cosmetic Chemists -C E R T I F I C A T E O F A N A L Y S I S- DATE: 07/14/92 SERIAL NO: 92-196-121 CLIENT: Mass Bay Medical Repair Inc . DATE RECEIVED: 07/14/92 1 gas sample (Salem Hospital) The above sample submitted by Mass Bay Medical Repair Inc . were analyzed as requested. The results are as follows : SAMPLE ID TEST RESULTS Oxygen Carbon monoxide not detected Carbon dioxide 100ppm Total hydrocarbons 8ppm (as methane) Purity OZ 99 .73% Ro"Ctfu 4VUhmitted INDUSTRZ TESTING A^ATORI�S • W 06 y e J hl of i1'tc:[tAaw„ GWrgeiaconescu, M. S . Chemie MEQ1CAL GAS OUTLET FORM J S n t e m 1.1 o S r i f t. !f' �' \7 00 LOCATION: OI ACo,,,4lPr - 4• AREA: I It New Pwd /VurSrry w1poyll",' ,r?" # 02 PSI 02 # AIR PSI 02 # VAC IN DYN STATION OVTLET FLOW x OUTLET FLOW �,_ OUTLET tlr&_ FLOW COMMENTS b cc, H SU�� a_.� fl lei 3.) ; 1 I$ s"4 �Bu 0 a � Oc � )1_a 'I� 91 ID 3 0 a 52��gv (oo 35z it .In ta'_ 61..x_._ 3.v 3 h � it o`- �1 J S��R' zl_3 :U J. d•? 3.y 5 u T7, II q It 1Ro Ift, a :) Fff v .2 1, , Ji ac, 31 ,, s T! 5550 0o N `ll 175 �i. �— 18 � �o s�o ts 1 ��o ��u n 1 o, _18 l }� Sc/l7S foo Sn1/�� dlL 1j . 3. q 50�16u Hyl S'/iY> v Iry ,ti.0 44 di � 3 N S Iry L Sell uJ dL — ad _ 8 44 ,) 5°li8u loo _ Su�i�� al—O 4') .5 7VIS ly pi # A- A - —Mo I kers Room Rtrs ox iu& s - L-!/ � —I— 0I s . 8° 100 � I '0/80 D— .71 3. o *-DESCRIPTION OF THE DISCREPANCY WILL BE FOUND ON THE PROBLEM REPORT SHEET r Jam RCMedical Gas Repair Services'INC. ' �t� 3'2D`t 7tRcPN 1017 North Ontario Avenue,Lindenhurst,New York 11757 (516)957-0989 (5I6)957-3564 PAX REP. NO. CUSTOMER NAME P.O.NUM ER STREET DEPT. CONTACT CITY g STATE 113 CUSTOMER NO. TELEPHONE NO. X ? 6 CONTRACT WARRA TY NON-WARRANTY OTHER DATE l N(P MLqq-a- 7siqCD�t wL ` -2>0cw • L '�,S - J � - PIG- 1-r✓L S i -r� S 1 46 5 ) 6JNfi O- ,mss uco \i cii` ,3 . -t ON liAQ, L � �, ) ru b,\j _Z j DESCRIPTION b. \ EOUIPMENT P • TOTAL MATERIAL CHARGES lll� I \\ MILEAGE MILES@ AIR TRAVEL CAR RENTAL EXPENSES TOTAL EXPENSE CHARGES LABOR HRS@, 21u TRAVEL TIME HRS.@ REPRESENTATIVE TOTAL HRS. CHARGES CUSTOMER SIGNATUR /j / !' .f..{, TOTAL CUSTOMER ACKNOWLEDGEMENIrOF WORK HAVING BEEN PERFORMED AS REOUIRED THIS IS NOT AN INVOICE NOTE CHARGES SUBJECT TO FINAL AUDIT 1 a � Salem Hospital 81 Highland Avenue Salem,Massachusetts 01970 Telephone (508) 741-1200 October 21 , 1992 Mr. Dave Harris Assistant Building Inspector City of Salem One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 Re: Macomber Building Level 7 Dear Dave; Please find attached the signed off Building Permit Card and the Medical Gas Certificate for the new system installed on the floor and a letter from the Architect of record for your files. Per your site tour, we have ordered one additional exit sign and will be installing magnetic door holders on the pair of doors in the corridor as suggested by Mr. LaPointe. I would expect the work to be completed by Friday, October 23, 1992. Please forward the occupancy permit for the above mentioned space at your earliest convenience. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me at (508) 741-1215 extension 1-599. Sincerely, J\ Ken Thompson Construction Manager Facilities cc: Norman LaPointe Jon Keys Project File D E S I G N G R O U P I N C 0 RP0RAIEC July 111992 ARCHITECTS P L A N N E RS CONSULTANTS MEMBER AMERICAN City of Salem INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS Public Property Department 96 RICHARDSON ROAD One Salem Green MELROSE, MA 02176 Salem, MA 01970 6 ' 7 - 665 - 7223 Attention: Building Commissioner Regarding: Macomber/Level 7 Women' s Imaging Health Center Salem Hospital 81 Highland Avenue Salem, MA Gentlemen: Pursuant to Article 1 , Section 127 .0 Construction Control of the State of Massachusetts Building Code, I hereby submit this letter as final review and approval, to the . best of my knowledge, of all quality control procedures for all code required materials and installations performed at the above location. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Very trulyo s, aQ Jo p G. DeMarco, AIA Pr s 'dent Ma Reg. #3852 cc: Frank Neville Facilities Design Dept. BRANCH OFFICc P. O . BOX 1492 ROGER S R O A D YORK BEACH. ME 03910 207 - 363 - 7381 Founded 1887 ` IlVDUSTRIAL TESTING LABORATORIES Andytird and Contul7ing Chemuu oaxome,. y' 50 MADISON AVENUE, NEW YORK, N.Y. 10010 MEMBERSHIPS (212)685-8788 CORPORATE/INDIVIDUAL, v o e American Association of Candy Chemists Amerinn Asmcl,nion of Cereal Chemises p Amerinn Chendr.1 Society of dal CM1emists 3 American Council f indep American Council of(Chemists Lahoramrics,h American InsOil Che is s Society Ly American Oil Chemises Society Amerinn Pharroum In911m[ Amerinn Pharmaaealth Association American Society Health Testing Association Mat American Society of Microbiology lo Materials Amerinn Society s lting Chemie AssociationChof l Engineer Chemists &Chemical Engineers Society or A plie Tpectroscopy Society for Applied Spectroscopy .. Society of Cosmetic CM1emisu -C E R T I F I C A T E O F A N A L Y S I S- DATE: 07/14/92 SERIAL NO: 92-196-121 CLIENT: Mass Bay Medical Repair Inc. DATE RECEIVED : 07/14/92 1 gas sample (Salem Hospital) The above sample submitted by Mass Bay Medical Repair Inc . were analyzed as requested. The results are as follows : SAMPLE ID TEST RESULTS Oxygen Carbon monoxide not detected Carbon dioxide 100ppm Total hydrocarbons 8ppm (as methane) Purity 02 99 .73% Re$pctfubmtted INDUSTRI TESTING ARATORIF,S r \ ye. .LJ hl of ��! �J1LLClat uil:'4iKlr•: ` GWrgezaconescu, M. S . Chemie ,� F�D.I_Cgl,_GAS (IUtLGT FORM - LOCATION= MACO+nbe-r - 7 AREA: Wi`mcnS Heml+hr- ZrnAl;n9 M 02 PSI 02 # AIR PSI 02 N VAC IN DYN STATION OUTLET FLOW x OUTLET- FLOW % OUTLET HG FLOW COMMENTS om 1 1 X175 loo N A _ �— �a 3.,L o_ > (ROOP4) M A►nwl 4 a -- ---- ss _ 1SD 100 _N�f► - - 21 3.3 p� —�' �(�C'11 STERoTIgc.nrC_ �A/jLi z''ArrGV`� � I /00 — ok — — dk 1 3.3 wgpin btu od( *-DESCRIPTION OF THE DISCREPANCY WILL BE FOUND ON THE PROBLEM REPORT SHEET ' PROBLE(1 REPORT SHEET_ , 4 LOCATION: /n/)cD uher 7 WoMms Pea 1411 + T'r+n91 n� AREA OUILEI TYPE/_q_ LPS_L ALL PRUBLEMS_1N__UIJAIL 0. ADA,p/4r, . /PG/S/O/✓ &d,',,41 Lcwµly der A00hr-5 Dovl f- mV/e / eJTO GNE�Ie�J2oi✓ GSH // jok Tc_d44A5 Cl7 — 5� G�IEMe_7tPc2�J FZCIO -ffi �j s 0 Al '� I . SHUT—OFF VALVES AND ALARMS DATA LOCATION: yYIY�Cow'brr - 7 AREA CONTROLLED: WoM.ns me .04 r?mpGin� PANEL ROOMS LOCATION CONTROLLED GASES OPERATION ALARMS lUUf5r5 ,hnnmo W2 S7EF U I C o. ro 0.a CIiecks ole1ESTc nll n . . UA c Allocks k Zcslsy vk n r n A CL ks 0 IPS7En Dk BUIILDIN 1' DEPT N��C V D E S I G N .JUL 6 9 02 PH '32 G R O U P I N C 0 R P O R A 7 E 0 FECEi'r,-D July 1i�1992: ` CITYOFSAILE'A,MASS. ARCHITECTS P L A N N E R S CONSULTANTS MEMBER AMERICAN City of Salem INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS Public Property Department 96 RICHARDSON ROAD One Salem Green MELROSE, MA 02176 Salem, MA 01970 617 - 665- 7223 Attention: Building Commissioner Regarding: Macomber/Level 7 Women' s Imaging Health Center Salem Hospital 81 Highland Avenue Salem, MA Gentlemen: Pursuant to Article 1 , Section 127 .0 Construction Control of the State of Massachusetts Building Code, I hereby submit this letter as final review and approval, to the best of my knowledge, of all quality control procedures for all code required materials and installations performed at the above location. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Veos " dent o s, JoDeMarco, AIA PrMa #3852 cc: Frank Neville Facilities Design Dept. BRANCH OFFICE: P. O . BOX 1492 ROGERSROAD YORK BEACH, ME 03910 207 - 363 - 7381 CONSTRUCTION CONTROL PROJECT NUMBER: 9223 PROJECT TITLE: RENOVATION FOR FACILITIES ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT PROJECT LOCATION: SALEM HOSPITAL NAME OF BUILDING: MAIN - LEVEL 8 - WEST NATURE OF PROJECT: RENOVATION OF EXISTING FLOOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 127.0 OF THE MASSACHUSETTS STATE BUILDING CODE. JOSEPH G. DEMARCO, AIA I , IN/EX DESIGNi',GROUP. INC. Registration No. 3852 BEING A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER/ARCHITECT HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE PREPARED OR DIRECTLY SUPERVISED THE PREPARATION OF ALL DESIGN PLANS, COMPUTATIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS CONCERNING: ENTIRE PROJECT XX— ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURAL FIRE PROTECTION ELECTRICAL MECHANICAL OTHER (specify) FOR THE ABOVE NAMED PROJECT AND THAT, TO THE BEST'OF MY KNOWLEDGE, SUCH PLANS, COMPUTATIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS MEET THE APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE MASSACHUSETTS STATE BUILDING CODE, ALL ACCEPTABLE ENGINEERING PRACTICES AND APPLICABLE LAWS AND ORDINANCES FOR THE•PROPOSED USE AND OCCUPANCY. I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT I SHALL PERFORM THE NECESSARY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AND BE PRESENT ON THE CONSTRUCTION SITE ON A REGULAR AND' PERIODIC BASIS TO DETERMINE THAT THE WORK IS PROCEEDING IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DOCUMENTS APPROVED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR,THE FOLLOWING AS SPECIFIED IN SECTION 127.2.2: 1. Review of shop drawings, samples and other submittals of the contractor as required by the construction contract documents as submitted for building permit, and approval for conformance to the design concept. 2. Review and approval of the quality control procedures for all code required controlled materials. 3. Special architectural or engineering professional inspection of critical construction components requiring controlled materials or construction specified in the accepted engineering practice standards listed in Appendix B. PURSUANT TO SECTION 127.2.3, I SHALL SUBMIT PERIODICALLY, A PROGRESS REPORT TOGETHER WITH PERTINENT COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING INSPECTOR. UPON COMPLETION OF THE WORK, I SHALL SUBMIT A FINAL 'REPORT AS TO THE SATIFACTORY COMPLETION AND READINESS OF THE PROJECT FOR OCCU NCY. Sig ature SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN BEFORE ME THIS 16th DAY F SEPTEMBER 19 92 U U TTTTTTTTTT S S S U U T S S U U T S U U T S S S Of MASSACHUSETTS, INC. U U T S U U T S S U U U T S S S 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 617-438-7755 STEEL INSPECTION REPORT- DATE 10/ 5/91 2 City of Salem, Bldg. Dept. Job No. UTS 9679 Mr. David Harris Project Salem Hospital, Surgi Ctr. p One Salem Greer Contractor R. W. Granger Salem, MA 01970 Monadnock. Fabrication Plant Inspection _-_ A visit was made to the Monadnock steel fabrication plant after receiv- ing a correspondence from the structural engineer regarding the use of the Gas Metal Are Welding Process (GMAW/MIG) . This process was not listed as an acceptable process as per Section 05120/203 E. I. Research was made by this inspector to rectify this condition and produced the following : A) The filler metal used for the welding process (GMAW/MIG) is in corn-- formance with the American Welding Society A. W. S. A5. 209 however, the welding process is not the specified Flux Cored Arc Welding (FLAW) process. B) Verbal communisation with Bob Boekelman, structural engineer, was made regarding this condition and it was agreed that with a proced-- ,_,. -ire qualification in compliance with the R. W. S. Sections 5. 5 through 5. 14 of the D1. 1-90 Structural Welding Code is performed, and the results are acceptable, the GMAW process may be performed. The qualification tests will be performed on 10/28/91. See the attached Certificate of Conformance for the filler metal used by the fabri-- cator•. INSPECTOR: S. Alikonis-8 hours U T S OF MASSACHUSETTS, INC:. Reviewed By: Steven T. Crabtree THF LINCOLN ELECTRIC COMPANY CERTIFICATE OF CONFORMANCE 22801 ST. CLAIR AVENUE (APPLIES ONLYTO U.S: MANUFACTURED PRODUCTS; p CLEVELAND, OHIO 44117-1199 SUPPLIED TO. LO This is to certify that 0Lye1shie/d4D ELECTRIC o- same classification, menu ac urtn MC 170, Classification lon Euire supplied on the above order nuTber is of the concluded on March 20 T931. All 9tests ereq uirded byrAWS A5420-79oand ASMEnts asDSFA�5C" Ode21) used lot [his annual lest , with !hese specs IG ons and the above material met a�eQSl �emonts oin con figuration and 5/64' size are shown at lower Tight . ionand performed in conformance pass sequence for Aerating Setlinos• 5/64" 1/16'1 .052" uire Feed Speed (in/min) 250 265 325 350 5/66„ I1 1716" .052,- Current .045" (amps) DC(+) 1445 Electrical Stickout (in) 1-178 1 1 1 3%4 Voltage (volts) 33) (332) (285) {290) Layers/Passes - 0 6/I1 11 7713 8/15 10/19 Shielding Gas 32 32 Interpass Temp { f) 402 I CO? cot CO 325 1 325 325 325 2 Mechanical Drooerties and chemical RnalvsOS of the weld deposlts were as follows : AWS/ASME I INFORMATION outY [ I Required Site I 1/16" OS 2" Re uirements 5764" oe. osit Oe osit I 045" VietTensile Strength (psi) I 72,000 min �J Oe nsit 1 Oc osit Yield Strength (Psi) f i 79,200 I 73,800 76,700 7<,800 Elongation, Y in 2" 60,000 min 63,700 , 61,tU0 I 22 min If 3t 1 62,600 i 64,700 1 - Hardness, Roc4uell B (avo 34 I 33 I 33 I --»�_ I Hot Required 85 83 81 )mpacl Properties 94 I _ (Charpy Y-notch) ft-lbs a 01F 20 min43 1 I l �I 1 71 99 I 77 33 46 51 (60 T5 77) 193.100-105 (75 76 79) ft-lbs a -20 of Not Required 20 i � 37 I x C 72 Mn I Not Required 1 .014 I 59 I S1 I 1,75 max I 1.29 I I .052 .061 .055 . S I .90 max II ,66 I ! 1.25 1 1.31 I 1.39 1 P I .03 max .027 ! .49 1 .42 I .49 OG m t I I .013 I .017 r .0z5 1 L .006 I 008 I OD7 [ Radioora_ ph�st: met requirements. Fillet lest (as required): Met requirements. Or Per ire Amecha Section 3, for the purpose of classification of product, "the chemical analysis, radiographic soundness test and required mechanical teats shall be made using 3/32" diameter electrode or the closes! sire manufactured.• The ocher sites Y shown are for information only. Also, see reverse side for different shielding gases. O m V N .-r Z STATE OF OHIO, COUhSVA( OF BEFORE ME \ 450 ;n - 9Lfl$CRIBCD A SWgr T08Efq(E NE THIS 0) AY Df 19 Or m upervising trigileer J 7 y0 Notary Pubic „ my cmmission expirle s June 3, 1991 1 1 . f hte ngineer U U TTTTTTTTTT S S S U U T S S U U T S U U T S S S Of MASSACHUSETTS, INC. U U T S U U T S S U U U T S S 'S 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 617-438-7755 CONCRETE INSPECTION REPORT DATE 10/22/91 43 City of Salem, Bldg. Dept. Job No. UTS 9679 Mr. David Harris Project Salem Hospital, Surgi Ctr. p One Salem Green Contractor R. W. Granger Salem, MA 01970 Cone. Co. Lynn Sand & Stone CLASS CONCRETE 4000# 3/4" CUBIC: YARDS 4 ASTM C:-39 __-------------------- -__--_ .----------------..---- - -- --- ---- __ 'TEST SAMPLES LOCRI-ION 4 Cubes Caisson cola-mn piers LIS, 018 slump ", air cent 5. 0%, air temp 69, cone temp 74, truck #12, ticket # 46086, time 1200 PM LAB DATE DATE AGE: NO. SIZE AREA CAST TESTED DAYS P. S. I. A612. GX12 28. 27 10/22/91 10/29/91 7 3, 540 A613 6x12 28. 27 10/22/91 11/19/91 28 A614 6x.12 28. '-x'7 10/22/91 11/19/91 28 A615 SX12 28. 27 10/22/91 11/19/91 28 REMARKS: -- U T S OF MASSACHUSETTS, INC. INSPECTOR: Reviewed Field-- G. DiMarco 4 hours By : Steven T. Crabtree ,rrr c, (Cittl of —`�ulem, ttssUctlusetts 'Noura of -Aupral DECISION ON THE PETITION OF SALEM HOSPITAL FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AND A VARIANCE AT 81 HIGHLAND AVENUE (R-1 ) A hearing on this petition was held May 16, 1990 with the following Board Members present: Edward Luzinski, Acting Chairman; Richard Febonio, Joseph Correnti, Mary Jane Stirgwolt and Associate Member Arthur LaBrecque. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioners, owners of the property, represented by Attorney John Serafini, Jr. , are requesting a Special permit to extend a nonconforming use and structure by allowing the construction of an addition to the present structure and expanding the surgicenter, also a Variance from parking. Property is located in an R-1 zone. The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this request for a Special Permit is Section V B 10, which provides as follows: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set forth in Section VIII F and IX D, grant Special Permits for alterations and reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement, extension or expansion of nonconfooming lots, land, structure, and uses, provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood. In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants. The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of the Board that: a. special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings or structures, in the same district; b. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner; c. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. DECISION ON THE PETITION OF SALEM HOSPITAL FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AND A VARIANCE AT 81 HIGHLAND AVENUE, SALEM page two The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1 . Salem Hospital is a nonconforming use permitted by Special Permit in an R-1 zone. 2. The present use of the entire area occupied by Salem Hospital is a legal nonconforming one. 3. The proposed changes will not unreasonably increase the volume or area of the existing nonconforming buildings. 4. The proposed changes will not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood. 5. The proposed changes can be implemented in harmony with the present non- conforming structures, both structurally and aesthetically. 6. The total number of parking spaces requested for the variance will be substantially the same as the present number of spaces. 7. Petitioner's land is peculiar in shape and size - a condition which affects petitioner's land .but not other lands in the Zoning District. 8. There will be minimal change in the parking layout that has existed for many years. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1 . The proposed changes will not be substantially more detrimental to the neighborhood than the existing nonconforming use and can be granted in harmony with the Zoning Ordinance and without derogating from its intent or the public good. 2. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district in general. 3. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the zoning ordinance would involve substantial hardship to the petitioner. 4. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. DECISION ON THE PETITION OF SALEM HOSPITAL FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AND A VARIANCE AT 81 HIGHLAND AVENUE, SALEM page three Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the Special Permit and Variance requested, subject to the following conditions: 1 . All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to fire safety be strictly adhered to. 2. Exterior finishes of the new addition be in harmony with the existing structure and appropriate landscaping done. 3. A drop-off area for handicapped patients be maintained. 4. Plans be reviewed by the Inspector of Buildings prior to the issuance of a building permit. 5. All construction be done as per the dimensions and plans submitted and in accordance with all City and State codes. SPECIAL PERMIT & VARIANCE GRANTED 0 JoSQq5h C. Correnti, Secretary A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to section 17 01 the Mass. General Laws, Chapter 808, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of thi; decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to tdoss. caaeral laws. Ch^pter 808• Section 11,the Variance or ?,aecial Permit ^ra not take effect until a copy of the decision, bearing the ccrufication of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismisse0 or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name or the owner of recordor is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. BOARD OF APPEAL I tl r '11:1 BI I L'D'I'tI8 DEP I- �� "°`� ofSttlEzlt, ttssttrl�uae##� r sitttlxr�nguttr�_ RIC !J cR ¢9D Comm O1tP tt1Em CSTPCIt `?D CITY 4F S4LEN, IHSS. c m !� n DECISION Site Plan Review Special Permit Salem Hospital 81 Highland Avenue s Salem, MA 01970 %Re: SurgiCenter/Maternity Wing,`'-1 On Thursday, September 20, 1990, the Salem Planning Board held a public hearing under Section VII-R Site Plan Review Special Permit of the City of Salem Zoning Ordinance for the construction of a Surgicenter and Maternity Wing at Salem Hospital, located at 81 Highland Avenue. At a regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning Board held on December 6, 1990, the Board voted by a vote of five in favor, none opposed, to approve the application as complying with the requirements of a Special Permit, subject to the following conditions: 1. Conformance With Plan Work shall conform with plan entitled "SurgiCenter- Salem Hospital", dated September 7, 1990. Z. Landscaping Landscaping shall conform to plan entitled, "SurgiCenter-Salem Hospital, Planting Plan", dated September 7, 1990. a. Trees shall be a minimum of 4" caliper. b. Shrubs shall be a minimum diameter of 24". c. After all project landscaping is completed, and prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the developer will be required to add further landscaping if such is required by the Planning Board or City Planner. d. Maintenance of all landscaping shall be the responsibility of the owner. 3. Board of Health Board of Health requirements stated in a letter dated September 19, 1990, shall be adhered to. 4. Lighting All exterior lighting shall be installed and maintained in such a way so as not to reflect or cause glare on abutting or facing residential premises. Lighting shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 5. Signage All proposed signage shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. b. Parking A detailed parking plan for handicapped and oncology patients shall be submitted to the City Planner for review and approval prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. 7. Construction Practices All construction shall be performed in accordance with the Rules and Regulations of the Planning Board, and in accordance with any and all applicable City of Salem regulations. 8. Violations Any violations of these conditions shall result in revocation of this permit by the Planning Board. I hereby certify that a copy of this decision and plans have been filed with the City Clerk and copies are on file with the Planning Board. The Special Permit shall not take effect until a copy of this decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that twenty (20) days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed or that if such appeal has been filed, and it has been dismissed or denied, is recorded in the Essex County Registry of Deeds and is indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded on the owner's Certificate of Title. The fee for recording or registering shall be paid by the owner or applicant. Walter B. Power, III Chairman M9WP Planning Architecture CANNON Engineering Project Delivery 148 State Street Boston,MA 02109 617-742-5440 29 March 1991 Mr. Gerard Parker Project Manager R.W. Granger&Sons, Inc. 415 Boston Turnpike, P.O.Box 5265 fa f? C ft Shrewsbury, MA 01545 Re: Salem Hospital APR ! -1991 D Surgicenter CBI Project N0.8925.03 R.W.GRANGER AND soNS, ii r- Dear Gerry: Please find enclosed the following material: 1. Signed Construction Control form from the Salem Building Department. 2. Copy of Fire Department Certificate of Approval for Building Permit, completed, submitted and ap- proved on 28 January 1991. Should you require any further information please advise. Sincerely, Robert Peterson, Project Manager/Vice President Cannon Boston Inc. RP/epd cc: M. Farnola S. Simpson D. Laidlaw Boston Buffalo Grand Island New York St.Louis Washington PROJECT :!UMBER: PROJECT :'ITLE: SURGICENTER - SALEM HOSPITAL PROJECTLOCATIOCI: 81 HIGHLAND AVENUE, SALEM, MA. NAME OF BUILDING: SALEM HOSPITAL NATURE OF PROJECT: ADDITION AND RENOVATIONS FOR EXPANDED OUTPATIENT SURGERY AND RELATED FUNCTIONS. IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 127.0 OF THE MASSACHUSETTS STATE BUILDING CODE, I CHUNG N. LEE Registration No. 7229 BEING A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER/ARCHITECT HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE PREPARED OR DIRECTLY SUPERVISE: THE PREPARATION OF ALL 2ESIGN PLANS', COMPUTATIONS AND SPECIFICA- TIONS CONCERNING: X11' CjVW r*'r 9fs/91 ENTIRE PROJECT X ARCHITECTURAL X STRUCTURAL FIRE PROTECTION ELECTRICAL MECHANICAL OTHER (specify) FOR THE ABOVE NAMED PROJECT AND THAT, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, SUCH PLANS, COMPUTATIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS MEET THE APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE MASSACHUSETTS STATE BUILDING CODE, ALL ACCEPTABLE ENGINEERING PRACTICES AND APPLICABLE LAWS AND OflDINANCES FOR THE PROPOSEpR RROFESSIONALC DESIGNEE FURTHER CERTIFY THAT _ r-HALL PERFORM THE aECESSARY P9OFESSIONAL SERVICES AND BE PRESENT ON THE CONSTRUCTION SITE ON A REGULAR AND PERIODIC BASIS TO DETERMINE THAT THE WORK IG PROCEDING 1N ACCORDANCE WITH THE DOCUMENTS APPROVED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FOLLOWING AS SPECIFIED IN SECTION 727.2.2: 1 . Review of shop dra,rinrs, sarples and other submittals of the contractor as recuired by the construction contract docurs7ts, as sutmitted for tuildiru; permit, and approval for conionnmce to the design concept. 2. Review and approval of the quality control prccedures for all code-required ccntmlled materials. 3. Special architectural or engineering professional inspection of critical ccrstruction cam monts requiring controlled materials or construction specified in the accepted eru veering practice standards listed in Appendix B. PURSUANT TO SECTION 127.2.3, I SHALL SUBMIT PERIODICALLY, A PROGRESS REPORT TOGETHER WITH PERTINENT COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING INSPECTOR. UPON COMPLETION OF THE WORK, I SHALL SUBMIT A FINAL REPORT AS TO THE SATISFACTORY COMPLETION AND READINESS OF THE PROJECT FOR OCCUPANCY. V �C SIGVATURE _ SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS 29 DAY OF MARCH 19 91 -. .. - . . .. _ r. - -.��I raw ww �'/. �/77CJ l✓ - • < Sa.Cern F,vze Depan.tmen,: F-&- e Pzeventton Bureau 48 La6ayette St Leet SaPem, Ma 01970 (508 ) 745-7777 I� FIRE DEPARTMENT CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL FOR BUILDING PERMIT In acco�tdarzce wZth the pn.ov-i 6-..on-6 06 the Ma-:, achu,6ett-6 State Bu i,Cd i,ny Code and the Satcm Ft ,e Code, o_pp ,scat on ti , he,Leby made ion. appnovaC o� p-a" and the ins-nuance o6 a ce,,ttt, ca.te oL appn•ovaC Uon. a bu-itdtnq pe-,untt by the SaCem F.,✓ze Depantmcr-t. (Rei . Section 113. 3, Maw,. State BCdg. Code) Job Location: Owner/Occupant: ECectnLtca.0 Con.t�Lacton.: F.7ze Supple- Ltorz Cont,zacton.: S%ynatu.ze o� App -scant; Phone # Add Yes o p ✓�c : tT .. . Ctit y v,Y AppCicani : 3S35- Town: t nays. AppnovaC date: Ce•,-t-4,6tcate o{r appn.ovaC t-6 hereby y,anted, on appn•oved pCan on ,ubmztt ov pnojec-t deta.-f t,, by .the Sat-ern F.vze Department. AZt pCans 'alze approved aoCety von. tdenti.{tca-tion .o6 type andCocat-i.on o� U-vze pn.otection devtce.6 and equtpment. ALC p-Cans ane %subject. to appnovct o� any othe"z authority having jur-iadtCt-,on. Upon comp.Cet-ton, the appCi,c.ant on, Ln taC.Cen(,5) '5/wflz reque-,t an tnspection and/on t"t o� the 6,vze protection dev.ic" and equipment. ( ** FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS, SEE REVERSE SIDE .. a$ New coast-zitction. T, Pnopvcty .COca=t 0n ham no compCiccnce wl th the .piovt-6tor" 0b Chapsen 148 , Section 26C/E, M. G. L. , ne-Cctive to the tin%taCat-i.oa 66 appn.oved {r e aCanm devtceis: ', The owner, off . this property s r.equ.vzed to ubtatn. comp ,,Lance as a condition o6 obtatn-tny a Su-i-edtng P un% t. . P-7,openty Locat�-on -.-s tn, comp Lance w.th the pn.ov-i,Lton6 o{r Chapte,L 148 , Sect on 26 C/E, M. G. L. ErpLnatiort date: TG a 0 \ S ign_afQ is aC FIRE DEPARTMENT CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL FOR BUILDING PERMIT In compliance with the provision of Section 113. 5 of the Massachusetts State Building Code, and under guidelines agreed upon by the Salem Bldg. Inspector and the Salem Fire Chief, the applicant for a building permit shall obtain the Certificate of Approval (see reverse side) and stamped plan approval from the Salem Fire Prevention Bureau. Said application and approval is required before a building permit may be issued. The Massachusetts State Building Code requires compliance approval of the Salem Fire Department, with reference to provisions of Articles 4 and 12 of the Building Code, the Salem Fire Code, Massachusetts General Laws, and 527 Code of Massachusetts Regulations. The applicant shall submit this application with three (3) sets of plans, drawn in sufficient clarity, to obtain stamped approval of the Salem Fire Department. This applies for all new, construction, substantial alterations, change of use and/or occupancy, and any other approvals required by the Massachusetts General Laws, and the Salem Fire Code. Exception: Plans will not be required for structural work when the proposed work to be performed under the building permit will not, in the opinion of the Building. Inspector, require a plan to show the nature and character of. the work to be , performed. i Notice: Plans are normally required for fire suppression systems, fire alarm systems, tank installations, and Fire Code requirements. Under the provisions of Article 22 of the Massachusetts State Building Code, certain proposed projects may not require submission of :plans or complete compliance with new construction requirements. In these cases, provisions of Article 22, Appendix T, and Tables applicable shall apply. This section shall not, however,' supersede .the provisions outlined in the Salem Fire Prevention Regulations, Chapter 148, MGL, or 527 Code of Massachusetts Regulations. ' All 'permits for . fire code use and/or occupancy shall apply for the entire structure; fire alarm and/or smoke detector installation shall apply to the entire structure based upon current requirements as per Laws and/or w Codes, but the existing structure may comply with 'regdlations applicable for existing structures. Notice: Sub-contractors may-also be required to filVe -individual applications for a Fire Department Certificate 'of-Approval for the area Of their work. Such 'sub-contractors shall file . an Application to Install with the Fire prevention Bureau prior to commencing any work for those areas applicable. Form 81X ( 10/90) Planning Architecture Engineering CANNONProject Delivery 148 State Street Boston,MA 02109 617-742-5440 29 October 1990 Mr. David Harris n Q Building Department < ry City of Salem One Salem Green _J x Salem, MA 01970 Re: Surgicenter CZ Salem Hospital �n o CBI Project No. 8925.03 Dear Mr. Harris: I am writing to thank you for your patience during our discussions regarding the exiting arrangements for the Surgicenter addition at Salem Hospital. Based on our discussions we will be maintaining the exiting arrangement as had been shown with one new stair in the new addition and a horizontal exit into the Domestic Building. Your assistance is greatly appreciated. Should I have misunderstood your direction or should you have any questions please advise me immediately. Sincerely, tz-t—� / Robert Peterson,AIA Project Manager/Vice President Cannon Boston Inc. RP/dbg cc: W. Monroe D. Geraghty D. DiPanfilo M. Farnola S. Simpson D. Laidlaw Boston Buffalo Grand Island New York St.Louis Washington v Planning Architecture CANNON Engineering Project Delivery 148 State Street. Boston,MA 02109 617-742-5440 30 January 1991 Mr. Norman LaPointe Fire Inspector Salem Fire Prevention Bureau 48 Lafayette Street Salem, tvtA 01,970 Re: Salem Hospital Surgicenter CBI Project No.8925.03 _ Dear Mr. LaPointe: Thank you for your review of the Surgicenter project. This letter is to advise you on behalf of Salem Hospital that compliance will be provided on the following items per your requirements: 1. The existing fire hydrant north of the Davenport 4 entry will not be removed until after the new fire hydrant to be located adjacent to the oxygen tanks has been installed and made operational. 2. The contractor(s)will obtain welding permits from the City of Salem Fire Prevention Bureau prior to any welding being performed on site. This applies to at least the following specification sections: A. Section 05120-Structural Steel. B. Section 05°00-Metal Decking. C. Section 15021 -Metal Fabrications D. Section 15510-Fire Protection. 3. The contractor will obtain a permit from the City of Salem Fire Prevention Bureau for the installation of a fire alarm system prior to the installation of the system covered under Section 16721 -Fire Alarm and Detection System. 4. Under Section 09680-Carpeting,the installation shall conform with 527-CMR 21.00 and NFPA 253. All necessary permits and certificates shall be applied for and submitted to the City of Salem Fire Prevention Bureau by the contractor. This material will be submitted as soon as possible to prevent delay to the project since the material is subsequently submitted to the State for approval. Boston Buffalo Grand Island New York St.Louis Washington ,lr CANNON Mr. Norman LaPointe Fire Inspector Re: Salem Hospital 30 January 1991 Page 2 Should you have any questions on the above items or any additional concerns please advise at your convenience. Thank you for your cooperation regarding the project. Sincerely, Robert Peterson,AIA Vice President/Project Manager Cannon Boston Inc. RP/epd cc: D,Hannis M. Faola m D. Geraghty D. DIPanfilo S. Simpson D. Laidlaw 4 .a Planning Architecture i Engineering _ �2•JI Project Delivery 148 State Street Boston.MA 02109 617-742-5440 19 April 1990 MEETING NOTES - Construction Meeting N0.3 C9 Salem Hospital C, r Surglcenter r ( CBI Project No. 8925.03 r a o cn C) co Meeting Date: 17 April 1991 Meeting Place: Domestic Level 4 - Salem Hospital + --' i Meeting T.me: 9:00 AM PERSONS IN ATTENDANCE N Gerard Parker Granger Paullnnamonati Granger Don Geraghty Salem Hospital Don DIPanfilo Salem Hospital Michael Farnola Salem Hospital John Keys Salem Hospital Robert Peterson Cannon DISCUSSION The following items were reviewed: NO. DESCRIPTION ACTION 1-1. Copies of the proposed agreement were distributed. Changes that had been made were discussed. Three copies were given to StepheoGranger to review and sign. 3 April 1991 Agreement has been fully executed. All parties have copies. The Hospital is registering the Lien Bond. 17 April 1991 all registered. 1-2. Don D!Panfilo noted that the Hospital is still considering the type Salem of roof to be used. This relates to alternate G2. Granger was requested to provide a letter confirming holding the price on this work for several more weeks. 3 April 1991 Granger has provided letter extending this option for 45 days from date of contract. Requires Hospital decision on which roof system to use. 17 April 1991 The Hospital is meeting this afternoon to decide. Roston Buffalo Grand Island New York St.Louis Washington -ANNON MEETING NOTES Salem Hospital Surgicenter Construction Meeting No. 3 CBI Project No. 8925.03 17 April 1991 Page 2 NO. DESCRIPTION ACTION 1-4. Bob Peterson noted that the documents have been submitted to Mr. David Harris at the Salem Building Department. The documents have been reviewed and approved by Inspector Norman LaPointe at the Salem Fire Department. Granger should now submit for permits. 3 April 1991 Will attempt to obtain after meeting. 17 April 1991 Obtained permit on 9 April 1991. 1-6. Bob Peterson noted that an updated subcontractors list needs to Granger be submitted. As discussed at the post bid review meeting the subcontractors proposed this time should be from the original list and If not are subject to approval by the Hospital. List of'major subcontractors to be submitted prior to the first application for payment. All subcontractors to be submitted prior to second application. 3 April 1991 Still being prepared. Major subcontractors are on board. Hospital has concerns with United Masonry for 180 day payment history. Resolution to be that Granger will submit list of subcontractors currently being considered for contracts. This will be submitted for current contracts by 4 April 1991. 17 April 1991 Caissons given to New England Foundation. Dominion is doing reinforcing steel. Monadnock Steel will do structural steel. Complete list will be submitted by Granger. 1-11 Mike Famola noted that parking stickers are needed for each construction vehicle. 3 April 1991 This process needs to be Initiated. 17 April 1991 Paul has initiated. 1-13. Fencing work will begin on week commencing 25 March 1991. Color of slats for temporary fence must be approved by the Hospital. 3 April 1991 Blue was approved. Slats will be installed week of 8 April 1991. 17 April 1991 Fencing is complete. -ANNON MEETING NOTES Salem Hospital Surgicenter Construction Meeting No. 3 CBI Project No. 8925.03 17 April 1991 Page 3 NO. DESCRIPTION ACTION 1-14. Construction sign layout will be given to Granger. Mike Famola Cannon will confirm Hospital standard. 3 April 1991 Mike has rough layout. Will give to Cannon to prepare final layout for Granger with location for sign indicated. 17 April 1991 Mike Famola provided rough layout today to Cannon. 1-15. Shop drawing schedule to be submitted prior to first application. Granger Remaining subcontractors can be Incorporated into schedule prior to second application. 3 April 1991 Granger submitted initial draft of schedule. Needs to be revised to coordinate with current schedule. 17 April 1991 Granger will update schedule. 1-18. The Hospital Is currently reviewing automatic doors. Granger to Granger provide letter noting extending time frame to the hospital for this decision. 3 April 1991 Granger has provided letter extending this for 45 days from date of contract. Granger is requested to submit manufacturer which they carried. Will be reviewed then further direction will be given. 17 April 1991 Awaiting letter from Granger. 1-20. Bob Peterson noted that Granger should proceed to verify survey Granger work. 3 April 1991 Granger will proceed. 17 April 1991 Surveyors(in-house Granger)will start 18 April 1991. 1-21 D. Granger will provide curing box on site. 3 April 1991. Not yet required or provided. I. Steve Crabtree will submit a distribution list for review. 3 April 1991 Mike to prepare distribution list. 18 April 1991 List submitted to t1TS by Mike. CANNON MEETING NOTES Salem Hospital Surgicenter Construction Meeting No. 3 CBI Project No. 8925.03 17 April 1991 Page 4 NO. DESCRIPTION ACTION 1-29 Brick samples. Cannon will obtain Initial samples for review with Cannon the Hospital. 3 April 1991 Brick panels have been brought to job site for initial review. They were reviewed after the meeting with Mike and Don DlPanfilo. 18 April 1991 Additional samples to be reviewed after the meeting. Based on review, Styles + Hart and Morin light flashed are the best matches to the existing. 2-1 Exhaust at tunnel must be maintained. The Hospital will shut off steam to sheds. Granger to remove electrkxl. 17 April 1991 Complete. 2-2 Procedures for working construction gates must be resolved. Granger/Salem Gates must be closed except when vehicles are going through. Vehicular traffic will generally use lower gate with possible exception of Paul's vehicle A sign may be provided by Granger. If used this will be submitted to Mike for Hospital approval. Suggestion by Mike that two way radio be provided to facilitate coordination. Granger will try two way radio system. Lower gate will be unlocked by security at 6:30 AM. Security to lock gate 4:00 PM. Granger will keep upper gate locked. 17 April 1991 Granger met with all subs to stress security requirements. The Hospital will put up signs at North Shore Childrens and temporary 'keep out' signs. 2.3 Hospital communication. Should Mike Famola not be available, Granger Don DlPanfilo Is the next person to contact Phone lists will be exchanged. 17 ApNI 1991 Home phone numbers were exchanged. Granger to submit a complete phone list. CANNON MEETING NOTES Salem Hospital Surgicenter Construction Meeting No. 3 CBI Project No. 0925.03 17 April 1991 Page 5 NO. DESCRIPTION ACTION 2-4 Don Geraghty noted that Salem has a new truck ordinance that restricts the roads which trucks can use in the city. Hospital has provided copy to Granger. 17 April 1991 Mike has obtained maps from the City that will be made available to Granger. 2-5 Gerry distributed current draft of construction schedule and cash flow chart for the project. Granger will provide additional scheduling for Items. 17 April 1991 Updated chart was submitted. 2-9 Work anticipated over next two weeks: Fence to be completed, Demolition work, Survey; excavation; mobilization. 17 April 1991 Everything complete except survey. 2-10 Granger will establish date at which hardhats will be required on Granger SRO. 17 April 1991 Will be established once sign is up. 2-11 Mike advised that there was an Incident involving the excavator's trailer and possibly a car. Granger is requested to obtain registration number of car that was involved if any. Granger will emphasize need for concern on congested site. 17 April 1991 There was a slight incident but no damage occurred. NEW BUSINESS 3-1 On 16 April 1991 Granger encountered some debris material along Salem the east side along column line 'X' where a tree was removed. The Hospital will have the material tested. 3-2 Paul noted that there is some stored material at Level 5. The Salem/Granger Hospital will remove this material by 19 April 1991. The Hospital requests that ductwork be removed and be stored at Jefferson CCA NN0N MEETING NOTES Salem Hospital Surgicenter Construction Meating No. 3 CBI Project No. 8925.03 17 April 1991 Page e NO. DESCRIPTION ACTION Avenue building. 3-3 Paul noted that various minor hidden conditions have been encountered such as a valve for the high pressure gas line which had been paved over. 3-4 Paul noted that existing retaining wall has been constructed in two different ways. Is readily removed. 3-5 Gerry noted that he had contacted Margaret O'Brien of Salem Granger Planning Board. Per his discussion with her submissions will be made bi-monthly. This may have to be Increased to weekly. 3f Gerry distributed copies of the requisition for review and as use as Salem schedule of values. He would like to meet 24 April 1991 to review pencil copy. Gerry requested that retainage on General Conditions not be held. The Hospital will consider. 3-8 Mike noted that he met with the Building Inspector last week to review exiting conditions in the Hospital. 3-9 Mike provided a copy of material to Granger on existing McQuay root top unit showing lifting points and other Information. 3-10 Mike needs copies of E201, E202, E203 and E801. Cannon to Cannon send to John Keys. 3-11 Work during next 2 weeks: Granger Mechanical trades will be mobilizing; excavation work continuing; Caisson meeting. Schedule to be confirmed to McPhail. 3-12 Next Meeting: 1 May 1991 3-13 A change proposal request is anticipated for relocating water line Salem/Cannon adjacent to North Shore Childrens' Hospital. -ANNON MEETING NOTES Salem Hospital Surgicenter Construction Meeting No. 3 CBI Project No. 8925.03 17 April 1991 Page 7 NO. DESCRIPTION ACTION 3-15 Granger will be holding their subcontractor meeting 17 April 1991 at 1:00 PM. Mike was Invited to attend to meet them. 3-16 John requested that construction workers be In the boiler plant only when required. To the best of my knowledge the above items were discussed. If there are any additions or corrections, please notify this office. ubmftted by, fob4en Peterson, Project Manager/Vice President Cannon Boston Inc. RP/epd cc: Attendeaq rris- Salem Building Dept. o e Salem Fire Dept. J. Copley P. innamoratl (Home Add: P.O. Box 406, Harvard, MA 01451) S. Simpson J. Boekelman T. Fowler D. Laidlaw M. Vaccaro J. Koenigsberg Salem Hospital 81 Highland Avenue Salem,Massachusetts 01970 Telephone (508)741-1200 April 24, 1991 Mr. David Harris Building Inspector One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 RE: Surgicenter Construction Project As per our site walk-thru on April 11, 1991 at Salem Hospital , we addressed how the construction project will impact egress in the Davenport, Domestic, Phippen and Macomber Buildings. The following was discussed: Davenport Building, Levels 3 and 4 will be maintained closed and signage will be used to assist in directing path of egress to the Davenport northeast stairwell . Domestic Building stairwell will now egress from Level 6 to Level 4 thru the old Clinical Services Department in a southerly direction, to the Main Building, Level 4 corridor. A combination of luminated exit sign and plexiglass signs will be used to assist in directing the path of egress. Domestic Building, Level 4 Laundry. The existing exterior exit door located on the north side of the building will be temporarily closed during construction. The Laundry personnel will utilize either the Phippen 4 stairwell to the south which exits to grade level , or the fire door (swings in wrong direction) to the east which leads to the Domestic 4 stairwell , which then connects to the main Hospital corridor opposite Radiology (on Level 4) . Macomber Building, Level 4 - new signage will have to be installed to direct the path of egress. Clinical Engineering and auditorium will utilize the new two-hour corridor in the Macomber 4 Birthplace at the northeast connection of that building. Alternate second means of emergency exit only; will travel to the back corridor which leads to the Main Building stairwell , which exits up to Level 5 then exits to northwest corner of the emergency ambulance dock. I am in the process of ordering all required signage which will be installed to assist in directing the path of egress for all of these above mentioned areas. Please advise me at your earliest convenience if there is any discrepancy in this letter, contrary to our site walk-thru. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Sincerely, / /f" Michael Farnola Construction Project Manager Facilities Engineering MF:lc cc: Bill Munroe, Building Inspector Inspector Norman LaPointe, Salem Fire Department Bob Peterson, Cannon Donald M. Geraghty Donald DiPanfilo David Perkins Gerry Parker, R. W. Granger Paul , Innamorati , R. W. Granger SurgiFile Field Copy CANNON OWNER ® M. Farnola, Salem Hospital FIELD REPORT ARCHITECT ® R. Peterson, CBI FIELD ® G. Parker, R.W. Granger OTHER Qx D. Harris, Salem Bldg. Dept. ® N. Lapointe, Salem Fire Dept. PROJECT: Surgicenter FIELD REPORT NO: 3 CONTRACT: Salem Hospital I Salem, MA CANNON PROJECT NO: 8925.03 DATE 24 April 1991 TIME 9:00 A.M. WEATHER Clear, Sunny TEMP. RANGE 60's EST.%OF COMPLETION CONFORMANCE WITH SCHEDULE WORK IN PROGRESS PRESENT AT SITE Slabs south of former sheds being removed. Joseph Onorato-Carlson, independent architect Project Manager Superintendent C225 and Operator Trucker Laborer OBSERVATIONS Asphalt paving is substantially removed. Debris along 'X' line has been tested by McPhail Associates. Tests indicate no contamination. McPhail indicates that material can remain in place. Unknown material encountered in existing trench at west end of site. Material is being tested by McPhail Appropriate action to then be taken. ITEMS TO VERIFY INFORMATION OR ACTION REQUIRED Test results from McPhail. ATTACHMENTS REPORT BY: Robert Peterson, AIA Salem H spitalWU*11igc DE,;al 81 Highland Avenue tH 33 Salem,Massachusetts 01970 Telephone (508) 741-1200 CJTy O April 24, 1991 Mr. David Harris Building Inspector One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 RE: Surgicenter Construction Project As per our site walk-thru on April 11;')1991 at Salem Hospital , we addressed how the construction project will impact egress in the Davenport, Domestic, Phippen and Macomber Buildings. The following was discussed: Davenport Building, Levels 3 and 4 will be maintained closed and signage will be used to assist in directing path of egress to the Davenport northeast stairwell . Domestic Building stairwell will now egress from Level 6 to Level 4 thru the old Clinical Services Department in a southerly direction, to the Main Building, Level 4 corridor. A combination, of luminated exit sign and plexiglass signs will be used to assist in directing the path of egress. Domestic Building, Level 4 Laundry. The existing exterior exit door located on the north side of the building will be temporarily closed during construction. The Laundry personnel will utilize either the Phippen 4 stairwell to the south which exits to grade level , or the fire door (swings in wrong direction) to the east which leads to the Domestic 4 stairwell , which then connects to the main Hospital corridor opposite Radiology (on Level 4). Macomber Building, Level 4 - new signage will have to be installed to direct the' path of egress. Clinical Engineering and auditorium will utilize the new two-hour corridor in the Macomber 4 Birthplace at the northeast connection of that building. Alternate second means of emergency exit only; will travel to the back corridor which leads to the Main Building stairwell , which exits up to Level 5 then exits to northwest corner of the emergency ambulance dock. I am in the process of ordering all required signage which will be installed to assist in directing the path of egress for all of these above mentioned areas. Please advise me at your earliest convenience if there is any discrepancy in this letter, contrary to our site walk-thru. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. SSiincceerelGy,,. l" �^'�`� Michael Farnola Construction Project Manager Facilities Engineering MF:lc cc: Bill Munroe, Building Inspector Inspector Norman LaPointe, Salem Fire Department Bob Peterson, Cannon Donald M. Geraghty Donald DiPanfilo David Perkins Gerry Parker, R. W. Granger Paul , Innamorati , R. W. Granger SurgiFile Field Copy MAY ZJ Z 13 Ph '99 F I L E)ir" CITY CIA" a 1iJ it7 Qfulem, ttssttc�Iusetts � w ,Enttra of Aufreul _ $ 1: DECISION ON THE PETITION OF SALEM HOSPITAL FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AND A VARIANCE AT 81 HIGHLAND AVENUE (R-1 ) A hearing on this petition was held May 16, 1990 with the following Board Members present: Edward Luzinski, Acting Chairman; Richard Febonio, Joseph Correnti, Mary Jane Stirgwolt and Associate Member Arthur LaBrecque. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioners, owners of the property, represented by Attorney John Serafini, Jr. , are requesting a Special permit to extend a nonconforming use and structure by allowing the construction of an addition to the present structure and .expanding the surgicenter, also a Variance from parking. Property is located in an R-1 zone. The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this request for a Special Permit is Section V B 10, which provides as follows: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set forth in Section VIII F and IX D, grant Special Permits for alterations and reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement, extension or expansion of nonconfoi,ming lots, land, structure, and uses, provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood. In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants. The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of the Board that: a. special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings or structures, in the same district; b. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner; c. desirable relief may granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. DECISION ON THE PETITION OF SALEM HOSPITAL FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AND A VARIANCE AT 81 HIGHLAND AVENUE, SALEM page two The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1 . Salem Hospital is a nonconforming use permitted by Special Permit in an R-1 zone. 2. The present use of the entire area occupied by Salem Hospital is a legal nonconforming one. 3. The proposed changes will not unreasonably increase the volume or area of the existing nonconforming buildings. 4. The proposed changes will not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood. 5. The proposed changes can be implemented in harmony with the present non- conforming structures, both structurally and aesthetically. 6. The total number of parking spaces requested for the variance will be substantially the same as the present number of spaces. 7. Petitioner's land is peculiar in shape and size - a condition which affects petitioner's land but not other lands in the Zoning District. 8. There will be minimal change in the parking layout that has existed for many years. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1 . The proposed changes will not be substantially more detrimental to the neighborhood than the existing nonconforming use and can be granted in harmony with the Zoning Ordinance and without derogating from its intent or the public good. 2. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district in general. 3. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the zoning ordinance would involve substantial hardship to the petitioner. 4. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. if-y -, ft 94 DECISION ON THE PETITION OF SALEM HOSPITAL FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AND A VARIANCE AT 81 HIGHLAND AVENUE, SALEM page three Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the Special Permit and Variance requested, subject to the following conditions: 1 . All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to fire safety be strictly adhered to. 2. Exterior finishes of the new addition be in harmony with the existing structure and appropriate landscaping done. 3. A drop-off area for handicapped patients be maintained. 4. Plans be reviewed by .the Inspector of Buildings prior to the issuance of a building permit. 5. All construction be done as per the dimensions and plans submitted and in accordance with all City and State codes. SPECIAL PERMIT & VARIANCE GRANTED 0 Jos4h C. Correnti, Secretary A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 01 the Mass. General Laws, Chapter 808, and shall be filed within 20 dayo after the date of fifng of this decision in the office of the City Clerk, Pursuant to Mass. General Laws, Chcpter 808, Section 11,the Variance or ?pecial Permit granted h^_:ein shcVl not take effect until a copy of the decision, bearing the ccriification of the city clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed,that it has been dismisse4 or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name or the owner of recorder is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. BOARD OF APPEAU d-0 t1ll f Ail o0e E 1 �a�;:711a MAT L L f y r r (Eity of �&ttlem, �41jassactluBetts -B1. ourb of Au{zeul DECISION ON THE PETITION OF SALEM HOSPITAL FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AND A VARIANCE AT 81 HIGHLAND AVENUE (R-1 ) A hearing on this petition was held May 10, 1990 with the following Board Members present: Edward Luzinski, Acting Chairman; Richard Febonio, Joseph Correnti, Mary Jane Stirgwolt and Associate Member Arthur LaBrecque. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioners, owners of the property, represented by Attorney John Serafini, Jr. , are requesting a Special permit to extend a nonconforming use and structure by allowing the construction of an addition to the present structure and expanding the surgicenter, also a Variance from parking. Property is located in an R-1 zone. The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this request for a Special Permit is Section V B 10, which provides as follows: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set forth in Section VIII F and IX D, grant Special Permits for alterations and reconstruction of . nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement, extension or expansion of nonconfo •ming lots, land, structure, and uses, provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood. In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants. The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of the Board that: a. special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings or structures, in the same district; b. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner; C. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. DECISION ON THE PETITION OF SALEM HOSPITAL FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AND A VARIANCE AT 81 HIGHLAND AVENUE, SALEM page two The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1 . Salem Hospital is a nonconforming use permitted by Special Permit in an R-1 zone. 2. The present use of the entire area occupied by Salem Hospital is a legal nonconforming one. 3. The proposed changes will not unreasonably increase the volume or area of the existing nonconforming buildings. 4. The proposed changes will not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood. 5. The proposed changes can be implemented in harmony with the present non- conforming structures, both structurally and aesthetically. 6. The total number of parking spaces requested for the variance will be substantially the same as the present number of spaces. 7• Petitioner's land is peculiar in shape and size - a condition which affects petitioner's land but not other lands in the Zoning District. 8. There will be minimal change in the parking layout that has existed for many years. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1 . The proposed changes will not be substantially more detrimental to the neighborhood than the existing nonconforming use and can be granted in harmony with the Zoning Ordinance and without derogating from its intent or the public good. 2. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district in general. 3. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the zoning ordinance would involve substantial hardship to the petitioner. 4. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. my. n, DECISION ON THE PETITION OF SALEM HOSPITAL FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AND A VARIANCE AT 81 HIGHLAND AVENUE, SALEM page three Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the Special Permit and Variance requested, subject to the following conditions: 1 . All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to fire safety be strictly adhered to. 2. Exterior finishes of the new addition be in harmony with the existing structure and appropriate landscaping done. 3. A drop-off area for handicapped patients be maintained. 4. Plans be reviewed by the Inspector of Buildings prior to the issuance of a building permit. 5. All construction be done as per the dimensions and plans submitted and in accordance with all City and State codes. SPECIAL PERMIT & VARIANCE GRANTED 0 Jll Josh h C. Correnti, Secretary A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to section 17 01 the Mass. General Laws, Chapter 808, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to Fdas;. General Laws. Ch'.p!er Sos, section 11,the Variance or Apeciai Permit ^n nir' h=:ei� s'cA not take effect until a copy of the deci;ion, bearing the ccrn:fication of the City Clerk that 20 days have eiapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name or the owner of recorder is recorded and noted In the owner's Certificate of TWO. BOARD OF APPS U! �l. f :71,1 Pr 1 MAT LJ 13 F , X90 i .:. ry a (Cita Lif ui 3MI assurttusetts F -Sottra of —Nupett! DECISION ON THE PETITION OF SALEM HOSPITAL FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AND A VARIANCE AT 81 HIGHLAND AVENUE (R-1 ) A hearing on this petition was held May 16, 1990 with the following Board Members present: Edward Luzinski, Acting Chairman; Richard Febonio, Joseph Correnti, Mary Jane Stirgwolt and Associate Member Arthur LaBrecque. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioners, owners of the property, represented by Attorney John Serafini, Jr. , are requesting a Special permit to extend a nonconforming use and structure by allowing the construction of an addition to the present structure and expanding the surgicenter, also a Variance from parking. Property is located in an R-1 zone. The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this request for a Special Permit is Section V B 10, which provides as follows: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set forth in Section VIII F and IX D, grant Special Permits for alterations and reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement, extension or expansion of nonconfOL'Ming lots, land, structure, and uses, provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood. In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants. The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of the Board that: a. special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings or structures, in the same district; b. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner; c. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. DECISION ON THE PETITION OF SALEM HOSPITAL FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AND A VARIANCE AT 81 HIGHLAND AVENUE, SALEM page two The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1 . Salem Hospital is a nonconforming use permitted by Special Permit in an R-1 zone. 2. The present use of the entire area occupied by Salem Hospital is a legal nonconforming one. 3. The proposed changes will not unreasonably increase the volume or area of the existing nonconforming buildings. 4. The proposed changes will not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood. 5• The proposed changes can be implemented in harmony with the present non- conforming structures, both structurally and aesthetically. 6. The total number of parking spaces requested for the variance will be substantially the same as the present number of spaces. 7. Petitioner's land is peculiar in shape and size - a condition which affects petitioner's land but not other lands in the Zoning District. 8. There will be minimal change in the parking layout that has existed for many years. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1 . The proposed changes will not be substantially more detrimental to the neighborhood than the existing nonconforming use and can be granted in harmony with the Zoning Ordinance and without derogating from its intent or the public good. 2. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property but not the district in general. 3. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the zoning ordinance would involve substantial hardship to the petitioner. 4. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. �1.. DECISION ON THE PETITION OF SALEM HOSPITAL FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AND A VARIANCE AT 81 HIGHLAND AVENUE, SALEM page three Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the Special Permit and Variance requested, subject to the following conditions: 1 . All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to fire safety be strictly adhered to. 2. Exterior finishes of the new addition be in harmony with the existing structure and appropriate landscaping done. 3. A drop-off area for handicapped patients be maintained. 4. Plans be reviewed by the Inspector of Buildings prior to the issuance of a building permit. 5. All construction be done as per the dimensions and plans submitted and in accordance with all City and State codes. SPECIAL PERMIT & VARIANCE GRANTED 0 Jos4h C. Correnti, Secretary A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 01 the Mass. General Laws, Chapter 808, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to Mass. Canes! Laws. chapter 808, Section 11, the Variance 11t effect until a copy decion, near ng the certification�of 'the'C tykClark that 20 days havfethe elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismisse0 or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name or the owner of recorder is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. BOARD OF APPEAL] A l,a tl '�Ia 7r CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS PLANNING DEPARTMENT WILLIAM E.LUSTER � ONE SALEM GREEN City Planner " � 01970 (508)745-9595,EXT.311 FAX(508)744-5918 uew[ April 4, 1991 R.W. Granger & Sons, Inc. Attn: Jerry Parker, Project Manager 415 Boston Turnpike P.O. Box 5265 Shrewsbury, MA 01545 Re: Salem Area Residents Job Ordinance Dear Mr. Parker: Enclosed please find a copy of the Salem Area Residents Construction Employment Ordinance. The purpose of this Ordinance is to ensure that Salem and Salem Area Residents receive the maximum benefits from the growing construction economy of the City of Salem. Upon initiation of construction, all developers shall submit weekly workforce reports listing the following: a) names of employees; b) residential address of each employee; c) craft of each employee; d) hours worked of each employee; e) hourly wage of each employee; and f) company which each employee is employed by. Please submit the above on a weekly basis to the Salem Planning Department, Attn: Margaret 0. Dowd, One Salem Green, Salem, MA 01970. If you have any questions concerning this matter please do not hesitate to contact me at (508) 745-9595 ext.311. Very truly yours, Margaret 0. Dowd Project Coordinator Enc. 1 cc: Building Department Salem Area Residents Ordinance Committee Citp of *aftm,-_;fflag-5arbugett! Public Property Bepartment "e��✓o "i Tguilbinq Bepartment (One 6alem Orem 745-9595 taxt. 380 William H. Munroe Director of Public Property Inspector of Buildings Zoning Enforcement Officer TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN : Attached hereto you will find a copy of an ordinance which became effective January 12 , 1987 , regarding development inspection fees . Any developer who constructs , reconstructs or rehabilitates six ( 6 ) or more residential units or 10 , 000 square feet or more of commercial space shall pay to the Building Department a fee for building , plumbing and. gas inspections . The fees will be charged at the rate of Twenty and 00/ 100 ( $20 . 00 ) dollars per hour and will be due within thirty ( 30 ) days of receipt of the invoice . No Certificate of Occupancy will be issued by this Department until all outstanding inspection fees have been paid . The above fees are to paid in addition to all other fees required under the Building Permit fee schedule in effect as of June 2 , 1986 . De eloper acknowledg s "William H . Munroe receipt of notice Inspector of Buildings City of Salem One Salem Green Salem, MA . 01970 The Ritchie Organization Architecture Planning Interiors 80 Bridge Street Newton, Massachusetts 0215§. c� November 29, 1989 6179P9400 '� FAX 33- Comm. No. 6888 �� 4669a T n C� n 3'"a Mr. David J. Harris Assistant Building Inspector City of Salem x19 LAO Public Property Department 1 Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 RE: SALEM HOSPITAL MACOMBER BUILDING Dear Mr. Harris: This will advise that we have observed the progress of the work for the Macomber expansion and renovation project and find the "roughing" work to comply with the contract documents. Should you require additional information, please advise. Very truly yours, TRO/THE RITCHIE ORGANIZATION Rolanneau, P.E. Construction Consultant RWM/ws cc: Connolly Brothers M. Farnola Birmingham, Alabama Sarasota, Florida The Ritchie Organization Architecture Planning Interiors 174 Boylston Street Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts 02167 April 4, 1989 6179699400 Comm. No. 6888 City of Salem c�-x C" ro Building Department enn GO z �m n One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 ym 00 rn Attention: Mr. David J. Harris N o� Assistant Building Inspector m RE: SALEM_HOSPIT_AL MACOMBER4 Gentlemen: Enclosed is a copy of a letter from Chapin Associates, Inc., the project's structural engineers, relative to the completion of the foundation work for the Macomber addition. l We trust this letter meets with your approval. Very truly yours, TRO/THE RI((T//CHIE ORGANIZATION Roland W. Martineau, P.E. Construction Consultant RWM/ws enc. cc: Connolly Brothers w/enc. M. Farnola w/enc. Birmingham, Alabama Sarasota, Florida CONNOLLY Planning•Design•Construction April 7, 1989 cs 3:0 c c.n r Mr. David J. Harris Assistant Building Inspector City of Salem r1 -a- One Salem Green �� T" M Salem, MA 01970 - RE: Salem Hospital Macomber 4 CBI Job #2780 Dear Mr. Harris: As per City request, I hereby certify that the Macomber 4 addi- tion at Salem Hospital conforms with drawings and specifications on record to-date. I further acknowledge the addition' s footprint is located on said property as per plans. Very truly yours, C OLLY BROTHERS, INC. John P. Feeney Project Superinten ent JPF/cs Connolly Brothers, Inc., 152 Conant Street, Beverly, MA 01915 (508) 927.0053, FAX (508) 927-7928 CONNOLLY Planning•Design•Construction Cl) c-- August August 11 , 1989 v+ o om i U,c, rC N O tr Y Mr. David J. Harris tin Assistant Building Inspector City of Salem One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 RE: Salem Hospital Davenport 9 / CBI Job #2780 Dear Mr. Harris: This letter is to inform you that our project, at Salem Hospital ' s Davenport 9 is completed in its rough framing. I hereby testify to the best of my knowledge that this project complies with the project drawings, specifications and Massachusetts State Building Codes in effect at this time. If you have any questions , please do not hesitate to contact me at 508-741-3807 . Very truly yours , ONNOL Y BROTHERS, INC. n P. Feeney Project Superin endent JPF/cs Connolly Brothers, Inc., 152 Conant Street, Beverly, MA 01915 (508) 927.0053, FAX (508) 927.7928 CONNOLLY Planning•Design•Construction January 26, 1990 CW) C— :4t; c3 < r-� o;U t nm C3 Mr. David Harris a °o n Assistant Building Inspector n City of Salem vco One Salem Green �' c Salem, MA 01970 Dear Mr. Harris, This is to certify that Salem Hospital 's Macomber IV project is complete. This project conforms to all plans and specifications dated to this point. To the best of my knowledge, this building also conforms to state building codes with exception to the following: A) Wall mounted sconset lights. B) Exterior guard rail. C) HP bath door to men' s room. These exceptions are being rectified with all parties involved. Sincerely, CO#NOLLY BROTHERS, INC. John P. Feeney Superintendent JPF/lbd Connolly Brothers, Inc., 152 Conant Street, Beverly, MA 01915 (508) 927-0053, FAX (508) 927-7928 CONNOLLY Planning•Design•Construction November 10, 1989 Mr. David Harris *gym o Assistant Building Inspector " z One Salem Green ,to Tnx Salem, MA 01970 a Dear Mr. Harris, IM um mn rc=ZD This is to certify that Macomber IV building projectatSalem Hospital is complete in its rough framing stage. This building does conform to all plans, specifications and building codes at this time. If you have any questions , please feel free to call. Sincerely, CONNOLLY BROTHERS, INC. hn P. Feeney Superintendent JPF/lbd Connolly Brothers, Inc., 152 Conant Street, Beverly, MA 01915 (508) 927-0053, FAX (508) 927-7928 E. L. BARRETT / COMPANY, INC. PROJECT -DATE .JAN. 1910 M4 . SYSTEM LOCATION MFGR. TYPE SIZE "K" DESIGN REQ'D ACTUAL ACTUAI FACTOR C.F.M. VEL. VEL. C.F.M. coeA vie -3 — Wr.15 "310e% 0,72 2000 2776 27S? /y6/ /ox/0 1 0,4'.7 :A 000 3-2a6 88 /es 8X8 b. Vo $00 /2 So / Y.78 T76- -5.00 7S500 /Z SO /2 72 SOry y 7*,4 L 500o 711o7 q9/4s � r oA Jr � Mm a � m �o N COMMENTS: )l: n/o VD '`o aA[.jo 55o CFA+ 4.4 Page E. L. BARRETT COMPANY, INC. '17CT :6xxam 4050 DATE ,ky `9 70 /ti- v reCnH„vgKy SYSTEM DESIGN ACTUAL DESIGN ACTUAL ACTUAL H.P. RATED ACTUAL AMPS. C.F.M. C.F.M. S.P. S.P. R.P.M. AMPS. phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 �o.C, E:C'Mv-Y 5000 49 8 0.75 7• 7R COMMENTS: Page � L U �• L. BA,RRETT COMPANY, INC. PROJECT ::;� LEM J-AfRIL44 DX990 m- 40 ATE --SAL em, mol,' t�'ELiMi voeJ P4DE5IGN ACTUAL DESIGN ACTUAL ACTUAL RATED ACTUAL AMPS, C.F.M. C.F.M. S.P. S.P. R.P.M. H.P. AMPS. Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 COMMENTS: Page E. L. BARRETT COMPANY, INC. PROJECT �ig16M 464PdA4 DATE JAAJ- /990 _ M- V f oG.An�.vnRy/ SYSTEM LOCATION MFGR. TYPE SIZE "K" DESIGN REQ'D ACTUAL ACTUAL FACTOR C.F.M. VEL, VEL. C.F.M. Z04 of r 8'- QEG &)e4 75 gc o B3- 16 5o /67 90 /7/ o i5 Sc4 Wo /d/ 75 /77 _ l� V-7 79 _ x34 35 l86 !Go _ � y COMMENTS:; No �PCldx' CbQuiQaD� p�rateT Cf,NA 9000 / F40 E/aOfi W180 . Page F _ ' ' i t >y�� d r - :, �- : _ � ! . > f,. r The Ritchie Organization Architecture Planning Interiors 80 Bridge Street Newton, Massachusetts 02158 January 25, 1990 617 969 9400 Comm. No. 6888 n [—. FAX 332 4669 � to —C N rA f" �rrn C3 Mr. David J. Harris Nc-> Lo x Assistant Building Inspector m o 0 City of Salem o --I m Public Property Department 3 One Salem Green v N tS� Salem, MA 01970 �', o RE: SALEM HOSPITAL MACOMBER4 Dear Mr. Harris: Pursuant to our conversation on January 24, 1990 at the project site, we advised that the project was advancing to "Substantial Completion" and was not ready for occupancy at that time. The remaining work, with respect to the subject Building Permit, is principally cosmetic. and listings of incomplete and corrective work are being addressed by the contractor on a day-to-day basis. . With regard to the State Building Code, Section 127, we certify, to the best or our knowledge, that subsections 127.2.2 and 127.2.3 have been observed by this office and, with the exception of attaining final completion, we are satisfied that the work complies with applicable provisions of the State Building Code and all acceptable engineering practices. Very truly yours, TRO/THE RITCHIE ORGANIZATION Roland W. Martineau, P.E. Construction Consultant RWM/ws cc: M. Farnola Connolly Brothers w Birmingham, Alabama Sarasota, Florida The Ritchie Organization architecture ?'arming Interivs 80 bodge Street Kaman., iMaaaaCrusan9 January 25, 1990 02168 Comm. No. 6888 617 969 3x00 FAX 332 e.669 Mr. David J. Harris Assistant Building Inspector City of Salem Public Property Department One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 RE: SALEM HOSPITAL MACOMBER4 Dear Mr. Harris: Pursuant to our conversation on January 24, 1990 at the project site, we advised that the project was advancing to "Substantial Completion" and was not ready for occupancy at that time. The remaining work, with respect to the subject Building Permit, is principally cosmetic and listings of incomplete and corrective work are being addressed by the contractor on a day-today basis. With regard to the State Building Code, Section 127, we certify, to the best or our knowledge, that subsections 127.2.2 and 127.2.3 have been observed by this office and, with the exception of attaining final completion, we are satisfied that the work complies with applicable provisions of the State Building Code and all acceptable engineering practices. Very truly yours, TRO/THE RITCHIE ORGANIZATION Roland W. Martineau, P.E. Construction Consultant RWM/ws cc: M. Farnola Connolly Brothers Birmiryha^', Alabama Sarasota, Flonde Y, �Cnnb]CClln hIVCC nIAa_n7_I r K1ATIW7Tk1WnUA MTUn1TL11❑ lkl=C Cow 0� � � RL1iI�r�ItdG G�f+� >35 ��jj CITY OF SALEM HEALTH DEPARTMENT FED 13 U P7 e�Q BOARD OF HEALTH Rk# rIVE© Salem, Massachusetts 01970 CITY pFAL€k3,HA , ROBERT E. BLENKHORN February 9 1990 9 NORTH STREET HEALTH AGENT (617) 741-1800 William H. Munroe Building Inspector One Salem Green Salem, Ma 01970 Dear Mr. Munroe: Please be advised that the Certificate_of.Occupancy permit for the new maternity wing at Salem Hospital Macomber #p4 will be signed off by this department with'the-condition-that-the`grading'and pitching .of the land creating runoff be resolved to the satisfaction of the Building and Engineering Departnents. Very truly yours, FOR THE BOARD Cr HEALTH REPLY TO: ROBEIZP E. BLEf1R1O1;N, C.H.O. VIRGINIA MOUSTAKIS Health Agent Sanitarian FEB/g cc: George E. Whittie, Director Public Services ? CERTIFICATE OF OWNEt,tiOn m: OWNER O SUBSTANTIAL CONTRACTOR O COMPLETION gTt ER v AIA DOCUMENT C704 LDG. INSP. p PROJECT: Salem Hospital ARCHITECT: The Ritchie Organization mme.address) 81 Highland Avenue AItCHITECT'S PROJECT NUMBER: 6888 Salem, MA 01970 TO-towner). CONTRACTOR: Connolly Brothers, Inc. 1 Salem Hospital CONTRACT FOR: Macomber 4 81 Highland Avenue Salem, MA 01970 L �,J1 CONTRACT DATE: Septembe616, 1;2 8 =1 .� DATE OF ISSUANCE: February 2, 1990 _` .C)A � m PROJECT OR DESICNATED PORTION SHALE INCLUDE: Macomber 4 �m co z Mrnm 'n The Work performed under this Contract has been reviewed and found to be substantially cotnple�F*. Themliof Suctantial Completion o+ the Project or portion thereof designated above Is hereby established as Januar 31, Leo —+ 0 Horth is also the.dare of commencement of applicable warranties required by the Contract Documentsexcept as staled below. DEFIVITION OF DATE OF SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION The Data of Substantial Completion of the Work or designated portion thereof is the Date candied lis. the Architect when construction is sufficiently complete. in accordance with the Contract Documents, so the Owner an occupy or utilize the Work or des,6naied portion thereof for the use for which it is intended. as expressed in the Contract Documents. A list of nems to be completed of corrected. prepared by the Contractor and verified and amended bt the Architect, is attached hereto The failure to include amY items on such list does not alter the responsibility of the Contractor to complete all Nork m accordance with the Contract Documents The date of commencement of warranties for items on the attached list will be the date of final patment unless otherwise a{reed to ' hin THE,RITCHIE ORGANIZATION ` �� 2/2/90 ARCHITECT By Roland W.Martinea�Martineau, rte— GATE The Contractor will complete or correct the Work on the list of items attached hereto within FIFTEEN (15) days from the abose Date of Substantial Completion. CONNOLLY BROTHERS, INC, CONTRACTOR DATE The Owner accepts the Work of designated portion thereof as substantially complete and will assume full possession thereof at (time)on (date). SALEM HOSPITAL _ OWNER R1f DAT The responsibilities of the Owner and the Contractor for security,maintenance,heat, utilities,damage to the Work and insurance shall be as follows: 'NOW—Ornery and Conlracla's kaat and insurance counsel should dnerm .r ine and mwwwrance m4uiremena and coverge: Convector Mtao aecwe co"Wrtl W surety company. ef ani.) Contractor: Contractural Owner: Security, maintenance, heat, utilities, damage to work and insurance. Ala • • Arra OOttHE A 6raa • CTat I11,Of C ftECTS.171At COr+te U AV Aea11 nh lr.10". c701�tf7g �lAa�frit AMte1CA1i IMST11ytl Of ARCHITECTS.171E NEW y0aa AK..N.W..WAtdrINC1ON,O r ' TRO/THE RITCHIE ORGANIZATION CHECK LIST Project: SALEM HOSPITAL Comm. No. 6888 14ACOMBER 4 Date: February 2, 1990 The attached sheets represent a list of items observed and/or otherwise having come to the attention of the Architects and Engineers which require further attention. You are requested to return three (3) copies of this listing to TRO on or before fifteen (15) days after receipt with your comments as to actions taken on each item. Copies: Client 3 G.C. 3 Elec. 1 HVAC 1 Plumbing 1 Office 1 Building Ins ctor 1 ITEMS: ONTRACTOR'S COMMENTS: GENERAL: 1. ) Final cleaning .(,1A-11). 2. ) Record drawings (1A-6). 3. ) Certifications (1A-7) . 4. ) Maintenance instructions ( IA-5) . 5. ) Maintenance materials (See listing, January 10, 1989) . 6. ) Adjust contract allowance (See listing, January 10, 1989) . 7. ) Affidavit, Consent of Surety (A201-9.9. 2) . 8. ) Guarntees (See listing, January 10, 1989) . 9. ) Certificate of Occupancy-City of Salem. 10. ) Exterior Doors-weatherstrip (50-7). 11. ) Restore non-skid' surfaces in shower stalls. 12. ) Air and water balance and reports. 13. ) Completion of R.W. Sullivan ' s listing dated January 31, 1989. 14. ) Completion of BR+A's listing dated January 8, 1989. 15. ) Completion of BR+A's listing in preparation. 16. ) Replace double acting door strike plate (hardware set #39). 17. ) Corridor opposite swing doors - cap unused template at head of frame. 18. ) Assure support at L.P. ledge at fan coil enclosures. 19. ) Furnish and install splash guard at Janitors' Closets-Owg. 640-detail #12. 20. ) Fill in oversized hole at head of frame on hardware set #18. 21. ) Floor expansion joints-flush to carpet. 22. ) Install medical gas control valve for alternate Delivery Room. ' ITEMS: CONTRACTOR'S CONVENTS: 23. ) Clean crawl space. 24. ) Exterior-Rub all exposed concrete, clean brick work at limestone, provide weep holes above all thru- wall flashings. 25. ) Mechanical Room-Clean, additional support under stairs. 26. ) Address Owner's "punch list" in preparation. 27. ) Complete fire curtain. 28. ) Verify finishing on oak doors (9F-5). 29. ) Finalize Change Orders. The Ritchie Organization Architecture Planning Interiors 80 Bridge October 13, 1989 StreetNewton, Massachusetts cs ® 02158 BY FAX < 617 999400 aIm O7 FAX 34669 YC)t Z Mr. David Harris Assistant Building Inspector rn m rn City of Salem n - -� Public Property Department y One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 RE: SALEM HOSPITAL SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS DAVENPORT BUILDING-LEVEL NINE (9) Dear Mr. Harris: Formal notice is hereby given that, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, construction of the subject project is sufficiently complete in accordance with the contract drawings and specifications so the Owner can occupy the premises for its intended use. Furthermore, it is my understanding that the new suite complies with all prevailing state and local codes. Very truly yours, TRO/TH(E�R�I�TCHIE ORGANIZATION MilliaC. Winder, AIA Senior Associate WCW/ws enc. Birmingham, Alabama Sarasota, Florida CERTIFICATE OF Distribution to: NER SUBSTANTIAL ARCHITECT p li CONTRACTOR C) U -COMPLETION FIELD AIA DOCUMEM C704 OTHER Q PROJECT: Salem Hospital ARCHITECT: The Ritchie Organization (name,address) 81 Highland Avenue Salem, MA 01970 ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NUMBER: 6888 TO(Owner). 0 CONTRACTOR: Connolly Brothers, Inc. Salem Hospital CONTRACT FOR: Davenport 9 81 Highland Avenue Salem, MA 01970 L J CONTRACT DATE: September 16, 1988 DATE OF ISSUANCE: October 4, 1989 PROTECT OR DESIGNATED PORTIOX SHALL INCLUDE: Davenport 9 The Work performed under this Contract has been reviewed and found to be substantially complete. The Date of Substantial Completion of the Protect or portion thereof designated above Is hereby established as October 4, 1989 wh-cA ,s also the date of commencement of applicable warranties required by the Contract Documents.except as stated below. DEFINITION Of DATE Of SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION The Date of Substantial Completion of the Work or designated portion thereof is the Date certified by the Architect when construction is sufficiently complete. In accordance with the Contract Document, so the Owner can occupy or utilize the Work or designated portion thereof for the use for which it is intended. as expressed in the Contract Document A list of Items to be completed or correctedprepared by the Contactor and verified and amended by the Architect, is attached hereto The failure to include any items on such list does not after the responsibility of the Contactor to complete all %%ork in accordance with the Contract Documents The date of commencement of 114411frantie3 for items on the attached Int will be the date of final payment unless otherwise agreed to in writing THE RITCHIE ORGANIZATION 10/4/89 ARCHITECT BY Roland W. I1arttneau_, RX-. DATE The Contractor will complete or correct the Work on the list of ' s attached roto within 2 ENTY-ONE days from the abo%e Dau of Substantial Completion. CONNOLLY BROTHERS, INC, (0/f f CONTRACTOR DATE The Owner accepts the Work or designated portion thereof u substantially complete and will assume lull possession thereof Otiose)onjnd��,X� (date). SALEM HOSPITAL aOWNERe .,t S. n 01 DATE The responsibilities of the Owner and the Contractor for security,maintenance, heat, utilities, damage to the Work and insurance shall be as follows: hvote—O„na"i and Connacrory Inar and fmvrance count*[should determine and aide% inturance regviremnsy and Co.trge.Contractor Man secure consent of suraq company. d any.) Owner - Insurance, security, maintenance, heat, utilities and damage to the work. Contractor - Completion of "punch list" items, Consent of Surety. atA oocuAt(Nt Crar 0 CUTUICATI Of suaSTANTIAt COMPLITSD.r • Aral, 11'0 tomo«1Ca• 1041 Aria RICAN INIIITUTI Or ARC04ITICT3.Vat NEW yOas AVE.. N.W., WA.%"1"C1ON,0 r G7W 1978 The RitchieOrganizetion Architecture Planring Imeriors 90 Bridge Street Newton, Q M8395ctw5en BY PAX ort sa j '-' �°7 m 617 949400 �m FAX 3:&669 r�C' _ nm z Mr. David Harris 3c` �O o Assistant Building Inspectorao s rn City of Salem y =+ Public Property Department y One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 RE: SALEM HOSPITAL SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS DAVENPORT BUILDING-LEVEL NINE (9) Dear Mr. Harris: Formal notice is hereby given that, to the beat of my knowledge, information and belief, construction of the subject project is sufficiently complete in accordance with the contract drawings and specifications so the Owner can occupy the premises for its intended use. Furthermore, it is my understanding. that the new suite complies with all prevailing state and local codes, Very truly yours, TRO/THS RITCHIE ORGANIZATION MiliaC, Winder, AIA Senior Associate WCW/we enc. Birmingham, Alabama Sarasota, Florida CERTIFICATE OF E9iatribution m: SUBSTANTIAL °A CMITECr g COMPLETION FIELD RAc�oR AJA DOCUMENT CW OTHER PROJECT: Salem Hospital ARCHITECT: The Ritchie Organization aAme,address) 81 Highland Avenue Salem, MA 01970 ARCHITEC'T'S PROJECT NUMBER: 6888 TO (Owner), CONTRACTCIR: Connolly Brothers, inc. Salem Hospital CONTRACT FOR: Davenport 9 81 Highland Avenue Salem, MA 01970 L J CONTRACT DATE: September 16, 1988 DATE OF ISSUANCE: October 4, 1989 PROJECT OR DESIGxATED PORTIO`` SHALL INCLUDE: Davenport 9 The Walk perforreed under this Contract has been rwiewed and found to be substantially complete. The Date of Substantial Complel on of the Prosect or portion thereo(dn,gnated above it hereby esublrshed as October 4, 1989 much n also the data of commencement of applicable warraelies required by the Contract bacQMehes "Cepr as slated below. DEFINITION OF, DATE Of SUISTANTIAL COMA, PLIETIONN The Date of Substantial Completion of the Work of designated Portion thereof is the Date certified by the Architect when conittuctron rt sufficiently eompl'ese, rn accordance with the Contract Documents, so the Owner can occupy or iltilue the Work of designated portion thereof fat the use for which It Is intended, as ettpressed in the Contract Dpcurnanti. A Liss of Items to be trompeted of corrected, prepared by the Connactot and verified and amended b) the Architect, h afuck9d hereto The failure td include ant.hems on such list does nos allot the responsibility of the Contractor to COmplete all %%ork In accordance with the Contract Documents The data of commencement of watrantiei(or items on the attached Inst will be the 4410 of final payment unlou otherwise agteed IO in WHIM;. THE_RITCHIH ORGANIZATION �, ,� tom, c .�.,. 10/4/89 ARCHITECT IIYo an1`W.. Martineau, F.E. DATE The Com4007 will compine or correct the Work on the List Of)*" f s attached roto T 0 ¢JF within ENTY-ONE days tram the above Date of Subuantui Completion. CONNOLLY BROTHERS, INC.--,, ( S CONTRACTORDATE The Owner Accepts the Work or designated panic" thereof sa substantially complete and will Aewme full posieision thereof at Elirlie)an tdmo). SALEM HOSPITAL OWNER • DATE The responsibilities of the Owner and the COnlIMOF for security, Maintenance, heat, utilities, damage to the Work and insurance shall be as follows: tuoto—O'ner'i and CoAHMIDry affil OAd Nr1W4Me MUM41 f oarou(d delarin,Ae &W M*m, 0rwrance regwr9~V and eweragt: C�trtlacee! ANU wolf toruenr of sums ee"Fly.N any-1 Owner - Insurance, security, maintenance, heat, utilities and damage to the work. Contractor - Completion of "punch list" items, Consent of Surety. fila Oot"'Wy GM • CI171PICATI Of WISTAN7IAI CCtsPlltt®N a APa II ed'a I0111pN I A'aa "• 101 ANIIICA% ONSI17VTI OI AICKitlICTS,119 Ntw YOU AW,MAC. WAIMINCTQN, D r C,7pa a 9er0 MEDICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES , INC . 13384 POINT RIDER LANE • HERNDON, VIRGINIA 22071 PHONE 703 471 7204 FAX 703.481 .0768 MEMBER: NFPA ASPE ASHE C') O n � _ c �n 3+ N Z r- < �j n m Testing and Certification of (n - Alterations and Additions to the Medical Gas Pi[9elil® t iDavenport 9 Renovation f Salem Hospital- Salem, Massachusetts t Test performed for: Metropolitan Plumbers and Mechanical Contractors, Inc. Testing performed: September 10 Through September 16, 1989 Vow COKALt" �pobR�LgT�F6G�00 T� 'd) , f:v" - 1 l MEDICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES , INC . 13384 POINT RIDER LANE • HERNDON, VIRGINIA 22071 PHONE 703.471 .7204 FAX 703.481 .0768 MEMBER: NFPA CERTIFICATE ASPE ASHE This certificate is issued September 16 , 1989 , by Medical Engineering Services, Inc. This certificate relates to work performed pursuant to a 'request for testing services by Metropolitan Plumbing. In accordance with the terms of that agreement , Medical Engineering Services has tested . the alterations and additions to the medical gas piping systems known as Salem Hospital Davenport 9 Renovation Project located in Salem, Massachusetts, and hereby certifies that as of the time said inspection was performed, and except as noted on the data sheets : 1 . There are no cross connections within the medical gas piping systems as required by Para. 4-5. 1 .1 .2 , NFPA 99. 2 . The medical gas alarm systems are functioning within the established limits as required by Para . 4-5 . 1 . 4 , NFPA 99 . 3 . All zone valves have been tested for operation and internal leakage as required by Para. 4-5 . 1 . 3 . 2 , NFPA 99 . 4 . All zone valves, gas outlets and alarms installed with ( this project were properly labeled in accordance with Para. 4-5. 1 . 1 . 2 (b) , NFPA 99. 5 . Each positive pressure piping system has been purged and analyzed and the gas dispensed is of the proper concentration as defined by applicable standards and as required by Para. 4-5 . 1 . 2. 3 , NFPA 99 . 6 . All positive pressure gas systems used for patient application have been tested for particulate contaminants . 7 . All positive pressure gas systems used for patient application have been tested for moisture. 8 . All positive pressure gas systems used for patient application have been tested for Total Volatile Hydrocarbons , Halogenated Hydrocarbons , and Carbon Monoxide contaminants . The data sheets accompanying this certificate in final report form substantiate the certifications and provide additional information ; they should therefore be read carefully by all parties . Only those outlets and that portion of the systems reflected on the attached data sheets are included within this certificate. This certificate shall be rendered void at any time adjustments , modifications , or maintenance is performed on any p-f the systems . By: David B. Mohile Date: September 16, 1989 Page 1 of 14 The following :report covers the testing and certification of the medical gas systems serving the Davenport 9 renovation of the Salem Hospital complex, located in Salem, Massachusetts . The installed systems consist of oxygen, air and vacuum. Gas Outlet Configuration All outlets were Chemetron Quick Connect series 500. Labeling During the conduction of the test program, all gas outlets , zone valves and alarms were checked for proper labeling with respect to both gas service and function. A recommendation is made that all zone valves be labeled to define the specific rooms or areas that they control . (See discussion section) . PROCEDURES Zone Valve Leakage All zone valves for the areas listed on the data sheets were tested for internal seal leakaae and operation. This test was conducted by pressurizing the inlet side of each valve with the system pressure. With the zone valve closed and the downstream side of the valve at 0 psig., the zone was monitored with a pressure gauge for an increase in pressure. The data sheets present the final results of this test. Area Leakage Each positive pressure zone was tested for leakage within the zone. After the zone was pressurized, the zone valve was shut off and the zone was monitored for any drop in pressure. This would indicate a leak within the zone . Minor drops in pressure can be attributed to new 0-rings in outlets, which usually seat properly after several cycles of usage. Any significant leakage would be reported under the Discussion heading. Alarm Systems Test All alarms serving the specific zones of each installed system were tested for operation at the low pressure actuation points . The data sheets present the final results of this test. Date: September 16 , 1989 Page 2 of 14 . Cross Connection Test All gas outlets defined on the data sheets were tested for cross connections . This test was accomplished by pressurizing each system to a different pressure level as indicated by the data sheets . Each outlet was then accessed with a calibrated pressure gauge and, proper adapter. Verification of the proper applied pressure was made and recorded. The data sheets present the final results of this test. Supply Systems The supply systems for the installed gas services were checked for delivery pressure . The following pressures are those measured at the time of the test. Oxygen 50 . 5 psig Air 46 - 49. 5 psig* Vacuum 16 . 75 - 17 .25 inches Hg *See discussion section Y Moisture Test The terminal outlets for each positive pressure system intended for patient use were tested for moisture by utilizing an automatic dewpoint analyzer . The acceptable limits are as follows: All Gases Except Air -45 degrees C. Medical Air -18 degrees C. The data sheets present the final results of this test. Purging and Analysis All outlets for rooms and areas listed on the data sheets were purged to remove both foreign test gas and solid particulate contaminants . During this purging, an evaluation of the ability for each outlet to flow was made, including vacuum. The ability of the gas outlet to accept the proper adapter was also verified. Upon completion of the purging, the dispensed gas from the outlet was analyzed for proper concentration as defined by the U.S.P. and C.G.A. Commodity Specifications . All equipment used in the gas analysis was periodically calibrated with test gases having known concentration. levels . The data sheets present the final results of this test . Date: September 16 , 1989 Page 3 of 14 Main Tie Ins Medical Air On. September 10, 1989, a shut down of the hospital medical air system was performed for the purpose of connecting the new medical air piping system with the existing system. The tie in was made outside of the Operating Suite in the vicinity. of the patient holding area. Prior to the tie in it was noted that there was some particulate contamination in the medical air system. This particulate was identified as copper oxide. It was probably not blown out of the system during the last portion of work. After the tie in, the system was reenergized and the outlets closest to the tie in were tested for particulate and moisture contamination, as well as trichloroethylene, carbon monoxide and hydrocarbons as methane equivalents . The results were as follows. Trichloroethylene <1 ppm Carbon monoxide <l. ppm Methane equivalents <1 ppm Particulates none noted Moisture +210 F. *See discussion Oxygen Concentration 20. 8 % It was noted at the time that there was a high moisture content in the medical air system. Oxygen On September 13 , 1989, a shut down of the oxygen system took place to allow for expansion into the ninth floor. The tie in took place on the eighth floor outside the Physical Therapy area . Prior to the work taking place, baseline readings were taken on the oxygen system for trichloroethylene, methane equivalents and particulate contaminants , as well as moisture and concentration. After the tie in was completed, the system was reenergized and another set of readings was taken. The results were as follows. Trichloroethylene <1 ppm Carbon monoxide <1 ppm Methane equivalents <1 ppm Particulates none noted Moisture -480 F. Oxygen Concentration 99. 5 % Date: September 16, 1989 Page 4 of 14 Readings were also taken in the new construction area after this tie in since the air and oxygen system were now live with hospital gas. The results were as follows for both the air and oxygen. Trichloroethylene <1 ppm Carbon monoxide <1 ppm Methane equivalents <l ppm Purity Conclusions The work done to install the new oxygen and air pipelines on Davenport 9 added nothing .to the pipelines in the way of contaminants . DISCUSSION If minor problems were discovered during the conduction of the test program an attempt to resolve the problem was made. The following information relates to items that were not resolved. The medical air pressure fluctuated between 46 and 49 . 5 Psi . The NFPA recommendation is a constant pressure selected by the hospital from a range between 50 and 55 psi. Those hospital that have high . risers such as Salem might select a pressure of 54 psi at the compressor which will yield a pressure of 50 psi on the upper floors. Consideration should be given to determining if the air line regulator is defective which might explain the fluctuation . The medical air system appears to contain .a high level of moisture. Consideration should be given to determining the cause of this moisture production and the extent of the moisture contamination in the facility . We would be interested in working with the facility to this end. Rooms 907 and 908 are on the other side of the fire doors which appear to delineate different nursing units . This might cause some confusion during a fire or other emergency . Consideration should be given to having signs clearly marked indicating which rooms they control mounted above the zone valve box assemblies . D A T A S H E E T S MEDICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES DATE: 9/10/89 PAGE 5 OF 14 CROSS-CONNECTION DATA SHEET FACILITY: Salem Hospital TESTED BY: D, Mohile AREA: Davenport 9 WITNESS: GAS SERVICE ROOM OXYGEN N20 AIR Nx VACUUM REMARKS NO. 50 psi 40psi 60 psi 160 psi 12" Hg 1 901 50 12/12 2 902 50 12/12. 3 903 50 60 12/12 4 50 60 12/12 5 904 50 60 12/12 6 . 905 50 60 12/12 7 906 50 60 12/12 8 925 50 60 12/12 9 50 60 12/12 10 926 50 60 12/12 11 927 50 60 12/12 12 50 60 12/12 13 928 50 12 14 50 12 15 r940me t 50 12/12 16 17 18 19 20 NOTES: MEDICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES 9/10/89 DATE: PAGE-i6PAGE—iL OF 14 CROSS-CONNECTION DATA SHEET FACILITY: Salem Hospital TESTED BY: D. Mohile Davenport 9 AREA: WITNESS: GAS SERVICE ROOM O%YGEN N20 AIR NZ VACUUM REMARKS NO. 50 psi 40 psi 60 psi 160 psi 12" Hg . 1 907 50 ' 60 12/12 2 908 50 60 12/12 3 909 50 60 12/12 4 910 50 60 12/12 5 911 50 12/12 6 912 50 12/12 7 913 50 12/12 8 914 50 12/12 9 915 50 12/12 10 916 50 12/12 11 50 12/12 12 917 50 12/12 13 918 50 12/12 14 50 12/12 15 919 50 12/12 16 50 12/12 17 920 50 12/12 18 50 12/12 19921 50 12/12 20 50 12/12 NOTES: MEDICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES DATE: 9/10/89 PAGE 7 OF 14 CROSS-CONNECTION DATA SHEET FACILITY: Salem Hospital TESTED BY: D. Mohile AREA: Davenport 9 WITNESS: GAS SERVICE ROOM OXYGENN20 AIR Nx VACUUM NO. REMARKS 50 psi 40 psi 60 psi 160 psi 12" Hg 1 922 50 ' 12/12 2 50 12/12 3 923 50 12/12 4 50 12/12 5 924 50 12/12 6 50 12/12 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 NOTES: MEDICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES DATE: 9/13/89 PAGE 8 OF 14 GAS CONCENTRATION & PURGING DATA SHEET FACILITY: Salem Hospital TESTED BY: D. Mohile AREA: Davenport 9 WITNESS: GAS SERVICE CONCENTRATION ROOM OXYGEN WO AIR N2 REMARKS LNO: %02 %02 1 901 99.5 2 902 99.5 3 903 99.5 20.8 4 99.5 20.8 ' 5 904 99.5 20.8 61 905 99.5 20.8 7 906 99.5 20.8 8 025 99.5 20.8 9 99.5 20,8 10 926 99.5 20.8 11 927 99.5 20,8 12 99.5 20.8 13 928 99.5 14 99.5 15 reatme t 940 99.5 16 17 18 19 20 NOTES: MEDICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES DATE: 9/13/89 PAGE 2 OF 14 GAS CONCENTRATION & PURGING DATA SHEET FACILITY: Salem Hospital TESTED BY: D. Mohile AREA: Davenport 9 WITNESS: � GAS SERVICE CONCENTRATION ROOM OXYGEN .wo AIR Na REMARKS NO. %Ox %Oz 1 907 99.5 20.8 2 908 99.5 20.8 3 909 99.5 20.8 . 4 910 99.5 20.8 5 911 99.5 6 . 912 . 99.5 7 913 99.5 8 914 99.5 9 915 99.5 10 916 99.5 11 99.5 12 917 99.5 13 918 99.5 14 99.5 15 919 99.5 16 99.5 17 920 99.5 18 99.5 19 921 99.5 20 99.5 NOTES: MEDICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES DATE: 9/13/89 PAGE 10 OF 14 GAS CONCENTRATION & PURGING DATA SHEET FACILITY: Salem Hospital TESTED BY: D. Mohile AREA: Davenport 9 WITNESS: GAS SERVICE CONCENTRATION ROOM OXYGEN WO AIR Nx REMARKS NO. %02 %02 1 922 99.5 2 99.5 3 923 99.5 4 99.5 5 924 99.5 6 99.5 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 NOTES: MEDICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES DATE: I1 9/13/89 PAGE OF 14 ZONE VALVE DATA SHEET FACILITY: Salem 1Tospital TESTED BY: D. Mobile WITNESS: INTERNAL LEAKAGE ZONE OR OXYGEN OUT N'O AIR NITROGEN VACUUM AREA IN IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT 9 north end 51 0 44 0 19 0 9 south end . 51 0 49 0 14 0 NOTES: MEDICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES DATE: 9/13/89 PAGE 12 OF 14 LEAK TEST DATA SHEET Salem Hospital D. Mohile FACILITY: TESTED BY: WITNESS: ZONE OR AREA OXYGEN N'O AIR NITROGEN 9 north side 0.0 0.0 9 south side 0.0 0.0 NOTES: MEDICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES DATE 9/13/89 PAGE 13 OF 14 MOISTURE ANALYSIS DATA SHEET FACILITY: Salem Hospital TESTED BY: D. Mohile AREA: 9th floor WITNESS: DEWPOINT ROOM OXYGEN N20 AIR REMARKS NO. -45°C -45°C -18°C t -48 -2 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 NOTES: MEDICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES DATE: 9/10/89 PAGE 14 OF 1_4 AREA ALARM TEST DATA SHEET FACILITY: Salem Hospital TESTED BY: D. Mohile WITNESS: PRESSURE SET POINTS ZONE OXYGEN N20 AIR NITROGEN VACUUM OR PSI PSI PSI PSI "149 AREA HI LO HI LO HI LO- HI LO LO HI LO HI LO 9 north 60 40 60 40 12 9 south 60 40 60 40 12 NOTES: The Ritchie Organization Architecture Planning Interiors 80 Bridge Street Newton, Massachusetts September 11; 1989 02188 Comm. No. 6888 617' 969 9400 y FAX 332 4669 rn H "9 tD Mr. David J. Harris om L o Assistant Building Inspector Nn vco — City of Salem rn< W Public Property Department :Xo w c One Salem Green n Salem, MA 01970 H to CZ CO RE: SALEMIHOSPITAL D ENPORT.9 Dear Mr. Harris: In accordance with the State Building Code Commission, Section 127, the construction of Salem Hospital's Davenport 9 project has been regularly and periodically visited to observe general compliance with the construction documents approved for the building. At this writing, the project is approximately95% completed Special observations were made at the "rough and finish" stages. When the contractor advises us that the project is substantially completed, we will conduct an inspection and file a report of our review. Very truly yours, TRO/THE RITCHIE -,ORGANIZATION Roland W. Martineau, P.E. Construction Consultant RWM/ws cc: Connolly Brothers M. Farnola a Birmingham, Alabama Sarasota, Florida OFFICE 1498 HIGH STREET LABORATORY BRIDGEWATER, MA 02924 176 PLYMOUTH STREET BRIDGEWATER, MA 02324 OLIVEIRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES, INC. FOOD-DAIRY PRODUCTS-WATER-WASTEWATER CHEMICAL&BACTERIOLOGICAL ANALYSES (508)697.2650 July 27, 1989 Able Engineering Corp. P. 0. Box 398 Millis, Mass. 02054 Subject: Macomber Building Salem.Hosp_ital, Salem, Mass. 4th. Floor Total Coliform S.P.C./ml. /100 ml. @ 35 C. @ 35 C. Membrane Filter Cold Water - Beginning of Main 1 1 Hot Water - beginning of Main 6 0 c'� cn Cold Water - End Of Main ., 450 2 tJ1 Hot Water - End of Main 710 'I0 c, C r- z rrt Z a Samples collected by Mr. Stephen Mercer of Able Engineering Corp. m Samples delivered to laboratory by Mr. Stephen Mercer on 7/25/89 atn�155/11 , - Comment: End of Main should have additional flushing and then be re-examined. . s Director OFFICE LABORATORY 1498 HIGH STREET 176 PLYMOUTH STREET BRIDGEWATER,MA 02324 BRIDGEWATER,MA 02324 OLIVEIRA ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORIES, INC. FOOD-DAIRY PRODUCTS-WATER-WASTEWATER CHEMICAL&BACTERIOLOGICAL ANALYSES (508)697.2650 August 7, 1989 Able Engineering Corp. P. 0. Box 398 Millis Mass. 02054 Subject: Salem Hospital - Salem, Mass. Macomber Building ( 4th. Floor ) Total Coliform S.P.C./ml. /100 ml. @ 35 C. @ 35 C. Membrane Filter Cold Water - Beginnig of Main 1 0 Cold Water - End of Main 43 0 Hot Water - End of Main 31 0 Cold Water - 5th. Floor - Corner Sink L 1 0 Hot Water - 5th. Floor - � r"..o � Corner Sink 3 0 Cm)rn r y �m -- z m< c) grn v o L e less than o �" M V N -7 Samples collected by Mr. Stephen Mercer of Able Engineering on 8/1/89 at 3:" P.Im Samples delivered to laboratory by Mr. Stephen Mercer on 8/2/89 at 10:30 A.M. Director MEDICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES , INC . 13384 POINT RIDER LANE • HERNDON, VIRGINIA 22071 PHONE 703.471 .7204 FAX 703.481 .0768 MEMBER: NFPA ASPE TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE ASHE This certificate is issued _ f� y G 1989, by Medical Engineering Services, Inc. Th ' s certificate relates to work performed pursuant to a request for testing services by retropggita4 Plumbing. In accordance with the terms of that 4agreek ntH Medical Engineering Services has tested the `41ter onstand additions to the medical gas piping systems known cas SalVnii'Bospital Project at located in Salem, Massachusetts , and �!herek}y; d`Y'',tifies that as of the time said inspection was 5erfoMee,',and except as noted on the data sheets: S m cc 0- co 1TYDere are no cross connections within the medical gas C110ping systems as required by Para. 4-5 . 1 . 1 . 2, NFPA 99 . 2 . The medical gas alarm systems are functioning within the established limits as required by Para. 4-5 . 1 . 4 , NFPA 99 . 3 . All zone valves have been tested for operation and internal leakage as required by Para. 4-5 . 1 . 3 . 2 , NFPA 99 . 4 . All zone valves, gas outlets and alarms installed with this project were properly labeled in accordance with Para. 4-5 . 1 . 1 . 2 ( b) , NFPA 99. 5 . Each positive pressure piping system has been purged and analyzed and the gas dispensed is of the proper concentration as defined by applicable standards and as required by Para. 4-5. 1 . 2. 3 , NFPA 99. 6 . All positive pressure gas systems used for patient application have been tested for particulate contaminants . 7 . All positive pressure gas systems used for patient application have been tested for moisture. The data sheets accompanying this certificate in final report form substantiate the certifications and provide additional information ; they should therefore be read carefully by all parties . Only those outlets and that portion of the systems reflected on the attached data sheets are included within this certificate. This certificate shall be rendered void at any time adjustments, modifications, or maintenance is performed on an of t systems . By: David B. Mohil.e The Ritchie Organization Architecture Planning Interiors 80 Bridge Street e7 Newton, - MassacTi;setts Cc n 02158 �" -n r Sl September 22, 1989 Mn (Do617 ssRnoo FAX33?�T5�669 Comm. No. 6888 g< LA C2 J [v y c0 Mr. David J. Harris - Assistant Building Inspector City of Salem Public Property Department One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 RE: SALEM HOSPITAL Dear David: Following our conversation regarding the corridor smoke doors, please see attached code provisions. Very truly yours, TRO/THE RITCHIE ORGANIZATION oland W. Martineau, P.E. Construction Consultant RWM/ws enc. cc: M. Farnola w/enc. Connolly Brothers w/enc. Birmingham, Alabama Sarasota, Florida �r c Page i Client 1 METROPOLITAN PLUMBERS rrsssssssawswersssaa&a&&sar 1406 Broadway BARCLAY CHEMICAL COMPANY Dracut, MA 01026 $50 Coolidge Avenue ! � Matertowns .MA 02172 Bend To 1 Mr.Oohn Roy 4617) 926 - 2400 I( Mr.D.Carvell rsrrswsssssaarrssssssaaarsw i Date of Sampling f 09/12/0! _I Copy to s R.Dion Date of Report 2 09/12/09 Reference I Belem Hospital - Drinking Mater sarrrrrrrrrw.•raaarrrwwwwrswasssssasawwssssassaaarwrsaswsaa�rsrsssaarwarwwsrrsrr Room 001 Room 901-A Roos 916-A Room 929-A Constituent units. rrrarawrarrarrwaarwrwwrrrwwwwsrsrswwra rwrwrswaaasaaasssssaaarsrrasssaaarlrr�rsssr Coli4or&n Bacteria •/100ml 0 O 0 0 Pre& Chlorine ppm 0.2 0.2 o. 1 0.3 I i i n W 4 w a� m 'Aen o (n n m< ry n gm Y p 477 ]s � '� C9 I arrwwwawwarrasrrsssssarrrwawsssssaarrwsassasaaasrwsssssaasawssssssrrssssssassaar Comments I Method of Arnslysisl Chlorine - OPD Free Chlorine procedure Coliforms - Membrane Filter Teohnique •sp&ctfully submitted by# Richard Traverse - Mgr.TeoheBvos. BARCLAY CHEMICAL COMPANYO INC. r .a8� ,y Peat 2 Client s METROPOLITAN PLUMBERS ++r+rwrrrfwrrlrrrrrrwrfrrws I %ARCLAY CHEMICAL COMPANY 130 Coolidge Avenue {i Matertowng MA 08178 tr: Send To 1 (617) 986 - 9400 n, rrrrlwfrffrw..rrwsrlfrsrrr. �;:. z bst* of sampling s Copy to s R.bion bat* of Report 0 04/19/69 Referenee � yy lrrr.rlrrfrrrrrwwwrrrrrw!!!lrwrr!lrrrrffrrrfrrf!lrwrrfrlrfrrfrrrwrwfrwwfrlrwawlw ' i Room 980-A s constituent Units wrrrrrrwrrrrrrrwrlrrrrwrrwrrrfwfrfrlrfrrrrtrwwrgrrlrrrlrrlr�rwrlrwwfurr!lufrw Vii ' Coliform Bacteris 0/100m1 0 I Free Chlorine ppm ova Cl C C T m p (n c) Z am N n r' n� rnrn r r m s a � a � y C N C,p rrrrrwrwrrrrlrrrrlrrf rrrrwrrw•rwrrrr•rrrrrrrrwrrwwrw!!!lwfilrrrrlw!lwrrrrrwfrrr. Comments s RespoatfUlly submitted by. Riohard Traverse - Mgr.Tech.Bvca- BARCLAY CHEMICAL COMPANYg INC. 8I111DMG DOT 25 11 46 AH ' 4AGGIM PREVENTERS IkECEIVED 55 BUILDING Cgy OF SAL " LOCATION SYSTEM DAV 1 Mech. Rm. Dietary Refrig. DAV 1 Mech. Rm. Day. 2 Heat DAV. 2 Pot Rm. Hood Wash DAV. - 3 MTC. Office Day. 3 - 5 Heat DAV. 6 Mech. Rm. Recovery / Day. 6 - 11 Heat PHIPPEN 2 Absorber Rm. Dav A.C. Chilled Water Make-Up DOMESTIC 4 laundry - Rm. 11 laundry Service MAC 3 Mech. Rm. Mac, 4 Heat MAC 3 Mech. Rm. Mac. Bldg. Sprinkler Service MAIN 5 Mech. Rm. N.S. Cardiology Heat MAIN 5 Hskpg. Corridor Main Bldg. Sprinkler Service POWER PLANT Old Boiler Rm. High Pressure Boilers POWER PLANT Old Boiler Rm. Cleaver-Brooks Boiler POWER PLANT New Boiler Rm. Low Pressure Boiler #1, #2 Pacer Plant Old Boiler Rm. Sprinkler Service M.O.B 1 Old Mech. Rm. M.O.B. Heat H.H. Ground Old Bike Rm. Sprinkler Service May 1989 + . the Commonfuettlth of + Mass arhusetts I ' uUDEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ENGINEERING Division of Water Supply '' In accordance with the provisions of the General Laws, Chapter 111, Section 160A and Rules and Regulations adopted under General Laws, Chapter 111, Section 160 as amended n by the Acts of 1987, Chapter 174, Section 15, A permit is hereby granted to: 4'7 I ' SALEM HOSPITAL 258155604 r 81 HIGHLAND AVE SALEM , MA 01970 1989 to maintain a water supply cross connection at DAVENPORT BUILDING ---- ----------------------------------------------------------------- ------ --------------------------------- (Areet Address or Name of Building! (CitY or sown Size of Valves: —0'750_ • Inches Make of Valves: WATTS 900 !� IGipe $ue) _ __________________________________________ IManuioJb,.r) MAINTENANCE OFFICE O --------------------------------------------------------- Ic.o« i«Drool --------- t 7 This permit is valid for one year from date subject to revocation for cause. Date:--January 1, 1989 13873 For The Commissioner � f , Director KUP CST PREMISES Division of Water Supply W UJ LL) V 1 L) C9 ,� US w do y ct3 W V Backflow Prevention Device TEST Inspection and Maintenance Initial ❑ p` Report Form Retest Supplier Semiannual o Owner Annual Department of Environmental Quality Engineering p Owner of Property j Date 00s Mailing Address I.J Examined by 2 S s Certificate# �Z36 ' (Town')) (zip) Cross Connection I.D. # S� #410E-_7 �6 g Contact Person ;/5 Phone#'�'7 / �,?7 yi Device Address RPBP DV DCVA ❑ (Town) (zip) Bronze iron ❑ Exact Device Location V• BL D6. - 1 E v E f. 3 ma�Nr o«�cE � Secondary Supply or System Type of Gate Valve By-Pass No Yes For Unit No. Make L�J 4 S Model No. AM Size l��e Serial No. _17%2/d Check Valve No. 1 Check Valve No. 2 Differential Pressure Relief Valve Tests Before Leaked( ) Leaked( ) Opened at Psi Repairs Closed Tight( ) Closed Tight( ) Reduced Pressure `Pressure drop across ' First Check Psi *Describe Repairs,Parts and Materials used C" V] FHnal Tes{.: a Closed Tight( Closed Tight( Opened at S Psi C= o� • Pressure drop Reduced Pressure �40- wacross G 7 =_j First Check Psi a wQ —t sr-� eCo Win%essed y: a- PASS FAIL ❑ Owner's . wner'a Agent Water W 04ficiall AP N Certified Tester * State Department of Plumber's Name Environmental Quality Engineering Plumbers License# the 01ommoufueolth of cMttssachusetts ' r` DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL EJ-1 ul 9QUALITY ENGINEERING Division of Water Supply y In accordance with the provisions of the General Laws, Chapter 111, Section 160A and Rules and Regulations adopted under General Laws, Chapter 111, Section 160 as amended n by the Acts of 1987, Chapter 174, Section 15, A permit is hereby granted to: SALEM HOSPITAL 258155603 � . 81 HIGHLAND AVE — SALEM MA 01970 1989 r to maintain a water supply cross connection at �— DAVENPOPT BUILDING _r - - - -- --- ----------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- )Slreet Addressor Nome of Beild ing) icily or Town) €� Size of Valves: _1 . 000 Inches Make of Valves: WATTS ------------------------------------------ IPipe Sixei (Manefaclerer) 6TH FLOOR, MECHANICAL ROOM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- © )Exact Location) This permit is valid for one year from date subject to revocation for cause. ® 1 p Date: January 1, 1989 I 0 For Th om ission r------------------ For The Commissioner ----------------- 4 Director *'- KEEP ON PREMISES Division of water Supply Cy , Ut y� tF Cr Z1 a, ♦— W r/7 c.7 Backflow Prevention Device TEST Inspection and Maintenance Initial ❑ `f Form Report FRetest ❑ ,rSupplier Semis mual Owner Annual Department of Environmental Quality Engineering La Owner of Property Mailing Address / Examined by -i-, 7D Certificate# 36 - (Town) (zip) Cross Connection I.D. # rT f, Contact Person j;Q Phone#' L�� X -ILa7V Device Address :.-4W -F RPBP DCVA ❑ (Town) (zip) Bronze ® Iron ❑ Exact Device Location N kr -84 66 &&.9 i?Af. ,I/ it Secondary Supply or System Type of Gate Valve "A/'5 -S By-Pass N,o_ , Yes For Unit No. Make Model No. 50(O Size q Serial No. Check Valve No. 1 Check Valve No. 2 Differential Pressure Relief Valve Tests Before Leaked( ) Leaked( ) Opened at Psi Repairs Closed Tight( ) Closed Tight( ) Reduced Pressure 'Pressure drop across First Check Psi *Describe Repairs,Parts and Materials used Final Tem a Closed Tight(k< Closed Tight(1< Opened at 4 Psi G ' Pressure drop Reduced Pressure C3 across o r > First Check�4�- Psi Wu- if Wimp d by:in �)a �t PASS FAIL ❑ Own is Agent Remarks qtq Vj/ rks Official Cirr/ifireedd Tester ' State Department of Plumber's Name Environmental Quality Engineering Plumber's License# 4 r the (gommonfnealt4 of Massac4usetto 1 uVDEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ENGINEERING r, Division of Water Supply Y In accordance with the provisions of the General Laws, Chapter 111, Section 160A and Rules and Regulations adopted under General Laws, Chapter 111, Section 160 as amended r, by the Acts of 1987, Chapter 174, Section 15, A permit is hereby granted to: Cr r, SALEM HOSPITAL y 258155607 n 81 HIGHLAND SAVE SALEM MA 01970 1989 to maintain a water supply cross connection at DAVENPORT BUILDING -------------------------------------------------------------- ------ - -- - (Street Addressor Name of Building) (City or sown e^. Size of Valves: _0. 750--- Inches Make of Valves: WATTS 900 -------- -------- --------------- ----------------- (Pipe Sixe) ABSORBER ROOM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (Fxocl Locotion) 0 This permit is valid for one year from date subject to revocation for cause. 13876 Date: January 1, 1989 ------------------For T eCom-fission Commissioner ------------------ C% The Commissioner o r r�llr!K16� , -------------------------------------------------------- 0 Director f KEEP ON PREMISES Division of Water Supply © l -- _ m vi - a o Cn �to u 'd to LU-d Utn C� W LL —J a o >- o. r CD W V R Backflow Prevention Device TFST Inspection and Maintenance Initial ❑ Retest ❑ Report Form Supplier Semiannual ❑ Owner Annual Department of Environmental Quality Engineering Owner of Property Date Mailing Address i Examined by // f}A/ lie O Certificate# own JJ�� P) Cross Connection I.D. # � Contact Person-10112 bl�6 Phone#,1-20 i�04 Device Address Mme- Xaa 7y RPBP 5r DCVA ❑ (Town) 1 (Tp) Bronze J' Iron ❑ Exact Device LocationyEN '/ D� ARSo.PAP.e iPrh_ ype y�.9TlS Secondary Supply or System T of Gate Valve By-Pass o Yes For Unit No. Make PA -S Model No. po. Size Serial No. , :LW--2/ 4 Check Valve No. 1 Check Valve No.2 Differential Pressure Relief Valve Tests Before Leaked( ) Leaked( ) Opened at Psi airs -co vNi Closed Tight( ) Closed Tight ( ) Reduced Pressure g a 'Pressure drop S across r �= First Check Psi CD rr w. *ascribe � u.a Itn pairs,Parts to ed Matel "CS used t� n Final Test Closed Tight( Closed Tight(Ai)/ Opened at Psi Pressure drop Reduced Pressure across First Check-7— Psi witri . PASS FAIL ❑ Remarks Owner's Agent Water Nyprks Official Certified Tester ' * State Department of Plumber's Name Environmental Quality Engineering Plumber's License# The Ritchie Organization Architecture Planning Interiors 80 CIDBridge Ter Street NewtR 'e >� Massaqhusetts T7402158 IF to,,r'D September 22, 1989 1.,rm sn ss�noo Comm. No. 6888 -W FAxaszyasss � w cn �_ Mr. David J. Harris Assistant Building Inspector City of Salem Public Property Department One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 RE: SALEM HOSPITAL DAVENPORT Dear David: We have reviewed the design and installation of the wheelchair shower room on Davenport 9 and find that it conforms to the Commonwealth of Massachusetts codes. Should you have any comments or questions, we should be pleased to review them with you. Very truly yours, TRO/THE RITCHIE ORGANIZATION Roland W. Martineau, P.E. Construction Consultant RWM/ws cc: M. Farnola Connolly Brothers G Birmingham, Alabama Sarasota, Florida W-46 nae nooas,nxn•Wwnows 2-2.5 Raised noncombustible sills or threshold's shall be bottom of the doorandthe floorshall novexceed N4 in. 1 C accep[able whenever combustible floor coverings are con- j 19.p mm). templated or are in use on one or both-sides of the door (c) The clearance between the bottom bfthe dobr'and openings: (See Figure B-2.) the nominal surface of floor coverintgs as provided for in 2-2.7 shall not exceed 1h in. (12.72 mm) I" 2-2.6 Combustible floor covering shall .not extend - ,. . - , through openings protected by 3-hour fire,protection 2-6' Frames with Transoms;Side Lights,or Panels. rated 'door assemblies. 2-6.1 Side lights, side panels, and/or transorns shall be 2-2.7 Combustible floor coverin that extend through non-operable when installed in labeled frames,.. openings protected by I1A-, I-, y¢-, or bis-hour fire 2-6.2 Frames with solid transoms and/or panels shall be protection rated fire door assemblies shall have a mini- permittedn situations where 3-.1 1h-1 1-',or s%-hour fire mum of a Class II interior floor finish rating in actor- i dance with the classification of Section 6=5 of NFPA 101, protections required. Life Safety Code. 2-6;3 Frames with glazed transoms and/or side lights 2-3 Wall Openings. Wall openings shall be con- shall be permitted in situations where 3%-hour fire protec- strutted to readily accept the fire door frame. The frame uon.is required. shall be considered to be non-load-bearing except when 2-7 Astragals. specifically designed to carry loads. Frames shall be securely anchored to the wall construction. 2-7.1 Doors swinging in pairs and having a fire protec- tion rating of more than 1 yf hours shall have an overlap- 2-4 Lintels. Separate reinforcing units shall be pro- ping astragal. vided for pressed steel door frames, when necessary, to support overhead wall loads over door openings. Rein- 2-7.2 Doors swinging in pairs and having a fire protec- forcements of head members of pressed steel door frames tion rating of not more than 14 hours, when located shall not be permitted. (See Figures B-5-11-8.) within a means of egress, shall not be equipped with astragals that inhibit the free use of either leaf.. 2-5 Frames. 2-7.3 Pairs.of doors that require astragals shall have at 2-5.1* Only labeled door frames shall be used. least one attached in place so as to.protect approximately 2-5.2 Methods of anchoring shall be as shown in the � in. (19.1 mm) or as may be otherwise indicated in the ng individual published listings. (See Figures B-21, 8-23, listing or as provided in Safety Stannard for Fire Door and B-31; also see 2-8.2.4.) Frames (UL 69 or ANSI Al55.1). 2-8 Builders Hardware. (See Figures B-20—B-28.) 2-5,2.1• Door frames intended for drywall installation shall be of the wrap-around type. Anchors shall be ap- 2-8.1 Hinges. propriately secured to vertical wall studs and floor. 2-8.1.1 Hinges shall be as required in Table 2-8A. 2-5.2.2 Proprietary type slip-on door frames(i.e., those 2-8.1.2 Attaching Hinges to Doors. Mortise hinges for use on pre-prepared openings in drywall construction) shall be secured to reinforcements in the doors with steel shall be installed in accordance with the manufacturer's machine screws and surface hinges shall be attached with - installation instructions. steel through-bolts. 2-5.2.8 Door frames provided with expansion bolt-type Exception.' Mortise hinges shall be secured to wood and anchors are intended to be installed in masonry walls plastic covered composite or wood core doors with No. 12 only. by Pt/-in. (31.75-mm) flat threaded-to-the-head, steel wood screws. 2-5.3, Wood or plastic-facedcomposite or wood core doors shall be installed in labeled door frames of the 2-8.1.3 Attaching Hinges to Frame. .Binges.shall. be single unit type. Steel-faced composite, hollow metal, secured to frames with steel screws. Types of screws will - t metal clad (Kalamein), and flush sheet metal doors shall vary depending onmaterial used for the-tnanufactuie of - be installed in pressed steel or steel channel frames. labeled door frames. Refer to labeled door frame manu- facturers' instructions and published listings for specific 2-5.4 The clearance between the door and the frame screw requirements. ,and between meeting edges of doors swinging in pairs 2-8.2 Locks or Latches. shall not exceed % in. (3.18 mm). 2-8.2.1 Only labeled locks and latches or labeled fire 2-5.5 The clearance under the bottom of the door shall exit hardware(panic devices) meeting both life safety re- be as follows: quirements andfireprotection requirements shall be (a) The clearance between the bottom,of the door and used. (See Sections 0-3 and•0-4, Introduction.) a raised noncombustible sill shall not exceed '/s in. (9.53 2-8,2.2 Fire,exit hardware shall be installed'only-on fire ' mm).;:, i•. ,. door"'hearing the marking, "Fire Doer,to Be Equipped (b) Where there is no sill, the clearance between the with Fire Exit Hardware." 19M Edition NEW HEALTH CARE OCCUPANCIES 101-87 12-3.7.5 Doors in smoke barriers shall be substantial doors, SECTION 12-4 SPECIAL PROVISIONS such as 1%4 in. (4.4 cm) thick, solid bonded wood core or con- struction that will resist fire for at least twenty minutes. Cross 12-4.1 Windowless Buildings. See Section 30-7 for require- corridor openings in smoke barriers shall be protected by a pair mems for windowless buildings. of swinging doors or a horizontal sliding door complying with 12-4.2 High Rise Buildings. (See 11-1.6 and 12-2.2.2.8.) 5-2.1.14. Swinging doors shall be arranged so that each door will swing in a direction opposite from the other.The minimum 12-4.3 Operating Features. (See Chapter 31.) door leaf width for swinging doors shall be as follows: (a) hospitals and nursing homes: 44 in. (122 cm) (b) hospitals for psychiatric care and limited care facilities: SECTION 12-5 BUILDING SERVICES 34 in. (86 cm) 12-5.1 Utilities. The minimum clear opening for horizontal sliding doors shall 12.5.1.1 Utilities shall comply with the provisions of Sectior be as follows: 7-I (a) hospitals and nursing homes: 88 in. (224 cm) (b) hospitals for psychiatric care and limited care facilities: 12-5.1.2 Alarms,emergency communication systems,and tht 68 in. (173 cm) illumination of generator set locations shall be as described it the Life Safety Branch of N FPA 99,Standard for Health Can Facilities. 12-3.7.6 Doors it,smoke barriers shall comply with 6-3.4 and shall be self-closing or automatic closing in accordance with 12-5.1.3 Any health care occupancy as indicated withir 12-2.2.2.6. 12-1.1.1.2 that normally utilizes life support devices shall havt electrical systems designed and installed in accordance Witt 12-3.7.7 Vision panels of approved transparent wired glass NEPA 99, Standard for Health Care Facilities. not exceeding 1,296 sq in. (.84 sq m) in steel or other approved Exception: This requirement does not apply to a facility tha metal frames shall be provided in each cross corridor swinging has life support equipment for emergency purposes only. door and at each cross corridor horizontal sliding door in a smoke barrier. 12-5.2 Heating, Ventilating, and Air Conditioning. 12-5.2.1 Heating,ventilating,and air conditioning shall cam 12-3.7.8 Rabbets, bevels, or astragals are required at the ply with the provisions of Section 7-2 and shall be installed ii meeting edges,and stops are regmred at the head and sides of accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. door frames in smoke barriers.Positive latching hardware is not Exception. As modified in 12-5.2.2 following. required. Center mullions are prohibited. � 12-5.2.2 Any heating device other than a central heating plant shall be so designed and installed that combustible mate 12-3.8 Special Features. rial will not be ignited by it or its appurtenances. If fuel fired 12-3.8.1 Every patient sleeping room shall have an outside such heating devices shall be chimney or vent connected, shal window or outside door arranged and located so that it can be take air for combustion directly from outside, and shall be s. opened from the inside to permit the venting of products of designed and installed to provide for complete separation of th combustion and to permit any occupant to have direct access to combustion system from the atmosphere of the occupied area fresh air in case of emergency. (See 11-1.1.1.7 for detention Any heating device shall have safety features to immediate), screen requirements.)The maximum allowable sill height shall stop the flow of fuel and shut down the equipment in case e not exceed 36 in. (91 cm) above the floor. Where windows either excessive temperatures or ignition failure. - require the use-of-tools or keys for operation,the tools or keys Exception No. 1: Approved suspended unit heaters may b shall be located on the floor involved at a prominent location used in locations other than means of egress and patient sleep accessible to staff. ing areas,provided such heaters are located high enough to b Exception No. 1: The window sill in special nursing care out of the reach of persons using the area, and provided the areas such as those housing ICU,CCU,hemodialysis,and neo- are equipped with the safety features called for above. natal patients may be up to 60 in. (152 cm) above the floor. Exception No. 2.: Fireplaces may be installed and used onl Exception No. 2: Rooms intended for occupancy of less than in areas other than patient sleeping areas,provided that then 24 hours, such as those housing obstetrical labor beds, recov- areas are separated from patient sleeping spaces by construe ery beds, and observation beds in the emergency department; tion having a 1-hour fire resistance rating and they comp) and newborn nurseries need not comply with this require- with NFPA 211.Standard for Chimneys,Fireplaces, Vents an ment. Solid Fuel Burning Appliances. In addition thereto, the firs Exception No. 3: Windows opening into atriums where the place shall be equipped with a hearth that shall be raised i atrium has a smoke removal system are,for the purposes of least 4 in. (10.1 cm) and a fireplace enclosure guarantee this requirement, considered outside windows; such windows against breakage up to d temperature of 65&F (343°C) an shall normally be closed and operable only with the use of tool constructed of heat tempered glass or other approved materia a key. If, in the opinion of the authority having jurisdiction, speck hazards are present, a lock on.the enclosure and other safer Exception No. 4: The window sill in limited care facilities precautions may be required. may be up to 44 in. (111 cin) above the floor. Exception No.5: Buildings designed with approved engineer- 12-5.3 Elevators,Dumbwaiters,and Vertical Conveyors. Eh ed smoke control systems in accordance with Section 7-3 need vators,dumbwaiters, and vertical conveyors shall comply wil not comply with the operable features of this requirement. the provisions of Section 7-4. IM Earn MUProtze Materials Engineering & Testing Company 36)ACONNET STREET, NBVTON HIGHLANDS, MA 02161 (617) 332-8460 RD9, BOX 610, OLD ROUTE 66, GREENSBURG, PA 15601 (412)837-5030 July 31, 1989 SALEM HOSPITAL ::j " c SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS o p L M cn n INSPECTION OF FIREPROOFING v m n MACOMBER 4 BUILDING y w m ciV.- REFERENCE NUMBER 89C-1630 N DATE OF INSPECTION July 25, 1989 REMARKS At the invitation of the Superintendent, the writer was requested to visit the site to test the bond strength of the fibrous fireproofing material. The specifications require the material to have a bond strength of 36 lbs/sq. ft. The tested locations included the material installed on metal decking, beams and columns. The results were as follows: Bond Failure Mode, PSF Location Cohesion Cohesion Adhesion Metal deck 26 70. 104 D-8, Beam 17 52 113 L-6, Column 9 139 148 The test method was performed in accordance with the ASTM C736-86. The two cohesion and one adhesion test were taken in the same 34" diameter area of the test location of the respective structural members. Cohesion failures occurred at approximately 1/2" depths after the fluffy surface was removed. Adhesion failure occurred at a satisfactory level above the specified strength. INSPECTION TIME 4 Hours (7 :30AM - 9:30AM + travel) INSPECTOR John Filtranti 2-Salem 1-TRO 1-Chapin 2-Connolly 1-SBD The Ritchie Organization Architecture Planning Interiors 80 Bridge C') C Street —t r Newton, Masagihusetts July 10, 1989 �w ^' 02158' Comm. No. 6888 Om 617 gig 9400 Ln FAX a!Q 4669 SIR U1 p o m Mr. David J. Harris rn Assistant Building Inspector N coo City of Salem Public Property Department 1 Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 RE: SALEM HOSPITAL Dear David: It was good talking with you again at Salem Hospital on June 27, 1989. With regard to the progress of the work on Davenport 9, our reviews and observations of the work in place indicate that all roughing is completed and that the project is somewhat over 70% completed. With regard to our discussions relative to partition work, we reference Section 433 of the State Building Code, copy attached, which references NFPA 101 Life Safety Code and State Building Code, Section 610.4, copy attached, which requires corridors serving as exitway access to be constructed to have a fire resistance rating of at least one hour. ,The_101_Life_Safety Code does_ not require partitions dividing patient coom� to be fire rated We trust the above will satisfy your concerns. Very truly yours, TRO/THE RITCHIE ORGANIZATION Roland W. Martineau, P.E. Construction Consultant RWM/ws encls. cc: M. Farnola w/encls. Birmingham, Alabama Sarasota, Florida 780 CMR STATE BUILDING CODE COMMISSION 4. All edges and the backs shall be fully encased in metal. 432.2.12 Kiosks: Kiosks and similar structures (temporary or perma- nent) shall meet the following requirements: 1. Combustible kiosks or other structures shall not be located within the covered mall unless constructed of fire retardant treated wood throughout, conforming to the standards listed in Appendices C and G. 2. Kiosks or similar structures located within the covered mall shall be provided with approved fire suppression and detection devices. 3. The minimum horizontal separation between kiosks and other struc- tures within the covered mall shall be twenty (20) feet. 4. Kiosks or similar structures shall have a maximum area of three hundred (300) square feet. SECTION 433.0 NURSING HOMES, REST HOMES, CHARITABLE HOMES FOR THE AGED, CONVALESCENT HOMES AND HOSPITALS 433.1 New facilities: Buildings to be constructed or proposed for a change of occupancy, to be used as nursing homes, rest homes, chari table homes for the aged, convalescent homes and hospitals (in use group 11-2) shall meet the provisions of NFiPA 101 Life Safety Code, as refer- lenced in Appendix B and the applicable provisions of this code. 433.2 Deleted 433.2.1, Deleted 433.2.2 Deleted 433.2.3 Deleted 433.2.4 Deleted - 433.2.5 Deleted 433.2.6 Deleted 433.2.7 Deleted 433.3 Construction requirements: - Hospitals, nursing homes, and conva- lescent homes shall be built only of Type 1 construction, in accordance with Chapter 111, Sections 51 and 71, of the Massachusetts General Laws, as amended. 9/1/80 188 F 780 CMR STATE BUILDING CODE COMMISSION 610.1.1 Turnstiles and gates: Access through turnstiles, gates, rails or similar devices shall not be permitted unless such a device is equipped to readily swing in the exiting direction of travel under a total pressure of not more than fifteen (15) pounds. 610.1.2 Restrictions: The required width of passageways, aisles or corridors shall be maintained free of projections and restrictions except doors opening into such spacesenoayare,uce.4he= clear width-tormot less than one-half.(1/2)-the-requiredl,width, When fully open, the door may project not more than seven (7) inches into the required width. 610.2 Dead ends: Exitway access passageways and corridors in all stories which serve more than one (1) exitway shall provide direct con- nection to such exitways In opposite directions from any point in the passageway or corridor, insofar as practicable. The length of a dead end corridor shall not be more than twenty (20) feet. 610.3 Width: The unit of egress width and occupancy allowance of aisles and corridors, unless otherwise provided for special uses and occupancies in Article 4, shall comply with Table 608 with a minimum total width of forty-four (44) inches except in institutional (I) buildings used for the movement of beds which shall be ninety-six (96) inches; in schools with more than one hundred (100) occupants which shall be seventy-two (72) inches; in one- and two-family dwellings which shall be thirty-six (36) inches; and in churches and chapels, side aisles may be one-half (1/2) the width but not less than thirty-two (32) inches clear. '610.4 Enclosures: Ali corridors serving as exitway access shall be kenclosed in fire separation walls having a fireresistance rating of at least i one (1) hour when serving an occupancy load greater than thirty (30). 610.4.1 Opening protectives: All door assemblies from rooms opening onto a corridor required to be of one (1) hour fireresistance rated con- struction shall be self-closing or automatic closing by smoke detection, with a twenty (20) minute fire protection rating when tested in accord- ' ante with ASTM E152 without the hose stream and labeled and listed by an independent, approved agency;: :orbe one and,three-quarter (1 3/4) inch solid wood core door or equivalent. All door assemblies from rooms opening onto a corridor, required by Table 214 to be of two (2) hour fireresistance rated construction, shall be one and one-half (1 1/2) hour fire doors. SECTION 611.0 GRADE PASSAGEWAYS USED AS AN EXITWAY ELEMENT 611.1 Passageways: Every required interior and exterior exitway ele- ment which does not adjoin a public way shall be directly connected to the public way or to an open court leading to the public way by an enclosed grade passageway or other unobstructed exitway element con- structed as provided in this section. 9/1/80 _ 221 Table 214 FIRERESISTANCE RATINRS OF STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS SIN HOURS) Type of construction SKUM:I4o ?rpe t —__1 2- sec non 215 5ec1 YM Tic.O Xct�mp21,0 seri on 3is.0 v _ ro snucl No,element NOncomnuspme Note c � E.Nr;or m senry walla Rame � Nple• I a � .n, I 3 in<C'no1 Een O di nary p — _ PrO1KfM UnprOtKtad 1- - Protected UnprOlKlad Im,lll Protected Unprotttlld — Ip IS Tp xB xC ]p JB JC 4p 48 In e.brlw vans 15Khon 906.0 and Note 01 --- -f a s ] z 1 0 z z z �1 I 0 m ore sewuro,of m OI more Non M ,.. I 1-fen... on or less loan s.. -gee 6 ] z I,p 1 x T_ 2 Note d Z _____ - i.re HOare[On OI 6 Or mO,e B } No'.s OVI IKt loan ll' T- '.1 Non he 8_� l T Ir I _ 0 x T z ] 0 m ile as.than n of 11'Or mare Be 8 _1_4 3 x 1--11 0 z 2 2- _. II _ __ 0 0 ew bsa men U' -- _ 3 N n0e 8 4 1 1 1 eeX x1).0 1 > Iia 1 0 ti T i'r<waur and pertr wells ISKnon 90301 1 4 ] T x � x x ) 2_ --- _.- i y.ae;nR a we 81dup-)sae Tadle 9Pz.1 x x VI Y l F p U loon, 1 1 f f ill { o.r<p0 d p l -r<R o 8 R,000 ee Taol<9°x.) j = n IM r ne l ' ly ISec10-909.0 d N n 1 T I x x I}I r z Y r z T Tt z I ,-.--_ ] 5nans lotfre. h n e.Iwenl,el IOr nolslwers �`T x T x x 1 x ] 1 } j - 1 5ecliOn 91°.01 T Npncom0us1;01e 6 1 Vertical f.pareNOn Oof l otter,Ngces -1-7-;-T 1 -- Note n 1 Owvinn[unl,fewrenont INoN r, _ —Nob o—v tomer ndn.Manne oanB.on. ° T-o�-u r a T—a o o_ __—o v n 0 0 0 mwoonin[ -- e btK;o.Oea.m men one noor T ] x 1 -. 0 See sK.2/'L0 1 0 t 0 3 Marme pmwona. suoporcne Oner Jo., mna,'noso , z 1 , 1 o see X< z;;.c 1 ° 1 0 then 1-1 tnu Steal.and Neo urine ISe bins 911.0 and NOI.Il Surp r'.1,48 ]-11 T n, I o see Xc.21'.0 1 9 Structural memWrs suplisl well ISecGm 91191 J x tl. 1 0 ----_ - ~ Not less than bensistanc ralin8 al well supported 1 0 1 0 m X _ w ID ilOor cpnsbucllOn'mclVd;n[teams Iclion 913.0 anp - -- � Nota el J : It if s«Xc 2170 t ° 1 0 _- Is'or Was x :V �1 r 0 sea SK TV.o -_1- -0 1 0 0 t0 lowest mall N0 le h T - 11' Rposes enld 1rary, au°ie/ams. less IMo M yin Vl 3 1 F 0 0 sees 2170 0 0 1 0 n rool MCR^5.,00 912.0 and h l to Noi<n NOtes 8 e d ;1 1presl memner ;n height to 0 I a 1 0 T O 0 leweat mem0er note In- n —Note on I0 (O N O 2 F+ H r i Y CORRECTED REPORT ®�� Protze Materials Engineering & Testing Company (Project) P" 36 )ACONNET STREET, NEWTON HIGHLANDS, MA 02161 (617) 332-8460 5103 OLD WM. PENN HIGHWAY, EXPORT, PA 15632 (412) 327-0707 _ L May 18, 1989 SALEM HOSPITAL SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS � c INSPECTION OF FIREPROOFING -4 < _ MACOMBER 4 ' REFERENCE NUMBER 89C-843 y'rig a M m- .3.3 o DATE OF INSPECTION May 15, 1989O as s na n -=w REMARKS 1l Material thicknesses were measured at the subject locations. Material densities were not requested by the Superintendent, John Feeney at this time. The following values were obtained: Average Level Location Thicknesses Required 1 let floor Delivery Room 1 7/8" 2 1/2" low M133-bar joist @ K3 Delivery Room 2 1/16" 2 1/2 low M133-bar joist @ L3 Delivery Room M133 2 1/8 1 7/8 ok Column @ K.5,3 Womens Toilet 1 3/16 3/8 ok Room 128 beam @ L8 Room 117 2 1/16 2 1/2 low Bar joist @ J.5,6.5 Room 121 2 2 1/2 ok Bar joist @ J8 The low areas were identified to the Superintendent by the writer. The Superintendent then indicated that another application of fireproofing would be made and reinspection will follow. INSPECTION TIME 5 Hours (12:30PPi - 3:30PM + travel) INSPECTOR Julie MacKinnon 2-Salem 1-TRO J 1-Chapin ✓/ 2-Connolly, 1-SBD PrA Protze Mateiials Engineering & Testing Company ::, NCO`;.VER S1 RE?T. NFATOS HiI;HL;':US, MA 0'161 (61 i) 33t-84l0 RD9, BOX 610, OLD ROUTE 66. GREENSBURG, PA 15601 (4121 83-5030 I i May 31, 1989 CR-. m C) Salem Hospital 4 81 Highland Avenue o= c_n o Salem, Massachusetts n r" coo n rn r— n Att: Mr. M. Farnola x m C:) v Re: Fireproofing j� X� fn P. Gentlemen: Maternity Macomber r- V1 C= Cn CO On May 1, 1989 the writer met with you and the contractor's representatives concerned with Fireproofing of Structural Steel Materials approvals, construction schedule, testing and inspection and inspection reports were reviewed as follows: American Energy Products Corp's product "Spray Don" has been approved and was on site. Start of application was due to start that week. We were to be advised when some area was nearly complete and thickness has been monitored by the applicator so that an acceptance inspection could then be made before equipment moves on. When thicknesses are reasonably uniform a random set of . thickness tests on column, beam and joists is to be made and Thickness Data Sheets filed. Bond tests are to be made 21 days after completion of application. A standard chart of thickness requirements is available. The inspection is to conform to "Inspection Procedures for Field Applied Sprayed Fire Protection Materials". Yours very truly, Ref. No. 89C-932 E.S. Van Buren, P.E. 2-Salem 1-TRO 1-Chapin 2-Connolly 1-SBD F --C Data Sheet for Thickness of Material on Beam or Column I I I T T T T P T 4 T 9 T T T LOC. 1 2 I I I i I j I ; I I 'R.cgcire' for coiun:cs ociy. Average recordec ! Avcrnge -_�•_i-ri I Un:r FIG. X1 Sample Dala $Leel. rhe .I:ner,'ren Sotiero for Tes;;rg and Alarrrn:ls Ickes no Position respecrng the validin' oI ane pcient right usmrred in ronr.ectien.'ith am ill""entionrd in this s;cncc:d. Users of(h is;xedard are nccrc;;i r a drurC the;drier";r.a;Inn a the r'alidur of cry svcn parent r,&s.and the risk of irfri'Er"nt at suni ngh;s,are eentelr their o,,n ru;^onr.'biliri - This vu.,dcrd is n,bjeci to tension at an; rime hr the rr.mansi^le technical corim:r,ee end mast he rewon'ed n'n: 1ir'e t'wrs end re,ard tither tec cprorrd or w-iriuirr.w::. }'our conur:rnet cre im',ird eirherjor rP r'tflan.N this s:c.^.dard Jr!ur.ac irian::i siondcrds c,-.d;nould Se addressed ro.i ST.N 1/mda:mrrr rs. )'aur ro"lle"rs Mill rrreire ccafui ronsiderauon at a rarer;nS oI the ' rrsnonrdrleterhnirrl ee-,"uree.M hich :ou r:mve::rnd. rraa . „•r ;'G;:vur ",rinenaimt'e not rteen'edal.-tr hear" 'ou should '!. S. n,akt tour views knon'n to the ASTM Can u..W,eem Smnddr cs. 1916 Race Se, Phdadelphia,Pa. H10J. 3ECCRC '--1 ON ` �0. OEM= RccZ Beams 300E Joists - esn Floor Deck _ NNIZ 1 f� Floor Seams + .-lour Joists Floor Deck Floor Beams — Floor Joists Columns Columns - Columns = Pipe - Pipe = Tube Column - Other (Braces) 5 t !6 t f i ,II PMUProtze Materials Engineering & Testing Company 36 JACONNET STREET, NE"r1ON HIGHLANDS, NLA 02161 (617) 3328760 RD9, BOX 610, OLD ROUTE 66, GREENSBURG, PA 15601 (412) 8375030 I y— n � C SALEM HOSPITAL CDm rwv r SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS -nm o nrn CK) z INSPECTION OF FIREPROOFING 3 m p o MACOMBER 4 BUILDING :CD fi. m n H CO REFERENCE NUMBER 89C-885 DATE OF INSPECTION May 22, 1989 REMARKS Upon arrival the writer reinspected the following areas: basement mechanical area; the delivery room M133; the womens, toilet area M128; Rooms 117 and 121. All areas far exceeded the minimum thickness requirements. Material thickness were measured at the subject locations. The following values were obtained: Average Level Location Thickness Required 1 Bar Joint 9.5A-D 3 1/8" 24" 1 Column D10 3 5/8 1 7/8 1 Column D9 3 1/8 1 7/8 1 Lobby bar joist G8 3 5/16 21- Average ;Average thicknesses were well above minimum requirements as indicated. INSPECTION TIME 51-, Hours (7 :30AM - 11:30AM + travel) INSPECTOR Julie MacKinnon 2-Salem 1-TRO 1-Chapin 1-Connolly 1-SBD P■ �� Protze Materials Engineering & Testing Company i®ii 36 IACONNET STREET, NEWTON HIGHLANDS, ASA 02161 (617) 332$460 RD9, BOX 610, OLD ROUTE 66, GREENSBURG, PA 15601 (412) 8375030 May 18, I9SY SALEM HOSPITAL SALEM, MASSACHUSE-T-TS--1--� a w INSPECTION OF FIREPROOFING o a `~"' r DAVENPORT 9 BUILDING n 172 :zn REFERENCE-NUMBER -&43 gM 1�' o s v m DATE OF INSPECTION May 15, 1989 REMARKS Material thicknesses were measured at the subject locations. Material densities were not requested by the Superintendent, John Feeney at this time. The following values were obtained: Average Level Location Thicknesses Required ? 1st floor Delivery Room 1 7/8" 2 1/2" low M133-bar joist @ K3 Delivery Room 2 1/16" 2 1/2 low M133-bar joist @ L3 Delivery Room M133 2 1/8 1 7/8 ok Column @ K.5,3 Womens Toilet 1 3/16 3/8 ok Room 128 beam @ L8 Room 117 2 1/16 2 1/2 low Bar joist @ J.5 ,6.5 Room 121 2 2 1/2 ok Bar joist @ 18 The low areas were identified to the Superintendent by the writer. The Superintendent then indicated that another application of fireproofing would be made and reinspection will follow. INSPECTION TIME 5 Hours (12:30PM - 3:30PM + travel) INSPECTOR Julie MacKinnon 2-Salem 1-TRO 1-Chapin 2-Connolly, 1-SBD Protze Materials Engineering & Testing Company �r 31, 1<0NNET S'REET nEY.?U� F'iC i-1L4\pj r,q G?167 165:: 3i:.84-0 RD9, BOa 610, OLD ROUTE 66, GREENSBURG, PA 15601 (412)837-5030 SALEM HOSPITAL May 10, 1989 SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS �� W --4 c .c n INSPECTION OF FIREPROOFING Nr,1 0 MACOMBER 4 BUILDING irn t Cry n- REFERENCE NUMBER 89C-807 xfn :F,7 2✓e iTl DATE OF INSPECTION MAY 3, 1989 &9 ICAP REMARKS Material thicknesses were measured and the follow- ing values were obtained, all in the Basement Mechanical Room. Average Location Thickness Required Accept? Roof deck D9-10 2-3/16" 2-1/2" Low Column DlO 1-7/16 1-7/8" Low Beam D9-10 1-3/8" 1-3/8" OK Bar Joists, 6 line 2-3/4" 2-1/2" OK @ Floor depression 2-1/2" 2-1/2" OK Floor deck, 6 line 2-5/8" 2-1/2" OK @ Floor depression Areas with low thicknesses were visually identified to the Superintendent, John Finney, by the writer. The Superintendent then indicated that another application would be made and reinspection will then be performed. Material densities were not requested at this time. INSPECTION TIME 6 Hours (10:OOAM - 2:OOPM + Travel) INSPECTOR Julie MacKinnon 2-Salem; 1-TRO; 1-Chapin; 2-Connolly; 1-SBD The Ritchie Organization Architecture Planning Interiors 80 Bridge Street Newton, Massachusetts 02158 617 9699400 May 1, 1989 FAX ssz4sss Comm. No. 6888 City of Salem Public Property Department n 3C One Salem Green M Salem, MA 01970 0 ,,, F . r n rn p Attention: David J. Harris (n C-) CD z Assistant Building Inspector =m C:) o 3 . m RE: SALEM HOSPITAL m x —01 MACOMBER BUILDING y CZ Gentlemen: Enclosed is a copy of a letter from the project'ss`ructural engineers regarding observations made by the Building Department concerning the—structural steel framing for the Macomber addition. Should you wish any further information, please advise. Very truly yours, TRO/THE RITCHIE ORGANIZATION Roland W. Martineau, P.E. Construction Consultant RWM/ws enc. cc: M. Farnola w/enc. Connolly Brothers w/enc. Birmingham, Alabama Sarasota, Florida Structural Engineers 106 Access Road- Norwood, Massachusetts 02062 Arthur F. Chapin, P.E. Telephone 762-0559 Edward J. LeNormand, P.E. Area Code 617 Warren W.Woodford April 10, 1989 The Ritchie Organization 174 Boylston Street Chestnut Hill, MA 02167 j -` C cam, Attn: Mr. Roland Martineau 1; N o Re: Salem-Hospital r m z CMacomber 4 _ x m kn o m m n �= Dear Roland, ti � y 00 c In response to a copy of a letter sent to me by your office from the City'of Salem Building Department dated March 27, 1989, I wish to offer the following based on my field visit on this date: 1. Column C-1 has the anchor bolts welded to the column base plate. This is acceptable to this office. 2. Column C-4 has excessive grout. This is acceptable to this office. 3. The cutting of the flanges of the W14x26 at a corner. I have checked the stresses in the beam in question and have determined that the member is not over-stressed. If you need further information on these items please let me know. Very truly yours, Arthur F. Chapin, .E. AFC/vc City of harem, AlaggacbUottg ail ,�a Public Prupertp Mcpartment �w�'111Y6 JOuilbing Department One batem green 745-9595 ext. 380 William H. Munroe Director of Public Property Inspector of Buildings Zoning Enforcement Officer March 27, 1989 The Ritchie Organization 174 Boylston Street Chestnut Hill, MA. 02167 Att: R.W. Martineau RE: Salem Hospital Dear Roland, During my inspection on March 22, 1989 the following was noted and I felt it necessary to contact you regarding these matters. 1 . Column #CI , (W8X48) that had been replaced following an accident dated 2/ 17/89 appears not to have the required anchoring. 2. Column 6C4 (W8X31) located at the front left corner of the building has approximately 4" of grout . Referring to drawing S 20, section 2-2, column designs require only 3/4" of grout maximum. 3. The top and bottom flange on the beam (W14X26) has been cut approximately 2" deep and 4' long. Could you please discuss these matters with your structural engineer and foward any documentation to me. Since 1y, David J. Harris Assistant Building Inspector DJH/eaf c.c. Connelly Brothers Michael Farnola REVISED REPORT „ Protze Materials Engineering & Testing Company 36 IACONNET STREET, NEWTON HIGHLANDS, MA 02161 (617) 332-8460 5103 OLD WM. PENN HIGHWAY, EXPORT, PA 15632 (412) 327-0707 April 27, 1989 INSPECTION OF CONCRETE CLIENT SALEM HOSPITAL, SALEM, M,%SSACHUSETTS PROJECT MACOMBER 4 BUILDING DATE April 13, 1989 REF.NO, 89C-716 INSPECTION OF FORMS, REINFORCING STEEL, CONCRETE MIXTURE, AND PLACEMENT WERE CARRIED OUT AS APPLICABLE AND AS PREVIOUSLY DESCRIBED IN DETAIL FOR SIMILAR WORK. THE FOLLOWING SPECIFICS CONCERN THIS DATE: BATCH CONTROL None TEST SPECIMENS Series No. 19 A-D Class, psi 3000 -` Load No. 6L.a Slump, .in. 3-1/2 cn o rn — a PLACEMENT OF First Floor Slab Addition g n ® c) 'a rn REMARKS The slab area was clean. Wire mesh was tiedproX. The ti wire mesh was laid over the compacted gravel. •1 coo The concrete mix was satisfactory and was transported by a concrete pump with 110 ft. of 4" diameter pipe and four flexible rubber hoses. The mix was deposited in an excellent manner and then screeded, bull floated and was to be machine trowelled. The placement area comprised compacted gravel and metal deck. The area of the slab on metal deck had a higher grade. Wire mesh, if chaired in this area, would have protruded above the finished slab so it was laid on the slab to be lifted up during concreting. The Contractor was notified. The writer recommended external heat be applied inasmuch as the ambient temperatures were at or below 400F. This was not considered necessary. INSPECTION TIME 8-1/2 Hours (7:30AM - 3:OOPM + Travel) INSPECTOR Julie MacKinnon 2-Salem I-TRO 1-aapin 2-Connolly 1-SBD A :-46 QUESTIONS?CALL 800-238-5355 TOLL FREE. AIRBILL V6 c N NUMBER t^.6 3 7 613 51LL4 �s 1#7;1 J 7613524 Date From our Name)Please PrinI Your Phone Number(Very Important) To(Recipient's Named Please Print Redp1.1r Phone Numam New In,a t) )a sv� � INi7C1� �l7 �P `fGF D�`Ui�� t�t�I�15 ,. - Company Department/Floor No. Company Department/Floor No. RITCHIE CAGANIZATICh U D( NU PePT-. Street Address Exact Street Address[Um of P.O.fill a P.O.a Zip CONS AN,OeMY Aahwq Lt)Hall M Exbe Cl 174 BOYLSTON ST ONE (-4ZC'f City State ZIPRequirea For Correct lnvoiung city State ZIPStreat Address Zip Required CmESTt UT HILI MA 0 2 1 4 T { �IUI NA 7'1 i YOUR BILLING REFERENCE INFORMATION IFIRST 24 CHARACTERS WILL APPEAR ON INVOICE.) HOLD FOR FICII AT THIS FEDERAL EAPNESS LOCATION: Federal Express Use V F/ L l\62 7 0 Street Atlaresa(See Se,Nce Guide or Call Belo-23R-5355) ' '.�1 (f Base Charges PAYMENT l$CNet ❑all Recigent's FWEs Acct No. ❑Pll 3rd PeM FWEx Acct No. ❑P II Cavil Cdrtl x _ _ City tate. Ly IJcashr' � Oecleretl Value Charge - SERVICES I DELIVERY AND SPECIAL HANDLING raueuEpunm arca ZIPezp cone of Street Address Requires C1 MCKMEW ITIENT W CHECK ONLY DNE BOX CHECK SERVICES REQUIRED YAINE AILS Origin Agent Charge. R t�PPRIOR/T►I OVERNIGHT NOIDlOR NCW-0P 1 �Jwerolpmoel,.,ry s �LETTER- 1 ❑ LRS uwovw aeaegrO tlw,exx.O,yl In,r�NB1rem Emp.No. Date OVERNIGHT DELIVERY IM'ra" 2 OELIYER N'EFWOAY LBS (]Cash Receivetl MIND OUR PACKAGING - 2 ❑courier-Pax awigh,Eno axi* DELIVER SATURDAY, ..r vo� LBS ❑I.shp.mr 12 tsN• S ❑orem9m Box A❑ 4❑ DANGEROUS GOODS LBS. ❑mlm rear ❑clq.To oel ❑ctro.T.Nde t2N"xt]N"x]" 1 Serimr<.k ParagrmmN e+wevpl Street Address 4 ❑13vemgmiel» B❑ -5❑ CONSTANT SUNVEIIIANCE SERVICE ICSSI Total Total Total *do6"xe"x value IFae.clwpllmrk Cu'M>+Sxmr,S *Drlaretl value ume$100 6❑ DRY ICF STANOARDAIR Receivetl At CM State Zip Total Chargee 5 ❑Dewery nor lntr men ]❑ OTNERSPECIAL SERVICE - 1❑R?Uar Stop mane buirr.°ay2 On-Call Stop SERVICE COMMITMENT s❑ S ( 4❑ 5 0' Na,omvl oerm.hrxve.m.ehwne,.,,,w,w,vq Drop z RS.c. Station Received Ry PART#10I REN 5I8I tee=^+x^^r�"r�^�^p^^x^®^+nea�. ASTURD.IT PICK-0P PRINTED U SA GBFE �ew�r°..�eewo•r•'°�w+w•m we<wur o„or g Om.nwN F�?f0ljra%s CA/�rP Employee No. X 10❑ ! -: f m"er.ile,.e.ensu,.%maa.w Pxn.n ..® // Date/Time Received Fel Employee Number 007 smears,mwmEeerrelF�pesvumiwlNsenipa ul ChiKgae9Na/sgnaMaagsl,NllMervuty D�t¢/ I Fo FedegExpress Use-'. Se lxM lWmlml FBbel&gNrvpn4ry dente ncreRart // Release / Si newre; �,! TERMS AND CONDITIONS r DEFMITMAIS It you send more than cure packeon bib A,Skt(yuu^Wy X fine 110 Pill deoler�d veI A'for l6 Cable A:rbil'we,our and usreiato Fiderzl Express Corporation,itsemployeesand,agenla.You presages.nM to exceed the$100$500 orR5"ph pe,.µoksgc tilde plbed.:bovA tEumlpk5 ardyour mfc'N the Forder.n.,employees-w agents. � � packages can beve a total declared value of up to$125 CJD) ASREEPENT TO TEAVSP more than one package lsshippedon lhba, 1, or x;d rytor loasocdairage will bellrndetlto the declared value of the package(s)sclualrylost or di ged(not tp cnce,H the par paclrage limits ByEiwngw your package todelive5 ori No to all the terms on this Airbl6 and Orf,our current- described above)You have(ha resporwibifty of prowrg the adual kiss or damage SaW�Gugd,-wonders available onNo wee dlryt Forhomed to unarm mohe terms of our FILINCAC/Ai:.t AgreemsmL ALL CLAIMS MUST BE MADE-BY YOU Ni l+ AESPORSICILIT'YfOR PACRACIMS AND COMPLETIME AIRSILL, • WITHIN 16-DAYS AFTER-yi DELIVER YOUR PACKAGE IF YOUR CLAIM F'ESULSS Wou4:re responsib!9 fbT ededoelelyp3c6agngy0uryaotlsaMtorproperiyfillingbotthts Airbdl. FROM SHORTAGE,DAMAGE OR DELAY.OR Because the names,olpeckages add wool psr package are c,ficalioaur ability tacorredly bill • WITHIN 90 DAYS AFTER WE ACCEPT YOUR PACKAGE.IF YOUR CLAIM RESULTS ' youtaay embsen ofthisinformm N ctlonfro 'sArbihwill result ina billing based onou?besles!Eimate FROM NONDEUVERY ofthe 0{r 0dr of p.ekeyesredeiv2dfrany6ira tlaheefimeled"tlefaulf'weohtper eacka¢a•as 9ifal consider your 0ift 3 Bled IFybD'b'•ll ail not y" ur"CDsteri Satv'ee Depdhrrien,aT o :ermk..A end periodically adjusted by us. 660-238-5355 and ro ly u.'n wrhmg is soon a pee.Iles AIR TRANSPORTATION TAA MCLDDEO t Within 90deystneryou notify us of your can yin,null( ^,d usaY relevc imformi about It. �__ _,_. We are pot pMip•atetltnadoO;ny Flom pntlyoa hb..r.r daltre spWat'onchergesangynumay Ouoral(igloiof Is szrvyctax.rlyGµi, %InlerliafP,si(enux CDdeSecLon A2f1'.eIT}fSEttlt gor$s•Juc4.the,elroun�ei You•dalry4om thtc ehe{)B<' 1 .� vamspodet pn poruwi pdihs scrnse + ff Ilia recipient acceptsyour pedwgaw shout rdng ar am^doonthederveryre ro.we Will LP.ITAIMAIS ON 098 LIADRRYassumethat thepackage was delivaredngood coi Inasertv;swkeracassyourclain,you Our kabllity for loss or damage to your;eckTge.is mmnedlayout actual damages-or 1d0k " must,tothoexlent lrssiblpmaketeefngmals I,adg*+danuantlpaCiirgavailabNforreir diens whichever i,less,unlesayou pay for and declare a honer f uNonmtl velue.We do,not provide Requests for refunds must be matleln wnl ngwtilFiRW"J days pl the ship date cargo liabil�ty,insurance,but you may pay thirty opera for each addikerrar$fgD'Iifdardared voice:11 " ,j S' - '1, WOT TQ ANSI you der,Aare-a higher volue,and paylha atltlkiaW.orange,con,IiiIi,w ilbethe lesser of yalr_ ,We,may;at our option,.DOW and in your pccaingesphor tbor after you give Nem to WW ,• declared value or the adtulrvatee of yoig_pack:.ge '+ 1 deliver. — Our:Iabilny fordelays not causad byyour negligence shall be limited rpa refuisfdyowdefNeryr t t ' Chiapas NCP'ap'sEAifirlE , _ We war{C=p2taelpcyqur Acts orgmi^as!gn;,inGudi0g 4u1 noZLm�Ndto improper aansut!�eM We don't provide C.0.4I sari pecking aborting,marklg eraddressing,or for lee ads orprodssorls ohne recipient w anyone RESPONSI$DJTYTOR PLtYEEIT elsewithan mtaestlnlhe paexage Also;we+vonlbelapla Hyo",the recipient violalesanyofthe termsofouragreemenl Weivonlbeliablefdr pssofar magatgsbpmentsolpgsh.Fuaenayor Even if you give us itAie?Itpaymentmvuc4ons,you anyy;.bep•'y(ii te,00neibleforml i other prohibited gems. delivery,costs,as we as any,yosts we may incur m either returnirid your Kcioge te yell or Fthally,we w'on't be a-Ile fppryryktss,damage or delay caused by events we.cannotteasonably w9rehousi g n pending di?;Jisn ) „(erosee or epnlrpl;mdltlirg bW not-limiiedto.clad Gou g h of the a§,weather eoncitions, '00,411 ILD'ACCEPTANCE 't meohan,cal delays,ads of pub,^enemies,worm cs:civil Eommoaons,or bbt pmissionsur " publraeiMafties(nclutl�^g customs antl gl.amnt tie oB�as's)wilh eclun''a apparent authority. We Teserve,the Foil to'a9jeota ahmment alem'lime,when ouch slpmcn(.weu.d be kkely ie WEWGN'TB(,,scl LEIHstom,ANY we lOaha INCIDENTAL,Cthact ,ENTWLOR SPECIAL causd6mageadelaytoChership Me;aill:pmentapersnnral,orifthetranspWationofwhich isprohib DAMAGES,.WHETHER OR NOT WE KNEW TNATEUi,AMAGES NIGHT BE INCURRED; netl by law or ishviolalign d-'ylyTOlcs cpmaipctl in Ns AkbAtabar Service Guide. DECLAP.ED VALUE LIdIiS The highest declared value we eibw for Overnight Loner andCouripai Overnight Envelope shipments Is$100,For a;her PnoHj:1 and Sendard Air: io'ierFS the highest declarN{value we allow is$25,000 unless you package caltain,dens of"exlraerginaryvelue;'in Fekh o se the highest declared value we allow is$50D.Items of"axbaerdiiti ry value;')ncli adwak,jewelry, furs,money,precious an hlahs nea0l)le,nskumeoG.alk7 oldptitans listed in our current Serves - Guide. t PMR Protze Materials Engineering & Testing Company 36 IACONNET STREET, NEWTON HIGHLANDS, MA 02161 -. (617) 332-8460 5103 OLD WM. PENN HIGHWAY, EXPORT, PA 15632 (412) 327-0707 - i April 13, 1989 INSPECTION OF CONCRETE CLIENT SALEM HOSPITAL, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS PROJECT MACOMBER 4 BUILDING, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS DATE April 7, 1989 REF.NO. 89C-638 INSPECTION OF FORMS, REINFORCING STEEL, CONCRETE MIXTURE, AND PLACEMENT WERE CARRIED OUT AS APPLICABLE AND AS PREVIOUSLY DESCRIBED IN DETAIL FOR SIMILAR WORK. THE FOLLOWING SPECIFICS CONCERN THIS DATE: BATCH CONTROL None TEST SPECIMENS Series No. 18A-D Class, psi 3000 Load No. 5 Slump, ,in. 4 1/2 PLACEMENT OF Roof slab A-M,1-11 r, -v 1 z W REMARKS The slab area was clean and preparations were LIM consistent with good concreting practice. ol" ro — nm CD z The concrete was conveyed to the slab via a rIm C3 Co concrete pump and consolidated by booting. It-xo was shoveled and screeded into place, then bult floated-and power troweled. Cn o� y C.0 INSPECTION TIME 10 Hours (7:30AM - 4:OOPM. + travel) INSPECTOR Colin MacGillivray 1 2-Salem 1-Chap 2-Connolly : . . 1-SBD PmffProtze Materials Engineering & Testing Company 36 IACONNET STREET, NEWTON HIGHLANDS, MA 02161 '(617) 332-8460 - RD9, BOX 610, OLD ROUTE 66, GREENSBURG, PA 15601. (412) 837-5030 April 12, 1989 SALEM HOSPITAL SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS cA -1 .co INSPECTION OF CONCRETE iF MACOMIDER 4 BUILDING urea W Z amen REFERENCE- NUMBER 89C-630 DATE OF INSPECTION April 3,1989 REMARKS Upon arrival the writer was. notified that the concrete placement was cancelled due to rain. INSPECTION "TIME 2 1/2 Hours (7:30AM - 8:30AM + travel) INSPECTOR Julie MacKinnon 2-Salem 1-TRD 1-Chapin 1-Canam 2-Connolly 1-SBD PM off Protze Materials Engineering & Testing Company 36 IACONNET STREET, NEWTON HIGHLANDS, MA 02161 (617) 332-8460 REN, BOX 610, OLD ROUTE 66, GREENSBURG, PA 15601 (412) 837-5030 SALEM HOSPITAL March 31, 1989 va SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS a < moi' r- . INSPECTION OF HIGH STRENGTH BOLTING , �1 MACOMBER 4 BUILDING rrn REFERENCE NUMBER 89C-518 ' 9 J Y (p DATE OF INSPECTION March 9, 19894A REMARKS The writer was at the above site to check bolting up procedures with the erector. With the use of a calibrated wrench we calibrated their power wrench to the proper setting to attain proper minimum tension during the tightening process. After setting the wrench, we witnessed the tightening procedure and randomly.checked several of the connections with the torque wrench and found said connections to be satisfactory. The writer informed the foreman that if further inspection was required, to notify our Office. INSPECTION TIME 4 1/2 Hours (7:OOAM - 10:00AM + travel) INSPECTOR John J. Mahoney 2-Salem 1-TRO 1-Chapin 2-Connolly 1-SBD Structural Engineers 106 Access Road - Norwood, Massachusetts 0206 Arthur F. Chapin, P.E. Tefephdne 762-0559 Edward J. LeNormand, P.E. Area Code 617 Warren W.Woodford March 27, 1989 Cl) m The Ritchie Organization o a m ro 174 Boylston Street " n CO Chestnut Hill, MA 02167 r n n co Attn: Mr. Roland Martineaurn $o Re: Salem Hospital v Macomber 4 C3' ca Salem, Mass. in Mass State Building Code SECTION 127. Gentlemen: As requested, I am writing to confirm that, to the best of my knowledge, the foundation portion of the above-referenced building has been constructed in reasonable and substantial conformance with the intent of the contract documents, applicable codes and standards, and good trade practices. This opinion is based on the following: 1. Review of shop drawings and other such submittals. 2. Frequent communication with field personnel, Architect, etc. 3. Reports of testing and inspectional services. 4. My own site observation visits conducted at frequent intervals. Very truly you/rs# G . Arthur F. Chapin, P.E. AFE/vc DF - AR►111JR F. a 1 1 Protze Materials Engineering & Testing Company Pmff 36 IACONNET STREET, NEWTON HIGHLANDS, MA 02161 (617) 332.6460 . � 5103 OlD WM. PENN HIGHWAY, EXPORT, PA 15632 (412) 327-0707 March 10, 1989 TEST OF CONCRETE SPECIMENS March 31, 1989 CLIENT SALEM HOSPITAL, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS PROJECT MACOMBER 4 BUILDING Reference Number 89L-313A BCD Date Received 3-6-89 Date Sampled 3-3-89 by us Location of Placement Retaining wall, 1st lift, 2nd lift, 7 ft off of 11A Truck Number Red-E-Mix Load Number 1-Uninspected Ticket Number Red-E-Mix Class Concrete 3000 @ 28 days Cubic Yards 10 Cement 525 lbs/cu.yd. Joliette type II Fine Aggregate 1525 " Heff-ron sand Coarse Aggregate 1500 " Benedetto 3/4" stone Water No data Admixture 26.2 oz/cu.yd. WRDA 1 -t m Time Sampled 8:45AM o, m n Weather Fair, 42°F r�_ Concrete Temperature 60°F r'^' Co a Slump4'Z" tnm a a o Entrained Air Not determined 3 1717 Appearance Satisfactory 3. 1 Storage Inside building, then laboratory fog roodP cin Date of Test 3-10-89 3-31-89 Age at Test 7 days 28 days Specimen Number 17A 17B 17C 17D Dimensions 4x8" 4x8" 4x8" 4x8" Density,lbs/cu.ft. 146 145 145 146 Compressive Strength 2940* 3830* 3700* 3740* Remarks Strength good By Michael Marren 2-Salem 1-TRO 1-Chapin 2-Connolly 1-Red-E-Mix 1-SBD PmffProtze Materials Engineering & Testing Company 36)ACONNET STREET, NEWTON,HIGHLANDS, MP,02161 (617) 3324460 RD9, BOX 610, OLD ROUTE 66, GREENSBURG, PA 15601 (412) 837-5030 March 23, 1989 SALEM HOSPITAL SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS ULTRASONIC TESTING OF WELDS MACOMBER 4 BUILDING Moment connection welds were tested ultrasonically by our agent Baker Testing Services on the following date as described in detail on the appended report. Date Results Hours 3-6-89 Acceptable 2 3/4 (9:45AM - 11 :OOAM + travel) The results were given to job personnel on the date of the test and are presented at this time for the record, Ref. No. 89C-473 Herman G. Protze 2-Salem 1-TRO 1-Chapin 2-Connolly 1-SBD BAKER TESTING SERVICES, INC. NONDESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION ` 98 Reservoir Park Drive METALLURGY AND FAILURE ANALYSIS Rockland, MA 02370 _ 617 671-4458 NON-DESTRUCTIVE TEST REPORT Customer Protze Materials Engineering & Testing Job No. 9322 P.O. Verbal Inspection Date 3-6-89 Test Method Ultrasonic Type Shear Wage Test Equipment Branson Model 303 Flaw Detector Part Name Moment Connections . Part No. Quantity 4 -Part Identification SalemL Hospital Material Steel Specification AWS D1 .1-88 Acceptance Standard AWS D1 .1-88 Test Data Transducer - /y X /4" 2.25 MHz Wed e An le - 0� Cou lant - Sonotrace I/ 0 Calibration Standard - IIW Block Reference Standard - .006" Side Drilled hole Results-4 Moment Connections inspected and found Acceptable Inspector /� James W. Rowe Level II Date 3-6-89 On Site Time; 9:45 am _ 11 :00 am Protze Materials Engineering & Testing Company Pmff 36)ACONNET STREET, NEWTON HIGHLANDS, MA 02161 (61.7) 332-W 5103 OLD WM. PENN HIGHWAY, EXPORT, PA 15632 (412) 327-0707 March 7, 1989 TEST OF CONCRETE SPECIMENS March 28, 1989 CLIENT SALEM HOSPITAL, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS PROJECT MACOMBER 4 BUILDING Reference Number 89L-291A BCD Date Received 3-1-89 Date Sampled 2-28-89 by us Location of Placement Two Hip walls between existing building and D-line Truck Number Red-E-Mix 16 Load Numberaw -t w c Ticket Number., Q — Class Concrete No data o 3000* @ 28 days ti n Cubic Yards 8 nm ,CJ z R - t rJ Cement 517 lbs/cu.yd. Independent type IIg M un Fine Aggregate 1380 " Heffron sand - m n Coarse Aggregate „ x Water 1730 Benevento 3/4„ stone v Admixture 310 gal/cu.yd, P C.= 26 oz/cu.yd. Pozzolith + 2 oz/cu.yd. Micro Air Time Sampled 1:45FM Weather Cloudy, 38'F Concrete Temperature 56°F Slump 6” Entrained Air Not determined Appearance 6" (no water added on job) Storage Job site building, then laboratory fog room Date of Test 3-7-89 3-28-89 Age at Test 7 days 28 days Specimen Number 16A 16B 16C 16D Dimensions 4x8" 4x8" 4x8" 4x8" Density,lbs/cu.ft. 141 140 140 140 Compressive Strength 3190* 4140* 4260* 39801* Remarks Strength good By Michael Marren 2-Salem 1-TRO 1-Chapin 2-Connolly 1-Red-E-Mix 1-SBD TORY FIRE RESISTANCE DIRECTORY 13 UV)—Continued FIRE RESISTANCE RATINGS (BXUV)—Continued r of the floor or roof section is not ro- and: 1)(f I values are not less than 0.37 e floor section which forms a pan of 21(Tl l values are not less then 3/8 in.and pedor and Restrained Beam Ratings, a pr the Unrestrained Beam Rating than 3)the Unrestrained Beam Rating is not less than 1 h. :ting. Accordingly, Unrestrained Beam ditions. Composite and Non-Composite BOSIMS—Because composite beams de- flect more under fire conditions when Sir essad to their allowable working stress than do noncom. minimum beam size is expressed in posits beams,non-composite beams may be substituted when composite beams are specified in a •e beam par lineal foot(lb/ft)and D is design.Composite beams may only be substituted into designs which specify composite beams. material and the steel through which n the same configuration and having a CaVltiOS--Cavities, if any, between the upper beam flange and the steel floor or roof Live design are considered larger than units shall be filled with the fire protection materiel applied to the beam, unless stated otherwise sign. on the individual design. shapes in accordance with ASTM AS COLUMNS beam sizes specified In the indlVldLL :num specified beam size is the next The minimum column size and configuration is specified in individual designs. The same hourly .d web thicknesses of the new shape rating applies when a column member with an equal or greater W/D ratio is substituted for the �tinued shape, specified column size of the same configuration. Where: W - Weight of column(lb/ft.) IS—Assembly designs include Unre- D = Perimeter or protection at interface between protection and steel through which are specified only in beam only do- heat Is transferred to steal(inches) Loams are more stringent than for re- Most structural steel producers began rolling a new series of structural shapes in accordance P.to beams which are designed struc- with ASTM AS on Sept. 1, 1978. Some column sizes specified for individual designs may have been discontinued.In that case,the minimum size column may be determined by selecting the next closest shape available, providing, that the published values for flange and web thickness of the •s designs include fire resistance rat- new shape are within 0.032 in.of the published thickness of the discontinued shape. ve sections of floor or roof construe Where the column protection material is subject to damage,it shall be protected. Unrestrained Beam Ratings,The fire WALLS AND PARTITIONS e Unrestrained which are supportededb by beams Unless otherwise indicated by the design,the ratings apply when either face of the wall or Corp. tion assembly Is exposed. Flashing and corner details may vary from those described, provided To Floor and Roof structural equivalency is maintained, and similar materials to those shown are used for supports, fasteners.and fleshings. n or roof the beam is supporting and For wood stud wall$,fire stopping requirements should be determined from local authorities. For and thickness of protection material most fire tests,horizontal bridging is included in order to fully load the studs.It should not be can. anly design in a floor or roof sssem- sl dared as a means of firestopping. nparable or greater capacity for heat Wood stud walls may contain fire retardant treated as well as untreated wood studs. For load specified in the beam only design.In bearing wood stud walls the ratings were derived with a superimposed load applied to the can. :in only design must be equal to or attraction intended to theoretically develop maximum working stresses not exceeding the design val. :sign.For concrete floors,an equal or use published in the 1980 Supplement to the 1977 edition of the National Design Specification for eta has an equal or greater density Wood Construction.The ratings for wood stud walla are also based on design stresses not exceed. Ing those shown in this 1980 Supplement. In addition, the design load per square inch of eros. 1,18- beam only series designs with sectional area for any stud shell not exceed 385 psi, s may be used with the unprotected Gypsum wallboard joints in wood or steel stud wells may either be exposed or covered with joint precast concrete floors provided that tape and joint compound for that portion of the wall above a suspended ceiling,which is pan of a side of the floor on both aidof the fire resistive floorceiling or roofcading assembly. is beam flange. The thickness of the The hourly Classification of a Load-Bearing Wall also applies to the some wall when it is used as shall be the same as required for the a Noo-Load-Bearing Well. : designs with unprotected steel floor For steel stud walls, the dimensions and gauge of studs specified for an Individual design are L concrete floor designs. minimums. The hourly Classifications apply to the design when constructed of steel studs of a . S8- beam only aeries designs with heavier gauge and/or larger dimensions than the stud specified in a design. be used with unprotected steel roof Wall Penetration$—Penetrations through all or a portion of a Well or Partition as, protection material is oversprayed to sembly can significantly affect the hourly rating.These penetrations may include,but are not limit. ninimum width of 12 in. beyond the ed to,such items as piping,electrical access or air distribution.Specifications for Through-Penetra- .I oversprayed to the underside of the tion Firestop Devices and Through-Penetration Firestop Systems are contained in the Building Mato- g is not required when the S-Series rials Directory, d in the P9- Series roof designs. The category of"Outlet Boxes and Fittings Classified for Fire Resistance" includes Classification only series without protection materi- for nonmetallic outlet and switch boxes for use in Well or Panition assemblies.The information giv. ,,at floors whose capacity for heat dis- en for each Classification includes the model numbers for the Classified products,a description of o the beam only tlesign. For this our- the rated assemblies,the spacing limitations for the boxes and the installation details. ving the same density range and vol- Listed single and double gang metallic outlet and switch boxes with metallic or nonmetallic cover plates may be used in bearing and nonbearing wood stud and steel stud walls with ratings not ex. ceeding 2 hr. These walls shall have gypsum wallboard facings similar to those shown in Design Material Thickness For - Nos.U301,U411,and U425. Is Beam SIZOS—Verioue size The surface area of Individualmetallicoutlet or switch boxesshallnot exceed 16 sq in.Th.so.) )8-, D9-,N7-,NS-,P7-, P8-.P9-, gregete surface area of the boxes shell not exceed 100-sq in.psi 100 sq R.Boxes located on-op- leem Ratings posite sides of walls or partitions shall be separated by a horizontal distance of 24 in.y g provided the beams ere The metallic outletorswitch-b 5hes shell be securely fastened-to-the'studs-and the opening in siative material is adjusted in accord. the wallboard facing shall be cut so that the clearance between the box and the wallboard does not exceed V.In. GUIDE FOR DETERMINING CONDITIONS OF RESTRAINT FOR FLOOR AND ROOF ASSEMBLIES AND FOR INDIVIDUAL BEAMS One of the major changes In the new rating criteria was the establishment of restrained and un- restrained ratings.To help determine the appropriate rating to use In a particular building situation, the protectionmeterial and the steel the fallowing Guide is presented.It is Appendix C from the Standard for Fire Teets of Building Can. struction and Materials, U1.263. Paragraphs C1 through C6 provide general Information with re- wired material thickness. spelt to the concept of restraint against thermal expansion of building elements as it relates to re.serial thick. strained and unrestrained ratings. Table C1 gives examples of restrained and unrestrained condi- tions for certain common construction types.It should be understood that the information provided IODUCT LOOK FOR MARK ON PRODUCT PM an Protze Materials Engineering & Testing Company_ 36 JACONNET STREET, NEWTON HIGHLANDS, MA 02161 - 1617) 332-8460 RD9, BOX 610, OLD ROUTE 66, GREENSBURG. PA 15601 (412) 837-5030 March 8, 1989 INSPECTION OF CONCRETE CLIENT SALEM HOSPITAL, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS PROJECT MEDICAL BUILDING DATE MARCH 3, 1989 REF. NO.' 89C-391 INSPECTION OF FORMS, REINFORCING STEEL, CONCRETE MIXTURE, AND PLACEMENT WERE CARRIED OUT AS APPLICABLE AND AS PREVIOUSLY DESCRIBED IN DETAIL FOR SIMILAR WORK. THE FOLLOWING SPECIFIES CONCERN THIS DATE: BATCH CONTROL None n 3. TEST SPECIMENS 03 Series No. 17A-D70 _ Class, psi 3000 '1rn Load No. 1 ern co z Slump, in. 4 1/4 Mm rn M m m PLACEMENT OF Stairwell retaining wall a s y W N C� REMARKS Preparations were complete. The forms were clean, appeared tight and had been oiled. Reinforcing steel was tied securely. The concrete mix was satisfactory and had a uniform consistency. A concrete pump with a three inch reducer and a three inch flexible rubber hose was used to transport the concrete to the point of deposit. The concrete was de- posited in suitable lifts with proper vibration. The wall was then hand trowelled. The writer recommended heat for curing the wall. The Superintendent indicated that the wall would be completely tented with plastic sheets without heat. INSPECTION TIME 4 1/2 Hours (7:30AM - 10:30AM + travel) INSPECTOR Julie MacKinnon 2-Salem 1-TRO 1-Chapin 2-Connolly 1-SBD ! ; I - —�=/—_�'�-fid% • ice..,,` - - - 6"�p--�.,,�.-.— --- f -- ._!'!A -fir--� --------- - - -- ------ ---- - -- --- - -- --- - - --— -------- -- ----------- — �CIV,_–�'�—.__�-�-C4u�_!6n _,(/au__ 4lipo 0 'xf - - _ ---------__ --/_�Y(r— – Qd n_7Q/P [J-__ y t h A tPP�-�� -- `ate P=LG"-�� - – ir'r-a c_•a__Mc9-` P^ --- --- --- -�.117 Gr/ ep . t lot- � eL a9 - 5' .fc _. (�;'s.`_f ��ol�v- �c ��- p© x„ iC�ee'VVIP IS I C7 cc S' Protze Materials Engineering & Testing Company PM s n 36 JACONNET STREET, NEWTON HIGHLANDS, MA 02161 (617) 332$460 5103 OLD WM. PENN HIGH\1'AY, E%PORT, PA 15632 (412) 327-0707 - INSPECTION OF CONCRETE February 14, 1989 CLIENT SALEM HOSPITAL, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS PROJECT MACOMBER 4 BUILDING DATE February 10, 1989 REF,NO. C13 -4C-275 _4 c+ co INSPECTION OF FORMS, REINFORCING STEEL, CONCRETE MIXTURE, AND PLACEMENT WERE CARRIED OUT(AS APPbfCABLE AF AS PREVIOUSLY DESCRIBED IN DETAIL FOR SIMILAR WORK. THE FOLLOWING SPECIFICS CgfdR IS DATE rn o_ BATCH CONTROL None s`rn z TEST SPECIMENS m 4C n Series No. 15A-D =o �, M Class, psi 3000 Load No. 1 ' H w Slump, in. 4 ca . PLACEMENT OF Walls on footing B4-6 and 4B-C Columns on footing 2E and 2F REMARKS Preparations were complete. The well constructed form was clean, oiled, and appeared tight. The steel reinforcing was securely tied and had proper clearances. Grout used for pump line lubrication was discarded outside the formed areas . The concrete mix characteristics were satisfactory. The walls and both columns were cast via pump in appropriate lifts . Consolidation was provided by good internal vibration. Methods followed good concreting practice. The freshly placed concrete was covered with insulated blankets for protection. INSPECTION TIME 4; Hours (12:00N - 3:OOPM + travel) INSPECTOR David Filtranti 2-Salem 1-TRO 1-Chapin 2-Connolly 1-SBD PMCr Protze Materials Engineering & Testing Company 36 JACONNET STREET, NEWTON HIGHLANDS, MA 02161 (617) 332-8460 RD9, BOX 610, OLD ROUTE 66, GREENSBURG, PA 15601 (4121837-5030 February 16, 1989 SALEM HOSPITAL SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS INSPECTION OF WELDING MACOMBER 4 BUILDING < N Q CD= r REFERENCE NUMBER 89C-281 m v T"C' co z �m DATE OF INSPECTION February 13, 1989 '^m o 3'o =, m REMARKS We visually checked the welding of the %jr jots -4 to the beams at roof level M-J, l'-9. Bd-Pore aQ could check the welds the slag had to be removed. This was done. There were 6 welds which we marked as unacceptable. They did not conform to size or configuration. The rest were satisfactory. Mr. Finney advised he would call when more welding was completed. INSPECTION TIME 3 Hours (7:OOAM - 8:30AM + travel) INSPECTOR Bernard Painter 2-Salem 1-TRO 1-Chapin 2-Connolly 1-SBD PM am Protze Materials Engineering & Testing Company 361ACONNET STREET, NEWTON HIGHLANDS, MA 02161 (617) 332-8460 RD9, BOX 610, OLD ROUTE 66, GREENSBURG, PA 15601 (412)837-5030 I February 9, 1989 SALEM HOSPITAL SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS �^ Co INSPECTION OF CONCRETE c"' o MAC.OMBER 4 BUILDINGm en n Qp z vm REFERENCE NUMBER 89C-252 S m w m 0 a J DATE OF INSPECTION February 7, 1989 mEn m N L'o REMARKS After arrival the writer was notified that the concrete placement was cancelled due to snowy conditions. INSPECTION TIME 2 Hours (12:30PM - 1:OOPM + travel) INSPECTOR Julie MacKinnon 2-Salem 1-TRC 1-Chapin 2-Connolly 1-SBD Protze Materials Engineering & Tasting Company PMU 36 IACONNET STREET, NEWTON HIGHLANDS, MA 02161 (617) 332-8460 5103 OLD WM. PENN HIGHWAY, EXPORT. PA 15632 (412) 327-0707 INSPECTION OF CONCRETE February 9, 1989 CLIENT SALEM HOSPITAL, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS PROTECT MACOMBER 4 BUILDING DATE February 8, 1989 REF.NO. 89C-251 INSPECTION OF FORMS, REINFORCING STEEL, CONCRETE MIXTURE, AND PLACEMENT WERE CARRIED OUT AS APPLICABLE AND AS PREVIOUSLY DESCRIBED IN DETAIL FOR SIMILAR WORK, THE FOLLOWING SPECIFIC CONgkN THIS DATE: IV m BATCH CONTROL None TEST SPECIMENS n m o Series No. 14A-D (no 00 Class, psi 3000 < X7 o Load No. 2 g oco m Slump, ,in. 3 7r (A PLACEMENT OF Machine Room walls 6-11,A-D N C-0 REMARKS The forms appeared tight and had been oiled. The inside faces of the adjoining walls and footings were clean. Reinforcing steel appeared to be tied securely. A pump with a three inch reducer and one rubber hose was used to transport the concrete . Several delays were incurred, due to pumping problems. Loads 2,5 and 6 were at least 2; hours old. Load #5 was rejected by the Superintendent, as recommended by the writer; however, the Contractor elected to use the remainder of the loads. Personnel deposited the mix with proper vibration and in suitable lifts. The wall was covered with plastic blankets for curing purposes . INSPECTION TIME 61�' Hours (10:30AM - 3 30PM + travel) INSPECTOR Julie MacKinnon 2-Salem 1-TRO p1-Chapin 2-SBDnolly PMRProtze Materials Engineering & Testing Company 36 IACONNET STREET, NEVNQON HIGHLANDS, MA 02161 (617) 332-8460 5703 OLD WM. PENN HIGH\NAY. E%PORT, PA 15632 (412) 327-0707 INSPECTION OF CONCRETE February 7, 1989 CLIENT SALEM HOSPITAL, SALEM MASSACHUSETTS PROJECT MA0014BER 4 BUILDING DATE February 2, 1989 REF.NO. 89C-242 INSPECTION OF FORMS, REINFORCING STEEL, CONCRETE MIXTURE, AND PLACEMENT WERE CARRIED OUT AS APPLICABLE AND AS PREVIOUSLY DESCRIBED IN DETAIL FOR SIMILAR WORK. THE FOLLOWING SPECIFICS CONCf*MTHIS D�aE: BATCH CONTROL None TEST SPECIMENS p $ Series No. 13A-D CPn Class, psi 3000 v1TL f 3. 4' Load No. 1 mfr m Slump, .in. 5 1/4 ¢ T' o� PLACEMENT OF Footings M8,L8 N REMARKS Preparations were coFrpleted. Forms were clean and tight. Steel was supported by large concrete chunks or stones and was tied securely. The mix appearance was satisfactory. The temperature was under the minimum recommended 60°F. The writer notified the Superintendent. The concrete was deposited directly into the forFns, screeded to grade and then float finished. Insulated blankets were to be placed over the footing as soon as the anchor bolts were set. Methods were acceptable. INSPECTION TIME, 3 1/2 Yours (1:00PM - 3:00pm + travel) INSPECTOR David Garland 2-Salem 1-TRO 1-Chapin 2-Connolly 1-SBD Protze Materials Engineering & Testing Company Pmff 36 JACONNET STREET, NEWTON HIGHLANDS, MA 02161 (617) 332-8460 5103 OLD WM. PENN HIGHWAY, EXPORT, PA 15632 (412) 327-0707 INSPECTION OF CONCRETE February 7, 1989 CLIENT SALEM HOSPITAL, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS PROJECT MACOMBER 4 BUILDING DATE February 1, 1989 REF.NO. 89C-241 INSPECTION OF FORMS, REINFORCING STEEL, CONCRETE MIXTURE, AND PLACEMENT WERE CARRIED OUT AS APPLICABLE AND AS PREVIOUSLY DESCRIBED IN DETAIL FOR SIMILAR WORK. THE FOLLOWING SPECIFICS CONCERN THIS DATE: BATCH CONTROL None TEST SPECIMENS -t c Series No. 12A-D CD m 0 Class, psi 3000 con CZm z Load No. X„m 1 r w Slump, in. 4 1/4 $o rn a xa PLACEMENT OF Footings Al1-8; 11A-D ch o0 N G� 1 1AIt<S Preparations were coirpleted. Forms were clean and tight. Steel was supported by large stones and had proper clearances. The appearance of the concrete was satisfactory. The concrete was deposited directly into the form and vibrated to provide consolidation. A hand float was used to finish the top. Insulated blankets were to be placed over the footings for cold weather protection. Methods were acceptable. INSPECTION =2 3 1/2 Hours (1.00PM - 3:00pM + travel) INSPECTOR David Garland 2-Salem 1-TRO 1-Chapin 2-Connolly 1-SBD PMLOT Protze Materials Engineering & Testing Company 36 IACONNET STREET, NEWTON HIGHLANDS, MA 02161 (617) 332-8460 5103 OLD 115M. PENN IiIGHWAI', EXPORT, PA 15632 1112) 327-0707 INSPECTION OF CONCRETE January 31, 1989 CLIENT SALEM HOSPITAL, SALEM MASSACHUSETTS PROJECT MAS BER 4 BUILDING DATE January 23, 1989 REF,NO. 89C-169 INSPECTION OF FORMS, REINFORCING STEEL, CONCRETE MIXTURE, AND PLACEMENT WERE CARRIED OUT AS APPLICABLE AND AS PREVIOUSLY DESCRIBED IN DETAIL FOR SIMILAR WORK, THE FOLLOWING SPECIFICS CONCERN THIS DATE: BATCH CONTROL None TEST SPECIMENS Series No. 8A-D Class, psi 3000 Load No. I `$ 4 Slump, .in. 3 1/2 PLACEMENT OF Footings 6A-D 3 R`IARKS Ledge had been removed and g gravel filh� deposited at the footing locations and the direction of the soils engineer. Ete- inforcing steel was installed at the coluan footing. The transit arrived with a very dry mix, to which approximately 40 to 50 gallons of water had to be added to achieve the sluTp of 3 1/2" . The concrete was chuted into the bucket of a power shovel, then deposited into the forms. The concrete was spaded for consolidation, then the surface was trowelled. The concrete was workable, and was placed in accordance with current standards and procedures. The formwork was to be covered with insulated blankets. INSPECTION TIME 3 1/2 Hours (1:00PM - 3c00PM + travel) INSPECTOR William Mahoney 2-Salem 1-TRO 1-Chapin 2-Connolly 1-SBD PMCrProtze Materials Engineering & Testing Company 36 IACONNET STREET, NEWTON HIGHLANDS, MA 02161 (617) 3328460 5103 OLD W�I. PENN HIGHWAY, EXPORT, PA 15632 1412) 3270707 INSPECTION OF CONCRETE January 31, 1989 CLIENT SALEM HOSPITAL, SALEM MASSACHUSETTS PROJECT MACOMg3ER 4 BUILDING DATE January 25, 1989 REF.NO. 89C-170 INSPECTION OF FORMS, REINFORCING STEEL, CONCRETE MIXTURE, AND PLACEMENT WERE CARRIED OUT AS APPLICABLE AND AS PREVIOUSLY DESCRIBED IN DETAIL FOR SIMILAR WORK. THE FOLLOWING SPECIFICS CONCERN THIS DATE: BATCH CONTROL None TEST SPECIMENS Series No. 9A-D Class, psi 3000 Load No. 1 rn Slump, .in. 2 1/2 t`. < a o= w F nm p PLACEMENT OF Footing 2E,F & D8-9.5 a m CO z C) 1EMAP.KS Preparations were being completed. StoeZ was being tied and set. A raTrp was bei fag m built for the concrete truck to access ) line footings. When completed, the forms cC 'o were clean and appeared tight and the steel was tied securely. A vibrator was also set up. The concrete mix was satisfactory. The mix was chuted directly off the truck. Workers demonstrated good concreting * techniques including proper vibration. The footings were to be hand trowelled, and covered by plastic sheets for Eroist curing. Methods were satisfactory. IIZSPECTION TIDE 4 Hours (9:30A14 - 12:OON + travel) INSPECTIOR Julie MacKinnon 2-Salem 1-TRO 1-Chapin 2-Connolly 1-SBD PMUProtze Materials Engineering & Testing Company 36)ACONNET STREET, NEWTON HIGHLANDS, MA 02161 (617) 332-8460 RD9, BOX 610, OLD ROUTE 66, GREENSBURG, PA 15601 '(412) 837-5030 January 30, 1989 SALEM HOSPITAL SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS a G; TEST OF CLAY BUILDING BRICK CP_ MACOMBER 4 BUILDING a A REFERENCE NUMBER 89S-6 r o DATE RECEIVED January 17, 1989PP 3 A � SPECIMENS Cn Fht Stiles & Har* red clay sand strucEu_�cuilmj r" brick, hard burned, 24 x 32 x "4' :average size, recessed and marked S+H. Some chips and slight warpage. METHOD OF ANALYSIS ASTM C67 RESULTS Absorption .Wt.as Compress 24Hr 5 Hr C/B Specimen Rec.'d. Strength Soak Boil Ratio r 2010 ;m, 158404 4.3% 6.4% 0.67 B 1920 13980 0.4 1. 1 0.36 C 1920 10360 2.0 3.8 0.53 D 1840 9470 0.6 2.4 0.25 E 1920 13470 1.8 4.0 0.45 Average12620,- 1.8% 3.5 0.45 REMARKS These brick satisfy ASTM Specifications C62.-85a for Grade SW and C216-85a fcr Grade SW, type F3S Clay Building Brick. Respectfully submitted Herman G. Protze v � 2-Salem 1-TRO 1-Chapin 2-Connolly 1-SBD Protze Materials Engineering & Testing Company Pmff 36 JACONNET STREET, NEWTON HIGHLANDS, MA 02161 16171 332$760 1103 OLD WM. PENN HIGHWAY, EXPORT, PA 11632 (412) 327-0707 INSPECTION OF CONCRETE January 31, 1989 CLIENT SALEM HOSPITAL, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS PROJECT MACOMBER 4 BUILDING DATE January 27, 1989 REF.NO. 89C-181 INSPECTION OF FORMS, REINFORCING STEEL, CONCRETE MIXTURE, AND PLACEMENT WERE CARRIED OUT AS APPLICABLE AND AS PREVIOUSLY DESCRIBED IN DETAIL FOR SIMILAR WORK. THE FOLLOWING SPECIFICS CONCERN THIS DATE: BATCH CONTROL None TEST SPECIMENS Series No. lOA-D Class, psi 3000 Load No. 1 �. Slump, in. 32 -4 co C) PLACEMENT OF Footings F8, G8 rn m Pedestals F2, E2 �T 'CICO m<c 1,s _ n rn co REMARKS Forms appeared tight, pre-oiled and clej+P Ren- forcing steel was securely tied with prr&er mar- ances . ti Q0 Concrete was deposited directly from the truck chute. An internal vibrator was used to provide consolidation. Exposed surfaces were float finished. The Contractor set anchor bolts in the footings, and stated that he would cover all freshly concreted forms with insulated blankets for curing. Methods were satisfactory. INSPECTION TIME 3 Hours (1:OOPM - 2:30PM + travel) INSPECTOR Michael Marren 2-Salem 1-TRO 1-Chapin 2-Connolly 1-SBD PMCrProtze Materials Engineering & Testing Company 36 1ACONNET STREET, NEWTON HIGHLANDS, MA 02761 (617) 332-8460 5103 OLD WM. PENN HiGHWAV, E%PORT, PA 15632 14121 327-0707 INSPECTION OF CONCRETE January 31, 1989 CLIENT SALEM HOSPITAL, SALEM MASSACHUSETTS PROJECT 111ACOMBER 4 BUILDING DATE January 30, 1989 REF,NO. 89C-208 INSPECTION OF FORMS, REINFORCING STEEL, CONCRETE MIXTURE, AND PLACEMENT WERE CARRIED OUT AS APPLICABLE AND AS PREVIOUSLY DESCRIBED IN DETAIL FOR SIMILAR WORK. THE FOLLOWING SPECIFICS CONCERN THIS DATE: BATCH CONTROL None TEST SPECIMENS Series No. 11A-D Class, psi 3000 - .� rn Load No. 2 =4 ca Go Slump, .in. 4 't C"Q"M O PLACEMENT OF Foundation walls 6-8,A-D & 113-D n m z Footings 10B, 8A < w n �M CO C7 y, ? REMARKS Forms were clean, had been oiled and ai7pearei -+ tight. Reinforcing steel was securely `�,ied � with proper clearances. The contractor added 1 gallon per cubic yard of Anti-Hydro before the concrete was purped into place. Walls were cast in four lifts with continuous internal vibration throughout. The Superintendent stated that the work would be covered with insulating blankets for cold weather protection. Methods were satisfactory. INSPECTION TINE 1/Y^ (12:00N - 3:00PM + travel) i L HOl"LCS INSPECTOR Michael Marren 2-Sale-n 1-TRD 1-Chapin 2-Connolly 1-SBD PMR 'Protze Materials Engineering & Testing Company 36 IACONNET STREET, NEWTON HIGHLANDS, MA 02161 (617) 332-8460 5103 OLD W.H. PENN HIGHWAY, EXPORT, PA 15632 1412) 327-0707 INSPECTION OF CONCRETE January 23, 1989 CLIENT SALEM HOSPITAL, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS PROTECT MACOMBER 4 BUILDING DATE January 19, 1989 REF.NO. 89C-64 INSPECTION OF FORMS, REINFORCING STEEL, CONCRETE MIXTURE, AND PLACEMENT WERE CARRIED OUT AS APPLICABLE AND AS PREVIOUSLY DESCRIBED IN DETAIL FOR SIMILAR WORK. THE FOLLOWING SPECIFICS CONCERN THIS DATE: BATCH CONTROL None TEST SPECIMENS Series No. 7A-D y a Class, psi 3000 rs' Load No. 1 oTFC Slump, in. 3, Q:n cr' �m Cap cD PLACEMENT OF Wall G6-C3 o In g a REMARKS Preparations were completed. Forms we ti clews, tigha and oiled. Steel was tied and had prolter clearances. The mix appearance was satisfactory. Anti-Hydro was added on site by the Contractor. The concrete was deposited directly into the forms . The Contractor started a, the lower level and worked up. The lift height was approximately 3 ft. A vibrator was used to provide consolidation. Top surfaces were trowelled. Insulated blankets were to be placed over the wall upon completion. INSPECTION TIME 3, Hours (10:00AM - 12 :OON + travel) INSPECTOR David Garland 2-Salem 1-Tro 1-Chapin 2-Connolly l-SED PmffProtze Materials Engineering & Testing Company 36 JACONNET STREET, NEWTON HIGHLANDS, MA 02161 (617) 332-8460 5103 OLD WM. PENN HIGHWAY, EXPORT, PA 15632 (412) 327-0707 ' INSPECTION OF CONCRETE January 18, 1989 CLIENT SALEM HOSPITAL, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS PROJECT MACOMBER 4 BUILDING DATE January 17,. 1989 , REF,NO. 89C-53 INSPECTION OF FORMS, REINFORCING STEEL, CONCRETE MIXTURE, AND PLACEMENT WERE CARRIED OUT AS APPLICABLE AND AS PREVIOUSLY DESCRIBED IN DETAIL FOR SIMILAR WORK. THE FOLLOWING SPECIFICS CONCERN THIS DATE: BATCH CONTROL None TEST SPECIMENS Series No. 6A-D Z G Class, psi 3000 Load No. 0 Slump, .in. 3� Ln C) rnL .n rn PLACEMENT OF Pads 8-line H,J,K; M4; o Front footing wall F-E v In REMARKS The forms were clean and appeared tight. The reinforcing steel was properly sized and the correct number bars were in the form. The steel was clean, tightly tied and the clearances were satisfactory. The concrete was conveyed to the forms via the truck chutes and was consolidated with an internal vibrator. Later, it was covered with insulating blankets for cold weather protection. Work was performed satisfactorily. INSPECTION TIME 5 Hours (10:00AM - 1:3OPe + Travel) INSPECTOR Colin MacGillvray 2-Salem 1-TRO 1-Chapin 2-Connolly 1-SBD PMUProtze Materials Engineering & Testing Company 36 JACONNET STREET, NEWTON HIGHLANDS, MA 02161 (617) 332-8460 5103 OLD WM. PENN HIGHWAY, EXPORT, PA 15632 (412) 327-0707 January 9, 1989 INSPECTION OF CONCRETE CLIENT SALEM HOSPITAL, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS PROJECT MACOMBER 4 BUILDING DATE December 6, 1989 REF.NO. 89C-10 INSPECTION OF FORMS, REINFORCING STEEL, CONCRETE MIXTURE, AND PLACEMENT WERE CARRIED OUT AS APPLICABLE AND AS PREVIOUSLY DESCRIBED IN DETAIL FOR SIMILAR WORK. THE FOLLOWING SPECIFICS CONCERN THIS DATE: BATCH CONTROL None TEST SPECIMENS Series No. 4A-D Class, psi 3000 Load No. 1 Slump, ,in. 2 1/2 PLACEMENT OF Foundation wall line 4 to line 6.G REMARKS Preparations were incomplete. Forms were clean and appeared tight. The reinforcing steel was securely tied with proper clearances in the forms m prior to placement of concrete and conformed with p y the drawings. However, inasmuch as there was no =r- preheat in the forms and contact temperatures C3 3E were 18°F the writer recommended to the contractor ,e_. o w -T a J that time concrete placement be postponed. The 00. Uj a contractor elected to proceed. The temperature w LL of the concrete on arrival was 52°F. Before C� discharge, the contractor added a 5 gallon o a F container of Anti-Hydro to the 10 cu.yd, load. -� The writer advised that this Anti-Hydro not be used inasmuch as it is not an anti-freeze. The Contractor cited specifications which prescribed the Anti-Hydro and continued the work. Concrete was deposited directly into the form via the truck: chutes. An internal vibrator was used to provide consolidation. After the casting was completed, the forms were covered with insulated blankets. INSPECTION. TT_i-h 4 1/2 Hours (8:OOAM - 11:00AM + travel) INSPECTOR Michael Marrem 2-Salem 1-TRO 1-Chapin 2-Connolly 1-SBD Fm 1 Protze Materials Engineering & Testing Company 36 JACONNET STREET, NEWTON HIGHLANDS, MA 02161 (617) 332-8460 EMENNEMEM RD9, BOX 610, OLD ROUTE 66, GREENSBURG, PA 15607 (412)837-5030 January 9, 1989 SALEM HOSPITAL SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS INSPECTION OF CONCRETE MACOMBER 4 BUILDING REFERENCE NUMBER 89C-9 DATE OF INSPECTION January 5, 1989 IU-LVZS The writer reported at the subject job site as scheduled and was later informed that work this date was cancelled due to cold weather. INSPECTION TIDIE 2 Hours (8:OOAM - 8:30AM + travel) INSPECTOR Colin MacGillivray 2-Salem 1-TIU IF;Szapin Veonnoqly SBD cl` o wUJa LID La. U cn f3' uj� N WCzO S F� 6 U Prot=e Materials Engineering & Testing Company FM off 36 IACONNET STREET, NEWTON HIGHLANDS, MA 02161 (617) 332-8460 5103 OLD WM. PENN HIGHWAY, EXPORT, PA 15632 (412) 327-0707 January 10, 1989 INSPECTION OF CONCRETE CLIENT SA . 1 HOSPITAL, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS PROJECT N,A0014BER 4 BUILDING DATE January 9, 1989 REF.NO. 89C-26 INSPECTION OF FORMS, REINFORCING STEEL, CONCRETE MIXTURE, AND PLACEMENT WERE CARRIED OUT AS APPLICABLE AND AS PREVIOUSLY DESCRIBED IN DETAIL FOR SIMILAR WORK. THE FOLLOWING SPECIFICS CONCERN THIS DATE: BATCH CONTROL None TEST SPECIMENS Series No. 5A-D Class, psi 3000 Load No. 1 Slump, ,in. 4 PLACEMENT OF Pier footings 6L and 7M REMARKS The preparations were Thorough. The forms were pre-oiled and appeared tight. Reinforcing steel was tied securely, and had proper clearances from forms. The areas inside the footings were clean and had been compacted. An internal vibrator was set up. The concrete nrix was satisfactory. The concrete was chuted directly off the trucks. The concrete was deposited in suitable lifts and with proper vibration. The footings were hand trowelled. The footings were to be covered with plastic sheets for moist curing. INSPECTION TIME 3 1/2 Hours (12:30PM - 2:30I)M + travel) INSPE=R Julie MacKinnon 2-Salem 1-TRO 1-Chapin 2-Connolly nm N R 1-SBD yam',m Ga rn :CM o ea a V1 Lb lA tm . . Pratae Materials Engineering & Testing Company k 1 36 IACONNET STREET, NEWTON HIGHLANDS, MA 02161 (617) 332-8460 omoomml RD9, BOX 610, OLD ROUTE 66, GREENSBURG, PA 15601 (412)837-5030 Decerrber 30, 1988 SALEM HOSPITAL ca y gp, SAL04, 1,P3SACHUSETTS INSPECTION OF CONCRETE MACOFfBER 4 BUILDINGJr m< Jr BD REFERENCE ?vu,v4BER 88C-3297 �rn 3 ca DATE OF Ii2SPECTION Decenber 19, 1988 N TEST SPECIMENS Series No. 1A-D Class, psi 3000 Load No. 1 Slum, in. 2 1/4 PLA=NT OF Footings K-M, 1-6 REKkRKS The forms were clean and appeared tight. There was no reinforcing steel in the forms and no vibrator available to consolidate the concrete. The base of the footing vas co:rpacted soil and it was free Of frost. The concrete was conveyed via excavator bucket from the truck. After it was de- posited, the concrete was spaded with shovels to provide consolidation. The freshly cast concrete was then covered with insulating blankets. Work was performed satisfactorily, except for lack of internal vibration. INSPECTION TI.TE 3 1/2 Hours (1:00PS`_ - 3:00PM + travel) INSPECTOR Colin MacGillivray 2-Salem 1-TRO 1-Chapin 2-Conrmlly 1-SBD ,CON WT4 Public Property PepttrtmentOCT 31 ++ IMML��'SY Ill uilbiuq 3epttrtntent IP L Pel=�'Py One ,,*'alem (15reen CITY OF SAVR91 745-0Z 13 William H. Munroe Director of Public Property Maurice M. Martineau, Asst Inspector Inspector of Buildings Edgar J. Paquin, Ass't Inspector Zoning Enforcement Officer John L. LeClerc, Plumbing/Gas Insp. To Whom It May Concern: Attached hereto you will find a copy of an ordinance which became effective January 12, 1987, regarding development inspection fees. Any developer who constructs, reconstructs or rehabilitates six (6) or more residential units or 10, 000 square feet or more of commercial space shall pay to the Building Department a fee for building, plumbing and gas inspections. The fees will be charged at the rate of Twenty and 00/100 ($20. 00) dollars per hour and will be due within thirty (30) days of receipt of the invoice. No Certificate of Occupancy will be issued by this Department until all outstanding inspection fees have been paid. The above fees are to be paid in addition to all other fees required under the Building Permit fee schedule in ffect as of J ne 2, 1986. velope ckn wledges William H. Munroe r ceipt notice Inspector of Buildings City of Salem One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 CONSTRUCTION CONTROL PROJECT NUMBER: btft) PROJECT TITLE: Mommf-_4 / anA PROJECT LOCATION: ((``��YYA,,, f fab 1 �� l&"-- U� �L�` kl��Pl7�f�% �I nJ'�S_ ��!`I� / �I�'11� Wiz- NAME OF BUILDING: ^MM6MWq' NATURE OF PROJECT: 20 y mr' q- 40 my Nw,;gNO ON 1r W0jF0fzT""- IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 127.0 OF THE MASSACHUSETTS STATE BUILDING CODE, I. NIUANM C' WINUr-f, Registration No. +-2:5?) BEING A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER/ARCHITECT HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE PREPARED OR DIRECTLY SUPERVISED THE PREPARATION OF ALL DESICN PLANS, COMPUTATIONS AND SPECIFICA- TIONS CONCERNING: ENTIRE PROJECT ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURAL FIRE PROTECTION ELECTRICAL MECHANICAL OTHER (specify) FOR THE ABOVE NAMED PROJECT AND THAT, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, SUCH PLANS, COMPUTATIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS MEET THE APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE MASSACHUSETTS STATE BUILDING CODE, ALL ACCEPTABLE ENGINEERING PRACTICES AND APPLICABLE LAWS AND ORDINANCES FOR THE PROPOSED USE AND OCCUPANCY. r FURTHER CERTIFY THAT I SHALL PERFORM THE NECESSARY PROFESSIONAL CERVICES AND BE PRESENT ON THE CONSTRUCTION SITE ON A REGULAR AND PERIODIC BASIS TO DETERMINE THAT THE WORK IS PROCEDING IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DOCUMENTS APPROVED FOR THE BUILDING PERMIT AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FOLLOWING AS SPECIFIED IN SECTION 127.2.2: 1 . Review of shop drawings, samples and other submittals of the contractor as required by the construction contract docunents as submitted for building permit, and approval for conformance to the design concept. 2. Review and approval of the quality control procedures for all code-required controlled materials. 3. Special architectural or engineering professional inspection of critical construction components requiring controlled materials or construction specified in the accepted engineering practice standards listed in Appendix B. PURSUANT TO SECTION 127.2.3, I SHALL SUBMIT PERIODICALLY, A PROGRESS REPORT TOGETHER WITH PERTINENT COMMENTS TO THE STATE BUILDING INSPECTOR. UPON COMPLETION OF THE WORK, I SHALL SUBMIT A FINAL REPORT AS TO THE SATISFACTORY COMPLETION AND 'READINESS OF THE PROJECT FOR OCCUPANCY. I GNAT RE SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS a' DAY OF NOTARY PUBLIC MY rnMMTCCTr)M PYPTRRC S -L—' ,owl The Ritchie Organization` Architecture Planning Interiors 174 Boylston Street May 5, 1989 - Chestnut Hill, Comm. No. 6888 Massachusetts rro 02167M G ® 6179gt9400 nm Mr. David J. Harris O� Assistant Building Inspector i nrn i City of Salem Mt^ `Uj n m Public Property Department o 1 Salem Green -t Salem, MA 01970 ct� N ct� RE: Salem Hospital Construction Macomber 4/Davenport 9 Partition Test Report Dear Dave: Please find attached a copy of the "Ohio State University Test Report No. T-3362" as requested. The report does not reference penetrations, but I have included Section 6-3.6 from the NFPA 101, Life Safety Code for your review. If I can be of further assistance in this matter, please let me know. Very truly yours, TRO/THE RITCHIE ORGANIZATION 4Ruc1IWG. Fuller,Jr., CPCA Code Administrator cc: R. Martineau B. Morrisroe W.Winder M. Farnola Code file Birmingham, Alabama Sarasota, Florida sr` FEATURES OF FIRE PROTECTION 101-31 Exception No. 4: Smoke dampers may be omitted where era]occupancy of the building or structure,such as those areas ducts penetrate floors that serve as smoke barriers. used for storage of combustibles or flammables, areas housing Exception No. 5: Smoke dampers maybe omitted where spe- heat-producing appliances, or areas used for maintenance pur- cifically permitted by Chapters 8 through 30. poses, as follows: (a) Enclosure with construction in accordance with Section 6.3.5.2 Required smoke dampers in ducts penetrating smoke 6-2 with a fire resistance rating as specified by Chapters 8 barriers shall close upon detection of smoke by: through 30,but not less than 1 hour without windows and with (a) Approved smoke detectors installed in accordance with doors of%.-hour fire protection rating, or - Chapter 9 of NFPA 72E, Standard on Automatic Fire Detec- (b) Protection with automatic extinguishing systems in ac- lots, or cordance with Section 7-7 as required by Chapters 8 through (b) Approved local smoke detectors on either side of the 30, or smoke barrier door opening where ducts penetrate smoke bar- (c) Both (a) and (b) above where specified by Chapters 8 riers above the smoke barrier doors, or through 30. (c) Approved smoke detectors located within the ducts in existing installations. 16-4.2' Explosion Protection. Where hazardous processes or ' storage are of such a character as to introduce an explosion 6-3.5.3 Required smoke dampers in air transfer openings potential, explosion venting or an explosion suppression system shall close upon detection of smoke by approved smoke detec- specifically designed for the hazard involved shall be provided. tors installed in accordance with Chapter 9 of NFPA 72E, Standard on Automatic Fire Detectors. 6-4.3 Flammable Liquids. Flammable liquids shall be pro- Exception: Where a duct is provided on one side of the smoke tected in accordance with NFPA 30,Flammable and Combus- barrier, the smoke detectors on the duct side shall be in accor- tible Liquids Code. dance with 6-3.5.2. 6-4.4 Laboratories. Laboratories that use chemicals shall Zx6-3.6 Penetrations and Miscellaneous Openings in Floors and comply with NFPA 45,Standard on Fire Protection for Labo- Smoke Barriers. ratories Using Chemicals, unless otherwise modified by other 6.3.6.1 Pipes, conduits, bus ducts, cables, wires, air ducts, provisions of this Code. pneumatic tubes and ducts, and similar building service equip- Exception: Laboratories in health care occupancies and med- menl that pass through floors and smoke barriers shall be pro- ical and dental offices shall comply with NFPA 99, Standard tected as follows: for Health Care Facilities. (a) The space between the penetrating item and the smoke barrier shall: 1. Be filled with a material capable of maintaining the SECTION 6-5 INTERIOR FINISH smoke resistance of the smoke barrier, or 2. Be protected by an approved device designed for the 6-5.1 General specific purpose. 16-5.1.1• Interior finish includes interior wall and ceiling fin- (b) Where the penetrating item uses a sleeve to penetrate the ish and interior floor finish. smoke barrier, the sleeve shall be solidly set in the smoke bar- rier, and the space between the item and the sleeve shall: 6-5.1.2 Interior wall and ceiling finish means the exposed 1. Be filled with a material capable of maintaining the interior surfaces of buildings including, but not limited to.. fixed smoke resistance of the smoke barrier, or or movable walls and partitions, columns, and ceilings. 2. Be protected by an approved device designed for the 6-5.1.3 Interior floor finish means the exposed floor surfaces specific purpose. of buildings including coverings that may be applied over a nor- (c) Where designs take transmission of vibration into consid- mal finished floor or stair, including risers. eration, any vibration isolation shall: L Be made on either side of the smoke barrier, or 6-5.1.4 Classification of interior finish materials shall be in 2. Be made by an approved device designed for the specif- accordance with tests made under conditions simulating actual is purpose. - installations, provided that the authority having jurisdiction may by rule establish the classification of any material on 6-3.6.2 Openings occurring at points where flours or smoke which a rating by standard test is not available. barriers meet the outside walls, other smoke barriers, or fire barriers of a building shall: 6-5.2' Use of Interior Finishes. --- (a) Be filled with a material capable of maintaining the 6-5.2.1 Requirements for interior wall and ceiling finish shall smoke resistance of the floor or smoke barrier. or - apply as specified elsewhere in this Code for specific occupan- (b) Be protected by an approved device designed for the spe- cies. (See Chapter 5 and the specific occupancy requirements cific purpose. of Chapters 8 through 30.) 6-5.2.2• Requirements for interior floor finish shall apply SECTION 6-4 SPECIAL HAZARD PROTECTION I only where (1) there is a floor finish of unusual hazard; or (2) where floor finish requirements are specified elsewhere in this 6-4.1 General Protection shall be provided from any area Code for specific occupancies. (See Chapters 8 through 30 for having a degree of hazard greater than that normal to the gen- specific occupancy requirements.) 19W EDITION No� City of Salem Ward 6q "CI 601,, t1 r � „ r - dot APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO BUILD ADDITION, MAKE ALTERATIONS OR NEW CONSTRUCTION IMPORTANT-Applicant to complete all Items in sections:1, 1f, /it, IV, and 1X. IRah SGloria Wallace BuildiDITRIIC AT(LOCATION) T 1. _l i n LOCATION The North .Shore Medical Center OF BETWEEN AND North Shore Ch7REk n' c HnT;+a BUILDING GROSS STREET) Tr055 LIREEi) LOT SUBDIVISION LOT—BLOCK SIZE It. TYPE AND COST OF BUILDING -All applicants complete Parts A-D A. TYPE OF IMPROVEMENT D. PROPOSED USE-FOR"DEMOLITION"USE MOST RECENT USE 1 ❑ New building Residential Nonresidential 2 ❑ Addition Of residential,enter number of new 12 ❑ One family 18 ❑ Amusement,recreational housing units added,if any,in pad D,13) 19 ❑ Chruch,other religious 13 ❑ Two or more family-Enter number ' 3 Alteration(See 2 above) of units _ 20 ❑ Industrial 21 ❑ Parking garage 4 ❑ Repair replacement 14 ❑ Transient hotel,motet,or dormitory- 22 Service station,repair garage Enter number of units __.........___._ 5 ❑.Wrecking(If multifamily residenea/,enter number 23 Hospital.institutional W units in building in Pad A 13) 15 ❑ Garage 24 ❑ Office,bank professional 6 ❑ Moving(relocation) 16 ❑ Carport 25 ❑ Public utility 26 ❑ School,library,other educational To foundation only 17 Other•Specify 26 ❑ Sloms,mercantile B.OWNERSHIP 28 ❑ Tanks,towers a (� Private(individual,corporation,nonprofit 29 ❑ Other-Specify institution,e1G) 9 ❑ Public(Federal.Sate,or local govemment C.COST (omR cards) Nonresidential-Describe in detail proposed use of buildings,e.g.,food processing dant, machine shop,laundry building at hospital,elementary school,secondary school,college, 50,000.00 parochial school,parking garage for department store,rental office building,office building 10. Cost of improvement -- —_-- 3 at industrial plant.If use of existing building is being changed,enter proposed use. To be installed but nor included Renovate existing office space for in the above cosf 6,500.00 a. Electrical b. Plumbing19 0 new Doctor' s offices. Q Heating,air conditioning d.-Other(eavalor,eta) �-- 11.TOTAL COST OF IMPROVEMENT s5o.onn no 111. SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS OF BUILDING -For new buildings and additions, complete Parts E-L;demolition, complete ontly Parts J 8 M, all others skip to IV E. PRINCIPAL TYPE OF FRAME F. PRINCIPAL TYPE OF HEATING FUEL G. TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL I. TYPE OF MECHANICAL 3D ® Masonry(wail bearing) 35 ❑ Gas 40 Public or private company Will there be central arc 31 ❑ Wood frame. 36 01 41 ❑ Prlvale(septic tank etc.) conditioning? 32 ❑ Structural ales( 37 ❑ ElectrIcAy 44 n Yes 45 ❑ No 33 ❑ Reinforced concrete 38 ❑ Coal H. TYPE OF WATER SUPPLY Will there by an elevator 34 ❑ Other•specify 39 ❑ Other•Specify 42 ® Public or private company 46 ❑ Yes 47 ® No 43 ❑ PrNate(well,dstem) t i I 4 DIMENSIONS ' as Number of stories—_ M. DEMOLITION OF STRUCTURES: N/A , 49. Total aware feel of lbo area Has Approval from Historical Commission been received ^r. ��`sbns wd""Is�`to—� for any structure over fifty(50)years? Yes— No_ so.Toa Wndareasq.IL. J[A Dig Safe Number KNUMBER OF OFF-STREET PARKING SPACES Pest Control: 51.EnrJowd HAVE THE FOLLOWING UTILITIES BEEN DISCONNECTED? 52. Outdoors Yes No L RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS ONLY Water. 51 Ercw:ee_._—____ Electric: Gas: Full N/A Sewer. 54. Number of bathrooms DOCUMENTATION FOR THE ABOVE MUST BE ATTACHED Parfial — BEFORE A PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED. IV. COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING: Historic District? Yes_ Nom (If yes,please enclose documentation from Hist Com.) Conservation Ara? Yes_ No-2L (If yes,please enclose Order of Conditioils) Has Fire Prevention approved and stamped plans or applications? Yes--L No Is property located in the S.R.A.district? Yes_ No X Comply with Zoning? Yes--L Nu_ (If no,enclose Board of Appeal decision) Is lot grandfathered? Yes-W No_ (If yes,submit documenlationlf no,submit Board of Appeal decision) If new construction,has the proper Routing Slip been enclosed? YeS-IL. No_ Is Architectural Access Board approval required? Yes— No--L (If yes,submit documentation) Massachusetts State Contractor License# t17 5544 Salem License# 947 Home Improvement Contractor# N/A Homeowners Exempt form(if applicable) Yes_ No_ CONSTRUCTION TO BE COMMENCED WITHIN SIX(6) MONTHS OF ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT CONSTRUCTION IS TO BE COMPLETED BY: If an extension is necessary,please submit in writing to the Inspector of Buildings. V. IDENTIFICATION. To be completed by all applicants Name Mailing address-Number,street city and state LP Code Tel.M. Salem Hospital Omer rx.' lessee z Ken Thompson 81 Highland Avenue 01970 41-1215 actor Salem, MA 01970 et °moo. X2593 a 1n/Ex Design 96 Richardson Road Mtlulea or Melrose, MA 1 hereby certify that roposed work is authorized by the owner of record and that I have been authorized by the owner to make this application as his aumlzedMpt and we agree to conform to all a livable laws of this jurisdiction. Sgnatu of li ddress Application date 81 Highland Avenue, Salem, 'MA 01970 } DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE VI.YALIDATION Building FOR DEPARTMENT USE ONLY Permit number Building Use Group Permit issued �o Io 19_I 7 Fire Grading Building 1 Permit Fee $ Live Loading Cerficate of Occupancy $ occupancy load ti Approved by. Drain Tile $ Plan Review Fee $ 1 TITLE NOTES AND Data-(For department use) W� X99 cru PERMIT TO BE MAILED TO: DATE MAILED: Construction to be started by. Completed by: ffy d t i VI ZONING PLAN EXAMINERS NOTES " DISTRICT USE FRONTYARD - SIDE YARD SIDE YARD REAR YARD NOTES SITE OR PLOT PLAN.For Applicant Use Please see attached drawings. O N Salem Fivice Department APPOINTMENT FOR FINAL' F-i to Prevention Su %eau. APPOINTMENT FOR FINAL INSPECTION MUST BE 48 La4ayette Street INSPECTION MUST BE MADE AT LEAST ONE WEEK Salem, Ma 01 970 MADE AT LEAST ONE WEEK AHEAD-----_-----— — (508) 745-7777 AHEAD FIRE DEPARTMENT CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL FOR BUILDING PERMIT In accordance wi th. the pnov.izZon,6 04 the Ma6.6achw6ett-6 State Buttdtng Code and the Salem Ftto Code, appt i.ca;tton .iA hereby made 4oa approval 04 pZan,6 and the t-6auance o4 a ce-tti,4tc4mte 04 approval 4o,% a buttd-Lng perm-Lt by the Salem Fvice Department. (Re-6. SectLon 113. 3, Ma-aa. State Bldg. Code) Job Location: Gloria Wallace Building Owners/Occupant: EZectEtca2 ContAactor: To be provided F-vice Suppt"-6ton ContAactor: Larkin Sprinkler Systems StgnatwLe 04 APPZccant. Ken Thompson / ,J� 7J Phone #: 741-1215 ext. 2593 Add,L".6 04 Salem Hospital Cdty or APAZ.ccant. 81 Highland Ave. , Salem, MA Town: s J Approval date: Ce�ttt 4-4.eate o4 apptovaZ -i-6 heteby grunted, on approved ptan.6 on -6ubmtttaC o4 project detaL2-6, by the Salem Ftte Depaztment. AZZ ptan.6 ane a.ppxoved -6oZeZy 4or tdent-LjZc4ztWon o4 type and ZoeatLon o4 J-,be protec .Lon devtce6 and equtpment. AZZ ptan,6 ane aubject to approval o4 any other authority having just-6d.Lct4on. Upon comptetton, the appttcant on tn,6taZler(-6) 4hatt n.equ"t an tn6peetGon and/on te-6t o4 the 4d�Le ptotectl.on devtce-6 and equ,Lpment. ( ** FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS, SEE REVERSE SIDE ** ) New eon6tructLon. Propeaty ZocatLon ha-6 no compZtan.ce with the provt,6Zon,6 o4 Chapter 148, Sectton 26 C/E, M. G. L. , retatLve to the tnatata .Lon o4 approved 4,Lte atanm devtce6. The owner o4 : th,i6 prope- ty t4 -%equtiLed to obtaLn comptiance " a condi-Lon o4 obtatnZn.g a BuZZdtng Perm-&t. Property ZocatLon .i,.6 in compt Lance with the provtzton4 04 Chapter 148, Section 26 C/E, M. G. L. Exp.vcation date: / 4 9 e 4 Fee due: under 7 500 Ft. - 510. 00 7 . 500 So. Ft. or Za •cger - S25 . 001 Foxm d81 FIRE DEPARTMENT CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL FOR BUILDING PERMIT In compliance with the provision of Section 113.5 of the Massachusetts State Building Code, and under guidelines agreed upon by the Salem Bldg. Inspector and the Salem Fire Chief, the applicant for a building permit shall obtain the Certificate of Approval (see reverse side) and stamped _=- plan approval from the Salem Fire Prevention Bureau. Said application and approval is required before a building permit may be Jw t issued. The Massachusetts State Building Code requires compliance z 3 11 approval of the Salem Fire Department, with reference to provisions of u. m w Articles 4 and 12 of the Building Code, the Salem Fire Code, Massachusetts o N p General Laws, and 527 Code of Massachusetts Regulations. N The applicant shall submit this application with three (3) sets of plans, W o i drawn in sufficient clarity, to obtain stamped approval of the Salem Fire F- Department. This applies for all new construction, substantial w w C alterations, change of use and/or occupancy, and any other approvals as N ¢ _ required by the Massachusetts General Laws, and the Salem Fire Code. a z Exception: Plans will not be required for structural work when the proposed work to be performed under the building permit will not, in the opinion of the Building Inspector, require a plan to show the nature and character of the work to be performed. Notice: Plans are normally required for fire suppression systems, fire alarm systems, tank installations, and Fire Code requirements. Under the provisions of Article 22 of the Massachusetts State Building Code, certain proposed projects may not require submission of plans or complete compliance with new construction requirements. In these cases, provisions of Article 22, Appendix T, and Tables applicable shall apply. This section shall not, however, supersede the provisions outlined in the Salem Fire Prevention Regulations, Chapter 148, MGL, or 527 Code of Massachusetts Regulations. All permits for fire code use and/or occupancy shall apply for the entire structure; fire alarm and/or smoke detector installation shall apply to the entire structure based upon current requirements as per Laws and/or Codes, but the existing structure may comply with regulations applicable for existing structures. Notice: Sub-contractors may also be required to file individual applications for a Fire Department Certificate of Approval for the area of their work. Such sub-contractors shall file an Application to Install with the Fire prevention Bureau prior to commencing any work for those areas applicable. T FOR F►NAE ; Form 81R (10/90) TMENT FOR BE AE pPPOE TON M SSONE WEEK 1NSPE T%ON MOSONE WEEK 1N E MSE AT LEAST_�� AHEp,D............. <�� i �� . a:�. / r �^��'�` G� I ....-- THC CCM WEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS OlPAfi ENT OF PUBLIC WORKS CO Y OF SALEM Plan o/ Pr6P0 d G-1ved Exfenslon, Drainage Sysjern end Ou41e4 5ETWIEN ,TA IOI.G, ANO gTA 104.70 ON THE 1946 STATE HIGHWAY ALTER Al ION SCALE' 40 FEET TO THE INCH AUGUST 21 1946. ACTING CHID NGINQQR THIN PIAN HA!j Ilk--A IQ,dLau. F'un �LAIIN') :6.t 1J.46INAL UN YILt. / 44 �N l +b� ,HIGHLAND AVC PM PIPOKL In 7•/+� .r sol •r•pl��o t;"a A P•....,e4y.. p If PIp. ' prop.12 Pip• Pro •\ - •» - to .(Jd.w(IM WU /: flMnf L4a•f�On Linc ~i R�op // / .r, I -x. +a'/ I I 11 ! 55 LSly wa=d•, ! OI jj MPJ . I x it Wr.•, Irar• 1 2 1�l lr. Q Il 1 / �/� CSSfXgE615TgTOfD4iD{SO.DIL7SAlFiRML;. Than.. QuAok _ �vve..a.53..a�.t' •e e''U•1� ' Q" Re D3Sy0/ 4ZY AW(c N., lob I!�►S: . t A ..kh, Ay<pr N wo, r MSS William f. Weld Aryeo Paul Ce!luccl James J.Kerasiotes Laurinda T. Bedingfi NI ,� Y Governor UMonAuGo`rma Sxrepry Commissioner October 29, 1993 Serafini, Serafini, and Darling Attorneys at Law 63 Federal Street Salem, MA 01970 Dear Mr. Serafini, Sr. : This is to acknowledge your recent correspondence as concerns existing drainage conditions in the area of 100 Highland Avenue (Route 107) in the City of Salem. A review of the correspondence submitted indicates the North Shore Medical Center's proposal to make an indirect tie into the State highway drainage system through the existing drainage structure, located on the property of the 100 Highland Avenue Realty Trust. Permit /J-31363 had been issued to Robert R. Nersasian of the 100 Highland Avenue Realty Trust for the purpose of making a drainage entry into the State highway system on April 6, 1990. However, the connection was never made, according to an investigation made at the site. The permit expired on April 6, 1991. It is recommended that the hospital submit a new drainage proposal with an attendant hydraulic analysis prepared by a Registered Professional Engineer, for entry into the State highway system. There is also the option of installing a separate, and independent system from your property to the outlet of the watershed area, in which case a permit will be required to occupy the State highway. If you have any questions please call the Permits Section of this office at 617 648-6100. incerely Yours, ^t4� �, Charles F. Mistretta, Jr. , P. E. District Highway Director DA/fgs cc: Rep. Michael J. Ruane Massachusetts Highway Department►District 4 .519 Appleton St., Arlington, MA 02174 • (617) 648-6100 (situ of i§tt1Pm, massar4usetts Public PrOpertg 19eltartment iguilbing Department (One #stem Green 508-745-9595 Ext. 380 Leo E. Tremblay Director of Public Property Inspector of Building Zoning Enforcement Officer October 21, 1993 John Serafini, Sr. , Esq. 63 Federal Street Salem, MA 01970 RE: 100 Highland Ave. Dear Mr. Serafini: In response to your letter of October 5, 1993 concerning the above referenced property with regards to the drainage system and it's termination at the property line. After considerable research I have concluded it would not be appropriate for this office to revoke the Occupancy Permit for 100 Highland Avenue. The owners of the property were unaware of the drainage situation which was caused by a contractor who no longer exists. I have been in contact with Mr. Charles Quigley, City of Salem Engineer and he has informed me he is currently working with the owners of the property and with Mackey Construction Company in an effort to come to a satisfactory solution for all concerned. Mr. Quigley has assured me there is no immediate danger as a result of this situation and there is no reason not to leave it as is until a resolution has been implemented. Any further correspondence regarding this matter should be directed to the City of Salem Solicitor, Robert Ledoux. I thank you for your concern and for advising this office of the problem. Sincer by, Leo E. Tremblay Zoning Enforcement Officer Inspector of Buildings LET:bms cc: Charles Quigley, Engineer Robert Ledoux, City Solicitor Trustees of 100 Highland Ave. Condominium Trust \100hghl\ BUIILtDINO DEPT. . SERAFINI, SERAFINI AND DARLING ATTORNEYS AT LAW ^{ 7 I�{ 63 FEDERAL STREET (JEp f 35 �Z Ph 13 SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 RECh!uFD CITY OF SALE''. Vii,°SS JOHN R. SERAFINI. SR. TELEPHONE JOHN R. SERAFINI,JR. 508-744 0212 JOHN E. DARLING 617-581-2743 ELLEN M. WINKLER TELECOPIER JOSEPH C. CORRENTI 508-741-4683 O October 5, 1993 M IN HAND Mr. Leo E. Tremblay Inspector of Buildings and ym Zoning Enforcement Officer ' ryt City of Salem U; c 7 `7a One Salem Green 5' Salem, Massachusetts 01970 RE: 100 Highland Avenue Condominium 100 Highland Avenue, Salem Dear Mr. Tremblay: This office represents the North Shore Medical Center (the "Hospital") , which is the owner of certain property located at 1-3 Colby Street in Salem. On behalf of the Hospital, we wish to call your attention to the zoning non-compliance of the medical office condominium building located at 100 Highland Avenue in Salem, owned by the 100 Highland Avenue Condominium Trust, which abuts the Hospital ' s property on Colby Street. The condominium building violates the City of Salem Zoning Ordinance because it was not constructed in accordance with the plan entitled, "Site Utility and Grading Plan, 100 Highland Avenue Realty Trust" , prepared by M. A. Lally Associates, North Andover, MA, as required in a Special Permit approved by the City of Salem Planning Board on November 20, 1986, and filed with the City Clerk on December 29 , 1986. A copy of the Special Permit is enclosed for your review. It has come to our attention that a twenty-four (24) inch drainage pipe represented on both the above referenced plan and an "as built" site plan entitled "Site Plan of Land in Salem, Massachusetts" , prepared by T & M Engineering Associates, Inc. , dated March 21, 1989, as connecting the on-site drainage system to the State drainage system in Highland Avenue, terminates within the boundaries of the property without going anywhere and does not, in fact, connect to any off-site drainage system as was required under the Special Permit issued for this project and as was required according to plans submitted to and approved by the City. t Mr. Leo E. Tremblay October 5, 1993 Page 2 The actual installation, therefore, sends all of the water for the Colby Street area directly into the below-ground area on Highland Avenue without any controls whatsoever. The only approval given by the City and the State was to build as per plans submitted. This has not been done. The failure of the property owner to construct the drainage system as represented to the City and required by the Special Permit, was discovered upon inspection by the City of Salem, undertaken on September 10, 1993 . In view of these violations of the conditions of the Special Permit, we call upon you, pursuant to M.G.L. ch. 40A, §7, to enforce the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Salem by revoking the Special Permit and withdrawing the occupancy permits for the 100 Highland Avenue Condominium Trust until such time as the conditions of the Special Permit are complied with, namely that the on-site drainage system be installed and connected as represented on the plans submitted. Very truly yours, SERAFINI, SERAFINI and DARLING by' Ynnn t /'JCS R. SIN R. JRS/1 n (� enclosure cc: William Luster, City Planner cc: Councilor Vincent Furfaro cc via certified mail return receipt requested to: 1. Patrick H. Curtin, Robert R. Nersasian and Howard Abrams, Trustees of 100 Highland Avenue Condominium Trust 2 . John A. Kazes and David P. St. Pierre, Trustees of S and K Associates 3 . Patrick H. Curtin 4. David P. St. Pierre, Trustee of Salem Sports Center Nominee Trust 5. Robert R. Nersasian Lawrence J. Monaldo 6. Pushpa D. Agarwal 7. Howard E. Abrams and Tomislaw Zargay, Trustees of AZ Realty Trust i too a, (U•tfu� of <&IICttt, �illassadlitsdis jlfalmillg ghiarll '�t�llry,a 1p{' (Air o5;41rm Grccll i I DECISION SPECIAL PERMIT SITE PLAN REVIEW fill Drs. Curtin, Nersasian, Monaldo, St: Pierre, and Kasis E11YC 100 Highland Avenue Realty Trust 100 Highland Avenue Salem, MA 01970 i t On Thursday, September f8, 1986, 'the Planning Board of the City of Salem held a public hearing under Section VII-R, Site Plan Review, of the Salem Zoning Ordinance on the application of Drs. Curtin, Nersasian, Monaldo, St. Pierre, and Kasis,, 100 Highland Avenue Realty Trust to construct a 12,020 square foot medical office building at 100 Highland Avenue. At a regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning Board held on November 20, 1986, the Board voted, by unanimous vote, to approve the application as complying with the requirements for issuance of a Special Permit , i subject to the following conditions: 1. Work shall conform to plan entitled, "Site Utility and Grading Plan, 100 Highland Avenue Realty Trust", prepared by M. A. Lally Associates, North Andover, MA. 2. Utility installation shall ,be approved by the Engineering Department. a. A Safety grate shall be installed on 24" culvert at the headwall located on the northwesterly side of the site. 3. Board of Health requirements set forth in a letter dated September 17, 1986, shall be strictly adhered to. 4. Landscaping of the site shall conform to plan entitled, "Landscaping Site Plan for 100 Highland Avenue Realty Trust," prepared by Barlow Gillfillen Architects, dated November 7, 1986, revised November 18, 1986. a. Maintenance of landscaping in a healthy and thriving condition shall be the responsibility of the applicants, their successors or ass,Sgns. b. There shall be no storage of snow on landscaped areas of. the site. . c. Location of granite curbing shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Page 2 5. Board of Appeal decision dated May 28, 1986 shall be adhered to. 6. All construction shall be conducted in accordance with the following conditions: i a. No work. shall commence before 7:00 a.m. on weekdays and 8:00 a.m. on Saturdays. No work shall continue beyond 5:00 p.m. ? No work shall be conducted on Sundays or holidays. b. All reasonable action shall be taken to minimize the negative effects of construction on abutters. i ` 7. Signage for the building shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to issuance of Certificates of Occupancy. 8. Any violation of these conditions will result in revocation of this permit by the Planning Board. I hereby certify that .a copy of this decision and plans have been filed j with the City Clerk and copies are on file with the Planning Board. This Special Permit shall not take effect until a •copy of this decision bearing thhe certification of 'the City Clerk that twenty (20) days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed or that if such appeal has been / filed, and it has been dismissed or denied, is recorded in the Essex County Registry of Deeds and is indexed In the grantor index under the name'of the owner of record 'or is recorded on the owner's certificate of title. The fee for recording or registering shall be paid by the owner l or applicant. �1 ILIA. LJ Walter B. Power, III 'Chairman C802 I ' ' i 6itg of9ttlEmtts�ttrhusPtt �,L Pepariment of 'Public lVorks Air �alrm Green 5 7 56 °80 RECEIVED GEORGE E.WHITTI E, P. E. CITY Cr `SSALCN, MASS. City Engineer Director of Public Services April 4, 1988 Dr. Patrick Curtin 100 Highland Avenue Salem, Ma. 01970 RE: Site Grading for 100 Highland Avneue Dear Dr. Curtin: I have observed that you have placed fill within the City right—of—way on Almeda Street which is contrary to the site plan submitted by you to this office. I am directing you to remove this material and return the grade to that which was existing prior to your regrading of the area. If you have any questions, please call me. Very truly yours, George E. Whittie, P.E. City Engineer Director of Public Services GEW/cmc cc: Mr. William Munroe Mr. Michael O'Brien r� .J STATLER GILFILLEN ARCHITECTS, INC. ARCHITECTURE HISTORIC PRESERVATION URBAN DESIGN PLANNING f5 �C:�ITIG'F.` ARCHITECT'S FIELD REPORT MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING 100 HIGHLAND AVENUE, SALEM Noon, September 8, 1987 WEATHER: 78 +/- muggy; overcast PRESENT: Bob Buthman Patrick Curtin Statler Gilfillen Steve Santry Bob Uva 1. Building Inspector, Steve Santry, and I reviewed site, roof to basement. 2. Issues relating to the rating above elevator were raised and Steve will get back to SWG. 3. Masons were laying brick an east and north walls. 4. There was extensive sweating of copper water lines in basement. This should be reviewed. 5. Building Inspector has requested copies of both UTS reports and structural engineer's reports/letters. 6. There was temporary lighting in the basement. 7. Structural engineer has been called regarding the welding of baseplates on columns. Structural engineer informs me that UTS report is to certify the welding. Architect and Building Inspector are waiting for these reports. BRAY WILKINS BUILDING, 161 SOUTH MAIN STREET MIDDLETON,MA.01949 1617)777-7978 STATLER W.GILFILLEN. MEMBER'DI TIE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS r .l 8. The Building Inspector wanted to know why the grout was used (3"-4") at beams instead of bearing plates as shown on the drawings. Contractor should respond directly to Building Inspector with copy to architect. Structural engineer will review. Grout is beginning to crack and there could be a softening issue that the contractor MUST REVIEW IMMEDIATELY 9. Contractor must call Building Inspector before walls are closed for inspection. 10. Owner needs quote immediately on the price of the two (2) skylights for the second floor offices. STATLER GILFILLEN ARCHITECTS, INC. ARCHITECTURE HISTORIC PRESERVATION URBAN DESIGN PLANNING August 26, 1988 Mr. Steve Santry Building Inspector City of Salem Salem, MA 01970 Dear Mr. Santry, On-August_24,_I_personally visited Dr. Pushpa Agarwal's suite at Z100-Highland Avenue. . The work was completed and conformed to the drawings presented`byjmy office. S Y, Statler Gilfillen, AIA SWG/cmm cc: Patrick Curtin Pushpa Agarwal yi^' Li 2r -'- tn - • cn BRAY WILKINS BUILDING, 161 SOUTH MAIN STREET MIDDLETON,MA.01949 (617)777-7978 STATLER W.GILFILLEN, MEMBER OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS ESSEX COUNTY CRAFTSMEN Sheet Metal Contractors M M 60 Ward Street SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 "Your Comfort Craftsmen" DATE (617) 745-8028 or 745-7372 TO 1!11"t SUBJECT ...... ....... ........... .............. av? ................... tz_ ............... rn r-'q CJD ............ .......... ............. ........ .. . .. .......... .................. ........0"R------ ................. j .... ...... j L�' ao. -.,.i.......... ........................................................................................................... ------------------------- ------....................------- ----------------- . ............. . ........... ............... ... ............... .......... ... ........................ ........ ................................ El SIGNED PLEASE REPLY NO REPLY NECESSARY 1 SUBMITTAL SHEET Essex County Craftsmen, Inc. , SHEET METAL CONTRACTORS 60 WARD STREET Owens-Corning SALEM, MASS. 01970 Vinyl Faced Duct "Your Comfort Craftsmen" Wrap Insulation ❑ 11/2" ❑2" 1:13" (. Uses Description Owens-Corning Fiberglas vinyl faced Fiberglas®vinyl faced duct wrap insu- duct wrap insulation is used to insu- lation consists of a blanket of glass ;X late residential and commercial air fiber factory-laminated to a vinyl conditioning or dual temperature vapor barrier facing(white or grey),A ducts operating at temperatures from 2"stapling flange is provided on one 40F to 250F. edge.This faced product qualifies for UL Listing. This insulation,when applied in f accordance with Owens-Corning's installation instructions,will provide the"Installed R-Value"as published for the product,assuring specified in-place thermal performance. Physical Properties _ Installed R-values: j Test Method _ Specification— ` 'Fire hazard -- - _ ---_, When installed in accordance with classification ^ "^^°• recommended installation procedures i(UL listed) Owensap i n ulatio will providnyl e ced R-v duct wrap insulation will provide R-values as follows: Operating temperature - - ' 250F - - ---� Nominal Installed Out-of-Package limit Thickness R-value R-value Thermal conductivity ASTM C 518 k=0.30 k1'/a" 3.8 5.0 @ 75F mean temp., 2" 5.0 6.7 Btu•in/h•ft2-deg F 3" 7.0 10.0 Corrosiveness Procedure, Will not accelerate corro- Standard Roll Width ...............48" Fed.Spec. sion of steel test panel HH-1-558B when compared to sterile cotton Thermal Conductivity(k): Mold growth ASTM D 2020 Does not breed or sustain 45 mold 40 Vapor permeance Procedure A, 1.3 perm max. T . 5 I ASTM E 96 (See Note 1) = 3 I Moisture adsorption ASTM C553 Less than 0.2%by volume 2 .30 (See Note 2) m .25 (1)Facing material as supplied.Higher ratings can be expected after product has been packaged,handled, and installed.Since such conditions are not known,Owens-Corning makes no claim for m-place vapor barrier performance. 50 75 100 150 (2)When exposed to conditions of 120F temperature,90%relative humidity,for 96 hours. Mean Temperature,F Thermal conductivity values are nominal,subject to normal testing and manufacturing tolerances. Condensation Control: - How to select appropriate thickness for `� C' ❑ NONE REQ'D —.I condensation control:To determine thickUZ - ness to prevent condensation at various LL 110 ^' _ ambient temperature and humidity levels, ❑ 116"REWD based on installed thickness 75%of nom- -' r"11 too �,; _ i na I(out-of-package)th ickness,55F.a i r a :rHra 00 duct internal temperature: E go ❑ 2"REQ'D (A) Select maximum expected relative m r humidity(RH)on the lower scale. e0 (B) Move up vertically until that line a El3"REQ'D � intersects the expected maximum 70 ambient temperature. 19m IC) Select the thickness indicated by 40 50 60 70 80 90 El MORE THAN 3"REQ'D the intersection point. Relative Humidity,% Vapor Barrier Limitations: Install Fiberglas vinyl faced duct wrap Selection insulation with facing outside so that tape Fiberglas vinyl faced duct wrap insulation flap overlaps insulation andfacing at other The selection of the proper vapor barrier should not be used on duct systems sub- end of piece of duct wrap.Insulation shall for faced duct wrap depends upon many ject to temperatures in excess of 250F. It be tightly butted. If ducts are rectangular factors. For normal air conditioning appli- should not be exposed to weathering or or square,install so insulation is not cations,however,the most important mechanical abuse without proper protec- excessively compressed at duct corners. single factor is the local climatic condi- tion.It should not be used on the inside Seams shall be stapled approximately 6" tion. In some areas,vinyl does not per- of ducts.Owens-Corning Fiberglas on center with outward clinching staples. form adequately as a vapor barrier. Corporation does not recommend nor will Where vapor barrier performance is it be responsible for applications of this required seal joints with pressure- In most localities,some water vapor will product whenever the vinyl facing,the sensitive tape. pass through the vapor barrier while the surrounding material,or the atmosphere air cooling system is operating,and will is at a temperature of 20F or below.To Where retangular ducts are 24"in width condense on the outside of the sheet avoid damage,it is recommended that or greater,duct wrap insulation shall be metal duct.This condensed water will this product be stored and installed at a additionally secured to the bottom of the accumulate during the air conditioning temperature above 20F at all times.Vinyl duct with mechanical fasteners such as season. facings are not to be considered an ade- pins and speed clip washers,spaced on quate vapor barrier due to the high per- 18"centers(maximum)to prevent sag- This condensed water will dry out during meance and should not be used in all ging of insulation. the heating season or when the air con- areas. ditioning is not operating.In most areas of Adjacent sections of duct wrap insulation the U.S.,the drying will be complete each Application Guidelines shall be tightly butted with the 2"tape winter.However, in tropical and sub- flap overlapping.Where vapor barrier per- tropical(Gulf Coast)areas,the drying will Application instructions to achieve formance is required,seal all tears,punc- not be complete,and some of the water installed R-value claimed:Before applying tures,and other penetrations of the duct condensed will build up from year to year. Fiberglas vinyl faced duct wrap insulation, wrap insulation facing with tape or mastic For example in New Orleans,Vinyl faced sheet metal dticts shall be clean,dry, to provide a vapor tight system. duct wrap may accumulate 1.15 oz.of tightly sealed at all joints and seams. water per sq.ft.in one year. Duct wrap insulation shall be cut to Workmanship is often a deciding factor in '"stretch-out"dimensions as provided in vapor barrier performance. Improper seal- Table 1 below,and a 2"piece of insulation ing of joints and careless punctures can removed from the facing at the end of the cause serious condensation regardless of piece of insulation to form an overlapping the quality of the barrier selected. staple and tape flap,as shown below. For more detailed information regarding REMOVE& vapor barrier selection,see an Owens- DISCARD Corning Fiberglas Sales Representative. STRETCH-OUT DIMENSION ISee Table 1 Below) 2"—� Table 1. Stretch-out dimensions,Fiberglas vinyl faced duct wrap insulations.(P=the perimeter of the duct:twice the width plus twice the height of square and rectangular ducts;circumference of round and oval ducts.Stretch-out dimensions include the 2"staple/tape flap.) Average STRETCH-OUT DIMENSIONS(inches) Nominal Installed Round Rectan- Thickness Thickness &Oval Square gular (inches) -(inches)- - Ducts Ducts. Ducts 11/21, 11/81, P+ 9.5 P+ 8.0 P+ 7.0 2" 11/2" P+ 12.0 P+ 10.0 P+ 8.0 3" 21/4" P+ 17.0 P+ 14.5 P+ 11.5 OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. Mechanical Insulation Products Fiberglas Tower,Toledo,Ohio 43659 Pub.1-MS-14722 Lithoin USA September1987 Copyright©1987 Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. WNER ' ARCHITECT'S AO CHITECT a /�O ff/G,HL�I NO 0crl1E, FIELD REPORT CONSULTANT ❑ _ _ AIA DOCUMENT 07711 /l FIELD ❑ _. PROJECT: &ACR.f'A 04 ` " �l�y FIELD REPORT NO: CONTRACT: D/ / ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: DATE P&D, 2, TIME P00>1 WEATHER TEMP. RANGE EST. % OF COMPLETION e' 7 z CONFORMANCE WITH SCHEDULE WORK IN PROGRESS PRESENT AT SITE UPIL BAA-- OBSERVATIONS Q/�tiMA4il e wu` � 7ZJ oo Si�f �/ I.J .ale 401 > /J lLN.dLt.J 1�f6 /•(j�](((� 4 !i ` �AKFi-( _ G" e i' ITEMS TO VERIFY INFORMATION OR ACTION REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS REPORT BY: AIA DOCUMENT 6711 • ARCHITECT'S FIELD REPORT OCTOBER 1972 EDITION .AlAOO © 1972 THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVE., NW. WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 page of pages ARCHITECT'S O NERECT o •FIELD REPORT CONSULTANT Cl AIA DOCUMENT 0711 FIELD ❑ PROJECT: �vo Pl&vL.lkt:IP 0vE FIELD REPORT NO: CONTRACT: ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: DATE 067' 7,-7,807 TIME (Z V5 WEATHER fa TEMP. RANGErj C' EST. % OF COMPLETION CONFORMANCE WITH SCHEDULE(+, -) WORK IN PROGRESS PRESENT AT SITE Bv6OVA w, AZYWAw 6�1lcsa.� . G�ec7�r�0 OBSERVATIONS /flus / J . QLu�I Lice i1Ps�ii .A wo ca.e/.t1•r � 5u� . �1 � st Rte►:. a.,a:. � , '� p/�..� �/ ITENS,TO VERIFY " INFORMATION OR ACTION REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS REPORT BY: AIA DOCUMENT 6711 • ARCHITECT'S FIELD REPORT • OCTOBER 1972 EDITION • AIA® • ® 1972 -THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS,1735 NEW YORK AVE., NW, WASHINGTON, D.C.20006 page of pages ARCHITECT'S OWN'RECT O FIELD REPORT ARCHCONSULTANT Cl AIA DOCUMENT G711 FIELD ❑ PROJECT: �Ilif111sgV FIELD REPORT NO: CONTRACT: ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: DATE(qG?' ZQ,67TIME WEATHER Caj _e T TEMP. RANGE (ptj EST. % OF COMPLETION CONFORMANCE WITH SCHEDULE I*, —) WORK IN PROGRESS PRESENT AT SITE OBSERVATIONS w 10 P&J-1`5 SE 0349, 60S M(A A4.4 &04�0 � . 'f aa' vavrv�isr.;s W Z4� ao, c : I , Ate ia.o. I . 1 ITEMS TO VERIFY INFORMATION OR ACTION REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS REPORT BY: AIA DOCUMENT 0711 ARCHITECT'S FIELD REPORT • OCTOBER 1972 EDITION • AIA® • ® 1972 1n\ , -THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS,1735 NEW YORK AVE., NW, WASHINGTON,D.C.20006 page of pages I\J ARCHITECT'S ARCHITECT CT 0 F LD REPORT CONSULTANT ❑ AIA DOCUMENT 0711 FIELD ❑ . P:"OJECT: P%&44 ,Q,1,1O(G. k4,W(. 4. FIELD REPORT NO: CONTRACT: ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 8rVO o DATE Od' 13 JIS7 TIME IZ'IJ15 WEATHER GIe,wA TEMP. RANGE EST. % OF COMPLETION CONFORMANCE WITH SCHEDULE(+, —) ORK IN PROGRESS PRESENT AT SITE r&Tfrl V0._ D , P� a6 O C:SERVATIONS � f/y1IJLd�6Lt—�dl� N 1. �0�6i/ ✓6�, a ",. w OY -� AZ A-Z;f5k�� L d/G ci Dad ,JCC Allke to 192�. llCMS TO VERIFY e f 6 W l R'"")RMATION OR ACTION REQUIRED A;TACHMENTS bsv'0RT BY: A DOCUMENT G711 • ARCHITECT'S FIELD REPORT • OCTOBER 1972 EDITION • AIA® -.© 1972 1, AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS,1735 NEW YORK AVE., NW, WASHINGTON, D.C.20006 page of pages ARCHITECT'S OWNER ❑ P.ELD: REPORT ARCHITECT ❑ � CONSULTANT❑ AIA DOCUMENT 0711 FIELD ❑ P!:OJECT: WMAL Offtly 5LG. FIELD REPORT NO: CONTRACT: ARCHJTECT'S PROJECT NO: DATE aj1• ofa TIME IZ Ua�� WEATHER �� 5E TEMP RANGE .tel L EST-% OF COMPLETION CONFORMANCE WITH SCHEDULE WORK IN PROGRESS PRESENT AT S1TE Pam U1ia o 7*,1 47/� _O9SF.RVATIONS xe o • a s4wl 2( OAM CISn Ito !�- 120 ' b caM - �.u,• -� I T NAS TO VERIFY amw _ OWIi o'1�„> �._l� +YAi+ Y)Q2,L r Kakl To Gi1�L�N..i1 17 ORMATION OR ACTION REQUIRED A' TACHMENTS R :I'ORT BY: %". DOCUMENT G711 ARCHITECT'S FIELD REPORT • OCTOBER 1972 EDITION AIA9 • m 1972 1� AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS,1735 NEW YORK AVE., NW, WASHINGTON,D.C.20006 page of pages ARCHITECT'S OWNER ❑ F;UD REPORT ARCHITECT ❑ CONSULTANT ❑ AIA DOCUMENT ,6711 - FIELD ❑ PROJECT: R�Dk+a- O FjL� FIELD REPORT NO:. CONTRACT: ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: DATE QPT e.,S TIME �Z uQ.V� WEATHER ��• /S[� � TEMP RANGE �'S� EST-%, OF COMPLETION CONFORMANCE WITH SCHEDULE(+, -) WORK IN PROGRESS PRESENT AT S1TE �, Uk s ��!/L MiGV► 7¢i 47i/ O�'SF.RVATIONS - � xe Val agedA 14 1243-4AJ ec 2 OtJ-�ViV: W. � fw. b•�b(b1G�- UNh • dulo yq-- '^ w"� `�S�1 t2t dew a�aJt2ti • 7��Y If -� 11!MS TO VERIFY an* G4X-� dmG►,.AAl-Al OYI 1r ORMATION OR ACTION REQUIRED -- yg9RED ARCHi A-TACHMENTS m NO. 5138 '7 V ea�si , DOCUMENT 6711 • ARCHITECT'S FIELD REPORT • OCTOBER 1972 EDITION • AIA® • 0 1972 AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS,1735 NEW YORK AVE., NW, WASHINGTON,D.C.20006 page of pages ARCHITECT'S ARCHITECT O f :LD REPORT CONSULTANT❑ A;A DOCUMENT 6711 FIELD ❑ _ P'.:OJECT: %C'A A40(G4 p/ FIELD REPORT NO: 1 CONTRACT: ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: &/4 25 , OC) DATEOCf lb JIS7 TIME IZ�I�i WEATHER CGjew,,7 TEMP. RANGE 45-5 EST. % OF COMPLETION CONFORMANCE WITH SCHEDULE(+, —) %FORK IN PROGRESS PRESENT AT SITE • w CMA;tjil ehd i 0yEL . ;� •/ br Coma. D , D.• 8+6 I� O^SERVATIONS / p'f'd rd 6"Z N414Z off. is UU y� 4A5_1ct � tid�., �..�^ aGo d, . 6ad�.J�i Ssoco . 11"NIS TO VERIFY G\SjERED AR�yT If i9n RMAT10N OR ACTION REQUIRED P ! o N 8 z 3 HAMILTON. hr G y ! I A_�TACHMENTSIle 1,V' ORT BY: DOCUMENT 6711 ARCHITECT'S FIELD REPORT • OCTOBER 1972 EDITION AIA® • © 1972 ' r AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS,1735 NEW YORK AVE., NW, WASHINGTON,D.C.20006 page of pages ARCHITECT'S O NERECT o FIELD REPORT CONSULTANT ❑ AIA DOCUMENT 0711 FIELD ❑ PROJECT: FIELD REPORT NO: CONTRACT: ARCHJTECT'S PROJECT NO: DATE jf'fG'r Q, j7TIME Ngle)t4 WEATHER �, TEMP. RANGE EST.% OF COMPLETION CONFORMANCE WITH SCHEDULE WORK IN PROGRESS PRESENT AT SITE OBSERVATIONS - U ,,y J1 lopg n 88W6 G.7�F161L8D ` gels 11JA 444 A444"401 !s✓ 7G�f4J VAM;2" G LZ-- _ $f CGI�FR'-111 . UOIO. AA 7Z e4V J4 14-e I • 1 ITEMS TO VERIFY " INFORMATION OR ACTION REQUIRED StiEPED ARCh,l g HAMILTON, ATTACHMENTS REPORT BY: AIA DOCUMENT 6711 ARCHITECT'S FIELD REPORT • OCTOBER 1972 EDITION AIA9 • 0 1972 -THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVE., NW, WASHINGTON,D.C.20006 page of pages ARCHITECT'S OWNERARCIIITCT ❑❑ FIELD REPORT CONSULTANT ❑ AfA TJOCUMENT 0711 FIELD ❑ PROJECT: �ft W&PLJA1p #\VE FIELD REPORT NO: CONTRACT: ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: DATE OGT ZZ` AJ TIME I Z WEATHER • Ajr, TEMP.RANGE Sy EST.% OF COMPLETION CONFORMANCE WITH SCHEDULE(*, —) _WORK IN PROGRESS PRESENT AT SiTE Ae6 OVA G�2GTYrli� OBSERVATIONS G � f 6� /� �C/C>7Hn` .f LH/le� / Ce ~b,406 IQ"z I L. 'm"'m./ "^� (/�1/d'LC•A sri�"a! ��t1 LW6/�l�`�/ J7^Il 44 5A6 . 'St R a.ra:. ye-0 a/ � ITEMS TO VERIFY ' INFORMATION OR ACTION REQUIRED F6\SS 0.W.cid /lFp HAMILTON. MASS. ATTACHMENTS �ryF SP`s Pop F REPORT BY: 'AIA DOCUMENT 6711 • ARCHITECT'S FIELD REPORT • OCTOBER 1972 EDITION AIA® • ® 1972 'THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS,1735 NEW YORK AVE., NW, WASHINGTON, D.C.20006 page Of pages ARCHITECT'S OWNER ARCHITECT O FIELD REPORT CONSULTANT ❑ AIA UOCUMENF 07711 n FIELD ❑ PROJECT: 7�" Wr FIELD REPORT NO: CONTRACT: ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: DATE P&,, Z TIME /Jowl WEATHER YOA„ TEMP. RANGE O EST. % OF COMPLETION ' fj 7�`I CONFORMANCE WITH SCHEDULE 1+, WORK IN PROGRESS PRESENT AT SITE uv6L W� OBSERVATIONS au�w.,a.� /•u L -For�.,cu s //� �Zi oo-� s:// �.yk..G..... ,yd ca�>� rT40eXM �. (DAF_I� c✓f/GG !' _ e Ill � ITEMS TO VERIFY TT INFORMATION OR ACTION REQUIRED 4V\Sq,F W' /<a Fir ND 5135 z HAMILTON. MAS B. y ATTACHMENTS y'Fq 15Ci REPORT BY: AIA DOCUMENT 6711 • ARCHITECT'S FIELD REPORT • OCTOBER 1972 EDITION AIAOO • 'J 1972 THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVE., NW, WASHINCTON. D.C.20006 page of pages '�7 -/ su1� LB—ra 7N/9/!�A-' .r9/eof .414. DAILY CONSTRUCTION REPORT CHECK (✓) ❑ Sunday ❑ Wednes..ay WSATM[R CI+�Ot oAT /e% /f7 10 ❑ Monday ❑' Thumav w ❑ Tuesday jff Fnday T2MP[RATUR[a A.M 12M A:=P.M ❑ Saturday I PERSONNEL F M L I SUBCONTRACTORS F ! m ; i 1 I Sitework 2 Concrete ! _ 3 Masonry I 4 Metals,Struct. &Arch. 5 I Moisture Protection& Insulation -------------- I 6 Metal Doors, Windows, Glass 7 Carpentry � __ _ i 8 Tile& Floor Covering I _ 9 i Lath&Plaster 10 j Plumbing _ 11 H.V.A.C. 12 I Electrical IT-7 Elevator 14 Painting 15 Other i 17 Staff W r.J a TOTALS' TOTALS EQUIPMENT: � CONCRETE PLACED fo-I — I � Rumark-s .S//{e�SllT9i1' i/1 r/ q//O7 /oe2 gd Lo/ �r -- __CL�VO7-ar d�io�T 1w�4 //(! • {orTior� 9.f/e 4C!un d S��2e+/ a Nm /"& AE Eiz a/Or. �( o fa A+eC�74 Co ola. ,Qe 6 oTC v4,41x. Cib/..� A4tE63&5 '1io.. J,; GroylsdJ. ----- --.. —.—.. — - - --t460 go w�ri.i roe /i on ooiwr ------ -- r - � ODU-D1Mo /oe ffq/►/and- /°.y rg1e.W Ito. DAILY CONSTRUCTION REPORT CHECK (,/) ❑ Sunday ❑ Wednescay /e:4t'' DAT /® 7 19 ❑ Monday J? Thursday W[ATM[R r ❑ Tuesday ❑ Friday T[MP[RATUR[O A.M 12 M �• O 4.30 P.M ❑ Saturday PERSONNEL (s v' — F M L I SUBCONTRACTORS F ! M ; 1 I Sitework 2 Concrete ! _ 3 Masonry I 4 Metals,Struct. &Arch. l i 5 1 Moisture Protection& Insulation I 6 Metal Doors, Windows, Glass j 7 Carpentry i '. 8 Tile& Floor Covering _ 9 I Lath& Plaster I _ 10 ' Plumbing 11 -•-.- 12 j Electrical ! 1� Elevator _�.. 14 I Painting I j 15 Other 16 Other j 17 j Staff wa/ch .S•- er. -- / -- --- TOTALS TOTALS EQL'1PIIENT: j CONCRETE PLACED Todav! - I � he_„ar.4s _ /29o�to — ---S�7�e—e-/� i- T lewl i t spa//a fiod sY1or 1 r ong%s - -. --- —____ !�_ or // C%aura eS�ar • d d on got;r. S`l'd 4"'A-B2d_..414'po/.if /Gc7�t/e. �- Ftc 4 arM e.�yetf>, /67r .�- .r.>•d. __—_.—_ .: r - i SUILDING 160 dolel.?A DAILY CONSTRUCTION REPORT CHECK (✓) ❑ Sunday W Wednes..oy W[ATN[R�•Q/n /�/C�r eAT �'��/ -ip ❑ Mooday ❑ ThuRGOy --� e ❑ Tuesday ❑ Fnday T[M P[RATUR[[AM 12 M 4:30 P.M ❑ Saturday PERSONNEL (�, t✓', — F M L I SUBCONTRACTORS F ! M ` ] 1 I Sitework 11 — — 2 Concrete 11 3 Masonry I 4 Metals,Struct. &Arch. j S j Moisture Protection & Insulation 6 lfetal Doors, Windows, Glass 7 Carpentry I 8 Tile& Floor Covering _ 9 Lath& Plaster _ 10 Plumbing 12 j Electrical 13 r Elevator _- 14 j Painting 15 Other - — - 16 Other j 17 i Staff Wrulc TOTALS` TOTTOTALS — _ _ EQUIPMENT: j CONCRETE PLACED Today! - -- i i Rc_marks //e A00yC:re - --- (5 740 crcw tf- a/tee. rieio., s on deoe yl%V/0 iD,-0$,f -- _ 6%de.«2v4 4- ,r 74=p S7FeoSyB7�u+ �tllvex-e .( a Y / a off. ------ - -_ ._ t - t BUILDINGA/ a //114/404 DAILY CONSTRUCTION RE?ORT CHECK (vl) s' ❑ Sunday ❑ wednescay Gel' DAT yto ❑ Monday ❑ Thursiay W[ATN[R 9 Tuesday ❑ Fnday TlMPlRATUR!l A.M 11 m / 4:30 P.M ❑ Saturday I PERSONNEL F M L SUBCONTRACTORS F —1 Sitework 2 Concrete _ 3 Masonry 4 Metals,Struct. &Arch. S Moisture Protection& Insulation I _ 6 LMetal Doors, Windows, Glass 7 � Carpentry I. i —_ _ 8 Tile&Floor Covering I 9 Lath& Plaster _ 10 Plumbing !_ 12 j Electrical 1TTI Elevator 14 Painting 15. Other _—.-- 16 Other 17 1 Stall Ljr-/a4 SVVr. - _ TOTALS` TOTALS EQUIPMENT: j CONCRETE PLACED Todav'____ RemarL-Isjp /o40Ao � f'tA/6� �4S STCrl cS�io✓�� 1-/A/S/f ��J �1 ___.___.._ a., /a7.e * A c1 oA9urinr Wood ever �e �a/ Wi.4dew eva(eil_ — CIeaTYIL t' ire 4 oriN /^o� `iii ou on 4oM� —_ __ .. BUILDING 0 o f></�l►/Vn d doW. DAILY CONSTRUCTION REPORT CHECX (10 y ❑ Sunday C Wednes..�y 1' �, 01/Cl�9d/ -OAT, It Monday ❑ ThursLoy TM w[ACR ° ❑ Tuesday ❑ Fnday TIM PWRATUR[°A.M-12 M �Q �:]O P.M ❑ Saturday I PERSONNEL (s C, — F M L SUBCONTRACTORS F ! M 1 Sitework 2 Concrete _ 3 Masonry j 4 Metals,Struct. &Arch. j 5 I Moisture Protection & Insulation 6 Metal Doors, Windows, Glass 7 � Carpentry i 8 Tile&Floor Covering 9 Lath & Plaster 10 Plumbing 11 H.V.A.C. - - 12 j Electrical I 1� Elevator - 14 j Painting _ 15 T Other 16 Other -- 17 Staff w�/e/. JL. er. I ---- -.. TOTALS' TOTALS EQLIPAIENT: i CONCRETE PLACED Today! 7-7 Rc:nark-s (CesT$�* .�r•99r.�� /,00,% Ce .�i/•�a Ho COMiD�9rq�r '/f4rn /e4de/J ppV/9 &7' . 6a//aa7! few A"-4 ,- o/vie awl ♦eo �.e�v6/<. AsLs��_�.0�`. 97Z W _ Lh4Seet OIC /o07 Co r0%/e '�ya 4Yeos �/!a .� 4 r' /osv/ wee oror✓4 /p 9 d "fa a e - -_!!!�.�/ _ O /t6'!t �/" �QYT!'T/o� J 6Cl�ra E/'ec.��• IiI_a�oi•1 J7-c5 a{e/J ro rail. ---- — ----- - �`le�� 'G/arS o ife v74ar ! ' d o� i291 ---- - - Svr_T ✓d-1L 0�e Via/ -- - . C,/C �qs{Ca o/�°iie. Y414 ° ,r,.0 Jf 4 lt i 4 BUILDINGD/ 0 ell?A 14A,L P/e 1f/C* 6t. DAILY CONSTRUCTION REPORT CHECK c,/) q/ ❑ Sunday C Wednes:ay C�a4/e DAT 1 ' P7 so ❑ Monday ❑ Thur%&v w[ATMCR rI ❑ Tuesday W Frnday T MP[RATUR[[A.M 12 M .�. �/OA:"P.M ❑ Saturday IMNfasonry PERSONNEL (s,�' — F M L I SUBCONTRACTORS F ' M - 1 2 ! _ 3 4 truct. &Arch.S Protection & Insulation 6 oors, Windows, Glassry8 loor Covering 9( Lath& Plaster :LO Plumbing I - 12 1 Electrical 13� Elevator 14 Painting 15 Other i----- 16 Other 17 Staff OTALS' TOTAC� EQL' E 11 T: CONCRETE PLACED fol v I Ru!narks d tc /ee Ye C'Hv.� reJoPZ� &'F,_f/+ 4i� bJ � 6vlrr seo .ars —: ens si r Q.r .L0 6/eer /1 at 4A' 71f Co.- /W eN — 1 1 BUILDING /06 M1741a' d Pk DAILY CONSTRUCTION REPORT CHECK (,/) / ❑ Su�dav 0Q Wedrescoy W[ATM[R �• DAT 9�1f9/87 19 ❑ Monday (9 TMurscay �ry e -❑ Tuesday C3Fridav T&MP[RATVR[l A.M 12M "• •^�o Ba:30 P.M _ ❑ Saturday I, PERSONNEL (�, �', — F M L 11 SUBCONTRACTORS F !—m- 1 m1 Sitework 2 Concrete ! _ 3 I Masonry I j 4 Metals,Struct. &Arch. S I Moisture Protection & Insulation 6 Metal Doors, Windows, Glass i 7 � Carpentry i _ __ 8. I Tile&Floor Covering I __ 9. -j Lath& Plaster J 10 j Plumbing 11 H.V.A.C. 1.2 j Electrical 1� Elevator _�- 14 I Painting 15 Other 16 Other _.: . 17 j . Staff w,&1 a4t— 'TOTALSTOTALS EQUIPMENT: j CONCRETE PLACED Tudav'__ I Her iar!. It co Pe Gd ' 0"eve'J fr..«r .life. We ----- XS OAF j1- GJ9slreIOC&S.- 4,[ 00TCOR D 9LAa IA VgmA105 9Pe91 OA 9�/ Sues. T�c y�+el .tfus>f6rise �iG - hrle e-,1 6ve.4( Tc -4�oro�erlys.Ne ..-- - -----_r �l4 Nee L✓i// `C c .o/a ed Aa Y eo� eslcSCtisclof, — - -- r�•ac%'v efid' OpZe 0', 04 .cQ��-inr e's,�r IXC t e-2 9/'eun� DAILY CONSTRUCTION REPORT CHECK c✓� n /y 9 ❑ Sundoy QS Wedn.s.:ay W[ATMCR a/CG/ V � /OJd _DAT •x•'/r7 fY ❑ Monday ❑ niuRGay A ❑ Tuesday ❑ Fnday T[MPfRATURROA.M 12M `'� 4:10 P.M ❑ Saturday I PERSONNEL (�, (✓ — F M L ! SUBCONTRACTORS F ! M ; ; 1 Sitework 2 Concrete i 3 1 Masonry 4 Metals,Struct. &Arch. I _ i S Moisture Protection & Insulation I I 6 LMetal Doors, Windows, Glass 7 Carpentry 8 Tile& Floor Covering _ 9 Lath&Plaster i i0 j Plumbing --- 1 2 j Electrical 13 Elevator 14 Painting ( _ 15 T Other p I �- 16 Other '—_+-- 17 Staff ws/,:s4 Su e% - ------ _ OTALSTOTAL-- EQUIPMENT: j CONCRETE PLACED Todav — I Remarks /nar�atpp� fir/y w '// �� OMmA'/s j 70;4iJ d oy• — - -- ---— s-/✓d _�n r o n .fin� e 71,4 AO/;f71 Or COMpIG /ate ave ocoBA,74ad1r- —W/f,f .uarar amtolMo /QO �r/f�j 1pw d P Sp/ey f1p• DAILY CONSTRUCTION REPORT CHECK (�/) • / ❑ Sunday ❑ Wednes.ay WIC ATMCR �Y e"I"ef r /rt7/'Y32�5 r + 7 to ❑ Monday ❑ Thur oy B Tuesday ❑ Fndav T[MP9RATUR6 l A.M-11 M A:10 P.M ❑ Saturday I PERSONNEL (s c' — F M L I SUBCONTRACTORS F ! M Ie 1 I Sitework ! 2 Concrete j 3 Masonry I 4 Metals,Struct. &Arch. _ S j Moisture Protection& Insulation I 6 Metal Doors, Windows, Glass ' 7 I Carpentry 8 1 Tile&Floor Covering 9 1 Lath& Plaster -_ 10 41 Plumbing 11 H.V.A.C. - 12 Electrical 13 Elevator 14 Painting _ 15 Other _ 16 Other j --- 17 j Staff we/eA w O/. ---.__.... TOTALS: TOTAL EQL'1PlENT: — j CONCRETE PLACED Today _- __ y RC.:1ar1:5 -JC7�ta/'( GJ4 �at.,.. o� �reo., d 1�.•.a/ on9orrt --------.._ MDQ( 47� y --- u kJ ' W P_4 21.4' e SC %S1C.74 �v.1 I'no .sem o f rt.+..r er r-a. ---- -------- V-16 LO I f ew�mwa — DAILY CONSTRUCTION REPORT CHECK (IF) ❑ Suaday C Wednes.ay OAT ?IA-Il87 ,Y Q4 Mo day ❑ Thurtco, w[A�seR ❑ Tuesday C) F,,day � T[MP[RATUR[l A.M IP M.�Y"LLss O 4:� P.M ❑ Saturday I PERSONNEL (s,(,' — F M L I SUBCONTRACTORS F ! M'i 1 I—Sitework I 2 Concrete ! _ 3 Masonry I 4 Metals,Struct. &Arch. j S j Moisture Protection& Insulation 6 Afetal Doors, Windows, Glass 7 Carpentry ! __;__ 8 Tile& Floor Covering 9 Lath& Plaster — 10 Plumbing 11 H.V.A.C. j — 12 I Electrical 13 I Elevator _. 14 j Painting 15 Other ! _—._- 16 Other I _. 17 I Staff Welck S., er — _ TOTALS: TOT.aL� EOU113MENT: j CONCRETE PLACED Today! — y _R emar!:s �cQ f`'a/d.nr Ln/.i o�/ r.av� f��1 ✓Door woo �. �1 l�.- -'74AAriun. roof on C! ieoo/ /on_S Ldor/</nr O'd e/ ConvgyC Cave/' Q� .S'ao•{ Enc( Or _ �.•�.-� -- ._. "r yre'.f Ru1LDIMD /GO Ae, .role.* /•4. DAILY CONSTRUCTION REPORT CHECK (.r) ❑ Sunday ❑ Wednescay W[ATNCR e/e 4r- -DATF ❑ Monday ❑ Thumcoy � ❑ Tuesday R Fnday TtMR[RATV R[e A.M IrJJ c 12 M •x P.M ❑ $aturdoy I PERSONNEL I SUBCONTRACTORS F ! -M ; 1 1 Sitework 2 I Concrete 3 Masonry I j 4 Metals,Struct. &Arch. 5 j Moisture Protection & Insulation j I I _ 6 Nfetal Doors, Windows, Glass j 7 1 Carpentry 8 I Tile& Floor Covering j — 9 I Lath& Plaster .- 10 j Plumbing I ! 11 H.V.A.C. 12 j Electrical I 1 13 I Elevator 14 Painting 15 I Other - i 16 Other 17 j Staff TOTALS` TOTAL- E0Ul1 -.N EST: j CONCRETE PLACED Tudac' — Remarks Ag 7410i1. 0 n 9 e Fil r .. ---. . SUILDIMo loo //i7L�Qnd '40 C. Sfi/ewe HC. DAILY CONSTRUCTION REPORT CHECX (if) ❑ Sunday ❑ wedr•escay y1aI87 tY ❑ Monday Q Thumcov W[ATN[R C/C4/ oAT ❑ Tuesday ❑ Friday TIMrRRATUR[R A.M �'i It M a aha F.M ❑ Saturday I PERSONNEL F M L I SUBCONTRACTORS F ! M 1 Sitework _ 2 Concrete ! 3 Masonry I 4 Metals,Struct. &Arch. j 5 I Moisture Protection& Insulation 6 • \fetal Doors, Windows, Glass 7 1 Carpentry 8 Tile&Floor Covering ! I 9 Lath&Plaster x-1.4 4 I 10 j Plumbing ! 11 H.V.k C. Z _ - 12 j Electrical 13 Elevator 14 Painting 15 I Other ! 16 Other ! -__-- 1 i j Stat .- _ TOTALS' TOTAL- EQL".PMENT: j CONCRETE PLACED Today, — i i 0 Huniarl:s lwg5 ,r War/� o, .. f e Teas • 4!/ 7.f ---_�,¢✓�dr ' <./s ✓9 ei' ya! en � en 7S�' fie,.. /<.,�j__ _ 111tL ''I Jc.7 IBJ S�/vie /S'� 'F Oei:o�in 9/I Ct 7f n la C / i ar TCiC 9�6vG W� 7'G S�sL� eo/'/ee�iunJ Mcl: awwn/e.7e1 �J �'Ce eD c �/. sUILolrra ��!��9e DAILY CONSTRUCTION REPORT CHECX c✓) ❑ S..aday .$r wednesray W[ATN[R Cl" /&V/ J Co f/T PAT /8�7 1[ ❑ µqday ❑ Thursday u ❑ Tuesday ❑ Fnday T[MP[RATUR[[A.M 1-M �T ^ `8 o Awa P.M ❑ soturday I PERSONNEL (T,�' — F M L . SUBCONTRACTORS F ! -M 1–Sitework ! _ 2 Concrete ! 3 Masonry 1 1 4 Metals,Struct. &Arch. 5 I Moisture Protection & Insulation I I 6 Metal Doors, Windows, Glass j 7 1 Carpentry 8 Tile& Floor Covering ! 9 Lath&Plaster 10 j Plumbing ! 11 H.V A.C. j --.----- 12 j Electrical I 1 13 Elevator .._ 14 j Painting _- 15 Other ! 16 Other 17 j Staff w1C 4 -- _ OTALS' TOTALS EQUIPMENT: j CONCRETE PLACED Tudar - - y I 57'UJf.r orou,4 IoCrf/kcl<r on got it .2,rd All G Pe 6/W004 0nZll_�4'p_ --L1�/0-52QJ' G/n f / Coro ��-�/o O P/ .Sf•//S. -- : . --- ToLn fs o!'e o WL a Lir'• i�/, �;r r c,Tc/ 74d Gl/tGw// ye, Owel9 /ES�/ie. ow l// scgfF6/4maw oma/vco f„r .f/9Son/Y WQr0 !,— /=s ---- -- _% riA/ !CI- 1fY6-/C.-.t ew�mMa /DO !./i /Cn-1 ue:, SI/eH W9. DAILY CONSTRUCTION REPORT CHECX (,r) ❑ Sunday C we&es ny 4't9/A eAT ❑ Monday ❑ Thursday wtAT. KR 9 Tuesday ❑ Fndav TtMPfMATVR1(4A.M 12M 7y A=P.M ❑ Saturday I PERSONNEL (s (,� — F M L I SUBCONTRACTORS F ! M 1 '—Sitework ! _ 2 Concrete ! 3 I Masonry I i 4 Metals,Struct. &Arch. 1 Moisture Protection & Insulation I I -iT ! Metal Doors, Windows,Glass 7 1 Carpentry 8 Tile&, Floor Covering 9 Lath& Plaster l0 i Plumbing ! 11 H V.A.C. i ._...:. 12 j Electrical ! ! -- 13 ; Elevator .._ 14 I Painting 15 1- Other ! !---.-- 16 i Other ------ l7 Staff - _ TOTALS' TOTALS E_ E I'lP.NIEtiT: j CONCRETE . PLACED Tudav -- y i i Rcn,ar!a-- rG+fg4 1 /Oce 1cd a U1l CIM0 /'00 .y.,4/o,1 Xp //0. DAILY CONSTRUCTION REPORT CHECX (.I) ❑ Sunday ❑ Wedneseay nT .9 Monday ❑ Thuncov weATsrro -A �f +' ❑ Tuesday ❑ Fnwv T%M•fRATUR9a A.Y f2 M 7z O ::30 RM ❑ Saturday I PERSONNEL FM LSUBCONTRACTORS -1 Sitework I _ 2 Concrete 3 Masonry I 4 N Petals,Struct. &Arch. S 1 Moisture Protection& Insulation j I 6 i Metal Doors, Windows, Glass 7 1 Carpentry 8 I Tile& Floor Covering -I I 9. j Lath&Plaster r71 .0 1 Plumbing t it H V.A.C- 12 j Electrical -- 13 Elevator .. 14 Painting '- 15 1 Other I __ 16 Other - 17 Sta(i — _ TOTALSTOTALS EOL?1PMENT: j CONCRETE PLACED Tudae ltc_:ur1:s �r .ol! M_yynl� r�or�� d olons tL/nn� .4.,e- wsl/- Ggs�`�. wwe��o/�; C16cs/.aa /yo ex�etr Mor/cr 6�/ird Erich �4i. �Pvc�� qY4 Y�e �__ —_._-- D.,� f• wee/l .� i,,s../v�iL„ or, so%�� Mery 9cc<p�l/c- --.— __-- --/roe ■un.otMa 6d0 f/i �ea d �ue, sg/e..c f>v. DAILY CONSTRUCTION REPORT CHECX (v?) ^ ❑ Sanday ❑ wedr•eseay •N t9 ❑ Monday C1Thursday W[ATN[R /'GSA nAT ❑ Tuesday Z Fncay U Tt MrtRATVRt•A.M. f 2 M .S6 A=P.M ❑ $oturdoy I PERSONNEL L I SUBCONTRACTORS F ; M 1 Sitework 2 Concrete ! 3 Masonry 4 1 Metals,Struct. &Arch. 5 1 Moisture Protection& Insulation I __ 6 1 Metal Doors, Windows, Glass i I Carpentry 8 1 Tile& Floor Covering 9Lath & Plaster _ I .0 j Plumbing t 111—H V.A.C. _.. 12 j Electrical 13 Elevator -.- i ! 14 I Painting 15Other ! ! ---•-- ! I i- 16 Other -------171 Staff TOTALS' TOTALS E..1L�IPNIENT: — j CONCRETE PLACED Tudav _ -- y i i H.Cm..arks em 'KQLn 9 d o 1-;o 7L 4va4 9-b . !_n_ d– yQ orG /N/vsa,jrV S ook dO G :� •UIlDINO �DO '�/aAd �✓!, S%/C.ei /yQ DAILY CONSTRUCTION REPORT CHECX c�) ❑ suadav C wednes :ty �4(A DAT p d 7�p ) to ❑ Monday GT Th.mGav W[ATM[R o ❑ Tuesdoy ❑ Fnday Tt MPCRATURR•A.M '2 M��—I�r•M ❑ Saturday I PERSONNEL F M L I SUBCONTRACTORS F ; m ;. 1 I Sitework I _ 2 Concrete 3 I Masonry I 4 Metals,Struct. &Arch. 5 1 Moisture Protection& Insulation I I I 6 Metal Doors, Windows, Glass 7 1 Carpentry 8 I Tile& Floor Covering j 9 I Lath&Plaster LO j Plumbing 11 H.A.C. - -•.-- 12 I Electrical 1 13 Elevator 14 1 Painting I I 15 r-Other ' ---•-- 16 Othcr -- --- 17 Staff 1yr/c4 .S., cr. / OT a LS` TOT LS EQL'1PMENT: — CONCRETE PLACED Tudav — — y i hR t �ed� o v e� d Cw sTi/�efro, e^!ar:s &.,P i,? e�9// one/t.rs Coma/c:�cd on /eon ' eear�/��ion Fa�fy�er 6vrrie. Inst o.�yornT - NU1LD1M0 %Co 7 DAILY CONSTRUCTION REPORT CHECK t.r) �/ ❑ Sundoy a�weMes.:ay C1GPr, DAT S�2G�87 19 ❑ Monday ❑ Thumdoy w[w:Ts[R ❑ Tuesday 13 Friday T[M►QATVR[S A.M 12M 4/4/ O4O I•M ❑ Saturday I PERSONNEL F M L JSUBCONTRACTORS F ; 3t -1 Sitework I _ 2 Concrete 4 Metals,Struct. &Arch. 5 1 Moisture Protection & Insulation I I 6 Metal Doors, Windows, Glass 7 1 Carpentry 8 I Tile& Floor Covering 9 Lath&Plaster 0 j Plurni;ing _ HSC j -- - 12 i Electrical -- 13 Elevator :--- 14 Painting I __—._-- 15 1 Other ----- 16 i Otho ------ 1 i I Staff TOTALSTOTALS L�,L'1P�1Eti'T: j CONCRETE PLACED Tuda�_!_ -- hc_,ar!s _W;qw e/!.+ oe7 ool'fi aA a7'' - ---- - y--�.aer //1 S - e o � O @Cc r'!G /vn oft boor of -- -- ��-// GCII� /Ot' 9 De!'Monenf i c eSv er !n 9c suao�Ma /po !><ij�/ord Arc. sc/c.•, yyy DAILY CONSTRUCTION REPORT CHECK cJ1 ,Q/ s/4 p ❑ Sunday ❑ we&es ay W[All[R /C Qr oAT A 19 O❑ Mdoy (3ThuRGoy a p $ Tuesdcy ❑ Fndoy T Mr[RATUR[9 A.M 1=M -V 4:30 r'M ❑ 5oturdey I PERSONNEL (s i✓' — F M L I SUBCONTRACTORS F ; Nt 1 Sitework _ 2 Concrete 3 I Masonry 4 Metals,Strutt. &Arch. I 5 I Moisture Protection& Insulation I I 6 Metal Doors, Windows,Glass I 7 1 Carpentry 8 I Tile&Floor Covering I 9 I Lath & Plaster i/' - a 3 ^ t0 j Plumbing 11—H H.V.A.C. - 12 j Electrical -- 13 Elevator 1 1 14 Painting _- 15 Other ---•— lii Other I ---- = 1 7 Staff =----- -'. .. TOTALS- TOTALS Ef')U1PNIENT: j CONCRETE PLACED Todavl Ne:nar!:s MGrqI o.r 1—vo)1- (.l��d WF/� .4for7td -- ---- f/o ' a res 06 !�(e'- oc ue lvor/l ii ---- -- �0 6�i (Q41 Avc, so/ew H4. suuotMo —T— DAILY CONSTRUCTION REPORT CHECK t✓) q to EMonday ❑ Thursday w[ATM[n ! ��Or _ oAT Gg' ❑ Tuesday ❑ Fnaay TIMPCRATUR[\A.M 12 M O A-�a r•M ❑ Saturday I PERSONNEL (T (✓' — F M L I SUBCONTRACTORS F ; 1i ;_ 1 I Sitework - 2 i Concrete 1 3 Masonry 4 Metals,Struct. &Arch. 1 S I Moisture Protection & Insulation 6 Metal Doors, Windows, Glass 7 1 Carpentry 8 I Tile& Floor Covering 9 Lath&Plaster A B jW =7e-rd i y 10 i Plumbing 12 Electrical I 1 -- 13 Elevator i — - I 1 14 I Painting ----- - 15 1 Other i --- — lh Otl i tar -----._.. . 17 1 Stasi TOTALS 1 TOT: LS EQL'IP\IE.NT: j CONCRETE PLACED Tudavl — — 1 i 94 i-- Ru,,,arl:s /y4Sei1 C4 /n v TorXT2r�br br/u!C C.�or� Scvrl'oldbn J'7c.? 9_�_a.�r ! ccrn 3 vL 44 r 7 e o/� -- - — oas� e1 yep work o�7�s�cr . — S�ree °, eor• (� on nd_f/� _...f'v� noT -- 7rjcd i;1G0 war Qn i /e0.4 . --- �rl�o_/vc_c�_7n—ef1. . D✓�� a�or/�C �-luJ_ �� s[�/, .��,/e% < At--. A- AF TLru- P//. Dc�+cry¢ -iov,csA f4G . 4 c1. - ----- - — suuolMa teo dyi-0 wd. DAILY CONSTRUCTION REPORT CHECX t✓) ❑ Sunday ❑ we&escay ❑ Mcnday ❑ Thur%&v W[ATMCR 8r; OVCr'CtJ ❑ Tuesday Qt Friday T[MRRATUR[•A.M 12M s� e 4:�I.M ❑, Saturday I PERSONNEL CT,�' F M L I SUBCONTRACTORS F I i4 1 1 Sitework 2 I Concrete 3 Masonry 4 Metals,Struct. &Arch. j 5 j Moisture Protection& Insulation 6 Metal Doors, Windows,Class ` 1 7 � Carpentry � 8 Tile& Floor Covering 9 I Lath& Plaster I _ w j Plumbing 11 H.V.•1.C. -_..-.-. 12 j Electrical --- 13 1 Elevator j 14 1 Painting I -_- 15 T Other - 16 Other -- I 1� j Stab TOTALS' TOTALS I E(?UIPMENT- -- j CONCRETE PLACED Todai,I —_ i Nc::arl:s--ConJL .do/e-aj: er LeJo� C'e.ui.er d/ /', i /is� C ./TaG. enioi 6�e�er.yO�/e Cl,/iere,_. - Arte 7# i o oi ' Co.s�oleTte� ex� ores a a r'/v.1r wberc ,teaF� —_._-- 14/LjT in Coe, /o cd 13)cc� s¢a�c F.enfs a- Co. 41// 1s Cfor��io.�l- -. dr r�14// 6eriro o}�/eo� �d E/cc. woi/l on -oiirf., L_J — ---..----tel s �. e a 1 eJ 0 // /oeo /old �v a c!. .. . _S'•ogl en 71ars 120 40 0-e el Llcvv �or leerisery vd /,o�a��n9/o%/en.S. /✓O Wo/�C�vr. S�iiY�� su,s.o,Mc�/dD fs/i oL/Qn .� �i� uS'o-/a� iNp DAILY CONSTRUCTION REPORT CHECK NO ❑ Sunday C we&esaay d /G a/ /0/19!87 tY ❑ Monday tff Thursday w[A-. ZR DAT ❑ Tuesday ❑ Frndov itM�fNATVR[•A.M t2M %rg D A� P.M ❑ Saturday I PERSONNEL 7 — F M L I SUBCONTRACTORS F ; i4 1-Sitework 2 i Concrete 3 I Masonry I j 4 Afetals,Struct. 8 Arch. 5 j Moisture Protection S Insulation 6 1 D'Ietal Doors, Windows, Glass 7 I Carpentry -- i 8 Tile 8.Floor Covering. 9 Lath& Plaster _ 10 i Plurni;ing I 11 H.V.A.C. I -...;.. 12 j Electrical j I i--- 13 I Elevator j I 14 Pairtina I I `------ i I 15- Other - . 16 Other ---- --- 17 j Staid -- TOTALS' TOT.a L E�Cilu\tET: .CONCRETE PLACED Today —_ i Rc:narks Fi'4/s9/-q.1 ;I a of f2 r. o tit ��2.t.r j- /j-/uer rna o.r sonic 1 ` -- -- - -c GT —.-- -.- /per° e c 1 C2 4e c..o - - o � or �� Bed sfds/i/ /:e� ` t' /vee • — .. - . ewwlMo DAILY CONSTRUCTION REPORT CHECK (if) ❑ $andoy .t3. we&es.oy /•Q//J DAT 7 19 ❑ MMdoy ❑ TIundoy W[AT. ZR ♦♦♦ ❑ Tu sdny ❑ Friday O Tt MR[RATU R[[A.M 11m 06; A=I•M ❑ $olUlduy I PERSONNEL (T �' — F M L SUBCONTRACTORS F i M 1 I Sitework 2 i Concrete 3 I Masonry I 4 Metals,Struct. &Arch. 5 I Moisture Protection& Insulation I _ --T—Metal Doors, �L'indows,Glass ` 7 I Carpentry � _ - 8 Tile& Floor Covering 9 I Lath& Plaster _ _I i0 j Plurni;i_ 11 H.V.A.C. -._..--- 12 j Electrical — --- 13 I Elevator i i — 14 Painting I I I ----- 15 r Other --- 16 Othcr i ----I--- 1 .i Staff Glc/oti S . er - TOTALS° i TOT.aLS EO[-1PNIENT: I CONCRETE PLACED Today— — — � ' / lit;::?arl:s A!wLoh !'4 41;2; pA 9 o ing Fol'M Guar 11 S'forTc d 9T S, LJ, Fern c/ Fr: ----Sstc mai dLo,.d,o af«/ rai/s e•�r lgs�v //c ,� . _ . _ _ Cr/a z i:n on i o c o C- u/R',.; erg + 4�'/y eo�•�/�,!< f on •ei�e. /ee. 4Z one/t :r ----- -. _ — --'----�.0_�e�/3.L�F�er sws-oiMa�— DAILY CONSTRUCTION REPORT CHECX (,/) ❑ Sundoy ❑ Wednes3y 10y197-,0- ❑ Mondoy ❑ Thundov W[Aa/CR 9r owTrW Tuesdoy ❑ Fddoy TIMVtRATUR[e A.M 12M O A�r'•M ❑ Soturdoy I PERSONNEL (s C — F M L SUBCONTRACTORS F I Nl 1 rSitework 2 Concrete 3 I Masonry 4 Metals,Struct. &Arch. S I Moisture Protection & Insulation 6 A'letal Doors, Windows,Class i 7 i Carpentry I � -:-- i 8 Tile&Floor Covering 9 I Lath& Plaster _ 10 j Plumbing ':- 11 12 j Electrical —1--= 13 E levator 14 j Painting 13. I Other ---- 16 Other ---'---- 17 Stat[ wr,1 Li C- e/ — -- _ TOTALS' j TOTALS EQIi1P.1ENT: j CONCRETE PLACED Today_ - i Rc:`,arks '14. 'L Q CtCaJ Ave / C n Jed GleOA 01 1n/u n o t/o a/sy_�z��ro� r�rs DAILY CONSTRUCTION REPORT CHECK (,/) Q ❑ Sunday ❑ wedr•es ay .� I f Monday ❑ Thurtc:oy WCAv. [M ale v'' OAT' to ❑ Tuesday ❑ Fridov TMMPtRATUR[l A.M tiM 4o30 P.M ❑ Saturday I PERSONNEL F M L I SUBCONTRACTORS F ! l4 -1 Sitework 2 I Concrete 3 Masonry i 4 Metals,Struct. &Arch. j Moisture Protection & Insulation 6 Metal Doors, Windows, Glass j 8 Tile&Floor Covering 9 I Lath& Plaster i �j 10 j Plumbing '. 11 H.V.A.C. l2 j Electrical --- 1Tri Elevator 14 j Painting ----- 15 Other - 16 j Other I ---- ---- 17 Stasi !✓e/a4 .V. et — / TOTALS` j TOTALS ! - —EQU"PMENT: j CONCRETE PLACED Tcdacl — — i i Rerun's 139c/� Fi/�� rv:� �od raves/ on a� o i /s nada eorovs ./ + 9rode .cfa//e af� l /Qlutir on -r----- -�-C. -- 7 +' Cr t✓e e ren i tel. 90 /o �e vi�p /e f .� a �S o c%/C on of i' c o Co.•+/o% g_ s,��ddr�Tf to�T� e/nrs L'o�ce�Tr4fio� o suiLolMc /Oo ffi9b /Csd. DAILY CONSTRUCTION REPORT CHECK (11) Sunday C Wednescay Clcgi I ayereotOAT' 2 3 / P7 1a ❑ Monday ❑ Thursday weATNCR T--� Q Tuesday Ek Friday 0 T2MPERATVR[a A.M 12M �:"P.M ❑ Saturday I PERSONNEL F M L I SUBCONTRACTORS F V1 I i 1 I Sitework 2 I Concrete I 3 I Masonry 4 I Metals,Strum &Arch. 6 I Moisture Protection g Insulation 6 Metal Doors, Windows, Glass j I 7 ! Carpentry j --:- 8 I Tile S Floor Covering 9 I Lath&Plaster ! _ 10 j Plumbing 11 HN.A.C.- j 12 j Electrical I I--- 13 Elevator I I — 14 I Painting i 15 I Other 16 Other I -------- - 17 j Stat Gu L/c�i Svcn - TO ! j --- j - IT TOTALS T:kLS EOUIPMENT: I CONCRETE PLACED Tuda�,1 -- j Re:narks -+- ;�rad'ns on solo co-n rra�erla / �ev1iP3_—i ----- - _-------_frsM� s /vss ann9/a�n T�e1a A,e.r Liov� �Io oo/i �e T� dausee _4!/ _ OVCl. Y�+O /0/oeG Ne{� /J !/1 -,"--L JeMe �aiA><I�c Mrilf 6C&r —� oa/+ f F/e To 7YtN Acer co rP/ /or ]�G. wood o � Sov//i 6o�il �/ c- /cid, r /ora ✓i iii •n 7?011 --.. —.—.._. __._.._-- r7 '�— BUILDING /O�42,44 A/f. Sa/C,., 14/0. DAILY CONSTRUCTION REPORT CHECK (,/) ❑ Sunday ❑ wedreszoy /DMZ zl1 to C) Monday a Thurscov 0152"1 ave/Cod/ r ATF C)w[ATN[e y Tuesday ❑ F.,dov T[MP[NATUA[[A.M 12 M C A•�a P.M ❑ Saturday I PERSONNEL F M L I SUBCONTRACTORS F ! m 1 Sitework 2 Concrete 3 I Masonry I 1 4 Aletals,Struct. &Arch. I _% S j Moisture Protection& Insulation 6 Afetal Doors, Windows,Glass j 7 1 Carpentry 8 I Tile& Floor Covering 9 I Lath&Plaster IF _ 10 I Plumbing 11 HN.A.C. 12 I Electrical 1 --- I 13 I Elevator I — 14 I Painting 115 T-Other ! --- - 16 Otbcr ! - ---- = 17 i Staff TOTALS: j TOTAL-5 LS EQL'1P\?E 'T: j CONCRETE PLACED Remarks _ . 411 � J ow Brop/mss �iR,E�..ar of 6w'/�r�r 90 'e Dov 4e �e /9 S SLi —�------ '- -------------- ---- •UILDIMa DAILY CONSTRUCTION REPORT CHECK t.!) ❑ Sunday ,K Wedr• --y ' /,3/.Q// 0, f9 ❑ Monday ❑ Thursiov weArMCR 4/n DATE ❑ Tuesday ❑ Friday ,Q e T MP[RATUR[a A.M 12 M x:00 P.M ❑ Saturday I PERSONNEL F M L I SUBCONTRACTORS F 1 TSitework . 2 Concrete 3 Masonry 4 Metals,Struct. &Arch. _ 5 Moisture Protection& Insulation 6 1'Ietal Doors, Windows,Glass _. 7 Carpentry I 8 Tile&, Covering I _ 9 I Lath&Plaster •I 1 , i0 Plurnuin- 11 H.V.A.C. ' ._..--- 12 j Electrical 13 Elevator I - 14 I Painting 1rOther ---- 16 Other --- --- 17 staff we/c TOTALS' TOT LS EQUIPMENT: _ j CONCRETE PLACED Toch-_! Rc^.arks E/ec, //�nr �v1Ir— 740 6a114 sfa�/io., t G � /S� i 6c3eM.,�' OU,LD,N0 1695 !-//;6z"'j m". SQ IEN f�Q• O18' I DAILY CONSTRUCTION REPORT CHECX (i/) T ❑ Sunday ❑ wednes ay wewTNCR C�cF�Os/G/•C vr� oAT' /4�,gO/R7 ,v ❑ Monday ❑ Thur,4oy _ ® Tuesday ❑ F,iday Ti MPORATUR[0 A.M ,2 M a.rG A:na P-M ❑ Saturday PERSONNEL (s,�' — F M L I SUBCONTRACTORS F1 �I 1 1 Sitework 2 i Concrete _ 3 Masonry 1 1 4 Metals,Strum &Arch. S j Moisture Protection & Insulation 6 Metal Doors, Windows, Glass ` 7 1 Carpentry 8 1 Tile 8 Floor Covering 9 I Lath& Plaster ! —_ 10 j Plumbing 1 11 H.V.k.C. - - - 1.2 ! Electrical 1 -- 13 j Elevator . J i 14 Painting I 15 16 ---- 16 Other —'--- 17 Staff L1 al chi S� en f - TOTALS` TbTAL� EQL'IPNIENT:-- I CONCRETE PLACED Re:nar!s_�/oc. -- ---fig' ��ry •�/ae/ D/D.a 6.,� Cs/— 9 zi��w 4 /—✓ / t-��7n.•nI—T sole. " --- .. --- --� --ter .'-7----71 -------------- M1 a., BUILD,,, 106 W/o(•/QAA AX S9/C,v Hr DAILY CONSTRUCTION REPORT CHECK (,/) ❑ Sundoy ❑ we&es cy C /c cr /d//9,87 to .® Monday ❑ Thu-560i W[ATNCR DATf��— ❑ Tuesday ❑ FndaY 0 T[MPCRATUR[a A.M t2 M S8' A:"P'M C] SOtUfdOY I ------------ PERSONNEL (s �� — F ML I SUBCONTRACTORS F ! 'vi 1 Sitework 2 Concrete 3 1 Masonry 4 Metals,Strum &Arch. 5 j Moisture Protection& Insulation 6 Metal Doors, Windows, Glass � 8 I Tile& Floor Covering __- 9 Lath& Plaster I I 10 j Plumbing 11 H.V.A.C. j __--- l" j Electrical I — 1� Elevator I -- I i 14 Painting I _-- 15 Other ' --- 16 Other --:-- . 17 Staff tuc/ch SU e% — / — — TOTaL_5' � TOT:>LS EQUlP11ENT: j CONCRETE PLACED Today,! - hcmarks Tt fir. Wood stIL. ' Born cJ 90� <o •r o/r�><� d GJoo we// on v rte- o,)74 f tura -- /u / s f _ Or witt n / ,_-- G_/oo u -- BUILDING DAILY CONSTRUCTION REPORT CHECX (✓) p ❑ Sunday ❑ wedne=oy C/e Cr DAT /� /GL-y �a ❑ Mo day ❑ Thursday W[ATN[R ❑ Tuesday :9 fnday T[MP[RATUR[l A.M 12M `e" a�=�P-M ❑ Saturday I PERSONNEL (T �' — F M L I SUBCONTRACTORS F ! 31 I 1 1 Sitework 2 Concrete 3 Masonry I 4 Metals,Struct. &Arch. ( —! 5 j Moisture Protection& Insulation 6 Metal Doors, Windows, Glass j 7 I Carpentry ' -- -- • I 8 Tile&Floor Covering 9 I Lath& Plaster �I Plumbing 11 H.V.•1.C. j ---_.--- 1.2 9 Electrical i ---- 1 T I� I Elevator I ' 14 j Painting =----- 19- Other ! ---- 16 Other ! --'•-- - 17 j Staff W+e/c4 TOTALS` TOTALS EQL'1P11ENT: - - j CONCRETE PLACED Tudav! — - i i — I Remarksf t (7 cern ei- .r Dgy c sT�Nlr�d_-ttld l n �s re unGale� :r /.c o e e bio cdzro r � rr _ u� eu,�o,Mo lo o /C.id /'/+. JO/Cw Ar.. DAILY CONSTRUCTION REPORT CHECX (-I) ❑ Sundoy ❑ wednes -y to ❑ Mo doy nurscov wewTMeR G oAT /n{-3/ ❑ Tuesdoy ❑ Fr, oy T MPWRATUR[a A.M t2M 04:W F•M ❑ Soturday I PERSONNEL G C — F M L I SUBCONTRACTORS F ! M 1 I Sitework I _ 2 � Concrete ! __ 3 Masonry 4 Metals,Struct. &Arch. � _i_- 5 Moisture Protection& Insulation I I 6 1"letal Doors, Windows,Glass ` 7 Carpentry 8 I Tile S Floor Covering 9 Lath& Plaster _ 10 Plumbing 11 H.V.A.C. TT-F—Electrical Electrical I -- 13 I E levator 14 . Painting I 15 TOther --- 16 Otherr ------.- . 17 Staff we/o4 et - I _ TOTaL_S' TOTAL- E0L.'1PfENT: CONCRETE PLACED Todav! _- Re::tarl:s An�� a �s o• o v ip0-6 c rh1� YCci viii . /'4�� suu.otMaf00 !,�/9�r lQ.•d PK. DAILY CONSTRUCTION REPORT CHECK ❑ Sunday n wedn± ^y ❑ Monday ❑ Thur%ca. weATMeR OAT' ZD//y/87 19- ❑ Tuesday ❑ Fndav Tf MPfRATVRf f A.M I2 M •H A:"P.M ❑ Saturday I PERSONNEL (s,� — F M L I SUBCONTRACTORS F ! ii ; 1 I Sitework 2 Concrete 3 Masonry 1 1 4 Metals,Struct. &Arch. _%j S I Moisture Protection & insulation 6 1letal Doors, Windows,Glass I j 7 1 Carpentry —_._- i T4 8 1 Tile&- Floor Cover;ng i 9 j Lath & Plaster LO 1 Plumbing 11 H.V.A.C. 12 i Electrical I --- 1Y-7 Elevator 14 j Painting 15 TTFher 1---- 16 Other j - ---- 17 j Staff w a/e.4 S� rl TOTALS' TOTALS E IPMENT: -- j CONCRETE PLACED Todav Rcinarl:s / er/ei' p 9, /1/aq C ------- _ F�rL �0rwie d 0( a a►/oz C" AUXlo�•.c.�i//Z_6� - _ fL4�/sCd 4 � M%1�tG ,S d" 4A 9IC ---- 117 —_._____-.T7A" G• (7 V Gh ST4/.r elli OA /A _.—. _..._. _. >t NU1la1M0/Op 1T/i PA' DAILY CONSTRUCTION REPORT CHECX (✓) ❑ Suadoy ❑ weaves;c. C /O�/?J 7 t9 ❑ Monday ❑ Thumcov wsATMee C 4/ owrr Ix Tuesday ❑ Fr�oav N�O T MPORATUAC 0 A.M 12 M�=A b P.M ❑ Soturday. I PERSONNEL (s ( — F M L I SUBCONTRACTORS 1 Sitework 2 Concrete 3 I Masonry i 4 ! Metals,Strutt. &Arch. ( S Moisture Protection& Insulation 6 Afetal Doors, Windows,Glass ` - 8 I Tile& Floor Covering 9 I Lath& Plaster. _ 10 j Plumbing ii x.v.A.C. 12 j Electrical ! --- 13 I Elevator ----- 14 I Painting I __--- 15Other ! --- lo Other --=--- 17 Staff TOTALS: TOTALSS EQUIP IENT: j CONCRETE PLACED Today. Rcniar.4s /erre c� d w // o oir i e e e .t t G,avc ( aon /ose oo --- tedwo rr. Si din 1UH /' /aE/r- 14-' u/ -- - �o /��od ueo �cC/ean ��P=cq-oi�J A sun L01Na DAILY CONSTRUCTION REPORT CHECK (,/) ❑ Sunday ❑ Wednes.:zy O Monday ❑ ThumB a", W[ATNCR OAT[ �� IY JR M - ❑ Tuesday fl Fnday T[MP[RATVR[l A.M ICM •:]a P.M ❑ Saturday I PERSONNEL (s,� — F M L I SUBCONTRACTORS F ! m 1 1 Sitework 2 t Concrete 3 Masonry I ! 4 Metals, Struct. &Arch. S I Moisture Protection& Insulation 6 Metal Doors, Windows,Glass ` j 7 ! Carpentry 8 I Tile&Floor Covering 9 I Lath& Plaster iJ 1 Plumbing ! _' 11 !1 H�- .VVaC - ! 12 j Electrical —_-- 13 Elevator _.----- 14 .14 Painting 15 r Other ! ----- 16 Other j - -- 17, Staff _ TOTaLS' TOTAL- EQL'IPN1E�'T: j CONCRETE PLACED Todav! -- — i 'L 4 '/ euuorMa /00 1-'gp4-1gdJ Ok DAILY CONSTRUCTION REPORT CHECX (,/) ❑ Sunday ❑ wedne� �i/G Q/- DATE /O/9/�19 ❑ Monday ❑ Thursday w[ArNen O ❑ Tuesday R Fnday T[MFURATUR[•A.N 12 My A:3a P.M ❑ Saturday I PERSONNEL (s,� — F M L I SUBCONTRACTORS I F ! M -1 �Sitework 2 Concrete _ 3 1 Masonry I 4 Metals,Struct. &Arch. S j Moisture Protection& Insulation 6 LMetal Doors, Windows, Glass 7 Carpentry 8 j Tile& Floor Covering 9 I Lath&Plaster .I _ 10 j Plumbing ! _' 11 H.V.A.C. 12 j Electrical ! —_ 13 Elevator 14 Painting 115 Other _--- 16 Other 1.7 Sta11 k),:1,,j, �Yr. c%" – l TOTALS` . TOT,aLS !_ E( t'IP\TENT: — — j CONCRETE PLACED Toda�_1 -- Rc":�r!;s Sime -�/ergA ,• r��..l /u m / evrn C-404. Liav lAfor y c.,/L Ao b T• a/*,c off a/! r. Adciaw ope'i�.;�� .is 7-4+G Caa+e�7�/ier 9S //d � foL 06oMe � �/�e YkJ4/� �I/ .Sf9trwoJl•O J�/s�ws. Ceyd/t�E.L Fle- ar /AST d/lperll7y, fi/[sM/A w l�l.r.�0 Fro.c./•�a � o��.0/AP, -----�},/y mals s /Jet./ c3/0,F i Ycit.isi /ate / eY/ee✓s-- — NUILD, !G 4 /og d. P/41. SF/RAr /yq DAILY CONSTRUCTION REPORT CHECK c�) ❑ Sunday ❑ Wedres,oy 87 ,9 C) Monday 9 Thursday W RA711RR QICQ/' DAT ---r---- ❑ Tuesday ❑ Fnday T MPRRATURR a A.M 12M 6 Q 4130 P.M - ❑ Saturday I PERSONNEL (T C, — F M L I SUBCONTRACTORS F ! 41 1 Sitework 2 Concrete 3 Masonry I — 4 Metals,Struct. &Arch. I _� S ( Moisture Protection& Insulation I I 6 ! 1letal Doors, Windows, Glass I 7 1 Carpentry --:-- 8 Tile& Floor Covering 9 Lath&Plaster _ '.. i0 Plumbing - 11 - l2 Electrical I---- 13 Elevator I 14 I Painting 15 Other ! --•- 16 Other. 17 I Staff W r,/oA S. TOTALS` TOTAL EQ,Li1PMENT: j CONCRETE PLACED Todav' hc_!_arl:sf /l'irvre, Wtna�ow tai a�2+wr� sr �< d ��i r dcv. t 2 �or_4�w_ /ndowS .0 Nib/iC- oreg 9rr– t, inGuerre �ioer,J wwe. w•rv1 /avg�er /naf�---- - / W lrrd _-1 �L�• zC_(w�e./I.r Cyw AO[.V/ C OSnd IGC. OA �u�_�/n3 . — -----� �-/A�r Jq GJv // S'T or t� PeY/.N P_/a LA 3v 47/OA OA�e/i/S. ._. RUILOING DAILY CONSTRUCTION REPORT CHECK (,r) 7 ❑ Sundoy 19 Wednes:oy �orn overt v s T DATEie / ii/�_ e7 _1I ❑ Monday ❑ Th.r,da-; w[ATMIR — T ❑ Tuesday ❑ Fnday TIM PIRATVRIOA.M 12M 4L224.Da P.H ❑ Saturday I, PERSONNEL (s,(' — F M L I SUBCONTRACTORS 1 I Sitework I _�_. 2 Concrete 3 i Masonry 4 Metals,Struct. &Arch. 5 l Moisture Protection& Insulation i I 6 Metal Doors, Windows, Glass 7 I Carpentry 8 Tile& Floor Covering 9 Lath& Plaster _! 10 Plumbing 11 H.V.A.C. -:- 1.2 j Electrical 14 Painting 15TOther ! ----- 16 Other I -- ----- 17 I Staff k/a/c/j Soger, — / _ TOTALS: TOTALS EOUIPMENT: j CONCRETE PLACED Toda.vl — i Remar!s ��vvfo/ /ns�a//of/oma o/�� eens E/eafria f /7e f%/ SA14111; _f�✓—.- / v9for R7 • � 4 aul�oiNo /00 #/17� /4 o/w V91t.R. W9 DAILY CONSTRUCTION REPORT CHECK (,/) 6 ❑ Suaday ❑ Wednesy:, C/eor nwr /0/;f/ 81 19 ❑ Monday ❑ Thumca; W(ATN CR Tuesday ❑ F.Wav TIMPIRATURI!A.M 11m a ACOA P.M ❑ Saturday I PERSONNEL (s (', — F M L I SUBCONTRACTORS j F ! M —1 Sitework 2 Concrete 3 Masonry 1 j I j 4 1 Metals,5truct. &Arch. 5 1 Moisture Protection & Insulation 6 Metal Doors, windows,Glass 7 1 Carpentry —_:-- 8 1 Tile&Floor Covering _----- 9 Lath& Plaster _ IOj uml wing _ 11 H.V.A.C.- j -- 12 j Electrical —�--- 13 Elevator I = 14 Painting 15 r Other I --- 16 j Other -- --- 17 Staff we/c,4 S_ger, — / -- TOTALS` TOTALS j— EQIiIP\tET : -- j CONCRETE PLACED Toda�_1 —_. Re:n.ar :s /ev4Toi /Ad�9�/4T/on ''4ar> e-J �/'c doI S�e�/ ------- -_.02 - ---- rte/0.« f / v f z -- 607� -- - - ----- P- - suuoiMa DAILY CONSTRUCTION REPORT / CHECX (-I) S p ❑ Sunday ❑ Wednes.: O Iff Monday ❑ Thursca W[ATNCR C/C P/' OAT' -� 1p ❑ Tuesday ❑ Friday e TtMR[RATUR[e A.M t[M AAar.M Q Saturday I PERSONNEL (�,C, — F M L I SUBCONTRACTORS F I m 1 I Sitework 2 1 Concrete _ 3 1 Masonry 4 Metals,Struct. &Arch. ✓ I S I Moisture Protection& Insulation 6 LMetal Doors, Windows, Glass ` r 1 Carpentry 8 1 Tile& Floor Covering 9 I Lath& Plaster ✓ ' —� _ 10 j Plumbing ' _! 11 HN.A.C. j -.---. 7.2 j Electrical ✓ ! --- 13 I Elevator I _. 14 j Painting 15� Other ---- 16 Other 17 StaflT- OTALS` TOTAL- LQL'1P11 ENT - j CONCRETE PLACED Toda�1 _ Rcriarks /L o n /oo% —.-- LfSOod CoYi7er,r 81F�' a Icer e.l O SrrG / o n S�s/l_ A� ..___ . cam/ sj4u1,;. mks /s7` end. Serie/!/er syr��.�, opo/ter. __ _//o a eV4 .or s7wrf e 4S '�• � /� ------- - r � ,-4 w,coxont Ctv of flAassar4usE##s Public ProperttV Peparttnent ttiliting Vepartntent (Onr Salem 6rren 7,15-0213 William H. Munroe Director of Public Property Maurice M. Martineau, Asst Inspector Inspector of Buildings Edgar J. Paquin, Ass't Inspector Zoning Enforcement Officer John L. Leclerc, Plumbing/Gas Insp. November 12, 1987 Mr. Starlet Gilfillen Gilfillen Architects, Inc. 161 South Main Street Middleton, MA. 01949 RE: IOO Highland Ave. , Salem,_n Dear Statler, Regarding our site visit to the above referenced project on the tenth of November with yourself, Bob Uva and Maurice Martineau, I would like to call your attention to the following items. I . Drawings are needed for the build-out of tenent spaces, designated Suite 113 and Suite 114. No more studding or boarding should be done until we are in receipt of these. 2. Manufactures Specifications regarding flame and smoke spread of carpets are needed by this department and Fire Department before a C.0 can be considered. 3. -A Certificate of Fire Resistance treating for wood used on the project is needed. 4. Field painting of all cuts, weld and bolting of steel connections should be done. 5. All openings in G.W.B between the core and tenent spaces need to be sealed, also all openings between tenent spaces need to be sealed throughout the building. 6. A copy of applications and design of all X-Ray Machines and Sheilding from Mass. Dept . of Public Health are needed by this office to make sure all machines and lead sheilding comply. y e • page 2 7. Please advise your clients that another qualified person will have to sign a Construction Control form after your obligation under Chapter 127 is over. As usual it was a pleasure meeting with you and if I can be of any further assistance please do not hesitate to call. Respe ?fully, r. �t /. p tephen W. antry Assistant Building Inspector SWS/eaf ww eltp of 6atem, 19aggacbUgettg +� as jublic property Mepartment 36uilbing Mepartment One balem Oreen 745-9595 @xt. 380 William H. Munroe Director of Public Property Inspector of Buildings Zoning Enforcement Officer September 12, 1989 To the Honorable Anthony V. Salvo Mayor, City of Salem Dear Mayor Salvo: As the Director of Public Property having charge of the land designated "Easement Parcel All and "Easement Parcel B" on that certain plan attached hereto and captioned "Plan of Land in Salem, Massachusetts, Prepared for.-One=Hundred"`Highland=Avenue—Condominium Trust dated July 7, 1989, and prepared by T &-M Engineering Associates, Inc. , 83 Pine Street, Peabody, Massachusetts" , I am writing to inform you that said land is no longer needed for any public purpose. I find that the dedication of an easement for the benefit of "Parcel All on the above plan across said land to insure its continued maintenance and public beautification does not derogate from any public purpose and I recommend that you request the City Council of the City of Salem to authorize you to enter into such a dedication of easement. Respectfully, William H. Munroe Director of Public Property WHM:bms TINTI, QUINN & SAVOY 222 ESSEX STREET SALEM,MASSACHUSETTS 01970 DECWILLIAM J. 1'1NTI E 6 9 oa AM 183 WILLIAM F. QUINN RECEIIGJ rb 745 8OG5 RICHARD E. SAVOY CITY OF SAL�V�Chx'ft�948 PETER R.MF.RRY H December 5, 1988 Mr. Gerard Kavanaugh Salem City Planner One Salem Green Salem, Massachusetts 01970 /P& l Re :. ase Highland Avenue, Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Dear Mr. Kavanaugh: Thank you for meeting with my client, Dr. Patrick Curtin, myself, and the other officials on Thursday. We appreciate your willingness to give us the opportunity to resolve the remaining site issues without delaying build-out for new tenants. My client has arranged to have a meeting at the site on Wednesday, December 7 between Mr. Whittie and our site engineer, Tony Lally. We will thereafter have Lally prepare the following: a. an ANR plan of the land encroachment along Almeda Street for the purpose of negotiating a land purchase from the City. b. designing a catch-basin along the rear property line to direct surface water into our drainage system. C . a confirmation that our drainage connection is into a proper drain pipe discharging into the state drainage line on Highland Avenue . We will also continue to work directly with Massachusetts Department of Public Works District 5 on the sewer-connection permit. • December 5, 1988 Page 2 I will advise you as these matters proceed. Very truly yours, ,3eQ William F. Quinn WFQ/mh CC : Dr. Patrick Curtin Dr. Robert Nersasian ony Lally William Munroe KAVANAUG/TXTMOMI jopNrtmrili of 11idthc ur :g GEORGE E. WHITTIE, P. E. N Engineer do •. .- .olic Services August 19, 1988 VA._Pa ck Curtin U0.0_NigUand Avenue Satem, MA. 01970— 7 RE: Site Devetopment @ 100 Hightand Avenue Dean Dn. CuAtin: I am waiting to conbi)un my conveuations with Doetou NuLsas<an and St. P.tenne on August 17th. I wiU sign .the two Cehti6icate6 ob Occupancy that ane to proses at this time. I wi.0 not sign the C.O. 's 'Lemain,ing (jon the appnox.imate 2,600 square beet og unoccupied space in the buitd.ing at .the above address untit aU matters addkessed in my pJLevio" 2ette)c ob June 13, 1988 is completed to my 6atis6action. Ib you have any questions on this matted, ptea�se eaP.e me. Ve)y truly yowv6, ' f- ULtt George E. whittie, P.E. City EngineeA Director o6 Pubtic Senvice6 GEWlcmc CC: U . Steve SantAy, Buitiling Inspeeto2 Mn. Michaele O'B&ien, City soticiton s ONE HUNDRED HIGHLAND PARK ' 100 HIGHLAND AVE. SALEM. MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE: 16171 745-6161 August 4, 1988 Mr. Whitte: In_regards—to,your_June._1,3, 1988 correspondence regarding the �High_ land Ave. Property../ 1. Mike O'Brien has been contacted and is preparing a draft to protect the City's right of way concerning Almedia Street and our property line. 2. Three meetings have taken place between our Representative, Salem I Hospital and other involved Personel and a plan is being devised to rectify the drainage problems from the Swale in the rear of our property. 3. A Representative from the State DPW will be on site next week to resolve the Permit Problem regarding the tie in into State Drainage System. Hopefully these matters will be resolved to your satisfaction by the first or middle of next week. If you have any questions please feel free to call me at the above number. I Sineer y, / `- Patrick H. Curtin D.D.S Trustee, � ��y f� � 1C ?M 8 �' PATRICK H. CURT"D.D,S, a SALEM DENTAL A950C. h:C. g AUb 00 �gf - �•m � CLUE HUNDRED HIGHLANp AVE. .:T�„�® SALEM.MA 07970 - X988 _.� - , BUILDING PERMIT JOB WEATHER CARD April 13 19 88 PERMIT NO. 216-88 /� /h e ADDRESS 20 Jacobs Ave. , Danvers MA. 1076 _ (7/9/c INO.) (STREET) (CONTF'S LICENSE NUMBE�9 OF I STORY MEDICAL- SUITE DWELLRING UNITS - s;y�✓�/ . (PROPOSED USE) N Ward 4 ZONING DISTRICT R- I ISTREET) S AND✓� (CROS5 STREET) / LOT LOT BLOCK 512E Y BUILDING IS TO BE 'lFT, WIDE By-' FT. L0. ' BY FT. M HEIGHT AND SHALL CONFORM IN CONSTRUCT TO TYPE USE GROUP BASEMENT WALLS OR FOUNDATION (TYPE) REMARKS: Build out Suite #ONE as per drawings submitted. "CALL FOR PERMIT TO OCCUPY 745EE-9595" %REA OR PER OLUME ESTIMATED COST N'1 SD,DDn_no FEEMIT S 355,0.0 . CUSIL/AGUARIE F99TT OWNER Dave SrPl rr A M.D. ADDRESS 27 RPsevnir Drive Danvers MA_ 01923 evlTTa. FF 11jFFQ,�LL� >. THIS PERMIT CONVEYS NO RIGHT TO OCCUPY ANY STREET, ALLEY OR SIDEWALK OR ANDS �TtA1rERQBFBiAi Hdf ligrAPgRARILY PERMANENTLY. ENCROACHMENTS ON PUBLIC PROPERTY. NOT SPECIFICALLY PERMITTED UNDER THE BUILDING CODE, MUST BE . PROVED BY THE JURISDICTION. STREET OR ALLEY GRADES AS WELL AS DEPTH AND LOCATION OF PUBLIC SEWERS MAY BE OBTAIN FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS. THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT RELEASE THE APPLICANT FROM THE CONDITIC OF ANY APPLICABLE SUBDIVISION RESTRICTIONS. MINIMUM OF THREE CALL APPROVED PLANS MUST BE RETAINED ON JOB AND THIS WHERE APPLICABLE SEPARATE INSPECTIONS REOUIq ED FOR CARD KEPT POSTED UNTIL FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION WORKI ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING AND 1. FOUNDATIONS OR FOOTINGS. MADE. WHERE A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY 15 RE. MECHANICAL INSTALLATIONS. 2. PRIOR TO COVERING STRUCTURAL QUIRED,SUCH BUILDING SHALLNOT SE OCCUPIED UNTIL MINAL INSPECTION TO LATH). FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE. 3. FINAL )NSPECTION BEFORE OCCUPANCY. POST THIS CARD SO IT IS VISIBLE FROM STREET BUILOING INSPE TION APPROVALS PLUMBING INSPECTION APPROVALS ELECTRICAL INSPECTION APPROVALS 6e BOARD OF HEALTH GAS INSPECTION APPROVALS FI DEPT. INSF#CTING APPOALIZAL5 ps 1(*4� may- - mut -7 d S is OTHER CITY ENGINEER 2 � 1Fp IV 2 , tlWE1 1 --3h s. WORK SHALL NOT PROCEED UNTIL THE I PERMIT WILL BECOME NULL AND VOID IF CONSTRUCTION INSPECTIONS INDICATED ON THIS CAI INSPECTOR HAS APPROVED THE VARIOUS WORK IS NOT STARTED WITHIN SIX MONTHS OF DATE THE CAN BE ARRANGED FOR BY TELEPHOI, STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION. PERMIT IS ISSUED AS NOTED ABOVE. OR WRITTEN NOTIFICATION. 'CON W, to V4 'VVV*a1m, Aassar4usdts A Public PritpertV Pepartinent � willing ,Y 7�Ap�epartntent (Otte °4atem (6reen 7.13-0213 William H. Munroe Director of Public Property Maurice M. Martineau, Asst Inspector Inspector of Buildings Edgar J. Paquin, Asst Inspector Zoning Enforcement Officer John L. LeClerc, Plumbing/Gas Insp. January 21 , 1988 Drs. Lawrence J. Monaldo and Robert R. Nersasian 100 Highland Ave. Salem, MA 01970 RE: New Office Building Dear Doctors: This letter will serve as temporary permission to occupy your suite only at 100 Highland Ave. , Salem. It appears that all the necessary inspections have been made. As you know, we are in receipt of your application for variance from accessible bathrooms, and your letter stating you will comply with their findings. We have received a letter from Statle Gilfillen Archi- tects and from the Welch Group Inc. as required by Massachusetts State Building Code, Chapter 127. When the conditions of the Architectural Access Board are met, we will issue a permenant Certificate of Occupancy. Sincerely, �f� Stephen W. Santry 7 Ass't Building Inspector SWS:bms ( hIIduel S '[)ukakis Ll f O s�''/r'W&ac dace - � Governor One n >�, Q��V,Bury �aata'c,./Cfaeuccc/uaell3 02!08 Cl1 } �6f7� 72 `0660 tuy TO: LOCAL BUILDING INSPECTOR MASSACHUSETTS INDEPENDENT LIVING PROGRAM LOCAL HANDICAPPED COMMISSION FROM: DEBORAH RYAN , ARCHITECTURAL ACCESS BOARD SUBJECT: - 100.Highland_Ave_. Salem, MA DATE: December 10,1987 Enclosed please find the following material regarding the above premises : X Application for Variance Decision of Board Notice of Hearing Correspondence Letter of Meeting The purpose of this memo is to inquire as to whether or not your office has any input on the application filed with respect to the above project. Also, to make you aware that a hearing has been or will be held on the matter. If you have any information that you feel would assist the Board in making a decision on this case, could you please advise this office as soon as possible. You may call the office at (617 ) 727-0660 or submit a letter of recommendations and/or comments . Thank you for your interest in this matter. 787 � o tze V� oa��za�nuleaL�f o��/��.tac�e� C�xecuCe'ue Cce uiWec ,1a eG�r �xc�Cc�ec�uxa+%rSd�ccaaa �ocr�xc� Michaele Dukakis GovernorGovernorOne SZ111iurlon eats - Room, 1s/0 Charles V. Barry 96066n, aLwac%ueeM 0%!08 Secretary 1617) 727-0660 Voice & TDD APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE . * In accordance with M.C.L. , Chapter 22, Section 13A, I hereby apply for modification of or substitution for the rules and regulations of the Architectural Access Board as they appiy to the facility described below on the grounds that Literal compliance with the Board requlations is impracticable in my case. 1. State the names and address of the owner of the building/facility: 100 Highland '?a^1 t)LT t - 66 Loring Avp nig7g 2. State the name and address or other identification of the building/facility:. 100 Highland Avenue, Salem, MA 3. Describe the facility: (number of floors, type of functions, etc. ) : Two floors with basement. Individual suites for three doctors. 4. Check the work performed or to be performed: X New construction Reconstruction, Alteration, Remodeling Addition Change of Use 5. Briefly describe the extent and nature of the work performed or to be performed: Construction of r4 and fin;sh;ng s suites. 6. State each section of the Rules and Regulations of the Architectural Access Board for which a variance is being requested. SECTION NUMBER DESCRIPTION 521 CMR 13.3 See Appendix "A"A" r "v y 8. For each variance requested, state insdetail the reasons why compliance with the Board' s regulations would not be practical. State the necessary cost of the work required to achieve compliance. (You should submit cost estimates decailing the amount of compliance) USE ADDITIONAL SHEETS IF NECESSARY. See Appendix "B" 9. Has a building permit been applied for? Yes. If yes, state the date the permit was issued: February 3. 1987 1.0. State the estimated cost of construction as stated on the building permit. $781 ,460.00 If a building permit has not been issued, state the anticipated construction cost: 11. Has a certificate of occupancy been issued for the facility? No. If yes, state the date: 12. State the actual assessed valuation of the BUILDING ONLY AS RECORDED IN THE ASSESSOR'S OFFICE of the municipality in which the building is located: 13. State the phase of design or construction of the facility as of the date of this application: Core area 98% complete - 1 suite comnlprpd 14. State the name and address of the architectural or engineering firm including the name of the individual architect or engineer responsible for preparing drawings of the facility: Statler Gilfi llen Arrhirprrc_ T„r 161 South Main Street, Middleton MA 01949 rawings submitted Nov. 23, 1987 to Board) EL:(617) 777-7g7A 15. State the name and address of the building inspector responsible for overseeing this project: Stephen Santry Building Tncnp�rnr's nff;r,, One Salem Green, Salem, MA 01970 PLEASE NOTE: The Board may, in its discretion, hold a hearing on your application for variance. The Board may also decide your application without a hearing, upon the information you submit. You should therefore, include all relevant information with your application. At minimum, the plans should include a site plan, all floor plans, elevations, sections and details. Photographs are extremely helpful. Date: December 8, 1987 SIGNATURE OF OWNER OR AUTHORIZED AGENT Patrick H. Curtin, Trustee PLEASE PRINT OWNER/AGENT'S NAME 100 Highland .Realty Trust Appendix "A" In reference to health facilities or buildings, 521 CMR 13 . 3 provides as follows: "Where toilet rooms are provided, at least one water closet and one lavatory must be accessible. " In planning the building which is the subject of this variance request, the owner and the owner' s architect interpreted this provision to require one ( 1 ) accessible toilet facility in the building. The building was constructed with one ( 1 ) accessible toilet facility, ( see plans submitted) . On November 23 , 1987 , by virtue of 521 CMR 4 . 5 , the owner requested the Architectural Barriers Board for an advisory opinion relative to 521 CMR 13 . 3 . On November 30 , 1987 , the Board interpreted this section to require that, if the doctors provided toilet facilities in their individual suites, then one ( 1) toilet facility in each suite was required to be accessible. (No written opinion has been provided to the petitioners to date) . The doctors are providing for employee toilet facilities in their individual suites . As per the reasons set forth in Section 8 of this application, those toilet facilities are not accessible. Therefore, the owner petitions for this variance. 00192L Appendix B Suite 1-2 Dr. Curtins Estimated cost of putting in new accessible bathroom $6000.00 to $8000 . 00 Estimated cost of redesign of suite to accommodate new bathroom $18 ,000 to $25 ,000 costs include Architectural, Plumbing, Electrical, Structural, Mechanical and finish of the suite. Suite 1-3 Drs. St. Pierre and Kases Estimated cost of new accessible bathroom $6000 . 00 to $8000 . 00 Estimated cost of redesign of suite to accommodate new bathroom to include Architectural, Electrical, Plumbing and structural redesign $13 ,000 to $18 ,000 Suite 2-3 Drs. Nersasian and Monaldo Estimated cost of new accessible bathroom $6000. 00 to $8000. 00 Estimated cost of redesign would be $30, 000 to $35 ,000 to include Architectural, Plumbing, Electrical, Mechanical and Structural, plus related cost to finish redesigned suite. I .LUM01},L (91#V of *alrnt, ttss�zcl#�zsE##S �jublir Propertg �9epttrtauent DINML��'4v rui(littglepttrtntent ODnr ,3oeilrm (brrru 7I:i-11213 William H. Munroe Director of Public Property Maurice M. Martineau, Asst Inspector Inspector of Buildings Edgar J. Paquin, Asst Inspector Zoning Enforcement Officer John L. LeClerc, Plumbing/Gas.lnsp. March Il , 1988 Dr. David St.Pierre 4 State Road Danvers, MA. 01923 RE:�t00'HlghlanT d_Ave.. a-lem, i'— — Dear Dr. St .Pierre, On March 10, 1988 I made a site visit to the above referenced building for the purpose of final inspection. The following items must be completed before we can issued a Certificate of Occupancy. I . Final sign off, of your suite by the plumbing, electrical and Fire Inspector. 2. A letter from Statler Gilfillen and Robert Buthmann stating that they have made their final inspection and the work complies with the drawings of record and the Mass State Building Code as per Chapter 127. I have enclosed a copy of the letter that I sent to Dr. Curtin regarding items that must be addressed in the rest of the building before a Certificate of Occupancy's will be issued. If I can be of further help, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Stephen W. Santry Assistant Building Insector SWS/eaf enc: Correspondence of 7 Ilublir Propertg Pepartmeut At'7(� JA�aIMML�+'tv �Ji lll�tlflla rpurtnlrltt 0)nr *alrm 05rren 743-11213 William H. Munroe Director of Public Property Maurice M. Martineau, Asst Inspector Inspector of Buildings Edgar J. Paquin, Asst Inspector Zoning Enforcement Officer John L. LeClerc, Plumbing/Gas Insp. March ll , 1988 Dr. Patrick Curtin Salem Dental Associates, Inc. 100 Highland Avenue ___ Salem,MA 01970 A - —100_Highland_Ave_,_Sam'MA-.-�... Dear Dr. Curtin, As you are aware, I made a site inspection of the above referenced property today with Statler Gilfillen, Robert Buthal and Dr. Nersasian in anticipation of issueing a permanent Certificate of Occupancy. I would call your attention to the following items which must be addressed before I will issue C.O. I . Ventilation system in crawl space does not seem to be working. 2. Shaft that runs between floors must be made tight, the door to shaft in basement must be a rated assembly for use in the two hour rated shaft wall. 3. Smoke detectors are covered .with plastic in both crawl spaces and in the sprinkler room, wires hanging at smoke detector in sprinkler room. 4 . Grab bars are missing in both second floor toilets off the common hall. Male and female signage should be applied to the doors and the unisex sign removed. 5. All rubbish and debris should be removed from empty space on second floor, empty space on first floor and basement . 6. We will need a letter from the Salem Planning Department that all conditions of their Special Permit of July 17, 1986 have been met . When the above items have been completed please contact me for a reinspection. Sincerely, Stephen W. Santry Assistant Building Inspector SWS/eaf C.C. Robert Buthmann @ Welch Group Statler Gilfillen Architects L` (1�itg of ,jttlrm, �fttssarliusetis Paura of A"eal Ft€ �4•mTA�, iiia r DECISION ON THE PETITION OF EDWARD ZAROHIAN FOR A VARIANCE AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR 111 HIGHLAND AVE. A hearing on this petition was held January 21 , 1987 with the following Board Members present: James Hacker, Chairman; Messrs. , Fleming,Luzinski and Strout. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearinz were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. The petitioner is requesting a Variance to encroach on side yard setbacks and a Special Permit to extend nonconforming use in this R-1 district. The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this request for a Special Permit is Section V B 10, which provides as follows: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set forth in Section VIII F and IX D, grant Special Permits for alterations and reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement, extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses, provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood. In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants. The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of the Board that: a. special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affect other lands, buildings or structures ir. - ,'Ie same district; b. literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would inrclve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner; 3. desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal. after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, makes the following findings of fact: 1 . There was major neighborhood opposition; 2. It was determined that the project in its current plan would be detrimental to neighboring property values; 3. Petitioner failed to meet his burdon of proof with regards to hardship. DECISION ON THE PETITION OF EDWARD ZAROHIAN FOR A VARIANCE AND SPECIAL PERMIT FOR 111 HIGHLAND AVE. , SALEM page two On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1 . The proposed plan would not be in harmony with the district and would not promote the health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants; 2. Special conditions do not exist which especially affect the subject property and not the district generally; 3. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Ordinance would not involve substantial hardship to the petitioner; 4. The relief requested cannot be granted without substantial detriment to the public good or without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district and the purpose of Ordinance. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 4-0, against granting the requested Variance and Special Permit. DENIED ,fames B. Hacker, Chairman A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK _. _ .. ....._ ; '7 ..7 . Eu,Ru OF A'; 'CON M.�, Ctu of ttl�m, ttss cl��zsP##s Y Iiublic PropertU Department J�ra,NNE��'4r 111 ttillntq 311rpttrtntent (Our .Sozdrm (hirrru 7.13-11213 William H. Munroe Director of Public Property Maurice M. Martineau, Asst Inspector Inspector of Buildings Edgar J. Paquin, Asst Inspector Zoning Enforcement Officer John L. LeClerc, Plumbing/Gas Insp. March II , 1988 Dr. Patrick Curtin ��7 S�f�p�d Salem Dental Associates, Inc. 100 Highland Avenue Salem,MA 01970 RE: 100 Highland Ave. , Salem,MA. Dear Dr. Curtin, As you are aware, I made a site inspection of the above referenced property today with Statler Gilfillen, Robert Buthal and Dr. Nersasian in anticipation of issueing a permanent Certificate of Occupancy. I would call your attention to the following items which must be addressed before I will issue C.O. irz 1 . Ventilation system in crawl space does not seem to be working. 2. Shaft that runs between floors must be made tight , the door to shaft in basement must be a rated assembly for use in the two hour rated shaft wall. 3. Smoke detectors are covered with plastic in both crawl spaces and in the sprinkler room, wires hanging at smoke detector in sprinkler room. .J 4 . Grab bars are missing in both second floor toilets off the common hall. 0•K Male and female signage should be applied to the doors and the unisex sign removed. �• 5. All rubbish and debris should be removed from empty space on second floor, empty space on first floor and basement . 6. We will need a letter from the Salem Planning Department that all conditions of their Special Permit of July 17, 1986 have been met . When the above items have been completed please contact me for a reinspection. Sincerely, / / Stephen W. Santry Assistant Building Inspector SWS/eaf C.C. Robert Buthmann @ Welch Group Statler Gilfillen Architects CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS PLANNING DEPARTMENT 4r,,.conmic�,� GERARD KAVANAUGH r`Z' ONE SALEM GREEN CITY PLANNER 01970 4 )617) 744-4580 s r/ t M1r March 16, 1988 n x William Munroe Building Inspector o One Salem Green cnrn -- Salem, MA 01970 r—rn o J — RE: 100 Highland Avenue — n rn Dear Bill: co ca cx� I am writing to you with regard to the issuance of Certificates of Occupancy for the 100 Highland Avenue medical building. The developers have satisfied all but one of the Planning Board Conditions of Approval; landscaping. The Planning Board has been guaranteed that the installation of landscaping will take place as soon as weather permits. Therefore, the Planning Board approves of the granting of the Certificates of Occupancy for 100 Highland Avenue. Sincerely, I/1I e W Beth Debski Assistant Planner J16O9 ,ON pI} Ctv of ttlenl, 'fflttssar4use##s a ublir Vropertg Pepartment 5 ' 'J�r4�MML��"tY )Nuilbiuq Department Air �:ftnlem (6reen 7.13-11213 William H. Munroe Director of Public Property Maurice M. Martineau, Asst Inspector Inspector of Buildings Edgar J. Paquin, Asst Inspector Zoning Enforcement Officer John L. LeClerc, Plumbing/Gas Insp. March Il , 1988 Dr. David St .Pier e 4 State Road Danvers, MA. 01923 RE: 100 Highland Ave. , Salem,MA. Dear Dr. St .Pierre, On March 10, 1988 I made a site visit to the above referenced building for the purpose of final inspection. The following items must be complet d before we can issued a Certificate of Occun % /�la'IE2 by P(1w" L7i c.K, 7chnt C, p. 1 . Final sign off, of your suite by the plumbing, electrical and Fire Inspector. 311W I , 2. A letter from Statler Gilfillen and Robert Buthmann stating that they 01 have made their final inspection and the work complies with the drawings of record and the Mass State Building Code as per Chapter 127. I have enclosed a copy of the letter that I sent to Dr. Curtin regarding items that must be addressed in the rest of the building before a Certificate of Occupancy's will be issued. If I can be of further help, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Stephen W. Santry Assistant Building Ins ector SWS/eaf enc: Correspondence ONE HUNDRED HIGHLAND PARK 100 HIGHLAND AVE. SALEM. MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE: 16171 745-6161 i March 15, 1988 Planning Department r� City of Salem Salem, Mass. 01970 m Attn: Debra Debski Ali Dear Ms. Debski: c�.n cxy ccs This letter is to address_the_conversationwe had on March 15, 1988 concerning the landscaping atk100 Highland_Park,_100 Hi -d-Ave. We are presently negotiating with three landscaping contractors and will have the landscaping in place at 100 Highland Ave. within 60 days. Unfortunatly we were not able to do this work in the Fall due to the weather conditions. Thank you for your help in this matter. 'SC�cerel Patrick H. Curtin Trustee, 100 Highland Ave. Realty Trust r '��•CON M,�,(QF of �$nlrni, cl�nsE##S } Public Property Pepartnent ♦,JgfplNNE � )Builling i9epartnuent One nlem (6reen 7,15-112 13 William H. Munroe Director of Public Property Maurice M. Martineau, Asst Inspector Inspector of Buildings Edgar J. Paquin, Asst Inspector Zoning Enforcement Officer John L. LeClerc, Plumbing/Gas Insp. January 21 , 1988 Drs. Lawrence J. Monaldo and Robert R. Nersasian 100 Highland Ave. Salem, MA 01970 RE: New Office Building Dear Doctors: This letter will serve as temporary permission to occupy your suite only at 100 Highland Ave. , Salem. It appears that all the necessary inspections have been made. As you know, we are in receipt of your application for variance from accessible bathrooms, and your letter stating you will comply with their findings. We have received a letter from Statle Gilfillen Archi- tects and from the Welch Group Inc. as required by Massachusetts State Building Code, Chapter 127. When the conditions of the Architectural Access Board are met, we will issue a permenant Certificate of Occupancy. Sincerely, �j� GLGvGr`''�.. Stephen W. Santry d" Asst Building Inspector SWS:bms THE WELCH GROUP, INC. Via: Delivered by Hand March 21, 1988 r 'ij M M_< M o -71 Mr . Stephen Santry City of Salem Building Department ` U One Salem Green Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Re: Medical Office Building 100 Highland Avenue Salem, Massachusetts Dear Mr . Santry: This letter shall serve to confirm and verify that the building located at 100 Highland Avenue, Salem, Massachusetts is substantially constructed and complete in accordance with plans and specifications and in conformance with all applicable Building Codes . If I can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to call . Respectfully submitted , The Welch Group, Inc. Ro ertP. uthmann Project Manager c.c. Highland Ave Realty Trust rpb:ez wp:substan: rpb CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT • BUILDERS 15 FRONT STREET SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 (617) 745-7870 STATLER GILFILLEN ARCHITECTS, INC. ARCHITECTURE HISTORIC PRESERVATION URBAN DESIGN PLANNING March 10, 1988 Mr. William Monroe Director of Public Property Public Property Department = =_ City of Salem One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 ILIm ry RE: Dr. Razes and Dr. St. Pierre's Suite ='o Medical_Office-_Building T -' C-100--Highland-Ave O9 �{ rn C� Salem, MA Dear Mr. Monroe, This letter is to inform you that we have made preliminary inspection of the Dr. Kazes and Dr. St. Pierre's Suite in the Medical Office Building at One Hundred Highland Avenue in Salem. We find that the suite has been constructed substantially in accordance with the plans and specifications provided by this office and in accordance with the Building Code of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and the requirements of the City of Salem. incer ly, Sta ler Gilfillen, AIA CC: Alex Nossiff BRAY WILKINS BUILDING, 161 SOUTH MAIN STREET MIDDLETON,MA.01949 (617)777-7978 STATLER W.GILFILLEN, MEMBER OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS Y ��vv &Whw 6 e Ol Ahman .9rixvieea Michael S. Dukakis 155 ?7"moocC JGxeet Governor "9 Philip W. Johnstonj Eleventh Floor �0d&n O2fif Tel: 727-6214 Secretary 727-2700 Deborah ProthrowStith, M.D. Commissioner November 25 , 1987 David St. Pierre, M.D. North Shore Center for Orthopedic Surgery 4 State Road _N µ Danvers, MA 01923 n RE: Shielding Design For r^ «' Radiographic Suite 100 Highland Ave,FSale w Dear Dr. St. Pierre: The Radiation Control Program has reviewed a shielding design con- sisting of floor plans and a physicist' s report. The Radiation Control Program is of the opinion that the submitted ° shielding design is drawn in conformance with modern radiological health practice and hereby approves it. Compliance with 105 CMR 120. the Department' s Radiation Control rules and regulations, require in sub-chapter 120 .103 (b) and (c) that each person that intends to maintain a facility or acquire a source of s ionizing radiation shall apply to the Massachusetts Department of Public Health ' s Radiation Control Program to register the facility prior to acquiring , installing or commencing to maintain the facility. The enclosed "Application For Registration gistration Of Ionizing Installations" shall be filed with the Massachusetts Department of Public Health ' s Radiation Control Program according to the regulations outlined above. Sincerely, ROBERT M. H LLISEY, �Director Radiation Control Program 9 RMH/TOC/11 Enclosure: (1) 727- 99Sa 3INESS F.=RK—UAV LC_': 'T DISTRICT 3INESS ?t RK DEVELOFs•iENT DISTRICT P CHANGES NTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT ,.T BUSIi:ESS DISTRICT N_RAL F CHANGES r , FINITION OF LAND . 744-8141 JAMES M. FLEMING AT70R-NEY AT LAW 47 BUFFUM STREET SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 January 29 , 1989 K i17 Architectural Access Board '71M r; McCormack Building, Room 1310 One Ashburton Place Boston, MA 02108 LA �, Attn: Ms. Deborah Ryan Re: Request for Variance 1-100-Highland"Avenue, Salem, MA Dear Ms . Ryan, ' _ As attorney for Dr. Patrick Curtin and others, the owners of 100 Highland Avenue, Salem, MA, I hereby withdraw their application for variance currently on file with your Board, relative to that building. Please cancel the informal adjudicatory hearing scheduled before the Board on February 8 , 1988 , at 2 : 45 PM. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. S' erely, L/ / James M. Fleming, Esq. JMF/mmc i IJII_i'I Fir'I FEB 3 9 16 PH CITY OF Si:! EH,°MASS �4 1 w r To : 1L> �' I T Fifa(YNC� 7j (OAK) IN NQS: 1. alfTKA4-T4?: Ib a190ta'yffaLE 'FOIA MEFITJN6i ALL 9V4U SZ: ,-MENTA. Off• A{zGl-1I�GTv�L- T34d'Zf�t��'� '�A,2f7 ra21 GMIZ- _-____,._ -- 2. Flwl4♦a Td MATG►-4 ToIL>_F 202 3.Tw'2 vg-4wlN& I5 TO t�v' Grit lh(D? = G S A.I4 �t7i^iIT1v�1 To T_lae for, IPO t4i&N4 -kq'p k�qr_ t�AT�•p MAYLI.1 Iqa�� a January' 1988 - NEW TOILEDITION STATLER GILFILLEN ARCHITECTS, INC. 100 Highland:+Ave. r : . " 161 SO. MAIN ST. MIDDLETON, MA. 01949 (617) 777-7979 ,x: .. SSI CAIR: AILL:R':'.'.11'RAI.BARRIERS MIARD fCI CTIIU ARClllll.L 11 RA:.'I%1 ltILIRS 1OARD ---- (421 inches long. one on the eamben 2�1 wn. stul am srtu eau e'd 30.5.4 has two (2) grab bars forty-hva 1J wall in back of the water closet and one on the aide wall 0...It W the water closet. Grab ban shall be one and one-puarter 0 T � 1/4) Inches In outside diameter, hay. a ane .nd one-half a ^1 1/2) inch clearance between nc bar and the wall, and be set - - -� at • M1e19ht of Mlrty (201 orches above and Parallel to the . Moor. Grab bars sM1 if ala. be non ruatng and add-etched a roughened. Where -.tank pr.v.r- location of the rear grab bar, a.bar may be Installed three (3) inch.. abs a the tank,( B Grab ban ends shall be located is (6) inch.. from the corner I m of the wall. y-a.an un arw R/. a:J 9J I\! \ / : l—J rmov" some" _ e / PLAN TYPICAL,STALL B pLAN—PRIVATE TOILET RC2PM 30.6 When uri=al+ era provided, one renal shall be either wsll-nnu^ted wiN tM r of the beain fifteen x(157 inches above the floor mw mum, or floor-mounted. - 3p,T The t of an shelf and/or bottom of an ror which is Provided above a avatory shall be eat eta height ne 1--ter than thirty-eight tnm.nae. (38) inches above the floor. Tilted +, wnera provided, shall be installed at a height of forty-two (42 rinchea above the floor to the y bottom of the mirror. 30.8Diaoenann: Tavel dispensen, drying davicea, or other typo of wfeaa and dlapeosen shall have It least one of each device oauated at a m sinum height of fortY-twe (42) inches above the floor, an It Fiilustonelof each device shall be located .ienin reachof Ne acu.alblaislets".30,9 Tallet paper dispensers shall be located on the side wall closest to the toilet, and be set at a height of twentY'four (24) inches above the _ floo' Dispenaan that col .livery, or that do not permit con- t(nuous paper flow are noallowed , mteneo eeu ad I aoa_ a.W s'd SECTION O s 12/l I/05 521 CMR-57 12/01/96 .i21 Ia1R-58 �B// off' �o„�/ �� i521 CMR: Altt'.I!Ill lfrl'It,V.BARRIERS BOARD t 521 CMR: Al1C11110"11'll:\I.IId IIRII:NS UUAIIU _ i elOMnaa07 ]tY wi mNDaPn 4 6'.d PUBLIC TOILET ROOMS .30 C� U. :. ; / n A -0 30.1 In each toilet roan at lent ono water closet and area lavatory shall W / I � 4 acoe.i�e�na in wheelchairs, or an eccmible private lavatory, usable by either sex. shall be provided. t\ aeae wsom ) td Its If - 30.2 Whore vestibules are provided, they shall commit with Section 26.3. 30.3 A f um clan swca of sixty (60)_i echos in diameter meuured without 1 me e+T a�w ooh to permit turnmg lu a ng), ha l without coming into contact with any fixtures or plumbing), shall ! be provided in each toilet rwm. P 30.4 One latae sink shall be wall-mounted withoutag Ins or pedestal at hili—V thirty-hvv (32) inches to the top of the rim or counter, neon,emei and shall extend at least twenty-twe (u) Inches from the wall; o may be • counter type with cies• open knee space of thirty (30) inches In width and at least twenty-+even (27) Inch., in height to the bottom of the counter. Exposed drain pipes and hot water pip. shall PL. AN_TYPICYLs STP-Ll. A. . be reeeasad, insulated er guarded. seats type faucets aro net allowed- and .Pring activated faucets an .11. .d only if water-running time is at least ten (10) second.. Laver handle faucets are preferred. Such faucets shall be avertible with a closed fist. 30.5 Toilet stalls: Each toilet reom shall have at least one(1) +tell which: 30.5.1 is sixty (60) inches wide and uyenty-two (72) inches deep; 30.5.2 has a door or ovening that is thirty-six (36) inches wide, +win's out or flid.s. and he. an automatic +elf-dewing hinge V device and a pull deyice to .+fiat In clewing the doer, provides eighteen (18) inches of clear pace an the latch pull side of the door, and has a lack located approximately thirty-six (36) inches above the floor. A at hook shall be provided at a _ - maximum hel'ht of fifty-four (54) inches by.the floor; u 30.5.3 looates the water dosat eight.. (18) inch.. from the can- - terline r the fixture inches the nearest side wall; maintains ant . least,11forty-two pa to the clear svace, the, from c n e terline of water douet to the farthest wall .1 y; ar he. . ha. • .anew undeno rein re that cinch. sharply; and ha+ a weal savant.. (17) to mnetaen (19) inches all the floor, to the top d the seat 1 SECTION-O 12/51/96 521 CSIR-55 _ 521 CptR-55 12131/86 S7A%e / /UmhlN* q TiIi3LE 5� M1 2-� DUUG q 2g 2 _ _ STATLER GILFILLEN ARCHITECTS, INC, ARCHITECTURE HISTORIC PRESERVATION URBAN DESIGN PLANNING Mr. William Monroe ., Director of Public Property City of SalemOne Salem Green c - Salem, MA 01970 January 15, 1988 RE: Medical Office„Buildng v , 0100 Highland-Avenue Salem, MA Dear Mr. Monroe, This letter is to inform you that we have made preliminay inspection of Dr. Nersasian and Dr. Monalto's Space in the Medical Office Building at 100 Highland Avenue in SAlem. We find that the building has beeen constructed substantially in accordance with the plans and spacifications provided by this office and in accordance with the Building Code of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and the requirements of the City of Salem. Please note as before there were 48 items which the owner chose to delete from our original drawings in his negoitations with the contractor. These included the deletion of the first floor toilets. S' Gere , Statler Gilfillen cc: Patrick Curtin BRAY WILKINS BUILDING, 161 SOUTH MAIN STREET MIDDLETON,MA.01949 (617)777-7978 STATLER W.GILFILLEN, MEMBER OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS PATRICK H. CURTIN. D.D.S. _. Salem ental Associates, Vnc. SIXTY-SIX LORING AVENUE SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE 745-6161 December 7, 1987 Mr. Steve Santry Building Inspector One Salem Green Salem, Mass. 01970 Dear Steve: An Application for a waiver has been submitted to the Architectural Access Board in Boston dated December 8, 1987. This waiver requests relief from Section M.G.L. Chapter 22 Section 13A in accordance of Provision 521 C.M.R. 4. 1 of their code relative to accesible Bathrooms in my suite and in the building in general. We are of the opinion that we have only Private use Bathrooms in my Suite and have available an accesible Bathroom in the public area. I will c9maply with the Board ruling after exhausting all my Legal avenues of appeal if necessary Thank you, Patrick H. Curtin D.D.S. p , Public Prope7rttg Peparhuent uACQ,NNE�+r4Y �uilbiu.q �epartntent (Onr —,;ntem (breen 7.1i-0213 William H. Munroe Director of Public Property Maurice M. Martineau, Ass't Inspector Inspector of Buildings Edgar J. Paquin, Ass't Inspector Zoning Enforcement Officer John L. LeClerc, Plumbing/Gas Insp. December 21, 1987 Dr. Patrick H. Curtain Salon Dental Associates Inc. 100 Highland Ave. Salem, Ma. 01970 Re: New Office Building Dear Dr. Curtain, This letter will serve as temporary permission to occupy your suite only, at 100 Highland Ave. It appears that all the necessary inspections have been made. As you know we are in receipt of your application for variance from from accessible bathrooms and your letter stating that you will comply with their findings. We have received a letter from Statler Gilfillen Architects and the Welch Group Inc. as required under Chapter 127, Mass. State Building Code. When the conditions of the Architectural Access Board are met we will issue a certificate of occupancy. Since ly, tephen W. try Asst. Building Inspector SWS/lyd CC: File f LAWRENCE J.MONALDO,D.D.S. "ROBERT R.NERSASIAN,D.M.D. 191 JEFFERSON AVENUE COLONIAL OFFICE PARK SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TEL. 745-8774 PRACTICE LIMITED TO ORALAND MAXILLOFACIAL DIPLOMATES A.B.O.S. SURGERY BY APPOINTMENT M December 8,1987 r-a Mr. Steve Santry :c;r4 �' r Building Inspectors Office One Salem Green o 3 Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Dear Mr. Santry, We have applied for a waiverfto=the—ArchitecturaII Access Board on our new office at 100 Highland Avenue Salem, on December 8, 1987. We have full intentions—of complying with their ruling after exhausting all areas of legal appeals if necessary. Respectfully Robert R. Nersasian D.M.D. Lawrence J/Monaldo D.D.S. RRN,LJM/tal j Michael S. Dukalds co.erna ARCHITECTURAL ACCESS BOARD Charles V. Barry ONE ASHBURTON PLACE Secretary ROOM 1310 BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02108 TEL: 727-0660 REQUEST FOR AN ADJUDICATORY HEARING Ir Tamoc M Rlomin�p Fci , representing: (Name of person requesting hearing) City/Town: (Name and address or other identification of the buil ing) do hereby request the Architectural Access Board to conduct an informal Adjudicatory Hearing in accordance with the provisions of 8.01 ,CMR Rule 1!.02 et seq. I understand that I may request such a hearing within thirty (30) days of receipt of the Notice of Action. James M. -Fleming Esq. (name - PRINT) t` ems. `G 47 Buffum Street t , S (Address) u ao cY q^ t _r G> K; Salem Mass. 01970 (City Town) s ca TEL: 744-8341 NOTE: THIS FORM MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE BOARD WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER RECEIPT OF THEPNOTTCE OF ACTION. MichaelS. Dukakis � � e7� Governor 9&a _ 9m /3/O fin, ..&Mao wom ovos ?? (VOT.CE7&7T D60 TO: ,Tames M. Fleming Esq. 47 Buffum Street Salem, Mass. 01970 DOCKET N0: P87-211 RE: Y00 Highland Ave_ Salem, MA You are hereby notified that an informal adjudicatory hearing before the Architectural Access Board will be held on February 8, 1988 at: 2-45 - P.M. in Room 1310, One Ashburton Place, John W. McCormack Building, Boston,MA_ 02108. This hearing is upon an application for variance made by: . Patrtck Curtin under the provisions of M.G.L. c. 22, Section 13A, for modification of or substitution for the following Rules and Regulations of the Board as specified in said-application: Sections: 13.3 of the 1982 Ru]:es and Regulations. A copy of said application is on file .at the office of the Board and is available for public inspection during regular business hours. This hearing will be conducted in accordance with the procedures set forth in M.G.L. c. 30A, and S. 1. 02 of the Standard Rules of Practice and Procedure, 801CMR. At the hearing each party may be represented by counsel, may present evidence and may cross examine opposing witnesse The Board often finds it helpful to consult drawings and photographs of the facility in reviewing ybiur variance. Please bring copies of said drawings and/or photographs With you to the hearing if you haven't submitted them already. Dated the 14th day of January 14 88 ARCHITECTURAL ACCESS BOARD GERALD LEBLANC, CHAIRMAN cC: Local Building Inpsector Local Handicapped Commission .Independent Living Center ✓1'GP V Q�e_.��'LCl/JdQ%C�2Cl%�S Michael S. ukakis �i Govem Vne 'Qu4w" dace - R.o M -1390 Charles V. Barly02108 Secretary (6l7) 727-06'6'0 VOICE & TDD NOTICE OF ACTION 100 HIGHLAND AVENUE, SALEM 1. An application for variance was filed with the Board by 'atric.k Curtin (Applicant) onn12/8/87 The applicant has requested variances from the following Sections of the 1982 Rules and Regulations of the Board: Section 13 .3 relating to _ Toiler room 1 %2. The application was heard by the Board as an incoming case on Monday, Nnvpmhpr 30 1987 3. After reviewing all materials submitted to the Board, the Board VOTED as follows: DENY the variance to 13.3 to one toilet in each suite. It was the opinion of the Board that wherever toilet facilities were provided, they were required to be accessible. Any person aggrieved by the above decision may request an adjudicatory hearing before the Board within thirty (30) days of receipt of this decision by filing the attached request for adjudicatory hearing form. If after thirty (30) days,, a request for an adjudicatory hearing is not received, the above decision becomes final decision and the appeal process is through Superior Court. YDATE 1%23/87 ARCHITECTURAL ACCESS BOARD '-` t,�a Gerald LeBlanc �a 4. Chair a/gcc&W-/ YaA+ Michael S. Dokalds ARCHITECTURAL ACCESS BOARD Coc n o Charles V. ONE ASHBURTON PLACE Bann ROOM 1310 5i'v BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02108 TEL: 727-0660 REQUEST FOR AN ADJUDSCATORY HEARING I , representing : e o (Namf person requesting hearing City/Town: Airp (Name and address or other identification of the buil ing) I c)7n do hereby request the Architectural Access Board to conduct an informal Adjudicatory Hearing in accordance with the provisions of 8.0l .CMR Rule 13.02 et seq. I understand that I may request such a hearing within thirty . (30) days of receipt of the Notice of Action. James M. Fleming Esq . _ (name - PRINT) 47 Buffum Street (Address) Salem FIass. 01970 (City Town) TEL: 744-8341 NOTE: THIS FORM MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE BOARD WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER RECEIPT OF THE"NOTTCE OF ACTION. &ccc&W 610" 01-'Aac Aeky 'chael S. Dukakis �j �4n 9%m - Room -/'ym VVV Governor Charles V. Barry AoaCara. /�ua�ac�euaelYa Ok908 Secretary (699) 727-0660 VOICE & TDD NOTICE OF ACTION 100 HIGHLAND AVENUE, SALEM 1 . An application for variance was filed with the Board by Patrick Curtin (Applicant) onn12/8i87 The applicant has requested variances from the following Sections of the 1982 Rules and Regulations of the Board: Section 13 .3 relating to Toiler ropm 2. The application was heard by the Board as an incoming case on Monday, N . , mh, ,0.1 987 3 . After reviewing all materials submitted to the Board, the Board VOTED as follows: DENY the variance to 13 .3 to one toilet in each suite . Tt was rhe opinion of the Board that wherever toilet facilities were provi.ded, they were reoui.red to be accessible. Any person aggrieved by the, above decision may request an adjudicatory hearing before the Board within thirty (30) days of receipt of this decision by filing the attached request for adjudicatory hearing form. If after thirty (30) days,, a request for an adjudicatory hearing is not received, the above decision becomes a final decision and the appeal process is through Superior Court. DATE: 12/23/87 ARCHITECTURAL ACCESS BOARD �Z. /L Gerald LeBlanc Chair STATLER GILFILLEN ARCHITECTS, INC. d , ARCHITECTURE HISTORIC PRESERVATION URBAN DESIGN PLANNING January 13, 1988 2 r-a _ Mr. Robert Buthmann The Welch Group, Inc. c,c' co 15 Front Street :..., Salem, MA 01970 ?r" Dear Mr. Buthman, �' co This letter is in response to your request for a final checklist of items to complete on One Hundred Highland Avenue. On January 11 Dr. Curtin and I walked through the building. It is my professional opinion that there are so many obvious things to complete that you are still several weeks away from a final punchout. When you are ready for a final walk through of the building I will need in writing a list of all items that you believe need to be completed. The following is a partial list of some of the items that I assume you will have complete or on a written checklist for us before a final walk through is to take place. Your checklist of uncompleted or unresolved items should include the status of when the work is to be completed and any other issues relating to completing the work. A partial list of the item I assume you will address: 1. Substantial portions of the vinyl base is not complete in the public space. 2. The public space from the carpet to the clerestory windows are not clean. 3. There is paint spattered over most of the electric heating units and equipment in the building. 4. Handrail at second floor window is unfinished. 5. Where the carpet meets the handrail on the second floor, it is not properly cut or glued down. The carpet in the public space is dirty and was not protected as per the requirements of the specifications. There are bubbles in the carpet on the stairs. The carpet was not cut properly around the door frames to the empty spaces. BRAY WILKINS BUILDING. 161 SOUTH MAIN STREET MIDDLETON.MA.01949 (617)777.7978 STATLER W.GILFILLEN, MEMBER OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS 6. The drywall needs to be touched up throughout the building. The work is not finished properly. Rough unfinished corners in the upper lobby space is not an acceptable standard. There is a horizontal crack at the base of the south stair in the entry. 7. It is my understanding that the stair area to the basement was to be finished. This included carpet to the basement door. 8. Please refer to our plans regarding finishing the toilet. The room is not as per plans and does not meet the requirements of the Code. This includes providing the basin in the custodian's room. 9. Throughout the public spaces the painting is not complete. As before, I refer you to the beam behind the elevator on the first floor. 10. The floor mat is missing from the south entry. 11. Drain in custodian's room does not work. 12. All exposed wood in the building should be finished. This includes painting the access doors to the crawl spaces. 13. There are pieces of wood form still in the basement ceiling. 14. I can see light around the door to the large basement room. 15. Although the meters in the basement are numbered, Dr. Curtin does not know which number corresponds to which space. 16. The doors to the electric room and water room are not installed as per the drawings. 17. Knob is missing to water room heater. 18. There are smoke alarms throughout the building still covered with plastic. This requires immediate atteationl 19. I was unable to find the light switch to the crawl space under Dr. St. Pierre's space. The light was on. 20. The door to the elevator room is not hung properly. 21. The door to the vertical mechanical shaft is not properly installed and lacks hardware. As per previous discussions, I recommend you secure approval from the Building Inspector as to his requirements. 22. Many of the lobby doors are not tightly installed and may need to be rehung or adjusted. 23. The window sills in the unfinished spaces have not been installed. 24. Wind bracing for the windows has not been provided as per our previous sketches. 25. The exterior concrete is still unacceptably finished, particularly at the South Entry. There are some other items that seem to be escaping the paperwork process. I need written response on the following items: 1. Change orders 6 through 10. 2. The status of the ladder to the roof. 3. The status of the gate to the basement. 4. A list of any deductions to the contract. Further, as we are approaching conclusion, we need to know the status of the Waivers of Lien from your subcontractors. I am also enclosing a copy of the Building Punch List from Crossfield Engineering, although I assume you also have a copy. These items must also be addressed. I trust that this will help speed matters to a favorable conclusion for all parties. incere y, Statler W. Gilfillen, AIA Enclosure cc: Mr. Ralph Camelengro Dr. Patrick Curtin Mr. Alexander Nossiff Mr. William Quinn SWG/b CROSSFIELD ENGINEHiUNG.WC. BUILDING PUNCH LIST 12/11/1987 Project : 100 Highland Park Salem, MA Our Proj . No. — 2686 Electrical Items 1 . Telephone back panels are not installed as originally shown. 2. Switch covers and receptacle plates are not installed in various areas . HVAC Items 1 . The return register for the second floor common area is not yet installed. 2. The toilet exhaust for the second floor Lav and janitors Closet is not ducted or wired. 3. The elec . heater in the second floor Lav needs fan balancing. 4. The inlets , outlets and controls for the Basement ventil . system has to be installed. This system was not installed in accordance with the original plans and specifications but does meet minimum ventilation requirements . 5. Ceiling plenum returns will not be acceptable for tennant revisions because of the presence of Romex wiring above the ceilings in the suites . Plumbing and Fire Protection Items 1 . The plastic cover for the fire extinguisher cabinet in the second floor corridor is damaged and should be replaced. . 2. The fire extinguishers are a very tight fit in the cabinets and are not removed with ease. This situation should be confronted and resolved immediately. 3. The piping penetrations in the second floor Lav and janitors Closet exceed the diameter of the pipe . Larger escutcheon plates should be installed. 4. The waste and vent piping for the first floor suite adjacent to Colby Street has not been installed as of yet . 5. Valve tags and pipe markers were not installed. 6 . There was no storm water system installed as originally shown. FN: 008784 CKOSSMLD ENGWEENNG,WC. y . BUILDING PUNCH LIST 01/04/1988 Project : 100 Highland Park Salem, MA Our Proj . No. - 2666 HVAC Items 1 . Basement ventilation system does not operate and the wire connections to the step-down transformer for this system are bare . 2. The toilet exhaust for the second floor Lav and Janitors Closet does not operate . 3. The control knob for the heater in the Basement water room is missing. 4. The fan blade. on the heater in the Common Area Toilet hits the face cover . 5. The thermostat in the second floor corridor has paint all over it and operates roughly. We feel it should be replaced. 6 . There is ductwork insulation missing on access panels and elbows up to units on the roof . if these portions are not insulated the ductwork will sweat during the air conditioning mode and discolor the ceiling tiles . 7 . We are concerned that there is no ladder to the roof for servicing and maintenance of the HVAC units . Plumbing and Fire Protection Items 1 . The waste and vent piping for the first floor suite adjacent to Colby Street has not been installed as of yet . 2 . The pump in the Basement is not accessible for inspection or servicing. The contractor should address this . 3 The discharge e ump in the ment pears thewronpiping gdirection. pThe contractor eshould po address this . FN: 0OW4 STATLER GILFILLEN ARCHITECTS, INC. ARCHITECTURE HISTORIC PRESERVATION URBAN DESIGN PLANNING January 15, 1988 Dr. Patrick Curtin 100 Highland Avenue Realty Trust :yi J 66 Loring Avenue Salem, MA 01970 Dear Pat, v> Because there seems to be a great deal of confusion regarding the specifics of what the toilet requirements are for both the Plumbing Code and the Access Code, I am attempting here to clarify why we designed the building as we did. The first issue is that your building's Permits for Construction were received before March, 1987. Most of our design and construction work was complete by February, 1986. In design of the building at the time of pulling a Building Permit, it is my understanding the following Codes, which we used, were in effect and governed our work: 1. 248 CMR 1.00 — 7.00, Fuel Gas and Plumbing Codes, Compiled as in Full Force and Effect December 31, 1984 2. 521 CMR Architectural Barriers Board, Compiled and in Full Force and Effect March 31, 1985 Please note that both Codes were changed in July, 1987. When the plans were submitted, the Building Inspector took no exception to our work. The issue of further clarification arose from him when it was discovered that the first floor toilet had been omitted. As you know, this was done in negotiation between you and Welch Construction Company. Those 48 items were not provided to the Building Inspector at the time of pulling Building Permits, as should have been done. Because you have received so many different opinions from different officials concerning acceptability, I can only refer you to the following: 1. According to 780 CMR, Section 204.0, you are a Use Group B, Business Building. (See attached.) ......�.o«� m,nnLrrON.MA.01949 16171777.7978 2. The building we designed was based on a speculative office building that would have net rentable space. Final 1 ownership structure was not an issue in our design program. 3. Section 2.10(e) CMR of the Plumbing Code (section attached) e our was the Curtin's staff has aThe npeakrload of 591 including. ) . the doctor. (b) Dr. Nersasian and Dr. Montaldo have a peak staff load of 5, including the doctors. (c) Dr. St. Pierre and Dr. Kazes have a peak load of 5, including the doctors. This brings the peak load requirements for the doctors' offices to 15, including the doctors themselves. Given the nature of their practices and the space constraints, this is unlikely to change in the forseeable future. The following are the plumbing fixtures are being provided per office: Dr. Curtin's office: 2 toilet rooms with a toilet and lavatory in each 8 lavatories in operatories 1 lavatory in kitchenette Dr. Nersasian's and Dr. Montaldo's office: 1 toilet room with toilet, lavatory and shower 5 lavatories in operatories 1 lavatory in kitchenette 1 double basin sink in laboratory 1 sink in dark room Dr. St. Pierre's and Dr. Kazes' office: 2 toilet rooms with toilet and lavatory in each 1 sink in dark room 1 lavatory in kitchenette Further, there is a second floor lobby, 30' door—to—door from Dr. Nersasian's and Dr. Montaldo'a suites, which has one toilet and one lavatory. Our interpretation of the Plumbing Codes indicates that we are well within the limits of the requirements as outlined under the Codes. The second issue regards the Architectural Barriers Board. The governing sections of the Code, at the time Welch Construction pulled the Building Permit, were Section 13, Health Institutions and Section 30, Public Toilet rooms. The following were our considerations: 1. In our programing of the building we we told by the doctors that the toilets in their space were strickly for themselves and their staff. At no time did they intend on having the public use their toilets. The public was to use the facilities in the common space. 2. If the unrented spaces required a different configuration to meet the code, they would be designed accordingly as they became rented. 3. Under Section the building is a facility in which medical services and treatment are provided. Section 13.3 requires that "where toilet rooms are provided, at least one water closet and one lavatory must be accessible." We interpret this to mean that because "health institutions or facilities are buildings", the accessible toilet in the building fully meet the requirements. Since—the-gross square footage of the building is approximately }1200,sq..ft4 the maximum distance any person requiring a barrier free toilet would be required to travel, including interior suite hallways, is under 75 feet. The Average distance to a barrier free toilet would be aproximately 35 feet. Nowhere under the Code were we able to find a distance requirement. 3. Section 30, Public Toilet Rooms allows that "an accessible, private lavatory usable by either sex" is the preferable situation, which is why we allowed for a unisex toilet adjacent to the Lobby. It was our intent to meet both the spirit and the intent of the codes that were in force at the time we were designing the building. I trust that this will clarify the issues. ' E W. Gilfillen, AIA Enclosure SWG/b cc Quinn Fleming Nossiff 750 CMR: STATE BUILDING CODE COWUSSION SECTION 204.0 USE GROUP B, BUSINESS BUILDINGS ` 204.1 General: AB buildings and structures,which hall be classified In the business ( B ) use grouphich are used for Walls- action of business for the rendering of professional services, or for other services that Involve stocks of goods, mares or merchandise in limited quantities for use Incidental to office uses or similar Purposecourthouses among others offices, banks, civic administration activities, oan utpatient ntsbasispolicwhiichodo notfharborlservicepatintssovernlghtclinics Petestingrated nand research laboratories, radio stations, telephone exchanges, motor fuel service stations and similar establishments. 204.2 Regulations guide: The following listing contained in Table 204.2 is a guide to the principal requirements of this code applicable nor use group B, business buildings. They are not necessarily the only, of er encestopanyslons with which provision hall not npullifyeis any rrequlirement�saion of�s code, nor exempt any structure from ouch requirement. Table 204.2 BUSINESS BUILDINGS REGULATIONS GUIDE Types of construction: •—•: Construction classi6calion 214.0 Mixed use and occupants 213.0 Historic buildings 436.0 Molm fuel seance stations 415.0 Open parking structures 429.0 High rise buildings 431.0 _ Allowable area: General area limitations 3054 Area exceptions 306.0 Subdivision of allic spaces 875.9 Unlimited area buildings 307.0 Allowable heighl: General height limdalions 305.0 Height exceptions 308,0 fire separations: fire walls and party walls 901.0 fire separation walls 909.0 Eterator opening protectives Article 16 IAutomatic bre duals and dampers 903.0 Mixed use and occupancy 213.0 Vertical shall$910 0 Poeesislance rated hoorlfool assemblies 9124 Ederior wall protection: _ [lielior walls 906.0 lienor opening Droledires 911.0 Glating at unprotected opeoiAg$1902.0 fire limit ferfurrements: Restrictions within lite limits 302.0 I Restrictions outside life limits 303.0 , pool structures 925.0 fiferesislance: Rte hatard classification 902.0 firefesislance tells 903.0 Rool coverings 903.3 Opening protectives 903.4 86 9/1/80 _...... •••� �, rwmntnS AND GAS I17T[RS 248 [MR: BOARD OF SIAIL C%AY.IK TABLE 3 2.10: continued FIxTURES REQUIRED IN DORMITORIES (r) Other rstabllshmrnt Occu •an Re uiremrnts. In every esuD- lishment, except n ustrte seta us ant an esubhshmenu where one (1) person Is empinyed or works• plLubing fixtures shall be toilet for each eight (8) occupants or provided aiihin reasonabie access and in accordance with Table 4 in -mals may be substituted for pone halfpNe p 1�e<'o�( 24B CMR 2.10. where two (2) or more persons are employed or work, separate waterclOseu and lavatories, plainly marked, shall be d on the basis of one (1) urinal substituted for one provided for each sex. The mrinum number of plumbing fixtures washbasin !o: each eight (B) occupants or for each sex shall be determined by the maximum number of persons portion of that sex which has access to such facilities at any Ume. hover or bathtub for each eight (8) Occupants or portion TABLE A. with shore than One (1) toilet, each toilet shall be saps- p1U!MEI%G TIMMES IMQUIREO or partitions which afford privacy. FOR NOR-LIMUSTRIALEEC�LIpUK-ES OF AS�LYS)ORS ARE E PLOTED :ower and handw�ash facilities shall be accessible from ilding and shall be so placed as; to not require passing art of another dwelling unit or toonp urdt. Riniata %vber undry tray for each fifty (50) persons. personsof ainisus xusber lop sink for each one hundred (If10) persons. Each Sea of Yater Closets' of Lrstoties ifrtnkinp fountain for each seventy-fwe (75) 1-15 1 1 . -- persons. .--. - _ . 16=35 2 _.`3 . . 36-55 3 C 3 TABLE 3A 56- 710 3, 6 .TURES REQUIRED 711-150 4 IN DETENTION FACILITIES It... than 200. One (1) per i0 additional persons. id linedwesh sink In each cell In which a person 15 locked ' Mete: where urinals are provided for s,S and womv, one (1) .&ter >7 a twenty-four (24) hour day. closet leu than the nuobes pecitsed tad say he provided for tart urinal shall De connected to the hot and cold water systems. installed, except that tae nutter of .&ter closets in such o um ividua/ facilities are not raqu[red by ntletber One above, saQl sot be reduced to leas char, two-thirds (2/3) of the ■ioisns one (1) toilet and one (1) handwash sink for each six specified. Urinals sway be substituted for one third (1/3) of the re- tlets. L be ane (1) shower or bathtub for each six (6) Inmates. (f) Tocation of Facilities. In every establishment where only one (1) person Is amp o� y�-or works, one (1) water closet and one (1) lavatory for use of its tenent shall be provided within a reasonable distance, not to exceed three hundred (300) feet. In all other establishments• toilet facilities shall be located within the premises and shall not be accessible from an adjcir;_,g establishment. (g) }trim ur.. racilities for Accred:led Ba:hin Beaches. The num- ber o p in ixtures require or sec sex at sn G"1.w.ited bathing beach shall be In eotnpliance with Table 5 In 248 CMR 2.10. TABLE Y FLMMI%G FIrrURES REWIRED JUDLSTRIAL LSTABLISIOUM Risistw limber Iliaisus Rusbet Tenons of Sack fes of Vater Closets Persons of East, bee of Lvatories 1- to 1 1- is I 11- 25 2 16- 35 I 26- so 3 36- 60 ` St- 75 4 61- to 76-100 S 11-125 IF 101-Iso 7 151-200 6 (lore tLe 200 ane (1) per 2s More tbao 125 ova (1) Par additional persons additional persons *)lots - Where urinals are provided, one water closet less than tht =her her specified say be provided let each urinal ioaralled, --rapt that the susber of water closets is sucb a use shall not be reduced les, than two-thirds (2/3) of tus ■inisus specified. Vol. 11 - 72 12/31/81 Vol. 11 - 72.1 i PUBLIC TOILET ROOMS 30 30.1 accessible natast one io wheelchairs,e or lan accessible Private lavatory, usable by either sex, shall be provided. I 30,2 Where vestibules are provided, they shall comply with Section 26.3. disawtor 30.3 twelve mum cl nchaaeabove$the floor (topermit turn ng of a wheeelcha r without coming into contact with any fixtuna or plumbing), $hall be provided in each toilet room. lavatory or sink shall be wall-mounted without legs or pedsstal at 30.4 One ---- a height of thirty-two (32) inches to the top of the rim or counter, and shall extend at least twenty-two (22) Inches from the wall; or may be a counter type with clear eveo(21)"inch" In height to space of thirty (the inches in width and at least twenty bottom of the counter. Exposed drain pipes and hot water pipes shall be recessed, insulated or guarded. Knob type faucets are not allowed, and spring activated faucets are allowed only if water-running time is at least ten (10) seconds. Laver handle faucets are preferred. Such faucets shall be operable with a closed fist. 30.5 Toilet stalls: Each toilet roan shall have at least one (1) stall which: 30.5.1 Is sixty (60) inches wide and seventy-two (72) Inches AM; 30.5.2 has a door or openin that is thirty-six (36) inches wide, swings out or slides, and has an automatic self-closing hinge device and a pull device to all in closing the door, provides of eighteen (18) inches of clear space on the latch pullside d(36) the door, and has a lock located apProximately thirty-six provided at a inches above the floor. A coat hook shall be P maximum height of fifty-four (54) inches above the floor; 30.5.3 locates f eacloset teen 8nafrom Maiainethe thefixtureto the nearest Side wll; Maintains t least forty-two (42) inches clear space, measured from can- terllns of water closet to the farthest wall or other has hat has a narrow understructure that recedes sharply, andseventeen (I1) to nineteen (19) inch" above the floor, to the toptop of�se_st• 52t CMR-55 12/31/86 6 FgG1L �3 HEALTH INSTITUTION ITIES� medical y0ryiu in which be limited , • buildings byt end drug d��* or facilities arinall inUude, doetara provide institutions snd sanatoriums. a1rA aslth via.d• M 13.1 ur trosion tis P dental offices, which on. or above. clinics. s In any the hospitals, building vided by y and be ification canters, and similar to those Pro health serv'lw revid•d, all bedur inches• . AL care is P (2) Per 1100 which' inpatient medial sof at I•ast thirty' a shall have bath' When r openingminimum of tr+n. 13.1 l5i), s with bathroom shall he clear goo action 30 or 32• least frve Peru o1 bedroom' th 5 one aster, sccorwrs r cleast and roamsis ful y accessible in. onto rovidsd' at least ons When filet rooms a$i P floor wet be 13.3 must be scsassible. Avided, at least one Per IevamrY 11.4 Whe Showers or tubs a trasint rooms, and waiting or visiting ere" acce"ib All III j�these Regu�d0ns. 13.! must compW �4 PLA'GES OF ASSEMBLY and fifty 0 hundred re than One auditoriums.jy with a capacity of e . Iv.with limited W and shall limned to include but not W etc•,• Places of asvmb ytadiums.1e�uan9 � dreesing 14.1 S0) p0nonsY^ahails. arenas, areas. 0 areae. Isct APpurtanant bKSlbla. sir'Regulations. sating, sc+9es0 acres that ticket o��cs�ee moms shall also be that shall M lobbies, and 9 for spaces le in section ryuns, showers number Of spac`'a th0 pb qc The. minimum in accordance with and shall be aMsPa60) Nll� shall be cow I level 14.2bu!ese gayYlations. spa shall b' In lieu of Each a Chir y-sis(36) inches unfastened and rsmpvsd SPA'CE'. and thirty' which can be readily 14.3 intra long ting w sections of used sM may ba PfOvidad, 1 CMR':B RALCO CONSTRUCTION GENERAL CONSTRUCTION CUSTOM BOMES Ralph R. Camerlemgo ConstraetWn Consultant 13 Jeff US=Street Management-Overseer LYnn, MA 01902 (617) 593-U" DAILY REPORT DECEMBER 28 1987 - JANUARY 8 1988 Monday, December 28, 1987 - Clear, 29 No activity on exterior. Dry wall and taping ongoing on fust and second floor suites. I have pointed out the many imperfections to the dry wall contractors and explained to him the proper process. Electrical ongoing in R.N. suite. Cabinet and counter installation ongoing as is door and frame installation. Paper hanging in common area ongoing first and second. Bullnose on stairways ongoing and near completion. Curtain suite goes into formal operation this day. The walled island at Curtain office has been wallpapered to hide drywall Imperfections. The contractors charges are to be deducted off the General Construction G.M.P. - Tuesday, December 19, 1987 - Snow, 11 No exterior activity. No Welch activity anywhere. Counter/cabinets/electrical ongoing in R.N. tte on second. ?aping Bu and drywall completed to this point is begging for further attention. Conversation with P.C. indicates no progress On the lavatory situation - will research. Wednesday, December 30, 1987 - Clear, 3 Cabinets/counters/electrical ongoing on second floor. Drop telling in place 95%, ceiling fixtures now being pInstalled- l ng lchcpaintralls doing hand rails, doors and frames. and doors. Paper hanging to be completed in common areas this day. Thursday, .December 31, 1987 - Clear, 7 rop Cabinets/counters/electrical ongoing on second fed. Welchh Painters in place 95%, ceiling fixtures now being installed. doing hand rails, doors and frames. Carpenter installing chair rails and doors. Friday, January 1, 1988' No ActlVity GENERAL CONSTRUCTION RALCO CONSTRUCTION CUSTOM SOMIES Ralph R. Camerkmgo Comsbuction Conaultant 13 Jefferson Street Mawgemmt-Overseer Lynne MA 0190Z (617) 593-1448 YAl..v oranaT 12/28/87 - 1/8/88 _C�li!!�iQ. Tuesday, January S, 1988 - clear, 10 Painting ongoing in R.N. suite. office and Code Research. No older activity. Wednesday, January 6, 1988 - Clear, 17 First floor cleanup. Painting on second. No Welch activity. Thursday, January 7, 1.988 - Clear, 18 Discussed code for handicap. Left code information on site. Friday, January 8 1988 - Snow, 24 Painters closing down for day. Building shut down. . (All left early). Telecoms this week with Statler Gillfellin and Jim Fleming on code enforcement for lavatories. My research de the Massachusetts Building Code, State Plumbing Code, and the itshpresent layoutCisenotdinate, in my violation ofianyncodeedueitoithe ln date the permit wes pulled as opposed to the date the A.A.B. code went into effect. ,264M&O& S" Aoalvd Michael S. Dukakis �ne ��io worn �alace - Woow -1390 Governor Charles V. Barry � , ✓� 02908 Secretary (697> 727-0660 BOARD ARCHITECSUaA�- ACCERm 1310 Place, 02108 one Ashburton ' $� Boston, Massachu \� ;c7 � QQ �f e�Voa��za�nflleaL�f o��//Ga�.tac�eG�• e �� l9 &° a/ ARCHITECWP-R4�' a_R' BOARD �xecutcue (:� cce o u a et 1310 Ashburton mace, Rm. Ston, Massach usetts 02108 Michael S. Dukakis �R 80 1 Governor ( 'ire literlon lace - �ooax. 93 0 Ki d 1, %-A Charles V. Barry �a+tan. /�uae!!.: 02f08 Secretary (6f7) 727-0660 Voice & TDD APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE In accordance with M.C.L. , Chapter 22, Section 13A, I hereby apply for modification of or substitution for the rules and regulations of the Architectural Access Board as they apply to the facility described below on the grounds that literal compliance with the Board requlations is impracticable in my case. - 1. State the names and address of the owner of the building/facility: 100 Highl And Renlry Tr - 66 Loring AAtPnjjP, qnlpm, MA QILJ7g -- 2. State the name and address or other identification of the building/facility: 100 Highland Avenue, Salem, MA 3. Describe the facility: (number of floors, type of functions, etc. ) : Two floors with basement. Individual suites for three doctors, 4. Check the work performed or to be performed: X New construction Reconstruction, Alteration, Remodeling Addition Change of Use 5. Briefly describe the extent and nature of the work performed or to be performed: Construction of r ' I.Tlij .1j., and finishing of i„di..i'j„=h 6 suites. 6. State each section of the Rules and Regulations of the Architectural Access Board for which a variance is being requested. SECTION NUMBER DESCRIPTION 521 CMR 13.3 See Aooendix "A" 8. For each variance requested, state in 'detaiL the reasons why compliance with + the Board's regulations would not be practical. State the necessary cost of the work required to achieve compliance. (You should submit cost estimates detailing the amount of compliance) USE ADDITIONAL SHEETS IF NECESSARY. rS favSee Appmen ix "B" 9. Has a building permit been applied for? Yes. If yes, state the date the permit was issued: February 3. 1987 10. State the estimated cost of construction as stated on the building permit. $781,460.00 If a building permit has not been issued, state the anticipated construction cost: 11. Has a certificate of occupancy been issued for the facility? No. If yes, state the date: 12. State the actual assessed valuation of the BUILDING ONLY AS RECORDED IN THE ASSESSOR'S OFFICE of the municipality in which the building is located: $128,900.00. 13. State the phase of design or construction of the facility as of the date of this application: Core area 98% complete - 1 suite comp] eel _ 14. State the name and address of the architectural or engineering firm including the name of the individual architect or engineer responsible for preparing drawings of the facility: Statler Gilfillen ArrhiYartc T- 161 South Main Street, Middleton MA 01949 rawings submitted Nov. 23, 1987 to Board) TEL:(6T7) 777-7g7g 15. State the name and address of the building inspector responsible for overseeing this project: Stephen Santry Building TngneLor's nffi,. One Salem Green, Salem, MA 01970 PLEASE NOTE: The Board may, in its discretion, hold a hearing on your application for variance. The Board may also decide your application without a hearing, upon the information you submit. You should therefore, include all relevant information with your application. At minimum, the plans should include a site plan, all floor plans, elevations, sections and details. Photographs are extremely helpful. Date: December 8, 1987 SIGNATURE OF OWNER OR AUTHORIZED AGENT Patrick H. Curtin, Trustee PLEASE PRINT OWNER/AGENT'S NAME 100 Highland Realty Trust Appendix B Suite 1-2 Dr. Curtins Estimated cost of putting in new accessible bathroom $6000. 00 to $8000 .00 Estimated cost of redesign of suite to accommodate new bathroom $18 ,000 to $25 ,000 costs include Architectural, Plumbing, Electrical, Structural, Mechanical and finish of the suite. Suite 1-3 Drs. St. Pierre and Kases Estimated cost of new accessible bathroom $6000 . 00 to $8000 . 00 Estimated cost of redesign of suite to accommodate new bathroom to include Architectural, Electrical, Plumbing and structural redesign $13 , 000 to $18 ,000 Suite 2-3 Drs . Nersasian and Monaldo Estimated cost of new accessible bathroom $6000 . 00 to $8000 . 00 Estimated cost of redesign would be $30 ,000 to $35 ,000 to include Architectural, Plumbing, Electrical, Mechanical and Structural, plus related cost to finish redesigned suite. Appendix "A" In reference to health facilities or buildings, 521 CMR 13 . 3 provides as follows : "Where toilet rooms are provided, at least one water closet and one lavatory must be accessible. " In planning the building which is the subject of this variance request, the owner and the owner' s architect interpreted this provision to require one ( 1 ) accessible toilet facility in the building. The building was constructed with one ( 1 ) accessible toilet facility, ( see plans submitted) . On November 23 , 1987 , by virtue of 521 CMR 4 . 5 , the owner requested the Architectural Barriers Board for an advisory opinion relative to 521 CMR 13 . 3 . On November 30 , 1987 , the Board interpreted this section to require that, if the doctors provided toilet facilities in their individual suites, then one ( 1) toilet facility in each suite was required to be accessible. (No written opinion has been provided to the petitioners to date) . The doctors are providing for employee toilet facilities in their individual suites. As per the reasons set forth in Section 8 of this application, those toilet facilities are not accessible. Therefore, the owner petitions for this variance. 00192L OAK FIRE PROTECTION CORP . Automatic Sprinkler Systems P. 0. Box 2579 Woburn, Mass. 01888 Tel: (617) 944-1725 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN The Salem Fire Department has fully approved the Sprinkler System at 100 Highland, Salem, Mass. SALEM FIRE DEPARTMENT DATE / Theodore Rodes President. TR/e r z�T UFC 4 9 THE WELCH GROUP, INC. Er r =r CITY OP ;;;:LEH,MASS. December 18, 1987 Building Inspector City of Salem One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 Re: 100 Highland Avenue Medical Office Building Gentlemen: This letter shall serve to verify that the building at 100 Highland Avenue, Salem, Massachusetts is substantially constructed in accordance with plans and specifications , as provided by Barlow & Gilfillen Architects in conformance with Building Codes. Variations from these plans are detailed on a supplemental list (highlighted and attached) , dated April 28, 1987 . These items were agreed upon by the Contractor and Owner as cost saving alternatives and were submitted to the Architect for his review as to Code compliance . This supplemental list is submitted with the final drawing set for your review and approval . Respectfully submitted, Robert P. Buthmann Project Manager ez CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT • BUILDERS 15 FRONT STREET SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 (617) 745-7870 STATLER GILFILLEN ARCHITECTS, INC. ARCHITECTURE HISTORIC PRESERVATION URBAN DESIGN PLANNING Mr. William Monroe, Director of Public Property Public Property Department r 7 City of Salem One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 - TT December 18, 1987 RE: Medical Office Building - 100 Highland Avenue c:> Salem, MA _rf Dear Mr. Monroe, This letter is to inform you that we have made preliminary inspection of Dr. Curtain's Space in the Medical Office Building at One Hundred Highland Avenue in Salem. We find that the buildiing has been constructed substantially in accordance with the plans and specifications provided by this office and in accordance with the Building Code of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and the requirements of the City of Salem. Please note that there were 48 items which the owmer chose to delete from our original drawings in his negotiations with the contractor. These included the deletion of the first floor toilets. A copy of all 48 items is attached. Sincerely, / D ARC, y�S �lF Q� yy�N , Staler W. Gilfillen, AIA 1 138 z 3: AMILIUN• 1- Enclosure > MASE. Oy�F cc: Patrick Curtin q(TH OF 0'SP4�J Alexander Nossiff William Quinn Joseph Stanley Arthur Tocci SWG/b BRAY WILKINS BUILDING, 161 SOUTH MAIN STREET MIDDLETON,MA.01949 (617)777-7978 STATLER W.GILFILLEN, MEMBER OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS STATLER GILFILLEN ARCHITECTS, INC. ARCHITECTURE HISTORIC PRESERVATION URBAN DESIGN PLANNING Mr. William Monroe, Director of Public Property Public Property Department City of Salem One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 December 11, 1987 RE: Medical Office Building 100 Highland Avenue Salem, MA Dear Mr. Monroe, This letter is to inform you that we have made preliminary inspection of the public spaces in the Medical Office Building at One Hundred Highland Avenue in Salem. We find that the buildiing has been constructed substantially in accordance with the plans and specifications provided by this office and in accordance with the Building Code of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and the requirements of the City of Salem. Please note that there were 48 items which the owmer chose to delete from our original drawings in his negotiations with the contractor. These included the deletion of the first floor toilets. A copy of all 48 items is attached. Si rely, Statler W. Gilfillen, AIA G\s EI) aR°yil 1 -- Enclosure - Z N Y, ILTON. cc: Patrick Curtin V, ASS, Jy Alexander William Quinn nnyhFq<Ty OF MNSSP4� Joseph Stanley Arthur Tocci SWG/b BRAY WILKINS BUILDING, 161 SOUTH MAIN STREET MIDDLETON,MA.01949 (617)777-7978 STATLER W.GILFILLEN, MEMBER OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS HIGHLAND PARK April 28, 1987 1 . An allowance of $2,000.00 shall be included for the installation of a sign at a location as may be determined at a later date. 2. Landscaping allowance shall include the furnishing and spreading of all loam. Furnishing and installing all shrubs, flowers, bushes or trees, and furnishing and installing automatic irrigation system. The allowance shall be $150000.00 3 . Foundation drainage shall be as detailed on the drawings, however , shall extend only around the perimeter of the habitable basement areas, as well as under the floor slab of the habitable basement as shown on the drawings by Barlow 6 Gilfillen,Architects . 4 . Curb at retaining wall . The concrete bumper curb shown on typical retaining wall detail k ', SD - 2 is deleted. 5 . Retaining wall . The retaining wall North- westerly side of the site, as detailed in typical retaining wall section sheet 1 SD-2 a,Q will be deleted. In its stead will be an allowance of $2,000 .00 to cover the costs of whatever work may be required. 6 . Crawlspace slab. The slab in the crawlspace as well as vapor barrier and, meshr shall be deleted. The crawl space shall be left in a rough graded manner and covered with 4' of gravel . 7 . Delete 1 door @ storage. This item involves the deletion of one door as well as accompanying frame and hardware into an area of the basement entitled basement. and E 2. in general , the items Lu U will be the furnishing and installation and exhaust fans (noted as EF 2) , ductwork, louvers,. unit heaters, (noted as uA 1) . humidistatst nd area ways as miscellaneous hangers, wiring shown on typical section entitled •area way.' .9 . Area ways delete 4 and change 2 This provision includes the installation of metal area way retainers as normally utilized in residential construction for the use with the exhaust fans for the habitable basement area. Both of these would be located along 5 line. other areaways have been deleted in the preceeding item. 10 . Wall bumpers. Delete all oak wall bumpers as shown on drawing A 16 as well as all backing for the bumpers. 1 . 11 . Eliminate 1st floor toilet and Janitors closet. Delete in its entirety the first floor toilet and janitors closet. This change includes the deletion of all plumbing, electrical drywall , flooring and ceiling as specified for those two rooms. The space shall be finished with carpet flooring and continuation of a 2 x 2 ceiling as shown on thshall be provided reflected ceiling plan. Lighting with 2 *pcs. of 2 x 2 drop in lights . Fixtures shall be included within the lighting allowance. 12 . Eliminate canopy. This change includes the elimination of the canopy in its entirety with the exception of the caissons for the canopy which have already been installed. 13 . Substitute Conc. for tile @ plaza This change incorporates the utilization of broom finish concrete sidewalks at the entry to the building and the deletion of all references to tile in that area. The ., area approximately 18 ' square which forms the corner of the building shall receive no concrete and shall be left to be finished with landscaping. The cost of the landscaping shall be included within land- scape allowance. 14 . Substitute lobby tile w/carpet This change includes the installation of carpet along the main corridor on first floor . The carpet strip shallbe approximately 6 ' 9' wide. The tile shall only be included as shown on 1/4" first floor plan drawing A 14 between column lines " 1 CO and '20. and 'AC" and 'B' . 16 . .Eliminate mechanical roof screen This item includes the elimination of mechanical roof screen in its entirety including all penetrations for roof. 17. Slope steel for drainage @ roof This item will not be utilized. Pitch for drainage shall be the minimum allowed by the roofing manufacturer and shall be accomplished by utilization of tapered insulation . The tapered insulation shall meet the require- ments of the State Building Code. 18 . Substitute asphalt shingles for standing seam metal roof. This item allows for the substitution of 215 lb. fiberglass asphalt shingles in lieu of the standing seam metal roof . 19 . Substitute fir for cyprus. This item allows the substitution of fir for cyprus on exterior woodwork . 20 . Substitute Kane Gonic brick w/$325 allowance This item allows a $325.00 per 11000 allowance for the purchase of a standard size brick to. be selected by the architect. The allowance cost includes brick purchased f .o.b. *job site and all sales tax. .i , 21 . Substitute Cronolite This estimate is based upon utilization of windows manufactured by Closure Co. of •.Woburn, Mass. , or equal. ✓ 22 . Drapery Pocket (incl. decrease in window size) This item provides for the deletion of the drapery pocket as shown in details H 11 H 2, and H 3 on A-12 and also allows for the reduction in height by approximately 15 ' of all exterior windows. This will allow for the ceiling to run directly into the top of the window frame as the drywall presently shows doing in detail H-1 on A 12 . 23 . Change plywood to gyp sheathing Delete all references to utilization of 1/2' CDX plywood sheathing and utilize 1/2' exterior grade gypsum sheathing in its place. 1/2' CDX plywood shall be utilized in' areas with wood siding. 24 . Eliminate extended head at window and substitute for breakmetal column closure . V. All breakmetal in the project shall be replaced with the appropriate adjacent exterior ., �-o. ; ni This being either brick or window shall be deleted . Precast 'concrete panels. The exterior precast concrete panels shown on drawings shall be deleted and replaced with masonry. 26 . Simplify window flashing (reinforced fabric) Details. and notes on drawing A 11 regarding window flashing shall be eliminated and a fabric thru-wall window flashing or aluminum window flashing recommended by the manufacturer shall be utilized instead. 27 . Revise Head b Sill detail @ Window. Structural channels- shown on details S 4 on drawing and A 12, H 1 on on drawing A 12, H 2 on drawing A 12, and S2 on A 12,' S3 on drawing A 12 and H3 on drawing A 12 shall be deleted. Windows shall be mounted directly to 6 ' metal studs . 28 . Simplify handrail (mill work ) sq. oak Detail E /A 13 shown for wood rail section shall be revised. New detail shall be the same size oak with easen corners but without the 1/2' rabbit. Fastening of the oak shall be to a flat plate recessed into the bottom of the oak by approximately 1/2' and there shall be no wood plug in-fill on the bottom of the oak. 29 . Simplify Detail H on A 13 . At the atrium rail, detail shall be changed as follows: 1. the channel iron and 20 gauge closure shall be deleted. 2 . concrete floors shall extendout to within 1/2' of the face of the gypsum 3 . the gypsum wall board shall run up to the top of the concrete floor . 4 . the railing shall have a piece of flat stock on the bottom and shall be attached to the concrete floor expansion bolts . 5 . Stairs - 20 gauge closure piece wrapping the channel shall be deleted and the channel painted to match the stairs . 30 . Substitute timber blocking @ 2nd fl . ( incl . edge form) Section 28-28 on drawing S 10 shall be revised as follows: continuous timber blocking shall be deleted. Light gauge continuous metal angle shall be utilized as the concrete stop. The concrete shall stop short of brick work . from the sprinkler system as well as related wiring. 32. F.D. connection on wall (replace Simese F.S. ) The Fire Department connection shown .:as free standing shall be replaced with a wall mounted connection.onnection. 33 . Less expensive double check valve Allow substitution for a less expensive double check valve. 34 . Review sprinkler line tester requirements Delete in excess of those required by code or local fire department regulations. 35 . Substitute semi recessed sprinkler heads for full recessed heads 36 . Move gas piping to exist chase This change involves the relocation of gas mains in the building from chase at approximately 1 A and C line into the existing chase at approximately 3 B line and deletion of the extra drywall partition which would be required by the chase at 1 A and C line. 37 . 10 ' base @ parking lot lighting Revise the parking light base from that shown to a 5 ' deep x 16' diameter concrete base. 38 . Lighting Allowance of 8 ,000 An allowance of $8 ,000 .00 shall be included within the contract for the purchase and delivery fob to the jobsite of all lighting fixtures. Includes all interior ,as well as exterior fixtures. 39 .Revise Finish Hardware An allowance of $3,800 shall be included for all door hardware . 40 . Bit Conc. thickness 3' to 2 1/2' This item includes the change of bituminous concrete thickness from 3' to 2 1/2" . Also includes deletion of tack- coat and weed killer installation . 41 . Delete Bit Conc. Berm All bituminous concrete berm shall be deleted and landscaping graded down to the edge of the bituminous concrete. as the connection of roof leaders into uiC storm system as shown on the civil engineering drawings: In lieu of roof drains and roof leaders, roof shall be pitched to the exterior of the building and aluminum scuppers added to the gravel stop. At locations where the drainage of water directly axed the ground below from the stop, ( sidewalk and p areas ) may be hazardous, -an aluminum rain leader shall be installed down to grade and will either drain onto a concrete splash box or extend down with the use of PVC pipe, below grade to the foundation drain system. 43 . Delete water pipe insulation 44 . Delete door buzzer system Delete the door buzzer system in its entirety . 45 . Use Alternates # El and E2 Alternates # E 1 and # E 2 as 'detailed in the electrical section specifications shall be incorporated within this contract. 46 . Go to overhead electrical service Delete all references to installation of an underground service and transformer . The service shall be brought into the building via overhead cables. 47 . Delete stave core solid doors and substitute solid core particle doors. 48 . All tenant finishes including ceilings, floors, paint, mechanicals, etc. for 1st and 2nd floor is included in the allowance only. Additional clarifications: (within contract --documents) All for the tenant finishes for the 3 suites presently contemplated is included in this price. The .allowance :includes all -.costs including the general conditions and -fees associated with the completion of the tenant finishes. The contract is based upon the deletion of supplementary and special us by -Barlow & Gilfillen in their. original specification conditions as provided contract. This contract sum is based upon the requirement for a general bond as provided in the contract documents provided by Barlow & Gilfillen being waived. Should a general performance and payment bond be required, there shall be an additional cost to the project . Pricing is based upon the ability of The Welch Grotrequired on utilize all onsite fill in any backfilling operations the site. The contract does not include any provisions for dealing with any hazardous wast or materials which may be encountered during the course of construction. This contract does not include the cost for testing and any additional architectural/engineering services which may be required. This Contract does not include the cost of Gas Company or Utility Company backcharges. Builders Risk Insurance is to be provided and paid for by the owner. RALCO CONSTRUCTION GENERAL CONSTRUCTION Ralph R. Camerlengo CUSTOM HOMES 13 Jefferson Street Construction Consultant Lynn, MA 01902 Management - Overseer (617) 593-T448 DAILY REPORT NOVEMBER 30, 1987 - DECEMBER 11, 1987 Monday, November 30, 1987 - Rain Overcast, 440 Landscape areas at North and N. East Corner cleanup and rough grading, ongoing. Aluminum trim at base (Mitre corners) are completed and not acceptable. T.&G. good trim installation not completed and to include; between all windows, the corners at the slant roof. Two tapers on board on second floor in Suite 5. Two Plumbers in lower crawl space tieing in vents, drains, and supply to rental suites. Welch forming up for box outs at column bases in basement. Two electricians on second floor suite, rough wiring. Three Painters on .board in common area stairwells. Gas Company on board relocating Gas Manifold and meters to inside large basement storage room. Target date for city inspection of P. Curtin suite and common area is set for Friday, December 4, 1987- After a discussion with Bob Uva, we both agree these two areas won't be available. Tuesday, December 1, 1987 - Clear, 570 T. & G. exterior trim completion ongoing. Ridge vent in place. P. Curtin on board, one Electrician, two Tapers, three Painters, one Plumber. No Welch supervision. Progress minimal, no heavy concentration in areas needed for occupancy. Wednesday, December 2, 1987 - Rain, 390 No actively on exterior. No change in progress in the interior. No Welch supervision. Concrete bumpers will start late this day. Thursday, December 3, 1987 - Clear, 380 Drop ceiling in Curtin suite, 98% complete. Sprinkler drops need fitting to ceiling elevation. No fitters on board. Closet ceilings not started. Painters in common area and Curtin suite. RALCO CONSTRUCTION GENERAL CONSTRUCTION Ralph R. Camerlengo CUSTOM HOMES 13 Jefferson Street Construction Consultant Lynn, MA 01902 Management -Overseer (617) 593-2448 DAILY REPORT - 11/30-12/11/87 CONTINUED Thursday, December 3, 1987 Continued Gas meter relocation will be completed this day. Plant heaters now operating. General activity has increased but not concentrated on priority area's. Parking lot bumper installation completed. Sanding and stain removal on T&G wood trim ongoing. There will not be a city inspection on the morrow. No Welch supervision. Friday, December 4, 1987 - Rain, 380 Gas installation completed and operating. All electrical junction boxes in basement need covers. The panels need switch identification. The pumproom (fire) and sprinkler mains need flow direction arrows and valve tags. Water marks still visible at areas previously noted. (See *) All smoke alarms in basement not completed (wiring and uncovering). Wall penetration (all) need closing. No dry wall painting in basement completed. Concrete slab at boxed out columns and threshold need flashing. Drop ceiling in stair landings ongoing. Sanding and taping on second floor ongoing. Large areas of dry wall are being over sanded. Many warnings have been issued. The bottom finish edge of T&G wood exterior trim at South West corner needs trimming out. Rug installlation started this day in Curtin suite. Monday, December 7, 1987 - Clear, 400 T&G wood trim between windows being stained. T&G wood walls in process of being stripped and sanded. This never ending process is ongoing. No action to correct unacceptable aluminum mitred corners. No change in basement conditions. Fire door buck needs caulking. Elevator pumproom floor covered with black oil. (Needs cleaning).' Water marks showing as previously noted, etc. etc. Dry wall ongoing in the second floor suite (closing). Rug installation in Curtin's suite ongoing. Plumbers in lav's. Finish paint has been applied to walls. Many taping imperfections are now visible. Electric, plumbing and fire wiring not completed. No sills in place, closet ceilings not done, wallpaper not started. No further advance in common area's (not complete), elevator not tested. (No permit to operate.) RALCO CONSTRUCTION GENERAL CONSTRUCTION Ralph R. Camerlengo CUSTOM HOMES 13 Jefferson Street Construction Consultant Lynn, MA 01902 Management -Overseer (617) 593-2448 DAILY REPORT — 11/30-12A'/87 CONTINUED Tuesday, December 8, 1987- Clear, 400 Tuesday's report reflects minimal progress from Monday. Owner equipment brought to site. Activity progressed to approximately 11:30 p.m. Fran on board. Wednesday, December 9,1987-Clear, 460 Painters on T&G wood exterior staining all areas. Rug installation 99% complete in Curtin suite. Closet ceilings ongoing. Panel wiring ongoing. Wallpaper to start this day. Lav's nearing completion, fixtures. Doctor's equipment spread out. Pull wire for alarms and security. Wood trim now installed. Heavy concentration in Curtain suite. Thursday, December 10, 1987-Clear, 510 Wallpaper in reception room, lav and front room completed. Electric, plumbing, security work ongoing in Curtin suite. Counter and cabinet installed in private lay. There will not be a city inspection tomorrow due to the essentials needed not being completed. Friday, December 11, 1987-Rain, 450 Met at site at 9:30 a.m. with Statler Gillfellin, W.W. Welch Project Manager, and Superintendent to tour the complete site find compile a "punch" list. See cover sheet. RALCO CONSTRUCTION GENERAL CONSTRUCTION Ralph R. Camerlengo CUSTOM HOMES 13 Jefferson Street Construction Consultant Lym, MA 01902 Management -Overseer (617) 593-2448 Friday, December 11, 1987-Rain, 450 At site to compile punch list ##1 Attendees on tour; Statler Gillfellin Bob Uva W.W.W. Bob Bothman - W.W.W. Second Floor Window Leaks - Suite 4, N.E. Corner, Store Front Solid care wood door, rough finish. Roof scuttle has factory prime paint. No ladder installed for roof access. Smoke alarms covered over. Atrium Area Elevator not accessible due to state testing. No rug on elevator floor. Painting not complete from bottom to top. (Blatant holidays, roller laps, splatters, over paintingon steel stringers.) Smoke alarms covered over. _Eire extinguisher cover (plastic) broken. Sill wood trim not finished (varnish). Nicks, gouges, over sanding of drywall plaster, generally poor workmanship in plastering. Concrete stairs, (all), all concrete areas to be covered by rug need; serious. flashing and grinding (holes in concrete, open areas). Presently patched depressions need grinding. Touch up all scratched brown aluminum trim thtruout building. No final cleanup of any finished area's. Second lavatory (public) oversized penetrations for piping at sink and in slop room. Electrical outlet in column, on first floor, plate not covering box cutout. Same column, rework ceiling track and tile around column. Basement landing; concrete walls at stairs show honeycomb, cold joint, extremely rough surface. Basement interior concrete walls show protuding form ties, bits of forms still in place. General condition of all walls are rough. Slab on grade between main room and entrance at threshold and at column box outs very rough and depressed. At North wall, water leaking down walls. Screws missing from various door hinges thruout. No paint on doors or bucks. No caulking around fire door frame. (See Note) Smoke alarms covered over. Electrical junction boxes have no covers, exposed wiring at smoke alarm. Grease and oil on elevator pump room floor. All wall penetrations need closing, stopping. Floor drain in fire room stopped up. No identification tags on all valves, plumbing and fire. No final cleanup. Cove base needed on all dry wall partitions. All dry wall painting not completed. Gouges, nicks, laps showing on drywall plaster. First floor, suite one, not completed. One window (Store Front) leaking. Suite three, water at East door threshold. Curtin suite, walls unacceptable in general. Poor workmanship on taping. Wood trim on sills not finished. Ceilings in closets not finished. Rugs in closets not finished. Wiring incomplete. Paint incomplete. Wallpaper incomplete. General and final cleanup, (window,' floor, etc.). RALCO CONSTRUCTION GENERAL CONSTRUCTION Ralph R. Camerlengo CUSTOM HOMES 13 Jefferson Street Construction Consultant Lynn, MA 01902 Management - Overseer (617) 593-2448 Punch List (cont. Exterior Aluminum corner mitre's at base need reworking, touch up all screwheads. First course of brick on relieving angle East side second floor brick work out of line. (Poor Workmanship) Water puddling at West (main) entrance. No city inspection for O.P. this day. RALCO CONSTRUCTION GENERAL CONSTRUCTION Ralph R. Camerlengo CUSTOM HOMES 13 Jefferson Street Construction Consultant Lynn, MA 01902 Management - Overseer (617) 593-2448 DAILY REPORT - 1130-12/11/87 (SEE *) Basement walls, overhead and slab. As previously shown to the Welch project manager and his superintendent, there has been, is now, and will be water problems in the basement. At the North basement wall, water penetration shows at the junction of the slab and foundation starting at the Northeast corner to a Westerly direction, 3/4 of the distrance to the N.W. corner. The water penetration is visable running down the corner pier from the top of the pier and oozing out of a cold joint two (2) feet from the floor. Along the bottom edge, at junction of slab on grade and foundation wall, water penetration is visible. This water condition is a constant problem as the area noted includes the electrical meter room and the fire equipment room. At the opposite end, South Wall, located in the elevator pumproom, at the floor (slab), the wall and floor show water penetration RALCO CONSTRUCTION GENERAL CONSTRUCTION Ralph R. Camerlengo CUSTOM HOMES 13 Jefferson Street Construction Consultant Lynn, MA 01902 Management - Overseer (617) 593-2448 Friday, December 11, 1987-Rain, 450 At site to compile punch list #1 Attendees on tour; Statler Gillfellin Bob Uva W.W.W. Bob Bothman - W.W.W. Second Floor Window Leaks - Suite 4, N.E. Corner, Store Front Solid care wood door, rough finish. Roof scuttle has factory prime paint. No ladder installed for roof access. Smoke alarms covered over. Atrium Area Elevator not accessible due to state testing. No rug on elevator floor. Painting not complete from bottom to top. (Blatant holidays, roller laps, splatters, over painting on steel stringers.) Smoke alarms covered over. _Eire extinguisher cover (plastic) broken. Sill wood trim not finished (varnish). Nicks, gouges, over sanding of drywall plaster, generally poor workmanship in plastering. Concrete stairs, (all), all concrete areas to be covered by rug need; serious flashing and grinding (holes in concrete, open areas). Presently patched depressions need grinding. Touch up all scratched brown aluminum trim thauout building. No final cleanup of any finished area's. Second lavatory (public) oversized penetrations for piping at sink and in slop room. Electrical outlet in column, on first floor, plate not covering box cutout. Same column, rework ceiling track and tile around column. Basement landing; concrete walls at stairs show honeycomb, cold joint, extremely rough surface. Basement interior concrete walls show protuding form ties, bits of forms still in place. General condition of all walls are rough. Slab on grade between main room and entrance at threshold and at column box outs very rough and depressed. At North wall, water leaking down walls. Screws missing from various door hinges thruout. No paint on doors or bucks. No':caulking around fire door frame. (See Note) Smoke alarms covered over. Electrical junction boxes have no covers, exposed wiring at smoke alarm. Grease and oil on elevator pump room floor. All wall penetrations need closing, stopping. Floor drain in fire room stopped up. No identification tags on all valves, plumbing and fire. No final cleanup. Cove base needed on all dry wall partitions. All dry wall painting not completed. Gouges, nicks, laps showing on drywall plaster. First floor, suite one, not completed. One window (Store Front) leaking. Suite three, water at East door threshold. Curtin suite, walls unacceptable in general. Poor workmanship on taping. Wood trim on sills not finished. Ceilings in closets not finished. Rugs in closets not finished. Wiring incomplete. Paint incomplete. Wallpaper incomplete. General and final cleanup, (window,' floor, etc.). RALCO CONSTRUCTION GENERAL CONSTRUCTION Ralph R. Camerlengo CUSTOM HOMES 13 Jefferson Street Construction Consultant Lyme, MA 01902 Management -Overseer (617) 593-2448 Friday, December 11, 1987-Rain, 45° At site to compile punch list #1 Attendees on tour; Statler Gillfellin Bob Uva _ W.W.W. Bob Bothman - W.W.W. Second Floor Window Leaks - Suite 4, N.E. Corner, Store Front Solid core wood door, rough finish. Roof scuttle has factory prime paint. No ladder installed for roof access. Smoke p�w alarms covered over. � � �o w� �/ '"d 1 Atrium Area / Elevator not accessible due to state testing. No elevator floor. Painting not complete from bottom to top. (Blatant holidays, roller laps, splatters, over painting on steel stringers.) Smoke alarms covered over. _Eire extinguisher cover (plastic) broken. Sill wood trim not finished (varnish). Nicks, gouges, over sanding of drywall plaster, generally poor workmanship in plastering. Concrete stairs, (all), all concrete areas to be covered by rug need; serious flashing and grinding (holes in concrete, open areas). Presently patched depressions need grinding. Touch up all scratched brown aluminum trim thruout building. No final cleanup of any finished area's. Second lavatory (public) oversized penetrations for piping at sink and in slop room. Electrical outlet in column, on first floor, plate not covering box cutout. Same column, rework ceiling track and tile around column. Basement landing; concrete walls at stairs show honeycomb, cold joint, extremely rough surface. Basement interior concrete walls show protuding form ties, bits of forms still in place. General condition of all walls are rough. Slab on grade between main room and entrance at threshold and at column box outs very rough and depressed. At North wall, water leaking down walls. Screws missing from various door hinges thruout. No paint on doors or bucks. No caulking around fire door frame. (See Note) Smoke alarms covered over. Electrical �boxes few.` s, expo junction boxes have no covers, exposed wiring at smoke alarm. Grease and oil on elevator pump room floor. All wall penetrations need closing, stopping. Floor drain in fire room stopped up. No identification tags on all valves, plumbing and fire. No final cleanup. Cove base needed on all dry wall partitions. All dry wall painting not completed. Gouges, nicks, laps showing on drywall plaster. First floor, suite one, not completed. One window (Store Front) leaking. Suite three, water at East door threshold. Curtin suite, walls unacceptable in general. Poor workmanship on taping. Wood trim on sills not finished. Ceilings in closets not finished. Rugs in closets not finished. Wiring incomplete. Paint incomplete. Wallpaper incomplete. General and final cleanup, (window, floor, etc.). RALCO CONSTRUCTION GENERAL CONSTRUCTION Ralph R. Camerlengo CUSTOM HOMES 13 Jefferson Street Construction Consultant Lynn, MA 01902 Management - Overseer (617) 593-2448 Punch List (cont.) Exterior Aluminum corner mitre's at base need reworking, touch up all screwheads. First course of brick on relieving angle East side second floor brick work out of line. (Poor Workmanship) Water puddling at West (main) entranc?. No city inspection for O.P. this day. Se { J . S ; v • /00 ff/G��L/9'N!> frvE 9/ /87 SAM oa AMC o f o- s L -- - 4 1 /s0 H/�H�aw� Avt• CoNO/TION .��2fA$- 5 7 1 0 1 0 / 0 P i r r /,0Q 1114001rLA00 WAY! �LX k { 'I i '� 057 }.G_i 06L - -._-- -._--�'_OLrL?O�rc- p, No. y City of Salem Ward M 4Ronm.vol' .. APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO BUILD ADDITION, MAKE ALTERATIONS OR NEW CONSTRUCTION IMPORTANT-Applicant to c'o'mplete/aft items in sections:1, 11, Ill, IV, and IX- I. ATILOCATIONI ZONINGDISTRI I LOCATION ("O) (STREET) OF BETWEEN AND BUILDING (CROSS STREET) (CROSS STREET) LOT SUBDIVISION LOT BLOCK SIZE II. TYPE AND COST OF BUILDING -All applicants complete Parts A -D A. TYPE OF IMPROVEMENT D. PROPOSED USE-FOR"DEMOLITION"USE MOST RECENT USE 1 Q New building Residential Nonresidential 2 Q Addition(If residential,enter number of new 12 ❑ One family 18 E] Amusement recreational housing units added,it any.in part D. 13) 19 Q Chinch,other religious 13 Two mofamily..Enter number 3 Alteration(See 2 above( of units res ................................................_..... 20 ❑ Industrial 21 [] Parking garage 4 E] Repair replacement 14 Transient hotel,motel,or dormitory- 22 ❑ Service station,repair garage Enter number of units ...........)....__.... 5 � Wrecking(it muttdamil y residential,enter number 23 C] Hospital,institutional .. ...of units in building in Part D. 13) 15L!! 3ararte 24 0'Office,bank,professional _ 6 ❑ Moving trelocaton) 16 ❑ Carwr.. 25 ❑ Public utility 26 School,library.other educational 7 Foundation only 17 ❑ Other-Specify B.OWNERSHIP 27 Q Tanks,Storesewersmencitthe - 28 E] Tanks,towers 8 (3 Private(individual,Corporation,nonprofit 29 ❑ Other•Specifyinstitution.etc.) 9 Q Public(Federal,State,or klcal government C.COST (Omit cents) Nonresidential-Describe in detail proposed use of buildings,e.g.;food processing pant, machine shop,laundry building at hospital,elementary school,secondary school,college, 10. Cost of improvement ................................................._... $ parochial school,parking garage for department store,rental office building,office building Pat industrial plant.It use of existing building is being changed,enter proposed use. To be installed but not included (� ((�� II „ in the above cost °(�t'�i�.e,(.0 11r-� Cg-( `1w 5 eACE: — C-O r'll/ 0^ a. Electrical........................................._................................ c1dJ ` b. Plumbing......_.................._.............................................. 6IZ'oY t�'�0 c. Heating,air conditioning d. Other(elevator.etc.)..............._.................................... 11. TOTAL COST OF IMPROVEMENT $ III. SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS OF BUILDING -For new buildings and additions, complete Parts E-L;demolition, complete only Parts J&M, all others skip to IV E. PRINCIPAL TYPE OF FRAME F. PRINCIPAL TYPE OF HEATING FUEL G. TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL I. TYPE OF MECHANICAL 30 Masonry(wall bearing) 35 ❑ Gas 40 G3 Public or private Company Will there be central air 31 ❑ Wood trams 36 Q Oil 41 ❑ private(septic tank,etc.) conditioning? 32 2Stnctural steel 37 ElectnCRy 44 LN-Tes 45 Q No TYPE OF WATER SUPPLY 33 Q Reinforced concrete 38 � Coal H. Will there by an elevator? 34 Other-Specify 39 ❑ Other•Specify 42 Public or private Company 46 ❑ yes 47 ❑ No 43 ❑ Private(well,cisteml I DIMENBIDNS M. DEMOLITION OF STRUCTURES: 48. Number of stories .......................................................... 49. Total souane feet of Boor area Has Approval from Historical Commission been received all Boor&based on extenor for any structure over fifty(50)years? Yes_ No_ dimensions ........................... ............................................. 50. Total land area.sq.B ..................................._.__..._.. Dig Safe Number K.NUMBER OF OFF-STREET PARKING SPACES Pest Control: 51. Enclosed ..............................................................._.......... HAVE THE FOLLOWING UTILITIES BEEN DISCONNECTED? 52. omdoors.........__._............__...._........................_.........__ - :... Yes No L RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS ONLY Water: Electric: 53 Enclosed ............................_...................._.................... Gas: Full........................................ Sewer: -.:. 54. Numberof bath aoms DOCUMENTATION FOR THE ABOVE MUST BE ATTACHED Partial.................................... BEFORE A PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED. IV. COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING: Historic District? Yes_ No Z (if yes, please enclose documentation from Hist Com.) Conservation Area? Yes_ No— (If yes, please enclose Order of Conditions) Has Fire Prevention approved and stamped plans or applications? Yes L/ No_ Is property located in the S.R.A.district? Yes_ No Comply with Zoning? Yes_ No_ (If no,enclose Board of Appeal decision) Is lot grandfathered? Yes_ No_ (If yes,submit documentation/if no,submit Board of Appeal decision) If new construction, has the proper Routing Slip been enclosed? Yeses_ No_ "//t4 t4 Is Architectural Access Board approval required? Yes— No✓ (It yes,submit documentation) Massachusetts tate ont ar ctor I nse/ O!K� Salem License# # Home Improvement Cont ct r u Homeowners Exempt form(if applicable) Yes_ No_ CONSTRUCTION TO BE COMMENCED WITHIN SIX(6)MONTHS OF ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT r If an extension is necessary,please submit CONSTRUCTION IS TO BE COMPLETED BY: � L� in writing to the Inspector of Buildings. V. IDENTIFICATION • To be completed by all applicants Name Mailing address-Number,sbeef,city.and state ZIP Code Tel.No. ,. l 4tc' au- o Paler �(� C"'J'n t- Lb(-f(c.6 4s6 Owner or Lessee T lul'; z. \11Stor e C-10 �o T HAs o contractor Builder's License No. 3. ole-0rases Ql S861LUC2- 0-316, Arriiaect or Engreer IIhherreby certify that the proposed work is authorized by the owner of record and that I have been authorized by the owner to make this application authorized a ent we a ee to conform to all applicable laws of this jurisdiction. 59reBlr�of applica Address App'ti to vI _ DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE VI. VAUDATION Building g�S� �� FOR DEPARTMENT USE ONLY Permit number �\ Use Group Building �V 19�y parmll Issued Fire Grading < Building JF Live Loading r,'Y ;Perm.-Fee "-- Occupancy Load lyl - " erh'ficate of Occupancy $ Approved b r. Drain Tile $ `Plan Review Fee $ TITLE NOTES AND Data • (For department use) _ PERMIT TO BE MAILED TO: DATE MAILED: Construction to be started by: C-F—ACompleted by: C d k A ZONING PLAN EXAMINERS NOTES DISTRICT USE FRONT YARD SIDE YARD SIDE YARD REAR YARD NOTES SITE OR PLOT PLAN •For Applicant Use O N Cr L A tte4Go.a Dukpiva ,.l�ie�wree .Ira&�r (R�ior „�rrriir. r„der Ktmtato rstttratmt gluo... ... OZlOd mailman toll martrs J. Diaeao ,autttmmraror MEMORANOUbt O: w BUIWtnn Ocoarrmtatsraraw 8u,wrae tnstxQars FROM: manta J. Dineat.Aammatrator DATE: OclaoerJ1. VISE SUEZECP. WCM con. 554. Aedes Rv e!MA 59 of the nen "( I"" The atave.mmutncu suwte rcautra trial ucurta ramune tram Inc acutontton. rcaweamredSltltea -r ntner atreratron tit a auttttme ur struatue ac uunosat of to a armteev nttamt stdd M'tt♦OW aauty as ucimeu ov MGL x.11. S 1Jf]A aatt mat nuttume permn t ur utaaesa arc to rONEMB- r Ow of Inc lataNty at wntee MC sate dcom a ut ne ttsttttatt. ',iIS REOUIREa.404r=W, Ne .APPLY TO NEW CONSTiZUO<.ON. In utter to sttttmtW Inc orocess ata to nrtnKm uatturtntty, we are attactln[ a conrot a NIR-wIMeY U un salter rcMwucc aoa use=It is Salm the mmtttetcu term wtd Cc attaracu to the uraae avffel bew petmns or it=== or rcproaucc It on yttur ICIICrri—a. in==at mtttatraL COMMOCIIl.innttltQL Ur mutu•unit noustnt construction. Inc COORCICIMKiat tm ;neuumtamrsuccontraear at Inc time at Inc auotttntt permit anpuattat. :n suCA casrs.tttatoe0td® of an Affidavit Can oc ttset. 'ice camntete law a mnnmm to Inc Nnvemncr issue tit C017E4Wt1R0 wn,rn wot nc madw to ww in 11 .lam twn weeC 'f vnu snaWa nave any uuatlan. ^teaac 1ct us know. JDAfm AFFTDA V1T As a result of the provisions of MGL c 40. 554. I acknowledge that as a condition of Building Permit Number all debris resulting from the construction activity governed by this Building Permit shall be aisposea of in a oroperiv ticensed solid waste disposal facility. as defined by MGL c 111. S 150A. I ccmty that I will notify the Building Official by (Two months maamumi of the location of the solid waste aisiami faaiity where the debris resulting t= the said construction acuviry shall be disposed of. and 1 shall submit the appropriate form for attachment to the Building Pertme. per ^ Signature of Permit APPliant (Print or type the followine informationi Name of Permit Appliont Firm Name. if any D �e1 �^a�a� S-f rtc�ilL( �nnc� Address In accordance with the provisions of MGL c 40. S 54. a condition of Building Permit Numver is that the debris resutune from this work shall be disposed of in a property ticcusea solid waste disposal facility as defined by MGL c 111. 5 15oa 'Me debris will be disposed of in: (Lcnuon of Facility) Signature of PCfth1L nnpamnt Date o CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS s PUBLIC PROPERTY DEPARTMENT 120 WASHINGTON STREET, 3RD FLOOR NINE SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 STANLEY J. USOVICZ, JR. TELEPHONE: 978-745-9595 EXT. 380 MAYOR FAX: 978-740-9846 June 30, 2004 100 Highland Avenue Condominium Trust 100 Highland Avenue Salem, Ma. 01970 RE: Shutoff of Two Rooftop Units Dear Owners: The intent of this letter is to clarify the events surrounding the locking out of two rooftop units at your building. A City of Salem Electrical Inspector and a City Gas Inspector were on the roof to inspect a new roof top unit that was installed by Drs. Monaldo and Nersasian. This unit was properly permitted and passed both inspections. While on the roof,the Electrical Inspector, Mark Rochon, spotted a serious electrical violation on two other rooftop units. The heavy voltage wires were not protected by the required flexible conduit,nor were they clamped where they passed through the metal housing of the rooftop unit. While looking at the unit,the Plumbing Inspector, Dennis Ross,noticed that the gas line feeding one of the units was piped with a cast iron elbow and not the code required malleable elbow. Both Inspectors reported the deficiencies to me. I instructed both Inspectors to check for permits. Neither Electrical nor Gas Permits had been filed. I should note the units were relatively new. I then checked with Dr. Curtain's office to try to determine whose units these were. Because the installers had not numbered the replacement units,the information was unavailable. At that point, I ordered the units locked out. I could not ignore the code violations or the potential for an accident. The next day, an Electrician and a Gas Fitter both showed up to rectify the code problems. Both contractors mentioned the H.V.A.C. Contractor Townsend and Vision Management. I contacted Peter Kitakos from Vision Management. Mr. Kitasko stated no involvement of the installation of the two units. "Letter Enclosed' Further investigation showed one of the units was constructed by Vision because it was the unit for the Common Area. The second unit was the same Contractor, Townsend, working for Dr. Abraham. The same day, the City of Salem Inspectors including myself, went out of our way to reinspect and to allow back in service the two units. It was disappointing to hear there were some bad feeling directed toward the City of Salem and the Inspectional Department. We are doing our jobs and protecting your investment and safety. If you wish to blame someone, look to the Contractors doing unpermitted and potentially unsafe work. If any further information is required, please contact me directly. Sry, Thomas St. Pierre Acting Building Commissioner cc: Kate Sullivan, Mayors Office Electrical Department Plumbing and Gas Inspectors cc: Enclosed vision Management letter 100 1�41cind Avenue Condominium Trust JaV.o M—" .t C—'w ' 90 L—i MoinSt. t Ml MA 01860 (97B)346 4717 June 17, 2004 Mr. Thomas St. Pierre, Building Inspector City of Salem 120 Washington Street Salem, MA 01970 Re: Roof Top Heating Units Dear Mr. St. Pierre: Pursuant to our conversation today regarding the installation of two roof top heating/cooling units at 100 Highland Avenue in Salem, I wish to reiterate that Vision Management Company as managing agent of the 100 Highland Avenue Condominium Trust had no prior knowledge or participation in the activities you described until those actions were described by you via telephone. We made no contract for work with and do not know the contractors you reported as working on the building. Thank you for your service to 100 Highland Avenue Condominium Trust and please let me know if I may be of any further assistance to you. Sincerely yours, 100 Highland Avenue Condominium Trust xtl Peter Kitsakos Managing Agent Cc: File