18 HAWTHORNE BLVD - BUILDING INSPECTION (002) _., �� ��fl ul� v r>> e �� J cl.
;q �a Qli#u of 15alem, a9Sadpoetts
piarb of CA" '81 OCT 19 P4 :2?_
CITY CLERKSnOFFICE
SAL01
DECISION 014 THE PETITION OF JOHN AND JOY FISHER FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT
FOR 18 HAWTHORNE BLVD.
A hearing on this Petition was held on October 14, 1981 with the following
Board Members present: Douglas Hopper, Chairman; Messrs. Piemonte, Hacker and
Feeherry and Associate Member Lusinski. Notice of-'the hearing was sent to
abutters and others and notices of the hearing were published in the Salem
Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A.
The Petitioners have requested a Special Permit to extend the existing non-
conforming structure at 18 Hawthorne Boulevard by constructing a 10' is 14' 3"
addition on the rear of the property. The property is within an R-3 district..
The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this request
for a Special Permit is Section V B 10, which provides as follows:
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in
this Ordinance, the Board of Appeals may, in accordance
with the procedure and conditions set forth in Section VIII F.
and IX D, grant Special Permits for alterations and reconstruction
of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement, extension
or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses,
provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expan-
sion shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing
nonconforming use to the neighborhood.
In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests,
guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding
by the Board that the grant of the Special Permit will promote the public health,
safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants.
The Board, after considering the evidence at the hearing on this matter,
makes the following findings of fact: .
1. The proposed addition was unopposed by any neighbors. .
2. The proposed addition will not reduce the off-street parking
at the site.
On the basis of the. above findings of fact and on the evidence presented
at the public hearing, the Board of Appeals finds (i) that the proposed addition
to the property will not be substantially more detrimental than the.existing structure
to the neighborhood, (ii) that the proposed addition to the property will promote
the public health, safety, convenience, and welfare, and (iii) that the proposed
addition to the property is in harmony with the Salem Zoning Ordinance. Accordingly,
the Board unanimously approved the granting of a Special Permit to the Petitioners.
. - - F CE
l
'81 OCT 19 P4 :22
DECISION - OCTOBER 14, 1981 - JOHN AND JOY FISHER - Page 2
CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
SALE.: f..�.•
The Special Permit is therefore granted in accordance with the
following terms and conditions:
1. Existing parking at the site shall be maintained.
r.
2. All .work shall be in accordance with the plans submitted to the Board. v
3. All plans must be submitted to the Salem Fire Marshall for stamped- "
approval.
f
Anthony M. Fe�helry, Se retary
AFPE"L FQD 1 I t - ;I SIM' PE U,AD I. pUZ;,;i7 7D S_Cd",:; 17 OF THE J.'ASS.
O pi.nAL LF.1 c
. -
OF THIS Gr !c n I .J S' r r.:cJ 11 .F:uJ iD DAIS A'-E7 �':T: CF F:LIiJO
I'
PLf. THE E ;:ei CF THE CITY
-T it
GR ..,LD FIG �i:a` I .. I u. -ELI.:: :
`E C .L Pc,',..11T
. FICA7I,,�J OF TYE Lhi Cal I ° I u `(L A COPY OF ThtD f r r
T.
OR -FiAi. IFS t T f C D��S -PE EL;PsD nD ID j.j,j, hn G4.R .
H 7 r.P� rL 'Al BID 1,�.. AT I Fr_ "E.I c r -a F.
RCa'1..Dc. I. rg•
D J T6 _EH E°SEd R'cdlSi Ry C' L"cCa A D k •E'EJ Dt�UNDER •C . . .:Eil IS
OfIF;( g GR IS PtCD3DcD AtiD @07ED OU II;E OFlf1ER'S CERLr CAIS OF TLLEr1A OF THE 07MER
BOARD OF APPEAL
A COPY OF THIS DECISION AND PLANS HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLEF