35 HANSON STREET - BUILDING INSPECTION ` 35 HANSON STREET
rl
---J
<.s
FIELD COPY
q~ CITY OF SALEM BUILDING
9 SALEM. MASSACHUSETTS 01970 PERMIT
Dec. 23 ,' 92 601-92
George O'Donnell
DATE ui;vu� PERMIT No. QRFi
APPLICANT g _O'Donnell — ADDRESS
Iu0.1 (STREET) C S Llf C xfEl
D � NUMBER OF
PERMIT iJ ADImmII�VIONNT 2 1 2 1 STORY DWELLING UNITS
I"RE O. IuvROrEUENn x0. IvvO rosin USE, —
—
PT ILOC.TIONI 35 Hanson Street Ward 4 ZONING
I (x0.1 IS iRE[il DISTRICT
BETWE'_•. AND
(EROSa STREET) (CROSS STREET)
LOT
SUBDIVISION - LOT _ BLOCK 512E
BUILDING T5 70 BE FT. WIDE N- FT. LONG BY FT. IN HEIGHT ANO SHALL CONFORM IN CONSTRUCTION
TO TYPE USE GROUP BASEMENT WALLS OR FOUNOATION
IT�P[1
REU RS: Construct a 6'X4' addition ( B.O.A.)
CALL FOR PERMIT m OCCUPY 7(45-9595
AREA 0. ESTIMATED C05T S_3j200.00 PERMIT 29.00
VOLUME
(CUBIC SOLARI rEETI _ FEE
OWNER George O'Dormell
AnORESS 35 hanson St., Salem,fvjA leo E. Tremblay
INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS
INSPECTION RECORD
DATE MOTE •NOGNEE7 - CRITICISM$ AND REMARK! INsp9CTOK
DEc 3
(Iit� of �ttlem, ^4EUSsacjjusrtj0y - �s " 9
ill
:��s �narD of �u{�ettl S oFzl
DECISION,ON. THE-_PETITION OF GEORGE AND PRISCILLA O'DONNELL FOR A VARIANCE
AT35 HANSON STREET (R-i)
I
A hearing on this petition was held November 18, 1992 with the following
Board Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Richard Febonio, Francis
Grealish Jr. , Edward Luzinski and Stephen Touchette. Notice of the hearing
was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly
published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts
General Laws Chapter 40A.
Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting a variance from side
setback requirement to allow construction of a single story addition in
this R-1 district.
The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding by this
Board that:
1. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the
land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting
other lands, buildings and structures involved.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner.
3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented
at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings
of fact:
1 . There was no opposition to the petition.
2. One abutter spoke in favor.
3. There are existing stairs there that lead directly to the outside.
These stairs will be removed and an enclosed entry way will be
constructed.
4. The egress is already existing and it would not be feasible to relocate
it.
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF GEORGE AND PRISCILLA O'DONNELL FOR
VARIANCE AT 35 HANSON STREET, SALEM
page two
1Ec 3 9 X16
CITY OF ,AI ..
On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidWe�gjf,4ent&"'
at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows:
1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property
but not the district in general.
2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would
involve substantial hardship to the petitioner.
3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to the
public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the
intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance.
Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the
variance requested, subject to the following conditions:
1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances,
codes and regulations.
2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions
submitted.
3. Petitioner shall comply with all requirements of the Salem Fire
Department relative to smoke and fire safety.
4. Petitioner shall obtain a legal building permit from the City of Salem
Inspector of Buildings.
5. Exterior finishes of the proposed addition will be in harmony with the
existing structure.
VARIANCE GRANTED
November 18, 1992
Francis X. Grealish, Jr. , Secretary
Board of Appeal
DECISION ON THE PETITION OF GEORGE AND PRISCILLA O'DONNELL
FOR VARIANCE AT 35 HANSON STREET, SALEM JfC 3
page three
CITY
FFOF Salt e-
A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOA RD�Aft 01'10-grfY
CLERK
Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of
the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20
days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City
Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the
Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a
copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20
days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has
been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South
Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record
or is recorded and noted on the owner' s Certificate of Title.
Board of Appeal