Loading...
24 GROVE STREET - BUILDING INSPECTION . � �24.GROVF ,STRPFT �,e 1 ofttlpm, ttssttrllusPfts 3 4 Pnara of '�u�enl Har 19 3 22 P?1 '99 CITY OF SALCH. M'1 SS CtCRK'S OFFICE DECISION OF THE PETITION OF RAYMOND & BARBARA HAIGHT REQUESTING A VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT`24-GROVE-STREET", R-1 A hearing on this petition was held May 20, 1998 with the following Board members present: Nina Cohen, Paul Valaskagis, Michaeliard, Ronald Harrison and Stephen Buczko. Notice of the hearing was sent U tt and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the```$$al p s News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Ch@t" ;-40A. C(. RKS^LI H HA Petitioner requests a Variances from side setbacks to allow e�@ABEryIrSof existing deck for property located at 24 Grove Street. The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of this Board that: 1 . Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other land, buildings, or structures in the same district. 2 . Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogation from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful considerations the evidence presented at the hearing, makes the following findings of fact: 1 . The petition was presented by Manual Raymond. 2 . The petition was to enclose an existing deck not to exceed the existing roof line . 3 . Plans were submitted that were 10 years old which were not accepted, but Mr. Goggin made the comment that without plans there would be no approval by the building department. 4 . There was no opposition to this petition. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearings, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1 . Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property and not the district in general. 2 . Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substation hardship to the petitioner. 3 . Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to public good and without nullifying and substantially derogating from the intent of the district or purpose of the Ordinance. DECISION OF THE PETITION OF RAYMOND & BARBARA HAIGHT REQUESTING A VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 24 GROVE STREET page two On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0 to grant the variance requested, subject to the following conditions: 1 . Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statures, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted. 3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and safety shall be strictly adhered to. 4 . A Certificate of Occupancy is to be obtained. 5. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to beginning any construction. 6 . Petitioner is to obtain approval from any City Board of Commission having jurisdiction including, but not limited to, the Planning Board. i . Exterior finished of the new construction shall be in harmony with the existing structure. 8. Proper plans to be submitted to the Building Inspectors Office. Variance Granted Nay 20, 1998 J� � � CSC Paul Valaskagis, Member Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. a v Board of Appeal r,o N—o i19 N ®9WRAalADJUSTERSof Boston/Lynn, Massachusetts (617) 662-7225 P.O. Box 858 Melrose,Massachusetts 02176 FAX(617) 662-7544 BUILDING COMMISSIONER OR BOARD OF HEALTH OR INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS BOARD OF SELECTMAN -X�:'I.QN O . J Is - sPr( srm,MA 01970 Insured. 4eu 0- c�� Property Address: a.N 6n 04S vz Policy #: t'O 153 gal;r(o Date of Loss: $•15•G 7- File/Claim #: 5ZIa-M7b(,79 Claim has been made involving loss, damage or destruction of the above captioned property which may either exceed $1,000.00 or cause Massachusetts General Laws Ch. 143 Sec. 6 to be applicable. If any notice under Massachusetts General Laws Ch. 139, Sec. 3B is appropriate, please direct it to the attention of the writer and include a reference to the captioned insured, location, policy number, date of loss and claim file number. Claims Representative On this date, I caused copies of this notice to be sent to the persons named above at the addresses indicated above by first class mail. Date 3 ( ftp of balm, Alaggacbuattg Public Propertp ]Department r 'nv iSuilbing department �4nme (One 9palem Oreen 745-9595 Cxt. 380 William H. Munroe Director of Public Property Inspector of Buildings Zoning Enforcement Officer July 25, 1991 Barbara Haight 24 Grove Street Salem, MA 01970 RE: 24 Grove Street Dear Ms. Haight, On Tuesday, July 23, 1991 a site visit was made at the above referenced property regarding the construction of a deck at the rear of the building. Upon inspection it was noted that the deck in its present condition would not meet the requirements of the Mass State Building Code, fourth edition. Belga is a list of recomnendations to follow. 1. Post anchors should be installed at each post for attachement to the concrete foundations. 2. Right angle gusset plates are recommended at the top of the 4X6 posts that attach,:to the bottom side of deck. 3. Any curved or warped posts shall be replaced. 4. Intermediate diagonal braces be installed in both directions. 5. Joist hangers to be nailed off with 8d galvanized nails into main timbers and teco joist-hanger nails in floor joists If you need further assistance or explanations of these recommendations please contact this office. Sinrrely, David J. Harris Assistant Building Inspector DJH/eaf tt''pp 111 8Q Ctv of *Iem, Anssar4usettoF I LTt�- Pourb of Anfezd BJTr `rLE°r DECISION,ON TH�ION OF RAYMOND AND BARBARA HAIGHT FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT A11T 24 GROVE STRREETI(R-1) A hearing on this petition was held August 9, 1989 with the following Board Members present: Richard Bencal, Vice Chairman, John Nutting, Secretary, Messrs. Richard Febonio, Edward Luzinski and Peter Dore. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioner, owner of the property, is requesting a Special Permit to allow construction of an addition and deck located in an R-1 district. The provision of the Salem Zoning Ordinance which is applicable to this request for a Special Permit is Section V B, 10, which provides as follows: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary appearing in this Ordinance, the Board of Appeal may, in accordance with the procedure and conditions set forth in Section VIII F and IX D, grant Special Permits for alterations and reconstruction of nonconforming structures, and for changes, enlargement, extension or expansion of nonconforming lots, land, structures, and uses, provided, however, that such change, extension, enlargement or expansion shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood. In more general terms, this Board is, when reviewing Special Permit requests, guided by the rule that a Special Permit request may be granted upon a finding by the Board that the special permit will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's habitants. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1. There was no opposition. 2. Neighbors and abutters spoke in favor. 3. The proposed changes would allow the petitioner a fuller use of their property. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1. The granting of the requested Special Permit will promote the public health, safety, convenience and welfare of the City's inhabitants and will be in harmony with the neighborhood. I. 1 DECISION ON THE PETITION OF RAYMOND AND BARBARA HAIGHT FOR A SPECIAL PERMIT AT 24 GROVE STREET (R-1) page two 2. The relief requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the ordinance. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0 to grant the request for a Special Permit to allow construction of an addition and deck, subject to the following conditions: 1. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety be adhered to. 2. All construction be done with a legal building permit and as per all City and State Building codes. 3. All construction be as per plans and dimensions submitted. 4.. Exterior finishes of the proposed addition be in harmony with the existing building. GRANTED Richard T. Febonio, Board Member A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Mass. General Laws, Chapter 808, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. ursuant to Mass. General Laws, Chapter 808, Section 11, the Variance or Spccial Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the dadsion, baarinv, the certification of tl.e City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, cr that, if such appeal has been Ned, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the South Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name or the owner of record or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. BOARD OF APPEAL �_. Lindsey & Newsom CLAIM SERVICES �S Merri Mac K St. �" is I-nwcence 0119 018(a 3 (SG8) Form of Notice of Casualty Loss to Building Under Mass. Gen. Laws, Ch. 139, Sec. 3B TO: Building Commissioner TO: Board of Health TO: Fire Department , or or or Inspector of Buildings Board of Selectman Arson Squad Address: C'� t/ /�cr�� ['� f v f ka 11 C/h 4)f SAL E r� r'► A S A L C ri r'1 Sri LC rA RE: INSURED:_ M0nj SpePd Letter. 44-902 Speed Lettero To From �A ✓1. 61/x . I I Subject .4'z e/(::1&L xoeeroru,R MESSAGE Date Signed REPLY r Date 14 Signed t I WilsonJones RECIPIENT—RE A N WHIT COPY, RETURN PINK GOP" GRAYLINE FORM 44-W2 3 PART t1983-PRINTEDINUSA TTed SENDEN—DETACH Al:!- =TAIN YELLOV;' :.OP`:-. -SENi) LVHITE AND PIN'd CG 'IES WITH CARBON INTAC.. ._, �! ' �4�� ds ` .r �� � ���� y x,i# .F yy t.f 11\t 11 �A ' KEVIN T. DALY �� LEONARD F. FEMINO ASSISTANT CITY SOLICITOR T ~ ? s �1r ASSISTANT CITY SOLICITOR 93 WASHINGTON STREET um� 93 ASHI.N� p �11q¢1/11 STREET AND CITY OF SALEM - MASSACHUSETT% 6 48 �A'N D'� ONE CHURCH STREET �o? .SA'.HOOL STREET MICHAEL E. O'B RIEN R"- SI��J SALEM, MA 01970 11 j�E�A Lt'4A�$ 01915 745-4311 CITY SOLICITOR CITY pF 745-4311 745-0500 93 WASHINGTON STREET 621-1990 AND PLEASE REPLY TO ONE CHURCH STREET 81 WASHINGTON STREET PLEASE REPLY TO ONE SCHOOL STREET SALEM, MA 01970 745-4311 744-3363 PLEASE REPLY TO SI WASHINGTON STREET October 4 , 1988 William H. Munroe, Building Inspector City of Salem One Salem Green Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Re: 24 Grove Street, Salem Dear Mr. Munroe: Please be advised I have examined affidavits, voting lists and utility records relative to the above entitled real estate and it is my opinion that it was a lawful two- family prior to adoption of the Zoning Ordinance on August 27, 1965 . In addition, the records of the Assessor ' s Office indicate it is currently assessed as a two-family. Accordingly, it is my opinion it should be afforded the protection of Section VIII (E. ) of the aforementioned ordinance relative to nonfoncorming uses and, thus, it' s current use as a two-family is permissible. Very ruly you is ael E. O'Brien City Solicitor MEO/jp o DoT N ' 93 /.v GRo an4 � � f y � I . , h I�}-/ITER. 1 I \ • t � I - , I � zy b a V //9 12 4f MR,Y yRs. RAVH e.vtr HA/ONY Z�/CROYL 57 SA[ey MASS ., Y/+7/sft 7YSJ-967 ado SUFFo[K A6F , • ak9 Y9/7 yB,Z„ /'Er�tr r.✓r.P o Xo7, y. 1 I . • N 038,y.. I V 44 � I I /L'X3z' I i,v CRo uvq � 6" 4t I I rI IL i 1 h l }arFR. 2 I a I I I I � Zy V � n 1119 /0 -- — ----- G� MR,YMRS. RArHONU- HA�oN7 zyo'aovc sr SALty MAss w.ra9s.7 Poo L3 BY MCouYf /NC, ado SOPAIn t Ars' AekIrRE lMss atry 1'9/� yg,z„ _ /'E�'u• ciNB DoT y O ry f 93$ y p S•f. I I /LX31' i i I I ` V I � u I; I�t/trEq. 2' I a SCI I ' I I I I /7'0/7 E At zy b , V � MR.Y MRS. RAVN eNO HA�o Nr • z ycAorc s� . SA[ty MASS Sao Suffo[K Ar.L , Rt[iF�'L /rASS • &tr9 Y9/7 yr 1„ � �Ertr• n.�t✓!' o /oT y S•F. � 6" i 1 1 y V � � i 2 32' 1 � I Ho FJ F A � Zy � b v ^ MRR MRS. RAYN eNO yA�OHy z yC>sovc sr S/ltry MRss �a. � Y/17/btS 9YS a-96) ` 1'e��3 er /bcovFF iNr. 30o SUFFotK At"F RCl�4'RC /YA5.5 2tt9 Y9/7 CITY OF SALEM NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT TASK FORCE .Jurisdiction ~ Hist. Comm. Yes ❑ No ❑ REFERRAL FOR:N1 Cons. Comm. Yes i7 No ❑ A / SRA Yes ❑ No ❑ Date: Address: Complaint: D Complainant: (JS CP/7 /G �0i` Phone#: Address of Complainant. BUILDING INSPECTOR KEVIN HARVEY FIRE PREVENTION ELECTRICAL DEPARTMENT HEALTH DEPARTMENT CITY SOLICITOR ANIMAL CONTROL SALEM HOUSING AUTHORITY PLANNING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT TREASURER/COLLECTOR ASSESSOR JWARD COUNCILLOR DPW SHADE TREE DAN GEARY PLEASE CHECK THE ABOVE REFERENCED COMPLAINT AND RESPOND TO DAVE SHE WITHIN ONE WEEK. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ASSISTANCE. ACTION: GG c/ 11,,r 2 -f l'l