1 GROVE STREET - BUILDING INSPECTION Y I GROVE STREET
�� '1 � 1enz C3�: �tcl�ustfi
of ;-
Y=i
u2� 3i9HS j
DFON PF.TTTTON OF HARRY A. HEWITT AND ELT-TOTT E .
6g
J°°cr, 1. °OVLG LMI:�,S �rT TO CONSTRUCT A CONCRETE AT,OCK RUTT,DTNG AT LOT
#1 GROVE, STTtFFT, FOR TTSF, AS AN OFFTCF, AND FOR PRF,FARPi I-A^Tn,
OF TIOTTSF COMPONENTS , AND THF SERVTCF ANTI) STORArF, OF pe -1 Pm'r
The Tnspector of Rnildin -s refused to issue a permit to erect a hni.lOii ;
this location, Lot #1 Grove Street , as this district is zoned R_2, for two-
family residences, and the plan shows that the proposed construction wrnr ! r;
net conform to the density regnirernents of the City Zoning Ordinance .
Petitioner appealed to the Ronrd of Appeals from this decision , and ,-, hear_
in . was held on this appeal On November 17, 1969, pursuant to notices msil -
.rci Postpaid to the petitioners, their counselor, abutters , Rnard Memh.-,rti ,
and others , and advertisements puhli.shed in the Salem F,venina News .
Board Members present at this heari.nf- included Mr. John M. rravi Sr.man, Mr. Arthur T,abrecque , Mr. Emery P. Tanch , Mr. Norman Welchanr, r,
William F. Abbott ; Mr. ,Toseph F. Doyle and Mr, ,Tames Roul ,
ner were
attend .
Charles J. PannfCoporrlos , Counselor for the petitioners appeared a: i
e Petition the same as in the ori-7i.na1 appeal on file ; he exnlai :••: :; '
lne lavout of the lot is such that no construction within the prencr- -
prescribed requirements is possible , and the environment is not coed •c , z,•-
to ,the construction of dwelli.n,?s •
Mr. T.itman appeared in favor of !*rnnti.nf*, this app
sition to f*,rantinr this Appeal were Mrs . T, ial . AZaberi of in on ;o_
HP Jankowski , Mr. ''/,aber of the Trial _
nut Finishing Companv, Mr. Frank Savory of the Pohl Chemical. Company; So_
nhie �. Walsh , Mr. Harald Spri.nf*, and Alice M„rin. While this petition
,aasehei heard a telephone call was received from the Ward Crnrncilor,
re•orpe F. McCabe regnestin;* that he he recorded opposed to frantin this
anneal and also srnhmittin;T names of his constituents ho had contacted
him ,hist prior to hi.s phone call with relation to registerina their on-
position to this appeal . Their names as (riven by the Councillor are Mr.
Michael Brennan, Mr. Cook , Sophie Walsh , and Mr. Demirs.
After a careful stndv of the facts presented at this hearing, the 7,oarc:
findinf• that there is no hardship involved , and further findini- than; T '
would be in violation of all of the density requirements of the- Citv Zr ,
in.- Ordinance , and for these reasons and to protect the people livinm in
the immediate vicinity, voted unanimously to denv . this appeal .
APPF.A1 DF\TED - .
TInARD OF. APoT:
By
''J ( Actin S