Loading...
1 GREENWAY ROAD - BUILDING INSPECTION � i j 1 GREENWAY RD. � I L� 1 _ _J �,. . �p SEP H JZ IO f ISL (fity ofttlem, � HussttCljusetts snLF.4. aie;ss " 9 '$aura of &Au}iettl c', E r,K�s or ricr- Qww,. DECISION OF THE PETITION OF MICHAEL GIGLIOTTI REQUESTING A VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1 GREENWAY ROAD (R-1) a/k/a 101 HIGHLAND AVENUE A hearing on this petition was held September 20, 1995 with the following Board members present: Stephen Touchette, Chairman; Gary Barrett, Albert !-fill, Nina Cohen, Joseph Ywuc and Arthur LeBrecque. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioner, owners of the property request a Variance to enlarge non conforming structure to construct an addition for the property located at 1 Greenway Road (R-1) . The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of this Board that: 1. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other land, buildings, or structures in the same district. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogation from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful considerations the evidence presented at the hearing, makes the following findings of fact: 1. Petitioners property is a two family home of one story. Petitioners seek to enlarge their property by adding and additional story without changing the footprint of the existing structure. 2. William Katsapetses, an abutter who owns property at 103 Highland Avenue, appeared and stated that he has no opposition to the proposed addition. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearings, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property and not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substation hardship to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to public good and without nullifying and substantially derogating from the intent of the district or purpose of the Ordinance. DECISION OF TE° PETITION OF MICHAEL GIGLIOTTI REQUESTING A VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT I GREEN AY ROAD (R-1) a/k/a/ 101 HIGHLAND AVENUE page two Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0 to grant the variance requested, subject to the following conditions: 1 . Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statures, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to beginning any construction. 3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safetv shall be strictly adhered to. 4. A Certificate of Occupancy is to be obtained. 5. Exterior finishes of the new construction shall be in harmony with the exterior finishes. 6. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted. Variance Granted September 20, 1995 Nina Cohen Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appw has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the Swab Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of rxd or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. Board of Appeal ci+ me N S N LD N tJ 1 (Eit of -'-5ttiem, MassuchusettsSEP Z6 IZ 10 rri '9S Cg a Cf f Y Ci tkLiM. FfASS a� �9 POMra cf Appeal I RK' Of I ICF DECISION OF THE PETITION OF MICHAEL GIGLIOTTI REQUESTING A VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT I GREENWAY ROAD (R-1) a/k/a 101 HIGHLAND AVENUE A hearing on this petition was held September 20, 1995 with the following Board members present: Stephen Touchette, Chairman; Gary Barrett, Albert Hill, Nina Cohen, Joseph Ywuc and Arthur LeBrecque. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioner, owners of the property request a Variance to enlarge non conforming structure to construct an addition for the property located at 1 Greenway Road (R-1) . The Variance which has been requested may be granted upon a finding of this Board that: 1. Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other land, buildings, or structures in the same district. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogation from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful considerations the evidence presented at the hearing, makes the following findings of fact: 1. Petitioners property is a two family home of one story. Petitioners seek to enlarge their property by adding and additional story without changing the footprint of the existing structure. 2. William Katsapetses, an abutter who owns property at 103 Highland Avenue, appeared and stated that he has no opposition to the proposed addition. On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearings, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1. Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property and not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substation hardship to the petitioner. 3. Desirable relief can be granted without substantial detriment to public good and without nullifying and substantially derogating from the intent of the district or purpose of the Ordinance. f1 DECISION OF THE PETITION OF MICHAEL GIGLIOTT-7 REQUESTING A VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1 GREEN AY ROAD (R-1) a/k/a/ 101 HIGHLAND AVENUE page two Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0 to grant the variance requested, subject to the following conditions: 1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statures, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to beginning any construction. 3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety shall be strictly adhered to. 4. A Certificate of Occupancy is to be obtained. 5. Exterior finishes of the new construction shall be in harmony with the exterior finishes. 6. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted. Variance Granted September 20, 1995 Nina Cohen Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision, if any, shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, and shall be filed within 20 days after the date of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A, Section 11, the Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the City Clerk that 20 days have elapsed and no appeal has been filed, or that, if such appw has been filed, that it has been dismissed or denied is recorded in the swth Essex Registry of Deeds and indexed under the name of the owner of rempd or is recorded and noted on the owner's Certificate of Title. Board of Appeal N 7 Zn 2 .n N • SEP L � '_`: ;, , ',1 b (I�itn of �ttivm, �4Russarijusefts �. ; S r � Paurb of C peal DECISION ON THE PETITION OF RICHARD & MARYANN-O'SHEA/MICHAEL GIGLIOTTI FOR VARIANCES AT 1 GREENWAY RD. a/k/a , HIGHLAND AVE __(R-1 ) A hearing on this petition was held september 11 , 1991 with the following Board Members present: Richard Bencal, Chairman; Joseph Correnti, Richard Febonio, Edward Luzinski, Mary Jane Stirgwolt. Notice of the hearing was sent to abutters and others and notices of the hearing were properly published in the Salem Evening News in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A. Petitioners, owners of the property, are requesting Variances to allow a fence which is in violation of the requirements for fences in the Entrance Corridor Overlay District and visibility at intersections to remain. The property is located in an R-1 district. The Variances which have been requested may be granted upon a finding of the Board that: 1 . Special conditions and circumstances exist which especially affect the land, building or structure involved and which are not generally affecting other lands, buildings or structures 'in the same district. 2. Literal enforcement of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would involve substantial hardship, financial or otherwise, to the petitioners. 3. Desirable relief may be granted without subsantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the hearing, and after viewing the plans, makes the following findings of fact: 1 . The petitioner received three price estimates for the existing fence and was unaware that the fence construction required a building permit because it was less than six feet. 2. The petitioners property is a corner lot that is unlike others in the zoning district in that it is open on two sides to traffic. 3. The parcel in question requires protection both from traffic and noise from adjacent Highland Avenue and Salem Hospital. 4. The fence replaced a group of shrubs and trees that were less attractive and the fence does not obstruct the view of traffic to significantly greater degree. 5. Several neighbors spoke in favor of this petition. 6. The petitioner's land would be severely restricted in use due to safety hazards from traffic if this petition is denied. DECISION ON THE PETITION OF RICHARD & MARYANN O'SHEA/MICHAEL GIGLIOTTI FOR VARIANCES AT 1 GREENWAY RD. a/k/a 101 HIGHLAND AVE. , SALEM page two On the basis of the above findings of fact, and on the evidence presented at the hearing, the Board of Appeal concludes as follows: 1 . Special conditions exist which especially affect the subject property and not the district in general. 2. Literal enforcement of the ordinance would involve substantial hardship to the petitioners. 3. The relief requested can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without nullifying or substantially derogating from the intent of the district or the purpose of the Ordinance. Therefore, the Zoning Board of Appeal voted unanimously, 5-0, to grant the Variance requested, subject to the following conditions: 1 . Petitioner is to obtain a legal building permit. 2. The section of fence adjacent to 99 Highland Ave. will be altered so as to lessen the obstruction of the view entering onto Highland Avenue. Variances Granted September 11 , 1991 � �,,pl 6444 ) Mary J StirgwOlt, mber, Board of Appeal A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision. If any,shall be made pursuant to section 17 01 the Mass. General Laws, Chapter 808, and shall be filed within 20 days after the dare of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk, n.cnted ha•ein shall not take effect until a copy of the Pursuant to Mass. General Laws, Chapter 808. Section i i,the Variance or aye:i�! rermlt . � b eciston, 'crin'; the enrol:cation of the CClerk that days have elapsed and no 3PPO�'l has been filed, or thhaa t, if such appeal has been filed, that it has been dlsm Registry of Deeissesi 0r denied is recorded In the South Essex ds and Indexed under the name or the owner of record or of cate —zc .: is recorded and noted on the owner gOARDf fOF APPEAL. a e ® SENDER: Complete items 1 and 2 when additional services are desired, and complete items 3 and 4. Put your address in the "RETURN TO" Space on the reverse side. Failure to do this will prevent this card from being returned to you.The return recei t fee will rovide ou the name of the erson delivered to and the date of delivery. Far addinona f ees the following services are available. onsult postmaster ortees andeck boxlesl for additional service(s) requested. 1. f Snow to whom delivered, date, and addressee's address. 2. ❑ Restricted Delivery (Extra charge) (Ertra charge) 3. Article Addressed to: 4. Article Number Richard & Maryann O'Shea P 268 692 041 1 Greenway Rd. Type of Service: Salem, MA 01 970 ❑ Registered ❑ Insured Certified ❑ COD Express Mail ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise Always obtain signature of addressee or agent and DATE DELIVERED. 5 S' u e — ddressee S. Add a ddress (ONLY if tr ex 1 ee`�airt) V . S' nature Agent ' Q A I •., X 4n `Qv 7. Date of Delivery 1 1991 . PS Form 3811, Apr. 1989 t U.S.G.P.O.1989-238-815 TIC RETURN RECEIPT UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICEy t- .. ..+^�' OFFICIAL BUSINESS SENDER INSTRUCTIONSti i quu �'`�'" —• �' Print your name,address and ZIP Co\ �� .. in the space below. • Complete Items 1,2,3,and 4 on the reverse. U=a • Attach to front of article if space permits. otherwise affix to back of article. PENALTY FOR PRIVATE • Endorse article "Return Receipt USE, $300 Requested" adjacent to number. RETURN Print Sender's name, address, and ZIP Code in the space below. TO David Harris, Assistant Building Inspector One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 ° CUP of harem, Alaaacb gettg Public Propertp department �3uitbing Mepartment (One balem Oreen 745-9595 Cxt. 380 William H. Munroe Director of Public Property Inspector of Buildings Zoning Enforcement Officer August 6, 1991 Richard & Maryann O'Shea 1 Greenway Road Salem, MA 01970 RE: _1 Greenway Rd/1Highland Ave. Dear Mr. & Mrs. O'Shea: Thank you for the application for a building permit for the existing fence located at the above referenced property. I am sorry that I cannot approve this application as the fence is in violation of the City of Salem Zoning Ordinance Section VII S.3 (dim- ensional requirements for fences in an Entrance Corridor Overlay District) and Section VII G. (Visibility at Intersection) . Enclosed is your permit application and check for $20.00. Please be advised of your right to appeal to the City of Salem Zoning Board of Appeal. I have enclosed three (3) applications, fee schedule, and informational sheet for your convenience. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me. Si ,ere��eC�� David J. Harris Assistant Building Inspector DJH:bms Enclosures cc: City Solicitor Councillor Furfaro Certified Mail # P 268 692 041 Plans must be filed and approved by the Inspector prior to a permit being granted X166 _ CITY OF SALEM No.,� - or?$.n - Ward -- Z HISTORIC DISTRICT? Y � „ Date IF FOR SIDING, HAS ELECTRIC ' Home Phone PERMIT BEEN OBTAINED? Y N Bus. Phone 7 4 -� z APPLICATION /FOR PERMIT TO tT Liu t L,c-0d(,r,—C TO THE INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS: The undersigned hereby applies for a permit to build according to the following specifications: Owner's name and address �r e Architect's name 2,1 Builder's name Q �S Location of building, No.� What is the purpose of building? `� �iG If dwelling, # of units? Material of bldng? Will building conform to law? Asbs? Estimated cost ty Lic. �(� State Lic.# Signature of Applicant !� SI UNDER THE PE1 OF PERJURY DESCRIPTION OF WORK TO BEDONE C p 1 44 tA.j rn.r••I.r2 w C Mail Permit to: �(1� r®r ai z H � •�� �. I � �° (r� '� 4 ��f(,��','vd �11T iq! i'I:. �i> �ilrk�r'i�f i F �I 'l y r t N, 20- wwa 3 APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO ROOF REROOF OR INSTALL SIDING Location lr 2 a z " Y PERMIT GRANTED /DLa.S 19CL/ App rove cl(a� B Idi Ina l l 40 D °-� CERTIF�CA .OF OCCUPANCY CITY OF SALEM Issued:3 5 to Permit#: 55095 SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 City of Salem Building Dept. �oiy�gcA DATE OCTOBER 17 19 951 PERMIT NO. 550-199 APPLICANT ED GASINOWKSI ADDRESS ! MAPLE SI" EXT 704 (N0.) (STREET) (CONTRS LICENSE) CITY PEABODY STATE MA ZIPCODE 019FsO TEL.NO. NUMBEROF PERMITTO ADD(T+O1,) ( ) STORY TWO OR MORE: FAMILY DWELLING UNITS (TYPE OF IMPROVEMENT) NO. (PROPOSED USE) AT(LOCATION) 01.0 i. % IGHLAND AVENUE ZONING R-'i (N0.) (STREET) BETWEEN AND (CROSS STREET) (CROSS STREET) SUBDIVISION MAP 14 LOT 0164 BLOCK LSIZE OT 0005231 ,SO F] BUILDING IS TO BE FT.WIDE BY FT.LONG BV FT.IN HEIGHT AND SHALL CONFORM IN CONSTRUCTION TO TYPE USE GROUP BASEMENT WALLS OR FOUNDATION (TYPE) REMARKS: BljiLD ADDITION 7'O L "I NG DUPIe_.X %d ONE GREENWAY Rc'.I'D.J/ AREA OR QPERMIT VOLUME ESTIMATED COST$ -�2. Biz' FEE $ 1 b''" 0;-/l (CUBIC/SQUARE FEET) OWNER OSHEFI MARYANN ._ -7SFIE-' RICHARD IS AnnRFRR GRELINWAY RD� BUILDING DEPT. 1. T ,( ' ! JOB SITE COPY r, CITY OF SALEM f BUILDING SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 PERMIT DATE OCTOBER 17 19 S`' PERMIT NO. 550-1995 APPLICANT ED GASINOWKSI ADDRESS 1 MAPLE ST EXT 704 (NO.) (STREET) (CONTR'S LICENSE) CITY F'EABODY STATE MA ZIPCODE 019Cs Q1 TEL.NO. PERMITTO ADDITION O sroav TWO OR MOR= FAMILY NUMBEROF _ (TYPE OF IMPROVEMENT) NO. (PROPOSED USE) DWELLING UNITS 0101 HIGHLAND AVENUE. ZONING AT(LOCATION) (NO.) (STREET) DISTRICT BETWEEN AND (CROSS STREET) (CROSS STREET) SUBDIVISION MAP !A LOT 0164" BLOCK LSIZE OT 000523 . SO FT BUILDING IS TO BE FT.WIDE BY FT.LONG BY FT.IN HEIGHT AND SHALL CONFORM IN CONSTRUCTION TO TYPE USE GROUP BASEMENT WALLS OR FOUNDATION (TYPE) REMARKSDUILD ADDITION T, O ' EX T STING DUPLEX 16 ONF GREEENWAY ROAD. J. J. J. AREAOR VGi: IVC i ei'lii`E LV VUw upy VOLUME ESTIMATED COST �S• 000FEE�ERMIT$ , C,gid. ��I (CUBICISQUARE FEET) OWNER OSHEA MARYAN^ J—OSHEi--9 RICHARD D BUILDING DEPT. ADDRESS 1 GREENWAY RD BY j, J. j THIS PERMIT CONVEYS NO RIGHT TO OCCUPY At•}V$$MEET,ALLEY OR SIDEWALK OR ANY PART THEREOF,EITHER TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY,ENCROACHMENTS ON PUBLIC PROPERTY,NOT SPECIFICALLY PERYAI , ED UNDER THE BUILDING CODE,MUST BE APPROVED BY THE JURISDICTION.STREET OR ALLEY GRADES AS WELL N. AS DEPTH AND LOCATION OF PUBLIC SEWERS MAY BftBTAINED FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS.THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT RELEASE THE APPLICANT FROM THE CONDITIONS OF ANY APPLICABLE SUBDIVISION RESTRICTIONS. _ MINIMUM OF THREE CALL INSPECTIONS APPROVED PLANS MUST BE RETAINED ON JOB AND THIS CARD KEPT WHERE APPLICABLE SEPARATE REQUIRED FORA ALL CONSTRUCTION WORK. 1.FOUNDATIONS OR FOOTINGSPOSTED UNTIL FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE. WHERE A PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR . ELECTRICAL,PLUMBING AND 2.PRIOR TO COVERING STRUCTURAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY IS REQUIRED,SUCH BUILDING SHALL MECHANICAL INSTALLATIONS. MEMBERS(READY TO LATH). NOT BE OCCUPIED UNTIL FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE. 3.FINAL INSPECTION BEFORE OCCUPANCY. POST THIS CARD SO IT IS VISIBLE FROM STREET BUILDINGINSPECT ONAPPROVALS PLUMBING INSPECTION APPROVALS ELECTRICAL INSPECTION APPROVALS � / rgw�i L�5 -- `� 2 - 2 4? B D HEA GAS INSPECTION APPROVALS FIRE DEP SPECTING PPROVALS ' 3d /� OTHER CITY ENGINEER 2 2 WORK SHALL NOT PROCEED UNTIL THE PERMIT WILL BECOME NULL AND VOID IF CONSTRUCTION WORK IS INSPECTIONS INDICATED ON THIS CARD INSPECTOR HAS APPROVED THE VARIOUS NOT STARTED WITHIN SIX MONTHS OF DATE THE PERMIT IS ISSUED CAN BE ARRANGED FOR BY TELEPHONE STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION. AS NOTED ABOVE. OR WRITTEN NOTIFICATION.