The URL can be used to link to this page

28 GOODHUE STREET - C/O'S 28 GOODHUE STREET Certificate Number: B-2014-0238 Permit Number: B-2014-0238 Commonwealth of Massachusetts City of Salem This is to Certify that the Multi.Family S+ Building located at .................... __.... ..., . .... Building Type 28 GOODHUE STREET in the City„of Salem Address Town/City Name IS HEREBY GRANTED A PERMANENT CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY 28 GOODHUE STREET UNIT 209 This Permit is granted in conforn-:iity with the Statutes and Ordinances relating thereto, and expires Not Applicable unless sooner suspended or revoked. Expiration Date Issued On: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 ` 1 y d ... �`SlylAla y �a sIMVM t� Certificate Number: B-2014-0274 Permit Number: B-2014-0274 Commonwealth of Massachusetts City of Salem This is to Certify that the Multi Family S+ Building located at Building Type 28 GOODHUE STREET in the Ci o Salem . ... .f ._..._,................,. . . Address Town/City Name IS HEREBY GRANTED A PERMANENT CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY 28 GOODHUE STREET UNIT 407 This Permit is granted in conformity with the Statutes and Ordinances relating thereto, and expires _._,.__.._......Not Applicable unless sooner suspended or revoked. Expiration Date Issued On: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 • W �6ti6: : �stQ• �1 4' wNVIS 7II H v Q v� o,\f,ts S Em, ? 0� 28 GOODHUE STREET 937-13 GS#: COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS Block ,.ui , xr, CITY OF SALEM Lot f. r: 0372,ra L.$! Category:tVx4'" 105 New Five or more Pem,t# 937u13 „ BUILDING PERMIT Project# u JS-2014-000491}i� Est COSI. PVitd: 5 $0.00 4, r µ Fee Charged.'; $0 00 Balance $oo;u OMRP�jftq PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO: Const.Class: Contractor: License: Expires: Use Group:. '!,,r'� f �"i' . `r' Essex Builders Corp/Christopher Serino Construction Control-20285 Lot Size(sq:ft) 88341.858s" a k' Zoning t jq"'4I'3,L'nl Her: NORTH RIVER CANAL LLC I'"im Units Gained:'a i Applicant: Essex Builders Corp/Christopher Serino Units Lost *'ia A1.' � 5 r AT: 28 GOODHUE STREET Dig Safe#:;41 :ISSUED ON: 11-Sep-2013 AMENDED ON: EXPIRES ON: 14-Mar-2014 TO PERFORM THE FOLLOWING WORK: UNIT PLEASE REFER TO PERMIT#927-13 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. POST THIS CARD SO IT IS VISIBLE FROM THE STREET Electric Gas Plumbing Building Underground: Underground: Underground: /� Excavation: Service: Mete � 1� r Footings: Rough:-3/.? 7. ?711 Rough: $ e Rough: Q � Foundation: Final: �� l.t.f Final: Final R 0 Rough Frame: LLL Fireplace/Chimney: D.P.W. Fire Health � )`g/l4— Insulation: Meter: Oil: House# Smoke: Final: 8/5 Ili t / - (� A////V� Assessor Treasury: Water: Alarm: l�C'� t Sewer: Sprinklers:Q1�l l Final: THIS PERMIT MAY BE REVOKED BY THE CITY OF SALEM UPON VIOLATION OF ANY OF ITS RULES AND REGULATIONS. Signature: GeoTMS®2013 Des Lauriers Municipal Solutions,Inc. ar Y . kONDITq� -. V"♦j_ VSQVE AD CITY OF SALEM • /-/b -7 _ 28 GOODHUE STREET 965-13 Gas# COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS p � , Block .� 16 BlG� CITY OF SALEM .�' �� ;: � ., -�,ztl Lot t ? V N 0372 'r IF' .-. § Category 105 New Five or more Penmt#.,..,.; 965-13& BUILDING PERMIT Project#,,j JS-2014-000581 J Est Cost $0.00'.4% Fee Charged: $0.00} PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO: Const.Class: ( OntractOr: License: Expires: Essex Builders Corp/Christopher Serino Construction Control-20285 Lot Size(sq:ft) 88341 858 Owner: NORTH RIVER CANAL LLC Zoning ,:c5 � 1.`et,tsaiX,`a�'I �#,' Units Gained:3 �,,- } � ,rod Applicant. Essex Builders Corp/Christopher Serino Units Lost:,'.,01 sg' , a` a' Rrl I" AT: 28 GOODHUE STREET Dig Safe#: ISSUED ON. 19-Sep-2013 AMENDED ON: EXPIRES ON. 19-Oct-2013 TO PERFORM THE FOLLOWING WORK: UNIT 407 -PLEASE REFER TO#927-13 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION POST THIS CARD SO IT IS VISIBLE FROM THE STREET F;lectric Gas Plumbing Building Underground: Underground: Underground: Excavation: (Service: Meter: Footings: Rough:ra�l��y��,�/////� Rough: 6g o�"�Jd�l Rough�� / t� Foundation: Final: O Fin / / Final:® , `/ Rough Frame: 3/(p/1 rq- Y Fireplace/Chimney: D.P.W. Fire Health Insulation:312 Meter: Oil: It A Final: /�A/lot ! /L House# Smoke: I' Treasury; Water: Alarm: ` t Assessor , Sewer: Sprinkler : S 1 Final: I THIS PERMIT MAY BE REVOKED BY THE CITY OF SALEM UPON VIOLATION OF ANY OF ITS MULES AND REGULATIONS. Signature: GeoTMS®2013 Des Lauriers Municipal Solutions,Inc. 166; =9�SIQ• a C1Vl'�A�S �"� . . � Z ► S ,a 28 GOODHUE STREET 943-13 Gis# 1565, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS Map Q 16 r } 3 Block ;m� ,!.. „"w J CITY OF SALEM Lot: n 4 u;" 0372%`"tom jl; ;G' Category 105 New Five or more Pemut#, rw 943'13-P� , Q, BUILDING PERMIT Protect#, " ,, JS-2014-000498 ,' Est Cost : , Fee Charged:_" $0.00`�q f, F" Balance Duet$oo -s ;:: a PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO: Const Class. ,,' `4: r'Contractor: License: Expires: Use Group: 1` Essex Builders Corp/Christopher Serino General Contractor-59924 Lot Size(s( ft) 88341 858!01 :t= Owner: NORTH RIVER CANAL LLC Zomng s,1S, , Uiuts Gained' aS scene+ApplZCant: Essex Builders Corp/Christopher Serino Units Lost:,' y 4r AT: 28 GOODHUE STREET Dig Safe#:1 °'T ''"'-�, ss�n -ISSUED ON. 12-Sep-2013 AMENDED ON: EXPIRES ON. 09-Mar-2014 TO PERFORM THE FOLLOWING WORK UNIT 215 -PLESE REFER TO PERMIT#927-13 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. POST THIS CARD SO IT IS VISIBLE FROM THE STREET Electric Gas Plumbing Building Underground: Underground: Underground: Excavation: Service: Meter- �� Footings: b Qr Rough Rough: Rough: R��'�+ � jl�{r Rough. �r / /�� Foundation: Final: Cd,2q_I � Final: Final: RoughFrame:5511 Fireplace/Chimney: D.P.W. Fire Health Insulation: Meter: Oil: Final: Q /� , House# Smoke" ?.C R` Treasury: Water: Alarm: ASS¢$SOY Sewer. Sprinkler : �7.�`l� Final: THIS PERMIT MAY BE REVOKED BY THE CITY OF SALEM UPON VIOLATION OF ANY OF ITS RULES AND REGULATIONS. Signature: CeoTMSO 2013 Des Lauriers Municipal Solutions,Inc. 'aa '� ..A P.: Y.' �f v _. R� a.} • � s S .M1s�t s,s .- a .� ;.. ...t w -'t �=9�glQ• W 4ti6`ti6 � w�wis � � w '28 GOODHUE STREET 950-13 GIs# 156s �� COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS 16 �" Block '% y, ,.t 0qh, CITY OF SALEM Lot.' It-,,-. , 0372 '"" ;.r, g,, 'aM i rY Cate8 o "r" , ` ' 105 New Five or more', r.. Perritt# �4, 950-13 BUILDING PERMIT Project# �_A JS-2014-000507. Est Cost . i,^,; $0.00 pt Fee Charged:" $000X { u.""^ Balance Due: $00,T ;r';1: PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO: _.sem- � Const. Class:-,� w a ,,:- ' ,E+*. =G3 =`,,`'�,' Contractor: License: Expires: Use Group "". `a. it.r Essex Builders Corp/Christopher Serino Construction Control -20285 Lot Srze(sq."ft) 88341 858�, rr Owner: NORTH RIVER CANAL LLC Zonngi %` m I „ �. ;: UnitsGamed:a t " a ;Applicant: Essex Builders Corp/Christopher Serino �iJnits LosC: ' .4P§'?.I,t ;�'r1 ?�,i�;',s AT: 28 GOODH[JE STREET - pig Safe#:: ISSUED ON: 13-Sep-2013 AMENDED ON: EXPIRES ON: 09-Mar-2014 TO PERFORM THE FOLLOWING WORK: UNIT 307-PLEASE REFER TO PERMIT#927-13 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. POST THIS CARD SO IT IS VISIBLE FROM THE STREET Electric Gas Plumbin¢ Building Underground: Under ground: Underground: Excavation: Service: / Meter:tttt////7777 1 I • Footings: Rough:�.�� Rough:7d`�� l Rung Foundation: Foundation: Final; r,/ Final:11// Final;,,,/< yi ew/�, Rough Frame Fireplace/Chimney: ID.P.W. Fire Health Insulation: N:E1—/ � Meter: Oil: House# Smok UnFinal: Water: Alarm: Assessor Treasury: Sewer: Sprin k S�tI Final: THIS PERMIT MAY BE REVOKED BY THE CITY OF SALEM UPONVIOLATION OF ANY OF ITS RULES AND REGULATIONS. Signature: GeoTMS®2013 Des Lauriers Municipal Solutions,Inc. I, �6ti6: : �stQ• a NIS DNS`' E-+ ° Of Massachusetts 'The Constrluction Testing People' -Page 1 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Soil Testing Results - Transmittal Report Report Date 11-11-2013 Report No. 1 _ Distribution Copy Job Number 16091 Project North River Apts,28 Goodhue St.,Salem,MA Contractor Essex Builders Corp. Sample Submitted By Sample No. 641 - ® Our Representative: Dave Lent Date Submitted: 11/4/13 ❑ Other: Source of Sample ❑ On-Site Existing @ location: ® Off-Site Borrow from: Diaz, Avon, MA. Reprocessed gravel Proposed Use: Pavement base Material Submitted As: ❑ Structural/Granular Fill: ❑ Ordinary Borrow: MHD M1.01.0 (Shall be approved by the Architect) ❑ Gravel Borrow: MHD M1.03.0 Type: -❑ Processed Gravel For Base Course: MHD M1.03.1 i❑ Sand Borrow: MHD M1.04.0 Type: .❑ Reclaimed Pavement Borrow for Base Course: MHD M1.11-0 '.❑ Crushed Stone: MHD M2.01.0 -❑ Dense Graded Crushed Stone for Base Course: MHD M2.01.7 ..:❑ Common Borrow: ❑ Drainage Fill: ® Other: Pavement base Requested Testing ❑ Atterberg Limits ® Gradation Analysis ❑ Hydrometer ® Modified Proctor ❑ Permeability ® Wash Sieve Analysis ❑ Other: Material Classification:Reprocessed gravel Project Specification Conformance Results ❑ Does conform: ' ❑ Does NOT conform: ❑ Marginally does not*conform...Basis: * We suggest the suitability of this soil sample be reviewed for approval by the Architect and the Engineers-of-Record. ElNo Specifications provided to our office. ❑ Specifications provided to our office but sample not submitted to a specific use. 0 . Sample submitted without indication of intended use and without specifications. .GENERAL REMARKS: Sample submitted for compaction testing. REVIEWED BY: Geotechnical Department ^ ' Our reports are available in EDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. O0f Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People- 0 Page 2 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781.438.7755(Voice)781438-6216(Fax) Soil Testing Results - Transmittal Report Report Date 11-11-2013 Report No. 1 Distribution Copy Job Number 16091 Project North River Apts,28 Goodhue St.,Salem,MA ,t Contractor Essex Builders Corp. CC: North River Canal, LLC Anthony Roberto Essex Builders Corporation Chris Serino Essex Builders Corporation Jennifer Patel Essex Builders Corporation Edward DeFanti Goldstein-Milano Brent Goldstein, PE Tom Galvin City of Salem Thomas St. Pierre Nichols-Renasco Associates Joseph L. Nichols, AIA r.x. } s UTS of Massachusetts, Inc. Page 3 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Report Date 11-11-2013 ReportNo. 1 Job Number 16051 Project North River Apts,28 Goodhue St.,Salem,MA Attachment Particle Size Distribution Report 100 90 I I I I I I I I I I I I I 80 I I I I I I I I I I I I I 70 1 to Z 60 Z 50 w I I I I I I I I I I I I I I w ao f a I I I I I I I I I I I I I 30 I I I I I I I I I I I I I 20 ! I I I I I I I I I I to I 0 loo 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE-mm. r3„ %Gravel %Sand _ %Fines _ Coarse Fine Coarsa Metliom Fine Sill Cla 0.0 7.2 28.4 11.7 I 21.1 17.4 14.2 SIEVE PERCENT SPEC.* PASS? Material Description SIZE FINER PERCENT (X=NO) REPROCESSED GRAVEL 1.5" 100.0 V. 96.8 3/4" 92.8 3/8" 78.3 AHerberg Limits #4 64,4 PL= NP LL= NV P1= NP 910 52.7 Coefficients #20 40.9 D90= 16.2838 D85- 12.8229 D60=3.5397 440 31.6 D50= 1.6396 D30=0.3824 D15=0.0886 #50 26.3 D10= Cu cc- #100 18.3 9200 14.2 Classification USCS= SM AASHTO= A-1-10 Remarks (no specification provided) Source of Sample:DIAZ,AVON,MA REPROCESSED GRAVEL Sample Number:641 Date: 11/11/2013 :UT,S:OF MASSACHUSETTS, INC. FClient: ESSEX BUILDERS CORP. Richardson Lane t: NORTH RIVER APTS,28 GOODHUE ST.,SALEM,MA neham, MA 02180 t No: 16091 Fi ere UTS of Massachusetts, Inc. Page 4 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781438-7755(Voice)781438-6216(Fax) Report Date 11-11-2013 Report No. 1 Job Number 16091 Project North River Apts,28 Goodhue St. ,Salem,MA Attachment COMPACTION TEST REPORT 135 i 130 I 0 125 ZAV for U n - Sp.G._ —2.75 v a r - 0 120 I 115 - i - • 4.5 6 7.5 9 10.5 12 13.5 Water content, ---Rock Corrected -o--Uncorrected Test specification: ASTM D 1557-91 Procedure C Modified ASTM D 4718-87 Oversize Corr.Applied to Each Test Point Elev/ Classification Nat. %,> %< Depth USCS AASHTO Moist. Sp.G. LL PI 314 in. No.200 SM A-1-b 2.75 NV NP 7.2 14.2 ROCK CORRECTED TEST RESULTS UNCORRECTED MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Maximum dry density= 125.3 pcf 122.9 pcf REPROCESSED GRAVEL Optimum moisture=9.2% 9.9% Project No. 16091 Client: ESSEX BUILDERS CORP. Remarks: Project: NORTH RIVER APTS,28 GOOD14UE ST.,SALEM,MA o Source:DIAZ,AVON,MA REPROCESSED GRAVEL Sample No.:641 UTS OF MASSACHUSETTS, INC. 5 Richardson Lane Stoneham MA 02180 Figure Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People.' -Page1 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438.7755(Voice)781-438.6216(Fax) Soil Inspection Report Report Date 11-11-2013 Report No. 2 Distribution Copy Job Number 16091 Project North River Apts,28 Goodhue St.,Salem,MA Contractor Essex Builders Corp. WEATHER: Clear, 400 -TIME: 7 : 00 a.m. CONTACT: Chris Serino of Essex Builders Corp. PURPOSE: Observe earthwork construction and perform field density tests EQUIPMENT: N/A TEST METHOD: ❑ Sand Cone ® Nuclear Densometer TITLE: ❑ Inspector ❑ Staff Engineer ❑ Engineer Maximum Field Test Percent Dry Dry Percent - >ft, sr Elevation No. Moisture. Density € Density :Compaction Location (Feet) 1 9.5 125.3 123.1 98.2 See Sketch PB 2 9.4 125.3 124.4 99.3 See Sketch PB 3 11.1 125.3 124.9 99.3 See Sketch PB 4 5.8 132.4 131.1 99.0 See Sketch PB' 5 11.6 125.3 125.0 99.8 See Sketch PB .6,.: 9.1 125.3 124.4 99.3 1 See Sketch PB 0,.,. 9.8 125.3 124.01 98.9 1 See Sketch PB 8 10.31 125.31 120.1.1 95.6 1 See Sketch PS OBSERVATIONS: .This report follows a site visit to observe/test the earthwork for Pavement Base. The writer observed reclaimed concrete had been placed and compacted for the parking area. In the area of Test #4, processed gravel had been placed. The compaction results could not be rendered in the field during this visit pending completion of 'laboratory testing of sampled material. Sample testing completed and results are included in this c4IrIreport. IrA total of eight (8) field density tests were performed using the ASTM D2922 Nuclear Densometer method. ,lie earthwork observed/tested does conform to minimum requirements of 95% compaction. These observations and/or testing results were reported to Mr. Serino during this visit. Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing Pe®'ple' 0 Page 2 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438.7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Soil Inspection Report Report Date 11-11-2013 Report No. 2 Distribution Copy Job Number 16091 Project North River Apts,28 Goodhue St.,Salem,MA Contractor Essex Builders Corp. - Inspector Premium„ ra" a ''. Travel NameTime Hours �' 4 �= Time D. Lent No Min Day 1 Hr(s) REVIEWED BY: Chuck Fraser e Our reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. cc: North River Canal, LLC Anthony Roberto Essex Builders Corporation Chris Serino Essex Builders Corporation Jennifer Patel Essex Builders Corporation Edward DeFanti Goldstein-Milano Brent Goldstein, PE Tom Galvin City of Salem Thomas St. Pierre Nichols-Renas co Associates Joseph L. Nichols, AIA LITS of Massachusetts, Inc. Page 3 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Report Date 11-11-2013 Report No. 2 Job Number 16091 Project North River Apts,28 Goodhue St.,Salem,MA Attachment Iii 7j j �a8 0 w 1°Cxty 4If &f,e4w C l 1 � �tiil i I %6 It zf w Z 7 ° cc , S 23 A NyJ �%w O K 2 v>N ~ �o l I`C OutO ° Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' -Page 1 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438.7755(Voice)781.438-6216(Fax) Soil Testing Results -Transmittal Report Report Date 11-14-2013 Report No. 2 Distribution Copy Job Number 16091 Project North River Apts,28 Goodhue St.,Salem,MA Contractor Essex Builders Corp. Sample Submitted By Sample No. 682 . ® Our Representative: Dave Lent Date Submitted: 11/11/13 ❑ Other: Source of Sample ❑ On-Site Existing @ location: ® Off-Site Borrow from: Diaz, processed qravel Proposed Use: pavement base Material Submitted As: `.❑ Structural/Granular Fill: ❑ Ordinary Borrow: MHD M1.01.0 (Shall be approved by the Architect) ❑ Gravel Borrow: MHD M1.03.0 Type: ❑ Processed Gravel For Base Course: MHD M1.03.1 ❑ Sand Borrow: MHD M1.04.0 Type: ❑ Reclaimed Pavement Borrow for Base Course: MHD M1.11.0 ❑ Crushed stone: MHD M2.01.0 ❑ Dense Graded Crushed Stone for Base Course: MHD M2.01.7 ❑ Common Borrow: ❑ Drainage Fill: ® Other: pavement base Requested Testing ❑ Atterberg Limits ® Gradation Analysis ❑ Hydrometer ® Modified Proctor ❑ Permeability ® Wash Sieve Analysis ❑ Other: Material Classification:processed gravel Project Specification Conformance Results ,,� ❑ Does conform: ❑ Does NOT conform: T El L, Marginally does not'conform...Basis: y ❑ No Specifications provided to our office. . , ; ❑ Specifications provided to our office but sample not submitted to a specific use. ❑ Sample submitted without indication of intended use and without specifications. GENERAL REMARKS: Sample submitted for the purpose of compaction testing. REVIEWED BY: Geotechnical Department n J Our reports are available in PDP form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmafs`s..,c000mm for more information. Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People^ 0 Page 2 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham, MA 02180 781.438-7755(Voice)781.438-6216(Fax) Soil Testing Results -Transmittal Report Report Date 11-14-2013 Report No. 2 Distribution Copy Job Number 16091 Project North River Apts,28 Goodhue St.,Salem,MA Contractor Essex Builders Corp. CC: North River Canal, LLC Anthony Roberto Essex Builders Corporation Chris Serino Essex Builders Corporation Jennifer Patel Essex Builders Corporation Edward DeFanti Goldstein-Milano Brent Goldstein, PE Tom Galvin City of Salem Thomas St. Pierre Nichols-Renasco Associates Joseph L. Nichols, AIA 1 UTS of Massachusetts, Inc. Page 3 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438.7755(Voice)781.438-6216(Fax) Report Date 11-14-2013 Report No. 2 Job Number 16051 Project North River Apts,28 Goodhue St. ,Salem,MA Attachment Particle Size Distribution Report - toe r II I I I I I 1 I V I I I 90 I e0 I I I I I I I I I I I I 70 Z e0 I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 Z so Ji of Lu 40 30 I I V I I I I I I I I I I I I 20 I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0 I I I I I I I I I I I i l l 0 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 DWI GRAIN SIZE-mm. -3„ Coa__ %Gravel %Sand __ %Fines rse Fine Coarse Medium Fine Silt Clay 0.0 1 12.2 32.7 1 13.3 1 21.1 11.6 9.1 SIEVE PERCENT SPEC.' PASS? - Material Description SIZE FINER PERCENT (x=NO) F-M-C SAND,AND GRAVEL,TRACE SILT 1.5" 100.0 1" 98.3 3/4" 87.8 3/8" 67.8 Atterberg Limits 94 55.1 PL= NP LL= NV P1= NP #10 41.8 Coefficients 920 28.2 D90=20.1361 D85= 17.7273 D60= 6.3618 #40 20.7 D50=3.4125 D30= 0.9689 D15=0.2237 #50 17.4 D10=0.0921 Cu= 69.10 Cc= 1.60 #100 12.4 4200 9.1 Classification USCS= SW-SM AASHTO= A-1-a Remarks (no spec icatlon provided) Source of Sample:DIAZ,PROCESSED GRAVEL Sample Number:682 Date: 11/14/2013 UTS OF MASSACHUSETTS, INC. Client: ESSEX BUILDERS CORP. 5 Richards n Lane Project: NORTH RIVER APTS,28 GOODHUE ST.,SALEM,MA Stoneham, MA 027$0 project No: 16091 Fi ure UTS of Massachusetts, Inc. Paye 4 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438.7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Report Date 11-14-2013 Report No. 2 Job Number 16091 Project North River Apts,28 Goodhue St.,Salem,MA Attachment COMPACTION TEST REPORT 143 138 133 0 a T N C N _ U r o 0 128 ZAV for Sp.G._ 2.75 123 118 • 3 4.5 6 7.5 9 10.5 12 Water content,% --Rock Corrected —0---Uncorrected Test specification: ASTM D 1557-91 Procedure C Modified ASTM D 4718-87 Oversize Corr.Applied to Each Test Point Elevl Classification Nat. Depth USCS AASHTO Moist. Sp.G. LL PI h> %� 314 In. No.200 SW-SM A- A 2.75 NV NP 12.2 9.1 ROCK CORRECTED TEST RESULTS UNCORRECTED MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Maximum dry density= 132.4 pcf 128.6 pcf F-M-C SAND,AND GRAVEL,TRACE SILT Optimum moisture=7.6% 8.6 Project No. 16091 Client: ESSEX BUILDERS CORP. Remarks: Project: NORTH RIVER APTS,26 GOODHUE ST.,SALEM,MA o Source:DIAZ,PROCESSED GRAVEL Sample No.:662 UTS OF MASSACHUSETTS, INC. 5 Richardson Lane Stoneham MA 02180 Figure COMcheck Software Version 3.9.2 (n�( Envelope Compliance Certificate 2009 MCC Section 1: Project Information Project Type:New Construction Project Title:North River Apartments Construction Site: Owner/Agent Designer/Contractor. 28 Goodhue Street North River Canal,LLC. Thomas GaMn Salem,AAA 01970 282 Bennington Street JD LaGrasse 8 Associates,Inc. East Boston,MA 02128 1 Elm Square Andover,MA 01810 978470.3675 tgalvin@lagmssearchitectacom Section 2: General Information Building Location(for weather data): Salem,Massachusetts Climate Zone: sa Bung Space Conditioning Typs(s): Nonresidential,Residential Vertical Glazing/Well Area PcL: 18% Activity Type(s) Floor Area Retail 6000 Multifamily 55710 Office 8141 Section 3: Requirements Checklist Climate-Specific Requirements: Component NameMescription Gross Cavity Cont. Proposed Budget Area or R-Value R-Value UFaetor U-Factor(.) Perimeter Floor 1:Slab-On-Grade:Unheated,Vertical 2 R,Nonresidential 630 — 10.0 — — Flow 2:Concrete Floor(over unconditioned space),Residential 4429 — 30.0 0.030 0.064 Fkrw 3:Steel Joist,Residential .14141 30.0 0.0 0.038 0.033 t941:Attic Roof with Wood Joists,Residential 18570 30.0 0.0 0.034 0.027 Roof 2:Other Roof,Nonresidential(b) 1072 — 0.030 0.027 Exterior Wag 1:Steel-Framed,16"o.c.,Nonresidential 8190 19.0 9.6 0.054 0.064 Aluminum Storefront Metal Frame Curtain Wall/Storefront-.Double 1190 — — 0.320 0.450 Pane with Low-E,Clear,SHGC 0.25,Nonresidential Aluminum Entries:Glass(>50%glazirg):Metal Frame.Entrance 399 — — 0.330 0.800 Dow,SHGC 0.29,Nonresidential Steel Doors:Insulated Metal,Swinging,Nonresidential 168 — — 0.160 0.700 Exterior Wall 2:Wood-Framed,16"o.c.,Residential 21018 19.0 9.6 0.039 0.051 Vinyl Windows:Vinyl Frame:Double Pane with Low-E,Clear,SHGC 2675 =� — 0.300 0.350 025,Residential Vinyl Sliders:Glass(>50%gle7ing):Nonmetal Frame, 864 — -- 0.330 0.350 Non-Entrance Dow,SHGC 0.29,Residential (a)Budget U-factors are used for software baseline calculations ONLY,and are not code requirements. (b)'Other components require supporting documentation for proposed 1.1-factors. Project Title:North River Apartments Report date: 1023/13 Data filename:S:12043•SelemlCorrespondencelBuiWing Dep112043-NRAock Page 1 of 2 Air Leakage,Component Certification,and Vapor Retarder Requirements: 1. All joints and penetrations are caulked,gasketed or covered with a moisture vapor-permeable wrapping material installed in accordance with the manufactraees Installation instructions. E] 2. Windows,doors,and skylights owfifed as meeting leakage requirements. Ll 3. Component R-values a tl4actom labeled as certified. 4. No roof insulation is Installed on a suspended ceding with removable ceiling panels. 5. 'Other components have supporting documentation for proposed U-Factors. 6. Insulation installed according to manufacture's instructirms,in substantial contact with the surface being insulated,and in a manner Mat achieves the rated R-value without compressing the insulation. 7. Stair,elevator shaft vents,and other outdoor ab Intake and exhaust openings in the building envelope are equipped with motorized dampers. Ll 8. Cargo doors and loading dock doors are weather seated. ❑ 9. Recessed lighting fixtures installed in the budding envelope are Type IC rated as meeting ASTM E283,are sealed with gasket or caulk. ❑ 10.Building entrance doors have a vestibule equipped with set-closing devices. Exceptions: Building entrances with revolving doors. El Doors not intended to be used as a building enhance. Doom that open directly from a space less than 3000 sq.ft.in area. Q Doors used primarily to facilitate vehicular movement or materials handling and adjacent personnel doors. C] Doors opening directly from a steeping/dwelling unit. Section 4: Compliance Statement Compliance Statement The proposed envelope design represented in this document is consistent with the building plans,specifications and other calculations submitted with this permit application.The proposed envelope s been designed to meet the 2009 IECC requirements in COMcheck Version 3.9.2 and to comply with the mandatory requiM ments Checklist. �r{zoriraS � (jw.l✓rr �rLl��:'� Yla..t of 1. ��`' �5 � ! .`�°� ! /3 Name-Title -�r�� — Signature n Na.20285 WAKEFIELD �o MASS. V� ir �7n r Project Title:North River Apartments Report date: 10123113 Data filename:5:120443-SalemlCorrespondenorlBuilding Dept12043-NRAeck Page 2 of 2 Of Massachusetts'. 'The Construction Testing People"' -Page 1 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438.7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Concrete Plant Report Report Date 08-20-2013 Report No. 2 Distribution Copy Job Number 16091 Project North River Apts,28 Goodhue St.,Salem,MA Contractor Essex Builders Corp. Concrete Co. Benevento Companies CLASS CONCRETE: 4000# 3/4" CUBIC YARDS: 235 Dry '€ z. ,. { Unit Of Weights `Quantity Measure Materials' M_,-,c. ; Cement 564* lbs./cu.yd. Brand Name LaFarge, Type II Fine Aggregate 1310 lbs./cu.yd. Source PePin, Sanford, ME Coarse Aggregate 1190 lbs./cu.yd. Source Benevento, Wilmington Coarse Aggregate 510 lbs./cu.yd. Source Benevento, Wilmington Admixture 2. ozs./cu.yd. Brand Name BASF-Micro air Admixture 9. ozs./cu.yd. Brand Name BASF-Glenium 7500 Water 24.2 gals/cu.yd. Source Town of Georgetown Description Result PLANT GRADATIONS Moisture in Sand % 4.3 SAND COARSE AGGREGATE Moisture in Coarse Aggregate % 2.9 F.M. 2.82 F.M. 6.63 Number of Determinations probe Sieve Size %Passing Sieve Size %Passing Weights Adjusted to Compensate for Moisture yes #200 #8 1.0 Sand Colormetric Test ok #100 6.0 #4 5.0 #50 21.0 3/8" 30.0 #30 42.0 1/2" #16 67.0 3/4" 95.0 #8 84.0 1" #4 98.0 111/2" GENERAL REMARKS: *cement = 451 and flv ash 113, 129 yards shipped from Georqetown plant. Inspector Premium ' ° e > a r cdi '` ,� Travel Name Hours u Time " ,.,._ J. viera No iMax Day 11 Hr(s) �-REVIEWED BY: William P. Crabtree �v Our reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utso£mass.com for more information. ° Of Maissachusetts 'The`Construction TestingPeople" Page 2 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781.438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Concrete Plant Report Report Date 08-20-2013 Report No. 2 Distribution Copy Job Number 16091 Project North River Apts,28 Goodhue St.,Salem,MA Contractor Essex Builders Corp. Concrete CO. Benevento Companies cc: North River Canal, LLC Anthony Roberto Essex Builders Corporation Chris Serino Essex Builders Corporation Jennifer Patel Essex Builders Corporation Edward DeFanti Goldstein-Milano Brent Goldstein, PE Tom Galvin City of Salem Thomas St. Pierre Nichols-Renasco Associates Joseph L. Nichols, AIA r Initial Construction Control bocument To be submitted with the building permit application by a R Registered Design Professional for work per the 8a' edition of the Massachusetts State Building Code, 780 CMR, Section 107.6.2 Project Title: North River Apartments Date: May 28, 2013 Property Address: 29 Goodhue Street Project: Check(x)one or both as applicable: x New construction Existing Construction Project description: Installation of new Automatic Sprinkler System I Nat Phillips MA Registration Number: 39850 Expiration date: am a registered design professional, and hereby certify that I have prepared or directly supervised the preparation of all design plans, computations and specifications concerning: Entire Project Architectural Structural Mechanical x Fire Protection Electrical Other: for the above named project and that such plans, computations and specifications meet the applicable provisions of the Massachusetts State Building Code, (780 CMR), and accepted engineering practices for the proposed project. I understand and agree that I(or my designee) shall perform the necessary professional services and be present on the construction site on a regular and periodic basis to: 1. Review, for conformance to this code and the design concept, shop drawings, samples and other submittals by the contractor in accordance with the requirements of the construction documents. 2. Perform the duties for registered design professionals in 780 CMR Chapter 17, as applicable. 3. Be present at intervals appropriate to the stage of construction to become generally familiar with the progress and quality of the work and to determine if the work is being performed in a manner consistent with the approved construction documents and this code. When required by the building official, I shall submit field/progress reports(see item 3.)together with pertinent comments, in a form acceptable to the building official. Upon completion of the work, I shall submit to the building official a `Final Construction Control Document'. r r LZH aP,�,t�, Enter in the space to the right a"wet"or electronic signature and sealNATHANIEL HANIEL c u R.PHILLIPS � FIRE PROTECTION " NO.39880 Phone number: 781-329-9799 Email: gfisk@aefireine.com 9O�SFcisreaeO .>e` / sr Building Official Use Only Building Official Name: Permit No.: Date: Note I.Indicate with an `x'project design plans,computations and specifications that you prepared or directly supervised.If`other' is chosen, provide a description. Trial Version 10 09 2012 Initial Construction Control Document WTTo be submitted with the building permit application by a Registered Design Professional for work per the 8a' edition of the Massachusetts State Building Code, 780 CMR, Section 107.6.2 Project Title: North River Apartments Date: May 28, 2013 Property Address: 29 Goodhue Street Project: Check(x)one or both as applicable: x New construction Existing Construction Project description: Installation of new Automatic Sprinkler System I Nat Phillips MA Registration Number: 39850 Expiration date: am a registered design professional, and hereby certify that I have prepared or directly supervised the preparation of all design plans, computations and specifications concerning: Entire Project Architectural Structural Mechanical x Fire Protection Electrical Other: for the above named project and that such plans, computations and specifications meet the applicable provisions of the Massachusetts State Building Code, (780 CMR), and accepted engineering practices for the proposed project. I understand and agree that I(or my designee) shall perform the necessary professional services and be present on the construction site on a regular and periodic basis to: 1. Review, for conformance to this code and the design concept, shop drawings, samples and other submittals by the contractor in accordance with the requirements of the construction documents. 2. Perform the duties for registered design professionals in 780 CMR Chapter 17,as applicable. 3. Be present at intervals appropriate to the stage of construction to become generally familiar with the progress and quality of the work and to determine if the work is being performed in a manner consistent with the approved construction documents and this code. When required by the building official, I shall submit field/progress reports(see item 3.)together with pertinent comments, in a form acceptable to the building official. Upon completion of the work, I shall submit to the building official a `Final Construction Control Document'. H OF PAS$r. Enter in the space to the right a"wet"or � NATHANIEL electronic signature and seal: „ R.PHILLIPS FIRE PROTECTION NO.39850 STE Phone number: 781-329-9799 Email: gfisk@aefireinc.com i Building Official Use Only Building Official Name: Permit No.: Date: Note I.Indicate with an `x'project design plans,computations and specifications that you prepared or directly supervised. If`other' is chosen, provide a description. Trial Version 10 09 2012 1011 Initial Construction Control Document RECEIVED JUN -'5 To be submitted with the building permit application by a Registered Design Professional for work per the 8"'edition of the Massachusetts State Building Code, 780 CMR, Section 107.6.2 Project Title:North River Apartments Date: May 30,2013 Property Address: 28 Goodhue Street, Salem,MA Project: Check(x)one or both as applicable: X New construction Existing Construction Project description: I Richard D. Cummings Jr. MA Registration Number: 49023 Expiration date: June 30,2014 am a registered design professional, and hereby certify that I have prepared or directly supervised the preparation of all design plans,computations and specifications concerning': Entire Project Architectural Structural Mechanical Fire Protection X Electrical Other: for the above named project and that such plans,computations and specifications meet the applicable provisions of the Massachusetts State Building Code,(780 CMR),and accepted engineering practices for the proposed project. I understand and agree that I(or my designee) shall perform the necessary professional services and be present on the construction site on a regular and periodic basis to: I. Review,for conformance to this code and the design concept,shop drawings, samples and other submittals by the contractor in accordance with the requirements of the construction documents. 2. Perform the duties for registered design professionals in 780 CMR Chapter 17,as applicable. 3. Be present at intervals appropriate to the stage of construction to become generally familiar with the progress and quality of the work and to determine if the work is being performed in a manner consistent with the approved construction documents and this code. When required by the building official, I shall submit field/progress reports(see item 3.)together with pertinent comments, in a form acceptable to the building official. Upon completion of the work, I shall submit to the building official a `Final Construction Control Document'. Enter in the space to the right a"wet"or 1N OF hlq electronic signature and seal: `� CyGN RICHARD D. rc� CUMMINGS,?R. y 45J" Phone number: 978 658 2616 Email: cummingseng@comcast.net Building Official Use Only Building Official Name: Permit No.: Date: Note 1.Indicate with an`x'project design plans,computations and specifications that you prepared or directly supervised.If'other'is chosen, provide a description. Initial Construction Control Document To be submitted with the building permit application by a Registered Design Professional for work per the Vh edition of the Massachusetts State Building Code, 780 CMR, Section 107.6.2 Project Title:North River Apartments Date:May 30,2013 Property Address: 28 Goodhue Street, Salem,MA Project: Check(x)one or both as applicable:X New construction Existing Construction Project description: I Richard D.Cummings Jr. MA Registration Number:49023 Expiration date:June 30,2014 am a registered design professional, and hereby certify that I have prepared or directly supervised the preparation of all design plans,computations and specifications concerning: Entire Project Architectural Structural Mechanical Fire Protection X Electrical Other: for the above named project and that such plans,computations and specifications meet the applicable provisions of the Massachusetts State Building Code,(780 CMR),and accepted engineering practices for the proposed project I understand and agree that I(or my designee)shall perform the necessary professional services and be present on the construction site on a regular and periodic basis to: 1. Review,for conformance to this code and the design concept,shop drawings,samples and other submittals by the contractor in accordance with the requirements of the construction documents. 2. Perform the duties for registered design professionals in 780 CMR Chapter 17,as applicable. 3. Be present at intervals appropriate to the stage of construction to become generally familiar with the progress and quality of the work and to determine if the work is being performed in a manner consistent with the approved construction documents and this code. When required by the building official, I shall submit field/progress reports(see item 3.)together with pertinent comments,in a form acceptable to the building official. Upon completion of the work,I shall submit to the building official a `Final Construction Control Document'. Enter in the space to the right a"wet"or OF M4S�4C electronic signature and seal: Q. RICHARD dR• N � 0 SJIIAStxS Np.49 Phone number:978 658.2616 Email:cummingseng@comcast.net S17MA�� Building Official Use Only Building Official Name: Permit No.: Date: Note 1.Indicate with an`x'project design plans,computations and specifications that you prepared or directly supervised.If`other'is chosen, provide a description. RECEIVED Initial Construction Control Document To be submitted with the building permit application by a Registered Design Professional a for work per the 8`s edition of the ' Massachusetts State Building Code, 780 CMR, Section 107.6.2 Project Title:North River Apartments Date:May 30,2013 Property Address: 28 Goodhue Street, Salem,MA Project: Check(x)one or both as applicable: X New construction Existing Construction Project description: I Richard D.Cummings Jr. MA Registration Number: 49023 Expiration date: June 30,2014 am a registered design professional, and hereby certify that I have prepared or directly supervised the preparation of all design plans, computations and specifications concerning': Entire Project Architectural Structural Mechanical Fire Protection Electrical Other:Plumbing for the above named project and that such plans,computations and specifications meet the applicable provisions of the Massachusetts State Building Code,(780 CMR), and accepted engineering practices for the proposed project. I understand and agree that I(or my designee)shall perform the necessary professional services and be present on the construction site on a regular and periodic basis to: 1. Review, for conformance to this code and the design concept, shop drawings, samples and other submittals by the contractor in accordance with the requirements of the construction documents. 2. Perform the duties for registered design professionals in 780 CMR Chapter 17,as applicable. 3. Be present at intervals appropriate to the stage of construction to become generally familiar with the progress and quality of the work and to determine if the work is being performed in a manner consistent with the approved construction documents and this code. When required by the building official, I shall submit field/progress reports(see item 3.)together with pertinent comments, in a form acceptable to the building official. Upon completion of the work,I shall submit to the building official a `Final Construction ent'. RICHARD DyN Enter in the space to the right a"wet"or $ CUMMmrg 3, electronic signature and seal: S Phone number: 978 658 2616 Email: cummingseng@comcast.net Building Official Use Only Building Official Name: Permit No.: Date: Note 1.Indicate with an`x'project design plans,computations and specifications that you prepared or directly supervised.If'other'is chosen, provide a description. RECEIVED JUN =5 2013 Initial Construction Control Document To be submitted with the building permit application by a Registered Design Professional for work per the 8`"edition of the Ulf Massachusetts State Building Code, 780 CMR, Section 107.6.2 Project Title:North River Apartments Date:May 30,2013 Property Address: 28 Goodhue Street, Salem,MA Project: Check(x)one or both as applicable:X New construction Existing Construction Project description: I Richard D.Cummings Jr. MA Registration Number:49023 Expiration date:June 30,2014 am a registered design professional, and hereby certify that I have prepared or directly supervised the preparation of all design plans,computations and specifications concerning: Entire Project Architectural Structural Mechanical Fire Protection Electrical Other:Plumbing for the above named project and that such plans,computations and specifications meet the applicable provisions of the Massachusetts State Building Code,(780 CMR),and accepted engineering practices for the proposed project. I understand and agree that I(or my designee)shall perform the necessary professional services and be present on the construction site on a regular and periodic basis to: 1. Review,for conformance to this code and the design concept,shop drawings,samples and other submittals by the contractor in accordance with the requirements of the construction documents. 2. Perform the duties for registered design professionals in 780 CMR Chapter 17,as applicable. 3. Be present at intervals appropriate to the stage of construction to become generally familiar with the progress and quality of the work and to determine if the work is being performed in a manner consistent with the approved construction documents and this code. When required by the building official, I shall submit field/progress reports(see item 3.)together with pertinent comments, in a form acceptable to the building official. Upon completion of the work,I shall submit to the building official a `Final Construction Control Document'. Enter in the space to the right a"wet"or electronic signature and seal: H OF 'i9pyG RICHARD o CUNNINGS JR. y Phone number:978 658 2616 Email: cummingseng@cwmcast.riet " NO.49023 A9 Building Official Use Only Building Official Name: PemitNo.: Date: Note 1.Indicate with an'x'project design plans,computations and specifications that you prepared or directly supervised.If'other'is chosen, provide a description. , w a1 ! 4?33 s [ HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS FOUNDATION IS LOCATED ON .THE GROUND AS SHOVvN. h p0 l ALSO CERTIFY. THAT THIS FOUNDATION PARTIALLY LIES WITHIN THE SCALEC}: LOCATION OF THE . 1 6 A .FLOOD HAZARD AREA ZONE A A SHOWN ON FLOOD, I A ` N ( ) S INSURANCE RATE MAP NUMBER , 1 1 0 6 25009Gd418F EFFECTIVE PATES JUL, 3 2012: DATE:, 1to1 l,_ 67 OF ROFE SI A 5 S L LAND S G � d ; �hlN J • _ 1 _. y �o No-4 m 3904 2 9 k p a_ 4 FS F s 9 Q. : fl SORV NOTE: I I DrA TUM FOR, BENHMARK INFORMATION IS M.G.V. . OF 1929- EASEMENTS 929.EAS M NTS AND AGREEMENTS NOTED ON DEED OR AP,PROYALS ISiONS ARE . .. ; /DEC. E _ NOT SHOWN 0N THIS PLAN O ,O Jp 4 O � L � I 1 t7 LOT AREA I 79,032±, S.F. a PARCEL INFORMATION. DEED REFERENCt. z BOOK_ 222,02 PAGE 393 I CA F I � PLAN.. REFERENCES: APPROXIMATE MATE LOCATION OF n SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT PLAN NORTH TH Rr VER CONDOMINIUM . UNCONSTRUCTED UPPER FLOORS c ALEM_ A.SSA H UStTF� E 1 ING CONDITIONS SHEET FO. C 1 , OF PROPOSED BUILDING I m D SCALE: 1 20 DATED. JANUARY T3 2006- U t _ , RE TNRU FEBRUARY -7, TYP ( ) 2007 BY EASTERN LAND SURVEY ASSOC. kNC. E _ PLAN F ,.AND H T - LA 0 SHE NO, SB 1 , SCALL. 1 30 DATED: ,5 13 02 -1 REV THRU JUNE 6 00 - _ I 2 , 2 2, BY BL COMPANIES; FILED AT TH ES EX E S } SOUTH REGISTRY OF DEEDS AS PEAK BOOK 361 PLAN 67. MISC. 'REFERENCES. ; . P I SIfE IAPJ REVIEW/WETLANDS AND 1 / N FLOOD HAZARD SPECIAL PERMIT REFERENCE: BOOK 6646 PAGE 4 E 2 2 2 `j SPECIA_ USE PERMIT APPROVAL REFERENCE. BOOK 29342- .PAGE 502 ,o Aj j : ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS DECISION N REF 5,6 �. � 0ERENCE. BOOK '.271 fl6 \. PAGE� O � 44 19.g ' (RECORDED AT THE ESSEX SOUTH DISTRICT REGISTRY OF DEEDS:) EDSi ) 4.776.5 10.0 . 35.6 ; PLAN L 4 8,9_ N .TIO , FO DA a ING _ EXIST 21..5 \ « LOCATION OF ZONE A AS OF SALEM SCALED ,.. o� - TC7F? SHOWN ON FLOOD INSURANCE - W. FOUNDATION ,. ` ". -w 10 , 20 _: : 4 RATE MAP NUMBER 25dO9,.0418F EL. 11 .76 - _ , ' \ _ , � l L EFFECTIVE DATE JULY 3 201.2: '; - SCA E. 1 2Q F � ,QAT� May 31, 2413 SHOWING AS BUILT. FORJNbTI4N 3 - \ t 3:63S l #2 eJry b " UE , STREET 6 4 337rJ , 4 31 .r 47 69,4 V. co _ --ti L — 1 1C98. Ad 826 E _E 9� S09'42'40, p X11, ------ W 104.84 ---'"' 70.15 --_ � -- S05-07'40"E , , Am SO1'58'20"W - T s , SPARA1.:7 E Elvciw�s � pwMreRa � suauerM , GOODHUE STREET .: 191 SOUTH' MAIN STREET SUITE 103! : ZONlNG DISTRICT: NORTH EVER CANAL CORRIDOR N CC MID I�XETON,.MA 01949(978) 530-8088 `PHONE:.. , . FAX::( 78 ) 76 7-8579 PROPERTY PARTIALLY LIES WITHIN THE ENTRANCE CORRIDOR OVERLAY DISTRICT (ECOD ) — T_ - ---- -- r —r—_ -- LI) Rr , v .)_ n „! ICES IP�SPE CIIG J„L S, 113 JUN 2 u A : 04 52 1 w a 1a 3 �7 3 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS FOUNDATION IS LOCATED ED 0N THE GROUND AS SHOVN 00 1 ALSO CERTIFY THAT THIS FOUNDATION PARTIALLY LIES WITHIN . THE SCALED LOCATfON :OF THE NHAZARD 6 ? FLOOD :A,R - AREA (ZONE A) :AS SHOWN ON FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP NUMBER 25009G0418F EFFECTIVE2012. , `DATES JULY 3 20 2 1 i ' _ ' 1V 0 , ✓./^w� s-- Y,t � ,� 6 ticoor.. ,w — 1. aQ rn0 ti cI ia 1 {"- 4 .7 0-5 � . . . r , 31,. . t1 .. dd E1pp.3.49-7 S> ww z _ � - 1 : .- DATE:::; : .. . ---`. _ � _ .' ...- ' : .. t , V ..: : w» . .. PL ■■ A N 6o.7N_ :. 2:�C _ t ,t . ga- uH Q,� rf Nd�_ Vff + R AL LAND S 1 S t KE st.Q 4Ir l SU NOTE: DATUM FOR BENCHMARK INFORMATION IS N GV.D. 0= 1929. EASEMENTSAND AGREEMENTS NOTED ON DEED OR APpROVA S/DEC1 f NS ARE NOT SHOWN ON THIS PLAN. . O LT AREA 79,032± PARL INFORMATION DEED REFERENCE. BOOK 222G2 PAGE 393 PLAN REFERENCES: APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT PLAN NORTH RIVERCONDLMINfUwnwjcn T PER FLOORS SALEM MASSACMUSETS EXISTING CONDITIONS SHEET NO,UNrCNaTRUCTED UP OF PROPOSED BUILDING SSALE, 1 _2Q , DATED JANUARY 13 20Q6 REV IHRUFEB2UARY _ 7 ' ,(TYP) 270/ BYEASTERNLAND SURVEY ASSOC. INC. PLAN OFLAND SHEET N0. SB 1 SCALE. 1 =30 DATED. 5/13/02. REV THRU JUNE 26 2002; BY BL COMPANIES E,LED ,AT THE ESSEX SOUTH REGISTRY ©F DEEDS AS PLAN BOOK 361 MISC. REFERENCES. SITE LAN REVIEW/WETLANDS AND FLOOD HAZARD SPACIAL PERMIT REFERENCE: BOOK 26646 PAGE 2 .2 E PERMIT APPROVAL REFERENCE: BOOK 29342 PAGESPEGlAL U 5r02 5.6 ZONINGBOARD OF APPEALS DECISION REFERENCE. BOOK 27id6 PAGE 4 19.9 (RECORDED AT THE ESSEX SOUTH DISTRICT REGSTRY. F DEEDS.) rn cyl 91 PLAINI , OF IA D 76.5 yiVNF0INVG IN EXIST 21 .5 SCALED LOCATION OF ZONE A AS TDP OF So A L E M, FOUNDATION ON FLOOD INSR NGE RATE MAO NUMBER 2.5009C0418F EL._1i;76 01 20 40 ,.,MEFFECTIVE DATEJULY 3, 212: SCALE: 1 20 PATa 3 1 , 2013 "SHOWING AS QU1LT FOUNDATION 3.6 y8GVVQU5 STREET*� 33.7 h. 31.5 69 4 58 � ,Eg8: : 115 S04240UV 104.84 S 70.15 07 WILL AMS SPARAtIft 58 2S010W . ENCNERS PLANNE5 SRS REETQODHUE Sl1 ] $oUTH'MAIN STREET SUITE 103 715TRIVER �ANAL CORRIDOR NRCC MIDSLEONZONING TH RMA01949 PHONE. 9781 539-8088 PAX: C97 } 767-8 79 PROPERTY PARTIALLY LIES WITHIN THE h0 .fi thZ N ff EO ENTRANCE CORRIDOR OVERLAY DISTRICT (ECOD) :. : �I I II 3 t' IVP,..119ddStdl �..: '. 3 p y, `t � : � ° Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testin" People' -Page 1 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham, MA 02180 781.438-7755(Voice)781-438.6216(Fax) Compressive Strength Report - Concrete Report Date 05-01-2013 Report No. 3 Distribution Copy Job Number 16091 Project North River Apts,28 Goodhue St.,Salem,MA Contractor Essex Builders Corp. Concrete Co. Benevento Companies ALL FIELD TESTS DONE ACCORDING TO ASTM: C-172 C-31 C-143 C-1064 -ALL COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TESTS DONE ACCORDING TO ASTM: C-39 CLASS CONCRETE: 3000# 3/4^ I No. Of Sets: 1 CUBIC YARDS: 31 SET 1 LOCATION: Wall: F.5 (7 to 8) foundation wall (stairs) Total Unit ' Slum in. 5 Lab Size Area - Date 11 1Date= Age ` "4 Load Load Fracture'. Air Tem F. 62 No. (in.) (sq.in.). Condition Cast Tested,-` - Days ""(lbs.) (psi.) 'dype Conc Tem F) 68 2629 4 x 8 12_56 Good 05/01/2013 05/08/2013 7 27,000 2,150 2 Truck No. 306 2630 4 x 8 12.56 Good 05/01/2013 05/15/2013 14 35,000 2,790 1 Ticket No. 35841 Z631 4 x 8 12.56 Good 05/01/2013 05/29/2013 28 Time 2:10 Z632 4 x 8 12.56 Good 05/01/2013 05/29/2013 28Unit Wt lbs/cu ft 2633 4 x 8 12.56 Good 05/01/2013 05/29/2013 26 Air Content(%) GENERAL REMARKS: Inspector Is.Premium " :Travel -Name Time . -Hours = - ` Time - -� ;E. C. Fraser No Min Day 1 Hr(s) ,S REVIEWED BY: Robert S. Granada �(�n FRACTURE TYPES X X R — Type 1 Type 2 Type 3 Type 4 Type5 Type 6 Reasonably well-formed Well-formed cone on Columner vertical Diagonal fracture Side fractures at top Similar to Type canes on both ends, one end,vedical cracks cracking through with no cracking or bottom(occur but end of less than 1 in. running through caps, both ends,no through ends;tap commonly with cylinder is j•, [25 mm]of cracking no well-defined cone well-formed cones with hammer to unbonded caps) pointed throught caps on other end distinguish from Type 1 Our reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. ° Of Massachusetts -The Construction Testing People' Page 2 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781.438.7755(Voice)781438.6216(Fax) Compressive Strength Report - Concrete Report Date 05-01-2013 Report No. 3 Distribution Copy Job Number 16091 Project North River Apts,28 Goodhue St.,Salem,MA -'^ Contractor Essex Builders Corp. Concrete Co. Benevento Companies GG: North River Canal, LLC Anthony Roberto Essex Builders Corporation Chris Serino Essex Builders Corporation - Jennifer Patel Essex Builders Corporation Edward DeFanti Goldstein-Milano Brent Goldstein, PE Tom Galvin City of Salem Thomas St. Pierre Benevento Companies Wayne Tarr Of Massachusetts. -The Construction Testing Pe®pie" Page 3 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham, MA 02180 781.438.7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Compressive Strength Report - Concrete Report Date 05-01-2013 Report No. 3 Distribution Copy Job Number 16091 Project North River Apts,28 Goodhue St.,Salem,MA Contractor Essex Builders Corp. Concrete Co. Benevento Companies FIELD SUMMARY REPORT Total Pour: Foundation walls/tie beam: E (4 to 7) , 7 (E to F.S) , F (7 to 8.3) , F.5 (7 to 8) Method of Placement: ❑Pump ®Chute Discharge ❑ Bucket ❑ Other Other: Method of Concrete Consolidation: ®Vibrator ❑ Other Other: Cylinder Fabrication Location: ® Truck Discharge Chute ❑ End of Pump Hose Cylinder Storage: Curing Box Thermal Blanket Hay/Straw Trailer LJ Field ❑ Other Placement Protection: ❑Thermal Blankets ❑ Heat ® None ❑ Other Slump Specification(in.) 3-5 Number of slumps out of specification reported to If rejected Approved by Remarks: ° Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' Page 1 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781.438.6216(Fax) Compressive Strength Report - Concrete Report Date 05-08-2013 Report No. 5 Distribution Copy Job Number 16091 Project North River Apts,28 Goodhue St.,Salem,MA Contractor Essex Builders Corp. Concrete Co. Benevento Companies ALL FIELD TESTS DONE ACCORDING TO ASTM: C-172 C-31 C-143 C-1064 ,ALL COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TESTS DONE ACCORDING TO ASTM: C-39 CLASS CONCRETE: 3000# 3/4" No. Of Sets: 1 CUBIC YARDS: 22 SET 1 LOCATION: Fortino: column line B at 1 a Total Unit `'A rAirTem . 6-5 k85 Size Area - Date Date Age Load -° Load ;Fracture F. 60 (in.) (sq.in.) Condition. Cast Tested Daysw a (Ibs.) ` (psi.) Type (F 76 4 x 8 12.56 Good 05/08/2013 05/15/2013 7 30,000 2,390 1 516 4 x 8 12.56 Good 05/08/2013 05/22/2013 14 35999 4 x 8 12.56 Good 05/08/2013 06/05/2013 28 2:20 4 x 8 12.56 Good 05/08/2013 06/05/2013 28 /cu ft 4 x 8 12.56 Good 05/08/2013 06/05/2013 28 Air Content(%) GENERAL REMARKS: Inspector '' Premium _ r Travel Name Time Hours -.; , + ` : Time Andrew Lawrence No Min Day 1 Hr(s) REVIEWED BY: Robert S. Granada FRACTURETYPES Type 1 Type 2 Type 3 Type 4 Types Type 6 Reasonably well-formed Well-formed cone on columnar vertical Diagonal fracture Side fractures at top Similar to Type cones on both ends, one end,vertical cracks cracking through with no cracking or bottom(occur but end of less than 1 in. running through caps, both ends,no through ends;tap commonly with cylinder is [25 mm)of cracking no well-defined cone well-formed cones with hammer to unbonded caps) pointed throught caps on other end distinguish from Type 1 Our reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. ° Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' Page 2 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham, MA 02180 781.438.7755(Voice) 781.438.6216(Fax) Compressive Strength Report - Concrete Report Date 05-08-2013 .. Report No. 5 Distribution Copy Job Number 16091 Project North River Apts,28 Goodhue St.,Salem,MA Contractor Essex Builders Corp. Concrete Co. Benevento Companies CC: North River Canal, LLC Anthony Roberto Essex Builders Corporation Chris Serino Essex Builders Corporation Jennifer Patel Essex Builders Corporation Edward EeFanti Goldstein-Milano Brent Goldstein, PE Tom Galvin City of Salem Thomas St. Pierre Benevento Companies Wayne Tarr v r IQ Ot Massachusetts. 'The Construction Testing Peoples' Page 3 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781.438.7755(Voice)781.438.6216(Fax) Compressive Strength Report - Concrete Report Date 05-08-2013 Report No. 5 Distribution Copy Job Number 16091 Project North River Apts,28 Goodhue St.,Salem,MA Contractor Essex Builders Corp. Concrete CO. Benevento Companies FIELD SUMMARY REPORT .Total Pour: Footing: column line A-E.8 at 7-9, A-E at 1-9.2 'Method of Placement: ®Pump ❑Chute Discharge ❑ Bucket ❑Other Other: Method of Concrete Consolidation: ®Vibrator ❑ Other Other: Cylinder Fabrication Location: ® Truck Discharge Chute ❑ End of Pump Hose Cylinder Storage: El Curing Box Thermal Blanket Hay/Straw Trailer Field ❑ Other Placement Protection: ❑Thermal Blankets ❑ Heat ® None ❑ Other Slump Specification(in.) 3 to 6 Number of slumps out of specification reported to If rejected •Approved by Remarks: LITS of Massachusetts, Inc. Page 4 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781.438-6216(Fax) Report Date 05-08-2013 Report No. 5 Job Number 16091 Project North River Apts,28 Goodhue St.,Salem,MA Attachment r Of Massachusetts Inc. "The Construction Testing People" Page # 11� __ DAILY REPORT OF CONCRETE POUR PROJECT NAME: 1`i 1,1 Z\.R frnAv' _PROJECT NO. 0 DATE: 54V y L AIR TEMP.: TOTAL YARDS: L Z LOCATION OF POUR: f T� 1 v Load & Slump Batching Batching Time In Yards Concrete % of Ticker # iVo. of fTruck# Inches In Out Minutes Temp. Air _ - _ Cylinders 1 11 I U _.S�_ � S I Z•'l5 � 2'• I S 12 35 Y91 I3_S I ZO 17.(10 2:yO IZo -3;00 -- --I i 1-7 I I L _ ! ---- '� I I I ! I I I I I I INSPECTORL�,U<P()c� epp� R E N I A R K S 5 Richardson lane, Stoneham, Massachusetts 02i80 (781) 438-7795 Fax (781) 438-6216 IX. Action Items a. Deliberation on the approval of the Collins Middle School and the Nathaniel Bowditch 8"' Grade trip to Canobie Lake Park on June 21, 2013 X. Sub Committee Reports Policy Subcommittee: a. Deliberation on the approval of the revision of the policy on Time and Location of School Committee Meetings 6402 b. Deliberation on the approval of the revision of the policy on Officers of the School Committee - 6302 c. Deliberation on the approval of the revision to the policy on the Evaluation of the Superintendent - 2105 d. Deliberation on the third reading of the policy on Vocational Programs 5212.05 e. Deliberation on the approval of the revision to the policy on School Age and Attendance- 5101 f. Deliberation on the approval of the first reading of the policy on Pre-Qualification of Service Providers and Vendors To Work in Salem Public Schools - 3801 Finance Subcommittee Personnel Subcommittee Buildings and Grounds Subcommittee Curriculum Subcommittee Special Education Subcommittee XI School Committee Concerns and Resolutions XII. Questions and Comments from the Audience regarding the 5/20/13 agenda XIII. Adjournment Respectfully submitted by: C, jo� Eile6n M. Sacco, Secretary to the Salem School Committee This notice posted on "Official Bulletin Board" City Hall, Salem, Mass. on �Ck cq Ito,ac 13 at y , -)-,A pMin accordance with MGL Chap. 30A, Sections 18-25. 0 Salem Historical Commission 120 WASHINGTON STREET, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 (978)745-9595 EXT. 311 FAX(978)740-0404 WAIVER OF THE DEMOLITION DELAY ORDINANCE It is hereby certified that the Salem Historical Commission has waived the Demolition Delay Ordinance for the proposed demolition as described below, as per the requirements set forth in the Historic District's Act(M.G.L. Ch. 40C) and the Salem Historic Districts Ordinance. Address of Property: 28 Goodhue Street Name of Record Owner: North River Canal LLC Description of Demolition Work Proposed: Demolition of remaining structures shown as the shaded area on the building plan, entitled "Scheme 2 (08/04/04), resulting in the demolition of the entire structure on the site. Dated: 4/21/2005 SALEM HISTORICAL COMMISSION By: THIS IS NOT A DEMOLITION PERMIT. Please be sure to obtain the appropriate permits from the Inspector of Buildings (or any other necessary permits or approvals) prior to commencing work. ONDIT CITY OF SALEM, MASSACHUSEr ire- 0 SALEM, MA BOARD OF APPEAL CLERK'S OFFICE 120 WASHINGTON STREET. 3RD FLOOR SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TELEPHONE: 978-745-9595 —" FAX 978-740-9846 200b OCT 18 P 12: 5-1KIMBERLEY DRISCOLL MAYOR October 17, 2006 Decision City of Salem Zoning Board of Appeals Petition of North River Canal LLC requesting Variance to Allow 1,800 —-sf per Dwelling Unit for propertylocated at 28 Goodhue Street, NRCC District A public hearing on the above petition was opened on September 27, 2006 pursuant to Mass General Law Ch. 40A, Sec. 11, with the following Zoning Board members present: Bonnie Belair, Nina Cohen,Elizabeth Debski, Richard Dionne, and Annie Hams. Petitioner seeks variances pursuant to Section 9-5 of the Salem Zoning Ordinance to allow construction of a new 78,700 sf building with 44 residential units instead of the 27 units allowed and 1,800 sf per unit instead of the required 3,500 sf. The Board of Appeal, after careful consideration of the evidence presented at the public hearing, and after thorough review of the plans and petition submitted, makes the following findings of fact: 1. Petitioner North River Canal LLC and its principals Alberto and Roberta Roberto and Louie Roberto of East Boston own the property at 28 Goodhue Street, in the North River Canal Corridor(NRCC) District. The petitioner is represented by Joseph C. Correnti, Esq. of Serafini, Serafini, Darling and Correnti LLP. 2. In 2005 a tannery and shoe factory built during the previous century was demolished by the present owner, and the site is currently vacant except for a brick structure, the walls of which were preserved. 3. Petitioner proposes to erect on the 79,300 sf site a new structure combining residential and commercial or retail uses, and to build a multi-use pathway dedicated to public use alongside the canal on the perimeter of the property. Petitioner asserts the proposed development conforms to the intent and purpose of the North River Canal Corridor(NRCC) Zoning ordinance enacted in December 2005 by the City of Salem City Council. Petitioner asserts the proposed project meets or achieves the goals of the NRCC District in the following ways: a. Maintaining the massing and scale of the original building. 2 b. Maintaining the existing sidewalk and creating a new sidewalk plaza in front of the building to enhance the retail uses on the ground floor. c. Establishing new public access to the North River canal by creating a landscaped and lighted pedestrian walkway to be conveyed by easement to the City of Salem. The new walkway will be 19 ft wide and 450 ft long adjacent to the canal. d. Creating 6,000 sf of active commercial or retail use on the ground floor which will encourage active use of retail e. Utilizing brick and other quality building materials throughout and excluding use of any pre-cast concrete or prefab aluminum or metal exterior panels. 4. The proposed new four-story steel and concrete structure would consist of forty-four(44) one-and two-bedroom residential condominium units, including four units which would remain subject to a fifteen-year affordability restriction. All proposed uses would be supported by adequate onsite parking. 5. Petitioner will provide a$10,000 payment to the City of Salem toward the cost of a traffic study to research and recommend improvements to the intersection at the meeting of Grove, Goodhue and Beaver Streets. 6. Petitioner proposes to widen the Goodhue Street sidewalk and establish a plaza at the Goodhue St. entry to the commercial spaces. On the side of the property bordering the Canal, petitioner proposes to create a ten foot wide multi-use pathway with a 3 ft landscaped border on the canal side and a 6 ft. landscaped border on the other side. This enhanced pathway, running for a total of 450 ft along the property's border, will be transferred by easement to the City of Salem to ensure continued public access. 7. Several City residents voiced opposition to the proposed density variance. Jim Treadwell, a Member of the North River Canal Corridor Implementation Committee, submitted a statement urging the Board not to allow more than the maximum allowed density of 27 units. Also in opposition was the Federal Street Neighborhood Association, which opposed the increase in density over that allowed by the terms of the ordinance, on the grounds that the planned density allowed more green space and better quality of life for residents. Ward Two City Councilor Mike Sosnowski also opposed any increase in density. S. Beverly McSwiggin of 30 Japonica St. opposed the granting of a variance on the grounds that granting relief in this case would encourage owners of other properties in the area to be developed more densely as well. Several 3 neighbors stated that intense development is inappropriate in the area because appropriate traffic and sewerage infrastructure is not in place at this time. 9. Pat Donohue of 12 Dearborn Lane, also of the North River Canal Corridor Committee, opposed the granting of a variance from the density guidelines approved by the City Council and stated that the intent of the ordinance was to enhance the quality of life for area residents. She stated that when variances are granted one development at a time, the cumulative effect has major changes in the unique character of Salem. Also in opposition were Meg Twohey, David Hart and Betsy Bums of Federal St.,Leslie Lyman of Southwick St.,Ed Plecinoga of Ocean Ave., Cathy Meadowcroft of Foster St., ------- and Lisa-Dubnel-of-Upham-St. — --- -- — -- 10. In support of the proposed development were Ward 6 City Councilor Paul Prevey, Ward 7 City Councilor Joseph O'Keefe, Bill Luster, representing Crowninshield Management, owner of an abutting property,Jim Moskovitz of the Gallows Hill Neighborhood Group and Joan Sweeney, of 22 Silver Street, who spoke for the Ward 4 neighborhood group. On the basis of the above findings of fact and all evidence presented at the public hearing including,but not limited to, the Plans,Documents and testimony, the Zoning Board of Appeals concludes as follows: 1. The petitioner may vary the terms of the North River Canal Corridor Zoning District to enable the proposed development,consisting of 44 residential units with 1,800 square feet per dwelling unit instead of the required 3,500,to be constructed at 28 Goodhue St. 2. In permitting such change, the Board of Appeals requires certain appropriate conditions and safeguards as noted below. In consideration of the above, the Salem Board of Appeals voted, five (5) in favor (Belair, Cohen, Debski,Dionne and Hams) none (0)opposed,to grant petitioner's request for a variance, subject to the following terms, conditions, and safeguards: 1. Petitioner shall comply with all city and state statutes, ordinances, codes and regulations. 2. All construction shall be done as per the plans and dimensions submitted to and approved by the Building Commissioner. 3. All requirements of the Salem Fire Department relative to smoke and fire safety shall be strictly adhered to. 4. Petitioner shall obtain a building permit prior to beginning any construction. 4 Ci1 Y OF SALEM. MA CLERK'S OFFICE 5. Certificates of Occupancy are to be obtained for the dwelling units. 6. Petitioner shall obtain street numbering from the City of Salem Ass9hoMToMeP 12: -I5'I and shall display such numbers so as to be visible from the street. 7. Petitioner is to obtain approval from any City Board or Commission having jurisdiction including, without limitation, the Planning Board, the Design Review Board and the Conservation Commission. 8. Petitioner shall submit proposed development plans to the Design Review Board for approval and shall obtain Site Plan Review from the Planning Board, as a ----- condition-o€the-granting ofthis-variance. --- 9. Petitioner shall investigate the applicability of new permeable surfaces in the parking area to enable reabsorption of rainwater and shall install such non-asphalt surface on the property if it is feasible. 10. Four of the 44 units will be subject to affordability restrictions for a period of fifteen years. Such affordable housing restriction shall be prepared in the form recommended by the City of Salem Planning Department in accordance with requirements of the Department of Housing and Community Development of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, and shall be registered with the South Essex Registry of Deeds at the conveyance of these units. 11. Petitioner shall create an easement for public access to the multi-use pathway shown on the plan submitted herewith and shall obtain endorsement by the City of Salem from the City Solicitor for such easement. Petitioner shall register such easement for public access with the South Essex Registry of Deeds prior to the issuance of a building permit. 12. Petitioner shall make a payment of the sum of$10,000 to the City of Salem to assist in the cost of a traffic analysis plan, and shall submit proof of such payment prior to the issuance of a building permit. Nina Cohen, Chair Salem Zoning Board of Appeals A COPY OF THIS DECISION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE PLANNING BOARD AND THE CITY CLERK Appeal from this decision,if any,shall be made pursuant to Section 17 of the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A,and shall be filed within 20 days of filing of this decision in the office of the City Clerk. Pursuant to the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40A,Section 11,the Variance or Special Permit granted herein shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certificate of the City Clerk has been filed with the Essex South Registry of Deeds. f, a Citp of harem, fRa2;garbU5ettg Pubic Propertp Mepartmeut �3uilbiug ;Oepartmeut One&alem green (978) 7459595 tt?st. 380 Peter Strout Director of Public Property Inspector of Buildings 091hoply Zoning Enforcement Officer May 21, 1999 Steve Chigas D/B/A/Steve's Auto Specialty 28 Goodhue Street Salem, Ma. 01970 An automotive repair is not a permitted use in the BPD District (Business Park Development). At this time we would recommend if you intend to continue operating at the property, that you attempt to seek appropriate zoning relief for the Board of Appeals for your automotive use. We will allow you to continue this business, however, this appeal process must start immediately. The application should be filed before June 15, 1999 along with notifying to Management Company and the Building Department. Obviously, we have no control over your lease, so you need to discuss it with L.T.W. 4Sincerely,ut Building Inspector cc: Scott L. Masse, Esq. 12 Peabody Square, 2nd Floor Peabody, Ma. 01960 The-commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Public Safety Board of Building Regulations and Standards One Ashburton Place - Room 1301 Argeo Paul Cellucci Boston MA 02108 Kentauro Tsutsumi Governor r Chairman Jane Swift Tel: (617) 727-7532 Fax: (617) 227-1754 Thomas L. Rogers Lieutenant Governor Administrator Jane Perlov Secretary STATE BUILDING CODE APPEALS BOARD Date: June 10, 1999 Name of Appellant: H &G Realty Corp. %LTW Management Associates, Inc. Service Address: 271 Western Avenue Lynn, MA. 01904 Re: Docket Number: 99-041 Property Address: 28 Goodhue Street Salem., M.A. 01970 Date of Hearing: April 15, 1999 We are pleased to enclose a copy of the decision relative to the above case wherein certain variances from the State Building Code had been requested. Sincerely: a m C STATE BUILDING CODE APPEALS BOARD �� =!� -.: c atrtcta A. Brenn lerk y ca Program Manager cc: State Building Code Appeals Board Building Official t� STATE BUILDING CODE APPEALS BOARD Docket Number: 99-041 Date: June 10, 1999 Background The Assistant Building Inspector in his letter of January 21, 1999 (which is made part of this decision by reference)identified thirteen(13) "building and fire code issues" (and one zoning issue) and ordered that they be addressed and the work completed by December 30, 1999. The Appeal Application described the building as of Type 5B construction and containing F-1 and F-2 Use Groups (Moderate and Low Hazard Factory and Industrial Occupancies). The Building Height and Area were not identified in the application. Relief Requested The relief requested is that Orders#1, 2, and 4 be annulled; that Orders#5 and 13 be amended; and that Order#9 be clarified. Testimony The Appellant gave a brief description of the structure and the history of its use: The building is approximately 84,000 square feet in total area and is a four story building of unprotected wood frame construction(Type 5B) approximately one hundred(100)years old. The entire building was a shoe factory until twenty(20)years ago when the first floor only was used as a shoe factory and other tenants (manufacturing and industrial uses)occupied the second,third and fourth floors. The size of the building pre-dates the current limitations (height and area) for a building of this construction type. The building is classified with the Building Department and identified by the appellant's architect as a Type 5B building of Use Groups F-1 and F-2. The Appellant testified that there are two other tenants in the building that could perhaps be classified in use groups other that F-1 and F-2 and is seeking clarification on that point. The current owners inherited the building and in the process of finding new tenants for the first floor(formerly the shoe manufacturing business). The management company could not put new tenants into the building as there are deficiencies the building the Building Department wishes corrected. These deficiencies include means of egress,hallways,bathroom facilities and other items identified in the appeal. The Appellant testified that he had been working with the Building Department for approximately a year and a half and in August of last year sent a letter to the Building Department of proposed corrections (ratings of corridors, emergency lighting,provision of fire extinguishers, structural review of the building) that would be made to presumably allow the occupancy of the first floor. Subsequently other items were identified by the Building and Fire Departments which the Appellant contends he is not required to do,primarily the fire alarm panel , the master box, and fire separation assemblies between tenants. The Appellant testified that the building is fully suppressed, and monitored by ADT Alarm who would then notify the Fire Department. The sprinkler system is annually tested. � 5 STATE BUILDING CODE APPEALS BOARD Docket Number: 99-041 Date: June 10, 1999 The Appellant reviewed the Building Inspector's orders of January 21, 1999, to identify the points of contention: Order#1 to install a fire protective signaling and automatic fire detection system is contested as the Appellant argues these systems are not required by the building code for Use Group F. The Appellant also contends that pursuant to MGL Ch 148 the requirement for this system is a matter for the Fire Department and not the Building Department and the Building Inspector is without authority to issue this order. At the Request of the Chair, and for the purposes of clarity, the items of the appeal were to be addressed one at a time with the Appellant, the Building Inspector, and the State Building Inspector,who provides technical assistance to the Board, addressing each issue in tum. The Building Inspector presented plans of the building(developed by the Appellant's architect)to identify the four floors of the building, the means of egress and average length of the building (along its longest dimension) as being approximately 580 feet. The Building inspector confirmed the building to be of Type 5B construction and to be fully suppressed. The Building Department initially inspected the building in response to a complaint to the Fire Department of inadequate ventilation. At that time hazardous means of egress were identified under Section 3400.5 of the building code as unsafe and inadequate and inadequate lightning and ventilation was identified under Section 3400.6. The Board questioned the lack of specific citation of Building Code Sections in the Inspector's letter. The Inspector responded by indicated that there had been an on-going process and at other meetings and in earlier letters (and with other attorneys) specific areas/sections of the code were discussed. The Inspector identified that the records of the Building Department do not reflect the actual use(s) of the building and that there are probably 27—28 tenants in the building which were discovered within the past year and one half and identified other letters (dated as early as December 1997) which have additional citations. The Board and the Inspector reviewed egress problems caused by individual tenants being able to lock doors in the path of travel so as to deprive other tenant a second means of egress. The Inspector presented 25 photographs to the Board which are collectively identified as Exhibit#1. There was a general discussion of how the building changed from a single use single tenant building to a building containing multiple tenants. There was also a general discussion of the responsibilities of the owners to ensure the conformance of the building to the requirement of the building code. Proposed plans for corrective actions (corridors, etc.)were presented. n � STATE BUILDING CODE APPEALS BOARD Docket Number: 99-041 Date: June 10, 1999 The Appellant contended that for the F-1/F-2 Use Group a fire protective signaling system is not a requirement of code. The Board questioned if there were other uses (not F-1/17-2)in the building. The Appellant identified two High Hazard Uses that are tenants in the building that will be moved out if it is required that they be moved out. In future no space will be occupied without proper approvals. The Appellant contended that in a factory use group a fire alarm system is not required and the fact that there are multiple tenants does not change that fact. The Board identified that currently the building contains multiple tenants of multiple uses as a fact having been established. The Appellant testified that there are also artists/photographers in the building which uses do not fall within the factory use and could be considered business uses which bring in people from the outside and for which tenant separations and safe corridors must be provided. In summary the Board identified that if the building were entirely within the F Use Group many of the problems would not exist,particularly if the tenants could not block the means of egress, and that the problems are caused by the multiple uses and the layout of the uses. The Appellant has agreed with the Building Department to relocate tenants not in the F Use Group most particularly the High Hazard Uses when the issues with the Building Department are resolved. There was a general discussion of remedial actions that could be taken once the building was entirely within the F Use Group no matter how many tenants of that use occupied the building. The issue of height and area limitations to be applied when an existing building is modined by addition or changes use was identified by the Building Inspector. At the Request of the Board the State Building Inspector testified that the Board has insufficient information upon which to make a decision. The State Inspector summarized the known facts about the building and its uses including the issues associated with its height and area. Without a complete inventory of the tenant/uses of the building issues of the necessity for tenant separation could not be addressed. The presence of multiple tenants of different uses also has a consequence in the requirement for a fire protective signaling system as the uses are not separated and therefore the most stringent requirement for any use must be maintained throughout the building. The State Inspector suggested the Owner provide a complete inventory of the uses for the Board to make any decision, and suggested that the District State Inspector could provide technical assistance. 1 STATE BUILDING CODE APPEALS BOARD Docket Number: 99-041 Date: June 10, 1999 On the issue of the hazardous egress in the building the State Inspector suggested that an Exit Order issued under Section 1004.2,Hazardous Means of Egress,might be a more appropriate action on the part of the Building Inspector. The Board considered continuing the hearing until complete floor plans could be provided. The Building Inspector presented pictures of the egress problems and identified that it has been a year and one half since these problems have been identified, and the egresses continue to be unsafe. The Building Inspector identified the concern of a conflagration problem and the concern of the Fire Marshall of conflagration. The Board identified that the Local Inspector should be issuing and Exit Order and the owner to have been derelict in not correcting the exit problem for a year and one half. The Board suggested a thirty day time period for the correction of the exit problems and upon their correction the Appellant return to the Board to resolve the other issues, and encouraged the Building Inspector to close the building unless the problems were corrected. The Building Inspector reviewed the exit layout as it exists in the building with tenants deprived of second means of egress. The Appellant testified that there are financial constraints to the correction of the building. A Motion was made to give the owners thirty days to correct the these obvious, excessive violations, and that the Building Inspector be kept informed of the improvements,and that a continuance without time limit be granted while the Building Inspector monitors the improvements of the egress. The Appellant testified that layout of corridors and other improvements have been designed, however, the decision to proceed with these improvement relies on cost estimates and these estimates have been impossible to make without a final determination of all requirements including those identified in this appeal. The State Inspector testified that the Code provides in Section 1004.2 for a Exit Order which has an appeal procedure associated with it, likewise in Section 121,Unsafe Structures, the code provides the method for dealing with unsafe structures. The Board has heard enough testimony to have strong suspicions that this may be an unsafe structure or a structure requiring and Exit Order, and might care to direct the Building Inspector to issue on or both of those documents in accordance with the Code and the General Law. STATE BUILDING CODE APPEALS BOARD Docket Number: 99-041 Date: June 10, 1999 The Board identified the General Law to be Chapter 143, Section 6. The Appellant identified that the Building Inspector has already set a time frame for compliance which extends to December 30, 1999. The Board discussed the existing egress which requires paths of travel through tenant space which may be subject to locking. The Appellant identified the problem of finally identifying all items required by code and the cost of those items to be critical to beginning improvement, particularly the fire protective signaling system,which he contends is not required in the F-1/F-2 Use Group. The Board identified that currently the building is not only F-1/17-2 Uses. As the first Motion was never seconded a new Motion was made that the Board order the Building Inspector to issue the proper orders to condemn this building under the Massachusetts State Building Code and Chapter 143 of the General Laws. The Motion was seconded, the Board discussed the length of time the violation have been allowed to exist. There was no further discussion and the Motion was voted unanimously. The following members voted in the above manner: Stanley ruman DamelO'Sllllivan lexanderMacLeod Chairman A complete administrative record including the audiotape of the proceedings is on file with the offices of the Building Code Appeals Board. A true copy attest, dated Patricia A. Bre an, Clerk Program Manager Any person aggrieved by a decision of the State Building Code Appeals Board may appeal to a court of competent jurisdiction in accordance with Chapter 30A, Section 14 of the Massachusetts General Laws. City of Salem, Massachusetts Fire Department a 48 Lafayette Street Robert qV rurner Salem, :1Tassachusetts 01970-3695 Tire Prevention Chief Tel 978-744-1235 Bureau 978-744-6990 Fax 978-745-4646 978-745-7777 Salem Fire Prevention Regulation #15A Rules and Guidelines for Installation and Approval of Automatic Fire Alarm Devices and Systems For Other Than Residential Occupancies, and Applicable When Structures Are Substantially Altered, For New Construction, and When a Change of Use Group Classification is Planned Under authority granted by the General Laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and in compliance with the provisions of Article #4 and Article #12 of the Mass. State Building Code, the following rules and guidelines are established to assist property owners, contractors and installers, for the installation and approval of fire alarm devices and systems. 1. Definitions: A. Use Groups: As defined in the current edition of the Massachusetts State Building Code. B. Approved Smoke Detector: An approved device, which detects visible or invisible products of combustion. Approved smoke detectors must be permanently wired and connected to a fire alarm panel. C. Approved Heat Detector: An approved device, which detects abnormally high temperatures of increased rate of temperature rise or a combination of both. Approved heat detectors shall be permanently wired, connected to a fire alarm panel, and shall activate an audible/visual alarm device. D. Common Hallways: A common corridor of space separately enclosed, which provides common access to or through the required exacters of the structure. E. Mechanical and Equipment Rooms: Any space designated to contain mechanical, electrical, transformer, telephone of elevator equipment. SALEM FIRE PREVENTION REGULATION 1115A -2- F. Utility Room: Any common area, consisting or over one hundred square feet, which may become a likely place ignition. Examdle: Storage rooms, laundry areas, shipping areas, etc. G. Occupied Open Areas: Any common use area, consisting of over one hundred square feet, which by its use would present a sufficient fire loading, to require fire protection devices. Example: Open Office Space, Open Sales Areas, Open Manufacturing Areas, Open Manufacturing Areas, Storage Areas, etc. 2. Application and Permit: A. An application to install shall be filed on Salem Fire Prevention Bureau Form #81F, by a licensed electrician, prior to starting any work on a fire alarm system. B. A fee of $10.00 shall accompany each application. C. Upon approval of the plans submitted or listing of items to be installed, a permit shall be issued for installation of fire alarm devices, subject to obtaining an electrical permit from the Salem Electrical Dept. D. Three sets of plans are required to be submitted with the application, for stamped approval of the Salem Fire Department. E. Two sets of stamped approved plans will be returned to the applicant, with the permit to start work. In the event plans are not approved, a written report will be forwarded to the applicant, stating any deficiencies and requesting a conference to correct any items which appear unsatisfactory. F. The Salem Fire Department shall have up to ten (10) working days to review plans, per Section 113.5 of the Mass. State Building Code. 3. Levels of Protection and Location of Devices: A. All automatic fire alarm systems, consisting of manual fire alarm pull stations, audible/visual devices, master fire alarm box (where deemed necessary), smoke detectors, heat detectors or other devices and/or equipment shall be installed as determined by the Head of the Fire Department, unless specifically set forth as to type of device by the Massachusetts State Building Code. B. Locations of all devices shall be subject to approval by the Fire i Prevention Bureau. C. Zoning shall be required where, in the opinion of the Fire Prevention Bureau, the area to be protected is sufficient in size to require a breakdown of area by floor or geographic area. SALEM FIRE PREVENTION REGULATION #15A -3- Sprinkler, standpipe, or fixed extinguishing systems may require additional zoning. D. An annunciator shall be provided in the front entry of all structures if zoning is required. Identification of each zone shall be customized to apply to the area served, shall be approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau, and shall be on permanent plates attached to the annunciator with permanent. screws or rivets which cannot be easily removed. Back lighted designations are acceptable. Graphic annunciators may be required if, in the discretion of the Fire Prevention Bureau, the zoning of the building or property is such that standard zoning is inadequate. E. A Square D #9001KS11K3, Silent Alarm Switch is required, and shall be located at the Annunciator or the Fire Alarm Panel, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. A remote trouble buzzer is required at the annunciator to indicate the system has been silenced by the silence alarm switch. 4. A Master Fire Alarm Box, where required, shall be installed on the exterior of the building, or as directed by the Salem City Eiectrician. A blank door may be specified and the code designation shall be provided by the City Electrician. 5. All electrical wiring shall be subject to the approval the City Electrician. 6. Final Approval and Inspection: A. Upon completion of the installation, the licensed electrician/installer, shall request an appointment for a final test and inspection. B. Appointments for the test shall be made with at least one (1 ) week advance notice, with the Salem Fire Prevention Bureau. The installer shall have tested the entire insta[lation, prior to the fire department inspection date. All appointments are subject to cancellation for fire department emergencies. The installer shall provide an employee to reset the panel and system throughout the test. C. Upon completion of the satisfactory testing of the system, the installer shall sign the certificate of completion, and a certificate of compliance will be issued by the Fire Prevention Bureau. 7. Maintenance: A. A maintenance program shall be established by the owner of record. -4- B. A written Maintenance report shall be filed with the Salem Fire Department on an annual basis. If the System is connected to a municipal fire alarm master box, the maintenance inspector shall also file a report with the Salem City Electrician, on a form provided by that office. C. Failure to file reports of condition of the system as required, shall constitute a violation of the Salem Fire Code; and such further action, as the law permits, shall be taken. 8. Certificate of Occupancy: A. It is the responsibility of the owner of record, to obtain the required Certificate of Occupancy from the Building Department. 9. It is recommended that a conference be held, by appointment, to save time on the part of all concerned. Please call 745-7777 for appointments. Postal (DomesticCERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT mLnM ' Ln Postage $do r9 O Certified Fee P t l Postmark Return Receipt Fee Here (Endorsement Required) C3 Restricted Delivery Fee O (Endorsement Required) 0 Total Postage&Fees O S Name(Please P or Clearly) to be plated by mailer) - - - - - - � Street Apt No.�or Po 8 No. ------'�-------- T66 r4�fl-�Iway O City state,Z,IF.s� (;viRew mt, 011 1 Certified Mail Provides: ■ A mailing receipt ■ A unique identifier for your mailpiece ■ A signature upon delivery — ' ■ A record of delivery kept by the Postal Service for two years Important Reminders: ■ Certified Mail may ONLY be combined with First-Class Mail or Priority Mail. ■ Certified Mail is not available for any class of international mail. ■ NO INSURANCE COVERAGE IS PROVIDED with Certified Mail. For valuables,please consider Insured or Registered Mail. ■ For an additional fee,a Return Receipt may be requested to provide proof of delivery.To obtain Return Receipt service,please complete antl attach a Return Receipt(PS Form 3811 to the article and add applicable postage to cover the fee.Endorse mailpiece 'Return Receipt Requested".To receive a fee waiver for a duplicate return receipt,a USPS postmark on your Certified Mail receipt is required. ■ For an additional fee, delivery may be restricted to the addressee or addressee's authorized agent.Advise the clerk or mark the mailpiece with the endorsement"Restricted Delivery". ■ If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is desired,please present the arti- cle at the post office for postmarking. If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is not needed,detach and affix label with postage and mail. IMPORTANT:Save this receipt and present it when making an inquiry. PS Form 3800,July 1999(Reverse) 102595-99-M-2087 1 COPY DECEMBER 24, 2001 KENNEDY DEVELOPMENT GROUP 500 BROADWAY EVERETT,MA 02149 RE: 28 GOODHUE STREET-SALEM DEAR OWNER, UNDER STATE BUILDING CODE 780 CMR SECTION 121.1 THRU 121.8 WE ARE DECLARING YOUR STRUCTURE TO BE ESPECIALLY UNSAFE IN CASE OF FIRE. WE HAVE BEEN NOTIFIED, BY THE HEAD OF FIRE PREVENTION, THAT THE LARGE NUMBER OF BROKEN AND MISSING WINDOWS MAKE YOUR STRUCTURE MORE VULNERABLE IN THE CASE OF FIRE. UNDER THE ABOVE MENTIONED STATUTES YOU ARE DIRECTED IMMEDIATELEY (24 HOURS) TO BEGIN TO SECURE YOUR BUILDING. FAILURE TO ACT WILL RESULT IN THE CITY OF SALEM OR ITS AGENTS SECURING THE BUILDING AT THE OWNERS EXPENSE. THANK YOU IN ADVANCE FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION IN THIS MATTER. THOMAS STYIERRE LOCAL BUILDING INSPECTOR CC: MAYORS OFFICE FIRE CHIEF FIRE PREVENTION SALLY HAYES-WARD 6 COUNCILLOR SLATER & SHUB, LLP cOpl COUNSELLORS AT LAW � 27 CONGRESS STREET, SUITE 512 SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 Telephone: (978)740-9200 Facsimile: (978)740-0300 JEFFREY W. SHUB,ESQUIRE February 26, 2001 John D. Keenan, City Solicitor 222 Essex Street Salem, MA 01970 Re: Property : 28 Goodhue Street, Salem, MA My file number: 24BO100 ----------------------------------------------------- Dear John: As requested in our prior telephone conference, please find enclosed copies of the manifests relative to the disposal of the materials, previously located at the above captioned property. As you will note, the same were removed by a licensed provider, all in conformity with current disposal requirements. This matter is now considered as closed, however, in the event that you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. I remain, Very truly yours, i ;,"Enel/ Jef y ,. Shub, Esq Spm_. as stated CC: LTW Management GREEN-OFFICE COPY •CANARY-:CUSTOMER'COPY• PINK-WAREHOUSE COPY..'. FOR DISPOSAL ONLY EMPTY DRUM HAZARDOUS MATERIAL SHIPPING FORM FROM: CONSIGNEE and DESTINATION Ae.4Uy7,S1C1, vwIneRAY SAFETY -KLEEN (NE), INC. AJY,<�^r - 221 SUTTON STREET .2c 6U_1014�lc sr NORTH ANDOVER, MA 01845 J�/Cl z m� oi47o TEL. (978) 683-1002 PACKAGGE NO. PE HIA PROPER SHIPPING IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMMM i r j to J 0 Q O L Z W � F z Q Z Cn fn 2 0 A a 0 QN O C x En rn 9 z D F M m z M O D U N "This is to certify that the above-named materials are properly classified, described, packaged, marked and labeled,and are in proper condition for transportation according to the applicable regulations of the Department of Transportation." CUSTOMER SIGNATURE �q,'�(,( .s '{rl'� i ='ATE V I \ i CHEMTREK 1-800-424-9300 DRIVER'S SIGNATURE, DATE a590-7590 CONTAINS HAZARDOUS MATERIALS �\ UUIVlhn UIVVVCHLln Uf IVIHJJHUrlUJC11J DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ' One Winter Street Boston, Massachusetts 02108 ' Please rint or type. Fonn d tied for use on elite(12-phch)tYPewntei UNIFORM HAZARDOUS 1•Generators US EPA ID No. Manifest Document No. 2.Page 1 Information in the shaded areas WASTE MANIFEST X p 7 8 1 5 9 6 1 1 8 9 3 45 1 7 8 of is not required by Federal law. 3.Generator's Name and Mailing Address FJ&6 REALTY CRP C/O LTK MAtW-eW.RT AZSMIATW I= 211 WURTAM AVIR BvfitateCae�lp� LYNN, MA 01"A a.Generators Phone 17811 596-1184f N 5.Transporter 1 Company Name 6.US EPA ID Number C36114e Tran.ID 00 Fd PRO SIVRYTCEw r FAA:. IM A a 9 9 0 ti 1 0 0 0 4 i",ED r h ti 7,Transporter 2 Company Name 8.US EPA ID Number D"' cm ;D.,Trartsporfet's,phone t' v 9.Designated Facility Name and Site Address 10.US EPA ID Number EpS ela,T atis..to y pa O SAFETY-KL4'W (f .). 114C. FTrarlspbrtersPhone - C) .300 tMNAL STREET G Stafe FauTtdys ID - NOT REQUIRED' b = 0 LASRENCYMP ! FFaa[ysPFrone { V C 11.US UOT Description(Including Proper ShippingName,Hazard Class and ID Number tz-Conveners ou t. co / No. Type Total Duan ",�,� WASTE NO. U aR<d II PAINT kilLATED Ai/:T PT: �t _,::.f, ti?' Fy373. m Z O SG:S_T (C4)O1t m m - c a G O m E b.. t ,, n. ,_ M f ' X ::3'i"f. ACE7(m, -� [L N E O R N o A m T o Rix= oiQ;Tr'.: Opti[;3CV^';S, 1 R M d U h��i.'_ � nc• ty rTl .T ' t Vn ,, ,. :.. .,. m' m O J.Additional Descriptions for Materials Usted'Above(include physical state and hazard code.)5 K.Handling Codes for Wastes Listed Above E PA1tiT.;l AMLO ltd CMSADfc&a�:V°i � E .. a § a. c.. A{C.{E(a1COaPiR n . =; 1G{jR{�LC.)1 AC {1tY>'ls. d eZo .?"�' FY } d a r4i L� R 1.r 0041ott. m h `�, mtisa A^ r. p , �,�,a xT d v ' a •:k ib, -d:: 15.Special Handling Instructions and Additional Information O IW.RS MG7 CX.417 CT- rNPR.D eIMRVIC'E:3, _LNC., -24 Rojas '.i30U)^tit r t L7't. 1:.fi C;i.11:EEK>zy lC. : s' Eii;Q127 b), ERG-0127 c) PRG012', .J! ERGMU U 1117125-011 C N 16.GENERATOR'S CERTIFICATION:labeled, and hereby declare that the contents of this consignment are fully and accurately described above l proper shipping name and are classified, m packed,marked,and IabeleQ antl are in all respects in proper condition for transport by hignway according to applicable international and national yuvernment regulations. If I am a large quantity generator,I certify that I have a program in place to reduce the volume and toxicity of waste generated to the degree I have determined to be economically practicable and that I have selected the practicable method of treatment,storage,or disposal currently available to me which minimizes the present and future threat to human E health and the environment;OR,if I am a small quantity generator. I have made a good faith effort to minimize my waste generation and select the best waste management (1) method that is available to me and that t can afford. O Date O Printedled Name Signature - Month Day year UT 17.Transporter 1 Acknowledgement of Receipt of Materials Date C A Printed{Typed Name Signature Month Day year N i S r P r q18.Transporter 2 Acknowledgement of Receipt of Materials Date EPrintedlTyped Name Signature Monm Day rear R F 19.Discrepancy Indication Space A C I 20,Facility Owner or Operator:Certification of receipt of hazardous materials covered by this manifest except as notetl in item l9 I Date T PrintedlTyped Name Signature Monm Day I Year y Form Approved OMB No.2050-0039.Expires 9-30-W EPA Form 8]W-22(Rev.9-SB)Previous editions are obsolete. COPY>8: GENERATOR RETAINS yTy\ UUIYIIVIUINWVCALItI Vr IVIA00AUF1U0CI 10 ® DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ' DIVISION OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS One Winter StreetBoston, Massachusetts 02108 Please print or type.(Form desi ned for use an elite(12-pitch)typewriter) UNIFORM HAZARDOUS 1.Generator's US EPA ID No. Manifest Document No. 2.Page 1 Information in the shaded areas WASTE MANIFEST M 7 8 1 5 9 6 1 1 i3 4 3 6 7 9 of is not required by Federal law. 3.Generators Name and Mailing Address 'r el,OPcument Number t, 4411 .. y HAG REALTY CMP COD LTV MAW411ti%v A �P.v AB-50IA4tE8 INC 271 YZPEJ'f RN AVE ,LYNN, i9A 01904 > 6 8.1} 546—i.1 g ni 4.Generators Phone CV � 5.Transporter 1 Company Name 6.US EPA ID Number CxSfate do aa:eROxsrtcE3,. INC. IM A D s u a 1 0 c , a 7 7.Transporter 2 Company Name 8.US EPA ID Number y=- .,,[ ;,_g„y�';. g' v D Trans{wr,ei's?hone �_'� 4 i < r✓ Cahs..i6#�” -0 E Siffie 9.Designated Facility Name and Site Address 10.US EPA ID Number `,�....,w.. ._ ".' - ';y ,-i o SAFe--TY—KLZS21 (NE)r iAh-. FTranspotos;Phone 300 ( 11$}^.11 S'PF'.E;E'P fl State Fapltys ID NOT REQUIRED; T,ra,'FWR*~SCEr Hk 0184+9 ik Cr 0 `t 6 v ,II „)-. { H Faalltys Pfion$-« _ C 11.US DOT Description(including Proper Shipping Name,Hazard Class and ID Number 12,containers la. U P ( 9 P PP 9 ) No. Tyne tool Quartly umwAsMNO- IT C zff r• 0 CL G 0 m E b. —ATF FJ:vTJTwl PD !.'.i i. Y7AfiTF i:.At � u >"a�itix _ 71 Q N 34Y7i ,= - m m E oR Cl) A T c ZA�i?'F. 0 e1 ? s N d. U N N J.Additional DescriptionsforMaterials Listed Abgve�( l e physical state and hazard code.) .:, K Handling Codes for Wastes Listed Above E t?TLY �'t7i:tDa r";` � z o � Di; s a Tr r I �- mor `d,xx¢~,rs- r?'i - - b d. .� m 15.Special Handling Instructions and Addibonarinformation O eNF,YC"ZXCYi CC WAC-A. ^EMPP.0 57?R`VTCr--8. .i'i'.='. —24 "Sil E:R a e) ¢RG$7S4 U 17-17r,—Q1 C N 16,GENERATOR'S CERTIFICATION:I hereby declare that theropcontentser condi of this consignment are lolly and accurately applicable int above l proper snipping name and are classified. p) packed,marked,and labeled,and are in all respects in proper condition for transport by highway according to applicable'mtemational and national government regulations. NIf I am a large quantity generator,1 certiy,that I have a program in place to reduce the volume and toxicity of waste generated to the degree I have determined to be economically practicable and that I have selected the practicable method of treatment,storage,or disposal currently available to me which minimizes the present and future threat to human E health and the environment:OR,if I am a small quantity generator, I have made a good faith effort to minimize my waste generation and select the best waste management 0) method that is available to me and that I can shoot. 0 Dale PrinfedlTyped Name Signature onto lay Year ._T ..[ _.,I .. r J) I .r^r yc - - - UT 17.Transporter 1 Acknowledgement of Receipt of Materials Date C A PrintediTyped Name Signature - Month Day Year N f S P R1 B.Transporter 2 Acknowledgement of Receipt of Materials Dale EPrinfedlTyped Name Signature Month Day Year R F 19.Discrepancy Indication Space A C I 20.Facility Owner or Operator:Certification of receipt of hazardous nationals covered by the manifest except as noon in item 19 L I Date T PrinfedlTyped Name Signature Month Dvy Year V Form Approved OMe No.2050-0034 Expires&30.99 EPA Form 870022(Rev.988)Previous editions are obsolete. COPY>8: GENERATOR RETAINS CT"i Y OF SALEM $UILDING DEPAMMIENT GTT`(+TALL ANNA ONE SALEM GR Z-N SAL=M,MASSACHLlS�'Ti S Dl970 TELEFROiti (978) 745-9595 8385 FAX (978) 740-9846 ,SAX COVER SHEET DATE: � S / FROM: TO: // ATTN: J OA" SUBJECT: (SLS 060 6a9l"'e COMMENTS: THANK YOU, WE ARE TRANSMITTING THIS COVER SHEET AND l PAGES. IF YOU HAVE ANY PROBLEMS OR QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT US AT THE ABOVE TELEPHONE NUMBER. City of Salem, Massachusetts Fire Department lrfl�To 48 Lafayette Street Robert 9N.Turner Salem, Massachusetts 01970-3695 Fire Prevention Chief Tel.978-744-1235 Bureau 978-744-6990 fax 978-745-4646 978-745-7777 January 3, 2001 H & G Realty Trust C/0 Ted Leigh LTW Management Associates 271 Western Avenue Lynn, Mass 01904-3017 RE: 28 Goodhue Street Dear Ted: - - - As per our telephone conversation on January 3,2001, you were informed of a walk thru inspection conducted on the property managed by you by the Salem Fire Department and Building Department. The following violations must be rectified immediately. Removal of unregistered vehicles from the property, also chemicals in boiler room must be removed by a licensed removal company within 48 hours. Before removal starts the Salem Fire Prevention office must be notified. SA" 'j"Iy Lt. Charles Latulippe Fire Marshal i THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL LAWS, CHAPTER 148 WILLIAM FRANCIS GALVIN, SECRETARY OF THE COMMONWEALTH CHAP. 148 - continued premises, or any ship or vessel, to make inspection or investigation, without being held or . deemed to be guilty of trespass. The marshal or the head of a fire department to whom he may delegate authority, shall make an inspectionxvery..three.months.of institutions.as defined by the state-building code, licensed by and under the supervision of the department of public health, or licensed by the department of public welfare, and shall make a report of such inspection to each such department on forms submitted to the marshal by such department for this purpose. Said marshal or such head of a fire department shall also make an inspection every three months of the premises specified in innholder's licenses issued under chapter one hundred and forty. 148:5. Investigation of premises and alleys as to fire hazards; remedy of conditions; lien; penalty. Section 5. The marshal, the head of the fire department or,any person to whom the marshal or the head of the fire department may delegate his authority in writing may, and - upon complaint of a person having an interest in any building or premises or property adjacent thereto,shall,at any reasonable hour,enter into buildings and upon premises,which term for the purposes of the remainder of this section shall include alleys adjacent thereto, within their jurisdiction and make an investigation as to the existence of conditions likely to cause fire. They shall, in writing, order such conditions to be remedied, and whenever such officers or persons find in any building or upon any premises any accumulation of combustible rubbish including, but not limited to, waste paper, rags, cardboard, string, packing material,sawdust, shavings, sticks,waste leather or rubber,broken boxes or barrels or any other refuse or useable materials that is or may become dangerous as a fire menace or as an obstacle to easy ingress into or egress from such buildings or premises, they sl-all, in writing, order the same to be removed or such conditions to be remedied. Notice of such order shall be served upon the owner, occupant or his authorized agent by a member of the fire or police department. If said order is not complied with within twenty-four hours, the person making such order, or any person designated by him, may enter into such building or upon such premises and remove such refuse or any useable materials or abate such conditions at the expense of such owner or occupant. Any expense so incurred by or on behalf of the commonwealth or of any city or town, shall be a debt due the commonwealth or the city or town, as the case may be, upon completion of such removal or abatement and the rendering of an account therefor to the owner. The provisions of the second paragraph of section three A of chapter one hundred and thirty-rune, relative to liens for such debt and the collection of the claims for such debt, and the collection of the claims for such debt, shall apply to any debt referred to,in this section, except that the marshal or the head of the fire department shall act hereunder in place of the mayor or board of selectmen. In the case of debts due the commonwealth, the collector of taxes shall pay over to the treasurer of the commonwealth the amounts collected by him. Any such owner or occupant who fails or refuses to comply with said order shall be punished by a fine of not more than fifty dollars for each consecutive forty-eight hours during which such failure or refusal to comply continues. 'i I APPLICATION ❑ ADULT NUMBER Trial Court of Massachusetts FOR COMPLAINT ❑ JUVENILE District Court Department ❑ ARRESTHEARING LJSUMMONS ❑ WARRANT COURT DIVISION The within named omplainant requests that a complaint issue against the within Salem District Court named defendant, charging said defendant with the offense(s) listed below. 65 Washington Street DATE OF APPLICATION DATE OF OFFENSE PLACE OF OFFENSE Salem, MA. 01970 O Wo o,-<C)/' '0 e -57- NAME OF COMPLAINANT S /� en /Pre 1.FA5 O OFFENSE G.L. Ch.and ADDRESS AND ZIP CODE OFC rPLAINANT [l,'� T L F .ro d,g F,9 ; 4Ve- — - --- In NAME,ADDRESS AND ZIP CODE OF DEFENDANT K L e r 9. 47/ 4. 60104-- 3017 COURT USE A hearing upon this complaint application DATE OF HEARING TIMEOFHEARING COURT US- ONLY----* will be held at the above court address on AT *--ONL` CASE PARTICULARS — BE SPECIFIC NAME OF VICTIM DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY VALUE OR PROPERTY TYPE OF CONTROLLED NO. Owner of property, Goods stolen,what Over or under SUBSTANCE OR WEAPON person assaulted,etc. destroyed,etc. $250. Marijuana,gun, etc. t 2 a OTHER REMARKS: g� // �e &r-l-z -d—j !�C' l-C''(J� ;i / ��5 s �Q /�e�n iSE'S /cn p vn qs I cU 6od4ti e s1��Pe7� �e?�nLlt.,7� 5 o/�e/�OIX -IL&I ✓�� ov 2. I ��ie>1;cti LS ,j�`e/nj� i.� �ro� lC✓ /Id O o, Ci nG� �. %/.l X jL0 O ,tr z2e l-70 yeql /'j2 SIGNATURE OF COMPLAINANT DEFENDANT IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION — Complete data below if known. DATE OF BIRTH PLACEOFBIRTH SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER, SEX RACE HEIGHT WEIGHT EYES HAIR OCCUPATION EMPLOYERISCHOOLMOTHER'S NAME(MAIDENI FATHER'S NAME COURT USE ONLY DATE DISPOSITION AUTHORIZED BY NO PROCESS TO ISSUE ❑ At request of complainant ❑ Complainant failed to prosecute ❑ Insufficient evidence having been presented PROCESS TO ISSUE TYPE OF PROCESS ❑ Sufficient evidence presented ❑ Warrant ❑ Defendant failed to appear ❑ Summons returnable ❑ Continued to COMMENTS 780 CMR: STATE BOARD OF BUILDING REGULATIONS AND STANDARDS THE MASSACHUSETTS STATE BUILDING CODE structure to a public way. A means of egress building shall be limited to that number. The fire - consists of three separate and distinct parts: the prevention code official shall be informed in writing exit access; the exit; and the exit discharge. A of the calculated occupant load. means of egress comprises the vertical and horizontal means of travel and shall include 1003.3 Posted occupant load: Every assembly intervening room spaces, doors, hallways, room or space in an assembly occupancy shall have corridors, passageways, balconies, ramps, stairs, the approved occupant load of the room or space enclosures, lobbies, horizontal exits, courts and posted in a conspicuous place, near the main yards(see 780 CMR 1006.0). entrance to the room or space. Rooms or spaces which have multiple-use capabilities shall be posted - Occupant load: The total number of persons that for all such occupancies. All posted signs shall be of are permitted to occupy a building or portion an approved legible permanent design. thereof at any one time(see 780 CMR 1008.0). - 780 CMR 1004.0 USE GROUP AND public way: Any street,alley or other parcel of land OCCUPANCY REQUIREMENTS open to the outside air leading to a public street, 1004.1 New buildings: Every building and which has been deeded, dedicated or otherwise structure, and par thereof, hereafter erected shall . permanently appropriated to the public for public have the prescribed number of exits of one or more use and which has a clear width and height of not of the approved types defined in 780 CMR I0. less than ten feet(3048 mm). - Exits, in combination with the exit access and exit SlidIescape: A straight or spiral chute, erected on the discharge, shall provide safe and continuous means interior or exterior of a building, which is of egress to a street or to an open space with direct designed as a means of egress direct to a street or access to a street. other public way(see 780 CMR 1026.0). 16041-Hat ardaus A1e_ans o E'%ress:, f _ Smukeproofenclosure: An enclosed stairway,with 1004.2.1—Eitit— rdFr/Hazardous."Means of access from the floor area of the building either Egress:In any existing building or structure not through outside balconies or ventilated vestibules, provided with'exit-facilities-as_herein prescribed. opening on a street,yard or open court;and with for--new.buildings d and in._which the exits are i a separately enclosed direct exit to the street at the deemed hazardous or dangerous to life and limb, grade floor(see 780 CMR 1015.0). the-,building ojjrcial shalldeclare such'building dangerous and unsafe in accordance with`the Stairway: One or more flights of stairs, and the provisions of 780 CMR 121.0- necessary landings and platforms connecting 1004.2.2 Appeal from exit order: Any person them, to form a continuous and uninterrupted served with any order pursuant to 780 CMR -+� passage from one floor to another(see 780 CMR 1014.0). 3400.5 shall have the remedy prescribed in 780 CMR 121. Winder: A step in a winding stairway (see 1004.3 Multiple occupancies: Where a building is 780 CMR 1014.6.3). occupied by two or more occupancies,the means of 780 CMR 10003.0 CONSTRUCTION egress requirements shall apply to each porion of I ()CUMEN the building based on the occupancy of space. 1003.1 Arrangement of egress: The construction 1004:4 Multiple-tenants:.Where more than one - documents shall show in sufficient detail the tenant occupiers anyone--floor,_of.a-but lding—or location,construction,size and character of all exits, structure, each tenant shall be provided with direct together with the arrangement of aisles, corridors, access to ed exits. passageways and hallways leading thereto in - compliance with the provisions of 780 CMR. 780 CMR 1005.0 GENERAL LIMPPATIONS 1005.1 Exits: An exit shall not be utilized for any 1003.2 Number of occupants: .In other than purpose that interferes with its function as a means occupancies in Use Groups R-2, R-3 and 1-1,.the of egress. construction documents and the application for a permit shall designate the number of occupants to be 1005.2 Floor openings: Manholes or floor access accommodated on every floor,and in all rooms and panels which reduce the clearance to less than 32 spaces as required by the code official. Unless inches(813 mm) shall not be located in the line of otherwise specified, the minimum number of means of egress. occupants to be accommodated by the exits shall be - determined by the occupant load prescribed in 780 CMR 1008.0. The posted occupant load of the 172 780 CMR-Sixth Edition 2/7/97 (Effective 2/28/97) The Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Public Safety Board of Building Regulations and Standards One Ashburton Place - Room 1301 Argeo Paul Cellucci Boston, MA 02108 KentChairman umi Governor Jane Swift Tel: (617) 727-7532 Fax: (617) 227-1754 Thomas L. Rogers Lieutenant Governor Administrator Jane Perlov Secretary STATE BUILDING CODE APPEALS BOARD Date: June 10, 1999 Name of Appellant: H&G Realty Corp. %LTW Management Associates, Inc. Service Address: 271 Western Avenue Lynn,MA. 01904 Re: Docket Number: 99-041 Property Address: 28 Goodhue Street Salem.,MA. 01970 Date of Hearing: April 15, 1999 We are pleased to enclose a copy of the decision relative to the above case wherein certain variances from the State Building Code had been requested. Sincerely: C� m STATE BUILDING CODE APPEALS BOARD yn rq ,-Patricia A. Brenn Jerk Program Manager cc: State Building Code Appeals Board Building Official t� STATE BUILDING CODE APPEALS BOARD Docket Number: 99-041 Date: June 10, 1999 Background The Assistant Building Inspector in his letter of January 21, 1999 (which is made part of this decision by reference)identified thirteen(13)"building and fire code issues"(and one zoning issue) and ordered that they be addressed and the work completed by December 30, 1999. The Appeal Application described the building as of Type 5B construction and containing F-1 and F-2 Use Groups(Moderate and Low Hazard Factory and Industrial Occupancies). The Building Height and Area were not identified in the application. Relief Requested The relief requested is that Orders#1,2, and 4 be annulled; that Orders#5 and 13 be amended; and that Order#9 be clarified. Testimony The Appellant gave a brief description of the structure and the history of its use: The building is approximately 84,000 square feet in total area and is a four story building of unprotected wood frame construction(Type 5B) approximately one hundred(100)years old. The entire building was a shoe factory until twenty(20) years ago when the first floor only was used as a shoe factory and other tenants (manufacturing and industrial uses) occupied the second,third and fourth floors. The size of the building pre-dates the current limitations (height and area) for a building of this construction type. The building is classified with the Building Department and identified by the appellant's architect as a Type 5B building of Use Groups F-1 and F-2. The Appellant testified that there are two other tenants in the building that could perhaps be classified in use groups other that F-1 and F-2 and is seeking clarification on that point. T he current owners inherited the building and in the process of finding new tenants for the first floor(formerly the shoe manufacturing business). The management company could not put new tenants into the building as there are deficiencies the building the Building Department wishes corrected. These deficiencies include means of egress, hallways,bathroom facilities and other items identified in the appeal. The Appellant testified that he had been working with the Building Department for approximately a year and a half and in August of last year sent a letter to the Building Department of proposed corrections (ratings of corridors, emergency lighting,provision of fire extinguishers, structural review of the building)that would be-made-to presumably allow the occupancy of the-first floor. Subsequently other items were identified by the Building and Fire Departments which the Appellant contends he is not required to do,primarily the fire alarm panel , the master box,and fire separation assemblies between tenants. The Appellant testified that the building is fully suppressed, and monitored by ADT Alarm who would then notify the Fire Department. The sprinkler system is annually tested. STATE BUILDING CODE APPEALS BOARD Docket Number: 99-041 Date: June 10, 1999 The Appellant reviewed the Building Inspector's orders of January 21, 1999,to identify the points of contention: Order#1 to install a fire protective signaling and automatic fire detection system is contested as the Appellant argues these systems are not required by the building code for Use Group F. The Appellant also contends that pursuant to MGL Ch 148 the requirement for this system is a matter for the Fire Department and not the Building Department and the Building Inspector is without authority to issue this order. At the Request of the Chair, and for the purposes of clarity,the items of the appeal were to be addressed one at a time with the Appellant, the Building Inspector, and the State Building Inspector,who provides technical assistance to the Board, addressing each issue in tum. The Building Inspector presented plans of the building(developed by the Appellant's architect)to identify the four floors of the building,the means of egress and average length of the building (along its longest dimension) as being approximately 580 feet. The Building inspector confirmed the building to be of Type 5B construction and to be fully suppressed. The Building Department initially inspected the building in response to a complaint to the Fire Department of inadequate ventilation. At that time hazardous means of egress were identified under Section 3400.5 of the building code as unsafe and inadequate and inadequate lightning and ventilation was identified under Section 3400.6. The Board questioned the lack of specific citation of Building Code Sections in the Inspector's letter. The Inspector responded by indicated that there had been an on-going process and at other meetings and in earlier letters (and with other attorneys) specific areas/sections of the code were discussed. The Inspector identified that the records of the Building Department do not reflect the actual use(s) of the building and that there are probably 27—28 tenants in the building which were discovered within the past year and one half and identified other letters (dated as early as December 1997) which have additional citations. The Board and the Inspector reviewed egress problems caused by individual tenants being able to lock doors in the path of travel so as to deprive other tenant a second means of egress. The Inspector presented 25 photographs to the Board which are collectively identified as Exhibit#1. There was a general discussion of how the building changed from a single use single tenant building to a building containing multiple tenants. There was also a general discussion of the responsibilities of the owners to ensure the conformance of the building to the requirement of the building code. Proposed plans for corrective actions (corridors, etc.)were presented. STATE BUILDING CODE APPEALS BOARD Docket Number: 99-041 Date: June 10, 1999 The Appellant contended that for the F-1/F-2 Use Group a fire protective signaling system is not a requirement of code. The Board questioned if there were other uses (not F-1/F-2)in the building. The Appellant identified two High Hazard Uses that are tenants in the building that will be moved out if it is required that they be moved out. In future no space will be occupied without proper approvals. The Appellant contended that in a factory use group a fire alarm system is not required and the fact that there are multiple tenants does not change that fact. The Board identified that currently the building contains multiple tenants of multiple uses as a fact having been established. The Appellant testified that there are also artists/photographers in the building which uses do not fall within the factory use and could be considered business uses which bring in people from the outside and for which tenant separations and safe corridors must be provided. In summary the Board identified that if the building were entirely within the F Use Group many of the problems would not exist,particularly if the tenants could not block the means of egress, and that the problems are caused by the multiple uses and the layout of the uses. The Appellant has agreed with the Building Department to relocate tenants not in the F Use Group most particularly the High Hazard Uses when the issues with the Building Department are resolved. There was a general discussion of remedial actions that could be taken once the building was entirely within the F Use Group no matter how many tenants of that use occupied the building. The issue of height and area limitations to be applied when an existing building is modified by addition or changes use was identified by the Building Inspector. At the Request of the Board the State Building Inspector testified that the Board has insufficient information upon which to make a decision. The State Inspector summarized the known facts about the building and its uses including the issues associated with its height and area. Without a complete inventory of the tenant/uses of the building issues of the necessity for tenant separation could not be addressed. The presence of multiple tenants of different uses also has a consequence ----iri tfie requirement for a fire protective signaling system as the uses arenotseparated and therefore the most stringent requirement for any use must be maintained throughout the building. The State Inspector suggested the Owner provide a complete inventory of the uses for the Board to make any decision, and suggested that the District State Inspector could provide technical assistance. STATE BUILDING CODE APPEALS BOARD Docket Number: 99-041 Date: June 10, 1999 On the issue of the hazardous egress in the building the State Inspector suggested that an Exit Order issued under Section 1004.2,Hazardous Means of Egress,might be a more appropriate action on the part of the Building Inspector. The Board considered continuing the hearing until complete floor plans could be provided. The Building Inspector presented pictures of the egress problems and identified that it has been a year and one half since these problems have been identified, and the egresses continue to be unsafe. The Building Inspector identified the concern of a conflagration problem and the concern of the Fire Marshall of conflagration. The Board identified that the Local Inspector should be issuing and Exit Order and the owner to have been derelict in not correcting the exit problem for a year and one.half. The Board suggested a thirty day time period for the correction of the exit problems and upon their correction the Appellant return to the Board to resolve the other issues, and encouraged the Building Inspector to close the building unless the problems were corrected. The Building Inspector reviewed the exit layout as it exists in the building with tenants deprived of second means of egress. The Appellant testified that there are financial constraints to the correction of the building. A Motion was made to give the owners thirty days to correct the these obvious, excessive violations, and that the Building Inspector be kept informed of the improvements, and that a continuance without time limit be granted while the Building Inspector monitors the improvements of the egress. The Appellant testified that layout of corridors and other improvements have been designed, however,the decision to proceed with these improvement relies on cost estimates and these estimates have been impossible to make without a final determination of all requirements including those identified in this appeal. _.� The State Inspector testified that the Code provides in Section 1004.2 for a Exit Order which has an appeal procedure a§sociafed-with it;likewise in-Section 121,—Unsafe Structures,-the codeprovt es the method for dealing with unsafe structures. The Board has heard enough testimony to have strong suspicions that this may be an unsafe structure or a structure requiring and Exit Order, and might care to direct the Building Inspector to issue on or both of those documents in accordance with the Code and the General Law. STATE BUILDING CODE APPEALS BOARD Docket Number: 99-041 Date: June 10, 1999 The Board identified the General Law to be Chapter 143, Section 6. The Appellant identified that the Building Inspector has already set a time frame for compliance which extends to December 30, 1999. The Board discussed the existing egress which requires paths of travel through tenant space which may be subject to locking. The Appellant identified the problem of finally identifying all items required by code and the cost of those items to be critical to beginning improvement,particularly the fire protective signaling system,which he contends is not required in the F-1/17-2 Use Group. The Board identified that currently the building is not only F-1/F-2 Uses. As the first Motion was never seconded a new Motion was made that the Board order the Building Inspector to issue the proper orders to condemn this building under the Massachusetts State Building Code and Chapter 143 of the General Laws. The Motion was seconded, the Board discussed the length of time the violation have been allowed to exist. There was no further discussion and the Motion was voted unanimously. The following members voted in the above manner: g✓ r � SWeyur�an Daniel O'Sullivan exanderMacLeod Chairman A complete administrative record including the audiotape of the proceedings is on file with the offices of the Building Code Appeals Board. A true copy attest, dated 1212 2 ' — -- -- — ice Patrica A—Bre an,-Clerk — _ -- - — __ Program Manager Any person aggrieved by a decision of the State Building Code Appeals Board may appeal to a court of ° competent jurisdiction in accordance with Chapter 30A, Section 14 of the Massachusetts General Laws. Cite of &alem, j51a!5garbu!5ettg f Public Prnpertp Department 3Builbing Department One gdlem Oreen (976) 7459595 Cxt. 360 Peter Strout Director of Public Property Inspector of Buildings Zoning Enforcement Officer CUPY May 21, 1999 Attorney Jeffrey Shub 27 Congress Street Salem, Ma. 01970 RE: 28 Goodhue Street Dear Mr. Shub: As per agreement of the parties, an inspection of the property at 28 Goodhue Street was completed on May 11, 1999 with Stan Bornstein, the City Engineer, Charlie Latulippe, the Fire Marshall, John Watney, an independent structural engineer, we deemed the property dangerous and unsafe according to 780 CMR, 121.0 established by MGL c143, Section 6,7 and 8. According to 780 CMR 121.3, if the owner submits a code compliant drawing and is accepted by the Building Department, this process to make the building safe should start immediately and continue the type of use. Sections to be addressed are as follows; 1. 780 CMR 3400.4.1a 2. 780 CMR 3400.5.1 3. 780 CMR 3400 4. 780 CMR Chapter 9 5. As per the structural report received by John Watney which requires the owner to obtain a comprehensive structural report for repairs needed according to 780 CMR, 3408.2 In order to occupy this building with the acceptable tenants, these violations need to be corrected prior to any occupancy. Prior to "retenanting " the property with, proper use tenants, these code violations need to be addressed and corrected. As of June 1, 1999, the building will be secured if violations are not corrected. Tenant access will be reasonably accommodated for the sole purpose of removing anything left behind. Attorney Jeffrey Shub 27 Congress Street Salem, Ma. 01970 page two Sincerel Pe er rout Building Inspector cc: Jeffrey Shub Tenants of 28 Goodhue Mike Greenstein � 5 �pC- 0PovLos Fc,iv 1 < lT, U 1� l ( lei � /L,4',( �iilJ �CCvlti1 �aDp�'F-�'. � ��D �NG -I-NSC� l LZAA ) /VIA VA C� l c�C VL �1 S '�-� -2— f, -T�ls Cb� �ltz�ns DUcl— T� L.CD� 'Ttt1s 7l4 l WEC�� IN �Ta \ A C-A C— T(1' '3 uN c 1 ) k c1 of cil Edd cG? tt �t ckc- l� /,Ii '114 ESC-�3�2�Z Ttt LAS- W L-e(L d l' L= A-ta N ( (i . J�l� L Cr /� v L iZ- �/�S leo AA f N1vv cq {-�v W E v C-� W ll 1. C (L-"� - Cc -To jw We C—t— yr MAY T(-t . UL\-( e L7uJ CC � Cttp of 46alem, 1flag!6arbu!5ettg r 3public Propertp Mepartment -�Ruilbing ;Department (One 6alem green (978) 745-9595 (Ext. 3S0 Peter Strout Director of Public Property Inspector of Buildings Zoning Enforcement Officer May 21, 1999 Steve Chigas D/B/A/ Steve's Auto Specialty 28 Goodhue Street Salem, Ma. 01970 An automotive repair is not a permitted use in the BPD District (Business Park Development). At this time we would recommend if you intend to continue operating at the property, that you attempt to seek appropriate zoning relief for the Board of Appeals for your automotive use. We will allow you to continue this business, however, this appeal process must start immediately. The application should be filed before June 15, 1999 along with notifying to Management Company and the Building Department. Obviously, we have no control over your lease, so you need to discuss it with L.T.W. Sincerely, P er trout Building Inspector cc: Scott L. Masse, Esq. 12 Peabody Square, 2"' Floor Peabody, Ma. 01960 Citp of Salem, fHa'55arbU5ettg t Vublic Vropertp Mepartment �Uuilbing Mepartment ®ne&alem Oreen (978) 745-9595 (Ext. 330 Peter Strout Director of Public Property Inspector of Buildings Zoning Enforcement Officer May 21, 1999 Attorney Jeffrey Shub 27 Congress Street Salem, Ma. 01970 RE: 28 Goodhue Street Dear Mr. Shub: As per agreement of the parties, an inspection of the property at 28 Goodhue Street was completed on May 11, 1999 with Stan Bornstein, the City Engineer, Charlie Latulippe, the Fire Marshall, John Watney, an independent structural engineer, we deemed the property dangerous and unsafe according to 780 CMR, 121.0 established by MGL c143, Section 6,7 and 8. According to 780 CMR 121.3, if the owner submits a code compliant drawing and is accepted by the Building Department, this process to make the building safe should start immediately and continue the type of use. Sections to be addressed are as follows; 1. 780 CMR 3400.4.1a 2. 780 CMR 3400.5.1 3. 780 CMR 3400 4. 780 CMR Chapter 9 5. As per the structural report received by John Watney which requires the owner to obtain a comprehensive structural report for repairs needed according to 780 CMR, 3408.2 In order to occupy this building with the acceptable tenants, these violations need to be corrected prior to any occupancy. Prior to "retenanting "the property with, proper use tenants, these code violations need to be addressed and corrected. As of June 1, 1999, the building will be secured if violations are not corrected. Tenant access will be reasonably accommodated for the sole purpose of removing anything left behind. Attorney Jeffrey Shub 27 Congress Street Salem, Ma. 01970 page two *er Building Inspector cc: Jeffrey Shub Tenants of 28 Goodhue Mike Greenstein 780 CMR: STATE BOARD OF BUILDING REGULATIONS AND STANDARDS THE MASSACHUSETTS STATE BUILDING CODE If it appears that such building or structure would be case of such demolition, the said building official • especially unsafe in case of fire, it shall be deemed shall cause such lot to be leveled to conform with dangerous within the meaning hereof, and the adjacent grades by a inorganic fill. The costs and building official may affix in a conspicuous place charges incurred shall constitute a lien upon the land upon its exterior walls a notice of its dangerous upon which the structure is located, and shall be condition, which shall not be removed or defaced enforced in an action of contract; and such owner without authority from him. shall,for every day's continuance of such refusal or neglect after being so notified,be punished a fine 121.3 Removal or making structure safe: Any in accordance with 780 CMR 118.4. The provisions person so notified shall be allowed until 12:00 noon of M.G.L. c. 139, § 3A, paragraph two, relative to of the day following the service of the notice in liens for such debt and the collection of claims for which to begin to remove such building or structure. such debt shall apply to any debt referred to in this or make it safe, or to make it secure, and he shall section, except that the said building official shall employ sufficient labor speedily to make it safe or act hereunder in place of the mayor or board of remove it or to make it secure; but if the public selectmen. During the time such order is in effect, safety so requiresandif tlieanayor or selectmen so it shall be unlawful to use or occupy such structure order, the building official may immediately enter or any portion thereof for any purpose. upon the premises with the necessary workmen and assistants and cause such unsafe structure to be made 121.6 Remedy of person ordered to remove a safe or demolished without delay and a proper fence dangerous structure or make it .safe: put up for the protection of passersby,or to be made Notwithstanding the provisions of 780 CMR 122,an secure. - owner, aggrieved by such order may have the remedy prescribed by M.G.L. c. 139, §2: provided 121.4 Failure to remove or make structure safe, that any provision of M.G.L. c. 139, §2 shall not be survey board,survey report: If an owner of such construed so as to hinder, delay or prevent the unsafe structure refuses or neglects to comply with building official from acting and proceeding under the requirements of such notice within the specified 780 CMR 121; and provided, further, that this time limit, and such structure is not made safe or section shall not prevent the city or town from taken down as ordered therein, a careful survey of recovering the forfeiture provided in said 780 CMR the premises shall be made by a board consisting;in 121.5 from the date of the service of the original a city, of a city engineer, the head of the fire notice,unless the order is annulled by the jury. department, as such term is defined in M.G.L. c. 148, § 1, and one disinterested person to be 780 CMR 122.0 BOARD OF APPEALS appointed by the building official; and, in a town of 122.1 State Building Code Appeals Board: a surveyor,the head of the fire department and one Except for actions taken pursuant to 780 CMR - disinterested person to be appointed by the building 121.0, whoever is aggrieved by an interpretation, official. In the absence of any of the above officers order, requirement, direction or failure to act under or individuals, the mayor or selectmen shall 780 CMR by any agency or official of the city,town designate one or more officers or other suitable or region, or agency or official of the State charged persons in place of the officers so named as with the administration or enforcement of 780 CMR members of said board. A written report of such or any of its rules or regulations, excepting any survey shall be made, and a copy thereof served on specialized codes, may appeal directly to the State such owner. Building Code Appeals Board as provided in 780 CMR 122.0. 121.5 Removal of dangerous or abandoned Whoever is aggrieved by an interpretation,order, structures: If such survey report as outlined in requirement, direction or failure to act under 780 CMR 121.4 declares such structure to be 780 CMR by any agency or official of a city, town dangerous or to be unused, uninhabited or or region charged with the administration or abandoned, and open to the weather, and if the enforcement of 780 CMR,excepting any specialized owner continues such refusal or neglect,the building codes, may appeal directly to the State Building official shall cause it to be made safe or taken down Code Appeals Board or may appeal first to.a local or or to be made secure; and, if the public safety so regional building code appeals board and if requires, said building official may at once enter the aggrieved thereby he may then appeal to the State structure,the land on which it stands or the abutting Building Code Appeals Board as provided in land or buildings, with such assistance as he may 780 CMR 122.0. require, and secure the same; and may remove and In the event an appeal is taken directly to the State evict, under the pertinent provisions of M.G.L. Building Code Appeals Board from an c.239,or otherwise,any tenant or occupant thereof; interpretation, order, requirement or direction, said I and may erect such protection for the public by appeal shall be filed as specified in 780 CMR -- proper fence or otherwise as may be necessary,and 122 3.1 with the State Building Code Appeals Board for this purpose may close a public highway. In the not later than 45 days after the service of notice 29 780 CMR-Sixth Edition 2/7/97 (Effective 2/28/97) 780 C.MR: STATE BOARD OF BUILDING REGULATIONS AND STANDARDS ADMINISTRATION 780 CMR 120.0 CERTIFICATE OF 120.5 Posting structures: ' OCCUPANCY 120.5.1 Posted use and occupancy: A suitably 120.1 General: New buildings and structures: A designed placard approved by the building official building or structure hereafter shall not be used or shall be posted by the owner on all floors of every occupied in whole or in part until the certificate of building and structure and part thereof designed use and occupancy shall have been issued by the for high hazard, storage, mercantile, factory and building commissioner or inspector of buildings or, industrial or business use(use grcaps H, S, M,F when applicable,the state inspector. The certificate and B) as defined in 780 CMR 3. Said placard shall not be issued until all the work has been shall be securely fastened to the building or completed in accordance with the provisions of the structure in a readily visible place, stating: the approved permits and of the applicable codes for use group,the fire grading, the live load and the which a permit is required, except as provided in occupancy load. 780 CMR 120.3. 120.5.2 Posted occupancy load: A suitably 120.2 Buildings or structures hereafter altered: designed placard approved by the building official A building or structure; in whole or in part, altered shall be posted by the owner in every room where to change from one use group to another; to a practicable of every building and structure and. different use within the same use group; the fire part thereof designed for use as a place of Alio grading; the maximum Eve load capacity; the assembly or as an-'institutional building for occupancy load capacity shall not be occupied or harboring people for penal, correctional, used until the certificate shall have been issued educational,medical or other care or treatment, or certifying that the work has been completed in as residential buildings used for hotels, lodging accordance with the provisions of the approved houses, boarding houses, dormitory buildings, permits and of the applicable codes for which a multiple family dwellings (use groups A, I, R-1 permit is required. Any use or occupancy, which andR-2). Said placard shall designate the was not discontinued during the work of alteration, maximum occupancy load. shall be discontinued within 30 days after the 120.5.3 Replacement of posted signs: All completion of the alteration unless the required posting signs shall be furnished by the owner and / certificate is issued. shall be of permanent design: they shall not be removed or defaced, and if lost, removed or 120.3 Temporary occupancy: Upon the request of defaced, shall be immediately replaced. the holder of a permit, a temporary certificate of occupancy may be issued before the completion of 120.5.4 Periodic inspection for posting: The the entire work covered by the permit, provided that building official may periodically inspect all such portion or portions shall be occupied safely existing buildings and structures except one and prior to full completion of the building or Structure two family dwellings for compliance with without endangering life or public welfare. Any 780 CMR in respect to posting;or he may accept occupancy permitted to continue during the work the report of such inspections from a qualified shall be discontinued within 30 days after registered engineer or architect or others certified completion of the work unless a certificate of by the BBRS; and such inspections and reports occupancy is issued by the building official. shall specify any violation of the requirements of 780 CMR in respect to the posting of floor load, 120.4 Contents of certificate: When a building or fire grading,occupancy load and use group of the structure is entitled thereto, the building official building or structure. shall issue a certificate of occupancy within ten days after written application. Upon completion of the 780 CMR 121.0 UNSAFE STRUCTURES final inspection in accordance with 780 CMR 115.5 121.1 General: The provisions of 780 CNIR 121.0 and correction of the violations and discrepancies, are established by M.G.L. c. 143, §§ 6, 7, 8, 9 and . and compliance with 780 CMR 903.4,the certificate 10. of occupancy shall be issued. The certificate of occupancy shall specify the following. 121.2 Inspection: The building official 1. The edition of the code under which the immediately upon being informed by report or permit was issued. otherwise that a building or other structure or 2. The use group and ocOrpancy,in accordance anything attached thereto or connected therewith is with the provisions of 780 CMR 3. dangerous to life or limb or that any building in that 3. The type of construction as defined in city or town is unused, uninhabited or abandoned, 780 CMR 6. and open to the weather, shall inspect the same;and 4. The occupant load per floor. he shall forthwith in writing notify the owner to 5. Any special stipulations and conditions of the remove it or make it safe if it appears to him to be �— building pertnit. dangerous, or to make it secure if it is unused, uninhabited or abandoned and open to the weather. 2/7/97 (Effective 2/28/97) 780 CMR- Sixth Edition 27 OM STRUCTURES NORTH FRX NO. : 9787456067 May. 17 1999 05:46PN P1 CONsVLTTNa ..;.e 4... y� k'. y"a , s .NGiNM.13aS To: Salem Building Department Attn: Peter Strout Fax#: 744-5918 From: John Wathne ate: May 17, 1999 _Re: 28 Go ue Street Pages: 8 including transmittal CC: John Keenan /Fax: 740-0072 i Urgent ForReview ew ! As Requested Please Comment i NOTES Leifer Report 05/17/99 MON 10:38 FAX 9787400072 JOHN D HEENAN 001/006 s. 60 Washington Street City Legal - ' Salem, Massachusetts 01970 John D. Keenan Tel: 978-741-4453 Asst. City Solicitor Fax: 978.740-0072 F APUC To: Peter Strout,Bldg.Inspector Fronu JDK Fac 7404404 Pages: 8 Phone: 741-4453 tate: 05/17/99 Ro: 28 Goodhue—Poly Slides CC: ❑Urgent X For Review ❑Please Comment ❑Please Reply ❑Please Recycle e Comments: Pete: Ijust took another look at the local zoning ordinance regarding Poly's use at the separate building at 28 Goodhue. It is my understanding that the fiber glass molding/manufacturing process is a"high hazard"use-both in its use of flammables and odor/fumes given off in the process. Article V,Section 5-2(i)(3)(b-c)specifically prohibits such uses. (See attached). Thus,the business has to go. I also spoke with Any Scott Masse again today regarding Steve's Auto. I informed him of what I thought we would squire for him to try to stay there. It is my opinion that he should have to at least file appropriate petition seeking a special permit by the end of June 30th. 05/17/99 MON 10:18 FAX 9787900072 .JOHN D tiEENAN IM002l006 May 17:7999 If there are building code violations(in addition to local use issue)specific to that building, he should also be notified to cony same. Please let me know when you have first draft of either letter so that we may finalize. I would like to have them out by Wednesday the latest. Thank you for your attention to these matters. John P.S. I also looked at appeal Issue. You're correct Q misread), there is a provision for local building board of appeals— but we do not have one. (quite different from our Board of Appeals). I think we should include a copy of 780 CMR 122.00 Board of Appeals with all notices of violations going forward. 0 Page 2 05/1;/99 MON 16:38 FAX 9787400072 JOHN D KEENAN Q003/006 USE REGULATIONS SALEM ZONING ORDINANCE Art:V,g 5.2 (7) sale ae merchandise brokers and whole- Housing Authority and financially aided by ge- either the U.S.Public HoushigAdmirustra- (8) Service establishments exceeding the re- tion and/or the Commonwealth of Massa- __IC quirements for such businesses in B-1 Dis. chusetts Department of Commetse Division tricts, such as major laundry, dry cleaning of Public Housing. and baking establishments. (13) Retail-wholesale contractors supply estab- (9) Churches and similar places of worship, lishments, provided, however, that the public and private nursery,elementaryand wholesale operation does not consist of over secondary schools,institutions of higher ed- fifty (50) percent of the business. ucat ion (14) Studios,workrooms and shops of artists,ar- ® (10) and loading facilities and tisans and craftsmen,provided that all prod- o er accessory uses and buildin , pro- ucts of the artistic endeavor or craft ac• vided that such uses ar 1 tivity are primarily for sale on the premises or by specific off-premises commission from v (11) All uses permitted in B-1 Districts, subject a sponsor or client. to all provisions specified for such uses,ex- (15) Publishing and printing establishments. cept that all residential uses are prohib- ited (16) Otte family,two-family and multifamily res- idential uses as primary uses in townhouse, (12) Retail uses relating to the permitted uses row house, flats or multistory arrange- in this subsection (q. ments, including high-rises, and as sec. (g) B-5 Districts. The following are permitted ondary uses in upper floors of structures uses in the central development districts: Primarily used for retail, personal service (1) All uses permitted in B•1 Districts, subject or office purposes. to all the provisions specified For such uses 117) Accessory uses generally in support of the '1 above permitted uses. C (2) Other retail stores and service establish- ments, exec t those permitted in B-4 Dis. he following aro permitted uses tricts. w fn the industrial districts: n L (3) Places of tbmmereial recreation and enter subject to alI a provisions sped- l tainment, such as theaters and bowling al- or uses. leys, _ (i) Business Park Development Districts.The fol- (4) Restaurants an other eating and drinking lowing are permitted uses in the Business Park places. Development Districts: (5) Nonprofit clubs, lodges and fraternal asso• (1) General office buildings including business u ciations. and professional offices and ancillary activ- ities (i.e., cafeteria facilities). (6) Philanthropic and charitable institutions. (2) Generals ' forage, warehousing and whole. (7) Music and dancing studios. sale distribution uses. (8) Trade and business schools. (3) Manufacturing, packaging, assembly, re• (9) Hotels, motels and inns. conditioning, processing, research and testing of the following types of industries: (10) Business and professional offices. testing and other related prod- (11) Off-street parking and loading facilities- ucts, food and kindred products, apparel, electronics and electrical products, furni- (12) Buildings and facilities for housing projects ture and fixtures, primary and fabricated built under the jurisdiction of the Salem metal products, box manufacturing, textile 13 05/1,7/99 MON 10:39 F.4.Y 9787400072 JOHN D IiEENAN 0004/006 Art.V.3 5.2 SALEM ZONING ORDINANCE USE REGULATIONS manufacturing, frozen food storage, ice in a dwelling to cavy on activities in which manufacturing, including the storage of goods, wares or merchandise are not eom- new materials and containers used in or mercially created or handled,provided that incidental to any of the foregoing.Provided any such home occupation: that such operations. a. Shall be operated entirely within a a. Are not specifically prohibited from the dwelling unit, with no display visible City of Salem according to the schedule from the street. of prohibited uses in section 5.3(h)(3) b. Shall be operated only by the residents herein, of the dwelling unit,with not more than b. - Are not dangerous by reason of hazard one (1) regular employee not residing from fire or explosion, in the dwelling unit. C. Are not offensive, detrimental, inju- c. Shall utilize not more than twenty-five rious, noxious or hazardous by reason (25) percent of the gross floor area of of causing dust,smoke,odor,fumes,ra• the dwelling unit. diation, groundwater discharge, noise, d. Shall display not more than one(1)non. vibration, traffic congestion or other electric announcement sign of an area nuisance. not greater than one and one-half(11/2) d. Are compatible with adjacent ronin• square feet and attached against the dustrial uses. building and not protruding therefrom. (4) Laboratories or research facilities,including Marinas medical and other research, provided man- ufacturing is clearly incidental to the oper- 3) Water rent boat yards. ation of the facility, does not exceed fifty (4) Waterfront yac t c u s. (50) percent of the gross floor area of the building and is not offensive,injurious,nox- (5) Outdoor swimming pools which do no con- ious,detrimental or hazardous by reason of farm with the requirements of Article VII, dust, smoke, odor, fumes, noise, radiation, Supplementary Regulations,as amended in groundwater discharge, traffic congestion this ordinance, or other nuisances. (6) Salem Hospital, 91 Highland Avenue, (5) Assembly or packaging of articles not ex- Salem,including private clinics built within ceeding two hundred(200)pounds in weight, one thousand live hundred (1,600) feet of provided that no manufacturing or pro- same. cessing is carried out_ (7) North Shore Babies and Children's Hog. (6) Food and beverage manufacturing,bottling pital, 57 Highland Avenue. or processing or commissary. (8) Salem Hospital for Chronic Diseases, Me- Sec. 5.3. Special permit uses, mot ial Drive, Salem. (a) Generally. Provided that permission of the board of appeals is obtained in accordance with (9) Dormitory or dormitories as defined in sec- the procedures and conditions set forth in section tion 2-2 herein. Such dormitories may only 9-4 hereof, buildings and structures may be con• be built on land owned by the Salem Hos- structed,altered,enlarged,reconstructed and used pital or the Commonwealth of Massachu- and land may be used for one (1) or more of the setts State College at Salem. purposes set out in this section. (10) Recreation buildings, including accessory (b) R-C and R•1 Districts. The following arespe• buildings usually constructed with such tial permit uses in the residential-conservation buildings, with the following provisions: and one-family residential districts: a, All other applicable provisions of the (1) Professional offices and other home ocmpa- Salem Building Code and zoning ordi. i tions involving the use of a room or rooms nance must be complied with. .14 05/1'/99 MON 10:39 FAX 9787400072 .JOHN D KEENAN 0005/006 Z' 3 7 4 055 202 532-")0 Fa"imllc (978) 532.8410 Sz2W�t cfi• ��LQiJ:Jf�' Attomey at law 12 poakAy Syvaro, .nj Pealr dy, (11goo L y1 1 r C May 10, 1999 Nl City of Salem " Y/,, ., ✓;; / 93 Washington Street Salem, MA 01970 ' Attn: Stanley Usovicz, Mayor RE: STEVE CHIGAS, D/B/A STEVE'S AUTO SPECIALTIES 28 GOODMM STREET, SALEM, MA Dear Mayor Usovicz: Please be advised that I have been retained by Steve Chigas, d/b/a Steve's Auto Specialties regarding his tenancy at 28 Goodhue Street, Salem, MA. I am in receipt of a letter dated April 29, 1999 addressed to Mr. Chigas from L.T.W. Management Associates, Inc. in which they disclosed to Mr. Chigas for the first time I might add, their ongoing problems with the City of Salem, regarding the premises at 28 Goodhue Street, at which Mr. Chigas is a tenant, specifically maintaining a business known as Steve's Auto Specialties_ (see enclosed) In light of this new information, notice is hereby given that it is Mr. Chigas' intentions to take any and all actions necessary to protect his business including any rights and claims he may have regarding his tenancy at 28 Goodhue Street, Salem, MA. Furthermore, request is hereby made that a formal meeting be established within seven (7) days so that Mr. Chigas and myself may be more informed as to the substantive nature of any actions which have purportedly been taken or contemplated both by City of Salem and L.T.W. Management Associates, Inc. 05/17/99 HON 10:39 FAX 9787400072 JOHN D HEENAN fL1J 006/006 ,r I await your response. S i77e — , d4ioo L. Masse SLM/rm cc! Steve Chigas CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED CERTIFIED NO. : Z 374 055 202 Legal Sixty Washington Street City Dept. n Salem, Massachusetts 01970 ' �OLJ M Tel: 978-741-4453 Asst. City Solicitor Fax: 978-740-0072 Fzm To: Jeff Shub, Esq. From: John Keenan Fa)c 740-0300 Pages: Phone: 978-741-4453 Date: 05/27/99 Re: 28 Goodhue CC: ❑Urgent X For Review ❑ Please Comment ❑Please Reply ❑ Please Recycle e Comments: Attorney Shub: I do not intend, in any way, to hold myself out as an expert on the building code. I have, however, endeavored this week to work my way through its labyrinthian provisions. I cannot find authority to allow work at 28 Goodhue on the order alone. Our local ordinance requires a permit(Sec. 9-1.Enforcement-copy attached). Furthermore, I believe Chapter 34 of the Code requires same. See attached provions: 110.1; 110.3(4); 121.0;3400.3(5); 3402.1. I have discussed this matter with Peter Strout as well. I expect if LTW seeks a permit tomorrow for this purpose,it will be granted forthwith. Poly Slides-potentially protected nonconforming use due to amendment of Zoning Ordinance in 1985 changing district from Industrial to BPD-will be granted thirty(30)days to investigate and flesh out same. Thank you for your attention to this matter. We look forward to working with you to make 28 Goodhue Street a productive building once again. John Keenan ADMINISTRATION SALEM ZONING ORDINANCE Art. IX, § 9.3 ARTICLE IX.ADMINISTRATION was in conformity at the time of enactment or amendment of this ordinance. Sec. 9-1. Enforcement. (4) The inspector of buildings shall maintain a record of all certificates of occupancy, and This ordinance shall be administered and en- copies shall be furnished to any person forced by the inspector of buildings. For the pur- having a proprietary or tenancy interest in pose of such administration and enforcement, the the building affected. y� following procedure shall apply: Sec. 9-2. Violations. �t (1) No building or other structure shall be (a) Whenever a violation of this ordinance oc- ,�S erected, moved, added to or structurally al- curs or is alleged to have occurred, any person tered untila permit ths been fs- may file a written complaint. Such complaint, sue y the ierefor ha ns ector of buildings. ap stating fully the causes and bases thereof, shall ca tons for such permits s a be in be filed with the inspector of buildings. He shall accordance with the requirements of the record promptly any such complaint,immediately building code. No building permit shall be investigate and take action thereon.The inspector issued unless all the provisions of this or- of buildings shall also notify in writing the party dinance have been complied with, except requesting such enforcement of any action or re- after written order from the board of ap- fusal to act and the reasons therefor, within four- peals. teen (14) days of receipt of such request. (2) No land shall be occupied or used and no (b) If the inspector of buildings shall find that building or part thereof hereafter created, any of the provisions of this ordinance are being erected, changed, converted or wholly or violated, he shall notify in writing the person re- partly altered or enlarged in its use or strut- sponsible for such violation,indicating the nature ture shall be used, occupied or changed in of the violation and ordering the action necessary use until a certificate of occupancy shall to correct it. He shall order discontinuance of il- have been issued therefor by the inspector legal uses of land, buildings or structures, re- of buildings, stating that the proposed use moval of illegal buildings or structures or of ad- of the building or land conforms to the re- ditions, alterations or structural changes thereto; quirements of this ordinance. No building discontinuance of any illegal work being done; or permit shall be issued until an application any other action authorized by this ordinance to has been made for a certificate of occu- ensure compliance with or to prevent violation of panty.The certificate shall be issued in con- its provisions. formity with the provisions of this ordi- (c) Violation of any of the provisions of this or- nance upon completion of the work dinance shall constitute a misdemeanor. An person who violates this ordinance shall,upon con- viction thereof, be fined not more than one hun- dred dollars ($100.00) per violation and, in addi- iffgs. tion, shall pay all costs and expenses involved in The certificate of occupancy shall state spe- the case. Each day such violation continues shall cifically wherein the nonconforming strut- be considered a separate offense. Nothing herein ture or use differs from the provisions of contained shall prevent the city from taking such this ordinance. Upon enactment or amend- other lawful action as is necessary to prevent or ment of this ordinance,owners or occupants remedy any violation. of nonconforming structures or uses shall have three (3) months to apply for certifi- Sec. 9.3. Board of appeals. cates of occupancy, Failure to make such (a) A board of appeals is hereby established, application within three (3) months shall which shall consist of five (5) members to be ap- be presumptive evidence that the property pointed by the mayor, subject to the confirmation 53 780 CMR: STATE BOARD OF BUILDING REGULATIONS AND STANDARDS ADMINISTRATION engaged in directly supervising persons prescribed by 780 CMR, provided that any such engaged in construction, reconstruction, alternative has been approved. Alternative alteration, repair, removal or demolition in materials, appliances, equipment or methods of those categories of building and structures for design or construction shall be approved when the which the BBRS does not require a license, building official is provided acceptable proof and provided that those municipalities which have has determined that said alternative is satisfactory established licensing requirements for and complies with the intent of the provisions of construction supervisors prior to January 1, 780 CMR, and that said alternative is, for the 1975, may maintain their existing licensing purpose intended, at least the equivalent of that requirements. prescribed in 780 CMR in quality, strength, 108.3.6 Registration of Home Improvement effectiveness, fire resistance, durability and Contractors: In accordance with the provisions safety. Compliance with specific performance of M.G.L. c. 1426, no home improvement based provisions of 780 CMR, in lieu of a contractor, or organization or firm shall be Prescriptive requirement shall also be permitted as involved in the improvement of any existing an alternate. owner occupied one to four family residential 109.3.2 Evidence submitted: The building building unless said home improvement official may require that evidence or proof be contractor has registered with the BBRS in submitted to substantiate any claims that may be accordance with the ntles and regulations for the made regarding the proposed alternate. registration of Home Improvement Contractors as 109.3.3 Tests: Determination of acceptance shall set forth in 780 CMR R6. be based on design or test methods or other such 108.3.7 Certification of Inspectors of Buildings, standards approved by the BBRS. In the Building Commissioners and Local Inspectors; alternative, where the BBRS has not provided The rules and regulations for the Certification of specific approvals, the building official may - Inspectors of Buildings,Building Commissioners accept, as supporting data to assist in this and Local Inspectors shall be as set forth in determination, duly authenticated engineering 780 CMR R7. reports, formal reports from nationally acknowledged testing/listing laboratories,reports 108.4 Enforcement: Whoever violates the from other accredited sources. The costs of all provisions of 780 CMR 108.0 or any rules and tests, reports and investigations required under regulations promulgated hereunder,or who falsifies these provisions shall be home by the applicant. or counterfeits a license,registration or certification 109.3.4 Approval by the Construction issued by the BBRS, or who fraudulently issues or Materials Safety Board: The building official accepts such a license, registration or certification - may refer such matters to the Construction be punished as provided in 780 CMR 118.0 or y Board in accordance with Materials Safety shall be subject to any other penalty provided for by Ma CMR Safet for approval. law. 780 CMR 109.0 APPROVAL 780 CMR 110.0 APPLICATION FOR PERMIT//� 109.1 Approved materials and equipment: All 110.1 Permit application: It shall be unlawful to`W materials, equipment and devices approved by the construct, reconstruct, alter, repair, remove or building official shall be constructed and installed in demolish a building or structure; or to change the accordance with such approval. use or occupancy of a building or structure; or to install or alter any equipment for which provision is made or the installation of which is regulated by 109.2 Used materials and equipment: Used 780 CMR without fist film a written a fc tion materials, equipment and devices which meet the with the buildin o tial and obtainin the a aired minimum requirements of 780 CMR for new Permit t eretor. materials,equipment and devices shall be permitted; - however, the building official may require satisfactory proof that such materials, equipment and 110.2 Temporary Structures: devices have been reconditioned, tested, and/or 110.2.1 General: A building permit shall be placed in good and proper working condition prior required for temporary structures, unless to approval. exempted by 780 CMR 110.3. Such permits shall be limited as to time of service, but such 109.3 Alternative materials and equipment: temporary construction shall not be permitted for year. 109.3.1 General: The provisions of 780 CMR more than one y - are not intended to limit the appropriate use or 110.2.2 Special approval: All temporary installation of materials, appliances, equipment or construction shall conform to the structural methods of design or construction not specifically strength, fire safety, means of egress, light, 2/7/97 (Effective 2/28/97) 780 CMR-Sixth Edition 19 780CMR STATE BOARD OF BUILDING REGULATIONS AND STANDARDS THE MASSACHUSETTS STATE BUII,DING CODE ventilation, energy conservation and sanitary the application. Such written authorization shall be requirements of 780 C,MR as necessary to insure signed by the owner and shall include a statement of the public health, safety and general welfare. ownership and shall identify the owner's authorized 110.2.3 Termination of approval:The building agent,or shall grant permission to the lessee to apply official may terminate such special approval and for the permit. The full names and addresses of the order the demolition of any such construction at owner,lessee,applicant and the responsible officers, the discretion of the building official. if the owner or lessee is a corporate body, shall be stated in the application. y- 110.3 Exemptions: A building permit is not Note: It shall be the responsibility of the (� required for the following activities, such exemption, registered contractor to obtain all permits however, shall not exempt the activity from any necessary for work covered by the Home review or permit which may be required pursuant to Improvement Contractor Registration Law, other laws, by-laws, rules and regulations of other M.G.L. c. 142A. An owner who secures his or jurisdictions(e.g.zoning,conservation,etc.)_ her own permits for such shall be excluded from 1. One story detached accessory buildings used the guaranty fund provisions as defined in M.G.L. as tool or storage sheds, playhouses and similar c. 142A. Refer to 780 CMR R6 and M.G.L. uses,provided the floor area does not exceed 120 c. 142A for additional information regarding the square feet. Home Improvement Contractor Registration 2. Fences six feet in height or less. Program. 3. Retaining walls which, in the opinion of the _building official, are not a threat to the public 110.6 The securing of a building permit by the safety health or welfare and which retain less than owner,or the owner's authorized agent,to construct, four feet of unbalanced fill. reconstruct, alter, repair, demolish, remove, install ,�. Ordinary repairs as defined in 780 CMR 2. equipment or change the use or occupancy of a lmary repairs s not �ue ,cutting building or structure, shall not be construed to awav ofanv wall partition oreofthe relieve or otherwise limit [he duties and removal or cuttingofany stru ,column responsibilities of the licensed,registered or certified or other loadbearing support, or the removal or individual or firm under the rules and regulations change of any required means of egress, or governing the issuance of such license registration or rearrangement of parts of a structure affecting the certification. egress requirements; nor shall ordinary repairs include addition to, alteration of, replacement or 110.7 Construction documents:The application for relocation of any standpipe, water supply, permit shall be accompanied by not less than three mechanical system,fire protection system, energy sets of construction documents. The buildm conservation system or other work affecting official is permitted to waive or modify the public health or general safety. requirements or g construction documents when 5. Greenhouses: A building permit or notice to _the building official determines that the scope of the the building official is not required for the won is o a rrunor nature. When t ea ity o_qutfie construction of greenhouses covered exclusively maters s rs essentia or conformity to 780 CMR, with plastic film (in accordance with St. 1983, specific information shall be given to establish such c. 671). (This exemption does not apply if the quality,and 780 CMR shall not be cited, or the term greenhouse is to be used for large assemblies of "legal" or its equivalent used as a substitute for people or uses other than normally expected for - specific information. this purpose.) 110.8 Engineering Details,Reports,Calculations, 110.4 Form of application: The application for a Plans and Specifications: In the application for a permit shall be submitted in such form as determined permit for buildings and structures subject to by the building official but in all cases shall contain, construction control in 780 CMR l 16.0, the as a minimum, the information required on the construction documents shall contain sufficient plans appropriate sample uniform building permit and details to fully describe the work intended, application forms in Appendix B. The application including, but not limited to all details sufficient to for a permit shall be accompanied by the required describe the structural,fire protection, fire alarm, fee as prescribed in 780 CMR 114.0 and the mechanical, light and ventilation, energy construction documents as required in 780 CMR conservation, architectural access and egress 110.7 and 110.8,where applicable. systems. The building official may require such calculations, descriptions narratives and reports 110.5 By whom application is made: Application deemed necessary to fully describe the basis of for a permit shall be made by the owner or lessee of design for each system regulated by 780 CMR. In the building or stricture, or agent of either. If accordance with the provisions of M.G.L. c. 143, application is made other than by the owner, the § 54A all plans and specifications shall bear the written authorization of the owner shall accompany original seal and original signature of a 20 780 CMR-Sixth Edition 2/7/97 (Effective 2/28/97) 780 CMR: STATE BOARD OF BUILDING REGULATIONS AND STANDARDS ADMINISTRATION 780 CMR 120.0 CERTIFICATE OF 120.5 Posting structures: OCCUPANCY 120.5.1 Posted use and occupancy: A suitably 120.1 General: New buildings and structures:A designed placard approved by the building official building or structure hereafter shall not be used or shall be posted by the owner on all floors of every occupied in whole or in part until the certificate of building and structure and part thereof designed use and occupancy shall have been issued by the for high hazard, storage, mercantile, factory and building commissioner or inspector of buildings or, industrial or business use(use groups H, S,M,F when applicable,the state inspector. The certificate and B) as defined in 780 CMR 3. Said placard shall not be issued until all the work has been shall be securely fastened to thebuildingor completed in accordance with the provisions of the structure in a readily visible place, stating: the approved permits and of the applicable codes for use group,the fire grading, the live load and the which a permit is required, except as provided in occupancy load. 780 CMR 120.3. 120.5.2 Posted occupancy load: A suitably 120.2 Buildings or structures hereafter altered: designed placard approved by the building official A building or structure; in whole or in part,altered shall be posted by the owner in every room where to change from one use group to another, to a practicable of every building and structure and different use within the same rise group; the fire part thereof designed for use as a place of public grading; the maximum live load capacity; the assembly or as an institutional building for occupancy load capacity shall not be occupied or harboring people for penal, correctional, used until the certificate shall have been issued educational,medical or other care or treatment,or certifying that the work has been completed in as residential buildings used for hotels, lodging accordance with the provisions of the approved houses, boarding houses, dormitory buildings, permits and of the applicable codes for which a multiple family dwellings (use groups A, I, R-1 permit is required. Any use or occupancy, which and R-2). Said placard shall designate the was not discontinued during the work of alteration, maximum occupancy load. shall be discontinued within 30 days after the 120.5.3 Replacement of posted signs: All completion of the alteration unless the required posting signs shall be furnished by the owner and certificate is issued. shall be of permanent design: they shall not be removed or defaced, and if lost, removed or 120.3 Temporary occupancy: Upon the request of defaced,shall be immediately replaced. the holder of a permit, a temporary certificate of occupancy may be issued before the completion of 120.5.4 Periodic inspection for posting: The the entire work covered by the permit,provided that building official may periodically inspect all such portion or portions shall be occupied safely existing buildings and structures except one and prior to full completion of the building or structure two family dwellings for compliance with without endangering life or public welfare. Any 780 CMR in respect to posting;or he may accept occupancy permitted to continue during the work the report of such inspections from a qualified shall be discontinued within 30 days after registered engineer or architect or others certified completion of the work unless a certificate of by the BBRS; and such inspections and reports occupancy is issued by the building official. shall specify any violation of the requirements of 780 CMR in respect to the posting of floor load, 120.4 Contents of certificate: When a building or fire grading,occupancy load and use group of the Q{ structure is entitled thereto, the building official building or structure. shall issue a certificate of occupancy within ten days b L� after written application. Upon completion of the 780 CMR 121.0 UNSAFE STRUCTURES �V final inspection in accordance with 780 CMR 115.5 121.1 General: The provisions of 780 CMR 121.0 and correction of the violations and discrepancies, are established by M.G.L. c. 143, §§ 6, 7, 8, 9 and f�L and compliance with 780 CMR 903.4,the certificate 10. of occupancy shall be issued. The certificate of occupancy shall specify the following. 12t.2 Inspection: The building official 1. The edition of the code under which the immediately upon being informed by report or permit was issued. otherwise that a building or other structure or 2. The rise group and occupancy, in accordance anything attached thereto or connected therewith is with the provisions of 780 CMR 3. dangerous to life or limb or that any building in that 3. The type of construction as defined in city or town is unused, uninhabited or abandoned, 780 CMR 6. and open to the weather,shall inspect the same;and 4. The occupant load per floor. he shall forthwith in writing notify the owner to 5. Any special stipulations and conditions of the remove it or make it safe if it appears to him to be building permit. dangerous, or to make it secure if it is unused, uninhabited or abandoned and open to the weather. 2/7/97 (Effcctive 2/28/97) 780 CMR-Sixth Edition 27 780 CMR: STATE BOARD OF BUILDING REGULATIONS AND STANDARDS THE MASSACHUSETTS STATE BUILDING CODE If it appears that such building or structure would be case of such demolition, the said building official especially unsafe in case of fire, it shall be deemed shall cause such lot to be leveled to conform with dangerous within the meaning hereof, and the adjacent grades by a inorganic fill. The costs and building official may affix in a conspicuous place charges incurred shall constitute a lien upon the land upon its exterior walls a notice of its dangerous upon which the structure is located, and shall be condition, which shall not be removed or defaced enforced in an action of contract; and such owner without authority from him. shall,for every day's continuance of such refusal or neglect after being so notified,be punished by a fine 121.3 Removal or making structure safe: Any in accordance with 780 CMR 118.4. The provisions person so notified shall be allowed until 12:00 noon of M.G.L. c. 139, § 3A, paragraph two, relative to of the day following the service of the notice in liens for such debt and the collection of claims for which to begin to remove such building or structure such debt shall apply to any debt referred to in this or make it safe, or to make it secure, and he shall section, except that the said building official shall employ sufficient labor speedily to make it safe or act hereunder in place of the mayor or board of remove it or to make it secure; but if the public selectmen. During the time such order is in effect, safety so requires and if the mayor or selectmen so it shall be unlawful to use or occupy such structure order, the building official may immediately enter or any portion thereof for any purpose. upon the premises with the necessary workmen and assistants and cause such unsafe structure to be made 121.6 Remedy of person ordered to remove a safe or demolished without delay and a proper fence dangerous structure or make it safe: put up for the protection of passersby,or to be made Notwithstanding the provisions of 780 CMR 122, an secure. owner, aggrieved by such order may have the remedy prescribed by M.G.L. c. 139, § 2: provided 121.4 Failure to remove or make structure safe, that any provision of M.G.L. c. 139, §2 shall not be survey board,survey report: If an owner of such construed so as to hinder, delay or prevent the unsafe structure refuses or neglects to comply with building official from acting and proceeding under the requirements of such notice within the specified 780 CMR 121; and provided, further, that this time limit, and such structure is not made safe or section shall not prevent the city or town from taken down as ordered therein, a careful survey of recovering the forfeiture provided in said 780 CMR the premises shall be made by a board consisting;in 121.5 from the date of the service of the original a city, of a city engineer, the head of the fire notice,unless the order is annulled by the jury. department, as such term is defined in M.G.L. c. 148, § 1, and one disinterested person to be 780 CMR 122.0 BOARD OF APPEALS appointed by the building official;and,in a town of 122.1 State Building Code Appeals Board: a surveyor, the head of the fire department and one Except for actions taken pursuant to 780 CMR disinterested person to be appointed by the building 121.0, whoever is aggrieved by an interpretation, official. In the absence of any of the above officers order,requirement,direction or failure to act under or individuals, the mayor or selectmen shall 780 CMR by any agency or official of the city,town designate one or more officers or other suitable or region,or agency or official of the State charged persons in place of the officers so named as with the administration or enforcement of 780 CMR members of said board. A written report of such or any of its rules or regulations, excepting any survey shall be made, and a copy thereof served on specialized codes, may appeal directly to the State such owner. BuildingCode Appeals Board as pp provided in 780 CMR 122.0. 121.5 Removal of dangerous or abandoned Whoever is aggrieved by an interpretation,order, structures: If such survey report as outlined in requirement, direction or failure to act under 780 CMR 121.4 declares such structure to be 780 CMR by any agency or official of a city, town dangerous or to be unused, uninhabited or or region charged with the administration or abandoned, and open to the weather, and if the enforcement of 780 CMR,excepting any specialized owner continues such refusal or neglect,the building codes, may appeal directly to the State Building official shall cause it to be made safe or taken down Code Appeals Board or may appeal first to a local'ot-„ or to be made secure; and, if the public safety so regional building code appeals board and if requires, said building official may at once enter the aggrieved thereby he may then appeal to the State shvcntre,the land on which it stands or the abutting Building Code Appeals Board as provided in land or buildings, with such assistance as he may 780 CMR 122.0. require, and secure the same; and may remove and In the event an appeal is taken directly to the State evict, under the pertinent provisions of M.G.L. Building Code Appeals Board from an c.239,or otherwise, any tenant or occupant thereof; interpretation, order, requirement or direction, said and may erect such protection for the public by appeal shall be filed as specified in 780 CMR proper fence or otherwise as may be necessary,and 122 3.1 with the State Building Code Appeals Board for this purpose may close a public highway. In the not later than 45 days after the service of notice 28 780 CMR;Sixth Edition 2/7/97 (Effective 2/28/97) CHAPTER 34 REPAIR,ALTERATION,ADDITION,AND CHANGE OF USE OF EXISTING BUILDINGS (780 CMR 34 is entirely unique to Massachusetts) 780 CMR 3400.0 SCOPE construction, except as otherwise provided in 3400.1 General:The provisions of 780 CMR 34 are 780 CMR 34. The combined height and area of intended to maintain or increase public safety, the existing building and the addition shall not health, and general welfare in existing buildings by exceed that allowed by 780 CMR 503.0 and Table permitting repair,alteration,addition,and/or change 503 as modified by 780 CMR 504 and 506. of use without requiring full compliance with the Where afire wall complying with 780 CMR 707.0 code for new construction except where otherwise and 708.0 is provided, the addition shall be specified in 780 CMR 34. considered as a separate building. 5.Ordinary repairs:Ordinary repairs conforming 3400.2 Compliance: Repairs,alterations,additions, to 780 CMR 110.3(4),780 CMR 2 and 780 CMR and changes of use shall conform to the 902 may be performed without a building permit. requirements of 780 CMR 34. Where compliance 6. Assembly use groups: A change from any with the provisions of this code for new construction other use group town assembly use group(A)or is required by 780 CMR 34 and where suchany alteration or change in occupancy within an co,,mp4ance r qu 41 beca4 a of ddhitchE` ioli _,I assembly use group shall comply with the aF $ ' requirements of the code for new construction, dtfficriines or r6gulatory Conflicts, coinp)'rance eq a/terrahves as degcnbed m 7$0 CMR 3466;0 may except that earthquake requirements need only bb'a6eepted by the burldirigoffctal. conform to 780 CMR 3408. 7. Institutional use groups: A change from any Note: Specialized codes, rules, regulations, and other use group to an institutional use group(I)or laws pertaining to repair, alteration, addition, or any alteration or change in occupancy within an change of use of existing buildings promulgated institutional use group shall comply with the by various authorized agencies may impact upon requirements of the code for new construction, the provisions of 780 CMR 34. Specialized state except that earthquake requirements need only codes,rules,regulations,and laws include,but are conform to 780 CMR 3408. not limited to those listed in Appendix A. 8. Residential use groups: A change from any other use group to a residential use group(R)or 3400.3 Applicability: The provisions of 780 CMR any alteration or change in occupancy within an 34 apply to repair, alteration addition or change in residential use group shall comply with the use to existing buildings which qualify to use requirements of the code for new construction, 780 CMR 34(see 780 CMR 3400.3.1),based on the except that earthquake requirements need only proposed continuation of,or change in use group,as conform to 780 CMR 3408. follows: 9. Historic buildings: Buildings which qualify 1. Continuation of the same use group, or a as totally or partially preserved historic buildings change in use group which results in a change in in accordance with 780 CMR 3409 shall meet the hazard index of one or less as determined by provisions of 780 CMR 3409. 780 CMR 3403 shall comply with 780 CMR 10. Structural requirements: Structural 3404.0. requirements for additions, and for existing 2. Change in use group to a use group with buildings subject to repair, alteration, and/or hazard index of two or more greater than the change of use, shall be in accordance with hazard index of the existing use shall comply with 780 CMR 3408. the requirements of 780 CMR 3405.0 and the code for new construction. Exceptions: Totally Preserved and Partially 3. Part change in use(Mixed Use):Portions of Preserved Historic Buildings the building is changed to a new use group, shall 3400.3.1 Buildings which qualify: The be separated from the remainder of the building provisions of 780 CMR 34 shall apply to existing with fire separation assemblies complying with buildings which have been legally occupied 780 CMR 313, or with approved compliance and/or used for a period of at least five years. alternatives. The portion of the building changed Any building for which there exists an shall be made to conform with the applicable outstanding notice of violation or other order of provisions of 780 CMR 34. the building official shall not qualify to use 4. Additions. Additions to existing buildings 780 CMR 34 unless such proposed work includes shall comply with all code requirements for new the abatement of all outstanding violations and 2/7/97 (Effective 2/28/97) 780 CMR-Sixth Edition 445 780 CMR: STATE BOARD OF BUILDING REGULATIONS AND STANDARDS THE MASSACHUSETTS STATE BUILDING CODE compliance with all outstanding orders of the dangerous,or hazardous,to the health and safety of building official. Buildings which do not qualify the occupants, the building official shall order the as existing buildings for the purposes of 780 CMR abatement of such conditions to render the building 34 shall comply fully with the applicable or structure livable for the posted use and occupant provisions of this code for new construction. load. Exceptions: In enforcing the provisions of 780 CMR 3400.6 (1) Existing buildings or portions thereof the building official may require or accept which are changed in use from any other use engineering or other evaluations of the lighting group to day care centers(1-2 or E) shall not and/or ventilation systems in order to evaluate qualify as existing buildings for the purposes of possible dangerous or hazardous conditions and 780 CMR 34, but shall comply with the acceptable solutions. requirements of 780 CMR 4,as applicable. Whe.re'fill compliance with 780 CMR for new' (2) Existing buildings or portions thereof, , construction'hs not practical for structural and/or which are changed in use from any use to a "'tither technical reasons, the building o1. fficial%may:t' Group Residence,Limited Group Residence orccept cotnphance alternatives, of engineeting'or Group Dwelling Unit shall not qualify as -other ey'eluapoha'whtibh adequately address-the-,:.�L existing buildings for the purposes of 780 ;=building or sWctureiivabilrty fdt'tfi2'pos[ed use and CMR 34,but shall comply with the provisions occupaittload. .- of 780 CMR 4,as applicable. 780 CMR 3401.0 DEFINITIONS 3400.4 Special Provisions for Means of Egress: 3401.1 General: Definitions shall, for the purposes 3400.4.1 Existing Non Conforming Means of of 780 CMR 3401.0, have the meaning shown Egress: The following conditions, when herein: observed by the building official,shall be cited,in writing as a violation. Said citation shall order Building System: Any mechanical, structural,egress, the abatement of the non conformance and shall electrical, plumbing, building enclosure and/or include such a time element as the building fire protection system, or fire resistive official deems necessary for the protection of the construction system, or portion thereof occupants thereof;or as otherwise provided for by statute. Building System Component: A part or portion of a 1. Less than the number of means of egress building system. serving every space and/or story, required by 780 CMR 1010.0 and Table 1010.2, or Compliance Alternative: An alternative life-safety 780 CMR 36 for one and two family dwellings. construction feature which meets or exceeds the 2. Any required means of egress component requirements or intent of a specific provision of which is not of sufficient width to comply with 780 CMR. The Building Official is authorized to 780 CMR 1009, or is not so arranged as to approve or disapprove compliance alternatives. provide safe and adequate means of egress, Compliance alternatives are only permitted for including exit signage and emergency lighting. existing buildings. 3400.5 Hazardous Means ofEgress: Existing building or structure: Any building or 3400.5.1 Exit Order/Hazardous Means of structure qualifying under 780 CMR 3400.3.1. Egress: In any existing building or structure not Hazard Index: A numerical value, between 1 and 8, provided with exit facilities as herein prescribed which is assigned to a specific Use Group in order for new buildings and in which the exits are to detemtine which of the provisions of 780 CMR deemed hazardous or dangerous to life and limb, 34 apply to the proposed work on the existing the building official shall declare such building building. The Hazard index is a relative scale dangerous and unsafe in accordance with the used only to determine applicable provisions of provisions of 780 CMR 121.0. 780 CMR 34. Hazard indices are listed in Table 3400.5.2 Appeal from exit order: Any person 3403 and Appendix F. served with any order pursuant to 780 CMR 3400.5 shall have the remedy prescribed in Historic buildings: (a) Any building or structure 780 CMR 121. individually listed on the National Register of Historic Places or (b) any building or structure 3400.6 Unsafe Lighting and/or Unsafe evaluated by MHC to be a contributing building Ventilation: In any existing building, or portion within a National Register or State Register thereof, in which (a) the light or ventilation do not District. (c) any building or structure which has meet the applicable provisions of 780 CMR 12.0 and been certified by the Massachusetts Historical (b)which,in the opinion of the building official, are Commission to meet eligibility requirements for individual listing on the National Register of 446 780 CMR- Sixth Edition 2/10/97 (Effective 2/28/97) 780 CMR: STATE BOARD OF BUILDING REGULATIONS AND STANDARDS REPAIR, ALTERATION,ADDITION AND CHANGE OF USE OF EXISTING BUILDINGS F Historic Places. Historic building shall be further such buildings undergo renovations or alterations, defined as totally or partially preserved change in use or occupancy or additions. As buildings. All entries into the totally preserved used in 780 CMR 34, substantial renovation or building list shall be certified by the substantial alteration shall have the following Massachusetts Historical Commission. The meanings;Substantial renovation and substantial Board of Building Regulations and Standards alteration is work which is major in scope artd shall ratify all buildings or structures certified expenditure when compared to the work and by the Massachusetts Historical Conunission to expenditure required for the installation of a fire qualify for totally preserved listing (see protection system, when such system is required Appendix H). by 780 CMR 9 for a particular use group. The Partiallypreserved buildings: (a)Any building or building official shall make such determination structure individually listed on the National and may request the owner or applicant to provide Register of Historic Places or such supporting information as is necessary to g (b)any building - or structure certified as a historic building by make such determination the Massachusetts Historical (Commission/t CMR 3402 0 IMPLEMENTATION and not designated a totally preserved building 780 in Appendix H. 3402.1 Building Permit Application Requirements for Existing Buildings: A building Restoration: Restoration is the process of permit shall be required for any work regulated by accurately reconstructing or repairing the 780 CMR 34. forms and details of a building or structure or portion thereof as it appeared at a particular Exception: Ordinary repairs may be performed period or periods of time by means of removal without a building permit. of later work/or the replacement of missing 3402.1.1 Investigation and evaluation: For any original work proposed work regulated by 780 CMR 34,which Totally preserved buildings: A totally preserved is subject to 780 CMR 116, as a condition of the building is an historic building or structure. issuance of a building permit the building owner The principal use of such a building or shall cause the existing building (or portion structure must be as an exhibit of the building thereof) to be investigated and evaluated in or the structure itself which is open to the accordance with the.provisions of 780 CMR 34 public not less than 12 days per year,although (see Appendix F). additional uses,original and/or ancillary to the The investigation and evaluation shall be in principal use shall be permitted within the sufficient detail to ascertain the effects of the same building up to maximum of 40% of the proposed work(if any)on the structural, egress, gross floor area. Totally preserved buildings fire protection, energy conservation systems and shall be those listed in Appendix H. All entries light and ventilation systems of the space under into the totally preserved building list shall be consideration and, where necessary, the entire certified by the Massachusetts Historical building or structure. . Commission. The Board of Building Regulations and Standards shall ratify all 3402.1.2 Submittal: The results of the buildings or structures certified by the investigation and evaluation, along with any Massachusetts Historical Commission to proposed compliance alternatives, shall be qualify for totally preserved listing (See submitted to the building official in written report Appendix H). form. Seismic Hazard Cate A numerical value, 3402.1.3 Non Conformities and Compliance Category: Alternatives: The application for a building between 1 and 3, which is based on a proposed permit shall identify all items of non or partial change in use, change in occupancy and cost of compliance with the requirements of 780 CMA alterations in order to determine which of the 34, and compliance alternatives, if any are provisions of 780 CMR 3408 apply to the proposed, for approval by the building official. proposed work on the existing building. The The building official shall respond to the _ Seismic Hazard Category is a relative scale used acceptability of any proposed compliance only to determine applicable provisions of alternatives within 30 days of the filing of the 780 CMR 34. Seismic Hazard Categories are building permit application. Where proposed listed in Table 3408.1 compliance alternatives are, in the opinion of the building official,unacceptable,or where issues of Substantial ter Renovation, renovation Substantial substation: non-compliance remain,the permit applicant shall The terms care de in dhereiand he substantial have the remedies prescribed by 780 CMR 122.0, alteration are defined herein for the specific purpose of determining whether fire protective 3402.1.5 Documentation of compliance systems are required in existing buildings, when alternatives: Whenever action is taken on any 2/7/97 (Effective 2/28/97) 780 CMR-Sixth Edition 447 Citp of balem, Olammrbuottt Mepartment of Public berbiceg One 6alem Oreen (978) 745-9595 (Ext. 321 STANLEY I.BORNSTEIN,P.E. City Engineer _fax: (978) 745-5877 Director of Public Services 5-13-99 0 c FROM: Stan Bornstein P.E. a ty cN Dir. of Public Services/City Engine e sr Rn N G� TO: Peter Strout Building Inspector RE: 28 Goodhue St. On May 11,1999 at approximately 1;00pm I toured the above referenced building with members of your staff, the City Attorney and representatives of the fire department. During the tour I noted numerous structural problems (e.g. stairwell resting on sprinkler pipe) as well as electrical code violations .In addition there were several spray booths that were not properly ventilated, paint and other combustibles in several locations not properly stored and in one case a large container of solvent covered rags was exposed to the atmosphere. Of major concern was the fact that the building has "racked" and is tilting out of plumb. The building has serious leaks, which make me question the condition of the roof(which I did not view). There are many windows missing and there seem to be quite a bit of non-fire rated materials covering the walls and ceilings. I did not examine the heating system. In summary the building should not be occupied in its present condition. There were other problems that will be addressed by the appropriate City departments. CC: Mayor Arty. Keenan �& (City of �*aiem, -41am6arbU!5ett9; department of Publir �berbireo One �&alem Oreen (978) 745-9595 Qfxt. 321 STANLEY I.BORNSTEIN,P.E. City Engineer lax: (978) 745-5877 Director of Public Services 5-13-99 c FROM: Stan Bornstein P.E. 02 a ey Dir. of Public Services/City Engine e sT n P LL n TO: Peter Strout e E � ` Building Inspector \l\ RE: 28 Goodhue St. On May 11,1999 at approximately 1:OOpm I toured the above referenced building with members of your staff, the City Attorney and representatives of the fire department. During the tour I noted numerous structural problems (e.g. stairwell resting on sprinkler pipe) as well as electrical code violations .In addition there were several spray booths that were not properly ventilated, paint and other combustibles in several locations not properly stored and in one case a large container of solvent covered rags was exposed to the atmosphere. Of major concern was the fact that the building has "racked" and is tilting out of plumb. The building has serious leaks, which make me question the condition of the roof(which I did not view). There are many windows missing and there seem to be quite a bit of non-fire rated materials covering the walls and ceilings. I did not examine the heating system. In summary the building should not be occupied in its present condition. There were other problems that will be addressed by the appropriate City departments. CC: Mayor Atty. Keenan e Citp of 6afem, J11a!52;arbU!5ettg Mepartment of Public 1ierbite$ (One Oalem green (978) 745-9595 Cxt. 321 STANLEY I.BORNSTEIN,P.E. City Engineer - Jf'ax: (978) 745-5877 Director of Public Services 5-13-99 FROM: Stan Bornstein P.E. a ey a�3� Dir. of Public Services/City Engine o sr n TO: Peter Strout Building Inspector RE: 28 Goodhue St. On May 11,1999 at approximately 1:00pm I toured the above referenced building with members of your staff, the City Attorney and representatives of the fire department. During the tour I noted numerous structural problems (e.g. stairwell resting on sprinkler pipe) as well as electrical code violations .In addition there were several spray booths that were not properly ventilated, paint and other combustibles in several locations not properly stored and in one case a large container of solvent covered rags was exposed to the atmosphere. Of major concern was the fact that the building has "racked" and is tilting out of plumb. The building has serious leaks, which make me question the condition of the roof(which I did not view). There are many windows missing and there seem to be quite a bit of non-fire rated materials covering the walls and ceilings. I did not examine the heating system. In summary the building should not be occupied in its present condition. There were other problems that will be addressed by the appropriate City departments. CC: Mayor Atty. Keenan a� 2�1 Citp of Salem, 11na55acbm5ettS Public Propertp Department �Builbing Department One f9alem green (975) 745-9593 Cxr. 350 Peter Strout Director of Public Property Inspector of Buildings Zoning Enforcement Officer April 16, 1999 L.T.W. Management Associates Inc. 271 Western Avenue Lynn, Ma. 01904-3016 RE: 28 Goodhue Street Dear Mr. Leigh: On Thursday, April 15, 1999 a State Building Code Appeals Board hearing took place relative to the structural, fire and building code violations which exist at 28 Goodhue Street. As a result of this hearing and a reinspection of the property, the following violations were identified. 1. 780CMR 121.0 unsafe structures that the building at 28 Goodhue Street would be especially unsafe and dangerous in case of fire. 2. 780 CMR 3400.41 a) The building has less then the number of means of egress serving every space and/or story required by 780 CMR 1010 and Table 1010.2 b) The means of egress components are not of sufficient width to comply with 780 CMR 1009, and are not arranged to provide safe and adequate means of egress including signage and emergency lighting. 3. 780 CMR 3400.5.1 The buildings exists are hereby deemed hazardous and dangerous to life and limb and are declared dangerous and unsafe in accordance with the provisions of 780 CMR 121.0 4. 780 CMR 3400.6 The existing buildings light and ventilation do not meet the applicable provisions of 780 CMR 12 and are dangerous and hazardous to the health and safety of the occupants. 5. 780 CMR Chapter 9 required that the building shall have a fire protected system and that the system be maintained in accordance with the code and applicable standards listed in Appendix A. You are hereby ordered to immediately cease and desist all business operations and rentals on the property and have all the tenants vacate the property no later than April 23, 1999. You have until 12:00 of the day following April 23, 1999 to make secure all exterior entrances and openings in and around the building and property including if necessary, proper fencing put up for the protection of passerby. The existing sprinkler and heating system shall be maintained and periodically tested to insure proper operation after the building is secured. Periodic inspections by the Building and Fire Departments shall be done to assure „. compliance with this order. Failure to comply with the requirements of this order immediately, will result in legal action being enforced as this order as noted in MGL., Chapter 143 ss.9 and 780 CMR, Section 121.3 and 121.4 and 121.5. Please contact this office immediately upon receipt of this letter. Sincerely, /may Kevin G. Goggin Assistant Building Inspector cc: Mayor Stanley Usocivz John Keenan, Assistant City Solicitor Chief Robert Turner Craig Wheeler, Planning Councillor O'Leary Chief Robert St. Pierre Fire Prevention Health Department 780 CMR: STATE BOARD OF BUILDING REGULATIONS AND STANDARDS THE MASSACHUSETTS STATE BUILDING CODE If it appears that such building or structure would be case of such demolition, the said building official especially unsafe in case of fire, it shall be deemed shall cause such lot to be leveled to conform with dangerous within the meaning hereof, and the adjacent grades by a inorganic fill. The costs and building official may affix in a conspicuous place charges incurred shall constitute a lien upon the land upon its exterior walls a notice of its dangerous upon which the structure is located, and shall be condition, which shall not be removed or defaced enforced in an action of contract; and such owner without authority from him. shall, for every day's continuance of such refusal or neglect after being so notified,be punished by a fine 121.3 Removal or making structure safe: Any in accordance with 780 CMR 118.4. The provisions person so notified shall be allowed until 12:00 noon of M.G.L. c. 139, § 3A, paragraph two, relative to of the day following the service of the notice in liens for such debt and the collection of claims for which to begin to remove such building or structure such debt shall apply to any debt referred to in this or make it safe, or to make it secure, and he shall section, except that the said building official shall employ sufficient labor speedily to make it safe or act hereunder in place of the mayor or board of remove it or to make it secure; but if the public selectmen. During the time such order is in effect, safety so requires and if the mayor or selectmen so it shall be unlawful to use or occupy such structure order, the building official may immediately enter or any portion thereof for any purpose. upon the premises with the necessary workmen and assistants and cause such unsafe structure to be made 121.6 Remedy of person ordered to remove a safe or demolished without delay and a proper fence dangerous structure or make it -safe: put up for the protection of passersby, or to be made Notwithstanding the provisions of 780 CMR 122,an secure. owner, aggrieved by such order may have the remedy prescribed by M.G.L. c. 139, §2:provided 121.4 Failure to remove or make structure safe, that any provision of M.G.L. c. 139, §2 shall not be survey board,survey report: If an owner of such construed so as to hinder, delay or prevent the unsafe structure refuses or neglects to comply with building official from acting and proceeding under the requirements of such notice within the specified 780 CMR 121; and provided, further, that this time limit, and such structure is not made safe or section shall not prevent the city or town from taken down as ordered therein, a careful survey of recovering the forfeiture provided in said 780 CMR the premises shall be made by a board consisting;in 121.5 from the date of the service of the original a city, of a city engineer, the head of the fire notice,unless the order is annulled by the jury. department, as such term is defined in M.G.L. c. 148, § 1, and one disinterested person to be 780 CMR 122.0 BOARD OF APPEALS appointed by the building official;and, in a town of 122.1 State Building Code Appeals Board: a surveyor, the head of the fire department and one Except for acticns taken pursuant to 780 CivOt disinterested person to be appointed by the building 121.0, whoever is aggrieved by an interpretation, official. In the absence of any of the above officers order, requirement, direction or failure to act under or individuals, the mayor or selectmen shall 780 C\IR by any agency or official of the city,town designate one or more officers or other suitable or region, or agency or official of the State charged persons in place of the officers so named as with the administration or enforcement of 780 CMR members of said board. A written report of such or any of its rules or regulations, excepting any survey shall be made, and a copy thereof served on specialized codes, may appeal directly to the State such owner. Building Code Appeals Board as provided in 780 CSIIt 122.0. 121.5 Removal of dangerous or abandoned Whoever is aggrieved by an interpretation, order, structures: If such survey report as outlined in requirement, direction or failure to act under 780 CMR 12t.4 declares such stnicture to be 780 CMR by any agency or official of a city, town dangerous or to be unused, uninhabited or or region charged with the administration or abandoned, and open to the weather, and if the enforcement of 780 CMR,excepting any specialized owner continues such refusal or neglect, the building codes, may appeal directly to the State Building official shall cause it to be made safe or taken down Code Appeals Board or may appeal first to a local or or to be made secure; and, if the public safety so regional building code appeals board and if requires, said building official may at once enter the aggrieved thereby he may then appeal to the State st.-ucnve,the land on which it stands or the abutting Building Code Appeals Board as provided in land or buildings, with such assistance as he may 780 CivfR 122.0. require, and secure the same; and may remove and In the event an appeal is taken directly to the State evict, under the pertinent provisions of M.G.L. Building Code Appeals Board from an c.239,or otherwise, any tenant or occupant thereof, interpretation, order, requirement or direction, said and may erect such protection for the public by appeal shall be filed as specified in 780 CMR proper fence or otherwise as may be necessary,and I vv 3 1 with the State Building Code Appeals Board for this purpose may close a public Highway. In the not later than 45 days after the service of notice CHAPTER 34 REPAIR, ALTERATION, ADDITION,AND CHANGE OF USE OF EXISTING BUILDINGS (780 CMR 34 is entirely unique to Massachusetts) 780 CMR 3400.0 SCOPE construction, except as otherwise provided in 3400.1 General:The provisions of 780 CNt 34 are 780 CLMR 34. The combined height and area of intended to maintain or increase public safety, the existing building and the addition shall not health, and general welfare in existing buildings by exceed that allowed by 780 0MR 503.0 and Table permitting repair, alteration,addition,and/or change 503 as modified by 780 CVfR 504 and 506. of use without requiring full compliance with the where afire wall complying with 780 CMA 707.0 code for new construction except where otherwise and 708.0 is provided, the addition shall be specified in 780 CMR 34, considered as a separate building. 5. Ordinary repairs:Ordinary repairs conforming 3400.2 Compliance: Repairs,alterations,additions, to 780 CMR 110.3(4),780 CMR 2 and 780 CMR and changes of use shall conform to the 902 may be performed without a building permit. requirements of 780 CIMR 34. Where compliance 6. Assembly use groups: A change from any with the provisions ofthis code for new construction other use group to an assembly use group (A)or is required by 780 CMR 34; and where such any alteration or change in occupancy within an compliance is impractical because of construction assembly use group shall comply with the difficulties or regulatory conflicts, compliance requirements of the code for new construction, alternatives as described in 780 CMR 3406.0 may except that earthquake requirements need only be accepted by the building official. conform to 780 CMR 3408. 7. Institutional use groups: A change from any Note: Specialized codes, rules, regulations, and other use group to an institutional use group(1)or laws pertaining to repair, alteration, addition, or any alteration or change in occupancy within an change of use of existing buildings promulgated institutional use group shall comply with the by various authorized agencies may impact upon requirements of the code for new construction, the provisions of 780 CNM 34. Specialized state except that earthquake requirements need only codes,rules,regulations,and laws include, but are conform to 780 CMR 3408. not limited to those listed in Appendit A. 8. Residential use groups: A change from any other use group to a residential use group(R) or 3400.3 Applicability: The provisions of780 Cib1R any alteration or change in occupancy within an 34 apply to repair, alteration addition or change in residential use group shall comply with the use to existing buildings which qualify to use requirements of the code for new construction, 780 CMR 34(see 780 C%,1R 3400.3.1),based on the except that earthquake requirements need only proposed continuation of, or change in use group, as conform to 780 CMR 3408. follows: - 9. Historic buildings: Buildings which qualify I. Continuation of the same use group, or a as totally or partially preserved historic buildings change in use group which results in a change in in accordance with 780 CMR 3409 shall meet the hazard index of one or less as determined by provisions of 780 CbfR 3409. 780 CNIR 3403 shall comply with 780 CMR 10. Structural requirements: Structural 3404.0. requirements for additions, and for existing 2. Change in use group to a use group with buildings subject to repair, alteration, and/or hazard index of two or more greater than the change of use, shall be in accordance with hazard index of the existing use shall comply with 780 CMR 3408. the requirements of 780 CMR 3405.0 and the code for new construction. Exceptions: Totally Preserved and Partially 3. Part change in use(Mixed Use): Portions of Preserved Historic Buildings the building is changed to a new use group, shall 3400.3.1 Buildings which qualify: The be separated from the remainder of the building provisions of 780 CVfR 34 shall apply to existing with fire separation assemblies complying with buildings which have been legally occupied 780 CMR 3:3, or with approved compliance and/or used for a period of at least five years. alternatives. The portion of the building changed Any building for which there exists an shall be made to conform with the applicable outstanding notice of violation or other order of provisions of 780 CMR 34. the building official shall not qualify to use 4. Additions: Additions to existing buildings 780 CMR 34 unless such proposed work includes shall comply with all code requirements for new the abatement of all outstanding violations and 2/7/97 (Effective 2/28/97) 780 CMR- Sixth Edition 445 y} "CS § 9 A,,y0-r,�-(ip LAWS OF i\�IASSACHU5E1 >. . C. 143 9. Dangerouy Structure to Be Removed or Repaired bypLocal; §Insppector' Penalty• for Continued Refusal to Remove or Re £nforcement of Lien. If such report declares such structure to be dangerous or if to be unused, uninhabited or abandoned, and open co the weather, and ? I the owner, lessee or mortgagee in possession continues such refusal �,. or neglect, the local inspector shall cause it to be made safe re taken 1 and, if the public safety so requires, said down or to be made secure, I local inspector may at once enter the structure, the land on e as it I } stands or the abutting land or buildings, with such assistance as he 1 and secure or'remove the same, and ,,By remove and 1-� I may require, Of ` I ! evict, under the peirty- r naps provisions (he eof, andhmayerect red hsuch ! `I. nine or otherwise, Y { y proper fence or otherwise protection for Clic puns may be tete- blic b protection and for this purpose may close a public higllway- In the case essaryI ' of such demolition, the local nspeocfor s lata 7 GII. Tll cause he costsh lot oabd i' levelled to uttiforiu grade by p 1 1 erc,or to charges incurred shall constitute a debt due Lite city or town upon completion of the work and stand shall i be ng oenforced nf "I 2cconanhaction of i' the owner of such structure, Ii?'i ; • contract, and such owner, lessee or mortgagee in possession shall, Cor every day's continuance of such refusal or neglect after being so ' noti6cd, be punished by a fine of not less than one hundred collate. f j . "rhe provisions of the second paragraph of section three of chapter `• one hundred and clai IllirLforysuchedeblt,tshall applyVC to stooan)- deb(r such ectferredtto 1 collection in this section, except that the local inspector shall act. hereunder m place of the mayor or board of selectmen. During CUP thechte 5 structure oOr awful to any is in effect it shall f for any(purpose,use or occupy '•. r } i"iistory— 451. § 17; IS99. 139. 3 4: RL I. IB7S, 47. §§ 4. 5: YS ISS2 i19�•S§G97`S§ 2: 1919. 150. § 5: 1949. 541. § 3: 1902. 104. § 7: 1913. 655. § : a 1972. 502. § 25: 1919. 479: 199 2. 75-:i 1957 9 133 § 4199, approved July 2(), 1992. by § 599, clicctivc July 1, 1992. u' Editorial Note-- ... The 1957 amendment struck out this section and mscncd a new an .r Y .11 partially rewritten section. punished by ts; ��i l•1 The 1959 amendment, in the third sentence. substituted "bc . j a tint of for "forfeit to the City or town m which the structure is locate The 1970 amendment deleted the third scntoicc and inserted two sen- `'�'- ' tcnees in its place, primarily to make the provisions of the second paragraph Y t"moi PPbcable to the debts and liens provided Cor in this sec- :is of GL c 139 § 3A a k� l ! tion. l.[. I;;Ji.• 1 106 3FPOM STRUCTURES NORTH FAX NO. 9787456067 May. 17 1999 05:47PM P2 STAUGUAB - N OATA CONSULTING ENCINEERS, May 17, 1999 NC' City of Salem Building Department One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 Attention: Mr. Peter Strout, Building Inspector Reference: 28 Goodhue Street Structural Condition Dear Peter: On Tuesday, May 11, visited 28 Goodhue Street in Salem to perform a general and cursory review of the structural condition of five of the site's structures. These consist of what I have called the Main Building, the South Building, the Southwest Building, the Boiler Plant, and the North Building. Please see the attached key plan taken from the assessors map for the structures' locations. During my visit I noted the following: BUILDINGS AND THEIR CONDITIONS: Main Building— Description: The"Main Building" is a four story, "L" shaped timber framed structure that fronts,Goodhue Street and then extends east, enclosing a parking lot behind the north half of the site. This structure is supported upon what are assumed to be deep foundations, presumabiv timber piles with stone masonry and/or concrete pile caps, directly beneath three lines of timber columns that run longitudinally to each leg of the "L". There is one bearing line in the middle of each leg and one bearing line along each side. Along the center bearing lines are regularly spaced columns and longitudinally running timber floor and roof beams. Between the center bearing lines and the sides of the building run transverse floor and roof beams that are supported alternately by the interior columns and longitudinal beams at their mid-spans. The outboard ends of each of the transverse beams are supported by columns (occurring at twice the frequency of the interior columns) and the exterior walls are wood framed and sheathed in "curtain wall" fashion between the outer Columns and the floor and roof beams. There are strip windows at each level. P.O. Box 85601 192 Essex Street •Salem, Massachusctts 01971 Voice (978) 745-6817•Fax (978) 745-6067 info@structureq-north.com FROM STRUCTURES NORTH FAX NO. : 9787456067 May. 17 1999 05:48PM P3 May 17, 1999 2s Goodhue Street Structures North Salem,MA Cast iron capitals support the miter-ended intersections of transverse and longitudinal beams at the interior columns, with exposed wooden peg keepers entering the timbers from the bottom at some locations. The outboard ends of the transverse beams are either supported with un-housed mortises into the exterior columns with wooden peg restrainers or are let into "sawtooth" type housings in the sides of the outboard columns. The interior ends of the transverse beams that land between the interior columns are supported from the longitudinal beams with bridle-iron hangers. Knee braces occur at each end bf the transverse beams that fall on interior column lines, being let into shallow, rectangular housings on the faces of the columns and beam soffits. There are large metal spikes driven between the knee braces and the main timbers to restrain them. Noted Conditions: I noted a general vertical undulation of many of the supporting interior and exterior columns and floor areas with differential movements of 3" to 6" and in some cases as much as 12". This is apparent in the sometimes extreme slopes of the supported floors and in some cases, the apparent vertical shearing, or"dipping", of the exterior walls. This vertical movement may have been caused by one or more of at least three conditions, these being (1) overload of the piles due to historically high floor loads that pushed the piles further into the ground than they were originally driven, or having failed them, (2) decomposition of the tops of the supporting piles due to water table fluctuations and (3) decomposition of the bottoms of the timber columns. I found cases where areas of the first floor slabs that are supported directly on the foundations undulated in the same pattern as the floors above, suggesting conditions (1) and/or (2). 1 also saw at least two cases where the bases of the columns had rotted after being surrounded by concrete that had entrapped moisture from below. At several of the more severely deflected locations, I found that interior finishes that did not appear to be more than 25 to 35 years old had been grossly deformed by the vertical movements, indicating that these movements occurred within the more recent history of the building. I was told by the management company's architect that some on-going monitoring had been done to measure the columns elevations and it had determined that the movements had stopped. I also noted what appeared to be unusually high bending deflections in several of the roof beams, and in a few cases, the floor beams. The large vertical movements between individual supporting columns combined with the variable bending deflections has caused a fair amount of displacement in many of the 2 FROM STRUCTURES NORTH FAX NO. : 9787456067 May. 17 1999 05:48PM P4 May 17, 1999 28 Goodhue Street Structures North Salem,'N1A column and beam connections. This has resulted in distortion of some of the members' ends and occasional signs of distress. In at least two cases the downward rotation of knee-braced transverse beams has caused them to lift out of their housings and cause the columns to spread. I noted a variable degree of lateral racking of the structure, sometimes of more than F per floor, that may have resulted from forced lateral displacements of knee braced connections due to differential vertical movements. In some cases, knee braces, which were intended to laterally restrain the structure against wind loads (and racking) are entirely missing. As a result of the racking, many of the timber columns are out of plumb. This can result in additional lateral loads on the structure caused by the horizontal components of the vertical forces that are put on the columns due to their angled positions (the tendency for them to "fall over"), I also noted that a significant number of the interior column and beam intersections had peeling paint and water stains, however, few of these displayed any direct signs of wood decomposition. In some cases, these connections' forced distortions had resulted in the supported timber beams partially pulling out of their original positions, however, typically not yet approaching the point where they would fall off of the supporting iron capitals. noted very large deflections in portions of the main building's concrete first floor at grade. It appears that this floor was cast directly on.the site grade and that the earth settled around the more rigid, pile supported column foundations that did not. This rhas left a network of ridges and valleys that follow the likely pattern of the deep foundation system. South Building — Description: The south building is a multi-story wood and steel framed structure with a center line of columns and north and south bearing lines. The floor appeared to be covered with concrete fill or is of concrete slab construction. Noted Conditions: . I noted drastically large deflections and undulations in the elevated floor construction that appeared to be due to the same contributing factors as at the main building. Several of the interior columns appeared to have deflected more than 6" and have distressed several of the supported floor and roof members and their connections. Southwest Building—Description: The Southwest Building is a single level warehouse at the southwest comer of the site that is directly attached to the "elbow" of the Main Building. The roof is framed of wooden 3 FROM STRUCTURES NORTH FAX No. 9787456067 May. 17 1999 05:49PM P5 . 28 Goodhue Street May 17, 1999 Salem,MA Structures North decking over timber beams supported on masonry piers and timber posts. A steel beam was added beneath the longest of the timber beams, presumably as part of a column removal since the timber beam is butt-spliced within the steel beam's length. The steel beam is supported by steel columns at each end. Noted Conditions: One of the beams has failed due to what appeared to be cubical brown rot deterioration. The failed ends of the beam hang loosely from a sagging valley in the roof deck which appears to support it. Another of the timber roof beams has slipped from its wall end bearing due to the failure of a tenon that appears to have sheared off under load. This beam now hangs from its bearing, having slipped downward by several inches. Boiler Plant—Description: The boiler plant is an isolated appendage of the main building that has masonry bearing walls on all sides and a timber framed hip roof. This is supported by what was once a center column and has been replaced by a steel beam between two steel columns, presumably to allow a more open floor plan. Noted Conditions: The lateral-torsional stability of the supporting beam and upper ends of the supporting columns should be reviewed. North Building— Description: The North Building is a long, narrow structure the follows the north river canal and has a dimensional lumber framed gabled roof and masonry bearing walls all around. This is framed with a ridge beam and post system of roof support. A single story structure, it has a concrete slab floor and an exposed roof structure. North Building— Noted Conditions: There was apparently a fire in the structure that damaged and/or charred a significant number of rafters and several of the ridge beams and posts as well as much of the roof decking, some of which has been replaced. Following the fire, additional rafters were added between the original rafters and some limited reinforcement appears to have been made on the ridge beam and post system. Because of the extent and depth of the char, it did not appear that all of the affected 4 FROM STRUCTURES NORTH FRX NO. : 9787456067 May. 17 1999 05:50PM P6 May 17,1999 28 Goodhue Street Structures North Salem,MA work may eview members had been saassoly cnforced, and iated ted work shoulld bel ldone before the f rst sigbe requi red. nif ca t of these conditions andnd any ny snowfall. Other Buildings and Structures: There were other, smaller buildings on the site that I did not enter and therefore have made no comments on these. PRESENT OCCUPANTS AND TNE1R AFFECT ON STRUCTURAL SAFETY: I was told that tenants were in the process of vacating the structures, however, several tenants still remained at the time of my walk-through. In all but one case, these tenants did not appear to have operations that significantly load the existing structures to a level that is anywhere near the level of loading that the structures would have originally been constructed to withstand. The one exception is a metal working shop in the main building that contains a variety of relatively heavy reciprocating machinery. With the exception of the machine shop, and assuming the structures are not subjected to extreme hurricane, seismic or snow conditions, it is not likely that the structures in their present condition and occupancies are in any immediate danger of collapse. This is due to the fact that the level of loading on the structures are slowly being decreased as the tenants continue to leave and the supporting members are experiencing stress levels that are less than those under which they have recently performed without failure. The machine shop may still present a potential hazard and its safe dismantling should be carefully supervised. Weather should be monitored and the structures should be empty of all human occupants whenever severe (hurricane or tornado) conditions approach. LEVEL OF SAFETY FOR INTENDED USE: In understand that the occupancy permits for most of the structures at 28 Goodhue Street have been revoked by the City of Salem Building Inspector's Office. This has apparently been done because of code violations that have not been corrected in a timely manner and the structures' suspected needs for structural repairs. Because of this, new certificates of occupancy will need to be obtained by the owners, should they wish to re-market and occupy the buildings. This will, as a minimum, require demonstration by the owners that the buildings meet the applicable requirements of 780 CMR, the Massachusetts State Building Code. Structurally, this will require conformance to 780 CMR Article 34, "Repair, Alteration, 5 FRO STRUCTURES NORTH FAX NO. 9787456067 May. 17 1999 05:5OPM P7 510v 17,1999 28 Goodhue Street Structures North Salem,MA Addition and Change in Use of Existing Buildings" and shall specifically include Section 3406.2 as it pertains to repairs and structural analysis. A structural evaluation will need to be made with respect to the intended use of the building, which is in this case F-1 and/or F-2: "Factory and Industrial" as defined in 780 CMR Article 3, Section 306.0. The occupancies listed therein under use groups F-1 and F-2 include both Light and Heavy Manufacturing. 780 CMR Article 34 allows that an existing structure or structural system may be evaluated in accordance with the code for new construction or with the codes that were in effect at the time of construction if the structure is in a condition that is of an equivalent level of safety to that with which it was originally constructed. 780 CMR Article 16 in the code for new construction requires that floors that are constructed for Light and Heavy Manufacturing safely support loads of 125 psf (pounds per square foot) and 150 psf, respectively. Based upon historical records, codes and standards of practice which were in effect at the time of the buildings' original construction required similar or greater floor capacities for manufacturing occupancies than does the present code. RECOMMENDATION: Based upon my experience in working with older structures, the amount of movement, distress, damage and deterioration that I have seen in these structures make it questionable as to whether they will satisfy the code prescribed loading requirements under close evaluation by a structural without requiring significant structural repairs. Such evaluation and repairs must be completed before the structures can be safely and legally re-occupied under anything but a tightly restricted and reduced basis. Please contact me if you have any questions. Respectfully Yours, John M. Wathne, PE, President Structures North Consulting Engineers, Inc. CC: John Keenan, Assistant City Solicitor 6 FROM STRUCTURES NORTH FRX NO. 9787456067 May. 17 1999 05:51PM P8 JOB 2,3 SHEUNO. OF- "TUMUS HOW CALCULATED By-d 'ATE CONSULTING aljTINED ENGINEERS INC.P.O. 01977 CHECHED BY DATE voiCE FA X 9 7 6 1 7 4 5 - 6 6 17 SCALE 0 10 Aou w q p 'o 0 to ca ..........- Vt.^ lo4 LID G 44 .0 POSTAGE _-2MTMARK 00 DATE of RETURN SROW TO WHOM DATE AND RESTRICTED / ,^ Or(1� w RECEIPT'« ADDRESS OF DELIVERY DELIVERY q \V`^O/>/frf O SERVICE ICE CERTIFIED FEE+RETURN RECEIPT yc,/_ S^ / `V•up WN C TOTAL FbSTAGEAND FEES -2 , \f9� D w N URA Pfl0 DEO-I'll (� WO O.. VENT TO: NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL PR 16 LLQ (]Q L.T.W. Hansgeent Associates .� °rc s 271 Western Avenue Lynn, Ka. 01902.-3015 USPS uo lu NZ � V¢ w PS FORM 3800 z RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL o � a vxireP tures wsru s-- _ STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER FIRST CLASS POSTAGE, CERTIFIED MAIL FEE,AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES(see front). 1. If you want this receipt postmarked,stick the gummetl stub to the right of the return address of the article,leaving the receipt attached,and present the article at a post office service window or hand d yo to ur rural carrier(no extra charge). * If you do not want this receipt postmarked,stick the gummed stub to the right of the return address of the article,date,detach and retain the receipt,and mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt,write the certified-mail number and your name and address on a return receipt card,Form 3811,and attach it to the front of the article by means of the gummed ends if space permits.Otherwise,affix to back of article.Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED adjacent to the number. 4. If you want delivery restricted to the addressee,or to an authorized agent of the addressee,endorse RESTRICTED DELIVERY on the front of the article. 5. Enter fees for the services requested in the appropriate spaces on the front of this receipt.If return receipt is requested,check the applicable blocks in item 1 of Form 3811. 6. Save this receipt and present it if you make inquiry. o- SENDER: Complete items 1 and/or 2 for additional services. I also wish to receive the • complete items 3,and 4a a to following services(for an extra fee): • Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can return this card to You. 1. ElAddressee's Address, • Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece,or on the back if space does not permit. • Write 'Return Receipt Requested'on the mailpiece below the article number. 2. ❑ Restricted Delivery • The Return Receipt Fee will provide you the signature of the person delivered to and the postmaster for fee.COosUlt date of delivery. P 3.Article Addressed to: 4a.Article Number L.T.W. P 921 991 930 7 d4b.Service Type CERTIFIED P 7.Date of Delivery 5.Signature—(Addressee) 8.Addressee's Address (ONLY it requested and lee paid.) 6.Signature—(Agent) PS Form 3811,November 1990 DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT United States Postal Service all ]]]1 04,17 Official Business PENALTY FOR PRIVATE USE,$300 I�lumrllllnlrul�lrnn�l �ulu�rl �ul�m�l INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS ONE SALEM GREEN SALEM MA 01970-3724 Citp of �§afe t, �ffla-4SaLbU!5PttS Public propertp -Bepartment �3uiIDinq department One sbalem Oreen (975) 745-9595 Ext. 3S0 Peter Strout Director of Public Property Inspector of Buildings Zoning Enforcement Officer April 16, 1999 L.T.W. Management Associates Inc. 271 Western Avenue Lynn, Ma. 01904-3016 RE: 28 Goodhue Street Dear Mr. Leigh: On Thursday, April 15, 1999 a State Building Code Appeals Board hearing took place relative to the structural, fire and building code violations which exist at 28 Goodhue Street. As a result of this hearing and a reinspection of the property, the following violations were identified. 1. 780CMR 121.0 unsafe structures that the building at 28 Goodhue Street would be especially unsafe and dangerous in case of fire. 2. 780 CMR 3400.41 a) The building has less then the number of means of egress serving every space and/or story required by 780 CMR 1010 and Table 1010.2 b) The means of egress components are not of sufficient width to comply with 780 CMR 1009, and are not arranged to provide safe and adequate means of egress including signage and emergency lighting. 780 CMR 3400.5.1 The buildings exists are hereby deemed hazardous and dangerous to life and limb and are declared dangerous and unsafe in accordance with the provisions of 780 CMR 121.0 4. 780 CMR 3400.6 The existing buildings light and ventilation do not meet the applicable provisions of 780 CMR 12 and are dangerous and hazardous to the health and safety of the occupants. 5. 780 CMR Chapter 9 required that the building shall have a fire protected system and that the system be maintained in accordance with the code and applicable standards listed in Appendix A. You are hereby ordered to immediately cease and desist all business operations and rentals on the property and have all the tenants vacate the property no later than April 23, 1999. You have until 12:00 of the day following April 23, 1999 to make secure all exterior entrances and openings in and around the building and property including if necessary, proper fencing put up for the protection of passerby. The existing sprinkler and heating system shall be maintained and periodically tested to insure proper operation after the building is secured. Periodic inspections by the Building and Fire Departments shall be done to assure compliance with this order. Failure to comply with the requirements of this order immediately, will result in legal action being enforced as this order as noted in MGL., Chapter 143 ss.9 and 780 CMR, Section 121.3 and 121.4 and 121.5. Please contact this office immediately upon receipt of this letter. Sincerely, Kevin G. Goggin Assistant Building Inspector cc: Mayor Stanley Usocivz John Keenan, Assistant City Solicitor Chief Robert Turner Craig Wheeler, Planning Councillor O'Leary Chief Robert St. Pierre Fire Prevention Health Department CHAPTER 34 REPAIR, ALTERATION, ADDITION,AND CHANGE OF USE OF EXISTING BUILDINGS (780 CMR 34 is entirely unique to Massachusetts) 780 CMR 3400.0 SCOPE construction, except as otherwise provided in 3400.1 General:The provisions of 780 CMR 34 are 780 CMR 34. The combined height and area of intended to maintain or increase public safety, the existing building and the addition shall not health, and general welfare in existing buildings by exceed that allowed by 780 CMR 503.0 and Table permitting repair,alteration,addition,and/or change 503 as modified by 780 CMR 504 and 506. of use without requiring full compliance with the Where afire wall complying with 780 CMR 707.0 code for new construction except where otherwise and 708.0 is provided, the addition shall be specified in 780 CMR 34. considered as a separate building. 5. Ordinary repairs:Ordinary repairs conforming 3400.2 Compliance: Repairs,alterations,additions, to 780 CMR 110.3(4),780 CMR 2 and 780 CMR and changes of use shall conform to the 902 may be performed without a building permit. requirements of 780 CMR 34. Where compliance 6. Assembly use groups: A change from any with the provisions of this code for new construction other use group to an assembly use group (A)or is required by 780 CMR 34; and where such any alteration or change in occupancy within an compliance is impractical because of construction assembly use group shall comply with the difficulties or regulatory conflicts, compliance requirements of the code for new construction, alternatives as described in 780 C,'ML 3406.0 may except that earthquake requirements need only be accepted by the building official. conform to 780 CMR 3408. 7. Institutional use groups: A change from any Note: Specialized codes,rules, regulations, and other use group to an institutional use group(I)or laws pertaining to repair, alteration, addition, or any alteration or change in occupancy within an change of use of existing buildings promulgated institutional use group shall comply with the by various authorized agencies may impact upon requirements of the code for new construction, the provisions of 780 CMR 34. Specialized state except that earthquake requirements need only codes,rules,regulations, and laws include,but are conform to 780 CMR 3408. not limited to those listed in Appendic A. 8. Residential use groups: A change from any other use group to a residential use group(R)or 3400.3 Applicability: The provisions of 780 CMR any alteration or change in occupancy within an 34 apply to repair, alteration addition or change in residential use group shall comply with the use to existing buildings which qualify to use requirements of the code for new construction, 780 CMR 34(see 780 CMR 3400.3.1),based on the except that earthquake requirements need only proposed continuation of, or change in use group,as conform to 780 CMR 3408. follows: 9. Historic buildings: Buildings which qualify 1. Continuation of the same use group, or a as totally or portially preserved historic buildings change in use group which results in a change in in accordance with 780 CMR 3409 shall meet the hazard index of one or less as determined by provisions of 780 CMR 3409. 780 CVIR 3403 shall comply with 780 CMR 10. Structural requirements: Structural 3404.0. requirements for additions, and for existing 2. Change in use group to a use group with buildings subject to repair, alteration, and/or hazard index of two or more greater than the change of use, shall be in accordance with hazard index of the existing use shall comply with 780 CMR 3408. the requirements of 780 CMR 3405.0 and the code for new construction. Exceptions: Totally Preserved and Partially 3. Part change in use(Mixed Use): Portions of Preserved Historic Buildings the building is changed to a new use group, shall 3400.3.1 Buildings which qualify: The be separated from the remainder of the building provisions of 780 CLMR 34 shall apply to existing with fire separation assemblies complying with buildings which have been legally occupied 780 CNIR 3!3, o, with approved compliance and/or used for a period of at least five years. alternatives. The portion of the building changed Any building for which there exists an shall be made to conform with the applicable outstanding notice of violation or other order of provisions of 780 CMR 34. the building official shall not qualify to use 4. Additions: Additions to existing buildings 780 CMR 34 unless such proposed work includes shall comply with all code requirements for new the abatement of all outstanding violations and 2/7/97 (Effective 2/28/97) 780 CMR- Sixth Edition 445 780 CMR: STATE BOARD OF BUII.DNG REGULATIONS AND STANDARDS THE MASSACHUSETTS STATE BUILDING CODE compliance with all outstanding orders of the dangerous,or hazardous,to the health and safety of building official. Buildings which do not qualify the occupants, the building official shall order the as existing buildings for the purposes of 780 CMR abatement of such conditions to render the building 34 shall comply fully with the applicable or structure livable for the posted use and occupant provisions of this code for new construction. load. Exceptions: In enforcing the provisions of 780 CMR 3400.6 (1) Existing buildings or portions thereof the building official may require or accept which are changed in use from any other use engineering or other evaluations of the lighting group to day care centers(I-2 or E) shall not and/or ventilation systems in order to evaluate qualify as existing buildings for the purposes of possible dangerous or hazardous conditions and 780 CMR 34, but shall comply with the acceptable solutions. requirements of 780 CMR 4,as applicable. where full compliance with 780 CMR for new (2) Existing buildings or portions thereof, construction is not practical for structural and/or which are changed in use from any use to a other technical reasons, the building official may Group Residence,Limited Group Residence or accept compliance alternatives, or engineering or Group Dwelling Unit shall not qualify as other evaluations which adequately address the existing buildings for the purposes of 730 budding or structure livability for the posted use and CMR 34,but shall comply with;he provisions occupant load. of 780 CMR 4,as applicable. ' 780 CMR 3401.0 DEFINTIIONS 3400.4 Special Provisions for Nleans of Egress: 3401.1 General: Definitions shall,for the purposes 3400.4.1 Existing Non Conforming Means of of 780 C,MR 3401.0, have the meaning shown Egress: The following conditions, when herein: observed by the building official,shall be cited,in Building System: Any mechanical,structural,egress, writing as a violation. Said citation shall order electrical, plumbing, building enclosure and/or the abatement of the non conformance and shall include such a time element as the building fire protection system, or fire resistive official deems necessary for the protection of the construction system, or portion thereof occupants thereof or as otherwise provided for by Building System Component: Apart or portion of a statute. 1. Less than the number of means of egress building system. serving every space and/or story, required by Compliance Alternative: An alternative life-safety 730 CMR 1010.0 and Table 1010.2, or construction feature which meets or exceeds the 780 CMR 36 for one and two family dwellings. requirements or intent of a specific provision of 2. Any required means of egress component which is not of sufficient width to comply with 780 rove o The approve Official c authorized s. 730 CMR 1009, or is not so arranged as to Compliance c disapprove compliance alternatives. provide safe and adequate means of egress, Compliance alternatives are only permitted for including exit signage and emergency lighting. existing buildings. 3400.5 Hazardous Means of Egress: Existing building or structure: Any building or structure qualifying under 780 CMR 3400.3.1. 3400.5.1 Exit Order/Hazardous Means of Egress: In any existing building or structure not Ha=ord index: A numerical value,between 1 and 8, provided with exit facilities as herein prescribed which is assigned to a specific Use Group in order for new buildings and in which the exits are to determine which of the provisions of 780 CMR deemed hazardous or dangerous to life and limb, 34 apply to the proposed work on the existing the building official shall declare such building building. The Ho=ard index is a relative scale dangerous and unsafe in accordance with the used only to determine applicable provisions of provisions of 730 CMR 121.0. 780 CMR 34. Hazard indices are listed in Table 34005.2 Appeal from exit order: Any person 3403 and Appendix F. served with any order pursuant to 730 CMR 3400.5 shall have the remedy prescribed in Historic buildings: (a) Any building or structure 730 CMR 12 1. individually listed on the National Register of Historic Places or (b) any building or structure 3300.6 Unsafe Lighting and/or Unsafe evaluated by MHC to be a contributing building within a National Register or State Register Ventilation: In any existing building , or portion thereof, iwhich (a)the light or ventilation or not District. (c) any building or structure which has meet the applicable provisions of 730 CMR 12.0 and been certified by the Massachusetts Historical (b)which,in the opinion of the building official, are Commission to meet eligibility requirements for individual listing on the National Register of 446 730 CMR-Sixth Edition 2/10!97 (Effective 2/23/97) 780 Cwt: STATE BOARD OF BUILDING REGULATIONS AND STANDARDS ADiM NISTRAT[ON 780 CMR 120.0 CERTIFICATE OF 1205 Posting structures: OCCUPANCY 120.5.1 Posted use and occupancy: A suitably 120.1 General: New buildings and structures: A designed placard approved by the building official building or structure hereafter shall not be used or shall be posted by the owner on all floors of every occupied in whole or in part until the certificate of building and structure and part thereof designed use and occupancy shall have been issued by the for high hazard, storage, mercantile, factory and building commissioner or inspector of buildings or, industrial or business use(use grcaps H, S, M, F when applicable,the state inspector. The certificate and B) as defined in 730 CNIR 3. Said placard shall not be issued until all the work has been shall be securely fastened to the building or completed in accordance with the provisions of the structure in a readily visible place, stating: the approved permits and of the applicable codes for use group,the fire grading, the live load and the which a permit is required, except as provided in occupancyload. 730 CMR 120.3. 1205.2 Posted occupancy load: A suitably 120.2 Buildings or structures hereafter altered: designed placard approved b;the building official A building or structure, in whole or in part, altered shall be posted by the owner in every room where to change from one use group to another; to a practicable of every building and structure and ' different use within the same rise group; the fire part thereof designed for use as a place of public grading; the maximum live load capacity; the assembly or as an institutional building for occupancy load capacity shall not be occupied or harboring people for penal, correctional, used until the certificate shall have been issued educational,medical or other care or treatment,or certifying that the work has been completed in as residential buildings used for hotels, lodging accordance with the provisions of the approved houses, boarding houses, dormitory buildings, permits and of the applicable codes for which a multiple family dwellings (use groups A, I, R-I permit is required. Any use or occupancy, which and R-2). Said placard shall designate the was not discontinued during the work of alteration, maximum occupancy load. shall be discontinued within 30 days after the 120.5.3 Replacement of posted signs: All completion of the alteration unless the required posting signs shall be furnished by the owner and certificate is issued. shall be of permanent design: they shall not be removed or defaced, and if lost, removed or 120.3 Temporary occupancy: Upon the request of defaced, shall be immediately repllced. the holder of a permit, a temporary certificate of occupancy may be issued before the completion of 120.5.4 Periodic inspection for posting: The the entire work covered by the permit, provided that building official may periodically inspect all such portion or portions shall be occupied safety existing buildings and structures except one and prior to full completion of the building or stricture two family dwellings for compliance with without endangering life or public welfare. Any 730 C;MR in respect to posting;or he may accept occarpancy permitted to continue during the work the report of such inspections from a qualified shall be discontinued within 30 days after registered engineer or architect or others certified completion of the work unless a certificate of by the BBRS; and such inspections and reports occupancy is issued by the building official. shall specify any violation of the requirements of 780 CMR in respect to the posting of floor load, 120.4 Contents of certificate: When a building or fire grading, occupancy load and use group of the structure is entitled thereto, the building official building or structure. shall issue a certificate of occupancy within ten days after written application. Upon completion of the 780 CMR 121.0 UNSAFE STRUCTURES Final inspection in accordance with 730 CMR 115.9 121.1 General: The provisions of 730 Cb1R 12 LO and correction of the violations and discrepancies, are established by M.G.L. c. 143, §§ 6, 7, 3, 9 and and compliance with 730 CMR 903.4, the certificate 10. of occrrpancy shall be issued. The certificate of occupancy shall specify the following. 121.2 Inspection: The building official 1. The edition of the code under which the immediately upon being informed by report or permit was issued. otherwise that a building or other strtrcaure or 2. The ruse group and Occupancy, in accordance anything attached thereto or connected therewith is with the provisions of 730 CMR 3. dangerous to life or limb or that any building in that 3. The type of construction as defined in city or town is unused, uninhabited or abandoned, 780 CVIR 6. and open to the weather,shall inspect the same;and 4. The occupant load per floor. he shall forthwith in writing notify the owner to 5. Any special stipulations and conditions of the remove it or make it safe if it appears to him to be building permit, dangerous, or to make it secure if it is unused, uninhabited or abandoned and open to the%,eather. 217/97 (Eft ctive 2/23/97) 780 C.\IR - Sixth Edition 27 780 CMR: STATE BOARD OF BUILDING REGULATIONS AND STANDARDS THE MASSACHUSETTS STATE BUILDING CODE If it appears that such building or structure would be case of such demolition, the said building official especially unsafe in case of fire, it shall be deemed shall cause such lot to be leveled to conform with dangerous within the meaning hereof, and the adjacent grades by a inorganic fill. The costs and building official may affix in a conspicuous place - charges incurred shall constitute a lien upon the land upon its exterior walls a notice of its dangerous upon which the structure is located, and shall be condition, which shall not be removed or defaced enforced in an action of contract; and such owner without authority from him. shall,for every day's continuance of such refusal or neglect after being so notified,be punished by a fine 121.3 Removal or making structure safe: Any in accordance with 780 CMR 118.4. The provisions person so notified shall be allowed until 12:00 noon of M.G.L. c. 139, § 3A,paragraph two, relative to of the day following the service of the notice in bens for such debt and the collection of claims for which to begin to remove such building or.structure such debt shall apply to any debt referred to in this or make it safe, or to make it secure, and he shall section, except that the said building official shall employ sufficient labor speedily to make it safe or act hereunder in place of the mayor or board of remove it or to make it secure; but if the public selectmen. During the time such order is in effect, safety so requires.and if the mayor or selectmen so it shall be unlawful to use or occupy such structure order, the building official may immediately enter or any portion thereof for any purpose. upon the premises with the necessary workmen and assistants and cause such unsafe structure to be made 121.6 Remedy of person ordered to remove a safe or demolished without delay and a proper fence dangerous structure or make it .safe: put up for the protection of passersby,or to be made Notwithstanding the provisions of 780 CMR 12-1,an secure. owner, aggrieved by such order may have the remedy prescribed by M.G.L. c. 139, §2:provided 121.4 Failure to remove or make structure safe, that any provision of M.G.L. c. 139, §2 shall not be survey board,survey report: If an owner of such construed so as to hinder, delay or prevent the unsafe structure refuses or neglects to comply with building official from acting and proceeding under the requirements of such notice within the specified 780 CMR 121; and provided, further, that this time limit, and such structure is not made safe or section shall not prevent the city or town from taken down as ordered therein, a careful survey of recovering the forfeiture provided in said 780 CMR the premises shall be made by a board consisting;in 121.5 from the date of the service of the original a city, of a city engineer, the head of the fire notice,unless the order is annulled by the jury. department, as such term is defined in M.G.L. c. 138, § 1, and one disinterested person to be 780 CbLR 122.0 BOARD OF APPEALS appointed by the building official; and, in a town of 122.1 State Building Code Appeals Board: a surveyor,the head of the fire department and one Except for actions taken pursuant to 780 COIR disinterested person to be appointed by the building 121.0, whoever is aggrieved by an interpretation, official. In the absence of any of the above officers order, requirement, direction or failure to act under or individuals, the mayor or selectmen shall 780 CMR by any agency or official of the city,town designate one or more officers or other suitable or region, or agency or official of the State charged persons in place of the officers so named as with the administration or enforcement of 780 CMR members of said board. A written report of such or any of its rules or regulations, excepting any survey shall be made, and a copy thereof served on specialized codes, may appeal directly to the State such owner. Building Code Appeals Board as provided in 780 CMR 122.0. 121.5 Removal of dangerous or abandoned whoever is aggrieved by an interpretation, order, structures: If such survey report as outlined in requirement, direction or failure to act under 780 CMR 121.4 declares such structure to be 730 CMR by any agency or official of a city, town dangerous' or to be unused, uninhabited or or region charged with the administration or abandoned, and open to the weather, and if the enforcement of 780 0,1R,excepting any specialized owner continues such refusal or neglect,the building codes, may appeal directly to the State Building official shall cause it to be made safe or taken down Code Appeals Board or may appeal first to a local or or to be made secure; and, if the public safety so regional building code appeals board and if requires, said building official may at once enter the aggrieved thereby he may then appeal to the State st.-ucdure,the land on which it stands or the abutting Building Code Appeals Board as provided in land or buildings, with such assistance as he may 780 CMR 122.0. require, and secure the same; and may remove and In the event an appeal is taken directly to the State evict, under the pertinent provisions of M.G.L. Building Code Appeals Board from an c.239,or otherwise, any tenant or occupant thereof; interpretation, order, requirement or direction, said and may erect such protection for the public by appeal shall be filed as specified in 780 CMR proper fence or otherwise as may be necessary,and 122 3.1 with the State Building Code Appeals Board for this purpose may close a public highway. In the not later than 45 days after the service of notice 2S 7qn rV. . c7,..1 ca:.:__ ,tea._._.. - ANNOTATED LAWS OF )MA5SACt4U5ETTS C. 1$3 § 9, Dangerous ! ocal to Be Removed or Repaired by Repair; Insppector; Penalty for Continued Refusal to Remove or Repasr; ' $nforcement of Lien. s such s If such report declareed, and open en to (ho be e weather. and f I ' unused, uninhabited or abandoned, ± 5.`• the owner, lessee or mortgagee in possession continues such refusal ' Or neglect, the local inspector shall cause n s be made safe re taken 1'.`• r down or to be made secure, and, if tfie public safety so requires, said I I local inspector may at once enter the structure. the land on which it I stanJs or the abutting land ur buildings, with such assutancc as he I may require, and secure or'remove the same, and may remove and evict, under the percent provisions c chapter two andhundred erecthsuch nine or otherwise,an tenant or occu ant thereof, Y {` protection for the public by proper fence otherwise as may be Case or essary, and for this purpose may close a public highway. In clic case of such demolition, the local inspector sniatary fill. The costsll cause such lot oand IcvclleJ to uniform grade by a pr, I ' I charges incurred shall constitute a debt due the city in town upon rider ng 1 I the oe TV wner of thewuch Lructurork de`land shall i be Of nnanhaction of contract, and such owner, lessee or In in possession shall, } I i �oc hedybeapunioWIEshedibce yna Cine of notof such ctcss Ithanor ioncehtindred dollarso I j : the provisions of the second paragraph of section three A of chapter '} t one hundred and thirty-nine, relative to licnstfoo,i'uaebtareferredlto 4 collection of claims for such debt, shall apply Y' n chis section, except that the local inspector shall act hereunder in place of the mayor oMC r board of sclecuricn. During is cI, structulre or der is in effect a shalt be unlauo use or Occup}' onion thereof for any Purpose- any ..t p l' RL History— 481. § 17; 1899. 139, 4 1. �. 1878. 47. §§ 4. 5: PS 1852. 104. § 7: 1894. 19.19. 156. § 5: 1949. 541. 4 3: 190?. 104. 4 7: 1913. 655, 4 7: 194x. 097. 4 ?• 80?. ; 25: 1979. 479: 1992. l." 1917, ?14. § 4: 1959. 75: 1970. 6 79. § a'X99, cfCcctivc July 1, 1992. 133. 4 499, aporovcd July ?0, 199_, by § IIIc ; w and s'C Editorial Note-- 1_.` ?�.I The 1957 amendment struck out this secuoes and inscrte ane t ;r. I unishcd by partially rcwnttcn section. �. The ]959 amendment, in the third sentence. substituted '• c is 1 �`;..•�., a fine of Cor "forfeit to the City or town m which the strucwrc is locate I. The 1970 amendm rtn]r dY`o n akcet1i1c1rd p Provisions of the sccondd Ara ra h p 3 P ecnces in its place, p rc,id,d for in this scc• pplicablc to the debts and liens p +; oC GL c 139 § 3A a til I tion. ,' t, I 106 4' ' � � � �. �� cc. � � �� ,__ . Citp of iaYem, A1ag!6arbu!5ett5 r 3publit Propertp Department Nuitbing Mepartment —- -- One fxiatem_Areen- (978) 7459595 (Ext. 380 Peter Strout ®F)ly Director of Public Property Inspector of Buildings Zoning Enforcement Officer January 21, 1999 L.T. W. Management Associates Inc. 271 Western Avenue Lynn, Ma. 01904-3017 RE: 28 Goodhue Street Dear Mr. Leigh: In response to our meeting with you in December, please be advised that we met with the Fire Prevention bureau to address the building and fire code issues at 28 Goodhue Street. We are hereby ordering that the following items be addressed and that the work be completed no later than December 30, 1999. 1. Install a fire protective signaling and automatic fire detection system per 780 CMR State Building Code, MGL 148, 527 CMR and local fire ordinance 2. Install new fire alarm master box on exterior of building as directed by Salem Fire Department. 3. Provide required exit access corridors on all levels. N 4. Provide required non-conbustable fire separation between tenant spaces. 5. All stairway being used as a means of egress shall be fire rated as per the building code to provide safe and continuos means of egress to the street. 6. Provide required means of egress lighting, emergency lighting and exit signs. 7. Provide continued monitoring of the building by the structural engineer and have the structural engineer furnish floor loads for all areas. 8. Proper toilet facilities shall be installed per building and plumbing codes. 9. Relocate existing high hazard tenants to concrete block buildings and furnish all required fire separations, exits and other code requirements. �hY L.T.W. Management Associates Inc. 271 Western Avenue Lynn, Ma. 01904-3017 page two 10. All tenants or building owners shall be required to apply for individual building permits for separation and build out of tenant space. 11. The building owner shall apply for proper building permits for all common areas. 12. The owner shall commission a registered architect to furnish a complete set of stamped drawings and be responsible for construction control 13. Any new tenants will be allowed to occupy the structure after all common area/ building renovations are completed and all new tenants shall also apply for building and occupancy permits for the new tenant spaces. 14. The building owner shall make application to the City of Salem Zoning Board of Appeals concerning variances for parking requirements to the BPD District. Please notify this department within ten (10) days upon receipt of this letter, to inform us as to what course of action you will take to rectify these violations. Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, Kevin G. Goggin Assistant Building Inspector cc: Fire Prevention Health Department Councillor Hayes, Ward 6 STAUCTUAB NOW CONSULTING May 17, 1999 ENGLNEERS, INC. City of Salem Building Department One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 Attention: Mr. Peter Strout, Building Inspector Reference: 28 Goodhue Street Structural Condition Dear Peter- On eterOn Tuesday, May 11, visited 28 Goodhue Street in Salem to perform a general and cursory review of the structural condition of five of the site's structures. These consist of what I have called the Main Building, the South Building, the Southwest Building, the Boiler Plant, and the North Building. Please see the attached key plan taken from the assessor's map for the structures' locations. During my visit I noted the following: BUILDINGS AND THEIR CONDITIONS: Main Building— Description: The "Main Building" is a four story, "L" shaped timber framed structure that fronts Goodhue Street and then extends east, enclosing a parking lot behind the north half of the site. This structure is supported upon what are assumed to be deep foundations, presumably timber piles with stone masonry and/or concrete pile caps, directly beneath three lines of timber columns that run longitudinally to each leg of the "L". There is one bearing line in the middle of each leg and one bearing line along each side. Along the center bearing lines are regularly spaced columns and longitudinally running timber floor and roof beams. Between the center bearing lines and the sides of the building run transverse floor and roof beams that are supported alternately by the interior columns and longitudinal beams at their mid-spans. The outboard ends of each of the transverse beams are supported by columns (occurring at twice the frequency of the interior columns) and the exterior walls are wood framed and sheathed in "curtain wall" fashion between the outer columns and the floor and roof beams. There are strip windows at each level. P.O. Box 8560/192 Essex street - Salcm, Massachusetts 01971 Voice (978) 745-6817 • Fax (978) 745-6067 info@structures-north.com 28 Goodhue Street May 17, 1999 Salem,MA Structures North Cast iron capitals support the miter-ended intersections of transverse and longitudinal beams at the interior columns, with exposed wooden peg keepers entering the timbers from the bottom at some locations. The outboard ends of the transverse beams are either supported with un-housed mortises into the exterior columns with wooden peg restrainers or are let into "sawtooth" type housings in the sides of the outboard columns. The interior ends of the transverse beams that land between the interior columns are supported from the longitudinal beams with bridle-iron hangers. Knee braces occur at each end of the transverse beams that fall on interior column lines, being let into shallow, rectangular housings on the faces of the columns and beam soffits. There are large metal spikes driven between the knee braces and the main timbers to restrain them. Noted Conditions: I noted a general vertical undulation of many of the supporting interior and exterior columns and floor areas with differential movements of 3" to 6" and in some cases as much as 12". This is apparent in the sometimes extreme slopes of the supported floors and in some cases, the apparent vertical shearing, or "dipping", of the exterior walls. This vertical movement may have been caused by one or more of at least three conditions, these being (1) overload of the piles due to historically high floor loads that pushed the piles further into the ground than they were originally driven, or having failed them, (2) decomposition of the tops of the supporting piles due to water table fluctuations and (3) decomposition of the bottoms of the timber columns. I found cases where areas of the first floor slabs that are supported directly on the foundations undulated in the same pattern as the floors above, suggesting conditions (1) and/or (2). 1 also saw at least two cases where the bases of the columns had rotted after being surrounded by concrete that had entrapped moisture from below. At several of the more severely deflected locations, I found that interior finishes that did not appear to be more than 25 to 35 years old had been grossly deformed by the vertical movements, indicating that these movements occurred within the more recent history of the building. I was told by the management company's architect that some on-going monitoring had been done to measure the columns elevations and it had determined that the movements had stopped. I also noted what appeared to be unusually high bending deflections in several of the roof beams, and in a few cases, the floor beams. The large vertical movements between individual supporting columns combined with the variable bending deflections has caused a fair amount of displacement in many of the 2 t,a 28 Goodhue Street Salem,MA May 17,1999 Structures Nora, column and beam connections. This has resulted in distortion of some of the members' ends and occasional signs of distress. In at least two cases the downward rotation of knee-braced transverse beams has caused them to lift out of their housings and cause the columns to spread. I noted a variable degree of lateral racking of the structure, sometimes of more than 6" per floor, that may have resulted from forced lateral displacements of knee braced connections due to differential vertical movements. In some cases, knee braces, which were intended to laterally restrain the structure against wind loads (and racking) are entirely missing. As a result of the racking, many of the timber columns are out of plumb. This can result in additional lateral loads on the structure caused by the horizontal components of the vertical forces that are put on the columns due to their angled positions (the tendency for them to "fall over"). I also noted that a significant number of the interior column and beam intersections had peeling paint and water stains, however, few of these displayed any direct signs of wood decomposition. In some cases, these connections' forced distortions had resulted in the supported timber beams partially pulling out of their original positions, however, typically not yet approaching the point where they would fall off of the supporting iron capitals. I noted very large deflections in portions of the main building's concrete first floor at grade. It appears that this floor was cast directly on the site grade and that the earth settled around the more rigid, pile supported column foundations that did not. This has left a network of ridges and valleys that follow the likely pattern of the deep foundation system. South 8uildinq—Description: The south building is a multi-story wood and steel framed structure with a center line of columns and north and south bearing lines. The floor appeared to be covered with concrete fill or is of concrete slab construction. Noted Conditions: I noted drastically large deflections and undulations in the elevated floor construction that appeared to be due to the same contributing factors as at the main building. Several of the interior columns appeared to have deflected more than 6" and have distressed several of the supported floor and roof members and their connections. Southwest Building — Description. The Southwest Building is a single level warehouse at the southwest corner of the site that is directly attached to the "elbow' of the Main Building. The roof is framed of wooden 3 . 3 28 Goodhue Street May 17, 1999 Salem,MA Structures North decking over timber beams supported on masonry piers and timber posts. A steel beam was added beneath the longest of the timber beams, presumably as part of a column removal since the timber beam is butt-spliced within the steel beam's length. The steel beam is supported by steel columns at each end. Noted Conditions: One of the beams has failed due to what appeared to be cubical brown rot deterioration. The failed ends of the beam hang loosely from a sagging valley in the roof deck which appears to support it. Another of the timber roof beams has slipped from its wall end bearing due to the failure of a tenon that appears to have sheared off under load. This beam now hangs from its bearing, having slipped downward by several inches. Boiler Plant— Description: The boiler plant is an isolated appendage of the main building that has masonry bearing walls on all sides and a timber framed hip roof. This is supported by what was once a center column and has been replaced by a steel beam between two steel columns, presumably to allow a more open floor plan. Noted Conditions: The lateral-torsional stability of the supporting beam and upper ends of the supporting columns should be reviewed. North Building— Description: The North Building is a long, narrow structure the follows the north river canal and has a dimensional lumber framed gabled roof and masonry bearing walls all around. This is framed with a ridge beam and post system of roof supporta A single story structure, it has a concrete slab floor and an exposed roof structure. North. Building— Noted Conditions: There was apparently a fire in the structure that damaged and/or charred a significant number of rafters and several of the ridge beams and posts as well as much of the roof decking, some of which has been replaced. Following the fire, additional rafters were added between the original rafters and some limited reinforcement appears to have been made on the ridge beam and post system. Because of the extent and depth of the char, it did not appear that all of the affected 4 28 Goodhue Street Salem,MA May 17, 1999 Structures North members had been sufficiently reinforced, and additional work may be required. Review of these conditions and any associated work should be done before the first significant snowfall. Other Buildings and Structures: There were other, smaller buildings on the site that I did not enter and therefore have made no comments on these. PRESENT OCCUPANTS AND THEIR AFFECT ON STRUCTURAL SAFETY: I was told that tenants were in the process of vacating the structures, however, several tenants still remained at the time of my walk-through. In all but one case, these tenants did not appear to have operations that significantly load the existing structures to a level that is anywhere near the level of loading that the structures would have originally been constructed to withstand. The one exception is a metal working shop in the main building that contains a variety of relatively heavy reciprocating machinery. With the exception of the machine shop, and assuming the structures are not subjected to extreme hurricane, seismic or snow conditions, it is not likely that the structures in their' present condition and occupancies are in any immediate danger of collapse. This is due to the fact that the level of loading on the structures are slowly being decreased as the tenants continue to leave and the supporting members are experiencing stress levels that are less than those under which they have recently performed without failure. The machine shop may still present a potential hazard and its safe dismantling should be carefully supervised. Weather should be monitored and the structures should be empty of all human occupants whenever severe (hurricane or tornado) conditions approach. LEVEL OF SAFETY FOR INTENDED USE: In understand that the occupancy permits for most of the structures at 28 Goodhue Street have been revoked by the City of Salem Building Inspector's Office. This has apparently been done because of code violations that have not been corrected in a timely manner and the structures' suspected needs for structural repairs. Because of this, new certificates of occupancy will need to be obtained by the owners, should they wish to re-market and occupy the buildings. This will, as a minimum, require demonstration by the owners that the buildings meet the applicable requirements of 780 CMR, the Massachusetts State Building Code. Structurally, this will require conformance to 780 CMR Article 34, "Repair, Alteration, 5 28 Goodhue Street Salem,MA May 17, 1999 Structures North Addition and Change in Use of Existing Buildings" and shall specifically include Section 3408.2 as it pertains to repairs and structural analysis. A structural evaluation will need to be made with respect to the intended use of the building, which is in this case F-1 and/or F-2: "Factory and Industrial" as defined in 780 CMR Article 3, Section 306,0. The occupancies listed therein under use groups F-1 and F-2 include both Light and Heavy Manufacturing. 780 CMR Article 34 allows that an existing structure or structural system may be evaluated in accordance with the code for new construction or with the codes that were in effect at the time of construction if the structure is in a condition that is of an equivalent level of safety to that with which it was originally constructed. 780 CMR Article 16 in the code for new construction requires that floors that are constructed for Light and Heavy Manufacturing safely support loads of 125 psf (pounds per square foot) and 150 psf, respectively. Based upon historical records, codes and standards of practice which were in effect at the time of the buildings' original construction required similar or greater floor capacities for manufacturing occupancies than does the present code. RECOMMENDATION, Based upon my experience in working with older structures, the amount of movement, distress, damage and deterioration that I have seen in these structures make it questionable as to whether they will satisfy the code prescribed loading requirements under close evaluation by a structural without requiring significant structural repairs. Such evaluation and repairs must be completed before the structures can be safely and legally re-occupied under anything but a tightly restricted and reduced basis. Please contact me if you have any questions. Respectfully Yours, John M. Wathne, PE, President Structures North Consulting Engineers, Inc. CC: John Keenan, Assistant City Solicitor 6 � 5TH (TURS pn Ip'HO��rylfSMEETNO.CONSULTINGENGINEEgSYY�LSSYYIIIUIIN2YC01 CALCULATED By DATE—Az: `94 P.O. 50X 8560, SALEM, MA 01971 CHECKED SY DATE V O I C E I F A X 9 7 8 1 7 4 5 - 6 8 1 7 SCALE . .. .... ..... 1 r O ....... -- e LAI lilt $ / v lei- AID > qti •1�� / Q 3 0 - P u� s X00 atip�11 B s•"'' �� _........'.............. wry¢. / et M �y° S.�FtE, ........ N -�28._Gao pfry� SI,� FROM : STRUCTURES NORTH FAX NO. 9787456067 May. 14 1999 01:35PM P1 yI'I�1I1 � 1epn'{�up'�pp� G'�'III� Z�C'b'O�U�►J f-MM1V I�c.�t4�� 5�� V 4 Y 9 �� U SNEET NO—sl CALMATED By — DATE` ••/¢ ~94 CONSULTING ENGINEERS INC. cNEcxeD Or�. --°— °ATE— P,O. BOX 8560. SALEM. MA 01971 V O I C I FAX : 87 8 1 745 - 681 7 SCALti_. post-IP Fax Note 7671 Date�':14- Pa ash s co o em Co.IDept5 j4M 4ffl� • ' -Y I Phone# •� Phone#,r ��tf1'a i Fax M AO .... p ,........ /1 (00 to g sl ik 64 b,9 e 2 u\�D ate+ .............. 0 p EE se d ... �L•n�00 tor. tia• ,F, Sw A.n _ n/ _ 517 15 e, mmuttawl;sM1ms�nvlP�11Pa�Pn1 4-29-1999 1 :4 PM FROM p 1 City of Salem, Massachusetts }ire Department FIRE PREVENTION DIVISION 29 FORT AVENUE SALEM, MA. 01970 PHONE: 998-745-7777 FAX PAGER: 978-489-8233 FAX. '978-745-94029402 FRANK PRECZEWSKI,J% Fire lmpector to: fax from: Eg date: Z- y subject: �ST NOTES: This facsimile contains privileged and conftdenbal infarrnat iort intertdad onq far the use the IBC of the rndividuat or envy to whom e!is addressed, f<the Deader of mile i8 not the intended recipient of the employee or agent responsible fpr de/Nering it to the intended recrprent, you are hereby notified that any cOrrtmtafrotibon. transmission, dfssemfnatfon.or reproduction of this facsimlie or its contents wa jkMMLgMft&ftd, !1 you h9ve rareiyed this !acsitrde in error, ,lease irrtmed4ely n.M us by ANephorre end rakmf the"anal facclmhe to us at the above address via the U.S,postal aNVjCe, Thank You. 4—e9-1999 1 :44PM FROM P. 2 PO%VF.R BURNERS Date November 23, 1977 Name Clayman 6 Sons C/0 NSG Realty Trust Location 28 No. of Tanks 1 -Name of Burner Ames Mass. Approval No. 2986 Gals. Stored 10,000 Kind of Heat Location of Tank I In dP rc r.it jnl Kind of Oil 4-6 Installed by Day;d g rC. of C. # . . . 9 Inspected by D• C.Sosnoaski pate Approved I1-22-77 4-29-1999 1 :44PM FROM P. 3 V1\1!L' 1% lJl' 1\ V JL JL COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS �.r Department of Fire Services Owner/Operator. N b G REALTY TRUST Facility 10: Facility Name: LT1.4 'ANACEMENT ASSOCIATES C/O TED LEIGH SFMCaseNo: Address: 28 GOODNUE STREET Telephone: City/Town: SALEM, MA. 01970 Zip; Owner: H 6 C REALTY TRUST C/O TED LEIGH SSN: Owner's Mailing Address: 271 WESTERN AVENUE Date of Birth: City/Town: LYNN Stare: MA. 01904 Zip: To Owner/Operator: On 4/22 19 99 INSP. FRANK PRECZEWSKI from the SALEM Fire Department inspected your sitp/facility and found the following violation(s)of fire laws as herein specified: TANK FILL IN YARD DAMAGED BY DRIVING OVER IT, AND BY SNOW FLOWING ETC. CAP BROKEN 0 Failure to install leak detection on underground storage tank(s). 527 CMR 9.05(7) Q. Failure to retrofit underground storage tank(s) and/or piping with cathodic protection. 527 CMR 9.05(11) ORDERED: Permit to maintain a storage facility is revoked forthwith.527 CMR 9.05(L)(2) Cease and desist from the delivery of any product into the underground storage tank(s) forthwith. MG.L. c. 148, §38G Remove all product from the underground storage tank(s), render the tank(s) inert and secure all openings forthwith. M.G.L. c. 148. §38G and 527 CMR 9.05(-1)(3) Remove the underground storage tank(s) and/or piping by: ASAP 527 CMR 9.05(7),(!1), 527 C,MR 9.07(0) Dvadhnr Date Ordered By: llrad of the Fire Drponment w Uelow Depaxmeni, This notice of violation served on: '—"� 1 Rgelownr Date I / ey: yo li 17�w l� � � an Officer delegated by the Head of the Fire Department in accordan,#with the provision s ofXG.L. c. 148,§§4, S. Whiff Copy-0,vM,.Uperaror tbllow Copy-Frre Department Pink Copy-Stare Fire Marshal 4-29-1999 1 :44PM FROM P. 4 . ate\ a//r �� o//iurt/u/(/mala�lJGf t�/b/'uxase�ipr.Jepa�aef.Ia • � r� ((.7YfI/I/Irl �j�(/'C O�• �!G(J�C�Cp�J(yp.I//L �n j �.l _L r�f�v/ii/r�//f n�Cf'rireC.lP�r /.7icea0 alb/ ARGPU P%i'I (-.'I t t'el'l STEPHEN D.CORN IKr,;.;q�/rrravlhy 0!775 _ / e STATE FIRE MnR$HAL J4\L:SAllr T!1OMASP.LEONARD brcl.Tli]A]i GU\'LRSON DEPUTY STATE FIRE MARSHAL l,Nl Pre!.on )1 I RQT,,NY \1E 10RAIND UM TO: Heads of Fire DrpannTerlts FROM: Stephen D,Coan S,-o c . State fire Marshal C---X-D DATE: March 1, 1999 SUB1FCT: Under round Storaue Tank Update The Dccemhcr "_ 1 99 deadline has come and ,one but the tank registry program III Uinta toed by the Oft ire Oftte SLue fire Marshal still needs your help. Back in early Deccrnbcr 1995 this office !hrough several meetings issued Underground Storage Tank Non C-uniphim Entorcemen! 12vpons to all fire departments and fire districts. These reports t�cre 'enccucd From the DecL!mher 1. 199S UST Data Base. We now must ask for each department ,hstrtct to fon and am ;(nd all miomiation if you have riot already done so eonccmut th :ollo%k In • Orders of\once issued by }our department/district • [ P-_''7I+' rcecr.ed .711er Dlxomber 1, 1998 F(' :Vn•R'n rccct ed atter December t, 1998 • i '1„tate !o tit: t S'f \oxt•Compiiart Enforcement Report \ 1 Ila(e Indie.nrd In the act, our Compliancc Officers and staff at the State Fire Marshal's oitice %N 111 connnue to ,York %%ill, .dl :onmunifcs on enforcement of the UST Program Please !n;ul .dl rrsp<a;scs to the :tiler wzi +,;'the t ST Compliance Program. if you lim c 7m yucsuons or tired !'Linhcr-tN.i,tarw,., please do no! hesitate to contact them at (978) 567- ;:un d-29-1999 1 :45PM FROM P. 5 y ��i�rrr�ii/irirCnn��'Gx6C./PiX?1f�5 Axa:LU P.\CL L:utCc I G,1\ x�ix ^y/r.u,. ��1.:.:nr•�/y�Clq Of 77.3" STEot1EN D.COAN STATE FIRE MARSHAL Llrl 11' ,'x": li.nl k�'rN THOMAS P, LEONARD DEPUTY STATE FIRE MARSHAL i\�h Prknn .96rR:.r.xr MEMORANDUM TO: Beads of fire Departments FROM: swphan D.Coan S.3 .'C State Firc Marshal DATE: March 1. NIP) SL BJ ECT: l:ndcr_rounJ Storage Tank Deadline of March 31, 1999 Just a reminder ofdtc upcomlm_ JcaJlim. of March 31,1999 for underground storage tanks. It, accordance i\1ih CAM R 9.07 l()i (c.I )- The owner or operator of any underground storage lank that �\as rendcr0d inoperau\r. cleaned and inert back on December 22,1998, must present to 1110 head of the lire dcpanme"I a copy of a written agreement or signed contract !o r0mo\c !hc !.tnk he this dcadhnc. The removal or permanent closure of any und:nrnnnJ tank and 11:111111 .hall he :n ,liconiancc with 527 CMR 9.07 (K) and be complctrd hc!hre S0pt0mhcr ;+I. i 1rn1 remo\al deadline Failure of any owner or operator of under-'round (ankl,I to pro\ide a comrlct or agreement shall be in violation of the deadline. Fire department,arc uri.,ed to continue to work closely with tank owners to ensure that the underground ;Iorace tank rcmo\al deadline is met. ' !•r.•,.••..%r.•in, 4„v... • -i/•r-.rrjr/r u.; ' /r%y/Nrm/i .!S n.�l.n,;� r . Cttp of Salem' Aa!5!6arbU!6Pttg tf o Public Prupertp Department -JRuilbing Department One sbalem Oreen (976) 745-9595 ext. 380 Peter Strout Director of Public Property Inspector of Buildings Zoning Enforcement Officer April 16, 1999 L.T.W. Management Associates Inc. 271 Western Avenue Lynn, Ma. 01904-3016 RE: 28 Goodhue Street Dear Mr. Leigh: On Thursday, April 15, 1999 a State Building Code Appeals Board hearing took place relative to the structural, fire and building code violations which exist at 28 Goodhue Street. As a result of this hearing and a reinspection of the property, the following violations were identified. 1. 780CMR 121.0 unsafe structures that the building at 28 Goodhue Street would be especially unsafe and dangerous in case of fire. 2. 780 CMR 3400.41 a) The building has less then the number of means of egress serving every space and/or story required by 780 CMR 1010 and Table 1010.2 b) The means of egress components are not of sufficient width to comply with 780 CMR 1009, and are not arranged to provide safe and adequate means of egress including signage and emergency lighting. 3. 780 CMR 3400.5.1 The buildings exists are hereby deemed hazardous and dangerous to life and limb and are declared dangerous and unsafe in accordance with the provisions of 780 CMR 121.0 / 4. 780 CMR 3400.6 The existing buildings light and ventilation do not meet the applicable provisions of 780 CMR 12 and are dangerous and hazardous to the health and safety of the occupants. 5. 780 CMR Chapter 9 required that the building shall have a fire protected system and that the system be maintained in accordance with the code and applicable standards listed in Appendix A. You are hereby ordered to immediately cease and desist all business operations and rentals on the property and have all the tenants vacate the property no later than April 23, 1999. You have until 12:00 of the day following April 23, 1999 to make secure all exterior entrances and openings in and around the building and property including if necessary, proper fencing put up for the protection of passerby. The existing sprinkler and heating system shall be maintained and periodically tested to insure proper operation after the building is secured. Periodic inspections by the Building and Fire Departments shall be done to assure compliance with this order. Failure to comply with the requirements of this order immediately, will result in legal action being enforced as this order as noted in MGL., Chapter 143 ss.9 and 780 CMR, Section 121.3 and 121.4 and 121.5. Please contact this office immediately upon receipt of this letter. Sincerely, Kevin G. Goggin Assistant Building Inspector cc: Mayor Stanley Usocivz John Keenan, Assistant City Solicitor Chief Robert Turner Craig Wheeler, Planning Councillor O'Leary Chief Robert St. Pierre Fire Prevention Health Department �nc.VIr�6u..lcvr.;/!cm !90! w)LUAu F.ween .i a�lars, .l� f.•,. ne. O.fl08 ��\TAROS3VTS VMI xAT1L6i4 M.DTOOU THO.4A51-11OGER.S TEL:(017,727,1= FAX:(017)227.1754 � STATE USE ONS Fee Received: STATE BUILDING CODE APPEALS BOARD Check No.: APPEAL APPLICATION FORM I Received By: _ DOCKET NUMBER: _ DATE: March 4,_19g_ (State Use Only) The undersigned hereby appeals to the State Board of Building Regulations and Standards from the decision of the: Building Official from the City/town of. em Board of Appeals from the City/Town of. Other Municipal Agency/Official entitled: Stale Agency/Official entitled: OTHER' Dated: jannjary 9.1 19 99 , having been aggrieved by such (check as appropriate) Interpretation o Order ISL Requirement o Direction o Failure to Act o Other o Explain All ap prropriat od stctiong must be identified All written supporting documentation must be submitted will) this application. Parties may present written material at the hearing. however, the DOArd reserves the right to continue the proceeding if such material warrants extensive review. State Briefly desired relief. _. � attched -•.- _ - APPELLANT: H & G Realty Corp c/o LTW Manattetttertt Associates, Eac. ADDRESS FOR SERVICE: 271 Wastern Avenue, Lynn MA 01904 _.. . ` --- - Telephone No.-4781 L596 1194 _ ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: 98 nri me Street, SAlent MA 01970 APPELLANT'S CONNECTION TO SUBJECT PROPERTY:_ Owner LTW g t c. _ .,7; Z � ' � Theodore P. Leigh SIGNATURE W APPELL&N"UR RE N ATI (NAME-PLEASE PRINT) 780 CMR: STATE BOARD OF BUILDING REGULATIONS AND STANDARDS THE MASSACHUSETTS STATE BUILDIM3 CODE DESCRIPTION OF BUILDING OH STRUCTURE RELATIVF TO THE MASSACHUSETTS I STATE BUILDING CODE (780 CMR 6th EDITION)- (Check as appropr atc) Check Here if Building is a One or Two Family Dwelling 17 Proceed to section entitled "Brief1)cscripfiorl ofncc Proposed Worle' - Do not compl4tc the table below DF.SCRIPT10N aF PROPOSED;WORg( NLU appltcahle) New Cott LrLeUoro ExIsting Bulldingo Repalr(s) ❑ Alterauon(s) o Addition ❑ Accessory Bldg. D Demolition ❑ Other o Specify: Bricf Description or Propuscd work: USE'GROUP:AI4D'OpNSTRUCTIONTYPE t m ,#-' USE GROUP (Check as appUcabte) CONSTRUCTION TYPE A Assembly I ❑ A-1 O A-2 ❑ A-3 ❑ lA ❑ A-4 ❑ A-5 ❑ ID ❑ 8 Duslnus ❑ 2A ❑ E Educational p 2B ❑ P Factory 01 F-1 F-2 ❑ 2C ❑ H High Hazard ❑ 3A ❑ I Insutuuunai ❑ 1-1 ❑ 1-2 ❑ 1-3 ❑ 3B ❑ M Mercantile ❑ 4 ❑ R Rcsldenllal ❑ R-1 ❑ R-2 ❑ R-3 ❑ SA p S Sic 'ge o S-1 1) S-2 ❑ 58 V Utlllty ❑ Specify: _ M Mixed Use ❑ Specify. _ 6 Special Use ❑ Specify. COMPLETE THIS SECT-ION IF.EXISTING:BLILDING,Ui By letter dated January 21, 1999, the Assistant Building Inspector entered an Order that fourteen (14) numbered actions be taken by the Appellant with respect to commercial property at 28 Goodhue Street, Salem, Massachusetts. A copy of that letter is submitted herewith. Appellant seeks to have the Board: Annul Order #1, because: a. these systems are not required by 780 CMR for a Use Group F (hazard index: 3) commercial building b. the Inspector of Buildings is not authorized to seek enforcement of the provisions of M.G.L.c.148, of 527 CMR, and/or of any local fire ordinances Annul Order #2, because this equipment is not required by 780 CMR for a Use Group F (hazard index: 3) commercial building. Annul Order #4 because this work is not required by 780 CMR. The building is a single-use, Group F (hazard index: 3) building. No application has ever been made for approval of a change in use of the building. If space in the building has been used for activities which exceed the hazard index, the remedy is to cease such use or alter the building so as to comply with the requirements for such higher hazard-index uses. Amend Order #5. There is no minimum fire resistance rating required for existing enclosed stairways used as a required means of egress, per 780 CMR 3404.13. Only new construction necessary to enclose existing open stairways used as required means of egress must be fire rated. All existing interior stairways used as required means of egress are currently covered. Clarify or Compel the Inspector to Clarify Order #9. The Inspector must clearly identify the "high hazard" tenants to which his Order refers. Further clarification is also needed as to the propriety of the presence of lower hazard tenants in the building and the effect of such presence upon the Use Group designation and hazard index of the building. Amend Order #13. Requiring new tenants to apply for building permits (if construction is to occur) and occupancy permits for new tenant spaces is, of course; reasonable. However, tenant spaces must be allowed to be used when the renovations to the common areas serving those spaces (including required means of egress) are completed. Approval for use of tenant spaces should not be withheld because common area renovations to parts of the building not serving those spaces (i.e. on other floors) are not completed. 14736apl.wfp of 6M[em, Aa55 ;acbugett.5 Public Propertp Mepartinent s �Buffbinq Mcpartment one $>alem t5reen (976) 7459595 (Zxr. 380 Peter Strout Director of Public Property Inspector of Buildings Zoning Enforcement Officer January 21, 1999 L.T. W. Management Associates Inc. 271 Western Avenue Lynn, Ma. 01904-3017 RE: 28 Goodhue Street Dear Mr. Leigh: In response to our.meeting with you in December, please be advised that we met with the'Fire Prevention bureau to'address the building and fire code issues at 28 Goodhue Street. We are hereby ordering that the following items be addressed and that the work be completed no later than Decerriber 30, 1999. 1. Install a fire protective signaling and automatic fire detection system per 780 CMR State Building Code, MGL 148, 527 CMR and local fire ordinance 2. Install new fire alarm master box on exterior of building as directed by Salem Fire Department. , 3. Provide required exit access corridors on all levels. 4. Provide required non-conbustable fire separation between tenant spaces. 5. All stairway being used as a means of egress shall be fire rated as per the building code to provide safe and continuos means of egress to the street. 6. Provide required means of egress lighting, emergency lighting and exit signs. 7. Provide continued monitoring of the building by the structural engineer and have the structural engineer furnish floor loads for all areas. B. Proper toilet facilities'shafl be installed,per.building and plumbing codes. 9. Relocate existing high hazard tenants to concrete block buildings and furnish all required fire separations, exits and other code requirements. ' L.T.W. Management Associates Inc. 271 Western Avenue Lynn, Ma. 01904-3017 page two 10. All tenants or building owners shall be required to apply for individual building permits for separation and build out of tenant space. 11. The building owner shall apply for proper building permits for all common areas. 12. The owner shall commission a registered architect to furnish a complete set of stamped drawings and be responsible for construction control. 13. Any new tenants will be allowed to occupy the structure after all common area/ building renovations are completed and all new tenants shall also apply for building and occupancy permits for the new tenant spaces. 14. The building owner shall make application to the City of Salem Zoning Board of Appeals concerning variances for parking requirements to the BPD District. Please notify this department within ten (10) days upon receipt of this letter, to inform us as to what course of action you will take to rectify these violations. Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, Kevin G. Goggin Assistant Building Inspector cc: Fire Prevention Health Department Councillor Hayes, Ward 6 780 CMR: STATE BOARD OF BUILDING REGULATIONS AND STANDARDS APPENDIX B r all C62 WILLIAM F.WELL) KEP7AY07SUTSUM) C. ':lJdllOrfo ..�(auac%ueuYs 0.!!Od - c�.I,,,.. KATVIocu M.OT LA THOMAS L RDCM TEL:(817)747.3400 FAX:(817)227.1754 A4u.. STATE BUILDING CODE APPEALS BOARD-SERVICE NOTICE Theodore P. Ieiah ' as_ representative for the Appel lant/Petitioner Ug G Realty COry in an appeal filed with the State Building Code Appeals Board on Maw 4 19 c HEREBY SWEAR UNDER THE PAINS AND PENALTIES OF PERJURY THAT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROCEDURES ADOPTED BY THE STATE BOARD OF BUILDING REGULATIONS AND STANDARDS AND SECTION 122.3.1 OF THE STATE BUILDING CODE, I SERVED OR CAUSED TO BE SERVED, A COPY OF THIS APPEAL APPLICATION ON THE FOLLOWING PERSON(S) IN THE FOLLOWING MANNER: NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON/A EN .Y SFR O 1vFTHO )OFC 'RV1 -F. DATE OF SFRVI_CC Petpx Strout Inspector of Buildi-n .anataljle March 4, 1999 _ Om Salem Green, Salem MA 01970 Siplatwc:APPEI,LANT/PET]r10NER On the Day of March _ 19- 99 , PERSONALLY APPEARED BEFORE ME THE ABOVLNAMED qq,mri,T,, p_ Leigh (Typc or1`riat the Nwlword,c AppcVml)AND ACKNOWLEDGED AND SWORE THE ABOVE STAT-ErS T,O BBE TR y p �.� MI f Commonwealth of Massachusetts Board of Building Regulations and Standards APV N Tot. One Ashburton Place, Room 1301 JUN �! •� a1 _,5 5 Boston, MA 02108-1618 �% ' M A 5421 b s US.POSTAGE Mr. Keuin G. Goggin Assistant Building Inspector City of Salem-Building Dept. One Salem Green Salem, MA. 01970 01� r0-a?35 01 Ilfnnnlll.luln.1111111dill,nl.I'll nIIIIIIn1iull1lull e 3 VIII !illi 1 it Illi lill it ! Ii HM H POLY SLIDES9 I CO 28 Goodhue St. Sm,MEMORANDUM '�i' ` : ��'Qodal: 15 From : !> ? J Date: SUbect : /- f / , Ir i :; blccic i 011 I E-6 VCat r^. .�I� I� IC :, C I �r� {r�r i5 �X�4rrS 2• , I T l.lL a�Crov�` E} C�1OS� G'-t PrvO � 1 `r �f}�'� PxIS 'III .•//:I r= �eGr1/-rlC2,I <'f` r,Y ; C ! /h. `rea ;�� be � IS.'_.US'.�.: F�lec tx hr.l_:j g �[Jw Pr t[) C 7h (�iel � l n-� UIQ WI tdCc✓ 'ar71C Grove �. ndorc,-n �'_`^.5 ;''.1t Cl'1C„t C,�•�t 3n p -54 .� Grove "pal �,, r',cciror_m , ,u4la o- ..11_s 13 etal orced concrete £Ci dt' Co nr V )e � 277M -_57Grove St p0-.ai .n Or —�—_ ?n p 2 Olr=�.+' p? -,r_c_ r cor. _ _ _ -e-7--41 -- -7- r ? . _ __ SCO- . .19 7110 3 Gallows Circle _Desjardins, ene_ L�a-�Ldd garage and-f-amily-r-oom.— .19 7111 5 Gallows Circle __ Feins, 5teohen Two car ga±age_and_family-ro_e 2 #123 20 Green St . St .Pierre ,R, Rebuild present poorch,reshin I 3 X128-5_Gables_Circle Banuffi,.Geno ._—Er-ect.__38x24_u.pper--LeseLshell._ l5 X152 Goodhue 5t. Goodhue Realty Repair fire damage ;roof etc . -5 ;x162 50 Gallows Hill Rd . Falkenstein H. Erect a swimming pool . 7167 13 Grafton St . Gr_ on_c_houski.,E_ 5 ' dormerin existing bath £o_ headroc .31 _7165-1.Z.Greenway_Rd.._____..Brown.,Philip_-__.Inst all__Vinyl_Siding. --_— e . 6 1J5_17 Goddell_S_t_.___Lockwood,Aly_ce _Sidewall. . 11 7216 51 Gallows Hill Rd_._ Frances,R. Attach 1 car ga.r.to dwelling. i264 5 Goddell St . T_e_lles ,Be_raard Sidewall . Remove eXist . exterior SiC 10 .5 X330 21_>oodell_StGerard_rresciette i�s_ta11._aluminuLs 3ia�._ R, _ 12 .4 #385 1 Grant Road Oueilette, Expand existing garag e. ------- —Purce-11;3: -- No------------------------- Application o-------------------•----- Application for Permit for Alterations, Repairs, & Demolitions Location, Ownership, and DETAIL Aust Be Correct Permits Must Be Obtained Before Beginning Work • Salem, b9ass•, �L ^-/------------------ 19 —�/ To the INSPECTOR OF BUILDINGS: rive �� Lv//�vti/ n u.. The undersignedr applies for a permit to tn_.a:1_�!z.1 r�_�t 5.... __. t e following dg0iibed building: Location _�-L1-L�d:. Ward L/� /c= Name of owner .�Z_.o c/�_. U� E �C�t�7 Name of occupant l. l..__ ___3_1_l.-�..`-_s Name of mechanic or Contractor ...... Name of architect __________ _____..___.________.__..- Number of Stories ...........:........: Material of Roof .........................; Material of Building --.-----.--------.---._---..---.--.-- Size of Building ............. 1st Floor --------------------------------------------•- 1st Floor ---------------- 2nd Floor ------------------------------------------ 2nd Floor -------------- Existing use of Building 3rd Floor------..______------------------.---------- If vacant show Previous Use 3rd Floor----- ---------- 4th Floor ------------------- -------------------------- 4th Floor ---------------- 5th Floor ----------------•---------- .................. 5th Floor -----•---------- lstFloor ------------------------------------------•-•----------------------------------------------------------------- 2nd Floor Proposed use after Alterations 3rd Floor --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4thFloor ------------------------ ---------------------------- SthFloor --------------------- ---------------------- ................. .......................... ---------........... Are 10 or more people employed? ----------------------------------------.-------------------------------- On What Floors? --------- ---------- Will 50 or more people assemble? -----------------------------............................................. On What Floors? ._.------......... .--.-. DETAIL OF PROPOSED ALTERATIONS, ETC.P --=-= d._.`Ll v--- ri,_Y --®---'�`-=-a--�--e--- a e S v' '? cam' e_ ..�---- --d ------ a.-✓:.v.!...�------Y ---` e-J--- .d-Q.. �.1�✓1 - G ........................ ............................... ................. .................... ........ ................... ....... ------- ....... ................ ....................................... ------ ------ ------------- ------------------------------------------------------------ Estimated Cost or Valuation of New Work -_.-./ ..�. .��:_U. �- Note: Separate Permits required to occupy sidewalk or for Plumbing and Electrical Work. IMPORTANT: Show Lot Plan on back of this application, drawn to scale, show•in'm location of Present Structure. Signature of Owner or ................ig.-c..... --- ................ Authorized Representative -----.- ..... ..j�-'A�Yy..vim.! o _... . .max L---------------------------- Residence - -...... if ...-_.. PLAN Oh LOT Application for Permit for Additions, Showing Location of Present Alterations, Repairs, ; and Demolitions I Structure and Addition _______--_-___________---___CLASS BUILDING LOCATION n / u No to -- a a ti ------------------------------- Ward---- -/e Owner --------- Cost--r. 3 CONDITIONS r _J -• aL--------- . Z PERMIT GRANTED = lJ'6--- ------------- 19�ti FROM Bobbie Bush Photography PHONE NO. : 9787409353 May. 03 1999 10:48AM P1 BOBBIE BUSH photography I FAX COYER SHEET 'c' FROM• be-�' DATE: [ONUMBER OF PAGES (including this cover sheet): 3 ®MESSAGE... BOBBIE BUSH photography tel (978) 744-6918 0 fix (978) 740-9353 FROM Bobbie Bush Photography PHONE NO. : 9787409353 May. 03 1999 10:49RM F2 L,T,W. MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, INC. ATMST: A TRUE COPY & DISC PAM April 29, 1999 T0: Nis. Barbara(Bobbie)Bush Bobbie Bush Photography 28 Goodhue Street Salem,.Massachusetts 01.970 J,Meac esmcxxbel-ialf:ofyour,l&ndlorh-hereby-fwir•.allynarf s ouyto r A, W _ gtiit arrd.8ehver up at the edd°bf ttte r ext mvnih ofyou'r"tenalicy,beginning after this notice, the premises now held by you as Tenant, namely: Second Floor Front 28 Goodhue Street, Salem, Massachusetts This notice to quit means that your tenancy ends on May 31, 1999, and the premises be vacated by you or anyone holding under you prior to .lune 1, 1999. Why are we where we are? We can tell you that the City of Salem issued an Order dated Apol 16, 1999, declaring the building at 28 Goodhue Street, Salem, MA as a "Dangerous Structure" pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws for failure to make the building comply with what the City deems to,bc applicable provisions of the Building and Safety Code. The applicability of these sections to the building is in serious question and is in dispute and has been for over fourteen (14) months. This issue has never been heard even though it is on appeal'li'efore the State Building Code Appeals Board. The City also had advised that the modifications demanded need not be completed until December, 1999. Notwithstanding, after fourteen (14) months and without a determination of this paramount issue(surd„we kiiowthat December has yet to.arriye)the City has, mandated that the building be ittunediately cleared and that'the building be secured on or before April'25,.1999,' [The City took steps to tag and clear the building on April 20th, three days before.] It appears that the City has invoked this power to close the building without thought'to,the owners and tenants and irrespective of our efforts taken in the interim to make the building comply with many of the City mandates. It also appears that the City in certainjnstances cannot cite the Code provisions for modifications demanded and upon which they have predicated their order to close the building. It appears they took this action after fourteen(14) months and without any effort to resolve the ouo.tanding Code applicability issues, only now perceiving and alleging some kiml of inured ate and life threaterdng condition exists in the building, It appears they took this action,pdor to December 1999, 771 Wtrt(QN AVt NVt. IVNW, MASSACNUttI IS 01004}01) 1{11PM6Nt. PHI 350.11$4.lax 72t ;06.102) FROM Bobbie Bush Photography PHONE NO. 9787409353 May. 03 1999 10:50RM P.3 Page Two Ap6129, 1999 As a result of the arbitrary and capricious action of the City, you, our Tenant, faced devastation by immediate removal from the premises. Through the efforts of our representatives the City has relented from immediate closure- The City has agreed that they will take no action until June 1, 1999 to close the building. In turn it was understood that Notices to Quit were to issue. These are the facts. The City has acted and as a result we have no alternative but to request that our representatives, meaning our lawyers, architects, structural engineers and others, effect a determination as to whether or not the Code cited by the City are applicable to 28 Goodhue Street, its tenants and its current usage. In the meantime, nothrttg can c daatc_ q_PX.u;t.Lyuut.Lccuy wey, 1Vtiegcct..tkte3ctiaa �£tl,r ritT_ Thank youlfid we w'rsh•yota good)uckm yt7Ut tt7tur 'end'eavbrs. L.T.W. Management Associates, Inc. Duly authorized by owner i ,t ,Jan- 14-99 11 : 25A LTW Management 617 596-1025 P.01 FAXI Date 01/14/99 lNumber of pis including cover sheet 5 TO: Peter Strout FROM: Ted Leigh Salem Building Dept. L.T.W. Management Associates, Inc. 271 Western Avenue Lynn, Massachusetts 01904-3017 Phone Fax Phone 978-740-9846 Phone 781-596-1184 CC: Fax Phone 781-596-1025 REMARKS: ❑ Urgent ® For your review ❑ Reply ASAP ❑ Please Comment RE: 26 GOODHUE STREET Peter--Attached for your review are an updated report from structural engineer, Edward Sabbagh, and the most recent inspection report on the building's sprinkler system performed by Metro Swift on November 19th. We hope things are moving along favorably and look forward to hearing from you at your convenience. Thanks for your attention. Jam""` 'Jany-•1.4-99 11 :25A LTW Management ^_ _617 596-1025 P.02 S A I PHONE 191.219.P)y3 PMx.71P4 I ASSOCIATES . INC 510nen:mmla 02100 $I .uCTUMAI LMCtN (f R- Np CuN &. LTAN }3 January 12, 1999 Mr. Ted Leigh LTW Management 271 Western Avenue Lynn,MA 01904 Re: 28 Goodhue Street Salem,MA Dear Mr. Leigh: In our letter to you dated January 19, 1998 we discussed the condition of the L- shaped wood building at the above property. It was recommended at that time that the beam to column connections be monitored periodically to determine whether there has been noticeable movement of the building frame. On January 12, 1999 we visited the above site to review the monitoring procedures undertaken since our earlier recommendations. We observed a typical beam connection at the third floor, where you had been monitoring the condition of the connection. In our observation we could not detect any relative movement of the beam and column at this or any other location since our earlier visit. In view of the indications of past settlement or movement of the building it is recommended that similar monitoring procedures be continued. We would be pleased to review these procedures annually, or more often if you feel that it is warranted by building conditions. If you should require any further information please contact our office Yours truly, Edward M. Sabbagh,P.E. Sabbagh Associates, Inc. Jan- 114-99 11 : 25A LTW Management 617 596-1025 P_03 Metro-Swift Sprinkler Corporation P.O. Box 3007 978-532-2909, 58 Rear Pulaski St. Peabody, MA 01960 INSPECTION REPORT FOR Clayman 63 Grove Street,Sn 20-30Goodue�Street Salem, MA 01970 Inspected by S.B. on 11-19-1998 y Inspection-25 Software By Walsh Engine n North KingstowninRl inc. Page 1 Jan- r4-99 11 : 25A LTW Management 617 596-1025 P.04 Fifth Year Inspection Report For Clayman & Sons Inc. (33) 63 Grove Street, 20-30 Goodue Street, Salem, MA 01970 S P R I N K L E R S Y S T E M S CONTROL VALVES WITH LOCKS OR TAMPER SWITCHES Are all control valves with locks or provided with tamper switches, in the normal (open or closed) position, accessible, provided with proper wrenches where needed, free from external leaks and have appropriate identification as to what they control 7 . . . • INSP. TEST CONN. Did you open the inspector's test conn, and did the flow cause the sprinkler water flow alarm to sound? • • • • - (')Yes { )No PRESSURE GAUGES Are the gauged on wet pipe systems in good condition and is normal water pressure being maintained ? . . . . . . . . . (*) Yes ( )No SPARE SPRINKLERS AND SPRINKLER WRENCH Is the supply of spare sprinklers adequate and are sprinkler wrenches of the proper type ? . . „ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (*) Yes ( )No AhARM DEVICES Are electrically operated alarm devicca free of physical damage, and are electrical connecione secure ? . . . . . . . . . . . . FIRE DEPARTMENT PUMPER CONNECTIONS (*)Yes ( )No Are fire department Siamese pumper connections provided 7 + • • • (*)Yes ( )NO Are Siamese pumper connections visible and accessible ? • • • • • • (*)Yes ( )No Are couplings or swivels in good condition and do they rotate freely 7 Are plugs or Caps in place and in good condition ? (`)Yes ( )No Are gaskets in good condition 7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (*)Yee ( )No Are identification signs provided ? (*)Yes ( )No Is the check valve in good condition and not leaking 7 ie an automatic ball drip drain valve provided and is (*)yes ( )No working properly ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (*)Yes ( )N0 Page 2 Oan.- Y4-99 11 : 25A LTW Management 617 596-1025 P . 05 Fifth Year Inspection Report For Clayman & Sons Inc. (33) 63 Grove Street, 20-30 Goodue Street, Salem, MA 01970 S P R I N K L E R S Y S T E M S HYDRADLIC DATA PLATE Are hydraulic data plates provided where required, and legible and securely attached to the sprinkler risers ? • • • • ( ) Yes (*)No N.A. SPRINKLERS Was the date of manufacture of the sprinklers noted and are all sprinklers less than 50 years old ? . . . - , . . . . . . . . . . . ( )Yes (*)No SPRINKLERS WERE TESTED IN 1994 (OVER 50 YRS OLD) Were sprinklers visually inspected from the floor level and do they appear to be free from corrosion, obstructions, to spray patterns, foreign material, paint and physical damage ? (*)yes ( ) No PIPING Is sprinkler piping in satisfactory condition, to external loads not subject corrosion, and free from physical damage, leakage, and misalignment. ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (*)Yes ( )No HANGERS AND SEISMIC BRACING Are sprinkler pipe hangers and (if provided) seismic braces in good condition with no loose or damaged hangers ? . . . . . . . . . (*)Yes ! )No BUILDINGS (Prior Co the Heating Season) Inspect buildings prior to the heating season, including windows, skylights, ventilators, doors, blind spaces, unused Attics, roof houses, stair towers, and low spaces under buildings. Check for doors partially open, broken windows, roof hatchee Open, or any other condition that will expose the water in the sprinkler pipes to freezing temperatures. In heated areas, at least 40 peg. F (4.4 Deg. C) must be maintained. Was-a-bu-ilding-inspect ion_made-and-were'aI1 conditions"found sifisfactO — - Yes _)No� PARTIAL-INSPECTION OE PIPING AND SYSTEMS 12/-1-9/98 MAIN DRAIN Did you conduct a 2 inch drain test? . . . . . . . . . (,) Yes ( )No 63 GROVE STREET STATIC 75 LBS RESIDUAL 70 LBS\\\ 20-30 GOODUE STREET STATIC 74 LBS RESIDUAL 60 LBS 11/19/98 Page 3 ... Oect23-98 02 : 57P LTW Management 617 596-1025 P.01 FAX Date 12/23/98 Number of a s indud_.. !ng cover sheet 3 TO: Peter Strout FROM: Ted Leigh L.T.W, Management Associates, Inc. 271 Western Avenue Lynn, Massachusetts 01904-3017 Phone Fax Phone 978-740-9846 CC: Phone 781-596-1184 Fax Phone 781-596-1025 REMARKS: ❑ Urgent Q For your review ❑ Reply ASAP ❑ Please Comment .,oec�23-95 02 : 57P LTW Management 617 596-1025 P.02 RONAN, SEGAL & HARRINGTON Aff*MM AM VW RIr�R�AI$IGfkT MMO LFown(rva-IfVI UMM.MANAC1A1f11901010J/)D 1�Cp i NWb IMM WA7If1 MAS'9N 410WO K AM&It OIe 7444= 0WHACAMW OX Oft�7m pCOwm RCN. ,MbNi A11RfY August 19, 1998 Mr. Kevin Goggin Building Inspector ono Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 RE: 28 GOodhue Street, Salem, MA Dear Kevin: indicatedAs I n retained to represent theowners of the lana and b buildings eek, I have a ldings at 28Goodhue Street with respect to your letter dated July 31, 1998. My clients have informed me thatpursuant to a meeting with your office on January 12, 1998, the following actions were taken: 1. The services of a structural engineer and architect were retained and the structural engineer' s report was provided to you on or about February 18, 1998. 2. Pursuant to the report, LTW Management began in March to monitor the third floor of the wooden structure for evidence of movement by inspection each month and maintenance of a log of the observations. During the six month period no evidence Of movement has been observed. If any movement is detected, a report will be provided to your office. 3 . Twelve (12) new fire extinguishers were installed in stairways on April 13, 1998 . 4. Pursuant to the report, structural repairs to the fire damaged building were completed on July 13, 199x , A copy of the invoice for the work is enclosed. is a to a result of receiving your determination that the building type 5-B building under the Building Code, we intend to take the following action in response to your most recent notica: ZOd ZCO N019Nj S6VH I IV03S NVN(jd! r9t1)bb) R)CI ) T , TT or T , •nnu =. Oec�23-98 O2 : 57P LTW Management 617 596-1025 P.03 1. Install exit signage and emergency lighting and repair open holes in flooring within thirty (30) days. 2. Install stairwell doors equipped with proper hardware and closing devices within sixty (60) days. 3. Relocate existing high risk tenants (On-Site Electrostatic Refinishing and Fantastic Finishes) to the concrete block building within sixty (60) days; provided that the tenants cooperate and that it is not necessary for court action to be instituted. (I am informed that the spray booths for both tenants have been inspected and approved by City inspectors. ) 4 . Commission architectural plans for submission to your office in order to obtain building permits for construction of hallways and passageways to allow for two means of egress for each tenancy without passage through ether tenanted space. 5. No new tenant space will be occupied without certificates of occupancy from your office. The owner and their management office assure me that they intend to continue to work with all City officials in order to improve this property for the safety and continued growth and prosperity of the numerous small businesses which occupy the structure. In the event that you wish to follow-up this response with a meeting, please notify me and I will arrange a convenient date and time. Veorge ruly yo W tkina, III GWA/mtc Enclosure CC: John Clayman Jane Clayman-Lakatoe Mayor Stanley Usovicz John Keenan, City Solicitor Craig wheeler, Planning Joanne Scott, Health Fire Prevention Councillor Hayes, ward 6 cod 300 N0LON168VH I IV$DS NVN08 TWO SONS ENGINEERING 5082817072 P. 02 Tenon`ts Schedule +�_ r; ,I .t� } •, iii , ' If �, ;, Realty i f,• ! ; : ! i 1 ilTenants / Septeebe, 1941 ' ' ! 4nitl I ' i c lfos. Floor Square fj' `�} ! :• ;$ } Ii I '1991 Date Locaticn Faatare t qd iAir Canfrol^ r 12 03126 4th, 49p I ;Balloon Desicns kit A Twist 1,2 31145 Ind. 11/4i '2nd 2,S< >+ SausQdertelj Anna n 071 12 95 11+ :, 3 i1Fay Colony koodxor ? c45 12 UA1.6 3rd, i•; :,.. ',. 1 ;I. i • .' I 3 4 8oisvert, Jznniter' , , 1S • ' 02147 ' 2nd. 2,5¢ j:•� it ... + .. {�&csh. Eo6bi f 1Q 03/91 1st. 1 000 s "ole Landscapirc " 'j •. �...1 . ' �' i' ; II I 12 OB195 4th, 2.0i4 ',K , { 4S , .Ebano Rood Works Inc L { 12 06/45 4th. 2,`0'� 5 ( ; 1 ii { 42 I Everson, Martha Phctoaraph ; }�•. '•I� t "+. !IFar.tastic Finishes' I 12 01/87 lth, t2 04146 2nd 5;51 26k21��Hanapole, Larry k�aworking 12 03191 4th. 1.25 40 IIHer_her, 63i1 Fikel 12 09186 1st. 2.50 L 1 ,. .�• ' .Ii; `.i I tS ;i Jetfab Carp. I 22 I i :, !0 11195 3rd. 304 ';,. Kass Coaounication 5 09/41 lst, 2s51F ` 4' i �` I I f 14 !I L. 6 .0 1nJepende3t arp L >t 0 Independent orp 7 06147 . ' )st, 2sd%� !0 0.147 2nd, "4.•; �! ;! i (, : ' 1 .I 72 �� Latatcs, Franla j2 12!45 7st. Lopes, Rodrioo 0,lOS tst, 1.706-`•, i. I 12 12 Srd. . 1-,.1:• , ; ,: '1' ' : ' I >� I M 6 R Hose Co. ' l;;'k I ' 34211 Micrc ration 5,000 ,y '' f I s 051% ` . 3rd. GA Site Electrosta ec F.elini.hir1 i� 02185 13 '' Pnlysiides Inc. I a'l 12 Q31d5 3rd. 2,50 ccy: Sadied Creations t Y 250 i '; II 12 01194 4th, I 1 ; •,L '.' .!. .. .; f , I '4 1; Saepson, Michael Lst. Steves Auta Speci�hties 12 08143 If' . a I 12 45181 2nd. Tsloropoulos, Chr St05'p i ! . 1 }451 Raln�t Prihtinq S ecsaltles Incl; 12 ' �9�9� 3rd. 4 • 101 kindew Dressing ..�,i.:f;•` � + :{ 1 �. , Ali I '' :.� , TWO SONS ENGINEERING 5082817072 P. 02 Te"p na�s Schedule i j1I 1 �( , I I .1. '� 617 ! i I � !g•' ;fee .1,} ;' r: .111 { '�•'�I ' Ill — {j , <f It • '1 Y.'. ' I'll •�.li r . r I: 1 IS ! I :. . . '�.r I 'Hk6Realty !Tenants 1 SePtes"r 1497 s I + I - yflltl t of Mos. ' Floor Egaare Date ' Location Foatare 1 > :1447 '4 Air Control'j•_. . 12 ova 4th, j f t-:I,:?•• ,( : . i { i.; I - 2 11195 32 ;'•,( •: f ' r �4 ;Balloon Desions Wit A Teist 1 12 12191 mA Bauegaertel, Anna , ! 1 no 12 07193 2nd: (;Fri" ` 3 1 Fa'1 Colony good+or 06195 3rd, {� lenniter; 12 ,! 1 ,. iJ 02147 2nd. 2 s� •;"11: 1t lI ' rl Bush, tobbi i l0 03197 1st. t 04 : V 8 "ole Landscaping { I I t h 5 I(Ebanc Nood Narks c. I • 12 08!95 . 4th. 2,2,M4 {: i r �•i , I In12 06195 4th. 42 Everson, Martha Photograph 12 07/87 r: ( t2 04194 ' . 2nd 3;51 •,} • r f 'f1 � , : 1 1 {J �I Fantastic Finishesi 1'•�I 'a I I 26E21il Nnapole, Larry go�drorkinc 4th. 1,33 " 12 03197 ' `':'•' !I f 40 i`kercher, 6311 Pike l2 jot ab 09165 : lit. 2.50 ` , ' ll ( # i.'r �• j t5 11 Carp. I ,� t .11'• I I Koss Coaoonicatio 10 11/96 3rd. 14 �� L. b .b Independent orp rl 7 06117 1st. Independent L k D Inde 21811 P orp 10 LakV3147 2nd, 4,000kI' '' i4.• �I i fl, .I '22 (l atos, Franla l 12 12195 1st. lopes, Rodrigo , z I1201!95 1st, 1!.,00: . I M k R Hose Co, 12 0�/8b 3rd. 2,500 342 : Micro Matign ( I { f I 05/96 3rd, 5 OV4 5 I• ;. L.,i j ' .{ ! I 31 1; on Site Electrosta a Reiini.hi,;g 12 12 02185 1st. Polystides Inc. 03186 .: 3rd. 2,5 z y1! 5adlea Creations 12 01 1 II 12 03194 4th. 1250 -' s.i; ;... ;:l� ; .•I 1i.. :l t •: r4 1, 5aepion, Michael I 12 08/43 : 1st. 2!40. ' j. f, ill Sieves Auto speclIlties l; 12 05181 2nd• ? �r Tsloropontos, Chr stos $,0 6 I 41. i2 .: 43185 4th q5 ! galn�t Prihtin 5 e I jes Inc, r g 0919] 3rd, { 4. 3�1 gindow Dressing .I S r , + ��' ',4 .' ` � • `1, 111: . I I l! II ,'f^.r� TWO SONS ENGINEERING AND SUPPLY CO. MACHINE REPAIR AND INSTALLATION MICHAEL R.MCEACHERN SR. OWNER 24 HOUR SERVICE. 41 MOUNT VERNON STREET GLOUCESTER MASS 01930 PHONE 978-281-7072 FAX 978-281-7072 { 72 P_ 02 ENGINEERING 50828170 k li I [ i Ts Schedule �If� H A 6 Realty it � { � I, �i jI' 1Tenants i Aeptenbe` 1997 1 of Mas Floor Square 1997 Date Location foo tadi -'-= _.,..:--= 12 03/26 4th, 9R j 4 Air Control y IAalloon 8esions Wit A Twist 12 1095 24d, 1,32 �' "� ', �� t ' {Baua4aertal, Anna 12 12194 : - 2nd. 2, f lj3 1 Raq colony Woadwor no 2 1,2 0)195 , 2nd 1,3, a I 1 1 ', , { I II 34 8oisvert, Jennifer, l2 08196 3rd 4nJ i�Bush:AdEbi ! 13 0214! '2nd 2r'SY Cole Lanescaping 'd 10 03/g1 1st 1,00 i Ebano Wood Works 1 c '3 12 08!95 ' . 4th. 2,02 �i � 12 06!45 4th. 2,50 e ap t tt f 42 i Everson, Martha Phataaraph. " Fantastic ! 12 07187 4th,43 4,G9� "3 3,51 26 27 Hanaaole, Larry Wo dworkina �{ L2 09794 Ind ; ,1 P 12 03x97 4th, 1.25 Herrher, Gail Pike / , 15 ;�detfab Carp. - 3 L2 04185 1st, 2,50 1 , fl t0 1L/45 3rd. 22 ti Kose Cort®unication 11j 1L, d U Independent orp 08191 14 1st. 1,50 p rr` P 7 06/97 1st, z,tiAn L d 0 Tnde endent or 411 r 1I' 10 0'141 . 2nd, 4,00? Frafla f i I !, 1 '� Lopes, Rodrigo / 12 12146 Ist. 4AQ `! i. 12 03185lst, 1, 0d, ' ' At R Nose Co,4 , a, Micro Motion �- 12 0�/8b 3rd. 1,500 I I 31 On Site Electrosta is Ref in is hirq12 051% 3rd, 5,o0�� 1 I � 12 02!85 1st. 4,144 1 ✓13 Pnlyslides lnc.r S 12 03164 3rd. 2,SQWj 1� Mies Creations 2 SaepSon, Michael 'd 12 03194 4th. 9teves Auto Specillties 12 08193 1st, IY141 .��' ;" r M ' ,15� T5lcropau145, Chr Stas 12 Qb1S7 2nd. '. { j45 WaWalnut Printing Specialties ]nc,S12 0318h ^ '4th: .'07 . window Ar?5sing 6 04/97 3rd. 4 I. I fi r I' , I i 2 Entity 12' c 17' 200, 3 ti '} Eapty 41' x LS' �3l tooty I,050 ',. Ewpty 40' M 30' 1,d5�i a 31 Eapty 40' 1 30' 652441 r4 _ TWO SONS ENGINEERING 5082817072 P. 01 j 1 , e S �e 41 MOUNT VERNON STREET GL UCESTER MA S.Pigm S� { PHONE 9187.7= FAX978-281-707'2 7& { t 1 i Ilk I }�, J1 �Q 1. T/�i'S�"hr.AG i I rom: fyj��(� hl t'.G" yJZ/1� Jec. ` To: F Pages: PT I YCO s � I ` ! �l E ❑ 4rger4 For Ravi O Please Comment lJ PI"Reply ❑Pleas®Rea" i i� � e Currrmennls. i j kl;T�7 T/7zS`' ' M. 11 i I I I f lil i 7-7 I E j I 1 „ L.T.W. MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, INC. MEMORANDUM DATE: January 26, 1998 TO: All Tenants 28 Goodhue Street FROM: L.T.W. Management RE: CITY OF SALEM BUILDING& FRE DEPARTMENT REQUIREMENTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- We are writing on behalf of the owners to advise you of certain City of Salem requirements that must be complied with by all tenants as soon as possible. The Building and Fire Departments recently conducted an inspection of the building and will require the following: All businesses must apply for a BUSINESS CERTIFICATE from the City of Salem Clerk's office. The fee is $10 and a form is included for your convenience. The Clerk's office is in Town Hall at 93 Washington Street. 4 All businesses must also apply for a CERTIFICATE OF INSPECTION from the City of Salem Building Department. The fee for this one is $40 and an application is also included. The Building Department is located at One Salem Green. The Fire Department also referenced good housekeeping issues and requests that tenants install fire extinguishers and store all combustible solvents and liquids in metal containers Thank you for your anticipated cooperation with these City requests. Please feel free to contact our office with any questions. C271ESTERN AVENUE, LYNN, e ASSACHUSETTS 01904 3017 TELEPHONE. 617.596.1184 FAX: 617.596.1025 / Citp of batem, Oagsacbugett5 BUSINESS CERTIFICATE DATE FILED Type: ❑ New Expiration Date ❑ Renewal. no change Number ❑ Renewal with chance In conformity with the provisions of Chapter one hundred and ten, Section five of the Massachusetts General Laws, as amended, the undersigned hereby declare(s) that a business is conducted under the title of: at type of business by the following named person(s): (Include corporate name and title if corporate officer) Full Name Residence Sienatures ----------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------- on 19—the above named person(s) personally appeared before me and made an oath that the foregoing statement is true. ----------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------- CITY CLERK Notary Public (seal) Date Commission Expires Identification Presented State Tax I.D. # S.S. # (if available) In accordance with the provision of Chapter 337 of the Acts of 1985 and Chapter 110, Section 5, of Mass. General Laws. business certificates shall be in effect fe:four i 4) years from the date of issue and shall be renewed each ro_:years thereafter. A statement under oath must be filed with the town clerk upon discontinuing, retiring, or withdrawing from such business or partnership. Copies of such certificates shall be available at the address at which such business is conducted and shall be furnished on request during regular business hours to any person who has purchased goods or services from such business. Violaticns are subiect to a fine of not more than three hundred dollars ($300.00) for each month during which cnr�+ vi niarinn rnnrinnrc FILIEG A BUSINESS CERTIFICAIE p;apt•r 110, Section 5) AIL BUSR&SS CEFiTIFICATFS DA7M PRIOR TO JA LPM 4, 1986 EXPIRE CN J= 1, 1987 -1,ny pe oadu=ting husi under any title ocher than the c�lefc zeal tame of the ovchrr, tth dth r individhially or m a p,.-,-nersh.ip '+AntY corporatiah doing ti.minc" in a Ime otirr than the oocpwate (must he filed by a mcpo<ate Offl.oer.) woo OCE i CNE r= th the City Clem, either in perrst or by tail. in em y city or tan%there an office of any salt persrn, parttnrdtip or oorp�tion shay be siomtnd. WHAT ABCIVf A CHAN= �tvsaing, retiring or withdrawing from such hi-i^a oc psrtsrr- ship, or in the case of a can9e of ceaidence of as=h Persah Or of the Iomtim there businma is ^^'+.rr,.i, such fo®must be filed tdth the Departmtsht of the City Clerk. DFS A EMD4ESS CErCrjFILTIE EXPIRE? -A to is in fame and effect for fes (l) Yes from the date of issue. A rew filing must he mode each fes Years as long as tha buainass is ^ rxkfi ctOd. DO I tMVE 10 DISPLAY ME CFSII'II'ICkTE7 -tio ... bLrL, yahst Eav'nde a copy on request, dhsin3 regular bnineas hour°, to any perem tbo has purdasad goods or seivices from such FEES -8� Certificate F111n9 ................................. 513.00 (i..,-1 .I.. one certified copy) ilitidrsraL, Dis h•�, parges, etc'................... 5 8.00 (includes ahe certified copy) PENES -Vhoiatiuu of the provisiore shall he ahbja t to a fire of rot �e than tiaoe hundred dollars ($700.00) for each month during thio[ such viclatlm oonti cs. BY HAIL: -<3xA= fo® from tan City Clerk's Office - Fill Out oapletely, except for em.ration date. - Sign form before a hbtarY Public. -fail with crack or make: order made out to CITY OF SALEM Hail to: CITY CLERK SAtili, KkSS. 01970 cawoNUEAI.IE OF Ntissacaos«.s CITY OF SALEH AFFLIC:=oN FOR CmERTIFICATE OF INSPECTION Date ( ) Fee Required 5 ( ) No Fee Required in accordance with the provisions of the Massachusetts State Building Code. Sec 108, 15, 1 hereby apply for a Certificate of Inspection for the below-named premises located ac the following address: Street 6 Number Nae of Premises Purpose for which Premises is used License(s) or Permit(s) required for the premises by other Governmental Agencies: License or Permit A¢encv Certificate to be issued to: Address: Owner of Record of Building: Address: Name of Present Holder of Certificate: - Name of Agent. if any. . . Sizm-Sure or Person cc worm �ert-ficace TITLE is issued or hisiher authorized agent Date INSTRUCTIONS: Day time phone ! 1. Make check payable to: The City of Salem 2. Return this applicaciou with your checi to: Insveccor of Buildinzs. City of Salem Building Devartmenc. one Salen Green. Salem. MA. 01970. PLEASE NOSE: 1. Applicarion form with required fee must be submitted for each building or strucrur of part thereof to be certified. 2. Application d fee moat be received before the ccrtif'_cate wi11 be issued. J. The building official shall be notified within ten (10) days of any change in the above information. CERTIFICATE I =1RATION DATE: JqN ' SABBAGH ASSOCIATES, INC. 1 zsye 451 Main Street Structural Engineering Consultants Stoneham, MA 02180 Tel: 781-279-2223 Fax: 781-279-2224 January 19, 1998 Mr. Ted Leigh LTW Management 271 Western Avenue Lynn,MA 01904 Re: 28 Goodhue Street Salem,MA Dear Mr. Leigh: On January 15, 1998 I visited the above site with you to review the condition of two structures on the property. The first is a one-story building with block bearing walls and a wood roof. The second is an L- shaped four-story timber building. The following summarizes my findings. One Story Block BuildinE The roof of this structure is framed with 2x10 joists spaced at 24 inches on center bearing at the low end on a block wall. At the high end the joists frame into a ridge beam comprised of three 2x12's which bear on wood posts. The posts have diagonal braces at the top, which support the ridge beams about three feet from the post. Much of the roof framing has been damaged by fire, and several of the joists have been replaced. The remaining framing appears sound but have experienced partial loss of section. Assuming an average loss of'i< inch around the surface of the joist due to fire, the bending strength of these sections is decreased by almost 40%. These joists cannot sustain this loss of strength and still resist code-required snow loading. The ridge beams also have experienced some loss of section. Assuming the same degree of loss as above, the ridge beam span at the north end of the building, which has the longest span of about 20 feet, is not capable of carrying the required loading. The exterior bearing walls of the building exhibit extensive cracking, but appear to be of sufficient strength to support the applied loading. The cracking would appear to be an issue only in the watertightness of the building if that were a concern Page 2. 1-19-98 T. Leigh Recommendations To reinforce the roof structure to account for the loss of strength due to fire damage it is recommended that additional 2x10 joists be installed near those at the north end which are damaged. The new joists should be attached to the ridge beam with metal J oist hangers and should bear on the block wall. At the ridge beam at the north end it is recommended that a 2x12 be nailed to each side of the fire damaged beam to span between the diagonal braces. The new 2x12's should be nailed at 12 inches on center. Ir Shaped Wood Building This building is framed of large posts and timbers, most of which appear to be in sound condition. At the upper floor of the north wing (along Goodhue Street) the main beams running in the north-south direction have pulled away slightly from the posts. Also the posts are noticeably out of plumb. It appears as though the building has experienced a differential movement between stories, either by lateral motion of the floors, building settlement, or a combination of both. Although all beams appear to be supported on their columns, it is possible that further movement could cause a separation of some of the framing. Recommendations The building should be monitored to determine whether movement is still occurring which could cause damage to the framing. It is recommended that all upper floors be monitored in at least three locations along the north side of the building. Gauges should be placed at or near the ends and middle of the wing. The gauges should be of any variety which allow for a measurement of differential horizontal movement between one side of the gauge and the other. The gauges should be placed across beam- to-column connections if possible. I would be pleased to discuss these recommendations with you at your convenience. If you should require further information please contact our office. Yours truly, Edward V. Sab6agh,P.E. Sabbagh Associates, Inc. /� q � ��.,.- � - �� 9� c� G � �� I FROM : JOHN M CLRYMRN PHONE NO. 978 922 4050 JRN. 05 1998 09:18RM P1 JOHN M. CLAYMAN P.0. Box 5532 Beverly Farris, Massachusetts 01915-5532 U.S.A. phone and fax.508-922-4050 s-mail.-clavmaninaol.com December 31, 1997 By: 'Telefax Mr. Leo Tremblay Inspector of Building City of Salem One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 Re: 28 Goodhue Street Dear Mr. Tremblay Your letters of December l lth and 12th to Mr. Bertrum Kellem have recently come to my attention. 1 would like to schedule an appointment to meet with you at your earliest convenience at 28 Goodhue Street. I can be reached by telephone at the numbers above. Thank you. Sincerely, in M. Clay - Co-executor of the Estat Of Henry P. Clayman Cc:Mr. Bern=Kellem r Ti#u of tt1�m, ttssttr uoPfts Public Property i9epnrtment Nuilbing i9epartment (9nt t3alrm 6rtrn 500.7.15-9595 Ext. 380 Leo E. Tremblay Director of Public Property Inspector of Building Zoning Enforcement Officer December 11 , 1997 Kellen Goodman & company c/o Bertram Kellen 60 Kendric Street Needam , Mass . 021904 RE: 28 Goodhue Street Dear Owners : On December 10 , 1997 the Building department along with the Fire Prevention bureau conducted an inspection of the structures located on Goodhue Street . The inspection was conducted with Michael MC Eachern Sr . , the property maintenance person . A list of occupants of these several buildings was requested by us , and will be I urnished to us by Mr . Mc Eachern, at which time we will forward a report of propose changes that need to be addressed in order to meet the required building and fire codes . At this time and for safety purposes concerning immediate dangers , we are requesting a structural engineer be hired by your firm to determine the safety of the building located at 28 Goodhue Street, a four story wood structure that seems to have questionable structural members and support failures . We are also concerned with the masonry building that houses a company called Poli Slide , located on the interior of the property. We would also like a report of this structure from a structural engineer . Please notify this department within fifteen ( 15 ) days upon receipt of this letter , to inform us as to what course of action you will take to rectify theses violations . i Thank you in advance for your anticipated cooperation in this matter. Sincerely Leo E . Tremla y Inspector o uildings LET: scm cc: Fire Department Health Department Councillor Hayes , Ward 6 Michael McEachear Sr . 41 Mount Vernon St . Gloucester , Mass . 01930 19 VU, ofttlQm, Itt �c>rhixP# Pertriral Pgpartmevt �ttul 9i�I.�il�ilr (Qifg Errtrittan 44 Knfanetfe �$f_ *leay Mass. 01970 Area 41obe 617 745-6300 April 28 , 1994 Clayman & Sons , Inc . Mr . Henry Clayman 63 Grove Street Salem . Massachusetts 01970 Re : 28 Goodhue Street Dear Mr . Clayman : A complaint was issued to this Department , in regards to 3 Trans- formers at the above location. The installation of the Transformers adjacent to the stairway and the condition of the Transformers presents an electrical safety hazard . You are in direct violation of the building , electrical (Massachusetts Electric Code Chapter 110-31 ) and the fire code. Please take the nec- essary arrangements to correct the electrical violations . Corrected steps should be taken immediately. All rules and regulations will be strictly enforced and all electrical work shall be done by a licensed electrician with. a permit from this office . I notified David Gendall , Commercial & Industrial Service Represent- ative , Massachusetts Electric company , he informed me the Transformers were not Massachusetts Electri$ property . However , he is available to assist in correcting the existing electrical hazardous conditions . if you have any questions , please contact my office . urs truly , c Paul M. Tuttle City Electrician cc : Mayor Neil J . Harrington Leo E . Tremblay , Building Inspector Norman Lapointe , Fire Prevention David Gendall , Commercial & Industrial Serv . ,Mass . Electric L . Rudolph Electric Co . , Inc . 307 Fourth St . , Chelsea , Ma . , � ��. ��M ��y �uilc/i�vG �s� 1Business Certificate Citp of 6atem. Aaggactjusettg 4 DATE FILED Jll 2 9 Type: Q New Expiration Date )4 Renewal. no change Number 4-68 Q Renewal with change In conformity with the provisions of Chapter one hundred and ten, Section five of the Massachusetts General Laws, as amended, the undersigned hereby declare(s) that a business is conducted under the title of: at. �� type of business by the following named person(s): (Include corporate name and title if corporate officer) �� si nc C Signatures ---------- ------- - - -- ---- --- -- ----------------------------------------------------- ------- -5y-y-,---------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------- on Uo/ ' O� '-- t 7 19'the above named person(s) personally appeared before me and made :in oath that the going •ta"is e. -----------------=------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------------------- CITY CLERK Notary PUbllc i seal) Date Commission Expires Identification Presented State Tax I.D. # S.S. # (if available) In accordance with the provision of Chapter 337 of the Acts of 1985 and Chapter 110, Section 5. of bass. General Laws, business certificates shall be in effect for four(4) years from the date of issue and shail be renewed each four years thereafter. A statement under oath must be filed with the town clerk upon discontinuing, retiring, of withdrawing from such business or partnership. Copies of such certificates shall be available at the address at which such business is conducted and shall be furnished on request during regular business hours to any person who has purchased goods or services from such business. Violations are subject to a fine of not more than three hundred dollars ($300.00)for each month during which such violation continues. <> e r; <. ,�� , . Astness t;eruucate Up of *atem, fflassarbusetts DATE FILED e / Type: tid New Expiration Date 7 ❑ Renewai, no change Number :1 Renewal with change In conformity with the provisions of Chapter one hundred and ten, Section five of the Massachusetts General Laws, as amended, the undersigned hereiiv deciaret s) that a business is conducted under'!,C' :Hie of: .�iEd�'4 f>rl/�O f,�f1'i,9L7iF. S' at. R 60o L) llae7 .rT S,gCEW leo�, e1970 type of business ��C1/.Q.!/�P 9L C�/SToa1i z/4/6 by the following named personts): (Include corporate name and title if corporate odicen Full Name Residence Signatures --------- -- 6 _ ____ ___ ________________ --______________________________-_______-________-_-- ________ __------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------- on 19�11he above namped ersontsl ersonaily appeared before rre and =dc an oatn 4Lne foregoing statement is true. 1 ----------------------------------------------------- CITY CLERK Notary Public (seai) Date Cotnmission Expires Identification Presented State Tax I.D. # S.S. (if available) In accordance with the provision of Chapter 337 of the Acts of 1985 and Chanter 110, Section 5, of Mass. General Laws; business certificates shall be.in effect for four (4) vears from tfte date of issue and shall be renewed each four vears thereafter. A statement under oath must be tiled with the town cleric upon discontinuing, retiring, or withdrawing from such business or partnership. Copies of such certificates shall be available at the address at which such business is conducted and shall be furnished on request during regular business hours to any person who has purchased goods or services from such business. Violations are subject to a fine of not more than three hundred dollars ($300.00) for each month during which such violation continues. ��} _ �� , r • JOHN R. LUTZ CORPORATION *JOHN R. LUTZ P.O. BOX 2070 CORPORATION SOUTH HAMILTON, MA 0'1982 sir F,+-'7-46B 4655 April 17, 1989 Public Property Department City of Salem 1 Salem Green Salem, Ma 01970 Attn: Mr. Stephen W. Santry Assistant Building Inspector Ref: JRL Job-#83 (Demolish Building Rear M Goodhue Street H-&-G-Realty-Co. �? Gentlemen: As we discussed on April 14, 1989, we hereby return the demolition permit issued by your office for the referenced project ( # 6-89) . We relinquish any interest we may have in the project as a result of a misunderstanding with the owner. We request that any responsibility we have to the city or state (DEQE) be released. We grant you permission to issue another demolition permit to whoever may apply. Copy of this letter will be forwarded to the DEQE in Woburn. Very truly yours, JOHN R. LUTZ CORPORATION -a CID c C� r- m John RLutz President gM n - o 0 a a m cc: Air Quality Section Chief y Division of Air Quality Control C4 Metro Boston/Northeast Region 5 Commonwealth Avenue Woburn, Ma 01801 H & G Realty Co. `Lbr '�'��I�. (} APPLICANT COPY � 2 BUILDING ZD THIS PERMIT NOT VALID UNLESS CITY OF SA LF 0n` PROPERLY RECEIPTED BY CASHIER 3 ^ ' SAI W1 MAPSSA@RIIUSETTS 01970 PERMIT �i VALIDATION �""�� ----� -DATE .Jan. 9 19 89 PERMIT No. 6-89 APPLICANT John R IF,Tt", ADDRESS Sn. 1058 1X0.1 ISTREETI ICON'S LICENSE) PERMIT TJ TAW*"0i.7TT.OflI_I STORY WPT'P�SEU E.R P. NUMBER DWEOF -- LLING UNITS ITr PE Or IMPROVEMENTI XO. )PROPOSED U5E) AT (LOCATIONI 7* AVVA'^,tX gryr73T' 'idP;T"f 9 - ZONING- Rpn DISTRICT 1x0.1 _ ISTREETI BETWEEN AND (CRO55 STREET) 'CROSS STREET) LOT SUBDIVISION LOT BLOCK SIZE BUILDING IS TO BE FT. WIDE N, FT. LONG BY FT. IN HEIGHT ANO SMALL CONFORM IN CONSTRUCTION TO TYPE USE GROUP BASEMENT WALLS OR FOUNDATION ITVPEI REMARKS: DEMOLISH 2 Story bai warehouse building in rens of lot AREA OR VOLUME ESTIMATED COST S Tom— ~� — FEEM T S 41.GC tCVRIC.SOUARE .EET- OWNER H 6 G Realty Co. q ; ADDRESS 63 Grove St . . Sa1Pm.KA. E bldi 5�., INSPEIMR OF BUILDINGS S.S. YOUR SPECIAL ATTENTION i� q,dlud to the 6dlowinw This permit is granted on the express condition that the said construction shall, in all respects,conform to the Ordinances of this jurisdiction including the Zoning Ordinance, regulating the construction an4use of buildings, and may be revoked at any time upon violation of any provisions of said ordinances. Nuautcrproof pin-ard given al Lw time permit is issurd mutt bo displayed on premises. The df.pmtment must N. notified and inslx•, tion rmvle of prior cons",tion work n+ requested on weather card. All new buildings and w1dili an.. and :dterations to existing building> rcyuir, a minimum of three call inspections, t urtely, (1) Footings, drain the s%stems, foundation and basement walls, when walls are at least two feet high, but before back- filling the wall and before proceeding with the nufevstrurlurea. ('l) Framing prior to lathing and plaeter.ng,duct work, fire .stopping and other equipment before it i.. ronrralnl. U0 Final inspection when building or structure in corms plated. On jobs involviml reinforced concrete work, inspection must be made after steel is in place and before concrete is poured. The Department reserves the right to reject mty work which has been concealed or completed without first having Men insfeetA-d ,aid approved by the Uopavtment in ameordan,•r with the requirements of the various codes. Any deviation from th, approved phutx must be ruthorized b) the approval of revised plaits subject to the same procedure estriblished for the examination of the original plans. An additional permit fee is also charged predicated on the extent of the v:vinuon from the original plans. Permits are not valid if construction work is not started within six months from date permit is issued. Request for Final Inspection should be mad( by postcard or phone call to this department when the construction work is rompleted and heating apparatus has been installed. Painting or decorating is not required before the Final Building Inspection. Final lnap ction and certificate of occupanev must be obtained before• cocupying building. JOHN R. LUTZ CORPORATION JOHN R. LUTZ P.O. BOX 2070CORPORATION SOUTH HAMILTON,'MA O19B2 - 69;-468-4655 - - - April 17, 1989 Air Quality Section Chief Division of Air Quality Control Metro Boston/Northeast Region 5 Commonwealth Avenue Woburn, Ma 01801 Ref: JRL Job # 081 Demolish Building 28—Goodhue:Street Rear—, S alem,Mal Gentlemen: Attached is a copy of a letter advising the Salem Building Inspector that we will no longer be involved in the referenced project. On August 18, 1988, we submitted a permit to your office advising of the impending removal and disposal of asbestos shingle siding. Since we are no longer involved with this ,project, we wish to withdraw our notice of asbestos removal . Very truly yours, JOHN R. LUTZ CORPORATION John R. Lutz President C3 cm c n;O H n O D rq Received: Department of Environmental Quality Engineering Division of Air Quality Control o °' o n m By: y 03 cc Title: Date: � IP JOHN R. LUTZ CORPORATION .- !.' .JOHN ORPORATION - --- P.O.BOX 2070 SOUTH HAMILTON, MA-O9962 - - - -- -S4-z-46S-4655 April 17, 1989 H & G Realty P.O. Box 169 Salem, Ma 01970 Attn: Mr.John Clayman Ref: JRL Job # 081 ,Demo]ish-Building-Rear 28-Goodhue Street-� Gentlemen: Attached are copies of letters sent to the Salem Building Inspector and the Department of Environmental Quality Engineering. Iwish you a successful completition of the project: ' Very truly yours, JOHN R. LUTZ CORPORATION John R. Lutz President c, 3=� a w -C C_ T M C) C>C') arn — m< w cD �m co a 7 N N N �� S� Sale Historical Commission ONE SALEM GREEN, SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 744-71580 September 18, 1986 Mr. Steven Smith 2 Garfield St. Marblehead, 11A 01945 Dear Mr. Smith: This letter serves as your official notice that at its September 17, 1986 meeting, the Historical Commission voted to waive any demolition delay period and recommended that a demolition permit be issued for the two-story building shown in red on the attached map at 28 Goodhue Street. Sincerely, Debra Hilbert Preservation Planner cc: William Munroe, Building Inspector r� n-r� =LQ --o rpt Ct> C� o �• a V 61 � 7g 65p0 90 Y 2 `?Lo09 ss O r 10 �G) .93?0 o�s 35 �boh \ 'A m t y Ac 61 �� ASE — _ MENT h N 6 j o AG 0 so M/5—L 300 Q �x ,C(� ^ ID CD n c CID H & G REALTY P.O. Box 169 = Salem_, MA 01970 ra U August 29., 1986 Mr. Edgar J. Paquin Assistant Building Inspector City of Salem One Salem Green Salem, MA 01970 Dear Mr. Paquin: Confirming our telephone conversation regarding one of our buildings located at-28 Goodhue'Street; Salem, we are currently seeking bids for the demolition-of-this`structure. In the meantime, we have taken measures to safeguard the public by securing the building and keeping it off limits. Naturally, we will insist that.our contractor secures the required permits for demolition from you office. Yours very truly, H $ G REALTY V_ John M. Clayman Property Manager JMC lljl 1 1 lhoMAs L. ORF I}I DIRECTOR OF MANUFACTURING P. CLAYMAN B SONS. INC. 63 GROVE ST. P. O. BOX 169 617-745-1550 SALEM. MASSACHUSETTS 01970 TWX 710-347.7604 rR •SENDER: Complete items 1,2,3 and 4. T o Put your address in the"RETURN TO"space on me .. 3 reverie aids.Failure to do this will prevent this card from being returned to you.The return receipt fee will provide you the name of the person dal ivered to and the date of delivery.For additional fees the following services are available.Consult postmaster for fees and check oox(esi c .� for cervicals)requested. J 1. Show to whom,date and address of delivery. 2. ❑ Restricted ONWery. V 3. Article AddrnW to: P. Clayman & Sons, Inc. 63 Grove St. Salem, MA 01970 4. Type of Service: Article Number c ❑ Registerad ❑ Insured P443 RCertified ❑ CDD 509 361 13 Express Mail \� Always clailin signatu t addresseeQr agent and DATE IVER p 5. Si X 6. Signature—Agent A xAp8 In 7.A38 yT- isaw S. Addressees Address(ONLY if regeeste a ee pa a P; M a I UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE I II II I OFFICIAL BUSINESS SENDERINSTRUCTIONS LL- Print your name,address,and ZIP Code in the �® space below. • Complete Items 1,2,3,and 4 on the reverse. • Attach to front Of article If space permits, PENALTY FOR PRIVATE otherwise affix to back of article. USE.S" • Endorse article"Return Receipt Requested' adjacent to number. RETURN TO Inspector of Buildings (Name of Sander) One Salem Green (No.and Street,Apt,Suite,P.O.Box or R.D.No.) Salem, MA 01970 (City,State,and ZIP Code) P 443 509 361 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED- NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL (See Reverse) Sen Str and N . u P.O.,S'te end Z I P Cod/e GV Postage $ Certified Fee Special Delivery Fee 11 Restricted Delivery Fee Return Receipt Showing to whom and Date Delivered Return Receipt Showing tow om, N Date.and Address of Delivery ao a TOTAL Postage and Fees $ a Postmark or Date' W O oho o / o L W P. SM POSTAGL STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER FIRST CLASS POSTACL$ CERTIFIED MAIL FEE AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES.(as Dsa) 1.If you want this recelpt postmarked,stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article leaving the receipt attached and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier.(no extra charge) 2 N you do not want this receipt postmarked,stick the Summed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article,date,detach and retain the receipt,and mall the article. 3.If you want a return receipt,write the certified-mail member and your name and address on e return raceiptcard,Form 3811,and attach itto thefrom ofthe articlebymeansofthegummedends ' H space permits.Otherwise,affix to back of article.Endorse from of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED adjacent to the number. 4.If you want delivery restricted to the addressee,or to an authorlud agent of the addressee. endorse RESTRICTED DELIVERY on the front of the article. S.Enter fees for the services requested in the appropriate spaces on the front of this receipt.If return receipt is requested,check the applicable blocks in Rem t of Form 3811. 8.Save this receipt and present It R you make Inquiry. 3 $ Vublic VrupertV Department ~ �I' ut(linq Department (Air *afrm (6rcen 7'15-11213 Wilhanl H. Munroe Director of Public Property Maurice M. Martineau, Ass't Inspector Inspector of Buildings Edgar J. Paquin, Ass't Inspector Zoning Enforcement Officer John L. LeClerc, Plumbing/Gas Insp. August 25, 1986 P. Clayman & Sons, Inc. 63 Grove St. , P.O. Box 169 Salem, MA 01970 RE: 28 Goodhue St. , Rear Salem Dear Sir: This notice will serve to inform you of the action taken by this Department on August 21 , 1986 regarding the above referenced property, which you presently own. The building located at the rear of the driveway known as 28 Rear Goodhue St. has been tagged CONDEMNED and should be removed or made safe with twenty four (24) hours of receipt of this notice. Please advise this office as to your intentions. Please be aware that a demolition permit must be obtained from this office. Respectfully, dg 9�n J.IPB uin C Assistant Building Inspector EJP:bms l cc: Mr. Mroz City Clerk Councillor O'Leary, Ward IV Fire Dept. Electrical Dept. file J"ILDING Ory U U EPT M (L41 of [Vill, Aa'��iad]11!3M5 RECEIVED INTER-DEPARTMENT MEMO C11-y 0' SALE H,MASS. Or= ".'n -ey f lie ........... In c6mpliance with the provisions of chapter 148, Section 28A 3r r of the General Laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, you are hereby notified of the following. Code action, which may require furthur action by your department. Date . November 26, 1979 Location . 8 Goodhue Street Type of Occupancy : — Manufacturing-Battery-processing . Individual or Business involved : Surrette Storage Battery Co. Nature of Code Action : One large tank of corrosive acid has been installed on front lawn area. It appears to be a very flimsy installation. No fire permit needed. Other Code Enforcement Officers to be Notified : Building Inspector : x Electrical Inspector : Health , Department ; x Police Department : Engineering Dept : Plumbing or Gas Insp . Other : Respectful submit -ed , Lt. David J. 0�6ggin �W T Salem Fire Marshal I T, Form #57A (10/76 ) a �# rrf 'SUIPM, 'Mttssadjusettg Pirr 1)rpertment 31pubquartrrs �amra �. �9renlun 48 71cafageffr fkreef Chief Date : Tune 23,1980 4th Floor Name: Mai Creations Inc . Re*. �28'C,00dhue St—1 Address :L43S Atlantic Ave Marblehead Ms . Salem Mass 01970 As a result of an inspection this date of the premises, structure, open land area or vehicle owned, occupied or otherwise under your control , the following recommendations are submitted and shall serve as a notice of violation of fire laws . These recommendations are made in the interest of fire prevention and to correct conditions that are or may become dangerous as a fire hazard or are in violation of law. You are hereby notified to remedy said violations named below within Seven Dayls of above date. Such .further action will be taken as the law requires , for failure to comply with the above requirements within the stipulated time. (Reference: General Laws of Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Chapter 148 , ( Section 30; and the Salem Fire Code Article 1 . ) 1.Inspection conducted with Building Inspector Robert Gauthier,coneurrinf with original inspection conducted on third floor in regards to proper exits and storage of class d Flammables. 2. It is hereby ordered that rear portion of 4th floor be tiedied up and proper exit signs be posted.Signs should be red on white or white on red with lettersat lease six inches high. 3.. Exit sign on west side (Goodhue St ) will have to be left unlocked while shop is in operation. 4. Storage of cartons will have to be kept below sprinklers (18) inches N.F.P .A . Standard 13 section 4-2-.5 CC . Mr Gauthier Bldg. Insp. ter;; n CO �lci �� rn m � QN d Form #25A(9/75) �`r_-/ K Ctu of ' tUlem, `'�ttssar1jusetts Nirr ]Department Irabquarters ,�amea �. �rrnl�all 40 lafaplle fPtrQPI Date : June 23.1980 Name : John Erekson Re: Walnut Printing Spear -y Ink. Address : 13 Roslyn St Salem Mass 28 Goodhue St Salem Mass As a result of an inspection this date of the premises, structure, open land area or vehicle owned, occupied Or otherwise under your control , the following recommendations are submitted and shall serve as a notice of violation of fire laws. These recommendations are made in the interest of fire prevention and to correct conditions that are or may become dangerous as a fire hazard or are in .violation of law. You are hereby notified to remedy said violations named below within Seven Day' s of above date. Such further action will be taken as the law requires , for failure to comply with the above requirements within the stipulated time. (Reference.: General Laws of Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Chapter 148 , Section 30; and the Salem Fire Code Article 1 .) 1. Inspection conducted with Building Inspactor- Robert Gauthiar Concerning the storage of Class A Flammables ( Ink) . 2. The products of NAZ-DAR Vinyl. Ink Flat Flash Point is 102 Gloss is 128 putting this in class B Flammables,but other. productO a@ paint thinner on shelf were class A . 3, A Form JOC application is inclosed for your storage permit and must be filled and sent this office . Storage of these products must be kept in --steel locker. with %J ' 'i proper lettering (Flammables ) painted on locker. 4.. Rear of floor had large amount of broken lumber and Junk materials that should be removed to prevent a possible vandal pro lom. C_ CC Robert Gauthier Bldg. Insp. •. n rn CO N Ci? N � Form #25A(9/75) s I N D U S T R I A L R E S I D E N T I A L CONSTRUCTION - CONNOLLY BROTHERS INCORPORATED — BEVERLY =R.i S. '1ASS:ACHUSETTS )1913 • BEVERLY FARMS 9.'700:3 BOSTON 665 91'6 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL INS fia.t� To : C1-`f bt ! Date 8 1b 6Z- C.B. Pro ect #� vm� 3 Project -V Cllm-Z-1tod 0, V\ASS Or Location Ww� Q Attention of 2C � We are sending you today V herewith 71 under separate cover ❑ prints ❑ specifications 17. plans other � Sheet No. Is ue ate scriptio -, o s� 1 L J s b,L [M-M&A iLe ❑ Revise Revise and Resubmit ❑ Approved ❑ For Approval Other — ]� 7 DV,2 4 Attached are Architect ' s Comments dated Please Note IF ENCLOSURES ARE NOT AS LISTED ABOVE, PLEASE NOTIFY AT ONCE. CONNOLLY BROT S, INC. By E S T A a L I S H E D 1 a 8 0 e I � I � I I �- u4, LO v OF MASSACHUSETTS-�1NL.--\--/--� S sFarr"Do0h LANl 4ION[11�11 M♦' �`!CI Y ED �' ` 1q 9 , PILE' DRIVING LOG S E T' F17TS8�61-0 Rpt . #2 P. Clayman & Son Salem, MA COMNOLLY dam. IDICof 1 'ROJECT: ym GENERAL CO y ros . Inc . _OCATION: Elevator & Loading Dock STRUCTURAL ENGINEER,: 'ile No. 3 Date 7/2$/82 Ill Pile No. 6 Date 7/28/82 lj Pile No. 7 Dote 7/28/82 Wood pile 1 : 05 PM Iii cod pile 8 :50 AM II T eWood pile Stop 10 : 00 Al ype P Stop I, Typ� P Stop yp P iommerMKT 9B3 Start 12 : 35 PM 0 Hommd,6KT 9B3 Start 8 : 15 AM 1; HommeMKT 9B3 Start 9 : 35 AT 'ay Lath Driv.Time35 min 11; Pay Lath Driv.Time 35minli Pay Lath Driv.Time25 m- D' = Elev.+ C. 0. Elev. I1, O' = EIev.4 C. O. Elev. O' = Elev.+ C. O. Elev. �V4t-- � ' 1 31 0l 3 3 3.'. I 31•'. a� 0: of oll d ° o, v o.. a, op c , o e. of o o1 ml, 6; mj �• co;; 01 ml' �II': DI - 1 I -11' - l 76';__ ._1 �j26- _115511 5.11 11 �� 111 1 �2�' 1. ._- 152' - �I 77 2 ' 271 521 _ 771- 2f 1271 52t 1_ _ 1 1 111 1128 I 1 521 11 781 111 1 1,128 1 62i 1 11 78 4Ii 2911 I' 1 I 29 54111i 79 ! 111 4 12 1129 154 1 11 791 5 1 1 { 11 13 0 I li 51 1 80 ! 11, 5 ll 1300 1 155 l 1801 6 5 1 31 Ii56 1 11 81 11 6 3 1131 561 81i lli 6 15 131 IL56 1 11 811 7_ I4 32 571 11 821 1 7 16 1132 57 82 lil, 7 135 .132 1157 1 11 821 7 1 g' it g3i'l 8 132 1133 58 _1-83 :il 8 33 1 b8 83 1 8 Il 34 11 591 11 841 Ili 9 121 1!34 1 591 1 841 Iii 9 i34 1i59 841 13 I ! 2 1 60 851 lil 10 35 ' 1160 1 11 851 I 1 15 36 1 61 i 11 861 11 11 12 11136 611 136 1 1161 I 11 861 _ 12 84 37 621 87 1112 1137 1 62 1 87 11112 115 11371 1162 871 3 78 38 631 881 113 93 38 1 631 1 881 1113 75 1138 1 1163 ) 881 4 74 11 39 1 64 -_1' 891 14 1 39 1 641 il 891 114 92 139 1 _ 1164 1Il 891 12 40 65i 90 15 107 140 ' 65 901 11115 11221140 1 165 901 80 41 1 661 11 911 1 16 105 141 , 1 661 11 911 lli 16 62 141 1 166 911 7 65 42 II 67i !1 921 II 17 196 1142 I 1 671 1 99-1 171 g 1142 I 1i67 11 92j R 1 56 A-3 11 6811931 11 18 193 1143 L 1681 11 931 111 18 1'143 1168 1 931 57 1 1 41 19194 44 H691 1 941 11119139 11441 1169 i1 941 75 1 11 0 1 „ ?0 1131 145 11 951 11120 144 1145 i 1170 1 951 u u II r ' '1 1 96 1' 4 11 711 11 0 1 I! �l 1 99 146 1 it 711 1' 961 111 21 'S4 ji46 1 1,71 961 95 47 it 791 11 971 ' 92 198 11471 11 7211 97 1122 72 47 1 1172 97 12 48 11 73 981 123 118 48 731 11 981 Ill 23 1 148 1 1173 98 > 13 II 4 I. 119 'i 49 I 11 741 11 99 111 24 1149 1174 I 991 1 1 1 iI OQli i I All piles were started 5 ' below grade _ Tech: M. Deshler Min Day + 1 hr. travel U T S OF MASSACHUSETTS , INC . By». .v v T OF MASSACHUSETTS, INC. 5 4 RICHARF)tON I AN! t.TON111AM MA 02IN PILE DRIVING LOG SHEET UUTaSge56100f-2RPT #1 'ROJECT: P. Clayman & Son, Salem, MA GENERAL CONTRACTOR: Connolly Bros . Inc . .00ATION: Elevator & Loading Dock STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: 'ile No. 4 Date 7/27/82 Pile No. 5 Date7/27/82 111 Pile No. Date ype Wood pile Stop 3 : 10 PM 11 Typ(Wood pile Stop 4 : 15 PM III Type Stop iommerMKT 9B3 Start 2 : 30 PM . 1 HammXT 9B3 Starr 4 : 00 PM III yammer Start 'ay Lath Driv.Time 40 mir�l Pay Lath Driv.Time15 mini'; Pay Lqth Driv.Time D' = Elev.+ C.0. Elev. II O' = Elev.+ C. O. Elev. 0' = Eiev.+ C.'O. El1ev. -:EI 0 0o c , _3oom OI mOI o 4a 01 G; m _ 14 95 2 2 1 52� 77 111 .2' 1 © 1�27� 88 1 521 �I_ o �1. I r ' I'_ 70�- ( 5 __ 1391 'i 1' _ � _ _ I i 2 1_ 1127 1152 i 771 11 22 11 511 1 7811 112S 11181 � _ 78 0 1 1 i� 129 12 1 541 791 Ili 4 1 129 1154 1 11 791 1 1 1 11 SQ 1 11 60 1 II 51 1 80 ' 11! 5 1 1130 1 155 1 801 6 1 10 11 31 ! 1 561 1 811 111 6 11 '131 561 . 81 1 Iii 6 1131 1S6 j ' 811 7 12 321 157,! 11 821 111 7 13 132 1 - 571 82 11 7 132 1157 e 18 31 58 j 831 111 8 12 J133 581 831 1'! S 1 1133 I 'S8 1 83' 26 1 44 11 5 91 111 84 111 9 4 1134 1 591 1 84 11� 9 1 134 h59� 1 841 30 1 I 5 i 1 60 1 8511 II 10 1 1135 160 1 8�_ 1 39 36 161 1186 111 14 136 611 1 86 1111 1136 161 1 11 861 2 48 1 371 11 621 11 871 k 12 19 1, 11 137 62 1 871 112 1 1137 1 1162 11 871. 3 631 l 88 11 13 10 1,38 II 631 881 �i 13 ! j138 1 1163 j li 881 62 38 –13 — 81 4 79 39 64, 111 891 ( 14 12 39 64'1 89114 139 1164 ' 1 891 11 40 65 90, 15 12 140 65 90 15 1 140 165 90 51 141 66 91 16 25 !41 1 661 91 i 16 1 141 66 1, 91 17 j 421 67 92 ;1 117 38 142 1 I 67j 92 f 1,1 17 1142 j i67 j II 92; R 6211 1 681 1 93 18 1 46 1143 681 1 931 11118 1 Il43 1168 1 11 931 55 1 14 19 1 5 8 1144 1 69 1 941 111 19 1144 1 1169 1 11 941 57 j11 1 1 I� ?0 ' 65 1145 1 1 701 951 11120 1145 1170 1 95 '1 66 ) 4h11 711 ii 96�11 38 1146 I! 711 1 9 1 1121 ! 146 ! 171 i !i 96' _ 77 1 1i 55 I4 1 2 1 97 ii 22 j 147 I 172 1 97 s 90 1 981 23 i 99 1148 731 1 981 11123 1148 1 173 1 11 981 > 12 11 1149 1 741 99 14 149 1 174 1 991 12L ?i 10 1 1 Ii; ? 11 S 11 n Piles were started at approximately 5 ' below grade Tech : M. Deshler I - U-T S-OF_.MASSACHUSETTS , INC. T OF MASSACHUSETTS, INC. SRWMARDSnN IAN] SI nNF NAM MA S t'117 E': E;YsEplo - Rpt . IIl PILE DRIVING LOG SHEE +: vPag e 1 o 2 , 'ROJECT: P . Clayman & Son, Salem, MA GENEP,AQGC) TRACTOP.: Connolly Bros . Inc . 01�.00ATION: Elevator & Loading Dock STRUCTURAL J "b` s.' n- iie No. 1 Date 7/27/82 �1 Pile No. 2 Date 71271/'8�21Z711` yPjl,e No. Date ype Wood Piles Stop 10 : 05 AM 11 Type Wood PilEStop 11 : 00 AM III Type Stop iommerMKT 9B3 Start 9 :30 AM 1; j{ammer MET 9F a5 10 : 30 AM j1' Hammer Start 'ay Loth Driv.Time 35 ri Pay Lgth Driv.Time30 min"I Pay Lath Driv.Time D' = Elev.+ C.0. Elev. li O' = Elev.+ C. O. bev. a 0' = Elev.+ C. 0. Elev. I! -ci 3 o '' ° I �1 01i nq ah o11 o1iCLj av of o. c q' m OI m p' ml' Oj mil D mu DI m' DI mll �; ma D �ml O mI O ac;�i �: m 11-52-1. 2�-I. 2 � 145, -52� I� ; �jl- 1' . __ 1126' 17�'... ._� (� ( X30 I 11 2 2 _52_ . 771 I _ �6, 1 2 '27 - - �� - .. 7711 i I _ II 11 7L Ili I `28 1 Ijs 1 II 78' 4 1;1 291 11 54 1 it 791 111! I No, 1129 1 5411 79 ' iG 4 1 129 154 ( 79' 5 l 4 li 1 ! III i 0 1130 ! I1 55! 80 lj 5 ! 1!30 1155 i 801 6 3 11 31 1561 !1. 81 11 6 13 1131 1 56 81 lli 6. 131 6 11 81 7 1 321 157111 82 1 7 17 1132 1 57 82 111 7 1132 1 . 107 821 41 1 58 11 83 li 8 i 9 IiD 1 5 83 '. I' 8 1 133 S8 II 43 5 19 8,1 Ill 9 117 1134 1 591 1 841 (1! 9 134 1159 i 1 64, 8 151 11 601 11 891 11111025 135 601851 1 10 1 35 1 1160 i 85 — 1 1 36 1 61 1 86 1 l l 10 136 Il 61 I 86 1111 136 161 1 11 861 '2 1 9 1 371 1 621 11 871 11_12 191, 11137 1 11 621 1 871 1112 11371 1162 11 87 3 24 36 63 88 �1 1 13 193 138 1 1 631 881 111 13 1138 1 1163 1 I1 881 114 48 39 641 Ill 891 1114 175 ji39 1 11 641 11 891 1114 1 139 1 1164 1' 891 11 7 40 65 90 1' 15 12 140 65 90. 1 15 114400 1 65 190 _ 93 41 66 91 16 12511,61 1 66 911 16 41 66 91 '7 86 1 421 t 671 Ii 921 It 17 11142 1 11 671 Ili 921 1111 17 1 1'142 1,167 921 R 83 1 1 1 18 83 1143 1 11 681 1 931 111181 143 1 1168 931 9 1 94 19 81144 1 1 691 1 941 111' 19 11441 1169 1 11 941 - 10 1 l0dI 451 11 701 1 951 20 188 145 1 1 701 Il 951 111201 1145 1 1170 1 11 95' �t 135'! 11 ii 1 !� i 114;1e ii 11 1 961 111 21 11146 i ii71 it 961 46L--1 ..-1----,,,II 14 h 1 lotX' 1 21 1 97 III 22 ii 47 I 1172 1 1 971 _ 14 g8 23 77 148 1 II 731 981 11123 1148 ( 73 1 981 )A 15 d 10 149 "74 11 99 Il!24 1149 1 1174 II 991 14 (I 10 1 1 1 1100li `5 5 I' o 2-m-irks_ All piles were started 5 ' below grade _ Tech: M. Deshler Max Day + 1 hr. travel U T_,S 01, .-MASSACHUSETTS,� IS1C. �— BY: / puc 11 3 N PN'81 CITY Of SALE,MASS. C O N S T R U C TI II O N CONNOLLY B6tffI INCORPORATED BEVERLY ;--eq - S, �.� SS4CHUa/fi1S �';�aBEv veAR rnS 7.'7 0053 BOSTON 665 '!i'�5 F S44 60 C LETTER OF TRANSM1Tv4S To : C1 UA, Date �3 2—C.B. Protect # 3 pVZPro,ject �1c� SS ©1 D Location Attention of LAn-A rn�N�bS}� We are sending you today herewith under separate cover ❑ prints ❑ specifications ❑ plans other Qty- Sheet No. Issue Date De r' do Z1 2l _ n�l 1711.aT ❑ Revise and Resubmit ❑ Approved ❑ For Approval Other yb1) Q, LI) Attached are Architect ' s Comments dated Please Note IF ENCLOSURES ARE NOT AS LISTED ABOVE, PLEASE NOTIFY AT ONCE. CIL -�— CONNO LY BROT S, INC. E S T A B U 1 5 H E D 1 a a 0 y FOREST TECHNOLOGY SALES pw ■ ®R T EK Area 617-667-6011 T.I...094-596 IRON HORSE PARK, NORTH SILLERICA,MASS.01967 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE Date_ 21 July 1982 WE HE.RE 1Y CERTIFY THAT SOUTUUDLYELLOW PINE, P - C B - Treated (Description , or, kind o ateri.a.. to retain 20# Grade #1 Creosote per cu.ft. of wood. FURNISHEll TO rbl�ea 1,�A Name of Contr•ac or Prime or Sub FOR .USE ON P. Claymon & Sons Elevator Shaft roject name PROJECT NO. #783 l`N�f[JE AMOUNT OF . 7 pcs. 60' long 1311-3'-7" {. Quantity Represen ,ed IDENI-IFIED BY our delivery ticket #11493 and Invoice .D12596 SLILPPED ON 11/26/80 19 DELIVERED ON 11/26/80 )y SHIPPED VIA our truck g MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF' THE PERTINENT PROJECT PLANS , SPECIAL PROVISIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS OF THE above named projeot4 IN 1"RWESIPFTS , PROCESSING, JAMM l .,,TME7R RAW MATERIALS ARE 'I^! CONFORMITY WITH . ALL APPLiCAL3i,E SI3ECl ICATIONS , - DRAWINGS ANU OR STANDARDS OF' ALL ARTICLES FURNISHED. All records and documents pertinent to this certificate and riot submitted. herewith will be maintained available by the undersigned for 'a period of-not less than three years from .date; of final payment to -tire State from Federal. funds. FOR,-TEK Supplier G' laa4 0, .�. S -arrd subscribed before me Lis-ned b Y. N y ala o:f _ 1 cha rd r i.s u m 14oscgh 3)dBeau; otary� I.Aiblic t.t ${ 'x ' ° f;¢ U fit•° n ,,rqr,a ( � t +.t x1a i•= ! t � e �;lr 7 Nef�i :s b �Y d�4._�'a �+ �-a6;..j* nY}#z'Y)f tIs,,y ht e, �+a-,6° d V�, A. *• DY t - 1 X r e�$+Q4 $+F t ya 11 Q TT e�yT • c 41FORES1MIGS.\ FOE K' r s Ar•d�617 66)-6011, Tdtn 094t 396 Ay +-�+ d IRON MORSE PARR,NORTH SMERICA MASS�OIRl1 t n it kP tf �, G F .�° °fib .p,•n 't + + k ftA• J .ae 9�r _ K af�`�! sF 'C,P , w x .,� M �+� x t�$s0i <t ` x + � ''01 n , 3! S $ • t Pe r a yc , i I +r ,'" ' • k + i s d ° ry{:ry�% it-,*�, x s-Y y, , M dab i.T r y:,x °�• a '+ } rq� . •� e�l��°k� '.,a + �x r'1. t ,.� d " •lr.��` i�A+ �b`{ r «, a ! ��'��7 �,a '�"' f x' + -M a " r^.�i f. i'y,3'�! e `•xi ,- k # CEl_2I IFICATL+ SOF CUMPLIA' ICE, 'i,t•" ' + C # •f � rx S r M qQ � l[ J P v ,� � ♦# •, < p. d k � 1t .°'^'k. r + is) ' '+ >• t + r 4 + x t 'ix- i d. sb 7r to sat Da t.2'1 Y. �x.1982 �" } `�R 6�n.,7 " X. 1• ,)ar f. WE, FIERFDY CEmm0y' TFTA1'z �a _ B T d 'x . . t: es,cr� Ittion, • gr kind -o Materia + + to retain 20# Grade #1tCreosot'e� cu.ft, of wood' ` 9,i C6 Bo hl,phpqd._ Mk9" F1(JRNISIFED .TO a . F a j ' tame b' + ontrtic Or, rT.rne or Sub); • t" ,O P Cla ori'&Y Sons'Flevator Shaft } �F.OT2 USE ON ym +. 4 ' r0: eb, .flame `f �' s a t3+ +r . ' t 1."4, e'Iray 1."4, 4 « fJIM , p Y motif y/ i„ ° :u rot ar „ a .}ROJECT NO a , .�. i .1-Qbli , a 4 ` y.y {Y ! ^�1 it + �� i� }• IN THE AMOUNT OF 7 pcs: 60'1long M 13n-3� In C • r'Gtt uanl i t e presented " v w' e r.. e43"♦E}k, ,r , P #y iy, •,. Y ^ '* a r ,, f r L r- ny. x '°, n s r r rs MA 4 ,., t +c i tqt ' f, IDENTIFIED Llt .,'tour,del dzr tickcFt #11493hand Invoige ,D12596 aAa •� A{,,y 1 m ..r 2.vt a • 1•L.iw 6�aYa" a ll wwb ON s „11/26/80 4 � 1�° DF F IVLRT D ON c' S't1I PPLD V,IA our truck.,''`„ �;.It, y i . �'! '. s hfl E lti, Tlit ,1tliQUIItE1 NTS OFrTHE .,P RYfINLNT PROywr,,Y,PLQNS ; 'SPECIAL �° +;. � 1, Pt.OV [SIGNS AND SPE.CIFICA'1IONS,`OFft...E `above: named ;proAeht } 5.11 _: )J SPE S. t k r i ^i t.l t •i. a r °:t� ' _ ,',- • i - S'!'i�?�1� IaN"Z a1NPPh(iCZiR + f f Y.F 1 1 1 '. to V, ) ' , 4 H �.. RAW MATERIALS At2E IN COIN�ORMITY„WI1'FL.ALL APPLIC.AFTLL SPECIEICATTONS,' DI7AWINGS ANL 'OR STANDARDS, OF, ALL AR7'ICLLS' FURNISHEDIle14 ° d� d Al 1, records and documents �portiftent too tthis ertiffi°cat6'and �no:t submr tted,:.hecewi:th will'. tie Imai.ntaine`d available ayy the under5;i,gned for = tL sf a' peri6d ,of not ,less than ithrec years from date tot �firral ,payment, to a a = 4 a -State from Federal faund�. c +:t< r3,�d��"t'`' ..� "° yi '3 r + s+ 9 K • r ,. �� t u7 �; 2 : 9 ` $' ' } ;:. ' ^"1,!'; r�°'# �t 'T s 4,.Y 4 '<t ' +` i . " • ti� jai + t etc 'ik .',,'-FOR..TEKI �t w' ➢f ,kv aa ; *p .. x+ t n r++ot n ( 6 7 �k+ Trter } 1l tt atld W MN 1 "' t A - i fi A v is yir nc.d,b r� T T : , S afsrd cri Bods ,boforo kmc g y a•, =t a tg 4 -char f )r 1.13 o < y Eta of r r +rt 'f ;Call " OtaY' , 1'ub TIC 3f' !v #{+*�� k¢y-nnz' + �y 3 r! 1, .:R + / !t • 1 ' Y wi , = $'1` ,t, y,tnl 5k, 7 .•. x 3 lay eq rR I, "I IT 5 ` C h v a a y yy m3;• h A l d'F��x��°�1 1 1 t�til a�q'•� �y41y, R's � �� , ht�I i , t � L i''3 }+ � y �f,��1"'YH + il��t,'r�`�sT4 t � i+��NtP_b"N,..a6�A1'`,.�t'• {Y� � l'r. I k'�,r < 1 $t,,t"i 6't '.+y { 'It.3-a � �! - � a •; ej+, �� zr ra,.'^�4��`�r}.,�Yw '�q•�'`�� 1��'1�M-t�°ZiY�; .':� }'va r�•S ,.Pk'z�,4 �gi�B P'}x tYo;�'.a. <' r. ,.. a �' Cr`k �y°: r✓•, e ^ .1Y t �v.f +gg,�. ._ ^d � I• � p ' r"� ..^ (f k gn �, ff..Y t•u� f.,. L' p C a. t Y d. ' ♦ . � 4 . •^ ^ w'S b `� Lr'�daY f) L.i'. P� ,t .} 4 e c m FOREST TECHfVOLOGY SALES FDR T E K � + tv . , .1 . �, ^ iti v Ar.a 617.667 6011 T.lu Wi`-59ti'. 'IL IRONHORSE PARR 'NORTH BILLERICA,MASS 01862 4 �, } q V ,k ,lN,�n, Yrp, .ia na arx ay .4t �'.' ti I 4 + •� •5 r. '.+'ki 5if`Y I o�Ur fi �' �. " &ERTIFIC`AT��OF V ! 1 ; i > t E. b« r Daten) 982 . WE rHE HLM `CFHI CI:Y THAT^ "a # ' _ B T ' a + . ' I• ' p c rate6Cr7.1) '].On � Or "ln( '0 'Er7A x4s W ,to retain 20 Grade #1 Creosote' per. cu ft. of ,tifiood !s C F1JUNISHIED TO pa ` a tT Martel Phead6 .;MA t 4�f k ^ a (Name O .y ontraC or rime,'oC yy �. e- i ( Sys 1 UR iUSE UN P ' Claymon 8 7 ons o evator. Shaft ) 1 b 4'� n iI Era,'ee , . >t ,' e,.t?�. >< ( + k,• 'a5� ( {y + �- KJ)kOJECT NO. #783, ` I I + , � ��'s�I"or � ;fllJ, 1`IN, TIIP AMOUNT UE' 7pcs ,60' lo►ig Al t1 , uarl 7hy1x,.epretiEn O I {§,r ed �tIDPf3EIFll. 1IY tour delve]y,tcket_'#11493 ;and Invoice D12596, & s, E P 4 � �{•�,1 t�' y 5 � �yk' a•� 2'�s fi - �1 j k. �.�a"° ' r �� i, "�s t'+ u° ta�� x w )r S1I.I F1PFD`fONL 11/26/80 DI4,1..iVLRED-J ON, 11/26/80 4kS #°x SHIF)PLD trucks tf 1.4 ak6„ { ��s` 4 4,( i' 1 t"k au e! N c;• . , ri i'ab"y,sr +r' � e�Psrt - ^ r I" g •eS y'si 3. JS a1`rqu€Y*�F T y q.- MN,EITS TIII I&QUIHEMENTS OF a1H Pf if1NE:NT' PROJECT. PLANS; tiP-'CIAL ROV1 10NS AND -SPECIFIGA7 ONS ;OE THE ' above named`,projebt. ' f 1�717'L"ni'S IAC 4.'1' . PROCESSI ANU t �vR •!'{ ri.4 � PAW:MATE.RIAL ARE IN*�GOMFORMITYr,`WI'PFI ALL,I APPLICAIIll SPECIEICAT.IONS " ' DRAW[NGS AND FOR STANDARDS UE +ALL dAI21:ICL1S'"E'UHNISHED .) q" xkJ' �4 r ��t n. ( �.x e r A11� ,records, apd�documetitst perCitient" to, this c�rt> f cate and 'not y q ^•, ; '1 ksuti dtted3';herewi`th,witll 'b^e maintained fava71ab1e 4Uy the under Signed ,for, a s a, f a* p'eriod of not lesisrtlian three'xyears ;from �date of, finalPpayu)ent to °: ¢res} 0 the,Statc from` }''edc ��' t ; +.cYk" r'I� 4FY A^F+. �W esn 444 {r Kra. NSF r :T� ° .+ � z�yt :ern �`V r t t � < I + !fit f^ FOR�TEK d r }i7 'n r+.,fsar�.l ✓,}} .k�'�( oP. �'I '�';y.'� �i &��+7r'�� t .r�•'sxt .^.F:.. s �'S "�"�r"'*T"� A Pr�x�� r# xl p�.7:Cr x 11 , ...... A�PO f� r� 7►�44> '. �t�'. 5. F(YYIa � raCl"�b1JQ b{I?��nroY. me i�"11({ne(�.r dS!a1'6( r 'J c7aC �i C : 0 +s-,- .4r' r " I r �A Of r 9Y>dk e t + 4 e , r + ¢ 4 a Y t� " � G Prri • r r s - • I . ,}5 � a 4 t>k"ra'l y � �:yf �,+ I fixs n 1 r4 w+tilk�.� at^ :�::`' UI3e$llr� O 7 tY f r r r x 1 tt?s s t .y� I s `f > �_p , pe9fe e � rS d tyr 'k' ,p yLw*1�`t! +�4,1 •h""4�8eRR .ar<r�'''�'PeFagall L r r r z C' ' ,r i o f ✓.+ Y F 9 t N { r r 1z'�ti �. '�` " ''``� ''P I, )` sI`- ' .. a r! _ , t r E a k J IW A4+Rv ✓•�+ )' t 3 ^e.� [a ys' ' A t_'�(� k Yea` { y {p �'��sr .. r6'1�` / �`�!?*ri� '�nl!«a+. 45, 's!' `ex= . t ' y;.A " h r r4 c p "'�7. 9 a� lyL3 ♦e"Si "fv p � '" 1 k4 � �' s w� � fl t �a �� a £� .sy � s y. d � �qry"r ♦ t. '� q "I j 1 i{ HNOLOGY SALES;, 't t?fOREST,TEC M ` r; ° FOR T E K Area 6 - bb 667 6011rabv 091 S96 '; s IRON HORSE PARK NORtH NLIFRICA,MASS OIRAl � g SS5 4` 4ct r $ 4x,;r °J, , t '!b{ tt by 1 SNt { , �S�R "!t ° .r ♦kp 9" f .h {r d44a« �� gd. ({°4CEI�TTFLCATE,^�OF:,CUMF'LIANCL g4'5pr` MAX; m t. 'At5s "f, J�'y .+nA s d i r r d'1• w !-; F r frac WE EiE FtE9Y CLRI lE YTf[A1¢ B TeateYd e e�1.. , 'escrrll 7. end - ern ala , . to-retain 20# Grady #1 Creosote Per., cu ft. .of, wood w ' GIFURNISI]ED TO, I A —MA Namc o on'trac or }rimeor ubf l «�r y . P.. Cla ont{& ISons, Elevator' Shaft :h # 4hr POR`lJSE ON 3m � + ° ro ec name <.: rsv '�'ROJGCII' NO � #7831 h SIN ;PHE AMOUNT« OF :7' 6'l F�, 60' ' long.' 4 w13" 3r '�,t �4 Uarl 3 EpYeserl ed x j. 1 ' IDFiVCIhIED: HYS " our delivery ticket #11493 .and Invoice D12596' y . pr f �` k a 4d f d s-r - Y S § " `i ' 5111 I?I'E D ONi 11/26/80 u c 11/26/80' rt t *wtr w a 'i Y` y , 1 1 J UI 1 IV} Itl D ON n 1 i, 'Slim) V1A our tr7dckt r,'r 4 « t « '�i; � aF'{Y, .� fir )" d ti' ° « Ca�it�'1 { "M:` r Y � •, �" �.I+I 'MEE'1S•tTHE RE'L?UJJ;E :NTS JOF„THF 'PERTINE;NT«PROJECT PlA;N6 5HECIAL * !! .' � pPROVISION$ xANDrSPECIFICATI0N8 'OE THE. above named`;.projebt.. ' IN!: FKbl' rS'S"> , IaN"Z a1VTitbi�ZfR c RAW MATERIALS ARE INvC WORMITi, WITH ALL &0l?LICA9IL 9PECII ICATIONS , DRAWINGS ANC OR SfANDARDS�OF ALL ARTICI,ESFU RNISHEll xr , Oi :. '6 5 _i k r' , v , s'•N`� .. All records. and documents �plertinent to; ,,this certif nate and , naCt na �ary�” �ubm� ttc�d lierewi th wi'1�1`rxbe,�mairtitairied `avat§1'able"by 'the, nd'ersi.gned for aA.period,"of not:,,I.ess;thah ' thrce '.y;ears l'romfdate of final pnyment to °a n the 'S tats from ,Federal fq'nds q d «�a t •Yrt k{r t i '' i 5 11`4 161,411,Yv! itrp gjtie i +i' C41&�Y" tSfN"',(.+ txF Supplier If r Y» �,4 «« l(�f :, Y. xm9 S+F4° 9L 4 r• t ,n°, a .i'. h fe `*� -F `4eay.a,yl.pf t t4 % vpWI,�'r e `1 a �1 IA '''' yh,..w' ti 5 MAY, On'>.M sy4t eSsJ ° < r -R f 1 t f�1x 40,kIT cls '; 2'( S tCrrd scribQd bef,ore O.frGIAr p rJ.ti et v s +�.�giT i«>" �p A t .. " .":. ��'•. 1 ''� t J "�' r«kms x.F1' txi +` t 4 h � 1 Y ( 1 ey P' '✓ 'fr n " 6i � • � r. •1` -:. a a� +�"'d4 ;p�a p ulleaU} A Otary PUb.l1C�a1 '.�? ,,.t. t 1w yr i }''` "/""'R' r a ' {� i , o{,JS 4yf >- ..pr J !t M , xy 6N §+ , `jf+M 3"a v% xd k t Air +' ' >k,.{§a1'.5�u�w'3+�r��a,�`Ij.i�loF'°.s�"3 qL�l'.4c."r.-T+4�fx.lv."�.i'{a�ihiy�,?tr.�`tre.9�.r��,t4i•''iS„'hnI+d�{1z 4.i��TgSnaF4*y MY•}"s�rt/�'`ir"Fw}F�,E�.6✓Wj;Aq��:..xl4!e'Ndaa"JYa��rort«wa',,dyFi�,vJLe"rfYa5`rak'.;„'�.'a!pp�!S��e�,a rG'��+��d`P`.y�+eA`�t'°�T`a,j`��'£'.”a'k7}4,tt4��rc hxai+nafi�k�Y.�n',xr.y`��,f�jy3 1��`"'.�",':�yl,},�{�6,r�wl dg��{"1tx'n3�t§y fx+S,fi�+FI,t�x;Z,r we�f��..,.aYTr+'�r kA1��Sp#5r1w{+?�ng..�`-,.gy°TF�€r��t',>l;�•..it Hp!IxGyh Ja�Y a�fjj��l"+lx+��>��i,v�',�s`�k„x�4yx�i1�l...'��tr�frsl�,.a4p�{Al� �',V 6k ",+. y' !• �... - d �(��iM , , 9ap leer��flnriiii UILi' Ik'G , , (luta of 'Salem' a' ussudjusetts L: r a� r dire department 3ieaDquartrre JUL ppnn 3 Tames A. 33rrmian 48 KafFl3, ent ikrePI 1 I �Efi of 9U�I CIT6} fIIL VED Date : July 3, 19tl SALEg,i•I:�SS. Mr. Al Hannoosh Name : Polyslides, Inc. Re: Complaint o£ Occupancy without proper permit Address : 28 Goodhue Street, Salem, Ma. Rei Notices dated 7/29%78 and OlYlyb a ure Comply; As a result of an inspection this date of the premises , structure, open land area or vehicle owned; occupied or otherwise under your control , the following recommendations are submitted and shall serve as a notice of violation of fire laws. These recommendations are made in the interest of fire prevention and to correct conditions that are or may become dangerous as a fire hazard or are in violation of law. You are hereby notified to remedy said violations named below within three days of above date. Failure to initiate plan approval before July 7., 1980 will be a violation. Such further action will be taken as the law requires , for failure to comply with the above requirements within the stipulated time. (Reference : General Laws of Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Chapter 148 , Section 30; and the Salem Fire Code Article 1 .) 1. Upon reinspection and complaint, the operation of a spray paint process, the storage of flammable matef'ials and various electrical code violations; it was determined that you have not made any. attempt to comply with the orders issued on July 28, 1978 and August 9, 19789 and are still operating with conditions likely to cause fire. 2. You are hereby notified that as a result of failure to comply with .the orders previously issued and as a result of the finding of hazardous conditions existing on the premises, this date, I have ordered a partial disconnection of electrical services, in an effort to prevent a continuation of a hazardous condition. This was ordered after a conference with Deputy Chief Frank Sosnowski, Wire Inspector Paul Tuttle and Michael Dennedy, who concurred that a probable cause ;of ignition existed. 3. A copy of the original order dated August 9, 1978, is attached and shall serve as a third notice of violation of the Salem Fire Code, Fire Prevention Regulations of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and the Massachusetts State Building Code. 4. Compliance with provisions of the order dated Aug. 9. 1978 shall be required before electricity is turned back on and failure to initiate plan approvals will be cause for complete shutting off of all electricity and court action as required by law. 5. Upon submission of plans for approval, and upon completion of required work for code compliance ; Permits shall be obtained from the Salem Fire Prevention Bureau, for operation of the spray process and storage of flammables. A Certificate of occupanc� is required from theSale �ildin I pec or. cel Bldg. Inspector A1Pc orm #25A(9/75) Health Dept. David J� Gog n e Ejjcetrical Dept. Salem Fire Marshal JI Vito, ,�1}': p tib; , i. Ttt� Of JE 213 ttsgrzcliets s. r Zama . �9rmnm CfTy p�SALt4p� Y. �q1,r Dnto August r .l' proms : Poly Slides, Inca � 11 �I �e Inspection, follow..up rl , it ' J � Addru s� : R28 Goodhue Street, Salem on Violation .Notice "i , ,11 $a h ei, ,- ly yl As a. rest Alt of an c land. sre ), insne_ ti_on thi date of t. ,� Irnm> r1 5 , .ntroc�ture, opq}l9°4Ejt=: � -tile,. 9 nrMVCw 7f 7r: o',•rn1 4r . n�Cl]' iri^.}. nr n{,'"9r 71.46 Il rlr}fln ,T 711r:]'�,ryrlt rt7l� , liy d`"" folloWin ^E+�;1 ,irnCn[.I '1 ll.nns 91. P_ �i1;0 �(9rV,e.. Vi ol3tinn of Pit— :of e9Fl nry. n1 ii ) iCerrla z,. . 17 r , { .ani ROf fire 7Iev,:7 rlF i.on ' n•7 '. „# Ott n"1A tl � h 'brh or eT nu$ .f).s '1 f' 47 ?I . �;r;; nr P^r� n [ 1 ,, .77r 7f,. thf+ tl'1t 41 .1 ext 7�,4f�1��4j;lr r.. I1 'VOl1 are herehv n')1 1 f "(Ss '?$µ vt.fyi iti p�9p``y�'7jI'.. 1 i ld to .renPd fourteen day T el^tWithin iig4 �5 cf ih e ',917PVt1d71 te . :hr1, t 'i St,, lilj'; Such f utuli.jr .1r, tjr l will 4^r, re F, comnly iql.th th(• '14 )ve re! 1111'n r-.9t1t Ln f 1. i i ,( t (Reference : re.ns)r 11 LsWs of Comm )nWe?] th of ` s9s.ac;-u etts C rtl HC i l on 30. ; Ind. tlt, :131en C'.irr' Cod - .irt .l( te' 1 , �f=a','I� �f er, Inspection con:lucted with Building Inspector John Fower ` ht c • g p $ concurred 1' ;;fi 'k th ori anal O inion of violation noted , in letter_ (Form x/:268) dated ", July 311 1.978. Said violations are concerninthe pli tig h Ij p` Of flammable f'tnlshR3. 1148E gn6d'`S @ 7' �g 2. It{ is hereby o!•dered that you shall provide the iiuilding .ImRector �'ri'j� It ij rgr with a' set of .t>lans for. construction of a paint spray area,; ,'' These plans sishall be in sufficient detail to permit the issueano-e�of ¢ g permit; to construct a booth for the application , 4f� , finishes. �. . i1 40A "". 3. All constrt irm shall be per the BuildingInspectors interpr:¢tat4q � of the Mass. State Building, Code. shall meet the requirements qP t�� IV the Mass. Electrical Code for wiring and lighting and shall meet `' ''d" thepro Qct provierions of the Salem Fire Cade for sprinkle outlined in our r,conference, r.. ? ff ! 9 r if4.' It has been determined that the storage of the ”, cj , c g 55 gallon rum$ . , flammables may be stored within the approved spray booth��bµt the" t� 1!{ "11`il smaller containers shall be kept in an approved storage,ropm. plan for the storage room shall also be approved inspector. by, thg . t�, ,A 5. A permit shall be obtained for the storage and use of that l +r c , when the work is completed. 9$'',i .� 6. As stated during our conference this date, the presentat�.on`.lOf p>�e, r1 ; to the Bui.ldin� Inspector and the issuance of a building,permit, " i I,fp' ,w�a tI > ' shall pelt this office to tend. th t,�ne required for., cqjgplian, � F r!'7' 4' for thir days. .6 David J p ccs Electrical Dept. ,, �+oggi Fire m�T � ,,'•c1 e 4t tri j� Building Inspector -r4 Y, ,�,1, 'd'or'm �r4 BUILDING DEPT Auc 10 3 07 t of '&kin A-angctiu5ett9 RECEIVED eke CI Y rimrrnl,3i;gabquarirra {; CITY OF SALEM,MASS. v ,,LE"' BMee �1. �i[cttt+an Date August 9, 1978 L hare : Poly Slides, Inc. ?e • Inspection follow-up- fit Addres,, - R28 Goodhue Street, Salem on Violation Notice As aresult of an inspection thi.a cite ofe r)r. ses t 1 ' land. area or vehir e c 5 , strur..ture , open O:Inp , , _ �{ ' the fo].lo�,linn ri 'r cnntrel, reC )nmpnd� i Lnn9 are ^1,7 i hr,,7 on , Ch 111 -� \rp 1c � not cel, of vio7.ati on Of fir ' la'. , . The Aq recn , n,..Cn ` Ong P. :'7fP in the inter- est of fire nrevention ani to Corr?^` " ".tin.re Or r i1 1)grinme dangerous a.s a f' * c ,nrd or arp i.n viol , .i.on oo thp.. 1- vn!1 Are hereb`r no+ ifi ,i ci 1;0 remedy 5+314 ''? n] •• ,, i C,'?y Ra,"('r:. ^pl n-.r ,,i i. t}'Lin fourteen dav� of he nhn date . Such' furt ,ur -a,r,ti.' n o .ill ` e taken + - ,, ,. tE ,, , for fnilare to � ! comely with the it e re( i uirements sit in the ti „ 1 ,Itod time . k, } :(Reference l.ener i.l Laws of Commonage 1 th of ags.a.cti a ntts , Chapter 1L4Ff', 1` Sect ' on 30; and the Saler, Fire CID'- ' -f i-cle 1 . ) II. }` 1. ' Inspection conducted with Building Inspector John Powers, concurred ' : with original opinionof violation noted in letter (Form #26B) dated - July 319 1.978. Said violations are concerning the use and application of .flammable finishes. 2. It is hereby ordered that you shall a Ig�q with a set of olan.s Provide the Building lhspector, t for construction of a paint spray area.. These j " 414 plans shall be in sufficient detail to permit the i.ssueance' of a building permit; to construct a. booth for the application of flammable 'it,.t finishes. ht Itki ? 3. All construction shall be per the Building Inspectors interpretation:' of 'the Mass. State Building Codeq shall meet the requirements of the Mass. Electrical Code for wiring and lighting and shall meet the provisions of the Salem Fire Code for sprinkler protection, as outlined in our conference. g it t 4' #; It has been de ermined that the storage of the +' ; 4' t+' , flammables may be stored within the ag 5i gallon drums of n roved spray booth, but the t smaller -containers shall be kept in an approved storage room. The-"' r ° L P . plan for the si:orage room shall also be approved by the building t`r= inspector. , ° 5, A permit shall be obtained for the storage and use of the flammablesv 5 e, j,; when the work .'is completed. r . 4 6. As stated duri1' Inspector and the issuance r:g our conference this date the presentation t to the Buildin Ins Aof abuildingpermit, o£ plana : 1'Y g pe { �£ shall per-mit tPlis office to �xtend_ th� t' e required for compliance + for thir. ty day;;, �� / cc Electrical De David t. J �cggin� alam_Fire Maxslral !" Building Inspector. R �, �,; h, ,� . � . � j V I Owner, 0(,ckillri.n 1; ()r Violator- Poly S1 j (jt- In,;, Si;. Salem, Ma. Loca.ti on Of 11 i ,I ;I t.1-o n 8 Uoodhijr_ Date of Viol,ttAon_ luH 191 7 8qimer 10: 1'; A. M. A 1tv;1w,ction or ,.in of)- ,rvoil by an Inspector of the !Stlerti the 1.'ojlowlnjc vic L�ritions_of Mass. Genera Laws and/or Fi-cf, Code were found to c x i::; I . A:; followsk 1 . PJojriIJ 1 ,, ,pp.i, i (!1, bion L0 t, or :11 � of I ; nma t; le finishes.t( LroVi(hI j [lover) 1: t1ooj:j1, f, IAimnable finis 3. hes xCV, -3 h.1 e oor. I A I) (1 amm in;1,1,c 4. r(: to j_)r0y i,I- rij)j)rovpd electrical e(lij , 1, e,-Fj,(T c;, (, I on for this ot-C1,I1.)�.iniy fJi,,l11 ili: c I qss T, Div. I. AM oj)erat i wihtla t)(� 1711,- — I contained in I_Liprovc(l re,,, and a )u.,L d n ari, 11 if ror con:-Alri.iction of, t;jj(. hooth room and a orage. Vio' ation r) [' : i 1 1 1 Articli, 16 I P. TYPE OF 1. W;irninf% Nottcr- 1 Colirt. Action Noti.ces 3. V iola t i (it I (I rol-irf-,I in c ;i!;o rmmpci i,,, te I y I x 4. V .LoltJ (in I I, h,- Corr,,c f:,�d within th in ;,i Days of This No,tJ 5. Return Wr i I t,-n Rep, - t of Corroc 1; j,v,-, Action i on he- Taken. Requested,' 6. Gon tac 11 1' u-,- 1,rc-vefl ti-nn Uur,!aki for re- 1 tion. X ::Ubm i tt-d Cor oC(n.iT)ancy, 2L .. Not.I.Cle 1 A r n c o rd of tiii :, vrnlai ion n I it s bcrn p ),ac!e(i jr, t(r., files and may be a bj:; i'!; for 1'1)rt �itir4zic the lci-;il need ,,I1 Stich t'twt,)tijr �i : fiinn J--i I I h, t ,-tk,,.m the ne lww for failure to (:oTtliply , ntly ri, tho lvt! I I ulf,it I,; w I t It 1 n the stipulated ch;t)-it,or lk%ij �(aCtjrjn 30. Method Crl' ,,r�CV L C )fItc : 2 z 0 M Hand Deliv(,-ry 1) 1 . by e d b.v Re gki lar, IV.,i 1 1 t C e r I: i L'I if I I I I-c Pf�r Ordi-Ir ol:1�4 FJ re Nllir�`hiil I' il Cc 3 Ew 11 d tor 1 71 lnsI)ecilor lk I I le E 4 Fociri w-. 4-29-1999 1 :31PM FROM P. 2 •�^� _� POWER BURNERS Date November 23, 1977 Nalne Clayman & Sons C/O H&G Realty Trust Location 28 No. of Tanks i 1; Name of Burner Ames Mkf ass. Approval No. 2986 Gals. Stared 10,000 Kind of Heat G Location of Tank Kind of Oil 4-6 installed b% pol C. of C. # F Inspected by O.C. Sosnowsk pate Approved 11-22-77 A SALEM�T: EM CHAMBER of CONINILRCL 32 Derby Square, Salem, MA 01970-3777 • Telephone: 978.744.0004 • Fax 978.745.3855 Tenants at the 28 Goodhue St. Property Prepared by Ellen DiGeronimo April 26, 1999 Name Space Requirement Anna Vojtech 3000 sq. ft. or Plus 3-4 other artists 500 sq. ft. for each artist 781-631-7390 978-745-0636 (studio) Leslie Rosenberg, 4/&/-5/- 781-592-9325 GileseL �L�C/je �f7SJ 978-745-4629 Gary Cote 978-739-9194 Eleanor Appleyard 600-800 sq. ft. 781-598-0304 Martha Everson Photography 1800 sq. ft. 978-740-0980 12' ceiling height Larry Hanapole 3500 sq. ft. Woodworking Wood Products loading dock 978-744-6830 Bobbie Bush Photography 1600-2000 sq. ft. 97$-744-6918 12'14' ceiling height 978-740-9353 Fax 978-629-7324 Pager V., Tony Constantino 3000 sq. ft. JetFab 978-741-4444 Freddy Encalada 11' ceiling height G Ebano Woodworks -54 978-745-4204 James Davenport 4000 sq. ft. Poly Slides, Inc. Fiber Glass 978-744-8280 (oldest tenant) Arthur Depeitro 15000-20000 sq. ft. On Site (electo static) loading dock 978-74.5-9133 12'-14' ceiling water Marc Zabar 3000-4000 sq. ft. Walnut Printing 978-745-0572 David Taubeneck 2500-3000 sq. ft. Fantastic Finishes Chris Tsioropoulos 800-1200 sq. ft. Wood Turning Business Art Studio for Sun 781-631-6330 Home 508-646-5351 Bus. 508-646-5808 Fax r,��ti� Enures. aSPD sy �• ItIl 747 � 7�_ ;7AI D/ i e Enmr..tol E,gjm enng &S%te Rera diation February 23, 2004 Mr. Thomas St. Pierre Building & Zoning Department City of Salem Salem City Hall 93 Washington.Street Salem, MA 01970 Subject: 28 Goodhue Street, Salem, MA RTN# 3-22996 Dear Mr. Pierre: FSL Associates;Inc. (FSL) has filed an Activity and Use Limitation (AUL) on behalf of the res ponsible'party, Salem Goodhue LLC, 500 Broadway, Everett, MA 02149 for the disposal site located at 28 Goodhue Street, Salem, RTN# 3-22996. The AUL was filed at the Essex Registry of Deeds in book 22203, page 383. A permanent solution has been achieved and a level of No Significant Risk exists at this disposal site. Copies of this report may be reviewed at the Northeast Regional Office of the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection pursuant public involvement requirements set forth at 310 CMR 40.1403. Please contact me at (617) 787-1440 ext. 14 if you require a copy or further information. Sincerely yours, FSL ASSOCIATES, INC. Jeffrey Goldbnrg, CE, Project Engineer 18 Shepard Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02135 (617) 787-1440 Fax: (617) 787-5843 ti SERAFINI, SERAFINI, DARLING & CORRENTI, LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 63 FEDERAL STREET SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS 01970 JOHN R. SERAFINI, SR. TELEPHONE JOHN R. SERAFINI, JR. 978-744-0212 JOHN E. DARLING 781-581-2743 JOSEPH C. CORRENTI TELECOPIER 978-741-4683 April 29, 2004 VIA HAND DELIVERY Denise M. McClure, Assistant City Planner Salem Planning Department 120 Washington Street, 3rd Floor Salem, Massachusetts 01970 Re: 28 Goodhue Street Dear Mrs. McClure: This office represents North River Canal LLC, owner of the property located at 28 Goodhue Street. The owners purchased the property a few months ago and have commissioned both architectural and engineering studies of the buildings to determine their suitability for rehabilitation. Enclosed please find the reports of Aharonian & Associates, Inc. , the architect, and C.A. Pretzer Associates, Inc. , the structural engineer, concerning the buildings on the site. The recommendations of each report are that the existing buildings be demolished due to their extremely poor and sometimes hazardous condition. Based on these reports, the owner has filed for a demolition permit with the Building Inspector' s office, and understands the necessity of going to the Historical Commission for a demolition delay waiver. The purpose of filing the application was to start the clock on the potential six-month delay. The owners and the architect have ideas for the re-use of this property; however, they want to be respectful of the current rezoning process that is ongoing for the neighborhood. Therefore, once you have had the opportunity to review these reports and speak with the committee, would you please contact me so that we may April 29, 2004 Page Two schedule a meeting with everyone involved. The new owners are prepared to make a significant investment and improvements to this site. I look forward to hearing from you. Si Mcerely, J se h C. Correnti JCC:dl Enclosure cc: Thomas M. St. Pierre, Building Inspector North River Canal LLC Aharonian&Associates,Inc.6 Blackstone Valley Place,Suite 110,Lincoln,RI 02865 RE REPORT DATE: 4/14/04 y RM Tom Grafo, PE CAP/otzerAssociates Inc. Mark Humphrys, RA Aharonian & Associates Inc. Aharonian & Associates Inc. (Architect) and C. A. Pretzer Associates (Structural Engineer) conducted an inspection of the main building to assess its Architectural value and present structural condition. The subject parcel of land is approximately 1.6 acres in area and has 2 existing structures on it. The main building is a 4 story structure with a footprint of approximately 32,500 square feet and is currently unoccupied. The secondary building is a 1 story structure that had a footprint of approximately 8,200 square feet until a recent fire reduced that area to approximately 5,000 square p— feet. This building is currently occupied by a nnoa|| automotive repair shop. The following aro our findings from the visual inspection of the main building. The Structural Report is attached to the end ofthis report. 1> Thonoainbui|dinginatypioa| Ua1roofnoiUnty|ontruoturovvithnn " L ^ nhapodounfigvru1ion and a 1 story boiler building appendage located at the internal corner of the "L" . The majority of the building is 4 stories in height but there is also a 2 story and a 1 story section located to the south and a 1 story section located to the northwest. These lower sections appear to have been additions thatvvnronoadetothonnain " L ^ shapodbvi|dingovorthoyoorn. Thenoainbui|dinginvvoodf/anoo construction with metal clapboard siding or transite shingle siding and a punched wood window pattern. The 1 story boiler building is brick construction with large linteled door openings and a few nnoaU arched windows. There is a chimney attached, consisting of a brick base and o 1a|| nnota| stack. The 2 story section is CMU construction with a larger punched ntoo| window pattern that extends from pier to pier. The southern 1 story section is precast concrete construction, also with a larger punched steel window pattern that extends from pier to pier. The 1 story noodon to the northwest is CMU construction, again, with a larger punched steel window pattern that extends from pier tvpier. See Photos 1 - 3, 5 - 8, 11 & l4. 2) While the basic building design and the subsequent additions are fairly typical of period noi|| buildings, they unfortunately have none of the wonderful architectural detailing also typical for those buildings of that period. There are no ornamental cornices, detailed window and door trim, water tables, comerboards or other similar detailing typical of period mill building architecture. The brick ' boiler building does have stone lintels and brick arches a1the door and window openings, however, Page / nf3 Aharonian 8 Associates,Inc. 6 Blackstone Valley Place, Suite 110,Lincoln,RI 02865 the detailing stops there. There is no differentiation in the brick coursing, quoins, corbelling, cornices or other similar brick detailing of the period. See Photos 1 - 3, 5 - 8, 11 & 14. • 3) The lack of any historical architectural significance aside, the overall physical condition of this structure is a major concern. The building is racked in several locations and appears to have significant structural and settlement issues. The exterior envelope of the main building and its additions are dilapidated and beyond repair. The metal siding is severely rusted, the transite shingles are falling off in several locations and the exterior walls are bulging at many locations due to the racking of the building structure. The CMU and precast concrete walls have major structural cracks and the built-up tar and gravel roofs are no longer viable systems. The brickwork is in very poor condition. The mortar joints are severely deteriorated, bricks have been displaced and have fallen out as have the brick arches over the windows. The windows are in poor condition or have failed completely as viable systems. See Photos 1 - 10,12, 13,15 & 16. 4) The interior of the building is in a similar state of disrepair. The structure and walls have sagged and settled. The concrete floor slabs and wood floors have heaved and settled. The wood stairways also have the same problems. Because the building envelope has deteriorated, there is a significant amount of water damage to both the building structure and its interior components. See Photos 17 - 38. 5) The existing heating, plumbing and electrical systems are outdated or have been cannibalized to the extent that they are no longer viable systems. The sprinkler main assembly has a few new components that are probably salvageable, such as the backflow preventors, but the distribution piping and sprinkler heads are old and the pipe sizes and head spacing pattern would not be appropriate for the proposed use. 6) Although a full code review has not been performed, it is readily apparent from this • inspection that the building is also in gross violation of the current State Building, Fire, Life Safety and Handicapped Accessibility Codes. Besides the obvious structural deficiencies which are addressed in the Structural section of this report, violations also include inadequate egress facilities, non-fire rated stairways and egress corridors, no fire separation assemblies between tenants and different use groups, inadequate finish material classifications for fire resistance requirements, inaccessible spaces and building systems (ADA) and generally hazardous conditions, just to list a very few. 7) See the attached Structural Report prepared by C. A. Pretzer Associates Inc. for more specific and detailed observations relative to the structural integrity of this building. Based on the above observations and those contained in the attached Structural Report, we offer the following recommendations: 1) There is no section or element of the existing building that has any Architectural significance to the project or the community at large that would dictate that the entire building or any portion of the building be salvaged for adaptive reuse. 2) Given the overall deteriorated condition of the building's envelope, structural systems, mechanical and electrical systems, the extensive Code violations and the concern over building settlement issues, salvaging the building or any portion of the building for adaptive reuse would not be feasible nor practicable, either physically or financially. 3) Since it appears there are significant building settlement issues that need to be addressed, a Geotechnical investigation should be performed to determine the viability of the soils relative to • Report on the Architecture and Physical Condition of the Existing Building Page 2 of 3 Aharonian 8 Associates,Inc. 6 Blackstone Valley Place,Suite 110,Lincoln,RI 02865 bearing capacity, water table elevation and similar related issues to ensure that that proposed project could be properly constructed on this site. . 4) Therefore, we recommend that the entire existing building be demolished down to the existing foundation level and the proposed Mixed Use Development be built on top of the existing foundation footprint, assuming that the foundations and soil characteristics are suitable to accommodate this scope of work. LR£PORT By;s 17"Mark Humphrys ° Pro)ect?Architectq • Report on the Architecture and Physical Condition of the Existing Building Page 3 of 3 R ASO C. A. PRETZER ASSOCIATES, INC. 50 Freeway Drive,Cranston, RI 02920 a 4n STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS C.ANDREW PRETZER, PHD., P.E. MICHAEL J.GRAFE, P.E. DESIGN,CONSULTATION, INVESTIGATION THOMAS P.GRAFE, P.E. (401)785-2690 FAX(401)461-9360 DAVID GRANDPRE, P.E. email: mall@capretzeLCom PETER W.GRAFE North River Canal Mill Building Salem, MA CAPA File No. 204402.20 Structural Report/April 13, 2004 On March 24, 2004, Mr. Mark Humphrys from Aharonian & Associates, Inc., Architects, and I visited the referenced site. The purpose of our visit was to determine the condition of the building structure. This report will summarize our findings, as well as comment on the suitability of the building for reuse. Attachment 1 contains photos I took during our visit. GENERAL BUILDING DESCRIPTION The main part of the building is a four-story, wood-framed, "L"-shaped structure. The longer leg of the "L" rums east to west between the street on the west and the canal on the east. The shorter leg runs north, roughly parallel to the street. The columns and floor beams are'constructed with heavy timber and the floors with tongue and groove wood plank. The walls are constructed with wood studs and wood sheathing and are generally sided with shingles and strip windows. See photos 1 through 16 for views of the entire building exterior. .. To the south of the longer leg of the main building is a two-story, steel-framed structure with masonry exterior walls and wood floor joists spanning between steel beams and columns. At the southwest corner of the main building is a one-story, cast-in-place concrete structure. There is another one-story structure with masonry exterior walls that runs along the east side of the shorter leg of the main building. Finally, there is a one-story brick structure with a wood- framed roof that extends out from the north side of the longer leg of the main building. BUILDING CONDITION Main Four-Story Structure The condition of the structure of the main four-story, "L"-shaped section of the building is poor. This is mainly because of problems related to settlement of the underlying soil. The first floor slab has cracked and settled throughout the building, in some places in excess of 1 foot, (see photo 17). Sections of the exterior foundation walls have cracked and settled to a lesser degree, (see photo 4). As a result, the upper floors are uneven and tilted. There are locations, especially on the upper floors, where water infiltration has caused deterioration of some of the structural wood members, (see photos 18 and 19). The entire shorter leg of the main building is racked as much as 1 foot out of plumb at the north end, again, due to differential settlement of the foundation from one side of the building to the other. The interior main columns are tilted, and the joints between the main framing members have opened up to accommodate the racking, (see photos 21, 22, and 23). The upper floors of the shorter leg are severely out of level, (see photos 24 and 25). Water infiltration has caused a roof beam and section of roof and fourth floor planking to,rot and sag, (see photos 26 and 27). C. A. PRETZER ASSOCIATES, INC. North River Canal Mill Building April 13, 2004 Page 2 The first floor of the shorter leg of the main building was covered with steel plates in some areas in an attempt to level the concrete floor. Water from the sprinkler main in the same location has caused the base of some of the wood columns to rot, (see photo 28). Two-Story Steel-Framed Structure The condition of the structure of the two-story section of the building is poor. The first floor slab is cracked and pitched due to settlement of the underlying soil of nearly 2 feet. A section of the first floor slab was cut away to reveal another slab 14 inches below. The lower slab had been filled over to accommodate settlement, and the newer slab continues to settle, (see photo 29). The tops of the main center steel columns have been shimmed about 10 inches. Even so, they have settled an additional foot, causing the second floor and roof structure to be severely out of level, (see photos 30, 31, and 32). Rusting reinforcing steel has caused all of the exterior concrete lintels to crack, and in some cases, fail, (see photo 9). There are numerous cracks in the masonry blocks, especially near the roof line, (see photo 33). - One-Story Concrete Structure The structure of the one-story, cast-in-place concrete section of the building is in poor condition. There are numerous exposed and rusted reinforcing bars on the exterior where concrete has spalled off, (see photos 11, 12, and 13). Settlement and cracking of the floor make it difficult to walk in the building without tripping. The roof structure along the west side has slid an inch or so to the east and is hardly bearing on the west wall, (see photo 34). One-Story Masonry Structure The exterior walls of the one-story section of the building along the east side of the short leg of the main section have numerous open cracks, (see photo 36). The roof has sagged. I expect the roof was not designed to support snowdrift from the adjacent four-story main building section. One-Story Brick Structure The one-story brick structure is in very poor condition. Mortar joints have deteriorated to the point that bricks have started to fall to the ground, (see photos 15 and 16). The wood roof framing members are severely rotted. The center of the roof has been shored up with steel posts and a beam to prevent it from collapsing, (see photos 37 and 38). C. A. PRETZER ASSOCIATES, INC. North River Canal Mill Building April 13, 2004 Page 3 SUMMARY All sections of the building structure have been significantly affected by settlement of the underlying soil, and to a lesser degree by wear and tear and water infiltration. Even the best portions of the building are out of plumb and in poor condition. It is my professional opinion that none of the building structure is suitable for rehabilitation and reuse. It would be my recommendation to remove the building super-structure in its entirety. Reuse of the existing foundation or even a new foundation should be considered only after a geotechnical investigation of the underlying soil is performed. C. A. PRETZER ASSOCIATES, INC. Thomas P. Grafe, P. Vice President Enc.(1): Attachment 1 —Photos taken March 24, 2004, by TPG i j C. A. PRETZER ASSOCIATES, INC. North River Canal j Mill Building April 13,.2004 Attachment 1 —Photos taken March 24, 2004,by TPG i s i 1 � _ i i\ E q gIZa31�p� AhV mg X _ - - North River Canal Mill Building Salem, MA • F ,�. CAPA 204402.20 Photo P Open foundation crack at southeast corner of building ! shown in photo 3. Y 9 l +b b Y Photo 5 East elevation of the shorter - ® t— : ® _ .� s® . ^� -- -fi leg of the main building section. InIl it _ 1 North Building i Salem, 1 y � ITT NMIi Tr I .R r� k � i ate, .y -- _. _• ups w , 4 3 3 \ \ Building Salem, MA CAPA• 204402.20 i l Ye� � y', ,�i E l'it — • - f ��e e r .•�� X11 �- ' `d ��I +r w � yeti • • 1 ,y ft �3 TO Yi1 _ 4 •_ _ i Y I 1 _ -• I 4 p North River Canal Mill Building 5_v ,. �. Salem, MA • z - , „ G h t CAPA 204402.20 F3 ,' � q = Photo 12 Cracked and spalled concrete _ * "y on exterior of building r section shown in photo 11. , T . ' t ° ` v Photo 13 • � b� A r 4r% � , ;' {r Open crack and bowed wall A .K of building section shown in photo 11. r E s. M Y 1 r Photo 14 - One-story brick building. t w: North River Canal t!•". Mill Building l Salem, MA CAPA 204402.20 Photo 15 Cracks and missing bricks on exterior of one-story brick building. �?r 7i_ � r^y_i A � •�- � - Photo 16 t r., Cracks and missing bricks on exterior arch of one-story brick building. d r� X Photo 17 ' Cracked and severely settled concrete slab on first floor in main section of the building. `r', North River Canal Mill Building Salem, MA CAPA 204402.20 S 1 lb )ajOrr • "1 ••• • 1 ! +r dam, . a � ,� r -1, �• �• .d � l .r .fig, cI i I it r tk l�tir I ' • -• •• • • �- •• • I, •J,.c , u r i ^ .F North River Canal Mill Building Salem, MA _ CAPA 204402.20 41 Photo 20 Tilted first floor column in T shorter leg of main building section, due to racking of the building. 6 idYr`. f ' iPhoto 21 Separation of beam hanger due to racking of shorter leg of main building section. N ,�I North River Canal Mill Building Salem, MA • "� CAPA 204402.20 Photo 22 Separation of joints in the wood framing due to rack- ing of shorter leg of main �^ building section. e i Photo 23 } f Racking of shorter leg of h �',.. n - ' main building section has nearly pulled the floor beam s V -"r off the supporting column. q 11 A.Y it t J North River Canal Mill Building Salem, MA CAPA 204402.20 Photo 24 •G h Sagging second floor in shorter leg of main building section. low p G Y a - Photo 25 Sagging second floor in shorter leg of main building I ! section. I � i' North River Canal Mill Building Salem, MA CAPA 204402.20 Photo 26 Rotted section of roof beam and plank in shorter leg of main building section. t s.: a ` Ph to 27 Close-up view of rotted roof beam and plank shown in r. a s photo 26. •ky'N:- ` North River Canal > µ , Mill Building Salem MA • { CAPA 204402.20 :] Photo 2 Base of first floor column rotted by water from sprinkler main in shorter leg of main building section. _t Photo 2 y �s Settled slab-on-grade in the j•`" 3, $ two-story building section. o Note original slab had settled ' before it was covered with R 9 _ b . . crushed stone and a second n slab placed. J Photo 30 '. 9 inches of shims on top of - the first floor column in the -,.AV=_�� two-story building section. North River Canal Mill Building Salem, MA • CAPA 204402.20 Photo 31 6 Sagging roof steel in two- story building section, where the center columns have I , settled. r r f" { Photo 32 Steel connections have pulled apart at center columns shown in photo 31. i i North River Canal Mill Building Salem, MA • CAPA 204402.20 Photo 33 Large open cracks in the wall of the two-story building. � ryry r ti l r i j a e d- Photo 34 Roof slab has nearly pulled ' s off the support column in the one-story concrete section of r ' �•,, � the building. fd ,1 North River Canal Mill Building Salem, MA • CAPA 204402.20 Photo 35 Severely settled slab in the one-story concrete section of the building. y" Y4 4' rjy] Photo 36 {� T X11 Cracks in the exterior masonry walls of the one- story building section on the east side of the smaller leg of g 7 the main building section. to i :a 5'. North River Mill Building Salem, MA t • ' 1 Severely / -1 wood roof framing in the one-story �� K•� .4 - C(/� 1_ .. brickbuilding 1 � 4 h 1� Photo 38 111 roof one-story brickbuilding section, 1 1 Ia steel beam andcolumns. i r i A 1 i} Yi c R7" Group, Ince Engineered 6om the Ground Up"' February 1, 2005 Mr. Anthony Roberto North River Canal, LLC 282 Bennington Street East Boston, MA 02128 RE: Phase II Geotechnical Engineering Services 28 Goodhue Street Building, Salem, MA FEC/RTG Project Nos. 04011.00/04114.01 Dear Anthony: In accordance with our Engineering Services Proposal dated November 30, 2004, we have evaluated the existing building foundation system at 28 Goodhue Street. Our Phase II work included three (3) days of test pit excavations to determine if the existing foundation system is pile supported. We also completed analyses to determine whether or not it will be possible to utilize the existing foundation and/or "underpin" it to D support the proposed building loads. Further, we evaluated a new pile foundation system to support the proposed building loads. Budget-Level construction cost estimates have been prepared for each alternative investigated. Based on the test pits completed, we have determined that the interior columns and perimeter walls of the subject building are supported on timber piles, and that these piles range from about 10'-0" to 16'-8" in length. Although the piles are in good condition and no decay or rot was observed, they are considerer too short to support g the proposed building based on estimated building loads and the subsurface conditions encountered. A SD S CL Summarized below is a discussion of the Phase II Investigation results, alternatives and estimated construction costs to support the existing/proposed building, and conclusions and recommendations. N <0 Phase II Investigation Results A A Four (4) Phase II test pits (TP-1 through TP-4) were completed between December 13 p and 14, 2004 (Figure 1). One (1) additional test pit (TP-5) was completed on December 22, 2004 (Figure 1). The test pits were completed using a track mounted excavator by g Fred and Barney Demolition of Danvers, MA. When timber piles were encountered, a nylon sling was attached to the butt of a selected pile and the pile was extracted using g the excavator by pulling it out of the ground. The pile diameter and length were w measured following extraction. N N A summary of the conditions encountered during test pit excavation is presented in Table 1. A total of three (3) interior and two (2) exterior test pits were completed across the site (Figure 1). It is assumed that the conditions encountered at these locations are representative of the conditions that will be encountered beneath the as 0 3 _tet Geotechnical Waterfront Structural Civil Geo-Environmental E/ 6' Mr. Anthony Roberto 2 February 1, 2005 proposed building, and schematic figures highlighting the conditions encountered are presented in Figures 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively. Because a crawl space was encountered during excavation at Test Pit No. 3 no additional exploratory work was completed at this location, and it was not possible to prepare a schematic figure of the conditions encountered at this location. Photographs at Test Pit No. 3, as well as the conditions encountered at the other test pit locations, are provided in Appendix A. Table 1 Test Pit Summary 28 Goodhue Street Building, Salem, MA Test Pit No. Timber Pile Butt Timber Pile Tip Timber Pile Diameter (in) Diameter (in) Length (ft) Comments Interior Column 1 8.5 to 10.0 6.0 12.0 Location, 4 timber piles per Column Exterior 2 8.5 to 10.0 7.5 10.0 Column/Wall, 2 timber piles per Column Exterior Column/Wall, 3 Not Ascertained Not Ascertained Not Ascertained Crawl Space Discovered, Stop Work Groundwater Infiltrated into 4 Not Ascertained Not Ascertained Not Ascertained Test Pit, But Timber Piles Observed Interior Column 5 8.5 to 10.0 6.0 16.67 Location, 4 timber piles per Column Pile Capacity Analyses Static pile capacity analyses were completed to estimate the individual and group capacity of the timber piles at each of the above test pit locations. Based on the preliminary analyses completed (Appendix B), the ultimate capacity of the timber piles at the interior column locations (e.g., TP-1 and TP-5) is estimated to range from about 7 to 8 tons per pile. The ultimate capacity of the timber piles at the exterior column locations (e.g., TP-2 and TP-4) is estimated to be about 6 tons per pile. ME Mr. Anthony Roberto 3 February 1, 2005 There are a total of four (4) piles at each interior column location and up to two (2) piles spaced about 8 feet on center along the exterior of the existing building. The ultimate group capacity at the interior column locations is estimated to range from about 28 to 32 tons, and the ultimate group capacity at the exterior column locations is estimated to be about 12 tons. Based on the framing plans provided, and what are considered to be reasonable dead and live loads (Table 2), the total estimated load at the interior column locations is about 79 tons, and the total estimated load at the exterior column locations is about 25 tons. Based on this, the estimated Factor of Safety (FOS) of the interior column pile groups is about 0.40. The estimated FOS of the exterior piles is about 0.60. The minimum recommended FOS for pile design is 2.0, and the existing foundation system is not adequate to support the proposed building loads. Table 2 Assumed Dead and Live Loads Acting on Proposed Building 28 Goodhue Street Building, Salem, MA Location Estimated Dead Load (PSF) Estimated Live Load (PSF) 1- Floor 80 100 2nd Floor 20-25 50 3' Floor 20 25 50 4 Floor 20-25__50 Roof 20-25 30 Down-drag effects were also considered due to the consolidation/settlement of the underlying peat layer (Figures 2 through 5) and the subsequent settlement of the fill Layer above it. This settlement has and will continue to occur due to long-term secondary compression of the peat. Down-drag effects will increase the total load on each pile and reduce its effective capacity. Based on the preliminary analyses completed, the FOS of the interior column pile groups is estimated to be about 0.20 to 0.30. The estimated FOS for the exterior column piles is about 0.30. The minimum FOS with respect to down-drag for design is 1.0 and the existing foundation system is not adequate to support the proposed building loads. ' Dead and Live Loads provided by C.A. Pretzer Associates and assume first floor commercial loading and residential loading above. Z The estimated Dead Load (DL) does not include the weight from a possible concrete overlay on the 2nd 3rd and 4th floors, which may be required to level the floors. If this is required, it will increase the DL, which will further reduce the factor of safety (FOS) on the piles. ME Mr. Anthony Roberto 4 February 1, 2005 Remedial Alternatives The preliminary analyses completed indicate that additional vertical capacity must be provided at the interior column locations to provide a minimum FOS of 2.0 with respect to pile capacity (and a minimum FOS of 1.0 with respect to down-drag). This is also true at the exterior column locations. If the existing foundation system is to be used to support the proposed building, this will require that the interior and exterior columns be underpinned using some type of deep foundation system. Screening of Alternatives A summary of alternatives that were considered to underpin the existing building are presented in Table 3. Of the four (4) alternatives considered, two (2) alternatives were carried forward for a detailed evaluation. These alternatives included (1) Resistance Piers and (2) Drilled Mini-Piles. Table 3 Screening of Alternatives 28 Goodhue Street Building, Salem, MA Remedial Alternative Installation Comments Equipment/Method Low-Clearance Auger Rig, Not Considered Suitable for Auger Cast Concrete Pile Concrete Placed as Augers Site Soils, Vibrations During Withdrawn Installation a Concern Fork-Lift Mounted Impact Multiple Butt Welds Driven H-Pile Hammer, Short Sections of Required (time and H-Pile Driven and Butt money), Vibrations During Welded Together Driving a Concern Commonly Used to Resistance Pier Hydraulically Installed Pipe Underpin Damaged Pile Buildings, Little to No Vibration Low-Clearance Drill Rig, Commonly Used to Drilled Mini Pile Short Sections of Pipe Pile Screwed Together and Filled Underpin Damaged with Concrete Buildings, Minimal Vibration Each of these alternatives is discussed in more detail below. Resistance Piers Resistance Piers are small diameter steel pipe piles (about 4 inches in diameter) that are "pushed" to the desired bearing depth using hydraulic equipment. A steel support bracket is bolted to the exterior of the building (in this case the interior and/or exterior pile caps) and short sections of pipe pile are inserted at the bracket and hydraulically pushed into the underlying soil. Once the first section of pile has been installed, ME Mr. Anthony Roberto 5 February 1, 2005 another section of pile is attached (by screwing the sections together), and the process is repeated until the desired resistance is attained. To adequately support the proposed building, it is estimated that a total of ten (10) Resistance Piers would need to be installed at each interior column location. A total of four (4) Resistance Pier would need to be installed at each exterior column location. Assuming that about fourteen (14) interior columns would remain, a total of 140 Resistance Piers would be needed to underpin the interior columns. Assuming that about 222 linear feet of building would remain, a total of 264 Resistance Piers would be needed to underpin the exterior of the building (includes the sides and ends of the building). Prior to installing the Resistance Piers, the structural floor slab of the building would be saw-cut into pieces and removed. The asphalt pavement and concrete floor slab on the exterior of the building would also be saw-cut and removed. After the floor slabs/pavement had been removed, a trench would be excavated around the interior columns and around the exterior of the building. The trench would need to be about 4 feet wide and 4 feet deep to provide adequate clearance for installing the Resistance Piers. After the trenches were excavated, steel brackets would be attached to the interior and exterior columns, and the Resistance Piers would be hydraulically installed. Upon completion, the excavated trenches would be backfilled with onsite excavated material and a new structural floor slab poured (new reinforcing steel would need to be drilled and grouted into position at the interior and exterior pile cap locations). Based on the preliminary analyses completed, the Resistance Piers would be about 70- feet-long and would terminate in the Silty/Sand stratum located below the Fill and Peat layers. The final length would be determined during final design, and additional and deeper soil borings could be required to finalize the Resistance Pier lengths. One caveat associated with this system is the potential to encounter obstructions in the Fill layer above the Peat. Obstructions could result in significant cost and schedule impacts. Drilled Mini-Piles The drilled Mini-Piles would be similar to the Resistance Piers, except that they would be drilled into position. The Mini-Piles would consist of small diameter steel pipe piles (about 8 inches in diameter) that would be advanced in short sections (that are screwed together) using a low-clearance drill rig. Reinforcing steel would be inserted into the upper portion of the installed pipe after drilling to the desired bearing depth, and the open pipe pile filled with concrete. The reinforcing steel at the top of the drilled Mini- Pile would be connected to the columns and the entire upper assembly cast into the structural floor slab. To adequately support the proposed building, it is estimated that a total of six (6) Drilled Mini-Piles would need to be installed at each interior column location. A total of two (2) drilled Mini-Pile would need to be installed at each exterior column location. Mr. Anthony Roberto 6 February 1, 2005 (Rev 01, 02/21/2005) Assuming that about fourteen (14) interior columns would remain, a total of 84 drilled Mini-Piles would be needed to underpin the interior columns. Assuming that about 222 linear feet of building would remain, a total of 132 drilled Mini-Piles would be needed to underpin the exterior of the building (includes the sides and ends of the building). The drilled Mini-Piles would be about 35- to 45-feet-long and would terminate in the Silty/Sand stratum located below the Fill and Peat layers. The final length would be determined during final design, and additional and deeper soil borings could be required to finalize the Resistance Pier lengths. The Mini-Pile system would not be significantly affected by obstructions in the fill layer above the Peat. Estimated Construction Costs The estimated quantities and unit cost breakdowns for the Resistance Pier and Drilled Mini-Pile Alternatives are provided in Appendix C (Tables C-1 and C-2). For comparison, a quantity and unit cost breakdown was also prepared to install a completely new pile foundation system to support the proposed building, assuming that the existing building and its foundation were demolished and removed (Table C-3). It was assumed that this new foundation system would be supported by 30- to 45-foot-long 12-inch diameter CCA treated timber piles (lengths to be verified during Final Design). A summary of estimated construction costs is presented in Table 4. Table 4 Estimated Construction Costs 28 Goodhue Street Building, Salem, MA Alternative Estimated Construction Cost Underpin Existing Foundation w/ $1,900,000.00 Resistance Piers Underpin Existing Foundation w/ Drilled $1,460,000.00 Mini-Piles Completely New Pile Supported $740,000.00 Foundation System Conclusions and Recommendations Based on the completed analysis, the cost to provide the needed support to the existing piles to carry the proposed building is not reasonable. Supporting and underpinning the existing foundation will cost approximately $700,000.00 to $1,200,000.00 more than building a new foundation, depending upon which remedial alternative is selected. This does not include the remedial costs associated with repairing the existing superstructure. We believe that these latter costs could be significant and should be factored into a cost comparison of repairing the existing superstructure compared to new construction. 3 The estimated Construction Costs do not include design, permitting, or services during construction. NE Mr. Anthony Roberto 7 February 1, 2005 We trust that this evaluation is suitable for your needs at this time and we await direction for final design of the selected alternative. In the meantime, please call us if you have any questions or require additional assistance. Sincerely, RT Group, Inc. Fairbanks Engineering Corporation H OF R SSE SE a- o LC v IVIS m No .43 5� ��9F EB James B. Russell, P.E. Robert Fairbanks, P.E. Principal / Senior Project Manager President R:\Projects\04114.01 - Phase II Services\CORRES\Phase II Report.doc FIGURES NOTE: DRAWING SCANNED FROM A PLAN — PROVIDED TO FAIRBANKS ENGINEERING BY AHARONIAN ASSOCIATES, INC. — SECTION OF BU�LDING DEMOLISHED }C TP-S + 1 ti 73' . Z -41 1. .Y M III ®y " -9 �W 10 P G'CA, X63, P 4 a . • ryU V YY 9Il J B ; 'OLD PoWER� F � CRY rt-t-�`��"�1� TP-2,t ONEST ..AD ' �w4 ro Iv (DEMOLISHED DITION o s J� �',Foue STORY (DEMoLI DBUILDINGXTP 1 SHE Uv pp J YN%V -�+�r// ✓iF'..'c'/ :ln:� Tf.^"LN f>fM1 T';ts: ssr�.se-: v O Q Q f;" U G LEGEND SCALE: 1"=60' B-4 SOIL BORING (BY NH BORING FOR FEC, JUNE 28-30, 2004) TP-4 TEST PIT (BY FRED AND BARNEY DEMOLITION FOR FEC, DECEMBER 2004) EXISTING BUILDING RT Group, Inc. 28 GOODHUE STREET FIGURE t SHEET 1 of 1 CV�'i1�i/^y "v7�„�Un DATE: 197 SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS BORING AND TEST PIT m° OM1a NORTH RIVER CANAL,LLC DEC 2004 w1.Ma14� Fw1,Ws27s LOCATION PLAN PROJ No. EAST BOSTON,MASSACHUSETTS 04114.01 FILENMIE: 04114.00/DWGS/TEST PIT PIAN.DWG INTERIOR B-3 TIMBER GROUND SURFACE COLUMN (EL. 0, ASSUMED FLOOR DATUM) SLAB 0 39' 67 RAI" 12' T-O" z 13 �19 4�r�( 0 F1 W LLI F! 0 LU LL- 3:: — -10 0 LLI JI _j U LLJ co 2 LLI PEAT 13 PILE. -20 — 13 :SILtlSAW-)-' "N" VALUES INTERIOR COLUMN CONFIGURATION AT TEST PIT NO. 1 N.T.S. RT Group, Inc 28 GOODHUE STREET SHE 1 of 1 �g��Up DATE 197 U.��M��- SALEM, MASSACHUSMS FIGURE 2 DEC-04 E�Pt�,��M ON14 T�]4A 31M F�l 4M SM NORTH RIVER CANAL,LLC PROJ No. EAST BOSTON,MASSACHUSETTS 041112L..j FILENAME: 04114.00/DWGS/SALEM FOUNDATION PROFILES.DWG EXTERIOR BUILDING WALL B-3 GROUND SURFACE (EL. 0, ASSUMED FLOOR SLAB DATU;) 0 )7e 28 5 U4J4 "'4 67 27, z �j :T�13 W LLI 0 LL1 . . . . . . U- 0 LU _j U 2 LLJ 2 LLI P EAT TIMBER PILt 113 % -20 - - j �ILt/SAND v VALUES PERIMETER WALL CONFIGURATION AT TEST PIT NO. 2 N.T.S. NED RT Group, Inc. 28 GOODHUE STREET SHEET 1 of 1 Elq.��Gl�U, DATE 197 T�A�S�M2 SALEM, MASSACHUSE7rS FIGURE 3 DEC-04 Ea�Pld��M14 NORTH RIVER CANAL, LLC T�]4M 31M F 401 4M 521 EAST BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS PROJ No. 04114.01 FILENAME: 04114.GO/DWGS/SALEM FOUNDATION PROFILES.DWG EXTERIOR BUILDING WALL � B-2 GROUND SURFACE I FLOOR (EL. 0, ASSUMED SLAB DATUM) 70 � r7� � lyr Pr, r r j � 5=-5-{s r r'r, F1LC3 . . Y A 16 W Y [W� W 1 -Y -L W y W i•`.��,�•,r�..,.'•Y��. L Y W W -L W IV YARIEJ_ W W � W W W �R-lr:• ••- ••r � J� y �W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W Z W -Y '17 W W W W W W y J' W L O iV 1 3 LL- O LU W y W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W WOH: W W W W wM Q W W W W W J' 3' W W J' -Y 1 W W W LL' Co 1 W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W I— Ln y W W W W W W W W W N W N W y W a PEAT 1 W y W W y W W W W W W W W LU � 114 .. TIMBER PILE; 17i : SEE NOTE 1 -20 �. 20 . . SILT/SAND. I . ' _N" VALUES NOTES: 1' TIMBER PILE NOT EXTRACTED AT THIS LOCATION, PILE LENGTH UNKNOWN PERIMETER WALL CONFIGURATION AT TEST PIT NO. 4 N.T.S. RT Group, 28 GOODHUE STREET SHEET 1 of 1 Engineerd ehour the Ground Up 1W Taunton Avenue,Suite 203 SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS DATE East Providence,Rhode Island 02914 FIGURE 4 DEC-04 T 401438310 F 4014395275 NORTH RIVER CANAL, LLC PROJ No. cAxe<nenot m:rcm nl mm 1 c'r uoEo.trwrra.ercl EAST BOSTON,MASSACHUSETTS 04114.01 FILENAME: 04114.GO/DWGS/SALEM FOUNDATION PROFILES.DWG INTERIOR B-1 TIMBER GROUND SURFACE COLUMN (EL. 0, ASSUMED FLOOR DAOM)7 SLAB r -/ FILL 39 6 12" 2 z C) W LLI LLI -10 - 6 0 Uj Lu Co LL- 1-- In W W W 5 CL PEAT LLI -20 -1 SAND VALUES PILE INTERIOR COLUMN CONFIGURATION AT TEST PIT NO. 5 N.T.S. 13E� RT Group, Inc 28 GOODHUE STREET SHE I of 1 cow E�i��Ihe�Up DATE 197�Awe.m Suft 202 SALEM, MASSACHUSETTS DrFIGURE 5 DEC-04 A Novodem�Rhode ISWW M14 NORTH RIVER CANAL, LLC PROJ No. T MI 438 31M F 401 439528 EAST BOSTON,MASSACHUSETTS 04114.01 FILENAME: D4114.0D/DWG5/5ALEIvI FOUNDATION PROFILES.DWG APPENDIX A PHOTOGRAPHS Wt •ii' i .t 1 Y' i, lY V d s�, �n Photo No. 1: Pile Cap Extracted at Test Pit No. 1 (Interior Column). i : r } y ,f 4 a Photo No. 2: Pile Cap Extracted at Test Pit No. 1, Note four (4) Timber Pile Locations (Interior Column). IS �s (} t -x t a� `�.• h• e. n . f 7t rov.F R F "^e LF., ti `a>za �kkpys'z�,< .9"' ✓ '�"'�4Y�'ray}'"in a�pA'"`#�^L J 1 •�•• i� i k�9� � p,, Photo No. 5: Timber Pile Being Extracted at Test Pit No. 2 (Perimeter Footing). N'T9 ) mO Y-41- Ann 77 � t r ' `'p y.. e . 4b Q _ 7 R. 9 i♦ ® .L ..a i • Photo No. 6: Timber Pile (Tip End) Extracted at Test Pit No. 2 (Perimeter Footing) ZF+3 �g kyr s i 4 a , 4 tr1:: Photo No. 7: Crawl Space below Interior Floor Slab at Test Pit No. 3 (unable to confirm timber pile locations). ,F Photo No. 8: Timber Pile at Test Pit No. 4 (Perimeter Footing) t { t y A f fffi AAM�iww+" y. w d Photo No.9: Pile Pulled from Test Pit No. 5 APPENDIX B SUPPORTING CALCULATIONS EXISTING TIMBER PILE CAPACITY R Group, /�/ .. IncQQ T PAGE AI 4'a Engineered Y \ _ VI o�./p, nPROJECT 2-8 6>OUfl HUL' S 1, PROJECT NO. CD 4 II 4'a Engineered From the Ground Up SUBJECT TIT-t F,�t,K„ 'pI�E CA-DACE COMPUTATIONS BY- DATE 1-7- US CNECN BY ' • DATE I�Zv-off cs-nlE-ice`, R.E Cl rr of _,_ vitiaF I t _ - F=E C6n F 16v1L/aTTaV S.: 8y �T-V/ G. o _T1WIZI S ASS F l,_ + L :. .. J_ TL_IN 67-fl 8 I . I I * 1-I � 0 77 -.. 3r't.t_ T�F(.�I -- qf Ls- I✓ GOup C uJ nET� T,_ i J�. i T I - i—f- 4 r . II 041'7.RC1�7yi i 5.-..4 Cu $1Av9T1 9;�J 1] m Z i n/ n/( ,C� LO r� S �.v 715 7WE .S�rrc c L rr. aJC '7NE OVA-cLV.f(�" �icL, IH•4 S_. . ANO �_w�c.c. Gaul NV-E _. MSEC'%�j .�/ 0c' P.CES7i�"C1 i - _ 1T i n _fiS�vwTyt7J S ' a RSSvP-tc`' , A� AVecl�T6l� ��A Ou��c_ F"u��. L GTf" 9 '- ® LISSv B.t ;Ori - _ — mA SS VtA.t )-Q LW _ sw41 93 I A _ I c_o .1J60 L r TJA:'Z� !`72x.1.✓ C ID $ ,—. . . . _ - �..� ,.�_...__ IncPAGE OF RTGroup, nPROJECT -za 60WJyjE !S-r PROJECT NO. 04 it 4'o ' Engineered From the Ground Up SUBJECTQIP'-N 9Z t�,C -01I-e+p OATACA7Y COMPUTATIONS BY y�p� - DATE (�� CHECK BY � �`�• DATE / zo`Ur i I COF.Ic , .,_ /s77ti G 77w 'fi1 _€ : -HA1E A'`1 -- - LI I_ ::ULTru^%1',�' jeFJI�LJc r`!l of 17U 1 �°3 T Cc _ } ,x LJ T .L -- 1 - : — - r 1-I 1 -a I L J I I IT 771,451 F os f J)W vF o i v*t �J-l�rr t I I 4 `,a !00 R�!6 E, , ' 's19 0 r '7�f� -r n/ROFi31 AiE I^ -. -0 /sfE _. AIC- U <; ,CAFE1 ! AtE L. he 3 T I 1^fM./O `nrLu73�s 't3v2o��.r •-w� c.c. nr !- _ Ti 70 '3. V Q.�C �!N IFJ 16 f ; -: I + i .__Fdj4/n/Q1!_-r�7 i i � i I r/''� q a / .� PA G E 3 O F.I� RTGroup, Incl PROJECT Z 8 6a3DNVES D1. PROJECT N0. O41I 4, O Engineered From the Ground Up SUBJECT -T 1" '14%I-tel� CAPAC i r '— ' COMPUTATIONS BY TDATE [-7- b J CHECK BY ��` DATE v I .EST/wut�€_.•".,Vn/I T t '7" /w� ✓`�O i lv''7' 2ES+'f�i1q.J G'. A SSvI.0 ?W-E S 'i^/ ich�[L_ ._.,_ -__. I * i EY.1 -t _- a1 I I 1 1_. + ice- _ AL 0 I _ II - i _ J I SUT/SA1� I l.6 _. 13o?CC)a ¢rCl3.o 16 Z,4P�a �� "f'Lwi'7°) 'Z4ZPse , I! Tdp o F 5� = C, � �C ( 4i3at')+ 4�(i3o —�✓oz.4a"^ 11 i3oPCF)+ 4 �( 13a.- 62..4-'Pct) t G f90 - 6''2.4p� F)K�°' /l) ° �� - i c .. !e 5 �s� I 3orro•�t a�1 ''usT' � -.�J RT p' Inc PAGE X44 0F� RGroup, PR OI ECT z � G�O��C�� ST. PROJECT NO. <D Q Engineered From the Ground Up SUBJECT TI wtgF_C•. 'Ar C C: Cf/9fJC r7y COMPUTATIONS BY ;tag- BATE CHECK BY •""-' DATE C�1GC U(�II6VS GoV 1 I � . 111 , I //?0-6 4) +_-6 l9 -62 4pa - a (/20 6Z i j) x /4a - - 25 s � • I r- / I I �g /= -------- 4Z Til « ; N-_r r t L.I 71 r � I , N 112 __ L, T10 l I r i I i T 0.20 v'r p .g RT Group, ® IncPAGE dV O F R/ Group, nPROJECT 28 Gann rw� S'f' PROJECT NO. 6 ` I4-0 Engineered From the Ground Up SUBJECT ?I avF P�C'L 'P)(—S CFPAc.-13TV COMPUTATIONS BY P �' DATE CHECK BY ^ DATE CU CA L L./k C59 f , 4 I ' L� CaE 1 i I I I `3A_sw o�J = r*�' IS +mo o r __ I - _, - L -- L+..-- { L�. �_ L L l i L {- L I-- TI r r_I if 7t C / s A c H Ir ns� uL n n - Cst n fc+vy` 7-1 I t-I T.-Ir/a-;�7 'ev.Cq+�/_ _ I 1111 -L- L .- -00-N4 pl l� 77r� II ' c-TV.rt L.i ' `Lo ArD, ✓t?' r '7 �uT-. I 33o I t IL , L' _f 6 L_ 1 1 /l ,/k ALfLT'O!— O iTvCAK �i P<htil ( o2 : I 1 r I PT 'I � J02r JCv�� AT w�aJS vz OLJ lam/ �EC � S gJ �iJ cK - ... _.. JET i pv � y, ��'� '� I w� L TEST I , S1 f oo/LI : 6o,v_s> 1x 3go S� :; ZC'�II400 - 'svcnl t6a.' I .- .aIS_AY(' SyeI�F _ ®t 'S O �R �IS 1 +sF-1 E3/ I12oo_PI I - ,f"' LJ 1 1 C_ I ; y I - Z Z 39 + oS,xTS ) IZ u Iso Pct'- ��90� 2 X _ - - � Table 1 r7 Static Capacity Summary 28 Goodhue Street Building Prepared b RT Group, Inc.,Janua10,2005 Pile Penetration in Stratum Estimated Friction TIF Estimated Capacity TONS Pile Upper Lower Upper Lower Percent Area Type Fill Peat Slit/Sand Fill Fill I Peat SiINSand Fill Fs Pt(I) Pult Pall 2 Friction TP-1 Timber 4.5 6 1 0 0.24 0.20 0.30 0.24 2.58 4.0 7 3 39 TP-2 Timber 3 6.5 1 0 0.24 0.20 0.30 0.24 2.32 4.0 6 3 37 TP-5 Timber 2 7 5.5 2 0.24 0.20 0.30 0.24 4.01 4.0 8 4 50 (1)See Static Capacity calculations for estimate of point bearing. (2)Pall = Pult/FS,where FS =2.0. rpe a r I, r 1 _ 11 ryry N Yr 1 � 1yn f WIL a � f i °IT tp'Lt� j� e 01 Al, �i ',f:'y; a {� , � ii�t �}`'� �,`, :. .. ' rpt I �► 4�� ¢` �'21, 4 4 1 to, � sc/ . 11 ! I Iy L� ` C Y p rP-2 a L �• e 77ePlau7)u-y rvkeny=,33o SF at sv J _ fit`! � �� n, .�r�7+� �� a �. m _ _ `. - _ ® � � i om m _. ', _ , i ails 7r�rnbhj 1 I FI; I I 1 a m e r ® ❑ ❑ m i. 1 m � I I i ® e I ' I I I p i I I � � ��.� . � � � v �� 0 0 � � - i < I � I i � ,� i - - � + j - � ' I � � � j i - � � . i ,. I f� g� 3 i Page 1 of 1 5 b4 James B. Russell From: Laurie Gibeau [Igibeau@rtg-eng.com] Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 12:40 PM To: 'James B. Russell' Subject: 28 Goodhue Street Hi, Jim- Bob Fairbanks called with these numbers: Exterior wall column spacing: 8'3"on center Interior column spacing: 16'6"on center(east-west axis), 20' on center(north-south axis) Len th of building they are trying to save: 222'8" Dead loads 2nd, aro, 4th floors and roof: 20-25 psf 1St floor: 80 psf Perimeter walls: 20 psf for face, not including pile cap Live loads: Roof: 30 psf 2nd 3b, 4th floors: 50 psf(residential) 1St floor: 100 psf(commercial) Laurie Gibeau Project Engineer RT Group, Inc. 197 Taunton Avenue, Suite 202 East Providence, Rhode Island 02914 Phone: 401 438 3100 Fax: 410 438 5275 1/10/2005 /''� p� eT PAGE 0 � OF RTGroup, Inc PROJECT Z GaotillUe , PROJECT N0. OLIII 0 Engineered From the Ground Up SUBJECT T7"J4 ''6 brL, t?1c-S CA-nAC in/ COMPUTATIONS BY <2/ DATE CHECK BY ,R DATE r _ I I F L L - _ Nq oo Sbpf+ eC 23p' CL I JIG ;Sao ?S 33o�.S I � �� 1fis !_. 5 33v: 1-- J -r 1-+1 =T JJ Is fir 41-1 1 � J SIJ.IOJi.> L✓' ' � � 3 { I II F 0(7 - _ + _7 I 1 4 1 _ `-41 _.I _ — _ rJ_ _ +_ - ! I _ � 1 .i it/.0.�£ [ _ -,V..GIrII(� 0j;_ ic `y 14_ 3 _i T 1 1 _ ' I � CC NVW � -- J ' L i _ y _ _ J� !� 1 r --9-2,4 /<- I i_ 1 -1. iI � I i - I -; -� _I L[.. 7 isrGc oP 'gx c�r5x ' � 4 j Z N J- adv 2, L F t � 3 0 ou41L S R,SC t-�- 0:6¢ - 1�5# II IncPAGE -7 7 RTGroup, n PROJECT 2-8 G60Dw-# PROJECT N0. C-4114 , O( Engineered From the Ground Up SUBJECT 7-/ Jg`yL' D/r.E CA(�AC f T'/ r COMPUTATIONS BY �Q� -' DATE CHECK BY RamFDATE I, _ : -F J _ r - -� F_, r- J /F�l + + P . x Ii$a p -I 8 , k 12111 i� 50 -1 - I J a 1 I -I I 1 v`U a Lr2. e e spAuF.IG— LX'YCgo%L wia amu., ~ 140 HlI dk 72 Cs-PTF h Ea CEv� l � SrJ i. t L I J TT— I .-. I� / �O—� I I dl r E I r I j-1 I 4 -h -�— z + I I �Tr �T1 i i. � I I 1 � _a U. = 491 Z 4 •r- I 1 jr - -I V1. Ii II ' � I s I r=te 3i �c ; IG cc�;r� w( an Vic, I _ I /a C Lou of F`o2 I ' I _ I I 7,4/7 Table 2 Group FOS Estimate 28 Goodhue Street Building Prepared by RT Group,Inc.,January 10,2005 Tributary Area Pile Cap Perimeter Wall TributaryArea Total Unfactored No.of Group Group Min Recommended Area Location DL(TONS) DL(TONS) DL(TONS) LL(TONS) DL+LL(TONS) P„i,(1) Piles per Location PUN FOS(2) FOS TP-1 Interior Column 29.70 3.45 -- 46.20 79.35 7 4.0 28 0.4 2.0 TP-2 Perimeter 8.20 2.20 3.20 11.20 21.60 6 2.0 12 0.6 2.0 TP-5 Interior Column 29.70 3.45 — 46.20 79.35 8 4.0 32 0.4 2.0 Footnotes* (1)See Static Capacity calculations for Ultimate Pile Capacity. 2 Group Ultimate Capacityrratal Unfactored DL+LL A17 Table 3 Group FOS Estimate w/Downdrag Included 28 Goodhue Street Building Prepared by RT Group, Inc.,Janus 10,2005 Total Unfactored Downdrag No.of Total Total Unfactored Group Group Min Recommended Area Location DL+LL(TONS)(1) (TONS)(1) Piles per Location Downdrag(TONS) w/Downdrag(TONS) P„n(2) P„it FOS(3) FOS TP-1 Interior Column 79.35 2.28 4.0 9 88 4.7 18.9 0.2 1.0 TP-2 Perimeter 21.60 2.02 2.0 4 26 4.0 8.0 0.3 1.0 TP-5 Interior Column 79.35 2.36 4.0 9 89 5.6 22.6 0.3 1.0 Footnotes' (1)See Table 2. (2)See Static Capacity calculations for Ultimate Pile Capacity(Downdrag subtracted out). 3 Group Ultimate Capaci lrotal Unfactored w/Downdrag. RESISTANCE PIERS /'� p / PAGE 1 Or� RTGroup, Inc PR OIECT 28 Ud�9N V� ST• PR OI ECT NO. 04- 11 A-. 0 1 Engineered From the Ground Up S U B I E C r S'l ESl S'J1eV G E t7{L � COMPUTATIONS BY- C,. L.+ DATE CHECK BY DATE I_ F I V I I ' IC{41UG (O - E'1C/Bc/nfCo Puca l S I"I , 1 1 i 1 I CS?7 ' I J =6tV e�1FS 01 Iw-t21,..=�'f�L` LLL .I GB'_+ASN Ot�2 CtLUM�/ i 71 Qr'4s A('_ ifiILL �I 16)cl'ILtiU' ITI S 1 C� F C� ICC I I /J`�71!(a 77 w(3�^IYC- l 'LErS tNiR.i�j_ A-r.J VL r CiFPAFL<7Y �O I I J i. I I 1 I- 1 ...� r-T Q iL I_ 1 r 1 1 oLFA`Tl.h I I r V I I I • �/,-12 t^.lI OJ� I `�I L�� I ' � I I I � f I I I I r , I r , I I S �F" � 4 ' -- I- _ L ; II ! J 11- III ASSwPTT,6US sl soi L f�t oFlr L' +41(- I A- C I � _I -'. ' '• 'ktS"l -r{y�lCv_ IS 't " Nj_ - i 11 1_ . �, l G4b,4� �Ty '� o•;-/___ _ L I I I F ±44 ±44 I ..rte L -S 1 I 1 -r I J 1 L } l T I-7791JC� J '� � III ' , •' ,zrc � 'rJ_ -I a_ ' It 6.1 - IT Atlas Foundation Systems, Inc. Page 3 aft 2/5 IXISTING BUILDING I , 1 BUSTING EDDYING I , ATLAS PIERS I NEW SLAB AT LOWER ELEVATION PLAN VIEW Below is a cross sectional sketch of the Atlas Pier installed to the existing structure and the relationship of the ne original structure. Carrtinuoui Cancrete Spread Footing AtlasRer - 'I — 1 T r-9"Column with Little or No lateral Sail Support { flew Finished Roar t-10"all Sleeve J Overt'Rerb Stiffen Segmerhed Joints Land Mring Stab atH.S Feet Below Footing SECTION http://www.atlasfoundations.com/110-12.html 1/14/2005 PAGE 3 OF RTGroup, Inc PROJECT �6a�HU� S� PR OI ECT N0. Z Engineered From the Ground Up S U B 1 E C T ESI S 77ev C6 `P1 I-<3 COMPUTATIONS BY lyalr— DATE CHECK BY DATE _ , 1 Cat_c;v� n/rw 777P7,A n/cc cer�S t9 2 S TJ T7cc I Ian TAn!3 1 S I_ --- -L- / I 1 _ I p�T O 2 Eo n rT _': co- I � I I I �— I - ,� 3-r x C ) . SAS ---—T 2XL jr+ I � 1 y-✓ -fir Q'.CS1s`1�etJ t^Ee/ - - (_�V-G�l '$:4$� clj._ ... ..- LAS j. COL unit�j Lo fJ$ RIES1 S-rer cc' -`M g pt e Q o/c CQL U"Ili t? A%, I%iu'A-t Z -F �SIS'll?r.1G� tit-s 7� tl"y7$Y�r ate,- CQI.V�I� - 1 J � I nr?�auac 1 I K794 I��' ee 2, d) - I(7o7x `f)�— 32,7 � . 4 0 ?rtE'Is / coy✓ N` I I , III C—Y I I oLgiJl v 71x1 ae L zo e , " ,�I^rs -LE i /eoc, ar.P i PAGE 4— RT Group, Inc. za cah uE �Tr od„¢ .o , PROJECT PROJECT NO. Engineered From the Ground Up SU HI ECT 'j” is Tn�c 7f C COMPUTATIONS 6Y Q�°yfG�� DATE /_ 4.Q SJ CHECK 6Y �w/ DATE - C1biC1'CiL3ws�, vr + - I I � - 'r __I- I i � I 1 i_ r 1 IL-� I '._{ - -r _rl I L I I err I I-♦—!.._ � ' �– I I I I T_!;._. ' � ' —L_ ' i _� _ _I ! _I lro �' I..i rLlrTjI LLI _L L r lY +A I _ r Ili1 � L -"— GI I _r 4 �.� IIT I r F � NiI1 �I I tt i4 i _GNc�7c�IL 7Ky @, SrSr�rS �c 4!_ I - s j�O `I 1-4 7-- 70 T- O 4-`� -- S� 2r 7 O�S I T /- ! 1 T I 70 S77 /0 +� i . I { - L71 1— q � - or r/�r)LF z:' I/�3 0 .T—cs•a�! o.Sa T / 5 , 2 6 r .- - I i C I l a I . IncPAGE J Of RT Group, nPROJECT 28 GoQt)> c Sir, PR OI ECT NO, Engineered From the Ground Up 5 U B 1 E C T COMPUTATIONS BY DATE CHECK BY BATE I� Zo-or r- I : ` i r. X11 _ _ I Ic�l 4 ' , I II ' 1. . _ I r9 ! F� 11(X f l _~ — iD I "C�i✓�� j- t J u..'A I .... � - F I 7/ I 9E3-T r / ZI 6 r T o hllrllT �K)T_J j-� I I I -�L� ' 7 I I I I I t E'S.S"7XfJ.Q� _i , i J _ ,-_� } L- I L I / .. J I I r IG-;�5r r � z-'2 Ira r . 1 t j ' + ,= Ir- 1:.. b7 S i 1 ' it I II : I : I ITT 1U I I 1 _ AL J"; I I : jI : DRILLED MINI-PILES PAGE OE RTGroup, Inc PROJECT 2-e., PR 0I E C T N0. 04114.01 Engineered From the Ground Up SUBJECT -D M I LL Ez:;) COMPUTATIONS BY S;Mec DATE CHECK BY DATE iT I I T q� 0 -�r t Ah� 4-r- tg� -5-17 I E_ ygg��Vtgv I q'j L Ll -IA L I I �!t J- –I-! 1 L J _17 L_._J_,'__ J _J_J.�_i_L- L -1-, L_ J 4- 4 V��L 6_�)- 4- 't L L t I-A -------------------- L ALI_LL 1 1 ...................= I AL-1 _L L! S' 411 2], JL, t- L _J 4 0AL4U1_A-'1Mzm"' Lj- ' T-1 7 J.- 4 rag Sc DIM IQ, -<I`� ej� qw� j I Lrj I 7 "Ll'761�c -9414 R E7 v( _bj L:C1 WD 4 r 7 1 A PAGE OE RT Group, Inc. PROJECT Z 6oahH�r, ST PROJECT No. 04/� ¢• O 7 Engineered From the Ground Up SUBJECT 1.�IC.1�- -t yw/-v+^ "A/SGS C COMPUTATIONS BY -DATE /[-/7- CHECK BY Raj-_ DATE •�ZB�� .- � I�, .1 /F7 IBX '�j' �K& t.tl'j r I T. :'TI - L � 6� �'- Lt I Ir cceo'aee)L� >7 i , J..�e•C.. -2E' rS'AgAe� 1`�-��''-e .A. �gcY ES� DuE1i_�,nJ� DtUc ...., , - _ �..I LecUG I I l V , I112 b - r I. - r uz I I _S7�vwN _ 7P£ty Q u C L �d4 tX l .p,T K L Dov C7 8 S' Inc PAGE 3 Of RTGroup/ nPROJECT 28 6yOaDHQIE S L ' PB Or ECT HO. 41` 4 o Engineered From the Ground Up SU B7ECT X211 L.��lr'-/r��-Il "PIL e-s COMPUTATIONS BY C ,//r�� DATE CHECK BY � DATE —_ 1 IV J.UStCO.. T I ._. L. L... _. . . C�9tC, — 7 14. r l (,.o lr,e3 T/ T)l + r -r 71F1)C 9 ). 17 /_F )C%D:17 * C '38 +� -IcoC�U_Mnls _ i 1 i.l_ ' C . 171 I - _ -rrwgl _� Y: 8 lrrovS r I- 1 yl r : r 4 ri -f r t .. xl L j �' L' !r L!c' > - - Q u" 1 I f Tr'j J Ji 4_1 rt f 1 �r li e I Irdl I -F-L a_J — _L —i`— "� 1. 4 t A0 r L-1 - _ 1 _ I L. E e T)CX III /- of / oa T _ � I L I r �, r L _i - - — 0 T/FI 4-roVS-+ I t-:- 7-. -_�( I 1 � I 1 1 1 iC61 M� I 1 I I ' r _ 1 I 11 g b_ a I1 1 NEW TIMBER PILE FOUNDATION /�T ® �1 e] / PAGE OF R Group, Inc PROJECT Lu Uoov�tQEs-' PROJECT NO. 04I 14,01 Engineered From the Ground Up SUBJECT J, EvJ Tlu.i(jr�. `7,4 5. COMPUTATIONS BY- /�^(,/ x DATE CHECK BY DATE �U✓t ?D5� " � t�;41 E 77-i�_ EQ_Qli ?dJ P I_wf LLVU -ro `svlV:iP_VLr y 1�..Jeo til IN:. F'2R.iruOtK-IJn'v) ' --- G TV 0y1 L c a� w �LS 79.4 i Ktt\Il t • S'CZ r,_ OGl(.,� I�./ -171 4T'Sv� tr�, SbIL `C� pi`T7oV$ r i l d-�E4r:_4 5L 4—rIUj L90": A, . ` ee 1 v,% -rH1=10-_I cc " c O"A?�Iv.A�_ { - � o'F" Stcl rJ ' �Ytr�m�_ /.�f- 'WJ J _ I i _ -. I =Oo�JQL4Sl> �'. ® .: o%G Croc yr til a�L� 'S nisi.. va 3' LNG. 13U C Ll_/H.cKJ `l / (ES —/O vE - v E 577 ^ti/FrL ` ITJL t L L �_ l JODn ' STPAGE__-2- OF Of RT Gru®, Inc 2PROIECT PROJECT N0. Engineered From the Ground Up SUBJECT NCW —n w�j�C,`,ILES COMPUTATIONS BY �6� DATE r�IT.V CNECN BY •' BATE 1 , _ �SaP rr —I s�—r�n _ c /(v 34-71 Fig L o l_ T ; Z1 -I h I 0P l'o ?ZKi- - - - I I I , r o - U - n - L_ friW_U.i+3.a1 j j F ' i 1 i _f. 3 r 1 J I LL r FJ T i i mo-- - - - z t C I i I 7: l V'Rl.v� �9 I , -FI , , I T ® O PAGE 3 0F� R9 Grou , In PR OIECT 2.8 Gozoime� Sr. PROJECT NO. (0-Ally 1 Engineered From the Ground Up S U EJECT t(tw 7J�n C1£.'C- ` \A.£S COMPUTATIONS BY � DAIEJ_Id_oS CHECK BV /ePP a'jF DATE /-ZO057 I I i r l e 2 I12 L I , 21 'S/ F (Or 2,52 /- ' : -- - i ! - _ - - - I _ I { , L L _ 3 114- _ I -. ' / 1 I I r � FS 16 37 t , I I 1 I i1 ; I Psgr lz I �- J, i /R.'� ® PAGE�,,4 Of S RT Grou I, Inc PROJECT 11T Z'�1 �lflNl(�' S7 PROJECT NO. '�T Engineered From the Ground Up SUBJECT COMPUTATIONS BY- -DATE 1.-14_Q5 CHECK BY „wP DATE I , 25d="59zw , ?2EC.�,-. - !`��L L, G.�Y �r3.! S on/- �" w(,9 r -co v"W - , LO FnS i 'j.)i LIE S �. N`ktki,� C_1'I_ . . -..... i — � 7 �-4 -7r x .12� ( -- Coiv 'uS 410 cif .�colv�7_ a_ - r 4 8 iavS I/'/cE - - ¢otv I" ,.r5 2 rl� til a/cel _ U 7NE- /ZEZiCO 6 + 60.L12- T T- ._'._• . T - 1 !_'. _. O to. 7TF-r 7(--�� J - G'S: 71 X i � ;24 {ry�T Group, IncO PAGEy O f S RGroup, c PROI ECT L6 GdO�KN� 4.a"'J�• PROJECT NO. Engineered From the Ground Up SUBJECT Aj kt J x"1'3dz COMPUTATIONS BY C%-/ DATE CHECK BY DATE �_��✓' l LALCUL9-�-)C✓S� CST I _ I _ 'lit tri e ;46 sir- 77C o`} a(o-SC7 IrT� -r2Z. r7 Z4,S I- I I - _ _ 1 -- ' _ I `^ CO SLS TI C T (ic z Zq 8 / S i '_ 4 T 4 6 r 3 °' Z I I I 1 : 1 , : � I I , I _ - i APPENDIX C COST BACK-UP DATA Table C-1 Budget-Level Construction Cost Estimate Installation of Resistance Piers Unit of Estimated Unit Extended Item Description Payment Quantity Price Total Comments 1 General Requirements Mix.Contractor Submittals LS 1 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 Estimators Judgment Record Drawings LS 1 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 Estimators Judgment $4,000.00 Calculate Bid Unit Cost LS 1 $4,000.00 2 Mobilization Mobilize Men,Equipment,and Materials LS 1 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 Estimators Judgement and Includes partial payment on materials $25,000.00 Calculate Bid Unit Cost LS 1 $25,000.00 3 Demolition and Removal for Pier Installation Saw Cut Floor Slab @ Interior Columns LF 560 $3.00 $1,680.00 Assumes 10'x 10'area cut around each column Saw Cut Floor Slab @ Interior Walls LF 530 $3.00 $1,590.00 Assumes a 222 x 45'interior footprint Saw Cut Floor Slab/Asphalt Pave @ Exterior Columns LF 530 $3.00 $1,590.00 Assumes 222'long cut on each side and 45'long cut on ends Excavate and Remove Interior Floor Slab/Pavement CY 340 $50.00 $17,000.00 Estimators Judgment,Assumes extensive hand-work Excavate Fill for Resistance Pier Installation CY 650 $20.00 $13,000.00 Estimators Judgement Transportation it Disposal of Demolition Debris TON 650 $60.00 $39,000.00 Assumes Non-Contaminated Demolition Debris $73,860.00 Calculate Bid Unit Cost LS 1 $73,860.00 4 Resistance Pier Installation Furnish and Install Piers @ Interior Columns EA 140 $3,500.00 $490,000.00 Assumes 14 Interior Columns x 10 Piers/Column(14x10=140), Furnish and Install Piers @ Exterior Columns EA 264 $3,000.00 $792,000.00 Assumes 66 Exterior Columns x 4 Piers/Column(66x4=264)' Backfill a Compact Around Piers w/Excavated Fill CY 650 $10.00 $6,500.00 Estimators Judgment $1,288,500.00 Calculate Bid Unit Cost LS 1 $1,288,500.00 5 Furnish and Install New Structural Floor Slab Drill and Grout Reinforcing at Columns EA 80 $500.00 $40,000.00 Estimators Judgement Furnish and Install New Structural Floor Slab CY 370 $500.00 $185,000.00 Estimators Judgement $225,000.00 Calculate Bid Unit Cast LS 1 $225,000.00 6 Demobilization and Clean-up Demobilization and Clean-up LS 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 Estimators Judgement $10,000.00 Calculate Bid Unit Cost LS 1 $10,000.00 SUBTOTAL $1,626,360.00 Sum of Bid Item Nos.1-6 SCOPE AND BUDGET CONTINGENCIES @ 20% $325,272.00 Contingencies' TOTAL ESTIMATE $1,960,000.00 Rounded Up to the Nearest$10,000. Actual Casts may vary. Footnote: 'Resistance Pier costs are based on a recent project completed by New England Foundation and Stabilization Co.for the Narragansett Bay Commission where 70-fact-long Resistance Piers were installed for about$5,000.00/EA. A cost of about$3,000.00 to$3,500.00/EA has been assumed for this project based on economy scale and the actual distribution of costs assumed. 'The Contingencies estimate Does Not include dewatering that may be required to install the proposed alternative or the possible need to handle contaminated groundwater as a result of dewatering activities. a.aa.ow rb,c.w�.mn. Page 1 of 1 2/12005 Table C-2 Budget-Level Construction Cost Estimate Installation of Drilled Mini-Piles Unit of Estimated Unit Extended Item Description Payment Quantity Price Total Comments 1 General Requirements Misc.Contractor Submittals LS 1 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 Estimators Judgment Record Drawings LS 1 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 Estimators Judgment - $4,000.00 Calculate Bid Unit Cost LS 1 $4,000.00 2 Mobilization Mobilize Men,Equipment,and Materials LS 1 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 Estimators Judgement and Includes partial payment on materials $25,000.00 Calculate Bid Unit Cost LS 1 $25,000.00 3 Demolition and Removal for Pile Installation Saw Cut Floor Slab @ Interior Columns LF 560 $3.00 $1,680.00 Assumes 10'x 10'area cut around each column Saw Cut Floor Slab @ Interior Walls LF 530 $3.00 $1,590.00 Assumes a 222'x 45'inferior footprint Saw Cut Floor Stab/Asphalt Pave @ Exterior Columns LF 530 $3.00 $1,590.00 Assumes 222'long cut on each side and 45'tang cut on ends Excavate and Remove Interior Floor Slab/Pavement CY 340 $50.00 $17,000.00 Estimators Judgment Excavate Fitt for Mint-Pile Installation CY 650 $20.00 $13,000.00 Estimators Judgement Transportation R Disposal of Demolition Debris TON 650 $60.00 $39,000.00 Assumes Non-Contaminated Demolition Debris $73,860.00 Calculate Bid Unit Cost LS 1 $73,860.00 4 Drilled Mini-Pile Installation Furnish and Install Mini-Piles @ Interior Columns EA 84 $4,700.00 $394,800.00 Assumes 14 Interior Columns x 6 Mini-Piles/Column Furnish and Install Mini-Piles @ Exterior Columns EA 132 $3,600.00 $475,200.00 Aswmes 66 Exterior Columns x 2 Mini-Piles/Column' Backfill It Compact Around Piles w/Excavated Fill CY 650 $10.00 $6,500.00 Estimators Judgment $876,500.00 Calculate Bid Unit Cost LS 1 $876,500.00 5 Furnish and Install Naw Structural Floor Slab Drill and Grout Reinforcing at Columns EA 80 $500.00 $40,000.00 Estimators Judgment Furnish and Install New Structural Floor Stab CY 370 $500.00 $185,000.00 Estimators Judgment $225,000.00 Calculate Bid Unit Cost LS 1 $225,000.00 6 Demobilization and Clean-up Demobilization and Clean-up IS 1 $10,000.00 510,000.00 Estimators Judgement $10,000.00 Calculate Bid Unit Cost LS 1 $10,000.00 SUBTOTAL $1,214,360.00 Sum of Bid Item Nos.1-6 SCOPE AND BUDGET CONTINGENCIES @ 20% $242,872.00 Contingenciest TOTAL ESTIMATE $1,460,000.00 Rounded Up to the Nearest$10,000. Actual costs may vary. Footnote 'Drilled Mini-Pile costs are based on a recent project completed by G.Donaldson Construction Co.,Inc.,far the Pastore Federal Building in Providence,RI. The Drilled Mini-Piles were about 50-feet-long on this project and cost about$5,300.001 EA. A cost of$3,600.00 to$4,700.00/EA has been assumed for this project based on the estimated lengths and actual distribution of costs assumed. °The Contingencies estimate Does Not include dewatering that may be required to install the proposed alternative or the possible need to handle contaminated groundwater as a result of dewatering activities. m.wn.anm.n.e. Page 1 of 1 2112005 Table C-3 Budget-Level Construction Cost Estimate New Timber Pile Foundation Unit of Estimated Unit Extended Item Description Payment Quantity Price Total Comments 1 General Requirements Misc.Contractor Submittals LS 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 Estimators Judgment Record Drawings LS 1 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 Estimator's Judgment $6,500.00 Calculate Bid Unit Cost LS 1 $6,500.00 2 Mobilization Mobilize Men,Equipment,and Materials LS 1 $35,000.00 $35,000.00 Estimator's Judgement and Includes partial payment on materials $35,000.00 Calculate Bid Unit Cost LS 1 $35,000.00 3 -Demolition and Removal of Building/Foundation Demolish Building and Foundation,Complete LS 1 $75,000.00 $75,000.00 To be Verfied by Owner $75,000.00 Calculate Total of Bid Items LS 1 $75,000.00 4 Furnish and Install CCA Treated Timber Piles Furnish and Install Timber Piles @ Interior Columns LF 2,520 $25.00 $63,000.00 Assume 56 piles total x 45-foot-long piles(56x45=2,520LF) Furnish and Install Timber Piles @ Exterior Columns LF 1,980 $25.00 $49,500.00 Assume 66 piles total x 30-foot-long piles(6600=1,980LF) Furnish Pile Top Tension Connector EA 122 $50.00 $6,100.00 Assume all piles fitted with No.8 Bar Tension Connection $118,600.00 Calculate Bid Unit Cost LS 1 $118,600.00 5 Furnish and Install Pile Caps Excavation for Pile Caps LS 1 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 Allowance Item,Estimator's Judgement Furnish and Install Interior Pile Caps CY 40 $600.00 $24,000.00 Assume a 6'x 6'x 18'THK Cap with a 2'x 2'x 4'Stem Furnish and Install Exterior Pile Caps CY 230 $600.00 $138,000.00 Assume a 4'wide x 18"THK Cap with a T x 4 Stem $162,000.00 Calculate Bid Unit Cost IS 1 $162,000.00 6 Furnish and Install New Structural Floor Slab Reinforcing @ Columns and Structural Floor Stab EA 80 $500.00 $40,000.00 Estimators Judgement Compact Subgrade and Furnish Imported Fill LS 1 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 Allowance Item,Estimator's Judgement Furnish and Insall New Structural Floor Slab CY 375 $500.00 $187,500.00 Assumes 222'x 45'x 12"THK $207,500.00 Calculate Bid Unit Cost LS 1 $207,500.00 7 Demobilization and Clean-up Demobilization and Clean-up LS 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 Estimators Judgement $10,000.00 Calculate Bid Unit Cost LS 1 $10,000.00 SUBTOTAL $614,600.00 Sum of Bid Item Nos.1-7 SCOPE AND BUDGET CONTINGENCIES @ 20% $122,920.00 Contingencies TOTAL ESTIMATE $740,000.00 Rounded Up to the Nearest$10,000. Actual costs may vary. r^•r m^ m•v>d• Page 1 of 1 2/1/2005 0 Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People °" -Page 1 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781.438.7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Concrete Field Report Report Date 05-09-2013 Report No. 5 Distribution Copy Job Number 16091 Project North River Apts,28 Goodhue St.,Salem,MA Contractor Essex Builders Corp. WEATHER: -TIME: CONTACT: SUMMARY: Transported one set of cylinders cast on 5/8/13 to the lab for testing. GENERAL REMARKS: Inspector 'Premwm, _r_`, Travel .Name Time .Hours Time Chad Phillips No REVIEWED BY: William P. Crabtree WT Our reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. t�+ Cc: North River Canal, LLC Anthony Roberto wf Essex Builders Corporation Chris Serino Essex Builders Corporation Jennifer Patel Essex Builders Corporation Edward EeFanti Goldstein-Milano Brent Goldstein, PE Tom Galvin City of Salem Thomas St. Pierre Nichols-Renasco Associates Joseph L. Nichols, AIA x�. Of Massachusetts. 'The Construction Testing People"0 Page 1 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham, MA 02180 781.438.7755(Voice)781.438-6216(Fax) Concrete Field Report Report Date 05-10-2013 Report No. 6 Distribution Copy Job Number 16091 Project North River Apts,28 Goodhue St.,Salem,MA Contractor Essex Builders Corp. WEATHER: -TIME: CONTACT: SUMMARY: Transported 2 sets of cylinders cast on 5/9/13 to the lab for testing. GENERAL REMARKS: Inspector "" Premium: ; Travel , Name - x ''r Time ' Hours , ° `` I .Timet°. Chad Phillips No REVIEWED BY: William P. Crabtree �v Our reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. Cc: North River Canal, LLC Anthony Roberto Essex Builders Corporation Chris Serino Essex Builders Corporation JenniferPatel Essex Builders Corporation Edward DeFanti • Goldstein-Milano Brent Goldstein, PE Tom Galvin City of Salem Thomas St. Pierre Nichols-Renato Associates Joseph L. Nichols, AIA ° Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testh g People' Page 1 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham, MA 02180 781438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Compressive Strength Report - Concrete Report Date 04-18-2013 Report No. 1 Distribution Copy Job Number 16091 Project North River Apts,28 Goodhue St.,Salem,MA Contractor Essex Builders Corp. Concrete Co. Benevento Companies ALL FIELD TESTS DONE ACCORDING TO ASTM: C-172 C-31 C-143 C-1064 C-231 ,ALL COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TESTS DONE ACCORDING TO ASTM: C-39 CLASS CONCRETE: 3000# 3/4" No. Of Sets: 1 CUBIC YARDS: 20 SET 1 LOCATION: Footin : column line E at 5 . ..... . Total ;;; '!Unit Nt -. .';, [Air in. 4 1/2 Lah Size. Area Date' '" Dater"" { Age... Load fL A `Fracture em F.) 52 ^No. (in.) (sq.in.) Condition Cast "' Tested ;` Days, d. (Ihs) (psi.) `Type ! c Tem F 60 :,T756 4 x 6 12.56 Good 04/18/2013 04/25/2013 7 30,000 2,390 2 k No. 527 ;T757 4 x 8 12.56 Good 04/18/2013 05/02/2013 14 40,000 3,180 2 et No. 70991 "T75B 4 x 8 12.56 Good 04/18/2013 05/16/2013 28 48,000 3,820 1 1:00 T759 4 x 8 12.56 Good 04/18/2013 05/16/2013 28 47,000 3,740 2 Wt lbs/cu ft T760 4 x 0 12.56 Good 04/18/2013 05/16/2013 28 50,000 3,980 1 ontent(%) 5.1 GENERAL REMARKS: ' . °,"'� ;Premium ` a..°' <<" ''" Travel Inspector_ n �,. .,. .. n 2 .,y i.f ,`„;d. Time Name .. _: ?- ”. ;,� Time "� Hours " Jordan Depina No Min Day 1 Hr(s) REVIEWED BY: Robert S. Granada - i f FRACTURE TYPES X Xi Type 1 Type 2 Type 3 Type 4 Type5 Type 6 Reasonably well-formed Well-formed cone on Columner vertical Diagonal fracture Side fractures at lop Similar to Type cones an both ends, one end,vertical cracks cracking through with no cracking or bottom(occur but end of less than 1 in. running through caps, both ends,no through ends;tap commonly with cylinder is [25 mml of cracking no welldefined cone well-formed cones with hammer to unbundled caps) pointed throught caps on other end distinguish from Type 1 Our reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. ° Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People" Page 2 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham, MA 02180 781.438.7755(Voice)781.438-6216(Fax) Compressive Strength Report - Concrete Report Date 04-18-2013 Report No. 1 Distribution Copy Job Number 16091 Project North River Apts,28 Goodhue St.,Salem,MA Contractor Essex Builders Corp. Concrete Co. Benevento Companies CE: North River Canal, LLC Anthony Roberto Ease. Builders Corporation Chris Serino Essex Builders Corporation Jennifer Patel Essex Builders Corporation Edward NeFanti Goldstein-Milano Brent Goldstein, PE Tom Galvin City of Salem Thomas St. Pierre Benevento Companies Wayne Tarr Nichols-Renasco Associates Joseph L. Nichols, AIA x. ° Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' Page 3 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Compressive Strength Report - Concrete Report Date 04-18-2013 Report No. 1 Distribution Copy Job Number 16091 Project North River Apts,28 Goodhue St.,Salem,MA Contractor Essex Builders Corp. Concrete Co. Benevento Companies FIELD SUMMARY REPORT Total Pour: Exterior Footing: column line E at 3.5-8 Method of Placement: ❑Pump ®Chute Discharge ❑ Bucket ❑Other Other: Method of Concrete Consolidation: ®Vibrator ❑ Other Other: Cylinder Fabrication Location: ® Truck Discharge Chute ❑ End of Pump Hose Cylinder Storage: Curing Box Thermal Blanket LJ Hay/Straw LJ Trailer Field ❑ Other Placement Protection: ❑Thermal Blankets ❑ Heat ❑ None ❑ Other Slump Specification(in.) 3 to 5 Number of slumps out of specification reported to If rejected Approved by Remarks: UTS of Massachusetts, Inc. Page a 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781-038.7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Report Date 09-18-2013 ReportNo. 1 Job Number 15091 Project North River Apts,28 Goodhue St.,Salem,MA Attachment Of Massachusetts Inc. "The Construction Testing People" I Page# DAILY REPORT OF CONCRETE POUR PROJECT NAME: 6..8,AE S'r Sa\'¢,,,.r PROJECT NO.. DATE: AIR TEMP.: SZ TOTAL YARDS: LOCATION OF POUR: `G IM2 /o v 3•S g I;n2 ([zf Ff !i Load 8 Slump Batching Batching Time In Yards Concrete % of Ticket # No. of Truck # Inches In Out Minutes Temp. Air — Cylinders 521 41Iz 12001 za ao. it (�7 5. 1 70941 As Ity 2u4 gs to�Z I —1 INSPECTOR: REMARKS: 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, Massachusetts 02180 17811 438-7755 Fax 17ntt aza_a�is Of 0 Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' °' Page 1 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Compressive Strength Report - Concrete Report Date 05-09-2013 Report No. 6 Distribution Copy Job Number 16091 Project North River Apts,28 Goodhue St.,Salem,MA Contractor Essex Builders Corp. Concrete Co. Benevento Companies ALL FIELD TESTS DONE ACCORDING TO ASTM: C-172 C-31 C-143 c-1064 C-231 .ALL COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TESTS DONE ACCORDING TO ASTM: C-39 CLASS CONCRETE: 3000# 3/4" No. Of Sets: 2 CUBIC YARDS: 66 SET 1 LOCATION: Beams: column line 8.3 at E ,� ... Total %,` ,Unit FUnitWtIbs/cuft 5 1/4 Lab Size Area Date Dates'"' Age Load `' Load Fracture : F. 56 No. (in.) (sq.in.) =Condition Cast `-'' Tested _` Days ' ' ` Ibs.) (psi.) '!;Type'° F 70 B299 4 x 8 12.56 Good 05/09/2013 05/16/2013 7 2B,000 2,230 1 307 B300 4 x 8 12.56 Good 05/09/2013 05/23/2013 14 '72040 B301 4 x 8 12.56 Good 05/09/2013 06/06/2013 28 8:95 B302 4 x 8 12.56 Good 05/09/2013 06/06/2013 28 s/cu ft B303 4 x 8 1 12.56 Good 05/09/2013 1 06/06/2013 28 1 Air Content(%) 4.8 SET 2 LOCATION: Beams: column line 8 at A " Total Unit Slum in. 5 sv ' u. Lab Size Area Date Date " $r Age {Load Load Fracture; -Air Tem F. 56 No. (in.) (sq.in.) Condition Cast it Tested"i..-� Days (Ibs.) '" e(psi.) 'Type. Conc Tem F 70 B304 4 x 8 12.56 Good 05/09/2013 05/16/2013 7 26,000 2,070 2 Truck No. 308 B305 4 x 8 12.56 Good 05/09/2013 05/23/2013 14 Ticket No. 36012 B306 4 x 8 12.56 Good 05/09/2013 06/06/2013 28 Time 10:15 8307 4 x 8 12.56 Good 05/09/2013 06/06/2013 28 Unit Wt lbs/cu ft 13308 4 x 8 1 12.56 1 Good 1 05/09/2013 1 06/06/2013 1 28 1 1 Air Content(%) 4.8 GENERAL REMARKS: Inspector f Premmm �' . ` Travel Name :'. 'r _` 1 Time ;,.��;� Time Hours sP Marc Hennessey No Min Day 1 Hr(s) REVIEWED BY: Robert S. Granada FRACTURETYPES / � I / Type 1 Type 2 Type 3 Type 4 Type5 Type 6 ° Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' Page 2 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781.438-7755(Voice)781.438.6216(Fax) Compressive Strength Report - Concrete Report Date 05-09-2013 Report No. 6 Distribution Copy Job Number 16091 Project North River Apts,28 Goodhue St.,Salem,MA Contractor Essex Builders Corp. Concrete Co. Benevento Companies Reasonably well-formed Well-formed cone on columnar vertical Diagonal fracture Side fractures at lop Similar to Type cones on both ends, one end,vertical cracks cracking through with no cracking or bottom(occur but end of less than 1 in. running through caps, both ends,no through ends;tap commonly with cylinder is [25 mm]of cracking no well-defined cone well-fornned cones with hammer to unbundled caps) pointed lhrought caps on other end distinguish from Type 1 Our reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. cc: North River Canal, LLC Anthony Roberto Essex Builders Corporation Chris Serino Essex Builders Corporation Jennifer Patel Essex Builders Corporation Edward DeFanti Goldstein-Milano Brent Goldstein, PE Tom Galvin City of Salem Thomas St. Pierre Benevento Companies Wayne Tarr Nichols-Renasco Associates Joseph L. Nichols, AIA e O0f Massachusetts. 'The Construction Testing People' ° Page 3 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781.438.6216(Fax) Compressive Strength Report - Concrete Report Date 05-09-2013 Report No. 6 Distribution Copy Job Number 16091 Project North River Apts,28 Goodhue St.,Salem,MA Contractor Essex Builders Corp. Concrete CO. Benevento Companies FIELD SUMMARY REPORT Total Pour: Wall: column line B.3 at F-C, C at 6.3-9, 9 at C-D, B at 8.1-9, 8.1 at A-B, A at 7.2-8.1; Beam:. F at 7-8.3, D at 6.3-7, C at 8.3-7.2, 9.20 at C-B Method of Placement: ®Pump ❑Chute Discharge ❑ Bucket ❑Other Other: Method of Concrete Consolidation: ®Vibrator ❑ Other Other: . Cylinder Fabrication Location: ® Truck Discharge Chute ❑ End of Pump Hose Cylinder Storage: Curing Box LJ Thermal Blanket Hay/Straw Trailer ❑ Field ❑ Other ' Placement Protection: ❑Thermal Blankets ❑ Heat ® None ❑ Other Slump Specification(in.) 5 Number of slumps out of specification reported to If rejected Approved by Remarks: Slumps and cylinders performed at truck dishcarge chute, 1" slump loss at end of hose. UTS of Massachusetts, Inc. Page 4 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Report Date 05-09-2013 Report No. 6 Job Number 16091 Project North River Apts,28 Goodhue St. ,Salem,MA Attachment Of Massachusetts Inc. aThe Construction Testing PeopWn Page# DAILY REPORT OF CONCRETE POUR PROJECT NAME: _ iM �l t/e S ( x; PROJECT NO.: DATE: S / AIR TEMP.: � TOTAL YARDS: G f, LOCATION OF POUR J cd.=X31 Load & „ Slump Batching Batching Time In Yards Concrete % of Ticket# No. of -- Truck# Y{.Inches In Out Minutes Temp. Air Cylinders 30`7 f1 -7 ao 1o`/3 80 G 6 ��o L I I I INSPECTOR: REMARKS: 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, Massachusetts 02180 (781) 438-7755 Fax (781) 438-6216 ° Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' -Page 1 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham, MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Compressive Strength Report - Concrete Report Date 05-09-2013 Report No. 6 Distribution Copy Job Number 16091 Project North River Apts,2B Goodhue St.,Salem,MA Contractor Essex Builders Corp. Concrete Co. Benevento Companies ALL FIELD TESTS DONE ACCORDING TO ASTM: C-172 c-31 C-143 C-1064 C-231 -ALL COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TESTS DONE ACCORDING TO ASTM: C-39 CLASS CONCRETE: 3000# 3/4" No. Of Sets: 2 CUBIC YARDS: 66 SET 1 LOCATION: Beams: column line 8.3 at E ;1 11a „� - ,3 z `}`Total Unit ' ',�': Slum (in.) 5 1/4 .Lab Size Area Date Date Age Load Load Fracture Air Temp. (F.) 56 No. (in.) (sq.in.) Condition Cast Tested 'L` Days. (Ibs.) (psi.) 'Type Conc Temp(F) 70 8299 4 x 8 12.56 Good 05/09/2013 05/16/2013 7 28,000 2,230 1 Truck No. 307 B300 4 x 8 12.56 Good 05/09/2013 05/23/2013 14 36,000 2,870 1 Ticket No. 72090 B301 4 x 8 12.56 Good 05/09/2013 06/06/2013 28 Time 8:45 B302 4 x 8 12.56 Good 05/09/2013 06/06/2013 28 Unit Wt lbs/cu ft B303 4 x 8 12.56 Good 05/09/2013 06/06/2013 28 1 Air Content(%) 4,8 SET 2 LOCATION: Beams: column line 8 at A ' Total Unkae Slum in. 5 Lab Size Area - Date Date _Age. Load :,'LoaAir Tem F. 56 No. (in.) (sq.in.) ,Condition Cast '{ Tested Days ,(lbs.) (psiConc Temp(F)_ 70 B304 4 x 8 12.56 Good 05/09/2013 05/16/2013 7 26,000 2,07Truck No. 308 B305 4 x 8 12.56 Good 05/09/2013 05/23/2013 l4 35,000 2,79Ticket No. 36012 8306 4 x 8 12.56 Good 05/09/2013 06/06/2013 28 Time 10:15 8307 4 x 8 12.56 Good 05/09/2013 06/06/2013 28 Unit Wt lbs/cu ft B308 4 x 8 1 12.56 Good 1 05/09/2013 06/06/2013 28 Air Content(%) 4.8 GENERAL REMARKS: Inspector Premium ' s; Travel Name = �'r lsx ct.. ?" � ws =� Time .Hours ;, �� '. Time - Marc Hennessey No Min Day 1 Hr(s) REVIEWED BY: Robert S. Granada C FRACTURETYPES X X Typell Type 2 Type 3 Type 4 Types Type 6 i.. Of Massachusetts. 'The Construction Testing People; Page 2 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Compressive Strength Report - Concrete Report Date 05-09-2013 Report No. 6 Distribution Copy Job Number 16091 Project North River Apts,28 Goodhue St.,Salem,MA Contractor Essex Builders Corp. Concrete Co. Benevento Companies Reasonably well-formed Well-formed cone on Columnervertical Diagonal fracture Side fractures at lop Similar to Type cones on both ends, one end,vertical cracks cracking through with no cracking or bottom(occur but end of less than 1 in. running through caps, both ends,no through ends;tap commonly with cylinder is [25 mm]of cracking no well-defined cone well-formed cones with hammer to unbonded caps) pointed lhrought caps on other end distinguish from Type 1 Our reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. CC: North River Canal, LLC Anthony Roberto Essex Builders Corporation Chris Serino Essex Builders Corporation Jennifer Patel Essex Builders Corporation Edward DeFanti Goldstein-Milano Brent Goldstein, PE Tom Galvin City of Salem Thomas St. Pierre Benevento Companies Wayne Tarr Nichols-Renasco Associates Joseph L. Nichols, AIA ° Of Massachusetts -The Construction Testin4 People' Page 3 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, MA 02180 781.438-7755(Voice)781-438.6216(Fax) Compressive Strength Report - Concrete Report Date 05-09-2013 Report No. 6 Distribution Copy Job Number 16091 Project North River Apts,28 Goodhue St.,Salem,MA Contractor Essex Builders Corp. Concrete Co. Benevento Companies FIELD SUMMARY REPORT Total Pour: wall: column line 8.3 at F-C, C at 8.3-9, 9 at C-D, B at 8.1-9, 8.1 at A-B, A at 7.2-8.1; Beam: F at 7-8.3, D at B.3-7, C at B.3-7.2, 9.20 at C-B Method of Placement: ®Pump ❑Chute Discharge ❑ Bucket ❑Other Other: Method of Concrete Consolidation: ®Vibrator ❑ Other Other: . Cylinder Fabrication Location: ® Truck Discharge Chute ❑ End of Pump Hose :,Cylinder Storage: Curing Box Thermal Blanket Hay/Straw ® Trailer ❑ Field ❑ Other Placement Protection: ❑Thermal Blankets ❑ Heat ® None ❑ Other Slump Specification (in.) 5 Number of slumps out of specification reported to If rejected Approved by Remarks: Slumps and cylinders performed at truck dishcarge chute, 1" slump loss at end of hose. a UTS of Massachusetts, Inc. Page 4 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Report Date 05-09-2013 Report No. 6 Job Number 16091 Project North River Apts,28 Goodhue St. ,Salem,MA Attachment Of Massachusetts Inc aThe Construction Testing People° Page# DAILY REPORT OF CONCRETE POUR PROJECT NAME: (;re' lyxc �Sl Si/x-n —PROJECT NO.: DATE: S / AIR TEMP.: 4r TOTAL YARDS: G LOCATION OF POUR: SLV> Z Load & Slump Batching Batching Time In Yards Concrete % of Ticket# No. of Truck# i .Inches In Out Minutes Temp. Air Cylinders -7 ao �I � � as INSPECTOR: ✓ i REMARKS. 5 Richardson Lane, Stoneham, Massachusetts 02180 (781) 438-7755 Fax (781) 438-6216 CITY COUNCIL MEETING NOTICE 2 WEEK OF JUNE 10, 2013 Wednesday,June 12, 2013 6:00 P.M. COMMITTEE ON ADMINISTRATION & FINANCE COPOSTED WITH COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE RE: FY2014 Budget Meeting INVITED: City Clerk/Elections/City Council, Assessors, Collector, Data Processing (GIS/MIS), Parking, Purchasing, Treasurer, Finance Thursday, June 13, 2013 6:00 P.M. COMMITTEE ON ADMINISTRATION & FINANCE RE: Matters in Committee 6:30 P.M. COMMITTEE ON ORDINANCES. LICENSES & LEGAL AFFAIRS RE: Claims, Licenses 7:00 P.M. REGULAR MEETING RE: Any and all business WEEK OF JUNE 17, 2013 Monday,June 17, 2013 6:00 P.M. COMMITTEE ON ADMINISTRATION & FINANCE COPOSTED WITH COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE RE: FY2014 Budget Meeting INVITED: Salem Public Schools, Salem Community Charter School WEEK OF JUNE 24 2013 Thursday, June 27, 2013 6:00 P.M. COMMITTEE ON ADMINISTRATION & FINANCE RE: Matters in Committee 6:30 P.M. COMMITTEE ON ORDINANCES LICENSES & LEGAL AFFAIRS RE: Claims, Licenses 7:00 P.M. REGULAR MEETING RE: Any and all business ATTEST :This notice posted On "Offici I Bulletin Board" CHERY A. LAPOINTE City Hall, Salem, Maes. on �` Y�n0�7 �(1/-3 CITY LERK at // :i Am in accordance M(i1L Chap. 30Ar Sections 18-25. ° Of Massachusetts. 'The Construction Testing People" -Page 1 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781.438.6216(Fax) Compressive Strength Report - Concrete Report Date 05-17-2013 Report No. 7 Distribution Copy Job Number 16091 Project North River Apts,28 Goodhue St.,Salem,MA Contractor Essex Builders Corp. Concrete CO. Benevento Companies ALL FIELD TESTS DONE ACCORDING TO ASTM: C-172 C-31 C-143 C-1064 C-231 ,ALL COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TESTS DONE ACCORDING TO ASTM: C-39 CLASS CONCRETE: 3000# 3/4^ 1 No. Of Sets: 2 CUBIC YARDS: 88 SET 1 LOCATION: Tie ,Beam:: column line C.3 at 5 &fir„ r'� tki i ffd5i"f"eN aF�f�` '° 'Wa` 1 cuN -.�9"vTotal 5 +Umt Slum (in.) 5 ,, t, , 1 C eE ��' v ::i q: Labe ��).Sizes E i ,Area ,° ® Date.' c Date Age, ,«,n LoadLoad Fracture; Air Tem F. 70 - q. No , r.E (m.�. (sq.m.) ,Conddion Cast. Tested .�a,e .Days ,,(lbs.) ..=.1 (psi) -:Type Conc Tem (F) 70 D533 4 x 8 12.56 Good 05/17/2013 05/24/2013 7 28,000 2,230 Truck No. 516 D534 4 x 8 12.56 Good 05/17/2013 05/31/2013 14 Ticket NO. 72614 D535 4 x 8 12.56 Good 05/17/2013 06/14/2013 28 Time 12:00 D536 4 x 6 12.56 Good 05/17/2013 06/14/2013 28 Unit Wt lbs/cu ft D537 4 x 0 12.56 Good 1 05/17/2013 06/14/2013 28 1 Air Content(%) 5.4 SET 2 LOCATION: wall: column line D.7 at 1 v vEri (CI'v "4ti �` Total $Slvi Unit (v vv ..' $IUm In. 5 Lab II , Sae ° Area [(. !.T .E Date , Dated Age, Load jLoad Fracture, Air Tem F. 70 No , (in.)r.I3' t(sgflin.) 1Conddiona Cast_ fL .r Tested'=[L__- ,Days .,_.(Ibs.) f t�I(psi.) Type-:N Cone Tem F 70 D528 4 x 8 12.56 Good 05/17/2013 05/24/2013 7 26,000 2,070 1 Truck No. 309 D529 4 x 8 12.56 Good 05/17/2013 05/31/2013 14 Ticket NO. 36244 D530 4 x 8 12.56 Good 05/17/2013 06/14/2013 28 Time 2:05 X531 4 x 8 12.56 Good 05/17/2013 06/14/2013 28 Unit te Wt lbs/cu ft D532 4 x 8 12.56 Good 05/17/2013 06/14/2013 28 Air Connt(%!) 5.5 GENERAL REMARKS: p d �:.. a ..Premmm �' (?'* , N, Travel?-,r ' n' Ins ector k , a �:u .,rev`s � 0 R vw ,Name � N d , ..,.d ,UHv ,N.,,,�n..e!,• °°'`_ sA®6Time Hours 5d, Time�u,.=XfiA�+.'. C. Whi£fen No Max Day 1 Hr(s) ^REVIEWED BY: Robert S. Granada FRACTURE TYPES X X Type 1 Type 2 Type 3 Type 4 TypeS Type 6 ° Of Massachusetts. 'The Construction Testing People' Page 2 �5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438.7755(Voice)781-438.6216(Fax) Compressive Strength Report - Concrete Report Date 05-17-2013 Report No. 7 Distribution Copy Job Number 16091 Project North River Apts,28 Goodhue St.,Salem,MA Contractor Essex Builders Corp. Concrete Co. Benevento Companies Reasonably well-formed Well-formed cone on Columner vertical Diagonal fracture Side fractures at top Similar to Type 5 cones on both ends, one end,vertical cracks cracking through with no cracking or bottom(occur but end of less than 1 in. running through caps, both ends,no through ends;tap commonly with cylinder is t; (25 mm]of cracking no well-defined cone well-formed cones with hammer to unbonded caps) pointed lhrought caps on other end distinguish from Type 1 Our reports are available in PDF form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. CC: North River Canal, LLC Anthony Roberto Essex Builders Corporation Chris Serino Essex Builders Corporation Jennifer Patel Essex Builders Corporation Edward DeFanti Goldstein-Milano Brent Goldstein, PE Tom Galvin City of Salem Thomas St. Pierre Benevento Companies Wayne Tarr Nichols-Renasco Associates Joseph L. Nichols, AIA P ° Of.Massachusetts. 'The; Construction Testing People' Page 3 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438.7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Compressive Strength Report - Concrete Report Date 05-17-2013 Report No. 7 Distribution Copy Job Number 16091 Project North River Apts,28 Goodhue St.,Salem,MA Contractor Essex Builders Corp. Concrete Co. Benevento Companies FIELD SUMMARY REPORT -Total Pour: Wall column ine A at 1-7, A-D.7 at 1, D.7 at 1-4, Interior Footings: C.3 at 2, C.3 at D, B.6 at 4, Tie Beam: C.3 at 4.5-6.1, B-C.3 at 4.5, E-C.4 at 4 Method of Placement: ®Pump ❑Chute Discharge ❑ Bucket ❑Other Other: Method of Concrete Consolidation: ®Vibrator ❑ Other Other: Cylinder Fabrication Location: ® Truck Discharge Chute ❑ End of Pump Hose Cylinder Storage: El Curing Box Thermal Blanket LJ Hay/Straw ❑ Trailer ® Field ❑ Other Placement Protection: ❑Thermal Blankets ❑ Heat ® None ❑ Other Slump Specification(in.) 4 to 5 'Number of slumps out of specification reported to If rejected Approved by Remarks: UTS of Massachusetts, Inc. Page a 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438.6216(Fax) Report Date 05-17-2013 Report No. 7 Job Number 16091 Project North River Apts,28 Goodhue St.,Salem,MA Attachment Of Massachusetts fnc. 'The Construction Testing people' 0$ Page p DAILY REPORT OF CONCRETE POUR PROJECT NAME: A)Of L-j Ridcf 99P�itj`m-21T PROJECT NO. DATE: .$'/'7—); AIR TEMP.:_ OTAL YARDS: I/,,�� Jnr F7ti� LOCATION OF FOUR&,#1-7h-b7 @ 11,D-7 &14 LqtS Are da'4J C, , C-3 e°�(S-G.< -!�'B�L3�u.S��E-C.v/y Tim gee.++1' Load 8 Slump Batching Batching Time In Yards Concrete %of Ticket I No �,f Truck>Y Inches In Out Minutes Temp. Air Cylinder, 01;� 65 s�v l I`1s ,J �,� �a3._ 309 �� Tt�l �f--S--" v �s _ IY- S�s� YO 3 s, 1-5� INSPECTOR: k ///,Li7Q REMARKS: 5 Richardson Lane,-Stoneham, Massachusetts 02180 17811 438-7756 ca. 97A11 43R-A�+ .ON xdd 9d Wdei310 EWE ZZ '6W ' ° Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing People' Page 1 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781.438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Reinforcing Steel Report Report Date 05-22-2013 Report No. 5 Distribution Copy Job Number 16091 Project North River Apts,28 Goodhue St.,Salem,MA Contractor Essex Builders Corp. CONTACT: Chris Serino .TIME OF INSPECTION: 10: 00 AM TIME OF CONCRETE PLACEMENT: 11 : 45 AM SPECIFICATION: ASTM A615 Grade 40 Grade 60 X Grade 75 ASTM A616 Grade 50 Grade 60 ASTM A617 Grade 40 Grade 60 CONTRACT DRAWINGS:S3 . 1 REVISION NUMBER: DATED: 5/1/13 SHOP DRAWING(S): PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS: 03300 OTHER: DRAWINGS STAMPED: YES X NO AREA REVIEWED: Footings: lines 7 at F.5, H; 8 at G, H; 9 at F, G, and H; E at 2, 3; Piers: line A at 5.8, 6, 6.9, and 7.1; ATTRIBUTES: REVIEWED Yes No Coverage(Top x Bottom x and/or Inside Face Outside Face ) X Clearance X Cleanliness(heavy rust,scale,mud,dirt,oil,etc.not permitted) X Bar Supports X Bar Spacing X Bar Quantity X Placement and tying X ® The details in the above described area(s)were complete at the time of this inspection. ® The results of this inspection were discussed with the aforementioned contact persons prior to departure from the project site. GENERAL REMARKS: i Of Massachusetts 'The Construction Testing Peo.'ple' ° Page 2 5 Richardson Lane,Stoneham,MA 02180 781-438-7755(Voice)781-438-6216(Fax) Reinforcing Steel Report Report Date 05-22-2013 Report No. 5 Distribution Copy Job Number 16091 Project North River Apts,28 Goodhue St.,Salem,MA Contractor Essex Builders Corp. Inspector Al Premium Travel fir'' : .- Mame °:k2x�'.°&;-. s a` .Ir1Ei k� a.. iak Time Hours � �.-_rrE1�@ _r'"-..�: 3�0; me v"wah6 V?�`-' �uE+�?.(..�M,wh r (B' Lumenello No REVIEWED BY: William P. Crabtree Our reports are available in PDP form via email. Please email us at reports@utsofmass.com for more information. CC: North River Canal, LLC Anthony Roberto Essex Builders Corporation Chris Serino Essex Builders Corporation Jennifer Patel Essex Builders Corporation Edward EeFanti Goldstein-Milano Brent Goldstein, PE Tom Galvin City of Salem Thomas St. Pierre ^' Nichols-Renasco Associates Joseph L. Nichols, AIA �d Initial Construction Control Document To be submitted withthebuilding permit application by a- Registered Design Professional for work per the 8"'edition of the Massachusetts State Building Code, 780 CMR, Section 107.6.2 Project Title: North River Apartments Date: 6/7/13 Property Address: 28 Goodhue St., Salem,MA Project: Check(x)one or both as applicable:W1 New construction R Existing Construction Project description: HVAC systems.for an apartment building I , Paul F. Padua MA Registration Number: 20856 Expiration date: 6/30/14 am a registered design professional, and hereby certify that I have prepared or directly supervised the preparation of all design plans,computations and specifications concerning': _ Entire Project _ Architectural _ Structural. Mechanical Fire Protection Electrical Other: for the above named project and that such plans, computations and specifications meet the applicable provisions of the Massachusetts State Building Code, (780 CMR),and accepted engineering practices for the proposed project. I understand and agree that I(or my designee)shall perform the necessary professional services and be present on the construction site on a regular and periodic basis to: 1. Review, for conformance to this code and the design concept, shop drawings, samples and other submittals by the contractor in accordance with the requirements of the construction documents. 2. Perform the duties for registered design professionals in 780 CMR Chapter 17,as applicable. 3. Be present at intervals appropriate to the stage of construction to become generally familiar with the progress and quality of the work and to determine if the work is being performed in a manner consistent with the approved construction documents and this code. When required by the building official,-I shall submit field/progress reports(see item 3.)together with pertinent comments, in a form acceptable to the building official.. Upon completion of the work,I shall submit to the building official a `Final Construction Control Document'. SH OF MgSSC Enter in the space to the right a"wet"or a 9 y electronic signature and seal: oo fNEOERICK o� w PADUA No. Phone number: (508) 946-2127 Oc 9Fer L ENG\�� Email: pfpadua@aol.com Building Official Use Only 6/7/13 Building Offreial'Name: Permit No.: Date: Note1:Indicate with an`x' project design plans,computations and specifications that you prepared or directly supervised If`other'is chosen, provide a description. Trial Version 10_09_2012 •z ea'